Next Article in Journal
Synthesis, Antimicrobial Evaluation, and Molecular Docking Analysis of Novel Schiff Bases Derived from Isatoic Anhydride and Salicylaldehyde
Previous Article in Journal
Epigenomics in Understanding Racial Disparities of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias
Previous Article in Special Issue
Naltrexone Has Variable and Schedule-Dependent Effects on Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Soft Tissue N-Glycome Profiles in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma, a Pilot Study

1
Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
2
Translational Glycomics Group, Research Institute of Biomolecular and Chemical Engineering, University of Pannonia, H-8200 Veszprem, Hungary
3
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
4
Horváth Csaba Memorial Laboratory of Bioseparation Sciences, Research Center for Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(2), 740; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020740
Submission received: 30 November 2025 / Revised: 7 January 2026 / Accepted: 9 January 2026 / Published: 11 January 2026

Abstract

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is an aggressive disease with a glycoproteomically unmapped progression and a low five-year survival rate. Thus, the aim of this pilot study was to explore the N-glycosylation pattern differences in malignant, adjacent mucosal and healthy tissues in the context of OSCC. Oral mucosal soft tissue samples was obtained by incisional biopsy from five patients with OSCC, both from the malignant and the opposite healthy gingival sides, and from seven age-sex-matched healthy controls. The collected tissues were homogenized, followed by N-glycan profiling of the endoglycosidase-released and fluorophore-labeled carbohydrates using capillary electrophoresis with ultra-sensitive laser-induced fluorescent detection (CE-LIF). Six out of the twenty-two identified N-glycan structures, including glycogens, showed significant (p < 0.05) differences between the malignant tissue samples of the OSCC patients and the healthy controls. Comparing the healthy and the positive control oral mucosal samples, differences in four N-glycan structures were revealed, while only one alteration was observed between the N-glycan profiles of the malignant tumor and positive control samples. However, the results are presented descriptively, reflecting the limited sample size of the pilot study, it shows the potential of high-resolution CE-LIF-based glyocoanalytical protocol to be highly efficient and sensitive for glycobiomarker-based molecular diagnostics of oral malignant lesions.

1. Introduction

In the past 50 years, the mortality rates of oral cancers have increased almost six-fold and disability-adjusted life-years of oral cancer patients have also shown a slight elevation trend [1]. While oral cancer is only the sixteenth most common malignancy worldwide, it has the highest incidence and mortality rate in Asia and the sixth for both sexes in Hungary [2,3]. More than 90% of oral cancer is squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and as the number proliferates, more than 377,000 new cases are diagnosed and consequently, 170,000 deaths are recorded worldwide annually. More importantly, OSCC has a relatively low (40–70%) five-year overall survival rate and interestingly has a higher prevalence in males than females. The tumor occurs mainly in the sixth and seventh decades of life, although the number of younger patients under 45 years is also increasing, being mostly associated with human papilloma virus (HPV) infection [2,3]. Squamous cell carcinoma not only affects the oral cavity but also the oropharyngeal region (OP-SCC), which shows a dramatic increase in its incidence in the US, again, due to HPV infection [4]. While the oral cavity consists of the labial mucosa, floor of the mouth, anterior two-thirds of the tongue, alveolar ridge and gingiva, buccal mucosa, hard palate, and retromolar trigone; the oropharynx includes the soft palate, palatine tonsils, palatoglossal folds, valleculae, posterior pharyngeal wall and the base of the tongue. The tumors at these two sites have different etiopathogenesis, treatment and prognosis [4]. The tumor on the tongue is the most common subsite and predicts higher mortality than other sites. Perineural spread, bone involvement and lymph node metastasis suggest poor prognostic value [5]. Besides the most commonly known risk factors, such as alcohol consumption, tobacco, poor oral hygiene and HPV infection, long-term immunosuppressant therapies may also increase the risk and change the therapeutic response of secondary malignancies [2,6]. Many factors determine the choice of the optimal treatment alternative, such as primary tumor site, stage, resectability, and patient factors. Surgical intervention and radiotherapy are the major treatment options combined with chemotherapy based on appropriate indication [7]. With new developments in oncotherapy, monoclonal antibodies have also found their place in the treatment of head and neck cancer. Cetuximab, an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor monoclonal antibody has been approved to apply in combination with radiation in HPV-negative OSCC, while pembrolizumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor, used as a primary treatment option for unresectable disease and recurrent or metastatic OSCC [8]. A deeper understanding of the molecular pathways of OSCC can help in developing less toxic, more targeted therapeutic alternatives and identifying predictive markers that can be used in clinical practice.
Oral cancers are often detected at advanced stages only [9]. Therefore, it would be particularly important to discover early, potentially non-invasive biomarkers for oral cancers. However, many omics (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics) focus on identifying sufficiently sensitive, specific and reliable markers, suitable for monitoring therapeutic response or early detection of tumor recurrence in addition to early diagnosis [10,11,12,13], the number of validated clinically useful biomarkers is negligible for the time being [14]. Saliva analysis can also be an excellent approach for this, as it also reflects detectable changes in tissues [15,16].
Glycosylation is one of the most common post-translational modifications, which has a pivotal role in several important biological processes such as cell-cell adhesion, mediating and regulating cell-matrix interactions, affecting protein stability and solubility, or information transmission at the intra- and extracellular level [17]. Aberrant glycosylation, on the other hand, is often observed in inflammation, tumorigenesis and metastasis formation [18], therefore, holds biomarker potential. Hypersialylation, e.g., a special modification, which is often related to tumorigenesis, progression and prognosis [19]. Increased free serum sialic acid can be observed in several solid tumor cases, such as oral cancer, while the alteration of N-glycan associated sialylated structures may reflect the effectiveness of therapeutic response to various oncological treatments. Numerous studies examined the changes of the total sialic acid level, sialyltransferase activity, sialidase activity, total sialic acid to total protein ratio in serum [20,21,22], saliva [23] or both [24,25,26] and soft tissue [12] in patients with oral cancer, and oral premalignant disorders compared to healthy controls. These studies consistently confirmed that the variables examined showed significantly elevated levels in cancer patients and these changes showed positive correlation with tumor stage, grade, progression and therapeutic response. Besides altered terminal sialylation, fucosylation has also been reportedly associated with tumor formation [18]. Significantly increased fucose level and mRNA expression of a specific fucosyltransferase enzyme (FUT6) were reported in patients with oral cancer compared to controls [27]. In addition, these authors observed increased fucose level and more pronounced FUT6 mRNA expression in poorly differentiated and advanced stage tumors than in well-differentiated and early stage tumors. Meanwhile, others highlight the biomarker role of fucose in the grading of oral cancer [28], and revealed that increased fucosylation has a pivotal role in invasive and metastatic properties of head and neck cancer stem cells [29]. Although extensive glycomic studies are underway to understand the etiology [30], development and progression of oral cancers and to find potential biomarkers [31], the number of deeper N-glycan analyses is relatively low [32].
Recent developments in separation science have transformed the landscape of glycomics, enabling high-resolution structural characterization of N-glycans even from small tissue samples with high sensitivity [33]. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC), porous graphitized carbon liquid chromatography (PGC-LC), mass spectrometry (MS) and capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection (CE-LIF) have all contributed to a quantitative and structurally detailed understanding of glycosylation in biological specimens [34]. In particular, CE-LIF in combination with exoglycosidase enzyme digestions and computational tools for structural annotation provided an opportunity to map comprehensive glycan signatures associated with malignant transformation [35,36]. Most importantly, these profiling approaches can detect subtle changes in branching patterns, terminal modifications, and glycan microheterogeneity—features that are often critical for distinguishing between normal and malignant conditions.
In this paper, we introduce a novel characterization approach of N-glycan alterations intrinsic to OSCC and evaluate their predictive potential in oral oncology. It should also be noted that this is the first report using capillary electrophoresis-based glycan analysis to reveal the biomarker potential of cellular glycogen concentration changes in oral cancer.

2. Results

The goal of our exploratory study was to evaluate a novel capillary electrophoresis-based workflow to identify novel glycobiomarker candidates that support high-precision prognosis and provide efficient therapeutic alternatives for oral cancers. The developed workflow, shown in Figure 1, comprised automated homogenization of the collected soft tissue samples, N-glycan release, and fluorophore labeling, followed by CE-LIF-mediated glycoprofiling.
Using the above introduced workflow, first, the asparagine-linked carbohydrate profile of the healthy control samples were compared to the tissues obtained from the healthy and malignant gingival sides of the oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patient (Supplementary Table S1). Figure 2 shows the resulting electropherograms of a representative example. Twenty-two peaks were identified with >1% relative peak area in any of the three traces. Comparing the healthy control to the healthy gingival side, one can observe an increase (↑) in the area of peak 3↑, and a decrease (↓) of peaks 5↓, 8↓, 11↓, 18↓, 21↓, and 22↓. On the other hand, comparison of the healthy control trace to the malignant side sample revealed increased areas of peaks 4↑ and 20↑, but a decrease in peaks 2↓, 5↓, 6↓, 8↓, 10↓, 11↓, 13↓, 18↓, 21↓, and 22↓.
Comparing the healthy and malignant gingival sides of the OSCC patient samples, the following increasing and decreasing differences were observed: peaks 2↓, 3↓, 4↑, 6↓, 7↓, 10↓, 13↓, 19,↓ and 20↑. The structures corresponding to the numbered peaks were identified by using the GUcal ver 1.2 software (www.gucal.hu accessed on 23 November 2025), publicly available databases (Glycosmos.org), and exoglycosidase enzyme-mediated glycan sequencing. To assure precise annotation of the separated oligosaccharides, we used the latter for verification. Figure 3 depicts the sequencing traces after the administration of sialidase (trace B), sialidase and galactosidase (trace C), as well as sialidase, galactosidase, and hexosaminidase (trace D) enzymes. As one can observe, after the sialidase treatment (trace B), peaks 1, 5, 8, 9, and 11 shifted to 18, 15, 18, 19, and 21, respectively. After the combined treatment with sialidase and galactosidase (trace C), the two major peaks of 18 and 21 shifted to 10 and 13, respectively. The reaction mixture containing sialidase, galactosidase, and hexosaminidase (trace D) caused peak 10 to shift to peak 2, and peaks 13 to 23. Structural assignments of the numbered peaks are listed in Table 1.
Interestingly, peaks 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 13, 14, and 19 were not or were only partially affected by these three digesting enzymes. With the consideration of the possibility of the presence of glycogen fragments in the cells of the collected soft tissue samples, the control sample was treated with amyloglucosidase, as shown in Figure 4. The butterfly diagram clearly reveals the disappearance of the majority of these peaks, except for peak 13, in which instance approximately 1/3rd of the peak remained intact.
After careful statistical analysis of the data (Supplementary Table S2), besides two mostly glycogen related peaks (2 and 3), the N-glycan structures of F(6)A1[3]G(4)1S(6)1, A2B, F(6)A2, and F(6)A2G(4)2 out of the 22 identified oligosaccharides showed significant (p < 0.05) differences between the malignant tissue samples of OSCC patients and the healthy controls as depicted in Figure 5A. Comparing the healthy and the positive control oral mucosal samples, besides the glycogen peak (7), differences in the following N-glycan structures have been revealed: A2G(4)2S(6)1, F(6)A2G(4)2S(3)1 and F(6)A2, while only the F(6)A1[3]G(4)1S(6)1 glycan showed alteration between the N-glycan profiles of the malignant tumor and positive control samples.
We also evaluated the sialoform to neutral (SF/NF) (Figure 5B) and core-fucosylated (Figure 5C) to total N-glycan (TG) ratios (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4). In both instances, the malignant side of the OSCC patients (OSCC-T) samples showed an increasing tendency in comparison to the healthy gingival side (OSCC-C). Interestingly, the SF/NF and fucosylated/TG ratio values of the healthy control sample (C) were between the OSCC-C and OSCC-T levels.

3. Discussion

This work aimed to provide the complete workflow for the exploratory characterization and future large-scale studies of the N-glycosylation patterns associated with OSCC using capillary electrophoresis-based carbohydrate profiling. The carbohydrate structures of interest (relative peak area > 1%) were validated by exoglycosidase array-mediated oligosaccharide sequencing.

3.1. Mucosal Soft Tissue N-Glycosylation

The mostly biantennary type glycan structures identified in this study showed similarities to other reported works in serum, saliva and tissue samples [32,38,39]. Furthermore, the ratio of sialylated to neutral and fucosylated to total glycan structures showed an increasing trend in the tumor tissue, as is generally reported in malignant processes [27].

3.2. Glycogen Depletion

The rapid proliferation of tumors requires significant energy, so they quickly deplete cellular glycogen stores [40,41], as evidenced by the reduced glycogen levels in our data (Figure 4). Glycogen is a multi-branched oligosaccharide comprising α1-4 and α1-6 linked glucose molecules with an average chain length of approximately 8–12 units, serving as a form of energy storage in cells. Amyloglucosidase readily digests the building blocks of this oligosaccharide, but has higher specificity to the α1-4 linked ones; therefore, as a first approximation, we consider that the remaining peak portions after this digestion step contained a higher level of α1-6 linked glucose units. However, by all means, the major revelation of this phenomenon was that the different chain length glycogen oligomers were in the released N-linked glycan pool, labeled along with them by the fluorophore dye and subsequently detected during capillary electrophoresis analysis. Considering the above in view of the differential electrophoretic analysis shown in Figure 2, major changes were observed in the glycogen peaks (6, 10 and 13) in addition to the released N-linked sugars (3, 8, 18 and 21).

3.3. Study Limitations

Since this pilot study was performed on a limited number of samples, the results should be considered indicative rather than confirmatory. Continuation of this work, including a larger number of individually analyzed soft tissue samples amended with serum and saliva specimens, will be an important next step towards verifying the observed trends and elucidating their prospective biological significance.

3.4. Significance and Potential Benefits

Although our conclusions were drawn with caution, pointing out that future studies with larger cohorts and individual-level analyses will be required to validate and extend these observations, it is important to emphasize that this manuscript describes significant methodological achievements to help our peers in similar studies. The novel data generated by analyzing the soft tissue N-glycome in OSCC, even if somewhat limited, highlights the significance of the glycobiomarker discovery perspective of this new workflow. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of the use of CE-LIF-based carbohydrate analysis to investigate cellular glycogen changes as potential biomarkers in malignant diseases, plausibly benefiting similar studies where glycogenic changes were not considered. In medical point of view, our study helps to map the OSCC glycome, thus understanding the role of N-glycans and glycogens in the etiopathogenesis of OSCC as well as to identify early, non-invasive biomarkers.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals

Tetrahydrofuran (THF) and isopropyl alcohol (≥99.9%) were from VWR (Debrecen, Hungary). Acetic acid was from Molar Chemicals Kft. (Halasztelek, Hungary). The HPLC grade water, ammonium acetate solution (7.5 M), acetonitrile (≥99.5%), sodium-cyanoborohydride (1.0 M in THF) and trypsin (from bovine pancreas, ≥10,000 BAEE units/mg protein) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The PNGase F (2.7 mg/mL), neuraminidase (0.2 mg/mL), galactosidase (0.34 mg/mL) and hexosaminidase (0.14 mg/mL) enzymes were provided by the Bio-Nanosystems Laboratory ( University of Pannonia, Veszprem, Hungary). The acidic (0.1 M HCl) and basic (0.1 M NaOH) wash solutions, the carbohydrate separation gel-buffer (HR-NCHO), 1-Aminopyrene-3,6,8-trisulfonate (APTS) and glycan capture beads were from Bio-Science Kft (Budapest, Hungary).

4.2. Tissue Sample Collection

Oral mucosal soft tissue samples were collected from five OSCC patients at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry , University of Debrecen (Debrecen, Hungary) by incisional biopsy from the malignant and the healthy sides of the gingiva, and their N-glycome profiles were compared with those of age- and sex-matched healthy controls. All OSCC patients have the same histopathological diagnosis of the tumor. The healthy control samples were derived from seven patients (collected at the Department of Dentoalveolar Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Debrecen (Debrecen, Hungary)), who were sex/age-matched (p = 0.0796) with the OSCC patients (Figure 1, step 1) having no acute or chronic diseases. The samplings were done during elective tooth extraction (with prosthetic or orthodontic indications) in case of healthy volunteers, while in the OSCC patients during the dental resolution prior to oncotherapy under local anesthesia. The samples were collected with the appropriate Ethical Permissions (Clinical Center, Regional and Institutional Research Ethics Committee, University of Debrecen, Hungary) and Informed Patient Consent forms (DE RKEB/IKEB: 6152-2022). The data of the OSCC patients and the controls are summarized in Table 2.

4.3. Sample Preparation/Tissue Homogenization

Two milligrams of each tissue sample were homogenized by an automated tissue homogenizer (BeatBox, Tissue kit 96-wells, PreOmics, Munich, Germany). The homogenizer was run on the highest setting for 30 minutes (Figure 1, step 2). To verify the homogenization efficiency of the automated tissue homogenizer, blending was also performed using a manual Potter (Kontes Glass Co., 2 mL(witeg Labortechnik GmbH, Wertheim, Germany)). The weighed pieces of tissue samples were placed on the top of the Potter and, after adding 100 µL of HPLC grade water, homogenization was accomplished by moving the glass tube up and down in the ground glass pestle for about 3 minutes followed by centrifugation at 500× g for 2 minutes. Approximately 4 µL trypsin (40 mg/mL, in 1 mM HCl) was added to 80 µL supernatant and incubated overnight at 37 °C. The effectiveness of the high-throughput automated and manual sample preparation methods is compared in Figure 6, showing excellent similarity.

4.4. N-Glycan Release, Fluorophore Labeling and Sample Cleanup

A total of 80 µL ammonium acetate buffer (20 mM, pH 6.97) and 2 µL PNGase F enzyme (1.3 mg/mL) were added to the denatured samples to release the asparagine-linked glycans and incubated at 37 °C for 2 hours (Figure 1, step 3). APTS was used as a fluorophore and linked to the removed N-glycans by reductive amination. The reaction mixture contained 8 µL of THF, 7 µL of acetic acid, 3 µL of water, 2 µL of sodium-cyanoborohydride (1.0 M in THF) and 1 µL of 120 mM APTS were added to 40 µL of each sample (Figure 1, step 4). The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 16 hours with an open cap, using our earlier published evaporative labeling protocol [42]. During the excess APTS removal step, the glycan capture magnetic bead storage liquid was replaced with HPLC water. 20 µL bead suspension was added to the dry labeled samples, followed by the addition of 185 µL of ACN. The tube containing the mixture was placed on a magnetic stand where the magnet collected the beads to one spot, allowing for the supernatant removal. A total of 20 µL of HPLC water was then added to the beads and carefully homogenized. This ACN purification step was repeated three times, and after the last ACN removal, 100 µL of water was added to release the purified APTS-labeled glycans.

4.5. Capillary Electrophoresis with Laser Induced Fluorescence Detection (CE-LIF)

The APTS-labeled glycans were analyzed with the CE-LIF separation method. It was accomplished in a PA 800 Plus CE Analysis System (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) equipped with laser-induced fluorescence detection (LIF, 488 nm excitation wavelength and 520 nm emission filter) (Figure 1, step 5). A bare fused silica capillary (50 µm ID) was used with 20 cm effective length (30 cm total) and was conditioned by rinsing with HPLC-grade water for 2 min, 50% IPA (in 0.5 N HCl) for 5 min, 0.5 N NaOH for 2 min, 0.5 N HCl for 2 min, then filled with the HR-NCHO gel-buffer system. Before the sample injection a water plug was injected by applying 5 psi pressure for 5 sec, then the electrokinetic sample injection was performed with 2 kV for 2 sec in reversed polarity separation mode. The separation process was completed in HR-NCHO gel buffer at 20 °C with 30 kV applied electric potential in reversed polarity mode. All measurements were performed in triplicate, with migration time and peak area %RSD values of <1% and <5%, respectively. The generated data was collected and processed by the 32Karat software (10.1 version, Beckman Coulter).

4.6. Exoglycosidase-Mediated Carbohydrate Sequencing

For higher precision structural elucidation, the released and APTS-labeled glycans from the control sample were treated with an exoglycosidase enzyme array. Sequencing was carried out by the following consecutive steps using 3 × 10 µL of sample: (1) 46.2 µL HPLC water and 3.8 µL neuraminidase was added to the first aliquot; (2) 44.0 µL HPLC water, 3.8 µL neuraminidase and 2.2 µL galactosidase were added to the second aliquot, (3) 32.0 µL HPLC water, 3.8 µL neuraminidase, 2.2 µL galactosidase and 12.0 µL hexosaminidase were added to the third aliquot. The three reaction mixtures were incubated overnight at 37 °C and analyzed by CE-LIF.
To identify the peaks not shifted by the exoglycosidase array treatment in their migration time, amyloglucosidase enzyme was applied. To prepare the enzyme for digestion, the 2.0 mg amyloglucosidase was dissolved in 308 µL of ammonium acetate buffer (pH = 4.5). A total of 20 µL enzyme solution was added to 40 µL sample and incubated at 60 °C for 2 hours, then the amyloglucosidase was inactivated by incubating the reaction mixture at 90 °C for 5 minutes prior to the analysis by CE-LIF.

4.7. Statistical Analysis

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to analyze the distribution of the data. In case of non-normal distribution, we applied the Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests to compare two groups, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

5. Conclusions

The high-resolution glycoanalytical approach reported in this paper proved to be an efficient and sensitive workflow for glycobiomarker-based molecular diagnostics of oral malignant lesions by using the automated tissue homogenizer in combination with high-performance capillary electrophoresis analysis of the released and fluorophore-labeled N-linked glycans. Our work was based on homogeneous samples (derived from the same locus with the same histological type), but it is possible to expand to other localizations and serum or saliva for early non-invasive predictive marker discovery.
It is important to note that all results are now presented descriptively, reflecting the low number of samples, and this paper is thus considered as an exploratory characterization study. However, these preliminary results suggest that the developed workflow will allow high-throughput screening of large patient cohorts to discover and validate novel cancer-related glycobiomarkers for accurate prognosis. Future studies with individual-level data and more detailed clinical characterization are planned accordingly to further investigate these preliminary observations and clarify their biological relevance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms27020740/s1.

Author Contributions

E.G. and A.S. collected the human tissue samples, K.H. performed sample preparation, CE-LIF performed N-glycosylation profiling and sequencing , as well as raw data evaluation. E.G. designed the study, analyzed the clinical data, and prepared the statistical analysis; E.G. and A.G. wrote the manuscript; A.G. reviewed and finalized the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the University of Debrecen Program for Scientific Publications #PTP2025.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki with the Ethical Permission document of DE RKEB/IKEB: 6152-2022.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed patient consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The kind support of the Department of Dentoalveolar Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Debrecen and PreOmics is greatly appreciated. This is contribution #202 of the Horváth Csaba Memorial Laboratory of Bio-separation Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
APTS1-Aminopyrene-3,6,8-trisulfonate
ACNAcetonitrile
BAEENα-benzoyl-L-arginine ethyl ester
CE-LIFCapillary electrophoresis with laser induced fluorescence detection
FUT6Fucosyltransferase enzyme
HILIC Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography
HPLCHigh-performance liquid chromatography
HPVHuman papilloma virus
HR-NCHOHigh-resolution N-linked carbohydrate separation buffer
ITNIntratracheal narcosis
MSMass spectrometry
OP-SCCOropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
OSCCOral squamous cell carcinoma
OSCC-COral squamous cell carcinoma-control
OSCC-TOral squamous cell carcinoma-tumor
PGC-LCPorous graphitized carbon liquid chromatography
PNGase FPeptide N-Glycosidase F enzime
SF/NF Sialoform to neutral carbohydrate ratio
SOHD Supraomohyoid neck dissection
TGTotal N-glycan
THFTetrahydrofuran

References

  1. Ren, Z.H.; Hu, C.Y.; He, H.R.; Li, Y.J.; Lyu, J. Global and regional burdens of oral cancer from 1990 to 2017: Results from the global burden of disease study. Cancer Commun. 2020, 40, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chamoli, A.; Gosavi, A.S.; Shirwadkar, U.P.; Wangdale, K.V.; Behera, S.K.; Kurrey, N.K.; Kalia, K.; Mandoli, A. Overview of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: Risk factors, mechanisms, and diagnostics. Oral. Oncol. 2021, 121, 105451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nemes, J.A.; Redl, P.; Boda, R.; Kiss, C.; Márton, I.J. Oral cancer report from Northeastern Hungary. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2008, 14, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chi, A.C.; Day, T.A.; Neville, B.W. Oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma—An update. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2015, 65, 401–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Almangush, A.; Mäkitie, A.A.; Triantafyllou, A.; de Bree, R.; Strojan, P.; Rinaldo, A.; Hernandez-Prera, J.C.; Suárez, C.; Kowalski, L.P.; Ferlito, A.; et al. Staging and grading of oral squamous cell carcinoma: An update. Oral. Oncol. 2020, 107, 104799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Madani, A.H.; Dikshit, M.; Bhaduri, D. Risk for oral cancer associated to smoking, smokeless and oral dip products. Indian J. Public Health 2012, 56, 57–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Argiris, A.; Karamouzis, M.V.; Raben, D.; Ferris, R.L. Head and neck cancer. Lancet 2008, 371, 1695–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Johnson, D.E.; Burtness, B.; Leemans, C.R.; Lui, V.W.Y.; Bauman, J.E.; Grandis, J.R. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2020, 6, 92, Erratum in Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2023, 9, 4.. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yakob, M.; Fuentes, L.; Wang, M.B.; Abemayor, E.; Wong, D.T. Salivary biomarkers for detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma—Current state and recent advances. Curr. Oral Health Rep. 2014, 1, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Cheng, Y.S.; Rees, T.; Wright, J. A review of research on salivary biomarkers for oral cancer detection. Clin. Transl. Med. 2014, 3, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pillai, J.; Chincholkar, T.; Dixit, R.; Pandey, M. A systematic review of proteomic biomarkers in oral squamous cell cancer. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2021, 19, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Shah, M.H.; Telang, S.D.; Shah, P.M.; Patel, P.S. Tissue and serum alpha 2-3- and alpha 2-6-linkage specific sialylation changes in oral carcinogenesis. Glycoconj. J. 2008, 25, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Csősz, É.; Lábiscsák, P.; Kalló, G.; Márkus, B.; Emri, M.; Szabó, A.; Tar, I.; Tőzsér, J.; Kiss, C.; Márton, I. Proteomics investigation of OSCC-specific salivary biomarkers in a Hungarian population highlights the importance of identification of population-tailored biomarkers. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chang, S.C.; Lin, W.L.; Chang, Y.F.; Lee, C.T.; Wu, J.S.; Hsu, P.H.; Chang, C.F. Glycoproteomic identification of novel plasma biomarkers for oral cancer. J. Food Drug Anal. 2019, 27, 483–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ishikawa, S.; Sugimoto, M.; Kitabatake, K.; Sugano, A.; Nakamura, M.; Kaneko, M.; Ota, S.; Hiwatari, K.; Enomoto, A.; Soga, T.; et al. Identification of salivary metabolomic biomarkers for oral cancer screening. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sanjay, P.R.; Hallikeri, K.; Shivashankara, A.R. Evaluation of salivary sialic acid, total protein, and total sugar in oral cancer: A preliminary report. Indian J. Dent. Res. Off. Publ. Indian Soc. Dent. Res. 2008, 19, 288–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, Y.T.; Chong, Y.M.; Cheng, C.W.; Ho, C.L.; Tsai, H.W.; Kasten, F.H.; Chen, Y.L.; Chang, C.F. Identification of novel tumor markers for oral squamous cell carcinoma using glycoproteomic analysis. Clin. Chim. Acta 2013, 420, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, J.T.; Chen, C.H.; Ku, K.L.; Hsiao, M.; Chiang, C.P.; Hsu, T.L.; Chen, M.H.; Wong, C.H. Glycoprotein B7-H3 overexpression and aberrant glycosylation in oral cancer and immune response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 13057–13062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gebri, E.; Kovács, Z.; Mészáros, B.; Tóth, F.; Simon, Á.; Jankovics, H.; Vonderviszt, F.; Kiss, A.; Guttman, A.; Hortobágyi, T. N-Glycosylation Alteration of Serum and Salivary Immunoglobulin a Is a Possible Biomarker in Oral Mucositis. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Joshi, M.; Patil, R. Estimation and comparative study of serum total sialic acid levels as tumor markers in oral cancer and precancer. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2010, 6, 263–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sawhney, H.; Kumar, C.A. Correlation of serum biomarkers (TSA & LSA) and epithelial dysplasia in early diagnosis of oral precancer and oral cancer. Cancer Biomark. Sect. A Dis. Markers 2011, 10, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Raval, G.N.; Patel, D.D.; Parekh, L.J.; Patel, J.B.; Shah, M.H.; Patel, P.S. Evaluation of serum sialic acid, sialyltransferase and sialoproteins in oral cavity cancer. Oral Dis. 2003, 9, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vajaria, B.N.; Patel, K.A.; Patel, P.S. Role of aberrant glycosylation enzymes in oral cancer progression. J. Carcinog. 2018, 17, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dadhich, M.; Prabhu, V.; Pai, V.R.; D’Souza, J.; Harish, S.; Jose, M. Serum and salivary sialic acid as a biomarker in oral potentially malignant disorders and oral cancer. Indian J. Cancer 2014, 51, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dhakar, N.; Astekar, M.; Jain, M.; Saawarn, S.; Saawarn, N. Total sialic acid, total protein and total sugar levels in serum and saliva of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients: A case control study. Dent. Res. J. 2013, 10, 343–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rasool, M.; Khan, S.R.; Malik, A.; Khan, K.M.; Zahid, S.; Manan, A.; Qazi, M.H.; Naseer, M.I. Comparative Studies of Salivary and Blood Sialic Acid, Lipid Peroxidation and Antioxidative Status in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC). Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2014, 30, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Raghvani Jashvanti, M.; Vajaria Bhairavi, N.; Patel Prabhudas, S. Significance of Glycosylation Changes in Oral Cancer. Gujarat Cancer Soc. Res. J. 2015, 17, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kumar, S.; Saxena, M.; Srinivas, K.; Singh, V.K. Fucose: A biomarker in grading of oral cancer. Natl. J. Maxillofac. Surg. 2015, 6, 176–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Desiderio, V.; Papagerakis, P.; Tirino, V.; Zheng, L.; Matossian, M.; Prince, M.E.; Paino, F.; Mele, L.; Papaccio, F.; Montella, R.; et al. Increased fucosylation has a pivotal role in invasive and metastatic properties of head and neck cancer stem cells. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Varelas, X.; Bouchie, M.P.; Kukuruzinska, M.A. Protein N-glycosylation in oral cancer: Dysregulated cellular networks among DPAGT1, E-cadherin adhesion and canonical Wnt signaling. Glycobiology 2014, 24, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Reis, C.A.; Osorio, H.; Silva, L.; Gomes, C.; David, L. Alterations in glycosylation as biomarkers for cancer detection. J. Clin. Pathol. 2010, 63, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sinevici, N.; Mittermayr, S.; Davey, G.P.; Bones, J.; O’Sullivan, J. Salivary N-glycosylation as a biomarker of oral cancer: A pilot study. Glycobiology 2019, 29, 726–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Donczo, B.; Szarka, M.; Tovari, J.; Ostoros, G.; Csanky, E.; Guttman, A. Molecular glycopathology by capillary electrophoresis: Analysis of the N-glycome of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded mouse tissue samples. Electrophoresis 2017, 38, 1602–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. El Rassi, Z. (Ed.) Carbohydrate Analysis by Modern Liquid Phase Separation Techniques, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  35. Vathy-Fogarassy, A.; Gombas, V.; Torok, R.; Jarvas, G.; Guttman, A. Improved analytical workflow towards machine learning supported N-glycomics-based biomarker discovery. Talanta 2025, 295, 128389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Abrahams, J.L.; Taherzadeh, G.; Jarvas, G.; Guttman, A.; Zhou, Y.; Campbell, M.P. Recent advances in glycoinformatic platforms for glycomics and glycoproteomics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2020, 62, 56–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Harvey, D.J.; Merry, A.H.; Royle, L.; Campbell, M.P.; Dwek, R.A.; Rudd, P.M. Proposal for a standard system for drawing structural diagrams of N- and O-linked carbohydrates and related compounds. Proteomics 2009, 9, 3796–3801, Erratum in Proteomics 2009, 9, 5002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guu, S.Y.; Lin, T.H.; Chang, S.C.; Wang, R.J.; Hung, L.Y.; Fang, P.J.; Tang, W.C.; Yu, P.; Chang, C.F. Serum N-glycome characterization and anti-carbohydrate antibody profiling in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0178927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Carnielli, C.M.; Melo de Lima Morais, T.; Malta de Sá Patroni, F.; Prado Ribeiro, A.C.; Brandão, T.B.; Sobroza, E.; Matos, L.L.; Kowalski, L.P.; Paes Leme, A.F.; Kawahara, R.; et al. Comprehensive Glycoprofiling of Oral Tumors Associates N-Glycosylation With Lymph Node Metastasis and Patient Survival. Mol. Cell. Proteom. MCP 2023, 22, 100586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aizawa, H.; Yamada, S.I.; Xiao, T.; Shimane, T.; Hayashi, K.; Qi, F.; Tanaka, H.; Kurita, H. Difference in glycogen metabolism (glycogen synthesis and glycolysis) between normal and dysplastic/malignant oral epithelium. Arch. Oral Biol. 2017, 83, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nie, H.; Hu, X.; Xiong, H.; Zeng, L.; Chen, W.; Su, T. Change and pathological significance of glycogen content in oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral submucous fibrosis. Tissue Cell 2024, 87, 102337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Reider, B.; Szigeti, M.; Guttman, A. Evaporative fluorophore labeling of carbohydrates via reductive amination. Talanta 2018, 185, 365–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The glycoanalytical workflow includes soft tissue sample collection (step 1), automated tissue homogenization (step 2), N-glycan release (step 3), fluorophore labeling (step 4) and capillary electrophoresis separation with laser-induced fluorescence detection (step 5).
Figure 1. The glycoanalytical workflow includes soft tissue sample collection (step 1), automated tissue homogenization (step 2), N-glycan release (step 3), fluorophore labeling (step 4) and capillary electrophoresis separation with laser-induced fluorescence detection (step 5).
Ijms 27 00740 g001
Figure 2. Comparative capillary electrophoresis analysis of the representative carbohydrate profiles (including N-linked glycans and glycogens) of the healthy control (trace A, ST-1, C5), as well as the healthy (trace B, ST-1, OSCC-C2) and malignant (trace C, ST-1, OSCC-T2) gingival sides of an oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patient. The glycan structures corresponding to the numbered peaks are listed in Table 1. Conditions: Separation capillary: 20 cm effective length BFS (30 cm total, 50 μm i.d./365 μm o.d.) filled with HR-NCHO gel buffer; Applied electric potential: 30 kV in reversed polarity mode; Separation temperature: 25 °C; Injection: water plug: 5 psi/5 s followed by the sample: 2 kV/2 s.
Figure 2. Comparative capillary electrophoresis analysis of the representative carbohydrate profiles (including N-linked glycans and glycogens) of the healthy control (trace A, ST-1, C5), as well as the healthy (trace B, ST-1, OSCC-C2) and malignant (trace C, ST-1, OSCC-T2) gingival sides of an oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patient. The glycan structures corresponding to the numbered peaks are listed in Table 1. Conditions: Separation capillary: 20 cm effective length BFS (30 cm total, 50 μm i.d./365 μm o.d.) filled with HR-NCHO gel buffer; Applied electric potential: 30 kV in reversed polarity mode; Separation temperature: 25 °C; Injection: water plug: 5 psi/5 s followed by the sample: 2 kV/2 s.
Ijms 27 00740 g002
Figure 3. Exoglycosidase array-based carbohydrate sequencing for high precision structural identification. Traces: (A) control (ST-1, C5); (B) sialidase; (C) sialidase + galactosidase; (D) sialidase + galactosidase + hexosaminidase. The arrows highlight examples of digestion mediated consecutive structural changes. Peak assignment is depicted in Table 1. Conditions were the same as in Figure 2.
Figure 3. Exoglycosidase array-based carbohydrate sequencing for high precision structural identification. Traces: (A) control (ST-1, C5); (B) sialidase; (C) sialidase + galactosidase; (D) sialidase + galactosidase + hexosaminidase. The arrows highlight examples of digestion mediated consecutive structural changes. Peak assignment is depicted in Table 1. Conditions were the same as in Figure 2.
Ijms 27 00740 g003
Figure 4. Effect of the amyloglucosidase treatment on the glycans derived from the sample of a representative healthy control patient. (A) control; (B) digested sample. Peak assignment is depicted in Table 1. The dotted lines guide the eye for the depletion of the glycogen content of the peaks. Conditions were the same as in Figure 2.
Figure 4. Effect of the amyloglucosidase treatment on the glycans derived from the sample of a representative healthy control patient. (A) control; (B) digested sample. Peak assignment is depicted in Table 1. The dotted lines guide the eye for the depletion of the glycogen content of the peaks. Conditions were the same as in Figure 2.
Ijms 27 00740 g004
Figure 5. Descriptive visual summary of the (A) significantly changed carbohydrate structures (N-glycans and glycogens) in the three examined groups: OSCC-T: malignant tumor sides of the oral squamous cell carcinoma patients; OSCC-C: healthy gingival sides of the oral squamous cell carcinoma patients; C: healthy controls. (B) The sialoform to neutral (SF/NF) carbohydrate ratio (%) in the three examined groups; (C) The ratio of core-fucosylated structures to the total N-glycosylation in the three examined groups. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 5. Descriptive visual summary of the (A) significantly changed carbohydrate structures (N-glycans and glycogens) in the three examined groups: OSCC-T: malignant tumor sides of the oral squamous cell carcinoma patients; OSCC-C: healthy gingival sides of the oral squamous cell carcinoma patients; C: healthy controls. (B) The sialoform to neutral (SF/NF) carbohydrate ratio (%) in the three examined groups; (C) The ratio of core-fucosylated structures to the total N-glycosylation in the three examined groups. (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Ijms 27 00740 g005
Figure 6. Comparison of the automated (A, BeatBox) and manual (B, Potter) tissue homogenization techniques.
Figure 6. Comparison of the automated (A, BeatBox) and manual (B, Potter) tissue homogenization techniques.
Ijms 27 00740 g006
Table 1. Identified carbohydrate structures in Figure 2. Please note that Peaks 2, 10, 13, and 19 encompassed co-migrating glycogen oligosaccharides. The structural interpretation followed the notation of Harvey et al. [37].
Table 1. Identified carbohydrate structures in Figure 2. Please note that Peaks 2, 10, 13, and 19 encompassed co-migrating glycogen oligosaccharides. The structural interpretation followed the notation of Harvey et al. [37].
Peak IDSuggested Structures
(Oxford Notation Name)
Suggested Structures (Oxford Notation)
1A2G(4)2S(3,6)2Ijms 27 00740 i001
2M3 + GlycogenIjms 27 00740 i002
3Glycogen
4F(6)A1[3]G(4)1S(6)1Ijms 27 00740 i003
5A2[6]G(4)1S(6)1Ijms 27 00740 i004
6Glycogen
7Glycogen
8A2G(4)2S(6)1Ijms 27 00740 i005
9A2BG(4)2S(3)1Ijms 27 00740 i006
10A2 + GlycogenIjms 27 00740 i007
11F(6)A2G(4)2S(3)1Ijms 27 00740 i008
12A2BIjms 27 00740 i009
13F(6)A2 + GlycogenIjms 27 00740 i010
14Glycogen
15A2[6]BG(4)1Ijms 27 00740 i011
16A2[3]BG(4)1Ijms 27 00740 i012
17F(6)A2BIjms 27 00740 i013
18A2G(4)2Ijms 27 00740 i014
19A2BG(4)2 + GlycogenIjms 27 00740 i015
20F(6)A2[3]BG(4)1Ijms 27 00740 i016
21F(6)A2G(4)2Ijms 27 00740 i017
22F(6)A2BG(4)2Ijms 27 00740 i018
23F(6)M3Ijms 27 00740 i019
Table 2. Patient characteristics.
Table 2. Patient characteristics.
PatientsNumber of
Patients
Average Age (Years)Male/Female RatioLocalizationMetastasisHistologyTreatment
OSCC558.87 ± 10.374/1C1 tongueNegativecc. planocellulare dyskeratosum G2SOHD, hemiglossectomy, radio-chemotherapy
C2 tongue and floor of the mouthNegativecc. planocellulare keratosum G1SOHD, tumor excision, mandibular block resection, forearm flap reconstruction
C3 radix linguaePositivecc. planocellulare keratosum G3SOHD, radio-chemotherapy
C4 tonguePositivecc. planocellulare keratosum G1SOHD, mandibulotomy, radio-chemotherapy
C5 tongueNegativecc. planocellulare dyskeratosum G3SOHD, hemiglossectomy
Control750.86 ± 3.24/3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gebri, E.; Hogyor, K.; Szabo, A.; Guttman, A. Analysis of Soft Tissue N-Glycome Profiles in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma, a Pilot Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020740

AMA Style

Gebri E, Hogyor K, Szabo A, Guttman A. Analysis of Soft Tissue N-Glycome Profiles in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma, a Pilot Study. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(2):740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020740

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gebri, Eniko, Kinga Hogyor, Adrienne Szabo, and Andras Guttman. 2026. "Analysis of Soft Tissue N-Glycome Profiles in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma, a Pilot Study" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 2: 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020740

APA Style

Gebri, E., Hogyor, K., Szabo, A., & Guttman, A. (2026). Analysis of Soft Tissue N-Glycome Profiles in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma, a Pilot Study. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(2), 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020740

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop