Next Article in Journal
Review of the Cyanobacterial Genus Phormidesmis (Leptolyngbyaceae) with the Description of Apatinema gen. nov.
Next Article in Special Issue
Predator-Induced Nocturnal Benthic Emergence: Field and Experimental Evidence for an Unknown Behavioral Escape Mechanism along the Coral Reef–Seagrass Interface
Previous Article in Journal
Can Larix sp. Mill. Provide Suitable Habitats for Insects and Lichens Associated with Stems of Picea abies (L.) H. Karst. in Northern Europe?
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Contribution of Subtidal Seagrass Meadows to the Total Carbon Stocks of Gazi Bay, Kenya
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diversity
Volume 14
Issue 9
10.3390/d14090730
diversity-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seasonal Occurrence and Relative Abundance of Marine Fish Larval Families over Healthy and Degraded Seagrass Beds in Coastal Kenya

by
James M. Mwaluma
1,*,
Gladys M. Okemwa
1,
Alphine M. Mboga
2,
Noah Ngisiange
1,
Monika Winder
3,
Margareth S. Kyewalyanga
4,
Joseph Kilonzo
1 and
Immaculate M. Kinyua
1
1
Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute (KMFRI), Mombasa P.O. Box 81651-80100, Kenya
2
School of Environment and Earth Science, Department of Environmental Science, Pwani University, Kilifi P.O. Box 195-80108, Kenya
3
Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
4
Institute of Marine Sciences (IMS), University of Dar es Salaam, Zanzibar P.O. Box 668, Tanzania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2022, 14(9), 730; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14090730
Submission received: 28 July 2022 / Revised: 29 August 2022 / Accepted: 31 August 2022 / Published: 5 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Seagrass Ecosystems, Associated Biodiversity, and Its Management)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Seagrass beds provide critical nursery habitats and spawning grounds for new generations of fish. The habitats are under threat from human activities and climate change, and with that, an important ocean service is lost that limits fish production. The present study investigates patterns in the larval occurrence and abundance in seagrass meadows at two locations with varying degrees of seagrass fragmentation. Monthly ichthyoplankton sampling was conducted during the northeast monsoon (NEM) and southeast monsoon (SEM) seasons in 2019 and 2020. A total of 42 larval fish families belonging to 37 genera and 21 species were identified. Dominant families were Labridae (29.5%), Blenniidae (28.7%), Gobiidae (26.0%), Engraulidae (23.3%) and Scaridae (22.3%). Canonical Correspondence Analysis and regression analysis revealed water temperature, dissolved oxygen and pH as the most important abiotic variables driving taxonomic composition of larval assemblages, while zooplankton and chlorophyll-a were the most important biotic factors. Fish larvae were more abundant in healthy seagrass habitats as compared to degraded ones. However, despite some loss in functionality, the degraded sites equally played a role in supporting some species, including Gobiidae and Blenniidae. Seasonality influenced larval abundance at the two sites, with a peak in mean abundance coinciding with the NEM season. Interannual variability in fish larval abundance was observed at both sites, indicating that factors controlling larval production varied between the years. This study demonstrates the important role of seagrass meadows in the replenishment of fish stocks and supportive evidence for their management and conservation.

1. Introduction

Seagrass beds provide critical settlement and nursery habitats for fish [1,2,3]. Their ecological health is, therefore, a vital factor in maintaining high survival rates of larval and juvenile fish. However, these essential nursery habitats are under threat due to human activities and climate change [4]. Recruitment of reef fish species specifically depends on shallow coastal habitats including seagrass beds, which provide settlement and nursery habitats [1,2,3]. However, these habitats continue to experience degradation resulting in fragmentation. Overfishing and use of destructive fishing gears such as beach seines are primary threats to the ecological integrity and functioning of seagrass meadows, further contributing to a decline in fishery resources, particularly within the Western Indian Ocean (WIO) region [5,6,7]. Various studies have shown that patchy seagrass meadows have lower species richness and diversity when compared to continuous meadows, thus limiting their nursery function [6,8]. Conservation of these near-shore habitats to enhance fish recruitment has, thus, become an important part of fishery management [9]. However, a key question is how increasing degradation of seagrass beds limits the production and dispersal of fish larvae, a critical bottleneck for sustainable fish stocks [10].
Studies conducted on fish larvae taxonomy, dispersal, distribution, and abundance in coastal and estuarine waters of the WIO region include Kaunda-Arara et al. [11], Mwaluma et al. [12,13,14] and Crochelet et al. [4,15]. In this study, we describe seasonal patterns of fish larval occurrence and abundance in seagrass habitats with varying degrees of fragmentation and relate this to biophysical factors and seasonal cycles. A better understanding of how degradation of seagrass meadows affects fish recruitment, distribution and diversity will provide supportive evidence for their management and conservation.

2. Materials and Methods

This study focused on two sites, Watamu, located at the north coast of Kenya, and Diani, located at the south coast (Figure 1).
Both sites are shallow lagoons characterized by a mixed semi-diurnal tide with two maxima and two minima per day with a tidal range of about 2.0 m at the neap tide and 2.9 m during the spring tide. Sampling at each site was conducted along transects lying 3 km from shore at two stations, one representing a healthy site and the other representing a degraded site. “Healthy sites” comprised relatively continuous seagrass cover composed of 65% and above, while “degraded sites” comprised fragmented seagrass zones with a cover of less than 65% interspersed with sandy bottoms. Watamu stations were coded as Watamu Healthy (WH) and Watamu Degraded (WD), while in Diani, the stations were coded as Diani Healthy (DH) and Diani Degraded (DD). DH was dominated by Thalasodenron ciliatum seagrass cover, while DD was located 2 km apart with a discontinuous seagrass zone of T. hemprichii and T. ciliatum interspersed with sandy bottoms. Watamu stations consisted of mixed meadows comprising of pioneer species, initial stages of recovery from what may have been as a result of previously reported urchin herbivory that had severely affected the region, while Diani stations were dominated by climax communities of T. ciliatum. Seagrass degradation at both study sites was first reported by Zanre [16] and Uku [17], evidenced by an extensive proliferation of the sea urchin Tripneustes gratilla. Recovery at the sites has since been slow due to overfishing of T. gracilis predators in several parts of the coast [18]. Other likely causes of degradation at the sites include use of destructive fishing gears (beach seines), collection of seagrass for use as bait and climate change [19].

2.1. Environmental Variables

Dissolved oxygen, chlorophyll-a, temperature, salinity and pH were measured monthly at each station using a YSI Multiparameter probe. Water samples for chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) were collected at each station. Chl-a samples (surface water) were collected using 1.5 L plastic bottles at each site and then filtered through 0.45 μm millipore membrane filter for laboratory analysis.

2.2. Plankton Sampling

At each station, replicate surface water plankton tows were made by towing horizontally a bongo net of 0.5 m diameter fitted with 500 µm mesh size net fastened with a General Oceanics flowmeter for 20 min. Towing was conducted between 09:00 h and 14:00 h against the incoming tide at a constant speed of between 0.5–1.8 knots. Collected samples were labeled and preserved using 5% formaldehyde buffered in seawater. Sampling was carried out in June, July and August in 2019 and 2020 to represent the SEM seasons, while sampling during the NEM season was conducted in November and December 2019 and 2020 and January 2020 and 2021.
In the laboratory, fish larvae were sorted from the zooplankton samples and separated in vials filled with 90% alcohol. Fish larvae were later removed from the vials, sorted into families and identified to the nearest species using identification keys [20,21,22,23] and counted. The rest of the zooplankton were identified, subsampled and counted.
Counting of zooplankton was performed in graduated petri dishes and the totals were multiplied by the dilution factor (250 mL/20 mL) to derive the total abundance estimate. This estimate was subsequently divided by the total volume of seawater filtered during the net haul (m3) with final zooplankton densities expressed as no·m−3. The keys and identification references used were obtained from [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33] Density for both fish larvae and zooplankton was expressed as no·100 m−3 and no·m−3, respectively.
Fish eggs were then separated from the same sample, counted whole and expressed as numbers per cubic meter (no·m−3). No attempt was made at assigning them to species due to the difficulty in identification and limited guides.

2.3. Data Analysis

Plankton abundance was log (x + 1) transformed to fulfill the normality requirements for parametric statistical analysis. Monthly data were considered replicates in each season. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was then applied to test for differences in fish larval densities, zooplankton, fish eggs and chlorophyll-a, pH, DO, salinity and temperature in different locations (Watamu vs. Diani), seasons (NEM vs. SEM) and sites (Healthy vs. Degraded). Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) was performed using PAST ver. 4.1.1 software to visualize the association between environmental variables and dominant fish larval families. Regression analysis was done to investigate the influence of biotic factors (Chl-a, zooplankton density and fish egg abundance) on overall fish larvae supply. Other biological factors that influence larval supply, such as phytoplankton density, were not considered in this study.

3. Results

3.1. Environmental Variables

Dissolved oxygen exhibited a seasonal pattern with higher values experienced during the SEM compared to NEM season. Higher values were obtained from Watamu compared to Diani (Figure 2A).
Chlorophyll-a exhibited a similar pattern to dissolved oxygen with higher values recorded during the SEM compared to the NEM. Higher values were obtained from Watamu site compared to Diani (Figure 2B) in 2019 during both seasons. Chlorophyll-a was highest in 2019 compared to 2020 and 2021, indicating interannual variability and implying that factors that were affecting productivity could have been different over the years. No significant differences were observed between stations in Diani and Watamu (Table S1).
Mean temperature and salinity varied between seasons, with lower salinities and temperatures recorded during the SEM. The highest temperature was recorded in November in Diani during the NEM 2020, while the lowest was in August the same year (Figure 2C). The highest salinity was observed in Watamu in November 2020, while the lowest was recorded in the same site (Figure 2D).
The mean pH during NEM was 8.08 ± 0.02 and ranged from 7.85–8.28. During SEM, the mean pH was 8.20 ± 0.03 and ranged between 7.99–8.54 (Figure 2E). Mean pH values differed significantly between seasons (p = 0.003), but did not differ significantly between sites (Table S1).

3.2. Zooplankton, Fish Eggs and Larval Fish Abundance

Zooplankton varied seasonally between the healthy and degraded sites (Figure 3A). Overall zooplankton density was highest during the NEM season, with a peak of 301 no·m−3 in the degraded site at Diani while the lowest was 24 no·m−3 during the SEM season also in the degraded site at Diani (Figure 3A). The healthy and degraded sites did not differ significantly despite higher values in Watamu; however, significant differences were recorded between seasons (p = 0.008). Zooplankton abundance in Diani was more variable in general, whereas Watamu was more consistent, but the pattern of degraded vs. healthy was not discernible at either site.

3.3. Fish Larvae

The highest fish larval abundance was 55 no·100 m−3 recorded in 2019 during the NEM season in Watamu, while the lowest was 2.0 no·100 m−3 during the same season in 2020 in Watamu (Figure 3C). Overall, healthy sites had a higher abundance of fish larvae compared to degraded sites; however, the difference was not significant (p = 0.109).

3.3.1. Species Composition and Abundance

A total of 42 families of fish larvae belonging to 37 genera and 21 species were identified. Dominant fish families were Labridae, Engraulidae, Blenniidae, Scaridae and Sphyraenidae. These families were predominant during the NEM in both sites (Table 1).

3.3.2. Distribution of Larval Fish Families

At both study sites, larval fish families were predominantly abundant in seagrass healthy sites comprising of the families Blenniidae, Engraulidae, Labridae, Scaridae, Myctophidae, Nemipteridae, Sphyraenidae and Atherinidae (Figure 4). Degraded sites were dominated by Gobiidae, Syngnathidae, Serranidae, Platycephalidae and Solenostomatidae. Lethrinidae, Lutjanidae and Scorpaenidae larvae were generally scarce at both study sites.

3.4. Influence of Biophysical Variables and Seasonality

Among the environmental variables measured, the CCA biplot of the 12 dominant families revealed sea water temperature as the most important variable driving taxonomic abundance of fish larvae in the study sites (Figure 5). The abundance of Nemipteridae and Blenniidae was negatively associated with decreasing salinity levels (Figure 5).
In Diani, the CCA further revealed seasonality as key driver of fish larval assemblage structure. Engraulidae, Solenostomidae and Atheridinae larvae were strongly associated with increasing temperature but negatively associated with decreasing salinity indicating that they were least abundant when salinity was low. Pomacentridae and Lutjanidae larvae were negatively associated with increasing temperature. In Watamu, increasing levels of dissolved oxygen strongly influenced the abundance of Apogonidae, Scaridae and Gobiidae larvae. Nemipteridae and Blenniidae larvae negatively correlated with increasing salinity levels.
The results of the regression analysis revealed that zooplankton and Chl-a had a strong positive correlation with fish larval abundance (Table 2).

4. Discussion

The ichthyoplankton assemblages reported in this study is comparable to previous findings of other studies along the Kenyan coast [12,13,14]. Over 60% of the assemblage was dominated by Blenniidae, Engraulidae, Gobiidae, Labridae and Scaridae larvae, suggesting that seagrass habitats play a major role in supporting these families. Bleniidae and Gobiidae, which are demersal spawners, were the most abundant, while larvae of the pelagic spawners Lethrinidae, Lutjanidae and Siganidae were particularly scanty. It is important to acknowledge that small, benthic/demersal spawners such as Blenniidae and Gobiidae do not undergo mass migrations to offshore or pelagic spawning grounds, and are, thus, likely to spawn locally (self-recruit), and hence, be well represented in plankton samples [12]. Notably, pelagic spawners are likely to migrate to deeper offshore coastal waters to spawn, and hence, likely to be poorly represented in plankton samples in and around shallow-water seagrass beds [34,35]. Thus, the composition of fish larval families reported in this study is strongly influenced by the spawning strategies of the species and the sampling method used.
The high numbers of larval fish In Watamu compared to Diani was likely due to the higher zooplankton density in Watamu and a diverse network of pioneer seagrass communities, which created suitable habitats for the larvae [18,36]. Additionally, Watamu is located adjacent to a Marine Park and could be experiencing larval seeding from the park [13]. However, the two study sites are not comparable on at least two scores: firstly, the geographic separation and, secondly, the different types of seagrass species [37]. The higher abundance of fish larvae during the NEM season in both sites suggests a typical phenomenon for the Kenyan coast area as observed by Mwaluma et al. 2011 [13]. The general peak in fish larval abundance is likely correlated with a peak in spawning during the NEM. The higher temperature and stable water conditions that prevail during the NEM season trigger optimum conditions, which increase phytoplankton and zooplankton productivity along the Kenya coast [34,35,36]. However, it is important to note that seasonal patterns of larval abundance will be species-specific, with some species peaking during the SEM season [13,38].
This study reported interannual variability in fish larval abundance at both study sites, indicating that factors controlling larval production vary between years and are influenced by seasonal dynamics, evidenced by changes in species composition [11], with distinct taxa and groups showing intra-annual peaks, a common feature in the tropics. Early studies conducted along the coast of Kenya found interannual variability in the species composition and abundance of fish larvae to be associated with lunar and seasonal changes in environmental processes [11,12,13,14]. More recent studies have further attributed variations in fish larval abundance to variations in fish spawning patterns, variations in larval supply and retention, zooplankton abundance and seasonality [4,39,40].
The survival and recruitment success of fish larvae largely depends on a coincidence of favorable abiotic and biotic factors [40]. Temperature was the primary abiotic driver of fish larval abundance in this study, while zooplankton and Chl-a were the important biotic factors, indicating the timing of fish reproduction to suitable biophysical conditions [11,13,39]. The lower pH values during SEM could be due to the influence of surface run-off of rainwater into the sea. Although pH was not a primary influential factor, studies have shown that lower pH values may affect fish larvae growth rates [41], and hence, should not be ignored.
The significantly higher abundance of fish eggs encountered in Watamu degraded site during the NEM was most likely due to an abundance of Blenniidae and Gobiidae observed in the larval samples. These species are known to be self-recruiting demersal spawners with a preference for sandy open areas [13]. Eggs of the demersal spawning Syngnathidae, Platycephalidae and Serranidae were also associated with open sandy areas, while eggs of the demersal spawning Blenniidae, Labridae and Scaridae eggs were highly abundant in seagrass sites. Most interesting was that eggs of Engraulidae, which are pelagic coastal water spawners, were also well represented in seagrass bed samples. Being planktivorus carnivores, Engraulidae are highly likely to be attracted to chemical cues from planktonic phases of crustaceans, gastropods and bivalves within the seagrass beds. Other factors reported to influence fish larval habitat associations and distribution of fish eggs to seagrass sites include adult spawning behavior [42,43], larval settlement behavior [44], physical and oceanographic processes (tides, currents) [45] and lunar cycles [13]. It has also been postulated that dense seagrass cover and plant detritus are correlated with zooplankton and phytoplankton abundance which constitute a major food source for ichthyoplankton and mesopredators, including fish [13,46].

5. Conclusions

This study investigated seasonal abundance patterns of fish larvae in seagrass meadows at two sites of varying fragmentation levels along the Kenya coast. Results showed differences in species abundance of fish larvae between healthy and degraded sites and between seasons. Overall, healthy and degraded sites did not differ significantly in the biotic factors; however, seasonal differences were observed, with the most important abiotic factors being temperature and salinity.
A limitation of this study is that plankton tows mainly capture pre-settlement larvae (planktonic), which may influence the results by underestimating other development stages of larvae, particularly those with strong swimming abilities which tend to avoid nets. Light traps would be useful for collection post-settlement larvae, although with biases towards phototactic larvae. Future studies can, therefore, be designed to utilize both methods in order to get a broader representation of taxa and families that settle within each habitat. Additionally, the assessments should focus on validating distribution and seasonal patterns along a perpendicular sampling regime from the lagoon to offshore waters, and also consider the influence of other environmental factors such as lunar cycles.
The study builds on the substantive evidence supporting the important nursery function of seagrass beds reported by Lefcheck et al. [47]. The findings have several implications in conservation and management. Firstly, the study has provided an account of key commercial fish families, utilizing coastal habitats as nursery habitats and the abiotic factors affecting their distribution. Secondly, it has further shown that despite some loss in functionality, degraded sites equally play a role in supporting replenishment of fish in nearshore coastal areas. This may be an important consideration in locating the boundaries of marine parks and conservation areas.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d14090730/s1, Table S1: Results of the Analysis of Variance testing for differences in fish larval densities, zooplankton, fish eggs and chlorophyll-a, pH, DO, salinity and temperature in different locations (Watamu vs. Diani), seasons (NEM vs. SEM) and sites (Healthy vs. Degraded). Bold p-values indicate a significant result of p < 0.05.

Author Contributions

J.M.M. is the lead author and responsible for coordination of all contributions; G.M.O. contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data and manuscript review; A.M.M. contributed to the literature review, sample collection and laboratory identifications of fish larvae; N.N. contributed to the generation of the maps and data analysis; M.W. contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data with contributions from M.S.K. and G.M.O.; M.W. and M.S.K. further contributed to proof reading and improvement of the manuscript. J.K. and I.M.K. were involved in sample collection and laboratory analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association (WIOMSA) grant no: MASMA/OP/2018/01.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the technical team from KMFRI for their assistance and dedication to sample collection and laboratory analysis. Funding was provided by the Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association (WIOMSA) grant no: MASMA/OP/2018/01.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. MacUra, B.; Lönnstedt, O.M.; Byström, P.; Airoldi, L.; Eriksson, B.K.; Rudstam, L.; Støttrup, J. What is the impact on fish recruitment of anthropogenic physical and structural habitat change in shallow nearshore areas in temperate systems? A systematic review protocol. Environ. Evid. 2016, 5, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Okemwa, G.M.; Kaunda-Arara, B.; Kimani, E.N. Patterns of juvenile reef-fish recruitment in Kenya’s shallow fringing- lagoon reefs. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 2019, 41, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Madi Moussa, R.; Bertucci, F.; Jorissen, H.; Gache, C.; Waqalevu, V.P.; Parravicini, V.; Lecchini, D.; Galzin, R. Importance of intertidal seagrass beds as nursery area for coral reef fish juveniles (Mayotte, Indian Ocean): Nursery areas in a tropical island. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2020, 33, 100965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tarimo, B.; Winder, M.; Mtolera, M.S.; Muhando, C.A.; Gullström, M. Seasonal distribution of fish larvae in mangrove-seagrass seascapes of Zanzibar (Tanzania). Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gullström, M.; de la Torre Castro, M.; Bandeira, S.O.; Björk, M.; Dahlberg, M.; Kautsky, N.; Rönnbäck, P.; Öhman, M.C. Seagrass ecosystems in the western Indian Ocean. AMBIO A J. Hum. Environ. 2002, 31, 588–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. McCloskey, R.M.; Unsworth, R.K.F. Decreasing seagrass density negatively influences associated fauna. PeerJ 2015, 2015, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Unsworth, R.K.; McKenzie, L.J.; Collier, C.J.; Cullen-Unsworth, L.C.; Duarte, C.M.; Eklöf, J.S.; Jarvis, J.C.; Jones, B.L.; Nordlund, L.M. Global challenges for seagrass conservation. Ambio 2019, 48, 801–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yoshikawa, K.; Tomiyama, T.; Shoji, J. Temporal changes of the fish community in a seagrass bed after disappearance of vegetation caused by disturbance of the sea bottom and sediment deposition. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 2019, 99, 1857–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Carter, A.B.; McKenna, S.A.; Rasheed, M.A.; Collier, C.; McKenzie, L.; Pitcher, R.; Coles, R. Synthesizing 35 years of seagrass spatial data from the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area, Queensland, Australia. Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. 2021, 6, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Beaugrand, G.; Brander, K.M.; Alistair Lindley, J.; Souissi, S.; Reid, P.C. Plankton effect on cod recruitment in the North Sea. Nature 2003, 426, 661–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kaunda-Arara, B.; Mwaluma, J.M.; Locham, G.A.; Øresland, V.; Osore, M.K. Temporal variability in fish larval supply to Malindi Marine Park, coastal Kenya. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2009, 19, S10–S18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mwaluma, M.J. Community Structure and Spatio-Temporal Variability of Ichthyoplankton in Kenyan Coastal Waters; University of Nairobi: Nairobi, Kenya, 2010; pp. 1–137. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mwaluma, J.M.; Kaunda-Arara, B.; Rasowo, J.; Osore, M.K.; Øresland, V. Seasonality in fish larval assemblage structure within marine reef National Parks in coastal Kenya. Environ. Biol. Fishes 2011, 90, 393–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mwaluma, J.M.; Kaunda-Arara, B.; Rasowo, J. Diel and lunar variations in larval supply to Malindi Marine Park, Kenya. West. Indian Ocean J. Mar. Sci. 2014, 13, 57–67. [Google Scholar]
  15. Crochelet, E.; Roberts, J.; Lagabrielle, E.; Obura, D.; Petit, M.; Chabanet, P. A model-based assessment of reef larvae dispersal in the Western Indian Ocean reveals regional connectivity patterns—Potential implications for conservation policies. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2016, 7, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zanre, R.; Kithi, E. Preliminary Sea Urchin Study and Kill Report; Local Ocean Trust Watamu Turtle Watch: Watamu, Kenya, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  17. Uku, J.; Ndirangu, S.; Muthama, C.; Kimathi, A. An Evaluation of the Effect of Sea Urchin Herbivory in the Diani-Chale Lagoon (No. 1); Preliminary Report; KMFRI: Mombasa, Kenya, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  18. Daudi, L.N. The Role of Food Availability and Presence of Predators on Population Trends of the Sea Urchin Tripneustes gratilla (L.) in Seagrass Beds of Watamu Marine National Park and Reserve, Kenya; WIOMSA/MARG;-I/2010-06; Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association: Zanzibar, Tanzania, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  19. UNEP-Nairobi Convention/WIOMSA. Guidelines for Seagrass Ecosystem Restoration in the Western Indian Ocean Region; UNEP: Nairobi, Kenya, 2020; p. 63. Available online: www.nairobiconvention.org/ (accessed on 22 August 2022).
  20. Mwaluma, J.; Kaunda-Arara, B.; Strydom, N. A Guide to Commonly Occurring Larval Stages of Fishes in Kenyan Coastal Waters; Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association: Zanzibar, Tanzania, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  21. Leis, J.M.; Rennis, D.S. The Larvae of Indo-Pacific Coral Reef Fishes; New South Wales University Press: Sydney, Australia, 1983; 269p. [Google Scholar]
  22. Leis, J.M.; Trnski, T. The Larvae of Indo-Pacific Shore Fishes; University of Hawaii Press: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1989; 371p. [Google Scholar]
  23. Leis, J.M.; Carson-Ewart, B.M. (Eds.) The Larvae of Indo-Pacific Coastal Fishes: An Identification Guide to Marine Fish Larvae; Brill: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  24. Giesbrecht, W. Systematik and faunistik der pelagischen copepoden des Golfes Von Naepal und der angrenzenden meeresabschinitte. Fauna Flora Golf. Naepal 1892, 19, 1–830. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sars, G.O. An Account of Crustacea of Norway. Copepoda Calanoida; Bergen Museum: Bergen, Norway, 1901; Volume 4, pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  26. Scott, A. The Copepoda of the Siboga Expedition. Siboga Expedite Monogr. 1909, 29A, 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sewell, R.B.S. Notes on the surface-living Copepoda of the Bay of Bengal. Rec. Ind. Mus. 1929, 8, 313–382. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sewell, R.B.S. The copepod fauna of the Indian seas. Calanoida. Mem. Ind. Mus. 1932, 10, 223–407. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sewell, R.B.S. The free-swimming planktonic Copepoda. Systematic account. Sci. Rep. John Murray Exped. 1947, 8, 1–303. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sewell, R.B.S. The free-swimming planktonic Copepoda. Systematic account. Sci. Rep. John Murray Exped. 1948, 3, 317–592. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wickstead, J.H. An Introduction to the Study of Tropical Plankton; Hutchinson, Co.: London, UK, 1965; p. 160. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wickstead, J.H. Marine Zooplankton; The Camelot Press Ltd.: Southampton, UK, 1976; p. 59. [Google Scholar]
  33. Owre, H.B.; Foyo, M. Copepods of the Florida current Fauna. Caribbea 1967, 1, 1–37. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mwaluma, J.M. Distribution and Abundance of Zooplankton off the Kenya Coast during the Monsoons. Master’s Thesis, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya, 1997; p. 90. [Google Scholar]
  35. Osore, M.K.W.; Mwaluma, J.M.; Fiers, F.; Daro, M.H. Zooplankton composition and abundance in Mida Creek, Kenya. Zool. Stud. 2004, 43, 415–424. [Google Scholar]
  36. Aboud, S.A.; Kannah, J.F. Abundance, Distribution and Diversity of Seagrass Species in Lagoonal Reefs on the Kenyan Coast. Am. Acad. Sci. Res. J. Eng. Technol. Sci. 2017, 37, 52–67. Available online: https://www.asrjetsjournal.org/index.php/American_Scientific_Journal/article/view/3484 (accessed on 18 August 2022).
  37. Cowburn, B.; Musembi, P.M.; Sindorf, V.; Kohlmeier, D.; Raker, C.; Nussbaumer, A.; Hereward, H.F.R.; Van Baelenberghe, B.; Goebbels, D.; Kamire, J.; et al. The Habitats and Biodiversity of Watamu Marine National Park: Evaluating Our Knowledge of One of East Africa’s Oldest Marine Protected Areas; Atoll Research Bulletin; Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2018; p. 618. [Google Scholar]
  38. Nzioka, R.M. Observations on the spawning seasons of East African reef fishes. J. Fish Biol. 1979, 14, 329–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sanvicente-Anorve, L.; Soto, L.A.; Espinosa-Fuentes, M.A.; Flores-Coto, C. Relationship patterns between ichthyoplankton and zooplankton: A conceptual model. Hydrobiologia 2006, 559, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mwaluma, J.; Ngisiang’e, N.; Osore, M.; Kamau, J.; Ong’anda, H.; Kilonzi, J.; Roberts, M.; Popova, E.; Painter, S.C. Assemblage structure and distribution of fish larvae on the North Kenya Banks during the Southeast Monsoon season. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2021, 212, 105800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Munday, P.L.; Donelson, J.M.; Dixson, D.L.; Endo, G.G. Effects of ocean acidification on the early life history of a tropical marine fish. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 276, 3275–3283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Igulu, M.M.; Nagelkerken, I.; van der Beek, M.; Schippers, M.; van Eck, R.; Mgaya, Y.D. Orientation from open water to settlement habitats by coral reef fish: Behavioral flexibility in the use of multiple reliable cues. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2013, 493, 243–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nonaka, M.; Fushimi, H.; Yamakawa, T. The spiny lobster fishery in Japan and restocking. In Spiny Lobsters Fisheries and Culture; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2000; pp. 221–242. [Google Scholar]
  44. Tzeng, W.N.; Wang, Y.T. Hydrography and distribution dynamics of larval and juvenile fishes in the coastal waters of the Tanshui River estuary, Taiwan, with reference to estuarine larval transport. Mar. Biol. 1993, 116, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Harris, S.A.; Cyrus, D.P.; Beckley, L.E. The larval fish assemblage in nearshore coastal waters off the St Lucia Estuary, South Africa. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 1999, 49, 789–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gross, C.; Donoghue, C.; Pruitt, C.; Trimble, A.C.; Ruesink, J.L. Taxonomic and functional assessment of meso-predator diversity across an estuarine habitat mosaic. Ecosphere 2017, 8, e01792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lefcheck, J.S.; Hughes, B.B.; Johnson, A.J.; Pfirrmann, B.W.; Rasher, D.B.; Smyth, A.R.; Williams, B.L.; Beck, M.W.; Orth, R.J. Are coastal habitats important nurseries? A meta-analysis. Conserv. Lett. 2019, 12, e12645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diversity 14 00730 g001 550
Figure 1. Map showing the location of the study sites and stations in Watamu and Diani in coastal Kenya.
Figure 1. Map showing the location of the study sites and stations in Watamu and Diani in coastal Kenya.
Diversity 14 00730 g001
Diversity 14 00730 g002 550
Figure 2. (A–E) Variation in dissolved oxygen (A), chlorophyll-a (B), temperature (C), salinity (D) and pH (E) in Watamu and Diani, Kenya (±SE) during June to December 2019, January to December 2020 and January 2021.
Figure 2. (A–E) Variation in dissolved oxygen (A), chlorophyll-a (B), temperature (C), salinity (D) and pH (E) in Watamu and Diani, Kenya (±SE) during June to December 2019, January to December 2020 and January 2021.
Diversity 14 00730 g002
Diversity 14 00730 g003 550
Figure 3. Seasonal variation in (A) zooplankton, (B) fish eggs and (C) fish larvae abundance in Watamu and Diani, Kenya in the years 2019–2020 (±SE). Fish eggs followed a similar pattern with zooplankton density. The highest fish egg densities recorded was 40 no·m−3 during the NEM season Watamu, while the lowest was 0.3 no·m−3 at the same site (Figure 3B). Fish egg abundance in Watamu was higher than Diani but not statistically significant (p = 0.06).
Figure 3. Seasonal variation in (A) zooplankton, (B) fish eggs and (C) fish larvae abundance in Watamu and Diani, Kenya in the years 2019–2020 (±SE). Fish eggs followed a similar pattern with zooplankton density. The highest fish egg densities recorded was 40 no·m−3 during the NEM season Watamu, while the lowest was 0.3 no·m−3 at the same site (Figure 3B). Fish egg abundance in Watamu was higher than Diani but not statistically significant (p = 0.06).
Diversity 14 00730 g003
Diversity 14 00730 g004 550
Figure 4. Composition and abundance of larval fish families in degraded and healthy seagrass habitats.
Figure 4. Composition and abundance of larval fish families in degraded and healthy seagrass habitats.
Diversity 14 00730 g004
Diversity 14 00730 g005 550
Figure 5. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) biplot depicting association of environmental variables (dissolved oxygen, salinity and temperature) among species at the study sites (Diani vs. Watamu), as well as status (Healthy vs. Degraded) with environmental variables presented as vectors (DD = Diani degraded, DH = Diani healthy, WD = Watamu degraded, WH = Watamu healthy).
Figure 5. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) biplot depicting association of environmental variables (dissolved oxygen, salinity and temperature) among species at the study sites (Diani vs. Watamu), as well as status (Healthy vs. Degraded) with environmental variables presented as vectors (DD = Diani degraded, DH = Diani healthy, WD = Watamu degraded, WH = Watamu healthy).
Diversity 14 00730 g005
Table
Table 1. Total larval abundance (no·100−3) during the northeast and southeast monsoon season and overall percentage contribution in Diani and Watamu.
Table 1. Total larval abundance (no·100−3) during the northeast and southeast monsoon season and overall percentage contribution in Diani and Watamu.
SitesDianiWatamu
FamilyNEMSEMOverall (%)NEMSEMOverall (%)
Acanthuridae1.00.00.12.00.00.3
Atherinidae0.00.00.02.60.00.4
Apogonidae19.22.53.116.25.83.3
Atherinidae15.43.42.79.20.01.4
Belonidae0.00.60.10.00.00.0
Blenniidae124.84.218.555.412.110.2
Bothidae16.20.02.30.00.00.0
Callionymidae0.00.00.01.90.00.3
Carangidae1.93.40.80.00.00.0
Diodontidae8.10.01.20.90.00.1
Eleotrididae1.00.00.10.00.00.0
Engraulidae136.34.620.218.41.43.0
Exocoetidae0.00.00.08.10.01.2
Gerreidae0.01.30.21.51.10.4
Gobiidae28.48.35.3117.519.220.7
Haemulidae0.01.10.20.00.00.0
Hemiramphidae8.12.71.50.00.00.0
Istiophoridae0.00.00.016.20.02.4
Labridae141.60.520.451.29.29.1
Leiognathidae1.10.00.21.10.00.2
Lethrinidae0.70.50.21.10.00.2
Lutjanidae4.41.90.92.80.00.4
Monodactylidae0.00.00.08.15.02.0
Mullidae2.50.00.40.00.00.0
Myctophidae0.00.00.064.80.09.8
Nemipteridae9.10.01.350.73.18.1
Nomeidae0.00.00.08.10.51.3
Ostraciidae 1.60.00.20.07.81.2
Platycephalidae1.83.90.88.14.21.9
Pleuronectidae0.00.50.10.00.00.0
Pomacentridae4.82.21.03.00.00.5
Scaridae77.03.611.649.421.110.6
Scombridae0.00.50.10.00.00.0
Scorpaenidae0.00.50.11.17.51.3
Serranidae0.00.90.116.21.02.6
Sillaginidae0.00.50.10.00.00.0
Solenostomidae7.40.81.22.98.01.6
Sphyraenidae16.20.02.30.90.00.1
Syngnathidae9.15.82.134.70.95.4
Terapontidae1.30.00.20.00.00.0
Tetraodontidae0.72.60.50.00.00.0
Trichonotidae0.70.00.10.00.00.0
Grand Total640.456.8 554.1107.9
Table
Table 2. Regression summary of the correlation between fish larvae density and biotic factors (Phy = Phytoplankton, Zoop = Zooplankton, abn = abundance, S.E. = Standard Error).
Table 2. Regression summary of the correlation between fish larvae density and biotic factors (Phy = Phytoplankton, Zoop = Zooplankton, abn = abundance, S.E. = Standard Error).
n = 56BetaS.E.BS.E.T (51)p-Level
Intercept 0.25250.5010.50310.617
Chl-a0.5710.09981.5290.2675.718* 0.000
Phy abn−0.1310.0999−0.2100.159−1.3140.194
Zoop abn0.6010.12420.6870.1414.844* 0.000
Fish eggs−0.0770.0122−0.0630.101−0.6320.529
* Significant at p = 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mwaluma, J.M.; Okemwa, G.M.; Mboga, A.M.; Ngisiange, N.; Winder, M.; Kyewalyanga, M.S.; Kilonzo, J.; Kinyua, I.M. Seasonal Occurrence and Relative Abundance of Marine Fish Larval Families over Healthy and Degraded Seagrass Beds in Coastal Kenya. Diversity 2022, 14, 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14090730

AMA Style

Mwaluma JM, Okemwa GM, Mboga AM, Ngisiange N, Winder M, Kyewalyanga MS, Kilonzo J, Kinyua IM. Seasonal Occurrence and Relative Abundance of Marine Fish Larval Families over Healthy and Degraded Seagrass Beds in Coastal Kenya. Diversity. 2022; 14(9):730. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14090730

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mwaluma, James M., Gladys M. Okemwa, Alphine M. Mboga, Noah Ngisiange, Monika Winder, Margareth S. Kyewalyanga, Joseph Kilonzo, and Immaculate M. Kinyua. 2022. "Seasonal Occurrence and Relative Abundance of Marine Fish Larval Families over Healthy and Degraded Seagrass Beds in Coastal Kenya" Diversity 14, no. 9: 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14090730

APA Style

Mwaluma, J. M., Okemwa, G. M., Mboga, A. M., Ngisiange, N., Winder, M., Kyewalyanga, M. S., Kilonzo, J., & Kinyua, I. M. (2022). Seasonal Occurrence and Relative Abundance of Marine Fish Larval Families over Healthy and Degraded Seagrass Beds in Coastal Kenya. Diversity, 14(9), 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14090730

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop