Next Article in Journal
Activation of TSLP–IL-9 Axis Hinders the Antifibrotic Effect of ST2 Deficiency in Pulmonary Fibrosis
Previous Article in Journal
Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Substitutions Underlying Tetrodotoxin Resistance in Nemerteans: Ecological and Evolutionary Implications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Emerging Breast Cancer Subpopulations: Functional Heterogeneity Beyond the Classical Subtypes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Pathogenesis-Guided Biomarker Assessment: A Shift in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics

by
Jessica M. Logan
1,*,
Victoria Malone
2,3,
John J. O’Leary
2,3 and
Doug A. Brooks
1,3,*
1
Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, Australia
2
Department of Pathology, The Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, D08 XW7X Dublin, Ireland
3
Department of Histopathology, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(24), 11786; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262411786
Submission received: 16 October 2025 / Revised: 28 November 2025 / Accepted: 2 December 2025 / Published: 5 December 2025

Abstract

Despite prostate cancer being one of the most common malignancies in men, its pathological diagnosis remains plagued by inter-observer variability and diagnostic ambiguity. Traditional morphological assessment and currently available biomarkers such as PSA (Prostate-Specific Antigen), AMACR (Alpha methylacyl CoA racemase), and p63 suffer from poor specificity and clinical reliability. In this review, we present a pathogenesis-guided biomarker discovery strategy that led to the development of a clinically validated biomarker panel—Appl-1, Sortilin, and Syndecan-1. These biomarkers, which reflect fundamental biological processes within the endosome–lysosome system, offer improved diagnostic precision and prognostic utility for patients with prostate cancer. This review discusses the rationale behind their discovery, the multidisciplinary approach that enabled it, the evidence supporting their use, and their implementation in U.S. clinical practice as a lab-developed test (LDT). We propose this approach as a new diagnostic standard that bridges mechanistic insight with real-world application.
Keywords: prostate cancer; biomarkers; diagnosis; pathogenesis prostate cancer; biomarkers; diagnosis; pathogenesis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Logan, J.M.; Malone, V.; O’Leary, J.J.; Brooks, D.A. Pathogenesis-Guided Biomarker Assessment: A Shift in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 11786. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262411786

AMA Style

Logan JM, Malone V, O’Leary JJ, Brooks DA. Pathogenesis-Guided Biomarker Assessment: A Shift in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(24):11786. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262411786

Chicago/Turabian Style

Logan, Jessica M., Victoria Malone, John J. O’Leary, and Doug A. Brooks. 2025. "Pathogenesis-Guided Biomarker Assessment: A Shift in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 24: 11786. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262411786

APA Style

Logan, J. M., Malone, V., O’Leary, J. J., & Brooks, D. A. (2025). Pathogenesis-Guided Biomarker Assessment: A Shift in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(24), 11786. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262411786

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop