Next Article in Journal
Vision Measurement of Gear Pitting Under Different Scenes by Deep Mask R-CNN
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Validity, Reliability, and Kinematic Characteristics of Multi-Segment Foot Models in Motion Capture
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Satellite-Terrestrial Relay Network: Proposed Model and Application of Power Splitting Multiple Access
Previous Article in Special Issue
Can Ensemble Deep Learning Identify People by Their Gait Using Data Collected from Multi-Modal Sensors in Their Insole?
Open AccessArticle

Variability of Muscle Synergies in Hand Grasps: Analysis of Intra- and Inter-Session Data

1
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
2
Information Systems Institute, University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES-SO), 3960 Sierre, Switzerland
3
Medical Faculty, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
4
Institute of Intelligent Industrial Technologies and Systems for Advanced Manufacturing (STIIMA), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), 23900 Lecco, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(15), 4297; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20154297
Received: 1 July 2020 / Revised: 27 July 2020 / Accepted: 29 July 2020 / Published: 1 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensor Techniques and Methods for Movement Analysis)
Background. Muscle synergy analysis is an approach to understand the neurophysiological mechanisms behind the hypothesized ability of the Central Nervous System (CNS) to reduce the dimensionality of muscle control. The muscle synergy approach is also used to evaluate motor recovery and the evolution of the patients’ motor performance both in single-session and longitudinal studies. Synergy-based assessments are subject to various sources of variability: natural trial-by-trial variability of performed movements, intrinsic characteristics of subjects that change over time (e.g., recovery, adaptation, exercise, etc.), as well as experimental factors such as different electrode positioning. These sources of variability need to be quantified in order to resolve challenges for the application of muscle synergies in clinical environments. The objective of this study is to analyze the stability and similarity of extracted muscle synergies under the effect of factors that may induce variability, including inter- and intra-session variability within subjects and inter-subject variability differentiation. The analysis was performed using the comprehensive, publicly available hand grasp NinaPro Database, featuring surface electromyography (EMG) measures from two EMG electrode bracelets. Methods. Intra-session, inter-session, and inter-subject synergy stability was analyzed using the following measures: variance accounted for (VAF) and number of synergies (NoS) as measures of reconstruction stability quality and cosine similarity for comparison of spatial composition of extracted synergies. Moreover, an approach based on virtual electrode repositioning was applied to shed light on the influence of electrode position on inter-session synergy similarity. Results. Inter-session synergy similarity was significantly lower with respect to intra-session similarity, both considering coefficient of variation of VAF (approximately 0.2–15% for inter vs. approximately 0.1% to 2.5% for intra, depending on NoS) and coefficient of variation of NoS (approximately 6.5–14.5% for inter vs. approximately 3–3.5% for intra, depending on VAF) as well as synergy similarity (approximately 74–77% for inter vs. approximately 88–94% for intra, depending on the selected VAF). Virtual electrode repositioning revealed that a slightly different electrode position can lower similarity of synergies from the same session and can increase similarity between sessions. Finally, the similarity of inter-subject synergies has no significant difference from the similarity of inter-session synergies (both on average approximately 84–90% depending on selected VAF). Conclusion. Synergy similarity was lower in inter-session conditions with respect to intra-session. This finding should be considered when interpreting results from multi-session assessments. Lastly, electrode positioning might play an important role in the lower similarity of synergies over different sessions. View Full-Text
Keywords: muscle synergies; hand grasps; variability; intra-session; inter-session; virtual electrode repositioning muscle synergies; hand grasps; variability; intra-session; inter-session; virtual electrode repositioning
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Pale, U.; Atzori, M.; Müller, H.; Scano, A. Variability of Muscle Synergies in Hand Grasps: Analysis of Intra- and Inter-Session Data. Sensors 2020, 20, 4297.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop