Next Article in Journal
Polyphenols and Fibre: Key Players with Antioxidant Activity in Two Extracts from Pomegranate (Punica granatum)
Previous Article in Journal
Special Issue “Skeletal Muscle Adaptations to Oxidative Stress”
Previous Article in Special Issue
Foliar Nano-Selenium Modulates Metabolic and Antioxidant Responses in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.): Integration of Pot and Field Evidence
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

ARGOS Genes in Cauliflower: Genome-Wide Identification and Functional Validation of BobARL2 Under Abiotic Stresses

State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, National Engineering Research Center for Vegetables, Beijing Key Laboratory of Vegetable Germplasm Improvement, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (North China), Beijing Vegetable Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(19), 9810; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199810
Submission received: 29 August 2025 / Revised: 1 October 2025 / Accepted: 4 October 2025 / Published: 9 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance in Plant Abiotic Stress: 3rd Edition)

Abstract

The Auxin-Regulated Gene Involved in Organ Size (ARGOS) proteins have crucial regulatory effects on organ size and responses to environmental stresses. Despite their importance, Brassica oleracea ARGOS gene members and their functions in response to abiotic stresses have not been thoroughly investigated. In this study, we identified 40 ARGOS genes via a genome wide analysis of cauliflower and two other B. oleracea morphotypes as well as Brassica rapa, Brassica nigra, and Raphanus sativus. Expression pattern analyses indicated that these genes are responsive to multiple abiotic stresses, including salinity, heat, cold, and diverse hormones. Notably, the expression of an ARGOS-like gene (BobARL2) was upregulated in cauliflower treated with 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC). Moreover, the overexpression of BobARL2 decreased ethylene sensitivity, resulting in less inhibition of root elongation compared to the wild-type. Additionally, the overexpression lines exhibited enhanced salt tolerance. A yeast two-hybrid assay and luciferase complementation imaging (LCI) assay confirmed that BobARL2 can interact with Reversion-to-ethylene sensitivity Like4 (BobRTL4), which negatively regulates ethylene signal transduction. These findings advance our understanding of the evolution and functional roles of ARGOS genes in cauliflower and other Brassicaceae species, particularly in relation to abiotic stress responses, while also offering valuable insights relevant to the genetic improvement and breeding of novel varieties.

1. Introduction

Brassica oleracea (2n = 2x = 18, CC), a species within the Brassicaceae family, is one of the three diploid species in the triangle of U, along with B. rapa (AA) and B. nigra (BB). This species includes a variety of economically important vegetable crops that display remarkable morphological diversity. This is exemplified by the leafy head of cabbage, the tuberous stem of kohlrabi, the succulent stem of Chinese kale, the axillary heading buds of Brussels sprouts, and the enlarged, arrested inflorescences (curds) of cauliflower and broccoli [1]. The development of these organs can be influenced by abiotic stresses, such as drought and cold, as well as by hormonal changes [2,3,4]. Despite significant advancements, domestication processes and the mechanisms responsible for the phenotypic diversity in these distinct organs remain largely unclear, thereby necessitating continued research on the development of specific organs. Although population resequencing studies have identified several genomic selection signals associated with specific morphotypes [1,5,6,7], the genetic mechanisms underlying this rapid evolution and domestication remain relatively uncharacterized. Some studies suggest that the genetic diversity in Brassica species may be linked to hormonal responses and environmental adaptability [1,7,8,9]; however, the specific genes mediating responses to environmental conditions and the underlying mechanisms require further investigation. Identifying genes related to environmental responses and organ development is crucial for further elucidating the development of Brassica vegetable organs and for advancing crop improvement.
ARGOS gene members encode a class of hormone-responsive proteins that are prevalent across various plant species. These proteins play a crucial role in regulating organ size and responding to environmental stresses [10,11,12,13,14]. ARGOS proteins are characterized by a conserved organ size-related (OSR) domain containing a distinct LPPLPPPP motif and two transmembrane helices, both of which are essential for promoting organ growth [10,11,12,13,14,15]. These proteins are primarily localized in membranes (e.g., endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, and cell) [16]. In Arabidopsis, four ARGOS genes have been identified: AtARGOS, AtARL, Organ size related 1 and 2 (AtOSR1 and AtOSR2). Orthologs have been characterized in several crop species, with five, eight, and four genes detected in Oryza sativa [17], Zea mays [18], and Nicotiana tabacum, respectively [19]. These genes encode proteins with distinct functions during the development of various organs and different stress conditions. The expression of ARGOS is induced by auxin and cytokinin in both Arabidopsis and rice. Ectopic expression prolongs the expression of Aintegumenta (ANT) and Cyclin D3;1 (CycD3;1), thereby enhancing cell division and promoting lateral organ growth [15,17,20]. Separately, in poplar, the auxin transporter Walls Are Thin1 (WAT1) has been shown to interact with PagARGOS to regulate xylem development [21]. Similarly, ARL expression is induced by brassinosteroids via the receptor BR INSENSITIVE 1 (BRI1) in Arabidopsis and rice, leading to increased cell enlargement due to cell volume regulation [17,19]. By contrast, the expression of OSR1 and OSR2 was downregulated by abscisic acid and brassinosteroids in Arabidopsis [10,11]. Ethylene upregulates ARL expression, further promoting cell expansion in Arabidopsis and tobacco [19,22]. Ethylene also upregulates OSR1 and OSR2 in Arabidopsis, as well as ARGOS and OSR1 in maize [10,12,13,14]. Notably, several ARGOS proteins are negative regulators of ethylene signaling. Earlier research revealed the similarity in the localization of ARGOS1 and ethylene receptors [16]. In maize, ZmARGOS8 and ZmOSR1 interact with Reversion-to-ethylene sensitivity1 (ZmRTE1), ZmRTL4, and ZmRTL2 to attenuate ethylene signaling [13]. There is also research showing that ARGOS genes are also involved in stress response. For example, ARGOS expression is upregulated by drought and salt stress; the overexpression of ARGOS enhances drought and salt resistance in wheat [23]. Similarly, overexpression of ZmARGOS8 in maize decreases ethylene sensitivity and improves yield under stress conditions [12,13,14]. Moreover, TaARGOS-D expression in common wheat is upregulated under drought and salinity stress conditions; its overexpression enhances Arabidopsis stress tolerance [23]. These findings provide valuable insights for elucidating the functions of ARGOS genes during stress responses.
Cauliflower is a vegetable crop that is cultivated and consumed worldwide. The curd is composed of fleshy and enlarged stems and developmentally arrested inflorescence meristems. Cauliflower reproductive development is highly susceptible to environmental conditions, making organ expansion and stress resistance crucial in influencing yield and quality. Previous studies showed that ARGOS genes are essential for organ enlargement and stress resistance. Although recent genomic studies of Brassicaceae species have enhanced our understanding of their gene families [6,24,25,26,27,28], ARGOS genes in B. oleracea have not been comprehensively investigated. Hence, in this study, the ARGOS genes in cauliflower and two other B. oleracea morphotypes were thoroughly analyzed and compared with the corresponding family in other Brassicaceae species, including B. rapa, B. nigra, and R. sativus. We characterized these ARGOS genes in terms of their phylogenetic relationships, exon–intron organization, conserved motifs, and promoter cis-acting elements. Notably, BobARL2 was revealed to be highly expressed in cauliflower leaf, root, and curd. Furthermore, the expression of BobARGOS genes was induced by various abiotic stresses (e.g., ethylene and NaCl treatment). These findings, combined with experimental validation of the interaction between BobARL2 and BobRTL4, suggest that BobARL2 may enhance abiotic stress tolerance by interacting with BobRTL4 to decrease ethylene sensitivity. This study provides a foundation for future studies aimed at elucidating the molecular mechanisms through which BobARL2 mediates hormone and stress responses in cauliflower.

2. Results

2.1. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of ARGOS Genes

On the basis of sequence homology and conserved domains, seven, seven, and five ARGOS genes were identified in three B. oleracea accessions: kale-like rapid cycling morphotype (TO1000, Bo) [24], broccoli (HDEM, Boi) [29], and cauliflower (Korso, Bob) [6], respectively. Additionally, six, eight, and seven ARGOS genes were identified in Chinese cabbage (Chiifu, Bra) [27], black mustard (YZ12151, Bni) [28], and radish (XYB-36-2, Rs) [26], respectively. These genes were named according to their homology with ARGOS genes in Arabidopsis (Table S1). Proteins encoded by these genes comprised 59 (BoOSR2.1) to 491 (BoARGOS2) amino acids, with molecular weights between 6.47 kDa (BoOSR2.1) and 57.68 kDa (BoARGOS2) and isoelectric points ranging from 3.34 (BniOSR2.1) to 11.57 (BniARGOS1) (Table S1). BraOSR2.2, BoiOSR2.2, BniOSR2.2, and RsARL3 contained a single transmembrane domain, whereas BobARL1 had three transmembrane domains. The other 35 ARGOS proteins from various species included two transmembrane domains, underscoring the evolutionary conservation of these genes. All identified ARGOS proteins share a conserved C-terminal OSR domain that is sufficient to promote organ growth, a feature consistent with ARGOS proteins from diverse species (Figure S1). Moreover, comparative analysis revealed that OSR1 and OSR2 proteins across different species contain incomplete OSR domains, in contrast to the full-length domains found in ARGOS and ARL.
To investigate the similarity and evolutionary history of ARGOS genes in Brassicaceae species, we performed a phylogenetic analysis using ARGOS protein sequences from Arabidopsis, kale-like rapid cycling morphotype, broccoli, cauliflower, Chinese cabbage, black mustard, and radish (Figure 1, Table S2). Using Arabidopsis as a reference, 40 ARGOS genes from six species were classified into three clusters (Clusters I–III). Cluster I included AtOSR2 (AT2G41225) and its homologs in kale-like rapid cycling morphotypes, broccoli, cauliflower, black mustard, radish, and Chinese cabbage. Similarly, Cluster II contained AtOSR1 (AT2G41230) and its homologs in the related species. Notably, AtOSR1 homologs were absent in all three B. oleracea accessions. Synteny analysis confirmed that the entire genomic region harboring OSR1 in Arabidopsis is missing in B. oleracea (Table S3), indicating that the loss of this gene resulted from a species-specific deletion event during genome duplication and fragmentation. Cluster III comprised AtARGOS and AtARL along with their homologs; the sequences of these genes were highly similar across species.

2.2. Structural Analysis of ARGOS Genes

We further analyzed the phylogenetic relationships of different paralogs of ARGOS genes in six distinct accessions of B. oleracea, B. rapa, B. nigra, and R. sativus to clarify the diversity and similarity of ARGOS genes within species (Figure 2A). A structural analysis revealed that the number of exons in ARGOS genes varied from one to five across species, reflecting species-specific characteristics (Figure 2B). Notably, all ARGOS genes in Chinese cabbage lacked introns. Homologs across species exhibited common features. For example, with the exception of BniOSR2.1, OSR genes in other species lacked introns. We subsequently screened 40 ARGOS homologs in the six selected accessions and identified 10 motifs (Figure 2C). All ARGOS homologs contained Motif 1, which corresponds to the conserved OSR domain (i.e., gene family characteristic). Almost all OSR2 homologs contained both Motifs 1 and 9 (the exception was BoiOSR2.3). Interestingly, OSR genes had significantly fewer motifs than the other ARGOS genes. Additionally, except for RsARL2, ARL genes in different species consistently contained Motifs 2 and 5, whereas most ARGOS genes lacked Motif 5 (Figure 2C). The distinct motif compositions among subclades suggest potential structural bases for functional diversification within the ARGOS family. These conserved and divergent patterns provide valuable clues for future investigations into the specific roles of different motifs.

2.3. Promoter Cis-Acting Elements in ARGOS Genes

An analysis of ARGOS gene promoters identified 39 major cis-acting elements (Figure 3), which were broadly classified into the following three main categories: light-responsive, hormone-responsive, and stress-responsive cis-acting elements. This indicates that the ARGOS genes in Brassicaceae may be predominantly regulated by these three factors. Light-responsive elements were the most abundant, accounting for more than 50% of all identified cis-acting elements. These elements included AE-box, 3-AF1 binding site, GT1-motif, AAAC-motif, 4cl-CMA1b, Sp1, and Box 4, among others, underscoring the critical regulatory effect of light on ARGOS gene expression. The identified hormone-responsive elements included ABRE (abscisic acid response), TGA-box and TGA-element (auxin response), ERE (ethylene response), TATC-box, P-box, and GARE-motif (gibberellin response), CGTCA-motif and TGACG-motif (methyl jasmonate response), O2-site (cytokinin response), and TCA-element (salicylic acid response). Hence, ARGOS genes are regulated by various hormone signaling pathways. Additionally, several stress-responsive elements were identified, including TC-rich repeats and MBS (drought stress response) and LTR (low-temperature response).
The number and types of cis-acting elements varied significantly among species and varieties. Specifically, BniOSR2.1 had the most cis-acting elements (32), compared to only 13 in both RsOSR1.2 and BniARL3. Notably, the light-responsive element Box-4 was detected in all ARGOS genes. The 3-AF1 binding site motif was not detected in any of the OSR genes across all analyzed species. Moreover, the methyl jasmonate-responsive elements (TGSCG-motif) were present in most genes (exceptions were OSR2.1 in kale-like rapid cycling morphotype, and OSR2.3 in broccoli, BraARGOS in Chinese cabbage and RsARL2 in radish). In addition, the light-responsive element chs-Unit 1 ml was identified only in kale-like rapid cycling morphotype and broccoli, while the LS7 element was exclusive to kale-like rapid cycling morphotype. Furthermore, the cytokinin-responsive element TATC-box was present only in B. nigra ARGOS genes.
These findings may reflect a complex regulatory network in which ARGOS genes affect various hormone signaling and stress response pathways. The observed differences in the number and types of cis-acting elements among ARGOS members may indicate functional diversification, which may have contributed to their distinct roles in plant development and stress adaptation. This analysis is significant as it provides crucial insights into the mechanisms regulating the ARGOS genes, thereby providing the basis for future research aimed at elucidating the roles of these genes in plant growth and responses to environmental conditions.

2.4. BobARGOS Endoplasmic Reticulum Localization

According to study predictions (Section 2.1), BobARGOS proteins are most likely localized to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). To validate these predictions, we selected several BobARGOSs (BobARGOS, BobARL1, BobARL2, and BobARL3) with expression levels that were significantly affected by stress conditions and constructed pFGC-BobARGOS-GFP expression vectors. Transient transformation experiments were performed via the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of the lower epidermal cells of N. benthamiana leaves. On the basis of the detected fluorescence, BobARGOS, BobARL1, BobARL2, and BobARL3 were localized to the ER. These results are consistent with the predictions, suggesting that BobARGOS, BobARL1, BobARL2, and BobARL3 may have similar functions (Figure 4).

2.5. ARGOS Gene Expression in Various Cauliflower Organs

To clarify the biological functions of five BobARGOS genes in different cauliflower organs, we used available transcriptome data [27] to analyze their expression in various tissues (root, stem, leaf, curd, bud, flower, and silique) and different curd development stages. We also performed a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis to compare their expression patterns in different leaf positions (L1–L7). BobARL1 and BobARL2 were highly expressed in leaves, while BobARL2 was also expressed at relatively high levels in roots and curds (Figure 5A). An analysis of expression in different leaf positions (L1–L7) showed that BobARL1 was highly expressed in young leaves. BobARL2 and BobARGOS had similar expression trends, with expression peaking in the third leaf from the outside and generally lower expression levels in younger leaves than in mature leaves. BobARL3 was most highly expressed in mature leaves, whereas BobOSR2 expression was almost undetectable in leaves (Figure 5B). Moreover, during curd development, BobARL2 was significantly expressed at maturity, while BobARL1 was expressed at high levels at maturity and during bolting. By contrast, BobARL3 was significantly expressed during the vegetative growth stage and at maturity, while BobARGOS expression was almost undetectable during curd development (Figure 5C). BobOSR2 was expressed at low levels across all examined tissues, suggesting that it may play a limited role in cauliflower under normal growth conditions.

2.6. Cauliflower ARGOS Gene Expression in Response to Different Abiotic Stresses

Considering multiple hormone- and stress-responsive elements were identified in BobARGOS promoters, we analyzed the effects of different hormones and abiotic stresses on BobARGOS expression. More specifically, the expression levels of five BobARGOS genes following exposures to different stresses, including indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA), 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP), gibberellin (GA3), ACC, 24-epibrassinolide (EBL), salinity (NaCl), and high/low temperatures, were analyzed via qRT-PCR (Figure 6). After IAA, NAA, and GA3 treatments, BobARL2 and BobARGOS expression levels were significantly downregulated. This implies that BobARL2 and BobARGOS may encode proteins with important roles when auxin or gibberellin levels are relatively low. The expression levels of four BobARGOS genes (excluding BobOSR2) decreased to varying degrees following the 1-MCP treatment. By contrast, BobARL2 and BobARL3 expression levels were significantly upregulated after the ACC treatment, indicating that these are responsive to ethylene. Furthermore, BobARL2 and BobARL3 expression patterns were similar in response to both 6-BA and ACC treatments, suggesting that they may play analogous roles in hormone-responsive processes. Under 6-BA and ACC treatment conditions, BobARL1 expression was initially downregulated, but was subsequently upregulated. After the EBL treatment, BobARL2, BobARL3, and BobARGOS expression levels initially decreased and then increased before decreasing again. Under both cold and heat stress conditions, BobARL2 and BobARL3 had similar expression patterns, with transcript levels generally increasing in both cases. Following an exposure to cold stress, expression peaked at 3 h, whereas under heat stress conditions, expression peaked at 1 h and then decreased. Under NaCl stress conditions, BobARL1 expression initially decreased, but this was followed by a transient upregulation (90 mM), biphasic response (peak at 1 h; 150 mM), or sustained downregulation (380 mM). By contrast, BobARL2 and BobARL3 expression levels were transiently upregulated by all NaCl treatments, peaking at 1–3 h before decreasing; however, the extent of these expression-level changes varied among NaCl concentrations. The expression level of BobOSR1 remained consistently low in cauliflower leaves across all treatments, indicating that it likely makes a negligible contribution to stress tolerance and hormone responses in cauliflower. For all stress treatments, BobARL2 consistently showed the highest expression level and the most statistically significant changes in expression across experimental conditions, indicating that it may be a key stress-responsive gene in the ARGOSs in cauliflower.

2.7. Regulatory Effects of BobARL2 on Arabidopsis Root Growth Under ACC and NaCl Stress Conditions

BobARGOS gene expression levels were influenced by various stresses, with BobARL2 expression significantly affected by ACC and NaCl treatments. To functionally characterize BobARL2, we used wild-type Arabidopsis (Columbia) plants and T3 transgenic Arabidopsis lines in which BobARL2 was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter to investigate the effects of ACC and NaCl stresses on root growth. When seedlings were grown vertically on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium, the inhibitory effects of 10 μM ACC on root growth were significantly greater for the wild-type control than for BobARL2-overexpressing (BobARL2-OE) Arabidopsis lines (Figure 7). Furthermore, under NaCl stress conditions, BobARL2-OE transgenic plants had significantly longer roots than wild-type plants, demonstrating enhanced salt tolerance (Figure 8). These phenotypic observations imply that BobARL2 overexpression decreases ethylene sensitivity in Arabidopsis.

2.8. Interaction Between BobARL2 and BobRTL4

Previous studies have indicated that BobARL2 is involved in ethylene signal transduction, and several ARGOS gene family members encode proteins that can interact with key components of the ethylene signaling pathway, including RTE1 and RTL4 [12]. Accordingly, we used AlphaFold3 to predict the three-dimensional structure of the BobARL2–BobRTL4 complex and characterize the interaction between the two proteins. The predicted structural model, which was visualized using PyMOL (Figure 9A), reveals the interaction between the two proteins. To experimentally validate this prediction, we conducted a yeast two-hybrid assay (Y2H) (Figure 9B) and luciferase complementation imaging (LCI) assay (Figure 9C). The results confirmed that BobARL2 directly interacts with BobRTL4, suggesting that BobARL2 may modulate ethylene signaling through this molecular association.

3. Discussion

In plants, ARGOS is a type of hormone-responsive protein associated with organ enlargement and stress responses [12,15,16,19,22,23]. ARGOS genes encode transmembrane proteins with an OSR domain [10,15,22]. Because of their key roles and the increasing availability of genomic data, researchers have identified multiple ARGOS genes in many species, including wheat, maize, and tobacco [14,19,23]. However, there has been no systematic identification and analysis of ARGOS genes in Brassicaceae, which includes many important vegetable crops. Therefore, in this study, ARGOS genes were identified in several recently published genomes of Brassicaceae species cultivated as vegetable crops (B. oleracea, B. rapa, R. sativus, and B. nigra) and then analyzed in terms of their structures, physicochemical properties, evolutionary characteristics, and promoter cis-acting elements as well as their responses to various stresses in cauliflower. Our findings suggest that ARGOS genes have moderately similar sequences and functions, but they vary regarding their tissue-specific roles and responses to diverse stresses. Therefore, these findings offer valuable insights into ARGOS genes and serve as a resource for future studies aimed at their functional characterization.
Phylogenetic analysis is a powerful tool for inferring the evolutionary history of genes across species [30]. On the basis of phylogenetic and evolutionary analyses, ARGOS genes were classified into three distinct clades (Figure 1). All ARGOS and ARL genes from different species were clustered together (Cluster III), suggesting that they are highly conserved in terms of sequence and function, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies [15,19,22]. Compared to those from other species, the ARL genes from the three B. oleracea varieties exhibited a closer evolutionary relationship among themselves. This indicates that they originated from a relatively recent gene duplication event specific to B. oleracea and have since undergone minimal functional divergence, maintaining a high degree of sequence and functional conservation among themselves. The expansion and diversification of the ARGOS genes are likely the consequences of the whole-genome triplication event shared by the ancestral Brassica species [31]. Following this triplication, ancestral Brassica species underwent diploidization involving extensive gene loss and functional diversification of the retained genes [31]. This process led to the elimination of a substantial number of genes. The extent of gene loss within the ARGOS genes following polyploidization varies across species. Notably, all three examined B. oleracea genomes lack an OSR1 homolog, suggesting that the loss of this gene likely occurred prior to the divergence of the B. oleracea lineage. This implies that one or more genes with similar or identical functions may have gradually compensated for the absence of OSR1 during the evolution of Brassicaceae species grown as vegetable crops.
Identifying cis-acting elements in promoter regions represents a fundamental strategy for studying temporospatial gene expression patterns, as well as gene expression related to tissue growth and developmental processes [32]. These cis-regulatory elements are essential for transcriptional regulation because they serve as binding sites for specific transcription factors [32,33]. In this study, an analysis of ARGOS promoter regions revealed numerous stress response-related cis-regulatory elements (Figure 3). Light-responsive elements were the predominant motifs among the ARGOS genes, with Box-4—which is a key regulatory element involved in light signaling—being present in all members. The promoter regions of most ARGOS members also contain other light-responsive elements such as GT1-motif and G-box, which are associated with the regulation of photoperiod and circadian rhythm [34]. Additionally, cis-acting elements such as ABRE and ERE were abundantly identified. The ABRE motif, which serves as the binding site for ABA-responsive element binding proteins (AREB/ABFs), plays a crucial role in ABA-mediated stress response signaling [35,36]. Moreover, ethylene transcription factors mediate ethylene signal transduction by binding to the ERE motif, thereby regulating the expression of a series of genes involved in plant growth, development, and stress response [37,38]. Collectively, these results demonstrate the critical functions of ARGOSs in mediating responses to photoperiod, hormonal cues, low temperature, and drought stress.
Subcellular localization results indicated that BobARGOS proteins (except BobOSR1) are predominantly localized to the endoplasmic reticulum (Figure 4), which is consistent with the result of a previous study [10]. Notably, earlier research on Arabidopsis showed that the endoplasmic reticulum also harbors ethylene receptors and other early signaling components of the ethylene pathway [16]. This may reflect spatial coordination of ethylene-related signaling molecules.
Previous studies showed that homologous genes across different species often retain similar functions throughout evolution [2,3,4]; the tissue-specific expression patterns of these genes are closely linked to their functions [2,3,4]. AtARGOS genes exhibit distinct tissue- and organ-specific expression patterns during Arabidopsis development. For example, OSR2 is most highly expressed in expanding leaves, inflorescences, and flowers [11], whereas ARL expression levels are highest in cotyledons, roots, expanding leaves, flowers, and siliques [22]. ARGOS is predominantly expressed in flowers, young siliques, and roots [15]. Similarly, in tobacco, NtARL1 is most highly expressed in flowers and the stem [19]. In wheat, TaARGOS expression levels are highest in the first true leaves, roots, and flowers [23]. These expression patterns are partially consistent with the observed expression of BobARGOS genes in different cauliflower tissues. Notably, BobARL1 and BobARL2 are significantly up-regulated in leaves, with BobARL2 also highly expressed in expanding leaves, roots, and siliques. Interestingly, BobARL2 is also expressed at high levels in the curd, suggesting a potential role in curd development (Figure 5C). BobARGOS expression levels in cauliflower leaves vary with leaf age, with BobARL2 expression peaking in the third leaf (from the outermost to innermost leaves) (Figure 5A). This expression peak in a maturing leaf, rather than in the innermost youngest leaf where cell division is most active, suggests that BobARL2 may be more involved in the phase of cell expansion. This observation is consistent with the documented role of its Arabidopsis homolog, ARL, which primarily promotes cell expansion rather than division [22]. It should be noted that this is a correlative observation, and direct evidence from cellular measurements is required to confirm this hypothesis. Moreover, during curd development, BobARL1, BobARL2, and BobARL3 expression patterns vary substantially, suggesting that the proteins encoded by these genes have diverse functions in cauliflower (Figure 5). Considering these genes encode small transmembrane proteins with an OSR domain, their high expression levels in specific tissues imply they may be involved in the development of these tissues.
ARGOS gene expression is induced by multiple stresses and varies among species, suggesting that these genes play diverse roles in stress resistance. For example, AtARGOS expression is significantly induced by low-temperature stress (8 °C) and high ethephon concentrations (e.g., 5 mM). The expression of AtARL in Arabidopsis is reportedly induced by NaCl and 5 mM ethephon [19]. In wheat, the expression of TaARGOS-D is induced by ABA, NaCl, and drought tolerance, while the expression levels of both TaARGOS-A and TaARGOS-B are upregulated under drought conditions [23,39]. In tobacco, NtARL1 expression is induced by IAA and NAA. In the present study, five BobARGOS genes were differentially expressed in response to high- and low-temperature stresses, salt stress, and various hormones (Figure 6). Specifically, BobARL2 expression was upregulated by ACC and NaCl at different concentrations, which is consistent with the observed effects of ACC and NaCl on NtARL1 expression in tobacco [19]. In contrast to a previous study [22], the current study indicated BobARGOS expression levels were not significantly upregulated by BR. In cauliflower, the expression levels of ARL homologs (BobARL1, BobARL2, and BobARL3) increased under low-temperature stress conditions, whereas BobARGOS expression was not induced, which is in contrast to the reported expression-level changes to homologous genes in tobacco [19].
Plants within the Brassicaceae family are highly susceptible to various abiotic stresses during growth. Recent studies have revealed that enhancing stress tolerance in Brassica vegetables can be achieved by modulating the expression of key genes. For instance, upregulation of Plasma membrane intrinsic protein 2-1(PIP2-1) expression in radish has been shown to significantly improve salt tolerance [40]. Moreover, protein phosphatase (BrPP5.2) has been demonstrated to regulate heat-responsive gene expression through its intrinsic chaperone activity in B. rapa [41]. Similarly, phytohormones also play crucial roles in enhancing stress tolerance in Brassica vegetables. In radish, C-repeat Binding Factor 2 (RsCBF2) and C-repeat Binding Factor 2 (RsERF18) improve salt tolerance via the ethylene synthesis pathway [40], while in Brassica napus, BnSIP1-1 contributes to salt and osmotic stress resistance by modulating ABA biosynthesis and signaling [42].
Numerous studies showed that the proteins encoded by ARGOS genes play critical roles in organ development and stress tolerance, primarily by modulating ethylene signaling [13,14,16,19,21,22]. These findings suggest that ARGOS gene members may be involved in a negative feedback mechanism that decreases plant sensitivity to ethylene, enabling plants to respond to a relatively broad range of ethylene concentrations. Proteins such as RTE1, its homolog RTL4, and Responsive-to-antagonist1 (RTA1) are involved in ethylene perception modulation [43,44,45]. Both RTE1 and RTL4 enhance the activity of Ethylene response1 (ETR1), thereby negatively regulating ethylene signal transduction [44,45,46,47,48]. In maize, ARGOS proteins interact with RTE1 and RTL4, collectively regulating ethylene signal perception and early transduction, which ultimately enhances abiotic stress tolerance and improves crop yield [13,14,47,48].
In this study, we demonstrated that overexpression of BobARL2, an ARGOS homolog from cauliflower, reduced ethylene sensitivity in transgenic Arabidopsis, as evidenced by root elongation assays under ACC treatment (Figure 7), which is consistent with earlier findings on ARGOS family genes. AlphaFold3 is an AI-based software for predicting protein structures, which has been increasingly applied to predict protein-protein interactions in plants due to its high accuracy and flexibility [49]. For example, AlphaFold3 has been used to analyze the interaction characteristics of GLABROUS1 enhancer-binding protein (GeBP3) and GeBP5 under drought and other stresses in pepper [50]. In this study, we employed AlphaFold3 to predict the interaction between BobARL2 and BobRTL4, and the results suggest the presence of multiple potential interaction sites between the two proteins. The interaction between BobARL2 and BobRTL4 was further verified through yeast two-hybrid experiment and LCI assay, which may contribute to the decreased ethylene sensitivity and increased salt tolerance observed in transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing BobARL2.
However, the precise molecular mechanism by which the BobARL2-BobRTL4 complex regulates ethylene transduction, such as through affecting the stability or activity of ethylene receptors or downstream signaling elements, remains an important subject for future investigation. Moreover, plant stress responses are often mediated by hormonal crosstalk rather than isolated pathways. For instance, auxin and ethylene cooperatively regulate root development and architecture, a key adaptive mechanism for drought and salinity tolerance [51], and ethylene can compensate for ABA deficiency in stomatal closure, enhancing drought tolerance in tomato [52]. Therefore, Therefore, BobARL2 may function as a node within a broader hormone network, possibly integrating signals from ethylene, ABA, and auxin—a hypothesis that merits further investigation.
While this study provides functional insights into BobARL2, it primarily relied on root elongation as a phenotypic readout. Future studies should include additional parameters such as shoot biomass and ion content to fully elucidate its mechanistic role. It is also important to note the limitations of using Arabidopsis as a heterologous system. Given the potential role of BobARL2 in the development of the unique cauliflower curd, future work should prioritize genetic validation in cauliflower itself to unequivocally define its functions in both stress adaptation and curd development.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Sequence Acquisition and Genome-Wide Identification of ARGOS Genes in Different Species

Whole-genome sequences from three B. oleracea subspecies (TO1000 kale-like rapid cycling morphotype, HDEM broccoli, and Korso cauliflower) were analyzed. The TO1000 genome was sourced from EnsemblPlants (http://plants.ensembl.org/, accessed on 19 March 2025) [25], whereas Korso and HDEM genomes were obtained from Figshare (https://figshare.com/collections/Korso_and_OX_heart_genome_assemblies_and_annotations/5392466/2, accessed on 19 March 2025) [6] and Genoscope (http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/, accessed on 19 March 2025) [29], respectively. Additional genome sequences for B. rapa ssp. Chiifu, B. nigra YZ12151, and R. sativus XYB-36-2 were retrieved from the BRAD database (http://brassicadb.org/brad/, accessed on 19 March 2025) [26,27,28]. The sequences of four Arabidopsis ARGOS proteins were obtained from the TAIR database (https://www.arabidopsis.org/, accessed on 19 March 2025) and used as queries for local BlastP searches (E-value = 10−5) of the genomes of the selected species. This approach identified candidate ARGOS sequences. To confirm homology, these candidates were further analyzed via BlastP searches of the TAIR Arabidopsis protein database. The top hits were examined to confirm that they correspond to Arabidopsis ARGOS genes, leading to the successful identification of ARGOS genes in seven species.
Physicochemical properties of ARGOS proteins (e.g., molecular weight and theoretical isoelectric point) were determined using the ExPASy 5.0 online tool (http://expasy.org) [53]. TMHMM Server v2.0 was used to predict ARGOS transmembrane structures (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-2.0/, accessed on 19 March 2024), whereas CELLO v.2.5 was used to predict subcellular localizations (http://cello.life.nctu.edu.tw/, accessed on 19 March 2024) [54].

4.2. Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analyses of ARGOS Genes

We used the global alignment tool ‘Needle’ from the EMBOSS 6.6.0 suite to calculate ARGOS protein sequence identities and similarities [55]. Whole ARGOS amino acid sequences were aligned using the MUSCLE 3.8.31 program [56]. The protein sequences were aligned using MultAlin software (version 5.4) (http://multalin.toulouse.inra.fr/multalin/ accessed on 20 March 2024) [57]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA 7.0 and the neighbor-joining method based on the Jones–Taylor–Thornton model, with 1,000 bootstrap replicates to assess the statistical support of each node [58]. We applied uniform rates, homogeneous lineages, and excluded gaps with a site coverage cutoff of 70%. An additional phylogenetic tree was constructed for ARGOS proteins using the same method.

4.3. Synteny Analysis of OSR1 in Brassica oleracea and Arabidopsis

To investigate the genomic basis for the absence of the OSR1 in Brassica oleracea, a comparative synteny analysis was performed. The genomic region harboring AtOSR1 in Arabidopsis thaliana was used as a query. Alignments were conducted using SynOrths (http://brassicadb.cn/#/RegionMicroSynteny/ accessed on 21 March 2024) [59].

4.4. Analyses of ARGOS Gene Structures and Conserved Motifs

On the basis of ARGOS amino acid sequences, we analyzed conserved motifs using MEME Suite v5.5.2 (https://meme-suite.org/, accessed on 20 March 2024). TBtools was used to analyze and visualize conserved domains in ARGOS proteins [60]. Furthermore, gene structures were visualized using GSDS2.0 (http://gsds.gao-lab.org/, accessed on 20 March 2024) [61].

4.5. Analysis of ARGOS Promoter Cis-Acting Elements

The 2,000 bp sequence upstream of the start codon was extracted and analyzed as the promoter region of ARGOS genes. Cis-acting elements in the promoters of ARGOS genes were predicted with PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 20 March 2025) [62] and visualized using TBtools (v2.331).

4.6. Plant Materials and Treatments

Korso cauliflower seeds were germinated at 24 °C for 2 days in darkness. The resulting seedlings were grown in plastic pots filled with soil under controlled conditions in a greenhouse [16-h light (24 °C)/8-h dark (20 °C)]. To investigate BobARGOS expression patterns in various cauliflower tissues and curd development stages, we used published transcriptome data [6] for different Korso cauliflower tissues (root, stem, leaf, flower, and curd) and various shoot apex/curd developmental stages (vegetative growth, transformation, enlargement, maturation, and bolting). To further analyze BobARGOS expression in different developmental stages, we selected 6-week-old cauliflower seedlings with seven leaves and sequentially sampled the first to seventh leaves (L1–L7 from the outermost to innermost leaves).
To explore BobARGOS expression profiles in response to abiotic stresses, 6-week-old cauliflower seedlings were treated with various hormones: 50 μM 6-BA, 5 μM IAA, 10 μM NAA, 1 μM EBL, 5 μM GA3, 10 μM abscisic acid, 0.5 mM ACC, and 2 mM 1-MCP as well as NaCl at different concentrations (90, 150, and 380 mM). The third leaf of each plant was collected at 0.5, 1, 3, and 5 h post-treatment. To examine BobARGOS expression under temperature stress conditions, 6-week-old cauliflower seedlings were incubated at 8 °C (low-temperature stress) or 42 °C (high-temperature stress). The third leaf was collected at 0.5, 1, 3, and 5 h post-treatment.
For the control group, 6-week-old cauliflower seedlings were sprayed with water and the third leaf was collected. All collected samples were rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for the subsequent analysis of BobARGOS expression in leaves at different development stages or in response to different abiotic stress conditions.

4.7. qRT-PCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from cauliflower using a FastPure Plant Total RNA Isolation Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), after which cDNA was synthesized using a PrimeScript™ RT Reagent Kit and gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Primers for qRT-PCR were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 software (Table S4). The cauliflower Actin gene was selected as the reference control, based on its demonstrated expression stability in cauliflower under similar abiotic stress and hormone treatment conditions [63]. TB Green® Premix Ex Taq™ (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) and the following program were used to conduct qRT-PCR analyses: 95 °C for 30 s; 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 20 s. Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method, with three technical replicates for each sample [64].

4.8. Subcellular Localization

Following the method of Dang et al. (2014), we determined the subcellular localization of BobARGOS proteins by transiently expressing eGFP fusions in N. benthamiana leaves via the pFGC system. Four BobARGOS genes (excluding the non-expressed OSR1) were cloned into the vector and introduced into A. tumefaciens EHA105. EHA105 cells were transformed with the constructed recombinant vectors or an empty pFGC vector (control). Cultures of the transformed A. tumefaciens cells were adjusted for an OD600 of 0.8, then infiltrated into tobacco leaves as previously described [65]. For co-expression assays, cultures containing the eGFP-BobARGOS construct, the endoplasmic reticulum marker RFP-HDEL, and the gene silencing suppressor p19 were mixed in a 1:1:1 ratio. Each treatment consisted of three biological replicates, with each replicate comprising three plants. Confocal imaging was performed 48 hours post-infiltration using an LSM780 microscope (Carl Zeiss), with parameters optimized for each fluorophore. Sequences of the primers used for cloning BobARGOS genes are provided in Table S4.

4.9. Vector Construction and Plant Transformation

The full-length BobARL2 coding sequence was amplified by PCR using gene-specific primers (upstream primer: 5′-cgctctagaactagtggatccATGATTCGTGAAATCTCCGGTC-3′; downstream primer: 5′-cttgatatcgaattcctgcagTTACATATAAGTTCTTGTTACATGTTTGGC-3′; underlined sequences indicate restriction enzyme cut sites). The p35S::BobARL2 construct was obtained by inserting BobARL2 into the pYBA1302 vector for the subsequent expression under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter and NOS terminator. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants were generated via floral dip transformation. We collected two leaves from each transgenic and control plant and then extracted genomic DNA using the CTAB (hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide) method for PCR analyses. Homozygous BobARL2-OE transgenic seeds (T3 generation) were used for the functional characterization of BobARL2.

4.10. ACC and NaCl Treatments of Transgenic Arabidopsis

Wild-type Arabidopsis and homozygous transgenic seeds (T3 generation) were stratified at 4 °C for 2 days to promote germination. The resulting seedlings were grown on half-strength MS medium under controlled conditions (22 °C, 16-h light/8-h dark cycle, and 60% relative humidity). To examine the effects of ACC and NaCl on seedling growth, 3-day-old uniformly growing seedlings were transferred to MS medium supplemented with 10 μM ACC or 100 mM NaCl. Root length was measured at 9 days post-ACC treatment and at 6 days post-NaCl treatment. Each treatment included three biological replicates, with each replicate consisting of 10 plants.

4.11. Predicting the Interaction Between BobARL2 and BobRTL4

The structural model of the BobARL2-BobRTL4 complex was generated with AlphaFold3 (https://golgi.sandbox.google.com/; accessed on 2 March 2024), and the binding sites visualized using PyMol 2.6 (Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, USA).

4.12. Protein Interaction Analysis

For the yeast two-hybrid assay, the coding sequences of BobARL2 were cloned into the pBT3-N plasmid to construct the prey vector, whereas the BobRTL4 coding sequence was inserted into the pPR3-N plasmid to generate the bait vector. Both the bait and prey plasmids were co-transformed into Y2HGold yeast strains. The pair of plasmids pTSU2-APP and pNubG-Fe65 was used as a positive control. The pair of plasmids pTSU2-APP and pPR3-N was used as a negative control. Transformed yeast cells were first cultured on SD medium lacking leucine and tryptophan (SD/–Leu/–Trp) for two days. Subsequently, the yeast colonies were transferred onto SD medium deficient in leucine, tryptophan, histidine, and adenine (SD/–Leu/–Trp/–His/–Ade) to assess protein–protein interactions.
To validate the protein-protein interaction, constructs encoding BobARL2-nLuc, BobRTL4-cLuc, BobARL2-cLuc, along with their corresponding empty vectors, were individually transformed into A. tumefaciens strain GV3101. Equal volumes of differentially combined bacterial suspensions were co-infiltrated into leaves of N. benthamiana. Luminescence signals were detected using a chemiluminescence imaging system (Clinx 6100, China) following application of D-Luciferin potassium salt (40901ES01, Yeasen, China).

5. Conclusions

This study presents a genome-wide identification and functional analysis of ARGOS genes in three B. oleracea varieties (kale-like rapid cycling morphotype, cauliflower, broccoli), along with B. rapa, B. nigra, and R. sativus. The characterization included analyses of phylogenetic relationships, chromosomal locations, gene structures, protein motifs, evolutionary patterns, promoter cis-elements, and expression profiles across various tissues and under abiotic stresses. Our results reveal that ARGOS genes exhibit both evolutionary conservation and diversity among Brassica species and play important roles in abiotic stress and hormonal responses in cauliflower. In particular, BobARL2 was shown to contribute significantly to stress adaptation, underscoring its functional importance and warranting further mechanistic investigation. These findings provide a foundation for future functional studies on ARGOS genes in B. oleracea and related species.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26199810/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.L.; Data curation, N.G.; Formal analysis, M.D.; Funding acquisition, M.D.; Methodology, M.D.; Project administration, M.Z.; Resources, M.Z. and S.H.; Software, M.D.; Supervision, N.G. and F.L.; Validation, M.D.; Visualization, G.W.; Writing—original draft, M.D.; Writing—review and editing, M.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF1003003); National Natural Science Foundation of China (32202503); Collection, Evaluation, and Innovation of Major Vegetable Germplasm Resources (KJCX20230126); International Science and Technology Cooperation Platform Development of Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (GHPT2025-09).

Data Availability Statement

All data are included in the article. RNA-seq raw data are available at the NCBI BioProject database under accession number PRJNA546441.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ARGOSAuxin-Regulated Gene Involved in Organ Size
BobRTL4Reversion-to-ethylene sensitivity Like4
OSROrgan size-related
ANTAintegumenta
BRI1Br insensitive 1
RTE1Reversion-to-ethylene sensitivity1
qRT-PCRquantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
IAAincluding indole-3-acetic acid
NAA1-naphthaleneacetic acid
6-BA6-benzylaminopurine
1-MCP1-methylcyclopropene
GA3gibberellin
ACC1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid
EBL24-epibrassinolide
RTA1Responsive-to-antagonist1
ETR1Ethylene response1
WAT1Walls Are Thin1
LCIluciferase complementation imaging
Cyc D3;1 Cyclin D3;1
RsCBF2C-repeat Binding Factor 2
RsERF18C-repeat Binding Factor 2
MSMurashige and Skoog
Y2Hyeast two-hybrid assay
GeBP3GLABROUS1 enhancer-binding protein

References

  1. Guo, N.; Wang, S.; Wang, T.; Duan, M.; Zong, M.; Miao, L.; Han, S.; Wang, G.; Liu, X.; Zhang, D.; et al. A graph-based pan-genome of Brassica oleracea provides new insights into its domestication and morphotype diversification. Plant Commun. 2024, 5, 100791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jiang, Q.; Wu, X.; Zhang, X.; Ji, Z.; Cao, Y.; Duan, Q.; Huang, J. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of AS2 Genes in Brassica rapa Reveal Their Potential Roles in Abiotic Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Karamat, U.; Guo, J.; Jiang, S.; Khan, I.; Lu, M.; Fu, M.; Li, G. Comprehensive, Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analyses of Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase Family under Abiotic Stresses in Brassica oleracea. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 10378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bian, X.; Cao, Y.; Zhi, X.; Ma, N. Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of the Plant Cysteine Oxidase (PCO) Gene Family in Brassica napus and Its Role in Abiotic Stress Response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cheng, F.; Sun, R.; Hou, X.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, B.; Liang, J.; Zhuang, M.; Liu, Y.; et al. Subgenome parallel selection is associated with morphotype diversification and convergent crop domestication in Brassica rapa and Brassica oleracea. Nat. Genet. 2016, 48, 1218–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guo, N.; Wang, S.; Gao, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Lai, E.; Duan, M.; Wang, G.; Li, J.; Yang, M.; et al. Genome sequencing sheds light on the contribution of structural variants to Brassica oleracea diversification. BMC Biol. 2021, 19, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chen, R.; Chen, K.; Yao, X.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Y.; Su, X.; Lyu, M.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, G.; Wang, M.; et al. Genomic analyses reveal the stepwise domestication and genetic mechanism of curd biogenesis in cauliflower. Nat. Genet. 2024, 56, 1235–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Sun, R.; Wu, J.; Liu, S.; Bai, Y.; Mun, J.H.; Bancroft, I.; Cheng, F.; et al. The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 1035–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Cai, C.; Ji, J.; Han, F.; Zhang, L.; Chen, S.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y.; Tang, Q.; et al. Large-scale gene expression alterations introduced by structural variation drive morphotype diversification in Brassica oleracea. Nat. Genet. 2024, 56, 1245–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Feng, G.; Qin, Z.; Yan, J.; Zhang, X.; Hu, Y. Arabidopsis ORGAN SIZE RELATED1 regulates organ growth and final organ size in orchestration with ARGOS and ARL. New Phytol. 2011, 191, 635–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Qin, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Feng, G.; Hu, Y. The Arabidopsis ORGAN SIZE RELATED 2 is involved in regulation of cell expansion during organ growth. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shi, J.; Gao, H.; Wang, H.; Lafitte, H.R.; Archibald, R.L.; Yang, M.; Hakimi, S.M.; Mo, H.; Habben, J.E. ARGOS8 variants generated by CRISPR-Cas9 improve maize grain yield under field drought stress conditions. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shi, J.; Drummond, B.; Wang, H.; Archibald, R.L.; Habben, J.E. Maize and Arabidopsis ARGOS proteins interact with ethylene receptor signaling complex, supporting a regulatory role for ARGOS in ethylene signal transduction. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 2783–2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shi, J.; Habben, J.E.; Archibald, R.L.; Drummond, B.J.; Chamberlin, M.A.; Williams, R.W.; Lafitte, H.R.; Weers, B.P. Overexpression of ARGOS genes modifies plant sensitivity to ethylene, leading to improved drought tolerance in both Arabidopsis and Maize. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 266–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hu, Y.; Xie, Q.; Chua, N.H. The Arabidopsis Auxin-Inducible Gene ARGOS Controls Lateral Organ Size. Plant Cell. 2003, 15, 1951–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Rai, M.I.; Wang, X.; Thibault, D.M.; Kim, H.J.; Schaller, G.E. The ARGOS gene family functions in a negative feedback loop to desensitize plants to ethylene. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, B.; Sang, Y.; Song, J.; Gao, X.Q.; Zhang, Q. Expression of a rice OsARGOS gene in Arabidopsis promotes cell division and expansion and increases organ size. J. Genet. Genom. 2009, 36, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guo, M.; Rupe, M.A.; Wei, J.; Winkler, C.; Goncalves-Butruille, M.; Weers, B.P.; Cerwick, S.F.; Dieter, J.A.; Duncan, K.E.; Howard, R.J.; et al. Maize ARGOS1 (ZAR1) transgenic alleles increase hybrid maize yield. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kuluev, B.; Mikhaylova, E.; Ermoshin, A.; Veselova, S.; Tugbaeva, A.; Gumerova, G.; Gainullina, K.; Zaikina, E. The ARGOS-LIKE genes of Arabidopsis and tobacco as targets for improving plant productivity and stress tolerance. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 234–235, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mizukami, Y.; Fischer, R.L. Plant organ size control: AINTEGUMENTA regulates growth and cell numbers during organogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 942–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yao, X.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, G.; Sun, Q.; Liu, C.; Chu, J.; Jing, Y.; Niu, S.; Fu, C.; Lew, T.T.S.; et al. PagARGOS Promotes Low-Lignin Wood Formation in Poplar. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2024, 22, 2201–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hu, Y.; Poh, H.M.; Chua, N.H. The Arabidopsis ARGOS-LIKE gene regulates cell expansion during organ growth. Plant J. 2006, 47, 1–9, Erratum in Plant J. 2006, 47, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhao, Y.; Tian, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Guan, P.; Kou, X.; Wang, X.; Xin, M.; Hu, Z.; Yao, Y.; et al. Molecular and Functional Characterization of Wheat ARGOS Genes Influencing Plant Growth and Stress Tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, S.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X.; Tong, C.; Edwards, D.; Parkin, I.A.; Zhao, M.; Ma, J.; Yu, J.; Huang, S.; et al. The Brassica oleracea genome reveals the asymmetrical evolution of polyploid genomes. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Parkin, I.A.; Koh, C.; Tang, H.; Robinson, S.J.; Kagale, S.; Clarke, W.E.; Town, C.D.; Nixon, J.; Krishnakumar, V.; Bidwell, S.L.; et al. Transcriptome and methylome profiling reveals relics of genome dominance in the mesopolyploid Brassica oleracea. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, R77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, X.; Yang, Q.; Yu, X.; Chen, X.; Cao, F.; Wu, Z.; Sun, Y.; Jing, Y.; Liu, B.; Shen, D.; et al. A de novo Genome of a Chinese Radish Cultivar. Hortic. Plant J. 2015, 1, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, L.; Cai, X.; Wu, J.; Liu, M.; Grob, S.; Cheng, F.; Liang, J.; Cai, C.; Liu, Z.; Liu, B.; et al. Improved Brassica rapa reference genome by single-molecule sequencing and chromosome conformation capture technologies. Hortic. Res. 2018, 5, 50, Erratum in Hortic. Res. 2019, 13, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, J.; Liu, D.; Wang, X.; Ji, C.; Cheng, F.; Liu, B.; Hu, Z.; Chen, S.; Pental, D.; Ju, Y.; et al. The genome sequence of allopolyploid Brassica juncea and analysis of differential homoeolog gene expression influencing selection. Nat. Genet. 2016, 48, 1225–1232, Erratum in Nat. Genet. 2018, 50, 1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Belser, C.; Istace, B.; Denis, E.; Dubarry, M.; Baurens, F.C.; Falentin, C.; Genete, M.; Berrabah, W.; Chèvre, A.M.; Delourme, R.; et al. Chromosome-scale assemblies of plant genomes using nanopore long reads and optical maps. Nat. Plants. 2018, 4, 879–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hillis, D.M. Phylogenetic analysis. Curr. Biol. 1997, 7, R129–R131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Cheng, F.; Mandáková, T.; Wu, J.; Xie, Q.; Lysak, M.A.; Wang, X. Deciphering the Diploid Ancestral Genome of the Mesohexaploid Brassica rapa. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 1541–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zou, C.; Sun, K.; Mackaluso, J.D.; Seddon, A.E.; Jin, R.; Thomashow, M.F.; Shiu, S.H. Cis-regulatory code of stress-responsive transcription in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 14992–14997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Molina, C.; Grotewold, E. Genome wide analysis of Arabidopsis core promoters. BMC Genom. 2005, 6, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhu, H.; Wang, J.; Jiang, D.; Hong, Y.; Xu, J.; Zheng, S.; Yang, J.; Chen, W. The miR157-SPL-CNR module acts upstream of bHLH101 to negatively regulate iron deficiency responses in tomato. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 1059–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yoshida, T.; Fujita, Y.; Sayama, H.; Kidokoro, S.; Maruyama, K.; Mizoi, J.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. AREB1, AREB2, and ABF3 are master transcription factors that cooperatively regulate ABRE-dependent ABA signaling involved in drought stress tolerance and require ABA for full activation. Plant J. 2010, 61, 672–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, R.; Duan, L.; Pruneda-Paz, J.L.; Oh, D.H.; Pound, M.; Kay, S.; Dinneny, J.R. The 6xABRE Synthetic Promoter Enables the Spatiotemporal Analysis of ABA-Mediated Transcriptional Regulation. Plant Physiol. 2018, 177, 1650–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Montgomery, J.; Goldman, S.; Deikman, J.; Margossian, L.; Fischer, R.L. Identification of an ethylene-responsive region in the promoter of a fruit ripening gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 5939–5943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Licausi, F.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Perata, P. APETALA2/Ethylene Responsive Factor (AP2/ERF) transcription factors: Mediators of stress responses and developmental programs. New Phytol. 2013, 199, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ahmed, K.; Shabbir, G.; Ahmed, M.; Noor, S.; Mohi Ud Din, A.; Qamar, M.; Rehman, N. Expression profiling of TaARGOS homoeologous drought responsive genes in bread wheat. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 3595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yi, X.; Yuan, X.; Zhang, M.; Qin, T.; He, Y.; Ying, J.; Wang, H.; Xu, L.; Liu, L.; Wang, Y. Ethylene-Mediated RsCBF2 and RsERF18 Enhance Salt Tolerance by Directly Regulating Aquaporin Gene RsPIP2-1 in Radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Plant Cell Environ. 2025, 48, 5740–5752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Muthusamy, M.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, S.H.; Park, S.Y.; Lee, S.I. BrPP5.2 Overexpression Confers Heat Shock Tolerance in Transgenic Brassica rapa through Inherent Chaperone Activity, Induced Glucosinolate Biosynthesis, and Differential Regulation of Abiotic Stress Response Genes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Luo, J.; Tang, S.; Mei, F.; Peng, X.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Yan, X.; Zeng, X.; Liu, F.; Wu, Y.; et al. BnSIP1-1, a Trihelix Family Gene, Mediates Abiotic Stress Tolerance and ABA Signaling in Brassica napus. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Binder, B.M.; Rodríguez, F.I.; Bleecker, A.B. The copper transporter RAN1 is essential for biogenesis of ethylene receptors in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 37263–37270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chang, C.; Kwok, S.F.; Bleecker, A.B.; Meyerowitz, E.M. Arabidopsis ethylene-response gene ETR1: Similarity of product to two-component regulators. Science 1993, 262, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hua, J.; Meyerowitz, E.M. Ethylene responses are negatively regulated by a receptor gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell 1998, 94, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Resnick, J.S.; Rivarola, M.; Chang, C. Involvement of RTE1 in conformational changes promoting ETR1 ethylene receptor signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2008, 56, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dong, C.H.; Rivarola, M.; Resnick, J.S.; Maggin, B.D.; Chang, C. Subcellular co-localization of Arabidopsis RTE1 and ETR1 supports a regulatory role for RTE1 in ETR1 ethylene signaling. Plant J. 2008, 53, 275–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dong, C.H.; Jang, M.; Scharein, B.; Malach, A.; Rivarola, M.; Liesch, J.; Groth, G.; Hwang, I.; Chang, C. Molecular association of the Arabidopsis ETR1 ethylene receptor and a regulator of ethylene signaling, RTE1. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 40706–40713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lin, P.-Y.; Huang, S.-C.; Chen, K.-L.; Huang, Y.-C.; Liao, C.-Y.; Lin, G.-J.; Lee, H.; Chen, P.-Y. Analysing Protein Complexes in Plant Science: Insights and Limitations with AlphaFold 3. Bot. Stud. 2025, 66, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cao, H.; Wang, D.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Su, D.; Lu, W.; Xu, K.; Li, Z. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Profiling of SlGeBP Gene Family in Response to Hormone and Abiotic Stresses in Solanum lycopersicum L. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 6008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kohli, A.; Sreenivasulu, N.; Lakshmanan, P.; Kumar, P.P. The Phytohormone Crosstalk Paradigm Takes Center Stage in Understanding How Plants Respond to Abiotic Stresses. Plant Cell Rep. 2013, 32, 945–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Liang, K.; Chen, X.; Liu, F. Crosstalk between ABA and ethylene in regulating stomatal behavior in tomato under high CO2 and progressive soil drying. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 5931–5946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gasteiger, E.; Gattiker, A.; Hoogland, C.; Ivanyi, I.; Appel, R.D.; Bairoch, A. ExPASy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3784–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yu, C.S.; Lin, C.J.; Hwang, J.K. Predicting subcellular localization of proteins for Gram-negative bacteria by support vector machines based on n-peptide compositions. Protein Sci. 2004, 13, 1402–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rice, P.; Longden, I.; Bleasby, A. EMBOSS: The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet. 2000, 16, 276–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Corpet, F. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16, 10881–10890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cheng, F.; Wu, J.; Fang, L.; Wang, X. Syntenic gene analysis between Brassica rapa and other Brassicaceae species. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hu, B.; Jin, J.; Guo, A.Y.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J.; Gao, G. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1296–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lescot, M.; Déhais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Van de Peer, Y.; Rouzé, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sheng, X.G.; Zhao, Z.Q.; Yu, H.F.; Wang, J.S.; Zheng, C.F.; Gu, H.H. In-depth analysis of internal control genes for quantitative real-time PCR in Brassica oleracea var. botrytis. Genet. Mol. Res. 2016, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Dang, F.; Wang, Y.; She, J.; Lei, Y.; Liu, Z.; Eulgem, T.; Lai, Y.; Lin, J.; Yu, L.; Lei, D.; et al. Overexpression of CaWRKY27, a subgroup IIe WRKY transcription factor of Capsicum annuum, positively regulates tobacco resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum infection. Physiol. Plant. 2014, 150, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Evolutionary relationships among ARGOS proteins from Arabidopsis, B. oleracea (kale-like rapid cycling, cauliflower and broccoli), B. rapa, R. sativus and B. nigra. The phylogenetic tree was constructed employing the Neighbor-Joining algorithm in MEGA-7.0, and the reliability of the branches was tested (1000 bootstrap replicates). The ARGOS proteins are classified into three major clades (Cluster I-III). Proteins in Group I-III are highlighted in orange, green and blue lines, respectively.
Figure 1. Evolutionary relationships among ARGOS proteins from Arabidopsis, B. oleracea (kale-like rapid cycling, cauliflower and broccoli), B. rapa, R. sativus and B. nigra. The phylogenetic tree was constructed employing the Neighbor-Joining algorithm in MEGA-7.0, and the reliability of the branches was tested (1000 bootstrap replicates). The ARGOS proteins are classified into three major clades (Cluster I-III). Proteins in Group I-III are highlighted in orange, green and blue lines, respectively.
Ijms 26 09810 g001
Figure 2. Unrooted neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree, conserved protein motifs, and structural analysis of ARGOS genes. (A) Evolutionary relationships of the ARGOS proteins in six species. (B) The structures of the 40 putative ARGOS genes. The UTRs, exons, and introns are represented by grey boxes, yellow boxes, and black lines, respectively. (C) Conserved motif analysis of the ARGOS proteins. The different motifs are indicated by different colored boxes numbered from motif 1 to motif 10.
Figure 2. Unrooted neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree, conserved protein motifs, and structural analysis of ARGOS genes. (A) Evolutionary relationships of the ARGOS proteins in six species. (B) The structures of the 40 putative ARGOS genes. The UTRs, exons, and introns are represented by grey boxes, yellow boxes, and black lines, respectively. (C) Conserved motif analysis of the ARGOS proteins. The different motifs are indicated by different colored boxes numbered from motif 1 to motif 10.
Ijms 26 09810 g002
Figure 3. Cis-element analysis of promoters of ARGOS genes. The 2000 bp promoter regions were analyzed, and the number of predicted elements is represented by the color scale. The multicolor histogram displays the number of various cis-regulatory element categories across these genes.
Figure 3. Cis-element analysis of promoters of ARGOS genes. The 2000 bp promoter regions were analyzed, and the number of predicted elements is represented by the color scale. The multicolor histogram displays the number of various cis-regulatory element categories across these genes.
Ijms 26 09810 g003
Figure 4. Subcellular localization of BobARGOS proteins in N. benthamiana epidermal cells. Confocal microscopy images showing the fluorescence signals of BobARGOS-eGFP fusion proteins (green) and the endoplasmic reticulum marker RFP-HDEL (red). The rightmost panels show the merged images, with yellow indicating co-localization. Epidermal cells expressing the empty pFGC-eGFP vector were used as a control. Scale bars = 50 µm.
Figure 4. Subcellular localization of BobARGOS proteins in N. benthamiana epidermal cells. Confocal microscopy images showing the fluorescence signals of BobARGOS-eGFP fusion proteins (green) and the endoplasmic reticulum marker RFP-HDEL (red). The rightmost panels show the merged images, with yellow indicating co-localization. Epidermal cells expressing the empty pFGC-eGFP vector were used as a control. Scale bars = 50 µm.
Ijms 26 09810 g004
Figure 5. Expression analysis of ARGOS genes in various cauliflower organs (A), leaves at varying maturity stages (B), and curd at different development stages (C). Significant differences were analyzed using ordinary one-way ANOVA by Tukey’s test; lowercase letters indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Expression analysis of ARGOS genes in various cauliflower organs (A), leaves at varying maturity stages (B), and curd at different development stages (C). Significant differences were analyzed using ordinary one-way ANOVA by Tukey’s test; lowercase letters indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Ijms 26 09810 g005
Figure 6. Expression analysis of ARGOS genes under various treatments. qRT-PCR was performed to assess transcript levels in response to abiotic stresses (cold, heat, salinity) and phytohormones (IAA, NAA, 6-BA, GA3, MCP, ACC, EBL).
Figure 6. Expression analysis of ARGOS genes under various treatments. qRT-PCR was performed to assess transcript levels in response to abiotic stresses (cold, heat, salinity) and phytohormones (IAA, NAA, 6-BA, GA3, MCP, ACC, EBL).
Ijms 26 09810 g006
Figure 7. Phenotypic analysis of wild-type (Col) and BobARL2-OE transgenic Arabidopsis lines under normal conditions and ACC stress. (A) Representative images of seedling root growth 9 days after vertical placement on 1/2 MS medium with or without ACC. Scale bar = 1 cm. (B) Quantification of primary root lengths corresponding to (A). (C) Root growth inhibition rate. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 30). Significant differences were determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 7. Phenotypic analysis of wild-type (Col) and BobARL2-OE transgenic Arabidopsis lines under normal conditions and ACC stress. (A) Representative images of seedling root growth 9 days after vertical placement on 1/2 MS medium with or without ACC. Scale bar = 1 cm. (B) Quantification of primary root lengths corresponding to (A). (C) Root growth inhibition rate. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 30). Significant differences were determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Ijms 26 09810 g007
Figure 8. Phenotypic analysis of wild-type (Col) and BobARL2-OE transgenic Arabidopsis lines under NaCl stress. (A) Root growth of Col and BobARL2-OE transgenic seedlings vertically grown on 1/2 MS medium with or without NaCl for 9 days after germination. Scale bar = 1 cm. (B) Main root lengths of Col and BobARL2-OE transgenic Arabidopsis lines measured 9 days after transfer to plates with NaCl. (C) Root growth inhibition rate. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 30). Significant differences were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 8. Phenotypic analysis of wild-type (Col) and BobARL2-OE transgenic Arabidopsis lines under NaCl stress. (A) Root growth of Col and BobARL2-OE transgenic seedlings vertically grown on 1/2 MS medium with or without NaCl for 9 days after germination. Scale bar = 1 cm. (B) Main root lengths of Col and BobARL2-OE transgenic Arabidopsis lines measured 9 days after transfer to plates with NaCl. (C) Root growth inhibition rate. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 30). Significant differences were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001).
Ijms 26 09810 g008
Figure 9. The interaction of BobARL2 and BobRTL4. (A) Molecular docking model of the protein complex (BobARL2, blue; BobRTL4, purple) predicted by AlphaFold3 and visualized with PyMol 2.6. The interaction was confirmed by Y2H (B) and LCI assays (C).
Figure 9. The interaction of BobARL2 and BobRTL4. (A) Molecular docking model of the protein complex (BobARL2, blue; BobRTL4, purple) predicted by AlphaFold3 and visualized with PyMol 2.6. The interaction was confirmed by Y2H (B) and LCI assays (C).
Ijms 26 09810 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duan, M.; Wang, G.; Zong, M.; Han, S.; Guo, N.; Liu, F. ARGOS Genes in Cauliflower: Genome-Wide Identification and Functional Validation of BobARL2 Under Abiotic Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 9810. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199810

AMA Style

Duan M, Wang G, Zong M, Han S, Guo N, Liu F. ARGOS Genes in Cauliflower: Genome-Wide Identification and Functional Validation of BobARL2 Under Abiotic Stresses. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(19):9810. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199810

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duan, Mengmeng, Guixiang Wang, Mei Zong, Shuo Han, Ning Guo, and Fan Liu. 2025. "ARGOS Genes in Cauliflower: Genome-Wide Identification and Functional Validation of BobARL2 Under Abiotic Stresses" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 19: 9810. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199810

APA Style

Duan, M., Wang, G., Zong, M., Han, S., Guo, N., & Liu, F. (2025). ARGOS Genes in Cauliflower: Genome-Wide Identification and Functional Validation of BobARL2 Under Abiotic Stresses. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(19), 9810. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199810

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop