Next Article in Journal
Anti-Adipogenic Effect of Secondary Metabolites Isolated from Tetracera loureiri on 3T3-L1 Adipocytes
Previous Article in Journal
Tyrosinase-Deficient Skin Melanophore Lineage in Xenopus tropicalis Tadpoles Shows Strong Autofluorescence
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mining the Hidden Pharmacopeia: Fungal Endophytes, Natural Products, and the Rise of AI-Driven Drug Discovery

1
College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi 64141, United Arab Emirates
2
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(3), 1365; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27031365
Submission received: 20 December 2025 / Revised: 15 January 2026 / Accepted: 19 January 2026 / Published: 29 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Bioactives and Nutraceuticals)

Abstract

Emerging from millions of years of evolutionary optimization, Natural products (NPs) remain unique, unparalleled sources of bioactive scaffolds. Unlike synthetic molecules engineered around single therapeutic targets, NPs often exhibit multi-target, system-level bioactivity, aligned with the principles of network pharmacology, which modulates pathways in a coordinated, non-disruptive manner. This approach reduces resistance, buffers compensatory feedback loops, and enhances therapeutic resilience. Fungal endophytes represent one of the most chemically diverse and biologically sophisticated NP reservoirs known, producing polyketides, alkaloids, terpenoids, and peptides with intricate three-dimensional architectures and emergent bioactivity patterns that remain exceptionally difficult to design de novo. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, deep learning, and multi-omics integration have redefined the discovery landscape, transforming previously intractable fungal metabolomes and cryptic biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) into tractable, predictable, and engineerable systems. AI accelerates genome mining, metabolomic annotation, BGC-metabolite linking, structure prediction, and activation of silent pathways. Generative AI and diffusion models now enable de novo design of NP-inspired scaffolds while preserving biosynthetic feasibility, opening new opportunities for direct evolution, pathway refactoring, and precision biomanufacturing. This review synthesizes the chemical and biosynthetic diversity of major NP classes from fungal endophytes and maps them onto the rapidly expanding ecosystem of AI-driven tools. We outline how AI transforms NP discovery from empirical screening into a predictive, hypothesis-driven discipline with direct industrial implications for drug discovery and synthetic biology. By coupling evolutionarily refined chemistry with modern computational intelligence, the field is poised for a new era in which natural-product leads are not only rediscovered but systematically expanded, engineered, and industrialized to address urgent biomedical and sustainability challenges.

1. Introduction

NPs have shaped therapeutic innovation for millennia [1], beginning with ancient remedies derived from diverse biological resources [2] and continuing into the modern era with the discovery of transformative drugs such as penicillin, streptomycin, cyclosporine, lovastatin, and paclitaxel. Between 1981 and 2019, more than half of all approved small-molecule drugs were NPs or their inspired derivatives [1,3]. These molecules possess defined stereochemical and architectural features, such as rigidity, three-dimensional scaffolds, and densely functionalized motifs, that remain difficult to reproduce through de novo chemical design [4]. Their complexity reflects evolutionary optimization under ecological pressures, giving rise to sophisticated modes of action that often modulate multiple biological pathways rather than targeting a single one [5]. This inherent multi-target activity aligns closely with network pharmacology, helping to explain why natural-product-derived compounds exhibit higher clinical success rates than fully synthetic small molecules [6,7].
Fungi, yeasts, and bacteria collectively produce a wide array of bioactive metabolites with antibacterial, anticancer, antifungal, antiviral, immunosuppressive, antiparasitic, and agrochemical activities [5]. Their extraordinary ecological adaptability from polar regions and deep-sea sediments to deserts, radioactive environments, and geothermal springs drives the evolution of novel metabolic strategies and chemically diverse metabolites not observed in other organisms [5]. Among these microbes, fungi stand out for their remarkable ability to occupy diverse niches and generate structurally unique metabolites through elaborate BGCs [6,7]. These pathways encode alkaloids, polyketides, terpenes, flavonoids, peptides, and numerous hybrid structures with significant pharmacological potential. To date, more than 30,000 fungal metabolites have been isolated [8]. Since the discovery of penicillin in 1928, fungi have yielded thousands of bioactive metabolites and numerous clinically important agents. These include lovastatin [8]; cephalosporins and other β-lactams; immunosuppressants such as mycophenolic acid and cyclosporine A [9]; antifungal drugs such as griseofulvin [10], caspofungin [11], micafungin [12], and anidulafungin [13]; and immunomodulators such as fingolimod [14].
A particularly rich and still underexplored source of fungal metabolites is endophytic fungi, which reside within plant tissues [15]. These organisms maintain a symbiotic association with their hosts, experiencing selective pressures and biochemical cues that differ markedly from those encountered by free-living fungi. This intimate ecological interplay drives the evolution of unique biosynthetic pathways and metabolites that are often structurally and functionally distinct from canonical fungal products [16]. Endophytes, therefore, represent an attractive reservoir for the discovery of new NPs with therapeutic and agricultural applications.
Despite their historical value, NPs’ research experienced a marked decline in the early 2000s. This downturn was driven by the pharmaceutical industry’s shift toward high-throughput synthetic chemistry, coupled with frequent rediscovery of known scaffolds and limitations in analytical technologies [17]. These challenges reduced industrial investment in natural-product pipelines, even as ongoing analysis continued to highlight the superior biological performance of NP-based scaffolds. NPs evolved under ecological competitive conditions, endowing them with mechanisms such as multi-target engagement, metabolic stability, and structural features optimized for interacting with complex biological networks [18]. Their privileged scaffolds have remained central to medicinal chemistry, with more than 70% of first-in-class small-molecule drugs approved between 1999 and 2022 retaining clear NP-derived architectural motifs [19].
In recent years, however, natural-product discovery has undergone a major resurgence, catalyzed by the emergence of AI and the proliferation of large-scale genomic, metabolomic, and multi-omics datasets. Several recent reviews highlight how machine learning and deep learning are transforming natural-product research into a predictive and design-driven discipline, enabling deeper exploration of biosynthetic diversity across microbes, plants, and complex microbiomes [19]. In organisms such as fungi and bacteria, the organization of specialized metabolite pathways into BGCs provides a tractable genomic entry point for discovery. More than 2500 BGCs and their corresponding metabolites have been experimentally characterized, and computational genome mining now enables the identification of millions of additional candidate pathways with the potential to encode novel scaffolds [17].
AI integrates seamlessly with these resources, enabling a new level of predictive power in natural-product discovery. Machine-learning and deep-learning models now support precise BGC detection, classification, and prioritization; high-throughput metabolomic annotation and dereplication; structural prediction directly from BGC architecture; multi-omics correlation for pathway identification; and computational strategies for activating silent pathways [20]. Generative AI and diffusion models allow in silico design of NP-inspired scaffolds with biosynthetic feasibility, while advances in protein-structure prediction, including AlphaFold2, open the door to rational modification of biosynthetic enzymes and pathway engineering [2].
For industry, this computational transformation offers shorter discovery cycles, improved hit-to-lead progression, stronger intellectual-property positioning, and a more promising starting point for biological experimental validation [21,22,23]. For funding agencies, the convergence of AI and NPs directly aligns with priority missions such as combating antimicrobial resistance, developing next-generation oncology therapies, improving plant resilience, and advancing microbiome-based treatments.
In this review, we survey the diverse chemical classes of NPs isolated from fungal endophytes, highlighting key structures, biosynthetic origins, and biological activities. We then present the major AI tools currently available to accelerate natural-product discovery across genome mining, metabolomics, structure prediction, multi-omics integration, and generative design. Finally, we discuss the challenges, gaps, and future opportunities at the interface of fungal NPs and AI-enabled discovery, outlining a roadmap for building a predictive, scalable, and innovation-driven natural-product research ecosystem.

2. Endophytes: Definition, Characteristics, and Diversity

Endophytes are a polyphyletic group of microorganisms known for their ability to colonize plant tissues without causing any harmful disease manifestations in their host plants [24]. These plant-associated microorganisms form a ubiquitous symbiotic relationship with the host plant that is generally harmless, unobtrusive, and established entirely within host tissues [25]. In these associations, the host plant provides the microorganisms with essential elements for survival, including sugars and carbohydrates. Endophytes, in turn, produce a wide range of chemical compounds known as secondary metabolites that help the host plant conserve water, absorb nutrients from the soil, withstand biotic and abiotic stresses, and protect against environmental threats. Furthermore, these metabolites contribute to plant defense against pathogens, herbivores, and insects that can affect the plant life cycle [26,27]. Owing to their continuous adaptation within this dynamic relationship, which is shaped by environmental and ecological factors, endophytes are considered a diverse and largely untapped reservoir of bioactive metabolites that can be exploited as therapeutic agents against a wide range of disease targets [28].
Among the different types of endophytes, fungi are considered the predominant microorganisms in terms of culturable biomass [26]. Multiple studies have shown that endophytic fungi are found in almost all plants growing across diverse climatic zones, reflecting their significant ecological roles within host plants [29,30]. Endophytic fungi have been isolated from a wide range of plant species, including grasses, marine plants, mosses, ferns, trees, and shrubs [31]. It has been estimated that more than one million species of endophytic fungi exist; however, less than 16% of these species have been discovered, highlighting the need for further investigation [4,32]. Endophytic fungi have been recognized as a historically important source of novel compounds, providing valuable insights into natural-product discovery. Compounds derived from fungal endophytes have demonstrated significant biological activities, including anticancer, antibacterial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, neuroprotective, and antidiabetic properties [4]. Taxol is one of the most well-known FDA-approved anticancer drugs and was isolated from the endophytic fungus Taxomyces andreanae in 1993. Its discovery stimulated substantial scholarly interest in the untapped metabolic capacity of endophytic fungi and their unique potential to address challenges such as drug resistance [33].
The diversity of endophytic fungal taxa among different plants exhibits a persistent pattern toward certain genera and is not randomly distributed. Despite hundreds of endophytic fungal genera reported in multi-host isolation studies, most endophytic fungi belong to a relatively stable group that includes Penicillium, Fusarium, Colletotrichum, Bipolaris, Curvularia, Lasiodiplodia, Chaetomium, Aspergillus, Alternaria, and Diaporthe. The genus Pestalotiopsis, along with related taxa such as Cladosporium, Nigrospora, Xylaria, and Trichoderma, has also been frequently documented in these studies [34,35]. The recurrent appearance of these genera, despite their presence in unrelated plants across diverse geographical ecosystems, indicates that endophytism is shaped more by ecological traits than by host specificity. This highlights that the enrichment of these genera is associated with ecological flexibility, including tolerance mechanisms toward host defense compounds, and the presence of unique BCGs capable of encoding the synthesis of diverse bioactive metabolites with promising activities [36]. Mapping the taxonomic core of these genes is essential for linking their community structure to their unique chemical output, providing valuable insights for metabolite isolation using genome mining and predictive AI-based computational tools.

3. Unveiling the Metabolic Capacity of Endophytic Fungi

Among the full spectrum of biological taxa, endophytic fungi produce a diverse array of chemically distinct secondary metabolites that belong to major biosynthetic families, including alkaloids, terpenes and terpenoids, polyketides, flavonoids, and non-ribosomal peptides, each synthesized through distinct biological pathways. These metabolites have demonstrated remarkable biological activities with a wide range of pharmacological effects, encompassing anticancer, antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective properties [15]. Compounds such as vinblastine, vincristine, griseofulvin, retapamulin, fusidic acid, echinocandinB0, and ibrexafungerp, which was FDA-approved as an antifungal in 2021, provide strong evidence of the ability of endophytic fungi to produce therapeutic compounds that can be used directly or indirectly in the treatment of diverse diseases [15].
Additionally, the biological potential of endophytic fungi extends beyond therapeutic applications, as they have been identified as a valuable source of enzymes, including proteases, amylases, catalases, and lipases, which can be employed in biotechnological and industrial applications. Furthermore, endophytic fungi have been utilized to address agricultural and pharmaceutical challenges globally [15].
The biosynthesis of secondary metabolites is governed by BGCs, which encode enzyme families such as polyketide synthases and non-ribosomal peptide synthetases. These enzymes operate through a complex series of reactions that determine the chemical structure and pharmacological properties of the resulting compounds [37]. The sophisticated logic of these enzymatic pathways explains why similar pathways often produce structurally related secondary metabolites and underscores the importance of variations within these pathways to generate unique scaffolds with novel properties [38]. The synthesis of these compounds can also be influenced by external environmental factors, epigenetic modifications, symbiotic interactions, and biotic and abiotic stresses [38].
The attribution of certain fungal metabolites, such as Taxol and vinblastine, to their host plants rather than endophytic fungi remains controversial due to the potential for horizontal gene transfer, host-plant contamination, and translocated metabolites. To address these concerns, multiple studies have employed strategies such as genomic and proteomic analyses to identify specific BCGs associated with endophytic fungi, repetitive labeled isolations, and validated production evidence from axenic fungal cultures [24]. In the case of Taxol, multiple fungal species have demonstrated the ability to produce the compound across successful generations in the absence of the host plant [39]. Furthermore, several studies have suggested that the ability of some endophytes to produce the same metabolites as their host plants may result from long-term co-evolution and horizontal gene transfer [24,40]. Accordingly, the relationship between each endophyte and its host plant should be carefully examined through genomic and biochemical validation. Based on their metabolic biosynthesis, known fungal secondary metabolites can be grouped into eight categories, as compiled in Table 1, with detailed structures presented in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7.

3.1. Alkaloids

Alkaloids are characterized by diverse nitrogen-containing scaffolds derived from amino acids, polyketide-alkaloid hybrids, and complex heterocyclic frameworks [163]. Fungal endophytes produce numerous clinically relevant alkaloids, which are traditionally associated with their host plants, demonstrating extensive metabolic convergence within the symbiosis. For example, Fusarium oxysporum isolated from Catharanthus roseus yields the anticancer alkaloids vinblastine and vincristine [41], while E.infrequens produces the topoisomerase inhibitor camptothecin [164]. Several endophytes synthesize potent cytotoxic or neuroactive agents, including homoharringtonine from Alternaria tenuissima [42], aspernigerin from Aspergillus niger [45], and the tremorgenic mycotoxin aflatrem [48]. Additional nitrogenous scaffolds with antimicrobial or anti-inflammatory actions include 3-O-methylviridicatin from Penicillium sp. [43], viridicatol from Phoma sp. [44], and solamargine from Aspergillus flavus [47]. Endophytes also produce plant-associated alkaloids with expanded bioactivity profiles, such as rohitukine from Fusarium oxysporum [46], vincamine [49], and huperzine A from Colletotrichum and Trichoderma species [53]. Broad-spectrum antimicrobial and anticancer compounds such as piperine (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, [54], sanguinarine (Fusarium proliferatum [58,59], aconitine (Cladosporium cladosporioides, [60], and berberine (Alternaria sp., [50]). Collectively, these examples highlight the enormous chemical diversity of fungal alkaloids and their ability to mirror the therapeutic potential of plant-derived metabolites. As an example, for structure activity association, Vinblastine’s core of activity is located within its dimeric structure, which is composed of catharanthine and vindoline units. The C-16 methyl ester and the nitrogen atom within the indole ring are essential for the binding affinity toward tubulin, and any further modification on them will lead to the entire loss of antinoplastic activity. Moreover, the hydroxyl group at C-3 and the ethyl group at C-4 are essential for stabilizing the protein-drug complex [165]. Campothecin inhibits Topoisomerase I through a pentacyclic planar ring system. The presence of the E-ring lactone is important for proper interaction with DNA. It is worth noting that if this ring is opened, the activity will be completely lost. The C-20 hydroxyl group (S) is essential for activity, as the (R) enantiomer is not biologically active [166]. Critical analysis of the structures of these compounds is essential to define chemical features associated with biological activity. Figure 1 shows examples of alkaloids that have been isolated from endophytic fungi.

3.2. Polyketides

Polyketides constitute one of the most structurally diverse classes of metabolites produced by endophytic fungi, arising from iterative polyketide synthases that generate aromatic, reduced, or highly oxygenated scaffolds [167]. Endophytes frequently biosynthesize unique polyketides not commonly encountered in free-living fungi, reflecting adaptation to their host environment and selective ecological pressures. Among the notable representatives is outovirin C, produced by Penicillium raciborskii from Rhododendron tomentosum, an antifungal agent with a polyoxygenated aromatic scaffold [61]. Members of the phomopsolide family (A–C), isolated from Diaporthe maritima of Picea sp., display characteristic butenolide motifs and exhibit diverse bioactivities [62]. Similarly, Curvularia sp. inhabiting Murraya koenigii produces the murranopyrone, murranofuran, murranolide, and murranoic acid series, highly functionalized polyketides reflecting complex oxidative tailoring reactions [63]. Several endophytes produce benzofuranone and isocoumarin structures, such as Fusarium fujikuroi [64,65], Lophodermium sp. generating pyrenophorin [68], and Biscogniauxia mediterranea, yielding methoxy isocoumarin derivatives [69]. The palmarumycin family biosynthesized by Berkleasmium sp. and Edenia sp. is distinguished by spirobisnaphthalene cores and demonstrates potent antiparasitic and cytotoxic properties [70,86]. Additional noteworthy polyketides include dichlorodiaportin and dichlorodiaportinolide from Trichoderma sp. [66], isoaigialones from Phaeoacremonium sp. [67], ficipyrone A from Pestalotiopsis fici [64], and mellein from Pezicula sp. [72]. Figure 2 represents examples of polyketides that have been isolated from endophytic fungi.
For structural analysis, Outovirin C is a secondary metabolite derived from epipolythiodioxopiperazines (ETPs). It is known for its unique sulfur-bridged diketopiperazine core. This rigid core is essential for target selectivity. The polydisulfide bridge across the diketopiperazine ring is essential for the biological activity of the compound [61].
Phomopsolide A is a potent metabolite known for its antibacterial and anticancer activity. The primary pharmacophore for this compound is the dihydropyranone ring, which allows the compound to covalently bind to the nucleophilic sites of the targeted enzyme, acting as an electrophilic Michael acceptor. The (S) configuration of the tigloyloxy group at C-5 is necessary for optimum target selection. The presence of a hydroxyl group at the pentyl chain was essential to water solubility [62].

3.3. Terpenes and Terpenoids

Terpenes and terpenoids are distinguished by their isoprenoid origins and extensive structural diversity, ranging from simple monoterpenes to highly oxygenated diterpenoids, sesquiterpenoids, and triterpenoid derivatives [168]. Among the most celebrated examples is Taxol (paclitaxel), a complex diterpenoid traditionally associated with Taxus species but now well documented in numerous endophytes, including Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Xylaria, Trichoderma, Pezicula, Fusarium solani, and Paraconiothyrium brasiliense [100]. These taxol-producing endophytes highlight the metabolic convergence between fungal and plant biosynthetic pathways. Related taxane-type diterpenoids have also been isolated from Alternaria sp. associated with Taxus baccata and from multiple other genera inhabiting Wollemia nobilis [99,165]. Endophytic fungi further yield a wide spectrum of sesquiterpenoids and meroterpenoids with diverse bioactivities. For example, Talaromyces pinophilus from Withania somnifera produces withanolide derivatives [104], while Scleroderma sp. generates sclerodol A and B, sesquiterpenoids with potent antifungal activity [105]. Additional examples include trichodermin from Trichoderma brevicompactum [106], guignardone N from Guignardia sp. [107], and botryosphaerin H from Botryosphaeria sp., associated with Huperzia serrata [108]. Additional terpenoid metabolites isolated from endophytes include zonarene-type compounds from Pestalotiopsis foedan [111], phyllospinarone from Phyllosticta spinarum [113], periconicins A and B [169], and neuroactive bilobalide and ginkgolide derivatives from Pestalotiopsis and Fusarium oxysporum associated with Ginkgo biloba [114,115]. Endophytes also produce simple monoterpenes such as camphor (Nodulisporium sp.) with antimicrobial activity [116], as well as diverse bioactive terpenoid glycosides, steroidal precursors, and trichothecene analogs, including dihydrocumambrin A [119], azadirachtin [120], asiaticoside [121], and agathic acid derivatives [122,123,124]. Some of the discovered terpenes and terpenoids isolated from endophytic fungi are shown in Figure 3.
The structure-activity relationship of Taxol indicates that the C-13 phenylisoserine side chain is the most critical part of the structure due to its importance for microtubule stabilization. The oxetane ring at C-4 & C-5 is essential for maintaining the active conformation of the molecule [100].
Guignardone N is a fungal metabolite derived from the meroterpenoid class of compounds. A tricyclic pyrano-carbazole-like structure defines the core of activity. The presence of different oxygenation patterns defines the main active features of this molecule. Besides that, the presence of tertiary alpha hydroxy ketone is highly linked with the biological activity, as it participates in the formation of hydrogen bonds with the active site within the fungal proteins. This will lead to interference in the cell wall integrity and synthesis [107].

3.4. Nonribosomal Peptides (NRPs)

Endophytic fungi synthesize a diverse array of nonribosomal peptides (NRPs) and peptide-derived metabolites through multimodular nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs), which incorporate both canonical and nonproteinogenic amino acids into structurally complex frameworks [170]. These metabolites frequently display cyclic motifs, unusual heterocycles, and extensive oxidative tailoring, which contribute to potent biological activities. Representative examples include trichodermamide C from Cryptosporiopsis quercina inhabiting Tripterygium wilfordii, a peptide with notable antifungal activity [15]. Eupenicillium sp. isolated from Glochidion ferdinandi produces fusarithioamide A, a sulfur-containing peptide exhibiting strong cytotoxic effects [127]. Likewise, Fusarium chlamydosporium associated with Anvillea garcinii synthesizes circumdatin G, a diketopiperazine-type peptide displaying cytotoxic and antimicrobial properties [128]. Several NRPs also possess potent antiparasitic or antifungal activity. For example, Cryptocandin, a lipopeptidic echinocandin analog produced by Fusarium sp. from Mentha longifolia, exhibits broad-spectrum antifungal and antimalarial properties [15]. Figure 4 represents some of the key NRPs isolated from endophytic fungi.
Cryptocandin is a lipopeptide metabolite that involves a cyclic hexapeptide core structure and is attached to a lipid tail as a side chain. The core cyclic structure is essential for targeting the fungal cell wall, while the lipid tail is utilized to integrate into the lipid membrane of fungi [171].

3.5. Phenolic Derivatives

Phenolic and aromatic metabolites represent a structurally diverse group of endophytic fungal products typically derived from the shikimate or polyketide pathways [172]. These compounds are characterized by aromatic ring systems bearing hydroxyl, methoxy, keto, or carboxyl substituents, often accompanied by oxidative or halogenated modifications that enhance their biological activities. Endophytes such as Chalara sp. associated with Artemisia vulgaris produce ergosterol, a sterol-like phenolic metabolite with notable antibacterial activity [129]. Several Alternaria species isolated from Sonneratia alba biosynthesize xanalteric acids I and II, displaying antimicrobial properties [97,130]. Additional phenolic metabolites include 4-hydroxybenzamide from Colletotrichum gloeosporioides inhabiting Michelia champaca, which has potent antifungal activity, and colletonoic acid from Penicillium chrysogenum associated with Cistanche deserticola, known for its neuroprotective effects [93]. Phenolic acids and polyketide-derived aromatics such as mollicellins G–I, isolated from Chaetomium sp. in Eucalyptus exserta, exhibit antibacterial, antioxidant, and cytotoxic activities [132], while related chromone and benzopyrone derivatives from various endophytes contribute additional antifungal and cytotoxic properties. Figure 5 represents some phenolic compounds isolated from endophytic fungi.
Mollicellin G is a fungal metabolite that contains chlorine and aldehyde groups on the aromatic rings, which are critical for the antibacterial activity [132].
The free carboxylic acid group within the colletotric acid and its certain orientation on the side of the chain is the key responsible for the antimicrobial activities of this compound [93].

3.6. Flavonoids

Flavonoids, although primarily associated with plant biosynthesis, have increasingly been identified in endophytic fungi, suggesting metabolic convergence or horizontal enzymatic mimicry within plant–fungus symbioses [173]. These metabolites are typically characterized by their polyphenolic C6–C3–C6 frameworks and diverse substitution patterns, which confer potent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic, and enzyme-modulatory activities. Among the most frequently reported endophytic flavonoids is apigenin, produced by Colletotrichum sp. isolated from Ginkgo biloba, as well as by Chaetomium globosum and species associated with Cajanus cajan and Cephalotaxus harringtonia, demonstrating broad antidiabetic, antioxidant, anticancer, and antibacterial effects [133,134,135,136]. Other endophytes biosynthesize structurally diverse flavonoids such as cajanol from Hypocreales species inhabiting Cajanus cajan, which exhibits significant antimicrobial and anticancer activities [137], and chrysin produced by Alternaria alternata from Passiflora incarnata as well as other Colletotrichum species [138]. Chalcones from Ceriporia lacerata associated with Cleistocalyx operculatus display anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antifungal, and cytotoxic properties [139], while Chaetomium globosum isolated from Curcuma wenyujin produces curcumin, a metabolite with established antioxidant, antitumor, and anti-inflammatory activity [140]. Endophytic fungi also synthesize quercetin, kaempferol, vitexin, rutin, and luteolin, metabolites traditionally considered plant-exclusive. These include Aspergillus nidulans, Annulohypoxylon species, Nigrospora oryzae, and Chaetomium species across various hosts [135,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153]. Figure 6 represents key structures of flavonoids with a variety of biological activities.
Apigenin and chrysin are flavones recognized by the C2, C3 double bond, and the C4 carbonyl group, which are essential for their antioxidant effect. Regarding activity, apigenin is considered more potent due to the presence of the 4-OH group on the B-ring that will enhance the receptor affinity [136].
Cajanol is an isoflavanone that depends on the 5-OH and 7-OMe substituting pattern on the A-ring, which is essential for the antimicrobial activity [137].

3.7. Steroids

Steroidal metabolites are characterized by their tetracyclic core structure and diverse oxidation, epoxidation, or side-chain modifications [174]. These metabolites frequently display potent antimicrobial, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, or immunomodulatory activities and often parallel or expand upon the chemical diversity of plant-derived steroids. Steroids mostly contribute to host defense or metabolic resilience. A well-documented example is Aspergillus terreus isolated from Carthamus lanatus, which synthesizes (22E,24R)-stigmasta-5,7,22-trien-3β-ol, a sterol demonstrating antimalarial, antimicrobial, and anti-leishmanial activities [98]. The rigid sterol core of the structure and 3β-OH are both essential for bioactivity and the interaction with the target. The E-Δ22 double bond and C-24 (R) alkyl group are responsible for target selectivity to interact with fungal and Gram-positive bacteria cell walls specifically, thus reducing toxicity in mammalian cells.

3.8. Hybrid Metabolites

Endophytic fungi produce a broad spectrum of metabolites that do not fall neatly into classical chemical categories [174]. This heterogeneous group includes azaphilones, cytochalasins, polyketide-alkaloid hybrids, lactones, sphingolipid analogs, and diverse indole derivatives. Many of these metabolites exhibit strong cytotoxic, antimicrobial, antifungal, antiparasitic, or neuroprotective activities, reflecting their ecological roles in mediating plant-fungus interactions and competition with other microbes. For example, torreyanic acid from Diaporthe sp. associated with mangroves, a highly oxygenated dimeric quinone exhibiting potent cytotoxicity [154]. Cytochalasin-type alkaloid-polyketide hybrids are widely produced across endophytes: chaetoglobosin A from Alternaria sp. [155] and Chaetomium globosum [158]. Cytochalasin E from Chaetomium globosum associated with Panax notoginseng [156], cytochalasin Z28 from Xylaria hypoxylon [157], and cytochalasin D from Aspergillus clavatus endophytic in Taxus mairei displaying antiangiogenic activity. These metabolites are characterized by large macrocyclic frameworks fused to isoindolone moieties, enabling strong modulation of cytoskeletal dynamics. Additional structurally unique compounds include indole-3-carboxylic acid from Chaetomium sp. [83], various polyketide–indole esters such as 2-phenylethyl 1H-indol-3-yl-acetate [131], and bioactive lactones like phomopsichalasin from Diaporthe sp. P133 is associated with Pandanus amaryllifolius, which exhibits notable antibacterial activity [161]. Fungal sphingolipid analogs such as fusaruside from Fusarium sp. IFB-121 [162] further demonstrates the biosynthetic versatility of endophytes. Other examples include microsphaerol from Microsphaeropsis sp. [160], seimatoric acid from Colletotrichum sp. [93], and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from Botryosphaeria dothidea [88], exhibiting diverse antimicrobial, antioxidant, antifungal, cytotoxic, and phytotoxic effects. Representative structures from this category are shown in Figure 7.
The activity of torreyanic acid is attributed to its electrophilic diastereomeric epoxyquinone core structure that will undergo nucleophilic attack by cellular thiols, which will result in inducing apoptosis in cancer cell lines [175].
The diaportheone B core structure is essential for its biological activity. It is composed of a pyrone ring fused with a benzene ring. The phenolic hydroxyl group and the presence of a side chain at C-2 are the factors for the biological properties of the compound [76].

4. Clinical Translation Pipeline of Endophytic Fungi-Derived Natural Products

Endophytic fungi have demonstrated a remarkable capacity to produce a wide variety of bioactive metabolites with diverse chemical structures and biological activities. These metabolites arise from long-term co-evolution with their host plants, combined with ecological pressures, leading to the development of novel compounds with unconventional modes of action. This renders them promising candidates for the discovery of new clinical therapeutics [40].

4.1. Examples of Clinically Approved Drugs Isolated from Endophytic Fungi

4.1.1. Palixital (Taxol)

Palixital is a diterpenoid-derived metabolite known for its antineoplastic activity. It promotes the assembly and stabilization of microtubules, leading to mitotic arrest in cancer cells. Palixital has been used to manage multiple malignancies, including non-small cell lung, ovarian, and breast cancers. Two decades after its discovery, Palixital was FDA-approved in 1992 for the treatment of ovarian cancer. It was first isolated from the medicinal plant Taxus brevifolia in 1971 and was later reported in T. andreanae. The discovery of Palixital led to a series of similar findings from 83 different endophytic sources isolated from various plant species [176,177,178].

4.1.2. Vinblastine

Vinblastine is an alkaloid-derived compound first isolated from Catharanthus roseus. It is the second most commonly used agent in anticancer drug regimens to treat various cancers, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia and nephroblastoma. Vinblastine interferes with spindle formation and angiogenesis in cancer cells without harming healthy cells [179,180]. The isolation of vinblastine from an endophytic fungal source was first reported in 1998 from Alternaria sp., hosted within C. roseus. Moreover, numerous studies have reported its isolation from different endophytes residing within the same plant, including F. oxysporum, Talaromyces radicus, and Eutypella sp. [41].

4.1.3. Camptothecin-Derived Analogs

Camptothecin is a potent alkaloid anticancer first isolated from Camptotheca acuminata in 1966, followed by discoveries in other plant species, including Miquelia dentata and Nothapodytes nimmoniana [164]. Camptothecin inhibits eukaryotic topoisomerase I (TopI) activity by selectively stabilizing the TopI–dsDNA complex, leading to cell death. Despite its promising activity, Camptothecin exhibits high toxicity and low water solubility, which limit its clinical application. 10-Hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT) and 9-methoxycamptothecin (MCPT) are natural analogs of Camptothecin; They retain the same activity without these limitations and have been used as precursors for the development of synthetic anticancer drugs such as topotecan and belotecan. The isolation of Camptothecin and its derivatives has been reported from more than 20 endophytic species residing within various plants, including E. infrequens and Neurospora sp. from Nothapodytes foetida, F. solani from C. acuminata, and A. alternata, Fomitopsis sp., and Phomopsis sp. from M.dentata. Collectively, these findings suggest that endophytic fungi could be a promising source of more efficient and safer derivatives of natural compounds [166].

5. Traditional Discovery Methods: Addressing Challenges and Limitations

The discovery and isolation of secondary metabolites from endophytic fungi involves a multi-step workflow rooted in classical natural-product chemistry. The process begins with isolating endophytic fungi from the inner tissues of surface-sterilized plants, followed by culturing on nutrient-rich media such as potato dextrose agar (PDA) or malt yeast agar (MYA) [181]. Once pure, isolated colonies are established, fermentation is carried out in solid or liquid media to stimulate the production of secondary metabolites. Subsequently, extraction is performed using organic solvents of varying polarity to recover crude metabolites from the cultured fungi, which are then subjected to bioactivity-guided fractionation [182]. The final step involves purification of the active fractions using various chromatographic techniques, followed by structural characterization with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Mass Spectrometry (MS) [183].
Despite its considerable success over the years, this traditional workflow has faced multiple challenges, including the frequent rediscovery of known compounds rather than novel ones. In addition, many BGCs remain silent and unexpressed under standard laboratory conditions, indicating that endophytic fungi possess untapped metabolic potential that cannot be revealed in vitro. Other limitations of traditional discovery pipelines include low-yielding scaffolds, high consumption of organic solvents, and lengthy timelines. These challenges underscore the need for new approaches to accelerate natural-product discovery, given their importance and significant contributions across multiple fields [183].

6. From Concept to Implementation: Artificial Intelligence in Natural Product Discovery

AI is transforming NP discovery by enabling automated, high-resolution analysis of metabolomic and genomic datasets, thereby accelerating dereplication, BGC annotation, and structural prediction. AI-driven genome-mining platforms such as antiSMASH, DeepBGC, and GECCO substantially improve BGC detection, classification, and prioritization, uncovering hidden biosynthetic potential that traditional approaches often miss [184,185,186,187]. In metabolomics, tools such as GNPS molecular networking, SIRIUS/CSI:FingerID, and MS2LDA extract structural and substructural information from complex LC–MS/MS datasets, facilitating analog discovery and filtering out known compounds before time-consuming isolation steps [188]. Complementary platforms, including PRISM and NRPSPredictor2/SANDPUMA, link genomic and metabolomic information by predicting the chemical scaffolds encoded within fungal BGCs, thereby guiding targeted compound identification [185,186,187]. Deep-learning frameworks further support discovery by identifying cryptic or silent BGCs and predicting environmental or regulatory cues capable of activating these pathways in vitro, unlocking the untapped metabolic potential of endophytic fungi [24], When integrated with traditional wet-lab workflows, AI shifts NP discovery from an empirical, trial-and-error model to a predictive, design-driven pipeline, accelerating the identification of novel pharmaceutical leads [189,190]. Figure 8 illustrates how AI and machine-learning algorithms mine genomic and metabolomic data to guide the prediction and discovery of new natural-product scaffolds. A summary of major AI tools applied to NP discovery over the past decade is provided in Table 2.

6.1. Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning Algorithms: Promising Tools for Natural Product Discovery

AI is recognized as a key approach for analyzing large biological datasets using machine-learning and deep-learning algorithms. These methods can predict the distribution of plant endophytes and their bioactive metabolites across diverse biological niches. The process can be optimized by incorporating initial multi-omics and metabolomic data from plants, followed by detailed integration of targeted regions through multi-omics analyses and metabolic pathway prediction tools. Currently, various machine-learning and deep-learning algorithms are being employed to enhance drug discovery from natural resources [184].
DeepBGC software (https://github.com/Merck/deepbgc, accessed on 19 December 2025) is designed to analyze large datasets from microbial communities by applying a skip-gram neural network model, similar to word2vec, to generate embeddings that are paired with a bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) network, trained on extensive datasets derived from microbial communities. Computational biology analyses and genome-mining tools emphasize the integration of various metabolomic approaches to effectively study the plant microbiome models and their associated biochemical changes, providing deeper insights into metabolic regulatory pathways and their interactions. Furthermore, by integrating deep-learning algorithms, genomic metabolic models, and cheminformatics tools, it is possible to perform detailed bio-prospective analyses of endophytes and their metabolites, efficiently predicting the chemical scaffolds of these compounds. Collectively, these deep-learning approaches and novel computational pipelines represent a significant milestone in natural-product discovery from endophytes [184].
Recent advancements in AI algorithms have unlocked the potential of generative models to predict ADMET properties for lead optimization. Generative models, such as generative adversarial networks (GANs) and variational autoencoders (VAEs), can propose structurally novel analogs by incorporating predefined optimization criteria, enabling exploration of the chemical space surrounding a scaffold of interest. These generative architectures also support de novo design with an inherent bias toward desirable structural features, which can be combined with predictive models for absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) to eliminate unfavorable candidates early in the discovery process. Graph neural network models, when paired with ADMET predictors, have demonstrated utility in rapid initial risk assessments and prioritization of compounds based on traditional QSAR approaches, facilitating efficient screening and evaluation of in silico libraries. By integrating these predictive frameworks with ADMET models, researchers can selectively prioritize compounds with favorable pharmacokinetic and toxicity profiles, thereby reducing the number of candidates requiring experimental validation. This approach minimizes empirical lead optimization efforts and enhances the efficiency and quality of early-stage drug discovery workflows [218,219]. Furthermore, the use of a transformer-based model may improve the early stages of drug discovery through predicting different drug properties at once, including pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and drug effectiveness, to ensure a simpler discovery process. This model has been successfully applied to HIV Integrase-1 to identify promising drug candidates and exclude unfavorable ones, highlighting it as a flexible solution support AI-driven drug discovery [220].

6.2. Genome Mining of Endophytic Fungi: A Case Study for AI-Assisted Fungal Metabolite Discovery

Genome mining has been proposed as a core strategy for evaluating the biosynthetic potential of endophytic fungi, particularly given the significant disparity between genomic predictions and experimentally validated metabolite production. A notable example is the genome-based analysis of the endophytic fungus Dactylonectria alcacerensis CT-6. In this study, they used antiSMASH (version 6.1.1) for whole-genome sequencing and annotation analysis, which revealed a high abundance of BGCs, including nonribosomal peptide synthetases, terpene synthases, polyketide synthases, and hybrid pathways. The number of putative BGCs predicted through bioinformatic analysis far exceeded the number of compounds successfully isolated ex situ, as most BGCs remain silent or are lowly expressed under standard laboratory conditions [221].
Furthermore, a genome mining tools were utilized in the case of Ascomycete sp., an endophytic fungus isolated from Taxus yunnanensis known as Chinese yew, using antiSMASH software (fungiSMASH 5.1.0), which revealed 35 putative BGCs, leading to the identification of lijiquinone 1. The isolated compound showed potential anticancer and antifungal activity [222].
From a methodological perspective, these cases highlight genome mining primarily as a predictive tool rather than a definitive drug discovery strategy. Current genome mining tools rely on rule-based detection frameworks derived from conserved enzymatic domain architectures. Neural network algorithms trained to detect BGCs can identify weakly expressed clusters and classify BGCs based on learned patterns rather than fixed rules. In the case of D. alcacerensis CT-6, AI tools could reduce false-negative predictions, refine BGC detection, and prioritize novel predicted clusters for subsequent experimental validation. These studies demonstrate the potential of genome mining in endophytic fungi, extensively predicting silent BGCs that were previously difficult to detect. In summary, AI tools and deep-learning algorithms should be employed as complementary approaches to reduce bias and enable prioritization of large genomic datasets, rather than as replacements for experimental validation.

7. Limitations and Future Perspective

Despite this rapid progress, significant gaps remain. Fungal endophytes contain extensive repertoires of transcriptionally silent or condition-dependent BGCs, and current AI pipelines, though increasingly sophisticated, still struggle to distinguish which clusters are actively expressed, functionally assembled, or chemically productive under specific ecological or laboratory conditions. Much of the available training data is derived from bacterial systems, resulting in models that do not yet generalize well to fungal biosynthetic logic, particularly iterative type I polyketide synthases (PKSs) and fungal-specific hybrid PKS–NRPS assembly lines. This taxonomic bias limits accurate prediction of domain functions, tailoring steps, and final chemical products in fungal endophytes. Furthermore, high risks of overfitting, false-positive predictions, data scarcity, and limited interpretability remain major constraints for these machine-learning algorithms [223].
Current AI tools attempt to overcome these limitations through filtration of metabolic noise, curated datasets, cross-validation across heterogeneous datasets, and re-annotation using updated BGC tools; However, their analytical capability is still insufficient to reliably detect misassigned clusters, errors associated with fragmentation patterns, and inconsistencies in metabolite expression.
Metabolomics-based AI approaches also face significant challenges. Spectral libraries remain incomplete and are disproportionately enriched for well-studied bacterial or plant compounds, leaving significant gaps in coverage for fungal metabolites. Consequently, structural assignments for truly novel scaffolds often remain low-confidence, even when advanced tools such as molecular networking, fragmentation-tree prediction, or deep-learning–based spectral annotation are applied. Multi-omics integration frameworks are emerging [224]. However, comprehensive pipelines that unify BGC expression, metabolite production, regulatory signaling, epigenetic influences, and ecological context are still lacking. The absence of large-scale paired genome and metabolome datasets further constrains the development of robust AI models capable of reliably predicting chemical output directly from genomic input. Addressing these limitations will require systematic profiling of fungal endophytes across diverse hosts, environmental conditions, and growth regimes to generate the high-quality training data essential for next-generation model development.
It is worth noting that AI-guided algorithms primarily focus on achieving chemical plausibility rather than biological feasibility, which must be further validated using established biochemical data and predictive enzymatic models. AI tools rely on previously curated databases of known metabolic interaction patterns (e.g., KEGG pathways) and established enzymatic reaction rules to design retrosynthetic pathways based on structured chemistry, rather than relying on randomness. Accordingly, AI approaches integrate predicted enzymatic functionality with structural model preferences to generate selective candidates that are compatible with realistic biochemical mechanisms [225].
Looking ahead, advances in AI-based natural-product discovery are poised to reshape the landscape of fungal NP research. Foundation models trained on massive genomic, chemical, and multi-omics datasets are expected to improve BGC boundary prediction, enzyme-function annotation, substrate specificity inference, and metabolite reconstruction with far greater accuracy than current task-specific models. Generative AI architectures, including generative adversarial networks (GANs), variational autoencoders (VAEs), and diffusion models [186], will increasingly shift discovery from passive exploration to proactive design, proposing novel NP-like scaffolds with both biosynthetic feasibility and desired bioactivity profiles.
AI-guided activation strategies are also expected to advance further. Bayesian optimization [226], reinforcement learning, and regulatory network modeling can prioritize cultural conditions or genetic perturbations most likely to activate silent fungal pathways, enabling targeted elicitation rather than random stimulation. At the level of enzyme engineering, breakthroughs in protein-structure prediction, particularly AlphaFold2 [190], will support the rational redesign of PKS and NRPS megasynthases, facilitating the generation of derivative molecules or entirely new chemical architectures.
Finally, global-scale computational analyses of microbial biosynthetic potential [192] highlight the vast reservoir of unexplored chemistry encoded within fungal and bacterial genomes. When combined with AI-driven genome mining, metabolomics, and generative modeling, these resources point to a future in which the chemical diversity of fungal endophytes can be systematically accessed, predicted, and engineered. Integrating these tools into unified, data-rich discovery pipelines will be essential for realizing the full potential of endophytic fungi as a source of next-generation therapeutics and biotechnological platforms.

8. Conclusions

Endophytic fungi represent a remarkably rich and still underexplored reservoir of bioactive secondary metabolites with significant pharmaceutical potential. Although traditional workflows have yielded thousands of clinically relevant scaffolds, these approaches are inherently time-consuming, resource-intensive, and prone to rediscovery. AI approaches offer a transformative solution to these constraints. The evolution of AI-based frameworks capable of predicting, annotating, and even designing complex molecular scaffolds promises to reshape the landscape of fungal NP discovery.
In this review, we highlighted the growing role of AI-integrated tools in the discovery of NPs from microbial sources, highlighting endophytic fungi as a particularly promising group. By adapting AI algorithms within the endophytic fungi discovery pipeline, the integration of computational foresight with experimental validation represents a foundational step toward unlocking the full biosynthetic potential of fungal endophytes and revitalizing NPs as a central pillar of drug discovery [227].
However, current AI-derived tools are limited by incomplete endophytic fungal genomes, metabolic noise, and the low availability of experimentally validated BGC metabolite linkages. These limitations can lead to a significantly high false-positive rate due to an overemphasis on chemical plausibility rather than enzymatic pathway feasibility. Accordingly, progress in the field will depend on improving genome data quality and reducing biases associated with multi-omic integration. Therefore, AI tools should be utilized as a supportive decision-making layer rather than a standalone solution for NP discovery.

Author Contributions

R.A.S. compiled the data, generated figures and tables, and prepared the initial draft of the manuscript. W.K.M. conceived and developed the overarching review concept, designed the review structure, compiled data, designed figures and tables, and wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research is supported by an external grant from the Sandooq Al Watan organization, UAE to the PI, WKM. Project ID: PRJ-SWARD-711. Grant NO: SWARD-F23-020.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs over the Nearly Four Decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 770–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Atanasov, A.G.; Zotchev, S.B.; Dirsch, V.M.; Orhan, I.E.; Banach, M.; Rollinger, J.M.; Barreca, D.; Weckwerth, W.; Bauer, R.; Bayer, E.A.; et al. Natural products in drug discovery: Advances and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 20, 200–216. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41573-020-00114-z (accessed on 20 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs over the 30 Years from 1981 to 2010. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 311–335. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/np200906s (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Prajapati, C.; Rai, S.N.; Singh, A.K.; Chopade, B.A.; Singh, Y.; Singh, S.K.; Haque, S.; Prieto, M.A.; Ashraf, G.M. An Update of Fungal Endophyte Diversity and Strategies for Augmenting Therapeutic Potential of Their Potent Metabolites: Recent Advancement. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2025, 197, 2799–2866. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12010-024-05098-9 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  5. Gunatilaka, A.A.L. Natural Products from Plant-Associated Microorganisms: Distribution, Structural Diversity, Bioactivity, and Implications of Their Occurrence. J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69, 509–526. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/np058128n (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  6. Singh, S.B.; Pelaez, F. Biodiversity, chemical diversity and drug discovery. Prog. Drug Res. 2008, 65, 141–174. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-7643-8117-2_4 (accessed on 17 December 2025).
  7. Keller, N.P. Fungal secondary metabolism: Regulation, function and drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 167–180. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-018-0121-1 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Riedling, O.L.; Rokas, A. mGem: How many fungal secondary metabolites are produced by filamentous fungi? Conservatively, at least 1.4 million. mBio 2025, 16, e0138125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, X.; Feng, P.; Yin, Y.; Bushley, K.; Spatafora, J.W.; Wang, C. Cyclosporine biosynthesis in Tolypocladium inflatum benefits fungal adaptation to the environment. mBio 2018, 9, e01211-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aris, P.; Wei, Y.; Mohamadzadeh, M.; Xia, X. Griseofulvin: An Updated Overview of Old and Current Knowledge. Molecules 2022, 27, 7034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, L.; Yue, Q.; Li, Y.; Niu, X.; Xiang, M.; Wang, W.; Bills, G.F.; Liu, X.; An, Z. Engineering of Glarea lozoyensis for Exclusive Production of the Pneumocandin B0 Precursor of the Antifungal Drug Caspofungin Acetate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 81, 1550–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Men, P.; Zhou, Y.; Xie, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, W.; Huang, X.; Lu, X. Improving the production of the micafungin precursor FR901379 in an industrial production strain. Microb. Cell Factories 2023, 22, 44. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36879280/ (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  13. Pfaller, M.A.; Boyken, L.; Hollis, R.J.; Messer, S.A.; Tendolkar, S.; Diekema, D.J. In Vitro Activities of Anidulafungin against More than 2,500 Clinical Isolates of Candida spp., Including 315 Isolates Resistant to Fluconazole. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 5425–5427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Brinkmann, V.; Billich, A.; Baumruker, T.; Heining, P.; Schmouder, R.; Francis, G.; Aradhye, S.; Burtin, P. Fingolimod (FTY720): Discovery and development of an oral drug to treat multiple sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 883–897, Erratum in Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 955.. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tiwari, P.; Bae, H.; Tiwari, P.; Bae, H. Endophytic Fungi: Key Insights, Emerging Prospects, and Challenges in Natural Product Drug Discovery. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 360. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/10/2/360/htm (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  16. Guo, B.; Wang, Y.; Sun, X.; Tang, K. Bioactive natural products from endophytes: A review. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2008, 44, 136–142. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0003683808020026 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  17. Koehn, F.E.; Carter, G.T. The evolving role of natural products in drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2005, 4, 206–220. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd1657 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, R.; Peng, X.P.; Newman, D.J.; Purchase, D.; Li, G.; Kusari, S. Unlocking the metabolic potential of endophytic fungi through epigenetics: A paradigm shift for natural product discovery and plant–microbe interactions. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2025, 42, 1690–1716. Available online: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/np/d5np00028a (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  19. Domingo-Fernández, D.; Gadiya, Y.; Preto, A.J.; Krettler, C.A.; Mubeen, S.; Allen, A.; Healey, D.; Colluru, V. Natural Products Have Increased Rates of Clinical Trial Success Throughout the Drug Development Process. J. Nat. Prod. 2024, 87, 1844–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Saldívar-González, F.I.; Aldas-Bulos, V.D.; Medina-Franco, J.L.; Plisson, F. Natural product drug discovery in the artificial intelligence era. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 1526–1546. Available online: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2022/sc/d1sc04471k (accessed on 20 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  21. Merzbacher, C.; Oyarzún, D.A. Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in dynamic pathway engineering. In Biochemical Society Transactions; Portland Press: London, UK, 2023; Available online: https://portlandpress.com/biochemsoctrans/article/51/5/1871/233483 (accessed on 20 December 2025).
  22. Szelogowski, D. Deep Learning for Protein Structure Prediction: Advancements in Structural Bioinformatics. bioRxiv 2025, 24, 538026. Available online: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.04.26.538026v3 (accessed on 20 December 2025).
  23. Bertoline, L.M.F.; Lima, A.N.; Krieger, J.E.; Teixeira, S.K. Before and after AlphaFold2, An overview of protein structure prediction. Front. Bioinform. 2023, 3, 1120370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kusari, S.; Hertweck, C.; Spiteller, M. Chemical Ecology of Endophytic Fungi: Origins of Secondary Metabolites. Chem. Biol. 2012, 19, 792–798. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1074552112001998?via%3Dihub (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  25. Agrawal, S.; Bhatt, A. Microbial Endophytes: Emerging Trends and Biotechnological Applications. Curr. Microbiol. 2023, 80, 249. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37347454/ (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  26. Kaul, S.; Gupta, S.; Ahmed, M.; Dhar, M.K. Endophytic fungi from medicinal plants: A treasure hunt for bioactive metabolites. Phytochem. Rev. 2012, 11, 487–505. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11101-012-9260-6 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  27. Meshram, V.; Elazar, M.; Maymon, M.; Sharma, G.; Shawahna, R.; Belausov, E.; Charuvi, D.; Freeman, S. Endophytic Fusarium clavum confers growth and salt tolerance in Cucumis melo. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2023, 206, 105153. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0098847222003756?via%3Dihub (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  28. Strobel, G.; Daisy, B.; Castillo, U.; Harper, J. Natural Products from Endophytic Microorganisms. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67, 257–268. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/np030397v (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Staniek, A.; Woerdenbag, H.J.; Kayser, O. Endophytes: Exploiting biodiversity for the improvement of natural product-based drug discovery. J. Plant Interact. 2008, 3, 75–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chowdhary, K.; Kaushik, N.; Coloma, A.G.; Raimundo, C.M. Endophytic fungi and their metabolites isolated from Indian medicinal plant. Phytochem. Rev. 2012, 11, 467–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mishra, Y.; Singh, A.; Batra, A.; Sharma, M.M. Understanding the Biodiversity and Biological Applications of Endophytic Fungi: A Review. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2014, S8, 4. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sun, X.; Guo, L.D. Endophytic fungal diversity: Review of traditional and molecular techniques. Mycology 2012, 3, 65–76. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21501203.2012.656724 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  33. Stierle, A.; Strobel, G.; Stierle, D. Taxol and taxane production by Taxomyces andreanae, an endophytic fungus of Pacific yew. Science 1993, 260, 214–216. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8097061/ (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  34. Porras-Alfaro, A.; Bayman, P. Hidden fungi, emergent properties: Endophytes and microbiomes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2011, 49, 291–315. Available online: https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081831 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rashmi, M.; Kushveer, J.S.; Sarma, V.V. A worldwide list of endophytic fungi with notes on ecology and diversity. Mycosphere 2019, 10, 798–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fontana, D.C.; de Paula, S.; Torres, A.G.; de Souza, V.H.M.; Pascholati, S.F.; Schmidt, D.; Neto, D.D. Endophytic Fungi: Biological Control and Induced Resistance to Phytopathogens and Abiotic Stresses. Pathogens 2021, 10, 570. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34066672/ (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  37. Vishwakarma, S.; Chaudhry, V.; Chand, S.; Sagar, K.; Gupta, K.K.; Bhardwaj, N.; Prasad, R.; Kumar, P.; Chandra, H. The Potential of Fungal Endophytes in Plants: Sources of Bioactive Compounds. Indian J. Microbiol. 2024, 65, 1813–1827. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12088-024-01406-3 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Elsarkasi, R.F.; Rabie, G.H.; El-Gazzar, N. Article review on bioactivity of secondary metabolites of endophytic fungi. Bull. Fac. Sci. Zagazig Univ. 2025, 2025, 243–251. Available online: https://bfszu.journals.ekb.eg/article_432015.html (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  39. Soliman, S.S.M.; Raizada, M.N. Interactions between co-habitating fungi elicit synthesis of Taxol from an endophytic fungus in host Taxus plants. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 40831. Available online: www.frontiersin.org (accessed on 14 January 2026). [CrossRef]
  40. Aly, A.H.; Debbab, A.; Kjer, J.; Proksch, P. Fungal endophytes from higher plants: A prolific source of phytochemicals and other bioactive natural products. Fungal Divers. 2010, 41, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kumar, A.; Patil, D.; Rajamohanan, P.R.; Ahmad, A. Isolation, Purification and Characterization of Vinblastine and Vincristine from Endophytic Fungus Fusarium oxysporum Isolated from Catharanthus roseus. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e71805. Available online: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0071805 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  42. Hu, X.; Li, W.; Yuan, M.; Li, C.; Liu, S.; Jiang, C.; Wu, Y.; Cai, K.; Liu, Y. Homoharringtonine production by endophytic fungus isolated from Cephalotaxus hainanensis Li. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 32, 110. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11274-016-2073-9 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  43. Ma, Y.M.; Qiao, K.; Kong, Y.; Li, M.Y.; Guo, L.X.; Miao, Z.; Fan, C. A new isoquinolone alkaloid from an endophytic fungus R22 of Nerium indicum. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 951–958. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14786419.2016.1258556 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  44. Mousa, W.K.; Schwan, A.; Davidson, J.; Strange, P.; Liu, H.; Zhou, T.; Auzanneau, F.I.; Raizada, M.N. An endophytic fungus isolated from finger millet (Eleusine coracana) produces anti-fungal natural products. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 148505. Available online: www.frontiersin.org (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, Y.; Han, T.; Ming, Q.; Wu, L.; Rahman, K.; Qin, L. Alkaloids Produced by Endophytic Fungi: A Review. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2012, 7, 963–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kumara, P.M.; Soujanya, K.N.; Ravikanth, G.; Vasudeva, R.; Ganeshaiah, K.N.; Shaanker, R.U. Rohitukine, a chromone alkaloid and a precursor of flavopiridol, is produced by endophytic fungi isolated from Dysoxylum binectariferum Hook.f and Amoora rohituka (Roxb).Wight & Arn. Phytomedicine 2014, 21, 541–546. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24215673/ (accessed on 17 December 2025).
  47. El-Hawary, S.S.; Mohammed, R.; Abouzid, S.F.; Bakeer, W.; Ebel, R.; Sayed, A.M.; Rateb, M.E. Solamargine production by a fungal endophyte of Solanum nigrum. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 120, 900–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nicholson, M.J.; Koulman, A.; Monahan, B.J.; Pritchard, B.L.; Payne, G.A.; Scott, B. Identification of Two Aflatrem Biosynthesis Gene Loci in Aspergillus flavus and Metabolic Engineering of Penicillium paxilli to Elucidate Their Function. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 7469. Available online: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2786402/ (accessed on 20 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Yin, H.; Sun, Y.H. Vincamine-producing endophytic fungus isolated from Vinca minor. Phytomedicine 2011, 18, 802–805. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0944711311000067?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Singh, A.; Singh, D.K.; Kharwar, R.N.; White, J.F.; Gond, S.K. Fungal Endophytes as Efficient Sources of Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds and Their Prospective Applications in Natural Product Drug Discovery: Insights, Avenues, and Challenges. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 197. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/9/1/197/htm (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Lin, Z.; Wen, J.; Zhu, T.; Fang, Y.; Gu, Q.; Zhu, W. Chrysogenamide A from an Endophytic Fungus Associated with Cistanche deserticola and Its Neuroprotective Effect on SH-SY5Y Cells. J. Antibiot. 2008, 61, 81–85. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/ja2008114 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  52. Devari, S.; Jaglan, S.; Kumar, M.; Deshidi, R.; Guru, S.; Bhushan, S.; Kushwaha, M.; Gupta, A.P.; Gandhi, S.G.; Sharma, J.P.; et al. Capsaicin production by Alternaria alternata, an endophytic fungus from Capsicum annum; LC–ESI–MS/MS analysis. Phytochemistry 2014, 98, 183–189. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031942213004780?via%3Dihub (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  53. Dong, L.H.; Fan, S.W.; Ling, Q.Z.; Huang, B.B.; Wei, Z.J. Indentification of huperzine A-producing endophytic fungi isolated from Huperzia serrata. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 30, 1011–1017. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11274-013-1519-6 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  54. Verma, V.C.; Lobkovsky, E.; Gange, A.C.; Singh, S.K.; Prakash, S. Piperine production by endophytic fungus Periconia sp. Isolated from Piper longum L. J. Antibiot. 2011, 64, 427–431. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/ja201127 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  55. Chithra, S.; Jasim, B.; Sachidanandan, P.; Jyothis, M.; Radhakrishnan, E.K. Piperine production by endophytic fungus Colletotrichum gloeosporioides isolated from Piper nigrum. Phytomedicine 2014, 21, 534–540. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0944711313004297?via%3Dihub (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  56. Chithra, S.; Jasim, B.; Anisha, C.; Mathew, J.; Radhakrishnan, E.K. LC-MS/MS Based Identification of Piperine Production by Endophytic Mycosphaerella sp. PF13 from Piper nigrum. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 173, 30–35. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12010-014-0832-3 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hellwig, V.; Grothe, T.; Mayer-Bartschmid, A.; Endermann, R.; Geschke, F.U.; Henkel, T.; Stadler, M. Altersetin, a new antibiotic from cultures of endophytic Alternaria spp. Taxonomy, fermentation, isolation, structure elucidation and biological activities. J. Antibiot. 2002, 55, 881–892. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12523821/ (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Singh, N.; Sharma, B. Toxicological effects of berberine and sanguinarine. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2018, 5, 332547. Available online: www.frontiersin.org (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, X.J.; Min, C.L.; Ge, M.; Zuo, R.H. An Endophytic Sanguinarine-Producing Fungus from Macleaya cordata, Fusarium proliferatum BLH51. Curr. Microbiol. 2013, 68, 336–341. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00284-013-0482-7 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  60. Yang, K.; Liang, J.; Li, Q.; Kong, X.; Chen, R.; Jin, Y. Cladosporium cladosporioides XJ-AC03, an aconitine-producing endophytic fungus isolated from Aconitum leucostomum. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 29, 933–938. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11274-012-1246-4 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  61. Kajula, M.; Ward, J.M.; Turpeinen, A.; Tejesvi, M.V.; Hokkanen, J.; Tolonen, A.; Häkkänen, H.; Picart, P.; Ihalainen, J.; Sahl, H.G.; et al. Bridged Epipolythiodiketopiperazines from Penicillium raciborskii, an Endophytic Fungus of Rhododendron tomentosum Harmaja. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 685–690. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/np500822k (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Tanney, J.B.; McMullin, D.R.; Green, B.D.; Miller, J.D.; Seifert, K.A. Production of antifungal and antiinsectan metabolites by the Picea endophyte Diaporthe maritima sp. nov. Fungal Biol 2016, 120, 1448–1457. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1878614616300496?via%3Dihub (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Mondol, M.A.M.; Farthouse, J.; Islam, M.T.; Schüffler, A.; Laatsch, H. Metabolites from the Endophytic Fungus Curvularia sp. M12 Act as Motility Inhibitors against Phytophthora capsici Zoospores. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 347–355. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b00785 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, S.; Liu, X.; Guo, L.; Che, Y.; Liu, L. 2H-pyran-2-one and 2H-furan-2-one derivatives from the plant endophytic fungus Pestalotiopsis fici. Chem. Biodivers. 2013, 10, 2007–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mousa, W.K.; Schwan, A.L.; Raizada, M.N. Characterization of Antifungal Natural Products Isolated from Endophytic Fungi of Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana). Molecules 2016, 21, 1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, W.; Xu, J.; Li, F.; Xu, L.; Li, C. A New Antifungal Isocoumarin from The Endophytic Fungus Trichoderma sp. 09 of Myoporum bontioides A. Gray. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2016, 12, 259. Available online: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5096270/ (accessed on 17 December 2025). [PubMed]
  67. Silva, G.H.; Zeraik, M.L.; De Oliveira, C.M.; Teles, H.L.; Trevisan, H.C.; Pfenning, L.H.; Nicolli, C.P.; Young, M.C.M.; Mascarenhas, Y.P.; Abreu, L.M.; et al. Lactone Derivatives Produced by a Phaeoacremonium sp., an Endophytic Fungus from Senna spectabilis. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 1674–1678. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b00828 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. McMullin, D.R.; Green, B.D.; Miller, J.D. Antifungal sesquiterpenoids and macrolides from an endophytic Lophodermium species of Pinus strobus. Phytochem. Lett. 2015, 14, 148–152. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1874390015300811?via%3Dihub (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  69. Carvalho, C.R.; Wedge, D.E.; Cantrell, C.L.; Silva-Hughes, A.F.; Pan, Z.; Moraes, R.M.; Madoxx, V.L.; Rosa, L.H. Molecular Phylogeny, Diversity, and Bioprospecting of Endophytic Fungi Associated with Wild Ethnomedicinal North American Plant Echinacea purpurea (Asteraceae). Chem. Biodivers. 2016, 13, 918–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Shan, T.; Tian, J.; Wang, X.; Mou, Y.; Mao, Z.; Lai, D.; Dai, J.; Peng, Y.; Zhou, L.; Wang, M. Bioactive Spirobisnaphthalenes from the Endophytic Fungus Berkleasmium sp. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 2151–2160. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/np400988a (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Liu, K.; Yang, Y.; Miao, C.P.; Zheng, Y.K.; Chen, J.L.; Chen, Y.W.; Xu, L.H.; Guang, H.L.; Ding, Z.T.; Zhao, L.X. Koningiopisins A–H, Polyketides with Synergistic Antifungal Activities from the Endophytic Fungus Trichoderma koningiopsis. Planta Medica 2016, 82, 371–376. Available online: http://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-0035-1558228 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wang, J.; Wang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, B.; Zhang, C.; Wang, L. Isolation and identification of an endophytic fungus Pezicula sp. in Forsythia viridissima and its secondary metabolites. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 30, 2639–2644. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11274-014-1686-0 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  73. Meng, X.; Mao, Z.; Lou, J.; Xu, L.; Zhong, L.; Peng, Y.; Zhou, L.; Wang, M. Benzopyranones from the Endophytic Fungus Hyalodendriella sp. Ponipodef12 and Their Bioactivities. Molecules 2012, 17, 11303–11314. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/17/10/11303/htm (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Talontsi, F.M.; Dittrich, B.; Schüffler, A.; Sun, H.; Laatsch, H. Epicoccolides: Antimicrobial and antifungal polyketides from an endophytic fungus Epicoccum sp. associated with Theobroma cacao. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 2013, 3174–3180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Anh, N.M.; Huyen, V.T.T.; Quyen, V.T.; Dao, P.T.; Quynh, D.T.; Huong, D.T.M.; Van Cuong, P.; Dat, T.T.H.; Minh, L.T.H. Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Secondary Metabolites from a Marine-Derived Fungus Penicillium citrinum VM6. Curr. Microbiol. 2023, 81, 32. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00284-023-03568-7 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Ola, A.R.B.; Debbab, A.; Kurtán, T.; Brötz-Oesterhelt, H.; Aly, A.H.; Proksch, P. Dihydroanthracenone metabolites from the endophytic fungus Diaporthe melonis isolated from Annona squamosa. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 3147–3150. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040403914005425?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  77. Hussain, H.; Kock, I.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Al-Rawahi, A.; Abbas, G.; Green, I.R.; Shah, A.; Badshah, A.; Saleem, M.; Draeger, S.; et al. Antimicrobial chemical constituents from endophytic fungus Phoma sp. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2014, 7, 699–702. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S199576451460119X?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  78. Li, Y.; Song, Y.C.; Liu, J.Y.; Ma, Y.M.; Tan, R.X. Anti-Helicobacter pylori substances from endophytic fungal cultures. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 21, 553–558. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11274-004-3273-2 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  79. Rukachaisirikul, V.; Buadam, S.; Sukpondma, Y.; Phongpaichit, S.; Sakayaroj, J.; Hutadilok-Towatana, N. Indanone and mellein derivatives from the Garcinia-derived fungus Xylaria sp. PSU-G12. Phytochem. Lett. 2013, 6, 135–138. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1874390012002273?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  80. Sica, V.P.; Rees, E.R.; Tchegnon, E.; Bardsley, R.H.; Raja, H.A.; Oberlies, N.H. Spatial and temporal profiling of griseofulvin production in Xylaria cubensis using mass spectrometry mapping. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 191615. Available online: www.frontiersin.org (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  81. Debbab, A.; Aly, A.H.; Edrada-Ebel, R.A.; Wray, V.; Müller, W.E.G.; Totzke, F.; Zirrgiebel, U.; Schächtele, C.; Kubbutat, M.H.G.; Wen, H.L.; et al. Bioactive Metabolites from the Endophytic Fungus Stemphylium globuliferum Isolated from Mentha pulegium. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 626–631. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/np8004997 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  82. Aly, A.H.; Edrada-Ebel, R.A.; Wray, V.; Müller, W.E.G.; Kozytska, S.; Hentschel, U.; Proksch, P.; Ebel, R. Bioactive metabolites from the endophytic fungus Ampelomyces sp. isolated from the medicinal plant Urospermum picroides. Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 1716–1725. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031942208001064?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  83. Aly, A.H.; Debbab, A.; Edrada-Ebel, R.; Wray, V.; Müller, W.E.; Lin, W.; Ebel, R.; Proksch, P. A new tetrahydrofuran derivative from the Endophytic Fungus Chaetomium sp. isolated from Otanthus maritimus. Z. Naturforschung—Sect. C J. Biosci. 2009, 64, 350–354. Available online: https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znc-2009-5-608/html (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Liu, L.; Tian, R.; Liu, S.; Chen, X.; Guo, L.; Che, Y. Pestaloficiols A–E, bioactive cyclopropane derivatives from the plant endophytic fungus Pestalotiopsis fici. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 6021–6026. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0968089608003805 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  85. Li, E.; Tian, R.; Liu, S.; Chen, X.; Guo, L.; Che, Y. Pestalotheols A-D, bioactive metabolites from the plant endophytic fungus Pestalotiopsis theae. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 664–668. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/np700744t (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Martínez-Luis, S.; Della-Togna, G.; Coley, P.D.; Kursar, T.A.; Gerwick, W.H.; Cubilla-Rios, L. Antileishmanial Constituents of the Panamanian Endophytic Fungus Edenia sp. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 2011–2014. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/np800472q (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Cota, B.B.; Rosa, L.H.; Caligiorne, R.B.; Rabello, A.L.T.; Almeida Alves, T.M.; Rosa, C.A.; Zani, C.L. Altenusin, a biphenyl isolated from the endophytic fungus Alternaria sp., inhibits trypanothione reductase from Trypanosoma cruzi. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2008, 285, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Xiao, J.; Zhang, Q.; Gao, Y.Q.; Tang, J.J.; Zhang, A.L.; Gao, J.M. Secondary Metabolites from the Endophytic Botryosphaeria dothidea of Melia azedarach and Their Antifungal, Antibacterial, Antioxidant, and Cytotoxic Activities. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 3584–3590. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf500054f (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  89. Cao, L.L.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Liu, Y.J.; Yang, T.T.; Zhang, J.L.; Zhang, Z.G.; Shen, L.; Liu, J.Y.; Ye, Y.H. Anti-phytopathogenic activity of sporothriolide, a metabolite from endophyte Nodulisporium sp. A21 in Ginkgo biloba. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2016, 129, 7–13. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048357515300420?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  90. Nalli, Y.; Mirza, D.N.; Wani, Z.A.; Wadhwa, B.; Mallik, F.A.; Raina, C.; Chaubey, A.; Riyaz-Ul-Hassan, S.; Ali, A. Phialomustin A–D, new antimicrobial and cytotoxic metabolites from an endophytic fungus, Phialophora mustea. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 95307–95312. Available online: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2015/ra/c5ra18121f (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  91. Budhiraja, A.; Nepali, K.; Sapra, S.; Gupta, S.; Kumar, S.; Dhar, K.L. Bioactive metabolites from an endophytic fungus of Aspergillus species isolated from seeds of Gloriosa superba Linn. Med. Chem. Res. 2012, 22, 323–329. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00044-012-0032-z (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  92. Lai, D.; Wang, A.; Cao, Y.; Zhou, K.; Mao, Z.; Dong, X.; Tian, J.; Xu, D.; Dai, J.; Peng, Y.; et al. Bioactive Dibenzo-α-pyrone Derivatives from the Endophytic Fungus Rhizopycnis vagum Nitaf22. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 2022–2031. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b00327 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  93. Hussain, H.; Root, N.; Jabeen, F.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Al-Rawahi, A.; Ahmad, M.; Hassan, Z.; Abbas, G.; Mabood, F.; Shah, A.; et al. Seimatoric acid and colletonoic acid: Two new compounds from the endophytic fungi, Seimatosporium sp. and Colletotrichum sp. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2014, 25, 1577–1579. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1001841714002708?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  94. Shah, A.; Rather, M.A.; Hassan, Q.P.; Aga, M.A.; Mushtaq, S.; Shah, A.M.; Hussain, A.; Baba, S.A.; Ahmad, Z. Discovery of anti-microbial and anti-tubercular molecules from Fusarium solani: An endophyte of Glycyrrhiza glabra. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 122, 1168–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Barreto, D.L.C.; Cantrell, C.L.; Kim, S.J.; De CARVALHO, C.R.; DE QUEIROZ, S.C.N.; Bajsa-Hirschel, J.; Tamang, P.; Duke, S.O.; Rosa, L.H. Phytotoxic and antifungal compounds for agriculture are interestingly produced by the endophytic fungus Fusarium sp. (Ascomycota) isolated from Piper sp. (Piperaceae). An. Acad. Bras. Ciências 2025, 97, e20241059. Available online: https://www.scielo.br/j/aabc/a/WFjqRfm6STscLyWNkDz4rmn/?lang=en (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  96. Dai, J.; Krohn, K.; Draeger, S.; Schulz, B. New naphthalene-chroman coupling products from the endophytic fungus, Nodulisporium sp. from Erica arboreal. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 2009, 1564–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sun, P.; Huo, J.; Kurtán, T.; Mándi, A.; Antus, S.; Tang, H.; Draeger, S.; Schulz, B.; Hussain, H.; Krohn, K.; et al. Structural and stereochemical studies of hydroxyanthraquinone derivatives from the endophytic fungus Coniothyrium sp. Chirality 2013, 25, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Ibrahim, S.R.M.; Elkhayat, E.S.; Mohamed, G.A.; Khedr, A.I.M.; Fouad, M.A.; Kotb, M.H.R.; Ross, S.A. Aspernolides F and G, new butyrolactones from the endophytic fungus Aspergillus terreus. Phytochem. Lett. 2015, 14, 84–90. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1874390015300665?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  99. Hussain, H.; Kliche-Spory, C.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Al-Rawahi, A.; Abbas, G.; Green, I.R.; Schulz, B.; Krohn, K.; Shah, A. Antimicrobial constituents from three endophytic fungi. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2014, 7, S224–S227. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1995764514602364?via%3Dihub (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  100. Liu, K.; Ding, X.; Deng, B.; Chen, W. Isolation and characterization of endophytic taxol-producing fungi from Taxus chinensis. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 36, 1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Perez-Matas, E.; Garcia-Perez, P.; Miras-Moreno, B.; Lucini, L.; Bonfill, M.; Palazon, J.; Hidalgo-Martinez, D. Exploring the Interplay Between Metabolic Pathways and Taxane Production in Elicited Taxus baccata Cell Suspensions. Plants 2023, 12, 2696. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37514310/ (accessed on 20 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Caruso, M.; Colombo, A.L.; Fedeli, L.; Pavesi, A.; Quaroni, S.; Saracchi, M.; Ventrella, G. Isolation of endophytic fungi and Actinomycetes taxane producers. Annu. Microbiol. 2000, 50, 3–14. [Google Scholar]
  103. Staniek, A.; Woerdenbag, H.J.; Kayser, O. Screening the endophytic flora of Wollemia nobilis for alternative paclitaxel sources. J. Plant Interact. 2010, 5, 189–195. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17429141003714721 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  104. Sathiyabama, M.; Parthasarathy, R. Withanolide production by fungal endophyte isolated from Withania somnifera. Nat. Prod. Res. 2018, 32, 1573–1577. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14786419.2017.1389934 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  105. Morandini, L.M.B.; Neto, A.T.; Pedroso, M.; Antoniolli, Z.I.; Burrow, R.A.; Bortoluzzi, A.J.; Mostardeiro, M.A.; Da Silva, U.F.; Dalcol, I.I.; Morel, A.F. Lanostane-type triterpenes from the fungal endophyte Scleroderma UFSMSc1 (Persoon) Fries. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 1173–1176. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960894X16300440?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Shentu, X.; Zhan, X.; Ma, Z.; Yu, X.; Zhang, C. Antifungal activity of metabolites of the endophytic fungus Trichoderma brevicompactum from garlic. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2014, 45, 248–254. Available online: https://www.scielo.br/j/bjm/a/PnbSqKdSCZR8jxYqTr8xcSK/?lang=en (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  107. Li, T.X.; Yang, M.H.; Wang, X.B.; Wang, Y.; Kong, L.Y. Synergistic Antifungal Meroterpenes and Dioxolanone Derivatives from the Endophytic Fungus Guignardia sp. J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 2511–2520. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b00008 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  108. Chen, Y.M.; Yang, Y.H.; Li, X.N.; Zou, C.; Zhao, P.J. Diterpenoids from the Endophytic Fungus Botryosphaeria sp. P483 of the Chinese Herbal Medicine Huperzia serrata. Molecules 2015, 20, 16924–16932. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/20/9/16924/htm (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Ding, D.D.; Yu, S.P.; Wang, L.W. A study on the secondary metabolites of endophytic fungus Chaetomium cupreum ZJWCF079 in Macleaya cordata. Health Res. 2013, 33, 94–96. [Google Scholar]
  110. Liang, X.A.; Ma, Y.M.; Zhang, H.C.; Liu, R. A new helvolic acid derivative from an endophytic Fusarium sp. of Ficus carica. Nat. Prod. Res. 2016, 30, 2407–2412. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14786419.2016.1190722 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  111. Xu, D.; Zhang, B.Y.; Yang, X.L. Antifungal Monoterpene Derivatives from the Plant Endophytic Fungus Pestalotiopsis foedan. Chem. Biodivers. 2016, 13, 1422–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Deshmukh, S.K.; Prakash, V.; Ranjan, N. Recent advances in the discovery of bioactive metabolites from Pestalotiopsis. Phytochem. Rev. 2017, 16, 883–920. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11101-017-9495-3 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  113. Wijeratne, E.M.K.; Paranagama, P.A.; Marron, M.T.; Gunatilaka, M.K.; Arnold, A.E.; Gunatilaka, A.A.L. Sesquiterpene Quinones and Related Metabolites from Phyllosticta spinarum, a Fungal Strain Endophytic in Platycladus orientalis of the Sonoran Desert. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 218–222. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/np070600c (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  114. Qian, Y.X.; Kang, J.C.; Luo, Y.K.; Zhao, J.J.; He, J.; Geng, K. A Bilobalide-Producing Endophytic Fungus, Pestalotiopsis uvicola from Medicinal Plant Ginkgo biloba. Curr. Microbiol. 2016, 73, 280–286. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00284-016-1060-6 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Cui, Y.; Yi, D.; Bai, X.; Sun, B.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y. Ginkgolide B produced endophytic fungus (Fusarium oxysporum) isolated from Ginkgo biloba. Fitoterapia 2012, 83, 913–920. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0367326X12001165?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  116. Suwannarach, N.; Kumla, J.; Bussaban, B.; Nuangmek, W.; Matsui, K.; Lumyong, S. Biofumigation with the endophytic fungus Nodulisporium spp. CMU-UPE34 to control postharvest decay of citrus fruit. Crop Prot. 2013, 45, 63–70. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261219412003286?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  117. Nibret, E.; Youns, M.; Krauth-Siegel, R.L.; Wink, M. Biological activities of xanthatin from Xanthium strumarium leaves. Phytother. Res. 2011, 25, 1883–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Xu, L.L.; Han, T.; Wu, J.Z.; Zhang, Q.Y.; Zhang, H.; Huang, B.K.; Rahman, K.; Qin, L.P. Comparative research of chemical constituents, antifungal and antitumor properties of ether extracts of Panax ginseng and its endophytic fungus. Phytomedicine 2009, 16, 609–616. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0944711309000828?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  119. Zaher, A.M.; Moharram, A.M.; Davis, R.; Panizzi, P.; Makboul, M.A.; Calderón, A.I. Characterisation of the metabolites of an antibacterial endophyte Botryodiplodia theobromae Pat. of Dracaena draco L. by LC-MS/MS. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 2275–2281. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14786419.2015.1012715 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  120. Kusari, S.; Verma, V.C.; Lamshoeft, M.; Spiteller, M. An endophytic fungus from Azadirachta indica A. Juss. that produces azadirachtin. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 28, 1287–1294. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11274-011-0876-2 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  121. Gupta, S.; Bhatt, P.; Chaturvedi, P. Determination and quantification of asiaticoside in endophytic fungus from Centella asiatica (L.) Urban. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 34, 111. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11274-018-2493-9 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Yuan, L.; Zhao, P.J.; Ma, J.; Lu, C.H.; Shen, Y.M. Labdane and tetranorlabdane diterpenoids from Botryosphaeria sp. MHF, an endophytic fungus of Maytenus hookeri. Helv. Chim. Acta 2009, 92, 1118–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Kamdem, R.S.T.; Wang, H.; Wafo, P.; Ebrahim, W.; Özkaya, F.C.; Makhloufi, G.; Janiak, C.; Sureechatchaiyan, P.; Kassack, M.U.; Lin, W.; et al. Induction of new metabolites from the endophytic fungus Bionectria sp. through bacterial co-culture. Fitoterapia 2018, 124, 132–136. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0367326X17312406?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  124. Yan, C.; Liu, W.; Li, J.; Deng, Y.; Chen, S.; Liu, H. Bioactive terpenoids from Santalum album derived endophytic fungus Fusarium sp. YD-2. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 14823–14828. Available online: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2018/ra/c8ra02430h (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  125. Taware, R.; Abnave, P.; Patil, D.; Rajamohananan, P.R.; Raja, R.; Soundararajan, G.; Kundu, G.C.; Ahmad, A. Isolation, purification and characterization of Trichothecinol-A produced by endophytic fungus Trichothecium sp. and its antifungal, anticancer and antimetastatic activities. Sustain. Chem. Process. 2014, 2, 8. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/2043-7129-2-8 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  126. Wu, L.S.; Jia, M.; Chen, L.; Zhu, B.; Dong, H.X.; Si, J.P.; Peng, W.; Han, T. Cytotoxic and Antifungal Constituents Isolated from the Metabolites of Endophytic Fungus DO14 from Dendrobium officinale. Molecules 2016, 21, 14. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/21/1/14/htm (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  127. Davis, R.A.; Longden, J.; Avery, V.M.; Healy, P.C. The isolation, structure determination and cytotoxicity of the new fungal metabolite, trichodermamide C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 2836–2839. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960894X08003752?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Ibrahim, S.R.M.; Elkhayat, E.S.; Mohamed, G.A.A.; Fat’hi, S.M.; Ross, S.A. Fusarithioamide A, a new antimicrobial and cytotoxic benzamide derivative from the endophytic fungus Fusarium chlamydosporium. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 479, 211–216. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006291X16314929?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  129. Lösgen, S.; Magull, J.; Schulz, B.; Draeger, S.; Zeeck, A. Isofusidienols: Novel chromone-3-oxepines produced by the endophytic fungus Chalara sp. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 2008, 698–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kjer, J.; Wray, V.; Edrada-Ebel, R.A.; Ebel, R.; Pretsch, A.; Lin, W.; Proksch, P. Xanalteric Acids I and II and Related Phenolic Compounds from an Endophytic Alternaria sp. Isolated from the Mangrove Plant Sonneratia alba. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 2053–2057. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/np900417g (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  131. Chapla, V.M.; Zeraik, M.L.; Leptokarydis, I.H.; Silva, G.H.; Bolzani, V.S.; Young, M.C.M.; Pfenning, L.H.; Araújo, A.R. Antifungal Compounds Produced by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, an Endophytic Fungus from Michelia champaca. Molecules 2014, 19, 19243–19252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Ouyang, J.; Mao, Z.; Guo, H.; Xie, Y.; Cui, Z.; Sun, J.; Wu, H.; Wen, X.; Wang, J.; Shan, T. Mollicellins O–R, Four New Depsidones Isolated from the Endophytic Fungus Chaetomium sp. Eef-10. Molecules 2018, 23, 3218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Tian, Y.; Amand, S.; Buisson, D.; Kunz, C.; Hachette, F.; Dupont, J.; Nay, B.; Prado, S. The fungal leaf endophyte Paraconiothyrium variabile specifically metabolizes the host-plant metabolome for its own benefit. Phytochemistry 2014, 108, 95–101. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031942214004026?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  134. Gao, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zu, Y.; Fu, Y.; Liang, L.; Luo, M.; Wang, W.; Efferth, T. Antioxidant properties, superoxide dismutase and glutathione reductase activities in HepG2 cells with a fungal endophyte producing apigenin from pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Food Res. Int. 2012, 49, 147–152. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0963996912003092?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  135. Zhou, S.L.; Zhou, S.L.; Wang, M.X.; Chen, S.L. Two compounds from the endophytic Colletotrichum sp. of Ginkgo biloba. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2011, 6, 1131–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Shukla, S.; Gupta, S. Apigenin: A Promising Molecule for Cancer Prevention. Pharm. Res. 2010, 27, 962–978. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11095-010-0089-7 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Zhao, J.; Li, C.; Wang, W.; Zhao, C.; Luo, M.; Mu, F.; Fu, Y.; Zu, Y.; Yao, M. Hypocrea lixii, novel endophytic fungi producing anticancer agent cajanol, isolated from pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan [L.] Millsp.). J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 115, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Seetharaman, P.; Gnanasekar, S.; Chandrasekaran, R.; Chandrakasan, G.; Kadarkarai, M.; Sivaperumal, S. Isolation and characterization of anticancer flavone chrysin (5,7-dihydroxy flavone)-producing endophytic fungi from Passiflora incarnata L. leaves. Annu. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 321–331. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13213-017-1263-5 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  139. Wang, J.; Yao, L.Y.; Lu, Y.H. Ceriporia lacerata DMC1106, a new endophytic fungus: Isolation, identification, and optimal medium for 2′,4′-dihydroxy-6′-methoxy-3′,5′-dimethylchalcone production. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2013, 18, 669–678. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12257-012-0846-z (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  140. Wang, Y.; Xu, L.; Ren, W.; Zhao, D.; Zhu, Y.; Wu, X. Bioactive metabolites from Chaetomium globosum L18, an endophytic fungus in the medicinal plant Curcuma wenyujin. Phytomedicine 2012, 19, 364–368. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S094471131100523X?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  141. Ebada, S.S.; Eze, P.; Okoye, F.B.C.; Esimone, C.O.; Proksch, P. The Fungal Endophyte Nigrospora oryzae Produces Quercetin Monoglycosides Previously Known Only from Plants. ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 2767–2771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Cheng, M.J.; Wu, M.D.; Yuan, G.F.; Chen, Y.L.; Su, Y.S.; Hsieh, M.T.; Chen, I.S. Secondary metabolites and cytotoxic activities from the endophytic fungus Annulohypoxylon squamulosum. Phytochem. Lett. 2012, 5, 219–223. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1874390011001911?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  143. Qiu, M.; Xie, R.S.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, H.; Chen, H.M. Isolation and identification of two flavonoid-producing endophytic fungi from Ginkgo biloba L. Annu. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 143–150. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13213-010-0016-5 (accessed on 18 December 2025).
  144. Cheng, M.J.; Wu, M.D.; Hsieh, S.Y.; Su, Y.S.; Chen, I.S.; Yuan, G.F. Secondary metabolites from the endophytic fungus Annulohypoxylon boveri var. microspora BCRC 34012. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2011, 47, 536. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10600-011-9990-5 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  145. Huang, J.X.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.R.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, X.; He, X.R. Mucor fragilis as a novel source of the key pharmaceutical agents podophyllotoxin and kaempferol. Pharm. Biol. 2014, 52, 1237–1243. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/13880209.2014.885061 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  146. Chaturvedi, P.; Gajbhiye, S.; Roy, S.; Dudhale, R.; Chowdhary, A. Determination of Kaempferol in extracts of Fusarium chlamydosporum, an endophyticfungi of Tylophora indica (Asclepeadaceae) and its anti-microbial activity. IOSR J. Pharm. Biol. Sci. 2014, 9, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Hu, M.Y.; Zhong, G.H.; Sun, Z.T.; Sh, G.S.; Liu, H.M.; Liu, X.Q. Insecticidal activities of secondary metabolites of endophytic Pencillium sp. in Derris elliptica Benth. J. Appl. Entomol. 2005, 129, 413–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. El-Elimat, T.; Raja, H.A.; Graf, T.N.; Faeth, S.H.; Cech, N.B.; Oberlies, N.H. Flavonolignans from Aspergillus iizukae, a Fungal Endophyte of Milk Thistle (Silybum marianum). J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 193–199. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/np400955q (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  149. Gu, C.B.; Ma, H.; Ning, W.J.; Niu, L.L.; Han, H.Y.; Yuan, X.H.; Fu, Y.J. Characterization, culture medium optimization and antioxidant activity of an endophytic vitexin-producing fungus Dichotomopilus funicola Y3 from pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 125, 1054–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Patil, M.P.; Patil, R.H.; Maheshwari, V.L. Biological Activities and Identification of Bioactive Metabolite from Endophytic Aspergillus flavus L7 Isolated from Aegle marmelos. Curr. Microbiol. 2015, 71, 39–48. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00284-015-0805-y (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Liu, X.; Dong, M.; Chen, X.; Jiang, M.; Lv, X.; Yan, G. Antioxidant activity and phenolics of an endophytic Xylaria sp. from Ginkgo biloba. Food Chem. 2007, 105, 548–554. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308814607003482?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  152. Huang, W.Y.; Cai, Y.Z.; Hyde, K.D.; Corke, H.; Sun, M. Endophytic fungi from Nerium oleander L (Apocynaceae): Main constituents and antioxidant activity. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 23, 1253–1263. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11274-007-9357-z (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  153. Zhao, J.T.; Ma, D.H.; Luo, M.; Wang, W.; Zhao, C.J.; Zu, Y.G.; Fu, Y.J.; Wink, M. In vitro antioxidant activities and antioxidant enzyme activities in HepG2 cells and main active compounds of endophytic fungus from pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Food Res. Int. 2014, 56, 243–251. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0963996913006820?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  154. Li, W.; Li, M.; Su, X.; Qin, L.; Miao, M.; Yu, C.; Shen, Y.; Luo, Q.; Chen, Q. Mycoepoxydiene induces apoptosis and inhibits TPA-induced invasion in human cholangiocarcinoma cells via blocking NF-κB pathway. Biochimie 2014, 101, 183–191. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0300908414000303?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  155. Aly, A.H.; Edrada-Ebel, R.A.; Indriani, I.D.; Wray, V.; Müller, W.E.G.; Totzke, F.; Zirrgiebel, U.; Schächtele, C.; Kubbutat, M.H.G.; Lin, W.H.; et al. Cytotoxic Metabolites from the Fungal Endophyte Alternaria sp. and Their Subsequent Detection in Its Host Plant Polygonum senegalense. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 972–980. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/np070447m (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  156. Wang, F.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, C.; Chang, S.; Shao, R.; Xing, J.; Chen, M.; Zhang, Y.; Si, S. Cytotoxic metabolites from the endophytic fungus Chaetomium globosum 7951. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 16035–16039. Available online: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2019/ra/c9ra02647a (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  157. Silva, G.H.; De Oliveira, C.M.; Teles, H.L.; Da S. Bolzani, V.; Araujo, A.R.; Pfenning, L.H.; Young, M.C.M.; Costa-Neto, C.M.; Haddad, R.; Eberlin, M.N. Citocalasinas produzidas por Xylaria sp., um fungo endofítico de Piper aduncum (piperaceae). Quim. Nova 2010, 33, 2038–2041. Available online: https://www.scielo.br/j/qn/a/WJnnpt6sFfwQytfP6FKXttw/?format=html&lang=pt (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  158. Zhao, S.S.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Yan, W.; Cao, L.L.; Xiao, Y.; Ye, Y.H. Chaetomium globosum CDW7, a potential biological control strain and its antifungal metabolites. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2017, 364, fnw287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Pereira, C.B.; De Oliveira, D.M.; Hughes, A.F.S.; Kohlhoff, M.; La Vieira, M.; Martins Vaz, A.B.; Ferreira, M.C.; Carvalho, C.R.; Rosa, L.H.; Rosa, C.A.; et al. Endophytic fungal compounds active against Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii. J. Antibiot. 2015, 68, 436–444. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/ja201511 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  160. Hussain, H.; Root, N.; Jabeen, F.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Ahmad, M.; Mabood, F.; Hassan, Z.; Shah, A.; Green, I.R.; Schulz, B.; et al. Microsphaerol and Seimatorone: Two New Compounds Isolated from the Endophytic Fungi, Microsphaeropsis sp. and Seimatosporium sp. Chem. Biodivers. 2015, 12, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Bungihan, M.E.; Tan, M.A.; Kitajima, M.; Kogure, N.; Franzblau, S.G.; Dela Cruz, T.E.E.; Takayama, H.; Nonato, M.G. Bioactive metabolites of Diaporthe sp. P133, an endophytic fungus isolated from Pandanus amaryllifolius. J. Nat. Med. 2011, 65, 606–609. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11418-011-0518-x (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Shu, R.G.; Wang, F.W.; Yang, Y.M.; Liu, Y.X.; Tan, R.X. Antibacterial and xanthine oxidase inhibitory cerebrosides from Fusarium sp. IFB-121, and endophytic fungus in Quercus variabilis. Lipids 2004, 39, 667–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Zuck, K.M.; Shipley, S.; Newman, D.J. Induced Production of N-Formyl Alkaloids from Aspergillus fumigatus by Co-culture with Streptomyces peucetius. J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 1653–1657. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/np200255f (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  164. Kusari, S.; Zühlke, S.; Spiteller, M. An Endophytic Fungus from Camptotheca acuminata That Produces Camptothecin and Analogues. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 2–7. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/np800455b (accessed on 13 January 2026). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Xu, D.; Xu, Z. Indole Alkaloids with Potential Anticancer Activity. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2020, 20, 1938–1949. Available online: https://www.eurekaselect.com/article/107572 (accessed on 13 January 2026). [CrossRef]
  166. Pérez-Ortega, H.U.; Córdova-Espíritu, R.R.; Cano-Serrano, S.; García-González, E.; Bravo-Sánchez, M.G.; Orozco-Mosqueda, M.d.C.; Jiménez-Islas, H.; Luna-Bárcenas, G.; Villaseñor-Ortega, F.; Pérez-Ortega, H.U.; et al. Camptothecin in Cancer Therapy: Current Challenges and Emerging Strategies with Nanoemulsions. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 1414. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/17/11/1414 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Hu, M.; Yang, X.Q.; Wang, C.F.; Zhao, T.D.; Wang, D.L.; Yang, Y.B.; Ding, Z.T. Paraverrucsins A–F, Antifeedant, and Antiphytopathogenic Polyketides from Rhizospheric Paraphaeosphaeria verruculosa and Induced Bioactivity Enhancement by Coculturing with Host Plant Dendrobium officinale. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 30596–30602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. González-Hernández, R.A.; Valdez-Cruz, N.A.; Macías-Rubalcava, M.L.; Trujillo-Roldán, M.A. Overview of fungal terpene synthases and their regulation. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 39, 194. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11274-023-03635-y (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  169. Kim, S.; Shin, D.S.; Lee, T.; Oh, K.B. Periconicins, Two New Fusicoccane Diterpenes Produced by an Endophytic Fungus Periconia sp. with Antibacterial Activity. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67, 448–450. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/np030384h (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  170. Miller, B.R.; Gulick, A.M. Structural Biology of Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetases. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016, 1401, 3–29. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26831698/ (accessed on 17 December 2025).
  171. Strobel, G.A.; Miller, R.V.; Martinez-Miller, C.; Condron, M.M.; Teplow, D.B.; Hess, W.M. Cryptocandin, a potent antimycotic from the endophytic fungus Cryptosporiopsis cf. quercina. Microbiology 1999, 145, 1919–1926. Available online: https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/micro/10.1099/13500872-145-8-1919 (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  172. Tousif, M.I.; Tauseef, S.; Nabeelah, S.; Sharmeen, J.; Zengin, G.; Legoabe, L.; Imran, M.; Mahomoodally, M.F. Phenolics from endophytic fungi as natural α-glucosidase inhibitors: A comprehensive review. J. Mol. Struct. 2023, 1291, 135852. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022286023009481?via%3Dihub (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  173. Toppo, P.; Jangir, P.; Mehra, N.; Kapoor, R.; Mathur, P. Bioprospecting of endophytic fungi from medicinal plant Anisomeles indica L. for their diverse role in agricultural and industrial sectors. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 588. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-51057-5 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  174. Zakariyah, R.F.; Ajijolakewu, K.A.; Ayodele, A.J.; Folami-A, B.I.; Samuel, E.P.; Otuoze, S.O.; Abdulrauf, L.B.; Ahmed, R.N. Progress in endophytic fungi secondary metabolites: Biosynthetic gene cluster reactivation and advances in metabolomics. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2024, 48, 44. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42269-024-01199-x (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  175. Lee, J.C.; Strobel, G.A.; Lobkovsky, E.; Clardy, J. Torreyanic Acid: A Selectively Cytotoxic Quinone Dimer from the Endophytic Fungus Pestalotiopsis microspora. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3232–3233. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jo960471x (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  176. De Andrade, H.F.; de Araújo, L.C.A.; dos Santos, B.S.; Paiva, P.M.G.; Napoleão, T.H.; Correia, M.T.d.S.; de Oliveira, M.B.M.; Lima, G.M.d.S.; Ximenes, R.M.; da Silva, T.D.; et al. Screening of endophytic fungi stored in a culture collection for Taxol production. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2018, 49, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Subban, K.; Kempken, F. Insights into Taxol® biosynthesis by endophytic fungi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 107, 6151–6162. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00253-023-12713-y (accessed on 13 January 2026). [CrossRef]
  178. Wani, M.C.; Horwitz, S.B. Nature as a remarkable chemist: A personal story of the discovery and development of Taxol. Anticancer. Drugs 2014, 25, 482–487. Available online: https://journals.lww.com/anti-cancerdrugs/fulltext/2014/06000/nature_as_a_remarkable_chemist__a_personal_story.2.aspx (accessed on 13 January 2026). [CrossRef]
  179. Moudi, M.; Go, R.; Yien, C.Y.S.; Nazre, M. Vinca Alkaloids. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2013, 4, 1231. Available online: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3883245/ (accessed on 13 January 2026). [PubMed]
  180. Wang, Y.N.; Wang, Y.Y.; Wang, J.; Bai, W.J.; Miao, N.J.; Wang, J. Vinblastine resets tumor-associated macrophages toward M1 phenotype and promotes antitumor immune response. J. Immunother. Cancer 2023, 11, 7253. Available online: https://jitc.bmj.com/content/11/8/e007253 (accessed on 13 January 2026). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Ogbiko, C.; Jonathan, E.C.; Joseph, I.C.; Chiedu, O.F.B. Isolation, characterization, and screening of secondary metabolites from endophytic fungi isolated from Nigerian Piliostigma thonningii for antimicrobial activities. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2024, 14, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Serag, M.S.; Baka, Z.A.; Shehata, R.M.; Kardosha, T.A.; Mohesien, M.T. Secondary metabolites production by endophytic fungi. In Endophytic Fungi: The Full Story of the Untapped Treasure; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2024; pp. 215–233. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/chapter/edited-volume/abs/pii/B9780323993142000188 (accessed on 17 December 2025).
  183. Mishra, S.; Sahu, P.K.; Agarwal, V.; Singh, N. Exploiting endophytic microbes as micro-factories for plant secondary metabolite production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 6579–6596. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00253-021-11527-0 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  184. Wang, Q.; Sun, B.; Yi, Y.; Velkov, T.; Shen, J.; Dai, C.; Jiang, H. Progress of AI-Driven Drug–Target Interaction Prediction and Lead Optimization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 10037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Chavali, A.K.; Rhee, S.Y. Bioinformatics tools for the identification of gene clusters that biosynthesize specialized metabolites. Brief. Bioinform. 2018, 19, 1022–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Donia, M.S.; Cimermancic, P.; Schulze, C.J.; Wieland Brown, L.C.; Martin, J.; Mitreva, M.; Clardy, J.; Linington, R.G.; Fischbach, M.A. A systematic analysis of biosynthetic gene clusters in the human microbiome reveals a common family of antibiotics. Cell 2014, 158, 1402–1414. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25215495/ (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Prihoda, D.; Maritz, J.M.; Klempir, O.; Dzamba, D.; Woelk, C.H.; Hazuda, D.J.; Bitton, D.A.; Hannigan, G.D. The application potential of machine learning and genomics for understanding natural product diversity, chemistry, and therapeutic translatability. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2021, 38, 1100–1108. Available online: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2021/np/d0np00055h (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  188. Chen, T.; Pang, Z.; He, S.; Li, Y.; Shrestha, S.; Little, J.M.; Yang, H.; Chung, T.C.; Sun, J.; Whitley, H.C.; et al. Machine intelligence-accelerated discovery of all-natural plastic substitutes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2024, 19, 782–791. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41565-024-01635-z (accessed on 20 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  189. Gupta, Y.D.; Bhandary, S. Artificial Intelligence for Understanding Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Resistance and Antimicrobial Discovery: A New Age Model for Translational Research. Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn. Drug Des. Dev. 2024, 117–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Paul, D.; Sanap, G.; Shenoy, S.; Kalyane, D.; Kalia, K.; Tekade, R.K. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Drug Discov. Today 2021, 26, 80–93. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359644620304256?via%3Dihub (accessed on 18 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  191. Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Kloosterman, A.M.; Charlop-Powers, Z.; Van Wezel, G.P.; Medema, M.H.; Weber, T. antiSMASH 6.0, Improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W29–W35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Blin, K.; Wolf, T.; Chevrette, M.G.; Lu, X.; Schwalen, C.J.; Kautsar, S.A.; Suarez Duran, H.G.; De Los Santos, E.L.C.; Kim, H.U.; Nave, M.; et al. antiSMASH 4.0—Improvements in chemistry prediction and gene cluster boundary identification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, W36–W41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Steinke, K.; Villebro, R.; Ziemert, N.; Lee, S.Y.; Medema, M.H.; Weber, T. antiSMASH 5.0, Updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W81–W87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Skinnider, M.A.; Johnston, C.W.; Gunabalasingam, M.; Merwin, N.J.; Kieliszek, A.M.; MacLellan, R.J.; Li, H.; Ranieri, M.R.M.; Webster, A.L.H.; Cao, M.P.T.; et al. Comprehensive prediction of secondary metabolite structure and biological activity from microbial genome sequences. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 6058. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19986-1 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  195. Skinnider, M.A.; Merwin, N.J.; Johnston, C.W.; Magarvey, N.A. PRISM 3, Expanded prediction of natural product chemical structures from microbial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, W49–W54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Hannigan, G.D.; Prihoda, D.; Palicka, A.; Soukup, J.; Klempir, O.; Rampula, L.; Durcak, J.; Wurst, M.; Kotowski, J.; Chang, D.; et al. A deep learning genome-mining strategy for biosynthetic gene cluster prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, e110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Kloosterman, A.M.; Cimermancic, P.; Elsayed, S.S.; Du, C.; Hadjithomas, M.; Donia, M.S.; Fischbach, M.A.; van Wezel, G.P.; Medema, M.H. Expansion of RiPP biosynthetic space through integration of pan-genomics and machine learning uncovers a novel class of lanthipeptides. PLoS Biol. 2020, 18, e3001026. Available online: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001026 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  198. Merwin, N.J.; Mousa, W.K.; Dejong, C.A.; Skinnider, M.A.; Cannon, M.J.; Li, H.; Dial, K.; Gunabalasingam, M.; Johnston, C.; Magarvey, N.A. DeepRiPP integrates multiomics data to automate discovery of novel ribosomally synthesized natural products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Carroll, L.M.; Larralde, M.; Fleck, J.S.; Ponnudurai, R.; Milanese, A.; Cappio, E.; Zeller, G. Accurate de novo identification of biosynthetic gene clusters with GECCO. bioRxiv 2021, 442509. Available online: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.03.442509v1 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  200. Shu, H.; Zhou, J.; Lian, Q.; Li, H.; Zhao, D.; Zeng, J.; Ma, J. Modeling gene regulatory networks using neural network architectures. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2021, 1, 491–501. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/s43588-021-00099-8 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  201. Wang, M.; Carver, J.J.; Phelan, V.V.; Sanchez, L.M.; Garg, N.; Peng, Y.; Nguyen, D.D.; Watrous, J.; Kapono, C.A.; Luzzatto-Knaan, T.; et al. Sharing and community curation of mass spectrometry data with Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 828–837. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.3597 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  202. Qin, G.F.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, F.; Huo, Z.Q.; Yao, Q.Q.; Feng, Q.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, G.M.; Yao, J.C.; Liang, H.B. MS/MS-Based Molecular Networking: An Efficient Approach for Natural Products Dereplication. Molecules 2023, 28, 157. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/28/1/157/htm (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Reher, R.; Kim, H.W.; Zhang, C.; Mao, H.H.; Wang, M.; Nothias, L.F.; Caraballo-Rodriguez, A.M.; Glukhov, E.; Teke, B.; Leao, T.; et al. A Convolutional Neural Network-Based Approach for the Rapid Annotation of Molecularly Diverse Natural Products. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 4114–4120. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jacs.9b13786 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  204. Howarth, A.; Ermanis, K.; Goodman, J.M. DP4-AI automated NMR data analysis: Straight from spectrometer to structure. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 4351–4359. Available online: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2020/sc/d0sc00442a (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Das, S.; Edison, A.S.; Merz, K.M. Metabolite Structure Assignment Using In Silico NMR Techniques. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 10412–10419. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00768 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  206. Wang, C.; Timári, I.; Zhang, B.; Li, D.W.; Leggett, A.; Amer, A.O.; Bruschweiler-Li, L.; Kopec, R.E.; Brüschweiler, R. COLMAR Lipids Web Server and Ultrahigh-Resolution Methods for Two-Dimensional Nuclear Magnetic Resonance- and Mass Spectrometry-Based Lipidomics. J. Proteome Res. 2020, 19, 1674–1683. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00845 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Dührkop, K.; Fleischauer, M.; Ludwig, M.; Aksenov, A.A.; Melnik, A.V.; Meusel, M.; Dorrestein, P.C.; Rousu, J.; Böcker, S. SIRIUS 4, A rapid tool for turning tandem mass spectra into metabolite structure information. Nat. Methods 2019, 16, 299–302. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-019-0344-8 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  208. Wandy, J.; Zhu, Y.; Van Der Hooft, J.J.J.; Daly, R.; Barrett, M.P.; Rogers, S. Ms2lda.org: Web-based topic modelling for substructure discovery in mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 317–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Yang, K.; Swanson, K.; Jin, W.; Coley, C.; Eiden, P.; Gao, H.; Guzman-Perez, A.; Hopper, T.; Kelley, B.; Mathea, M.; et al. Analyzing Learned Molecular Representations for Property Prediction. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2019, 59, 3370–3388, Erratum in J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2019, 59, 5304–5305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Reker, D.; Perna, A.M.; Rodrigues, T.; Schneider, P.; Reutlinger, M.; Mönch, B.; Koeberle, A.; Lamers, C.; Gabler, M.; Steinmetz, H.; et al. Revealing the macromolecular targets of complex natural products. Nat. Chem. 2014, 6, 1072–1078. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/nchem.2095 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  211. Bian, Y.; Xie, X.Q. Generative chemistry: Drug discovery with deep learning generative models. J. Mol. Model. 2021, 27, 71. Available online: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10984615/ (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. De Cao, N.; Kipf, T. MolGAN: An implicit generative model for small molecular graphs. arXiv. 2018. Available online: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.11973 (accessed on 17 December 2025).
  213. Alakhdar, A.; Poczos, B.; Washburn, N. Diffusion Models in De Novo Drug Design. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2024, 64, 7238–7256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Huang, L.; Xu, T.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, P.; Chen, X.; Han, J.; Xie, Z.; Li, H.; Zhong, W.; Wong, K.C.; et al. A dual diffusion model enables 3D molecule generation and lead optimization based on target pockets. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 2657. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-46569-1 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  215. Hekkelman, M.L.; de Vries, I.; Joosten, R.P.; Perrakis, A. AlphaFill: Enriching AlphaFold models with ligands and cofactors. Nat. Methods 2022, 20, 205–213. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-022-01685-y (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef]
  216. Lutz, K.C.; Yang, S.; Bedi, T.; Neugent, M.L.; Madhavaram, N.; Yao, B.; Zhan, X.; De Nisco, N.J.; Li, Q. MiCoDe: A web tool for performing microbiome community detection using a Bayesian weighted stochastic block model. Bioinformatics 2025, 41, btaf384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Finnigan, W.; Hepworth, L.J.; Flitsch, S.L.; Turner, N.J. RetroBioCat as a computer-aided synthesis planning tool for biocatalytic reactions and cascades. Nat. Catal. 2021, 4, 98–104. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41929-020-00556-z (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Venkataraman, M.; Rao, G.C.; Madavareddi, J.K.; Maddi, S.R. Leveraging machine learning models in evaluating ADMET properties for drug discovery and development: Review article. ADMET DMPK 2025, 13, 2772. Available online: https://pub.iapchem.org/ojs/index.php/admet/article/view/2772 (accessed on 13 January 2026). [CrossRef]
  219. Pathan, I.; Raza, A.; Sahu, A.; Joshi, M.; Sahu, Y.; Patil, Y.; Raza, M.A.; Ajazuddin. Revolutionizing pharmacology: AI-powered approaches in molecular modeling and ADMET prediction. Med. Drug Discov. 2025, 28, 100223. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259009862500020X?via%3Dihub (accessed on 13 January 2026). [CrossRef]
  220. Khambhawala, A.; Lee, C.H.; Pahari, S.; Kwon, J.S.I. Minimizing late-stage failure in drug development with transformer models: Enhancing drug screening and pharmacokinetic predictions. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 508, 160423. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894725012288?via%3Dihub (accessed on 15 January 2026). [CrossRef]
  221. Ming, Q.; Huang, X.; He, Y.; Qin, L.; Tang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, P. Mining and Screening for Secondary Metabolite Production in the Endophytic Fungus Dactylonectria alcacerensis CT-6. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Cain, J.W.; Miller, K.I.; Kalaitzis, J.A.; Chau, R.; Neilan, B.A. Genome mining of a fungal endophyte of Taxus yunnanensis (Chinese yew) leads to the discovery of a novel azaphilone polyketide, lijiquinone. Microb. Biotechnol. 2020, 13, 1415–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Chigozie, V.U.; Ugochukwu, C.G.; Igboji, K.O.; Okoye, F.B. Application of artificial intelligence in bioprospecting for natural products for biopharmaceutical purposes. BMC Artif. Intell. 2025, 1, 4. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s44398-025-00004-7 (accessed on 14 January 2026). [CrossRef]
  224. Cech, N.B.; Medema, M.H.; Clardy, J. Benefiting from big data in natural products: Importance of preserving foundational skills and prioritizing data quality. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2021, 38, 1947–1953. Available online: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2021/np/d1np00061f (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Ni, Z.; Stine, A.E.; Tyo, K.E.J.; Broadbelt, L.J. Curating a comprehensive set of enzymatic reaction rules for efficient novel biosynthetic pathway design. Metab. Eng. 2021, 65, 79–87. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096717621000288?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed on 14 January 2026). [CrossRef]
  226. Jumper, J.; Evans, R.; Pritzel, A.; Green, T.; Figurnov, M.; Ronneberger, O.; Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Bates, R.; Žídek, A.; Potapenko, A.; et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 2021, 596, 583–589. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03819-2 (accessed on 17 December 2025). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Nazir, A.; Puthuveettil, A.R.; Hussain, F.H.N.; Hamed, K.E.; Munawar, N. Endophytic fungi: Nature’s solution for antimicrobial resistance and sustainable agriculture. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1461504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Examples of some of the alkaloids isolated from endophytic fungi.
Figure 1. Examples of some of the alkaloids isolated from endophytic fungi.
Ijms 27 01365 g001
Figure 2. Representative examples of polyketides isolated from endophytic fungi.
Figure 2. Representative examples of polyketides isolated from endophytic fungi.
Ijms 27 01365 g002aIjms 27 01365 g002bIjms 27 01365 g002cIjms 27 01365 g002d
Figure 3. Examples of the terpenes and terpenoids isolated from endophytic fungi.
Figure 3. Examples of the terpenes and terpenoids isolated from endophytic fungi.
Ijms 27 01365 g003aIjms 27 01365 g003b
Figure 4. Examples of non-ribosomal peptides isolated from the co-culturing of endophytic fungi.
Figure 4. Examples of non-ribosomal peptides isolated from the co-culturing of endophytic fungi.
Ijms 27 01365 g004
Figure 5. Examples of phenolics and aromatic compounds isolated from the co-culturing of endophytic fungi.
Figure 5. Examples of phenolics and aromatic compounds isolated from the co-culturing of endophytic fungi.
Ijms 27 01365 g005
Figure 6. Examples of some of the flavonoids isolated from endophytic fungi.
Figure 6. Examples of some of the flavonoids isolated from endophytic fungi.
Ijms 27 01365 g006
Figure 7. Examples of hybrid isolated compounds from endophytic fungi.
Figure 7. Examples of hybrid isolated compounds from endophytic fungi.
Ijms 27 01365 g007
Figure 8. Illustration of the main NPs discovered through AI-integrated tools. (1) Represent the main types of multi-omics data that can be integrated. (2) highlight the process of data integration and processing through different approaches and their application. (3) present some of NPs that were discovered through AI algorithms.
Figure 8. Illustration of the main NPs discovered through AI-integrated tools. (1) Represent the main types of multi-omics data that can be integrated. (2) highlight the process of data integration and processing through different approaches and their application. (3) present some of NPs that were discovered through AI algorithms.
Ijms 27 01365 g008
Table 1. Secondary metabolites produced by endophytic fungi and their associated biological activity.
Table 1. Secondary metabolites produced by endophytic fungi and their associated biological activity.
Alkaloids and Nitrogen-Containing Derived Metabolites
CompoundsEndophytic FungusHost PlantsReported Biological ActivityReferences
VinblastineFusarium oxysporumCatharanthus roseusAnticancer activity[41]
CamptothecinEntrophospora infrequensCamptotheca acuminata[15]
HomoharringtonineAlternaria tenuissimaCephalotaxus sp.[42]
3-O-methylviridicatinPenicillium sp. R22Nerium indicumAntifungal activity[43]
5-hydroxy-8-methoxy-4-phenylisoquinolin-1(2H)-one
ViridicatolPhoma sp. WF4Eleusine coracana[44]
AspernigerinAspergillus nigerCynodon dactylonCytotoxic activity[45]
RohitukineFusarium oxysporum,Dysoxylum binectariferumAnticancer and cytotoxic activities[46]
Fusarium solani
SolamargineAspergillus flavusSolanum nigrum[47]
AflatremMany plantsNeurotoxic activity[48]
VincristineFusarium oxysporumCatharanthus roseusAntitumor activity[41]
Vincamine-Vinca minorAntihypertensive activity.[49]
SipeimineCephalosporium cordaFritillaria ussuriensisAnti-ulcer activity[50]
Chrysogenamide APenicillium chrysogenumCistanche deserticolaNeuroprotective activity[51,52]
CapsaicinAlternaria alternataCapsicum annuumAnti-inflammatory activity[52]
Huperzine AColletotrichum sp. Trichoderma sp.Huperzia serrataAcetylcholinesterase inhibitor activity.[53]
PiperineColletotrichum gloeosporioidesPiper nigrumAnti-cancer, Anti-microbial, Anti-inflammatory, antidepressant, and hepatoprotective activities.[54]
Periconia sp.[55]
Mycosphaerella sp.[56]
altersetinAlternaria sp.-Anti-Gram-positive activity[57]
SanguinarineFusarium proliferatumMacleaya cordataAntimicrobial, anticancer, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, and anthelmintic activity.[58]
[59]
AconitineCladosporium cladosporioidesAconitum leucostomumAnti-cancer, Anti-neurologic, and anti-inflammatory activity[60]
BerberineAlternaria sp.Phellodendron amurenseAnti-bacterial, antihypertensive, anti-diabetic, antiproliferative, anti-hyperlipidaemic, and vasodilator activity[50]
Polyketide-derived metabolites
Outovirin CPenicillium raciborskiiRhododendron tomentosumAntifungal activity[61]
Phomopsolide ADiaporthe maritimaPicea sp.[62]
Phomopsolide B
Phomopsolide C
MurranopyroneCurvularia sp. strain M12Murraya koenigii[63]
Murranofuran A
Murranolide A
Murranoic acid A
Ficipyrone APestalotiopsis ficiCamellia sinensis[64]
5-hydroxy 2(3H)-benzofuranoneFusarium fujikuroi (WF5)Eleusine coracana[65]
DichlorodiaportinTrichoderma sp. 09Myoporum bontioides[66]
Isoaigialone BPhaeoacremonium sp.Senna spectabilis[67]
Isoaigialone C
Aigialone
PyrenophorinLophodermium nitens DAOM 250027Pinus strobus[68]
(−)-(3R)-8-hydroxy-6-methoxy-3,5- dimethyl-3,4-dihydroisocoumarinBiscogniauxia mediterraneaEchinacea purpurea[69]
Palmarumycin C6Berkleasmium sp.Dioscorea zingiberensis[70]
Palmarumycin C8
Palmarumycin C11
Palmarumycin C12
Diepoxin ζ
Cladospirone B*
5-hydroxy-2-hydroxymethyl-4Hchromen-4-oneNodulisporium sp.Erica arborea[15]
DichlorodiaportinolideTrichoderma sp. 09Myoporum bontioides[66]
Koningiopisin CTrichoderma koningiopsisPanax notoginseng[71]
MelleinPezicula sp.Forsythia viridissima[72]
TMC-264Hyalodendriella sp.Populus deltoides MarshAntimicrobial activity[73]
Palmariol B
Hyalodendriol C
Penicilliumolide B
Alternariol 9-methyl ether
EpicolactoneEpicoccum sp.Theobroma cacao[74]
Epicoccolide A
Epicoccolide B
CitrininPenicillium
citrinum
-[75]
Flavomannin-6,6’ -di-O-methyl etherDiaporthe melonisAnnona squamosa[76]
PhomalactonPhoma sp.Fucus serratus[77]
EmodinAspergillus glaucusUlva lactuca (Seaweed)[15]
Isofusidienol AChalara sp.Artemisia vulgarisAntibacterial activity[15]
Isofusidienol B
Isofusidienol C
Isofusidienol D
MonomethylsulochrinAspergillus sp. strain CY725- [78]
GriseofulvinXylaria sp. strain F0010Abies holophylla Garcinia hombronianaAntioxidant activity[79,80]
StemphypyroneStemphylium globuliferumMentha pulegiumAnticancer activity[81]
TalaroflavoneAlternaria sp.Polygonum senegalense[15]
3′-hydroxyalternariol 5-O-methyl ether *
Alternaric acid *
Alterlactone *
Altenuene *
Altertoxin I *
2,5-dimethyl-7-hydroxychromone
4′-epialtenuene
Alternariol 5-O-sulfate
Alternariol 5-O-methyl ether
Alterporriol GStemphylium globuliferumMentha pulegium[81]
Altersolanol AAmpelomyces sp.Urospermum picroides[82]
Altersolanol KStemphylium globuliferumMentha pulegium[81]
Altersolanol L
Pestalotiopsone FPestalotiopsis sp.Rhizophora mucronata[15]
Orsellinic acidChaetomium sp.Otanthus maritimus[83]
Isocochliodinol
Aureonitolic acid
Pestalotiopsin APestalotiopsis ficiTaxus wallichianaAnti-HIV activity[84]
Pestalotheol APestalotiopsis theae-[85]
Pestalotheol B
Pestalotheol C
Pestalotheol D
Palmarumycin CP17Edenia sp.Petrea volubilisAntiparasitic activity[86]
Palmarumycin CP18
2′,3′-dihydrosorbicillin(9Z,12Z)-2,3-dihydroxypropyloctadeca9,12-dienoate *penicillium chrysogenumCistanche deserticolaNeuroprotective activity[51]
AltenusinAlternaria sp.Trixis vauthieriAnti-leishmaniasis activity[87]
DjalonensoneBotryosphaeria
dothidea KJ-1
Melia azedarachAntioxidant, Antibacterial, cytotoxic, and Antifungal activities.[88]
Pycnophorin
Alternariol
Stemphyperylenol
SporothriolideNodulisporium sp. A21Ginkgo bilobaAntifungal, and Anti-phytopathogenic activities[89]
Phialomustin CPhialophora musteaCrocus sativusCytotoxic, and antimicrobial activities[90]
Penicilliumolide D
6-methyl-1,2,3-trihydroxy-7,8-cyclohepta-9,12-diene-11-one-5,6,7,8- tetralene-7-acetamide (KL-4) * Aspergillus sp.Gloriosa superba[91]
Rhizopycnin DRhizopycnis vagum Nitaf 22Nicotiana tabacum[92]
Seimatoric acidColletotrichum sp.GomeraAntibacterial and Antifungal activities.[93]
PhomafuranolPhoma sp.Fucus serratus[77]
FusarubinFusarium solaniGlycyrrhiza glabraAnti-microbial and anti-tubercular
Activities
[94]
JavanicinFusarium sp. Piper sp. (PiperaceaePhytotoxic and antifungal activities[95]
Nodulisporins DNodulisporium sp.Erica arboreaAntifungal and Antialgal Activities[96]
Nodulisporins E
Nodulisporins F
Coniothyrinones AConiothyrium sp.Salsola oppostifoliaAntifungal, Antibacterial, and Algicidal activities[97]
Coniothyrinones B
Coniothyrinones C
Coniothyrinones D
Aspernolides FAspergillus terreusCarthamus lanatusAnti-microbial, Anti-malarial, Anti-leishmanial, and cytotoxic activities[98]
RadicininPhysalospora sp.-Antifungal, Antibacterial, and Herbicidal activities[99]
Mycorrhizin APlectophomella sp.
Terpenes and Terpenoids—derived metabolites
TaxolAspergillus sp.Taxus chinensisAnticancer activity[100]
Ceratobasidium sp.
Cladosporium Tenuissimum
Xylaria sp.
Trichoderma sp.
Sordaria sp.
Phomopsis sp.
Pezicula sp.
Fusarium solani
Coniothyrium diplodiella
Epacris sp.
Metarhizium anisopliae
Paraconiothyrium brasiliense
TaxaneAlternaria sp.Taxus baccata[101,102]
Aspergillus sp.
Beauveria sp.
Fusarium sp.
Epicoccum sp.
Geotrichum sp.
Phoma sp.
Phomopsis sp.
Gelasinospora sp.
Cladosporium sp.Wollemia nobilis[103]
Langeronii sp.
Phomopsis sp.
WithanolideTaleromyces pinophilusWithania somnifera[104]
Sclerodol A *Scleroderma UFSM Sc1Eucalyptus grandisAntifungal activity[105]
Sclerodol B
Trichodermintrichoderma brevicompactum 0248Allium sativum[106]
Guignardone NGuignardia sp.Euphorbia sieboldiana[107]
Guignardic acid
Botryosphaerin HBotryosphaeria sp. P483Huperzia serrata[108]
13,14,15,16-tetranorlabd-7-en19,6β:12,17-diolide
Ergosta-5,7,22-trien-3beta-olChaetomium cupreum
ZJWCF079
Macleaya cordata[109]
Helvolic acid methyl esterFusarium sp.Ficus carica[110]
Hydrohelvolic acid *
Helvolic acid
(3R,4R,6R,7S)-7-hydroxyl-3,7-dimethyl-oxabicyclo [3.3.1] nonan-2-one *Pestalotiopsis foedanBruguiera sexangula[111]
(3R,4R)-3-(7-methylcyclohexenyl)-propanoic acid * [112]
PhyllospinaronePhyllosticta spinarumPlatycladus orientalisCytotoxic activity[113]
3-ketotauranin
Tauranin -(+)-(5 S,10 S)-4′-hydroxymethylcyclozonarone *
3 alpha-hydroxytauranin
12-hydroxytauranin
3b-hydroxy-5a, 8a-epidioxy-ergosta-6, 22-diene * Aspergillus sp. strain CY725Not reported Antibacterial activity[15]
Periconicins APericonia sp.Taxus cuspidata[15]
Periconicins B
BilobalidePestalotiopsis uvicolaGinkgo bilobaNeuroprotective activity[114]
GinkgolideFusarium oxysporumGinkgo bilobaAnti-inflammatory activity[115]
CamphorNodulisporium sp.Lagerstroemia loudoniAntimicrobial activity[116]
β-sitosterol glucoside *Botryosphaeria dothidea KJ-1Melia azedarachAntioxidant, Antibacterial, and anti-fungal activities.[88]
XanthatinPaecilomyces sp.Panax ginsengAntitumor activity[117,118]
Dihydrocumambrin ABotryodiplodia theobromaeDracaena dracoCytotoxic and Antibacterial activities.[119]
AzadirachtinPenicillium sp.Azadirachta indicaHepatoprotective and insecticidal activities.[120]
AsiaticosideColletotrichum gloeosporioidesCentella asiaticaAnti-inflammatory, Immunomodulatory, and antioxidant activities.[121]
Agathic acidBotryosphaeria sp.Maytenus hookeriAnti-inflammatory and anticancer activities[122]
Bionectria sp.Raphia taedigera[123]
Fusarium sp.Santalum album[124]
Trichothecinol ATrichothecium sp.Phyllanthus amarusAntifungal, anticancer, and antimetastatic activities[125]
(4S,6S)-6-[(1S,2R)-1,2-dihydroxybutyl]-4-hydroxy-4-methoxytetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-onePestalotiopsis sp. DO14Dendrobium officinaleCytotoxic and Antifungal Activities[126]
(6S,2E)-6-hydroxy-3-methoxy-5-oxodec-2-enoic acid
Peptides and amino acid-derived compounds
Trichodermamide CCryptosporiopsis quercinaTripterigium wilfordiiAntifungal activity[127]
Fusarithioamide AEupenicillium sp.Glochidion ferdinandiCytotoxic activity[127]
Circumdatin Gfusarium chlamydosporiumAnvillea garciniiCytotoxic and Antimicrobial activities.[128]
CryptocandinFusarium sp.Mentha
longifolia
Antifungal and antimalarial activities.[15]
Phenolic and aromatic—derived compounds
ErgosterolChalara sp.Artemisia vulgarisAntibacterial activity[129]
Xanalteric acid IIAlternaria sp.Sonneratia alba[130]
Mollicellin O
Xanalteric acid IConiothyrium sp.Salsola oppostifoliaAntimicrobial activity[97]
4-hydroxy-benzamideColletotrichum gloeosporioidesMichelia champacaAntifungal activity[131]
Colletonoic acid *Penicillium chrysogenumCistanche deserticolaNeuroprotective activity[93]
Colletotric acidColletotrichum sp.GomeraAntibacterial, antifungal, and antialgal activities[93]
Mollicellin GChaetomium sp.Eucalyptus exsertaAntibacterial, antioxidant, and cytotoxic activities[132]
Mollicellin H
Mollicellin I
Steroid-Derived Metabolites
(22E,24R)-stigmasta 5,7,22-trien-3-β-ol *Aspergillus terreusCarthamus lanatusAntimalarial, antimicrobial, and anti-leishmanial activities.
[98]
Flavonoids—derived Metabolites
ApigeninColletotrichum sp.Ginkgo bilobaAntidiabetic, antioxidant, anticancer, and Antibacterial activities[133,134,135,136]
Chaetomium globosum
Cajanus cajan
Paraconiothyrium variabileCephalotaxus harringtonia
CajanolHypocrea lixiiCajanus cajanAntimicrobial and Anticancer activities.[137]
ChrysinAlternaria alternataPassiflora incarnataAnticancer activity[138]
Colletotrichum capsici
Colletotrichum taiwanense
ChalconeCeriporia lacerataCleistocalyx operculatusAnti-inflammatory, Antibacterial, antitumor, and antifungal activities.[139]
CurcuminChaetomium globosumCurcuma wenyujinAntioxidant, antitumor, and Anti-inflammatory activities.[140]
QuercetinAspergillus nidulansGinkgo biloba[141,142,143]
Aspergillus oryzae
Annulohypoxylon squamulosumCinnamomum sp.
Nigrospora oryzaeLoranthus micranthus
KaempferolFusarium chlamydosporumTylophora indicaAntitumor, Antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antidiabetic activities.[142,144,145,146]
Mucor fragilisPodophyllum hexandrum
Annulohypoxylon boveri var. microsporaCinnamomum sp.
Annulohypoxylon squamulosum
RotenonePenicillium sp.Derris ellipticaPesticide and Insecticide activities.[147]
SilymarinAspergillus iizukaeSilybum marianumHepatoprotective, cardioprotective, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and Anticancer activities.[148]
VitexinDichotomopilus funicolaCajanus cajanNeuroprotective, antitumor, and Antioxidant activities.[135,149]
Colletotrichum sp.Ginkgo biloba
RutinChaetomium sp.Nerium oleanderNeuroprotective, cardioprotective, and Antioxidant activities.[150,151,152]
Xylaria sp.Ginkgo biloba
Aspergillus flavusAegle marmelos
LuteolinAspergillus fumigatusCajanus cajanAntioxidant activity[153]
Hybrid and Other types of metabolites
Torreyanic acidDiaporthe sp.mangrovesCytotoxic activity[154]
Diaportheone BPestalotiopsis microsporaTorreya taxifolia[50]
Chaetoglobosin AAlternaria sp.Polygonum senegalense[155]
Cytochalasin EChaetomium globosum
Panax notoginseng[156]
Indole-3-carboxylic acidChaetomium sp.Otanthus maritimus[83]
Cytochalasin Z28Xylaria hypoxylonPiper aduncum[157]
Penicillium chrysogenumCistanche deserticolaNeuroprotective activity[51]
Chaetoglobosin A *Chaetomium globosum CDW7Ginkgo bilobaAntifungal activity[158]
Chaetoglobosin D
2-amino-3,4-dihydroxy-2-25-(hydroxymethyl)-14-oxo-6,12- eicosenoic acid * Mycosphaerella sp.Eugenia bimarginata[159]
Myriocin
MicrosphaerolMicrosphaeropsis sp.Salsola oppositifolia[160]
2(2-hydroxyphenyl) acetic acid *
2-phenylethyl 1H-indol-3-yl-acetate
PhomopsichalasinDiaporthe sp. P133Pandanus amaryllifoliusAntibacterial Activity[161]
FusarusideFusarium sp. IFB-121Quercus variabilis[162]
2S,20R,3R,30E,4E,8E)-1-O-beta-Dglucopyranosyl-2-N-(20 -hydroxy-30-octadecenoyl)-3-hydroxy-9-methyl4,8-sphingadienine *
Cytochalasin DAspergillus clavatusTaxus maireiAntiangiogenic activity[4]
Cytochalasins EPhomopsis sp.Anti-microbial activity
Cytochalasins KPlectophomella sp.-Antifungal, Antibacterial, and Herbicidal Activities[99]
Physalospora sp.
(6S,2E)-6-hydroxy-3-methoxy-5-oxodec-2-enoic acidPestalotiopsis sp. DO14Dendrobium officinaleCytotoxic and Antifungal Activities[126]
3-(2,3-dihydroxyphenoxy)-butanoic acidNodulisporium sp.Erica arboreaAntialgal and Antifungal activities[96]
5-hydroxymethylfurfuralBotryosphaeria dothidea KJ-1Melia azedarachCytotoxic, Antibacterial, Antifungal, and Antioxidant activities[88]
* Denote structure is not available in the 1–7 structure figures.
Table 2. Compiled list of existing AI-based tools enabling NPs discovery.
Table 2. Compiled list of existing AI-based tools enabling NPs discovery.
AI ToolAI TechnologyAdvantagesLimitationsApplicationReferences
Genome Mining and Biosynthetic Gene Cluster (BGC) Prediction
antiSMASHBGC detection using ML-supported heuristics.
-
The most widely used platform for BGC detection
-
Limited discovery of novel BGCs
-
Used to identify the BCGs of Beauvericin and Oxepinamide
-
Identify hybrid cytochalasin PKS–NRPS BCG in fungal genome
[191,192,193]
PRISMPredicts and identifies NP scaffolds from BGC using ML models
-
Works well with fungal PKS/NRPS pathways.
-
Limited discovery of novel BGCs
-
Predict NRPS-derived peptide scaffolds related to etamycin.
[194,195]
ClusterFinderUse Hidden Markov Models (HMM)-based generative probabilistic modeling to detect noncanonical fungal and bacterial BGCs.
-
Detect novel classes of BGCs.
-
High rate of false positives
-
Human microbiome mining for BCGs is associated with antibiotics.
[185,186]
DeepBGCUse the Deep Learning (using Pfam2vec and Random Forest classifiers) algorithm.
-
Detect non-canonical and novel BGCs.
-
High rate of false positives
-
Prediction of a wide range of BGCs, including NRPS, PKS, and terpene
[187,196]
decRiPPterSupport Vector Machines (SVM)/Machine Learning algorithms.
-
Predict novel families of (RiPPs).
-
Higher rate of false positives.
-
Discovery of Pristinin A3
[197]
DeepRiPPDeep Learning (Natural language processing).
-
Enables the non-canonical RiPPs.
-
Higher discovery rate
-
Limited to RiPPs
-
Discovery of Deepflavo, deepginsen, and deepstreptin.
[198]
GECCODeep Learning (CRF-based)
-
Detect novel classes of BGCs.
-
Predict potential bioactivity.
-
High false positive rate.
-
Metagenome mining for novel clusters
[199]
DRNMsThese models use deep learning to predict transcription factor binding and regulatory elements controlling BGC expression.
-
Detect complex, nonlinear interactions.
-
Multi-omics data integration.
-
High false positive rate.
-
Predication silent BCGs and metabolite production.
-
Integrate a wide range of omics data.
[200]
AI-Assisted Metabolomics and MS/MS Analysis and Structure Elucidation
GNPSIt uses machine learning on MS/MS spectral networks to cluster structurally related metabolites.
Employ feature-based molecular networking (FBMN)
-
Dereplication using community spectral libraries.
-
Identify analog families through molecular networking.
-
High false positive rate.
-
Molecular networking for NPs.
-
Dereplication of known NPs.
[201,202]
SMART 2.0Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for structure elucidation
-
Guides discovery and structure elucidation
-
Limited coverage of all possible protein families.
-
Discovery of novel chimeric macrolide, Symplocolide A
[203]
DP4-AIBayesian Approach combined with Quantum Chemistry
-
Automates NMR shift calculations
-
Exploration of conformational space is computationally demanding for flexible molecules.
-
Stereochemistry determination—Automated structure elucidation.
[204]
ASE-ANIMachine Learning
-
Filters force field-generated conformations
-
Reduce the high computational cost of quantum chemistry calculations.
-
High false positive rate.
-
Generate a wide range of conformers and rank them for docking and NMR shift prediction.
[205]
COLMARAI/Database MatchingIdentifies and annotates primary metabolites from the NMR spectra of complex mixtures.
-
Require 2D NMR spectra
-
Overlapped spectra in complex mixtures
-
Detection of known metabolites only.
-
Identify primary metabolites from a complex NMR spectrum
[206]
SIRIUS + CSIFragmentation-tree algorithms
Deep neural networks to predict structural fingerprints and candidate structures
-
High accuracy for complex fungal metabolites.
-
Combined with GNPs for molecular networking integration.
-
Limited capacity distinguishing highly similar isomers or stereoisomers.
-
Determination of molecular formula
-
Screening of complex fungal metabolites
[207]
MS2LDAApplies topic modeling (LDA) to MS/MS substructure motifs
-
Independent database discovery.
-
Handle large sets of MS/MS sets.
-
Limited full structure elucidation
-
No bioactivity prediction
-
Identify azaphilone-related substructures and to group known and putative azaphilone analogs within complex MS/MS datasets
[208]
AI-assisted for Target identification and Bioactivity Prediction
ChempropA graph neural network model for predicting physicochemical and biological properties of NPs.
-
Predicts ADMET, bioactivity, and drug-likeness of microbial metabolites.
-
Supports prioritization of NP leads.
-
Limited full structure elucidation.
-
Require highly diverse training data.
-
Prediction of antifungal activity of polyketides.
-
QSAR modeling of fungal alkaloids.
-
Toxicity prediction of NP analogs.
[209]
SPIDERUtilize Self-Organizing Maps (SOM) algorithms
-
Predict bioactivities.
-
Predict mutation and detect variants in peptide structures.
-
Limited to proteomic analysis.
-
Limited capacity for discovery of novel proteins in homologous sequence sets
-
Predict the biological activity of macrocyclic natural NPs and fragment-like NPS
[210]
Generative AI and In Silico NP Design
Generative Models (Original Tool)Generative models (GANs, VAEs, diffusion models) create NP-like scaffolds.
-
Exploring novel scaffold
-
Generating rapid hypotheses before synthesis
-
Limited capacity for discovery of novel molecules
-
A generated scaffold does not guarantee biosynthetic feasibility.
-
Generative models used to propose coumarin derivatives, polyketide-like scaffolds, and naphthoquinone analogs,
[211,212]
Molecular Diffusion Models for NP DesignDiffusion-based models generate novel NP scaffolds with improved realism and chemical diversity.
-
Explore novel analogs of NPS and propose structure modification.
-
Working with 3D coordinates, which is useful in the case of complex NB
-
Large and diverse chemical datasets needed
-
Limited biosynthetic feasibility.
-
Limited capacity in predicting meroterpenoid analog and PKS-like polyketide design.
[213,214]
AI-assisted tool for Protein Structure Prediction
AlphaFill for Substrate-Bound Modelsenhances AlphaFold models by adding cofactors, substrates, or ligands.
-
Ligand addition to the predicted proteins.
-
Provide information about active sites and docking
-
Processing multiple protein structures at once.
-
Low predication for substrate specificity.
-
Design enzyme-substrate interactions.
-
Metabolic enzymes structural annotation
[215]
AI-assisted tool Microbial Networking and Ecology
Microbiome ML Co-Occurrence ModelsThese models detect ecological patterns linked to NP biosynthesis.
-
Ability to capture interactions at the community level.
-
Complex dataset handling and guide NP discovery.
-
Low resolution for revealing all levels of microorganisms.
-
Environmental effects.
-
Design ecological mapping for microbial communities.
-
Predict endophyte-host interaction.
[216]
AI-assisted tool Synthetic Biology & BGC Engineering
RetroBioCat AIMachine-learning tools for retrosynthesis and biosynthesis route design and enzyme selection.
-
Generates optimal biosynthetic pathways for NP analog synthesis.
-
Predicts enzyme candidates for pathway refactoring.
-
Limited capacity to predict the full kinetic and efficiency of the reaction.
-
Prediction depends on the rule of known enzymes
-
Design of fungal phenylpropanoid derivatives.
-
Enzyme redesign for meroterpenoid biosynthesis.
-
Optimization of NRPS/PKS pathway steps.
[217]
AI: Artificial intelligence/ML: Machine learning/NP: Natural product/HMM: Hidden Markov Models/decRiPPter: Data-driven Exploratory Class-independent RiPP Tracker/RiPPs: ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides/DRNMs: Deep Regulatory Network Models/PRISM: Prediction Informatics for Secondary Metabolomes/QSAR: Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship/NRPS: Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetases/PKS: Polyketide Synthases.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al Shami, R.; Mousa, W.K. Mining the Hidden Pharmacopeia: Fungal Endophytes, Natural Products, and the Rise of AI-Driven Drug Discovery. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 1365. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27031365

AMA Style

Al Shami R, Mousa WK. Mining the Hidden Pharmacopeia: Fungal Endophytes, Natural Products, and the Rise of AI-Driven Drug Discovery. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(3):1365. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27031365

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al Shami, Ruqaia, and Walaa K. Mousa. 2026. "Mining the Hidden Pharmacopeia: Fungal Endophytes, Natural Products, and the Rise of AI-Driven Drug Discovery" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 3: 1365. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27031365

APA Style

Al Shami, R., & Mousa, W. K. (2026). Mining the Hidden Pharmacopeia: Fungal Endophytes, Natural Products, and the Rise of AI-Driven Drug Discovery. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(3), 1365. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27031365

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop