Next Article in Journal
Rotating-Coil Measurement System for Small-Bore-Diameter Magnet Characterization
Next Article in Special Issue
Development and Analysis of Electrochemical Reactor with Vibrating Functional Element for AAO Nanoporous Membranes Fabrication
Previous Article in Journal
Estimation of the Kinematics and Workspace of a Robot Using Artificial Neural Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ultrasensitive and Regenerative Transistor Sensor Based on Dynamic Covalent Chemistry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structural and Magnetic Properties of FeNi Films and FeNi-Based Trilayers with Out-of-Plane Magnetization Component

by
Andrey V. Svalov
1,
Alexandr N. Gorkovenko
1,
Aitor Larrañaga
2,
Mikhail N. Volochaev
3 and
Galina V. Kurlyandskaya
1,4,*
1
Institute of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ural Federal University, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia
2
Advanced Research Facilities (SGIKER), Universidad del País Vasco UPV-EHU, 48080 Bilbao, Spain
3
Kirensky Institute of Physics FRS KSC SB RAS, 660036 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
4
Departamento de Electricidad y Electrónica, Universidad del País Vasco UPV/EHU, 48080 Bilbao, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2022, 22(21), 8357; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218357
Submission received: 16 October 2022 / Revised: 26 October 2022 / Accepted: 28 October 2022 / Published: 31 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Design, Fabrication and Sensor Applications of Nano-Electrodes)

Abstract

:
FeNi films of different thickness and FeNi/(Fe, Co)/FeNi trilayers were prepared by magnetron sputtering deposition onto glass substrates. The permalloy films had a columnar microstructure. The detailed analysis of the magnetic properties based on the magnetic and magneto-optical measurements showed that at thicknesses exceeding a certain critical thickness, hysteresis loops acquire a specific shape and the coercive force of the films increase sharply. The possibility of the estimation of the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy constant using the Murayama equation for the thickness dependence of saturation field was demonstrated. The results of studies of the structural and magnetic properties of FeNi films laminated by Fe and Co spacers with different thickness are presented.

1. Introduction

Soft ferromagnetic films are used in various types of magnetoelectronic devices [1]. One of the ways to increase the magnetic softness of thin films is to create the layers with helical magnetic anisotropy [2]. The helical variation in the orientation of the easy magnetization axis can be obtained by the deposition of the films in the magnetic field rotating in the plane of the substrate [2,3]. A stable helical profile may occur for a film thickness greater than the specific value, defined as 2π(A/K)1/2, where K is the anisotropy constant, and A is the exchange stiffness constant. For FeNi films, a specific thickness depends on the deposition conditions, but it is approximately equal to 1 μm [3]. However, at a thickness of several hundreds of nanometres, FeNi films can demonstrate the transition into the so-called “transcritical” state. This state is characterized by an increase in the coercive force Hc, appearance of the stripe domains, existence of so-called “rotatable anisotropy” and particular shape of the magnetic hysteresis loop [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. An indispensable condition for the possibility of a transition is the presence of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in the sample, while the quality factor Q = Kp/2πMs, where Kp is the perpendicular anisotropy constant, Ms is the saturation magnetization of the sample, which should be less than unity. The critical thickness value Lc depends on the deposition conditions (deposition rate, working gas pressure) and corresponds usually to the interval of 100 to 350 nm [5,6,12,13].
The perpendicular magnetic anisotropy is responsible for the formation of the “transcritical” state in FeNi films prepared by sputtering technique. It might be a strain-caused consequence of magnetostriction and magnetoelastic contribution and/or the columnar structure of the films [5,8,14]. Laminating of the thick FeNi film with various non-magnetic and weakly magnetic spacers allows to avoid the transition into the “transcritical” state [15,16,17,18]. The use of interlayers of magnetically strong materials with a crystal structure different from that one of the Fe20Ni80 permalloy is much less studied [19,20].
Understanding the conditions of the transition into the “transcritical” state has very special importance for electronics applications as soft ferromagnetic films with magnetic permeability form part of the inductors, decoders, magnetic field sensors, and many other kinds of the devices [1,21]. Additionally, removing the “transcritical” state will make it possible to obtain soft magnetic films whose thickness will exceed the specific critical thickness mentioned above. Therefore, the condition for the preparation of the films with a helical magnetic anisotropy by the deposition of the films at the rotating magnetic field will be open. In addition, such a fundamental question as the change in the value of the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy constant Kp with the variation in the thickness of the FeNi films still remains open. In this work, the structural and magnetic properties of FeNi films of different thickness and FeNi/(Fe, Co)/FeNi trilayers were comparatively analyzed with the focus on the understanding of the conditions of out-of-plane magnetic anisotropy formation.

2. Experiment

Thin films and multilayered samples were deposited by dc magnetron sputtering onto Corning glass substrates at room temperature. Metallic circular targets of Fe20Ni80, Fe or Co were used. The deposition rates were defined by additional calibration procedure using 100 nm films of each composition. The thin films thicknesses for calibration were verified by the sharp step analyzed with Dektak 150 Stylus Profilometer (Veeco, Somerset, NJ, USA). The following deposition rates were used: 26 nm/min for FeNi layers and 1 nm/min for Fe and Co spacer materials. The thickness of the FeNi films L varied from 50 nm to 1000 nm and the thickness of Fe and Co spacers lsp was subject to variations in the interval of 5 nm to 100 nm. A constant magnetic field of 250 Oe was applied parallel to the film plane during deposition in order to induce in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy.
The phase analysis and average grain size was defined by X-ray diffraction technique (XRD) using a PHILIPS X’PERT PRO automatic diffractometer (Pan Analytical, Cambridge, UK) operating at 40 kV and 40 mA with Cu-Kα radiation (wavelength λ = 1.5418 Å). The configuration used for XRD studies has been theta-theta Bragg-Brentano. The particular configuration was selected as the main objective has been to irradiate the maximum sample volume to obtain the maximum signal intensity. This geometry allows the correct evaluation of the full width at half maximum (FWHM) for later size estimations. The identification of the initial phases was performed using High Score program and the powder diffraction file (PDF). The structure of the films was studied also by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a Hitachi HT 7700 microscope (Hitachi HT, Tokyo, Japan) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) JEOL JSM-640 (JEOL, Freising, Germany), SEM images were acquired in secondary electrons.
Magnetic measurements were carried out by means of vibrating sample magnetometer 7407 VSM vibrating-sample magnetometer (Lake Shore Cryotronics London, UK) and magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) using the optical microscope Evico (Evico, Dresden, Germany).

3. Results and Discussion

The X-ray diagrams for the FeNi films confirm the fcc crystalline structure of all samples under consideration (Figure 1). The presence of an (111) intense peak is a characteristic feature of the diffractograms obtained for all studied films. An increase in the film thickness is accompanied by an increase in the intensity of the (111) and (200) peaks.
For (220) peaks, an increase in the intensity is clearly observed for the films of 400 and 200 nm. However, the intensity of the (220) peak for the thinnest film of 50 nm is low and it is difficult to form a definite conclusion. This observation confirms the evidence of an improvement in crystallinity of the films. At the same time, similar average grain size of the order of 10–15 nm was observed in all cases. The size of the coherent domain was calculated using the Scherer formula for (111) reflection (2θ ≈ 44.5°). A typical cell parameter of 3.52 Å was also detected for all types of FeNi films.
Figure 2 shows the SEM morphology of the free surface of the FeNi film and typical example of TEM cross-sectional image of FeNi film of 100 nm. The grain-like SEM images (Figure 2a) may be due to the presence of a columnar microstructure in the film which is represented as round units in this projection. The TEM cross-sectional images confirm this assumption (Figure 2b). One can see that the geometry of the cross section of the columns on the free surface of the film is close to the circular shape and the diameters of the columns are reasonably close to the interval of 4 nm to 10 nm.
For Fe and Co single layer films, the average grain size was approximately equal to the thickness values, but it did not exceed 15 nm. Single-layer iron films were polycrystalline bbc structures having high levels of the (110) texturing and cell parameter of 2.85 Å (Figure 3).
The high degree of texturing observed for thin Co films did not allows us to unambiguously determine the lattice type, namely, cubic or hexagonal (Figure 4a). The metals growing incoherently on the substrates are known to prefer the close-packed orientation, like (111) plane for the fcc structure [22]. It therefore can be supposed that in thin cobalt films, both cubic and hexagonal phases can be present. The appearance of the hcp (100) and hcp (101) peaks for thicker Co films testifies the increase of the relative amount of the hexagonal phase with the increase of the Co film thickness.
The critical thickness for FeNi films was close to 200 nm. Thinner films had uniaxial magnetic anisotropy with the anisotropy axis oriented in the sample plane (Figure 5a). The easy magnetization axis coincided with the orientation of the magnetic field applied during thin film deposition. The coercive force Hc of such films did not exceed 1 Oe, and the anisotropy field Hk was about 4 Oe.
An analysis of hysteresis loops allows us to determine another important magnetic characteristic, namely, the saturation field Hs (Figure 5b). For the “transcritical” films [23,24,25], the relationship between the saturation field and the film parameters was previously described by Murayama’s equation [26,27]:
1 H s H k = 1 + K p 2 π M s 2 1 / 2 L c L
where Hs and Hk are the saturation and the anisotropy fields, respectively; Kp is perpendicular magnetic anisotropy constant; Lc is the critical thickness of the film. In our case, the thickness dependence of the magnetic saturation field Hs is well described by Murayama’s model at Ms = 810 G, Lc = 200 nm taking Kp value as high as 5 × 104 erg/cm3 (Figure 6). Moreover, this result indicates that the value of the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy constant remains unchanged despite film thickness variation in the interval under consideration.
Within the framework of the Murayama model, an equation for estimation the Lc was also proposed:
Lc = 2π (A/Kp)1/2
where A is the exchange stiffness constant; Kp is perpendicular magnetic anisotropy constant. We use the value Kp = 5 × 104 erg/cm3 obtained above. Then the experimentally observed Lc value of 200 nm can be obtained according to expression (2) at A = 5 × 10−7 erg/cm. The obtained A value was in good agreement with the data reported by the other research for FeNi [28,29,30]. Thus, the observed values of Lc and Kp were in a good agreement with each other.
In order to determine the origin of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in the studied FeNi films, the samples with low level of the internal stresses were fabricated as follows. Some films were deposited on NaCl single crystal substrate, and then they were separated from the substrate and annealed at a temperature of 300 °C during one hour. The shape of the hysteresis loops for such films was changed very little, while the values of Hc and Hs remained unchanged (Figure 5b). Thus, this result and the presence of a columnar structure (Figure 2) allow us to conclude that the source of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in the studied FeNi films is the columnar microstructure of the films rather than the magnetostriction effect.
Fe and Co films of different thicknesses were used as magnetic spacers in three-layered FeNi/X/FeNi structures. In the present studies, the thickness of the FeNi layers was 170 nm, i.e., it was below the critical thickness of the transition into “transcritical” state Lc = 200 nm. In single-layered films of Fe and Co, uniaxial magnetic anisotropy was also formed in the plane of the sample under the influence of the magnetic field applied during deposition. For these films, there were no signs of transition to the “transcritical” state (Figure 7). The observed behavior is consistent with the known data for Fe films, for which the reported critical thicknesses exceed 100 nm [31]. For Co films, the reported critical thicknesses range from 10 nm to 180 nm [31,32,33]. Most likely, this distinction is due to the structural features of the films prepared under different conditions.
The nanostructuring of thick FeNi films into trilayered structures having magnetic layers with L < Lc by Fe spacer does not prevent the occurrence of the “transcritical” state for FeNi/Fe/FeNi trilayers (Figure 8a). For the sample with lFe = 5 nm, this result can be related to the small thickness of the Fe spacer. For FeNi-based multilayers, the surface roughness of multilayers prepared by dc magnetron sputtering at present conditions is quite small, only a few Angstroms [34], and the thickness of the interface (the zone of mutual interlayer diffusion) is about one nm [35].
It was shown recently that for a strong/weak/strong ferromagnetic sandwich, exchange coupling between strong ferromagnetic outer layers can be reduced when the weakly ferromagnetic type spacer has a lower Curie temperature than that of the strong ferromagnetic layers [36]. However, the Curie temperature of Fe and iron-enriched interfaces surpasses the Curie temperature of the FeNi alloy. Therefore, the Fe spacer does not weaken the interlayer coupling of FeNi layers. As a result, FeNi(170 nm)/Fe/FeNi(170 nm) trilayered structure was in the “transcritical” state like a single layered FeNi(340 nm) film. As lFe increases, the Fe interlayer acquires more and more structural independence, and its magnetic characteristics become closer to those of bulk iron.
Let us estimate the possible value of the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy constant in the Fe films under consideration. According to the results of structural studies, the Fe films had the (110) texture. If one takes into account only the first magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant and neglects the magnetoelastic contribution, then for a cubic iron film with (110) texture, the effective perpendicular anisotropy constant can be determined as Kp = 3/16 × K1 [37]. For iron, the magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant K1 = 4.8 × 105 erg/cm3 [35], then Kp = 9 × 104 erg/cm3.
Due to the strong interlayer interaction, the FeNi/Fe/FeNi three-layer system behaves as a whole. Based on this fact, let us make an approximating estimate of the Lc value for the FeNi(170 nm)/Fe(100 nm)/FeNi(170 nm) sample using expression (2). Being aware of the largely arbitrary nature of the procedure, let us average the values of Kp and constant A using the corresponding values for FeNi films (Kp = 5 × 104 erg/cm3, A = 0.5 × 10−6 erg/cm) and Fe (Kp = 9 × 104 erg/cm3, A = 2.1 × 10−6 erg/cm) and taking into account the ratio of the layer thicknesses. As a result, for FeNi(170 nm)/Fe(100 nm)/FeNi(170 nm) we obtain Kp = 5.9 × 104 erg/cm3, A = 0.9 × 10−6 erg/cm and Lc = 240 nm. The resulting estimate agrees with the experimentally observed “transcritical” state for FeNi(170 nm)/Fe(100 nm)/FeNi(170 nm) film.
Laminating of the thick FeNi film with cobalt spacer allows to avoid the transition into the “transcritical” state at lCo > 50 nm. For small values of lCo, the situation is apparently the same as for three-layered samples with small lFe. The results of structural studies indicate the possibility of the presence of both fcc (texture (111)) and hcp (possible texture (002)) cobalt phases in the layers under consideration. Both of these crystallographic orientations contribute to the appearance of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in the film, since the [111] axis of the fcc lattice and the [002] axis of the hcp lattice are easy magnetization axes related to magnetocrystalline anisotropy. However, the uncertainty in the number of hcp and fcc crystalline phases in thick Co layers makes it meaningless to try to estimate the value of the effective constant of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in Co interlayers. In addition, the value and sign of this constant can be affected by a magnetoelastic contribution, the evaluation of which is beyond the scope of the present study, but which can be significant in Co films [38]. Here, for now, we only indicate the possibility to avoid the transition into the “transcritical” state by means of laminating of the thick FeNi film with Co spacers. Finding out the exact reason for this requires a separate thorough investigation. In addition, laminating of the thick FeNi film with cobalt spacer does not reduce the coercive force of FeNi/Co/FeNi trilayers to the level of the coercive force of single-layer soft magnetic films FeNi with L < Lc, as happens in the case of non-magnetic spacers [15,16,17,18]. Nevertheless, the absence of the “transcritical” state and, as a consequence, the absence of rotatable anisotropy opens the possibility of more precise control of the features of the magnetic anisotropy of such film systems. This creates a perspective for the preparation of the films with a helical magnetic anisotropy by the deposition of the films at the rotating magnetic field and possible manipulation of the magnetization of helimagnets through the spin-transfer torque effect [39].
Magnetically soft thin FeNi films and FeNi films based multilayered structures are widely used in sensor applications. In many cases, they are used as the main materials of sensitive element for low magnetic field measurements [40,41,42]. However, for the functionality of the magnetic field sensors they must be integrated in the electronic circuit with compatible characteristics, for example inductor structures with magnetic films, including FeNi components [43]. In addition, present day applications request multifunctional devices in which positioning plays very important role. With respect, soft magnetic films may contribute as additional positioning element or elements array up to flexible devices [44,45,46,47]. One can also mention the need of electromagnetic protection of electronic devices including magnetic sensors for correct operation and avoiding the unwanted interferences for which FeNi films with high magnetic permeability and especially FeNi-based multilayers with tunable dynamic magnetic properties are quite suitable [48,49,50].

4. Conclusions

Structural and magnetic properties of FeNi films of different thickness and FeNi/(Fe, Co)/FeNi trilayers were comparatively analyzed. It was found that the permalloy films had a columnar microstructure. It is shown that perpendicular magnetic anisotropy constant does not depend on the FeNi film thickness in the range of the thicknesses of 50 to 1000 nm. Based on the results of structural and magnetic measurements, it can be concluded that the main origin of the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in FeNi films is the columnar microstructure. It was demonstrated that for FeNi(170 nm)/Fe/FeNi(170 nm) trilayers the “trascritical” state exists at any Fe spacer thickness up to 100 nm. At the same time, for FeNi(170 nm)/Co/FeNi(170 nm) trilayers the “transcritical” state disappears at lCo > 50 nm. It is possible to avoid the transition into the “transcritical” state by means of laminating of the thick FeNi film with Co spacers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.V.S. and G.V.K.; methodology, A.V.S. and A.N.G.; software, A.V.S.; validation, A.V.S. and G.V.K.; formal analysis, G.V.K.; investigation, A.V.S., A.N.G., A.L. and M.N.V.; data curation, G.V.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.V.S. and G.V.K.; writing—review and editing, A.V.S. and G.V.K.; visualization, A.N.G., A.L. and M.N.V.; supervision, A.V.S. All authors discussed the results and implications and commented on the manuscript at all stages. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (RSF), project no. 22-29-00980, https://rscf.ru/en/project/22-29-00980/ and in part by the Research Groups of the UPV-EHU.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This work did not involve humans or animals and therefore it did not require the Institutional Review Board Statement and approval.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

M.N.V. is grateful to Krasnoyarsk Regional Center of Research Equipment of Federal Research Center «Krasnoyarsk Science Center SB RAS» for the TEM studies support. Selected measurements (XRD and magnetic measurements) were made at SGIKER Services of UPV-EHU. We thank I. Orue for special support. The authors wish to thank the anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yabukami, S.; Suzuki, T.; Ajiro, N.; Kikuchi, H.; Yamaguchi, M.; Arai, K. A high frequency carrier-type magnetic field sensor using carrier suppressing circuit. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2001, 37, 2019–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gloanec, M.; Dubourg, S.; Acher, O.; Duverger, F.; Plessis, D.; Bonneau-Brault, A. Influence of a helical anisotropy profile on the static and dynamic properties of a soft magnetic layer. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 094433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Thompson, D.A.; Finzi, L.A.; Chang, H.; Albert, P. Magnetic film with helical anisotropy. J. Appl. Phys. 1966, 37, 1274–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Álvarez-Prado, L.M.; Alameda, J.M. Micromagnetism of nanowires with low out-of plane-anisotropy. Physica B 2004, 343, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Amos, N.; Fernández, R.; Ikkawi, R.; Lee, B.; Lavrenov, A.; Krichevsky, A.; Litvinov, D.; Khizroev, S. Magnetic force microscopy study of magnetic stripe domains in sputter deposited Permalloy thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 07E732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Svalov, A.V.; Aseguinolaza, I.R.; Garcia-Arribas, A.; Orue, I.; Barandiaran, J.M.; Alonso, J.; Fernández-Gubieda, M.L.; Kurlyandskaya, G.V. Structure and magnetic properties of thin Permalloy films near the “transcritical” state. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2010, 46, 333–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Garnier, L.-C.; Marangolo, M.; Eddrief, M.; Bisero, D.; Fin, S.; Casoli, F.; Pini, M.G.; Rettori, A.; Tacchi, S. Stripe domains reorientation in ferromagnetic films with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. J. Phys. Mater. 2020, 3, 024001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dzhumaliev, A.S.; Vysotskii, S.L.; Sakharov, V.K. Effect of bias voltage and deposition rate on the structure and coercivity of NiFe films. Phys. Solid State 2020, 62, 2439–2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. de Melo, A.S.; Bohn, F.; Ferreira, A.; Vaz, F.; Correa, M.A. High-frequency magnetoimpedance effect in meander-line trilayered films. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2020, 515, 167166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Raj, R.; Kuila, M.; Gupta, M.; Reddy, V.R. 57Fe Mössbauer and magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) study of transcritical state in permalloy (FexNi100-x) thin films. Hyperfine Interact. 2021, 242, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Komogortsev, S.V.; Vazhenina, I.G.; Kleshnina, S.A.; Iskhakov, R.S.; Lepalovskij, V.N.; Pasynkova, A.A.; Svalov, A.V. Advanced characterization of FeNi-based films for the development of magnetic field sensors with tailored functional parameters. Sensors 2022, 23, 3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ben Youssef, J.; Vukadinovic, N.; Billet, D.; Labrune, M. Thickness-dependent magnetic excitations in Permalloy films with nonuniform magnetization. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 69, 174402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ramos, C.A.; Vassallo Brigneti, E.; Gómez, J.; Butera, A. Stripe domains in Permalloy films as observed by ferromagnetic resonance and magnetic force microscopy. Phys. B 2009, 404, 2784–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huber, E.E.; Smith, D.O. Properties of Permalloy films having a magnetoelastic easy axis normal to the film. J. Appl. Phys. 1959, 30, S267–S269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cheng, S.F.; Lubitz, P.; Zheng, Y.; Edelstein, A.S. Effects of spacer layer on growth, stress and magnetic properties of sputtered permalloy film. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2004, 282, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kurlyandskaya, G.V.; Elbaile, L.; Alves, F.; Ahamada, B.; Barrue, R.; Svalov, A.V.; Vas’kovskiy, V.O. Domain structure and magnetization process of a giant magnetoimpedance geometry FeNi/Cu/FeNi(Cu)FeNi/Cu/FeNi sensitive element. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2004, 16, 6561–6568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Romera, M.; Ranchal, R.; Ciudad, D.; Maicas, M.; Aroca, C. Magnetic properties of sputtered Permalloy/molybdenum multilayers. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 110, 083910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Dastagir, T.; Xu, W.; Sinha, S.; Wu, H.; Cao, Y.; Yua, H. Tuning the permeability of permalloy films for on-chip inductor applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 162506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Egelhoff, W.F., Jr.; Bonevich, J.; Pong, P.; Beauchamp, C.R.; Stafford, G.R.; Unguris, J.; McMichael, R.D. 400-fold reduction in saturation field by interlayering. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 105, 013921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Svalov, A.V.; Fernandez, E.; Garcia-Arribas, A.; Alonso, J.; Fdez-Gubieda, M.L.; Kurlyandskaya, G.V. FeNi-based magnetoimpedance multilayers: Tailoring of the softness by magnetic spacers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 162410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nakai, T. Nondestructive detection of magnetic contaminant in aluminum casting using thin film magnetic sensor. Sensors 2021, 21, 4063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chihaya, H.; Kamiko, M.; Yamamoto, R. Effect of Ti seed layer on Co/Cu metallic multilayers: Changing Ti seed layer thickness. Thin Solid Films 2006, 515, 2542–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Coïsson, M.; Vinal, F.; Tiberto, P.; Celegato, F. Magnetic properties of FeSiB thin films displaying stripe domains. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2009, 321, 806–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lehrer, S.S. Rotatable anisotropy in negative magnetostriction Ni–Fe films. J. Appl. Phys. 1963, 34, 1207–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kern, P.R.; da Silva, O.E.; de Siqueira, J.V.; Della Pace, R.D.; Rigue, J.N.; Carara, M. A study on the thickness dependence of static and dynamic magnetic properties of Ni81Fe19 thin films. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2016, 419, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Murayama, Y. Micromagnetics on stripe domain films. I. Critical cases. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 1966, 21, 2253–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sugita, Y.; Fujiwara, H.; Sato, T. Critical thickness and perpendicular anisotropy of evaporated permalloy films with stripe domains. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1967, 10, 229–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Asti, G.; Solzi, M.; Ghidini, M.; Neri, F.M. Micromagnetic analysis of exchange-coupled hard-soft planar nanocomposites. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 69, 174401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. McCord, J.; Erkartal, B.; von Hofe, T.; Kienle, L.; Quandt, E.; Roshchupkina, O.; Grenzer, J. Revisiting magnetic stripe domains —Anisotropy gradient and stripe asymmetry. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 073903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Solovev, P.N.; Izotov, A.V.; Belyaev, B.A.; Boev, N.M. Micromagnetic simulation of domain structure in thin permalloy films with in-plane and perpendicular anisotropy. Physica B 2021, 604, 412699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Holz, A.; Kronmüller, H. The nucleation of stripe domains in thin ferromagnetic films. Phys. Stat. Sol. 1969, 31, 787–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Donzelli, O.; Bassani, M.; Spizzo, F.; Palmeri, D. Reorientational transition and stripe domains in Co films. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2008, 320, e261–e263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, M.; Tian, Z.; Yu, X.; Yu, D.; Ren, L.; Fu, Y. Influence of thermal annealing on the morphology and magnetic domain structure of Co thin films. Mater. Res. Express 2021, 8, 056103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. López Antón, R.; González, J.A.; Andrés, J.P.; Svalov, A.V.; Kurlyandskaya, G.V. Structural and magnetic properties of Ni0.8Fe0.2/Ti nanoscale multilayers. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Svalov, A.V.; Vas’kovskiy, V.O.; Larrañaga, A.; Kurlyandskaya, G.V. Structure and magnetic properties of FeNi/Ti multilayered films grown by magnetron sputtering. Solid State Phenom. 2015, 233, 591–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kravets, A.F.; Timoshevskii, A.N.; Yanchitsky, B.Z.; Bergmann, M.A.; Buhler, J.; Andersson, S.; Korenivski, V. Temperature-controlled interlayer exchange coupling in strong/weak ferromagnetic multilayers: A thermomagnetic Curie switch. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 214413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zou, P.; Yu, W.; Bain, J.A. Influence of stress and texture on soft magnetic properties of thin films. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2002, 38, 3501–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liang, X.; Dong, C.; Chen, H.; Wang, J.; Wei, Y.; Zaeimbashi, M.; He, Y.; Matyushov, A.; Sun, C.; Sun, N. A review of thin-film magnetoelastic materials for magnetoelectric applications. Sensors 2020, 20, 1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ustinov, V.V.; Yasyulevich, I.A. Chirality-dependent spin-transfer torque and current-induced spin rotation in helimagnets. Phys. Rev. B 2022, 106, 064417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Correa, M.A.; Bohn, F.; Viegas, A.D.C.; de Andrade, A.M.H.; Schelp, L.F.; Sommer, R.L. Magnetoimpedance effect in structured multilayered amorphous thin films. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2008, 41, 175003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Buznikov, N.A.; Svalov, A.V.; Kurlyandskaya, G.V. Influence of the parameters of permalloy-based multilayer film structures on the sensitivity of magnetic impedance effect. Phys. Met. Metallogr. 2021, 122, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Naumova, L.I.; Milyaev, M.A.; Zavornitsyn, R.S.; Pavlova, A.Y.; Maksimova, I.K.; Krinitsina, T.P.; Chernyshova, T.A.; Proglyado, V.V.; Ustinov, V.V. High-sensitive sensing elements based on spin valves with antiferromagnetic interlayer coupling. Phys. Met. Metallogr. 2019, 120, 653–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gardner, D.S.; Schrom, G.; Paillet, F.; Jamieson, B.; Karnik, T.; Borkar, S. Review of on-chip inductor structures with magnetic films. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2009, 45, 4760–4766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Melzer, M.; Kaltenbrunner, M.; Makarov, D.; Karnaushenko, D.; Karnaushenko, D.; Sekitani, T.; Someya, T.; Schmidt, O.G. Imperceptible magnetoelectronics. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Grimes, C.A. Sputter deposition of magnetic thin films onto plastic: The effect of undercoat and spacer layer composition on the magnetic properties of multilayer permalloy thin films. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1995, 31, 4109–4111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kurlyandskaya, G.V.; Fernández, E.; Svalov, A.; Burgoa Beitia, A.; García-Arribas, A.; Larrañaga, A. Flexible thin-film magnetoimpedance sensors. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2016, 415, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Koo, J.H.; Seo, J.; Lee, T. Nanomaterials on flexible substrates to explore innovative functions: From energy harvesting to bio-integrated electronics. Thin Solid Films 2012, 524, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, S.-Y.; Lim, Y.-S.; Choi, I.-H.; Lee, D.-I.; Kim, S.-B. Effective combination of soft magnetic materials for magnetic shielding. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2012, 48, 4550–4553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Madrid Aguilar, C.M.; Svalov, A.V.; Kharlamova, A.M.; Shalygina, E.E.; Larrañaga, A.; Orue, I.; Kurlyandskaya, G.V. Magnetic and microwave properties of FeNi thin films of different thicknesses deposited onto cyclo olefin copolymer flexible substrates. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2022, 58, 2200105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nguyen, C. Analysis Methods for RF, Microwave, and Millimeter-Wave Planar Transmission Line Structures; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns for FeNi films with different thicknesses indicated in the legends. Miller indexes are shown for all bright peaks.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns for FeNi films with different thicknesses indicated in the legends. Miller indexes are shown for all bright peaks.
Sensors 22 08357 g001
Figure 2. SEM morphology of the free surface (a) and TEM cross-sectional image (b) of FeNi film of 100 nm thickness.
Figure 2. SEM morphology of the free surface (a) and TEM cross-sectional image (b) of FeNi film of 100 nm thickness.
Sensors 22 08357 g002
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction pattern for Fe films (a) and FeNi(170 nm)/Fe(lFe)/FeNi(170 nm) trilayers (b).
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction pattern for Fe films (a) and FeNi(170 nm)/Fe(lFe)/FeNi(170 nm) trilayers (b).
Sensors 22 08357 g003
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction patterns for Co films of different thicknesses (a) and FeNi(170 nm)/Co(lCo)/FeNi(170 nm) trilayers (b). In all cases, the legends indicate the cobalt layer thickness.
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction patterns for Co films of different thicknesses (a) and FeNi(170 nm)/Co(lCo)/FeNi(170 nm) trilayers (b). In all cases, the legends indicate the cobalt layer thickness.
Sensors 22 08357 g004
Figure 5. (a) hysteresis loops for FeNi(180 nm) film measured along (1) and perpendicular (2) to the easy axis magnetization; (b) hysteresis loops for FeNi (340 nm) film both in initial state and after separation from the substrate and annealing at 300 °C during one hour; (c) MOKE image of the stripe magnetic domain structure for FeNi (220 nm) film.
Figure 5. (a) hysteresis loops for FeNi(180 nm) film measured along (1) and perpendicular (2) to the easy axis magnetization; (b) hysteresis loops for FeNi (340 nm) film both in initial state and after separation from the substrate and annealing at 300 °C during one hour; (c) MOKE image of the stripe magnetic domain structure for FeNi (220 nm) film.
Sensors 22 08357 g005
Figure 6. Experimental (dots) and calculated on the basis of Murayama’s model (line) thickness dependence of the saturation field Hs for FeNi films.
Figure 6. Experimental (dots) and calculated on the basis of Murayama’s model (line) thickness dependence of the saturation field Hs for FeNi films.
Sensors 22 08357 g006
Figure 7. Hysteresis loops measured along easy magnetization axis for Fe (100 nm) and Co (100 nm) films (a). Images of the magnetic domain structure for Fe film (b) and Co film (c) obtained near Hc after magnetization of the samples to saturation along the easy magnetization axis (EA). The application axis of the external field is parallel to the EA and vertical sides of the images.
Figure 7. Hysteresis loops measured along easy magnetization axis for Fe (100 nm) and Co (100 nm) films (a). Images of the magnetic domain structure for Fe film (b) and Co film (c) obtained near Hc after magnetization of the samples to saturation along the easy magnetization axis (EA). The application axis of the external field is parallel to the EA and vertical sides of the images.
Sensors 22 08357 g007
Figure 8. Magnetic hysteresis loops of FeNi(170 nm)/Fe/FeNi(170 nm) (a) and FeNi(170 nm)/Co/FeNi(170 nm) (b) trilayers with different thicknesses of Fe and Co spacers indicated by the legends.
Figure 8. Magnetic hysteresis loops of FeNi(170 nm)/Fe/FeNi(170 nm) (a) and FeNi(170 nm)/Co/FeNi(170 nm) (b) trilayers with different thicknesses of Fe and Co spacers indicated by the legends.
Sensors 22 08357 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Svalov, A.V.; Gorkovenko, A.N.; Larrañaga, A.; Volochaev, M.N.; Kurlyandskaya, G.V. Structural and Magnetic Properties of FeNi Films and FeNi-Based Trilayers with Out-of-Plane Magnetization Component. Sensors 2022, 22, 8357. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218357

AMA Style

Svalov AV, Gorkovenko AN, Larrañaga A, Volochaev MN, Kurlyandskaya GV. Structural and Magnetic Properties of FeNi Films and FeNi-Based Trilayers with Out-of-Plane Magnetization Component. Sensors. 2022; 22(21):8357. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218357

Chicago/Turabian Style

Svalov, Andrey V., Alexandr N. Gorkovenko, Aitor Larrañaga, Mikhail N. Volochaev, and Galina V. Kurlyandskaya. 2022. "Structural and Magnetic Properties of FeNi Films and FeNi-Based Trilayers with Out-of-Plane Magnetization Component" Sensors 22, no. 21: 8357. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218357

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop