Next Article in Journal
Observations on the Surface Structure of Aurelia solida (Scyphozoa) Polyps and Medusae
Next Article in Special Issue
The Joint Contributions of Environmental Filtering and Spatial Processes to Macroinvertebrate Metacommunity Dynamics in the Alpine Stream Environment of Baima Snow Mountain, Southwest China
Previous Article in Journal
Record of Caromiobenella (Copepoda, Monstrilloida) in Brazil and Discovery of the Male of C. brasiliensis: Morphological and Molecular Evidence
Previous Article in Special Issue
Liver Lipid Accumulation in European Bullhead (Cottus cobio) from a High-Mountain Lake: An Adaptive Strategy to Survive the Adverse Winter Season
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diversity
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/d13060243
diversity-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Responses of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities of Two Tropical, High-Mountain Lakes to Climate Change and Deacidification

by
Javier Alcocer
1,*,
Luis A. Oseguera
1,
Diana Ibarra-Morales
2,
Elva Escobar
3 and
Lucero García-Cid
4
1
Grupo de Investigación en Limnología Tropical, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. de los Barrios No. 1, Los Reyes Iztacala, 54090 Tlalnepantla, Mexico
2
Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Ciudad Universitaria 3000, Alcaldía Coyoacán, C.P., 04510 Ciudad de México, Mexico
3
Laboratorio de Biodiversidad y Macroecología, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Ciudad Universitaria 3000, Alcaldía Coyoacán, C.P., 04510 Ciudad de México, Mexico
4
Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Ciudad Universitaria 3000, Alcaldía Coyoacán, C.P., 04510 Ciudad de México, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2021, 13(6), 243; https://doi.org/10.3390/d13060243
Submission received: 29 April 2021 / Revised: 24 May 2021 / Accepted: 28 May 2021 / Published: 31 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue High-Mountain Lakes, Indicators of Global Change: Ecological Characterization and Environmental Pressures)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
High-mountain lakes are among the most comparable ecosystems globally and recognized sentinels of global change. The present study pursued to identify how the benthic macroinvertebrates (BMI) communities of two tropical, high mountain lakes, El Sol and La Luna, Central Mexico, have been affected by global/regional environmental pressures. We compared the environmental characteristics and the BMI communities between 2000–2001 and 2017–2018. We identified three principal environmental changes (the air and water temperature increased, the lakes’ water level declined, and the pH augmented and became more variable), and four principal ecological changes in the BMI communities [a species richness reduction (7 to 4), a composition change, and a dominant species replacement all of them in Lake El Sol, a species richness increase (2 to 4) in Lake La Luna, and a drastic reduction in density (38% and 90%) and biomass (92%) in both lakes]. The air and water temperature increased 0.5 °C, and lakes water level declined 1.5 m, all suggesting an outcome of climate change. Contrarily to the expected acidification associated with acid precipitation, both lakes deacidified, and the annual pH fluctuation augmented. The causes of the deacidification and the deleterious impacts on the BMI communities remained to be identified.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Lake ecosystems are vulnerable to environmental change. This vulnerability makes them in good sentinels of environmental change [1]. The role of lakes as sentinels of climate change has been extensively recognized. Lakes provide early indications of climate change effects on ecosystem structure and functioning [2] and play as regulators of climate change [3].
Lakes comprise a geographically distributed network that makes them essential sentinels [4]; among them, high-mountain lakes are the most comparable ecosystems in the world [5]. Their naturally acidic waters with low alkaline reserve and mineralization make them especially sensitive to global change [6,7,8].
Climate change and airborne pollutants are critical environmental pressures on high-mountain lakes leading, among other alterations, to the loss of diversity and changes in communities [9]. However, most studies on high-mountain lakes have been accomplished in temperate latitudes, while less information has come from tropical latitudes [10]. There are important differences between temperate and tropical lakes, mainly related to solar radiation [11]. As a consequence of higher and more constant irradiances, tropical high mountain lakes show higher minimum water temperatures, absence of winter ice cover, and predominance of warm polymixis thermal type, among other features [12].
Tropical lakes are more sensitive than temperate lakes to environmental alterations. For example, nutrient load increases led to prompter eutrophication, degrading water quality, and loss of deep-water dissolved oxygen concentration, all of these changes affecting the aquatic biota. The differences between temperate and tropical lakes limnology imply implementing different sound protection and management strategies [13].
Available information from tropical, high-mountain lakes is from the Andes [14], the Himalayas [12], Africa [15,16,17], and Central and South America [18,19,20]. Unfortunately, among them, the benthic macroinvertebrate (BMI) communities of tropical high-mountain lakes remained poorly known [5]; studies on BMI are scarcely available [21,22]. In this study, our primary goal was to understand how the environmental characteristics and the BMI communities of two tropical, high mountain lakes have been affected by global/regional environmental pressures. For this purpose, we addressed the following research questions: (1) How have the environmental water characteristics—particularly pH and water temperature—changed during the past 18 years? (2) How have the BMI community’s composition and structure changed during the past 18 years?
Our central hypothesis was that regional anthropogenic activities (e.g., urban and industrial development) had affected the environmental and biological communities in the lakes. Specifically, we expected these anthropogenic activities to cause 1) warmer temperatures through global warming, (2) lake acidification associated with acid precipitation, and (3) BMI composition and structure modifications (e.g., species richness reduction).
To answer the research questions and test the proposed hypothesis, our approach was to evaluate the temporal changes in the (a) air temperature and rainfall using meteorological data derived from monthly monitoring within the past 18 years (2000 to 2018), (b) water quality of the lakes using data derived from monthly monitoring of the water column within the past 18 years (2000–2001 and 2017–2018), and (c) benthic macroinvertebrates’ community composition and structure of the lakes using data derived from monthly monitoring of the benthic macroinvertebrate community within the past 18 years (2000–2001 and 2017–2018).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Lakes El Sol and La Luna are inside the crater of the Nevado de Toluca volcano (19°10′ N, 99°45′ W), Estado de México, Mexico, at 4240 m a.s.l. [23]. The lakes are separated by a dacitic dome known to cover the volcano’s chimney (Figure 1). Nevado de Toluca is a Pleistocene age andesitic–dacitic stratovolcano [24,25]. The National Meteorological Service Weather Station SMN-15062 reports mean annual (1951–2010) temperature of 3.9 °C (−0.6 to 8.4 °C), annual rainfall of 1277.1 mm, and annual evaporation of 970.8 mm, corresponding to a cold, alpine climate. Being above the timberline, the vegetation in the crater is sparse and consists of mosses, lichens, and alpine grasses.
Both lakes are endorheic with no affluents or effluents. Water inputs are rainfall and runoff, while the major water loss is through evaporation. The maximum depth recorded of Lake El Sol is 15 m (average depth 6 m), with a surface area of 237,321 m2 (length 795 m, width 482 m), while the maximum depth of Lake La Luna is 10 m (depth mean of 5 m), with a surface area of 31,083 m2 (length 227 m, width 209 m) [23]. Lake El Sol is discontinuous warm polymictic, while Lake La Luna is continuous warm polymictic [26].

2.2. Field Sampling

The environmental temperature and rainfall records between 2000 and 2018 were obtained from the Automatic Meteorological Station Nevado de Toluca (SMN-15062) at the Nevado de Toluca volcano (19°07′ N, 99°46′ W, 4139 m a.s.l.). We conducted two sampling campaigns for the monthly collection of water and surface sediment samples: March 2000 to March 2001 (12 sampling visits), and October 2017 to September 2018 (12 sampling visits). We first sampled Lake El Sol (12:00–14:00 h local time) and later sampled Lake La Luna (14:00–16:00 h).
Sampling took place in the central and deep part (>mean depth) of both lakes, which comprise around 50% of the bottom area in Lake El Sol and 60% in Lake La Luna. We measured water depth (echosounder) and water transparency (Secchi disk). In situ profiles (discrete readings every meter) of temperature, dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, and electrical conductivity (K25) were obtained with a calibrated multiparameter water-quality data logger (Hydrolab DS4 & DS5).
Samples for sediment analysis and benthic macroinvertebrates were collected with an Ekman-type grab sampler (0.0225 m2 area, 15 × 15 × 15 cm). We avoided sampling at the same site at each visit. A total of 4 replicates at each lake were collected per visit, one for sediment analysis and three for macroinvertebrates.
Three superficial subsamples were obtained from the first grab with a hand corer (0.05 cm2) for sediment texture and the other three for organic matter. Sediment texture was determined in a Beckman Coulter LS230 laser diffraction analyzer. Particle size was characterized following the classification scale of Wentworth [27]. The organic matter percentage (OM) of the sediment was calculated based on the loss on ignition (LOI) technique [28].
The other three replicate samples (top 10 cm only) were sieved in situ through a 0.5 mm mesh pore size to retain the benthic macroinvertebrates [29]. The samples were preserved in 96% alcohol [30]. The organisms were first identified according to general keys [31,32,33,34], followed by specific keys for oligochaetes [35,36,37], and chironomids [38,39,40]. The specimens of each species were quantified to determine their density (ind m–2). The specimens were further weighted (alcohol-fixed wet weight, FWW) [30], and their biomass calculated applying the conversion factors (mg FWW to mg C) considering that 10% of the FWW is the ash-free dry weight (AFDW) and that 3.5% of the AFDW is organic carbon [41,42].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The linear regressions of air temperature and rainfall versus time and the Mann-Whitney U tests comparing air temperature and rainfall between 2000–2001 and 2017–2018 periods were carried out with Sigma Plot. To compare the abundance and biomass of the BMI communities between lakes in 2000–2001, a paired samples Student’s t-test was used, and the data was ln-transformed [ln(x + 1)] to reduce skewed distributions. We first verified that normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) and homogeneity (Levene test) of variance assumptions were met for all Student’s t-test. A Mann-Whitney U test (which corresponds to a non-parametric analysis of the Student’s t-test) was performed to compare the lakes in 2017–2018 and between periods.

3. Results

3.1. The Environment

There was an increasing trend in air temperature with a total change of 0.5 °C (0.03 °C y−1) in 18 years (r = 0.12). Differently, rainfall did not show a regular trend (r = 0.03) nor significant difference (Mann-Whitney U Statistic, T = 528, n small= 22, n big = 24, p = 0.817) along the same period (Figure 2). The average air temperature was significantly higher in 2017–2018 than 2000–2001 (Mann-Whitney U Statistic, T = 418, n small= 22, n big= 24, p = 0.030), differently from rainfall which remained similar.
Table 1 reports the main environmental characteristics measured in Lakes El Sol and La Luna in 2000–2001 and 2017–2018. Water depth diminished in both lakes (approximately 1.5 m). Moreover, the water temperature also increased in both lakes (0.5 °C), while K25 increased and DO concentration diminished in Lake El Sol. All these changes suggest higher evaporation rates associated with higher environmental and water temperatures. However, and contradicting, K25 in Lake La Luna remained similar while DO concentration increased.
Contrarily to the expected acidification process associated with anthropogenic activities and airborne pollution, pH increased in both lakes, particularly in El Sol which changed 0.85 pH units between 2000–2001 to 2017–2018. La Luna’s pH increased was minor with 0.11 pH units. Additionally, the annual pH range (min-max) increased between both periods in both lakes. Lake El Sol’s pH annual range rose from 1.21 to 4.56 pH units, while Lake La Luna changed from 0.91 to 2.61 pH units between 2000–2001 to 2017–2018. In 18 years, pH augmented and became more variable on an annual basis (Figure 3).
The lowest pH values in Lake El Sol changed from 4.92 in 2000–2001 to 5.07 in 2017–2018, while in Lake La Luna from 4.51 in 2000–2001 to 4.01 in 2017–2018. The highest pH values in Lake El Sol changed from 6.13 in 2000–2001 to 9.63 in 2017–2018, while in Lake La Luna from 5.42 in 2000–2001 to 6.62 in 2017–2018 (Table 1). It must be noticed that while Lake La Luna’s pH ranges from acid to close to neutrality, Lake El Sol’s pH rose from acidic to strongly alkaline pH.
Sediment texture and organic matter in Lakes El Sol and La Luna were similar. Also, sediment texture and organic matter content remained similar in 2000–2001 and 2017–2018 (Table 1).

3.2. The Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community

The taxonomic list reported for both lakes of the Nevado de Toluca (2000–2001 and 2017–2018) sum a total of 8 species: 7 for 2000–2001 and 6 for 2017–2018 (Table 2). Four species belong to the phylum Annelida, two species to Mollusca, one to Arthropoda, and one to Cnidaria.
Table 3 reports the main ecological characteristics evaluated in Lakes El Sol and La Luna in 2000–2001 and 2017–2018. From 2000–2001 to 2017–2018, there was a species richness reduction in Lake El Sol from 7 to 4 species, while Lake La Luna increased from 2 to 4 species. In Lake El Sol, N. pardalis, L. hoffmeisteri and H. vulgaris remained, T. tubifex, L. variegatus, P. branickii and P. casertanum disappeared, while Physa sp. appeared. In Lake La Luna, L. hoffmeisteri and P. branickii remained, while N. pardalis and Lumbriculus variegatus appeared. The average species richness in Lake El Sol was 5 ± 1 in 2000–2001, while 2 ± 1 species in 2017–2018. In Lake La Luna, average species richness was 2 ± 0 in 2000–2001, while 2 ± 1 species in 2017–2018.
BMI average annual density in 2000–2001 in Lake El Sol (6541 ± 7414 ind m−2) was 82% of Lake La Luna (7955 ± 7349 ind m−2). Nonetheless, there were no significant differences in the BMI density of both lakes (Student’s t-tests, n = 24, t = 3.78, p = 0.59). The BMI average annual density in 2017–2018 in Lake El Sol (2453 ± 2949 ind m−2) was much higher (68%) than in Lake La Luna (783 ± 1042 ind m−2). In this case, there were significant differences in the BMI density values of both lakes (Student’s t-tests, n = 24, t = 2.51, p = 0.17). Quite differently, BMI average annual density in 2017–2018 in both lakes was much lower than in 2000–2001 with a percent decrease of 63% in Lake El Sol and 90% in Lake La Luna (Table 4, Figure 4).
The maximum density of the BMI in Lake El Sol in 2000–2001 was 13,809 ± 15,517 ind m−2, and the minimum was 921 ± 287 ind m−2 in November and December, respectively. Throughout 2017–2018, the maximum density was 5214 ± 3713 ind m−2 in February, and in June, there were no organisms (Figure 4).
The BMI maximum density in Lake La Luna during 2000–2001 was 15,102 ± 13,789 ind m−2, found in May, while the minimum (803 ± 1013 ind m−2) occurred in January. During 2017–2018, the maximum density was recorded in February (3066 ± 395 ind m−2) and the minimum (absence of organisms) in May (Figure 4). There was no temporal pattern in the BMI density in both lakes and both periods.
In both annual cycles, the annelids numerically dominated the BMI community in both lakes. In 2000–2001, T. tubifex (73.5%) and L. variegatus (16.3%) composed most of the BMI community (89.8%) in Lake El Sol. In Lake La Luna, L. hoffmeisteri was dominant with 98.2% of the BMI community. In 2017–2018, annelids remained the dominant benthic component in Lake El Sol, but in 2000–2001 the species were replaced by L. hoffmeisteri (56.5%) and N. pardalis (41.5%), which composed most of the BMI community (98%). Differently, L. hoffmeisteri (93.3%) remained to be dominant in Lake La Luna.
BMI average annual biomass in 2000–2001 in Lake El Sol (47.49 ± 54.28 mg C m−2) was around 94% of that in Lake La Luna (50.44 ± 54.33 mg C m−2). The 2017–2018 BMI average annual biomass in Lake El Sol (3.63 ± 4.43 mg C m−2) was around 98% of that in Lake La Luna (3.69 ± 7.35 mg C m−2). There were no significant differences in the BMI average biomasses of both lakes (Mann-Whitney U Statistic, T = 79, n = 24, p = 0.617) in both periods (Mann-Whitney U Statistic, T = 64, n = 24, p = 0.652). The BMI average annual biomass in 2017–2018 in both lakes was much lower than in 2000–2001, a reduction of 92% in El Sol and 93% in La Luna (Table 4, Figure 4).
The maximum BMI biomass in Lake El Sol in 2000–200 was 111.86 ± 148.37 mg C m−2 in November, while the minimum with 12.08 ± 10.90 mg C m−2 in December. In 2017–2018, the maximum biomass was found in February with 2.24 mg C m−2 and the minimum in June with no organisms. In Lake La Luna in 2000–2001, the maximum BMI biomass was found in May (140.86 ± 121.61 mg C m−2) and the minimum in December (12.08 ± 10.90 mg C m−2). For 2017–2018, the maximum was 4.29 ± 6.67 mg C m−2 in February and the minimum with no organisms in June. There were no temporal biomass dynamics in both lakes and in both periods.
In both annual cycles, the annelids dominated the biomass of the BMI community in both lakes. In 2000–2001, T. tubifex (53.1%) and L. variegatus (27.9%) composed most of the BMI community (81.0%) in Lake El Sol. In Lake La Luna, L. hoffmeisteri was dominant with 94.8% of the BMI community. In 2017–2018, annelids remained dominant in Lake El Sol, but the 2000–2001 species were replaced by L. hoffmeisteri (59.2%) and N. pardalis (40.0%), which composed most of the BMI community (99.3%). Unlike Lake El Sol, similarly to 2000–2001, L. hoffmeisteri (83.6%) remained dominant in Lake La Luna.

4. Discussion

4.1. The Environment

We anticipated an increase in air temperature and decrease rainfall, both evidencing a response to climate change. We recorded a 0.5 °C increase in air temperature at the Nevado de Toluca between 2000–2001 and 2017–2018 (18 years) in good agreement with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [43] report about a temperature increase of 0.5 °C in 50 years as indicative of climate change. Air temperature warming in high altitude mountains occurs at an average rate of 0.3 °C per decade with a ±0.2 °C variability [44]. In general, warming is enhanced above 500 m a.s.l., the elevation-dependent warming data are insufficient and contradictory. Some studies have demonstrated that anthropogenic greenhouse emissions are one of the dominant factors of temperature increase above 4000 m a.s.l. [44]. In the tropics, warming can be enhanced at higher elevation by a reduction of the vertical temperature gradient due to increased latent heat released above the condensation level, favored in a warmer and moister atmosphere [45].
Air and water temperatures but not rainfall suggested evidence of the expected climate change; air and lakes’ water temperatures increased 0.5 °C, and water levels diminished around 1.5 m. Lake levels evidence changes in water quantity availability by reflecting the balance between water input (rainfall, runoff) and loss (evaporation), and it is often related to long-term cyclic climatic changes [2,46]. The warming rate in other high altitude lakes in the Tibetan Plateau has been 0.055 ± 0.022 °C yr−1. The K25 increase in Lake El Sol suggested a higher evaporation rate since increase weathering carrying solutes to the lake would require more significant rainfall rates, which was not the case. The relatively low mineralization of Lake La Luna and the smaller lake’s water volume and micro-drainage basin could probably explain the lack of detectable response in K25.
Numerous high mountain lakes worldwide have been acidified associated with the widespread problem of acid precipitation [47]; pH decreases are between 0.5 and 1 pH units [48]. Examples of acidification of high mountain lakes are found ubiquitously, for example, in European lakes [49] and the Adirondack Mountains in New York [50].
Also, some documented cases of pH increase (recovery) in high mountain lakes in Europe and North America [49,51,52,53,54]. The pH increases—deacidification—in these cases resulted from the diminution of the emission and deposit of sulfur and nitrogen oxides due to international agreements to reduce atmospheric pollutant emissions. The pH in these “recovered” lakes changed from anthropogenic (acid precipitation) acidity (pH < 5) to “natural” water acidity [55]. Lakes El Sol and la Luna display a similar deacidification process. However, it seems the answer to this recovery is not reducing the acid species into the atmosphere. Bulk deposition pH at the Nevado de Toluca volcano remained acidic all year round [56], so acidification instead of deacidification of both lakes was expected.
The pH increased in both lakes, and the pH annual fluctuation range also increased, particularly in Lake El Sol. The broad pH changes in both periods are most likely explained by the lakes’ low buffer capacity (i.e., alkaline reserve). However, the wider pH range in Lake El Sol was unexpected considering alkalinity is lower in Lake La Luna (2003: 2.1 ± 0.3 mg L−1, 2017–2018: 1.1 ± 0.9 mg L−1) than in Lake El Sol (2003: 27.5 ± 0 mg L−1, 2017–2018: 21.6 ± 3.1 mg L−1) (2003 data, [48]; 2017–2018, unpublished data). In addition, it must be noted that alkalinity declined ~48% in Lake El Sol and ~21% in Lake La Luna from 2003 to 2017–2018, which also explains the increase in the pH variation ranges in 2017–2018.

4.2. The Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community

The species diversity in high mountain lakes is usually low [21,57]; nonetheless, the species richness found in Lakes El Sol and La Luna was particularly low (8 species), compared with other high-mountain lakes of up to 180 species found in six lakes [22,57,58,59]. Altitude seems to influence the BMI communities’ composition, abundance, and diversity, which decline with higher altitudes, probably responding to harsher environments at higher altitudes [60]. Habitats become less complex [44]. Lakes El Sol and La Luna are above 4000 m a.s.l., representing harsher environments.
The overall dominance of annelids over chironomids in Lakes El Sol and La Luna in both cycles contrasts with the findings in Alpine lakes [60], where chironomid dominated BMI, particularly with increasing acidity, with larger dominance as altitude augmented most likely associated to their dispersal mechanisms. Also, other studies reported chironomid as the principal BMI component in the High-Andean lakes and temporary and permanent Tatra Mountains’ lakes [22,58]. These studies also found the presence of annelids, but their contribution was well below that of chironomids.
The dominance of chironomids over annelids is explained mainly because oligochaetes exhibit a slow dispersal process and need a transportation vector or a passive dispersion mechanism through the air as cysts and cocoons. Although a negative correlation with altitude in high mountain lakes, its frequency of appearance is usually high (>70%) [61]. However, chironomids’ higher dispersal abilities explain their high frequency of appearance and higher abundance in high mountain lakes than annelids. Chironomids dominate in strongly acidified and alpine acidified lakes, while annelids in subalpine acidified and non-acidified lakes [62]. The latter suggests higher pHs and lower altitudes favor annelids, while lower pHs and higher altitudes favor chironomids (e.g., [63]).
Lakes El Sol and La Luna were already acidified (i.e., pH < 5.6) in 2000–2001, this is, the low pH and the high altitude of both lakes should have favored chironomids and not annelids as found. Refs. [64,65] found organisms buried inside the sediments (infauna) like annelids display a delayed reaction to acidification in comparison with those living above (epifauna) the sediments. Besides, acidification affects BMI physiologically through acid anions (H+) but also altering other chemicals (e.g., aluminum concentration) and biological (e.g., food availability, biotic interactions) characteristics (e.g., [66]). Ref. [44] reported that species composition and abundance have markedly changed in high mountain ecosystems in recent decades. Some cold-adapted species, including endemics, have declined in abundance in freshwater communities and will continue to decline in the following decades. A combination of factors not yet identified could answer the annelid dominance over chironomids in Lakes El Sol and La Luna.
The dominant species positively correlated with pH and temperature in both lakes in 2000–2001. Similar positive correlations between the dominant species and pH and temperature in both lakes were found in 2017–2018. The positive correlations between the dominant species and temperature and pH indicate higher temperatures and pHs promote larger BMI densities and biomasses. However, this is not the case when both periods are included in the same correlation analysis. The higher water temperature and pH in both lakes in 2017–2018 compared to 2000–2001 did not mirror in higher but instead much lower densities (Lake El Sol: 63% and Lake La Luna: 90% reduction) and biomasses (>90% reduction) in 2017–2018 compared to 2000–2001. The latter indicates the comparatively significant change in temperature and pH from 2000–2001 to 2017–2018 harmed the BMI leading to a drastic reduction in their densities and biomasses in both lakes.
While the 2000–2001 and 2017–2018 increase in temperature is similar in both lakes, the pH change in Lake El Sol is much more significant than in Lake La Luna. The latter could be the main reason explaining the more extensive changes in the BMI community of Lake El Sol (lower species richness, dominant species replacement, lower density, and biomass) comparing with the comparatively “minor” changes in Lake La Luna (species richness increase, lower density, and biomass). The higher pH and the larger annual fluctuation in Lake El Sol in 2017–2018, ranging from acidic (5.07) to strongly alkaline (9.63), probably led to the more significant changes in the BMI. Lake La Luna pH also fluctuated in 2017–2018 but remained within the acid range (4.01 to 6.62).
Most investigations look for identifying the effects of acidification on high mountain lakes. Many of them found that anthropogenic acidification does not affect the zoobenthos [58,65,67,68,69]. In contrast, others indicate the macrobenthic invertebrate community will be significantly simplified, with only resistant species able to cope with the acid conditions [64]. However, both Lakes El Sol and La Luna illustrate an opposite case; instead of an acidification process, the lakes underwent deacidification. The two lakes were already acidified in 2000–2001, while in 2017–2018, both lakes were deacidified. It seems deacidification did not foster the BMI communities’ recovery, as suggested by the drastic reduction in the density and biomass of the BMI communities of both lakes.

5. Conclusions

The anthropogenic activities (acid precipitation, climate change) lead to environmental changes and then on the composition and structure of the BMI communities of Lakes El Sol and La Luna from 2000–2001 to 2017–2018. Air and water temperature increased 0.5 °C, while water level declined 1.5 m in both lakes. Contrarily to the lakes’ expected acidification associated with acid precipitation, we found deacidification in both lakes. The BMI density and biomass were drastically reduced in both lakes. More extensive changes in Lake El Sol (species richness reduction, change in species composition, and dominant species replacement) respecting Lake La Luna are most likely associated with the more significant increase in pH in the former and probably the wider pH annual fluctuation from acid to strongly alkaline in Lake El Sol. The causes of the deacidification and the deleterious impacts on the BMI communities remained to be uncovered. Identified changes in Lake El Sol and Lake La Luna showed unexpected responses to global change (e.g., deacidification), illustrating the relevance of better known and understand the limnology of tropical high mountain lakes to provide the scientific basis to implement protection and management actions to avoid further environmental deterioration, and even restoration actions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.A., L.A.O., E.E.; methodology, J.A., L.A.O., D.I.-M.; software, L.A.O., D.I.-M., L.G.-C.; validation, J.A., L.A.O., D.I.-M., E.E.; formal analysis, J.A., L.A.O., D.I.-M., E.E., L.G.-C.; investigation, J.A., L.A.O., D.I.-M., E.E., L.G.-C.; resources, J.A.; data curation, D.I.-M., L.G.-C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.A., L.A.O., E.E.; writing—review and editing, J.A., L.A.O., D.I.-M., E.E., L.G.-C.; visualization, J.A., L.A.O., E.E.; supervision, J.A., L.A.O.; project administration, L.A.O.; funding acquisition, J.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded the Fondo Sectorial de Investigación Ambiental SEMARNAT-CONACYT 2015 through project 262970, the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México DGAPA/PAPIIT through projects IN105009 and ES209301, and Programa de Investigación en Cambio Climático (PINCC 2012–2014 and 2020–2021).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The Comisión Estatal de Parques Naturales y de la Fauna (CEPANAF, Secretaría de Ecología, Gobierno del Estado de México) provided the permit for scientific research at the Área de Protección de Flora y Fauna Nevado de Toluca.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

References

  1. Williamson, C.E.; Dodds, W.; Kratz, T.K.; Palmer, M.A. Lakes and streams as sentinels of environmental change in terrestrial and atmospheric processes. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 6, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Adrian, R.; O’Reilly, C.M.; Zagarese, H.; Baines, S.B.; Hessen, D.O.; Keller, W.; Livingstone, D.M.; Sommaruga, R.; Straile, D.; Van Donk, E.; et al. Lakes as sentinels of climate change. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2009, 54, 2283–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tranvik, L.J.; Downing, J.A.; Cotner, J.B.; Loiselle, S.A.; Striegl, R.G.; Ballatore, T.J.; Dillon, P.; Finlay, K.; Fortino, K.; Knoll, L.B.; et al. Lakes and reservoirs as regulators of carbon cycling and climate. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2009, 54, 2298–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Williamson, C.E.; Saros, J.E.; Vincent, W.F.; Smol, J.P. Lakes and reservoirs as sentinels, integrators, and regulators of climate change. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2009, 54, 2273–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Catalan, J.; Rondón, D. Perspectives for an integrated understanding of tropical and temperate high-mountain lakes. J. Limnol. 2016, 75, 215–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Boggero, A.; Barbieri, A.; De Jong, J.; Marchetto, A.; Mosello, R. Chemistry and critical loads of Alpine lakes in Canton Ticino (Southern Central Alps). Aquat. Sci. 1998, 60, 300–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Curtis, C.J.; Barbieri, A.; Camarero, L.; Gabathuler, M.; Galas, J.; Hanselmann, K.; Kopacek, J.; Mosello, R.; Nickus, U.; Rose, N.; et al. Application of static critical load models for acidity to high mountain lakes in Europe. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2002, 2, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marchetto, A.; Mosello, R.; Psenner, R.; Barbieri, A.; Bendetta, G.; Tait, D.; Tartari, G.A. Evaluation of the level of acidification and the critical loads for Alpine lakes. Ambio 1994, 23, 150–154. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pastorino, P.; Prearo, M. High-mountain lakes, indicators of global change: Ecological characterization and environmental pressures. Diversity 2020, 12, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Payne, A.I. The Ecology of Tropical Lakes and Rivers, 1st ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1991; 310p, ISBN 0471905240. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lewis, W.M. Tropical lakes: How latitude makes a diference. In Perspectives in Tropical Limnology; Schiemer, F., Boland, K.T., Eds.; SPB Academic Publishing bv: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996; pp. 43–64. [Google Scholar]
  12. Löffler, H. The limnology of tropical high-mountain lakes. Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 1964, 15, 176–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lewis, W.M.J. Radar image of one dimension rough surface with buried object. Lakes Reserv. Res. Manag. 2000, 5, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Aguilera, X.; Lazzaro, X.; Coronel, J.S. Tropical high-altitude Andean lakes located above the tree line attenuate UV-A radiation more strongly than typical temperate alpine lakes. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2013, 12, 1649–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Eggermont, H.; Russell, J.M.; Schettler, G.; Van Damme, K.; Bessems, I.; Verschuren, D. Physical and chemical limnology of alpine lakes and pools in the Rwenzori Mountains (Uganda-DR Congo). Hydrobiologia 2007, 592, 151–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fetahi, T.; Mengistou, S.; Schagerl, M. Zooplankton community structure and ecology of the tropical-highland Lake Hayq, Ethiopia. Limnologica 2011, 41, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Rietti-Shati, M.; Yam, R.; Karlen, W.; Shemesh, A. Stable isotope composition of tropical high-attitude fresh-waters on Mt. Kenya, Equatorial East Africa. Chem. Geol. 2000, 166, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Löffler, H. Contribution to the Limnology of High Montain Lakes in Central America. Int. Rev. Gesamten Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 1972, 57, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rivera-R., C.; Solano-M., D.; Zapata-A., A.; Donato-R., J. Phytoplankton diversity in a tropical high mountain lake. Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 2005, 29, 418–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Widmer, C.; Kittel, T.; Richerson, P.J. A survey of the biological limnology of Lake Titicaca. Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 1975, 19, 1504–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huamán, P.; Mariano, M.; Chanco, M.; Montoya, H. Estructura del Macrobentos de la laguna de Paca, Junin. Rev. Peru. Biol. 2002, 9, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tapia, L.; Sánchez, T.; Baylón, M.; Jara, E.; Arteaga, C.; Maceda, D.; Salvatierra, A. Invertebrados bentónicos como bioindicadores de calidad de agua en Lagunas Altoandinas del Perú. Ecol. Apl. 2018, 17, 149–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Alcocer, J.; Oseguera, L.A.; Escobar, E.; Peralta, L.; Lugo, A. Biomass and Water in Two Phytoplankton Chemistry in Central Lakes Mexico Tropical. Artic Antart. Alp. Res. 2004, 36, 342–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. García-Palomo, A.; Macías, J.L.; Arce, J.L.; Capra, L.; Garduño, V.H.; Espíndola, J.M. Geology of Nevado de Toluca Volcano and surrounding areas, central Mexico. Geol. Soc. Am. Map Chart Ser. 2002, MCH089, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bloomfield, K.; Valastro, S. Late Pleistocene Eruptive History of Nevado de Toluca Volcano, Central Mexico. Bull. Volcanol. 1974, 85, 901–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alcocer, J.; Roberson, J.; Oseguera, L.A.; Lewis, W.M. Rhythmic episodes of heating and cooling control thermal stratification of two tropical high mountain lakes. Aquat. Sci. 2020, 82, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Folk, R.L. Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks; Hemphill Publishing Company: Austin, TX, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  28. Santisteban, J.I.; Mediavilla, R.; López-Pamo, E.; Dabrio, C.J.; Ruiz, Z.M.B.; Gil, G.M.J.; Silvino, C.; Martínez-Alfaro, P.E. Loss on ignition: A qualitative or quantitative method for organic matter and carbonate mineral content in sediments? J. Paleolimnol. 2004, 32, 287–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wetzel, R.G. Limnology: Lake and River Escosystems, 3rd ed.; Elsevier Science: San Diego, CA, USA, 2001; 1006p. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rice, E.W.; Baird, R.B.; Eaton, A.D. (Eds.) Standar Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater; AWWA: New York, NY, USA, 2017; 1193p. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ward, H.B.; Whipple, G.C. Fresh-Water Biology, 2nd ed.; Edmondson, W.T., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons.: New York, NY, USA, 1959. [Google Scholar]
  32. Merritt, R.; Cummins, K.; Berg, M.B. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 5th ed.; Kendall Hunt Pub Co: Dubuque, IA, USA, 2019; 1498p. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pennak, R.W. Fresh-Water Invertebrates of the United States; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  34. Throp, J.H.; Covich, A.P. Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  35. Brinkhurst, R.O.; Marchese, R.M. Guía Para la Identificación de Oligoquetos Acuáticos Continentales de Sud y Centroamerica, 2nd ed.; Asociación Ciencias Naturales del Litoral: Santa Fe, Argentina, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hiltunen, J.K.; Klemm, D.J. A Guide to the Nadidae (Annelida: Clitellata: Oligochaeta) of North America; EPA: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 1980; 64p. [Google Scholar]
  37. Stimpson, K.; Donald, J.K.; Hiltunen, J. A Guide to the Freshwater Tubificidae (Annelida: Clitellata: Oligochaeta) of North America; Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 1982; 70p. [Google Scholar]
  38. Mason, W.T.J. An Introduction to the Identification of Chironomid Larvae; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 1973; 96p.
  39. Wiederholm, T. Chironomidae of the Holarctic Region: Keys and Diagnoses; Entomological Society of Lund: Lund, Sweden, 1989; 457p. [Google Scholar]
  40. Moreno, J.; Massaferro, J.; Caballero, M.; Oseguera, L. First record of the Pseudodiamesa branickii species-group (Diptera: Chironomidae: Diamesinae) from central Mexico. Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 2020, 91, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Margalef, R. Limnología; Ediciones Omega, S.A.: Barcelona, Spain, 1983; 1010p. [Google Scholar]
  42. Weber, C.I. Biological Field and Laboratory Methods for Measuring the Quality of Surface Water and Effluents; National Environmental Research Center, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 1973; 231p. [Google Scholar]
  43. IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; IPCC: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2013; 1585p. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hock, R.; Rasul, G.; Adler, C.; Cáceres, B.; Gruber, S.; Hirabayashi, Y.; Jackson, M.; Kääb, A.; Kang, S.; Kutuzov, S.; et al. High Mountain Areas. In IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate; Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D.C., Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Tignor, M., Poloczanska, E., Mintenbeck, K., Alegría, A., Nicolai, M., Okem, A., et al., Eds.; Paris, France, 2019; in press; Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/srocc/ (accessed on 28 April 2021).
  45. Held, I.M.; Soden, B.J. Robust responses of the Sahelian hydrological cycle to global warming. J. Clim. 2006, 19, 5686–5699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Williamson, C.E.; Saros, J.E.; Schindler, D.W. Climate change: Sentinels of change. Science 2009, 323, 887–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wuebbles, D.J.; Easterling, D.R.; Hayhoe, K.; Knutson, T.; Kopp, R.E.; Kossin, J.P.; Kunkel, K.E.; LeGrande, A.N.; Mears, C.; Sweet, W.V.; et al. Our globally changing climate. In Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment; Webbles, D.J., Fahey, D.W., Hibbard, K.A., Dokken, D.J., Stewart, B.C., Maycock, T.K., Eds.; U.S. Global Change Research Program: Washington, DC, USA, 2017; Volume I, pp. 35–72. [Google Scholar]
  48. Charles, D.F. Effects of acidic deposition on North American lakes: Palaeolimnological evidence from diatoms and chrysophytes. Philos. Trans.-R. Soc. Lond. B 1990, 327, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mosello, R.; Marchetto, A.; Boggero, A.; Brizzio, M.C.; Tartari, G.A.; Rogora, M. Pluriannual evolution of the hydrochemistry of two Alpine lakes (Lake Paione Inferiore and Lake Paione Superiore, Ossola Valley) in relation to atmospheric loads. J. Limnol. 1999, 58, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Roy, K.M.; Dukett, J.; Houck, N.; Lawrence, G.B. A Long-Term Monitoring Program for Evaluating Changes in Water Quality in Selected Adirondack Waters; New York State Energy Research and Development Authority: New York, NY, USA, 2012; 43p. [Google Scholar]
  51. Driscoll, C.T.; Driscoll, K.M.; Roy, K.M.; Mitchell, M.J. Chemical response of lakes in the Adirondack Region of New York to declines in acidic deposition. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 2036–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Henriksen, A.; Joranger, E.; Semb, A. The Contribution of Nitrogen to Acidification; The National Environmental Monitoring Programme Report 408/90; State Pollution Control Authority: Oslo, Norway, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  53. Marchetto, A.; Mosello, R.; Rogora, M.; Manca, M.; Boggero, A.; Morabito, G.; Musazzi, S.; Tartari, G.A.; Nocentini, A.M.; Pugnetti, A.; et al. The chemical and biological response of two remote mountain lakes in the Southern Central Alps (Italy) to twenty years of changing physical and chemical climate. J. Limnol. 2004, 63, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rogora, M.; Marchetto, A.; Mosello, R. Trends in the chemistry of atmospheric deposition and surface waters in the Lake Maggiore catchment. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2001, 5, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. The MOLAR water Chemistry Group The MOLAR project: Atmospheric deposition and lake water chemistry. J. Limnol. 1999, 58, 88–106. [CrossRef]
  56. Ibarra-Morales, D.; Alcocer, J.; Oseguera, L.A.; Sosa-Echeverría, R. Bulk Deposition and Main Ionic Composition in a Remote Tropical Region: Nevado de Toluca, Mexico. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020, 231, 413, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rieradevall, M.; Jiménez, M.; Prat, N. The zoobenthos of six remote high mountain lakes in Spain and Portugal. Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 1998, 26, 2132–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kownacki, A.; Galas, J.; Dumnicka, E.; Mielewczyk, S. Invertebrate communities in permanent and temporary high mountain lakes (Tatra Mts). Ann. Limnol. 2000, 36, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hamerlík, L.; Svitok, M.; Novikmec, M.; Očadlík, M.; Bitušík, P. Local, among-site, and regional diversity patterns of benthic macroinvertebrates in high altitude waterbodies: Do ponds differ from lakes? Hydrobiologia 2014, 723, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Füreder, L.; Ettinger, R.; Boggero, A.; Thaler, B.; Thies, H. Macroinvertebrate diversity in Alpine lakes: Effects of altitude and catchment properties. Hydrobiologia 2006, 562, 123–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Catalan, J.; Camarero, L.; Felip, M.; Pla, S.; Ventura, M.; Buchaca, T.; Bartumeus, F.; De Mendoza, G.; Miró, A.; Casamayor, E.O.; et al. High mountain lakes: Extreme habitats and witnesses of environmental changes. Limnetica 2006, 25, 551–584. [Google Scholar]
  62. Krno, I.; Šporka, F.; Galas, J.; Hamerlík, L.; Zaťovičová, Z.; Bitušík, P. Littoral benthic macroinvertebrates of mountain lakes in the Tatra Mountains (Slovakia, Poland). Biologia 2006, 61, S147–S166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Steingruber, S.M.; Boggero, A.; Caissutti, C.P.; Dumnicka, E.; Colombo, L. Can we use macroinvertebrates as indicators of acidification of high-altitude Alpine lakes? Boll. Della Soc. Ticin. Sci. Nat. 2013, 101, 23–34. [Google Scholar]
  64. Allard, M.; Moreau, G. Effects of experimental acidification on a lotic macroinvertebrate community. Hidrobiologia 1987, 144, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Collins, N.C.; Zimmerman, A.P.; Knoechel, R. Comparisons of benthic infauna and epifauna biomasses in acidified and non-acidified Ontario lakes. In Proceedings of the Effects of Acidic Precipitation on Benthos; Singer, R., Ed.; The North American Benthological Society: Hamilton, NY, USA, 1980; pp. 35–48. [Google Scholar]
  66. Vrba, J.; Bojková, J.; Chvojka, P.; Fott, J.; Kopáček, J.; Macek, M.; Nedbalová, L.; Papáček, M.; Rádková, V.; Sacherová, V.; et al. Constraints on the biological recovery of the Bohemian Forest lakes from acid stress. Freshw. Biol. 2016, 61, 376–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dermott, R.M. Benthic fauna in a series of lakes displaying a gradient of pH. Hydrobiologia 1985, 128, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Barmuta, L.A.; Cooper, S.D.; Hamilton, S.K.; Kratz, K.W.; Melack, J.M. Responses of zooplankton and zoobenthos to experimental acidification in a high-elevation lake (Sierra Nevada, California, U.S.A.). Freshw. Biol. 1990, 23, 571–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vranovský, M.; Krno, I.; Šporka, F.; Tomajka, J. The effect of anthropogenic acidification on the hydrofauna of the lakes of the West Tatra Mountains (Slovakia). Hydrobiologia 1994, 274, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diversity 13 00243 g001 550
Figure 1. Location of Lakes El Sol and La Luna, Nevado de Toluca, Estado de México, Mexico. (Altitude in meters.)
Figure 1. Location of Lakes El Sol and La Luna, Nevado de Toluca, Estado de México, Mexico. (Altitude in meters.)
Diversity 13 00243 g001
Diversity 13 00243 g002 550
Figure 2. Air temperature (red dots) and rainfall (blue dots) trends from 2000 to 2018. Dots represent monthly average values of air temperature and rainfall. (Automatic Meteorological Station Nevado de Toluca SMN-15062).
Figure 2. Air temperature (red dots) and rainfall (blue dots) trends from 2000 to 2018. Dots represent monthly average values of air temperature and rainfall. (Automatic Meteorological Station Nevado de Toluca SMN-15062).
Diversity 13 00243 g002
Diversity 13 00243 g003 550
Figure 3. Temporal dynamics of pH in Lakes El Sol (orange dots) and La Luna (blue dots).
Figure 3. Temporal dynamics of pH in Lakes El Sol (orange dots) and La Luna (blue dots).
Diversity 13 00243 g003
Diversity 13 00243 g004 550
Figure 4. Temporal dynamics of the BMI density and biomass (average ± standard deviation) in Lake El Sol ((a): 2000–2001, (c): 2017–2018), and Lake La Luna ((b): 2000–2001, (d): and 2017–2018).
Figure 4. Temporal dynamics of the BMI density and biomass (average ± standard deviation) in Lake El Sol ((a): 2000–2001, (c): 2017–2018), and Lake La Luna ((b): 2000–2001, (d): and 2017–2018).
Diversity 13 00243 g004
Table
Table 1. Environmental variables (average ± standard deviation) of Lakes El Sol and La Luna, Nevado de Toluca, measured in 2000–2001 and 2017–2018 annual cycles. (ZMAX = maximum depth, ZSD = Secchi disk depth, a = total water transparency, DO = dissolved oxygen, K25 = electrical conductivity, OM = sedimentary organic matter, Texture = average grain size). (b = calculated by first transforming pH to H+ concentrations).
Table 1. Environmental variables (average ± standard deviation) of Lakes El Sol and La Luna, Nevado de Toluca, measured in 2000–2001 and 2017–2018 annual cycles. (ZMAX = maximum depth, ZSD = Secchi disk depth, a = total water transparency, DO = dissolved oxygen, K25 = electrical conductivity, OM = sedimentary organic matter, Texture = average grain size). (b = calculated by first transforming pH to H+ concentrations).
VariableUnitEl SolLa Luna
2000–20012017–20182000–20012017–2018
Air temperature°C4.2 ± 1.05.0 ± 1.14.2 ± 1.05.0 ± 1.1
Annual rainfallmm2367252123672521
Monthly rainfallmm107.6 ± 100.3109.3 ± 97.7107.6 ± 100.3109.3 ± 97.7
ZMAXm13.512.011.09.5
ZSDm4.6 ± 1.04.1 ± 0.310.2 ± 0.4 a8.8 ± 0.4 a
Water temperature°C8.58 ± 1.969.3 ± 1.608.43 ± 1.739.10 ± 2.10
Average pH b 5.286.134.654.76
pH range 4.92–6.135.07–9.634.51–5.424.01–6.62
DOmg L−16.7 ± 0.86.0 ± 2.06.7 ± 0.86.9 ± 0.3
K25µS cm−116 ± 163 ± 2014 ± 112 ± 3
OM%12 ± 314 ± 318 ± 416 ± 3
Texturemm0.002–0.050.002–0.050.002–0.050.002–0.05
Substrate type fine siltfine siltfine siltfine silt
Table
Table 2. Taxonomic list of the benthic macroinvertebrates of Lakes El Sol and La Luna, Nevado de Toluca. (X = presence, - = absence).
Table 2. Taxonomic list of the benthic macroinvertebrates of Lakes El Sol and La Luna, Nevado de Toluca. (X = presence, - = absence).
FamilySpeciesEl SolLa Luna
2000–20012017–20182000–20012017–2018
NaididaeNais pardalis Piguet, 1906XX-X
Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri Claparède, 1862XXXX
Tubifex tubifex Muller, 1774X---
LumbriculidaeLumbriculus variegatus Müller, 1774X--X
ChironomidaePseudodiamesa branickii Makarchenko & Makarchenko, 1999X-XX
HydridaeHydra vulgaris Pallas, 1766XX--
PhysidaePhysa sp. Draparnaud, 1801-X--
SpaeriidaePisidium casertanum Poli, 1791X---
Table
Table 3. Ecological variables (average ± standard deviation) of Lakes El Sol and La Luna, Nevado de Toluca, measured in 2000–2001 and 2017–2018 annual cycles. (S = species richness, Avg = average).
Table 3. Ecological variables (average ± standard deviation) of Lakes El Sol and La Luna, Nevado de Toluca, measured in 2000–2001 and 2017–2018 annual cycles. (S = species richness, Avg = average).
VariableUnitEl SolLa Luna
2000–20012017–20182000–20012017–2018
Sspecies7424
Avg Sspecies5 ± 12 ± 12 ± 02 ± 1
Avg Densityind m−26541 ± 74142453 ± 29497955 ± 7349783 ± 1042
Avg Biomassmg C m−247.49 ± 54.283.63 ± 4.4350.44 ± 54.333.69 ± 7.35
Table
Table 4. Recurrence percentage (Rec.), and BMI density and biomass (average ± standard deviation and % of annual density and biomass) of Lakes El Sol and La Luna, Nevado de Toluca, measured in 2000–2001 and in 2017–2018.
Table 4. Recurrence percentage (Rec.), and BMI density and biomass (average ± standard deviation and % of annual density and biomass) of Lakes El Sol and La Luna, Nevado de Toluca, measured in 2000–2001 and in 2017–2018.
2000–20012017–2018
Rec.DensityBiomassRec.DensityBiomass
El Sol%ind m−2%mg C m−2%%ind m−2%mg C m−2%
N. pardalis41.719 ± 470.30.03729 ± 0.100080.175.01018 ± 199941.50.00144 ± 0.0029039.7
L. hoffmeisteri66.751 ± 1060.80.23986 ± 0464510.583.31385 ± 210156.50.00213 ± 0.0034558.8
T. tubifex1004807 ± 655773.525.22899 ± 42.6836653.1-----
L. variegatus91.71068 ± 142616.313.22973 ± 18.8635027.9-----
P. branickii8.31 ± 70.00.00561 ± 0.033670.0-----
H. vulgaris58.325 ± 740.40.00798 ± 0.017850.016.716 ± 560.60.00002 ± 0.000070.5
Physa sp.-----16.733 ± 1471.40.00004 ± 0.000171.0
P. casertanum100571 ± 7548.78.73803 ± 11.4431618.4-----
La Luna
N. pardalis-----33.340 ± 1155.00.00031 ± 0.001458.3
L. hoffmeisteri1007808 ± 727098.247.79901 ± 53.4772594.891.7734 ± 103893.30.00309 ± 0.0066183.7
P. branickii100146 ± 1621.82.64082 ± 3.234245.225.010 ± 261.30.00018 ± 0.000514.8
L. variegatus-----8.34 ± 220.40.00012 ± 0.000703.2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alcocer, J.; Oseguera, L.A.; Ibarra-Morales, D.; Escobar, E.; García-Cid, L. Responses of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities of Two Tropical, High-Mountain Lakes to Climate Change and Deacidification. Diversity 2021, 13, 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13060243

AMA Style

Alcocer J, Oseguera LA, Ibarra-Morales D, Escobar E, García-Cid L. Responses of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities of Two Tropical, High-Mountain Lakes to Climate Change and Deacidification. Diversity. 2021; 13(6):243. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13060243

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alcocer, Javier, Luis A. Oseguera, Diana Ibarra-Morales, Elva Escobar, and Lucero García-Cid. 2021. "Responses of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities of Two Tropical, High-Mountain Lakes to Climate Change and Deacidification" Diversity 13, no. 6: 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13060243

APA Style

Alcocer, J., Oseguera, L. A., Ibarra-Morales, D., Escobar, E., & García-Cid, L. (2021). Responses of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities of Two Tropical, High-Mountain Lakes to Climate Change and Deacidification. Diversity, 13(6), 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13060243

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop