Next Article in Journal
Chemoresistance Evolution in Ovarian Cancer Delineated by Single-Cell RNA Sequencing
Previous Article in Journal
Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Metabolic Pathways and Key Genes Involved in Oleic Acid Formation of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Therapeutic Potential of CHCHD2 in Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury: Mechanistic Insights into Nrf2-Dependent Antioxidant Defense in HK2 Cells
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

40 Improves Cerebrovascular Endothelial Function via NOX4-Dependent Hydrogen Peroxide Release

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(14), 6759; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146759
by Elizabeth Heller, Lindsey McGurran, Joseph K. Brown, Kathleen Love, Matthew Hobbs, Jeong Sook Kim-Han and Byung Hee Han *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(14), 6759; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146759
Submission received: 4 June 2025 / Revised: 30 June 2025 / Accepted: 7 July 2025 / Published: 15 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Focus on Antioxidants and Human Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This is a well-designed, well-documented, and generally well-presented study on the fole of NOX4 in Ab40-stimulated protection of bEnd.3 endothelial cells. The findings are clear and significant and the limitations of the study are appropriately discussed.  My only concern is that the Discussion section was made unnecessarily long and burdensome by exhaustive reiteration of the results.  The actual discussion of the results in the discussion section is good and should be kept, just not the rehasing of what is already clear in the Results section.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors
  1. The study investigates the effect of Aβ40 on cell viability, which might be influenced by cell proliferation. Is there evidence to differentiate whether the observed changes in cell viability are due to enhanced cell metabolism or an actual increase in cell number?
  2. Figure 3 demonstrates that NOX4 is the predominant NOX isoform in bEnd.3 cells. This prompts a question about whether NOX4 expression is associated with cell adhesion and growth in vitro.
  3. The manuscript does not incorporate relevant clinical single-cell sequencing data. Would it be feasible to explore if the gene expression patterns and interactions found in this study are supported by clinical data, potentially enriching the understanding of the gene interaction network in Alzheimer's disease?
  4. The interaction between Aβ40 and NOX4 is not fully clarified. While the study shows that NOX4 mediates the Aβ40-induced increase in Hâ‚‚Oâ‚‚ production, is there a direct interaction between Aβ40 and NOX4, or does Aβ40 activate NOX4 via alternative signaling pathways or molecules?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I believe that the revisions have strengthened the manuscript and addressed the key issues raised during the review process. I am pleased to inform you that I am considering the acceptance of your manuscript.

Back to TopTop