Next Article in Journal
Marine Nearshore Biodiversity: Introduction to the Special Issue
Next Article in Special Issue
Something’s Fishy: An Unexpected Intertidal Encounter with the New Zealand Lancelet, Epigonichthys hectori (Benham, 1901), near the Whangarei Heads, NZ
Previous Article in Journal
Separate and Simultaneous Effects of Silver Nanoparticles and Arsenic on the Taxonomic Diversity of Free-Living Marine Nematodes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hidden Depths: A Unique Biodiversity Oasis in the Persian Gulf in Need of Further Exploration and Conservation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Interesting Images

Face-Down, Tail-Up: Unusual In Situ Behavior of the Blackchins Neoscopelus macrolepidotus, Neoscopelus microchir, and Scopelengys tristis (Myctophiformes: Neoscopelidae)

by
Leah A. Bergman
1,*,
Yoshihiro Fujiwara
2,
Victoria E. Assad
3,
Jessica N. Perelman
4,
Jeffrey C. Drazen
3 and
Dhugal J. Lindsay
5,*
1
School of Marine Biosciences, Kitasato University, Sagamihara 252-0373, Japan
2
Research Institute for Global Change (RIGC), Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan
3
Department of Oceanography, University of Hawaii, Mānoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
4
CIMAR/NOAA Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, Honolulu, HI 96818, USA
5
Institute for Extra-Cutting-Edge Science and Technology Avant-Garde Research (X-STAR), Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2023, 15(7), 837; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15070837
Submission received: 9 June 2023 / Revised: 1 July 2023 / Accepted: 2 July 2023 / Published: 6 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Interesting Images from the Sea)

Abstract

:
Orienting vertically with the head facing upward allows fish to look for the shadow of their prey against ambient light, while also making their own shadow smaller to predators beneath them. Here, we describe the in situ behavior of three midwater fish in the family Neoscopelidae, Neoscopelus macrolepidotus, Neoscopelus microchir, and Scopelengys tristis, all of which were observed facing vertically with the head downward. This behavior allows the fish to diminish its shadow to hide from predators while hunting prey below. Assessing unique behaviors helps us better understand the role of these and other poorly studied deep-sea fishes.

Many midwater predators face vertically with their eyes oriented upward to hunt their prey from below [1,2,3]. These predators look for the shadow of their prey from the faint downwelling light from the surface [4,5]. In response to this hunting behavior, midwater fish have adapted ventral photophores to hide their shadows, called counterillumination, as well as silver scales to obscure the shape of their bodies [4,5]. Orienting their body vertically in the water column not only diminishes their shadow from predators below, but it also allows them to look for shadows of their prey above [1].
The order Myctophiformes contains 245 midwater species, with 99% possessing ventral photophores [6]. The order Myctophiformes contains lanternfishes in the family Myctophidae and the blackchins in the family Neoscopelidae. Since the 1940s, there have been increasing interests in developing Myctophiformes fisheries for consumption, use as fishmeal, use as Omega-3 dietary supplements, and in bioprospecting for pharmaceuticals [7,8,9]. Myctophiformes are also an important link in the food web between primary consumers, such as zooplankton and tertiary consumers, including tuna, sharks, whales, and dolphins [7,10]. Within the family Neoscopelidae, ventral photophores can be absent (in the derived genera Scopelengys and Solivomer) or present (in the stem blackchin genus Neoscopelus) [11]. Unlike lanternfish, Neoscopelus contains a row of photophores on the tongue, and their purpose is unknown, in addition to ventral rows on the body [12]. Blackchins are medium-sized fish that are black to silver in color, and their diet has not been studied in detail [11]. The mouth contains multiple rows of small, filiform teeth, and the gill rakers are well developed, with the stomach of one fish caught off southern California containing copepods, suggesting they prey on pelagic crustaceans or small fishes similar to the lanternfishes [11,12,13].
Visual surveys of underwater environments are useful for gaining insight into the behavior of midwater fishes [14,15], although no records have described blackchins in detail. In this report, we describe the in situ behavior of three species within the family Neoscopelidae, including Neoscopelus macrolepidotus, Neoscopelus microchir, and Scopelengys tristis, based on observations using Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) and Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs).
Blackchin observations were collected from four sources: the JAMSTEC E-library of Deep-Sea Images (J-EDI) [16], the NOAA Ocean Exploration Video Portal [17,18,19], cruise KM20-10C leg 2 to Ritto Seamount, and cruises DG5b and DG5e in the NORI-D area of the eastern Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ). Blackchin behavior was divided into six categories: resting head upward, resting head downward, resting horizontally, swimming upward, swimming downward, and swimming horizontally. If the fish changed its behavior during the observation, only the initial behavior was recorded.
One video of Neoscopelus macrolepidotus observed during the R/V ‘Natsushima’ cruise NT07-11 was selected from the J-EDI database. The ROV Hyper-Dolphin aboard the R/V ‘Natsushima’ cruise NT07-11 surveyed the hydrothermal vents at Minami-Ensei Knoll within the Okinawa Trough on 24 June 2007. The ROV Hyper-Dolphin was equipped with a high-definition Super HARP TV camera. During Dive HPD0703, one N. macrolepidotus was observed resting head downward from 01:28:38 to 01:34:35 UTC (from 10:28:38 Japan Standard Time) between 698–700 m depth (Temperature: 7.5 °C; Salinity: 34.32; Dissolved Oxygen: 1.90 mL/L), five meters above the seafloor. The fish occasionally beat the extended fins to maintain its position and remained less than 20° removed from the vertical (in situ image in Figure 1). The mouth was positioned slightly open during the observation, yet the gill operculum did not move. At the end of the observation, the fish swam downward and out of view with four consecutive tail beats.
Four observations of N. macrolepidotus from cruises EX1603, EX1605L3, and EX1606 were selected from the NOAA Ocean Exploration Video Portal. The Deep Discover ROV aboard the Okeanos Explorer was equipped with a high-definition Insite Titan Tilt and Rotate Color Zoom Camera (Insite Pacific Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The observations of N. macrolepidotus during cruises EX1603 and EX1605L3 were resting head downward, while the two observations of N. macrolepidotus during cruise EX1603 DIVE06 were resting horizontally, directly above the seafloor.
During cruise EX1605L3 DIVE07 to Supply Reef on 23 June 2016, one N. macrolepidotus was observed resting head downward from 21:49:40–21:50:14 UTC (from 07:49:40 Chamorro Standard Time) between 941–957 m depth (Temperature: 4.3 °C; Salinity: 34.44; Dissolved Oxygen: 2.00 mL/L), approximately one meter above the seafloor. The fish remained completely motionless during the observation, with all fins fully extended, until it swam upward and out of view with six tail beats. Throughout the observation, the angle of the body changed from less than 20° removed from the vertical to 45° before abruptly changing its orientation and swimming upward. During cruise EX1606 DIVE08 to Wake Island on 10 August 2016, one N. macrolepidotus was observed from 3:03:23–3:07:27 UTC (from 15:03:23 Wake Time) between 775–779 m depth (Temperature: 4.8 °C; Salinity: 34.43; Dissolved Oxygen: 1.77 mL/L), one meter above the seafloor. The first changed its orientation during the observation, resting head downward less than 20° removed from the vertical to resting horizontally less than 10° removed from the horizontal. The fish occasionally beat its extended pectoral and caudal fin to maintain its position and navigate around the benthic terrain.
Twenty-eight observations of Neoscopelus microchir were recorded during the R/V ‘Kaimei’ cruise KM20-10C leg 2 with the KM-ROV and the AUV YOUZAN. The KM-ROV was equipped with a pan-tiltable high-definition Mini Zeus video camera, and the AUV YOUZAN was equipped with a 4K UMC-S3CA network camera with a FE 28 mm F2 lens (Sony, Tokyo, Japan). The KM-ROV was equipped with a Seabird SBE 49 Fast CAT CTD system, measuring depth, temperature, and salinity, while the AUV YOUZAN was equipped with a temperature and salinity sensor A7CT-USB (JFE Advantec, Takahatachou, Japan), a turbidity sensor ATUD-USB (JFE Advantec), and a pH sensor SPS14 (Kimoto Electronic, Osaka, Japan). During KM-ROV dive KM0129 to Ritto Seamount on 5 December 2020, two N. microchir were observed, resting head downward, and one was observed, swimming downward from 00:36:33–00:38:57 UTC (from 09:36:33 JST) between 696–698 m depth (Temperature: 5.7 °C; Salinity: 34.25), 1.5–1.8 m above the seafloor. During AUV YOUZAN Dive#2 to Ritto Seamount on 8 Dec 2020, twenty-five N. microchir were observed from 00:24:30–04:15:01 UTC (from 09:24:30 JST) between 699–808 m depth (Temperature 4.9–5.9 °C; Salinity: 34.57–34.73), 2.8–4.3 m above the seafloor. Twenty were observed resting head down, while five were resting horizontally directly above the seafloor.
Most observations were fleeting: two longer observations were selected for an in-depth behavioral analysis. During Dive KM0129, one N. microchir was observed swimming downward between 00:37:21–00:37:26 UTC (from 09:37:21 JST) at 697 m depth (Temperature: 5.7 °C; Salinity: 34.25). The fish swam downward in three swimming bursts, with each burst using three caudal fin beats. Between swimming bursts was a short rest period where the fish rested head downward. During Dive#2, one N. microchir was observed resting head downward between 2:04:01–2:04:06 UTC (from 11:04:01 JST) at 774 m depth (Temperature 5.0 °C; Salinity: 34.70), 3.0 m above the seafloor. The fish occasionally beat its extended fins to maintain its position and remained less than 10° removed from the vertical (Supplementary Material Video S1). The mouth position of both fish could not be determined.
Fifty-one observations of Scopelengys tristis were recorded during cruises DG5b and DG5e. The ROV Odysseus aboard the Maersk Launcher was equipped with a pan-tilt-unit-mounted Mini Zeus 4K (Insite Pacific Inc.) with a 1/2.5 inch Exmor R CMOS sensor and a 20× Optical Zoom lens. Cruise DG5b was conducted between 28 February through 22 April 2021, while Cruise DG5e was conducted between 11 November though 19 December 2021. Scopelengys tristis were observed from 647–1122 m depth (Temperature 4.1–7.3 °C, Salinity 34.54–34.58, Dissolved Oxygen 0.05–1.04 mL/L), thousands of meters above the seafloor, which was at approximately 4200 m depth. All resting S. tristis were resting head downward. Scopelengys tristis preferred to be head downward when resting (χ2, p = 7.579 × 10−5) and swim downward when swimming (χ2, p = 8.423 × 10−6). Time of day had an effect on their overall activity level (one-way ANOVA, p = 0.0376), with more S. tristis swimming during the daytime. Time of day did not affect the direction of swimming. Depth, temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen had no effect on behavior.
Most observations of S. tristis were fleeting; two longer observations were selected for an in-depth behavioral analysis to compare with N. macrolepidotus and N. microchir. During Dive OY034 on 5 December 2021, one S. tristis was observed between 22:51:16–22:51:51 UTC (from 14:51:16 Pacific Standard time) at 724 m depth (Temperature: 5.8 °C; Salinity: 34.55; Dissolved Oxygen: 0.21 mL/L). The fish remained completely motionless throughout the observation, with all fins fully extended and the mouth closed, until it swam downward and out of view with one tail beat. During Dive OY039 on 15 December 2021, a second S. tristis was observed between 19:11:31–19:12:51 UTC (from 11:11:31 PST) from 712–714 m depth (Temperature: 6.0 °C; Salinity: 34.55; Dissolved Oxygen: 0.09 mL/L). Similarly, the fish was oriented with its head down, mouth closed, and all fins extended, remaining completely motionless with its mouth closed (Supplementary Material Video S2). The altitude of both remained less than 10° removed from the vertical.
During the OY034 and OY039 observations, bristlemouths (genus Cyclothone) were observed near S. tristis. A paralepid barracudina (Magnisudis atlantica) was also observed near the OY039 S. tristis. The only record of predation on blackchins is from the Mediterranean Sea, where one N. macrolepidotus was found in the stomach of the swallower Chiasmodon niger [20]. Considering that M. atlantica eats krill, squid, and lanternfish [21,22], it is possible that it is a predator on S. tristis, but this requires further study on the diet of M. atlantica in the eastern CCZ.
Neoscopelus macrolepidotus and S. tristis had similar swimming behavior, even though Neoscopelus has ventral bioluminescent organs and a swim bladder, while Scopelengys has neither. Both fish employed rapid escapes with a c-start [23] before beating the caudal fin, the propulsive wave originating near the anal fin origin, and moving out of view of the ROV within a second. One caudal fin beat took only two frames to complete. Neoscopelus microchir also had similar swimming behavior, but the short rest periods between swimming bursts were unique to this species. Both N. macrolepidotus and N. microchir used periodic pectoral fin beats to maintain position as they faced downward, whereas no S. tristis moved their fins unless it was for escape. S. tristis were observed in lower dissolved oxygen than N. macrolepidotus, which may be why this species only moved to escape, although dissolved oxygen concentration did not affect their overall activity level. Contrastingly, N. macrolepidotus is reported to have a well ossified skeleton and firm musculature, whereas S. tristis has flabby muscles and a weakly ossified skeleton [24], suggesting the two species have different swimming mechanics. This difference in anatomy may instead be explained in the two species having a different diet or foraging behavior, both of which have not been thoroughly studied.
Downward-facing behavior in deep-sea fishes is uncommon, yet it is reported in several species [1,14]. In the lanternfish Stenobrachius leucopsarus and Triphoturus mexicanus, head-up orientation is hypothesized to diminish their shadow from below [1]. Despite lanternfish possessing ventral photophores to use in counterillumination, some predators with highly specialized vision can discern ambient light from bioluminescence, which turns their camouflage into a target [4,25]. By orienting their bodies vertically, rather than horizontally, their shadow becomes harder to spot for upward-facing predators. Considering that S. tristis remained stationary during the observations, with only minimal fin movement in N. macrolepidotus and N. microchir, they are likely adopting a vertical position to avoid being seen by predators. The silvered scales on N. macrolepidotus, N. microchir, and S. tristis further obscure the shape of the body when viewed from the side. Despite the added protection by orienting vertically, this still does not explain why blackchins rest head downward, rather than head upward.
The distance above the seafloor may affect the resting behavior of N. macrolepidotus and N. microchir. All blackchins resting horizontally were directly above the seafloor, although the exact distance is difficult to determine because only the ROV or AUV distance above the seafloor can be recorded. Moreover, some N. microchir observed in Dive#2 were also resting head downward directly above the seafloor, rather than at the same distance above the seafloor as the survey vehicle. The change from resting head down to resting horizontal in the EX1606 DIVE08 N. macrolepidotus observation may illustrate the effect distance from the seafloor has on behavior. However, this requires further examination of N. macrolepidotus and N. microchir in the midwater, far from the seafloor.
Time of day affecting the activity of midwater S. tristis likely has to do with changing prey abundance throughout the day. Scopelengys tristis do not undergo diel migration in the eastern CCZ, which is further underscored by the fact that time of day had no effect on swimming direction. If S. tristis has a diet similar to the lanternfishes, then their potential prey consists of vertically-migrating species which inhabit deeper areas during the day. By facing head downward, prey looking upward may not recognize the diminished shadow as a potential predator hunting from above. Moreover, their potential prey release bioluminescent signals, which are easier to see against a darker background when the fish is facing downward. Although all N. macrolepidotus and N. microchir within this study were observed near the seafloor and most had their mouth closed, the diminished shadow and the photophores on their tongue may be used in conjunction to lure bathypelagic prey looking upward.
Members of the family Neoscopelidae are a poorly studied group within the order Myctophiformes that are observed in many different areas around the Pacific Ocean. This study not only describes the in situ behavior of blackchins, but it also adds records of blackchins within the CCZ. The NORI-D area within the CCZ is a mining license area where deep-sea mining may commence as early as the end of 2024 [26]. This study provides a baseline assessment of behavior and distribution of S. tristis in NORI-D, which is important when assessing the potential effects of deep-sea mining on fishes within this region in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d15070837/s1, Video S1: In situ video of Neoscopelus microchir from Dive#2 during cruise KM20-10 to Ritto Seamount taken with the 4K UMC-S3CA network camera at 774 m; Video S2: In situ video of Scopelengys tristis from Dive OY039 during cruise DG5e taken with the 4K Mini Zeus camera at 712 m.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.A.B.; methodology, L.A.B.; formal analysis, L.A.B.; investigation, L.A.B. and D.J.L.; resources, Y.F., J.C.D. and D.J.L.; data curation, L.A.B., Y.F., J.C.D. and D.J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, L.A.B., Y.F., J.N.P., V.E.A., J.C.D. and D.J.L.; writing—review and editing, L.A.B., Y.F., J.N.P., V.E.A., J.C.D. and D.J.L.; visualization, L.A.B.; supervision, Y.F., J.C.D. and D.J.L.; project administration, Y.F., J.C.D. and D.J.L.; funding acquisition, L.A.B., Y.F., J.C.D. and D.J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was partially supported by the Monbukagakusho (MEXT) Scholarship to LAB. Research aboard the R/V ‘Kaimei’ was partly funded by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (JPMEERF20S20700) of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan and an MPA monitoring project outsourced by the Ministry of the Environment of Japan to YF. Research in the NORI-D area in the eastern CCZ was partly funded by The Metals Company Inc. in a joint collaboration between the University of Hawaii and JAMSTEC. The authors received support from TMC (The Metals Company Inc.) through its subsidiary Nauru Ocean Resources Inc. (NORI). NORI holds exploration rights to the NORI-D contract area in the CCZ regulated by the International Seabed Authority and sponsored by the government of Nauru. All funders were not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication. This is contribution TMC/NORI/D/008 and SOEST contribution #11688.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Video data from the J-EDI and NOAA Ocean Exploration Video Portal are publicly available. Video data from Ritto Seamount and NORI-D are available upon request from the authors and permission from the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan and The Metals Company Inc.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the crew, the ROV and AUV teams, and the scientists aboard the R/V ‘Natsushima’, the Okeanos Explorer, the R/V ‘Kaimei’, and the Maersk Launcher, without whom this work would not be possible. We also wish to thank Meagan Putts and Saki Sugihara for their invaluable help in technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Barham, E.G. Deep-Sea fishes: Lethargy and vertical orientation. In Proceedings of An International Symposium on Biological Sound Scattering in the Ocean; US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  2. Janssen, J.; Pankhurst, N.W.; Harbison, G.R. Swimming and body orientation of Notolepis rissoi in relation to lateral line and visual function. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 1992, 72, 877–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wagner, H.J.; Douglas, R.H.; Frank, T.M.; Roberts, N.W.; Partridge, J.C. A novel vertebrate eye using both refractive and reflective optics. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Warrant, E.J.; Locket, N.A. Vision in the deep sea. Biol. Rev. 2004, 79, 671–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Johnsen, S. Hide and seek in the open sea: Pelagic camouflage and visual countermeasures. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2014, 6, 369–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. World Register of Marine Species. Available online: https://www.marinespecies.org (accessed on 23 January 2023).
  7. Catul, V.; Gauns, M.; Karuppasamy, P.K. A review on mesopelagic fishes belonging to family Myctophidae. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2011, 21, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hidalgo, M.; Browman, H.I. Developing the knowledge base needed to sustainably manage mesopelagic resources. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2019, 76, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Pauly, D.; Piroddi, C.; Hood, L.; Bailly, N.; Chu, E.; Lam, V.; Pakhomov, E.A.; Pshenichnov, L.K.; Radchenko, V.I.; Palomares, M.L.D. The biology of mesopelagic fishes and their catches (1950–2018) by commercial and experimental fisheries. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Drazen, J.C.; Sutton, T.T. Dining in the deep: The feeding ecology of deep-sea fishes. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2017, 9, 337–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Nafpaktitis, B.G. Family Neoscopelidae. In Fishes of the Western North Atlantic; Gibbs, R.H., Ed.; Yale University: New Haven, CT, USA, 1977; Volume 1, pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  12. Moser, H.G.; Watson, W. Preliminary Guide to the Identification of the Early Life History Stages of Myctophiform Fishes of the Western Central Atlantic; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: Miami, FL, USA, 2001; p. 453.
  13. Ebeling, A.W.; Cailliet, G.M. Mouth size predator strategy of midwaters fishes. Deep Sea Res. Oceanogr. Abstr. 1974, 21, 959–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Moore, J.A. Upside-down swimming behavior in a whipnose anglerfish (Teleostei: Ceratioidei: Gigantactinidae). Copeia 2002, 4, 1144–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Luck, D.G.; Pietsch, T.W. In-Situ observations of a deep-sea ceratioid anglerfish of the genus Oneirodes (Lophiiformes: Oneirodidae). Copeia 2008, 2, 446–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. JAMSTEC E-Library of Deep-Sea Images (J-EDI). Available online: https://www.godac.jamstec.go.jp/jedi/e/ (accessed on 28 February 2023).
  17. Cantwell, K.; Pomponi, S.; Fryer, P. Oceanographic Data and Information Collected during the EX1605L3 (CAPSTONE CNMI & Mariana Trench MNM (ROV & Mapping)) Expedition on NOAA Ship OKEANOS EXPLORER in the North Pacific Ocean from 2016-06-17 to 2016-07-10 (NCEI Accession 0156334); NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information: Silver Spring, MA, USA. [CrossRef]
  18. Kennedy, B.; Wagner, D.; Tree, J. Oceanographic Data and ROV Dive-Related Multimedia and Information Collected during the EX1603 Hohonu Moana: Exploring the Deep Waters off Hawai‘i Expedition on NOAA Ship OKEANOS EXPLORER in the North Pacific Ocean from 2016-02-23 to 2016-03-16 (NCEI Accession 0150527); NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information: Silver Spring, MA, USA. [CrossRef]
  19. Kennedy, B.; Kelley, C.; Konter, J. Oceanographic Data and ROV Dive-Related Multimedia and Information Collected during the EX1606 (CAPSTONE Wake Island Unit PRIMNM (ROV & Mapping)) Expedition on NOAA Ship OKEANOS EXPLORER in the North Pacific Ocean from 2016-07-27 to 2016-08-19 (NCEI Accession 0156560); NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information: Silver Spring, MA, USA. [CrossRef]
  20. Johnson, J.Y. New and very Rare Fish from the Mediterranean. Nature 1882, 26, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ilinskii, E.N.; Bulanov, A.A.; Ivanov, O.A. Rare mesopelagic fishes, Scopelosaurus harryi, Arctozenus rissoi, Magnisudis atlantica and Tactostoma macropus, in northwestern part of the Pacific Ocean. Report 2: Distribution and general biology. Vopr. Ikhtiologii 1995, 35, 189–200. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  22. Jones, R. Ecology of the Barracudinas (Aulopiformes: Paralepididae), a Ubiquitous but Understudied Mesopelagic Predatory Fish Family, in the Gulf of Mexico. Ph.D. Dissertation, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  23. Witt, W.C.; Wen, L.; Lauder, G.V. Hydrodynamics of C-Start Escape Responses of Fish as Studied with Simple Physical Models. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2015, 55, 728–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Priede, I.G. Deep-Sea Fishes: Biology, Diversity, Ecology and Fisheries; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2017; p. 196. [Google Scholar]
  25. Douglas, R.H.; Thorpe, A. Short-wave absorbing pigments in the ocular lenses of deep-sea teleosts. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. United Kingd. 1992, 72, 93–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. The Metals Company (TMC). Available online: https://metals.co/nori/ (accessed on 28 February 2023).
Figure 1. Cropped in situ still images of three blackchin species observed by ROVs and AUVs. (A): Neoscopelus macrolepidotus from Dive HPD0703 during cruise NT07-11 taken with the high-definition Super HARP TV camera at 701 m. (B): Neoscopelus macrolepidotus from DIVE07 during cruise EX1605L3 to Supply Reef taken with the HD Insite Titan Tilt and Rotate Color Zoom Camera at 950 m. (C): Neoscopelus microchir from Dive#2 during cruise KM20-10 to Ritto Seamount taken with the 4K UMC-S3CA network camera at 774 m. (D): Scopelengys tristis from Dive OY039 during cruise DG5e taken with the 4K Mini Zeus camera at 712 m.
Figure 1. Cropped in situ still images of three blackchin species observed by ROVs and AUVs. (A): Neoscopelus macrolepidotus from Dive HPD0703 during cruise NT07-11 taken with the high-definition Super HARP TV camera at 701 m. (B): Neoscopelus macrolepidotus from DIVE07 during cruise EX1605L3 to Supply Reef taken with the HD Insite Titan Tilt and Rotate Color Zoom Camera at 950 m. (C): Neoscopelus microchir from Dive#2 during cruise KM20-10 to Ritto Seamount taken with the 4K UMC-S3CA network camera at 774 m. (D): Scopelengys tristis from Dive OY039 during cruise DG5e taken with the 4K Mini Zeus camera at 712 m.
Diversity 15 00837 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bergman, L.A.; Fujiwara, Y.; Assad, V.E.; Perelman, J.N.; Drazen, J.C.; Lindsay, D.J. Face-Down, Tail-Up: Unusual In Situ Behavior of the Blackchins Neoscopelus macrolepidotus, Neoscopelus microchir, and Scopelengys tristis (Myctophiformes: Neoscopelidae). Diversity 2023, 15, 837. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15070837

AMA Style

Bergman LA, Fujiwara Y, Assad VE, Perelman JN, Drazen JC, Lindsay DJ. Face-Down, Tail-Up: Unusual In Situ Behavior of the Blackchins Neoscopelus macrolepidotus, Neoscopelus microchir, and Scopelengys tristis (Myctophiformes: Neoscopelidae). Diversity. 2023; 15(7):837. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15070837

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bergman, Leah A., Yoshihiro Fujiwara, Victoria E. Assad, Jessica N. Perelman, Jeffrey C. Drazen, and Dhugal J. Lindsay. 2023. "Face-Down, Tail-Up: Unusual In Situ Behavior of the Blackchins Neoscopelus macrolepidotus, Neoscopelus microchir, and Scopelengys tristis (Myctophiformes: Neoscopelidae)" Diversity 15, no. 7: 837. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15070837

APA Style

Bergman, L. A., Fujiwara, Y., Assad, V. E., Perelman, J. N., Drazen, J. C., & Lindsay, D. J. (2023). Face-Down, Tail-Up: Unusual In Situ Behavior of the Blackchins Neoscopelus macrolepidotus, Neoscopelus microchir, and Scopelengys tristis (Myctophiformes: Neoscopelidae). Diversity, 15(7), 837. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15070837

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop