Physiologically Relevant Organotypic Tissue Slice Model for Evaluating Cell Responses to Ionizing Radiation
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Approaches for Handling Living Organotypic Tissue Slices
3. Current Approaches to 3D Tissue Models for Assessment of Ionizing Radiation Sources
4. Tissue Cultures in Pharmacology and Radiobiology
5. Future Research
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| CAM | Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane |
| ECM | Extracellular Matrix |
| LD50 | Median Lethal Dose |
| OTC | Organotypic Tissue Culture |
| OTS | Organotypic Tissue Slices |
| ROS | Reactive Oxygen Species |
References
- Gabryś, D.; Greco, O.; Patel, G.; Prise, K.M.; Tozer, G.M.; Kanthou, C. Radiation Effects on the Cytoskeleton of Endothelial Cells and Endothelial Monolayer Permeability. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2007, 69, 1553–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, D.; Xue, G.; Zhu, J.; Hu, B. Ionizing radiation induced biological effects in three-dimensional cell cultures. Rend. Lincei 2014, 25, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baranovskii, D.; Smirnova, A.; Yakimova, A.; Kisel, A.; Koryakin, S.; Atiakshin, D.; Katunina, A.; Sidorova, M.; Chernikov, V.; Knyazev, E.; et al. Tissue-Cultured Chondrocytes Survive After Irradiation in 1300 Gy Dose. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Desoize, B.; Jardillier, J. Multicellular Resistance: A Paradigm for Clinical Resistance? Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2000, 36, 193–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Raitanen, J.; Barta, B.; Hacker, M.; Georg, D.; Balber, T.; Mitterhauser, M. Comparison of radiation response between 2D and 3D cell culture models of different human cancer cell lines. Cells 2023, 12, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fazeli, G.R.; Khouei, S.; Nikoufar, A.; Goliaei, B. Reduced DNA Damage in Tumor Spheroids Compared to Monolayer Cultures Exposed to Ionizing Radiation. Iran. J. Radiat. Res. 2007, 5, 63–69. [Google Scholar]
- Santini, M.T.; Rainaldi, G.; Indovina, P.L. Multicellular tumour spheroids in radiation biology. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1999, 75, 787–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durand, R.E.; Sutherland, R.M. Radiation Studies with Spheroids. In Spheroids in Cancer Research; Acker, H., Carlsson, J., Durand, R., Sutherland, R.M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1984; pp. 103–115. [Google Scholar]
- Tang, H.M.; Talbot, C.C.; Fung, M.C.; Tang, H.L. Molecular signature of anastasis for reversal of apoptosis. F1000Research 2017, 6, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, R.N.; Khosravi, M.; Rahman, H.S.; Adili, A.; Kamali, A.; Solali, S.; Fakhrjou, A. Anastasis: Cell Recovery Mechanisms and Potential Role in Cancer. Cell Commun. Signal. 2022, 20, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, R.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Liu, M.; Sun, L.; Pan, X.; Hu, H.; Jiang, B.; Zou, Y.; Liu, Q.; et al. Anastasis enhances metastasis and chemoresistance of colorectal cancer cells through upregulating cIAP2/NF-κB signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2023, 14, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashemi, S.R.; Hosseinpour-Soleimani, F.; Abedi, M.; Mostafavi, E.; Mozafari, M.; Laurent, S.; Rafiei, P.; Kalantari, A. Nanomedicine Solutions for Inhibiting Anastasis and Inducing Apoptosis to Mitigate Relapse in Treatment-Resistant Cancers. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2025, 1006, 178121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Seervi, M.; Sumi, S.; Chandrasekharan, A.; Sharma, A.K.; SanthoshKumar, T.R. Molecular profiling of anastatic cancer cells: Potential role of the nuclear export pathway. Cell Oncol. 2019, 42, 645–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mavragani, I.V.; Laskaratou, D.A.; Frey, B.; Candéias, S.M.; Gaipl, U.S.; Lumniczky, K.; Georgakilas, A.G. Key Mechanisms Involved in Ionizing Radiation-Induced Systemic Effects. A Current Review. Toxicol. Res. 2016, 5, 12–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Edmondson, R.; Broglie, J.J.; Adcock, A.F.; Yang, L. Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Systems and Their Applications in Drug Discovery and Cell-Based Biosensors. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 2014, 12, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vantangoli, M.M.; Madnick, S.J.; Huse, S.M.; Weston, P.; Boekelheide, K. MCF-7 human breast cancer cells form differentiated microtissues in scaffold-free hydrogels. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sant, S.; Johnston, P.A. The production of 3D tumor spheroids for cancer drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today Technol. 2017, 23, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perut, F.; Sbrana, F.V.; Avnet, S.; De Milito, A.; Baldini, N. Spheroid-based 3D cell cultures identify salinomycin as a promising drug for the treatment of chondrosarcoma. J. Orthop. Res. 2018, 36, 2305–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smyrek, I.; Mathew, B.; Fischer, S.C.; Lissek, S.M.; Becker, S.; Stelzer, E.H.K. E-cadherin, actin, microtubules and FAK dominate different spheroid formation phases and important elements of tissue integrity. Biol. Open 2019, 8, bio037051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nath, S.; Devi, G.R. Three-Dimensional Culture Systems in Cancer Research: Focus on Tumor Spheroid Model. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016, 163, 94–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhmoud, J.F.; Woolley, J.F.; Moustafa, A.A.; Malki, M.I. DNA Damage/Repair Management in Cancers. Cancers 2020, 12, 1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatia, S.N.; Ingber, D.E. Microfluidic Organs-on-Chips. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 760–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akolawala, Q.; Accardo, A. Engineered Cell Microenvironments: A Benchmark Tool for Radiobiology. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2025, 17, 5563–5577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aziz, A.U.R.; Geng, C.; Fu, M.; Yu, X.; Qin, K.; Liu, B. The Role of Microfluidics for Organ on Chip Simulations. Bioengineering 2017, 4, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- An, L.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y. Organ-on-a-Chip Applications in Microfluidic Platforms. Micromachines 2025, 16, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Remmert, K.; Hernandez, J.M.; Lwin, T.M. Overview of Advances in Live Animal Imaging. In Success in Academic Surgery: Basic Science; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2025; pp. 301–320. [Google Scholar]
- Keam, S.; MacKinnon, K.M.; D’Alonzo, R.A.; Gill, S.; Ebert, M.A.; Nowak, A.K.; Cook, A.M. Effects of Photon Radiation on DNA Damage, Cell Proliferation, Cell Survival, and Apoptosis of Murine and Human Mesothelioma Cell Lines. Adv. Radiat. Oncol. 2022, 7, 101013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mochizuki, C.; Kayabe, Y.; Nakamura, J.; Igase, M.; Mizuno, T.; Nakamura, M. Surface Functionalization of Organosilica Nanoparticles with Au Nanoparticles Inhibits Cell Proliferation and Induces Cell Death in 4T1 Mouse Mammary Tumor Cells for DNA and Mitochondrial-Synergized Damage in Radiotherapy. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 907642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shestakova, V.A.; Klabukov, I.D.; Baranovskii, D.S.; Shegay, P.V.; Kaprin, A.D. Assessment of immunological responses—A novel challenge in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Biomed. Res. Ther. 2022, 9, 5384–5386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shestakova, V.A.; Smirnova, E.I.; Atiakshin, D.A.; Kisel, A.A.; Koryakin, S.N.; Litun, E.V.; Saburov, V.O.; Demyashkin, G.A.; Lagoda, T.S.; Yakimova, A.O.; et al. Impact of minimally manipulated cell therapy on immune responses in radiation-induced skin wound healing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrel, A.; Burrow, M.T. Cultivation of Tissues in Vitro and its Technique. J. Exp. Med. 1911, 13, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrel, A. A Method for the Physiological Study of Tissues in Vitro. J. Exp. Med. 1923, 38, 407–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suckert, T.; Nexhipi, S.; Dietrich, A.; Koch, R.; Kunz-Schughart, L.A.; Bahn, E.; Beyreuther, E. Models for translational proton radiobiology—From bench to bedside and back. Cancers 2021, 13, 4216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoshida, Y.; Suzuki, Y.; Al-Jahdari, W.S.; Hamada, N.; Funayama, T.; Shirai, K.; Katoh, H.; Sakashita, T.; Kobayashi, Y.; Nakano, T. Evaluation of the relative biological effectiveness of carbon ion beams in the cerebellum using the rat organotypic slice culture system. J. Radiat. Res. 2012, 53, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schettino, G.; Johnson, G.W.; Marino, S.A.; Brenner, D.J. Development of a method for assessing non-targeted radiation damage in an artificial 3D human skin model. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2010, 86, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Szymonowicz, K.; Krysztofiak, A.; van der Linden, J.; Kern, A.; Deycmar, S.; Oeck, S.; Squire, A.; Koska, B.; Hlouschek, J.; Vüllings, M.; et al. Proton irradiation increases the necessity for homologous recombination repair along with the indispensability of non-homologous end joining. Cells 2020, 9, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamiloglu, S.; Sari, G.; Ozdal, T.; Capanoglu, E. Guidelines for Cell Viability Assays. Food Front. 2020, 1, 332–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frandsen, S.K.; Gibot, L.; Madi, M.; Gehl, J.; Rols, M.P. Calcium Electroporation: Evidence for Differential Effects in Normal and Malignant Cell Lines, Evaluated in a 3D Spheroid Model. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varan, G.; Varan, C.; Öztürk, S.C.; Benito, J.M.; Esendağlı, G.; Bilensoy, E. Therapeutic efficacy and biodistribution of paclitaxel-bound amphiphilic cyclodextrin nanoparticles: Analyses in 3D tumor culture and tumor-bearing animals in vivo. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, N.H.; Park, H.J.; Yang, S.S.; Choi, K.S.; Lee, J.S. Anti-cancer efficacy of nonthermal plasma dissolved in a liquid, liquid plasma in heterogeneous cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakajima, K.; Takakura, H.; Shimizu, Y.; Ogawa, M. Changes in Plasma Membrane Damage Inducing Cell Death after Treatment with Near-Infrared Photoimmunotherapy. Cancer Sci. 2018, 109, 2889–2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Teo, A.E.; McCarty, N. ROS-Induced CXCR4 Signaling Regulates Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) Cell Survival and Drug Resistance in the Bone Marrow Microenvironment via Autophagy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 187–199, Erratum in Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaidieh, T.; Smith, J.R.; Ball, K.E.; An, Q. ROS as a novel indicator to predict anticancer drug efficacy. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baranovskii, D.; Lyamina, S.; Kalish, S.; Kozhevnikova, E.; Ivanova, T.; Kisel, A.; Malkov, M.; Yakovleva, T.; Chernikov, V.; Knyazev, E.; et al. Fractionated Electron Irradiation Induces Human Adipose Tissue Stem Cell Senescence. Cytotherapy 2025, 27, e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smirnova, A.; Yatsenko, E.; Baranovskii, D.; Klabukov, I. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in skin wound healing: The risk of senescent drift induction in secretome-based therapeutics. Mil. Med. Res. 2023, 10, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Habanjar, O.; Diab-Assaf, M.; Caldefie-Chezet, F.; Delort, L. 3D Cell Culture Systems: Tumor Application, Advantages, and Disadvantages. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobayashi, D.; Shibata, A.; Oike, T.; Nakano, T. One-Step Protocol for Evaluation of the Mode of Radiation-Induced Clonogenic Cell Death by Fluorescence Microscopy. J. Vis. Exp. 2017, e56338. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Fu, Q.; Huang, T.; Liu, Y.; Chen, G.; Lin, S. Ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage responses affect cell compressibility. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2022, 603, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jogdand, A.; Alvi, S.B.; Rajalakshmi, P.S.; Rengan, A.K. NIR-Dye Based Mucoadhesive Nanosystem for Photothermal Therapy in Breast Cancer Cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2020, 208, 111901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, D.R.; Kato, D.; Endo, Y.; Kadosawa, T. Apoptosis and Ki-67 as Predictive Factors for Response to Radiation Therapy in Feline Nasal Lymphomas. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2016, 78, 1161–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, Q.; Lin, C.; Zhu, X.; Cao, Y.; Guo, C.; Wang, L. 125I Seeds Irradiation Inhibits Tumor Growth and Induces Apoptosis by Ki-67, P21, Survivin, Livin and Caspase-9 Expression in Lung Carcinoma Xenografts. Radiat. Oncol. 2020, 15, 1–10, Erratum in Radiat. Oncol. 2021, 15, 214. https://10.1186/s13014-021-01926-y. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Zhang, N.; Wu, J.; Dong, P.; Lv, H.; Wang, Q.; Song, F.; Shi, Y. A Novel Dextran-Based Dual Drug Conjugate Targeted Tumors with High Biodistribution Ratio of Tumors to Normal Tissues. Int. J. Nanomed. 2022, 17, 4895–4910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; He, Y.; Li, F.; Huang, Q.; Kato, T.A.; Hall, R.P.; Li, C.Y. Caspase-3 Promotes Genetic Instability and Carcinogenesis. Mol. Cell 2015, 58, 284–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, G.; Guzman, E.; Balasanyan, V.; Conner, C.M.; Wong, K.; Zhou, H.R.; Kosik, K.S.; Montell, D.J. A molecular signature for anastasis, recovery from the brink of apoptotic cell death. J. Cell Biol. 2017, 216, 3355–3368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; So, C.; Lam, H.; Fung, M.; Tsang, S. Apoptosis reversal promotes cancer stem cell-like cell formation. Neoplasia 2018, 20, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, H.M.; Fung, M.C.; Tang, H.L. Detecting anastasis in vivo by CaspaseTracker biosensor. J. Vis. Exp. 2018, 132, 54107. [Google Scholar]
- Bolookat, E.R.; Malhotra, H.; Rich, L.J.; Sexton, S.; Curtin, L.; Spernyak, J.A.; Singh, A.K.; Seshadri, M. Development and Validation of a Clinically Relevant Workflow for MR-Guided Volumetric Arc Therapy in a Rabbit Model of Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schlaak, R.A.; Frei, A.; Fish, B.L.; Harmann, L.; Gasperetti, T.; Pipke, J.L.; Sun, Y.; Rui, H.; Flister, M.J.; Gantner, B.N.; et al. Acquired immunity is not essential for radiation-induced heart dysfunction but exerts a complex impact on injury. Cancers 2020, 12, 983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kabarriti, R.; Brodin, N.P.; Yaffe, H.; Barahman, M.; Koba, W.R.; Liu, L.; Asp, P.; Tomé, W.A.; Guha, C. Non-Invasive Targeted Hepatic Irradiation and SPECT/CT Functional Imaging to Study Radiation-Induced Liver Damage in Small Animal Models. Cancers 2019, 11, 1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farris, M.K.; Helis, C.A.; Hughes, R.T.; LeCompte, M.C.; Borg, A.M.; Nieto, K.; Munley, M.T.; Willey, J.S. Bench to Bedside: Animal Models of Radiation Induced Musculoskeletal Toxicity. Cancers 2020, 12, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cosper, P.F.; Abel, L.; Lee, Y.; Paz, C.; Kaushik, S.; Nickel, K.P.; Alexandridis, R.; Scott, J.G.; Bruce, J.Y.; Kimple, R.J. Patient Derived Models to Study Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Response. Cancers 2020, 12, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vincent-Chong, V.K.; Seshadri, M. Development and radiation response assessment in a novel syngeneic mouse model of tongue cancer: 2D culture, 3D organoids and orthotopic allografts. Cancers 2020, 12, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alkadhimi, M.; Manne, A.H.; Jiang, Y.; Green, M.; Ryan, A.J. An organotypic model for investigating drug-radiation responses in the lung. J. Biol. Methods 2024, 12, e99010041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghaderi, M.; Fernández Moro, C.; Pouso Elduayen, S.; Hultin, E.; Verbeke, C.S.; Björnstedt, M.; Dillner, J. Genome-wide transcriptome profiling of ex-vivo precision-cut slices from human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haehnel, S.; Rade, M.; Kaiser, N.; Reiche, K.; Horn, A.; Loeffler, D.; Blumert, C.; Rapp, F.; Horn, F.; Meixensberger, J.; et al. RNA sequencing of glioblastoma tissue slice cultures reveals the effects of treatment at the transcriptional level. FEBS Open Bio 2022, 12, 480–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Savas, A.; Warnke, P.C.; Ginap, T.; Feuerstein, T.J.; Ostertag, C.B. The effects of continuous and single-dose radiation on choline uptake in organotypic tissue slice cultures of rabbit hippocampus. Neurol. Res. 2001, 23, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagner, F.R.; Watanabe, R.; Schampers, R.; Singh, D.; Persoon, H.; Schaffer, M.; Fruhstorfer, P.; Plitzko, J.; Villa, E. Preparing samples from whole cells using focused-ion-beam milling for cryo-electron tomography. Nat. Protoc. 2020, 15, 2041–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimou, P.; Trivedi, S.; Liousia, M.; D’Souza, R.R.; Klampatsa, A. Precision-Cut Tumor Slices (PCTS) as an Ex Vivo Model in Immunotherapy Research. Antibodies 2022, 11, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shestakova, V.; Smirnova, A.; Yakimova, A.; Koryakin, S.; Baranovskii, D.; Saburov, V.; Yatsenko, E.; Moiseev, A.; Ivanov, S.; Smirnova, E.; et al. Biological efficacy of ionizing radiation sources on 3D organotypic tissue slices assessed by fluorescence microscopy. Curr. Radiopharm. 2025, 18, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neuhaus, V.; Schaudien, D.; Golovina, T.; Temann, U.-A.; Thompson, C.; Lippmann, T.; Bersch, C.; Pfennig, O.; Jonigk, D.; Braubach, P.; et al. Assessment of Long-Term Cultivated Human Precision-Cut Lung Slices as an Ex Vivo System for Evaluation of Chronic Cytotoxicity and Functionality. J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 2017, 12, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dewyse, L.; Reynaert, H.; van Grunsven, L.A. Best Practices and Progress in Precision-Cut Liver Slice Cultures. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jensen, M.S.; Bouzinab, K.; Tingskov, S.J.; Mutsaers, H.A.M.; Stribos, E.G.D.; Nielsen, P.M.; Jespersen, B. Standardized Protocol for the Preparation of Precision-Cut Kidney Slices: A Translational Model of Renal Fibrosis. In Kidney Research: Experimental Protocols; Nlandu-Khodo, S., Gallazzini, M., Eds.; Methods in Molecular Biology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 123–134. [Google Scholar]
- Sivakumar, R.; Chan, M.; Shin, J.S.; Nishida-Aoki, N.; Kenerson, H.L.; Elemento, O.; Beltran, H.; Yeung, R.; Gujral, T.S. Organotypic tumor slice cultures provide a versatile platform for immuno-oncology and drug discovery. Oncoimmunology 2019, 8, e1670019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baspinar, E.; Simonti, M.; Srour, H.; Desroches, M.; Avitabile, D.; Mantegazza, M. GABAergic Neurons Can Facilitate the Propagation of Cortical Spreading Depolarization: Experiments in Mouse Neocortical Slices and a Novel Neural Field Computational Model. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2025, 21, e1013099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munyonho, F.T.; Clark, R.D.E.; Lin, D.; Khatun, M.S.; Pungan, D.; Dai, G.; Kolls, J.K. Precision-Cut Lung Slices as an Ex Vivo Model to Study Pneumocystis murina Survival and Antimicrobial Susceptibility. mBio 2024, 15, e0146423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ross, A.J.; Krumova, I.; Tunc, B.; Wu, Q.; Wu, C.; Camelliti, P. A novel method to extend viability and functionality of living heart slices. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023, 10, 1244630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kenerson, H.L.; Sullivan, K.M.; Labadie, K.P.; Pillarisetty, V.G.; Yeung, R.S. Protocol for Tissue Slice Cultures from Human Solid Tumors to Study Therapeutic Response. STAR Protoc. 2021, 2, 100574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wiesner, E.; Binz-Lotter, J.; Hackl, A.; Unnersjö-Jess, D.; Rutkowski, N.; Benzing, T.; Hackl, M.J. Correlative multiphoton-STED microscopy of podocyte calcium levels and slit diaphragm ultrastructure in the renal glomerulus. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 13019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Layous, R.; Tamás, B.; Mike, A.; Szegedi, V.; Mátyás, F.; Osapay, J.; Káli, S.; Szabó, G.; Holderith, N. Optical Recordings of Unitary Synaptic Connections Reveal High and Random Local Connectivity between CA3 Pyramidal Cells. J. Neurosci. 2025, 45, e0102252025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Panzer, J.K.; Caicedo, A. Protocol to generate and utilize pancreatic tissue slices to study endocrine and exocrine physiology in situ from mouse and human tissue. STAR Protoc. 2023, 4, 102399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gundogan, F.; Gilligan, J.; de la Monte, S. Precision-Cut Slice Culture Method for Rat Placenta. In Trophoblasts: Methods and Protocols; Renaud, S.J., Ed.; Methods in Molecular Biology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2023; Volume 2645, pp. 35–41. [Google Scholar]
- Adler-Levy, Y.; Roussel, T.; Comment, A.; Ducret, M.-R.; Lutz, N.W.; Cudalbu, C.; Guechi, A.; Baktash, J.B.; Lazeyras, F.; Dumont, E.; et al. In-Cell determination of lactate dehydrogenase activity in a luminal breast cancer model–ex vivo investigation of excised xenograft tumor slices using dDNP hyperpolarized [1-13C] pyruvate. Sensors 2019, 19, 2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kheirollahi, V.; Wasnick, R.M.; Biasin, V.; Vazquez-Armendariz, A.I.; Chu, X.; Moiseenko, A.; Weiss, A.; Wilhelm, J.; Zhang, J.-S.; Kwapiszewska, G.; et al. Metformin Induces Lipogenic Differentiation in Myofibroblasts to Reverse Lung Fibrosis. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selever, J.; Kong, J.Q.; Arenkiel, B.R. A rapid approach to high-resolution fluorescence imaging in semi-thick brain slices. J. Vis. Exp. 2011, 53, 2807. [Google Scholar]
- Cala Garcia, J.D.; Arce Deza, C.F.; Waich, A.R.; Poli, F.; Cardenas Castillo, R.E.; Tsoyi, K.; Pineda, R.H.; Koenigshoff, M.; Rosas, I.O.; Celada, L.J. Standardization and Validation of a Protocol for Human Precision-Cut Lung Slices (PCLS) for the Study of Lung Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2024, 209, A2555. [Google Scholar]
- Greier, M.D.C.; Runge, A.; Dudas, J.; Ricchelmann, H.; Dudás, J. Cytotoxic Response of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes of Head and Neck Cancer Slice Cultures Under Mitochondrial Dysfunction. Front. Oncol. 2024, 14, 1364577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Speckmann, E.J.; Köhling, R.; Lücke, A.; Straub, H.; Wittkowski, W.; Elger, C.; Wiemann, M.; Bingmann, D. Microcutting of living brain slices by a pulsed ultrafine water jet which allows simultaneous electrophysiological recordings (micromingotome). J. Neurosci. Methods 1998, 82, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez-Martin, B.; Ranade, G.; Pandey, H.; Thakor, N.V. Low Cost, Portable, 3D Printable Tissue Precision Slicer. HardwareX 2024, 20, e00611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gähwiler, B.H. Organotypic Monolayer Cultures of Nervous Tissue. J. Neurosci. Methods 1981, 4, 329–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tauck, D.L.; Nadler, J.V. Evidence of functional mossy fiber sprouting in hippocampal formation of kainic acid-treated rats. J. Neurosci. 1985, 5, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazar, A.A.; Schulte, R.; Faddegon, B.; Blakely, E.A.; Roach, M., III. Clinical Trials Involving Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy and the Path Forward. Cancer 2018, 124, 4467–4476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Zhang, P.; Li, F.; Jin, X.; Li, J.; Chen, W.; Li, Q. Metal-Based NanoEnhancers for Future Radiotherapy: Radiosensitizing and Synergistic Effects on Tumor Cells. Theranostics 2018, 8, 1824–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Okamoto, K.; Ishikawa, T.; Abe, R.; Ishikawa, D.; Kobayashi, C.; Mizunuma, M.; Norimoto, H.; Matsuki, N.; Ikegaya, Y. Ex vivo cultured neuronal networks emit in vivo-like spontaneous activity. J. Physiol. Sci. 2014, 64, 421–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bortolussi, S.; Altieri, S. Boron Concentration Measurement in Biological Tissues by Charged Particle Spectrometry. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 2013, 52, 493–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kenerson, H.L.; Sullivan, K.M.; Seo, Y.D.; Stadeli, K.M.; Ussakli, C.; Yan, X.; Lausted, C.; Pillarisetty, V.G.; Park, J.O.; Riehle, K.J.; et al. Tumor Slice Culture as a Biologic Surrogate of Human Cancer. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cristina, F.; Vieira, L.; Bentley, M.V.L.B. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy as a Tool for the Investigation of Skin Drug Delivery Systems and Diagnosis of Skin Disorders. In Confocal Laser Microscopy—Principles and Applications in Medicine, Biology, and the Food Sciences; Lagali, N., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2013; p. 99. [Google Scholar]
- Dominijanni, A.J.; Devarasetty, M.; Forsythe, S.D.; Votanopoulos, K.I.; Soker, S. Cell Viability Assays in Three-Dimensional Hydrogels: A Comparative Study of Accuracy. Tissue Eng. Part C 2021, 27, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gantenbein-Ritter, B.; Potier, E.; Zeiter, S.; van der Werf, M.; Sprecher, C.M.; Ito, K. Accuracy of Three Techniques to Determine Cell Viability in 3D Tissues or Scaffolds. Tissue Eng. Part C 2008, 14, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Parekh, P.R.; Choudhuri, R.; Weyemi, U.; Martin, O.A.; Bonner, W.M.; Redon, C.E. Evaluation of surrogate tissues as indicators of drug activity in a melanoma skin model. Cancer Med. 2016, 5, 1731–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fang, R.; Halpern, A.R.; Rahman, M.M.; Huang, Z.; Lei, Z.; Hell, S.J.; Dulac, C.; Zhuang, X. Three-Dimensional Single-Cell Transcriptome Imaging of Thick Tissues. eLife 2024, 12, RP90029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicolas, J.; Magli, S.; Rabbachin, L.; Sampaolesi, S.; Nicotra, F.; Russo, L. 3D extracellular matrix mimics: Fundamental concepts and role of materials chemistry to influence stem cell fate. Biomacromolecules 2020, 21, 1968–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Langhans, S.A. Three-Dimensional In Vitro Cell Culture Models in Drug Discovery and Drug Repositioning. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, K.H.; Smith, A.S.T.; Lone, S.; Kwon, S.; Kim, D.-H. Biomimetic 3D Tissue Models for Advanced High-Throughput Drug Screening. J. Lab. Autom. 2015, 20, 201–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foglietta, F.; Canaparo, R.; Muccioli, G.; Terreno, E.; Serpe, L. Methodological Aspects and Pharmacological Applications of Three-Dimensional Cancer Cell Cultures and Organoids. Life Sci. 2020, 254, 117784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yip, S.; Wang, N.; Sugimura, R. Give them vasculature and immune cells: How to fill the gap of organoids. Cells Tissues Organs 2023, 212, 369–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arrizabalaga, L.; Russo-Cabrera, J.S.; Belsúe, V.; Berraondo, P.; Melero, I.; Aranda, F. Tumor Slice Culture System for Ex Vivo Immunotherapy Studies. Methods Cell Biol. 2024, 189, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Humpel, C. Organotypic Brain Slice Cultures: A Review. Neuroscience 2015, 305, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rastovic, U.; Bozzano, S.F.; Riva, A.; Simoni-Nieves, A.; Harris, N.; Miquel, R.; Lackner, C.; Zen, Y.; Zamalloa, A.; Menon, K.; et al. Human precision-cut liver slices: A potential platform to study alcohol-related liver disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kobuch, K.; Herrmann, W.A.; Framme, C.; Sachs, H.G.; Gabel, V.-P.; Hillenkamp, J. Maintenance of Adult Porcine Retina and Retinal Pigment Epithelium in Perfusion Culture: Characterisation of an Organotypic In Vitro Model. Exp. Eye Res. 2008, 86, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amesz, J.H.; de Groot, N.M.S.; Langmuur, S.J.J.; de Boer, T.P.; van der Heyden, M.A.G. Biomimetic Cultivation of Atrial Tissue Slices as Novel Platform for In-Vitro Atrial Arrhythmia Studies. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 3648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olinga, P.; Groen, K.; Hof, I.H.; De Kanter, R.; Koster, H.J.; Leeman, W.R.; Rutten, A.A.; Van Twillert, K.; Groothuis, G.M. Comparison of five incubation systems for rat liver slices using functional and viability parameters. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 1997, 38, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, H.; Sarsat, J.P.; Lerche-Langrand, C.; Housset, C.; Balladur, P.; Toutain, H.; Albaladejo, V. Morphological and biochemical integrity of human liver slices in long-term culture: Effects of oxygen tension. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2002, 18, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stoppini, L.; Buchs, P.A.; Muller, D. A simple method for organotypic cultures of nervous tissue. J. Neurosci. Methods 1991, 37, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yasuno, H.; Sotomatsu, S.; Maeda, M.; Sato, M.; Nishimura, A.; Matsubara, M. Organ culture of adult human skin; effect of culture temperature. J. Dermatol. 1981, 8, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reaven, E.P.; Cox, A.J. Behavior of adult human skin in organ culture. II. Effects of cellophane tape stripping, temperature, oxygen tension, pH and serum. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1968, 50, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eugène, E.; Cluzeaud, F.; Cifuentes-Diaz, C.; Fricker, D.; Le Duigou, C.; Clemenceau, S.; Baulac, M.; Poncer, J.C.; Miles, R. An Organotypic Brain Slice Preparation from Adult Patients with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. J. Neurosci. Methods 2014, 235, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mock, D.; Main, J.H. Long-Term Organ Culture of Hamster Cheek Pouch Mucosa. J. Oral Pathol. 1976, 5, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schopow, N.; Kallendrusch, S.; Gong, S.; Rapp, F.; Körfer, J.; Gericke, M.; Spindler, N.; Josten, C.; Langer, S.; Bechmann, I. Examination of ex-vivo viability of human adipose tissue slice culture. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0233152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reim, M.; Althoff, C.; Von Mulert, B. Effect of low temperatures on the metabolism of corneal cultures. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 1988, 226, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Agostino, D.P.; Putnam, R.W.; Dean, J.B. Superoxide (·O2−) Production in CA1 Neurons of Rat Hippocampal Slices Exposed to Graded Levels of Oxygen. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 98, 1030–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, X.; Seo, Y.D.; Sullivan, K.M.; Pillarisetty, V.G. Establishment of Slice Cultures as a Tool to Study the Cancer Immune Microenvironment. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1884, 283–295. [Google Scholar]
- Morin, J.-P.; Baste, J.-M.; Gay, A.; Crochemore, C.; Corbière, C.; Monteil, C. Precision Cut Lung Slices as an Efficient Tool for In Vitro Lung Physio-Pharmacotoxicology Studies. Xenobiotica 2013, 43, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez, C.-A.; Kanno, T.; Roberts, S.; Goodwin, K.; Shilts, J.; Tilly, G.; Cook, P.C.; MacDonald, A.S.; Phythian-Adams, A.T.; Allen, J.E. A Cell Culture Model That Mimics Physiological Tissue Oxygenation Using Oxygen-Permeable Membranes. Bio-Protoc. 2019, 9, e3371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Schoen, J. Air-Liquid Interface Cell Culture: From Airway Epithelium to the Female Reproductive Tract. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2019, 54, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meijer, T.G.; Naipal, K.A.; Jager, A.; van Gent, D.C. Ex Vivo Tumor Culture Systems for Functional Drug Testing and Therapy Response Prediction. Future Sci. OA 2017, 3, FSO190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parrish, A.R.; Gandolfi, A.J.; Brendel, K. Precision-cut tissue slices: Applications in pharmacology and toxicology. Life Sci. 1995, 57, 1887–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kang, C.; Qiao, Y.; Li, G.; Baechle, K.; Camelliti, P.; Rentschler, S.; Efimov, I.R. Human Organotypic Cultured Cardiac Slices: New Platform For High Throughput Preclinical Human Trials. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Upadhyay, A.; Tsamchoe, M.; Zeitouni, A.; Gigliotti, J.; Peng, J.; Mahmoodi, M.; Sharkh, H.A.; Makhoul, N.M.; El-Hakim, M.; Wu, J.; et al. Extracellular Vesicles of Salivary Mesenchymal Stem Cells Mitigate Acute Irradiation Injury: Use of an ex-vivo organotypic human slice tissue culture as a disease model. bioRxiv 2025, 2025-09. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merz, F.; Gaunitz, F.; Dehghani, F.; Renner, C.; Meixensberger, J.; Gutenberg, A.; Giese, A.; Schopow, K.; Hellwig, C.; Schäfer, M.; et al. Organotypic slice cultures of human glioblastoma reveal different susceptibilities to treatments. Neuro-Oncol. 2013, 15, 670–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bokhout, L.; Campeiro, J.D.; Dalm, S.U. Exploring the landscape of current in vitro and in vivo models and their relevance for targeted radionuclide theranostics. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2025, 52, 3291–3311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haydo, A.; Schmidt, J.; Crider, A.; Kögler, T.; Ertl, J.; Hehlgans, S.; Hoffmann, M.E.; Rathore, R.; Güllülü, Ö.; Wang, Y.; et al. BRAT1—A new therapeutic target for glioblastoma. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2025, 82, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haydo, A.S. Novel Strategies for the Targeted Elimination of Glioblastoma-and Glioblastoma Stem-like Cells. Doctoral Dissertation, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidorcenco, V.; Krahnen, L.; Schulz, M.; Remy, J.; Kögel, D.; Temme, A.; Krügel, U.; Franke, H.; Aigner, A. Glioblastoma Tissue Slice Tandem-Cultures for Quantitative Evaluation of Inhibitory Effects on Invasion and Growth. Cancers 2020, 12, 2707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heckelmann, B.; Duhn, J.; Braun, R. Current Advances in Preclinical Patient-Derived Cultivation Models for Individualized Drug Response Prediction in Pancreatic Cancer. Chemotherapy 2026, 26, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaupel, P. Tumor microenvironmental physiology and its implications for radiation oncology. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 2004, 14, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Averbeck, D.; Candéias, S.; Chandna, S.; Foray, N.; Friedl, A.A.; Haghdoost, S.; Jeggo, P.; Kämäräinen, O.; Laurier, D.; Lindholm, C.; et al. Establishing Mechanisms Affecting the Individual Response to Ionizing Radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2020, 96, 297–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Budantsev, A.Y. A unified series of microtomes for biology and medicine designed on the basis of a rotation microtome. Biomed. Eng. 1993, 27, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baranovskii, D.; Lyamina, S.; Kisel, A.; Kalish, S.; Kozhevnikova, E.; Ivanova, T.; Malkov, M.; Yakovleva, T.; Chernikov, V.; Knyazev, E.; et al. Electron Beam Irradiation Induces Senescence Alterations in Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2025, 21, 1138–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiao, Y.; Liu, C.; Cui, F.M.; Xu, J.Y.; Tong, J.; Qi, X.F.; Li, Y.H.; Tian, Y.Y. Radiation-Induced Cell Death and Its Mechanisms. Health Phys. 2022, 123, 376–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Averbeck, D.; Rodriguez-Lafrasse, C. Role of Mitochondria in Radiation Responses: Epigenetic, Metabolic, and Signaling Impacts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nordlund, K.; Zinkle, S.J.; Sand, A.E.; Granberg, F.; Averback, R.S.; Stoller, R.E.; Suzudo, T.; Malerba, L.; Banhart, F.; Weber, W.J.; et al. Primary radiation damage: A review of current understanding and models. J. Nucl. Mater. 2018, 512, 450–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tinganelli, W.; Weber, U.; Puspitasari, A.; Simoniello, P.; Abdollahi, A.; Oppermann, J.; Schuy, C.; Horst, F.; Helm, A.; Fournier, C.; et al. FLASH with carbon ions: Tumor control, normal tissue sparing, and distal metastasis in a mouse osteosarcoma model. Radiother. Oncol. 2022, 175, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fajardo, L.F. The Pathology of Ionizing Radiation as Defined by Morphologic Patterns. Acta Oncol. 2005, 44, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Upadhyay, A.; Tsamchoe, M.; Tran, S.D. Salivary Organotypic Tissue Culture: An Ex-vivo 3D Model for Studying Radiation-Induced Injury of Human Salivary Glands. Methods Mol. Biol. 2024, 2749, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warner, J.D.; Peters, C.G.; Saunders, R.; Won, J.H.; Betzenhauser, M.J.; Gunning, W.T.; Yule, D.I.; Giovannucci, D.R. Visualizing form and function in organotypic slices of the adult mouse parotid gland. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2008, 295, G629–G640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanchez, M.M.; Bagdasarian, I.A.; Darch, W.; Morgan, J.T. Organotypic cultures as aging associated disease models. Aging 2022, 14, 9338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majc, B.; Novak, M.; Kopitar-Jerala, N.; Jewett, A.; Breznik, B. Immunotherapy of glioblastoma: Current strategies and challenges in tumor model development. Cells 2021, 10, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roelants, C.; Pillet, C.; Franquet, Q.; Sarrazin, C.; Peilleron, N.; Giacosa, S.; Guyon, L.; Fontanell, A.; Fiard, G.; Long, J.-A.; et al. Ex-Vivo Treatment of Tumor Tissue Slices as a Predictive Preclinical Method to Evaluate Targeted Therapies for Patients with Renal Carcinoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, X.; Fang, D.; Liu, Y.; Ramamoorthi, M.; Zeitouni, A.; Chen, W.; Tran, S.D. Three-dimensional organotypic culture of human salivary glands: The slice culture model. Oral Dis. 2016, 22, 639–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dünker, N.; Jendrossek, V. Implementation of the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model in radiation biology and experimental radiation oncology research. Cancers 2019, 11, 1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shestakova, V.A.; Smirnova, E.I.; Baranovskii, D.S.; Klabukov, I.D. Ex vivo drug testing of patient-derived lung organoids: The breakthrough of organotypic tissue slices for physiologically relevant imaging. Lung Cancer 2025, 203, 108503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Timmins, N.E.; Scherberich, A.; Früh, J.A.; Heberer, M.; Martin, I.; Jakob, M. Three-dimensional cell culture and tissue engineering in a T-CUP (tissue culture under perfusion). Tissue Eng. 2007, 13, 2021–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narciso, M.; Ulldemolins, A.; Júnior, C.; Otero, J.; Navajas, D.; Farré, R.; Gavara, N.; Almendros, I. A fast and efficient decellularization method for tissue slices. Bio-Protoc. 2022, 12, e4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salti, H.; Kramer, L.; Nelz, S.C.; Lorenz, M.; Breitrück, A.; Hofrichter, J.; Frank, M.; Schulz, K.; Mitzner, S.; Wasserkort, R. Decellularization of precision-cut kidney slices—Application of physical and chemical methods. Biomed. Mater. 2023, 18, 025004, Erratum in Biomed. Mater. 2025, 20, 029501. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/adae47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]




| Cutting Methods | Peculiarities | Application | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Krumdieck tissue slicer | Classic cutting device; automatic slicer with a reciprocating blade. Requires pre-prepared cylindrical samples. Slice thickness ~100–500 µm. | Lung, liver, kidney | [70,71,72] |
| Vibrating Microtome | Oscillating (vibrating) blade in a buffer bath, frequency 85 Hz. Vibration reduces resistance, compression. A total of 50–1000 µm and deformation of soft tissue. Typical slices thickness: 50–1000 µm (standard ~200–400 µm). | Liver, solid tumors, brain, lung, heart, kidney, pancreatic tissue | [73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80] |
| McIlwain Tissue Chopper | Guillotine principle: a sharp blade is lowered onto stationary tissue fixed in an agarose block. This method is used to cut small or irregularly shaped specimens measuring ~100–1000 µm. Allows obtaining tissue cubes 300 × 300 × 300 µm. | Placenta, tumor, lung, liver, brain | [81,82,83] |
| Compresstome | A modernized version of the vibratome. The tissue is clamped between two plates during cutting, which minimizes vibration and damage. This method requires the tissue to be embedded in agarose. Typical slices thickness: 50–800 µm (standard ~200–400 µm). Producing sections approximately five times faster than Vibratome. | Brain, lung, tumor | [84,85,86] |
| Pulsed ultrafine water jet | Experimental method. Water is ejected by pressure from patch pipettes (10–12 µm tip diameters). Typical slice thickness: 450–500 µm. | Brain | [87] |
| 3D printable tissue precision slicer and other do-it-yourself devices | A device created by assembling components using a 3D printer (Nylon-12). The system is suitable for long-term culture but requires tissue embedding in agarose gel. The device is operated by using manual mechanical cutting without vibration. Typical slice thickness: 200–500 µm. | Brain | [88] |
| Manual tissue slicing | Outdated approach, using a surgical scalpel, razor blades, or microsurgical instruments (tweezers, scissors) under a stereomicroscope. Typical slice thickness ~300–400 µm. | Brain | [89,90] |
| Staining Type | Description | Application for 3D Cultures | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| MTT/MTS assays | The methods stain products of cellular respiratory metabolism. | The absorption line is very thin and non-standardized for 3D tissue slices. | [97] |
| Live/dead cell evaluation | The method is based on stained cells with damaged membrane and active intracellular enzymes. | The method could be compromised by auto-fluorescence of the extracellular matrix. | [98] |
| Double-strand breakage staining based on anti-γH2AX and other antibody-based techniques | Visualize double-strand breaks and other intracellular reactions. | The reactions could be studied during prolonged exposure and could be performed only by the nanobodies. | [99] |
| RNA-probes for evaluation of the cell expression | Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) can help in understanding the spatial and temporal regulation of genes involved in neurogenesis, neuronal migration, and differentiation. | Additional physical or extended staining methods, cell membrane damage, or electroporation should be explored to perform the FISH technique for tissue slices. | [100] |
| Extracellular Matrix-targeted low molecular weight compounds | The methods could visualize the active groups in collagen macromolecules. | The method requires nanodots or low molecular weight fluorophores. | [101] |
| Tissue Origin | Physical Properties of Tissue | Media and Supplements | Physical Condition, Gas Media and Temperature | Features of Outcomes, Long-Terms Results | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tumor Tissue (liver tumor) | Small (~250 μm) organotypic tumor slice cultures from patient-derived solid tumors. Preserves stroma, immune cells, and native ECM. Often highly vascularized or hemorrhagic. | Modified William’s E Media supplemented with hEGF (20 ng/mL), Nicotinamide (12 mM/mL), L-Ascorbic Acid 2-phosphate (175 μM/mL), Sodium Bicarbonate 0.225%, HEPES (20 mM/mL), D-(+)-Glucose (0.5%), Sodium Pyruvate (1 mM/mL), L-Glutamine (2 mM/mL). Penicillin Streptomycin (0.4%), ITS + Premix (1%) | 37 °C, 5% CO2. Use a rocker (20 rocks/min) to alternately expose the sections to the medium and air. | Viability: limited to 5–10 days. Outcome: valuable for short-term assays of chemo-, immuno-, and cell-based therapies. Not suitable for long-term radiobiology requiring repeated assays. | [77] |
| Tumor Tissue (E.G7-OVA—mouse lymphoma; MC38—colon tumor C57BL/6 mouse) | Small (270 μm) tumor tissue slices. | Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM)/F12 Advanced supplemented with Fetal Bovine Serum (5%), 1 GlutaMAX (1%), Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium (1%) and HEPES (15 mM/mL). Penicillin/Streptomycin (0.5%), | 37 °C, 5% CO2. Use a rocker (25 rocks/min) | Viability: limited to 7 days, optimal—48–72 h. Outcome: valuable for short-term testing immunotherapeutic agents, tumor-specific lymphocytes and CAR-T cells. | [106] |
| Brain Tissue (Hippocampus, Cortex) | Small (300 μm) tissue slices. Soft, layered, electrically active. High metabolic rate. Delicate synaptic architecture. | 50% minimal essential medium, 25% horse serum, 25% Hanks’ balanced salt solution supplemented with 133 mM glucose, and antibiotics | 37 °C, 5% CO2. | Enables long-term (weeks) electrophysiological recording and stimulation of live neural networks. Mimics functional connectivity for studying plasticity, epilepsy, and neurodegeneration in a preserved architectured context. | [93] |
| Brain Tissue | Organotypic brain slices, typically 100–400 µm thick. | 50% MEM/HEPES, 25% heat-inactivated horse serum, 25% Hanks’ solution is supplemented with NaHCO3(2 mM), glucose (6.5 mg/mL), glutamine (2 mM). pH 7.2. | 37 °C, 5% CO2. | Slices reorganize and thin but preserve original multilayered cytoarchitecture, specific neuronal connections (e.g., trisynaptic loop in hippocampus), and functional properties for several weeks to months in culture. Allows long-term studies of neurodegeneration, plasticity, and infection. | [107] |
| Liver Tissue (Precision-Cut Liver Slices) | Soft tissue slices, approximately 5 mg in weight, 250 µm thick. Maintains a sinusoidal network | William’s E Medium supplemented Human AB serum (5%), Glutamine (2 mM), Insulin (10 mg/L), Transferrin (5.5 mg/L), Sodium selenite (6.7 µg/L), EGF (1 nM), Glucagon (100 nM), Corticosterone (1 µM), and antibiotics. | 37 °C, 5% CO2, 95% O2. Use an orbital rocker incubator at 70 RPM. | Viability: limited to 5–6 days, optimal 24–48 h. Outcome: suitable for short-term assays of toxicology and drug safety screening, liver fibrosis processes and regeneration mechanisms. | [108] |
| Retina–Retinal Pigment Epithelium | Small (250 μm), maintains the laminarity of all 10 layers | Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), 15% porcine serum, 2.5% HEPES-buffer solution, 1% penicillin/streptomycin. | Perfusion culture: Use a two-compartment perfusion container. Gas-permeable silicone tubes, internal diameter 1 mm, perfusion speed: 1 mL/h, flow drive: peristaltic pump, 37 °C. Static culture: 37 °C, 95% air, 5% CO2, 100% humidity | Viability: limited to 10 days, optimal 24–72 h. Outcome: suitable for short-term assays of pharmaceutical agents or vitreous substitutes | [109] |
| Myocardium (Living Myocardial Slices) | Small (300 μm) soft tissue slice. Maintain 3D architecture with intact cellular interconnections and cell–cell junctions. | Medium-199 supplemented with penicillin–streptomycin, insulin-transferrin-selenite and 2-mercaptoethanol | 37 °C, 5% CO2, 20% O2, 80% humidity. Use a rocker (60 rocks/min) and biomimetic cultivation chambers. | First protocol for reliable cultivation of human atrial slices for 1–2 weeks under near-physiological load. Allows direct modeling of atrial tachyarrhythmia, study of the impact of atrial arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, on structural and electrical remodeling, and drug testing. | [110] |
| Liver Tissue (Precision-Cut Liver Slices) | 200–300 µm thick slices, cut with a mechanical slicer. | Williams’ medium E supplemented with n-glucose (25 mM), FBS (5%), insulin (0.1 µM), gentamicin (50 mL), saturated with carbogen at 37 °C. | 37 °C, 40% O2, 5% CO2, Use a rocker Platform (~10 cycles a minute). | Viability: limited to 24 h, optimal 1.5 h. Outcome: maintains intact morphology, testosterone and lidocaine metabolism, and the ability to metabolize antipyrine at the same rate as after 1.5 h of incubation. The preferred system for long-term metabolism and toxicology studies on liver slices. | [111] |
| Liver Tissue | 250 + 50 µm | Williams’ medium E supplemented with FCS (10%), BSA (0.2%), insulin (5 mg/mL), nicotinamide (10 mmol/L), hydrocortisone (1 mmol/L), penicillin (25 IU/mL), streptomycin (25 mg/mL). | 37 °C, 70% O2 25% N2 5% CO2. Use a rocker platform (5 rocks/min). | Viability: 72 h. Outcome: high oxygen tension (70% O2), provides optimal conditions for preserving both morphological and biochemical integrity, without inducing significant oxidative stress. | [112] |
| Nervous Tissue | 400 µm thick hippocampal slices | 50% MEM/HEPES, 25% heat-inactivated horse serum, 25% Hanks’ solution supplemented with glucose (6.5 mg/mL). pH 7.2 | 36 °C, 5% CO2. | Viability: more than 6 weeks. Outcome: preservation of the layered structure of the hippocampus was observed. Pyramidal neurons exhibited typical morphology with developed dendritic spines and synaptic contacts similar to those seen in vivo. Analysis of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic potentials was retained. Active growth of new synaptic contacts and neuritic growth cones was observed during the first days of culture. | [113] |
| Skin Tissue (Split-Thickness Skin Grafts and Foreskin) | Explants (1.5 × 1.5 mm). Epidermal stratification preserved in culture. | Eagle’s minimum essential medium, 35% calf serum, Heparinized chicken plasma + 20% chick embryo extract (1:1 ratio). | 32 °C, 95% air, 5% CO2 | Viability: more than 3 weeks. Outcome: the peak of mitotic activity is delayed until day 3. The initial thickening of the epidermis is subtler, with less parakeratosis. An extended adaptation phase occurs, during which the epidermis is preserved, and 4–8 spinous layers are still visible on days 13–14. Epidermal viability is significantly prolonged, and active proliferation is maintained due to modulation of cell cycle kinetics. | [114] |
| Skin Tissue (Abdominal Wall of Cadavers or Breast Skin or Skin from Amputated Limbs) | Squares 3–5 mm squares from a 0.4 mm thick keratotome slice. Epidermis stripped. | Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium supplemented with L-glutamine (1%), and calf serum (10%), penicillin G (200 U/mL) and streptomycin sulfate (100 eg/mL). | 31–32 °C, 40% O2 or 20% O2 5% CO2, | Viability: ~3 weeks. Outcomes: 1. Low culture temperatures slow epidermal proliferation, slow the rate of metabolic decline, prolong the adaptation phase in culture, and preserve tissue structure over a long period. 2. Elevated oxygen concentrations (40%) lead to increased proliferative and mitotic activity, especially in intact skin samples, where the stratum corneum limits diffusion. However, this leads to disorganization and the formation of cellular debris due to oxidative stress, leading to tissue integrity loss. 3. Oxygen concentrations below 20% lead to decreased viability and proliferation, potentially accelerating culture deterioration. | [115] |
| Brain Tissue (Hippocampus, Temporal Cortex) | 300 μm thick | Organotypic slice culture medium (OSCM) with no serum consisted of additional energy substrates and metabolites. | 37 °C, 95% air, 5% CO2 | Viability: 3–4 weeks. Outcomes: suitable for long-term studies. Use of an OSCM may reduce astrocyte proliferation, the formation of exuberant synaptic connections, neurogenesis and network reorganization in culture, ambient levels of glutamate and toxic degradation products, thereby ensuring neuronal survival rather than proliferation. | [116] |
| Cheek Pouch Mucosa | Fragments ~1 mm2 Tissue maintained in organotypic relationship between epithelium and lamina propria. | Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium supplemented with calf serum (10%), hydrocortisone (1 μg/mL), ascorbic acid (300 μg/mL), penicillin (100 I.U./mL), streptomycin (100 mg/mL) and amphotericin B (0.25 mg/mL). | 37 °C, 10% CO2, | Viability: 23/24 cultures viable at 35, 42, and 49 days. Outcomes: the stratified squamous epithelium retained its normal maturation sequence, with a predominantly parakeratinized surface. Normal epithelial–connective tissue relationships were preserved, and the basement membrane remained clear and intact. There was no significant epithelial growth from the explant margins. This system is suitable for long-term studies of tissue metabolism, exposure to exogenous agents, and chemical carcinogenesis. | [117] |
| Adipose Tissue | Fragments 500 μm thick | DMEM supplemented with insulin-transferrin-selenium mixture (1%), Penicillin/Streptomycin (1%), Fetal bovine serum (10%). | Cultivation on a liquid-air-interface. 35 °C, 5% CO2 | Viability: 14 days. Outcomes: 500 μm thick slices and low culture temperatures preserve adipocytes, macrophages, and stromal cells as well as maintain proliferation even without serum. | [118] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Shestakova, V.; Smirnova, E.; Isaeva, E.; Smirnova, A.; Atiakshin, D.; Yatsenko, E.; Yakimova, A.; Koryakin, S.; Baranovskii, D.; Saburov, V.; et al. Physiologically Relevant Organotypic Tissue Slice Model for Evaluating Cell Responses to Ionizing Radiation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 2850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062850
Shestakova V, Smirnova E, Isaeva E, Smirnova A, Atiakshin D, Yatsenko E, Yakimova A, Koryakin S, Baranovskii D, Saburov V, et al. Physiologically Relevant Organotypic Tissue Slice Model for Evaluating Cell Responses to Ionizing Radiation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(6):2850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062850
Chicago/Turabian StyleShestakova, Victoria, Ekaterina Smirnova, Elena Isaeva, Anna Smirnova, Dmitrii Atiakshin, Elena Yatsenko, Anna Yakimova, Sergey Koryakin, Denis Baranovskii, Vyacheslav Saburov, and et al. 2026. "Physiologically Relevant Organotypic Tissue Slice Model for Evaluating Cell Responses to Ionizing Radiation" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 6: 2850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062850
APA StyleShestakova, V., Smirnova, E., Isaeva, E., Smirnova, A., Atiakshin, D., Yatsenko, E., Yakimova, A., Koryakin, S., Baranovskii, D., Saburov, V., Sulina, Y., Komarova, L., Ivanov, S., Shegay, P., Kaprin, A., & Klabukov, I. (2026). Physiologically Relevant Organotypic Tissue Slice Model for Evaluating Cell Responses to Ionizing Radiation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(6), 2850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062850

