FTIR Spectroscopy of Vitreous Humor for Postmortem Interval Estimation: A Multivariate Regression Approach
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Spectral Changes with PMI
2.2. Regression Modeling of Data
2.2.1. Principal Component Analysis of VH Spectra
2.2.2. Partial Least Squares (PLS) Regression for PMI Prediction
Model Performance Across Multiple Train/Test Splits
Final PLS Model Calibrated on All Known Samples
Interpretation of PLS Model: Standardized Regression Coefficients and Variable Importance
2.2.3. Prediction of PMI for Unknown Samples Using the PLS Model
2.2.4. Binary Classification of Samples for Forensic Triage
2.2.5. Comparison of Regression Methods for PMI Prediction
3. Discussion
3.1. Compliance with Daubert and Frye Standards—Forensic Admissibility Framework
3.2. Comparison with Previous Studies and Novelty of the Present Approach
3.3. Methodological Considerations and Limitations; Future Perspectives
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Case Selection
4.2. VH Sample Collection
4.3. Sample Processing and ATR-FTIR Measurements
4.4. Data Analysis
4.4.1. Spectral Processing
Extended Multiplicative Signal Correction (EMSC)
Second-Derivative Transformation
Mean-Centering
4.4.2. Peak Intensity Analysis
4.4.3. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
4.4.4. Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS)
Model Validation Using Multiple Train/Test Splits
Final Model Calibration
Spectral Interpretation
4.4.5. Binary Classification of Samples
4.4.6. Comparative Analysis of Regression Methods
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| PMI | postmortem interval |
| VH | vitreous humor |
| ATR | attenuated total reflection |
| FTIR | Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy |
| PCA | principal component analysis |
| PC | principal components |
| PLS | partial least squares |
| LOOCV | leave-one-out cross-validation |
| RMSE | root mean squared error |
| MAE | mean absolute error |
| VIP | variable importance in projection |
| LDA | linear discriminant analysis |
| OLS | ordinary least squares |
| RE | right eye |
| LE | left eye |
| EMSC | extended multiplicative signal correction |
| R2 | coefficient of determination |
| RANSAC | RANdom SAmple Consensus |
References
- Ely, S.F.; Keyes, K.; Gill, J.R. Chapter 4—The Scene Investigation, Postmortem Changes, and Time of Death. In Principles of Forensic Pathology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023; pp. 65–101. [Google Scholar]
- Henssge, C.; Madea, B. Estimation of the Time since Death. Forensic Sci. Int. 2007, 165, 182–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Knight, B. Estimation of the Time Since Death: A Survey of Practical Methods. J. Forensic Sci. Soc. 1968, 8, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saukko, P.; Knight, B. Knight’s Forensic Pathology, 4th ed.; CRC Press: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, S.; Sangwan, A.; Singh, P.; Singh, S.P. Overview of Conventional Techniques for the Estimation of Post-Mortem Interval (PMI). In Advances in Forensic Biology and Genetics; Dash, H.R., Elkins, K.M., Al-Snan, N.R., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2025; pp. 85–98. [Google Scholar]
- Mathur, A.; Agrawal, Y.K. An Overview of Methods Used for Estimation of Time since Death. Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 2011, 43, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutton, L.; Byrd, J. An Introduction to Postmortem Interval Estimation in Medicolegal Death Investigations. WIREs Forensic Sci. 2020, 2, e1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bambaradeniya, T.B.; Magni, P.A.; Dadour, I.R. A Summary of Concepts, Procedures and Techniques Used by Forensic Entomologists and Proxies. Insects 2023, 14, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghosh, S.; Banerjee, D. Biology of Forensically Important Invertebrates; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Salerno, M.; Cocimano, G.; Roccuzzo, S.; Russo, I.; Piombino-Mascali, D.; Márquez-Grant, N.; Zammit, C.; Esposito, M.; Sessa, F. New Trends in Immunohistochemical Methods to Estimate the Time since Death: A Review. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, S.; Hu, Z.; Shao, Y.; Zhang, G.; Wang, Z.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cui, W.; Wang, Y.; Ren, L. Influence of Drugs and Toxins on Decomposition Dynamics: Forensic Implications. Molecules 2024, 29, 5221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akçan, R.; Taştekin, B.; Yildirim, M.Ş.; Aydogan, H.C.; Sağlam, N. Omics Era in Forensic Medicine: Towards a New Age. Turk. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 50, 1480–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pesko, B.K.; Weidt, S.; McLaughlin, M.; Wescott, D.J.; Torrance, H.; Burgess, K.; Burchmore, R. Postmortomics: The Potential of Untargeted Metabolomics to Highlight Markers for Time Since Death. Omics J. Integr. Biol. 2020, 24, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonicelli, A.; Mickleburgh, H.L.; Chighine, A.; Locci, E.; Wescott, D.J.; Procopio, N. The “ForensOMICS” Approach for Postmortem Interval Estimation from Human Bone by Integrating Metabolomics, Lipidomics, and Proteomics. eLife 2022, 11, e83658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Wu, Y.; Liu, M.; Li, N.; Dang, L.; An, G.; Lu, X.; Wang, L.; Du, Q.; Cao, J.; et al. Multi-Omics Integration Strategy in the Post-Mortem Interval of Forensic Science. Talanta 2024, 268, 125249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Secco, L.; Palumbi, S.; Padalino, P.; Grosso, E.; Perilli, M.; Casonato, M.; Cecchetto, G.; Viel, G. “Omics” and Postmortem Interval Estimation: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meurs, J.; Krap, T.; Duijst, W. Evaluation of Postmortem Biochemical Markers: Completeness of Data and Assessment of Implication in the Field. Sci. Justice J. Forensic Sci. Soc. 2019, 59, 177–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mróz, M.; Miodońska, M.; Cieśla, J.; Skowronek, R.; Tomsia, M. As Precisely as Possible! Molecular Methods of Postmortem Interval Prediction—Current Prospects and Limitations. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2025, 115, 102946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bishop, P.N.; Crossman, M.V.; McLeod, D.; Ayad, S. Extraction and Characterization of the Tissue Forms of Collagen Types II and IX from Bovine Vitreous. Biochem. J. 1994, 299, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boneva, S.K.; Wolf, J.; Rosmus, D.-D.; Schlecht, A.; Prinz, G.; Laich, Y.; Boeck, M.; Zhang, P.; Hilgendorf, I.; Stahl, A.; et al. Transcriptional Profiling Uncovers Human Hyalocytes as a Unique Innate Immune Cell Population. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 567274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Le Goff, M.M.; Lu, H.; Ugarte, M.; Henry, S.; Takanosu, M.; Mayne, R.; Bishop, P.N. The Vitreous Glycoprotein Opticin Inhibits Preretinal Neovascularization. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shafaie, S.; Hutter, V.; Brown, M.B.; Cook, M.T.; Chau, D.Y.S. Diffusion through the Ex Vivo Vitreal Body—Bovine, Porcine, and Ovine Models Are Poor Surrogates for the Human Vitreous. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 550, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, D.; Gade, S.; Glover, K.; Sheshala, R.; Singh, T.R.R. Vitreous Humor: Composition, Characteristics and Implication on Intravitreal Drug Delivery. Curr. Eye Res. 2023, 48, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Harper, D.R. A Comparative Study of the Microbiological Contamination of Postmortem Blood and Vitreous Humour Samples Taken for Ethanol Determination. Forensic Sci. Int. 1989, 43, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, R.A.; Hoadley, P.A.; Sampson, B.G. Determination of Postmortem Interval by Sampling Vitreous Humour. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 1997, 18, 158–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sachdeva, N.; Rani, Y.; Singh, R.; Murari, A. Estimation of Post-Mortem Interval from the Changes in Vitreous Biochemistry. J. Indian Acad. Forensic Med. 2011, 33, 78–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pigaiani, N.; Bertaso, A.; De Palo, E.F.; Bortolotti, F.; Tagliaro, F. Vitreous Humor Endogenous Compounds Analysis for Post-Mortem Forensic Investigation. Forensic Sci. Int. 2020, 310, 110235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butler, H.J.; Ashton, L.; Bird, B.; Cinque, G.; Curtis, K.; Dorney, J.; Esmonde-White, K.; Fullwood, N.J.; Gardner, B.; Martin-Hirsch, P.L.; et al. Using Raman Spectroscopy to Characterize Biological Materials. Nat. Protoc. 2016, 11, 664–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Kelani, M.; Buthelezi, N. Advancements in Medical Research: Exploring Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy for Tissue, Cell, and Hair Sample Analysis. Skin Res. Technol. 2024, 30, e13733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aitkenhead-Peterson, J.A.; Fancher, J.P.; Alexander, M.B.; Hamilton, M.D.; Bytheway, J.A.; Wescott, D.J. Estimating Postmortem Interval for Human Cadavers in a Sub-Tropical Climate Using UV-Vis-near-Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Forensic Sci. 2021, 66, 190–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, H.; Zha, S.; Fang, R.; Wei, X.; Fan, S.; Wang, Z. Estimation of the Late Postmortem Interval Using FTIR Spectroscopy and Chemometrics in Human Skeletal Remains. Forensic Sci. Int. 2017, 281, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubio, L.; Suárez, J.; Martin-de-las-Heras, S.; Zapico, S.C. Partners in Postmortem Interval Estimation: X-Ray Diffraction and Fourier Transform Spectroscopy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Magalhães, S.; Goodfellow, B.J.; Nunes, A. FTIR Spectroscopy in Biomedical Research: How to Get the Most out of Its Potential. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2021, 56, 869–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, M.; Liang, X.; Zhang, W.; Xie, S.; Wu, S.; Hu, G.; Luo, J.; Wu, H.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, R.; et al. A Novel Perspective of ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy Combined with Multiple Machine Learning Methods for Postmortem Interval (PMI) Human Skin. Vib. Spectrosc. 2025, 138, 103800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alkhuder, K. Attenuated Total Reflection-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy: A Universal Analytical Technique with Promising Applications in Forensic Analyses. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2022, 136, 1717–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Wu, H.; Xu, W.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y. New Application of ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy for Postmortem Interval Estimation Based on Puparia of the Sarcosaprophagous Fly Chrysomya megacephala (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Forensic Chem. 2023, 33, 100484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Virkler, K.; Lednev, I.K. Raman Spectroscopic Signature of Semen and Its Potential Application to Forensic Body Fluid Identification. Forensic Sci. Int. 2009, 193, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woess, C.; Huck, C.W.; Badzoka, J.; Kappacher, C.; Arora, R.; Lindtner, R.A.; Zelger, P.; Schirmer, M.; Rabl, W.; Pallua, J. Raman Spectroscopy for Postmortem Interval Estimation of Human Skeletal Remains: A Scoping Review. J. Biophotonics 2023, 16, e202300189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ansari, N.; Lodha, A.; Menon, S.K. Smart Platform for the Time since Death Determination from Vitreous Humor Cystine. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 86, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ansari, N.; Menon, S.K. Determination of Time since Death Using Vitreous Humor Tryptophan. J. Forensic Sci. 2017, 62, 1351–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chighine, A.; Locci, E.; Nioi, M.; d’Aloja, E. Looking for Post-Mortem Metabolomic Standardization: Waiting for Godot—The Importance of Post-Mortem Interval in Forensic Metabolomics. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2021, 34, 1946–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, J.; Wei, X.; Huang, J.; Lin, H.; Deng, K.; Li, Z.; Shao, Y.; Zou, D.; Chen, Y.; Huang, P.; et al. Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) Spectral Prediction of Postmortem Interval from Vitreous Humor Samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410, 7611–7620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wójtowicz, A.; Mitura, A.; Wietecha-Posłuszny, R.; Kurczab, R.; Zawadzki, M. Spectroscopy as a Useful Tool for the Identification of Changes with Time in Post-Mortem Vitreous Humor for Forensic Toxicology Purposes. Monatshefte Chem. Chem. Mon. 2021, 152, 745–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Notarstefano, V.; Santoni, C.; Montanari, E.; Paolo Busardò, F.; Montana, A.; Orilisi, G.; Mariani, P.; Giorgini, E. A New Approach to Assess Post-Mortem Interval: A Machine Learning-Assisted Label-Free ATR-FTIR Analysis of Human Vitreous Humor. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2025, 327, 125326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, H.; Zhang, J.; Huang, P.; Wang, Z. Research Progress in the Estimation of the Postmortem Interval by Chinese Forensic Scholars. Forensic Sci. Res. 2016, 1, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, J.; Kumar, A.; Trivedi, S.; Pandey, S.K. Advancements in Estimating Post-Mortem Interval in Medico-Legal Practice: A Comprehensive Review. Leg. Med. 2025, 75, 102627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, G.; Gao, Y.; Cheng, S.; Li, N.; Ren, K.; Du, Q.; Bai, R.; Sun, J. Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Pathology: Multi-Organ Postmortem Pathomics for Estimating Postmortem Interval. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2025, 270, 108949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zelentsova, E.A.; Yanshole, L.V.; Melnikov, A.D.; Kudryavtsev, I.S.; Novoselov, V.P.; Tsentalovich, Y.P. Post-Mortem Changes in Metabolomic Profiles of Human Serum, Aqueous Humor and Vitreous Humor. Metabolomics 2020, 16, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, K.; Wang, Q.; Liu, R.; Wei, X.; Li, Z.; Fan, S.; Wang, Z. Evaluating the Effects of Causes of Death on Postmortem Interval Estimation by ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2020, 134, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pelzel, J.; Anderson, R.; Ulness, D.J.; Strand, K. Imaging of Laser-Induced Thermal Convection and Conduction in Artificial Vitreous Humor. Biophysica 2025, 5, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, R.; Guo, Y.; Lei, B.; Jiang, R. Thermal Ocular Injury Associated with Retinal Necrosis and Vitreous Inflammation: A Case Report. Front. Med. 2025, 12, 1511514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayanniyi, A.A.; Fasasi, M.K. Uniocular Blindness Following Thermal Injury. Malays. J. Med. Sci. MJMS 2013, 20, 88–91. [Google Scholar]
- Hitomi, E.; Simpkins, A.N.; Luby, M.; Latour, L.L.; Leigh, R.J.; Leigh, R. Blood-Ocular Barrier Disruption in Patients with Acute Stroke. Neurology 2018, 90, e915–e923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaw, H.E.; Landers, M.B. Vitreous Hemorrhage after Intracranial Hemorrhage. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1975, 80, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jena, S.; Tripathy, K. Vitreous Hemorrhage. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, P.; Yan, W.; Yan, H. Changes in the Vitreous Body after Experimental Vitreous Hemorrhage in Rabbit: An Interdisciplinary Study. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0281165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poonprasartporn, A.; Chan, K.L.A. Label-Free Study of Intracellular Glycogen Level in Metformin and Resveratrol-Treated Insulin-Resistant HepG2 by Live-Cell FTIR Spectroscopy. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 212, 114416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Toepel, J.; Welsh, E.; Summerfield, T.C.; Pakrasi, H.B.; Sherman, L.A. Differential Transcriptional Analysis of the Cyanobacterium Cyanothece sp. Strain ATCC 51142 during Light-Dark and Continuous-Light Growth. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 3904–3913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tymchenko, E.; Glova, V.; Soldatova, A.; Chikhirzhina, E.; Polyanichko, A. FTIR Study of the Secondary Structure of DNA in Complexes with Platinum Coordination Compounds. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1400, 033004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bozkurt-Girit, O.; Kilic, M.A. FTIR Spectroscopic Characterization Reveals Short-Term Macromolecular Responses to Photobiomodulation in Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 31051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geladi, P.; Kowalski, B.R. Partial Least-Squares Regression: A Tutorial. Anal. Chim. Acta 1986, 185, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wold, S.; Sjöström, M.; Eriksson, L. PLS-Regression: A Basic Tool of Chemometrics. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2001, 58, 109–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talari, A.C.S.; Martinez, M.A.G.; Movasaghi, Z.; Rehman, S.; Rehman, I.U. Advances in Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy of Biological Tissues. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2017, 52, 456–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oleszko, A.; Olsztyńska-Janus, S.; Walski, T.; Grzeszczuk-Kuć, K.; Bujok, J.; Gałecka, K.; Czerski, A.; Witkiewicz, W.; Komorowska, M. Application of FTIR-ATR Spectroscopy to Determine the Extent of Lipid Peroxidation in Plasma during Haemodialysis. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 245607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewis, R.N.A.H.; McElhaney, R.N. The Structure and Organization of Phospholipid Bilayers as Revealed by Infrared Spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lipids 1998, 96, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wood, B.R. The Importance of Hydration and DNA Conformation in Interpreting Infrared Spectra of Cells and Tissues. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 1980–1998, Correction in Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cs90121a. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barth, A. The Infrared Absorption of Amino Acid Side Chains. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2000, 74, 141–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chong, I.-G.; Jun, C.-H. Performance of Some Variable Selection Methods When Multicollinearity Is Present. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2005, 78, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coe, J.I. Hypothermia: Autopsy Findings and Vitreous Glucose. J. Forensic Sci. 1984, 29, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rousseau, G.; Chao de la Barca, J.M.; Rougé-Maillart, C.; Teresiński, G.; Chabrun, F.; Dieu, X.; Drevin, G.; Mirebeau-Prunier, D.; Simard, G.; Reynier, P.; et al. Preliminary Metabolomic Profiling of the Vitreous Humor from Hypothermia Fatalities. J. Proteome Res. 2021, 20, 2390–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bray, M. The Effect of Chilling, Freezing, and Rewarming on the Postmortem Chemistry of Vitreous Humor. J. Forensic Sci. 1984, 29, 404–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Theil-Sen Regression—Scikit-Learn 0.19.2 Documentation. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/0.19/auto_examples/linear_model/plot_theilsen.html (accessed on 5 March 2026).
- Justia U.S. Supreme Court. Daubert et Ux, Individually and as Guardians ad Litem for Daubert, et al. v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeal as for the Ninth Circuit. 1992; pp. 579–601. Available online: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/509/579/case.pdf (accessed on 28 February 2026).
- Justia U.S. Supreme Court. Frye v. U.S., 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923). Available online: https://law.justia.com/cases/district-of-columbia/court-of-appeals/1923/no-3968.html (accessed on 28 February 2026).
- Madea, B. Methods for Determining Time of Death. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2016, 12, 451–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Locci, E.; Stocchero, M.; Noto, A.; Chighine, A.; Natali, L.; Napoli, P.E.; Caria, R.; De-Giorgio, F.; Nioi, M.; d’Aloja, E. A 1H NMR Metabolomic Approach for the Estimation of the Time since Death Using Aqueous Humour: An Animal Model. Metabolomics 2019, 15, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afseth, N.K.; Kohler, A. Extended Multiplicative Signal Correction in Vibrational Spectroscopy, a Tutorial. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2012, 117, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abraham, S.; Golay, M.J.E. Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. Anal. Chem. 1964, 36, 1627–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rinnan, Å.; van den Berg, F.; Engelsen, S.B. Review of the Most Common Pre-Processing Techniques for near-Infrared Spectra. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2009, 28, 1201–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fisher, R.A. Frequency Distribution of the Values of the Correlation Coefficient in Samples from an Indefinitely Large Population. Biometrika 1915, 10, 507–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benjamini, Y.; Hochberg, Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 1995, 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonnier, F.; Byrne, H.J. Understanding the Molecular Information Contained in Principal Component Analysis of Vibrational Spectra of Biological Systems. Analyst 2011, 137, 322–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jolliffe, I.T.; Cadima, J. Principal Component Analysis: A Review and Recent Developments. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2016, 374, 20150202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hawkins, D.M.; Basak, S.C.; Mills, D. Assessing Model Fit by Cross-Validation. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 579–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, H.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, K.; Liu, R.; Fan, S.; Wang, Z. Estimation of Postmortem Interval Using Attenuated Total Reflectance: Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy in Adipose Tissues. J. Forensic Sci. Med. 2019, 5, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Efron, B.; Tibshirani, R.J. An Introduction to the Bootstrap; Chapman and Hall/CRC: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Faber, N.K.M. Estimating the Uncertainty in Estimates of Root Mean Square Error of Prediction: Application to Determining the Size of an Adequate Test Set in Multivariate Calibration. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1999, 49, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graf, R.; Zeldovich, M.; Friedrich, S. Comparing Linear Discriminant Analysis and Supervised Learning Algorithms for Binary Classification—A Method Comparison Study. Biom. J. 2024, 66, 2200098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, R.; Hao, N. Quadratic Discriminant Analysis by Projection. J. Multivar. Anal. 2022, 190, 104987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cortes, C.; Vapnik, V. Support-Vector Networks. Mach. Learn. 1995, 20, 273–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breiman, L. Random Forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45, 5–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menze, B.H.; Kelm, B.M.; Masuch, R.; Himmerlreich, U.; Bachert, P.; Petrich, W.; Hamprecht, F.A. A Comparison of Random Forest and Its Gini Importance with Standard Chemometric Methods for the Feature Selection and Classification of Spectral Data. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, L.; Zheng, C.; Zhou, W.; Zhou, W.-X. A New Principle for Tuning-Free Huber Regression. Stat. Sin. 2021, 31, 2153–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, A.; Jayaprakash, B.; Jasim, L.H.; Kundlas, M.; Anad, M.Y.; Srivastava, A.; Ramudu, M.J.; Bharathi, B.; Sahu, P.K. Implementing Partial Least Squares and Machine Learning Regressive Models for Prediction of Drug Release in Targeted Drug Delivery Application. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 22461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fischler, M.A.; Bolles, R.C. Random Sample Consensus: A Paradigm for Model Fitting with Applications to Image Analysis and Automated Cartography. Commun. ACM 1981, 24, 381–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Wavenumber of Diagnostic Peak (cm−1) | Vibrational Mode | Biochemical Band Assignment | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Literature | Observed | ||
| ~1666 | ~1663 | ν (C=O), ν (C–N) (amide I) | α helices in peptides, proteins |
| ~1630 | ~1630 | ν (C=O), ν (C–N) (amide I) | β sheets in peptides, proteins; contribution from small nitrogenous solutes |
| ~1580 | ~1580 | ν (C–N), δ (N–H) (amide II) | proteins and nitrogen-containing metabolites (urea, creatinine, uric acid) |
| ~1452 | ~1456 | δ (CH2), δ (CH3) | lipids, proteins, aliphatic groups from small metabolites |
| ~1417 | ~1414 | ν_s (COO−) | free amino acids, organic acids, hyaluronic acid |
| ~1313 | ~1315 | ν (C–N), δ (N–H) (amide III) | proteins, peptides |
| ~1120 | ~1121 | ν (C–O) | lactate and small carbohydrates |
| ~1080 | ~1086 | ν (P–O), ν (C–O) | phosphate-containing compounds, phosphoric acids |
| ~1040 | ~1041 | ν (C–O), ν (C–OH) | glucose, monosaccharides |
| ~925 | ~925 | ν (C–O), ν (P–O) | nucleic acids fragments |
| ~854 | ~855 | ν (C–C), ν (C–O) | lactate and small carbohydrates |
| ~780 | ~780 | ν (C–O), ν (C–C) | carbohydrate |
| Peak (cm−1) | r | 95% CI | p (FDR) | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1086 | 0.549 | [0.375, 0.686] | 1.6 × 10−6 | Strong positive |
| 1580 | −0.493 | [−0.643, −0.307] | 2.0 × 10−5 | Moderate negative |
| 1315 | −0.481 | [−0.634, −0.292] | 2.6 × 10−5 | Moderate negative |
| 1630 | 0.434 | [0.237, 0.597] | 1.7 × 10−4 | Moderate positive |
| 1041 | 0.407 | [0.205, 0.575] | 4.3 × 10−4 | Moderate positive |
| 1663 | 0.33 | [0.119, 0.513] | 5.6 × 10−3 | Weak positive |
| 1456 | 0.323 | [0.111, 0.506] | 6.0 × 10−3 | Weak positive |
| 1414 | −0.29 | [−0.479, −0.075] | 1.2 × 10−2 | Weak negative |
| 780 | −0.29 | [−0.479, −0.075] | 1.2 × 10−2 | Weak negative |
| 855 | −0.266 | [−0.459, −0.049] | 2.1 × 10−2 | Weak negative |
| 1121 | −0.142 | [−0.351, 0.080] | 0.226 | Not significant |
| 925 | 0.023 | [−0.197, 0.242] | 0.837 | Not significant |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Samples used | 20 (all known) |
| Optimal components | 2 |
| RMSE (hours) | 15.82 |
| MAE (hours) | 12.27 |
| R2 | 0.531 |
| 95% CI (non-parametric) | ±36.1 |
| Sample | Estimated PMI (h) | PLS Predicted (h) | 50% CI (h) | 75% CI (h) | 90% CI (h) | Agreement with Estimate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 647 | ~12 | 29.6 | [23–37] | [14–46] | [10–50] | Consistent (within 90% CI) |
| 205 | ~15 | 67 | [60–74] | [51–83] | [47–87] | Discrepant (outside 90% CI) |
| 634 | ~17 | 37.7 | [31–45] | [22–54] | [18–58] | Discrepant (outside 90% CI) |
| 723 | ~19 | 28.9 | [22–36] | [13–45] | [9–49] | Consistent (within 75% CI) |
| 643 | ~20 | 54.6 | [48–62] | [39–71] | [35–75] | Discrepant (outside 90% CI) |
| 637 | ~21 | 48.5 | [42–56] | [33–65] | [29–69] | Discrepant (outside 90% CI) |
| 467 | ~33 | 27.1 | [20–34] | [11–43] | [7–47] | Consistent (within 50% CI) |
| 1247 | ~33 | 39.6 | [33–47] | [24–56] | [20–60] | Consistent (within 50% CI) |
| 598 | ~35.5 | 39.2 | [32–46] | [23–55] | [19–59] | Consistent (within 50% CI) |
| 641 | ~179 | 80.1 | [73–87] | [64–96] | [60–100] | Large discrepancy |
| Classifier | Accuracy | Precision (Early) | Recall (Early) | Precision (Late) | Recall (Late) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Random Forest | 0.700 | 0.750 | 0.375 | 0.688 | 0.917 |
| LDA | 0.600 | 0.500 | 0.375 | 0.643 | 0.750 |
| SVM (linear) | 0.600 | 0 | 0 | 0.600 | 1.000 |
| QDA | 0.450 | 0.412 | 0.875 | 0.667 | 0.167 |
| SVM (RBF) | 0.450 | 0 | 0 | 0.529 | 0.750 |
| Sample | Predicted Class | Confidence | PMI Estimate | Agreement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 647 | Early (≤48 h) | 0.59 | ~12 h | yes |
| 205 | Early (≤48 h) | 0.52 | ~15 h | yes |
| 634 | Early (≤48 h) | 0.64 | ~17 h | yes |
| 723 | Early (≤48 h) | 0.83 | ~19 h | yes |
| 643 | Late (>48 h) | 0.52 | ~20 h | no |
| 637 | Early (≤48 h) | 0.64 | ~21 h | yes |
| 1247 | Early (≤48 h) | 0.64 | ~33 h | yes |
| 467 | Early (≤48 h) | 0.62 | ~33 h | yes |
| 598 | Early (≤48 h) | 0.64 | ~35.5 h | yes |
| 641 | Late (>48 h) | 0.87 | ~179 h | no |
| Model | Full Dataset (n = 20) | Excluding Clinical Confounders i (n = 17) | Excluding PLS Problematic ii (n = 18) | Forensic Range (PMI < 72 h, n = 13) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMSE (h) | R2 | MAE (h) | RMSE (h) | R2 | MAE (h) | RMSE (h) | R2 | MAE (h) | RMSE (h) | R2 | MAE (h) | |
| PLS (2 comp) | 15.82 | 0.531 | 12.27 | 12.27 | 0.688 | 9.96 | 12.44 | 0.705 | 10.01 | 20.46 | −2.102 | 14.90 |
| OLS (Baseline) | 15.57 | 0.545 | 12.66 | 10.93 | 0.753 | 9.17 | 18.17 | 0.370 | 13.07 | 20.46 | −2.104 | 14.02 |
| Theil–Sen | 15.57 | 0.545 | 12.66 | 10.93 | 0.753 | 9.17 | 18.17 | 0.370 | 13.07 | 20.46 | −2.104 | 14.02 |
| RANSAC | 15.91 | 0.525 | 13.22 | 10.93 | 0.753 | 9.17 | 18.19 | 0.369 | 13.10 | 20.75 | −2.192 | 15.11 |
| Huber | 24.33 | −0.11 | 21.04 | 23.08 | −0.102 | 19.99 | 23.94 | −0.093 | 21.22 | 13.04 | −0.260 | 10.73 |
| Sample | Case | PMI | Age | Gender | Cause of Death |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, hospital deaths, known PMI | |||||
| 172 | 172/2025 | 24.8 * | 73 | F | thermal burns |
| 490 | 490/2024 | 26.67 * | 67 | M | thermal burns |
| 371 | 371/2024 | 29.25 * | 72 | M | poisoning |
| 152 | 152/2025 | 31.83 * | 78 | M | traumatic brain injury, chronic subdural hematoma |
| 484 | 484/2025 | 40.5 * | 79 | M | traumatic brain injury |
| 1148 | 1148/2024 | 43.58 * | 46 | M | traumatic brain injury |
| 1400 | 1400/2024 | 43.83 * | 51 | M | traumatic brain injury |
| 718 | 718/2024 | 46.25 * | 50 | M | head trauma, subdural hematoma surgery |
| 1242 | 1242/2024 | 48.73 * | 57 | M | epilepsy seizure |
| 455 | 455/2025 | 48.97 * | 49 | M | tonsil carcinoma |
| 645 | 645/2024 | 53.42 * | 65 | M | traumatic brain injury |
| 1139 | 1139/2024 | 55.98 * | 71 | M | cervical spine injury |
| 1285 | 1285/2024 | 64.87 * | 90 | F | septic shock, infected leg hematoma |
| 317 | 317/2024 | 73.33 * | 75 | M | subdural hematoma, septic shock |
| 482 | 482/2025 | 76.08 * | 71 | M | septic shock |
| 1478 | 1478/2024 | 82.83 * | 64 | M | traumatic brain injury |
| 597 | 597/2024 | 87.25 * | 88 | M | traumatic brain injury |
| 332 | 332/2024 | 90.5 * | 48 | M | meningeal hemorrhage |
| 16 | 16/2025 | 94.33 * | 57 | M | pancreatic cancer, acute cerebral stroke |
| 1104 | 1104/2024 | 97.58 * | 54 | F | drug intoxication |
| Cohort 2, estimated PMI | |||||
| Hospital deaths | |||||
| 641 | 641/2024 | 179.28 * | 69 | M | septic shock |
| Scene deaths | |||||
| 647 | 647/2024 | ~12 ** | 35 | M | drug intoxication |
| 205 | 205/2025 | ~15 ** | 55 | M | hypothermia |
| 634 | 634/2024 | ~17 ** | 64 | M | fall from height |
| 723 | 723/2024 | ~19 ** | 19 | M | hypothermia |
| 643 | 643/2024 | ~20 ** | 55 | M | fall from height |
| 637 | 637/2024 | ~21 ** | 71 | F | thermal burns |
| 467 | 467/2025 | ~33 ** | 49 | M | choking |
| 1247 | 1247/2024 | ~33 ** | 55 | M | septic shock |
| 598 | 598/2024 | ~35.5 ** | 25 | M | hanging |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Țurlea, I.R.; Curca, G.C.; Mernea, M.; Mătanie, A.C.; Fendrihan, S.; Mihăilescu, D.F. FTIR Spectroscopy of Vitreous Humor for Postmortem Interval Estimation: A Multivariate Regression Approach. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 3468. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27083468
Țurlea IR, Curca GC, Mernea M, Mătanie AC, Fendrihan S, Mihăilescu DF. FTIR Spectroscopy of Vitreous Humor for Postmortem Interval Estimation: A Multivariate Regression Approach. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(8):3468. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27083468
Chicago/Turabian StyleȚurlea, Ioana Ruxandra, George Cristian Curca, Maria Mernea, Alina Cristina Mătanie, Sergiu Fendrihan, and Dan Florin Mihăilescu. 2026. "FTIR Spectroscopy of Vitreous Humor for Postmortem Interval Estimation: A Multivariate Regression Approach" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 8: 3468. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27083468
APA StyleȚurlea, I. R., Curca, G. C., Mernea, M., Mătanie, A. C., Fendrihan, S., & Mihăilescu, D. F. (2026). FTIR Spectroscopy of Vitreous Humor for Postmortem Interval Estimation: A Multivariate Regression Approach. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(8), 3468. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27083468

