Next Article in Journal
EEG-Based Prediction of the Recovery of Carotid Blood Flow during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Swine Model
Previous Article in Journal
Detection of Movement Events of Long-Track Speed Skating Using Wearable Inertial Sensors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 21
Issue 11
10.3390/s21113648
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Interoperable Nanoparticle Sensor Capable of Strain and Vibration Measurement for Rotor Blade Monitoring

by
Soo-Hong Min
1,
Ying-Jun Quan
2,
Su-Young Park
1,
Gil-Yong Lee
3 and
Sung-Hoon Ahn
1,2,*
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
2
Institute of Advanced Machines and Design, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gyeongbuk, Gumi 39177, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2021, 21(11), 3648; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21113648
Submission received: 10 April 2021 / Revised: 20 May 2021 / Accepted: 21 May 2021 / Published: 24 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Nanosensors)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Recent advances in nanomaterials technology create the new possibility to fabricate high performance sensors. However, there has been limitations in terms of multivariate measurable and interoperable sensors. In this study, we fabricated an interoperable silver nanoparticle sensor fabricated by an aerodynamically focused nanomaterial (AFN) printing system which is a direct printing technique for inorganic nanomaterials onto a flexible substrate. The printed sensor exhibited the maximum measurable frequency of 850 Hz, and a gauge factor of 290.62. Using a fabricated sensor, we evaluated the sensing performance and demonstrated the measurement independency of strain and vibration sensing. Furthermore, using the proposed signal separation algorithm based on the Kalman filter, strain and vibration were each measured in real time. Finally, we applied the printed sensor to quadrotor condition monitoring to predict the motion of a quadrotor.

1. Introduction

A sensor is a key enabler for the process or condition monitoring and optimization for an overall machine [1,2,3]. Data obtained by sensors and real-time feedback to a mechanical system enable the direct benefits for the quality and performance of the end-product. Hence, previous research related to sensor technologies have focused on expanding the physical quantity that can be measured and improving the performance of the sensor itself [4,5,6,7,8].
Especially, there have been several efforts to fabricate highly sensitive strain sensors using metal nanoparticles (NPs) [9,10,11,12,13]. Using the current transport mechanism based on current tunneling between nanogaps between NPs, drastic contact resistance change was available according to physical quantity to be measured [14,15,16,17,18].
According to Figure S1 and Table S1 (Supplementary Materials), it has been confirmed that existing studies have limitations in both high sensitivity and a measurable range. Furthermore, the study was not only insufficient but also limited in terms of high performance for a multivariate measurable sensor [19,20]. In the case of strain sensors, several researches on sensors with high sensitivity or a wide measurable range have been reported while other physical quantities such as vibration and temperature cannot be measured simultaneously [21,22,23,24,25,26,27].
This research has focused on the development of an interoperable sensor capable of strain and vibration sensing without the decrease of each sensing performance. Using an aerodynamically focused nanomaterial (AFN) printing system which is a direct printing technique for inorganic nanomaterials onto a flexible substrate in low vacuum and room temperature conditions, a conductive pattern composed of porous NPs was fabricated in several tens of micrometers scale [28]. Then, the sensing performance of the fabricated sensor was evaluated and real-time measurement independency of strain and vibration using proposed signal processing technique was validated. Finally, real-time quadrotor motion prediction was conducted using the data from the printed sensor.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

We used Kapton polyimide film as an adhesive substrate to attach on a certain level of free-form surface and silver nanoparticles (576, 832, <100-nm diameter, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) as printing materials. The printing process is occurred by mechanical movements of substrate driven by multi-axis stage (SGSP20, Sigma Koki, Japan) with a velocity of 0.2 mms−1 which is controlled by LabVIEW 2015 and NI USB 6009 modules (National Instrument, Austin, TX, USA). The AgNPs erupted from a nozzle with an inner diameter of 150 µm (Taeha Co., Korea). After a wiring and soldering process using silver paste (conductive paste, 735,825, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) at the tip of printed line pattern, UV curable adhesives (UV-3300, Skycares Co., Gimpo, Korea) are wrapped for electrical insulation and mechanical protection from external stimulation.

2.2. Sensor Direct Printing

Figure 1a,b shows a schematic diagram of the AFN printing system and its process, respectively. The AFN printing system includes a vacuum chamber, nozzle, and nanomaterials feeder to generate an aerosolized nanoparticle beam. Using successive repetition of excitation and purging of aerosolized nanoparticles, aerosolized nanomaterials are aerodynamically focused when they erupt from the AFN system and directly accumulated on to a substrate governed by drag force, Saffman’s lift force, and centrifugal force [25].
Since it does not require any post-process include chemical etching and heat treatment, it is an environmentally friendly process with a high degree of freedom in design and manufacturing. It is especially suitable for the fabrication of a microscale porous pattern which could be applied to highly sensitive sensor fabrication. Furthermore, patterns could be reconfigured or repaired according to needs, which defeat the limitations of conventional processes such as photolithography or laser ablation.
Aerodynamic focusing is administered by evacuation of compressed air and time-scaling of excitation, optimizing process parameters is important to fabricate patterns as desired. A high upstream pressure tends to drop off Saffman’s lift effect when focusing the nanoparticles inside the nozzle and reduces the relaxation time, thus augmenting the nanoparticle beam in downstream of the nozzle. Hence, an excitation time of 10 ms and purging time of 90 ms remained for the process while the source pressure and chamber pressure were maintained at 1000 and 400 Pa, respectively.
Figure 1c,d shows the optical microscope image and the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the fabricated sensor obtained by charge-couple device (CCD) cameras (EO-0813C, Edmond Optics, USA) and field-emission scanning SEM (AURIGA60, Carl Zeiss AG, Germany), respectively. The printed sensor has a porous structure of NPs inside the triangular shape of the cross section of the strip, which enables highly sensitive properties of sensor due to the drastic variance of resistance occurred by mechanical detachment among NPs. In comparison to conventional metal foil strain gauge, it was demonstrated that several micrometers strain can be measured by an AFN printed sensor in a previous study [29,30].
According to the previous study, it was demonstrated that the packing ratio of the pattern, which is defined as the volume ratio of printed nanoparticles to the surface border of the pattern, could be controlled by the scan velocity of the AFN printing process [29,30]. By measuring the disparity between the mass of the substrate before and after AFN printing by a precise microbalance (Sartorius AG, Germany) and surface profile by laser confocal microscope (OLS 4100, Olympus, Japan), the packing ratio was calculated as shown in Figure 1f. The scan velocity dominantly influences on not only the geometry of the printed pattern but also the packing ratio. By differing the velocity of the scan from 2 to 80 µm/s, the packing ratio decreased from 65% to 40%.
Furthermore, the decrease of the packing ratio occurred with the increase of relative electrical resistance as shown in Figure 1g. Since the high packing ratio decreased the distance among nanoparticles, electrical resistance increased as the number of electrical floating nanoparticles increased in the printed pattern. Hence, the scan velocity was maintained as 80 µm/s during the AFN printing process for highly sensitive sensor fabrication.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Sensing Performance Evaluation

Figure 2a shows the schematic diagram of the sensing mechanism for a NP-based strain sensor to explain the highly sensitive properties of the fabricated sensor. A simplified electron-tunneling model has often been used to explore the resistive responses of the NPs based strain sensor, represents that the relative resistance change is due to mechanical detachment between NPs. Mechanical segregation between NPs enables the drastic variances of relative resistance.
We evaluated the strain sensing performance based on a standardized four-points bending method. Both ends of the sensor were fixed to the mechanical jig and the center of the sensor was translated by a motorized stage (SGSP 20–85, Sigma Koki, Japan) with the initial gap between both ends at 40 mm. The images during translation were captured by a CCD camera (UI-2240SE, IDS Imaging Development Systems, Germany). The resistive responses of the printed sensor and commercial strain gauge (FLA-2-11-1L, Tokyo Sokki Kenkyujo, Japan) were captured by a data acquisition board (NI-USB-6009, National Instruments, USA) to gauge and estimate the applied strain within the experimental setup. The plots in Figure 2b show the resistive response by the applied strain. The response of a sensor exhibited that the sensitivity was changeable dramatically by varying the scan velocity of AFN printing. In an instant, sensitivity of 1056 was exhibited at an applied strain with a narrow strain range [24,25].
To not only evaluate strain sensing performance but also vibration sensing performance, the sensing performance evaluation for vibration was also conducted. The printed sensor was directly attached to a vibration shaker (Vibration testing shaker, TIRA GmbH, Germany) and relative resistance change was measured during a continuous vibration with various vibration frequencies as shown in Figure 2c. Figure 2d shows the frequency analysis results by fast Fourier transform (FFT) according to induced frequency. The average and standard deviation values of spectrum were calculated using quality factor (Q-factor) at 70.7%. Hence, it was demonstrated that the printed sensor was capable of not only strain sensing but also vibration sensing.
In order to verify that the strain and vibration could be separated each other, a statistical verification was conducted. First, the sensor data was divided by strain, vibration, and the random noise component for further analysis as shown in Equation (1) where Xt is sensor signal, St is strain component, Vt is vibration component, and Et is normal random noise component.
Xt = St + Vt + Et
As shown in Equation (2), the null hypothesis H0, which denotes that the resistance change of the sensor was only influenced by strain component, was set. Otherwise, the alternative hypothesis H1 assumed that the resistance change of the sensor was influenced by both independent strain and vibration component as shown in Equation (3).
H0: Xt = St + Et
H1: Xt = St + Acos(2π fct) + Bsin(2π fct) + Et
To test the probability of hypothesis, analysis of variance (ANOVA) based on F-distribution was conducted to determine whether the means of strain and vibration are different [31]. The F-distribution which is continuous probability distribution based on beta function could be simply explained by the variation between sample means by variations within the samples. In consideration of the statistical degree-of-freedom of the sensor data, the variable was defined to follow the F-distribution without scaling as shown in Equation (4), where DF denotes degree of freedom that can vary in an analysis without breaking any constraints and SS denotes sum of square of variation. The sum of square of variation at frequency with 0 Hz was subtracted to separate the strain effects of interoperable sensor.
( ∑ i D F i − D F t − 1 ) S S t / D F t ∑ i S S i − I ( 0 ) − S S t ~ F ( D F t , ∑ i D F i − D F t − 1 )
By calculating probability value (p-value) which is the probability of obtaining test results at least as extreme as the results actually observed during the test by assuming that the null hypothesis is correct, it was decided to whether reject or accept null hypothesis [32]. At a significance level of 0.05, the null hypothesis was rejected, and the alternative hypothesis was accepted, which means measurement independency of strain and vibration was validated as shown in Table 1.
Figure 2e shows the proposed overall flowchart of signal process technique for real-time separation of strain and vibration. First, the raw data of the sensor signal was filtered by the Kalman filter which is a widely used algorithm for a series of measurement observed over time, containing statistical noise and other inaccuracies [33,34]. We estimated a joint probability distribution over the variables for each time frame of the prediction steps. Then we updated estimates using a weighted average with more weight being given to estimates with higher certainty. The filtered signal was considered to the strain value and the value obtained by subtracting the filtered signal from the raw data was perceived as a vibration signal. The FFT was conducted for vibration signal to estimate the vibration frequency.

3.2. Interoperable Strain and Vibration Measurement

To apply the vibration and strain simultaneously to the sensor, the experimental setup using a rotor was configured as shown in Figure 3a. Since the blade was mechanically bended during rotation of the rotor, we could apply the vibration and strain to the sensor by attaching the sensor to the fan blade. We connected the fan blade (D200-26A, Hawco, UK) to the BLCD motor (DC 12V-36V 775, Mabuchi Motor Company, Japan) capable of rotation up to 1400 Hz by regulation of the voltage which was controlled by DC power supply (DP30-05A, TOYOTECH, Korea). Sensor was directly attached to the back side of the fan blade and the resistance of the sensor was measure using Source meter (KEITHLEY 2450, Keithley Instruments, USA).
Figure 3b shows the estimated resistance by linear interpolation with respect to various frequencies of 200, 400, 600, and 800 Hz. As discussed above, the resistance data was filtered using the Kalman filter to estimate the strain as shown by the solid line in Figure 3d. The estimated strain was compared to the actual strain which was measured by commercial strain gauge (FLA-2-11-1L, Tokyo Sokki Kenkyujo, Japan) as indicated by the dotted line in Figure 3d. The strain value measured by the printed sensor and measured by a commercial strain gauge exhibited similar trends, which denotes that the strain measurement performance was validated. The mechanical deformation of fan blade was initially increased and stagnated after few seconds varied by rotation frequency.
Figure 3d represents the estimated vibration signal by subtracting filtered data in Figure 3c The FFT results of the vibration signal exhibited that the peak frequency followed the induced frequency as shown in Figure 3e which denotes that vibration sensing performance of printed sensor was also validated.

3.3. Quadrotor Monitoring

We applied the interoperable strain and vibration sensing of the printed sensor to the commercial quadrotor (Tello, Ryze Technology, China). Figure 4a shows the schematic illustration of the drone and its motion including up and down, turn, and flip which were all supported by the manufacturer. The experiments were conducted by measuring the resistance during each motion and the spectrogram was calculated.
Figure 4b shows the photograph of experimental setup. We directly attached the printed sensors onto the backside of the blade similar to fan blade experiment. Similarly, a loop wire was hooked to the ring wire which is located in the shaft of the blade and the resistance of the shaft was measured. An identical source meter (KEITHLEY 2450, Keithley Instruments, USA) was used to measure the resistance of the sensor.
Figure 4c–e shows the spectrogram of time–frequency plots resulted by FFT of vibration signal of the sensor with respect to motion of up and down, turn, and flip, respectively. According to Figure 4c, the rotation frequency of the quadrotor was increased as the quadrotor went up and decreased during the quadrotor went down. For the turning motion, rotation frequency was the highest when it rotated. Hence, it has been confirmed that real-time monitoring was available for quadrotors including drones using the printed sensor. For the up motion of the drone, the frequency should increase to get more thrust for the elevation of the height. Otherwise, frequency should decrease to decrease their thrust force which was shown well in Figure 4c. In terms of the turn motion, four motors at each blade of the drone should be driven differently. With the angular speed of the motor in charge of the rotating axis being maintained, the angular speed of the motor in the direction to be rotated should increase and that of the other motors should decrease. In the experiment, the measured resistance of the blade we measured by the developed sensor was almost maintained during the turning motion since it behaved as a rotational axis. Finally, for the flipping motion, the angular speed of the motors driving the two blades in the direction to be turned upward should decrease and the angular speed of the other motors should increase. Likewise, the blade we measured during the experiment which was flipped in the direction of downward showed a decrease in motor frequency.

4. Conclusions

This research has focused on the fabrication and evaluation of an interoperable sensor which is capable of real-time strain and vibration measurement. The sensor was printed using an AFN printing process which is a dry and direct printing technique without chemical process using successive repetitions of excitation and purging of aerosol. The porous properties of the conductive patterns fabricated by the AFN printing process overcame the challenge of high sensitivity of current strain sensor and enabled the interoperable measurement of strain and vibration sensing.
The strain and vibration sensing performance of the printed sensor was evaluated respectively and independency was demonstrated by statistical methods. Furthermore, the signal processing technique for real-time separation was introduced based on the Kalman filter. As a result of experiments with a sensor attached to the rotating fan blade, the real-time interoperable measurement performance was verified. Finally, we applied the printed sensor to the quadrotor condition monitoring and predicted the quadrotor’s motion through the sensor data.
The proposed sensor exhibited the wide range in terms of gauge factor (GF) and maximum measurable frequency in comparison to the previous interoperable sensor as shown in Figure 5 [10,16,17,24,26,29,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. The results presented in this research are expected to facilitate the highly sensitive reliable measurement of strain and vibration sensing based on a cost-effective method that can leverage the future development of related technologies including structural dynamic behavior analysis of rotational machines.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/s21113648/s1, Figure S1: Previous researches of sensor according to measurable range and gauge factor, Figure S2: SEM image of mechanical crack in developed sensor, Figure S3: The average and standard deviation value of vibration amplitude by frequency of 10 different sensors, Figure S4: The evaluation results of life-cycle test for strain sensing and its magnified view, Figure S5: The evaluation results of life cycle evaluation test of vibration sensing, Figure S6: The RMS value of life cycle evaluation test of vibration sensing, Figure S7: The relative resistance of printed sensor according to temperature, Figure S8: The relative resistance of printed sensor according to humidity, Figure S9: Schematic diagram of the resistance measurement method in rotating environment, Table S1: Previous researches of multivariate measurable sensor, Table S2: Material-substrate compatibility of AFN printing process, Table S3: The statistical analysis of RMS value of life cycle evaluation test of vibration sensing, Table S4: The statistical results according to induced frequency with 200 Hz, Table S5: The statistical results according to induced frequency with 400 Hz, Table S6: The statistical results according to induced frequency with 600 Hz.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-H.M. and Y.-J.Q.; methodology, S.-H.M. and G.-Y.L.; validation, S.-H.M., Y.-J.Q., S.-Y.P., G.-Y.L. and S.-H.A.; formal analysis, S.-H.M.; investigation, S.-H.M., Y.-J.Q. and S.-Y.P.; resources, S.-H.M. and S.-Y.P.; data curation, S.-H.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-H.M.; writing—review and editing, S.-Y.P.; supervision, S.-H.A.; project administration, S.-H.A.; funding acquisition, S.-H.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants funded by the MSIT (NRF-2018R1A2A1A13078704), Basic Research Lab Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the MSIT (NRF- No. 2021R1A4A2001824), and Institute of Engineering Research at Seoul National University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Supplementary Material here.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tao, F.; Cheng, J.; Qi, Q.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, H.; Sui, F. Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 94, 3563–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schleich, B.; Anwer, N.; Mathieu, L.; Wartzack, S. Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering. CIRP Ann. 2017, 66, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Xiang, T.; Huang, K.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Y. Detection of Moving Load on Pavement Using Piezoelectric Sensors. Sensors 2020, 20, 2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kim, D.H.; Lu, N.; Ghaffari, R.; Rogers, J.A. Inorganic semiconductor nanomaterials for flexible and stretchable bio-integrated electronics. NPG Asia Mater. 2012, 4, e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Jeong, C.Y.; Joung, C.W.; Lee, S.H.; Feng, M.; Park, Y.B. Carbon Nanocomposite Based Mechanical Sensing and Energy Harvesting. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green Technol. 2020, 7, 247–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lalam, N.; Lu, P.; Venketeswaran, A.; Buric, M.P. Pipeline Monitoring Using Highly Sensitive Vibration Sensor Based on Fiber Ring Cavity Laser. Sensors 2021, 21, 2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, Y.; Pharr, M.; Salvatore, G.A. Lab-on-Skin: A Review of Flexible and Stretchable Electronics for Wearable Health Monitoring. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 9614–9635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kim, D.H.; Rogers, J.A. Stretchable Electronics: Materials Strategies and Devices. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 4887–4892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qi, K.; He, J.; Wang, H.; Zhou, Y.; You, X.; Nan, N.; Shao, W.; Wang, L.; Ding, B.; Cui, S. A Highly Stretchable Nanofiber-Based Electronic Skin with Pressure-, Strain-, and Flexion-Sensitive Properties for Health and Motion Monitoring. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 42951–42960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shi, J.-X.; Lei, X.-W.; Natsuki, T. Review on Carbon Nanomaterials-Based Nano-Mass and Nano-Force Sensors by Theoretical Analysis of Vibration Behavior. Sensors 2021, 21, 1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, J.; Kim, S.; Lee, J.; Yang, D.; Park, B.C.; Ryu, S. A stretchable strain sensor based on a metal nanoparticle thin film for human motion detection. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 11932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, Z.; Qi, D.; Hu, G.; Wang, H.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, G. Surface Strain Redistribution on Structured Microfibers to Enhance Sensitivity of Fiber-Shaped Stretchable Strain Sensors. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1704229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pang, C.; Lee, G.Y.; Kim, T.I.; Kim, S.M.; Kim, H.N.; Ahn, S.H. A flexible and highly sensitive strain-gauge sensor using reversible interlocking of nanofiber. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 795–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gong, S.; Lai, D.; Wang, Y.; Yap, L.W.; Si, K.J.; Shi, Q. Tattoolike Polyaniline Microparticle-Doped Gold Nanowire Patches as Highly Durable Wearable Sensors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 19700–19708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Amjadi, M.; Kyung, K.U.; Park, I.; Sitti, M. Stretchable, Skin-Mountable, and Wearable Strain Sensors and Their Potential Applications: A Review. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 1678–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Puyoo, E.; Malhaire, C.; Thomas, D.; Rafaël, R.; R’Mili, M.; Malchère, A.; Roiban, L.; Koneti, S.; Bugnet, M.; Sabac, A.; et al. Metallic nanoparticle-based strain sensors elaborated by atomic layer deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 123103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, S.; Koo, J.; Kang, S.K.; Park, G.; Lee, Y.J.; Chen, Y.Y. Metal microparticle—Polymer composites as printable, bio/ecoresorbable conductive inks. Mater. Today 2018, 21, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Herrmann, J.; Müller, K.H.; Reda, T.; Baxter, G.R.; Raguse, B.; de Groot, G.J.J.B.; Chai, R.; Roberts, M.; Wieczorek, L. Nanoparticle films as sensitive strain gauges. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91, 183105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yao, S.; Zhu, Y. Wearable multifunctional sensors using printed stretchable conductors made of silver nanowires. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 2345–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shin, U.H.; Jeong, D.W.; Park, S.M.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, H.W.; Kim, J.M. Highly stretchable conductors and piezocapacitive strain gauges basedon simple contact-transfer patterning of carbon nanotube forests. Carbon 2014, 80, 396–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liao, X.; Liao, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Yan, X.; Liang, Q.; Wang, Q. A Highly stretchable ZnO@ Fiber-Based Multifunctional Nanosensor for Strain/Temperature/UV Detection. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 3074–3081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ra, Y.S.; La, M.W.; Cho, S.M.; Park, S.J.; Choi, D.W. Scalable Batch Fabrication of Flexible, Transparent and Self-triggered Tactile Sensor Array Based on Triboelectric Effect. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green Technol. 2021, 8, 519–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Piliposian, G.; Hasanya, A.; Piliposyan, G.; Jilavyan, H. On the Sensing, Actuating and Energy Harvesting Properties of a Composite Plate with Piezoelectric Patches. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green Technol. 2020, 7, 657–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Boland, C.S.; Khan, U.; Backes, C.; Neill, O.; Mccauley, A.; Duane, J.S. High-Strain, High- Rate Bodily Motion Sensors Based on Graphene-Rubber Composites. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 8819–8830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, Y.G.; Quan, Y.J.; Kim, M.S.; Cho, Y.G.; Ahn, S.H. Lithography-free and Highly Angle Sensitive Structural Coloration Using Fabry–Perot Resonance of Tin. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green Technol. 2021, 8, 997–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fan, W.; Bu, W.; Shi, J. On The Latest Three-Stage Development of Nanomedicines based on Upconversion Nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 3987–4011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jo, M.H.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, S.Y.; Cho, G.J.; Lee, T.M.; Lee, C.W. Resistance Control of an Additively Manufactured Conductive Layer in Roll-to-Roll Gravure Printing Systems. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green Technol. 2021, 8, 817–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lee, G.Y.; Park, J.I.; Kim, C.S.; Yoon, H.S.; Yang, J.; Ahn, S.H. Aerodynamically focused nanoparticle (AFN) printing: Novel direct printing technique of solvent-free and inorganic nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 16466–16471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, G.Y.; Kim, M.S.; Min, S.H.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, H.J.; Keller, R.; Ihn, J.B.; Ahn, S.H. Highly Sensitive Solvent-free Silver Nanoparticle Strain Sensors with Tunable Sensitivity Created Using an Aerodynamically Focused Nanoparticle Printer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 26421–26432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Min, S.H.; Lee, G.Y.; Ahn, S.H. Direct printing of highly sensitive, stretchable, and durable strain sensor based on silver nanoparticles/multi-walled carbon nanotubes composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 161, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Feir-Walsh, B.J.; Toothaker, L.E. An Empirical Comparison of the Anova F-Test, Normal Scores Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test Under Violation of Assumptions. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1974, 34, 789–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Westfall, P.H.; Young, S.S. On Adjusting P-Values for Multiplicity. Biometrics 1993, 49, 941–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wan, E.A.; Merwe, R. The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 Adaptive Systems for Signal Processing, Lake Louise, AB, Canada, 1–4 October 2000; pp. 153–158. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hoshiya, M.; Saito, E. Structural Identification by Extended Kalman Filter. J. Eng. Mech. 1757, 110, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, W.Q.; Badel, A.; Formosa, F.; Wu, Y.P.; Agbossou, A. Novel piezoelectric bistable oscillator architecture for wideband vibration energy harvesting. Smart Mater. Struct. 2013, 22, 035013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Roy, B.K.; Chakraborty, S.; Mihsra, S.K. Robust optimum design of base insolation system in seismic vibration control of structures under uncertain bounded system parameters. J. Vib. Control 2014, 20, 786–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Speller, K.E.; Yu, D. Unattended/Unmanned Ground, Ocean, and Air Sensor Technologies and Applications VI. Proc. Spie 2004, 5417, 63–72. [Google Scholar]
  38. Chiu, Y.; Tseng, V.F.G. A capacitive vibration-to-electricity energy converter with integrated mechanical switches. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2008, 18, 104004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Gerfers, F.; den Besten, G.W.; Petkov, P.V.; Conder, J.E.; Koellmann, A.J. A 0.2–2 Gb/s 6x OSR Receiver Using a Digitally Self-Adaptive Equalizer. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2008, 43, 1436–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yaghootkar, B.; Azimi, S.; Bahreyni, B. A High-Performance Piezoelectric Vibration Sensor. IEEE Sens. J. 2017, 17, 4005–4012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sangeetha, N.M.; Decorde, N.; Viallet, B.; Viau, G.; Ressier, L. Nanoparticle-Based Strain Gauges Fabricated by Convective Self Assembly: Strain Sensitivity and Hysteresis with Respect to Nanoparticle Sizes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 1935–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yi, L.; Jiao, W.; Wu, K.; Qian, L.; Yu, X.; Xia, Q. Nanoparticle monolayer-based flexible strain gauge with ultrafast dynamic response for acoustic vibration detection. Nano Res. 2015, 8, 2978–2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sensors 21 03648 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the aerodynamically focused nanomaterial (AFN) printing system. (b) Schematic illustration of AFN printing of silver nanoparticle onto polyimide substrate. (c) Optical microscope image of AFN-printed microscale conductive line pattern. (d,e) Scanning electron microscope images of AFN-printed microscale conductive pattern. (f) Nanoparticle packing ratio with respect to the scan velocity. (g) Relative electrical resistance with respect to the scan velocity.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the aerodynamically focused nanomaterial (AFN) printing system. (b) Schematic illustration of AFN printing of silver nanoparticle onto polyimide substrate. (c) Optical microscope image of AFN-printed microscale conductive line pattern. (d,e) Scanning electron microscope images of AFN-printed microscale conductive pattern. (f) Nanoparticle packing ratio with respect to the scan velocity. (g) Relative electrical resistance with respect to the scan velocity.
Sensors 21 03648 g001
Sensors 21 03648 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Schematic diagram of the sensing mechanism of the nanoparticle sensor for strain and vibration measurement, respectively. (b) Relative resistance changes of sensor according to strain. (c) Relative resistance changes during continuous vibration with a frequency of 200 Hz by the vibration shaker. (d) Peak frequency of sensor resistance obtained by fast Fourier transform (FFT) at Q-level of 70.7% with respect to the induced frequency. (e) Flowchart of proposed interoperable strain and vibration measurement.
Figure 2. (a) Schematic diagram of the sensing mechanism of the nanoparticle sensor for strain and vibration measurement, respectively. (b) Relative resistance changes of sensor according to strain. (c) Relative resistance changes during continuous vibration with a frequency of 200 Hz by the vibration shaker. (d) Peak frequency of sensor resistance obtained by fast Fourier transform (FFT) at Q-level of 70.7% with respect to the induced frequency. (e) Flowchart of proposed interoperable strain and vibration measurement.
Sensors 21 03648 g002
Sensors 21 03648 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Photograph of the experimental setup for strain and vibration measurement of the fan blade (b) Measured resistance according to rotor frequency. (c) Estimated strain from the printed sensor using the Kalman filter (solid line) and measured strain from the commercial strain gauge (dotted line) (d) Estimated vibration obtained by subtracting the estimated strain from the measured resistance. (e) Fast Fourier transform (FFT) results of estimated vibration.
Figure 3. (a) Photograph of the experimental setup for strain and vibration measurement of the fan blade (b) Measured resistance according to rotor frequency. (c) Estimated strain from the printed sensor using the Kalman filter (solid line) and measured strain from the commercial strain gauge (dotted line) (d) Estimated vibration obtained by subtracting the estimated strain from the measured resistance. (e) Fast Fourier transform (FFT) results of estimated vibration.
Sensors 21 03648 g003
Sensors 21 03648 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Schematic illustration of drone and its motion including up and down, turn, and flip. (b) Photograph of experimental setup for rotor blade monitoring. Time-frequency plots of measured resistance with motion of (c) up and down, (d) turn, and (e) flip.
Figure 4. (a) Schematic illustration of drone and its motion including up and down, turn, and flip. (b) Photograph of experimental setup for rotor blade monitoring. Time-frequency plots of measured resistance with motion of (c) up and down, (d) turn, and (e) flip.
Sensors 21 03648 g004
Sensors 21 03648 g005 550
Figure 5. Comparison to previous studies according to sensitivity and maximum frequency.
Figure 5. Comparison to previous studies according to sensitivity and maximum frequency.
Sensors 21 03648 g005
Table
Table 1. The results of p-value according to induced frequency.
Table 1. The results of p-value according to induced frequency.
Vibration Source (Hz)Results of p-Value
2000.032
4000.018
6000.011
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Min, S.-H.; Quan, Y.-J.; Park, S.-Y.; Lee, G.-Y.; Ahn, S.-H. Interoperable Nanoparticle Sensor Capable of Strain and Vibration Measurement for Rotor Blade Monitoring. Sensors 2021, 21, 3648. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21113648

AMA Style

Min S-H, Quan Y-J, Park S-Y, Lee G-Y, Ahn S-H. Interoperable Nanoparticle Sensor Capable of Strain and Vibration Measurement for Rotor Blade Monitoring. Sensors. 2021; 21(11):3648. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21113648

Chicago/Turabian Style

Min, Soo-Hong, Ying-Jun Quan, Su-Young Park, Gil-Yong Lee, and Sung-Hoon Ahn. 2021. "Interoperable Nanoparticle Sensor Capable of Strain and Vibration Measurement for Rotor Blade Monitoring" Sensors 21, no. 11: 3648. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21113648

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop