Next Article in Journal
IL-33 as a Marker of Poor Early Response in Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients Undergoing Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
The OsteoSense Imaging Agent Identifies Organ-Specific Patterns of Soft Tissue Calcification in an Adenine-Induced Chronic Kidney Disease Mouse Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Proteomic Insights into Childhood Obesity: A Systematic Review of Protein Biomarkers and Advances

1
Saint John Paul II Upper Silesian Child Health Centre, Public Clinical Hospital no.6 of the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Medyków 16 Street, 40-752 Katowice, Poland
2
Department of Pediatric Neurology, Independent Public Healthcare Centre—Municipal Hospital Complex, ul.W. Truchana 7, 41-500 Chorzow, Poland
3
Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(17), 8522; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178522
Submission received: 5 July 2025 / Revised: 22 August 2025 / Accepted: 25 August 2025 / Published: 2 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Informatics)

Abstract

Childhood obesity has emerged as one of the most pressing public health challenges of the 21st century. Early-onset obesity is associated with an increased risk of developing numerous comorbidities later in life. Despite extensive research into its multifactorial etiology—including genetic, behavioral, environmental, and socioeconomic factors—the precise molecular mechanisms underlying the development and persistence of obesity in the pediatric population remain incompletely understood. Proteomics offers promising insights into these mechanisms. The application of proteomics in pediatric obesity research has grown, enabling the identification of proteins that reflect dynamic changes in metabolic and inflammatory pathways. This advancement allows clinicians to move beyond traditional anthropometric measurements toward personalized approaches with notification of early complications of obesity. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between 2010 and 2025. Inclusion criteria: human studies, participants aged 0–18, proteomic analysis of obesity, and biomarkers. Data extraction and quality assessment followed standardized protocols. From 239 articles, 20 were included. Key dysregulated proteins include APOA1, CLU, and HP. LC-MS/MS was the predominant technique used. Some biomarkers were predictive for obesity complications in children. Proteomics holds clinical potential for early detection and personalized treatment of pediatric obesity. Standardized methodologies and longitudinal studies are needed for translation into clinical practice.

1. Introduction

Childhood obesity has emerged as one of the most important public health challenges of the 21st century. Its global prevalence has increased at an alarming rate, with the World Health Organization (WHO) estimating in 2020 that over 39 million children under the age of five were overweight or obese. Numbers are continuing to rise, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, and they have been increasing more rapidly in children than in adults [1]. Childhood obesity is a complex health issue arising from interactions among genetic factors and changing environmental influences—particularly modern dietary patterns—that together disturb the balance between calorie intake and energy burned [2,3]. This imbalance initiates a cascade of metabolic disorders, creating the conditions for various negative health consequences [4]. The early-onset form of obesity is associated with an increased risk of developing metabolic syndrome, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, systemic inflammation, cardiovascular disease, and psychological comorbidities later in life [5,6,7,8,9,10].
Early diagnosis is essential in arranging well-coordinated, specialized, and multidisciplinary care, requiring active collaboration among healthcare providers, social services, and families. Preventing the worsening of obesity involves controlling food availability, creating a supportive and structured eating routine, and encouraging consistent, tailored, and supervised physical activity on a daily basis [11,12,13,14,15].
Despite extensive research into its multifactorial etiology, the precise molecular mechanisms that cause and maintain obesity in pediatric populations remain incompletely understood.
One of the greatest challenges in addressing childhood obesity is detecting the condition and its metabolic consequences early, often before serious health problems arise. Traditional anthropometric and biochemical assessments offer limited insights into the complex biological networks that drive the onset and progression of obesity and its comorbidities [16,17].
In modern medical diagnostics, multi-omics approaches have emerged as a novel and promising field. In our study, we focused specifically on proteomic techniques as a tool for identifying potential biomarkers of metabolic dysfunction, such as proteins, altered lipid profiles, inflammatory responses, and hormonal imbalances. (In Supplementary File S1, we present the foundational principles of proteomic techniques.) By identifying these biomarkers in obese children or those exhibiting subclinical metabolic dysfunction, proteomic analysis may facilitate the early identification of at-risk individuals and enable timely interventions to prevent the onset of obesity-related conditions [18].
Consequently, there is a growing interest in identifying reliable biomarkers that can facilitate early diagnosis, risk stratification, and targeted intervention. There is increasing recognition that personalized treatment strategies are needed in order to address obesity effectively. Proteomic studies can help in the creation of personalized obesity management strategies by identifying distinct proteomic signatures in different obesity subtypes. For example, the response to dietary changes, physical activity, bariatric surgery, changes in the growing organism, or pharmacological treatments could be predicted based on protein expression profiles [13,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. In our review, we have focused on studies on biomarkers in the pediatric population where proteomic studies were used.
This review aims to synthesize the current state of knowledge regarding proteomic biomarkers in childhood obesity, highlighting key methodological approaches, the protein signatures identified, and their relevance to clinical phenotypes. These integrated models will also help clarify the interactions between genetic predisposition and environmental factors, providing a more holistic understanding of childhood obesity.

2. Materials and Methods

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A structured literature search was performed across three major databases and registers: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, and through websites and citation searching, covering studies published between January 2010 and April 2025.
The detailed search strategy is available in Supplementary File S2. The study selection process is illustrated in the PRISMA flowchart (Figure 1).
Inclusion criteria:
Studies involving human participants aged 0–18 years.
Participants classified as overweight or obese.
Use of proteomic analysis to identify or assess biomarkers.
Original peer-reviewed articles, including cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, or interventional designs.
Studies published in English.
Exclusion criteria:
Animal or in vitro studies.
Studies involving only breastfeeding infants or incorrect age group.
Papers using general protein measurements without applying a proteomic approach.
Reviews, editorials, and conference abstracts.
Study selection and data extraction:
Two independent reviewers [D.K.&K.Sz] screened all titles and abstracts. Full-text articles were retrieved for potentially eligible studies and assessed for final inclusion. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer.
A standardized data charting form was developed and pilot-tested. For each included study, we extracted the following information:
Study characteristics (authors; year of publication).
Participant demographics (age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities).
Sample type and proteomic platform used.
Identified biomarkers and proteins.
Main outcomes and clinical correlations.
Supplementary File S2—Proteomic article search algorithm.
Although the systematic search informed the structure of this review, not all included studies were subjected to quantitative synthesis. Instead, the extracted data were used to support a narrative synthesis of the current state of proteomic biomarker discovery in pediatric obesity. Studies were categorized according to the types of behaviors they examined, and for each category, the settings, populations, and study designs were summarized, along with the measurement approaches and overarching findings. The systematic review framework was applied solely to describe and discuss the methodological aspects; these studies were therefore not included in our primary Table 1.

3. Results

The literature search, including records identified via databases and registers [“Articles screened (n = 168)”] and those identified via other methods [“Articles sought for retrieval (n = 71)”], has given rise to a total of 239 studies. Following the screening of titles and abstracts, 146 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. The study selection process is presented in Figure 1.
Reasons for exclusion included participants not being the correct age, studies that involved proteins but did not constitute proteomics works, exclusively breastfeeding-related studies, animal studies, and incorrect study designs. All included studies are summarized in Table 1.
We identified more than 54 proteomic biomarkers or candidates/emerging biomarkers for childhood obesity, summarized key methodological approaches, detected protein signatures, and presented their functions. These are detailed in Table 2
Identifying biomarkers for early-onset obesity is crucial in the timely intervention and prevention of associated metabolic disorders. Recent research utilizing proteomic analyses has uncovered several potential biomarkers in children; we have chosen those that show the strongest correlation and are the most often repeated:
-
APOA1 (Apolipoprotein-A1): Studies have shown a decrease in various isoforms of APOA1 in obese children compared to lean controls. This reduction is more pronounced in insulin-resistant individuals and may be partially reversed with weight loss. APOA1 particles can increase cholesterol efflux from cells and risk for cardiovascular disease [18,20,21,27,28,40,41,46,47,48].
-
CLU (Clusterin; Apolipoprotein J): This is involved in lipid transport, apoptosis regulation, and protection against oxidative stress. Reduced levels of clusterin have been observed in obese pediatric populations, suggesting a compromised capacity to manage cellular stress and lipid transport. This protein is known to accumulate in the artery wall during the development of atherosclerosis and has been detected in the infarcted heart during myocardial infarction. Given its multifaceted role, alterations in clusterin levels may contribute to the pathophysiology of obesity and its related complications [30,31,39,49,50,51].
-
APOE (Apolipoprotein E): This is involved in lipid transport and clearance [28].
-
HP (Haptoglobin): An increase in low-molecular-weight isoforms of haptoglobin (as well as a decrease in high isoforms) has been observed in obese children, especially those with insulin resistance. These elevated levels correlate positively with inflammatory markers such as interleukin-6 and NAMPT/visfatin. It is also an acute-phase/inflammation marker [6,18,28,33,39,49,52,53,54].
-
CFB (Complement Factor B), CFH (Complement Factor H), and CFI (Complement Factor I): These proteins are integral components of the immune system’s complement pathway. Elevated levels have been associated with an increased BMI, suggesting a link between obesity and immune system activation [8,9,20,22,28,31,32,33,39,40,43,55,56,57].
-
VDBP (Vitamin D Binding Protein): This protein transports vitamin D metabolites in circulation. Lower concentrations in obese children may reflect alterations in vitamin D metabolism associated with obesity. Upregulation was paralleled by the adiponectin-interactive protein DsbA-L, suggesting that the VD regulation of adiponectin involves post-transcriptional events. Some pediatric studies link higher VDBP levels with higher HOMA-IR or impaired glucose metabolism, suggesting that VDBP may be involved in the vitamin D–insulin axis. Higher or altered VDBP levels in obese children compared to lean ones are often correlated with insulin resistance or inflammatory markers. Using a proteomic approach, multimeric adiponectin has been identified as a key plasma protein that links VDD with pediatric obesity [8,32,36,43,49,58].
-
ADIPOQ (Adiponectin): This is a clinically relevant protein biomarker that reflects metabolic health in children with obesity. Its HMW form is especially significant in insulin sensitivity and is often reduced in obese, insulin-resistant, or vitamin D-deficient children [32].
-
TTR (Hormonal Transthyretin): This transports thyroxine and retinol-binding protein. Decreased levels in obese children suggest potential impacts on thyroid hormone and vitamin A transport [32,49,59].
-
PEDF (Pigment Epithelium-Derived Factor): Secreted by adipose tissue, this can induce insulin resistance and inflammatory signaling [7,31,48,57,60,61].
-
RBP4 (Retinol-Binding Protein 4): This protein contributes to insulin resistance, vascular inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and atherosclerosis. It also influences adipocyte differentiation and inflammation [10,20,31,57,62,63].
-
PON1 (Paraoxonase 1): This plays a key antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and detoxifying role. Alterations in its activity—often due to genetic polymorphisms—are associated with a broad spectrum of diseases, particularly those involving oxidative stress, inflammation, lipid dysregulation, and toxin exposure [5,58,64,65,66,67,68].
-
ALDH (Aldehyde dehydrogenase): This is a family of enzymes that detoxify aldehydes (through lipid peroxidation, alcohol metabolism, etc.), contributing to oxidative stress control. ALDH isoforms are often upregulated in obese children, particularly in those with metabolic syndrome or fatty liver disease. This suggests a compensatory response to oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation associated with excess adiposity. It has been identified in plasma and liver tissue proteomics in obesity-related NAFLD and may serve as a marker of oxidative stress load or liver dysfunction in early obesity-related organ damage [27,28,69,70].
-
ALB (Albumin): This is a major plasma protein; it maintains oncotic pressure and transports hormones, fatty acids, and drugs. In pediatric obesity, total albumin levels may remain normal, but post-translational modifications (e.g., glycation; oxidation) increase. Lower “functional” albumin may reflect oxidative stress or systemic inflammation. It is identified as differentially abundant or modified in obese vs. lean children in serum proteomic panels. Changes in albumin may reflect subclinical inflammation, oxidative damage, or early renal impairment in obesity [20,71,72].
-
CD38 (Cluster of differentiation 38): This is a transmembrane enzyme that breaks down NAD+, a key cofactor in cellular metabolism. CD38 is heavily involved in diet-induced obesity and is the protein that shows the most consistent association with cardiometabolic and brain health. Its receptor is involved in immune cell activation, calcium signaling, and NAD+ metabolism. In pediatric obesity, CD38 levels have been found to be lower in metabolically healthy obese (MHO) children compared to metabolically unhealthy obese (MUO) ones. This suggests a potential protective role: lower CD38 may reflect reduced inflammation and a better metabolic profile. It is also linked to brain–immune signaling and blood–brain barrier integrity [40,73].
-
LAIR2 (Leukocyte-Associated Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor 2) collagen-binding protein: This is a soluble immune modulator that inhibits immune cell overactivation by interfering with LAIR1. In pediatric obesity, it is lower in MHO children than in MUO children. It may reflect reduced chronic low-grade inflammation, making it a potential marker of a healthier immune–inflammatory status in obesity [40].
-
MANF (Mesencephalic Astrocyte-derived Neurotrophic Factor): This is a neurotrophic factor that supports neuron survival and maintains endoplasmic reticulum (ER) function and cellular stress responses. It is reduced in metabolically healthy obese compared to non-metabolically healthy obese children. Its decrease in healthier obese children might suggest lower ER stress or better neural and metabolic balance, highlighting links between metabolic health and brain function [40].
-
NRP2 (Neuropilin-2): This is a co-receptor for VEGF isoforms and plays a role in neurological diseases in obese children. It is involved in angiogenesis, neurodevelopment, and immune cell migration. In pediatric obesity, it is lower in MHO children. This suggests that there is improved vascular and neuroimmune regulation in metabolically healthier obesity phenotypes [40].
-
HSP90AA1 (Heat Shock Protein beta 1 A, PCYOX1, and HSP90AA1): These are small heat shock proteins involved in cell protection, cytoskeletal stability, and anti-apoptotic functions. They may be upregulated as a cellular defense mechanism against metabolic or oxidative stress. Elevated levels may correlate with insulin resistance or inflammatory stress. They have been detected to be upregulated in obese children with insulin resistance in targeted proteomics studies. They represent a potential early marker of cellular stress and insulin resistance development, predictive for liver steatosis [20,44].
-
PDIA3 (Protein Disulfide-isomerase A3): This is an ER-resident protein that assists in protein folding and redox regulation and is often upregulated in obese individuals’ children, indicating ER stress and misfolded protein response, which are common in insulin resistance and obesity. It has been identified in both the liver and plasma proteomes of obese pediatric patients, often in those with NAFLD. It may reflect ER dysfunction and metabolic inflammation, possibly preceding overt comorbidities [20,28,48,58,72].
-
Plasma lyso-PEs, especially 16:0 and 22:6 species: Lyso-PEs are bioactive lipid intermediates, formed via the partial hydrolysis of phosphatidylethanolamines, typically by phospholipase A2. They influence membrane fluidity, cell signaling, and inflammation. A pattern of Lyso-PE 16:0 (palmitoyl-LysoPE) ↓ decreasing and Lyso-PE 22:6 (docosahexaenoyl-LysoPE) ↑ increasing was observed in overweight vs. normal-weight children even before classical lipid profile abnormalities. These changes may reflect early alterations in lipid metabolism, cellular stress, or low-grade inflammation and may indicate subclinical shifts in lipid signaling or mitochondrial lipid remodeling [20,41,61,62,74,75].
-
IGFBP1 (Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 1): This binds to IGF1, regulating its availability for tissues. It is inversely regulated by insulin—a high level of insulin suppresses IGFBP1 production. IGFBP1 is consistently found to be reduced in obese and insulin-resistant children. This reflects hyperinsulinemia, even before glucose tolerance declines. IGFBP1 (and IGFBP2) are often measured in proteomic studies via multiplex immunoassays, SOMAscan, or targeted mass spectrometry. These proteins are among the most reliable early indicators of metabolic dysfunction, especially when combined with inflammatory and lipid-related markers [55,76,77,78,79].
-
CRP (C-Reactive Protein): A well-known marker of inflammation, CRP levels correlate strongly with BMI in obese individuals, indicating chronic low-grade inflammation associated with obesity [20,22,27,28,43].
-
Calprotectin Complex (S100-A8/S100-A9): This complex is involved in inflammatory responses and has been found at higher concentrations in individuals with obesity, reflecting an ongoing inflammatory state [43,47].
-
S100 Proteins (S100-A8 and S100-A9): These calcium-binding proteins form the calprotectin complex, which is involved in inflammatory processes. Their elevated expression in obese individuals further highlights the inflammatory component of obesity [80].
-
PTX3 (Pentraxin 3) is a mediator of subclinical inflammation in atherosclerosis, which could serve as a sensitive early biomarker for cardiovascular risk in children, signaling inflammation before overt disease manifests [81,82].
-
NEBL (Nebulette): This may reflect subclinical cardiovascular remodeling or cardiac stress in pediatric obesity [43].
-
Galectin 3BP (Galectin-3 binding protein): This is a novel marker of obesity and metabolic syndrome [35].
-
SEM4A, PSB3, DDC, C1RL1, T132A (uncharacterized), pyruvate carboxylase, and C1-esterase inhibitor: These proteins implicate inflammation, metabolic stress, proteostasis dysregulation, and immune activation in the early pathogenesis of diabetic kidney disease. They could be used as markers in early risk stratification and targeted interventions in obese youth-onset T2D [39].
-
RAS-GTPase: This is involved in insulin signaling, activating the PI3K/Akt and MAPK pathways. Its dysregulation leads to insulin resistance. eIF4E Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E leads to translation initiation and metabolic stress [29].
-
PKC-η (Protein kinase C-eta): This plays a role in inflammation signaling and activates inflammatory cytokine expression; it is overactive in obesity and contributes to IR (insulin resistance) [35,83].
-
SSP1 (Osteopontin): This is a known bone remodeling and inflammatory marker. It indicates that in obese adolescents, inflammatory/integrity pathways play a key role in bone development and density changes [45].
-
MFAP5 (Microfibrillar-associated protein 5): This is an extracellular matrix protein implicated in bone strength, used to identify youth at risk for poor bone accrual. It is particularly important in the context of excess adiposity [45].
-
p38 MAPK (Mitogen-activated protein kinase): This is involved in inflammatory signaling (e.g., TNF-α; IL-6), insulin signaling modulation, adipocyte differentiation and lipolysis, and muscle and liver glucose homeostasis [29].
-
AHSG (Fetuin A): Children with obesity or overweight consistently show elevated serum and salivary fetuin-A levels. Increased fetuin-A correlates with increased BMI, waist circumference, HOMA-IR (insulin resistance index), and triglyceride levels. Weight loss or physical activity programs can lower fetuin-A levels, reflecting improved insulin sensitivity and metabolic health [63].
-
MSR1 (Macrophage scavenger receptor type I): Membrane glycoproteins are implicated in the pathological deposition of cholesterol in the arterial wall. This protein plays a role in clearing infectious agents and toxic molecules in pro- and anti-inflammatory responses and cardiometabolic and brain health [80].
-
STAT3: Proteomic/phosphoproteomic studies in children are still emerging. However, STAT3′s downstream involvement in energy homeostasis, inflammation, and hypothalamic regulation suggest that it is an important therapeutic and mechanistic target in pediatric metabolic research [41].
-
PDK1 (Phosphoinositide-Dependent Kinase 1): PDK1 is a central kinase downstream of PI3K, responsible for the phosphorylation and activation of Akt/PKB and other AGC kinases—key players in insulin, growth factor, and metabolic signaling. Though direct evidence in pediatric obesity is currently limited, PDK1′s role in insulin pathway functionality is well established. Future proteomic or phosphoproteomic studies may reveal its regulation in relation to adiposity, insulin resistance, or growth hormone signaling in youth [41].
-
OLFM1: This is a brain-enriched protein that shows decreased levels in children with obesity [40].
-
ANPEP (Aminopeptidase N): This points to alterations in the gut–metabolic axis or digestive enzyme regulation in obese children [43].
-
FHL3 (Four and a Half LIM Domains 3): This may reflect impaired muscle development, lower lean mass, or altered muscle signaling in obesity [43].
-
UMOD (Uromodulin): This suggests a kidney–metabolism connection; lower levels may indicate systemic inflammation or early renal stress [43].
-
KIM1 (Kidney Injury Molecule-1): Elevated plasma levels correlate with decreased vagal heart rate variability (HRV), a marker of poor cardiovascular autonomic health. KIM1 is one of the three proteins (with IDUA and BOC) most consistently associated with at least three heart rate parameters, suggesting early cardiovascular stress in children with obesity [32].
-
BOC (Brother of CDO): Elevated plasma BOC correlates positively with HRV. It is one of the top three proteins consistently linked across multiple HRV parameters, hinting at potential cardiometabolic benefits [40,42].
-
IDUA (Alpha-L-iduronidase): Plasma IDUA levels are positively correlated with HRV—a higher IDUA means a better vagal tone. It is ranked among the key proteins associated with ≥3 HRV metrics, implying a potentially protective cardiovascular effect [42].
-
GSTA1: Its elevation suggests enhanced antioxidant defense and a reduction in oxidative stress [40,41].
-
MYH10: This points to improved muscle–adipocyte physiology and insulin signaling [41].
-
CNDP1: Its changes correlate with BMI, but its role in obesity requires further investigation [41].
-
CDH2 (Cadherin 2): A cell–cell adhesion molecule (N-cadherin), may reflect hepatic or adipose tissue remodeling, showing significant correlation with the severity of steatosis [45].
-
CTSO (Catepsin O): This protease is involved in tissue remodeling, showing a significant correlation with the severity of steatosis [41,45].
-
LILRA5 (Leukocyte Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor A5): This is an immune receptor on leukocytes; it is possibly linked to inflammation-driven liver pathology, showing a significant correlation with the severity of steatosis [27].
-
ALPL (Alkaline Phosphatase): This is significantly upregulated in obese subjects. Elevated ALPL levels are correlated with cardiovascular risk factors, including systolic/diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, carotid intima–media thickness, and a trend toward higher fasting insulin, a consistent and novel neutrophil activation marker in obesity [34,84].
These biomarkers provide deeper insights into the complex interplay between metabolic processes and inflammation in the context of early-onset obesity. Their identification underscores the potential of proteomic analyses in uncovering novel targets for early detection and intervention strategies in pediatric obesity.

4. Discussion

Proteomic research in childhood obesity represents an incredibly promising and rapidly evolving area. Over the last fifteen years, significant technological innovations and the growing demand for personalized healthcare have led to the expansion of proteomic applications in pediatric obesity research.
In the context of obesity, proteomic analysis enables us to capture dynamic changes in metabolic and inflammatory pathways that may not be evident at the genomic or transcriptomic levels. Unlike the relatively stable genome, the proteome is highly dynamic and responsive to external factors, developmental stages, and disease processes, making it particularly valuable in pediatric research, where age-dependent biological variation is significant [7,14,15,19,20,24,26,36,41,49,76,77,81,85,86,87,88,89].
Serum proteomic analysis can identify novel biomarkers that complement standard clinical assays, enabling the early detection of metabolic impairments in obese children. This approach may enhance early intervention strategies and improve the management of childhood obesity. One of the most promising applications of proteomics in the context of pediatric obesity is its potential to stratify patients by metabolic risk and to predict disease progression or treatment response. As obesity is a heterogeneous condition, the ability to differentiate between metabolically healthy and unhealthy phenotypes in children is essential in early intervention and personalized care [18,24,35,90].
Our review highlights the way in which proteomic studies have emerged as a powerful approach to investigating the dynamic molecular dysregulations seen in obesity. Studies have consistently demonstrated that proteomic analyses can detect the distinct expression patterns of proteins involved in inflammation, oxidative stress, lipid metabolism, and hormonal regulation [89]. These findings can pave the way for individualized risk stratification, moving beyond traditional anthropometric metrics such as BMI to support the real-time monitoring of disease progression and treatment response [14,28,29,48]. These systems biology approaches enable clinicians to move beyond BMI, allowing for individualized risk profiling and the real-time monitoring of disease progression and treatment response [20,48,77,91].
Pediatric proteomic research faces challenges such as limited sample volumes, developmental variability, and ethical concerns. There is also the challenge of biological variability: children undergo constant physiological changes that affect protein levels, adding another layer of complexity [43,92].
Proteomic analyses have begun to uncover a range of candidate proteins that are differentially expressed in obese versus non-obese children. These biomarkers provide insights into the molecular mechanisms underpinning adipose tissue dysfunction, systemic inflammation, metabolic derangements, and early organ damage associated with obesity [7,11,18,22,37,45,46,53,59,62,81,93,94,95,96]. Proteomic studies in children commonly utilize non-invasive or minimally invasive biological samples such as plasma, serum, urine, and saliva. Each matrix offers distinct advantages and limitations. For example, plasma and serum are rich sources of circulating proteins involved in metabolic and immune processes but pose challenges due to the wide and dynamic range of protein concentrations. Urine and saliva, while more accessible, may contain a lower protein content and require more sensitive analytical techniques [38,40,42,97], and adipose tissue is less known. However, we could only find proteomic studies in adult cohorts. These findings suggest that proteomics may allow for the subclinical detection of metabolic impairment before overt obesity or comorbidities develop. The research below provides insights into the proteomic differences associated with metabolic health status in children with overweight or obesity, emphasizing the importance of early identification and intervention. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Several longitudinal studies have examined how proteomic markers change in response to weight loss through diet and exercise. The normalization of APOA1 and a reduction in inflammatory proteins such as haptoglobin and S100A8/A9 have been observed following even modest reductions in body weight [15,41,98]. However, these findings are derived from relatively small cohorts, often lacking ethnic diversity, and the analytical platforms used vary substantially between studies. Without harmonized protocols and longitudinal validation, the clinical utility of APOA1, haptoglobin, and S100A8/A9 as surrogate markers of therapeutic efficacy in pediatric populations remains to be confirmed.
In addition to weight loss, dietary composition and physical activity have also been linked to distinct proteomic signatures. Studies have demonstrated that healthy dietary patterns are associated with proteomic profiles indicative of reduced risk for obesity-related complications. Proteins related to inflammation, lipid metabolism, and oxidative stress can be modulated by specific dietary components, which may support the development of tailored nutrition strategies for children at risk of metabolic disease [11].
Thrush’s study investigated why some obese (“diet-resistant”) individuals struggle to lose weight. Differences in muscle metabolism and plasma proteomic signatures pointed to intrinsic impairments in fat oxidation and energy expenditure. A study on six children with obesity undergoing a 30-day weight loss program identified changes in 43 proteins and 165 metabolites post-intervention, highlighting the molecular impact of weight loss [12].
Moreover, physical activity interventions have been shown to induce significant shifts in the proteome. Exercise-based randomized controlled trials in adolescents have identified changes in numerous immune-related proteins and inflammatory markers. In the study by Ramirez-Velez et al., they analyzed 65 immune-related proteins before and after a 6-month exercise intervention in adolescents, revealing changes in inflammatory markers [36]. Rodriguez-Ayllon’s RCT found that a 20-week exercise program significantly reduced MSR1 (macrophage scavenger receptor type I) levels in overweight or obese children, linking activity with brain health biomarkers [38]. Despite the observed reduction in MSR1 levels, these results require cautious interpretation, as current evidence is limited to single-center trials with modest sample sizes, and inter-assay variability may influence reproducibility across laboratories.
In terms of pharmacological treatment, Alshahrani et al. compared plasma protein expression among obese individuals, obese individuals with type 2 diabetes, and those treated with metformin. They identified 30 proteins with reliable sequence matches, including calbindin, apolipoprotein A-I, albumin, haptoglobin, annexin A3, and alpha-2-macroglobulin, involved in lipid transport, inflammation, oxidative stress, and cellular regulation. The study provides insights into how metformin modulates plasma protein profiles in obese diabetic patients, particularly across inflammation, oxidative stress, and metabolic pathways [48]. However, the cross-sectional nature of most studies and the confounding effects of concurrent lifestyle interventions limit the ability to attribute these proteomic changes solely to pharmacological treatment.
Large-scale studies employing advanced platforms such as SomaScan have expanded our understanding of the pediatric plasma proteome. The identification of hundreds of proteins associated with BMI and metabolic dysfunction supports the use of proteomic biomarkers as predictive tools in the early detection of comorbidities. The largest pediatric MS-based proteomic analysis to date, expanding our understanding of how biology and genetics shape the plasma proteome during growth, took place in the 2005 study by Niu et al. The study identified protein markers that can predict BMI, making them candidates for early diagnostic tools for metabolic risk in children [41,43]. Furthermore, combinations of proteomic biomarkers have demonstrated improved predictive power over traditional measures such as BMI or simple biochemical markers alone. Multiplex panels incorporating inflammatory, lipid, and hormonal proteins could facilitate risk stratification, helping clinicians to identify children who would benefit from intensified monitoring or early lifestyle interventions [63]. Although such multiplex panels show promise, differences in analytical sensitivity, the absence of standardized pediatric reference ranges, and population-specific variability still limit their readiness for routine clinical implementation.
Rothwell et al.’s paper [29] reports on a study on a group of overweight adolescent girls (13–17) and shows a specific proteomic signature in plasma associated with the HOMA value. It is clear that proteomic analysis of the plasma proteome in obese adolescents can potentially yield valuable information concerning the underlying changes in protein expression and metabolic changes that give rise to metabolic syndrome. Nevertheless, HOMA-related proteomic associations can be influenced by factors such as pubertal stage, acute illness, or nutritional status, which should be accounted for in future validation studies.
The final intervention treatment for severe pediatric obesity is bariatric surgery, which has emerged as an effective treatment for sustained weight loss and the resolution of comorbidities. Preliminary proteomic studies on adolescents undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass have identified dramatic shifts in circulating protein profiles within months post-surgery. These include the restoration of favorable lipid-related proteins (e.g., APOA1), reductions in pro-inflammatory markers, and improvements in oxidative stress proteins [77,91].
Oberbach et al. designed a study assessing six children with morbid obesity in relation to proteomic changes. The study demonstrates that LSG in children and adolescents leads to significant metabolic and proteomic alterations, reflecting improvements in lipid metabolism and reductions in obesity-related biomarkers. These changes suggest enhanced metabolic health and a decreased risk of obesity-related complications following surgery [31,62]. Still, these findings stem from very small cohorts, and replication in larger, multi-center pediatric surgical populations is necessary before such proteomic changes can be integrated into clinical monitoring protocols.
Some papers show a connection between obesity-related complications and changes in the proteome, such as obstructive sleep apnea, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease, hepatic steatosis, kidney fibrosis and renal disease, and even asthma in the context of obesity [27,44,46,99,100,101,102,103].
Moving on to inflammation, we found several studies covering this subject; for example, Manell et al. employed the proximity extension assay (PEA) to quantify 113 inflammation-related proteins, identifying IL-33, IL-17C, and FGF-23 as potential biomarkers in adolescents with both asthma and obesity [104].
Similarly, Beglarian and colleagues analyzed a broad panel of 653 proteins, focusing on immune and inflammatory markers, cytokines, and metabolic and cardiovascular-related proteins, to explore their association with changes in bone mineral density and obesity in youth [45].
Rahman et al. applied a bead-based multiplex immunoassay to measure plasma levels of IGFBP1, IGFBP3, and IGFBP7 in a cohort of 420 adolescents aged 11–14 years, identifying IGFBP1 as a sensitive biomarker of obesity-related metabolic complications [55]. However, IGFBP1 concentrations can be influenced by non-obesity-related factors such as growth stage, acute inflammation, or nutritional status, which should be addressed in future studies.
In a distinct population, Sztolsztener et al. investigated apolipoprotein profiles in 58 childhood survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), linking several apolipoproteins (APOA1, A2, C1, C3, H, J, and D) with obesity-related metabolic risk [105].
Importantly, the integration of proteomics into other omics technologies, including multi-omics approaches, could offer valuable insights into early diagnosis, personalized risk assessment, and therapeutic targeting [16,17,41,62,64,80,100,106,107].
For example, a meta-analysis incorporating genomics, metabolomics, and epigenomics could provide a comprehensive systems-level perspective on childhood obesity [108]. A study by Hellmuth et al. spanning multiple European pediatric cohorts revealed distinct amino acid and lipid metabolomic signatures in obese and insulin-resistant children [109]. Pan et al. identified ALPL as a marker of neutrophil activation associated with obesity [34], while Inoue et al. reported that overweight children exhibited altered lyso-PE lipid profiles, indicating early metabolic shifts before conventional lipid abnormalities became evident [74].
Furthermore, Concepcion et al. conducted the targeted metabolomic profiling of plasma and 24 h urine in 90 adolescents, stratified into three groups (obesity with T2D, obesity without T2D, and normal-weight controls). Using LC-MS/MS, they quantified 273 analytes and identified 22 urinary metabolites specifically associated with T2D. They found that urinary branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) and their intermediates were more specific biomarkers for T2D and that plasma BCAAs were associated with obesity and insulin resistance, regardless of diabetes status [110]. While urinary BCAAs show promise, variability in dietary protein intake, hydration status, and sample handling can affect quantification, underscoring the need for standardized pre-analytical protocols [111].
Despite the promise shown, the translation of proteomic discoveries into clinical practice in pediatric obesity faces challenges. Current limitations include a lack of standardized protocols and methodologies, variability due to age, sex, and comorbidities, and longitudinal data. To overcome these barriers, future research should prioritize large-scale, multicenter cohort studies with long term follow-up. These studies are essential in validating candidate biomarkers, establishing pediatric reference ranges, and refining clinical risk stratification tools.

5. Conclusions

The rapidly advancing field of omics-based research, particularly proteomics, offers promising opportunities for identifying biomarkers of systemic metabolic disturbances in children with obesity. Across the reviewed literature, several candidates have emerged as particularly promising, including APOA1, haptoglobin, S100A8/A9, MSR1, IGFBP1, and BCAAs. These biomarkers hold potential for integration into clinical diagnostics, risk prediction, and the monitoring of therapeutic interventions.
While technical and interpretive challenges remain—especially in pediatric populations—the future of proteomics in childhood obesity is encouraging. Progress in mass spectrometry, bioinformatics, and multi-omics integration will enhance our ability to translate proteomic discoveries into meaningful clinical applications. Incorporating these insights into routine pediatric care could pave the way for a precision medicine framework, enabling more personalized, targeted, and effective treatment strategies.
In conclusion, the intersection of childhood obesity and proteomics research holds the potential to transform approaches to prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. However, it is essential that we overcome methodological barriers and bridge the gap between research and practice. Standardization and integration across omics platforms will be critical in unlocking the full potential of precision medicine for pediatric obesity and improving long-term outcomes for children with early-onset obesity worldwide.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26178522/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization D.K. and L.H.-K.; methodology, D.K. and K.S.; software, K.S., M.C., and D.K.; validation, D.K., A.G.-S., and L.H.-K.; formal analysis, L.H.-K., T.K., and M.P.; investigation, D.K.; resources, D.K., K.S., and M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, D.K.; writing—review and editing, L.H.-K., T.K., and A.G.-S.; visualization, M.C.; supervision, L.H.-K., M.P.; project administration, D.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
2D-DIGE2-dimensional Differential Gel Electrophoresis
BMIBody Mass Index
DIAData-Independent Acquisition
ELISAEnzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay
LC-MS/MSLiquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
LSGLaparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
MALDI-TOFMatrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-Of-Flight
MHOMetabolically Healthy Obese
MRMMultiple Reaction Monitoring
MSMass Spectrometry
MUOMetabolically Unhealthy Obese
SRMSelected Reaction Monitoring
T2DType 2 Diabetes
TMTTandem Mass Tagging
PEAProximity Extension Assay
PPIProtein–Protein Interaction
RCTRandomized Controlled Trial

References

  1. WHO European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (COSI). Available online: https://www.who.int/europe/initiatives/who-european-childhood-obesity-surveillance-initiative-(cosi) (accessed on 30 June 2022).
  2. Vasile, C.M.; Padovani, P.; Rujinski, S.D.; Nicolosu, D.; Toma, C.; Turcu, A.A.; Cioboata, R. The Increase in Childhood Obesity and Its Association with Hypertension during Pandemics. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 5909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lifshitz, F. Obesity in Children. J. Clin. Res. Pediatr. Endocrinol. 2011, 1, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Weihe, P.; Weihrauch-Blüher, S. Metabolic Syndrome in Children and Adolescents: Diagnostic Criteria, Therapeutic Options and Perspectives. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2019, 8, 472–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hawton, K.; Shirodkar, D.; Siese, T.; Hamilton-Shield, J.P.; Giri, D. A recent update on childhood obesity: Aetiology, treatment and complications. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2025, 38, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chung, S. Childhood Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease Risk. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2023, 25, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ding, W.; Mak, R.H. Early markers of obesity-related renal injury in childhood. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2015, 30, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lim, C.Y.S.; Foo, Y.W.; Tok, C.L.X.; Lim, Y.Y.; Loke, K.Y.; Lee, Y.S.; Ng, N.B.H. Screening for metabolic complications of childhood and adolescent obesity: A scoping review of national and international guidelines. Obes. Rev. 2022, 23, e13513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pacheco, L.S.; Blanco, E.; Burrows, R.; Reyes, M.; Lozoff, B.; Gahagan, S. Early Onset Obesity and Risk of Metabolic Syndrome Among Chilean Adolescents. Prev. Chronic. Dis. 2017, 14, 170132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Malhotra, S.; Sivasubramanian, R.; Singhal, V. Adult obesity and its complications: A pediatric disease? Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 2021, 28, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhu, K.; Li, R.; Yao, P.; Yu, H.; Pan, A.; Manson, J.E.; Rimm, E.B.; Willett, W.C.; Liu, G. Proteomic signatures of healthy dietary patterns are associated with lower risks of major chronic diseases and mortality. Nat. Food 2024, 6, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Thrush, A.B.; Antoun, G.; Nikpay, M.; A Patten, D.; DeVlugt, C.; Mauger, J.-F.; Beauchamp, B.L.; Lau, P.; Reshke, R.; Doucet, É.; et al. Diet-resistant obesity is characterized by a distinct plasma proteomic signature and impaired muscle fiber metabolism. Int. J. Obes. 2018, 42, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. O’rEilly, M.; Dillon, E.; Guo, W.; Finucane, O.; McMorrow, A.; Murphy, A.; Lyons, C.; Jones, D.; Ryan, M.; Gibney, M.; et al. High-density lipoprotein proteomic composition, and not efflux capacity, reflects differential modulation of reverse cholesterol transport by saturated and monounsaturated fat diets. Circulation 2016, 133, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Calabrese, F.M.; Porrelli, A.; Vacca, M.; Comte, B.; Nimptsch, K.; Pinart, M.; Pischon, T.; Pujos-Guillot, E.; De Angelis, M. Metaproteomics Approach and Pathway Modulation in Obesity and Diabetes: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2021, 14, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Figarska, S.M.; Rigdon, J.; Ganna, A.; Elmståhl, S.; Lind, L.; Gardner, C.D.; Ingelsson, E. Proteomic profiles before and during weight loss: Results from randomized trial of dietary intervention. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fabbri, L.; Garlantézec, R.; Audouze, K.; Bustamante, M.; Carracedo, Á.; Chatzi, L.; González, J.R.; Gražulevičienė, R.; Keun, H.; E Lau, C.-H.; et al. Childhood exposure to non-persistent endocrine disrupting chemicals and multi-omic profiles: A panel study. Environ. Int. 2023, 173, 107856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Stratakis, N.; Anguita-Ruiz, A.; Fabbri, L.; Maitre, L.; González, J.R.; Andrusaityte, S.; Basagaña, X.; Borràs, E.; Keun, H.C.; Chatzi, L.; et al. Multi-omics architecture of childhood obesity and metabolic dysfunction uncovers biological pathways and prenatal determinants. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Martos-Moreno, G.Á.; Sackmann-Sala, L.; Barrios, V.; E Berrymann, D.; Okada, S.; Argente, J.; Kopchick, J.J. Proteomic analysis allows for early detection of potential markers of metabolic impairment in very young obese children. Int. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. 2014, 2014, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ma, H.; Wang, X.; Heianza, Y.; Manson, J.E.; Qi, L. Proteomic Signature of BMI and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease. Clin. Chem. 2024, 70, 1474–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rodriguez-Muñoz, A.; Motahari-Rad, H.; Martin-Chaves, L.; Benitez-Porres, J.; Rodriguez-Capitan, J.; Gonzalez-Jimenez, A.; Insenser, M.; Tinahones, F.J.; Murri, M. A Systematic Review of Proteomics in Obesity: Unpacking the Molecular Puzzle. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2024, 13, 403–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Medeiros, I.; Aguiar, A.J.F.C.; Fortunato, W.M.S.; Teixeira, A.F.G.S.; e Silva, E.G.S.O.; Bezerra, I.W.L.; Maia, J.K.d.S.; Piuvezam, G.; Morais, A.H.d.A. In silico structure-based design of peptides or proteins as therapeutic tools for obesity or diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis. Medicine 2023, 102, e33514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Castro, A.P.P.; Hermsdorff, H.H.M.; Milagres, L.C.; de Albuquerque, F.M.; Filgueiras, M.d.S.; Rocha, N.P.; de Novaes, J.F. Increased ApoB/ApoA1 ratio is associated with excess weight, body adiposity, and altered lipid profile in children. J. Pediatr. 2019, 95, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Conroy, R.; Espinal, Y.; Fennoy, I.; Accacha, S.; Boucher-Berry, C.; Carey, D.E.; Close, S.; DeSantis, D.; Gupta, R.; Hassoun, A.A.; et al. Retinol binding protein 4 is associated with adiposity-related co-morbidity risk factors in children. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 24, 913–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Doumatey, A.P.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, M.; Prieto, D.; Rotimi, C.N.; Adeyemo, A. Proinflammatory and lipid biomarkers mediate metabolically healthy obesity: A proteomics study. Obesity 2016, 24, 1257–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huen, K.; Harley, K.; Beckman, K.; Eskenazi, B.; Holland, N. Associations of PON1 and Genetic Ancestry with Obesity in Early Childhood. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liao, J.; Goodrich, J.A.; Chen, W.; Qiu, C.; Chen, J.C.; Costello, E.; Alderete, T.L.; Chatzi, L.; Gilliland, F.; Chen, Z. Cardiometabolic profiles and proteomics associated with obesity phenotypes in a longitudinal cohort of young adults. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 7384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Giraudi, P.J.; Pascut, D.; Banfi, C.; Ghilardi, S.; Tiribelli, C.; Bondesan, A.; Caroli, D.; Minocci, A.; Sartorio, A. Serum proteome signatures associated with liver steatosis in adolescents with obesity. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2024, 48, 213–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Galata, Z.; Moschonis, G.; Makridakis, M.; Dimitraki, P.; Nicolaides, N.C.; Manios, Y.; Bartzeliotou, A.; Chrousos, G.P.; Charmandari, E. Plasma proteomic analysis in obese and overweight prepubertal children. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 41, 1275–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Rothwell, S.W.; Poth, M.; McIver, H.; Ayika, C.; Eidelman, O.; Jozwik, C.; Pollard, H.B. Plasma Proteomic Signature in Overweight Girls Closely Correlates with Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA), an Objective Measure of Insulin Resistance. Hum. Genom. 2011, 2011, 323629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  30. Gozal, D.; Jortani, S.; Snow, A.B.; Kheirandish-Gozal, L.; Bhattacharjee, R.; Kim, J.; Capdevila, O.S. Two-Dimensional Differential In-Gel Electrophoresis Proteomic Approaches Reveal Urine Candidate Biomarkers in Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2009, 180, 1253–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Oberbach, A.; Bergen, M.V.; Blüher, S.; Lehmann, S.; Till, H. Combined Serum Proteomic and Metabonomic Profiling After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Children and Adolescents. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. 2012, 22, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Walker, G.E.; Marzullo, P.; Prodam, F.; Bona, G.; Di Blasio, A.M. Obesity modifies expression profiles of metabolic markers in superficial and deep subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue depots. Endocrine 2014, 46, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. López-Villar, E.; Martos-Moreno, G.Á.; Chowen, J.A.; Okada, S.; Kopchick, J.J.; Argente, J. A proteomic approach to obesity and type 2 diabetes. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2015, 19, 1455–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pan, Y.; Choi, J.-H.; Shi, H.; Zhang, L.; Su, S.; Wang, X. Discovery and Validation of a Novel Neutrophil Activation Marker Associated with Obesity. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhen, S.; Ma, Y.; Han, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Yang, X.; Wen, D. Serum galectin-3BP as a novel marker of obesity and metabolic syndrome in Chinese adolescents. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 2021, 9, e001894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ramírez-Vélez, R.; García-Hermoso, A.; Correa-Rodríguez, M.; Fernández-Irigoyen, J.; Palomino-Echeverría, S.; Santamaría, E.; Correa-Bautista, J.E.; González-Ruíz, K.; Izquierdo, M. Effects of Different Doses of Exercise on Inflammation Markers Among Adolescents With Overweight/Obesity: HEPAFIT Study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022, 107, e2619–e2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Selvaraju, V.; Babu, J.R.; Geetha, T. Multiplexed measurements of salivary fetuin-A, insulin, and adiponectin as potential non-invasive biomarkers in childhood obesity. Cytokine 2022, 153, 155843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Rodriguez-Ayllon, M.; Plaza-Florido, A.; Mendez-Gutierrez, A.; Altmäe, S.; Solis-Urra, P.; Aguilera, C.M.; Catena, A.; Ortega, F.B.; Esteban-Cornejo, I. The effects of a 20-week exercise program on blood-circulating biomarkers related to brain health in overweight or obese children: The ActiveBrains project. J. Sport Health Sci. 2023, 12, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pyle, L.; Choi, Y.J.; Narongkiatikhun, P.; Sharma, K.; Waikar, S.; Layton, A.; Tommerdahl, K.L.; de Boer, I.; Vigers, T.; Nelson, R.G.; et al. Proteomic Analysis Uncovers Multiprotein Signatures Associated with Early Diabetic Kidney Disease in Youth with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2024, 19, 1603–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Olvera-Rojas, M.; Plaza-Florido, A.; Solis-Urra, P.; Osuna-Prieto, F.J.; Ortega, F.B. Neurological-related proteomic profiling in plasma of children with metabolic healthy and unhealthy overweight/obesity. Pediatr. Obes. 2024, 19, e13155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Liu, X.; Wang, H.; Zhu, L. Profound perturbations are found in the proteome and metabolome in children with obesity after weight loss intervention. Heliyon 2024, 10, e31917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Plaza-Florido, A.; Olvera-Rojas, M.; Alcantara, J.M.A.; Radom-Aizik, S.; Ortega, F.B. Targeted proteomics involved in cardiovascular health and heart rate variability in children with overweight/obesity. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2024, 36, e24113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Niu, L.; Stinson, S.E.; Holm, L.A.; Lund, M.A.V.; Fonvig, C.E.; Cobuccio, L.; Meisner, J.; Juel, H.B.; Fadista, J.; Thiele, M.; et al. Plasma proteome variation and its genetic determinants in children and adolescents. Nat. Genet. 2025, 57, 635–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Díaz, M.; Quesada-López, T.; Villarroya, F.; Casano, P.; López-Bermejo, A.; de Zegher, F.; Ibáñez, L. The Proteome of Exosomes at Birth Predicts Insulin Resistance, Adrenarche and Liver Fat in Childhood. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Beglarian, E.; Chen, J.C.; Li, Z.; Costello, E.; Wang, H.; Hampson, H.; Alderete, T.L.; Chen, Z.; Valvi, D.; Rock, S.; et al. Proteins and pathways involved in inflammation are longitudinally associated with total body bone mineral density among primarily Hispanic overweight/obese adolescents and young adults. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2025, 40, 372–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gayret, Ö.B.; Taşdemir, M.; Erol, M.; Nacaroğlu, H.T.; Zengi, O.; Yiğit, Ö. Are there any new reliable markers to detect renal injury in obese children? Ren. Fail. 2018, 40, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zeng, M.; Liang, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, M.; Wang, B.; Chen, X.; Zhou, N.; Cao, D.; Wu, J. Plasma metabolic fingerprinting of childhood obesity by GC/MS in conjunction with multivariate statistical analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2010, 52, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Alshahrani, A.; Aljada, A.; Masood, A.; Mujammami, M.; Alfadda, A.A.; Musambil, M.; Alanazi, I.O.; Al Dubayee, M.; Rahman, A.M.A.; Benabdelkamel, H. Proteomic Profiling Identifies Distinct Regulation of Proteins in Obese Diabetic Patients Treated with Metformin. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ravnsborg, T.; Svaneklink, S.; Andersen, L.L.T.; Larsen, M.R.; Jensen, D.M.; Overgaard, M. First-trimester proteomic profiling identifies novel predictors of gestational diabetes mellitus. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chirico, V.; Lacquaniti, A.; Manti, S.; Cuppari, C.; D’Angelo, G.; Lanzafame, A.; Filippelli, M.; Munafó, C.; Salpietro, C.; Arrigo, T. New available biomarkers to face a worldwide emergency: The childhood obesity. J. Pediatr. Biochem. 2014, 4, 139–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Arnold, T.; Brandlhofer, S.; Vrtikapa, K.; Stangl, H.; Hermann, M.; Zwiauer, K.; Mangge, H.; Karwautz, A.; Huemer, J.; Koller, D.; et al. Effect of Obesity on Plasma Clusterin: A Proposed Modulator of Leptin Action. Pediatr. Res. 2011, 69, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Chiellini, C.; Bertacca, A.; Novelli, S.E.; Görgün, C.Z.; Ciccarone, A.; Giordano, A.; Xu, H.; Soukas, A.; Costa, M.; Gandini, D.; et al. Obesity modulates the expression of haptoglobin in the white adipose tissue via TNFα. J. Cell. Physiol. 2002, 190, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Manti, L.; D’Angelo, C.; Lanzafame, F.; Munafò, S.; Arrigo, C. New available biomarkers to face a world-wide emergency: The childhood obesity. J. Pediatr. Biochem. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  54. Huang, Y.; Nagamani, M.; Anderson, K.E.; Kurosky, A.; Haag, A.M.; Grady, J.J.; Lu, L.-J.W. A strong association between body fat mass and protein profiles in nipple aspirate fluid of healthy premenopausal non-lactating women. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2007, 104, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rahman, A.; Hammad, M.M.; Al Khairi, I.; Cherian, P.; Al-Sabah, R.; Al-Mulla, F.; Abu-Farha, M.; Abubaker, J. Profiling of Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Proteins (IGFBPs) in Obesity and Their Association With Ox-LDL and Hs-CRP in Adolescents. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 727004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kosteria, I.; Kanaka-Gantenbein, C.; Anagnostopoulos, A.K.; Chrousos, G.P.; Tsangaris, G.T. Pediatric endocrine and metabolic diseases and proteomics. J. Proteom. 2018, 188, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Moreno-Navarrete, J.M.; Martínez-Barricarte, R.; Catalán, V.; Sabater, M.; Gómez-Ambrosi, J.; Ortega, F.J.; Ricart, W.; Blüher, M.; Frühbeck, G.; de Cordoba, S.R.; et al. Complement Factor H Is Expressed in Adipose Tissue in Association With Insulin Resistance. Diabetes 2010, 59, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Newton, D.A.; Baatz, J.E.; Kindy, M.S.; Gattoni-Celli, S.; Shary, J.R.; Hollis, B.W.; Wagner, C.L. Insights image for vitamin D binding protein polymorphisms significantly impact vitamin D status in children. Pediatr. Res. 2019, 86, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Higgins, V.; Omidi, A.; Tahmasebi, H.; Asgari, S.; Gordanifar, K.; Nieuwesteeg, M.; Adeli, K. Marked Influence of Adiposity on Laboratory Biomarkers in a Healthy Cohort of Children and Adolescents. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 105, e1781–e1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cominetti, O.; Galindo, A.N.; Corthésy, J.; Valsesia, A.; Irincheeva, I.; Kussmann, M.; Saris, W.H.M.; Astrup, A.; McPherson, R.; Harper, M.-E.; et al. Obesity shows preserved plasma proteome in large independent clinical cohorts. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Sylvetsky, A.C.; Issa, N.T.; Chandran, A.; Brown, R.J.; Alamri, H.J.; Aitcheson, G.; Walter, M.; Rother, K.I. Pigment Epithelium-Derived Factor Declines in Response to an Oral Glucose Load and Is Correlated with Vitamin D and BMI but Not Diabetes Status in Children and Young Adults. Horm. Res. Paediatr. 2017, 87, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Oberbach, A.; Blüher, M.; Wirth, H.; Till, H.; Kovacs, P.; Kullnick, Y.; Schlichting, N.; Tomm, J.M.; Rolle-Kampczyk, U.; Murugaiyan, J.; et al. Combined Proteomic and Metabolomic Profiling of Serum Reveals Association of the Complement System with Obesity and Identifies Novel Markers of Body Fat Mass Changes. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 4769–4788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Reinehr, T.; Stoffel-Wagner, B.; Roth, C.L. Retinol-Binding Protein 4 and Its Relation to Insulin Resistance in Obese Children before and after Weight Loss. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 93, 2287–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Saraswathi, V.; Ai, W.; Kumar, V.; Sharma, K.; Gopal, T.; Kumar, N.; Malhi, H.; Sehrawat, T.; Desouza, C.V. A Pilot Study on the Proteomics Profile of Serum Exosome-Enriched Extracellular Vesicles from Normal versus Individuals with Obesity-Related Insulin Resistance. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Copenhaver, M.M.; Yu, C.-Y.; Zhou, D.; Hoffman, R.P. Relationships of complement components C3 and C4 and their genetics to cardiometabolic risk in healthy, non-Hispanic white adolescents. Pediatr. Res. 2020, 87, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tryggestad, J.B.; Wang, J.J.; Zhang, S.X.; Thompson, D.M.; Short, K.R. Elevated plasma pigment epithelium-derived factor in children with type 2 diabetes mellitus is attributable to obesity: PEDF in youth with T2DM. Pediatr. Diabetes 2015, 16, 600–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ege, S.; Akduman, H.; Aşır, A.; Korak, T. Excessive Weight Gain During Pregnancy Increased Ponoxarase 1 Level in Neonatal Cord Blood. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Seres, I.; Bajnok, L.; Harangi, M.; Sztanek, F.; Koncsos, P.; Paragh, G. Alteration of PON1 Activity in Adult and Childhood Obesity and Its Relation to Adipokine Levels. Paraoxonases Inflamm. Infect. Toxicol. 2010, 660, 129–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.; Xu, M.; Yue, T.; Ling, P.; Fang, T.; Luo, S.; Xu, S.; Weng, J. Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Liver Tissues and Serum in db/db Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pascut, D.; Giraudi, P.J.; Banfi, C.; Ghilardi, S.; Tiribelli, C.; Bondesan, A.; Caroli, D.; Minocci, A.; Grugni, G.; Sartorio, A. Proteome profiling identifies circulating biomarkers associated with hepatic steatosis in subjects with Prader-Willi syndrome. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1254778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Atabek, M.E.; Keskin, M.; Yazici, C.; Kendirci, M.; Hatipoglu, N.; Koklu, E.; Kurtoglu, S. Protein oxidation in obesity and insulin resistance. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2006, 165, 753–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Nishimura, R.; Kanda, A.; Sano, H.; Matsudaira, T.; Miyashita, Y.; Morimoto, A.; Shirasawa, T.; Kawaguchi, T.; Tajima, N. Glycated albumin is low in obese, non-diabetic children. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2006, 71, 334–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Vukovic, R.; Santos, T.J.D.; Ybarra, M.; Atar, M. Children With Metabolically Healthy Obesity: A Review. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Inoue, N.; Gowda, S.G.B.; Gowda, D.; Sakurai, T.; Ikeda-Araki, A.; Bamai, Y.A.; Ketema, R.M.; Kishi, R.; Chiba, H.; Hui, S.-P. Determination of plasma lysophosphatidylethanolamines (lyso-PE) by LC-MS/MS revealed a possible relation between obesity and lyso-PE in Japanese preadolescent children: The Hokkaido study. Ann. Clin. Biochem. Int. J. Lab. Med. 2025, 62, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Anjos, S.; Feiteira, E.; Cerveira, F.; Melo, T.; Reboredo, A.; Colombo, S.; Dantas, R.; Costa, E.; Moreira, A.; Santos, S.; et al. Lipidomics Reveals Similar Changes in Serum Phospholipid Signatures of Overweight and Obese Pediatric Subjects. J. Proteome Res. 2019, 18, 3174–3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bhangoo, A.; Gupta, R.; Shelov, S.P.; Carey, D.E.; Accacha, S.; Fennoy, I.; Altshuler, L.; Lowell, B.; Rapaport, R.; Rosenfeld, W.; et al. Fasting Serum IGFBP-1 as a Marker of Insulin Resistance in Diverse School Age Groups. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 840361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Goudswaard, L.J.; Smith, M.L.; Hughes, D.A.; Taylor, R.; Lean, M.; Sattar, N.; Welsh, P.; McConnachie, A.; Blazeby, J.M.; Rogers, C.A.; et al. Using trials of caloric restriction and bariatric surgery to explore the effects of body mass index on the circulating proteome. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 21077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lewitt, M.S.; Boyd, G.W. Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-1 (IGFBP-1) as a Biomarker of Cardiovascular Disease. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Katz, L.E.L.; A Gralewski, K.; Abrams, P.; Brar, P.C.; Gallagher, P.R.; Lipman, T.H.; Brooks, L.J.; Koren, D. Insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 are related to cardiovascular disease biomarkers in obese adolescents: The IGF axis and adolescent obesity. Pediatr. Diabetes 2016, 17, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Handakas, E.; Lau, C.H.; Alfano, R.; Chatzi, V.L.; Plusquin, M.; Vineis, P.; Robinson, O. A systematic review of metabolomic studies of childhood obesity: State of the evidence for metabolic determinants and consequences. Obes. Rev. 2022, 23, e13384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zaki, M.; El-Bassyouni, H.; Kamal, S.; El-Gammal, M.; Youness, E. Association of serum paraoxonase enzyme activity and oxidative stress markers with dyslipidemia in obese adolescents. Indian J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 18, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Uysal, M.; Mete, B.; Kara, E.; Demirhindi, H.; Haytoglu, Z.; Yuksel, B.; Turan, I.; Daglioglu, G.; Dogus, Y. Plasma pentraxin-3 levels and its role in childhood obesity—Is it anti-inflammatory? A matched group study. Clin. Endocrinol. 2024, 101, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Luo, Y.; Luo, D.; Li, M.; Tang, B. Insulin Resistance in Pediatric Obesity: From Mechanisms to Treatment Strategies. Pediatr. Diabetes 2024, 2024, 2298306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Pan, Y.; Choi, J.; Shi, H.; Su, S.; Wang, X. ALPL, A Novel Marker of Neutrophil Activation in Response to Obesity. FASEB J. 2018, 32, lb477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Romano, A.; Del Vescovo, E.; Rivetti, S.; Triarico, S.; Attinà, G.; Mastrangelo, S.; Maurizi, P.; Ruggiero, A. Biomarkers Predictive of Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiovascular Disease in Childhood Cancer Survivors. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Masood, A.; Benabdelkamel, H.; Alfadda, A.A. Obesity Proteomics: An Update on the Strategies and Tools Employed in the Study of Human Obesity. High-Throughput 2018, 7, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Giuliani, E.; Schon, S.B.; Yang, K.; Burns, G.W.; Neff, L.M.; Remmer, H.A.; Teixeira, J.M.; Marsh, E.E. Obesity-induced follicular phase endometrial proteome dysregulation in a well-phenotyped population. FS Sci. 2022, 3, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Foratori-Junior, G.A.; Ventura, T.M.O.; Grizzo, L.T.; Carpenter, G.H.; Buzalaf, M.A.R.; Sales-Peres, S.H.D.C. Label-Free Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Reveals Inflammatory Pattern Associated with Obesity and Periodontitis in Pregnant Women. Metabolites 2022, 12, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Calcaterra, V.; De Amici, M.; Leonard, M.M.; De Silvestri, A.; Pelizzo, G.; Buttari, N.; Michev, A.; Leggio, M.; Larizza, D.; Cena, H. Serum Calprotectin Level in Children: Marker of Obesity and its Metabolic Complications. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2018, 73, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Kiseleva, O.I.; Arzumanian, V.A.; Poverennaya, E.V.; Pyatnitskiy, M.A.; Ilgisonis, E.V.; Zgoda, V.G.; Plotnikova, O.A.; Sharafetdinov, K.K.; Lisitsa, A.V.; Tutelyan, V.A.; et al. Does Proteomic Mirror Reflect Clinical Characteristics of Obesity? J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ahmed, H.; Fernandes, M.F.; Abbas, K.; Synowsky, S.A.; Shirran, S.L.; Ajjan, R.A.; Stewart, A.J. Quantitative proteomics identifies plasma protein alterations that associate with metabolic and thrombotic profile changes after bariatric surgery. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2025, 27, 2647–2657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lind, L.; Figarska, S.; Sundström, J.; Fall, T.; Ärnlöv, J.; Ingelsson, E. Changes in Proteomic Profiles are Related to Changes in BMI and Fat Distribution During 10 Years of Aging. Obesity 2020, 28, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sharma, P.; Roy, A.; Dhamija, R.K.; Bhushan, S.; Baswal, K.; Kulandaisamy, R.; Yadav, S.; Kumar, S.; Inampudi, K.K. A comprehensive proteomic profiling of urinary exosomes and the identification of early non-invasive biomarker in patients with coronary artery disease. J. Proteom. 2024, 293, 105059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Goknar, N.; Oktem, F.; Ozgen, I.T.; Torun, E.; Kuçukkoc, M.; Demir, A.D.; Cesur, Y. Determination of early urinary renal injury markers in obese children. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2015, 30, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Xia, Z.; Shen, S.; Wang, L.; Sun, B.; Yin, J.; Huo, J.; Guo, X. Advances in biomarkers of transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics and childhood obesity. Chin. J. Sch. Health 2024, 45, 1364–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Shi, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Ye, M.; Wang, J. The correlation of apolipoprotein B and apolipoprotein A1 with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in children and adolescents with obesity. Pediatr. Obes. 2025, 20, e70017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Schauermann, M.; Wang, R.; Pons-Kuehnemann, J.; Hartmann, M.; Remer, T.; Hua, Y.; Bereket, A.; Wasniewska, M.; Shmoish, M.; Hochberg, Z.; et al. Targeted quantitative analysis of urinary bile acids by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: Method development and application to healthy and obese children. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2025, 249, 106712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. DiStefano, J.K.; Piras, I.S.; Wu, X.; Sharma, R.; Garcia-Mansfield, K.; Willey, M.; Lovell, B.; Pirrotte, P.; Olson, M.L.; Shaibi, G.Q. Changes in proteomic cargo of circulating extracellular vesicles in response to lifestyle intervention in adolescents with hepatic steatosis. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2024, 60, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Leonetti, S.; Herzog, R.I.; Caprio, S.; Santoro, N.; Tricò, D. Glutamate–Serine–Glycine Index: A Novel Potential Biomarker in Pediatric Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Children 2020, 7, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wu, Y.; Li, M.; Zhang, K.; Ma, J.; Gozal, D.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, Z. Quantitative Proteomics Analysis of Serum and Urine with DIA Mass Spectrometry Reveals Biomarkers for Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Arch. Bronconeumol. 2025, 61, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Carullo, N.; Zicarelli, M.; Michael, A.; Faga, T.; Battaglia, Y.; Pisani, A.; Perticone, M.; Costa, D.; Ielapi, N.; Coppolino, G.; et al. Childhood Obesity: Insight into Kidney Involvement. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 17400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Bălănescu, A.; Stan, I.; Codreanu, I.; Comănici, V.; Bălănescu, E.; Bălănescu, I.P. Circulating Hsp90 Isoform Levels in Over-weight and Obese Children and the Relation to Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Results from a Cross-Sectional Study. Dis. Markers 2019, 2019, 9560247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Małecki, P.; Tracz, J.; Łuczak, M.; Figlerowicz, M.; Mazur-Melewska, K.; Służewski, W.; Mania, A. Serum proteome assessment in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children: A preliminary study. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2020, 17, 623–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Manell, H.; Tsolakis, N.; Janson, C.; Malinovschi, A.; Alving, K. Multiarray screening identifies plasma proteins associated with Th17 cell differentiation and viral defense in coincident asthma and obesity. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2024, 35, e14187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Sztolsztener, K.; Żywno, H.; Hodun, K.; Konończuk, K.; Muszyńska-Rosłan, K.; Latoch, E. Apolipoproteins—New Biomarkers of Overweight and Obesity among Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Survivors? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sunderland, K.L.; Tryggestad, J.B.; Wang, J.J.; Teague, A.M.; Pratt, L.V.; Zhang, S.X.; Thompson, D.M.; Short, K.R. Pigment epithelium-Derived Factor (PEDF) Varies with Body Composition and Insulin Resistance in Healthy Young People. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, E2114–E2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Hu, Z.; Han, L.; Liu, J.; Fowke, J.H.; Han, J.C.; Kakhniashvili, D.; LeWinn, K.Z.; Bush, N.R.; Mason, W.A.; Zhao, Q. Prenatal metabolomic profiles mediate the effect of maternal obesity on early childhood growth trajectories and obesity risk: The Conditions Affecting Neurocognitive Development and Learning in Early Childhood (CANDLE) Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2022, 116, 1343–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Szczerbinski, L.; Wojciechowska, G.; Olichwier, A.; Taylor, M.A.; Puchta, U.; Konopka, P.; Paszko, A.; Citko, A.; Goscik, J.; Fiehn, O.; et al. Untargeted Metabolomics Analysis of the Serum Metabolic Signature of Childhood Obesity. Nutrients 2022, 14, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Hellmuth, C.; Kirchberg, F.F.; Brandt, S.; Moß, A.; Walter, V.; Rothenbacher, D.; Brenner, H.; Grote, V.; Gruszfeld, D.; Socha, P.; et al. An individual participant data meta-analysis on metabolomics profiles for obesity and insulin resistance in European children. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Concepcion, J.; Chen, K.; Saito, R.; Gangoiti, J.; Mendez, E.; Nikita, M.E.; Barshop, B.A.; Natarajan, L.; Sharma, K.; Kim, J.J.; et al. Identification of pathognomonic purine synthesis biomarkers by metabolomic profiling of adolescents with obesity and type 2 diabetes. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0234970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Balikcioglu, P.G.; Trub, C.J.; Balikcioglu, M.; Ilkayeva, O.; White, P.J.; Muehlbauer, M.; Bain, J.R.; Armstrong, S.; Freemark, M. Branched-chain α-keto acids and glutamate/glutamine: Biomarkers of insulin resistance in childhood obesity, Endocrinol. Diabetes Metab. 2023, 6, e388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart for study selection process.
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart for study selection process.
Ijms 26 08522 g001
Table 1. Proteomic studies in pediatric obesity.
Table 1. Proteomic studies in pediatric obesity.
StudyCohortMethodKey FindingsProtein
Giraudi et al. (2011) [27]59 obese adolescents (11–18 yo)Proximity extension assay (PEA)Focused on liver steatosisCDH2, CTSO, and LILRA5
Galata et al. (2011) [28]Prepubertal boys (10 normal, 10 overweight, 10 obese)2-DE + MSChanges in apolipoproteins highlight early dyslipidemiaAPOA1, APOE, APOA4, CFB, CFH, CFI, HP, and CD5L
Rothwell et al. (2011) [29]5 girls (13–17 yo), but the control group comprised adult femalesClontech antibody microarraysPlasma proteomics can reflect metabolic dysfunction in obese youthIdentified plasma protein signatures (groups of proteins) that correlate with insulin resistance (e.g., hILP/XIAP, Nup888, Hap-1, Ki-67, TNFa, and ARPK1)
Gozal et al. (2011) [30]120 children with overweight or obesity2D-DIGE + mass spectrometry + Western blottingPediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) biomarker discoveryUMOD, UCN3, ORM1, KLK1, and AZGP1
Oberbach et al. (2012) [31]6 morbidly obese children and adolescentsLikely LC-MS/MS (not specified)Shifts in lipid metabolism, insulin sensitivity, and oxidative stress after bariatric proceduresCLU, PEDF, RBP4, and PON1
Walker et al. (2014) [32]42 children and adolescents aged between 5 and 18 yoTwo-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) and then mass spectrometry (MS) and immunoblottingThe proteomic approach highlights multimeric adiponectin as a potential molecular link between pediatric obesity and vitamin D deficiency. Vitamin D deficiency was associated with the downregulation of high-molecular-weight adiponectin, a protein linked to insulin sensitivityAdiponectin
Martos-Moreno et al. (2014) [18]22 obese prepubescents and 21 healthy prepubescents; 20 were obese before intervention and after weight reductionTwo-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE)  +  mass spectrometry (MS)The study identified differential expression of proteins (231) suggesting early metabolic alterations in obesityAPOA1, Apo-J-clusterin, vitamin D binding, transthyretin, and haptoglobin
López-Villar et al. (2015) [33]Review article on proteomic research tools and their applications in obesity and type 2 diabetesMass spectroscopy SRM (Selected Reaction Monitoring) or MRM (Multiple Reaction Monitoring) proteomic profiling of inflammatory pathways/bead-based targeted proteomics (e.g., Luminex, quantifying ~49 metabolic/inflammatory proteins) in serumObesity and diabetes linked to inflammatory protein expressionComplement C3, C5–C7, and lipid transport proteins
Pan et al. (2019) [34]12 obese vs. 12 lean African American male adolescents (aged 14–20)Label-free quantitative proteomics (likely LC–MS/MS)Novel protein associated with obesity inflammation ALPLALPL
Zhen et al. (2021) [35]60 (13–18 yo) Chinese normal weight/overweight/obese adolescentsTMT (Tandem Mass Tag)Galectin-3BP associated with obesity and metabolic syndromeGalectin3bp
Ramirez-Velez et al. (2022) [36]95 adolescents aged 11–17 yoA multiplex proteomic assayIGFBP1 is a sensitive marker of obesity-related metabolic riskBLC, Eotaxin, MCP-4, FGF-6, and PARC
Selvaraju et al. (2022) [37]76 children (6–10 yo)Multiplexed measurementsSaliva-based assays can detect key metabolic biomarkersFetuin-A, insulin, and adiponectin identified as non-invasive biomarkers
Rodriguez-Ayllon et al. (2023) [38]81 overweight/obese children ~10 yoOlink 92 protein panel (PEA)Novel biomarkers influenced by lifestyle interventions. While the exercise program did not affect the selected candidate biomarkers, the identification of MSR1 as a responsive protein suggests potential avenues for future research into its role in health and diseasemsr1
Pyle et al. (2024) [39]Youth-onset T2D 374 baseline plasma samples; >90% had obesityMultiprotein signature via mass spectrometryBiomarkers identified for early diabetic kidney disease in obese childrenSEM4A, DDC, C1RL1, and pyruvate carboxylase are linked to kidney risk
Olvera-Rojas et al. (2024) [40]84 10-yo with overweight/obesityOlink 92 protein panelNeurological/metabolic proteins such as CD38 and LAIR2 distinguish metabolic health within obesityCD38, CPM, EDA2R, IL12, JAMB, KYNU, LAYN, MSR1, SMOC2, and LAIR2
Liu et al. (2024) [41]6 children (10–14 yo)TMT and LC-MSThe study identified 43 differentially expressed proteins and 165 metabolites, highlighting pathways involved in lipid metabolism and inflammationLCAT, GSTA1, PRCP, MYH10, and CNDP1
Plaza-Florido et al. (2024) [42]44 (10-yo)Olink 92 protein panelPotential novel biomarkers linking cardiovascular-related plasma proteins to autonomic nervous system function in children with overweight or obesityEight proteins—KIM1, IgG Fc receptor II-b, IDUA, BOC, IL1RL2, TNFRSF11A, VSIG2, and transferrin (TF)
Niu et al. (2025) [43]2147 children/adolescents (12-yo)MS-DIA, high-throughput methodsIdentified genetic determinants of proteome variation, BMI-related protein variation, pathway referencesCRP, ACPS, SAA1, C3, CFH, CFI, ORM1, LBP, and PRG4
Díaz et al. (2025) [44]Cord blood-derived exosomes collected at birth from 20 AGA (appropriate-for-gestational-age) and 20 SGA (small-for-gestational-age) infantsLabel-free MS followed by bioinformatic pathway and protein–protein interaction (PPI) analysesExosome proteomics at birth can reveal protein signatures that predict metabolic outcomes such as insulin resistance and liver fat accumulation later in childhoodPCYOX1 and HSP90AA1 are predictive for liver fat at age 7
Beglarian et al. (2025) [45]304 (8–13 yo) Hispanic children and 169 (17–22 yo) Hispanic adolescentsOlink 650 protein panel44 inflammation-related proteins, e.g., early biomarkers for impaired bone healthPI3K-Akt pathways
Table 2. Proteomic biomarkers in childhood obesity. ↓ decrease; ↑ increase.
Table 2. Proteomic biomarkers in childhood obesity. ↓ decrease; ↑ increase.
BiomarkerSourceAssociated ComplicationProteomic MethodNotes
APOA1
(Apolipoprotein-A1)
Plasma, serumInsulin resistance,
lipid metabolism
2D-DIGE, LC-MS/MSReduced in obese and insulin-resistant
children; reversible with weight loss
CLU (Apolipoprotein J, Clusterin)Plasma, serumLipid transport, oxidative stress2D electrophoresis, MSReduced in obese children
HP (Haptoglobin)Plasma, serumInflammation, insulin resistance2D-DIGE, MSLow MW isoforms increased; correlates with IL-6, visfatin
CFB, CFH, CFI (Complement Factors B,H,I)Plasma, serumImmune activation, obesityMALDI-TOF/MS
analysis of 2-DE
Elevated in obese children
VDBP (Vitamin D Binding Protein)PlasmaVitamin D metabolismLC-MS/MSReduced in obesity; linked with
adiponectin pathway
HMW (Adiponectin)PlasmaVitamin D deficiency in obesity2D-DIGE + MS +
Western blot
↓ in vitamin D-deficient obese children;
↑ after 1 year of vitamin D supplementation
TTR (Transthyretin)Plasma, serumThyroid hormone and retinol transportLC-MS/MSDecreased in obesity
PEDFAdipose tissueInsulin resistance, inflammationProteomic profilingInduces insulin resistance and inflammation
RBP4PlasmaInsulin resistance, endothelial
dysfunction
2D-DIGE, MSElevated in obese children
PON1SerumOxidative stress,
lipid metabolism
Activity assays, MSAltered activity in obesity
ALDH (Aldehyde
dehydrogenase),
ALB (Albumin), HSPB1, PDIA3
PlasmaStress response, detoxificationLC-MS/MSAltered expression in obesity
Lyso-PEs (16:0, 22:6)PlasmaLipid signalingLipidomicsElevated in obese children
IGFBP1PlasmaGrowth factor regulationImmunoassays, MSReduced in obesity
CRPPlasmaChronic inflammationImmunoassaysCorrelates with BMI in obesity
S100-A8, S100-A9,
calprotectin
PlasmaInflammationProteomicsOverexpressed in obesity
PTX3PlasmaCardiovascular inflammationTMT-labeled LC-MS/MS and ELISAEarly marker for CV risk
Galectin 3BPSerumObesity, metabolic syndromeTMT-labeled LC-MS/MS and ELISAMarker for metabolic syndrome risk
PCYOX1, HSP90AA1PlasmaLiver fat predictionTargeted proteomicsPredictive for liver steatosis
RASPlasma, CellularInsulin signalingAntibody microarrays: ClontechAltered in obesity
PKC-ηPlasma, CellularInflammationClontechUpregulated in inflammation
PDK1Plasma, CellularInsulin/PI3K pathwayAntibody microarraysAltered expression
STAT3Plasma, CellularInflammation, metabolismAntibody microarraysActivated in obesity
p38 MAPKPlasma, CellularStress responseAntibody microarraysIncreased in metabolic stress
AHSG (Fetuin-A)Plasma, salivaLinked to insulin resistance2D-MS differential spotsCorrelates with insulin resistance and adiposity
CD38PlasmaRegulation of cell growth,
insulin secretion
LC-MS/MSAltered expression in cardiovascular and
neurological diseases and aging
MSR1PlasmaImmune response, lipid transport, inflammation
metabolism
LC-MS/MS, OlinkAtherosclerosis—positively associated with TG levels and in clearing infectious agents
MANFPlasmaNeuron projection developmentLC-MS/MS, OlinkNeurological disease
LAIR2PlasmaCollagen bindingLC-MS/MS, OlinkImmunological response in obese
OLFM1PlasmaNeurological systemOlinkDecreased in obese children; may be involved in neurodevelopment and synaptic plasticity
ANPEPPlasmaDigestive system and immuneOlinkRegulates peptide digestion and immune signaling
FHL3PlasmaSkeletal systemOlinkMuscle development, differentiation, and function
UMODPlasmaUrological systemOlinkAnti-inflammatory; protects renal function
KIMPlasma, urineUrological systemOlinkElevation in obese youth indicates subclinical kidney stress
BOCPlasma, serumCardiometabolic systemOlinkEarly signs of metabolic and organ-specific stress
IDUASerumCardiovascular systemOlinkImplying a potentially protective cardiovascular effect
CDH2SerumCardiometabolic systemOlink PEALiver steatosis
CTSOSerumCardiometabolic systemOlink PEALiver steatosis
LILRA5SerumCardiometabolic systemOlink PEALiver steatosis
SEM4A, PSB3, DDC, C1RL1, T132APlasmaKidney diseaseSomaScan v.7KMultiprotein plasma signatures that strongly predict early DKD outcomes in youth-onset T2D—far outperforming clinical markers alone
ALPLPurified
neutrophils
Cardiovascular systemQuantitative, label-free mass spectrometry proteomics performed on purified neutrophilsALPL is consistently elevated in obese neutrophils and correlates with CVD risk markers
NRP2PlasmaMetabolic health statusOlinkDecrease in metabolic health in children with obesity versus children with metabolic syndrome and obesity
SSP1 (Osteopontin)PlasmaBone mineral density, cardiovascular systemOlinkIncrease in bone mineral density gains in obese children
MFAP5PlasmaBMD dynamicsOlink (inflammatory and cardiometabolic panel)Biphasic: ↑ at baseline, ↓ longitudinally
GSTA1SerumBMI and oxidative stress after weight lossTMT-labeled
LC-MS/MS
Decrease after weight loss
MYH10SerumObesity-related adipogenesisTMT-labeled
LC-MS/MS
Decrease after weight loss, regulates
adipocyte GLUT4 activity
CNDP1SerumObesity and metabolic responseTMT-labeled
LC-MS/MS
Increase after weight loss
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Krakowczyk, D.; Szeliga, K.; Chyra, M.; Pietrowska, M.; Koszutski, T.; Gawlik-Starzyk, A.; Hyla-Klekot, L. Proteomic Insights into Childhood Obesity: A Systematic Review of Protein Biomarkers and Advances. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8522. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178522

AMA Style

Krakowczyk D, Szeliga K, Chyra M, Pietrowska M, Koszutski T, Gawlik-Starzyk A, Hyla-Klekot L. Proteomic Insights into Childhood Obesity: A Systematic Review of Protein Biomarkers and Advances. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(17):8522. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178522

Chicago/Turabian Style

Krakowczyk, Dominika, Kamila Szeliga, Marcin Chyra, Monika Pietrowska, Tomasz Koszutski, Aneta Gawlik-Starzyk, and Lidia Hyla-Klekot. 2025. "Proteomic Insights into Childhood Obesity: A Systematic Review of Protein Biomarkers and Advances" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 17: 8522. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178522

APA Style

Krakowczyk, D., Szeliga, K., Chyra, M., Pietrowska, M., Koszutski, T., Gawlik-Starzyk, A., & Hyla-Klekot, L. (2025). Proteomic Insights into Childhood Obesity: A Systematic Review of Protein Biomarkers and Advances. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(17), 8522. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178522

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop