Next Article in Journal
Molecular Signature in Focal Cortical Dysplasia: A Systematic Review of RNA and Protein Data
Previous Article in Journal
Magnesium Preserves Calcium Homeostasis and Contributes to Protect Myotubes from Inflammation-Induced Damage
Previous Article in Special Issue
Major Common Hallmarks and Potential Epigenetic Drivers of Wound Chronicity and Recurrence: Hypothesis and Reflections
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 26
Issue 20
10.3390/ijms26209911
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of the Phenolic Profile of Chelidonium majus L. and Its Combination with Sericin: Balancing Antimicrobial Activity and Cytocompatibility

by
Ana Borges
1,2,
José Luis Ordóñez-Díaz
3,*,
Yara Aquino
1,
José Manuel Moreno-Rojas
3,
María Luisa Martín Calvo
4,
Josiana A. Vaz
5 and
Ricardo C. Calhelha
1
1
CIMO, LA SusTEC, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
2
Grupo de Investigación en Desarrollo y Evaluación de Formas Farmacéuticas y Sistemas de Liberación Controlada, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
3
Department of Agroindustry and Food Quality, Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training (IFAPA) Alameda del Obispo, Avda. Menéndez–Pidal s/n., 14004 Córdoba, Spain
4
Grupo de Investigación en Fisiología y Farmacología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
5
Research Center for Active Living and Wellbeing (LiveWell), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(20), 9911; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26209911
Submission received: 1 September 2025 / Revised: 7 October 2025 / Accepted: 10 October 2025 / Published: 11 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Natural Compound for Wound and Tissue Repair and Regeneration: 4th Edition)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

The incorporation of bioactive natural compounds into biomedical applications offers a promising route to enhance therapeutic efficacy while supporting sustainability. In this study, we investigated the synergistic potential of Sericin, a silk-derived biopolymer, and Chelidonium majus L. (C. majus), a medicinal plant with a diverse phenolic profile, in relation to biological activities relevant for wound care and infection control. A combined experimental strategy was applied, integrating detailed chemical characterization of C. majus extracts with antimicrobial and cytocompatibility assays across different Sericin–plant extract ratios (1:1, 1:2, 2:2, and 2:1). Phytochemical analysis identified and quantified 57 phenolic compounds, including high levels of flavonoids (quercetin, kaempferol, isorhamnetin) and phenolic acids (caffeic and ferulic acid). Salicylic acid (123.6 µg/g), feruloyltyramine (111.8 µg/g), and pinocembrin (98.4 µg/g) were particularly abundant, compounds previously reported to disrupt microbial membranes and impair bacterial viability. These metabolites correlated with the strong antimicrobial activity of C. majus against Gram-positive strains (MIC = 5–10 mg/mL). In combination with Sericin, antimicrobial performance was ratio-dependent, with higher proportions of C. majus (2:1) retaining partial inhibitory effects. Cytocompatibility assays with HFF1 fibroblasts demonstrated low antiproliferative activity across most formulations (GI50 > 400 µg/mL), supporting their potential safety in topical applications. Collectively, the results indicate a concentration-dependent interaction between C. majus phenolics and the Sericin protein matrix, reinforcing their suitability as candidates for natural-based wound healing materials. Importantly, the valorization of Sericin, an underutilized byproduct of the silk industry, together with a widely accessible medicinal plant, underscores the ecological and economic sustainability of this approach. Overall, this work supports the exploration of the development of biomaterials with potential for advancing tissue repair and wound management.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Plant-derived phenolic compounds have recently gained attention as promising components of wound biomaterials due to their dual ability to exert antimicrobial effects and modulate the redox microenvironment of healing tissues [1,2,3]. Phenolics such as flavonoids and hydroxycinnamic acids can disrupt microbial membranes, inhibit quorum sensing, and interfere with essential enzymatic pathways, thereby offering broad-spectrum antimicrobial protection. Simultaneously, their redox activity plays a critical role in tissue regeneration: by scavenging excess reactive oxygen species (ROS), they protect fibroblasts from oxidative damage, while moderate redox signaling promotes angiogenesis, fibroblast proliferation, and extracellular matrix deposition. Nonetheless, phenolic-rich formulations must be carefully balanced, as elevated concentrations may impair fibroblast viability and compromise tissue repair [3,4,5,6]. These insights underscore the need to evaluate antimicrobial activity and cellular responses in parallel, since the therapeutic value of phenolic-based biomaterials ultimately depends on their capacity to control infection without hindering fibroblast proliferation—an essential event in wound healing [2,3,4].
Recent scaffold-based studies have translated these principles into engineered wound matrices. Polyphenol-infused hydrogels and polymer–polyphenol scaffolds have demonstrated the ability to reduce oxidative stress, sustain antibacterial release, and support re-epithelialization and collagen deposition in both full-thickness and diabetic wound models, while maintaining the viability of fibroblasts [2,7]. Reviews further emphasize that scaffold performance depends strongly on design parameters—including polyphenol type and loading, crosslinking strategy, and release kinetics—which collectively shape the redox dynamics and biological outcomes of wound healing [3,8].
Beyond their general antioxidant properties, mechanistic studies highlight the nuanced role of phenolic compounds in modulating ROS-mediated signaling. While excessive ROS are cytotoxic, controlled ROS levels act as secondary messengers that regulate angiogenesis, fibroblast migration, and extracellular matrix remodeling. Plant-derived phenolics help fine-tune this balance by simultaneously scavenging harmful ROS and supporting physiological redox signaling. A recent review of oxidative stress–driven therapeutic strategies reinforces the relevance of this dual activity in regenerative medicine [9]. Complementary experimental studies show that phenolic-enriched hydrogels enhance vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and promote fibroblast proliferation through ROS-mediated activation of MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathways, underscoring their role as bioactive modulators in wound biomaterials. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that phenolics are not passive antioxidants but active regulators of redox biology, with direct implications for scaffold design and wound repair [10,11,12,13,14].
Chelidonium majus L. (Greater Celandine) is a medicinal herb widely distributed across Europe and Asia, with documented use extending into North America [15,16,17]. Traditionally used in folk medicine and modern phytotherapy, this perennial plant is valued for its diverse pharmacological activities, which stem from its complex secondary metabolite profile [16,17,18,19,20]. Its phytochemical composition includes isoquinoline alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, vitamins (notably A and C), mineral elements, sterols, and various acid derivatives [16,17,19,20,21,22]. These compounds contribute synergistically to its antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, immunomodulatory, hepatoprotective, and neuroprotective activities [16,17,18,19,20]. Nevertheless, the variability in phytochemical composition due to environmental factors and the need for clinical validation highlight the importance of continued research [15,16,22].
Among the secondary metabolites of C. majus, phenolic compounds are particularly significant [16,17,18,22,23]. These compounds, characterized by aromatic rings with hydroxyl substituents, play vital roles in plant defense and offer well-documented benefits in human health. Their potent antioxidant properties mitigate oxidative stress, while their anti-inflammatory effects are associated with modulation of inflammatory signaling pathways, leading to reduced production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in a concentration- and context-dependent manner. Moreover, phenolics display antimicrobial activity, influence gut microbiota, and exert anticancer effects through apoptosis induction and proliferation inhibition [16,20,21,22,23]. Despite these benefits, important challenges remain. Limited bioavailability and rapid metabolism restrict therapeutic translation, while safety concerns, particularly the reported hepatotoxicity of C. majus, underscore the need for rigorous toxicological evaluation. In addition, most evidence derives from in vitro and preclinical studies, with relatively few clinical investigations available. Addressing these gaps is essential to fully establish the safety and efficacy of C. majus–derived phenolics for human applications [16,17,22,23].
An emerging strategy involves combining phenolic-rich extracts with Sericin, a natural silk-derived protein renowned for its biocompatibility, antioxidant activity, and film-forming properties. Sericin has found applications in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food technology, and its incorporation into C. majus formulations offers a means to improve bioavailability and stability of phenolic compounds. By enhancing solubility and gastrointestinal absorption, Sericin can potentiate the therapeutic efficacy of C. majus. Additionally, its film-forming ability supports topical applications, improving local delivery and wound healing outcomes, while encapsulation strategies may enable controlled and targeted release [24,25,26].
The combination of C. majus and Sericin thus represents a promising biocompatible approach with applications ranging from pharmaceutical wound formulations to functional foods [16,18,21,22]. Their potential synergistic antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties could yield innovative, sustainable products to manage oxidative stress and inflammation [24,25,26]. Leveraging Sericin, an underutilized byproduct of the silk industry, together with C. majus, a widely available medicinal plant, emphasizes both ecological and economic sustainability [15,16,17,22].
This study aims to develop novel wound-healing formulations enriched with C. majus extracts and Sericin through an integrated approach. By characterizing the phenolic composition of C. majus and exploring its interactions with Sericin, we assessed antimicrobial properties and cytocompatibility across different ratios. These formulations hold potential as sustainable wound therapeutics, maximizing the bioactive potential of natural compounds while aligning with public health and environmental goals (Figure 1).

2. Results and Discussion

The investigation of natural extracts has attracted considerable attention due to their biodegradability, safety, and potential to reduce environmental impact [24,25,27]. In this study, we examined the biological effects of Sericin, a protein derived from Bombyx mori cocoons, and Chelidonium majus L., a medicinal plant with a long history of therapeutic use. Their antimicrobial activity and cytocompatibility were assessed to evaluate their suitability for biomedical applications. Given the increasing interest in phenolic compounds as key contributors to the pharmacological properties of medicinal plants [17,24,28], the phenolic profile of C. majus was also characterized in detail. By combining chemical and biological analyses, this work provides new insights into the potential of C. majus and Sericin as natural resources for the development of sustainable wound-healing biomaterials.

2.1. Chemical Characterization

Plants synthesize a wide range of chemical compounds broadly classified into primary and secondary metabolites. Primary metabolites—including carbohydrates, lipids, and nucleic acids—are essential for growth, development, and cellular function, providing energy and structural integrity [19]. In contrast, secondary metabolites play specialized roles in plant defense, adaptation, and environmental interaction. These include alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolic acids, terpenoids, and saponins, many of which exhibit considerable pharmacological potential [19,20].
Among these, phenolic compounds are particularly relevant due to their strong antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties, which underpin their value in both medicinal and industrial applications [20]. Sericin, a silk-derived protein, also represents a bioactive compound of significant interest. A recent study demonstrated that the amino acid composition and bioactivity of Sericin are strongly influenced by cocoon origin and extraction methodology [29]. Extracted Sericin contained a wider diversity of amino acids compared to commercial sources, with hydrolyzed forms presenting up to 16 distinct amino acids. Given this comprehensive characterization, the present study did not reassess Sericin’s biochemical composition but instead used these findings as a reference for its biological potential. Importantly, highlighted that high-temperature and high-pressure extraction conditions markedly alter Sericin’s biochemical profile, thereby impacting its suitability for specific biomedical applications [29].
In contrast, the phytochemical profile of Chelidonium majus L. (C. majus) required further characterization, particularly with respect to its phenolic constituents. While previous research has focused largely on its isoquinoline alkaloids, emerging evidence indicates that flavonoids (e.g., quercetin, kaempferol) and phenolic acids (e.g., caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid) contribute significantly to its antimicrobial and cytocompatibility properties. These compounds are known to neutralize free radicals, alleviate oxidative stress, and modulate inflammatory pathways, reinforcing their therapeutic relevance [19,20,21,22,23].
Given the increasing interest in medicinal plants, the characterization of C. majus cultivated in Portugal is particularly relevant. Such efforts support the validation of its traditional uses, ensure quality control in herbal product development, and provide a basis for risk assessment—especially considering the potential toxicity of certain alkaloids, which necessitates controlled dosages. While C. majus holds considerable pharmacological promise, detailed phytochemical profiling remains essential to optimize its therapeutic benefits while minimizing risks, thereby ensuring its safe integration into modern healthcare [19,22].
The chemical composition of C. majus, however, is highly variable and influenced by factors such as geographical origin, environmental conditions, and extraction techniques. This variability underscores the need for rigorous characterization to standardize and optimize the recovery of bioactive constituents [18,22]. Notably, water-based extraction methods have proven particularly effective for isolating phenolic compounds, supporting both their bioavailability and medicinal efficacy.

Phenolic Compounds Profile in C. majus 

The phenolic composition of Chelidonium majus L. was comprehensively characterized, with 57 compounds tentatively identified and quantified (Table 1). In this sense, 31 of 57 compounds identified were confirmed by analytical standards, being the rest of the compounds tentatively annotated based on MS/MS fragmentation patterns and database comparisons. The concentration of these compounds was semi-quantified using the standard curves of compounds with a similar chemical structure. To confirm these compounds, the availability of analytical standards or the use of complementary techniques such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) would be necessary (Table S1).
Phenolic acids and flavonoids were the predominant classes. Among the hydroxycinnamic acids, seven derivatives were detected, including dihydrocaffeic acid, caffeic acid, homovanillic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, and neochlorogenic acid. Six hydroxycinnamic acid amides were also identified, such as p-coumaroyltyramine, N-caffeoyltyramine, feruloyltyramine, p-coumaroylputrescine, feruloylagmatine, and p-coumaroyltryptamine. In addition, nine flavones (e.g., apigenin, luteolin, scutellarein, diosmetin, vitexin) and fifteen flavonols (e.g., kaempferol, quercetin, isorhamnetin and their glycosylated derivatives) were detected. These results are consistent with previous phytochemical studies [19,22,23,28,30], reinforcing that C. majus is particularly rich in flavonoids and phenolic acids, especially kaempferol, quercetin, and their glycosides. The predominance of these compounds supports the well-documented pharmacological relevance of the species, as quercetin exhibits potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, kaempferol is associated with anticancer activity, and caffeic and ferulic acids contribute to oxidative stress modulation [16,19,21,23,28].
Quantitative analysis revealed a chemically diverse profile with several metabolites present at particularly high concentrations. Notably, phenylacetic acid (5.774 mg/g), pinocembrin (2.599 mg/g), feruloyltyramine (1.770 mg/g), and salicylic acid (1.545 mg/g) were among the most abundant. Additional compounds such as protocatechuic acid (0.468 mg/g), veratric acid (0.525 mg/g), 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (0.659 mg/g), and rutin (0.429 mg/g) were also detected at substantial levels, further enriching the plant’s bioactive profile. In contrast, metabolites such as p-coumaroylputrescine, vitexin, and reynoutrin were present at trace concentrations (0.001 mg/g). Hydroxybenzoic acids emerged as the most concentrated group, known for their potent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities, thereby reinforcing the pharmacological relevance of C. majus.
Among the quantified flavonols, isorhamnetin was particularly abundant. As a 3′-O-methylated derivative of quercetin, isorhamnetin is recognized for its antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and wound-healing properties. Mechanistically, it exerts antioxidant and cytoprotective effects through the modulation of oxidative stress pathways, while promoting fibroblast migration and angiogenesis, two processes critical for tissue repair. Recent findings also highlight its ability to regulate redox-sensitive signaling cascades, including PI3K/Akt and MAPK pathways, thereby linking its high concentration in C. majus extracts to potential wound-healing applications [31].
When compared with previous reports, which described total flavonoid and phenolic acid contents of 137.43 mg/g and 23.67 mg/g, respectively [28], and in different parts of the plant [19,23], the present study provides a more detailed compound-specific profile of the whole plant. These findings are consistent with other studies showing that flavonoids can constitute up to 96% of total phenolics in hydroethanolic extracts of C. majus [30], with quercetin-3-O-rutinoside, kaempferol, and isorhamnetin consistently identified as key constituents [28].
From a structure–activity perspective, the predominance of flavonoids and hydroxycinnamic derivatives is noteworthy, as these compounds are characterized by conjugated aromatic systems and hydroxyl substituents known to support antioxidant and antimicrobial activities [32,33]. In particular, phenolic amides such as feruloyltyramine have been reported to disrupt microbial cell integrity, while hydroxybenzoic acids play a central role in mitigating oxidative stress and modulating inflammatory responses [32,34]. The chemical richness of C. majus therefore provides a rational basis for evaluating its biological potential.
However, several challenges must be considered before translating these findings into practical applications. Phenolic compounds are inherently prone to oxidative degradation and may undergo rapid metabolism, raising concerns about stability and bioavailability [32,35]. Moreover, while phenolics are generally associated with beneficial effects, C. majus is also known to contain alkaloids linked to hepatotoxicity, emphasizing the need for careful dose optimization and safety assessment [36,37]. Another critical limitation is the gap between in vitro characterization and in vivo or clinical evidence; most available data, including the present work, remain at the preclinical stage, limiting conclusions about therapeutic applicability in humans.
These considerations highlight that the chemical composition of C. majus not only supports its traditional use but also demands careful attention to compound interactions, stability, and dosing.
A crucial aspect of this work is the consideration of how phenolic bioavailability may be influenced by interactions with Sericin. Previous studies on Sericin [25,29] have shown that its amino acid composition is dominated by serine, aspartic acid, and glycine, residues that promote hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions. These structural characteristics suggest that Sericin can engage with polyphenolic compounds primarily through such interactions, potentially modulating their solubility, stability, and release kinetics. Consequently, these protein–polyphenol interactions may play a critical role in determining the biological availability of phenolics in downstream formulations [16,19,23,25,29].
Altogether, the phytochemical richness of C. majus, together with the distinctive amino acid profile of Sericin, creates a complementary chemical environment in which protein–polyphenol interactions may occur. Such interactions could potentially influence the solubility, structural integrity, or release profile of phenolic compounds, thereby affecting their availability in downstream biological assays. This framework provides a rationale for subsequent evaluations of antimicrobial activity and cytocompatibility and supports the exploration of multifunctional biomaterials for wound-healing applications, while acknowledging that the extent and functional consequences of these interactions remain to be experimentally determined.
Table 1. Tentative identification and quantification by LC-HRMS/MS of phenolic compounds in Chelidonium majus L.
Table 1. Tentative identification and quantification by LC-HRMS/MS of phenolic compounds in Chelidonium majus L.
GroupPhenolic CompoundsMolecular FormulaRetention TimeCalculatedExperimentalms/msErrorMSIMI Level aMeanSDReference
(min) [m/z]-[m/z]-(ppm)(mg/g)(mg/g)
Phenolic Acids
Hydroxybenzoic acidsProtocatechuic acidC7H6O45.8153.0193153.019255.668181.0347108.0216109.02956.7620.4680.077[38]
Veratric AcidC9H10O46.56181.0506181.050892.92107.0502136.91163.03991.3320.5250.077
Salicylic acidC7H6O37.21137.0244137.024465.039793.034696.0093108. 89968.1721.5450.22
4-H-phenylacetic acidC8H8O37.52151.04151.039944.998494.9573107.0503122.9526.6810.6590.083Standard
Vanillic acidC8H8O47.74167.0349167.0353108.0217123.0448138.929152.01178.5310.1530.02
Ellagic AcidC14H6O88.33300.9989300.999126.8811257.2135265.1811283.19143.9420.2350.035[39]
Hydroxycinnamic acidsDihydrocaffeic acidC9H10O46.95181.0506181.050859.658592.92136.91181.05091.3310.1740.002Standard
Neochlorogenic acidC16H18O97.01353.0878353.0871106.0289133.0151178.0739310.11531.2720.1920[40]
Caffeic acidC9H8O47.57179.0349179.035444.998290.9243107.0504135.04528.910.040.005Standard
Homovanillic acidC9H10O48.28181.0506181.050892.92122.8946136.9099152.91767.210.0060.001Standard
p-Coumaric acidC9H8O38.56163.04163.040193.0344119.0503121.0522162.83921.1520.0580.008[38]
Ferulic acidC10H10O48.8193.0506193.05121.0659134.0374149.0972178.02736.2410.0550.01Standard
4,5-Dicaffeoylquinic acidC25H24O129.01515.1194515.119593.0345135.0452173.0455191.05632.1510.1780.004
Hydroxycinnamic acid amidesFeruloylagmatineC15H22N4O38.08305.1619305.158997.0659135.0816249.1497287.1646−6.0520.0060.001[41]
p-CoumaroylputrescineC13H18N2O29.23233.1295233.1659120.0819164.9275215.1557 4.9320.0010[42]
N-CaffeoyltyramineC17H17NO49.29298.1084298.108675.0088135.03179.0357206.97494.3120.0080[43]
p-CoumaroyltyramineC17H17NO39.96282.1135282.1136119.0503132.0579145.0298162.05614.0720.9010.002[44]
FeruloyltyramineC18H19O4N10.16312.1241312.12418148.0531178.0511190.0513297.1013.6721.770.242[45]
p-CoumaroyltryptamineC19H18N2O211.8305.1295305.1759135.0816249.1497287.1646 8.4120.0020[46]
Flavonoids
FlavanolCatechinC15H14O66.98289.0717289.0718146.9387162.8392190.9286197.80814.1710.0020Standard
EpicatechinC15H14O67.12289.0717289.0718160.8422181.0508190.9287195.81114.1710.0210
FlavanoneHesperidinC28H34O159.01609.1824609.1462151.0033243.0298271.0244300.02772.0110.1810.024
NaringeninC15H12O511.32271.0611271.061359.013962.582495.9463198.8294.6810.590.031
HesperetinC16H14O611.57301.0717301.2022126.8811221.1912265.1811283.19144.1810.0380.004
PinocembrinC15H12O413.62255.0662255.0664151.0037171.0455213.0554 4.822.5990.094[47]
FlavoneVitexinC21H20O108.28431.0983477.104131101.0243114.6059205.9066348.56178.2810.0010Standard
CynarosideC21H20O118.44447.0932447.0929227.0347255.0298284.0329285.04060.810.0020
DiosminC28H32O158.87607.1668607.1673277.0348283.0256299.0564 2.6510.0240.005
ApigetrinC21H20O109.01431.0983431.0983151.0038211.0406268.038311.05681.0810.0020
Diosmetin-7-glucosideC22H22O119.18461.1089461.108763.0241255.0298284.0328299.0564210.0230.001
Luteolin/ScutellareinC15H10O610.38285.0404285.0405121.0296126.8811133.0295136.90994.0810.0030
ApigeninC15H10O511.23269.0455269.045557.844364.801365.6261 3.910.0040
DiosmetinC16H12O611.4299.0561299.056159.01469.6641164.8297255.30271.110.0020
FlavonolIsorhamnetin-rutinoside- glucosideC34H42O217.15785.2145785.2154315.051623.1617 2.520.0280[30]
Quercetin-3-rhamnosylrutinosideC33H40O207.66755.204755.2044300.0276271.025255.0302243.02971.4920.1410.003[28]
Isorhamnetin rutinoside-rhamnosideC34H42O207.96769.2196769.2206315.051299.0197271.0249243.02992.6920.0820.001[30]
RutinC27H30O168.12609.1461609.1466243.0296271.0246300.0276405.79152.7210.4290.035Standard
Quercetin-glucosideC21H20O128.4463.0881463.0878151.0037255.0303271.0245300.02751.6320.0210.001[28]
Kaempferol 3-rutinosideC27H30O158.53593.1511593.1517183.0449227.035255.0301285.04062.8510.0690.011Standard
Isorhamnetin rutinosideC28H32O168.58623.1617623.1619315.051299.0197271.0249243.02992.0320.320.024[30]
Guaiaverin/ReynoutrinC20H18O118.73433.0776433.0764151.0044255.0307271.025300.0276−0.11810.0010Standard
Quercitrin/Quercetin 3-rhamnosideC21H20O118.84447.0932447.0929183.0463255.0295284.0329300.02751.7910.0250.001
Isorhamnetin-3-glucosideC22H22O128.89477.1038477.1041199.0409243.0298285.0407314.04352.8810.0050
QuercetinC15H10O710.44301.0353301.2022126.8811221.1912265.1811283.19144.1810.0110
KaempferolC15H10O611.37285.0404285.207552.2938126.8809267.1924 5.310.0070
IsorhamnetinC16H12O711.53315.051315.0512288.9368294.8804310.858313.03581.3410.0420
Coumarins
Esculetin/AesculetinC9H6O47.57177.0193177.019389.0393105.0345133.0296149.02446.1820.0610.012[48]
UmbelliferoneC9H6O37.68161.0244161.081987.0451115.0401117.0557132.98086.9220.0040[49]
ScoparoneC11H10O48.78205.0506205.0506125.8733157.8631160.8422161.85011.0720.0040[50]
ScopoletinC10H8O48.98191.0349191.0193102.9488111.0088146.9387176.01153.8220.0080.001[45]
Stilbenes
ResveratrolC14H12O39.37227.0713227.1289130.9838165.1285183.1392227.12891.1520.010[51]
PiceatannolC14H12O410.98243.0662243.1236146.961199.1338174.9564225.11314.0720.010[52]
Others
Phenolic AldehydeSyringaldehydeC9H10O46.56181.0506181.050892.92136.91152.9175181.05091.3320.1240.008[53]
VanillinC8H8O38.56151.04151.04108.0217122.9521136.0166151.04017.3410.1290.01Standard
ProtocatechualdehydeC7H6O310.3137.0244137.024492.92108.9124.8951 8.5320.1860.037[54]
PhenylethanoidsHydrotyrosolC8H8O38.56151.04151.04108.02122.9521136.0166 7.3410.0610.012Standard
PhenylpropanoidsPhenylacetic acidC8H8O29.88135.0451135.045159.013987.008890.9241 1.0915.7740.323
a Metabolite Standards Initiative metabolite identification (MSIMI) levels. Reference compounds were available for all compounds identified at MSIMI level 1. Compounds at MSIMSI level 2 were tentatively identified.

2.2. Antimicrobial Activity

The antimicrobial evaluation of C. majus and Sericin extracts, alone and in combination, is summarized in Table 2. As expected, C. majus alone exhibited measurable antimicrobial activity, with MIC values ranging from 5 to 10 mg/mL across all tested bacteria and fungi and MBC/MIC ratios of 1–2, indicating modest bactericidal effects. In contrast, Sericin alone was inactive, except for the commercial variant (Sigma-Aldrich), which showed activity against Cutibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis (MIC = 5 mg/mL). When combined, the extracts generally demonstrated reduced antimicrobial activity, with the outcome depending primarily on the concentration ratio rather than the Sericin source. Notably, the 2:1 ratio of C. majus to Sericin retained partial inhibitory effects against S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and C. acnes, whereas the 1:2 ratio abolished all activity. Combinations containing Sericin S3 consistently produced the weakest outcomes.
The inclusion of reference antibiotics (ampicillin and vancomycin for Gram-positive bacteria) ensured the reliability of the antimicrobial assays and provided a benchmark for interpreting the activity of the extracts. Candida albicans, being a yeast species, was tested using fluconazole as the reference antifungal control. The positive controls exhibited strong inhibitory effects against S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and P. acnes, with MIC values within the expected ranges reported for clinical isolates in the recent literature [55,56]. Similarly, fluconazole demonstrated potent inhibitory activity against C. albicans, with MIC values also consistent with established benchmarks [56,57]. This concordance corroborates the robustness of the assay conditions and validates the observed antimicrobial performance of the C. majus extract. In comparison, the extract demonstrated moderate inhibitory activity (MIC = 5 mg/mL), which, although requiring higher concentrations than conventional antibiotics and antifungals, indicates a reproducible antimicrobial effect attributable to its phenolic profile. Furthermore, the use of these controls confirmed that the reduced activity observed in sericin-rich combinations was not a methodological artifact but rather reflected genuine modulation of extract efficacy through protein–phenolic interactions.
Moreover, these findings are consistent with prior reports showing that aqueous Sericin solutions or Sericin-based hydrogels lack antimicrobial effects against common wound pathogens (S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli) [58]. In contrast, the antimicrobial potential of C. majus metabolites has been confirmed in other systems; for example, ref. [59] demonstrated that C. majus incorporated into bacterial nanocellulose matrices inhibited both planktonic and biofilm-forming cells, including S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and Candida albicans.
A possible association can be drawn between the antimicrobial activity of C. majus and its phenolic composition. The extract contained high levels of metabolites such as salicylic acid, feruloyltyramine, pinocembrin, and phenylacetic acid, all previously reported to affect microbial integrity or signaling.
Recent studies suggest that these compounds act through complementary mechanisms involving disruption of microbial membrane integrity, interference with enzyme function, and induction of oxidative stress. Salicylic acid and related hydroxybenzoic acids are known to impair cell wall synthesis and alter membrane permeability, whereas flavanones such as pinocembrin can inhibit ATP production and increase membrane depolarization, leading to leakage of intracellular components [Refs]. Feruloyltyramine and phenylacetic acid, on the other hand, have been associated with inhibition of quorum sensing and modulation of oxidative stress–related pathways in bacteria.
However, this study did not directly test the contribution of individual metabolites, and therefore, no causal link can be established. When combined with Sericin, activity decreased in a ratio-dependent manner, suggesting that the presence of Sericin may reduce the bioavailability or effective concentration of phenolic compounds.
One plausible explanation involves phenolic–protein interactions [60,61]. The interaction between Sericin and phenolic compounds may attenuate these effects by reducing the availability of free phenolic hydroxyl groups, which are essential for antimicrobial action. Sericin, rich in polar amino acids (serine, glycine, aspartic acid), can form hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions with phenolic structures, thereby stabilizing the compounds but decreasing their reactivity. This interaction likely limits the diffusion of active metabolites across microbial membranes, resulting in lower observed antimicrobial potency [1,62]. Mechanistically, the antimicrobial activity of C. majus phenolics has been linked to reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, protein oxidation, and cell wall disruption—processes that may be partially hindered when Sericin is present as a binding matrix [4,63,64].
Differences among Sericin sources may further reflect variations in amino acid composition, solubility, and molecular weight distribution resulting from distinct extraction methods. Commercial Sericin preparations typically contain smaller, more soluble fractions, which may explain the limited intrinsic activity observed here, whereas crude extracts (S1–S3) produced less consistent outcomes. Such variability is well documented, as extraction protocols strongly influence Sericin’s biochemical profile and functional properties [25,29,65].
Comparisons with other biopolymer–plant systems highlight the broader translational relevance of these results. For example, quercetin nanocrystal–loaded alginate hydrogels exhibited sustained release, antimicrobial efficacy, and accelerated wound closure in vivo [66]. Similarly, gelatin/alginate scaffolds co-loaded with caffeic acid and quercetin achieved multifunctional effects by combining antimicrobial, antioxidant, and pro-healing properties [67]. Injectable photocrosslinked hydrogels incorporating quercetin-loaded metal–organic frameworks were also shown to enhance re-epithelialization while suppressing bacterial growth [68]. These examples demonstrate how the integration of phenolic biopolymers can yield multifunctional wound dressings. Within this framework, the unique behavior of C. majus–Sericin combinations underscores the importance of matrix composition and bioactive interactions, highlighting opportunities for rationally optimizing antimicrobial and cytocompatible formulations.
Finally, the microbial strains selected in this study—S. epidermidis and P. acnes—were chosen for their clinical relevance to skin health and wound healing. S. epidermidis is associated with biofilm formation that can delay tissue repair, while C. acnes contributes to inflammatory conditions. Evaluating C. majus–Sericin combinations against these strains, therefore, provides insight into their potential applicability in dermatological and wound care contexts, even though the results show that Sericin attenuates rather than enhances the antimicrobial effects of C. majus under the tested conditions. Although the findings contrast with the initial hypothesis of a synergistic interaction, the attenuation of antimicrobial activity by Sericin offers relevant mechanistic insight. Sericin appears to act as a modulator that stabilizes but also limits the bioavailability of C. majus phenolics through protein–phenolic interactions. These results, while representing negative outcomes in terms of antimicrobial potency, are valuable in defining the physicochemical constraints of such systems. They highlight the trade-off between bioactivity and cytocompatibility, providing a useful framework for optimizing future Sericin-based formulations in wound-healing and biomedical applications.

2.3. Cytocompatibility Evaluation

The cytocompatibility of the tested samples, expressed as GI50 values (µg/mL) in HFF1 fibroblasts, is summarized in Table 3. Most individual extracts and combinations demonstrated high cytocompatibility, with GI50 values above 400 µg/mL, indicating negligible cytotoxicity. Several formulations, including 2CS1, 2CS2, 3CS2, 3CS3, 4CS3, and 4CS4, displayed moderate cytocompatibility, with GI50 values between 150 and 377 µg/mL. The lowest value was observed for the 2CS1 formulation (2:1 ratio of C. majus with Sericin from Castelo Branco; GI50 = 150 ± 3.6 µg/mL), suggesting a concentration-dependent effect at higher doses. Importantly, even the lowest GI50 values remained within acceptable safety margins, supporting the potential of these natural extracts for biomedical use. These results highlight the importance of optimizing extract ratios to balance biological activity with cellular safety.
The findings are consistent with previous reports showing dose-dependent cytotoxicity of C. majus in different systems. A recent study described strong activity in pod and flower extracts, with more moderate inhibition from leaf, stem, and root fractions [19]. By contrast, Sericin has repeatedly been shown to be biocompatible. For example, another study demonstrated that Sericin–chitosan scaffolds at a 1:1 ratio were non-toxic to dermal fibroblasts over eight days [69]. Taken together, the present results suggest that while C. majus contributes measurable bioactivity, Sericin may mitigate potential cytotoxic effects, thereby supporting fibroblast viability.
A possible association between the safety profile of C. majus and its phytochemistry can be noted. The extract is rich in hydroxybenzoic acids, hydroxycinnamic acids, flavones, and flavonols—compounds widely reported for their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Metabolites such as salicylic acid, feruloyltyramine, pinocembrin, and phenylacetic acid were present at relatively high levels and may contribute to maintaining cytocompatibility, although no direct causative link was tested here. Hydroxybenzoic acids, in particular, are known to reduce oxidative stress, which may partially explain the generally favorable cytocompatibility observed.
A deeper insight into the bioactivity of the C. majus–Sericin formulations can be considered in terms of specific compounds and potential mechanisms. Phenolic constituents such as hydroxybenzoic acids, hydroxycinnamic acids, flavones, and flavonols are likely contributors to both cytoprotective and antimicrobial effects. These compounds can modulate oxidative stress in fibroblasts, supporting cell viability, while simultaneously exhibiting antimicrobial activity through interactions with microbial membranes or enzymes. Sericin may interact with these phenolics via hydrogen bonding or hydrophobic interactions, which could influence their bioavailability and release kinetics, thereby balancing antimicrobial potency with cytocompatibility [70,71,72,73]. Although the precise cellular pathways were not directly assessed in this study, the combination of antioxidant phenolics and Sericin’s protective properties suggests a mechanism whereby fibroblast survival is maintained even in the presence of bioactive compounds with antimicrobial potential.
Variability among Sericin sources may also explain differences in cytocompatibility. Commercial Sericin typically consists of lower molecular weight fractions with higher solubility, properties that can favor biocompatibility. In contrast, crude preparations may retain larger peptides, pigments, or residual impurities that influence cell behavior. Such differences, reported in prior studies [29,65,74], suggest that Sericin’s extraction method strongly shapes its biochemical profile and interactions with C. majus, influencing cytocompatibility outcomes.
Comparable biopolymer–phenolic systems help contextualize these findings. For instance, quercetin nanocrystal–loaded alginate hydrogels accelerated wound closure in vivo while maintaining fibroblast viability in vitro [66]. Similarly, gelatin/alginate scaffolds reinforced with TiO2 nanoparticles released quercetin, caffeic acid, and allantoin while preserving cytocompatibility [67]. More recently, 3D-printed Alg–Gel scaffolds functionalized with TA@ZIF-8 supported fibroblast proliferation and adhesion alongside antimicrobial effects [75]. In this context, the present results suggest that higher Sericin proportions may help preserve fibroblast viability by moderating phenolic exposure, even if this reduces antimicrobial potency. While higher Sericin ratios were associated with reduced antimicrobial activity in other assays, these formulations consistently maintained excellent cytocompatibility, highlighting a trade-off between antimicrobial potency and cellular safety that may guide optimal formulation design.
Finally, the HFF1 human fibroblast line was chosen because of its relevance to skin physiology and wound healing. These cells contribute to extracellular matrix production, collagen synthesis, and tissue remodeling, making them a widely used model for evaluating cytocompatibility. Their use strengthens the translational value of the present findings, which suggest that C. majus–Sericin formulations can achieve acceptable safety levels while maintaining biological activity, supporting further exploration for wound-healing applications.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chelidonium majus L. (C. majus)

C. majus whole plant was purchased in dried form from Natura Store (Setúbal, Portugal; Lot no. 11CELL435J191S), packaged and distributed by Alfredo Augusto Tavares & Sucessores, Lda. According to supplier information, the material originated from Bulgaria. Upon reception, the dried material was stored in a dry, dark environment at room temperature until extraction. Hydroethanolic extracts were obtained using a solid–liquid extraction method. Briefly, 1.5 g of dried plant material was mixed with 30 mL of an ethanol–water solution (80:20, v/v; providing an intermediate polarity optimal for the extraction of a broad spectrum of phytochemicals, particularly polyphenols and flavonoids) and stirred at 500 rpm with a magnetic stirrer for 1 h at room temperature. The suspension was then filtered through quantitative ashless cellulose filter papers (CHMLAB, Grade F2040, Ref. DA0073A, 125 mm diameter, ash content ≤ 0.01%), and the retained residue was re-extracted under identical conditions. The combined filtrates were concentrated by removing ethanol under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator (Hei-VAP Core, Heidolph Instruments, Schwabach, Germany) at 40 °C, 120 rpm, and a pressure of approximately 175 mbar [76,77]. The remaining aqueous phase was frozen at −80 °C and lyophilized with a Büchi R-20 lyophilizer (Flawil, Switzerland). The resulting extract was stored in the dark until further analysis.

3.2. Sericin

Sericin was extracted from Bombyx mori cocoons collected in different regions of Portugal. Cocoons from Bragança (2019) were provided by Casa da Seda (Centro de Ciência Viva de Bragança), and those from Castelo Branco (2019) were obtained from the Associação Portuguesa de Pais e Amigos do Cidadão Deficiente Mental (APPACDM). Commercial Sericin samples were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and FUJIFILM Wako Chemicals (2023). The extraction procedure followed an adaptation of [29]. Briefly, cocoons were manually cleaned, cut into ~1 cm2 fragments, and washed three times with deionized water. The cleaned material was dried at 50 °C, weighed, and subjected to degumming by immersion in ultrapure water (1.5% w/v), followed by autoclaving at 120 °C for 30 min. The resulting aqueous Sericin solution was filtered to remove residual fibers, stored in sealed containers, frozen at −80 °C, and lyophilized. The obtained Sericin powders were stored at 4 °C until further use.

3.3. Combination of the Extracts

Formulations combining C. majus and Sericin extracts were prepared at different concentration ratios (1:1, 1:2, 2:2, and 2:1). Each ratio was designed for the respective assays to evaluate potential synergistic or antagonistic interactions. This systematic approach enabled a comprehensive assessment of their combined effects, providing insights into the interaction dynamics between C. majus and Sericin under varying experimental conditions (Table 4).

3.4. Identification and Quantification of Phenolic Compounds in C. majus

The tentative identification and quantification of the phenolic compounds in the C. majus samples were performed using a micro-flow LC-HRMS/MS mass spectrometer system (Thermo Fischer Scientific, San José, CA, USA) comprising a Vanquish Neo UHPLC system coupled to an Orbitrap Exploris 240 mass spectrometer. The chromatography separation was performed using an Acclaim™ PepMap™ 100 C18 columns (150 mm × 1 mm, 2 μm) (Thermo Fischer Scientific, San José, CA, USA). The mobile phase A was water and mobile phase B was acetonitrile, both acidified with 0.1% of formic acid. The gradient time was 20 min (0–2 min, 0% B; 2–16 min, 0–95% B; 16–20 min, 95% B) at a flow rate of 50 μL/min and sample injection was 0.2 μL. The Exploris 240 MS was operated in full scan in negative mode (m/z 100–1500 Da) and tandem MS/MS using data-dependent mass scan mode. The resolution was fixed at 180,000 and 15,000 to full scan and date-dependent mass scan, respectively. The parameters of Heated-Elestrospray Ionization (HESI) were the following: spray voltage (2500 V), sheath gas (20 units), auxiliary gas (5 units), ion transfer tube temperature (325 °C), vaporizer temperature (120 °C), and RF lens (70%). Data acquisition and analysis were performed using Trace Finder 5.1 software and Xcalibur 4.6 software (Thermo Scientific, San José, CA, USA). The identification of phenolic compounds was performed by comparing the exact mass as well as the retention time with available standards. When the standards were not available, the phenolic compounds were tentatively identified by comparing the theoretical exact mass and experimental accurate mass of the molecular ion, these were checked with chemical compound databases, such as MzCloud, Phytohub, Phenol Explorer, PubChem, etc., with an error tolerance ≤5 ppm. The quantification of phenolic compounds was performed using standard curves of reference standards, in the absence of these, the quantification was carried out using a closely related parent compound.

3.5. Bioactivities Evaluation

The antimicrobial and cytocompatibility properties of the different extract combinations were evaluated due to their direct relevance to critical phases of the wound healing process, including infection control, modulation of oxidative stress, and maintenance of tissue compatibility.

3.5.1. Antimicrobial Assay

The antimicrobial assay was performed following the protocol described by [56]. A colorimetric method was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the samples. Extracts were dissolved in DMSO/MHB, serially diluted, and transferred into microplates containing MHB/TSB, the test sample, and the microbial inoculum. MIC values were determined by adding 0.2 mg/mL p-iodonitrotetrazolium chloride, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 30 min. The minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) was established by plating aliquots from wells showing no visible growth. The antimicrobial potential was tested against four clinically relevant skin-associated strains: three Gram-positive bacteria—Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Propionibacterium acnes—as well as the fungus Candida albicans. All strains were isolated from patients hospitalized in different departments of the Hospital Center of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (Vila Real, Portugal). Appropriate controls were included: (i) MHB/TSB only, (ii) extract only, and (iii) medium with antibiotic as negative controls, and (iv) MHB with inoculum as a positive control. Ampicillin and vancomycin served as reference antibiotics for Gram-positive bacteria. Results were expressed as MIC, minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), or minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC), in mg/mL.

3.5.2. Cytocompatibility Assay

The cytocompatibility of the extracts was evaluated using the sulforhodamine B (SRB) colorimetric assay, following the protocol described by [78]. Human fibroblast cells (HFF1), obtained from the Leibniz Institute DSMZ—German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH (Braunschweig, Germany), were used as the in vitro model. Cytocompatibility was quantified based on the GI50 value, defined as the concentration required to inhibit 50% of cell proliferation. Extracts were classified according to the criteria established by the U.S. National Cancer Institute: low cytocompatibility (GI50 ≤ 20 µg/mL), moderate (GI50 = 21–200 µg/mL), high (GI50 = 201–400 µg/mL), and very high (GI50 > 400 µg/mL). A cell suspension without extract served as the control. Results are expressed as GI50 values (µg/mL), with higher values indicating greater cytocompatibility.

3.6. Statistical Analysis

Each assay was conducted in duplicate, and the results were expressed as mean values ± standard deviation, calculated using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA).

4. Conclusions

Comprehensive chemical profiling of C. majus revealed a diverse set of 57 phenolic compounds, with flavonols, flavones, and hydroxycinnamic acids (including amides) as the predominant groups. Among these, salicylic acid, feruloyltyramine, pinocembrin, and phenylacetic acid were particularly abundant, while hydroxybenzoic acids represented the most concentrated class overall. Additional metabolites, such as protocatechuic acid, veratric acid, and rutin, also contributed substantially, whereas p-coumaroylputrescine and vitexin were detected only in trace amounts. This chemical richness is consistent with previous reports on the phytochemical diversity of C. majus and supports its relevance as a source of bioactive compounds.
Biological assays further clarified the functional significance of these extracts. C. majus alone exhibited consistent antimicrobial activity, with MIC values of 5–10 mg/mL against all tested bacterial and fungal strains. In contrast, Sericin alone was inactive, except for the commercial variant, which showed limited effects against C. acnes and S. epidermidis. When combined, antimicrobial activity was generally attenuated, with the ratio of C. majus to Sericin being the primary determinant. Formulations with higher C. majus content (2:1) retained partial inhibitory activity, whereas Sericin-rich formulations (1:2) abolished antimicrobial effects. These results suggest that Sericin may reduce the bioavailability or effective concentration of phenolic compounds, potentially through protein–polyphenol interactions, and underscore the concentration-dependent nature of the observed outcomes.
Cytocompatibility testing in HFF1 fibroblasts showed that most extracts and combinations maintained high cell viability (GI50 > 400 µg/mL). Several formulations displayed moderate cytocompatibility (GI50 = 150–377 µg/mL), with the lowest value recorded for the 2CS1 formulation (GI50 = 150 ± 3.6 µg/mL). Although these results indicate a possible concentration-dependent cytotoxic effect, all values remained within acceptable safety thresholds. The data therefore suggest that while C. majus provides measurable bioactivity, Sericin may help to balance these effects, contributing to the overall cytocompatibility of the formulations.
Together, these findings indicate that C. majus–Sericin combinations exhibit ratio-dependent biological behavior, in which Sericin does not act as a synergistic enhancer of antimicrobial activity but may play a role in moderating cytotoxicity. Similar dynamics have been described in other biopolymer–phenolic systems, where interactions between proteins and polyphenols influence both bioavailability and functional outcomes. Within this framework, careful adjustment of formulation ratios emerges as a critical step for balancing antimicrobial activity and cellular safety. Although these results diverge from the initial expectation of a synergistic interaction between C. majus and Sericin, they provide insight into the behavior of such biopolymer–phenolic systems. The observed attenuation of antimicrobial activity upon Sericin incorporation suggests a modulatory rather than potentiating role, likely arising from protein–phenolic associations that limit the bioavailability of active metabolites. Importantly, these findings constitute a valuable result, delineating the functional boundaries of Sericin–phenolic interactions and underscoring the necessity of precise formulation optimization to achieve a balance between antimicrobial efficacy and cytocompatibility.
Beyond their biological properties, these extracts also carry environmental and economic advantages. Sericin, typically discarded as a byproduct of silk production, can be valorized as a biocompatible protein source, while C. majus, a widely distributed wild-growing plant, represents a sustainable source of phenolic compounds. Integrating these natural materials into biomedical applications offers the dual benefit of reducing waste and advancing eco-friendly healthcare solutions.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that C. majus–Sericin formulations show concentration-dependent antimicrobial and cytocompatibility outcomes. While Sericin did not enhance the antimicrobial activity of C. majus, it may contribute to maintaining biocompatibility, suggesting a modulatory rather than synergistic role. These results highlight the importance of ratio optimization and provide a basis for further investigation into the interactions between Sericin proteins and C. majus phenolics. Future work should focus on elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying these interactions and refining formulations for wound-healing applications, while also considering the sustainability benefits of these natural bioresources.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26209911/s1.

Author Contributions

A.B.: Conceptualization. Methodology. Investigation. Formal Analysis. Writing—original draft. J.L.O.-D.: Methodology. Formal Analysis. Writing—review & editing. Y.A.: Methodology. Formal Analysis. Writing—review & editing. J.M.M.-R.: Writing—review & editing. Supervision. M.L.M.C.: Writing—review & editing. J.A.V.: Conceptualization; Methodology. Resources. Writing—review & editing. R.C.C.: Conceptualization. Methodology. Investigation. Resources. Writing—review & editing. Supervision. Funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Science and Technology (FCT. Portugal) for financial support through national funds FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) to CIMO (UIDB/00690/2020 and UIDP/00690/2020) and SusTEC (LA/P/0007/2020). National funding by FCT. P.I. through the scientific employment program contract for the contract of R. Calhelha (CEEC Institutional DOI:10.54499/CEECINST/00016/2018/CP1505/CT0009) and through the project Wastesilk (http://doi.org/10.54499/PTDC/BTA-BTA/0696/2020).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT. Portugal) for financial support through national funds FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) to CIMO (UIDB/00690/2020 and UIDP/00690/2020) and SusTEC (LA/P/0007/2020). National funding by FCT. P.I. through the scientific employment program contract for the contract of R. Calhelha (CEEC Institutional DOI:10.54499/CEECINST/00016/2018/CP1505/CT0009) and through the Project Wastesilk (http://doi.org/10.54499/PTDC/BTA-BTA/0696/2020). José Luis Ordóñez-Díaz was supported by a postdoctoral contract from Junta de Andalucía within the PAIDI 2020 program (POSTDOC_21_00914) and José Castillejo mobility program from the Spanish Ministry of Universities (CAS23/00285).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, D.; Li, M.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Nie, J.; Ma, G. The Synergetic Effect of Alginate-Derived Hydrogels and Metal-Phenolic Nanospheres for Chronic Wound Therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2024, 12, 2571–2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Iosageanu, A.; Mihai, E.; Seciu-Grama, A.M.; Utoiu, E.; Gaspar-Pintiliescu, A.; Gatea, F.; Cimpean, A.; Craciunescu, O. In Vitro Wound-Healing Potential of Phenolic and Polysaccharide Extracts of Aloe Vera Gel. J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, H.; Feng, Y.; Wang, T.; Zhang, J.; Song, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Zhou, D.; Gu, Z. Natural Polyphenolic Antibacterial Bio-Adhesives for Infected Wound Healing. Biomater. Sci. 2024, 12, 2282–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhou, C.; Zou, Y.; Xu, R.; Han, X.; Xiang, Z.; Guo, H.; Li, X.; Liang, J.; Zhang, X.; Fan, Y.; et al. Metal-Phenolic Self-Assembly Shielded Probiotics in Hydrogel Reinforced Wound Healing with Antibiotic Treatment. Mater. Horiz. 2023, 10, 3114–3123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Aminzadehanboohi, M.; Makridakis, M.; Rasti, D.; Cambet, Y.; Krause, K.H.; Vlahou, A.; Jaquet, V. Redox Mechanisms Driving Skin Fibroblast-to-Myofibroblast Differentiation. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yerebakan, M.; Tuter, G.; Bagriacik, E.U.; Oruklu, N.; Guldurur, T. Evaluation of the Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant and Wound Healing Effects of Pterostilbene in Human Gingival Fibroblasts in Vitro. Odontology 2025, 113, 1098–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gao, D.; Shipman, W.D.; Sun, Y.; Glahn, J.Z.; Beraki, L.; Hsia, H.C. Macroporous Scaffolds Based on Biomass Polymers and Their Applications in Wound Healing. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2025, 10, 14–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Olteanu, G.; Neacșu, S.M.; Joița, F.A.; Musuc, A.M.; Lupu, E.C.; Ioniță-Mîndrican, C.B.; Lupuliasa, D.; Mititelu, M. Advancements in Regenerative Hydrogels in Skin Wound Treatment: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rana, J.N.; Mumtaz, S. Prunin: An Emerging Anticancer Flavonoid. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cioanca, O.; Lungu, I.I.; Batir-Marin, D.; Lungu, A.; Marin, G.A.; Huzum, R.; Stefanache, A.; Sekeroglu, N.; Hancianu, M. Modulating Polyphenol Activity with Metal Ions: Insights into Dermatological Applications. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Joorabloo, A.; Liu, T. Recent Advances in Reactive Oxygen Species Scavenging Nanomaterials for Wound Healing. Exploration 2024, 4, 20230066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, H.; Ai, R.; Liu, B.Z.; He, L. Tea Polyphenol Nano-Crosslinked Dynamical Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogel for Diabetic Wound Healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 282, 136856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, T.; Cao, H.C.; Wang, R.; Yang, Q.; Wei, S.; Pan, P.; Shi, H. Polyphenol-Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogel Remodels the Wound Microenvironment and Eliminates Bacterial Infection for Accelerating Wound Healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 280, 135931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. González-Acedo, A.; Illescas-Montes, R.; de Luna-Bertos, E.; Ruiz, C.; Ramos-Torrecillas, J.; García-Martínez, O.; Melguizo-Rodríguez, L. Extra Virgin Olive Oil Phenolic Compounds Modulate the Gene Expression of Biomarkers Involved in Fibroblast Proliferation and Differentiation. Genes 2024, 15, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dostemessova, A.B.; Ametov, A.A.; Kurmanbayeva, M.S.; Izbastina, K.S. Biomorphological and Phytochemical Parameters of Chelidonium majus L. in the Conditions of Kungei-Alatau. Fundam. Exp. Biol. 2023, 111, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Maji, A.K.; Banerji, P. Chelidonium majus L. (Greater Celandine)-A Review on Its Phytochemical and Therapeutic Perspectives. Int. J. Herbal. Med. 2015, 3, 10–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Terzic, M.; Fayez, S.; Fahmy, N.M.; Eldahshan, O.A.; Uba, A.I.; Ponniya, S.K.M.; Selvi, S.; Nilofar; Koyuncu, I.; Yüksekdağ, Ö.; et al. Chemical Characterization of Three Different Extracts Obtained from Chelidonium majus L. (Greater Celandine) with Insights into Their In Vitro, In Silico and Network Pharmacological Properties. Fitoterapia 2024, 174, 105835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Samatadze, T.E.; Yurkevich, O.Y.; Hazieva, F.M.; Konyaeva, E.A.; Morozov, A.I.; Zoshchuk, S.A.; Amosova, A.V.; Muravenko, O.V. Agro-Morphological, Microanatomical and Molecular Cytogenetic Characterization of the Medicinal Plant Chelidonium majus L. Plants 2020, 9, 1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nile, S.H.; Wang, H.; Nile, A.; Lin, X.; Dong, H.; Venkidasamy, B.; Sieniawska, E.; Enkhtaivan, G.; Kai, G. Comparative Analysis of Metabolic Variations, Antioxidant Potential and Cytotoxic Effects in Different Parts of Chelidonium majus L. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2021, 156, 112483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hilal, B.; Khan, M.M.; Fariduddin, Q. Recent Advancements in Deciphering the Therapeutic Properties of Plant Secondary Metabolites: Phenolics, Terpenes, and Alkaloids. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 211, 108674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kumar, V.; Sharma, A.; Kohli, S.K.; Bali, S.; Sharma, M.; Kumar, R.; Bhardwaj, R.; Thukral, A.K. Differential Distribution of Polyphenols in Plants Using Multivariate Techniques. Biotechnol. Res. Innov. 2019, 3, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zielinska, S.; Jezierska-Domaradzka, A.; Wójciak-Kosior, M.; Sowa, I.; Junka, A.; Matkowski, A.M. Greater Celandine’s Ups and Downs-21 Centuries of Medicinal Uses of Chelidonium majus from the Viewpoint of Today’s Pharmacology. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Warowicka, A.; Nawrot, R.; Goździcka-Józefiak, A. Pharmacologically Active Compounds from Latex-Bearing Plants. Adv. Bot. Res. 2020, 93, 119–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Borges, A.; Calvo, M.L.M.; Vaz, J.A.; Calhelha, R.C. Enhancing Wound Healing: A Comprehensive Review of Sericin and Chelidonium majus L. as Potential Dressings. Materials 2024, 17, 4199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Silva, A.S.; Costa, E.C.; Reis, S.; Spencer, C.; Calhelha, R.C.; Miguel, S.P.; Ribeiro, M.P.; Barros, L.; Vaz, J.A.; Coutinho, P. Silk Sericin: A Promising Sustainable Biomaterial for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 4931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Saad, M.; El-Samad, L.M.; Gomaa, R.A.; Augustyniak, M.; Hassan, M.A. A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances in Silk Sericin: Extraction Approaches, Structure, Biochemical Characterization, and Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 250, 126067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Arora, D.; Sharma, A. A Review on Phytochemical and Pharmacological Potential of Genus Chelidonium. Pharmacogn. J. 2013, 5, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Grosso, C.; Ferreres, F.; Gil-Izquierdo, A.; Valentão, P.; Sampaio, M.; Lima, J.; Andrade, P.B. Box-Behnken Factorial Design to Obtain a Phenolic-Rich Extract from the Aerial Parts of Chelidonium majus L. Talanta 2014, 130, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Reis, S.; Spencer, C.; Soares, C.M.; Falcão, S.I.; Miguel, S.P.; Ribeiro, M.P.; Barros, L.; Vaz, J. Chemical Characterization and Bioactivities of Sericin Extracted from Silkworm Cocoons from Two Regions of Portugal. Molecules 2025, 30, 1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Metzner, B.T.; Marcelino, S.; Mandim, F.; Calhelha, R. Exploration of Chelidonium majus L. as a Healing Agent. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  31. Rana, J.N.; Gul, K.; Mumtaz, S. Isorhamnetin: Reviewing Recent Developments in Anticancer Mechanisms and Nanoformulation-Driven Delivery. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 7381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Olszowy-Tomczyk, M.; Paprotny, Ł.; Wianowska, D. Stability of Selected Phenolic Acids Under Simulated and Real Extraction Conditions from Plants. Molecules 2024, 29, 5861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Krizhanovska, V.; Sile, I.; Kronberga, A.; Nakurte, I.; Mezaka, I.; Dambrova, M.; Pugovics, O.; Grinberga, S. The Cultivation of Chelidonium majus L. Increased the Total Alkaloid Content and Cytotoxic Activity Compared with Those of Wild-Grown Plants. Plants 2021, 10, 1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dozio, D.; Ghosh, S.; Consolini, D.A.; Ermini Starna, J.L.; Pinto, L.; Baruzzi, F.; Contente, M.L.; Pinto, A.; Cortesi, P.; Princiotto, S.; et al. Feruloyl-Amides as Natural Antimicrobials for Crop and Food Protection. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2025, 12, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pasquet, P.L.; Julien-David, D.; Zhao, M.; Villain-Gambier, M.; Trébouet, D. Stability and Preservation of Phenolic Compounds and Related Antioxidant Capacity from Agro-Food Matrix: Effect of PH and Atmosphere. Food Biosci. 2024, 57, 103586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Teschke, R.; Frenzel, C.; Glass, X.; Schulze, J.; Eickhoff, A. Greater Celandine Hepatotoxicity: A Clinical Review. Ann. Hepatol. 2012, 11, 838–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Gao, L.; Schmitz, H.J.; Merz, K.H.; Schrenk, D. Characterization of the Cytotoxicity of Selected Chelidonium Alkaloids in Rat Hepatocytes. Toxicol. Lett. 2019, 311, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Khalil, A.M.; Sabry, O.M.; El-Askary, H.I.; El Zalabani, S.M.; Eltanany, B.M.; Pont, L.; Benavente, F.; Mohamed, A.F.; Fayek, N.M. Uncovering the Therapeutic Potential of Green Pea Waste in Breast Cancer: A Multi-Target Approach Utilizing LC-MS/MS Metabolomics, Molecular Networking, and Network Pharmacology. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2024, 24, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ojeda, G.A.; Sgroppo, S.C.; Sánchez Moreno, C.; de Ancos Siguero, B. Mango ‘Criollo’ by-Products as a Source of Polyphenols with Antioxidant Capacity. Ultrasound Assisted Extraction Evaluated by Response Surface Methodology and HPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS Characterization. Food Chem. 2022, 396, 133738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ding, Y.; Morozova, K.; Imperiale, S.; Angeli, L.; Asma, U.; Ferrentino, G.; Scampicchio, M. HPLC-Triple Detector (Coulometric Array, Diode Array and Mass Spectrometer) for the Analysis of Antioxidants in Officinal Plants. LWT 2022, 162, 113456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rodríguez-Pérez, C.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M.; Guerra-Hernández, E.; Cerretani, L.; García-Villanova, B.; Verardo, V. Comprehensive Metabolite Profiling of Solanum tuberosum L. (Potato) Leaves by HPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS. Food Res. Int. 2018, 112, 390–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, J.; Liu, J.; Han, Z.; He, X.; Herrera-Balandrano, D.D.; Xiang, J. Comprehensive Evaluation on Phenolic Derivatives and Antioxidant Activities of Diverse Yellow Maize Varieties. Food Chem. 2025, 464, 141602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rinaldi de Alvarenga, J.F.; Quifer-Rada, P.; Hurtado-Barroso, S.; Illan, M.; Torrado-Prat, X.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. Cuisinomics: MS-Based Untargeted Approach Reveals Chemical Modulation by a Recipe during Home Cooking. Food Res. Int. 2020, 138, 109787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Elattar, M.M.; Hammoda, H.M.; Ghareeb, D.A.; Abdulmalek, S.A.; Abdelrahim, F.A.; Seif, I.A.K.; Dawood, H.M.; Darwish, R.S. Insights into Bioactive Constituents of Onion (Allium cepa L.) Waste: A Comparative Metabolomics Study Enhanced by Chemometric Tools. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2024, 24, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, H.H.; Oh, K.E.; Jo, Y.H.; Ahn, J.H.; Liu, Q.; Turk, A.; Jang, J.Y.; Hwang, B.Y.; Lee, K.Y.; Lee, M.K. Characterization of Tyrosinase Inhibitory Constituents from the Aerial Parts of Humulus Japonicus Using LC-MS/MS Coupled Online Assay. Bioorg Med. Chem. 2018, 26, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hanif, S.; Shahzadi, Z.; Anjum, I.; Yousaf, Z.; Aftab, A.; Javed, S.; Maqboo, Z.; Ullah, R.; Iqbal, Z.; Raza, M.A. Colchicine, Serotobenine, and Kinobeon A: Novel Therapeutic Compounds in Carthamus tinctorius L. for the Management of Diabetes. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2024, 67, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Saber, F.R.; Mohsen, E.; El-Hawary, S.; Eltanany, B.M.; Elimam, H.; Sobeh, M.; Elmotayam, A.K. Chemometric-Enhanced Metabolic Profiling of Five Pinus Species Using HPLC-MS/MS Spectrometry: Correlation to in Vitro Anti-Aging, Anti-Alzheimer and Antidiabetic Activities. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2021, 1177, 122759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yun, E.S.; Park, S.K.; Kim, B.S.; Chae, Y.Z.; Cho, S.M.; Yi, H.; Cho, H.J.; Shin, H.C. Determination of the Esculetin Contents of Medicinal Plants by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2012, 26, 1247–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhou, L.; Li, J.; Yan, C. Simultaneous Determination of Three Flavonoids and One Coumarin by LC–MS/MS: Application to a Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study in Normal and Arthritic Rats after Oral Administration of Daphne Genkwa Extract. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2018, 32, e4233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hsueh, T.P.; Tsai, T.H. Preclinical Pharmacokinetics of Scoparone, Geniposide and Rhein in an Herbal Medicine Using a Validated LC-MS/MS Method. Molecules 2018, 23, 2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ramalingam, P.; Ko, Y.T. Validated LC-MS/MS Method for Simultaneous Quantification of Resveratrol Levels in Mouse Plasma and Brain and Its Application to Pharmacokinetic and Brain Distribution Studies. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2016, 119, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Vasdekis, E.P.; Karkabounas, A.; Giannakopoulos, I.; Savvas, D.; Lekka, M.E. Screening of Mushrooms Bioactivity: Piceatannol Was Identified as a Bioactive Ingredient in the Order Cantharellales. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2018, 244, 861–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gasparetto, J.C.; Guimarães De Francisco, T.M.; Campos, F.R.; Pontarolo, R. Development and Validation of Two Methods Based on High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Determining 1,2-Benzopyrone, Dihydrocoumarin, o-Coumaric Acid, Syringaldehyde and Kaurenoic Acid in Guaco Extracts and Pharmaceutical Preparations. J. Sep. Sci. 2011, 34, 740–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Liu, H.; Yang, A.-P.; Zheng, Z.-G.; Liu, F.; Liu, J.; Wang, R.-X.; Yang, H.; Huang, Z.-J.; Huang, P.-Y. Natural Products as Sources of Cytotoxic Compounds with Potential for Development into Anti-Cancer Agents-Short Communication Screening for Potential Antibreast Cancer Components from Prunellae Spica Using MCF-7 Cell Extraction Coupled with HPLC-ESI-MS/MS. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2020, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Al Jammal, D.; Bachir, J.; Moussa, J.A.; Al Ramahi, J.W. In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Clinical Isolates from Adult and Paediatric Patients in Jordan: Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) 2010–2021. Front. Antibiot. 2024, 3, 1375980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pires, T.C.S.P.; Dias, M.I.; Barros, L.; Alves, M.J.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Dried Portuguese Apple Variety (Malus Domestica Borkh. Cv Bravo de Esmolfe). Food Chem. 2018, 240, 701–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Sobel, J.D. Resistance to Fluconazole of Candida Albicans in Vaginal Isolates: A 10-Year Study in a Clinical Referral Center. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2023, 67, e00181-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Baptista-Silva, S.; Borges, S.; Costa-Pinto, A.R.; Costa, R.; Amorim, M.; Dias, J.R.; Ramos, O.; Alves, P.; Granja, P.L.; Soares, R.; et al. In Situ Forming Silk Sericin-Based Hydrogel: A Novel Wound Healing Biomaterial. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 7, 1573–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zielińska, S.; Matkowski, A.; Dydak, K.; Czerwińska, M.E.; Dziągwa-Becker, M.; Kucharski, M.; Wójciak, M.; Sowa, I.; Plińska, S.; Fijałkowski, K.; et al. Bacterial Nanocellulose Fortified with Antimicrobial and Anti-Inflammatory Natural Products from Chelidonium majus Plant Cell Cultures. Materials 2022, 15, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dash, R.; Acharya, C.; Bindu, P.; Kundu, S. Antioxidant Potential of Silk Protein Sericin Against Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced Oxidative Stress in Skin Fibroblasts. BMB Rep. 2008, 41, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Saha, J.; Mondal, M.I.; Karim Sheikh, M.R.; Habib, M.A. Extraction, Structural and Functional Properties of Silk Sericin Biopolymer from Bombyx Mori Silk Cocoon Waste. J. Text. Sci. Eng. 2019, 9, 1000390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ozdal, T.; Capanoglu, E.; Altay, F. A Review on Protein-Phenolic Interactions and Associated Changes. Food Res. Int. 2013, 51, 954–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Feng, Y.; Jin, C.; Lv, S.; Zhang, H.; Ren, F.; Wang, J. Molecular Mechanisms and Applications of Polyphenol-Protein Complexes with Antioxidant Properties: A Review. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, J.; Yong, H.; Yao, X.; Hu, H.; Yun, D.; Xiao, L. Recent Advances in Phenolic-Protein Conjugates: Synthesis, Characterization, Biological Activities and Potential Applications. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 35825–35840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Aramwit, P.; Kanokpanont, S.; Nakpheng, T.; Srichana, T. The Effect of Sericin from Various Extraction Methods on Cell Viability and Collagen Production. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 2200–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nayak, M.; Kumar, V.; Banerjee, D.; Pradhan, L.; Kamath, P.; Mukherjee, S. Quercetin Nanocrystal-Loaded Alginate Hydrogel Patch for Wound Healing Applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2024, 13, 1690–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Babić Radić, M.M.; Vukomanović, M.; Nikodinović-Runić, J.; Tomić, S. Gelatin-/Alginate-Based Hydrogel Scaffolds Reinforced with TiO2 Nanoparticles for Simultaneous Release of Allantoin, Caffeic Acid, and Quercetin as Multi-Target Wound Therapy Platform. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Chen, Z.; Zhe, M.; Wu, W.; Yu, P.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, H.; Liu, M.; Xiang, Z.; Xing, F. Injectable Photocrosslinked Hydrogel Dressing Encapsulating Quercetin-Loaded Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8 for Skin Wound Healing. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Chollakup, R.; Uttayarat, P.; Chworos, A.; Smitthipong, W. Noncovalent Sericin-Chitosan Scaffold: Physical Properties and Low Cytotoxicity Effect. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. de Oliveira, M.R.; Peres, A.; Gama, C.S.; Bosco, S.M.D. Pinocembrin Provides Mitochondrial Protection by the Activation of the Erk1/2-Nrf2 Signaling Pathway in SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cells Exposed to Paraquat. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017, 54, 6018–6031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Klančnik, A.; Šimunović, K.; Kovac, J.; Sahin, O.; Wu, Z.; Vučković, D.; Abram, M.; Zhang, Q.; Možina, S.S. The Anti-Campylobacter Activity and Mechanisms of Pinocembrin Action. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Butkhup, L.; Jeenphakdee, M.; Jorjong, S.; Samappito, S.; Samappito, W.; Butimal, J. Phenolic Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Thai and Eri Silk Sericins. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2012, 21, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tao, G.; Cai, R.; Wang, Y.; Zuo, H.; He, H. Fabrication of Antibacterial Sericin Based Hydrogel as an Injectable and Mouldable Wound Dressing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 119, 111597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Aramwit, P.; Damrongsakkul, S.; Kanokpanont, S.; Srichana, T. Properties and Antityrosinase Activity of Sericin from Various Extraction Methods. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2010, 55, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Maghsoudi, M.A.F.; Aghdam, R.M.; Asbagh, R.A.; Moghaddaszadeh, A.; Ghaee, A.; Tafti, S.M.A.; Foroutani, L.; Tafti, S.H.A. 3D-Printing of Alginate/Gelatin Scaffold Loading Tannic Acid@ZIF-8 for Wound Healing: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 265, 130744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tourabi, M.; Metouekel, A.; ghouizi, A.E.L.; Jeddi, M.; Nouioura, G.; Laaroussi, H.; Hosen, M.E.; Benbrahim, K.F.; Bourhia, M.; Salamatullah, A.M.; et al. Efficacy of Various Extracting Solvents on Phytochemical Composition, and Biological Properties of Mentha longifolia L. Leaf Extracts. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 18028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Plaskova, A.; Mlcek, J. New Insights of the Application of Water or Ethanol-Water Plant Extract Rich in Active Compounds in Food. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1118761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Larbi, S.; Aylanc, V.; Rodríguez-Flores, M.S.; Calhelha, R.C.; Barros, L.; Rezouga, F.; Seijo, M.C.; Falcão, S.I.; Vilas-Boas, M. Differentiating between Monofloral Portuguese Bee Pollens Using Phenolic and Volatile Profiles and Their Impact on Bioactive Properties. Molecules 2023, 28, 7601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 26 09911 g001
Figure 1. Graphic overview of the study.
Figure 1. Graphic overview of the study.
Ijms 26 09911 g001
Table 2. Antimicrobial potential of the different samples studied.
Table 2. Antimicrobial potential of the different samples studied.
Antibacterial
Activity		Antifungal
Activity
Gram-Positive Bacteria
Cutibacterium acnesStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus epidermidisCandida
albicans
MICMBCMICMBCMICMBCMICMFC
SamplesC10 mg/mL5>1051010>1010>10
S110 mg/mL>10>10>10>10>10>10>10>10
S210 mg/mL10>10>10>10>10>10>10>10
S310 mg/mL5>10>10>105>10>10>10
S410 mg/mL>10>10>10>10>10>10>10>10
1CS110 mg/mL>10>1010>1010>10>10>10
1CS210 mg/mL10>101010>10>10>10>10
1CS310 mg/mL10>1010>1010>10>10>10
1CS410 mg/mL10>10>10>1010>10>10>10
2CS110 mg/mL>10>10>10>10>10>10>10>10
2CS210 mg/mL>10>10>10>10>10>10>10>10
2CS310 mg/mL>10>10>10>10>10>10>10>10
2CS410 mg/mL>10>10>10>10>10>10>10>10
3CS110 mg/mL10>101010>10>10>10>10
3CS210 mg/mL10>10101010>10>10>10
3CS310 mg/mL>10>10>10>1010>10>10>10
3CS410 mg/mL10>10101010>10>10>10
4CS110 mg/mL>10>1010>1010>10>10>10
4CS210 mg/mL10>101010>10>10>10>10
4CS310 mg/mL10>1010>1010>10>10>10
4CS410 mg/mL10>10>10>1010>10>10>10
Positive controlAmpicillin20 mg/mL0.075<0.15<0.15n.t.n.t.n.t.n.t.
Vancomycin1 mg/mL n.t.n.t.0.250.50.255n.t.n.t.
Fluconazol1 mg/mLn.t.n.t.n.t.n.t.n.t.n.t.0.060.06
MIC—minimal inhibitory concentration; MBC—minimal bactericidal concentration; MFC—minimal fungicidal concentration. Values in mg/mL. S1—Sericin from Castelo Branco; S2—Sericin from Bragança; S3—Sericin purchased from Sigma-Aldrich; S4—Sericin purchased from FUJIFILM Wako Chemicals; C—Chelidonium majus L. 1CS—Ratio 1 C. majus: 1 Sericin; 2CS—Ratio 1 C. majus: 2 Sericin; 3CS—Ratio 2 C. majus: 1 Sericin; 4CS—Ratio 2 C. majus: 2 Sericin. Positive controls: Ampicillin, vancomycin, and fluconazol. Negative control 5% DMSO did not interfere with microbial growth. n.t.—not tested.
Table 3. Cytocompatibility of the different samples studied.
Table 3. Cytocompatibility of the different samples studied.
CS1S2S3S41CS11CS21CS31CS42CS12CS22CS32CS43CS13CS23CS33CS44CS14CS24CS34CS4
HFF1>400150 ± 3.6250 ± 8.9>400155 ± 4.1333 ± 3.4>400182 ± 2.1377 ± 4.7
Results were expressed as the mean values ± standard deviation. S1—Sericin from Castelo Branco; S2—Sericin from Bragança; S3—Sericin purchased from Sigma-Aldrich; S4—Sericin purchased from FUJIFILM Wako Chemicals; C—Chelidonium majus L. 1CS—Ratio 1 C. majus: 1 Sericin; 2CS—Ratio 1 C. majus: 2 Sericin; 3CS—Ratio 2 C. majus: 1 Sericin; 4CS—Ratio 2 C. majus: 2 Sericin.
Table 4. Coding information of the combined samples.
Table 4. Coding information of the combined samples.
CodesRatioConcentration
C. majus/Sericin (µg/mL)		Type of Sericin
(Location/Provider)
1CS11:1200:1600Castelo Branco
1CS2Bragança
1CS3Sigma-Aldrich
1CS4FUJIFILM Wako Chemicals
2CS11:2200:3200Castelo Branco
2CS2Bragança
2CS3Sigma-Aldrich
2CS4FUJIFILM Wako Chemicals
3CS12:1400:1600Castelo Branco
3CS2Bragança
3CS3Sigma-Aldrich
3CS4FUJIFILM Wako Chemicals
4CS12:2400:3200Castelo Branco
4CS2Bragança
4CS3Sigma-Aldrich
4CS4FUJIFILM Wako Chemicals
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Borges, A.; Ordóñez-Díaz, J.L.; Aquino, Y.; Moreno-Rojas, J.M.; Calvo, M.L.M.; Vaz, J.A.; Calhelha, R.C. Analysis of the Phenolic Profile of Chelidonium majus L. and Its Combination with Sericin: Balancing Antimicrobial Activity and Cytocompatibility. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 9911. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26209911

AMA Style

Borges A, Ordóñez-Díaz JL, Aquino Y, Moreno-Rojas JM, Calvo MLM, Vaz JA, Calhelha RC. Analysis of the Phenolic Profile of Chelidonium majus L. and Its Combination with Sericin: Balancing Antimicrobial Activity and Cytocompatibility. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(20):9911. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26209911

Chicago/Turabian Style

Borges, Ana, José Luis Ordóñez-Díaz, Yara Aquino, José Manuel Moreno-Rojas, María Luisa Martín Calvo, Josiana A. Vaz, and Ricardo C. Calhelha. 2025. "Analysis of the Phenolic Profile of Chelidonium majus L. and Its Combination with Sericin: Balancing Antimicrobial Activity and Cytocompatibility" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 20: 9911. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26209911

APA Style

Borges, A., Ordóñez-Díaz, J. L., Aquino, Y., Moreno-Rojas, J. M., Calvo, M. L. M., Vaz, J. A., & Calhelha, R. C. (2025). Analysis of the Phenolic Profile of Chelidonium majus L. and Its Combination with Sericin: Balancing Antimicrobial Activity and Cytocompatibility. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(20), 9911. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26209911

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop