Next Article in Journal
Prolonged QT Interval in HIV-1 Infected Humanized Mice Treated Chronically with Dolutegravir/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Emtricitabine
Previous Article in Journal
Water-Dispersible Supramolecular Nanoparticles Formed by Dicarboxyl-bis-pillar[5]arene/CTAB Host–Guest Interaction as an Efficient Delivery System of Quercetin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of the Mechanism of Wood Vinegar and Butyrolactone Promoting Rapeseed Growth and Improving Low-Temperature Stress Resistance Based on Transcriptome and Metabolomics
error_outline You can access the new MDPI.com website here. Explore and share your feedback with us.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue: “Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Biostimulants”

by
Michael Moustakas
1 and
Julietta Moustaka
1,2,*
1
Department of Botany, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Department of Food Science, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(1), 517; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010517
Submission received: 27 December 2025 / Accepted: 1 January 2026 / Published: 4 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Biostimulants)
Among the current methodologies proposed to increase plant resistance to abiotic stresses, the utilization of plant biostimulants in crop production stands out [1,2,3,4]. Plant biostimulants constitute an emerging class of agricultural inputs that aim to improve nutrient acquisition and increase crop quality and yield, while protecting the crops from abiotic stresses [5,6,7]. The main categories of biostimulants are protein hydrolysates, humic substances, seaweed and plant extracts, inorganic compounds, chitosan and biopolymers, and, lastly, microbial inoculants [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
Today, biostimulants have become instrumental in the move towards sustainable agricultural approaches. Recent regulatory efforts, principally by the European Union with regulation 2019/1009, have helped in promoting their use in agriculture but uncertainties remain concerning their differentiation from fertilizers and plant protection products, and the evaluation of their effects is constrained by agronomic variability and the absence of standardized methodologies [18,19,20,21]. Moreover, the guiding background for biostimulants remains fragmented, which is a noteworthy obstacle to their universal acceptance [20]. Biostimulants, as mentioned above, encompass a broad range of products which complicates the efforts to establish standards that can homogenously be applied through all the types [22].
Today, there is a need to improve the current crop productivity to meet the increasing food demands [23,24,25]. The optimization of biostimulant utilization has great potential in an innovative and sustainable agriculture context, providing benefits to plant growth and health through increases in nutrient uptake, photosynthesis and secondary metabolism, conferring plant tolerance to environmental stresses [26,27,28,29].
To maximize the benefits of biostimulants, formulations must be tailored to the specific needs and growth circumstances of each crop species [20]. This level of customization necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the complex interactions between biostimulants and the distinct biochemical pathways of different crop species [20], thus elucidating their unique mode of actions. Achieving this understanding requires extensive research to systematically elucidate these interactions, thereby ensuring that biostimulant applications effectively and efficiently enhance plant health and productivity [30].
Confirmation from numerous studies reveals the benefits of biostimulants throughout crops [31]. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are emerging as novel approaches of biostimulants for improving crop quality and yield and also enhancing photosynthesis and environmental stress tolerance by activating genes responsible for antioxidant defense system [32,33,34,35]. Microbial biostimulants trigger plant growth through solubilization of minerals and boosting nutrient uptake, production of phytohormones, secondary metabolites, enzymes, volatile organic and inorganic compounds, carbohydrates, terpenoids, lipopolysaccharides, and photosynthetic capacity [34,36].
Low-temperature stress affects crop growth, development, yield, and quality of many crops [37], and, among others, the important oil crop, rapeseed. Zhu et al. [38] reported that the application of wood vinegar or butyrolactone (γ-Butyrolactone, one of the main components of wood vinegar) to rapeseed at the seedling stage promoted the growth and enhanced the low-temperature resistance by improving biomass, chlorophyll content, and soluble sugars, while also reducing membrane lipid oxidation. By using transcriptome and metabolomics analysis they revealed that wood vinegar improved growth through amino acid biosynthesis pathways and enhanced low-temperature tolerance via proline metabolism. Butyrolactone promoted growth through amino acid biosynthesis and improved low-temperature resistance by activating sphingolipid metabolism. The authors suggested the use of wood vinegar and butyrolactone as a new approach to increase rapeseed yield under low-temperature stress [38].
Metal-based nanoparticles (NPs) have shown to be suitable as fertilizers, enhancing crop productivity and reducing plant disease. It was proposed that they can be used as nanofertilizers, nanopesticides, or growth stimulators, since they pose a lesser risk of environmental contamination than the conventional agrochemicals [39,40] and, recently, new formulations based on nanotechnology are being explored for plant biostimulants [19,41]. In recent years, among the tested NPs, calcium hydroxide nanoparticles [Ca(OH)2 NPs] have attracted significant interest for their ability to impact plant photosynthesis and boost agricultural productivity [39]. Tryfon et al. [42] synthesized oleylamine-coated calcium hydroxide nanoparticles [Ca(OH)2@OAmNPs] and concluded that they can be used as photosynthetic biostimulants to enhance crop yield. The synthesized nontoxic Ca(OH)2@OAmNPs effectively regulated the non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) mechanism that resulted in a controlled increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation that induced a hormetic response of photosystem II (PSII) function. A controlled increase in ROS triggers acclimation signaling for the regulation of a variety of physiological functions, including plant function and development [43]. The high anti-bacterial and anti-fungal efficacy of Ca(OH)2 NPs is mediated through a controlled increase in ROS [44]. Low levels of ROS exert beneficial action and are considered as hormetic molecules [45,46].
Iron (Fe), despite being the fourth-most abundant element in the Earth’s crust, has poor solubility under basic pH conditions commonly found in calcareous soils, making Fe deficiency a major agricultural issue worldwide [47]. Beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, and/or yeast) play a fundamental role in improving plant nutrition and in activating local and systemic responses to biotic and abiotic stresses [3,4,48,49,50,51]. Sevillano-Caño et al. [52] reported that the yeast Debaryomyces hansenii can function as a biofertilizer in iron-deficient soils by enhancing plant nutrition and stimulating growth. It achieves this by promoting root hair development, which are crucial for nutrient absorption, particularly under iron-deficient conditions. The activation of plant mechanisms to acquire more iron is achieved by increasing ferric reductase activity and the expression of iron-acquisition genes like FRO1 and IRT1. Additionally, D. hansenii may also induce systemic resistance in plants and improve the overall crop production sustainability [52]. It is suggested that the use of D. hansenii as a biofertilizer offers a sustainable alternative to conventional chemical fertilizers, which can have negative environmental impacts [52].
The increased demands to feed a world population of 9.77 billion people by 2050 [53] will require more than 60% further increases in food production [54]. Noel et al. [54], by using radiocarbon flux analysis in soybean plants, show that wood vinegar (pyroligneous acid) enhanced plant growth by stimulating the biosynthesis of chlorophylls a, b, and β-carotene, which resulted to improved photosynthesis and biomass production and up 40% higher crop yield.
Salinization occurs in a wide range of climates being more prominent in arid and semi-arid regions [55]. In irrigated cropland owing to human activities, a “secondary” salinization becomes more severe, due to the progressive accumulation in the soil of toxic ions dissolved in the irrigation water [56]. This accumulation of soluble salts in the soil is one of the principal reasons for the low productivity of many essential crops [57]. Zuzunaga-Rosas et al. [56], in a review article, summarized the beneficial role of agroindustrial by-products (like seeds, husks, biomass and fruits) as sources for biostimulants, in boosting horticultural crops’ tolerance to abiotic stresses including salinity, by improving nutrient uptake, photosynthesis, and antioxidant defense, while regulating osmotic homeostasis. These waste-derived stimulants, especially protein hydrolysates, enhance growth, yield, and quality by activating stress-responsive genes, controlling ion transport, and osmoprotection, offering a sustainable solution to climate change impacts in agriculture [56].
This review elucidates the capacity of biostimulants to mitigate the adverse effects of biotic and abiotic stresses, improve nutrient use efficiency, and strengthen the resilience of agricultural systems. By critically examining recent advancements and proposing policy development, and field-level implementation, the review emphasizes the necessity of advancing biostimulant science to fully harness its potential in driving the transition toward sustainable agriculture.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M. and J.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M. and J.M.; writing—review and editing, M.M. and J.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We extend our sincere gratitude to the authors, peer reviewers, and editorial team whose contributions have made this Special Issue possible. Together, their work reflects both the depth of scientific inquiry and the collaborative effort required to address one of the most important agricultural challenges of our time.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nephali, L.; Piater, L.A.; Dubery, I.A.; Patterson, V.; Huyser, J.; Burgess, K.; Tugizimana, F. Biostimulants for plant growth and mitigation of abiotic stresses: A metabolomics perspective. Metabolites 2020, 10, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Del Buono, D. Can biostimulants be used to mitigate the effect of anthropogenic climate change on agriculture? It is time to respond. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 751, 141763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ma, Y.; Freitas, H.; Dias, M.C. Strategies and prospects for biostimulants to alleviate abiotic stress in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1024243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Monteiro, E.; Gonçalves, B.; Cortez, I.; Castro, I. The role of biostimulants as alleviators of biotic and abiotic stresses in grapevine: A review. Plants 2022, 11, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Drobek, M.; Frąc, M.; Cybulska, J. Plant biostimulants: Importance of the quality and yield of horticultural crops and the improvement of plant tolerance to abiotic stress—A review. Agronomy 2019, 9, 335, Correction in Agronomy 2020, 10, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kisvarga, S.; Farkas, D.; Boronkay, G.; Neményi, A.; Orlóci, L. Effects of biostimulants in horticulture, with emphasis on ornamental plant production. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Loeza-Lara, P.; Jiménez-Mejía, R.; Santoyo, G. The effect of biostimulants on horticultural crops. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bartucca, M.L.; Cerri, M.; Del Buono, D.; Forni, C. Use of biostimulants as a new approach for the improvement of phytoremediation performance—A review. Plants 2022, 11, 1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rouphael, Y.; Colla, G. Editorial: Biostimulants in agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kumari, M.; Swarupa, P.; Kesari, K.K.; Kumar, A. Microbial inoculants as plant biostimulants: A review on risk status. Life 2022, 13, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H. The application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as microbial biostimulant, sustainable approaches in modern agriculture. Plants 2023, 12, 3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ashour, M.; Hassan, S.M.; Elshobary, M.E.; Ammar, G.A.G.; Gaber, A.; Alsanie, W.F.; Mansour, A.T.; El-Shenody, R. Impact of commercial seaweed liquid extract (TAM®) biostimulant and its bioactive molecules on growth and antioxidant activities of hot pepper (Capsicum annuum). Plants 2021, 10, 1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. du Jardin, P.; Brown, P.H.; DeJong, T.M.; Cassán, F.; Ferrante, A.; Fotopoulos, V.; Manganaris, G.A.; Carillo, P. Unlocking the black box of plant biostimulants. Sci. Hortic. 2025, 350, 114281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Michalak, I.; Chojnacka, K.; Saeid, A. Plant growth biostimulants, dietary feed supplements and cosmetics formulated with supercritical CO2 algal extracts. Molecules 2017, 22, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Prisa, D.; Fresco, R.; Jamal, A.; Saeed, M.F.; Spagnuolo, D. Exploring the potential of macroalgae for sustainable crop production in agriculture. Life 2024, 14, 1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Rady, M.M.; Elkelish, A.; Nady, N.M.; Kusvuran, S.; Kusvuran, A.; Shaaban, A.; Alhaithloul, H.A.S.; Ali, M.A.M.; Abu-Elsaoud, A.M.; François, T.; et al. Role of seed priming using natural biostimulants in reducing salt stress effects by reshaping physio-biochemical and antioxidant defense systems in glycine max seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1630537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, J.; Forghieri, G.; Geelen, D.; du Jardin, P.; Brown, P.H. The optimization of crop response to climatic stress through modulation of plant stress response mechanisms. Opportunities for biostimulants and plant hormones to meet climate challenges. New Phytol. 2026, 249, 130–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mannino, G. Plant-biostimulants interaction: Scientific trends, markets dynamics, and real-world implication. J. Plant Interact. 2025, 20, 2572668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Carillo, P.; Avice, J.-C.; Vasconcelos, M.W.; du Jardin, P.; Brown, P.H. Biostimulants in agriculture: Editorial. Physiol. Plant. 2025, 177, e70046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Khoulati, A.; Ouahhoud, S.; Taibi, M.; Ezrari, S.; Mamri, S.; Merah, O.; Hakkou, A.; Addi, M.; Maleb, A.; Saalaoui, E. Harnessing biostimulants for sustainable agriculture: Innovations, challenges, and future prospects. Discov. Agric. 2025, 3, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. du Jardin, P. Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 196, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mannino, G. A new era of sustainability: Plant biostimulants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhao, C.; Liu, B.; Piao, S.; Wang, X.; Lobell, D.B.; Huang, Y.; Huang, M.; Yao, Y.; Bassu, S.; Ciais, P.; et al. Temperature increase reduces global yields of major crops in four independent estimates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 9326–9331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhu, X.G.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Jajoo, A.; Lawson, T.; Lin, R.; Liu, C.M.; Liu, L.N.; Liu, Z.; Lu, C.; Moustakas, M.; et al. Improving photosynthesis through multidisciplinary efforts: The next frontier of photosynthesis research. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 967203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Moustakas, M. Molecular mechanisms of plant abiotic stress tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Martínez-Lorente, S.E.; Martí-Guillén, J.M.; Pedreño, M.Á.; Almagro, L.; Sabater-Jara, A.B. Higher plant-derived biostimulants: Mechanisms of action and their role in mitigating plant abiotic stress. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Win, P.P.; Park, H.-H.; Kuk, Y.-I. Integrated approach of using biostimulants for improving growth, physiological traits, and tolerance to abiotic stressors in rice and soybean. Agronomy 2025, 15, 2265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Al Khallaf, H.; Rashad, H.M.; Alsamadany, H. Biofertilizers mitigate salinity stress: Insights from spring wheat physiology and gene expression. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1697160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Di Sario, L.; Boeri, P.; Matus, J.T.; Pizzio, G.A. Plant biostimulants to enhance abiotic stress resilience in crops. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H.; Kuang, Y.; Wang, N. Amino acids biostimulants and protein hydrolysates in agricultural sciences. Plants 2024, 13, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mashabela, M.D.; Terefe, T.; Kerchev, P.; Sitole, L.; Mhlongo, M.I. Next-generation biostimulants: Molecular insights, digital integration, and regulatory frameworks for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2025, 16, 1710899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Moustakas, M.; Bayçu, G.; Sperdouli, I.; Eroğlu, H.; Eleftheriou, E.P. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis enhances photosynthesis in the medicinal herb Salvia fruticosa by improving photosystem II photochemistry. Plants 2020, 9, 962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lephatsi, M.M.; Meyer, V.; Piater, L.A.; Dubery, I.A.; Tugizimana, F. Plant responses to abiotic stresses and rhizobacterial biostimulants: Metabolomics and epigenetics perspectives. Metabolites 2021, 11, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kaushal, P.; Ali, N.; Saini, S.; Pati, P.K.; Pati, A.M. Physiological and molecular insight of microbial biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1041413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chaudhary, A.; Poudyal, S.; Kaundal, A. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in maintaining sustainable agroecosystems. Appl. Microbiol. 2025, 5, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Caulier, S.; Nannan, C.; Gillis, A.; Licciardi, F.; Bragard, C.; Mahillon, J. Overview of the Antimicrobial Compounds Produced by Members of the Bacillus subtilis Group. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Soualiou, S.; Duan, F.; Li, X.; Zhou, W. CROP PRODUCTION UNDER COLD STRESS: An understanding of plant responses, acclimation processes, and management strategies. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 190, 47–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhu, K.; Liu, J.; Lyu, A.; Luo, T.; Chen, X.; Peng, L.; Hu, L. Analysis of the mechanism of wood vinegar and butyrolactone promoting rapeseed growth and improving low-temperature stress resistance based on transcriptome and metabolomics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Antonoglou, O.; Moustaka, J.; Adamakis, I.D.; Sperdouli, I.; Pantazaki, A.; Moustakas, M.; Dendrinou-Samara, C. Nanobrass CuZn nanoparticles as foliar spray non phytotoxic fungicides. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 4450–4461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Francis, D.V.; Abdalla, A.K.; Mahakham, W.; Sarmah, A.K.; Ahmed, Z.F.R. Interaction of plants and metal nanoparticles: Exploring its molecular mechanisms for sustainable agriculture and crop improvement. Environ. Int. 2024, 190, 108859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Mansi; Danai, P. Nanoparticles as biostimulants in organic farming: Advancing sustainable agriculture through nanotechnology. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2025; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tryfon, P.; Sperdouli, I.; Moustaka, J.; Adamakis, I.-D.S.; Giannousi, K.; Dendrinou-Samara, C.; Moustakas, M. Hormetic response of photosystem II function induced by nontoxic calcium hydroxide nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Moustaka, J.; Moustakas, M. ROS Generation in the light reactions of photosynthesis triggers acclimation signaling to environmental stress. Photochem 2025, 5, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Samanta, A.; Podder, S.; Ghosh, C.K.; Bhattacharya, M.; Ghosh, J.; Mallik, A.K.; Dey, A.; Mukhopadhyay, A.K. ROS mediated high anti-bacterial efficacy of strain tolerant layered phase pure nano-calcium hydroxide. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2017, 72, 110–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Moustakas, M.; Moustaka, J.; Sperdouli, I. Hormesis in photosystem II: A mechanistic approach. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2022, 29, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sonmez, M.C.; Ozgur, R.; Uzilday, B. Reactive oxygen species: Connecting eustress, hormesis, and allostasis in plants. Plant Stress 2023, 8, 100164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Molnár, Z.; Solomon, W.; Mutum, L.; Janda, T. Understanding the mechanisms of Fe deficiency in the rhizosphere to promote plant resilience. Plants 2023, 12, 1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. van der Heijden, M.G.A.; Streitwolf-Engel, R.; Riedl, R.; Siegrist, S.; Neudecker, A.; Ineichen, K.; Boller, T.; Wiemken, A.; Sanders, I.R. The mycorrhizal contribution to plant productivity, plant nutrition and soil structure in experimental grassland. New Phytol. 2006, 172, 739–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Romera, F.J.; García, M.J.; Lucena, C.; Martínez-Medina, A.; Aparicio, M.A.; Ramos, J.; Alcántara, E.; Angulo, M.; Pérez-Vicente, R. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) and Fe deficiency responses in dicot plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Moustaka, J.; Meyling, N.V.; Hauser, T.P. Root-associated entomopathogenic fungi modulate their host plant’s photosystem II photochemistry and response to herbivorous insects. Molecules 2022, 27, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. García-Espinoza, F.; Quesada-Moraga, E.; García del Rosal, M.J.; Yousef-Yousef, M. Entomopathogenic fungi-mediated solubilization and induction of Fe related genes in melon and cucumber plants. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sevillano-Caño, J.; García, M.J.; Córdoba-Galván, C.; Luque-Cruz, C.; Agustí-Brisach, C.; Lucena, C.; Ramos, J.; Pérez-Vicente, R.; Romera, F.J. Exploring the role of Debaryomyces hansenii as biofertilizer in iron-deficient environments to enhance plant nutrition and crop production sustainability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 5729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. United Nations. DESA Report 2017. In World Population Prospects; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  54. Noel, R.; Schueller, M.J.; Ferrieri, R.A. Radiocarbon flux measurements provide insight into why a pyroligneous acid product stimulates plant growth. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 4207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. El-Ramady, H.; Prokisch, J.; Mansour, H.; Bayoumi, Y.A.; Shalaby, T.A.; Veres, S.; Brevik, E.C. Review of crop response to soil salinity stress: Possible approaches from leaching to nano-management. Soil Syst. 2024, 8, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zuzunaga-Rosas, J.; Boscaiu, M.; Vicente, O. Agroindustrial by-products as a source of biostimulants enhancing responses to abiotic stress of horticultural crops. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hussain, S.; Shaukat, M.; Ashraf, M.; Zhu, C.; Jin, Q.; Zhang, J. Salinity stress in arid and semi-arid climates: Effects and management in field crops. In Climate Change and Agriculture; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moustakas, M.; Moustaka, J. Special Issue: “Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Biostimulants”. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010517

AMA Style

Moustakas M, Moustaka J. Special Issue: “Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Biostimulants”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(1):517. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010517

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moustakas, Michael, and Julietta Moustaka. 2026. "Special Issue: “Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Biostimulants”" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 1: 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010517

APA Style

Moustakas, M., & Moustaka, J. (2026). Special Issue: “Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Biostimulants”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(1), 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010517

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop