Next Article in Journal
Ambulatory Evaluation of ECG Signals Obtained Using Washable Textile-Based Electrodes Made with Chemically Modified PEDOT:PSS
Next Article in Special Issue
The Campus as a Smart City: University of Málaga Environmental, Learning, and Research Approaches
Previous Article in Journal
A Pattern-Based Approach for Detecting Pneumatic Failures on Temporary Immersion Bioreactors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Visualization of Urban Mobility Data from Intelligent Transportation Systems

A Regulatory View on Smart City Services

Sedam IT d.o.o., HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2019, 19(2), 415;
Received: 12 December 2018 / Revised: 7 January 2019 / Accepted: 14 January 2019 / Published: 21 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Cities)
Even though various commercial Smart City solutions are widely available on the market, we are still witnessing their rather limited adoption, where solutions are typically bound to specific verticals or remain in pilot stages. In this paper we argue that the lack of a Smart City regulatory framework is one of the major obstacles for a wider adoption of Smart City services in practice. Such framework should be accompanied by examples of good practice which stress the necessity of adopting interoperable Smart City services. Development and deployment of Smart City services can incur significant costs to cities, service providers and sensor manufacturers, and thus it is vital to adjust national legislation to ensure legal certainty to all stakeholders, and at the same time to protect interests of the citizens and the state. Additionally, due to a vast number of heterogeneous devices and Smart City services, both existing and future, their interoperability becomes vital for service replicability and massive deployment leading to digital transformation of future cities. The paper provides a classification of technical and regulatory characteristics of IoT services for Smart Cities which are mapped to corresponding roles in the IoT value chain. Four example use cases are chosen—Smart Parking, Smart Metering, Smart Street Lighting and Mobile Crowd Sensing—to showcase the legal implications relevant to each service. Based on the analysis, we propose a set of recommendations for each role in the value chain related to regulatory requirements of the aforementioned Smart City services. The analysis and recommendations serve as examples of good practice in hope that they will facilitate a wider adoption and longevity of IoT-based Smart City services. View Full-Text
Keywords: smart city; regulatory characteristics; taxonomy; internet of things; interoperability smart city; regulatory characteristics; taxonomy; internet of things; interoperability
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Weber, M.; Podnar Žarko, I. A Regulatory View on Smart City Services. Sensors 2019, 19, 415.

AMA Style

Weber M, Podnar Žarko I. A Regulatory View on Smart City Services. Sensors. 2019; 19(2):415.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Weber, Mario, and Ivana Podnar Žarko. 2019. "A Regulatory View on Smart City Services" Sensors 19, no. 2: 415.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop