Next Article in Journal
Filling the Gap and Improving Conservation: How IUCN Red Lists and Historical Scientific Data Can Shed More Light on Threatened Sharks in the Italian Seas
Previous Article in Journal
Transferability of Microsatellite Markers Developed in Oenothera spp. to the Invasive Species Oenothera drummondii Hook. (Onagraceae)
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Case Study of Nematode Communities’ Dynamics along Successional Paths in the Reclaimed Landfill
Open AccessArticle

Evaluation of Metabarcoding Primers for Analysis of Soil Nematode Communities

1
Department of Agroecology, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Aarhus University, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark
2
Department of Botany, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Jahangirnagar University, 1342 Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh
3
Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Aarhus University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
4
Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2020, 12(10), 388; https://doi.org/10.3390/d12100388
Received: 5 August 2020 / Revised: 6 October 2020 / Accepted: 7 October 2020 / Published: 9 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Nematodes Research)
While recent advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have accelerated research in microbial ecology, the application of high throughput approaches to study the ecology of nematodes remains unresolved due to several issues, e.g., whether to include an initial nematode extraction step or not, the lack of consensus on the best performing primer combination, and the absence of a curated nematode reference database. The objective of this method development study was to compare different primer sets to identify the most suitable primer set for the metabarcoding of nematodes without initial nematode extraction. We tested four primer sets for amplicon sequencing: JB3/JB5 (mitochondrial, I3-M11 partition of COI gene), SSU_04F/SSU_22R (18S rRNA, V1-V2 regions), and Nemf/18Sr2b (18S rRNA, V6-V8 regions) from earlier studies, as well as MMSF/MMSR (18S rRNA, V4-V5 regions), a newly developed primer set. We used DNA from 22 nematode taxa, 10 mock communities, 20 soil samples, 4 root samples, and one bulk soil. We amplified the target regions from the DNA samples with the four different primer combinations and sequenced the amplicons on an Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform. We found that the Nemf/18Sr2b primer set was superior for detecting soil nematodes compared to the other primer sets based on our sequencing results and on the annotation of our sequence reads at the genus and species ranks. This primer set generated 74% reads of Nematoda origin in the soil samples. Additionally, this primer set did well with the mock communities, detecting all the included specimens. It also worked better in the root samples than the other primer set that was tested. Therefore, we suggest that the Nemf/18Sr2b primer set could be used to study rhizosphere soil and root associated nematodes, and this can be done without an initial nematode extraction step. View Full-Text
Keywords: nematode diversity; soil; rhizosphere; environmental; NGS nematode diversity; soil; rhizosphere; environmental; NGS
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Sikder, M.M.; Vestergård, M.; Sapkota, R.; Kyndt, T.; Nicolaisen, M. Evaluation of Metabarcoding Primers for Analysis of Soil Nematode Communities. Diversity 2020, 12, 388.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop