Next Article in Journal
Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule Ncam1b Promotes Effective Hair Cell Regeneration in Zebrafish Neuromasts
Previous Article in Journal
The α-Gal Epitope (Galα1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAc) as Therapeutic Agent in Cancer Immunotherapy, Vaccine Effectiveness Amplification and Injured Tissue Regeneration
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Multi-Layered Analytical Pipeline Combining Informatics, UHPLC–MS/MS, Network Pharmacology, and Bioassays for Elucidating the Skin Anti-Aging Activity of Melampyrum roseum
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Kombucha as a Bioactive Functional Beverage: Current Evidence, Production Challenges, and Future Perspectives

by
Antia G. Pereira
1,2
1
Nutrition and Food Group (NuFoG), Department of Analytical Chemistry and Food Science, Instituto de Agroecoloxía e Alimentación (IAA), Campus Auga, Universidade de Vigo, 32004 Ourense, Spain
2
Nutrition and Food Group (NuFoG), Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), SERGAS-UVIGO, 36213 Vigo, Spain
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(6), 2739; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062739
Submission received: 24 February 2026 / Revised: 12 March 2026 / Accepted: 16 March 2026 / Published: 17 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactives from Natural Products)

Abstract

Kombucha is a beverage obtained through the fermentation of tea leaves by a symbiotic culture of bacteria and yeast called SCOBY. This beverage is popularly known for the potential health benefits associated with its consumption, which is the main reason for its commercial expansion over the last century. These potential benefits are linked to the presence of a wide variety of bioactive compounds, notably phenolic compounds and organic acids. This composition varies significantly depending on the fermentation conditions, which in turn modifies the beverage’s bioactive properties (i.e., antioxidant capacity or antimicrobial properties, among others). For this reason, the most recent advances in kombucha production are geared towards achieving standardized production, including strategies for enhancing bioactive content and fortification with functional ingredients. All these advances should satisfy quality control and regulatory compliance. However, despite the growing scientific and commercial interest in kombucha, current knowledge remains fragmented across different disciplines, highlighting the need for an updated and integrative overview of its composition, bioactivity, production variables, and safety aspects. In this review, nutritional, microbiological, and technological perspectives are integrated to provide an updated framework for understanding kombucha as a functional beverage, while also outlining key directions for future research and industrial application.

1. Introduction

Kombucha is a non-alcoholic or low-alcohol, fermented beverage made from sweetened tea (mainly black and green tea with 5–10% sucrose), and other herbal infusions that can be added during the secondary fermentation step [1]. Following the conventional procedure, black or green tea is infused with sucrose for five minutes and subsequently allowed to cool to ambient temperature (Figure 1). The infusion is then filtered, after which a portion of kombucha from a previous batch is incorporated as the starter culture [2,3]. This starter culture is known as a SCOBY (symbiotic colony of bacteria and yeast) or “mother” [4]. These microorganisms mostly belong to the Acetobacteraceae family (Acetobacter aceti, Acetobacter estunensis, Acetobacter pasteurianus, Gluconobacter oxydans, Komagataeibacter kombuchae, Komagataeibacter. rhaeticus, and Komagataeibacter xylinus), Lactobacillus sp. as well as osmophilic yeasts (Brettanomyces/Dekkera, Candida, Saccharomyces, Schizosaccharomyces, Starmerella sp., Torulopsis, Pichia sp., and Zygosaccharomyces) [2,3]. The mixture is then covered and allowed to ferment under dark conditions for 10–14 days, during which the product, commonly referred to as “tea fungus,” is formed. This tea fungus is characterized by having a cellulose-like film on the surface of the fermentation medium, a film that will be used as a starter culture in the next production batch [4]. During this period, the product develops its characteristic organoleptic properties, most notably its slightly acidic and refreshing flavor, and a mild natural effervescence resulting from carbon dioxide production during fermentation. Some of the beverage’s sensory properties can be further modified during the secondary fermentation, in which additional ingredients such as fruit juices, plant extracts, or other functional components are added to enhance flavor, aroma, or bioactive content [5,6].
The origin of this beverage dates back to 220 BC in ancient China during the Qin Dynasty, where it was valued for its organoleptic properties and potential health benefits, leading to its designation as “immortal tea” or “Divine Che”. Later, this beverage spread to other Far East countries, with bibliographic references from 414 AD reporting its export from Korea to Japan to treat Emperor Inkyo’s digestive problems [7,8]. From there, its consumption spread to regions of East Asia and Eastern Europe (19th and 20th centuries), acquiring regional adaptations and distinct names (e.g., “Manchurian Mushroom Tea”, “Tea Fungus”, “Kargasok Tea”, “Grib tea kvass”, “Indian Tea Fungus”, “Manchu Fungus”, “Teakwass”, “Tea Beer” and many others) [9]. Its production was traditionally artisanal, passed down through generations, which explains the regional variations in preparation methods observed around the world [6,10]. Industrial production and commercialization, however, are relatively recent, beginning in the 1990s, primarily in the United States, and leading to the establishment of organizations such as Kombucha Brewers International, which today comprises numerous commercial producers worldwide, including 134 kombucha-producing companies in the United States, 28 in Canada, and smaller numbers in Europe, where the largest producers are Spain and the United Kingdom [11]. The number of producers is expected to increase. In fact, between 2014 and 2018, the market for this beverage grew by approximately 20% annually, with a similar trend observed in subsequent years’ (USD 1.5 billion in 2018, USD 1.67 billion in 2019, USD 2.2 billion in 2020, and 3.5 to 5 billion in 2025) [4,11]. This increase is attributed to global consumption increasing demand of natural products with potential health benefits, particularly in the case of processed beverages and probiotic products. However, it is important to note that although some of these products are widely consumed as “functional foods” due to their potential health benefits, no health claims have been officially authorized by regulatory bodies such as the European Food Safety Authority. Moreover, there is a scarcity of clinical trials evaluating the effects of kombucha or its constituents on human health [12].
Additionally, the continued growth of the sector has led to modifications in the traditional composition of kombucha, resulting in alternative products often marketed under the same name. Many of these emergent alternatives use new raw materials, new microorganisms, or different fermentation conditions during beverage production [4,13]. Consequently, it is important to determine the key factors affecting the biological activities of this product, and how changes in individual components may affect the fermentation process itself, and consequently, the health benefits of the final, commercial products. This review article presents a comprehensive analysis of kombucha, addressing its chemical composition, with an emphasis on the bioactive compounds responsible for its potential health effects. The main biological properties reported in in vitro and in vivo studies are reviewed, as well as recent innovations in its production and emerging applications in food, biotechnology, and sustainable materials. Furthermore, aspects related to food safety and regulation are discussed, considering the challenges posed by the variability of the fermentation process and the need to establish clear criteria for its production and marketing.

2. Methodology

The literature included in this review was collected through searches in major scientific databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed. The search was conducted using combinations of keywords such as “kombucha”, “fermented tea”, “SCOBY”, “bioactive compounds”, “fermentation”, “bioactivity”, “functional beverage”, “innovation”, “safety”, and “legislation”. Particular attention was given to peer-reviewed articles published during the last decade, although earlier studies were also included when they provided important background information. Both original research articles and review papers addressing the chemical composition, microbial ecology, fermentation parameters, biological properties, and technological aspects of kombucha production were examined. The final selection of references was based on their scientific relevance and contribution to the understanding of kombucha as a functional beverage.

3. Chemical Composition of Kombucha

The composition of this type of beverage varies considerably depending on the production method used—the choice of microorganisms and the type of tea employed being crucial factors. However, in general terms, kombucha is primarily composed of sugars, proteins, vitamins, minerals, phenolic compounds, organic acids (e.g., acetic, lactic, gluconic, glucuronic, and oxalic acids), and other minor compounds (e.g., alcohol) [7,12,14].

3.1. Nutritional Composition

Kombucha has a low energy content and a limited proportion of macronutrients (Figure 2), including residual sugars from fermentation [15]. During kombucha fermentation, most of the sucrose added in the initial steps is partially metabolized, resulting in varying concentrations of glucose and fructose [16], whose abundance depends on fermentation conditions and differs markedly between studies [5]. For example, one study found that the highest glucose levels were reported 14 days after the start of fermentation, with a concentration of up to 19.60%, while the maximum fructose concentration was 10.25% on the tenth day [17]. Similar results were obtained in another study in which fructose was metabolized before glucose, with all three sugars present after 21 days of fermentation [18].
In addition to sugars (Table 1), significant proportions of proteins have been identified, reaching contents of up to 3 mg/mL [5]. Regarding the composition of these proteins, it has been observed that most of the identified amino acids come from tea leaves, although some were also generated during fermentation by the metabolic activity of microbial SCOBYs in kombucha [19]. The main amino acids identified were lysine, leucine, isoleucine, and theanine, the latter representing up to 50% of the total amino acids [19,20]. At lower concentrations, it was possible to detect the amino acids alanine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, methionine, phenylalanine, proline, threonine, tryptophan, and valine [20]. The presence of these compounds requires the study of the possible effects of microbial decarboxylation during fermentation, capable of transforming amino acids into different types and concentrations of biogenic amines [21]. Of the amino acids identified in kombucha, three can give rise to biogenic amines (lysine, phenylalanine, and tryptophan) [22]. Ethylamine, choline, and adenine are the only identifiable biogenic amines found in kombucha that have been discussed in the literature, none of which are harmful [23]. Nevertheless, information on this subject remains scarce, and the exact biotransformation route and the microorganisms involved are unknown [24].
In addition, this type of beverage is also a significant source of vitamins and minerals. For example, kombucha prepared from black tea has been shown to contain 74 mg/100 mL of vitamin B1, 52 mg/100 mL of vitamin B6, and 84 mg/100 mL of vitamin B12 [25], and 8.3 mg/100 mL of vitamin B2 [26]. Kombucha is also a significant source of additional B vitamins such as vitamins B3, B5, B7, B9 and vitamin C or ascorbic acid, with concentrations reaching 28.98 mg/L after 10 days of fermentation [23,26]. It should be noted, however, that vitamin levels reported in kombucha can vary considerably among studies due to differences in fermentation conditions, SCOBY composition, and analytical methods used for their determination. Similar variability has also been reported for other components of kombucha, including minerals and secondary metabolites such as organic acids and phenolic compounds. As for minerals, the tea leaves used play a fundamental role in the mineral composition of the beverage, as they constitute a significant source of iron, potassium, and manganese [27,28]. Other minerals identified in kombucha samples include cobalt, copper, magnesium, nickel, zinc, and fluoride ions [25,29], with concentrations ranging from 0.004 μg/mL to 0.462 μg/mL for cobalt and manganese, respectively [25]. Furthermore, the anionic characterization revealed that fluoride is the predominant anion, registering a concentration of 3.2 mg/g [30]. However, these fluoride levels will depend on the type of water used to make the beverage. For example, municipal water sources increase the concentration of this compound in the samples [27], the recommended dietary allowance for adults being 3–4 mg/mL for women and men, respectively [23]. Therefore, in some cases, a single glass of this beverage will constitute a significant contribution to this recommended amount. Furthermore, it has been shown that levels of copper, iron, manganese, nickel, and zinc can increase during the fermentation process, while cobalt levels decrease [23]. These studies also analyzed the presence of toxic minerals such as lead (0.005 μg/mL), chromium (0.001 μg/mL), and cadmium (below detection limit), all of which were considered safe levels for human consumption [25].

3.2. Phytochemical Composition

3.2.1. Phenolic Compounds

From a functional perspective, phenolic compounds are among the main bioactive constituents of kombucha, originating from plant-based substrates—either tea or another herbal infusion (up to 30% of the dry weight in the tea leaves) [31,32]. Their levels are influenced by the SCOBY’s microbial composition, fermentation conditions (e.g., time, temperature, sucrose concentration), and the methods used for their analysis [20,23].
During fermentation, these compounds undergo transformations that may modify their chemical structure and bioavailability [33,34]. However, its metabolic pathway is not yet fully understood, although various lines of evidence suggest that SCOBY can hydrolyze complex phenolic compounds present in the plant ingredients used, releasing simpler forms that often increase the total content of soluble phenolic compounds. Furthermore, the presence of enzymes produced during fermentation—such as cellulases, glucosidases, and pectinases—can break down cell walls and polyphenolic complexes, facilitating their release into the liquid medium [35]. This would be the main reason behind the rise in total phenol concentration (up to 3.53 times) as fermentation progresses [36].
This increase in concentration is fastest during the first seven days of fermentation, which may be due to the higher microbial diversity achieved by that time [37,38], reaching maximum levels of epicatechin (~150%) and epicatechin gallate (~115%) in green and black tea on day 12 of fermentation [39]. The main contributors to this increase are phenolic compounds such as gallic acid, caffeic acid, epicatechin, and rutin, as well as phenolic compounds not present in the initial infusion such as chlorogenic, p-coumaric, and ferulic acids [36]. However, from day 21 of fermentation onwards, the concentration of these types of compounds begins to decrease significantly [40]. Such effects arise from other phenolic compounds, such as complex flavonoids, tend to decrease in concentration due to their transformation or microbial degradation [36]. This decrease in the concentration of phenolic compounds is also observed when red algae are used during the second fermentation [41]. However, further kinetic studies are still needed to fully understand the biotransformation processes of polyphenols during kombucha fermentation. To enhance this understanding, the development of suitable synthetic microbial communities would be of great interest. These communities would reveal the phenolic metabolic characteristics of complex microbial communities and allow for the creation of customizable phenolic combinations for kombucha products [42].
Regarding the phenolic profile of kombucha (Figure 2), kombucha made with black tea typically exhibits a greater overall diversity of phenolic compounds compared to that made with green tea (1.09 vs. 0.70 mg GAE/mL, respectively), resulting in a higher antioxidant capacity [43,44]. These values can be increased up to 5.68 times when filtration processes are not used during production [45]. Regarding the characterization of these phenolic compounds, more than 127 compounds have been identified in green and black tea kombucha, mostly flavonoids (70.2%), followed by phenolic acids (18.3%), other polyphenols (8.4%), lignans (2.3%) and stilbenes (0.8%) [43]. Among the flavonoids, catechins and their derivatives stand out (more abundant in green tea), including epicatechin, epicatechin gallate, and epigallocatechin gallate, with concentrations reaching 120–380 μg/L GAE [43,44,45,46]. Both epigallocatechin gallate and epicatechin gallate remain relatively stable during fermentation (18% and 23%, respectively). In contrast, catechin derivatives such as theaflavins and thearubigins are more susceptible to degradation, likely due to the activity of as-yet-uncharacterized enzymes released by yeasts and bacteria in the kombucha culture [39]. Other phenolic compounds identified include gallic acid, caffeine, gallocatechin gallate, gallocatechin, ellagic acid, quercitrin, astragalin, and isorhamnetin [45,47]. Kombucha prepared from black tea contains anthocyanins such as delphinidin-3-O-beta-d-galactoside, cyanidin-3-O-beta-d-galactoside, delphinidin-3-O-beta-D-[6-(E)-p-coumaroyl] galactopyranoside, and cyanidin-3-O-beta-D-[6-(E)-p-coumaroyl]; galactopyranoside are also detected [48]. When yerba mate is used as the substrate in the secondary fermentation, the resulting kombucha is enriched with additional phenolic compounds such as caffeoylquinic acid, dicaffeoylquinic acid, different flavonoids, and xanthines [40].

3.2.2. Organic Acids

The main organic acids identified are acetic acid (0.21 to 16.57 g/L), glucuronic acid (0.04 to 7.36 g/L), lactic acid (0.015 to 0.702 g/L), citric acid (0.05 to 2.77 g/L), tartaric acid (0.23 g/L), succinic acid (3.05 g/L), oxalic acid (0.04 to 0.044 g/L), malic acid (0.029 to 0.03 g/L), and quinic acid (0.46 to 0.47 g/L); their concentration varied according to the type of tea and the fermentation conditions [24]. In most cases, the most abundant organic acid is acetic acid (16.57 g/L, reaching 3 g/L after 10 days of fermentation) followed by succinic acid (3.05 g/L), with the remaining identified compounds present in significantly lower concentrations [24,43]. However, when kombucha is made with green tea, the predominant organic acid is gluconic acid, with succinic, citric, and gallic acids being less abundant [48]. In fact, this is the type of kombucha formulation in which the highest concentrations of lactic acid are detected [23], being detectable only on the third day of fermentation [39]. Other organic acids identified in kombuchas made from tea include gluconic, folic, carbonic, malonic, pyruvic, and usnic acids [1,20,24]. Regarding the organic acids present in kombucha analogs, these mainly include acetic acid (up to 15.10 g/L), lactic acid (up to 5.25 g/L), glucuronic acid (up to 132.81 g/L), citric acid (up to 1072 g/L), malic acid (up to 1.59 g/L), oxalic acid (up to 3.45 g/L), formic acid (up to 2.33 g/L) and succinic acid (up to 0.30 g/L), with their concentration varying according to the type of substrate and the fermentation conditions [24]. For example, when grapes effluent is used, the predominant organic acid is acetic acid [49].
Concerning the kinetics of these compounds, acetic acid tends to slowly increase its concentration during fermentation. For example, when black tea is used, the concentration of this compound increases to 11 g/L after 10 days of fermentation, and then gradually decreases to 8 g/L after 60 days [50]; results were similar to previous studies (maximum 9.5 g/L after 15 days of fermentation) [39]. Another study observed an increase in acetic and gluconic acids concentration in green tea kombucha reaching 16.57 and 7.36 g/L, respectively, after 21 days of fermentation [37]. Glucuronic acid reaches its maximum in kombucha made with green tea after 12 days of fermentation (2.3 g/L) [39]. These trends were also observed when different herbal infusions were used for kombucha production. For example, formulations made with lemon balm showed a peak concentration of organic acids on the seventh day of fermentation, with a concentration of 8.12 g acetic acid/L [51]. In the case of soy whey, acetic and glucuronic acid concentration reached 5.77 and 132.81 g/L after 8 days of fermentation [52]. The subsequent gradual decrease in the concentration of organic acids is attributed to the fact that, once the available sugars in the formulation are depleted, the bacteria begin to use other carbon sources, including the organic acids themselves. In turn, the SCOBY’s metabolism causes the pH of the formulation to decrease, reducing the activity of the acetic acid bacteria [50]. In kombucha made with beet molasses, a greater decrease in pH and a higher total acid concentration (0.9–3.1 g/L) were observed compared to that prepared with sucrose, because molasses contains its own organic acids. However, acetic acid production was lower, possibly because some components of molasses inhibit acetic acid bacteria or promote the conversion of acetic acid into other compounds [53]. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the fermentation time, since the accumulation of organic acids can exceed the limits considered safe for human consumption [5]. This optimization process must take into account factors such as temperature, since high values increase the fermentation rate and favor the accumulation of acids [41].

3.3. Others

3.3.1. Alcohol

The main alcohol reported in kombucha is ethanol (Figure 2), which is generated during fermentation. Its concentration typically ranges from 0.007% to 2.3%, depending on the initial sugar content of the unfermented beverage, as well as storage conditions and the fermentation time and temperature [24,37,54,55]. Therefore, it is essential to control all these factors so that the resulting beverage does not exceed the maximum legal percentage of ethanol allowed in non-alcoholic beverages, with the average value taken as the limit being 0.5% (v/v) [24]. Otherwise, the beverage should be labeled as an alcoholic beverage, although it is increasingly common to find kombucha beverages with a higher alcohol content (known as “hard kombucha” and up to 5.5%) that are not labeled correctly [23,56]. This is of great importance when using black tea, as it undergoes a faster increase in ethanol concentration than green tea (0.3% versus 0.2% after 15 days of fermentation) [57]. Some studies show that this alcohol content can be reduced by increasing the fermentation time by one week, especially when acetic bacteria are used [37,58]. However, longer fermentation times (up to 60 days), regardless of the fermentation temperature, would not produce this decrease in alcohol content, with all samples having alcohol levels higher than those permitted in non-alcoholic beverages [55]. Therefore, to market these beverages without exceeding permitted alcohol levels, it is essential to properly control the fermentation process and store the product at appropriate temperatures, as refrigeration temperatures stabilize alcohol production by reducing the fermentation speed of viable microbial cells in the beverage [56].

3.3.2. Alkaloids

Several studies have reported alkaloids in kombucha. These alkaloids originate from the tea leaves used as raw material, which are a significant source of caffeine (up to 3–6% of the content of tea leaves) [59]. These leaves also contain other alkaloids in lower concentrations (Figure 2), notably theobromine and theophylline [23,60]. All these alkaloids belong to the methylxanthine group, and their final concentration is influenced by the type of tea, the fermentation time, brewing conditions, and growing conditions of the raw material. They are characterized for being stable during the fermentation process [61]. During kombucha fermentation, caffeine contributes to the growth and metabolism of yeasts and bacteria by providing nitrogen for cell synthesis and the energy needed for the microorganisms to carry out fermentation [23].

3.3.3. D-Saccharic Acid-1,4-Lactone

D-saccharic acid-1,4-lactone is an oxygenated organic compound that belongs to the lactone group, derived from the oxidation of carbohydrates during the fermentation process [62]. Its presence in kombucha is due to the metabolism of D-saccharic acid (glucaric acid) by the microorganisms that make up the SCOBY. It is considered a bioactive component of interest due to its chemical stability and its relationship with organic acid metabolism [63]. The presence and concentration of D-saccharic acid-1,4-lactone in the fermented beverage depend on factors such as the type of substrate, the fermentation time, and the process conditions [64], with contents ranging between 57.99 and 132.72 μg/mL, reaching the highest values on the eighth day of fermentation [65].

3.3.4. Volatile Compounds

During kombucha fermentation, a series of volatile compounds are generated. These compounds are responsible for the characteristic sensory properties (especially fruity and floral notes) of this type of beverage. Among the various volatile compounds identified in kombucha, significant concentrations of complex mixtures of esters, alcohols, carboxylic acids, aldehydes, ketones, phenols, and terpenes—with esters such as ethyl acetate, ethyl decanoate, and isoamyl acetate—were detected. These compounds arise primarily from the metabolic activity of the SCOBY and vary depending on the raw materials, fermentation conditions, and storage time, which explains the aromatic differences between batches and fermented varieties [35,66].

4. Bioactive Properties of Kombucha

Kombucha has long been consumed as a beverage believed to promote health, and its regular intake has been linked to various potential benefits [24]. Its historical use as a traditional functional drink has prompted extensive research into its bioactive components and health-promoting properties. In the following subsections, the main bioactivities reported for kombucha will be examined, including its antioxidant, anticancer, and antimicrobial effects.

4.1. Antioxidant

Numerous studies, largely conducted in vitro, have demonstrated that different types of kombucha possess significant antioxidant activity. This activity is primarily attributed to the presence of various phenolic compounds and organic acids. However, most currently available studies have not isolated the potential bioactive compounds (at best, only the purification of the extracts is carried out) (Table 2). Therefore, this correlation between compounds and bioactivities can only be established statistically, without directly attributing the activity to individual molecules. Regarding the effectiveness of these extracts, kombucha fermentation has been reported to significantly improve the in vitro antioxidant capacity of the extracts due to the increased bioavailability of the bioactive molecules. Furthermore, during fermentation, some conjugated phenolic compounds undergo bioconversion, resulting in free phenolics and a consequent increase in antioxidant capacity [15]. Furthermore, the antioxidant potential is significantly influenced by factors such as the type of tea, fermentation time, and processing conditions, suggesting a joint contribution from polyphenols, organic acids, and other metabolites generated during fermentation [67,68]. For example, prolonged fermentation times (more than 14 days) could decrease the antioxidant capacity [69,70]. In the case of the sample formulation, it was observed that the antioxidant activity of the beverage was improved when brown sugar, white sugar, glucose and sucrose were used as sugars, obtaining significantly worse results with the use of artificial sweeteners [71]. Similar results were obtained with kombucha analogs. For example, kombucha tea fermented with coconut palm sugar exhibited higher in vitro antioxidant activity than with white refined sugar or molasses sugar [69]. Further examples can be found in Table 2, which shows that most of the available evidence comes from in vitro assays, limiting the direct extrapolation of these results to in vivo antioxidant effects in humans. However, according to the available studies, the antioxidant activity of kombucha appears to be mediated by multiple mechanisms. These include the ability to chelate pro-oxidant metals, which would otherwise catalyze oxidation reactions, and the modulation of pro-oxidant enzymes, which reduces the generation of reactive species. These actions act synergistically to neutralize free radicals, as observed in in vitro DPPH and ABTS assays [35].

4.2. Anticancer

The anticancer activity of kombucha has been extensively investigated, primarily through in vitro assays (Table 2). The observed effects have been associated with the combined action of phenolic compounds, organic acids, and other metabolites generated during fermentation (e.g., D-saccharic acid 1,4-lactone, dimethyl 2-(2-hydroxy-2-methoxypropylidene) malonate, vitexin) [63,68,79,90]. However, the composition of kombucha varies significantly between different preparations, which directly influences its bioactivity. In a study that evaluated human lung adenocarcinoma epithelial cells (A549), ileocecal colorectal adenocarcinoma cells (HCT8), colorectal adenocarcinoma epithelial cells (Caco-2), and normal lung cells (IMR90), kombucha made from green tea produced the most notable effects. This activity could be explained by its high catechin content and the presence of verbascoside—compounds associated with anticancer and antioxidant properties [43]. The anticancer properties of these extracts are attributed to their ability to inhibit cell proliferation, altering the cell cycle, and activating apoptotic pathways [63,68,79,90]. For example, kombucha treatment increased early apoptosis and induced cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase in human colorectal cancer cells (HCT-116) more effectively than green tea extract alone. Mechanistically, this was accompanied by upregulation of tumor suppressor genes such as p21 and p53 and pro-apoptotic Bax, with concurrent downregulation of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2, suggesting that kombucha can influence gene expression linked to programmed cell death pathways when combined with chemotherapeutics [91]. In another study, kombucha treatment leads to increased apoptosis via modulation of p53 and Bax/Bcl-2 balance and results in cell cycle inhibition at G2/M phase in human liver cancer (HepG-2) cells, without obvious cytotoxicity against non-cancerous cells [102]. Moreover, some of the compounds present in kombucha have demonstrated in vitro the ability to modulate oxidative stress and the activity of enzymes involved in detoxification processes, which may indirectly contribute to antitumor effects [103,104]. In addition, recent research has focused on postbiotic metabolites produced by the kombucha microbiota. Specifically, cell-free supernatants obtained from strains of Gluconobacter oxydans isolated from kombucha demonstrated antiproliferative effects against gastric adenoma cells. These findings suggest that certain bioactive compounds produced by the microbial community during fermentation can exert cytotoxic activity independently of the complete kombucha drink [105]. However, the available evidence comes mostly from in vitro trials, so these results should be interpreted with caution and firm conclusions should not be drawn about anticancer effects in humans.

4.3. Antimicrobial

The antimicrobial activity of kombucha has been extensively documented in experimental studies, primarily through in vitro assays against pathogenic bacteria and spoilage microorganisms (Table 2), so its relevance under in vivo conditions still requires further investigation. This effect is attributed to the presence of organic acids, especially acetic acid, which lowers the pH of the medium and interferes with the integrity of the microbial cell membrane [12]. Furthermore, the presence of other bioactive compounds (e.g., polyphenols) or ethanol may exert synergistic effects [12]. The concentration of these compounds, and therefore the antimicrobial potential, will depend on the fermentation time, the type of tea, and the composition of the substrate, generally increasing as fermentation progresses [106]. For example, the addition of other vegetable ingredients such as cinnamon increases the concentration of some organic acids (e.g., acetic and glucuronic acids) with the consequent increase in the antimicrobial activity of kombucha [15,78,81]. Similar effects have been reported when plant matrices rich in phenolic compounds are added during secondary fermentation. For example, the addition of soy whey results in increased flavonoid content and antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, and Escherichia coli [52].
In addition to its direct antimicrobial activity, kombucha may exert functional effects through the modulation of the gut microbiota, an aspect of particular relevance in the field of functional foods [107]. Although evidence is still limited, recent studies suggest that kombucha consumption may induce changes in the host’s microbial composition. In a murine model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, modifications were observed in gut bacterial populations, with reductions in the abundance of genera such as Allobaculum, Turicibacter, and Clostridium after kombucha tea ingestion, changes that could contribute to decreased hepatic lipid accumulation [108,109]. These effects could be related to both the antimicrobial activity of certain kombucha metabolites and indirect interactions with the gut microbiota. However, extrapolating these results to humans requires caution, and controlled clinical trials are needed to conclusively assess the impact of kombucha consumption on the human microbiota and its implications for health.

4.4. Others

In addition to the bioactivities mentioned previously, various studies have demonstrated that kombucha possesses other bioactivities that contribute to human health, most of which are related to its antioxidant capacity. These effects include anti-inflammatory, hepatoprotective, and antidiabetic properties, as well as benefits in regulating metabolism and the immune system, reducing inflammation, and supporting overall physiological functions, thus reinforcing its appeal as a functional beverage [19].
Its anti-inflammatory effects (Table 2) are related to the reduction in pro-inflammatory mediators and the attenuation of oxidative stress (e.g., in vitro inhibition of 5-lipoxygenase activity or reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokines secretion), processes in which phenolic compounds and other metabolites generated during fermentation play a relevant role [68,79,85,110]. Therefore, kombucha could play a key role in modulating cellular pathways associated with the inflammatory response, with a potential protective effect against chronic inflammatory processes. However, despite these promising in vitro and in vivo results, evidence in humans remains limited [19].
Regarding the hepatoprotective activity of kombucha, several studies using animal models have reported improvements in biochemical parameters related to liver function and a reduction in histological alterations in the liver. In fact, kombucha has demonstrated a superior hepatoprotective effect to that of unfermented black tea in various animal models. For example, studies in albino rats exposed to aflatoxin B1 showed that kombucha reduced markers of hepatotoxicity such as aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, decreased lipid peroxidation, and modulated the hepatic antioxidant system, including reduced glutathione and antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione S-transferase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase, catalase, and superoxide dismutase [111,112]. Furthermore, in murine models of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and steatohepatitis, kombucha consumption protected hepatocytes against lipotoxicity, modulated lipid metabolism, and attenuated inflammation and fibrosis, contributing to liver restoration [113]. Part of this effect could also be related to the modulation of the gut microbiota, since kombucha tea has been observed to promote microbial populations that help reduce non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in mice [108]. These effects have been attributed to the combined action of antioxidants, organic acids, and other bioactive compounds capable of mitigating oxidative damage and promoting hepatic detoxification mechanisms. For example, glucuronic acid can bind to toxic substances in the liver, facilitating their efficient excretion [114]. Another compound of interest present in kombucha is D-saccharic acid 1,4-lactone, produced by Gluconacetobacter sp. during the fermentation process, which has detoxifying and hepatoprotective properties [23].
Furthermore, studies in animal models of induced diabetes suggest that kombucha may have antidiabetic effects (Table 2). In these studies, kombucha consumption has been associated with a reduction in blood glucose levels and an improvement in the lipid profile—effects that could be related to the modulation of glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity [12,99]. For example, tea kombucha reduces the activity of plasma and pancreatic α-amylase [100]. This type of beverage is also capable of inhibiting porcine pancreatic α-amylase, increasing the inhibitory capacity with fermentation time and the presence of phenolic compounds (i.e., epigallocatechin gallate, gallocatechin gallate and epicatechin gallate) [57]. Another study observed that kombucha was rich in D-saccharic acid 1,4-lactone, which is a compound capable of protecting against hyperglycemia-induced hepatic apoptosis in diabetic rats [62]. However, the available evidence is still insufficient to draw firm conclusions in humans, with only one study of this type reported. In that study, kombucha was administered daily for three months to various consumers, and normalized blood sugar values were observed in subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, but without considering a control group [12]. Therefore, controlled clinical trials are required.
Furthermore, several studies in animal models have indicated that kombucha may contribute to reducing total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride levels, as well as increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, suggesting a potential cholesterol-lowering effect (Table 2). This effect has been associated with the combined action of organic acids, polyphenols, and other bioactive metabolites produced during fermentation, which can modulate lipid metabolism and promote cholesterol excretion. Trials in hypercholesterolemia models have also shown improvements in liver parameters and a reduction in lipid accumulation in the liver, indicating a possible cardiovascular and metabolic benefit [100,101].

5. Innovations in Kombucha Formulation

The artisanal production of kombucha presents several challenges, most notably the lack of reproducibility between different production batches. This lack of uniformity leads to problems with stability and consistent bioactivity, hindering its commercialization and the declaration of functional properties. To overcome these challenges, several innovations in the production process have been implemented, including variations in fermentation conditions (time, temperature, concentrations, and microorganisms involved) and changes in substrate composition (use of different starting matrices or fortification). All these parameters directly affect microbial dynamics and, therefore, the accumulation of metabolites and the composition of the final product [115,116,117].
Regarding the parameters that influence fermentation, the most important are temperature, pH, oxygen, substrate, sugar concentration, SCOBY origin, container geometry, and fermentation time. Any variation in these factors can interfere with sensory characteristics, chemical properties, nutritional quality, and biological activities [5]. In most cases (Table 3), the sugar used is sucrose at a concentration of 20%. The concentration of tea or herbal infusion usually varies between 1.0 and 100 g/L [24]. Regarding SCOBYs, this is one of the main areas of innovation in the kombucha industry. The combinations of microorganisms that can make up a SCOBY are endless due to the inherently diverse microbial composition of kombucha (Table 4). In most cases, the most abundant microorganisms are bacteria belonging to the genus Komagataeibacter and yeasts from the genera Zygosaccharomyces, Brettanomyces, or Saccharomyces [19]. This knowledge has served as the basis for exploring custom-designed consortia that combine microorganisms with complementary metabolic functions. This is the case with SCOBYs composed of cellulose-producing bacteria and ethanol-resistant probiotic yeasts [118,119]. In this respect, the latest available studies show that isolating and combining specific microbial strains allows for increased production of certain desirable bioactive metabolites, as well as more consistent results after each fermentation [120]. For example, the combination of Komagataeibacter swingsii, Komagataeibacter saccharivorans and Dekkera bruxellensis allows for up to three times the levels of gluconic acid in the resulting beverage, with the consequent reduction in pH and an increase in the functional potential of the final product [121,122]. Another study reported that selecting strains such as Komagataeibacter saccharivorans, Brettanomyces anomala, and Kluyveromyces marxianus resulted in non-alcoholic kombucha without diminishing its probiotic capacity or sensory quality during over 60 days of storage [123]. It has also been observed that including probiotics such as Lactiplantibacillus plantarum or Pediococcus pentosaceus can provide more robust probiotic functions, with the potential to improve gut health when the strains survive gastrointestinal transit [124]. Therefore, SCOBY optimization represents one of the main steps to achieve a reproducible fermentation process with the desirable functional properties. This optimization could also help in the prevention of the production of unwanted compounds (e.g., biogenic amines or high alcohol content) during fermentation, molecules that could compromise product safety and consumer acceptance [125]. This is especially relevant at the end of fermentation, when most of these unwanted compounds are produced. Therefore, thorough control of the fermentation process would not only reduce the potential risks of this beverage but also improve its possible functional attributes.
The selection of substrates is another fundamental aspect of the fermentation process, both in primary fermentation (carried out using tea) and in secondary fermentation, which continues after the removal of the SCOBY layer, as active microorganisms remain in the liquid. The addition of new matrices (Table 3) during secondary fermentation has proven to be an effective strategy for enriching the nutritional and functional profile of kombucha [24,141]. For example, kombuchas formulated with papaya and whey proteins encapsulated with probiotics showed improved microbiological stability, together with a greater capacity to inhibit α-glucosidase and enzymes related to lipid metabolism, suggesting that the addition of nutrient matrices can broaden the spectrum of functional activities beyond the traditional properties of kombucha [52,134]. The applicability and potential of these alternative formulations stem from the fact that the microorganisms in the SCOBY not only consume the available carbon in the medium but also metabolize many of the other compounds present in the mixture. This metabolism encompasses diverse metabolic pathways that give rise to a wide variety of bioactive compounds. Therefore, the addition of other raw materials not only helps diversify the kombucha market and attract consumers with new sensory properties but would also allow for the development of products with optimized functional properties. This would include beverages with anti-inflammatory potential or metabolic support. For example, infusion of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.), pear juice (Opuntia ficus-indica), or yarrow (Achillea millefolium) fermented with kombucha culture showed higher antimicrobial and antioxidant activity compared to the unfermented infusion [51,92,129,131].
Table 4. Microorganism species mainly found in SCOBY for kombucha fermentation.
Table 4. Microorganism species mainly found in SCOBY for kombucha fermentation.
YeastBacteria Fermentation Ref.
Zygosaccharomyces bailii, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Torulospora delbreuckii, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, Brettanomyces bruxellensis, Candida stellataAcetobacter spp.Black tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucrose, 5.4 g/L tea//14 days, RT[142]
Zygosaccharomyces sp., Saccharomyces cerevisiaeAcetobacter spp.Green and black tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 70 g sucrose, 1.5 g/L tea//10 days, 28 °C[26]
Dekkera bruxellensis, Dekkera anomala, Zygosaccharomyces bisporus, Zygosaccharomyces lentus, Pichia kudriavzevii, Davidiella tassiana, Wallemia sebi, Lachancea fermentati, Leucosporidiella fragaria, Kazachstania unispora, Kluyveromyces marxianus, Naumovozyma castelli, Hanseniaspora vineaeLactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Bifidobacterium, Acetobacter, GluconacetobacterBlack tea//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucrose, 0.49% w/v tea//10 days, 23 °C[143]
Candida, Lachancea, Kluyveromyces, Debaryomyces, Pichia, Waitea, Eromothecium, Meyerozyma, Zygowilliopsis, Saccharomyces, Saccharomycopsis, Hanseniaspora, Kazachstania, Starmera, Merimbla, Sporopachydermia, SugiyamaellaLactobacillus, Weissella, Bifidobacterium, Komagataeibacter, GluconobacterBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucrose, 5 g/L tea//21 days, 28 °C[37]
Candida boidinii, D. anomala, D. bruxellensis, Hanseniaspora valbyensis, Wickerhamomyces anomalus, Pichia membranifaciens, S. cerevisiae, Saccharomyces uvarum, Torulaspora microellipsoides, Z. bailii, Zygosaccharomyces florentinaOenococcus oeni, Lactobacillus nagelii, Lactobacillus satsumensis, Acetobacter lovaniensis, Acetobacter okinawensis, Acetobacter peroxydans, Acetobacter syzgii, Acetobacter tropicalis, Gluconacetobacter eurapaeus, Gluconacetobacter hansenii, Gluconacetobacter intermedius, Gluconacetobacter liquefaciens, Gluconacetobacter xylinus, Gluconobacter cerinus, Gluconobacter oxydans, Tanticharoemia sakaeratensisBlack and green tea//CP//8 days, RT[144]
Dekkera, Pichia, ZygosaccharomycesLactobacillus, Leuconostoc, Lactococcus, Bifidobacterium, Gluconacetobacter, AcetobacterBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g artificial sweeteners, 0.1 g/L tea//7 days, 24 °C[71]
NdLactobacillus, Lactococcus, Streptococcus, Acetobacter, G. xylinus, Gluconacetobacter saccharivoransGreen tea//10 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucrose, 10 g/L tea//21 days, 20 °C[145]
B. bruxellensis, Zygosaccharomyces parabailiiLactobacillaceae, Leuconostocaceae, Streptococcaceae, Komagataeibacter intermedius, Komagataeibacter rhaeticus, Gluconobacter entaniiGreen and black tea, roiboos//3 min, 74 °C, 1 L W, 80 g sucrose, 8 g/L tea//14 days, 27 °C[86]
Zygosaccharomyces, Z. bailiiKomagataeibacter, K. rhaeticusNd//10 min, 100 °C, 1.35 L W, 150 g sucrose, 6.7 g/L tea//15 days, 28 °C[146]
Candida arabinofermentans, B. bruxellensis, S. pombe, Z. bailiiAcetobacter maolroum, Acetobacter pasteurianus, Acetobacter pomorum, Acetobacter tropicalis, K. rhaeticus, Komagataeibacter xylinus, Komagataeibacter europaeus, K. intermedius, G. oxydans, Gluconacetobacter sp. SXCC-1Black tea//15 min, 80 °C, 1 L W, 70 g sugar, 10 g/L tea//14 days, 25 °C[68]
Z. bailiiA. pasteurianus, G. xylinusBlack tea//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucrose, 8 g/L tea//10 days, 29 °C[147]
B. bruxellensis, Zygosaccharomyces bisporusAcetobacteraceae, K. rhaeticus, K. hansenii, K. xylinusGreen tea//15 min, 121 °C, 1 L W, 70 g sucrose, 0.5% tea//15 days, 30 °C[148]
D. bruxellensis, S. uvarum, Z. bailiiL. nagelii, O. oeni, A. tropicalis, A. okinawensis, K. hansenii, G. oxydansGreen tea//30 min, 104 °C, 1 L W, 55 g blond sugar, 0.5% tea//27 days, 25 °C[149]
B. bruxellensis, H. valbyensis, S. cerevisiaeAcetobacter papayae, Gluconobacter takamatsuzukensisBlack tea//1 L W, 60 g sucrose, 1% tea//3 days, 26 °C[150]
B. bruxellensis, D. bruxellensisG. intermediusBlack tea//121 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucrose, 1 g/L tea//8 days, RT[151]
Zygosaccharomyces sp.Acetobacter xylinumTea bag//10 min, RT, 1 L W, 70 g sucrose, 1.5 g/L tea//60 days, RT[152]
NdAcetobacteraceae, GluconacetobacterCE[153]
NdAcetobacteraceae, KomagataeibacterCE[154]
Abbreviatures. Nd: not determined; CE: commercial extract; RT: room temperature; W: water; CP: commercial preparation.
Furthermore, the design of fortified kombucha products benefits from a deeper understanding of how microbial and chemical interactions influence the stability of added components. For example, certain phenolic compounds can be preserved or even transformed into more active forms during fermentation, while others may degrade if conditions are not optimal [155]. Therefore, fortification must consider not only the timing of the addition but also the compatibility of the added compounds with the microflora and the overall fermentation process. Additionally, sensory evaluations should be conducted to assess the effect of fortification on consumer acceptance of the final product [156,157]. In some cases, the addition of these matrices has increased acceptance. For example, a kombucha SCOBY-fermented beverage made from grape juice showed better sensory acceptance and functional properties compared to the unfermented grape beverage after 6 days of fermentation [137]. Consequently, many companies are investing in new formulations with a wide range of flavors that combine fruits, spices, herbs, and botanical extracts, adapting to local tastes and global trends as a strategy to attract new consumers and retain existing ones. Furthermore, efforts have focused on improving texture and carbonation levels, key aspects for product acceptance, especially among consumers accustomed to traditional soft drinks [158].
Another key aspect is sustainability, which has become a central driver of innovation in this industry. Many companies are adopting more sustainable production practices, such as using organic ingredients, reducing water and energy consumption, and valorizing byproducts from the fermentation process [159]. SCOBY, for example, has been reused in the production of alternative products such as dehydrated snacks, supplements, or even biodegradable materials, reflecting an innovative approach to the circular economy [160,161].
Therefore, the combination of these strategies (i.e., fermentation optimization, including the selection of more efficient strains, the incorporation of alternative matrices, and/or fortification) is transforming kombucha formulation from a traditional art into a modern food biotechnology focused on reproducibility, functionality, and safety. These innovations are supported by a growing body of scientific literature that utilizes meticulous microbiological analyses, metabolomics, bioactivity studies, and experimental design approaches to guide formulation improvements. As more data emerges on how the microbiota interacts with ingredients and fermentation conditions, it will become possible to design fermented beverages with predefined functional profiles and specific health benefits, potentially further solidifying kombucha’s position within the functional food sector.

6. Safety and Regulations

Kombucha is a fermented beverage that is generally safe for human consumption when produced, stored, and consumed under hygienic and controlled conditions. However, increased production and consumption have raised concerns about its safety, both in industrial and artisanal settings. According to the International Association for Food Protection, the potential risks of kombucha can be grouped into chemical and biological hazards [19].
Regarding chemical hazards, one of the most frequently discussed risk is the ethanol content of kombucha. Although commercial products are usually labeled as non-alcoholic, alcohol is produced as a natural part of the fermentation process, including secondary fermentation in the bottle, which is rarely analyzed in studies. The concentration of ethanol depends on factors such as fermentation time, microbial composition, and storage conditions. In some cases, ethanol levels have been reported to exceed legal limits set for non-alcoholic beverages, with implications for consumer safety and regulatory compliance [1,23,56]. The permitted percentage of ethanol varies slightly from country to country. In the United States and Europe, a maximum of 0.5% is allowed at any stage of production, bottling, or storage [162]. A higher content, even on a one-off basis, would legally require that production batch to be classified as an alcoholic beverage, subjecting it to different regulations that include distinct production, licensing, labeling, and tax requirements specific to alcoholic beverages. To avoid this problem, many studies apply a pasteurization stage that eliminates any remaining microorganisms in the beverage [58]. Furthermore, the controlled addition of preservatives after fermentation could help stabilize the beverage by maintaining its characteristic pH and inhibiting the activity of residual yeasts [31,163]. This prevents further fermentation of remaining sugars during storage, which could otherwise lead to an increase in ethanol content and changes in acidity and flavor.
Another chemical concern relates to the formation of biogenic amines, such as ethylamine, choline, tyramin, Spermine, N-(9-oxodecyl) acetamide, N-(4-morpholinophenyl)-4-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl) benzamide, and adenine. These compounds can arise during the fermentation of proteins and amino acids by certain microorganisms [22,164]. At high concentrations, biogenic amines have been associated with adverse health effects, particularly in sensitive individuals or when consumed in large amounts [165]. Reported levels of amines in kombucha vary widely across studies, depending on factors such as the fermentation substrate and the microbial community. Concentrations typically increase from day 0 to day 6, then drop sharply on day 8, rise again on day 10, and decrease once more by day 12, which may correlate with the predominant presence of microorganisms such as Lactobacillus parafarraginis, Lactobacillus harbinensis, and Lentilactobacillus, which are the predominant microorganisms that grew up to day 6 [164]. Conversely, the decline in amine levels after day 6 may be attributed to the metabolic activity of other microorganisms, including Saccharomyces sp. and Lactobacillus curvatus, which become more abundant during the mid-stage of fermentation [164,166,167]. Therefore, understanding the microbial ecology and the metabolic pathways involved in the synthesis and degradation of biogenic amines is crucial for controlling their levels in kombucha. Moreover, given the potential presence of harmful biogenic amines during fermentation, future studies should investigate the relationship between specific microbial strains and the formation of these compounds, using functional experiments in which sterilized kombucha is inoculated with individual strains to quantify their amine production.
Therefore, these chemical hazards arise from the metabolic processes of the fermenting microorganisms, which underscores the need to control microbial growth and activity to prevent the occurrence of biological hazards. Their growth can occur at any stage of production emphasizing the need to carefully manage microbial activity [19]. Therefore, strict hygiene measures must be established to prevent the occurrence of microbial hazards, including the sanitization of fermentation vessels and tools, the use of previously boiled water for tea preparation, the selection of a high-quality uncontaminated SCOBY, pH monitoring, equipment cleaning, and the use of certified raw materials [19,168]. These practices help minimize the risk of undesirable microorganism proliferation by ensuring adequate hygienic conditions and pH control that limits their growth and significantly reduce the risk of growth of foodborne pathogens such as Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, and Clostridium botulinum, or contamination by molds such as Penicillium and Aspergillus [169,170]. Nevertheless, in the case of kombucha, this risk is inherently low due to its acidic pH (generally between 2.5 and 4.2), which constitutes an intrinsic barrier that inhibits the growth of most foodborne pathogens. In fact, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in its Food Code Model establishes pH values of 4.2 as the maximum values on the seventh day of fermentation for kombucha to be considered microbiologically safe. Conversely, values below 2.5 necessitate restoring the beverage to an acceptable pH range [24,58] to avoid physiological damage and corrosion of vessels used to ferment and store them [19]. This erosion can generate the release of compounds with potential negative health effects (e.g., heavy metals) [171].
Therefore, both chemical and biological hazards in kombucha can be effectively minimized through careful control and standardization of the fermentation process. The degree of risk reduction largely depends on the production system, which highlights important differences between home-brewed and industrially produced kombucha. In home-brewed or artisanal preparations, there is often a lack of standardized procedures and comprehensive monitoring, being subject to greater variability in ingredients, fermentation conditions, and hygiene practices, which can increase the likelihood of safety issues if careful procedures are not followed [157,172]. Industrial production benefits from controlled fermentation conditions, systematic quality management, and adherence to regulatory standards, including the implementation of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) systems [168]. Such systems involve identifying potential hazards, defining critical control points in the production process, establishing monitoring procedures, and setting corrective actions to prevent or eliminate risks (including poorly controlled herbal ingredients or additives, contamination with resistant spores, generation of unwanted compounds, or high ethanol content), ensuring both product safety and consistency [173].
In addition to microbiological and chemical risks, isolated adverse effects associated with kombucha consumption have been reported. These occur primarily when the beverage is ingested in large quantities, prepared using poor hygiene practices, or consumed by vulnerable populations, such as young children, pregnant women, people with compromised immune systems (e.g., HIV infection, acute renal failure, or a predisposition to acidosis), and individuals with hypersensitivity or allergies to certain kombucha compounds. Furthermore, consuming highly acidic kombuchas, resulting from prolonged fermentation processes, may increase the likelihood of adverse effects [20,31]. Reported adverse effects include gastrointestinal problems, allergic reactions, mild liver toxicity, lactic acidosis, acid accumulation in the blood, hyponatremia, anti-Jo1 myositis, cholestatic hepatitis, jaundice, headache, and dizziness [19,23,31]. High consumption of kombucha can also negatively affect dental health due to its tannin content, which can accumulate on the teeth and lead to discoloration [174], as well as its acidity, which erodes tooth enamel, potentially leading to halitosis and enamel weakening, thus increasing the predisposition to tooth decay [175]. Furthermore, the added sugars used to promote the fermentation process can have an adverse effect on oral health [23]. These high sugar contents can also contribute to other health problems, such as obesity, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes [23]. In pregnant women, attention should be paid to the concentrations of glycosaminoglycans and heparin—compounds present in teas that are capable of inhibiting the blood-clotting system protein in the body. This is a critical aspect especially in the third trimester [20]. For these reasons, the bioactive compounds present in kombucha should be systematically quantified, and evidence-based guidelines for daily consumption should be established and communicated to consumers through product labeling [31,163]. Faced with these challenges, some producers have sought certifications for internationally recognized food safety standards, such as IFS Food in Europe or ISO 22000 management systems, which involve external audits, traceability, and systematic hazard control [176,177]. These certifications help ensure that the kombucha produced meets hygiene standards, raw material controls, documented processes, and labeling requirements that support product safety.
In this regard, a recent scientific review on the risks and toxicity of kombucha highlights that while most commercial kombuchas are safe, the lack of clear and uniform regulatory frameworks in many countries hinders the standardization of safe production practices [157,178]. Therefore, it is essential to develop appropriate regulations and labeling, incorporating food safety principles even in home settings, such as strict cleaning measures, the use of safe raw materials, pH measurement, and, where possible, validation of fermentation techniques through microbiological analysis. Currently, Brazil is the only country with specific legislation for kombucha, established through Normative Instruction No. 41/2019 of the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply (MAPA). This regulation defines the official criteria regarding product name, composition, classification, labeling requirements, marketing restrictions, and analytical parameters applicable to this fermented beverage. These parameters include pH (2.5–4.2), alcohol content for non-alcoholic kombucha (≤0.5%) and alcoholic kombucha (0.6–0.8%), volatile acidity (30–130 mEq/L), and pressure in carbonated products. Furthermore, the regulation prohibits the use of labeling terms that suggest functional properties or superlative qualities not supported by current legislation [24]. In the United States, fermented drinks and acidified canned foods are exempt from regulation by the FDA; therefore, there is no specific legislation for kombucha, only recommendations established under the framework of the FDA Food Code, which establishes basic HACCP protocols applicable to the entire production chain [179]. For its part, Kombucha Brewers International has established a code of good practices that promotes food safety, quality and transparency standards for producers, in addition to a voluntary certification program [24]. In any case, the marketing of this beverage must comply with legal labeling requirements, including ingredients, net content, storage conditions and alcohol warnings if applicable.

7. Conclusions and Prospects

Kombucha is a fermented beverage whose final composition results from the interaction between the plant-based substrate and the metabolic activity of a complex microbial community. Throughout the fermentation process, various compounds are generated and transformed, including polyphenols and organic acids, which have shown biological activity in experimental studies, such as antioxidant or antimicrobial effects. However, the presence and concentration of these compounds vary considerably depending on the brewing conditions, which limits the generalizability of their potential effects and highlights the need for caution in interpreting the benefits attributed to this beverage. Current research suggests that the microbial consortium of kombucha and its cellulosic biofilm also hold potential for sustainable applications in packaging, environmental, and biomedical fields. Despite their renewable and low-cost nature, industrial-scale use requires careful evaluation of safety, functionality, and stability. Overall, both kombucha and its associated microbiota represent an expanding field of study that combines nutritional, technological, and biomaterial interests, but whose responsible use depends on standardized processes and more robust scientific validation.

Funding

The research leading to these results was supported by Xunta de Galicia for supporting the post-doctoral grant of Antia G. Pereira (IN606B-2024/011). Funding for open access charge: Universidade de Vigo/CISUG.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Abaci, N.; Senol Deniz, F.S.; Orhan, I.E. Kombucha—An Ancient Fermented Beverage with Desired Bioactivities: A Narrowed Review. Food Chem. X 2022, 14, 100302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kaashyap, M.; Cohen, M.; Mantri, N. Microbial Diversity and Characteristics of Kombucha as Revealed by Metagenomic and Physicochemical Analysis. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ramírez Tapias, Y.A.; Di Monte, M.V.; Peltzer, M.A.; Salvay, A.G. Bacterial Cellulose Films Production by Kombucha Symbiotic Community Cultured on Different Herbal Infusions. Food Chem. 2022, 372, 131346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Antolak, H.; Piechota, D.; Kucharska, A. Kombucha Tea—A Double Power of Bioactive Compounds from Tea and Symbiotic Culture of Bacteria and Yeasts (SCOBY). Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Villarreal-Soto, S.A.; Beaufort, S.; Bouajila, J.; Souchard, J.-P.; Taillandier, P. Understanding Kombucha Tea Fermentation: A Review. J. Food Sci. 2018, 83, 580–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, B.; Rutherfurd-Markwick, K.; Zhang, X.-X.; Mutukumira, A.N. Kombucha: Production and Microbiological Research. Foods 2022, 11, 3456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dufresne, C.; Farnworth, E. Tea, Kombucha, and Health: A Review. Food Res. Int. 2000, 33, 409–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jayabalan, R.; Malbaša, R.V.; Lončar, E.S.; Vitas, J.S.; Sathishkumar, M. A Review on Kombucha Tea—Microbiology, Composition, Fermentation, Beneficial Effects, Toxicity, and Tea Fungus. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014, 13, 538–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kapp, J.M.; Sumner, W. Kombucha: A Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Human Health Benefit. Ann. Epidemiol. 2019, 30, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Andrade, D.K.A.; Wang, B.; Lima, E.M.F.; Shebeko, S.K.; Ermakov, A.M.; Khramova, V.N.; Ivanova, I.V.; Rocha, R.d.S.; Vaz-Velho, M.; Mutukumira, A.N.; et al. Kombucha: An Old Tradition into a New Concept of a Beneficial, Health-Promoting Beverage. Foods 2025, 14, 1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, J.; Adhikari, K. Current Trends in Kombucha: Marketing Perspectives and the Need for Improved Sensory Research. Beverages 2020, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Morales, D. Biological Activities of Kombucha Beverages: The Need of Clinical Evidence. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 105, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ghion, G.; Sica, J.; Massaro, S.; Tarrah, A.; Devold, T.G.; Porcellato, D.; Giacomini, A.; de Barros, F.A.R.; Corich, V.; Nadai, C. Functional Compound Bioaccessibility and Microbial Viability in Green and Black Tea Kombucha During Simulated Digestion. Foods 2025, 14, 2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. De Roos, J.; De Vuyst, L. Acetic Acid Bacteria in Fermented Foods and Beverages. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2018, 49, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ivanišová, E.; Meňhartová, K.; Terentjeva, M.; Harangozo, Ľ.; Kántor, A.; Kačániová, M. The Evaluation of Chemical, Antioxidant, Antimicrobial and Sensory Properties of Kombucha Tea Beverage. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 1840–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. da Silva Júnior, J.C.; Meireles Mafaldo, Í.; de Lima Brito, I.; Tribuzy de Magalhães Cordeiro, A.M. Kombucha: Formulation, Chemical Composition, and Therapeutic Potentialities. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2022, 5, 360–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Malbaša, R.V.; Lončar, E.S.; Kolarov, L.J.A. Sucrose and Inulin Balance During Tea Fungus Fermentation. Roum. Biotechnol. Lett. 2002, 7, 573–576. [Google Scholar]
  18. Petrović, S.; Petrović, S.; Malbasa, R.; Verac, R. Biosynthesis of Glucuronic Acid by Means of Tea Fungus. Nahrung 2000, 44, 138–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kitwetcharoen, H.; Phung, L.T.; Klanrit, P.; Thanonkeo, S.; Tippayawat, P.; Yamada, M.; Thanonkeo, P. Kombucha Healthy Drink—Recent Advances in Production, Chemical Composition and Health Benefits. Fermentation 2023, 9, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Martínez Leal, J.; Valenzuela Suárez, L.; Jayabalan, R.; Huerta Oros, J.; Escalante-Aburto, A. A Review on Health Benefits of Kombucha Nutritional Compounds and Metabolites. CyTA-J. Food 2018, 16, 390–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ruiz-Capillas, C.; Herrero, A.M. Impact of Biogenic Amines on Food Quality and Safety. Foods 2019, 8, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dimidi, E.; Cox, S.R.; Rossi, M.; Whelan, K. Fermented Foods: Definitions and Characteristics, Impact on the Gut Microbiota and Effects on Gastrointestinal Health and Disease. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bishop, P.; Pitts, E.R.; Budner, D.; Thompson-Witrick, K.A. Chemical Composition of Kombucha. Beverages 2022, 8, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. de Miranda, J.F.; Ruiz, L.F.; Silva, C.B.; Uekane, T.M.; Silva, K.A.; Gonzalez, A.G.M.; Fernandes, F.F.; Lima, A.R. Kombucha: A Review of Substrates, Regulations, Composition, and Biological Properties. J. Food Sci. 2022, 87, 503–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bauer-Petrovska, B.; Petrushevska-Tozi, L. Mineral and Water Soluble Vitamin Content in the Kombucha Drink. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2000, 35, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Malbaša, R.V.; Lončar, E.S.; Vitas, J.S.; Čanadanović-Brunet, J.M. Influence of Starter Cultures on the Antioxidant Activity of Kombucha Beverage. Food Chem. 2011, 127, 1727–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jakubczyk, K.; Gutowska, I.; Antoniewicz, J.; Janda, K. Evaluation of Fluoride and Selected Chemical Parameters in Kombucha Derived from White, Green, Black and Red Tea. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 3547–3552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pereira, A.G.; Cassani, L.; Liu, C.; Li, N.; Chamorro, F.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Prieto, M.A. Camellia Japonica Flowers as a Source of Nutritional and Bioactive Compounds. Foods 2023, 12, 2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jakubczyk, K.; Kałduńska, J.; Kochman, J.; Janda, K. Chemical Profile and Antioxidant Activity of the Kombucha Beverage Derived from White, Green, Black and Red Tea. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kumar, S.D.; Narayan, G.; Hassarajani, S. Determination of Anionic Minerals in Black and Kombucha Tea Using Ion Chromatography. Food Chem. 2008, 111, 784–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ojo, A.O.; de Smidt, O. Microbial Composition, Bioactive Compounds, Potential Benefits and Risks Associated with Kombucha: A Concise Review. Fermentation 2023, 9, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yuksek, E.N.; Prieto, M.A.; Pereira, A.G. Phytochemical Insights and Industrial Applications of Camellia Japonica Leaves: A Focus on Sustainable Utilization. Nutrients 2025, 17, 3382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Grondalska, J.; Kolniak-Ostek, J. Evaluation of Anti-Inflammatory, Antidiabetic, Antioxidant, and Anticholinergic Activities, as Well as Chemical Composition and Polyphenolic Compounds in Novel SCOBY-Fermented Juices. Molecules 2025, 30, 1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mfopa, A.N.; Kemzeu, R.; Fokom, R.; Yamthe, L.R.T.; Dize, D.; Boyom, F.F. Phenolic Compounds, Antioxidant and Antileishmanial Activities of Kombucha as Affected by Fermentation Time. Heliyon 2024, 10, e40463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Phung, L.T.; Kitwetcharoen, H.; Chamnipa, N.; Boonchot, N.; Thanonkeo, S.; Tippayawat, P.; Klanrit, P.; Yamada, M.; Thanonkeo, P. Changes in the Chemical Compositions and Biological Properties of Kombucha Beverages Made from Black Teas and Pineapple Peels and Cores. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 7859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, H.; Hur, S.; Lim, J.; Jin, K.; Yang, T.; Keehm, I.; Kim, S.W.; Kim, T.; Kim, D. Enhancement of the Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activities of Kombucha Prepared Using Specific Bacterial and Yeast. Food Biosci. 2023, 56, 103431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chakravorty, S.; Bhattacharya, S.; Chatzinotas, A.; Chakraborty, W.; Bhattacharya, D.; Gachhui, R. Kombucha Tea Fermentation: Microbial and Biochemical Dynamics. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 220, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chu, S.-C.; Chen, C. Effects of Origins and Fermentation Time on the Antioxidant Activities of Kombucha. Food Chem. 2006, 98, 502–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jayabalan, R.; Marimuthu, S.; Swaminathan, K. Changes in Content of Organic Acids and Tea Polyphenols during Kombucha Tea Fermentation. Food Chem. 2007, 102, 392–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ziemlewska, A.; Nizioł-Łukaszewska, Z.; Bujak, T.; Zagórska-Dziok, M.; Wójciak, M.; Sowa, I. Effect of Fermentation Time on the Content of Bioactive Compounds with Cosmetic and Dermatological Properties in Kombucha Yerba Mate Extracts. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 18792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aung, T.; Eun, J.-B. Production and Characterization of a Novel Beverage from Laver (Porphyra Dentata) through Fermentation with Kombucha Consortium. Food Chem. 2021, 350, 129274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shi, S.; Wei, Y.; Lin, X.; Liang, H.; Zhang, S.; Chen, Y.; Dong, L.; Ji, C. Microbial Metabolic Transformation and Antioxidant Activity Evaluation of Polyphenols in Kombucha. Food Biosci. 2023, 51, 102287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cardoso, R.R.; Neto, R.O.; dos Santos D’Almeida, C.T.; do Nascimento, T.P.; Pressete, C.G.; Azevedo, L.; Martino, H.S.D.; Cameron, L.C.; Ferreira, M.S.L.; de Barros, F.A.R. Kombuchas from Green and Black Teas Have Different Phenolic Profile, Which Impacts Their Antioxidant Capacities, Antibacterial and Antiproliferative Activities. Food Res. Int. 2020, 128, 108782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yang, J.; Lagishetty, V.; Kurnia, P.; Henning, S.M.; Ahdoot, A.I.; Jacobs, J.P. Microbial and Chemical Profiles of Commercial Kombucha Products. Nutrients 2022, 14, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhou, D.-D.; Saimaiti, A.; Luo, M.; Huang, S.-Y.; Xiong, R.-G.; Shang, A.; Gan, R.-Y.; Li, H.-B. Fermentation with Tea Residues Enhances Antioxidant Activities and Polyphenol Contents in Kombucha Beverages. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pereira, A.G.; Cassani, L.; Oludemi, T.; Chamorro, F.; Calhelha, R.C.; Prieto, M.A.; Barros, L.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Lucini, L.; Garcia-Perez, P. Untargeted Metabolomics and in Vitro Functional Analysis Unravel the Intraspecific Bioactive Potential of Flowers from Underexplored Camellia Japonica Cultivars Facing Their Industrial Application. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 204, 117389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bhattacharya, D.; Bhattacharya, S.; Patra, M.M.; Chakravorty, S.; Sarkar, S.; Chakraborty, W.; Koley, H.; Gachhui, R. Antibacterial Activity of Polyphenolic Fraction of Kombucha Against Enteric Bacterial Pathogens. Curr. Microbiol. 2016, 73, 885–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tsuru, V.H.; Gomes, R.J.; Silva, J.R.; Prudencio, S.H.; Costa, G.N.; Spinosa, W.A. Physicochemical, Antioxidant and Sensory Properties of Kombucha Beverages Obtained from Oolong or Yerba Mate Tea Fermentation. Res. Soc. Dev. 2021, 10, e62101118790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vukmanović, S.; Vitas, J.; Ranitović, A.; Cvetković, D.; Tomić, A.; Malbaša, R. Certain Production Variables and Antimicrobial Activity of Novel Winery Effluent Based Kombucha. LWT 2022, 154, 112726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, C.; Liu, B.Y. Changes in Major Components of Tea Fungus Metabolites during Prolonged Fermentation. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 89, 834–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Velićanski, A.S.; Cvetković, D.D.; Markov, S.L.; Šaponjac, V.T.T.; Vulić, J.J. Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activity of the Beverage Obtained by Fermentation of Sweetened Lemon Balm (Melissa officinalis L.) Tea with Symbiotic Consortium of Bacteria and Yeasts. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2014, 52, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tu, C.; Tang, S.; Azi, F.; Hu, W.; Dong, M. Use of Kombucha Consortium to Transform Soy Whey into a Novel Functional Beverage. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 52, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Malbaša, R.; Lončar, E.; Djurić, M. Comparison of the Products of Kombucha Fermentation on Sucrose and Molasses. Food Chem. 2008, 106, 1039–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Neffe-Skocińska, K.; Sionek, B.; Ścibisz, I.; Kołożyn-Krajewska, D. Acid Contents and the Effect of Fermentation Condition of Kombucha Tea Beverages on Physicochemical, Microbiological and Sensory Properties. CyTA-J. Food 2017, 15, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Talebi, M.; Frink, L.A.; Patil, R.A.; Armstrong, D.W. Examination of the Varied and Changing Ethanol Content of Commercial Kombucha Products. Food Anal. Methods 2017, 10, 4062–4067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Australian Government Department of Health. Fermented Beverages Stakeholder Roundtable; Australian Government Department of Health: Canberra, Australia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  57. Kallel, L.; Desseaux, V.; Hamdi, M.; Stocker, P.; Ajandouz, E.H. Insights into the Fermentation Biochemistry of Kombucha Teas and Potential Impacts of Kombucha Drinking on Starch Digestion. Food Res. Int. 2012, 49, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nummer, B.A. Kombucha Brewing under the Food and Drug Administration Model Food Code: Risk Analysis and Processing Guidance. J. Environ. Health 2013, 76, 8–11. [Google Scholar]
  59. Sharma, V.K.; Bhattacharya, A.; Kumar, A.; Sharma, H.K. Health Benefits of Tea Consumption. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2007, 6, 785–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hara, Y.; Luo ShaoJun, L.S.; Wickremasinghe, R.L.; Yamanishi, T. Chemical Composition of Tea. Food Rev. Int. 1995, 11, 435–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ivani\vsová, E.; Meňhartová, K.; Terentjeva, M.; Godo\vciková, L.; Árvay, J.; Ka\vcániová, M. Kombucha Tea Beverage: Microbiological Characteristic, Antioxidant Activity, and Phytochemical Composition. Acta Aliment. 2019, 48, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bhattacharya, S.; Gachhui, R.; Sil, P.C. The Prophylactic Role of D-Saccharic Acid-1,4-Lactone against Hyperglycemia-Induced Hepatic Apoptosis via Inhibition of Both Extrinsic and Intrinsic Pathways in Diabetic Rats. Food Funct. 2013, 4, 283–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, K.; Gan, X.; Tang, X.; Wang, S.; Tan, H. Determination of D-Saccharic Acid-1,4-Lactone from Brewed Kombucha Broth by High-Performance Capillary Electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. B 2010, 878, 371–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Strains, L.S.; Nguyen, N.K.; Dong, N.T.N.; Le, P.H.; Nguyen, H.T. Evaluation of the Glucuronic Acid Production and Other Biological Activities of Fermented Sweeten-Black Tea by Kombucha Layer and the Co-Culture with Different. Int. J. Mod. Eng. Res. 2014, 4, 12–17. [Google Scholar]
  65. Yang, Z.; Zhou, F.; Ji, B.; Li, B.; Luo, Y.; Yang, L.; Li, T. Symbiosis between Microorganisms from Kombucha and Kefir: Potential Significance to the Enhancement of Kombucha Function. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 160, 446–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mozzon, M.; Rinaldi, L.; Ahmed, A.E.M.; Kovács, B.; Foligni, R. Investigating the Volatiles of Kombucha During Storage Under Refrigerated Conditions. Beverages 2025, 11, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ahmed, R.F.; Hikal, M.S.; Abou-Taleb, K.A. Biological, Chemical and Antioxidant Activities of Different Types Kombucha. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2020, 65, 35–41, Erratum in Ann. Agric. Sci. 2021, 66, 98–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Villarreal-Soto, S.A.; Bouajila, J.; Pace, M.; Leech, J.; Cotter, P.D.; Souchard, J.-P.; Taillandier, P.; Beaufort, S. Metabolome-Microbiome Signatures in the Fermented Beverage, Kombucha. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 333, 108778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hasan, B.J.M.M.; Osman, F.; Muhamad, R.; Sapawi, C.W.N.S.C.W.; Anzian, A.; Voon, W.W.Y.; Hussin, A.S.M. Effects of Sugar Sources and Fermentation Time on the Properties of Tea Fungus (Kombucha) Beverage. Int. Food Res. J. 2019, 26, 481–487. [Google Scholar]
  70. Vohra, B.M.; Fazry, S.; Sairi, F.; Babul-airianah, O. Effects of Medium Variation and Fermentation Time on the Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Kombucha. Malasian J. Fundam. Appl. Sci. 2019, 2018, 298–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Watawana, M.I.; Jayawardena, N.; Ranasinghe, S.J.; Waisundara, V.Y. Evaluation of the Effect of Different Sweetening Agents on the Polyphenol Contents and Antioxidant and Starch Hydrolase Inhibitory Properties of Kombucha. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2017, 41, e12752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Amarasinghe, H.; Weerakkody, N.S.; Waisundara, V.Y. Evaluation of Physicochemical Properties and Antioxidant Activities of Kombucha “Tea Fungus” during Extended Periods of Fermentation. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 659–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pure, A.E.; Pure, M.E. Antioxidant, Antibacterial and Color Analysis of Garlic Fermented in Kombucha and Red Grape Vinegar. Appl. Food Biotechnol. 2016, 3, 246–252. [Google Scholar]
  74. Jayabalan, R.; Subathradevi, P.; Marimuthu, S.; Sathishkumar, M.; Swaminathan, K. Changes in Free-Radical Scavenging Ability of Kombucha Tea during Fermentation. Food Chem. 2008, 109, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Silva, K.A.; Uekane, T.M.; de Miranda, J.F.; Ruiz, L.F.; da Motta, J.C.B.; Silva, C.B.; de Souza Pitangui, N.; Gonzalez, A.G.M.; Fernandes, F.F.; Lima, A.R. Kombucha Beverage from Non-Conventional Edible Plant Infusion and Green Tea: Characterization, Toxicity, Antioxidant Activities and Antimicrobial Properties. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 34, 102032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Uțoiu, E.; Matei, F.; Toma, A.; Diguță, C.F.; Ștefan, L.M.; Mănoiu, S.; Vrăjmașu, V.V.; Moraru, I.; Oancea, A.; Israel-Roming, F.; et al. Bee Collected Pollen with Enhanced Health Benefits, Produced by Fermentation with a Kombucha Consortium. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gramza-michałowska, A.; Kulczyński, B.; Xindi, Y. Research on the Effect of Culture Time on the Kombucha Tea Beverage’s Antiradical Capacity and Sensory Value. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2016, 15, 447–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Shahbazi, H.; Hashemi Gahruie, H.; Golmakani, M.-T.; Eskandari, M.H.; Movahedi, M. Effect of Medicinal Plant Type and Concentration on Physicochemical, Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Sensorial Properties of Kombucha. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 2568–2577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Villarreal-Soto, S.A.; Beaufort, S.; Bouajila, J.; Souchard, J.-P.; Renard, T.; Rollan, S.; Taillandier, P. Impact of Fermentation Conditions on the Production of Bioactive Compounds with Anticancer, Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Properties in Kombucha Tea Extracts. Process Biochem. 2019, 83, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mizuta, A.G.; de Menezes, J.L.; Dutra, T.V.; Ferreira, T.V.; Castro, J.C.; da Silva, C.A.J.; Pilau, E.J.; Machinski Junior, M.; de Abreu Filho, B.A. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity of Green Tea Kombucha at Two Fermentation Time Points against Alicyclobacillus spp. LWT 2020, 130, 109641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kaewkod, T.; Bovonsombut, S.; Tragoolpua, Y. Efficacy of Kombucha Obtained from Green, Oolong, and Black Teas on Inhibition of Pathogenic Bacteria, Antioxidation, and Toxicity on Colorectal Cancer Cell Line. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Xia, X.; Dai, Y.; Wu, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Yin, L.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Zhou, J. Kombucha Fermentation Enhances the Health-Promoting Properties of Soymilk Beverage. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 62, 103549, Erratum in J. Funct. Foods 2020, 69, 103913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Vukmanović, S.; Vitas, J.; Malbaša, R. Valorization of Winery Effluent Using Kombucha Culture. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44, e14627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Hrnjez, D.; Vaštag, Ž.; Milanović, S.; Vukić, V.; Iličić, M.; Popović, L.; Kanurić, K. The Biological Activity of Fermented Dairy Products Obtained by Kombucha and Conventional Starter Cultures during Storage. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 10, 336–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Vázquez-Cabral, B.D.; Larrosa-Pérez, M.; Gallegos-Infante, J.A.; Moreno-Jiménez, M.R.; González-Laredo, R.F.; Rutiaga-Quiñones, J.G.; Gamboa-Gómez, C.I.; Rocha-Guzmán, N.E. Oak Kombucha Protects against Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Processes. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2017, 272, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gaggìa, F.; Baffoni, L.; Galiano, M.; Nielsen, D.S.; Jakobsen, R.R.; Castro-Mejía, J.L.; Bosi, S.; Truzzi, F.; Musumeci, F.; Dinelli, G.; et al. Kombucha Beverage from Green, Black and Rooibos Teas: A Comparative Study Looking at Microbiology, Chemistry and Antioxidant Activity. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Bhattacharya, S.; Gachhui, R.; Sil, P.C. Effect of Kombucha, a Fermented Black Tea in Attenuating Oxidative Stress Mediated Tissue Damage in Alloxan Induced Diabetic Rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 60, 328–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yang, Z.-W.; Ji, B.-P.; Zhou, F.; Li, B.; Luo, Y.; Yang, L.; Li, T. Hypocholesterolaemic and Antioxidant Effects of Kombucha Tea in High-Cholesterol Fed Mice. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sai Ram, M.; Anju, B.; Pauline, T.; Prasad, D.; Kain, A.K.; Mongia, S.S.; Sharma, S.K.; Singh, B.; Singh, R.; Ilavazhagan, G.; et al. Effect of Kombucha Tea on chromate(VI)-Induced Oxidative Stress in Albino Rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 71, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Jayabalan, R.; Chen, P.-N.; Hsieh, Y.-S.; Prabhakaran, K.; Pitchai, P.; Marimuthu, S.; Thangaraj, P.; Swaminathan, K.; Eok, S. Effect of Solvent Fractions of Kombucha Tea on Viability and Invasiveness of Cancer cells—Characterization of Dimethyl 2-(2-Hydroxy-2-Methoxypropylidine) Malonate and Vitexin. Indian J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 75–82. [Google Scholar]
  91. Rasouli, L.; Aryaeian, N.; Gorjian, M.; Nourbakhsh, M.; Amiri, F. Evaluation of Cytotoxicity and Anticancer Activity of Kombucha and Doxorubicin Combination Therapy on Colorectal Cancer Cell Line HCT-116. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2021, 10, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Četojević-Simin, D.; Velićanski, A.S.; Cvetković, D.D.; Markov, S.L.; Mrđanović, J.Ž.; Bogdanović, V.; Šolajić, S.V. Bioactivity of Lemon Balm Kombucha. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012, 5, 1756–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Srihari, T.; Arunkumar, R.; Arunakaran, J.; Satyanarayana, U. Downregulation of Signalling Molecules Involved in Angiogenesis of Prostate Cancer Cell Line (PC-3) by Kombucha (Lyophilized). Biomed. Prev. Nutr. 2013, 3, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Sinaga, E.; Hasanah, U.; Sipahutar, F.R.P.; Simorangkir, M.; Sipahutar, M.N. Identifying Therapeutic Effect of Kombucha Pirdot (Saurauia Vulcani Korth.) against Colorectal Cancer: The Experimental Data and in Silico Approach. Med. Microecol. 2024, 20, 100105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Battikh, H.; Chaieb, K.; Bakhrouf, A.; Ammar, E. Antibacterial and Antifungal Activities of Black and Green Kombucha Teas. J. Food Biochem. 2013, 37, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bhattacharya, D.; Sinha, R.; Mukherjee, P.; Howlader, D.R.; Nag, D.; Sarkar, S.; Koley, H.; Withey, J.H.; Gachhui, R. Anti-Virulence Activity of Polyphenolic Fraction Isolated from Kombucha against Vibrio cholerae. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 140, 103927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Pei, J.; Jin, W.; Abd El-Aty, A.M.; Baranenko, D.A.; Gou, X.; Zhang, H.; Geng, J.; Jiang, L.; Chen, D.; Yue, T. Isolation, Purification, and Structural Identification of a New Bacteriocin Made by Lactobacillus Plantarum Found in Conventional Kombucha. Food Control 2020, 110, 106923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zubaidah, E.; Afgani, C.A.; Kalsum, U.; Srianta, I.; Blanc, P.J. Comparison of in Vivo Antidiabetes Activity of Snake Fruit Kombucha, Black Tea Kombucha and Metformin. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 17, 465–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Srihari, T.; Karthikesan, K.; Ashokkumar, N.; Satyanarayana, U. Antihyperglycaemic Efficacy of Kombucha in Streptozotocin-Induced Rats. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 1794–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Aloulou, A.; Hamden, K.; Elloumi, D.; Ali, M.B.; Hargafi, K.; Jaouadi, B.; Ayadi, F.; Elfeki, A.; Ammar, E. Hypoglycemic and Antilipidemic Properties of Kombucha Tea in Alloxan-Induced Diabetic Rats. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 12, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Adriani, L.; Mayasari, N.; Kartasudjana, R. The Effect of Feeding Fermented Kombucha Tea on Hdl, Ldl and Total Cholesterol Levels in the Duck Bloods. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb. 2011, 27, 1749–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. El Nady, G.H.; Ibrahim, N.; Gamar, G.; El-Dougdoug, N. Assessment of Antiproliferation Effects of Kombucha Tea in HepG-2 Cells. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. 2023, 15, 513–527. [Google Scholar]
  103. Onsun, B.; Toprak, K.; Sanlier, N. Kombucha Tea: A Functional Beverage and All Its Aspects. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2025, 14, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Taupiqurrohman, O.; Hastuti, L.P.; Oktavia, D.; Al-Najjar, B.O.; Yusuf, M.; Suryani, Y.; Gaffar, S. From Fermentation to Cancer Prevention: The Anticancer Potential of Kombucha. Phytomed. Plus 2024, 4, 100633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Neffe-Skocińska, K.; Długosz, E.; Szulc-Dąbrowska, L.; Zielińska, D. Novel Gluconobacter Oxydans Strains Selected from Kombucha with Potential Postbiotic Activity. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 108, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Içen, H.; Corbo, M.R.; Sinigaglia, M.; Korkmaz, B.I.O.; Bevilacqua, A. Microbiology and Antimicrobial Effects of Kombucha, a Short Overview. Food Biosci. 2023, 56, 103270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Vamanu, E. Complementary Functional Strategy for Modulation of Human Gut Microbiota. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 4144–4149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Jung, Y.; Kim, I.; Mannaa, M.; Kim, J.; Wang, S.; Park, I.; Kim, J.; Seo, Y.-S. Effect of Kombucha on Gut-Microbiota in Mouse Having Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 28, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Kozyrovska, N.O.; Reva, O.M.; Goginyan, V.B.; Vera, J. De Kombucha Microbiome as a Probiotic: A View from the Perspective of Post-Genomics and Synthetic Ecology. Biopolym. Cell 2012, 28, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Marzban, F.; Azizi, G.; Afraei, S.; Sedaghat, R.; Seyedzadeh, M.H.; Razavi, A.; Mirshafiey, A. Kombucha Tea Ameliorates Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis in Mouse Model of Multiple Sclerosis. Food Agric. Immunol. 2015, 26, 782–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Jayabalan, R.; Baskaran, S.; Marimuthu, S.; Swaminathan, K.; Yun, S.E. Effect of Kombucha Tea on Aflatoxin B1 Induced Acute Hepatotoxicity in Albino Rats-Prophylactic and Curative Studies. J. Korean Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2010, 53, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wang, Y.; Ji, B.; Wu, W.; Wang, R.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, D.; Tian, W. Hepatoprotective Effects of Kombucha Tea: Identification of Functional Strains and Quantification of Functional Components. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lee, C.; Kim, J.; Wang, S.; Sung, S.; Kim, N.; Lee, H.-H.; Seo, Y.-S.; Jung, Y. Hepatoprotective Effect of Kombucha Tea in Rodent Model of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Coelho, R.M.D.; de Almeida, A.L.; do Amaral, R.Q.G.; da Mota, R.N.; de Sousa, P.H.M. Kombucha: Review. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2020, 22, 100272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Liao, T.; Li, L.; Yang, J.-R.; Shao, S.-T.; Zheng, W.-M.; Cheng, L.-H.; Fan, L. Reconstitution of Dominant Kombucha Strains to Enhance Functional Properties and Product Quality. Front. Nutr. 2025, 12, 1687776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Njieukam, J.A.; Ciccone, M.; Gottardi, D.; Ricci, A.; Parpinello, G.P.; Siroli, L.; Lanciotti, R.; Patrignani, F. Microbiological, Functional, and Chemico-Physical Characterization of Artisanal Kombucha: An Interesting Reservoir of Microbial Diversity. Foods 2024, 13, 1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Alves, R.O.; de Oliveira, R.L.; de Moraes, M.M.; Santos, W.W.V.; da Câmara, C.A.; da Silva, S.P.; Porto, C.S.; Porto, T.S. Evaluation of the Impact of Fermentation Conditions, Scale Up and Stirring on Physicochemical Parameters, Antioxidant Capacity and Volatile Compounds of Green Tea Kombucha. Fermentation 2025, 11, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Gagliardi, T.R.; de Farias Nascimento, A.; Valencia, G.A. Kombucha Bacterial Cellulose: A Promising Biopolymer for Advanced Food and Nonfood Applications. Foods 2025, 14, 738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Santiago-Santiago, R.M.; Michel, M.R.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Aguilar-Zárate, P.; Ascacio-Valdés, J.A.; Flores-Gallegos, A.C. Symbiotic Culture of Bacteria and Yeast (SCOBY) in the Food Sector as a Source of Polysaccharides and Other Applications in the Food Sector. Polysaccharides 2025, 6, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Samakkarn, W.; Wai, H.P.; Pichaiyotinkul, P.; Paemanee, A.; Soontorngun, N. Co-Fermentation of Probiotic and Aromatic Yeasts Enriched Antimicrobial Acid and Antioxidant Content of Rosé Yeast Kombucha. Food Biosci. 2025, 73, 107575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Wang, B.; Rutherfurd-Markwick, K.; Naren, N.; Zhang, X.-X.; Mutukumira, A.N. Microbiological and Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Black Tea Kombucha Fermented with a New Zealand Starter Culture. Foods 2023, 12, 2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kilmanoglu, H.; Yigit Cinar, A.; Durak, M.Z. Evaluation of Microbiota-Induced Changes in Biochemical, Sensory Properties and Volatile Profile of Kombucha Produced by Reformed Microbial Community. Food Chem. X 2024, 22, 101469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Fabricio, M.F.; Vargas, B.K.; Tischer, B.; Wagner, R.; Ribeiro, S.R.; Cordeiro, N.; Flôres, S.H.; Záchia Ayub, M.A. Revamping Kombucha Production: Achieving Consistency and Probiotic Potential through a Tailor-Made Microbial Consortium. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2023, 34, 100844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ouili, A.S.; Mogmenga, I.; Ouattara, A.; Tidiane Compaoré, C.O.; Maiga, Y.; Nikiema, M.; Ouattara, A.S. Assessment of the Probiotic Properties of Pediococcus Acidilactici, Pediococcus Pentosaceus, and Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum Strains Isolated From Fermented Maize Grains. J. Food Prot. 2025, 88, 100514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Sanwal, N.; Gupta, A.; Bareen, M.A.; Sharma, N.; Sahu, J.K. Kombucha Fermentation: Recent Trends in Process Dynamics, Functional Bioactivities, Toxicity Management, and Potential Applications. Food Chem. Adv. 2023, 3, 100421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Saito, M.S.; dos Santos, W.A.; Mamede, M.E.d.O. Coffee-Flavoured Kombucha: Development, Physicochemical Characterisation, and Sensory Analysis. Fermentation 2024, 10, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Rodríguez-Castro, R.; Guerrero, R.; Valero, A.; Franco-Rodriguez, J.; Posada-Izquierdo, G. Cocoa Mucilage as a Novel Ingredient in Innovative Kombucha Fermentation. Foods 2024, 13, 1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Vázquez-Cabral, B.D.; Rocha-Guzmán, N.E.; Gallegos-Infante, J.A.; González-Herrera, S.M.; González-Laredo, R.F.; Moreno-Jiménez, M.R.; Córdova-Moreno, I.T.S. Chemical and Sensory Evaluation of a Functional Beverage Obtained from Infusions of Oak Leaves (Quercus resinosa) Inoculated with the Kombucha Consortium under Different Processing Conditions. Nutrafoods 2014, 13, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Vitas, J.S.; Cvetanović, A.D.; Mašković, P.Z.; Švarc-Gajić, J.V.; Malbaša, R.V. Chemical Composition and Biological Activity of Novel Types of Kombucha Beverages with Yarrow. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 44, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Yavari, N.; Assadi, M.M.; Larijani, K.; Moghadam, M.B. Response Surface Methodology for Optimization of Glucuronic Acid Production Using Kombucha Layer on Sour Cherry Juice. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2010, 4, 3250–3256. [Google Scholar]
  131. Ayed, L.; Hamdi, M. Manufacture of a Beverage from Cactus Pear Juice Using “tea Fungus” Fermentation. Ann. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 2293–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Zhang, J.; Van Mullem, J.; Dias, D.R.; Schwan, R.F. The Chemistry and Sensory Characteristics of New Herbal Tea-Based Kombuchas. J. Food Sci. 2021, 86, 740–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Salafzoon, S.; Mahmoodzadeh Hosseini, H.; Halabian, R. Evaluation of the Antioxidant Impact of Ginger-Based Kombucha on the Murine Breast Cancer Model. J. Complement. Integr. Med. 2018, 15, 20170071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Sharifudin, S.A.; Ho, W.Y.; Yeap, S.K.; Abdullah, R.; Koh, S.P. Fermentation and Characterisation of Potential Kombucha Cultures on Papaya-Based Substrates. LWT 2021, 151, 112060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Do, A.D.; Nguyen, L.B.X.; Pham, D.Q.; Le, T.T.; Leya, M.; Phan Van, T. Kombucha Tea Derived from Papaya (Carica papaya L.) as a Potential Functional Food: Physicochemical Parameters, Biological Activities, and Sensory Evaluation. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 59, 7786–7794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Yavari, N.; Mazaheri-assadi, M.; Mazhari, Z.H.; Moghadam, M.B. Glucuronic Acid Rich Kombucha-Fermented Pomegranate Juice. J. Food Res. 2018, 7, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Ayed, L.; Ben Abid, S.; Hamdi, M. Development of a Beverage from Red Grape Juice Fermented with the Kombucha Consortium. Ann. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Linhares, M.d.F.D.; Fonteles, T.V.; de Oliveira, L.S.; de Souza, S.B.; de Castro Miguel, E.; Fernandes, F.A.N.; Rodrigues, S. Powdered Kombucha Flavored with Fruit By-Products: A Sustainable Functional Innovation. Processes 2025, 13, 3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Pure, A.E.; Pure, M.E. Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activity of Kombucha Beverages Prepared Using Banana Peel, Common Nettles and Black Tea Infusions. Appl. Food Biotechnol. 2016, 3, 125–130. [Google Scholar]
  140. Jakubczyk, K.; Melkis, K.; Maciejewska-Markiewicz, D.; Muzykiewicz-Szymańska, A.; Nowak, A.; Skonieczna-Żydecka, K. Innovative Approaches to Enhancing Kombucha through Flavour Additives: A Phytochemical and Antioxidant Analysis. Food Funct. 2025, 16, 1442–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Senna, M.; Melo, R.; Ferreira, S.; Camile, A.; De Jesus, A.; Eugênia, M.; Mamede, D.O. Analysis of Innovations in Kombucha Production and the Protection of Intellectual Property. Biotechnol. Res. Innov. 2024, 8, e2024016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Teoh, A.L.; Heard, G.; Cox, J. Yeast Ecology of Kombucha Fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 95, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Marsh, A.J.; O’Sullivan, O.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P.; Cotter, P.D. Sequence-Based Analysis of the Bacterial and Fungal Compositions of Multiple Kombucha (Tea Fungus) Samples. Food Microbiol. 2014, 38, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Coton, M.; Pawtowski, A.; Taminiau, B.; Burgaud, G.; Deniel, F.; Coulloumme-Labarthe, L.; Fall, A.; Daube, G.; Coton, E. Unraveling Microbial Ecology of Industrial-Scale Kombucha Fermentations by Metabarcoding and Culture-Based Methods. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2017, 93, fix048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. De Filippis, F.; Troise, A.D.; Vitaglione, P.; Ercolini, D. Different Temperatures Select Distinctive Acetic Acid Bacteria Species and Promotes Organic Acids Production during Kombucha Tea Fermentation. Food Microbiol. 2018, 73, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Arıkan, M.; Mitchell, A.L.; Finn, R.D.; Gürel, F. Microbial Composition of Kombucha Determined Using Amplicon Sequencing and Shotgun Metagenomics. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Wang, S.; Zhang, L.; Qi, L.; Liang, H.; Lin, X.; Li, S.; Yu, C.; Ji, C. Effect of Synthetic Microbial Community on Nutraceutical and Sensory Qualities of Kombucha. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 3327–3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Leonarski, E.; Cesca, K.; Borges, O.M.A.; de Oliveira, D.; Poletto, P. Typical Kombucha Fermentation: Kinetic Evaluation of Beverage and Morphological Characterization of Bacterial Cellulose. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e16100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Savary, O.; Mounier, J.; Thierry, A.; Poirier, E.; Jourdren, J.; Maillard, M.-B.; Penland, M.; Decamps, C.; Coton, E.; Coton, M. Tailor-Made Microbial Consortium for Kombucha Fermentation: Microbiota-Induced Biochemical Changes and Biofilm Formation. Food Res. Int. 2021, 147, 110549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Tran, T.; Grandvalet, C.; Winckler, P.; Verdier, F.; Martin, A.; Alexandre, H.; Tourdot-Maréchal, R. Shedding Light on the Formation and Structure of Kombucha Biofilm Using Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 725379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Nguyen, N.K.; Nguyen, P.B.; Nguyen, H.T.; Le, P.H. Screening the Optimal Ratio of Symbiosis between Isolated Yeast and Acetic Acid Bacteria Strain from Traditional Kombucha for High-Level Production of Glucuronic Acid. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 64, 1149–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Sievers, M.; Lanini, C.; Weber, A.; Schuler-Schmid, U.; Teuber, M. Microbiology and Fermentation Balance in a Kombucha Beverage Obtained from a Tea Fungus Fermentation. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1995, 18, 590–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Dutta, D.; Gachhui, R. Nitrogen-Fixing and Cellulose-Producing Gluconacetobacter kombuchae sp. Nov., Isolated from Kombucha Tea. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Yamada, Y.; Yukphan, P.; Lan Vu, H.T.; Muramatsu, Y.; Ochaikul, D.; Tanasupawat, S.; Nakagawa, Y. Description of Komagataeibacter Gen. Nov., with Proposals of New Combinations (Acetobacteraceae). J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 58, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. La Torre, C.; Fazio, A.; Caputo, P.; Plastina, P.; Caroleo, M.C.; Cannataro, R.; Cione, E. Effects of Long-Term Storage on Radical Scavenging Properties and Phenolic Content of Kombucha from Black Tea. Molecules 2021, 26, 5474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Chen, F.-I.; Yang, Y.-J.; Khoirunnida, F.L.; Tanzil, L.; Agustino, S.V.; Lu, Y.-C. Functional Bread Development Using Kombucha-Enriched Sourdough: Effects on Antioxidant Activity, Shelf Life, and Consumer Acceptance. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2025, 42, 101344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Batista, P.; Penas, M.R.; Pintado, M.; Oliveira-Silva, P. Kombucha: Perceptions and Future Prospects. Foods 2022, 11, 1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Selvaraj, S.; Gurumurthy, K. Metagenomic, Organoleptic Profiling, and Nutritional Properties of Fermented Kombucha Tea Substituted with Recycled Substrates. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1367697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Cubas, A.L.V.; Provin, A.P.; Dutra, A.R.A.; Mouro, C.; Gouveia, I.C. Advances in the Production of Biomaterials through Kombucha Using Food Waste: Concepts, Challenges, and Potential. Polymers 2023, 15, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Vera-Guerrero, D.; Mendoza, L.M.; Lara, G.B.; Vallejo, D.L.; Valenzuela-Cobos, A.; Domínguez-Brito, L.; Fiallos-Cárdenas, M. Sustainable Kombucha Production: A Conceptual Framework Integrating Life Cycle Assessment and Circular Economy Principles. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2025, 159, 104996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. González-Laredo, R.F.; Herrera-Rocha, K.M.; Gallegos-Infante, J.A. Use of Kombucha for Valorization of Food Wastes an Agro-Residues Managing the Circular Economy. In Kombucha; Rocha-Guzmán, N.E., González-Laredo, R.F., Gallegos-Infante, J.A., Moreno-Jiménez, M.R., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2025; pp. 165–179. [Google Scholar]
  162. Jang, S.S.; McIntyre, L.; Chan, M.; Brown, P.N.; Finley, J.; Chen, S.X. Ethanol Concentration of Kombucha Teas in British Columbia, Canada. J. Food Prot. 2021, 84, 1878–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Greenwalt, C.J.; Ledford, R.A.; Steinkraus, K.H. Determination and Characterization of the Antimicrobial Activity of the Fermented TeaKombucha. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 1998, 31, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Liao, T.; Li, X.-R.; Fan, L.; Zhang, B.; Zheng, W.-M.; Hua, J.-J.; Li, L.; Mahror, N.; Cheng, L.-H. Nature of Back Slopping Kombucha Fermentation Process: Insights from the Microbial Succession, Metabolites Composition Changes and Their Correlations. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1433127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Saha Turna, N.; Chung, R.; McIntyre, L. A Review of Biogenic Amines in Fermented Foods: Occurrence and Health Effects. Heliyon 2024, 10, e24501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Li, L.; Wen, X.; Wen, Z.; Chen, S.; Wang, L.; Wei, X. Evaluation of the Biogenic Amines Formation and Degradation Abilities of Lactobacillus Curvatus From Chinese Bacon. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Sun, X.; Sun, E.; Sun, L.; Su, L.; Jin, Y.; Ren, L.; Zhao, L. Effect of Biogenic Amine-Degrading Lactobacillus on the Biogenic Amines and Quality in Fermented Lamb Jerky. Foods 2022, 11, 2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Phan, T.G.; Duggin, G.; Estell, J.; Beer, I.; Smith, D.; Ferson, M.J. Lead Poisoning from Drinking Kombucha Tea Brewed in a Ceramic Pot. Med. J. Aust. 1998, 169, 644–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Bintsis, T. Foodborne Pathogens. AIMS Microbiol. 2017, 3, 529–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Watawana, M.I.; Jayawardena, N.; Gunawardhana, C.B.; Waisundara, V.Y. Health, Wellness, and Safety Aspects of the Consumption of Kombucha. J. Chem. 2015, 2015, 591869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Lind, E.; Mähönen, H.; Latonen, R.-M.; Lassila, L.; Pöllänen, M.; Loimaranta, V.; Laine, M. Erosive Potential of Ice Tea Beverages and Kombuchas. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2023, 81, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. de Oliveira, P.V.; da Silva Júnior, A.H.; de Oliveira, C.R.S.; Assumpção, C.F.; Ogeda, C.H. Kombucha Benefits, Risks and Regulatory Frameworks: A Review. Food Chem. Adv. 2023, 2, 100288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Otávio, L.; Cavicchia, A.; Elisa, M.; De Almeida, F. The Risks, Toxicity and Contamination of Kombucha Beverage: A Perspective on Its Production, Storage, and Consumption. Segur. Aliment. Nutr. 2024, 31, e024005. [Google Scholar]
  174. Lee, R.J.; Bayne, A.; Tiangco, M.; Garen, G.; Chow, A.K. Prevention of Tea-Induced Extrinsic Tooth Stain. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2014, 12, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Ehlen, L.A.; Marshall, T.A.; Qian, F.; Wefel, J.S.; Warren, J.J. Acidic Beverages Increase the Risk of in Vitro Tooth Erosion. Nutr. Res. 2008, 28, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Păcală, M.-L.; Căpăţână, C.; Oancea, S. Insight into the Implementation of the Ifs Food Version 8 Requirements in the Food Safety Management System: Key Steps and Benefits. Sci. Study Res. Chem. Chem. Eng. Biotechnol. Food Ind. 2024, 25, 455–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Granja, N.M.C. Worldwide Diffusion of Food Safety Management System Standards. Master’s Thesis, Universidade do Minho (Portugal), Braga, Portugal, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  178. Mukherjee, A.; Gómez-Sala, B.; O’Connor, E.M.; Kenny, J.G.; Cotter, P.D. Global Regulatory Frameworks for Fermented Foods: A Review. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 902642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. U.S. Food & Drug. Food Code 2009. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/food/fda-food-code/food-code-2009 (accessed on 2 February 2026).
Figure 1. Production of kombucha.
Figure 1. Production of kombucha.
Ijms 27 02739 g001
Figure 2. Chemical composition of kombucha.
Figure 2. Chemical composition of kombucha.
Ijms 27 02739 g002
Table 1. Nutritional composition reported in kombucha.
Table 1. Nutritional composition reported in kombucha.
CompoundsFermentation ConditionsConcentrationResultsRef.
Sugars
Sucrose, glucose, fructoseBlack tea//15 min, 80 °C, W, 70 g sucrose//21 daysUp to 19.60% glucose and 10.25% fructose.Highest glucose and fructose levels at 14 and 10 days.[17]
Inulin and its polyfructan fractions, sucrose, glucose, fructoseJerusalem Artichoke tubers + black tea//15 min, 80 °C, W, 70 g sucrose//21 daysUp to 0.59% glucose and 10.41% fructose.Much less content of glucose and fructose than kombucha without artichoke.[17]
Sucrose, glucose, fructoseBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, W, 100 g sucrose//21 daysUp to 0.22 mol/L glucose and 0.10 mol/L fructose.Maximum concentrations at 14th day of fermentation.[18]
Sucrose, glucose, fructoseBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, W, 30 g sucrose//7 daysUp to 17.81 g/L sucrose, 9.35 g/L glucose, and 1.41 g/L fructose.Fructose is preferred as the source of carbon by yeast.[15]
Proteins
Total proteinsBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, W, 100 g sucrose//15 daysUp to 3 mg/mL.Originate from tea leaves.[5]
Amino acids: lysine, leucine, isoleucine, theanineBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, W, 100 g sucrose//21 daysTheanine up to 50% of total amino acids.Minor quantities can be produced during fermentation.[19,20]
Amino acidsBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, W, 100 g sucrose//21 daysTheanine up to 50% of total amino acids.Trace levels of alanine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, methionine, phenylalanine, proline, threonine, tryptophan, and valine.[19,20]
Biogenic amines (ethylamine, choline, and adenine)CENSNone are harmful.[23]
Vitamins
Vitamins BBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, W, 70 g sucrose//15 daysB1: 74 mg/100 mL, B6: 52 mg/100 mL, B12: 84 mg/100 mLRelevant source of vitamins.[25,26]
Vitamin CBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, W, 70 g sucrose//15 days1.51 mg/mLRelevant source of vitamins.[25]
Vitamins B3, B5, B7, B9 and CBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, W, 70 g sucrose//10 daysUp to 28.98 mg/LAll are water-soluble.[23,26]
Minerals
Iron, potassium, and manganeseBlack and green tea//10 min, 90 °C, W, 100 g sucrose//14 daysMn ≈ 1.57 mg/L; Fe ≈ 0.31 mg/LMineral profile largely reflects the composition of the tea substrate.[27,28]
Cobalt, copper, magnesium, nickel, zinc, and fluoride ionsBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, W, 70 g sucrose//15 days0.004 μg/mL to 0.462 μg/mL for cobalt and manganese, respectively.[25,29]
Abbreviatures. CE: commercial extract; NS: not specified.
Table 2. Main bioactive properties reported in kombucha.
Table 2. Main bioactive properties reported in kombucha.
Bioactive CompoundsInfusionModel and ResultsRef.
Antioxidant activity
In vitro (RSA)PP//TPBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, W, 100 g sucroseTime dependent; ↑ up to 70%[38]
PP//TPBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, W↓ activity after 8 weeks[72]
PP//TPBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 20 g sucrose, garlicIC50 0.086 mL[73]
PP//TPBlack tea//10 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 70 g sucroseTea (89.69%) > barley (76.19%) > rice (36.04%)[67]
PP//TPBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g artificial sweeteners↑ activity with brown sugar, white sugar, glucose, and sucrose[71]
PP//TPGreen, black tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucrose50–80 µg GAE/mL[74]
PP//TPGreen tea//5 min, 100 °C, 700 mL W, 35 g sucrose, Malvaviscus arboreusEC50 80.7 mL/L[75]
PP//TPGreen tea//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 70 g sucrose, bee pollenIC50 10.56–15.16 mg/mL[76]
PP//TPCommercial preparationNo changes during shelf-life[77]
PP//HPLCGreen tea//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 65 g sucrose, cinnamon, cardamom, or Shirazi thyme↑ activity kombucha with cinnamon[78]
PP//HPLCBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucrose, soy wheyEC50 1.66–9.11 mg extract/mL[52]
PP//GC-MSBlack tea//HAE (15 min, 80 °C, W)Activity not affected by the vessel geometry or the fermented volume. IC50 9–28.0 μg/mL [79]
PP//UHPLC-HRMSGreen tea//20 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucroseFood preservative[80]
PP//UHPLC-QTOF-MSGreen and black tea//2–4 min, 75–95 °C, 1 L W, 50 g sucrose↑ activity black tea[43]
PP, OA//TP, FTIRBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 30 g sugar180.17 mg GAE/L[15]
PP, OA//CG-MSBlack tea//15 min, 80 °C, 1 L W, 70 g sugarNon-polar phenolic compounds exhibited a higher activity[68]
PP, OA//HPLC, TPGreen, oolong, and black tea//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucrose1.248–2.642 mg GAE/mL[81]
PP, OA, vitamin C, sugars//HPLCBlack tea//10 days, 28 °C, 1 L soymilk, 70 g sucrose0.1 mL, 50%[82]
PP, OA, vitamin C, sugars//HPLCBlack tea//7 days, 25 °C, 1 L winery effluent, 70 g sugar89%[83]
OA, vitamin C//HPLCGreen and black tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 70 g sucrose47.7%[26]
In vitro (ACE)Vitamin C//HPLCBlack tea//7 days, 25 °C, 1 L milk, 70 g sucrose↑ ACE inhibition on 14th day of storage[84]
In vitro (macrophages)PP//LC-ESI-MS/MSBlack tea//10 min, 80 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucrose, oak↓ oxidative stress (2–200 μg/mL)[85]
In vitro (RSA, cell cultures)PP, OA//HPLCGreen and black tea, rooibos//3 min, 74 °C, 1 L W, 80 g sucrose↑ activity in black and green kombucha; rooibos important effect on the recovery of oxidative damage on fibroblast cell lines against oxidative stress[86]
In vivo (mice)PP//TPBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, WSuppressed the oxidative stress mediated organ dysfunction in ALX induced diabetes[87]
In vivo (mice)PP//HPLCBlack tea//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucrosePotent antioxidants to radicals and inhibitors of LDL oxidation[88]
In vivo (rats)NdCommercial preparation↑ plasma and tissue MDA levels; ↓ DTH response, enhanced glutathione peroxidase, and catalase activities[89]
Anticancer activity
In vitroPP//TPGreen tea//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 70 g sucrose, bee pollenHep-2//IC65 20 mg/mL[76]
PP//GC-MSBlack tea//15 min, 80 °C, WMCF7, HCT-116//IC30 50 μg/mL, IC50 50 μg/mL in HCT-116[79]
PP//NMRBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucroseA549, U2OS, 786-O//0.25 μg/mL[90]
PP//UPLC-QTOF-MSGreen and black tea//2–4 min, 75–95 °C, 1 L W, 50 g sucroseCACO-2, A549//low cytotoxicity and antiproliferative action against non-cancer cells; GI50 40.93–47.15 and 116.8–137.0 μg/mL[43]
PP, OA//HPLC, TPGreen, oolong, and black tea//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucroseCACO-2//IC50 1.18–16.34%[81]
PP, OA//CG-MSBlack tea//15 min, 80 °C, 1 L W, 70 g sugarHCT-116, MCF-7, OVCAR//50 μg/mL inhibition of up to 8.0, 14.6, and 34.7%[68]
NdGreen tea//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L WHCT-116//apoptosis induction and G0/G1 phase arrest, IC50 0.9 mg/mL[91]
NdTea leaves//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W with lemon balm, 70 g sucroseHeLa, MCF7, HT-29//IC50 > 500μg/mL [92]
NdBlack tea//100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucrosePC-3//IC50 400 μg/mL[93]
In vivoNdCommercial preparationColon cancer//500 mg/kg[94]
Antimicrobial activity
In vitro (DDM)PP//TPBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 20 g sucrose, garlicStaphylococcus saprophyticus, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, B. stearothermophilus, Staphylococcus typhimurium, Escherichia coli, P. aeruginosa (32–11 mm)[73]
PP//HPLCBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucrose, soy wheyS. aureus, E. coli, Bacillus subtilis (0.9–1.9 mm)[52]
PP//ESI-MSBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 50 g sugarE. coli, Vibrio cholerae, Shigella flexneri, Salmonella Typhimurium, S. aureus (4.3–20.7 mm)[47]
PP, OA//TP, FTIRBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 30 g sugarCandida krusei, Candida glabrata, Candida albicans, Candida. tropicalis, Haemophilus influenzae, E. coli (4–16 mm)[15]
OA//HPLC, TPGreen, oolong, and black tea//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucroseE. coli, Shigella dysenteriae, Salmonella Typhi, Vibrio cholera (15–25 mm)[81]
NdTea leaves//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W with lemon balm, 70 g sucrosePseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, E. coli, Salmonella enteritidis, Erwinia carotovora, S. aureus, Bacillus cereus, Sarcina lutea (13.67–17.83 mm)[92]
NdGreen tea//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 20 g sugarS. epidermidis, Listeria monocytogenes, Micrococcus luteus (21.5–22.0 mm)[95]
In vitro (MIC)PP//TPGreen tea//5 min, 100 °C, 700 mL W, 35 g sucrose, Malvaviscus arboreusC. albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans, Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, E. coli[75]
PP//TP, HPLCGreen tea//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 65 g sucrose, cinnamon, cardamom, or Shirazi thyme↑ activity kombucha with cinnamon (S. aureus, Bacillus cereus, E. coli, S. typhimurium)[78]
PP//UHPLC-HRMSGreen tea//20 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucroseAlicycobacillus acidoterrestris, Alicyclobacillus herbarius, Alicyclobacillus acidiphilus, Alicyclobacillus cycloheptanicus, Alicyclobacillus hesperidum (<50–12.5%)[80]
PP//ESI-MSBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 50 g sugarVibrio cholerae (800 μg/mL)[96]
Bacteriocin SLG10//HPLCCommercial preparationB. subtilis, B. cereus, M. luteus, Brochothrix thermosphacta, Clostridium butyricum, S. aureus, Listeria innocua, L. monocytogenes, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, Salmonella paratyphi (nd-32 μg/mL)[97]
In vitro (RSA)PP//UPLC-QTOF-MSGreen and black tea//2–4 min, 75–95 °C, 1 L W, 50 g sucrose↑ activity green tea (250 µL/mL)[43]
Anti-inflammatory
In vitro (macrophages)PP//LC-ESI-MS/MSBlack tea, oak//10 min, 80 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucroseNitric oxide, TNF-alpha, and IL-6 production[85]
PP, OA//CG-MSBlack tea//15 min, 80 °C, 1 L W, 70 g sugar28–44.5%[68]
Antidiabetic
In vivo (rats)PP//TPBlack tea//10 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sugar↓ fasting plasma glucose; ↑ oxidative stress indices and lipid profiles[98]
PP//TPBlack tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1,6 L, 160 g sucrose150 mg lyophilized extract/kg body weight 14 days; restored alloxan-induced pathophysiological changes[87]
NdCommercial preparation6 mg/kg body weight 45 days; ↓ glycosylated hemoglobin; ↑ plasma insulin, hemoglobin, tissue glycogen; reversed the altered activities of gluconeogenic enzymes[99]
NdCommercial preparation5 mL/kg body weight 30 days; inhibitor of α-amylase and lipase; suppressor of increased blood glucose levels[100]
Hypocholesterolemic
In vivo (rats)PP//HPLCBlack tea//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucrose↓ total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol[88]
In vivo (ducks)NdCommercial preparation↓ total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol[101]
Abbreviatures. Bioactive compounds. PP: polyphenols; OA: organic acids; Nd: not determined; Detection method. TP: total phenolic compounds determination using Folin–Ciocalteu method; HPLC: high-performance liquid chromatography; GC-MS: gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; LC-ESI-MS/MS: liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry; UHPLC-HRMS: ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry; UHPLC-QTOF-MS: ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry; FTIR: Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; NMR: nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy; ESI-MS: electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry; Infusion. W: water; Model and results. RSA: radical scavenging assays; ALX: alloxan monohydrate; ↑: enhanced; ↓: decrease; ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme assay; Hep-2: human epithelial type 2; MCF7: Michigan cancer foundation-7; HCT-116: human colorectal carcinoma-116; A549: adenocarcinomic human alveolar basal epithelial cells; U2OS: human osteosarcoma; 786-O: human renal carcinoma; CACO-2: colon adenocarcinoma-2; OVCAR: ovarian carcinoma; HeLa: henrietta lacks; HT-29: human colon adenocarcinoma-29; PC-3: prostate cancer cell-line; DDM: disk diffusion method; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration.
Table 3. Alternative kombucha formulations.
Table 3. Alternative kombucha formulations.
Secondary FermentationPrimary FermentationBCResultsRef.
Lemon balm (5 g/L)Black tea//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 70 g sucrose//7 days//SCOBY Y: Saccharomycodes ludwigii, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces bisporus, Torulopsis sp., Zygosaccharomyces sp./B: Acetobacter genusRA, AATPC 850.3 µg GAE/L, AO, AM (Listeria spp., Escherichia coli, Salmonella sp., Citrobacter freundii, Staphylococcus equorum, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Bacillus sp.)[51]
Lemon balmTea leaves//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W with lemon balm, 70 g sucrose//SCOBY Commercial preparation (nd)NdAM (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, E. coli, Salmonella enteritidis, Erwinia carotovora, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Sarcina lutea), AT[92]
Arabica coffee (2–13%)Green tea//6 min, 93 °C, 1 L W//18 days//SCOBY Commercial preparation (nd)GA↓ luminosity; low-calorie; ↑ consumer acceptation[126]
Cocoa mucilageGreen tea//up to 100 g/L sugar//15 days//SCOBY Commercial preparation (nd)PP↑ consumer acceptation[127]
Oak (1%)Black tea//10 min, 80 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucrose//7 days//SCOBY Commercial preparation (nd)PPAI[85,128]
Yarrow (2%)Black tea//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W//7 days//SCOBY Y: S. ludwigii, S. cerevisiae, S. bisporus, Torulopsis sp., Zygosaccharomyces sp./B: Acetobacter genusAA, OA, FA, SA, MA, CAAM, CY, ↑ consumer acceptation[129]
Wax mallow (7%)Green tea//5 min, 100 °C, 700 mL W, 35 g sugar//18 days//SCOBY Medusomyces giseviiAATPC 124.6 mg GAE/L, AO[75]
Sour cherry juiceGreen tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 80 g sugar//14 days//SCOBY Osmophilic Y, acetic acid bacteriaGAAO[130]
Cactus pear juice (10%)Black tea//5 min, 100 °C, 400 mL W, 40 g saccharose//15 days//SCOBY ndGUTPC 857 mg GAE/L, AO, AM (S. aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, B. cereus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, E. coli) [131]
Snake fruit juiceBlack tea//10 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sugar//15 days//SCOBY ndPPTPC 535.59 mg GAE/L, AO, AD[98]
Soy milk (1:2 v/v)Black tea//10 min, 28 °C, 1 L soymilk, 70 g sucrose//10 days//SCOBY Acetobacter, LactobacillusAA, GA, MA, CA, LATPC 3.58 GAE/g dw, AO[82]
Soy whey (1:10 v/v)Black tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 100 g sucrose//7 days//SCOBY Y: Pichia, Dekkera/B: Acetobacter, LactobacillusPPAO (EC50 1.66–9.11 mg extract/mL), AM (S. aureus, E. coli, Bacillus subtilis)[52]
Cinnamon (50:50 w/w)Green tea//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 65 g sucrose//16 days//SCOBY Commercial preparation (nd)AA, GA, CA, LA TPC 0.55 mg GAE/mL, AO, AM (S. aureus, B. cereus, E. coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Helicobacter pylori)[78]
Cardamon (50:50 w/w)Green tea//15 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 65 g sucrose//16 days//SCOBY Commercial preparation (nd)AA, GA, CA, LATPC 0.45 mg GAE/mL, AO, AM (S. aureus, B. cereus, E. coli, S. typhimurium)[78]
Mint (10 g/L)Black tea//100 °C, 1 L W, 50 g sucrose//13 days//SCOBY Commercial preparation (nd)AC↑ consumer acceptation[132]
GingerBlack tea//100 °C, 1 L W, 10 g sucrose//10 days//SCOBY Commercial preparation (nd)ndAO, AT[133]
Papaya (10% w/v)1 L W, 10 g sugar//4 days//SCOBY Commercial preparation (nd)AAFurther optimization needed [134]
Papaya (10 g/L)20 min, 1 L W, 100 g sugar//14 days//SCOBY Y: Brettanomyces bruxellensis, S. cerevisiae/B: Komagataeibacter pomaceri, Komagataeibacter rhaeticusPPAM (S. aureus, Salmonella typhi, E. coli), AD, ↑ consumer acceptation[135]
Pomegranate juiceBlack tea//100 °C, 5 min, 200 mL W, 8 g sucrose//14 days//SCOBY Y: Saccharomyces, Koleckera, Pichia, Schizosaccharomyces/B: Acteobacter spp., Gluconobacter spp. GAPotential functional beverage candidate due to GA content[136]
Red grape juiceBlack tea//100 °C, 5 min, 200 mL W, 20 g saccharose//15 days//SCOBY Y: Zygosaccharomyces, Saccharomyces/B: Acetobacter xylinus, Acetobacter pasteurianus, Gluconobacter oxydansPPAO, AM, ↑ consumer acceptation[137]
Grape by-products (20% v/v)Green tea//15 min, 90 °C, 1 L W, 30 g sucrose//15 days//SCOBY Commercial preparation (nd)PPTPC 227.34 mg GAE/L[138]
Mango by-products (20% v/v)Green tea//15 min, 90 °C, 1 L W, 30 g sucrose//15 days//SCOBY Commercial preparation (nd)PPTPC 165.77 mg GAE/L[138]
Banana peel (10 g)Green tea//5 min, 100 °C, 1 L W, 20 g sucrose//21 days//SCOBY Commercial preparation (nd)PP, ACTPC 530.5 ppm, AO[139]
Flavor additivesGreen tea-based kombucha and different additives (lemongrass; lavender; liquorice-mint; turmeric-lemon; mango; reishi-chaga; mint-rose-pomegranate)PPTPC up to 265.82 mg GAE/L, AO[140]
Abbreviatures. Bioactive compounds. BC: bioactive compounds; RA: rosmarinic acid; AA: acetic acid; GA: glucuronic acid; PP: polyphenols; OA: oxalic acid; FA: formic acid; SA: succinic acid; MA: malic acid; CA: citric acid; GU: gluconic acid; LA: lactic acid; CA: caffeine; AC: organic acids; SCOBY. Y: yeast; B: bacteria. Results. TPC: total phenolic content; AO: antioxidant; AM: antimicrobial; AT: anticancer; AI: anti-inflammatory; CY: cytotoxic; AD: antidiabetic; ↑: enhanced; ↓: decrease.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pereira, A.G. Kombucha as a Bioactive Functional Beverage: Current Evidence, Production Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 2739. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062739

AMA Style

Pereira AG. Kombucha as a Bioactive Functional Beverage: Current Evidence, Production Challenges, and Future Perspectives. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(6):2739. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062739

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pereira, Antia G. 2026. "Kombucha as a Bioactive Functional Beverage: Current Evidence, Production Challenges, and Future Perspectives" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 6: 2739. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062739

APA Style

Pereira, A. G. (2026). Kombucha as a Bioactive Functional Beverage: Current Evidence, Production Challenges, and Future Perspectives. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(6), 2739. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27062739

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop