Next Article in Journal
A Novel Model of Staphylococcus aureus-Induced Lymphoplasmacytic Rhinosinusitis in Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Clinical Utility: Utilization of International Standards and Guidelines for Metagenomic Sequencing in Infectious Disease Diagnosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Ethephon on Ethylene and Chlorophyll in Zoysia japonica Leaves
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

New Hybrid Ethylenediurea (EDU) Derivatives and Their Phytoactivity

by
Maxim S. Oshchepkov
1,*,
Leonid V. Kovalenko
1,
Antonida V. Kalistratova
1,
Sergey V. Tkachenko
1,
Olga N. Gorunova
2,
Nataliya A. Bystrova
2 and
Konstantin A. Kochetkov
1,2,*
1
Department of Chemistry and Technology of Biomedical Drugs, Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia, Miusskaya Sq. 9, 125047 Moscow, Russia
2
A. N. Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences, 28 Vavilova St., 119991 Moscow, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(6), 3335; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063335
Submission received: 23 January 2024 / Revised: 8 March 2024 / Accepted: 12 March 2024 / Published: 15 March 2024

Abstract

:
Natural and synthetic phytohormones are widely used in agriculture. The synthetic cytokinin ethylenediurea (EDU) induces protection in plants against ozone phytotoxicity. In our study, new hybrid derivatives of EDU were synthesized and tested for phytoactivity. The germination potential (Gp), germination of seeds (G), and relative water content in leaves (RWC), characterizing the drought resistance of plants, were determined. The results of laboratory studies showed that EDU and its hybrid derivatives have a positive effect on root length, the growth and development of shoots, as well as the ability of plants to tolerate stress caused by a lack of water.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Global climate change has a negative impact on global crop production, threatening food safety around the world [1]. Exogenous phytohormones such as auxins (Auks) and cytokinins (Ctks) have been used recently to improve seed germination, stress, and disease resistance and increase crop yields [2]. According to the marketing research company Future Market Insights [3], the production and demand for exogenous cytokinins will double in the next decade. They stimulate the mobilization and transport of nutrients and changes in all growth processes. The treatment of crops with exogenous phytohormones can be used to prevent the lodging of cereals [4], synchronize fruit ripening, delay aging, and improve qualitative and quantitative yield indicators [5]. Today, one of the key types of exogenous cytokinins is N,N′-diphenylurea (DPU) and its analogues: N-phenyl-N′-(2-chloro-4-pyridyl)urea (forchlorfenuron, CPPU), N-phenyl-N′-1,2,3-thiadiazol-5-ylurea (TDZ), N-[2-(2-oxo-l-imidazolidinyl)ethyl]-N′-phenylurea (EDU), etc. [6] (Figure 1).
Ethylenediurea (EDU) occupies a special place in the range of urea derivatives. It consists of two moieties: an imidazolidinone and an N-phenylurea residue, connected by a short linker. EDU can be used to protect plants from tropospheric ozone (O3), whose content in the air has increased significantly over the past thirty years [7]. The increased concentration of tropospheric ozone reduces crop yields due to oxidative stress. EDU mitigates the harmful effects of oxidative stress, improves photosynthesis and growth, and increases biomass and productivity. The use of EDU helps in obtaining good harvests of maize [8], rice [9,10], and peanuts [11], increases the growth and biomass of peas [12] and legumes [13,14], and improves the growth, nutritional properties, and yield of wheat grain [15,16,17,18]. It also protects seedlings of Japanese larch [19,20] and willow [21], which are important plants for cultivation as sources of bioenergy.
It was found in [22] that the rate of application of EDU required to protect plants from ozone depends on the features of the crop and environment and typically ranges from 0.02 to 3.0 kg per hectare. EDU can be applied to soil [23] or used as a foliar spray [21]. The optimal concentration for foliar spraying is 500 ppm of EDU, which provides good protection for flowers, herbaceous plants, and some types of tree seedlings.
In addition, EDU has cytokine-like activity at a concentration of 2 × 10−5 M [24]. In terms of its biological properties, this compound is close to natural adenine-type Ckts, such as kinetin (KIN) [5]. It binds to the same site of cytokinin receptors as natural derivatives of N6-substituted adenine, leading to the activation of a two-component signaling system [25].
The main idea of our work was to obtain a series of hybrid derivatives of EDU (IIX) and to study their effect on the growth and development of wheat seeds (Triticum aestivum L.) in comparison with the known compounds kinetin (KIN) and N-2-hydroxyethyl-2-oxo-imidazolidine (IM).

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemical Synthesis

New EDU derivatives (IIX) were obtained using known methods (according to Figure 2) from 2-imidazolidinone with an aminoethyl substituent by interaction with various aryl isocyanates in the presence of triethylamine in anhydrous acetonitrile, as described in [26,27,28]. The main physicochemical characteristics of compounds (IIX) are given in the Supplementary Materials.

2.2. Laboratory Tests

We have previously shown that EDU derivatives affect the growth and development of seeds, and the optimal concentration for use is 4·10−5 M [3]. In this study, wheat seeds were treated with compounds IIX according to the described method (S.II), by which the following indicators were determined: germination potential (Gp, %), germination (G, %), root length (root, cm), shoot height (shoot, cm), and relative content water (RWC, %). The results of the experiments are presented in Table 1.
It is known that the levels of cytokinins in plants are regulated by the enzyme cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase [5]. However, the mechanism of action of ethylenediurea derivatives is not fully understood. In plants, the phenyl moiety of ethylenediurea compounds binds to the same hydrophobic pocket as the isoprenoid tail of trans-zeatin (tZ). The urea moiety establishes polar interactions in the site of action that are very similar to those observed for N7 and N6 in adenine-type complexes [29]. Therefore, urea derivatives IIX are probably also able to bind to the cytokinin binding site in the receptor, which possibly determines their cytokinin activity.
The life cycle of a plant begins with the germination stage. To simulate the development of seeds, the first day of the experiment was carried out in the dark. The appearance of visible roots after 24 h was used as a morphological marker of germination potential (Gp) and calculated using Formula (1). The results are shown in Figure 3.
The germination (G) of the seeds was calculated on the seventh day by Formula (2), according to the recommendation of the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) [30]. It was found that seeds treated with compound VII had higher values of Gp (65%) and G (94%) compared to the control (56% and 84%) and those treated by IM (60% and 86) and KIN (59% and 88%). According to this, it was superior among the tested compounds. The germination potential and germination of seeds treated by I, II, and III also had high values (average Gp value—above 50%; average G value—above 90%). This may be due to the presence of a chlorine atom in the aromatic ring as an electronegative and hydrophobic substituent, which can also lead to increased binding of the urea moiety to cytokinin receptors responsible for the activation of the two-component signaling system [25]. The germination potential and germination of seeds treated by compounds IVVI had an average Gp value of above 50% and an average G value of above 85%. These are also statistically higher than the average control values, which indicates good opportunities for a further search for leading compounds among this class of cytokinin-like synthetic compounds. It should be noted that, in these experiments, shoots appeared on the second day, which is significantly earlier than the results we obtained in other investigations [3,31].
Drought stress is the most harmful environmental factor, and it is described as a multifactorial environmental stress because it causes extensive changes in plant morphology, physiology, and biochemistry [32]. The advanced architecture of root systems helps to improve the adaptation of plants to changes in the environment and is one of the key characteristics that determine the yield in normal, stressful, and (primarily) drought conditions [3,31,33].
A positive effect of compounds I and IX on the root system of plants was previously established [3]. Our experiments showed that the tested compounds II, III, and VVII had a positive effect on the architecture of roots, promoting the formation of main and lateral roots (the total number of roots was six). In contrast to the shoots treated with I, those treated with IV, VIII, IM, and KIN and the control plants (Figure 4) had mainly four roots. It should be noted that shoots treated with compounds II and VI had lateral roots with root hairs. Presumably, this is the consequence of a change in the balance between endogenous cytokinins and auxins under the action of EDU [34].
To assess the water status of a plant at a specific point in time, it is necessary to test the relative water content (RWC) of the leaves [3,31]. A typical RWC value is 98% in freshly cut leaves. When the RWC is in the range of 40–70%, the process of gradual leaf withering has begun. A value of RWC between 30 and 40% is the main indicator of when the withering process can be reversed. Severe drying and aging of leaves are observed at RWC values below 20% [3,31]. Higher RWC values are an indicator of drought tolerance [35,36].
The values of RWC for compounds IIX were calculated using Formula (3). The results are shown in Figure 5. The shoots treated by compounds IIIVII 120 h after the last watering had a minimal degree of wilting (RWC 30–35%) compared to the control samples (RWC 25–28%). Thus, compounds IIIVIII increase the drought resistance of plants. These results agree with field tests for compounds I and IX previously performed on wheat seeds [3].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals

Arylureas N-[2-(2-oxoimidazolidin-1-yl)ethyl]-N′-(3-chlorophenyl)urea (I), N-[2-(2- oxoimidazolidin-1-yl)ethyl]-N′-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)urea (II), N-[2-(2-oxoimidazolidin-1-yl)ethyl ]-N′-(3-chlorophenyl)urea (III), and N-[2-(2-oxo- imidazolidin-l-yl)ethyl]-N′-phenylurea (IX) were synthesized earlier [27,28]. EDU derivatives N-[2-(2-oxoimidazolidin-1-yl)ethyl]-N′-(4-tolyl)urea (IV), N-[2-(2-oxoimidazolidin-1-yl)ethyl]-N′-(2,4-dimethylphenyl)urea (V), N-[2-(2-oxoimidazolidin-1-yl)ethyl]-N′-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)urea (VI), N-[2-(2-oxoimidazolidin-1-yl)ethyl]-N′-(4-methoxyphenyl)urea (VII), and N-[2-(2-oxoimidazolidin-1-yl)ethyl]-N′-(2-ethylphenyl)urea (VIII) were obtained using the known method (according to Figure 2) from 2-imidazolidinone with an aminoethyl substituent by interaction with various arylisocyanates in the presence of triethylamine in anhydrous acetonitrile (see Supplementary Materials, Figures S1–S10). The structures all of the compounds were confirmed by 1H NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The purity of the compounds was between 95 and 99%, as established by HPLC-MS. Kinetin (KIN) (CAS: 525-79-1), ethylenediurea (EDU) (CAS: 54924-46-8) and N-2-hydroxyethyl-2-oxo-imidazolidine (IM) (CAS: 3699-54-5) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Wheat seeds (Triticum aestivum L.) of the “AGATA®” No. 8853479 [37] variety, crop 2020, provided by LLC “Zhito,” Russia 54.60° S.w., 39.80° V.D. were used.

3.2. Instruments

1H NMR spectra were recorded using a Bruker DRX-400 NMR spectrometer at 400.13 MHz. DMSO-d6 was used as a solvent and TMS as an internal standard. Chemical shift values were measured with an accuracy of 0.01 ppm; coupling constants are given in Hertz. HPLC-MS was recorded on an x Series II ICP-MS inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Melting points were determined using a Stuart SMP20 instrument (Cole-Palmer, Stone, Staffordshire, UK). Reaction mixture composition qualitative analysis was performed by thin-layer chromatography on silica gel (0.015–0.040 mm) aluminum-backed TLC plates with an F254 fluorescent indicator (20 × 20 cm) (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). “Kieselgel 60” (0.015–0.040 mm, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) silica gel was used for chromatographic separation on a preparative scale.

3.3. Laboratory Experiment

Four identical chambers with UFO-79–01-00 phyto-LED lighting with a wavelength of Red 615/Blu 457 nm and an intensity of at least 250 lux were simultaneously used to conduct four series of experiments. The experiment was carried out for 7 days with illumination day/night 12/12 at a relative humidity of 24% and temperature of 20 °C.
The technique described in [3,31] was used to spray the product on the 50 dry sterilized wheat seeds placed on filter paper in 75 × 85 (mm) Petri dishes. All tested compounds are highly soluble in water. Aqueous solutions with concentrations of 4 × 10−5 M were prepared for all test compounds according to a known technique [31]. Wheat seeds were sprayed with 0.34 ± 0.02 mL of the test compound solutions.
The germination potential of wheat seeds was determined 24 h after the start of the experiment according to Formula (1):
Germination potential (%) = [Number of germination seeds 1d/Number of total seed] × 100
Seed germination was calculated by Formula (2) [30] after the end of the experiment:
Germination (%) = [Number of germination seeds 7d/Number of total seed] × 100
Root lengths, shoot heights, and relative water content (RWC) were determined from fifteen randomly selected shoots from Petri dishes. The last watering was 96 h after the start of the experiment. RWC was determined within three days after the end of the experiment according to Formula (3):
RWC % = [(TW (FW − DW)/−DW)] × 100
where FW = fresh weight; TW = turgid weight; DW = dry weight.

3.4. Statistic

The relationships between the studied indicators were determined using the statistical software package “Statistica 12.1” (Stat-Soft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test at significance levels of p ˂ 0.05 and p ˂ 0.01. Microsoft Excel 2010 and Corel-Photo pain 12 were used to generate graphs to present the results of the statistical analyses.

4. Conclusions

New hybrid ethylenediurea (EDU) derivatives, belonging to the class of cytokinin-like compounds, were obtained, and their effect on the growth and development of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seeds was studied. Compounds IIX were available and prepared according to a standard procedure starting from substituted 2-imidazolidinones and the corresponding phenyl isocyanate. Seeds treated by tested compounds IIX showed high values of germination potential and seed germination. There was also a significant positive effect on the growth and development of root system architecture and shoot height, as well as high values of plant drought resistance. It can be assumed that the beneficial effect on wheat seeds is associated, in particular, with the presence of chlorine atoms in the aromatic ring as an electronegative and hydrophobic substituent, which can lead to increased binding of the urea fragment to cytokinin receptors responsible for the activation of the two-component signaling system. Among the tested compounds, a superior substance, VIII, was identified, which showed the best results. These newly studied hybrid derivatives of EDU can be recommended for further study of the possibility of using them in agriculture. In particular, we plan to conduct field tests on wheat seeds under actual drought conditions.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25063335/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S.O. and K.A.K.; methodology, M.S.O. and K.A.K.; validation, M.S.O., L.V.K. and A.V.K.; investigation, L.V.K.; supervision, L.V.K.; project administration, M.S.O. and S.V.T.; funding acquisition, N.A.B.; investigation (growth-regulating activity field experiment), O.N.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The first four authors would like to thank the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 22-73-10076. (Maxim S. Oshchepkov, Leonid V. Kovalenko, Antonida V. Kalistratova, Sergey V. Tkachenko) This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Contract No. 075-00-277-24-00) (Olga N. Gorunova, Nataliya A. Bystrova and Konstantin A. Kochetkov).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the analytical studies carried out at the D.I. Mendeleev Center for Collective Use of Scientific Equipment and Center for molecular composition studies of INEOS RAS.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rezaei, E.E.; Webber, H.; Asseng, S.; Boote, K.; Durand, J.L.; Ewert, F.; Martre, P.; MacCarthy, D.S. Climate change impacts on crop yields. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2023, 4, 831–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kosakivsk, I.V.; Vedenicheva, N.P.; Babenko, L.M.; Voytenko, L.V.; Romanenko, K.O.; Vasyuk, V.A. Exogenous phytohormones in the regulation of growth and development of cereals under abiotic stresses. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2022, 49, 617–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Available online: https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/cytokinins-market (accessed on 1 February 2021).
  4. Oshchepkov, M.S.; Kovalenko, L.V.; Kalistratova, A.V.; Solovieva, I.N.; Tsvetikova, M.A.; Gorunova, O.N.; Bystrova, N.A.; Kochetkov, K.A. Phytoactive Aryl Carbamates and Ureas as Cytokinin-like Analogs of EDU. Agronomy 2023, 13, 778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rizwan, A.; Riffat, Y.; Madiha, M.; Ambreen, A.; Mazhar, M.; Rehman, A.; Umbreen, S.; Ahmad, M. Phytohormones as Plant Growth Regulators and Safe Protectors against Biotic and Abiotic Stress. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 1301–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Oshchepkov, M.S.; Kalistratova, A.V.; Savelieva, E.M.; Romanov, G.A.; Bystrova, N.A.; Kochetkov, K.A. Natural and synthetic cytokinins and their applications in biotechnology, agrochemistry and medicine. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2020, 89, 787–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dewan, S.; Lakhani, A. Tropospheric ozone and its natural precursors impacted by climatic changes in emission and dynamics. Review. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 1007942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gupta, S.K.; Sharma, M.; Majumder, B.; Maurya, V.K.; Farah Deeba, F.; Zhang, J.-L.; Pandey, V. Effects of ethylenediurea (EDU) on regulatory proteins in two maize (Zea mays L.) varieties under high tropospheric ozone phytotoxicity. Plant Phys. Biochem. 2020, 61, 675–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Singh, A.K.; Mitra, S.; Kar, G. Assessing the impact of current tropospheric ozone on yield loss and antioxidant defense of six cultivars of rice using ethylenediurea in the lower Gangetic Plains of India. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022, 29, 40146–40156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shang, B.; Fu, R.; Agathokleous, E.; Dai, L.; Zhang, G.; Wu, R.; Feng, Z. Ethylenediurea offers moderate protection against ozone-induced rice yield loss under high ozone pollution. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806 Pt 3, 151341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chaudhary, I.J.; Rathore, D. Assessment of dose–response relationship between ozone dose and groundnut (Arachishypogaea L.) cultivars using Open Top Chamber (OTC) and Ethylenediurea (EDU). Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 22, 101494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jabeen, F.; Ahmed, S. Ethylenediurea regulates growth and physiochemical responses of Pisumsativum to ambient O3. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 18, 3571–3580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nigar, S.; Nazneen, S.; Khan, S.; Neelum, A.; Tasneem, S. Response of Vignaradiata L. (Mung Bean) to Ozone Phytotoxicity Using Ethylenediurea and Magnesium Nitrate. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jabeen, F.; Ahmed, S.; Shah, A.A. Impact of ambient ozone pollution on yield attributes of Pisumsativum L. plants by using ethylenediurea. Iran. J. Plant Phys. 2021, 11, 3789–3798. [Google Scholar]
  15. Surabhi, S.; Pande, V.; Pandey, V. Ethylenediurea (EDU) mediated protection from ambient ozone-induced oxidative stress in wheat (Triticumaestivum L.) under a high CO2 environment. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2022, 13, 101503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kannaujia, R.; Singh, P.; Prasad, V.; Pandey, V. Evaluating impacts of biogenic silver nanoparticles and ethylenediurea on wheat (Triticumaestivum L.) against ozone-induced damages. Environ. Res. 2022, 203, 111857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gupta, S.K.; Sharma, M.; Maurya, V.K. Effects of ethylenediurea (EDU) on apoplast and chloroplast proteome in two wheat varieties under high ambient ozone: An approach to investigate EDU’s mode of action. Protoplasma 2021, 258, 1009–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Maurya, V.K.; Gupta, S.K.; Sharma, M.; Majumder, B.; Deeba, F.; Pandey, N.; Pandey, V. Growth, physiological and proteomic responses in field grown wheat varieties exposed to elevated CO2 under high ambient ozone. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plant 2020, 26, 1437–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Agathokleous, E.; Kitao, M.; Wang, X. Ethylenediurea (EDU) effects on Japanese larch: An one growing season experiment with simulated regenerating communities and a four growing season application to individual saplings. J. For. Res. 2021, 32, 2047–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Agathokleous, E.; Kitao, M.; Koike, T. Ethylenediurea (EDU) effects on hybrid larch saplings exposed to ambient or elevated ozone over three growing seasons. J. For. Res. 2022, 33, 117–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Agathokleous, E.; Kitao, M.; Shi, C.; Masui, N.; Abu-ElEla, S.; Hikino, K.; Satoh, F.; Koike, T. Ethylenediurea (EDU) spray effects on willows (Salix sachalinensis F. Schmid) grown in ambient or ozone-enriched air: Implications for renewable biomass production. J. For. Res. 2022, 33, 397–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Carnahan, J.E.; Jenner, E.L.; Wat, E.K.W. Prevention of Ozone Injury to Plants by a New Protectant Chemical. Phytopathology 1978, 68, 1225–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Singh, A.A.; Singh, S.; Agrawal, M.; Agrawal, S.B. Assessment of Ethylene Diurea-Induced Protection in Plants Against Ozone Phytotoxicity. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; Whitacre, D.M., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; p. 233. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee, E.H.; Chen, C.M. Studies on the meclianisms of ozone tolerance: Cytokioin-like activity of N-[2-(2-oxo-l-imidazolidinyl)ethyI]-N’-plienylurea, a compound protecting against ozone injury. Physiol. Plant 1982, 56, 486–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Romanov, G.A.; Schmülling, T. On the biological activity of cytokinin free bases and their ribosides. Plant 2021, 255, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Manning, W.L.; Paoletti, E.; Sandermann, H., Jr.; Ernst, D. Ethylenediurea (EDU): A research tool for assessment and verification of the effects of ground level ozone on plants under natural conditions. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 3283–3293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kalistratova, A.V.; Kovalenko, L.V.; Oshchepkov, M.S.; Gamisoniya, A.M.; Gerasimova, T.S.; Demidov, Y.A.; Akimov, M.G. Synthesis of New Compounds in the Series of Aryl-Substituted Ureas with Cytotoxic and Antioxidant Activity. Mendeleev Commun. 2020, 30, 153–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Oshchepkov, M.; Kovalenko, L.; Kalistratova, A.; Ivanova, M.; Sherstyanykh, G.; Dudina, P.; Antonov, A.; Cherkasova, A.; Akimov, M. Anti-Proliferative and Cytoprotective Activity of Aryl Carbamate and Aryl Urea Derivatives with Alkyl Groups and Chlorine as Substituents. Molecules 2022, 27, 3616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Nisler, J. TDZ: Mode of Action, Use and Potential in Agriculture. In Thidiazuron: From Urea Derivative to Plant Growth Regulator; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 37–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. ISTA. Chapter 1. International Rules for Seed Testing. Certificates 2023, 1, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kochetkov, K.A.; Gorunova, O.N.; Bystrova, N.A. Biologically Oriented Hybrids of Indole and Hydantoin Derivatives. Molecules 2023, 28, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kurepa, J.; Smalle, J.A. Auxin/Cytokinin Antagonistic Control of the Shoot/Root Growth Ratio and Its Relevance for Adaptation to Drought and Nutrient Deficiency Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yamoune, A.; Zdarska, M.; Depaepe, T.; Korytarova, A.; Skalak, J.; Berendzen, K.W.; Mira-Rodado, V.; Tarr, P.; Spackova, E.; Badurova, L.; et al. Cytokinins regulate spatially specific ethylene production to control root growth in Arabidopsis. BioRxiv 2023, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Giampaoli, P.; Santos, D.; Mollo, L.; Kanashiro, S.; Tavares, A. Effect of fertilisation with urea on development in the ornamental bromeliad Aechmea fasciata. Crop Sci. Rev. 2017, 48, 657–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kalistratova, A.V.; Oshchepkov, M.S.; Ivanova, M.S.; Kovalenko, L.V.; Tsvetikova, M.A.; Bystrova, N.A.; Kochetkov, R.A. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Reaction to New Bifunctional Carbamate Compounds. J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 13, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Oshchepkov, M.S.; Kalistratova, A.V.; Kovalenko, L.V.; Ivanova, M.S.; Tsvetikova, M.A.; Bystrova, N.A.; Kochetkov, K.A. Evaluation of potential and rate of the germination of wheat seeds (Triticum aestivum L.) treated with bifunctional growth regulators under water stress. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2023, 35, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. State Register of Selection Achievements Approved For Use. V.1. “Varieties of Plants” (Official Publication); FGBNU “Rosinformagrotech”: Moscow, Russia, 2023; Volume 1, p. 719.
Figure 1. Known cytokinins: N,N′-diphenylurea (DPU), N-phenyl-N′-(2-chloro-4-pyridyl)urea (CPPU), N-phenyl-N′-1,2,3-thiadiazol-5-ylurea (TDZ), N-[2-(2-oxo-l-imidazolidinyl)ethyl]-N′-phenylurea (EDU).
Figure 1. Known cytokinins: N,N′-diphenylurea (DPU), N-phenyl-N′-(2-chloro-4-pyridyl)urea (CPPU), N-phenyl-N′-1,2,3-thiadiazol-5-ylurea (TDZ), N-[2-(2-oxo-l-imidazolidinyl)ethyl]-N′-phenylurea (EDU).
Ijms 25 03335 g001
Figure 2. Preparation of EDU derivatives (IIX).
Figure 2. Preparation of EDU derivatives (IIX).
Ijms 25 03335 g002
Figure 3. Germination potential (Gp, %) and germination (G, %) of wheat seeds treated by compounds IIX, IM, KIM. Control was treated only by distilled water. Each treatment group contained 4 replicates (600 seeds in each replicate). Online calculator was used to analyze the data, which are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test based on p < 0.01 (*).
Figure 3. Germination potential (Gp, %) and germination (G, %) of wheat seeds treated by compounds IIX, IM, KIM. Control was treated only by distilled water. Each treatment group contained 4 replicates (600 seeds in each replicate). Online calculator was used to analyze the data, which are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test based on p < 0.01 (*).
Ijms 25 03335 g003
Figure 4. Root length (cm) and shoot height (cm) of wheat seeds treated by compounds IIX, IM, and KIM and controls. Online calculator was used to analyze the data, which are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test based on p < 0.01 (*) and p < 0.001 (**).
Figure 4. Root length (cm) and shoot height (cm) of wheat seeds treated by compounds IIX, IM, and KIM and controls. Online calculator was used to analyze the data, which are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test based on p < 0.01 (*) and p < 0.001 (**).
Ijms 25 03335 g004
Figure 5. Relative water content (RWC %) of leaves 120 h after the last watering in wheat seeds treated by compounds IIX, IM, and KIM and controls. Online calculator was used to analyze the data, which are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test based on p < 0.01 (*).
Figure 5. Relative water content (RWC %) of leaves 120 h after the last watering in wheat seeds treated by compounds IIX, IM, and KIM and controls. Online calculator was used to analyze the data, which are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test based on p < 0.01 (*).
Ijms 25 03335 g005
Table 1. The results of laboratory tests on the wheat seeds treated with compounds IIX. Wheat seeds were treated by compounds IIX, IM, KIN. Germination potential (Gp, %), germination (G, %), root length (root, cm), shoot height (shoot, cm), and relative water content (RWC, %) were determined. Seeds in a Petri dish treated only by distilled water were taken as control. IM is N-2-hydroxyethyl-2-oxo-imidazolidine; KIN is N6-furfuryladenine. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. The statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test based on p < 0.05 (*) and p < 0.01 (**).
Table 1. The results of laboratory tests on the wheat seeds treated with compounds IIX. Wheat seeds were treated by compounds IIX, IM, KIN. Germination potential (Gp, %), germination (G, %), root length (root, cm), shoot height (shoot, cm), and relative water content (RWC, %) were determined. Seeds in a Petri dish treated only by distilled water were taken as control. IM is N-2-hydroxyethyl-2-oxo-imidazolidine; KIN is N6-furfuryladenine. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. The statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test based on p < 0.05 (*) and p < 0.01 (**).
CompoundsGp,
%
G,
%
Root,
cm
Shoot,
cm
RWC,
%
Control56.47 ± 4.1984.21 ± 2.637.76 ± 1.9312.63 ± 3.1827.29 ± 1.16
I
Ijms 25 03335 i001
53.28 ± 3.0592.17 ± 4.347.82 ± 1.1015.04 ± 2.91 **29.46 ± 2.37
II
Ijms 25 03335 i002
59.60 ± 1.70 *93.51 ± 3.418.16 ± 1.7015.27 ± 1.82 *30.84 ± 2.95
III
Ijms 25 03335 i003
52.41 ± 2.0192.54 ± 2.58 *8.71 ± 2.08 **18.85 ± 3.16 **33.58 ± 3.96 *
IV
Ijms 25 03335 i004
54 ± 3.7888 ± 2.518.3 ± 1.29 *5.4 ± 1.58 *35.58 ± 3.81
V
Ijms 25 03335 i005
51.33 ± 2.0885.62 ± 2.368.27 ± 1.82 *14.42 ± 1.20 *35.02 ± 6.08
VI
Ijms 25 03335 i006
52.05 ± 5.588.31 ± 5.919.62 ± 1.29 **13.50 ± 1.8335.52 ± 6.40
VII
Ijms 25 03335 i007
65.39 ± 2.16 *94.27 ± 2.82 *8.96 ± 1.31 **15.47 ± 1.76 *34.97 ± 4.12 *
VIII
Ijms 25 03335 i008
57.45 ± 2.4690.11 ± 5.569.37 ± 1.82 **15.12 ± 1.67 *30.68 ± 3.08
IX
Ijms 25 03335 i009
55.61 ± 2.6486.24 ± 2.168.88 ± 1.3114.34 ± 1.6529.73 ± 2.05
IM60.05 ± 4.3286.42 ± 2.06.26 ± 1.5513.50 ± 1.225.52 ± 0.89
KIN59.32 ± 6.84 *88.16 ± 7.798.13± 0.5514.57 ± 2.4 *28.43 ± 0.04
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oshchepkov, M.S.; Kovalenko, L.V.; Kalistratova, A.V.; Tkachenko, S.V.; Gorunova, O.N.; Bystrova, N.A.; Kochetkov, K.A. New Hybrid Ethylenediurea (EDU) Derivatives and Their Phytoactivity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3335. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063335

AMA Style

Oshchepkov MS, Kovalenko LV, Kalistratova AV, Tkachenko SV, Gorunova ON, Bystrova NA, Kochetkov KA. New Hybrid Ethylenediurea (EDU) Derivatives and Their Phytoactivity. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(6):3335. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063335

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oshchepkov, Maxim S., Leonid V. Kovalenko, Antonida V. Kalistratova, Sergey V. Tkachenko, Olga N. Gorunova, Nataliya A. Bystrova, and Konstantin A. Kochetkov. 2024. "New Hybrid Ethylenediurea (EDU) Derivatives and Their Phytoactivity" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 6: 3335. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063335

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop