Next Article in Journal
The Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Atopic Dermatitis
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification of the SPP/SPPL Gene Family and BnaSPPL4 Regulating Male Fertility in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Efficacy of Cold Atmospheric Plasma vs. Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 25
Issue 6
10.3390/ijms25063253
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MsHDZ23, a Novel Miscanthus HD-ZIP Transcription Factor, Participates in Tolerance to Multiple Abiotic Stresses

by
Naixu Liu
1,†,
Ruikang Yu
1,†,
Wendi Deng
2,
Ruibo Hu
3,
Guo He
3,
Kang He
4,
Yingzhen Kong
5,6,
Xianfeng Tang
2,
Gongke Zhou
2,6,* and
Congpeng Wang
2,6,*
1
College of Resources and Environment, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
2
College of Landscape Architecture and Forestry, Qingdao Agricultural University, No. 700 Changcheng Road, Chengyang District, Qingdao 266109, China
3
CAS Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Energy Genetics, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266101, China
4
Shandong Peanut Research Institute, Qingdao 266100, China
5
College of Agronomy, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
6
Academy of Dongying Efficient Agricultural Technology and Industry on Saline and Alkaline Land in Collaboration with Qingdao Agricultural University, Dongying 257000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(6), 3253; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063253
Submission received: 22 January 2024 / Revised: 25 February 2024 / Accepted: 7 March 2024 / Published: 13 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Genomics of Energy Crops 2.0)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The homeodomain-leucine zipper (HD-ZIP) transcription factors, representing one of the largest plant-specific superfamilies, play important roles in the response to various abiotic stresses. However, the functional roles of HD-ZIPs in abiotic stress tolerance and the underlying mechanisms remain relatively limited in Miscanthus sinensis. In this study, we isolated an HD-ZIP TF gene, MsHDZ23, from Miscanthus and ectopically expressed it in Arabidopsis. Transcriptome and promoter analyses revealed that MsHDZ23 responded to salt, alkali, and drought treatments. The overexpression (OE) of MsHDZ23 in Arabidopsis conferred higher tolerance to salt and alkali stresses compared to wild-type (WT) plants. Moreover, MsHDZ23 was able to restore the hb7 mutant, the ortholog of MsHDZ23 in Arabidopsis, to the WT phenotype. Furthermore, MsHDZ23-OE lines exhibited significantly enhanced drought stress tolerance, as evidenced by higher survival rates and lower water loss rates compared to WT. The improved drought tolerance may be attributed to the significantly smaller stomatal aperture in MsHDZ23-OE lines compared to WT. Furthermore, the accumulation of the malondialdehyde (MDA) under abiotic stresses was significantly decreased, accompanied by dramatically enhanced activities in several antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) in the transgenic plants. Collectively, these results demonstrate that MsHDZ23 functions as a multifunctional transcription factor in enhancing plant resistance to abiotic stresses.

1. Introduction

Unfavorable environmental factors, such as salt, alkali, and drought stress, severely limit the growth and development of sessile plants above ground. Plants have developed various coping strategies to survive in challenging environments [1]. They have evolved complex physiological and molecular mechanisms to withstand and maintain normal growth under stressful conditions. The activation of many stress-responsive genes leads to altered metabolic and physiological processes and is an important molecular mechanism for abiotic stress tolerance in plants [2]. Abscisic acid (ABA) is a well-known stress-related phytohormone that plays a key role in abiotic stress signaling cascades. Various genes associated with ABA-mediated stress signaling pathways have been identified in different plant species [3,4]. Drought, salt, or alkali stress also triggers the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can adversely affect cellular redox homeostasis and lead to oxidative stress [5,6]. In addition, transcription factors (TFs) have been recognized as key regulators in abiotic stress signaling networks, controlling the activation or repression of downstream stress-responsive genes [7,8]. TFs regulate abiotic stress signaling through pathways dependent or independent of ABA signaling [9]. The homeodomain-leucine zipper (HD-ZIP) TF family is of particular interest among the various TF families because of its crucial regulatory role in tolerating various abiotic stresses [10].
HD-ZIP proteins are plant-specific transcription factors that contain a homeodomain (HD) and a leucine zipper (LZ) domain. The highly conserved HD binds specifically to DNA, and the LZ mediates homodimer or heterodimer formation [11]. The HD-ZIP protein mediates stress tolerance in plants by regulating the expression of downstream stress-related genes mainly through the ABA-mediated signaling pathway [12]. In the model species Arabidopsis, the disruption of the HD-ZIP II genes HAT1 and HAT3 results in enhanced drought tolerance [13]. Notably, HAT1 directly binds to the promoters of the ABA biosynthesis genes ABA3 and NCED3 to negatively regulate their expression, resulting in reduced ABA accumulation [13]. Another HD-ZIP II protein, HAT22/ABIG1, showed increased expression in response to ABA and drought treatments and shared a similar regulatory pattern with two other known ABA signaling genes, PYL6 and CIPK12, suggesting that HAT22/ABIG1 may be an important component of the ABA signaling pathway [14]. In Miscanthus, the HD-ZIP TF MsHB7 negatively regulates salt tolerance by inhibiting the expression of the ABA-response genes MsSnRK2.6 and MsABI1 [15]. Similarly, HD-ZIP TF CaHDZ12 in chickpeas plays a role in ABA-dependent signaling and contributes to abiotic stress tolerance. It promotes osmolyte production, reduces intracellular ROS levels, and induces the expression of SnRK2 kinase and other stress-related genes in response to abiotic stresses [16]. Additionally, HD-ZIP proteins have been identified in eucalyptus [17], wheat [18,19,20], maize [21,22,23], and rice [24,25,26,27,28], where they play diverse roles in abiotic stress responses by controlling plant development and influencing stress-related gene expression.
Despite great progress in stress-related HD-ZIP proteins in model plants and crops, little is known about HD-ZIP genes in abiotic stresses in Miscanthus. Miscanthus is a perennial rhizomatous C4 grass native to East Asia [29]. Miscanthus has outstanding characteristics, such as having a high biomass yield, being rich in polysaccharides, and having a wide adaptability to various environments (especially marginal lands) and low water and fertilizer requirements [30], making it a promising lignocellulosic bioenergy crop in China [31,32,33]. The cultivation of Miscanthus on marginal land (e.g., saline soil) that is not arable for agronomic crops will not only provide sufficient raw materials for second-generation bioethanol production, but will also aid in soil reclamation, CO2 emission reduction, and carbon sequestration and neutralization [34]. However, compared with the main crops, the genetic improvement of Miscanthus lags far behind because of its complex genetic background and the unclarified molecular mechanisms underlying agronomic traits and abiotic stress tolerance [35]. In the present study, we identified 48 HD-ZIP proteins from M. sinensis. Among these HD-ZIP proteins, MsHDZ23 is dramatically induced under alkali, mixed salt–alkali, and prolonged drought stresses. We carried out a detailed functional characterization of MsHDZ23 in abiotic stress responses in transgenic Arabidopsis. Our results demonstrate that MsHDZ23 plays a positive role in drought, alkali, and salinity stress tolerance. The enhanced tolerance of transgenic plants was achieved via the activation of antioxidant enzymes in ROS scavenging. The results lay the theoretical foundations for the further improvement of Miscanthus stress tolerance by means of genetic engineering.

2. Results

2.1. Genome-Wide Identification of HD-ZIP Genes in M. sinensis

The HD-ZIP protein sequences were identified via a local BLAST search against the annotated genome of M. sinensis using the HMM profile of the HD and LZ domain. The presence of the HD and LZ domain was further confirmed with a conserved domain (CD) search at Phytozome. Ultimately, 48 HD-ZIP genes were identified in the M. sinensis genome. They were designated MsHDZ1 to MsHDZ48, based on the physical locations on chromosomes. Like the Arabidopsis HD-ZIP family, the 48 HD-ZIP transcription factor genes of M. sinensis were divided into four subfamilies (Figure S1). Detailed information on M. sinensis HD-ZIP genes and their closest Arabidopsis orthologs is provided in Supplementary Table S1. Generally, there were one or two MsHDZ orthologs for each Arabidopsis HDZ gene.

2.2. Expression Profiling of MsHD-ZIP Genes in Multiple Abiotic Stresses

To explore the expression profile of MsHD-ZIP genes in response to drought, salt, or/and alkaline stress, we mined their expression profiles using the transcriptome data (unpublished data). At least 18, 12, 13, 15, and 14 MsHD-ZIP genes exhibited significantly upregulated expression (more than two-fold change) under short drought, long drought, salt, alkali, and mixed salt–alkali stresses, respectively (Figure S2). For example, the expression of MsHDZ17, MsHDZ34, MsHDZ37, and MsHDZ42 was specifically upregulated under salt stress, while the expression of MsHDZ22 was specifically upregulated under salt and prolonged drought stresses. Moreover, the expression of MsHDZ4, MsHDZ10, MsHDZ25, and MsHDZ31 was upregulated under mixed salt–alkali and prolonged drought stresses. Significantly, the expression of MsHDZ23, which responds to various stresses, was upregulated under alkali, mixed salt–alkali, and prolonged drought stresses, highlights its function in the stress resistance of M. sinensis.

2.3. MsHDZ23 Was Induced by Multiple Abiotic Stresses

To explore whether MsHDZ23 responds to abiotic stress (Figure S2), we conducted a GUS staining assay using a ProMsHDZ23::GUS construct in Miscanthus sinensis. The promoter region of MsHDZ23 (2500 bp) was cloned and fused with the GUS reporter gene. Germinated seeds were grown on 1/2 MS medium supplemented with different concentrations of ABA (0.5 μM, 1.0 μM), NaCl (100 mM, 150 mM), mannitol (150 mM, 200 mM), and NaHCO3 (5 mM, 7 mM) to induce abiotic stress. After 14 days, GUS staining was performed on the seedlings. Under different stresses, the leaves of seedlings showed GUS staining and the staining deepened with the increase in stress level (Figure 1). This result indicates that the expression of MsHDZ23 is indeed induced by various abiotic stresses.

2.4. MsHDZ23 Is a Nucleus-Localized TF with Transactivation Activity

HD-ZIP proteins were predicated to be transcription factors in plants [10]. A transcriptional activation assay was performed using the Gal4 binding domain (BD)-MsHDZ23 fusion protein and a constitutively expressed reporter gene containing four upstream Gal4 DNA-binding sites (Gal4 [4X]-D1-3[4X]-GUS; Figure 2A). The data showed that MsHDZ23 led to the activation of the reporter gene expression (Figure 2A). As controls, MYB3 and MYB221 were included to represent activation and inhibition controls, respectively, and their respective effects on the reporter gene expression were consistent with previous findings [36,37].
The transactivation activity assay of MsHDZ23 was investigated using a yeast transactivation assay. Yeast cells containing the full-length sequence of CDS coding region (pBD-MsHDZ23-FL), the N-terminal domain (pBD-MsHDZ23-1), or the C-terminal domain (pBD-MsHDZ23-3) and vector control could grow on SD/−Trp medium, indicative of successful transformation. By contrast, transformants containing pBD-MsHDZ23-FL, pBD-MsHDZ23-1, or pBD-MsHDZ23-3 were able to grow on SD/−His medium (Figure 2B). Furthermore, yeast transformants containing these three constructs displayed strong β-galactosidase activity in the presence of X-α-gal (Figure 2B), indicating that ADE2 and HIS3 reporter genes were successfully activated by MsHDZ23.
The subcellular localization of MsHDZ23 was examined via transient expression in the Nicotiana. benthamiana leaf epidermis. The GFP signals of the vector control were pervasively distributed throughout the cell without specific localizations. By contrast, the fluorescence signals of MsHDZ23-GFP were almost solely detected in the nuclei. This nuclear-specific localization was confirmed via co-staining with DAPI, which specifically labels DNA within the nucleus (Figure 2C).

2.5. MsHDZ23 Overexpression Affects the Development of Transgenic Arabidopsis

According to the phylogenetic tree (Figure S1) and Supplement Table S1, MsHDZ23 and Arabidopsis HOMEOBOX7 (AtHB7) are orthologous genes. To characterize the functional role of MsHDZ23 in the plant stress response, we generated the overexpression lines of MsHDZ23 (referred to as MsHDZ23-OE) and hb7 mutant complement lines (referred to as MsHDZ23-complemented hb7) in Arabidopsis. The overexpression of MsHDZ23 had a noticeable impact on the morphogenesis characteristics of transgenic Arabidopsis, particularly on the leaves (Figure S3). The rosette leaves of the MsHDZ23-OE lines exhibited a distinct phenotype, with shortened lengths and longer petioles, which is in striking contrast to the typically long and narrow shape of the WT and hb7 leaves (Figure S3A,B,D). Accordingly, the leaf size was substantially reduced in the MsHDZ23-OE lines compared to WT (Figure S3A,B).

2.6. MsHDZ23 Overexpression Improves Salt Tolerance

The salt tolerance of MsHDZ23-OE lines was investigated by measuring germination rates under salt (NaCl) treatments (Figure 3). In the control 1/2 MS medium, the germination rate of both the MsHDZ23-OE lines and WT was over 90%, whereas only the hb7 mutant had a lower germination rate of 78% (Figure 3B). However, there was no significant difference in germination rates between the MsHDZ23-complemented hb7 lines and WT. Under50 mM NaCl treatment, the germination time of all genotypes was delayed by 1 day, but the germination rate was not significantly affected. Under treatment with 100 mM NaCl, the germination rates of WT, the hb7 mutant, and the MsHDZ23-complemented hb7 lines decreased to 35%, 14.5%, 48.6%, and 58%, respectively, while the MsHDZ23-OE lines showed only a slight reduction in germination rate, accompanied by delayed germination (Figure 3B). Additionally, the MsHDZ23-OE lines displayed very vigorous growth characteristics, while a substantial inhibitory effect was observed for the WT seedlings (Figure 3A). When exposed to 150  mM NaCl, the difference in seed germination was dramatically increased between the overexpression lines and other genotypes. The germination rate of the MsHDZ23-OE lines was about 8 times higher than that of WT (Figure 3B).
The response of MsHDZ23 overexpression to salt stress was further assessed via root elongation assays (Figure S3). All genotypes exhibited an equivalent root length when vertically cultivated under normal conditions (Figure S3A). However, significant differences were observed between all genotypes when exposed to 50 mM, 100  mM, or 150  mM NaCl treatment (Figure S3B). The primary root of the MsHDZ23-OE lines was dramatically longer compared to the other genotypes. Under three different concentrations of salt stresses, the MsHDZ23-OE lines were 55–57%, 35–38%, and 35–41% longer than WT, respectively. The hb7 mutant exhibited the shortest root length under 100 mM NaCl salt stress, while the MsHDZ23-complemented hb7 lines displayed a root length 25% longer than WT.
We further examined the performance of the MsHDZ23-OE lines under salt stress during the vegetative growth stage (Figure 4). Upon NaCl treatment, most of the hb7 mutant were severely wilted and eventually perished compared to WT (Figure 4A). In contrast, the majority of the MsHDZ23-OE lines maintained a healthy green appearance, with only slight leaf wilting observed (Figure 4A). Under the control conditions, the chlorophyll content of the MsHDZ23-OE lines was 10–13% lower than that of WT. However, under 150 mM salt stress, the chlorophyll content of the OE lines was 26% and 43% higher than that of WT, respectively (Figure 4D). Similarly, the chlorophyll content of the MsHDZ23-complemented hb7 lines was 25–31% higher than that of the hb7 mutant. The proline content, an essential index of plant stress resistance, was also evaluated. The results revealed that under salt stress, the proline content of the MsHDZ23-OE lines was 27–68% higher than that of WT. The MsHDZ23-complemented hb7 lines showed an even higher proline content, with values 56% to 79% higher than that of the hb7 mutant and even exceeding that of WT (Figure 4E).
To ascertain whether the ROS level is altered in transgenic and mutant lines, we performed in situ histochemical assays of ROS accumulation via DAB and NBT staining. Under normal conditions, the colors developed via DAB and NBT staining in all the lines were relatively light, and there were no significant differences in ROS levels between the transgenic lines, mutant lines, and WT (Figure 4B,C). When exposed to salt treatment, the coloration of DAB and NBT staining was drastically deepened in the leaves of all genotypes. However, the leaves of the MsHDZ23-OE lines exhibited a lighter staining color compared to the other genotypes, with the mutants displaying the darkest color, suggesting that the overexpression of MsHDZ23 alleviates ROS generation under abiotic stress (Figure 4B,C). As an indicator of oxidative damage, the content of MDA generated during the peroxidation of membrane lipids is commonly used under abiotic stresses [38,39]. Equivalent amounts of MDA were detected in all genotypes under normal conditions. However, when exposed to salt stress treatment, only 44–46% levels of MDA were detected in the MsHDZ23-OE lines compared to WT, and the MsHDZ23-complemented hb7 lines showed MDA levels similar to WT (Figure 4F).
Since the formation of ROS in the cells can be promoted by most abiotic stresses and subsequently hurts the plants [40,41], we postulate that the overexpression of MsHDZ23 can probably inhibit the production of ROS and/or facilitate the removal of the oxidative products to protect plants from membrane damage. To validate this hypothesis, we determined the activities of CAT, POD, and SOD before and after stress treatments. Under normal conditions, the enzyme activities were comparable in all genotypes. Under salt stress conditions, enzyme activities increased in all genotypes. However, more dramatic increases were observed for the MsHDZ23-OE lines than for the other genotypes (Figure 4G–I). The most obvious difference was observed in CAT activity. Under stress conditions, the activity of CAT enzyme in MsHDZ23-OE lines was 3.5–4.4 times higher than that of WT and 8–10 times higher than that of hb7 mutant lines (Figure 4H). The enzyme activity of the MsHDZ23-complemented hb7 lines was similar to that of WT. These data suggest that MsHDZ23 overexpression stimulates the activities of anti-oxidative enzymes and enhances the ROS-scavenging capability. Collectively, these results indicate that MsHDZ23-OE lines have a superior salt stress tolerance compared with WT, and MsHDZ23 can restore the tolerance of hb7 mutants to that of WT.

2.7. MsHDZ23 Overexpression Improves Alkali Tolerance

In order to assess the function of MsHDZ23 in alkali stress, the germination rate of each genotype under 7 mM NaHCO3 stress was determined (Figure 5). Treatment with 7 mM NaHCO3 significantly decreased the germination rate of WT, MsHDZ23-complemented hb7 lines, and hb7 mutant. However, in the MsHDZ23-OE lines, although there was a delay in germination, the germination rate was only slightly reduced (Figure 5). Under 7 mM NaHCO3 stress, the germination rate of MsHDZ23-OE lines was 95–100% higher than that of WT. These results indicate that the overexpression of MsHDZ23 enhances the tolerance to NaHCO3 to promote seed germination under alkali stress conditions.
We further investigated the tolerance of the MsHDZ23-OE lines, hb7 mutant, MsHDZ23-complemented hb7 lines, and WT to NaHCO3 stress at the early vegetative stage. The three-week-old soil-grown plants were irrigated with 125 mM NaHCO3 every 3 days for a period of 2 weeks. The results of the survey showed that the MsHDZ23-OE lines demonstrated better stress tolerance to NaHCO3 than the other genotypes (Figure 6A). Under normal condition, almost no difference was found in plant growth, chlorophyll contents, proline contents, or MDA levels among all genotypes (Figure 6D–F). However, in the present of 125 mM NaHCO3, the chlorophyll content in WT was decreased by 36.7%, the hb7 mutant was decreased by 40%, and the two MsHDZ23-OE lines only exhibited a decrease of 1.4% and 2.9% (Figure 6D). The change trend in proline was opposite to that of chlorophyll under NaHCO3 stress. Conversely, the proline content increased in the MsHDZ23-OE lines under NaHCO3 stress compared to that of WT, with an increase of 49% and 53%, while the proline content in the mutant was the lowest, only 39% of that in WT. The MSHDZ23-complemented hb7 line showed proline content levels similar to WT (Figure 6E). Moreover, the MDA levels demonstrated that MsHDZ23 reduced the damage caused by high alkaline stress in plants (Figure 6F). The results of DAB and NBT staining showed that the accumulation of ROS in the MsHDZ23-OE lines under alkali stress was the least among all genotypes, which was consistent with the results for salt stress (Figure 6B,C). Furthermore, the activities of CAT, POD, and SOD in the MsHDZ23-OE lines treated with NaHCO3 were higher than those in the other genotypes (Figure 6G–I). This suggests that MsHDZ23-OE lines are more efficient in removing ROS products and additional free radicals to protect cell structures from damage.

2.8. Overexpression of MsHDZ23 Enhances Drought Tolerance

Given the evidence of crosstalk between the signaling pathways that regulate different responses to salt, alkaline, and drought stresses [42,43], along with the response of MsHDZ23 to prolonged drought in transcriptome analyses (Figure S1B), we investigated drought-tolerant phenotypes across the MsHDZ23-OE lines, hb7 mutant lines, the MsHDZ23-complemented hb7 lines, and WT plants. Under the treatment of 100 mM and 200 mM mannitol, the seeds of the MsHDZ23-OE lines exhibited a slower seed coat breakage pace and a slight reduction in germination rate (Figure 7). However, the germination rates of other genotypes decreased significantly with increasing stress intensity, particularly the hb7 mutant and WT. The germination rates of the hb7 mutant decreased by 29.7% (100 mM) and 61% (200 mM), while the WT rates decreased by 34.6% (100 mM) and 70.1% (200 mM), respectively (Figure 7B). The results indicated that the overexpression of MsHDZ23 enhanced tolerance to mannitol-induced osmotic stress.
The drought stress tolerance of the MsHDZ23-OE lines was further assessed at the vegetation growth stage (Figure 8A). After the dehydration stress, WT, hb7 mutant, and MsHDZ23-complemented hb7 lines displayed extreme leaf wilting due to a severe water deficiency. However, the MsHDZ23-OE lines only exhibited a slight wilting phenotype, with most of the leaves remaining turgid and maintaining a healthy green color (Figure 8A). After 3 d of resuming watering, only a few of WT plants survived and all the hb7 mutants died. In contrast, most of the MsHDZ23-OE lines resumed growth (Figure 8A). During the six-hour dehydration stress of excised leaves, a steady weight loss resulting from leaf evaporation was observed in all genotypes. However, a much lower water loss rate was always observed for the MsHDZ23-OE lines compared to other genotypes at all designated time points (Figure 8B). Stomatal movement is one of the main physiological responses of plants to drought stress. Under normal conditions, the stomata of all genotypes were open and the pore size of mutants was the largest. Under drought stress, the stomata of the MsHDZ23-OE lines were closed, while those of mutants remained open (Figure 8C). The results showed that MsHDZ23 could enhance the sensitivity of stomatal opening and closing to drought stress, thereby controlling the movement and changes in stomatal size and ultimately improving plant drought resistance.
The results of NBT and DAB staining showed that the MsHDZ23-OE lines had the lightest staining, while the hb7 mutant had the deepest staining, which was similar to the results for salt and alkali treatment (Figure S5A,B). The MDA content analysis showed that after drought treatment, the MDA content of the MsHDZ23-OE lines was 62.9% and 60.7% of WT (Figure S5C). Even after re-watering, the MDA content of WT was 24.9% and 40.4% higher than that of the MsHDZ23-OE lines and did not recover to control level. The CAT enzyme activity data showed that the MsHDZ23-OE lines had the highest enzyme activity after drought, which was 1.5 and 2.5 times higher than WT. In contrast, the hb7 mutant displayed the lowest enzyme activity, with values of only 25.7% and 15.7% of the OE lines, aligning with the results obtained for salt and alkali stress (Figure S5E). After re-watering, the CAT enzyme activity of the OE lines was still higher than that of other genotypes and did not return to a growth state consistent with the control. Similar trends were observed for SOD and POD enzyme activities (Figure S5D,F). These results suggest that MsHDZ23 stimulates anti-oxidant enzymes and enhances ROS-scavenging capability under drought stress.

2.9. MsHDZ23 Overexpression Confers ABA Insensitivity

The GUS staining of ProMsHDZ23:: GUS lines showed that MsHDZ23 was induced by the ABA signal (Figure 1C). We examined the sensitivities of the MsHDZ23-OE lines, WT, hb7 mutant lines, and MsHDZ23-complemented hb7 lines to exogenous ABA (Figure 9A). When grown on 1/2 MS supplemented with 0.5  μM or 1.0  μM ABA, there were dramatic reductions in germination rates in all genotypes (Figure 9A,C–E). On 0.5 μM ABA medium, the germination rate of the MsHDZ23-OE lines was 6.4 times and 10.7 times that of WT (Figure 9C). This indicated that the inhibitory effect of exogenous ABA on seed germination was alleviated in the MsHDZ23-OE lines (Figure 9A,C–E).
A root elongation assay was further performed under ABA treatment. The exogenous application of 0.5 or 1.0  μM ABA significantly inhibited root elongation for all seedlings (Figure 9B). However, the hb7 mutant exhibited more pronounced reductions in root length, followed by WT, while the MsHDZ23-OE lines were the least affected. This indicates that MsHDZ23 reduces the sensitivity to ABA (Figure 9F).

3. Discussion

Saline, alkaline, and drought stresses represent the main environmental factors that limit crop growth and reduce crop productivity worldwide [44]. Understanding the mechanisms of plant responses to alkaline, saline, or drought stress and identifying resistant genes are crucial to developing biotechnological strategies to improve crop resistance [45]. Miscanthus sinensis, a forage, ornamental, and energy crop known for its high biomass, photosynthesis potential, and water use efficiency, can withstand various abiotic stresses and is widely cultivated all over the world [46]. The recent publication of the chromosome-scale assembly of the M. sinensis genome has provided a precious genetic resource for the improvement of Miscanthus breeding and the mining of a stress-resistant molecular regulatory network [47].
A couple of transcription factors were found to be inducible in the transcriptome profiles of M. sinensis under multiple abiotic stresses. Among these transcription factors, the HD-ZIP family is one of the prominently induced families. HD-ZIP proteins comprise a large family of plant-specific TFs, which plays a crucial role in the growth and development of plants and stress responses [10]. Transcriptome analysis revealed diverse expression patterns of HD-ZIP genes in response to abiotic stresses (Figure S1). Through bioinformatic analysis, we identified 48 HD-ZIP TFs in Miscanthus (Supplement Table S1), 35 of which responded to stresses (Figure S1), whereas no HD-ZIP proteins from M. sinensis have been verified, and their physiological and biological functions have remained unknown until now. Among these transcription factors, MsHDZ23 has an obvious response to alkali, saline–alkali mixture, and long-term drought stresses (Figure S1). We carried out a detailed functional characterization of MsHDZ23 in response to abiotic stresses. As Miscanthus is recalcitrant to be transformed and, currently, the transformation platform has not been established, we had to resort to studying the function of MsHDZ23 in Arabidopsis. Our results demonstrated that MsHDZ23 functions as a stress-responsive HD-ZIP activation factor and plays a critical role in saline, alkaline, and drought stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. MsHDZ23 is localized in the nucleus and shows transactivation activity (Figure 2), which is in accordance with the typical characteristics of TFs.
HD-ZIP TFs have been revealed to mediate the abiotic stress response through ABA-dependent signaling pathways [13,15,48]. There is compelling evidence supporting the role of MsHDZ23 in the abiotic stress response via an ABA-dependent pathway. Firstly, the expression of MsHDZ23 was significantly upregulated when subjected to exogenous ABA (Figure 1). Secondly, the overexpression of MsHDZ23 in Arabidopsis conferred decreased sensitivity to ABA, which was evidenced by the significantly higher seed germination and increased seedling root length in the overexpression lines compared to WT (Figure 9). The results indicate that the overexpression of MsHDZ23 led to hyposensitivity to ABA, and enhanced drought, salt, and alkali stress tolerance (Figure 4, Figure 6 and Figure S4). Therefore, MsHDZ23 may act as a positive transcriptional regulator in drought, salt, and alkali stresses tolerance in an ABA-dependent manner.
Abiotic stresses usually impose substantial oxidative or osmotic stress on plants [15]. As a result, massive amounts of ROS (e.g., H2O2 and O2•−) are generated. ROS, when present at a normal level, serve as important signaling molecules in various plant physiological processes. However, the excessive accumulation of ROS can lead to severe peroxidation damage to cellular membranes, resulting in the generation of massive secondary products, such as MDA [5,49]. To counterbalance the excessively accumulated ROS, plants have evolved intricate defensive strategies, among which various types of antioxidative enzymes play an important role. SOD, POD, and CAT are among the three most important anti-oxidative enzymes [5,49]. The accumulation of ROS and MDA was dramatically reduced in the MsHDZ23-OE lines compared with WT, implying that the oxidative damage was substantially alleviated in the OE lines. Conversely, the hb7 mutant showed the opposite trend (Figure 4C,E,F, Figure 6C,E,F, and Figure S4A–C). Correspondingly, three representative anti-oxidative enzymes were significantly induced by MsHDZ23 overexpression. This suggests that the MsHDZ23-OE lines have more effective ROS scavenging systems, which is consistent with the enhanced stress tolerance phenotype of OE lines (Figure 4G–I, Figure 6G–I and Figure S4D–F).
The overexpression of MsHDZ23 led to an enhanced tolerance to drought stress, which was partly attributed to the lower loss rate of water from leaves (Figure 8B). The slower water loss rate caused the MsHDZ23-OE lines to maintain a relatively higher water content during drought stress (Figure 8B). As a result, the leaf wilting of the OE lines was less severe than that of WT, and the majority of leaves maintained a green color and normal turgor (Figure 8A). The decreased leaf evaporation of the MsHDZ23-OE lines might be attributed to the reduced stomatal aperture, as the stomata play a crucial role in controlling water transpiration from leaves. It is well documented that ABA acts as a pivotal player in regulating stomatal closure under abiotic stresses [4]. However, the decreased sensitivity of the MsHDZ23-OE lines to ABA resulted in decreased stomatal pore size and ultimately improved water retention, although the underlying mechanisms are still unclear.
As shown in the phenotypic data, the MsHDZ23-OE lines showed significant tolerance to NaHCO3 at the germination and mature seedling stages (Figure 5A and Figure 6A). In the absence of NaHCO3, the total chlorophyll content of WT plants was slightly higher than that of transgenic lines. However, upon supplementation with 150 mM NaHCO3, the WT plants exhibited a greater reduction in total chlorophyll contents than the MsHDZ23-OE lines (Figure 6B). These results suggest that the overexpression of MsHDZ23 reduces chlorophyll degradation and enhances tolerance to alkaline stress. It is well established that alkaline stress in soil is mainly caused by a high concentration of NaHCO3 [50]. A previous study suggests that under alkaline stress, plants may activate much more complicated responsive mechanisms in comparison with plants under other stresses [51]. This may be caused by the multiple toxicities of alkali stress, such as high pH, HCO3−, CO32−, and concomitant Na+ in the NaHCO3 solution [52,53]. While the precise function of MsHDZ23 in regulating alkaline stress remains unknown, further investigation is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
HD-ZIP TFs are usually involved in the development of plant organs, and their absence or overexpression can lead to developmental defects in plants, including vascular [54], epidermal [55], and root hair [56] defects. HD-ZIP also affects plant stress tolerance by regulating organ development [57]. However, in the case of MsHDZ23, it did not exhibit any abnormal growth characteristics aside from leaf shape regulation under normal conditions (Figure S2). From this perspective, MsHDZ23 holds great potential as an excellent candidate in the genetic improvement of Miscanthus abiotic stress tolerance because it positively regulates plant stress tolerance without exerting any harmful influence on plant growth and productivity.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. The Identification of HD-ZIP Genes in M. sinensis

Genome sequences of M. sinensis were downloaded from Phytozome (http://www.phytozome.net/) (accessed on 1 November 2019), and HD-ZIP protein sequences of Arabidopsis were downloaded from the Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) (https://www.arabidopsis.org/index.jsp) (accessed on 3 November 2019). The hidden Markov model (HMM) profile of HD (PF00046) and ZIP (PF02183) was downloaded from the Pfam database (http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/) (accessed on 5 November 2019). Local BLASTP was performed using HD-ZIP protein sequences of Arabidopsis and HMM profile as queries against the proteome sequences of M. sinensis with an e-value cut-off at 1 × 10−5. The candidate sequences were filtered via an online conserved domain (CD) search at NCBI to confirm the HD and ZIP domains. For genes with several alternative splicing variants, only the longest sequence was retained. The closest MsHDZ orthologs to Arabidopsis were predicted via BLASTP searching against the Arabidopsis proteome sequences (V11.0) (https://www.arabidopsis.org/) (accessed on 21 November 2019).

4.2. Phylogenetic Analysis

The neighbor-joining (NJ) tree was constructed with MEGA software (V 11) [58] using the full-length sequences of HD-ZIP proteins of M. sinensis and Arabidopsis. The bootstrap analysis was carried out with 1000 replicates. Only support values higher than 50% were shown on the clades. The other parameters were adopted as default.

4.3. Plant Materials and Abiotic Stress Treatment

The M. sinensis plants were clonally propagated and transplanted into potting soil with comparable sizes. The soil was mainly composed of coconut bran, vermiculite, perlite, humus, and peat (3:1:2:2:12, w/w). After being grown for 2 months, the plants were irrigated with salt (0.3 M NaCl and 0.3 M Na2SO4), alkali (0.315 M Na2CO3 and 0.315 M NaHCO3), and mixed salt–alkali (0.15 M NaCl, 0.15 M Na2SO4, 0.15 M Na2CO3, and 0.15 M NaHCO3) solutions, respectively. For RNA-seq, the top three fully expanded leaves were collected at 0 and 6 h of each stress treatment. In the case of drought, the plants were grown for 2 months and then subjected to short-term (5 days) or long-term (10 days) drought conditions before being harvested for analysis.The transcriptome analysis was performed at BGI Tech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Each experiment was carried out with three replicates.

4.4. Plasmid Construction and Transformation of Arabidopsis

To create an MsHDZ23 OE construct, the coding region of MsHDZ23 was amplified via PCR and fused with six copies of the MYC tag at the N-terminus under the control of CaMV35S promoter in the modified PBI121-MYC vector with nptII (a kanamycin resistance gene) [59]. To investigate the expression pattern of MsHDZ23, a 2500 bp genomic DNA sequence from the promoter region of MsHDZ23 was inserted into the DX2181 vector with nptII to drive the GUS (β-glucuronidase) reporter gene. The constructs were transformed into Arabidopsis Columbia-0 (Col-0) or hb7 mutant (cs875449) using the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method [60]. The primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S2. Positive transgenic lines were screened on 1/2 MS plates containing the kanamycin (50 mg mL−1). Two homozygous MsHDZ23-OE lines or MsHDZ23-complemented hb7 lines were selected for phenotypic analysis under abiotic stress treatments.

4.5. Histochemical GUS Staining

The GUS expression patterns of ProMsHDZ23::GUS seedlings grown on 1/2 MS medium with different stress were analyzed. The GUS staining solution contained 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 0.5 mg mL−1 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl β-D-glucuronic acid, 0.1% Triton, and 0.5 mM each of potassium ferricyanide and ferrocyanide. Samples were vacuum infiltrated for 15 to 30 min and incubated at 37 °C for 16 to 24 h. After staining, plant tissues were then fixed in 4% formaldehyde, 50% ethanol, and 5% acetic acid, dehydrated in an ethanol series [61]. Observation was conducted with a light microscope (stemi 508; Zeiss; Suzhou, China).

4.6. Subcellular Localization

The full-length sequence (without the termination code) of MsHDZ23 was amplified and integrated into the pEarleyGate101 via the Gateway LR recombination reaction (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). The recombinant plasmid and empty vector were separately transformed into agrobacterium EHA105, then transiently expressed in tobacco leaves. The GFP fluorescence was detected using a confocal microscope (TCSsp5Ⅱ03040101, Leica; Wetzlar, Germany). Staining with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) was performed before observation.

4.7. Transactivation and Transcriptional Activation Analysis

For the transactivation assay, different truncations of MsHDZ23 were individually amplified and separately inserted into the pGBKT7 (Clontech; Dalian, China). Each recombinant construct and the empty vector were transformed into yeast AH109. Transformants were sequentially cultivated on SD/-Trp and SD/-Trp-His medium supplemented with 1 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (3-AT). The growth of yeast colonies and blue colors manifested by β-galactosidase activity against X-α-gal were observed after cultivation at 30 °C for 3 d [62].
Activation assays were carried out in protoplasts prepared from 4-week-old Arabidopsis seedlings grown under short-day conditions [63]. The DNA BD from GAL4 was used, and the GAL4 BD-MsHDZ23 fusion proteins could bind to the GAL4 DNA-binding sites of the GUS reporter. The known activator protein MYB3 and suppression protein MYB221 were used as a positive control. The GUS reporter containing four upstream GAL4 DNA-binding sites (GAL4 [4X]-D1-3[4X]-GUS), as well as the luciferase reporter, were cotransformed with GAL4 BD-OsGRF6 into Arabidopsis protoplasts. The GUS activity was quantified as described [64]. A plasmid carrying the luciferase gene under the control of the 35S promoter was used as an internal control to normalize the data for variations in the experiment [65].

4.8. Seedling Growth Assays

Seed germination assays were performed under various ABA (0.5 and 1.0 μM), NaHCO3 (7 mM), Mannitol (100 and 200 mM), and NaCl (50, 100, and 150 mM) treatments. The germination rates were calculated after cultivation for 5 d.
For root elongation assays, seedlings were vertically cultivated on 1/2 MS medium for 3 d, then moved to fresh 1/2 MS medium to grow vertically under ABA (0.5 and 1.0 μM) or NaCl (50, 100, and 150 mM) treatments. The length of primary root was measured after 7 d.

4.9. Evaluation of Drought, Salt, and Alkali Tolerance

For drought tolerance assay, seedlings were grown in soil under normal conditions for three weeks. Afterwards, water supply was withheld for 12 d. After re-watering for 3 d, the survival rate was calculated. Leaves were excised and air-dried for 6 h to measure the water loss rate, which was calculated as the proportion of weight loss at each designated time point to the initial weight. To evaluate the salt stress tolerance, first, the seedlings were grown in soil for three weeks, and then, they were adequately irrigated with a NaCl solution (200 mM) at 4 d intervals three times. To study the alkali stress tolerance, the seedlings were grown in the soil for three weeks and were then adequately irrigated with a NaHCO3 solution (150 mM) every 3 d for 12 d.

4.10. Physiological Measurements and Histochemical Assays

Leaf samples for physiological measurements and histochemical staining were collected from the above drought, salt, and alkali stress assays. The content of MDA was quantified using the previously described method [66]. The proline content was measured using the detection kit (Jiancheng BioEngineering Co., Nanjing, China). For measurement of chlorophyll content, 1 g of fresh leaf samples from genotypes were quickly homogenized in 0.5 mL of 100% acetone followed by addition of 1 mL of 80% acetone to determine the chlorophyll contents according to the method described by Cao et al. [44]. The absorbance values of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b were, respectively, measured at 663 and 645 nm using an ultraviolet spectro-photometer (UV-2550, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The enzymatic activities of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and superoxide (SOD) were measured using commercial detection kits (Jiancheng BioEngineering Co., China).
The in situ accumulation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide (O2•−) in leaves was determined via reactions against 1 mg mL−1 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) (pH 3.8) and 0.1 mg mL−1 nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) (pH 7.5) solution for 16 h. Following incubation, leaf chlorophyll was removed by soaking in 95% ethanol for 2 h to facilitate visualization. The appearance of brown or blue spots indicated the accumulation of H2O2 or O2•−, respectively.

4.11. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were carried out with three replicates, and data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The significance of differences between different genotypes was examined with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Duncan’s multiple range test with SPSS software (v18.0). Significant difference was assumed at p ≤ 0.05.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we functionally characterized MsHDZ23, a Miscanthus HD-ZIP TF, in the plant abiotic stress response. MsHDZ23 acts as a positive regulator of the plant abiotic stress response in transgenic Arabidopsis. MsHDZ23 is a nuclear-localized transcription activator. The overexpression of MsHDZ23 led to enhanced salt, alkali, and drought stress tolerance by stimulating anti-oxidative enzymes and ROS scavenging capability. The expression of MsHDZ23 was induced by ABA, suggesting that it possibly participate in the plant stress response via an ABA-dependent pathway. Importantly, the overexpression lines of MsHDZ23 showed no detrimental effects on plant growth or development under different stress conditions, indicating the potential of MsHDZ23 as a valuable candidate for improving abiotic stress tolerance in Miscanthus without compromising plant growth and productivity.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25063253/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.W., R.H. and G.Z.; Data curation, C.W. and N.L.; Funding acquisition, C.W. and G.Z.; Investigation, N.L., R.Y., G.H. and K.H.; Project administration, C.W. and G.Z.; Resources, G.H. and G.Z.; Software, W.D.; Writing—original draft, C.W.; Writing—review and editing, R.H., Y.K., X.T. and G.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Major Science and Technology Innovation Project of Shandong Province (2021SFGC0303, 2022LZGC018), the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA26050201-02), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972860, 32270273, and 31700526), Shandong Province Higher Education Institutions’ “Youth Innovation Team Plan” (2022KJ166), and Yellow River Delta Scholars (NO.DYRC20220109).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data in this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

The Miscanthus resources used in this manuscript were collected and managed by Gongli Zhou (Anxiang County Agriculture and Rural Bureau Seed Management Station).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sytar, O.; Ghosh, S.; Malinska, H.; Zivcak, M.; Brestic, M. Physiological and molecular mechanisms of metal accumulation in hyperaccumulator plants. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 173, 148–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bohnert, H.J.; Gong, Q.; Li, P.; Ma, S. Unraveling abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms–getting genomics going. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mehrotra, R.; Bhalothia, P.; Bansal, P.; Basantani, M.K.; Bharti, V.; Mehrotra, S. Abscisic acid and abiotic stress tolerance-Different tiers of regulation. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 486–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sah, S.K.; Reddy, K.R.; Li, J. Abscisic Acid and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sarvajeet, S.G.; Narendra, T. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar]
  6. Apel, K.; Hirt, H. Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 373–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lan Thi Hoang, X.; Du Nhi, N.H.; Binh Anh Thu, N.; Phuong Thao, N.; Phan Tran, L.S. Transcription Factors and Their Roles in Signal Transduction in Plants under Abiotic Stresses. Curr. Genom. 2017, 18, 483–497. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, H.Y.; Wang, H.L.; Shao, H.B.; Tang, X.L. Recent Advances in Utilizing Transcription Factors to Improve Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance by Transgenic Technology. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Agarwal, P.K.; Jha, B. Transcription factors in plants and ABA dependent and independent abiotic stress signalling. Biol. Plant. 2010, 54, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Y.X.; Yang, Z.R.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Guo, J.J.; Liu, L.L.; Wang, C.F.; Wang, B.S.; Han, G.L. The roles of HD-ZIP proteins in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1027071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xie, L.H.; Yan, T.X.; Li, L.; Chen, M.H.; Hassani, D.; Li, Y.P.; Qin, W.; Liu, H.; Chen, T.T.; Fu, X.Q.; et al. An HD-ZIP-MYB complex regulates glandular secretory trichome initiation in Artemisia annua. New Phytol. 2021, 231, 2050–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mehmood, M.; Khan, M.J.; Khan, M.J.; Akhtar, N.; Mughal, F.; Shah, S.T.A.; Hyder, M.Z.; Farrakh, S.; Sadiq, I. Systematic analysis of HD-ZIP transcription factors in sesame genome and gene expression profiling of SiHD-ZIP class I entailing drought stress responses at early seedling stage. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2022, 49, 2059–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tan, W.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, H.; Zheng, T.; Yin, Y.; Lin, H. Transcription factor HAT1 is a substrate of SnRK2.3 kinase and negatively regulates ABA synthesis and signaling in Arabidopsis responding to drought. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, T.; Longhurst, A.D.; Talavera-Rauh, F.; Hokin, S.A.; Barton, M.K. The Arabidopsis transcription factor ABIG1 relays ABA signaled growth inhibition and drought induced senescence. eLife 2016, 5, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, X.; Hou, Y.Y.; Li, M.N.; Zhang, F.; Yi, F.Y.; Kang, J.M.; Yang, Q.C.; Long, R.C. Overexpression of an ABA-inducible homeodomain-leucine zipper I gene MsHB7 confers salt stress sensitivity to alfalfa. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 177, 114463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sen, S.; Chakraborty, J.; Ghosh, P.; Basu, D.; Das, S. Chickpea WRKY70 Regulates the Expression of a Homeodomain-Leucine Zipper (HD-Zip) I Transcription Factor CaHDZ12, which Confers Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Transgenic Tobacco and Chickpea. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 1934–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sasaki, K.; Ida, Y.; Kitajima, S.; Kawazu, T.; Hibino, T.; Hanba, Y.T. Overexpressing the HD-Zip class II transcription factor EcHB1 from Eucalyptus camaldulensis increased the leaf photosynthesis and drought tolerance of Eucalyptus. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 14121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kovalchuk, N.; Chew, W.; Sornaraj, P.; Borisjuk, N.; Yang, N.N.; Singh, R.; Bazanova, N.; Shavrukov, Y.; Guendel, A.; Munz, E.; et al. The homeodomain transcription factor TaHDZipI-2 from wheat regulates frost tolerance, flowering time and spike development in transgenic barley. New Phytol. 2016, 211, 671–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, S.M.; Chen, N.; Li, F.F.; Mei, F.M.; Wang, Z.X.; Cheng, X.X.; Kang, Z.S.; Mao, H.D. Characterization of wheat homeo-domain-leucine zipper family genes and functional analysis of TaHDZ5-6A in drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 23. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yang, Y.F.; Luang, S.; Harris, J.; Riboni, M.; Li, Y.; Bazanova, N.; Hrmova, M.; Haefele, S.; Kovalchuk, N.; Lopato, S. Overexpression of the class I homeodomain transcription factor TaHDZipI-5 increases drought and frost tolerance in transgenic wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 1227–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Depège-Fargeix, N.; Javelle, M.; Chambrier, P.; Frangne, N.; Gerentes, D.; Perez, P.; Rogowsky, P.M.; Vernoud, V. Functional characterization of the HD-ZIP IV transcription factor OCL1 from maize. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhao, Y.; Ma, Q.; Jin, X.L.; Peng, X.J.; Liu, J.Y.; Deng, L.; Yan, H.W.; Sheng, L.; Jiang, H.Y.; Cheng, B.J. A Novel Maize Homeodomain–Leucine Zipper (HD-Zip) I Gene, Zmhdz10, Positively Regulates Drought and Salt Tolerance in Both Rice and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 1142–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qiu, X.; Wang, G.R.; Abou-Elwafa, S.F.; Fu, J.X.; Liu, Z.X.; Zhang, P.Y.; Xie, X.W.; Ku, L.X.; Ma, Y.; Guan, X.K.; et al. Genome-wide identification of HD-ZIP transcription factors in maize and their regulatory roles in promoting drought tolerance. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2022, 28, 425–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, S.; Haider, I.; Kohlen, W.; Jiang, L.; Bouwmeester, H.; Meijer, A.H.; Schluepmann, H.; Liu, C.-M.; Ouwerkerk, P.B.F. Function of the HD-Zip I gene Oshox22 in ABA-mediated drought and salt tolerances in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2012, 80, 571–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ding, Y.F.; Gong, S.H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, F.J.; Bao, H.; Sun, J.W.; Cai, C.; Yi, K.K.; Chen, Z.X.; Zhu, C. MicroRNA166 Modulates Cadmium Tolerance and Accumulation in Rice. Plant Physiol. 2018, 177, 1691–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bang, S.W.; Lee, D.K.; Jung, H.; Chung, P.J.; Kim, Y.S.; Choi, Y.D.; Suh, J.W.; Kim, J.K. Overexpression of OsTF1L, a rice HD-Zip transcription factor, promotes lignin biosynthesis and stomatal closure that improves drought tolerance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 17, 118–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dong, N.Q.; Sun, Y.W.; Guo, T.; Shi, C.L.; Zhang, Y.M.; Kan, Y.; Xiang, Y.H.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Y.B.; Li, Y.C.; et al. UDP-glucosyltransferase regulates grain size and abiotic stress tolerance associated with metabolic flux redirection in rice. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kaur, R.; Das, S.; Bansal, S.; Singh, G.; Sardar, S.; Dhar, H.; Ram, H. Heavy metal stress in rice: Uptake, transport, signaling, and tolerance mechanisms. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 173, 430–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Brosse, N.; Dufour, A.; Meng, X.; Sun, Q.; Ragauskas, A. Miscanthus: A fast-growing crop for biofuels and chemicals production. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefining 2012, 6, 580–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, W.C.; Kuan, W.C. Miscanthus as cellulosic biomass for bioethanol production. Biotechnol. J. 2015, 10, 840–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, S.-W.; Wu, L.-M.; Persson, S.; Peng, L.-C.; Feng, S.-Q. Sweet sorghum and Miscanthus: Two potential dedicated bioenergy crops in China. J. Integr. Agric. 2017, 16, 1236–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, W.; Mi, J.; Song, Z.; Yan, J.; Li, J.; Sang, T. Long-term water balance and sustainable production of Miscanthus energy crops in the Loess Plateau of China. Biomass-Bioenergy 2014, 62, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xue, S.; Lewandowski, I.; Wang, X.Y.; Yi, Z.L. Assessment of the production potentials of Miscanthus on marginal land in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 54, 932–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xu, Y.; Zheng, C.; Liang, L.; Yi, Z.L.; Xue, S. Quantitative assessment of the potential for soil improvement by planting Miscanthus on saline-alkaline soil and the underlying microbial mechanism. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy 2021, 13, 1191–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bevan, M.W.; Uauy, C.; Wulff, B.B.H.; Zhou, J.; Krasileva, K.; Clark, M.D. Genomic innovation for crop improvement. Nature 2017, 543, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chai, G.H.; Qi, G.; Cao, Y.P.; Wang, Z.G.; Yu, L.; Tang, X.F.; Yu, Y.C.; Wang, D.; Kong, Y.Z.; Zhou, G.K. Poplar PdC3H17 and PdC3H18 are direct targets of PdMYB3 and PdMYB21, and positively regulate secondary wall formation in Arabidopsis and poplar. New Phytol. 2014, 203, 520–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tang, X.; Zhuang, Y.; Qi, G.; Wang, D.; Liu, H.; Wang, K.; Chai, G.; Zhou, G. Poplar PdMYB221 is involved in the direct and indirect regulation of secondary wall biosynthesis during wood formation. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kotchoni, S.O.; Kuhns, C.; Ditzer, A.; Kirch, H.-H.; Bartels, D. Over-expression of different aldehyde dehydrogenase genes in Arabidopsis thaliana confers tolerance to abiotic stress and protects plants against lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 1033–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Weber, H.; Chételat, A.; Reymond, P.; Farmer, E.E. Selective and powerful stress gene expression in Arabidopsis in response to malondialdehyde. Plant J. 2004, 37, 877–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huang, X.-S.; Liu, J.-H.; Chen, X.-J. Overexpression of PtrABF gene, a bZIP transcription factor isolated from Poncirus trifoliata, enhances dehydration and drought tolerance in tobacco via scavenging ROS and modulating expression of stress-responsive genes. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jaspers, P.; KangasjcTrvi, J. Reactive oxygen species in abiotic stress signaling. Physiol. Plant. 2010, 138, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhao, Y.; Xu, T.; Shen, C.-Y.; Xu, G.-H.; Chen, S.-X.; Song, L.-Z.; Li, M.-J.; Wang, L.-L.; Zhu, Y.; Lv, W.-T.; et al. Identification of a Retroelement from the Resurrection Plant Boea hygrometrica That Confers Osmotic and Alkaline Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Guo, R.; Shi, L.; Yang, Y. Germination, Growth, Osmotic Adjustment and Ionic Balance of Wheat in Response to Saline and Alkaline Stresses; Taylor & Francis Group: Abingdon, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  44. Cao, L.; Yu, Y.; DuanMu, H.Z.; Chen, C.; Duan, X.B.; Zhu, P.H.; Chen, R.R.; Li, Q.; Zhu, Y.M.; Ding, X.D. A novel Glycine soja homeodomain-leucine zipper (HD-Zip) I gene, Gshdz4, positively regulates bicarbonate tolerance and responds to osmotic stress in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhu, D.; Bai, X.; Chen, C.; Chen, Q.; Cai, H.; Li, Y.; Ji, W.; Zhai, H.; Lv, D.; Luo, X.; et al. GsTIFY10, a novel positive regulator of plant tolerance to bicarbonate stress and a repressor of jasmonate signaling. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 77, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nie, G.; Liao, Z.; Zhong, M.; Zhou, J.; Cai, J.; Liu, A.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X. MicroRNA-Mediated Responses to Chromium Stress Provide Insight Into Tolerance Characteristics of Miscanthus sinensis. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 666117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mitros, T.; Session, A.M.; James, B.T.; Wu, G.A.; Belaffif, M.B.; Clark, L.V.; Shu, S.; Dong, H.; Barling, A.; Holmes, J.R.; et al. Genome biology of the paleotetraploid perennial biomass crop Miscanthus. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gao, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhang, K.; Li, F.; Wu, M.; Xiang, Y. A moso bamboo transcription factor, Phehdz1, positively regulates the drought stress response of transgenic rice. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 187–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Krasensky, J.; Jonak, C. Drought, salt, and temperature stress-induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1593–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Miller, G.; Suzuki, N.; Ciftci-Yilmaz, S.; Mittler, R. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 453–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ge, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhu, Y.-M.; Bai, X.; Lv, D.-K.; Guo, D.; Ji, W.; Cai, H. Global transcriptome profiling of wild soybean (Glycine soja) roots under NaHCO3treatment. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. DuanMu, H.; Wang, Y.; Bai, X.; Cheng, S.; Deyholos, M.K.; Wong, G.K.-S.; Li, D.; Zhu, D.; Li, R.; Yu, Y.; et al. Wild soybean roots depend on specific transcription factors and oxidation reduction related genesin response to alkaline stress. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2015, 15, 651–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Koropatkin, N.M.; Koppenaal, D.W.; Pakrasi, H.B.; Smith, T.J. The structure of a cyanobacterial bicarbonate transport protein, CmpA. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 2606–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, Y.; Yang, C.; Liu, G.; Jiang, J. Development of a cDNA microarray to identify gene expression of Puccinellia tenuiflora under saline–alkali stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2007, 45, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Prigge, M.J.; Otsuga, D.; Alonso, J.M.; Ecker, J.R.; Drews, G.N.; Clark, S.E. Class III homeodomain-leucine zipper gene family members have overlapping, antagonistic, and distinct roles in Arabidopsis development. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Chew, W.; Hrmova, M.; Lopato, S. Role of Homeodomain leucine zipper (HD-Zip) IV transcription factors in plant development and plant protection from deleterious environmental factors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 8122–8147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Khosla, A.; Paper, J.M.; Boehler, A.P.; Bradley, A.M.; Neumann, T.R.; Schrick, K. HD-Zip Proteins GL2 and HDG11 Have Redundant Functions in Arabidopsis Trichomes, and GL2 Activates a Positive Feedback Loop via MYB23. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 2184–2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhu, Z.; Sun, B.; Xu, X.; Chen, H.; Zou, L.; Chen, G.; Cao, B.; Chen, C.; Lei, J. Overexpression of AtEDT1/HDG11 in Chinese Kale (Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra) Enhances Drought and Osmotic Stress Tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1285. [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhao, X.; Xu, Y.; He, G.; He, K.; Xiao, L.; Hu, R.; Li, S. Genome-Wide Characterization and Expression Profiling of the GRAS Gene Family in Salt and Alkali Stresses in Miscanthus sinensis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Cheng, M.-C.; Liao, P.-M.; Kuo, W.-W.; Lin, T.-P. The Arabidopsis ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR1 Regulates Abiotic Stress-Responsive Gene Expression by Binding to Different cis-Acting Elements in Response to Different Stress Signals. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 1566–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yang, X.; He, K.; Chi, X.; Chai, G.; Wang, Y.; Jia, C.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, G.; Hu, R. Miscanthus NAC transcription factor MlNAC12 positively mediates abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2018, 277, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, H.; Guo, S.; Xu, Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, D.; Xu, S.; Zhang, C.; Chong, K. OsmiR396d-Regulated OsGRFs Function in Floral Organogenesis in Rice through Binding to Their Targets OsJMJ706 and OsCR4. Plant Physiol. 2014, 165, 160–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Jefferson, R.A.; Kavanagh, T.A.; Bevan, M.W. GUS fusions: Beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 1987, 6, 3901–3907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Draper, H.H.; Squires, E.J.; Mahmoodi, H.; Wu, J.; Agarwal, S.; Hadley, M. A comparative evaluation of thiobarbituric acid methods for the determination of malondialdehyde in biological materials. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 1993, 15, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 25 03253 g001
Figure 1. GUS expression in seedlings of Arabidopsis under various treatments. Transgenic Col-0 harboring MsHDZ23 promoter::GUS (the GUS reporter gene fused with the promoter sequence of −2500 bp from the first ATG) were analyzed after exposure to NaCl (A) (0, 100, and 150 mM), mannitol (B) (0, 150, and 200 mM), ABA (C) (0, 0.5, and 1 μM), and NaHCO3 (D) (0, 6, and 8 mM). The seedlings were grown on the normal 1/2 MS for 5 days and then moved to the treated medium for 7 days. Activation of the MsHDZ23 promoter was observed via GUS staining (blue). It should be noted that MsHDZ23 mainly dyes the leaves. The scale bar is 0.5 mm.
Figure 1. GUS expression in seedlings of Arabidopsis under various treatments. Transgenic Col-0 harboring MsHDZ23 promoter::GUS (the GUS reporter gene fused with the promoter sequence of −2500 bp from the first ATG) were analyzed after exposure to NaCl (A) (0, 100, and 150 mM), mannitol (B) (0, 150, and 200 mM), ABA (C) (0, 0.5, and 1 μM), and NaHCO3 (D) (0, 6, and 8 mM). The seedlings were grown on the normal 1/2 MS for 5 days and then moved to the treated medium for 7 days. Activation of the MsHDZ23 promoter was observed via GUS staining (blue). It should be noted that MsHDZ23 mainly dyes the leaves. The scale bar is 0.5 mm.
Ijms 25 03253 g001
Ijms 25 03253 g002
Figure 2. The MsHDZ23 protein has trans-activating activity and can be localized in the nucleus. (A) MsHDZ23 functions as a transcriptional activator. Arabidopsis leaf protoplasts were cotransfected with three reporter genes and one effector gene. The effector gene contains the yeast Gal4 BD fused in-frame with MsHDZ23, MYB221 (repressor control), or MYB3 (activator control). Data are the average of three independent experiments. (B) Subcellular localization of MsHDZ23. The recombinant vector pEarleyGate101-MsHDZ23-YFP and vector control were infiltrated into tobacco leaves separately. Fluorescence was observed under a laser scanning confocal microscope. DAPI staining indicates the location of cell nuclei. DIC: differential interference contrast. Bar = 100 μm. (C) Trans-activation activity assay of MsHDZ23 in yeast. Schematic diagram showing the structural domains in pGBKT7 of full-length (MsHDZ23-FL) and different truncated forms (N-terminal fragment, MsHDZ23-1, HOX structural domain, MsHDZ23-2, and C-terminal fragment, MsHDZ23-3) of MsHDZ23 fused to GAL4 DNA binding. The recombinant construct and pGBKT7 (negative control) were transformed into yeast strain AH109, respectively. The growth in the transformants was evaluated sequentially on SD/-Trp and SD/-Trp-His media. β-Galactosidase activity was assayed in the presence of X-α-gal substrate.
Figure 2. The MsHDZ23 protein has trans-activating activity and can be localized in the nucleus. (A) MsHDZ23 functions as a transcriptional activator. Arabidopsis leaf protoplasts were cotransfected with three reporter genes and one effector gene. The effector gene contains the yeast Gal4 BD fused in-frame with MsHDZ23, MYB221 (repressor control), or MYB3 (activator control). Data are the average of three independent experiments. (B) Subcellular localization of MsHDZ23. The recombinant vector pEarleyGate101-MsHDZ23-YFP and vector control were infiltrated into tobacco leaves separately. Fluorescence was observed under a laser scanning confocal microscope. DAPI staining indicates the location of cell nuclei. DIC: differential interference contrast. Bar = 100 μm. (C) Trans-activation activity assay of MsHDZ23 in yeast. Schematic diagram showing the structural domains in pGBKT7 of full-length (MsHDZ23-FL) and different truncated forms (N-terminal fragment, MsHDZ23-1, HOX structural domain, MsHDZ23-2, and C-terminal fragment, MsHDZ23-3) of MsHDZ23 fused to GAL4 DNA binding. The recombinant construct and pGBKT7 (negative control) were transformed into yeast strain AH109, respectively. The growth in the transformants was evaluated sequentially on SD/-Trp and SD/-Trp-His media. β-Galactosidase activity was assayed in the presence of X-α-gal substrate.
Ijms 25 03253 g002
Ijms 25 03253 g003
Figure 3. Overexpression of MsHDZ23 promotes seed germination under NaCl stress. (A) Germination assay under control and 100 mM NaCl treatment. Bar: 0.5 cm. (B) Quantification of greening cotyledon frequency under control, 50 mM, 100 mM, and 150 mM NaCl treatment. The greening cotyledon rate was calculated as the percentage of seedlings with green cotyledon out of the whole seedlings. Data represent the mean of three replicates with 40 seeds for each genotype. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Figure 3. Overexpression of MsHDZ23 promotes seed germination under NaCl stress. (A) Germination assay under control and 100 mM NaCl treatment. Bar: 0.5 cm. (B) Quantification of greening cotyledon frequency under control, 50 mM, 100 mM, and 150 mM NaCl treatment. The greening cotyledon rate was calculated as the percentage of seedlings with green cotyledon out of the whole seedlings. Data represent the mean of three replicates with 40 seeds for each genotype. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Ijms 25 03253 g003
Ijms 25 03253 g004
Figure 4. In transgenic Arabidopsis, overexpression of MsHDZ23 improves salt stress tolerance. (A) Performance of MsHDZ23 transgenesis lines, hb7 mutant, and WT plants under salt stress. Three-week-old plants were adequately irrigated with NaCl solution (150 mM) for 12 d. (B,C) Histochemical assays to detect the accumulation of H2O2 and O•2− via DAB (B) and NBT (C) staining under control and NaCl conditions. The scale bar is 0.5 mm. (D,E) Chlorophyll (D) and free proline (E) content of MsHDZ23 transgenesis lines, hb7 mutant and WT plants under NaCl treatments. (F–I) Quantification of MDA content and anti-oxidant enzyme activities. The MDA (F) level and enzymatic activities of SOD (G), POD (H), and CAT (I) were measured after 150 mM NaCl treatment for 12 d. Values are averages of three independent measurements. Error bars represent standard deviation. The different letters represent significant differences between lines (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 4. In transgenic Arabidopsis, overexpression of MsHDZ23 improves salt stress tolerance. (A) Performance of MsHDZ23 transgenesis lines, hb7 mutant, and WT plants under salt stress. Three-week-old plants were adequately irrigated with NaCl solution (150 mM) for 12 d. (B,C) Histochemical assays to detect the accumulation of H2O2 and O•2− via DAB (B) and NBT (C) staining under control and NaCl conditions. The scale bar is 0.5 mm. (D,E) Chlorophyll (D) and free proline (E) content of MsHDZ23 transgenesis lines, hb7 mutant and WT plants under NaCl treatments. (F–I) Quantification of MDA content and anti-oxidant enzyme activities. The MDA (F) level and enzymatic activities of SOD (G), POD (H), and CAT (I) were measured after 150 mM NaCl treatment for 12 d. Values are averages of three independent measurements. Error bars represent standard deviation. The different letters represent significant differences between lines (p ≤ 0.05).
Ijms 25 03253 g004
Ijms 25 03253 g005
Figure 5. Overexpression of MsHDZ23 promotes seed germination under NaHCO3 stress. (A) Germination assay under control and 7 mM NaHCO3 treatment. Bar: 0.5 cm. (B) Quantification of greening cotyledon frequency under control and 7 mM NaHCO3 treatment. The greening cotyledon rate was calculated as the percentage of seedlings with green cotyledon out of the whole seedlings. Data represent the mean of three replicates with 40 seeds for each genotype. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Figure 5. Overexpression of MsHDZ23 promotes seed germination under NaHCO3 stress. (A) Germination assay under control and 7 mM NaHCO3 treatment. Bar: 0.5 cm. (B) Quantification of greening cotyledon frequency under control and 7 mM NaHCO3 treatment. The greening cotyledon rate was calculated as the percentage of seedlings with green cotyledon out of the whole seedlings. Data represent the mean of three replicates with 40 seeds for each genotype. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Ijms 25 03253 g005
Ijms 25 03253 g006
Figure 6. Overexpression of MsHDZ23 improves alkali stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. (A) Performance of MsHDZ23 transgenesis lines, hb7 mutant lines, and WT plants under alkali stress. Three-week-old plants were adequately irrigated with NaHCO3 solution (150 mM) for 12 d. (B,C) Histochemical assays to detect the accumulation of H2O2 and O•2− via DAB (B) and NBT (C) staining under control and NaHCO3 conditions. The scale bar is 0.5 mm. (D,E) Chlorophyll (D) and free proline (E) content of MsHDZ23 transgenesis lines, hb7 mutant lines, and WT plants under NaHCO3 treatments. (F–I) Quantification of MDA content and anti-oxidant enzyme activities. The MDA (F) level and enzymatic activities of SOD (G), POD (H), and CAT (I) were measured after 150 mM NaHCO3 treatment for 12 d. Values are averages of three independent measurements. Error bars represent standard deviation. The different letters represent significant differences between lines (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 6. Overexpression of MsHDZ23 improves alkali stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. (A) Performance of MsHDZ23 transgenesis lines, hb7 mutant lines, and WT plants under alkali stress. Three-week-old plants were adequately irrigated with NaHCO3 solution (150 mM) for 12 d. (B,C) Histochemical assays to detect the accumulation of H2O2 and O•2− via DAB (B) and NBT (C) staining under control and NaHCO3 conditions. The scale bar is 0.5 mm. (D,E) Chlorophyll (D) and free proline (E) content of MsHDZ23 transgenesis lines, hb7 mutant lines, and WT plants under NaHCO3 treatments. (F–I) Quantification of MDA content and anti-oxidant enzyme activities. The MDA (F) level and enzymatic activities of SOD (G), POD (H), and CAT (I) were measured after 150 mM NaHCO3 treatment for 12 d. Values are averages of three independent measurements. Error bars represent standard deviation. The different letters represent significant differences between lines (p ≤ 0.05).
Ijms 25 03253 g006
Ijms 25 03253 g007
Figure 7. Overexpression of MsHDZ23 promotes seed germination under mannitol stress. (A) Germination assay under control and 200 mM mannitol treatment. (B) Quantification of greening cotyledon frequency under control, 100 mM, and 200 mM treatment. The greening cotyledon rate was calculated as the percentage of seedlings with green cotyledon out of the whole seedlings. Data represent the mean of three replicates with 40 seeds for each genotype. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Figure 7. Overexpression of MsHDZ23 promotes seed germination under mannitol stress. (A) Germination assay under control and 200 mM mannitol treatment. (B) Quantification of greening cotyledon frequency under control, 100 mM, and 200 mM treatment. The greening cotyledon rate was calculated as the percentage of seedlings with green cotyledon out of the whole seedlings. Data represent the mean of three replicates with 40 seeds for each genotype. Error bars represent standard deviation.
Ijms 25 03253 g007
Ijms 25 03253 g008
Figure 8. Overexpression of MsHDZ23 improves drought stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. (A) Drought stress tolerance assay. The MsHDZ23 transgenesis lines, hb7 mutant lines, and WT plants were grown normally for four weeks in soil. Water supply was withheld for 12 d, then followed by re-watering for recovery. Images were taken 3 d after recovery. (B) Water loss rates of MsHDZ23 transgenesis lines, hb7 mutant, and WT plant leaves. (C) Stomatal aperture of rosette leaves of MsHDZ23 transgenesis lines, hb7 mutant and WT plants under drought stress tolerance. Values are averages of three independent measurements. Error bars represent standard deviation. The different letters represent significant differences between lines (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 8. Overexpression of MsHDZ23 improves drought stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. (A) Drought stress tolerance assay. The MsHDZ23 transgenesis lines, hb7 mutant lines, and WT plants were grown normally for four weeks in soil. Water supply was withheld for 12 d, then followed by re-watering for recovery. Images were taken 3 d after recovery. (B) Water loss rates of MsHDZ23 transgenesis lines, hb7 mutant, and WT plant leaves. (C) Stomatal aperture of rosette leaves of MsHDZ23 transgenesis lines, hb7 mutant and WT plants under drought stress tolerance. Values are averages of three independent measurements. Error bars represent standard deviation. The different letters represent significant differences between lines (p ≤ 0.05).
Ijms 25 03253 g008
Ijms 25 03253 g009
Figure 9. MsHDZ23 overexpression confers ABA insensitivity in germination and root elongation. (A) Germination assay of MsHDZ23 transgenesis lines, hb7 mutant lines, and WT plants under control and 1 μM ABA treatment. (C–E) Quantification of greening cotyledon frequency under control, 0.5 μM, and 1 μM treatment. The greening cotyledon rate was calculated as the percentage of seedlings with green cotyledon out of the whole seedlings. Data represent the mean of three replicates with 40 seeds for each genotype. Error bars represent standard deviation. (B) Root elongation assay under ABA treatment. Images were taken 7 d after vertical cultivation. The scale bar is 1 cm. (F) Quantification of primary root length under different concentrations of ABA treatment (0, 0.5, 1 μM) for 5 d. Data represent the mean of three replicates with 20 plants for each genotype. Error bars indicate the standard deviation. The different letters represent significant differences between lines (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 9. MsHDZ23 overexpression confers ABA insensitivity in germination and root elongation. (A) Germination assay of MsHDZ23 transgenesis lines, hb7 mutant lines, and WT plants under control and 1 μM ABA treatment. (C–E) Quantification of greening cotyledon frequency under control, 0.5 μM, and 1 μM treatment. The greening cotyledon rate was calculated as the percentage of seedlings with green cotyledon out of the whole seedlings. Data represent the mean of three replicates with 40 seeds for each genotype. Error bars represent standard deviation. (B) Root elongation assay under ABA treatment. Images were taken 7 d after vertical cultivation. The scale bar is 1 cm. (F) Quantification of primary root length under different concentrations of ABA treatment (0, 0.5, 1 μM) for 5 d. Data represent the mean of three replicates with 20 plants for each genotype. Error bars indicate the standard deviation. The different letters represent significant differences between lines (p ≤ 0.05).
Ijms 25 03253 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, N.; Yu, R.; Deng, W.; Hu, R.; He, G.; He, K.; Kong, Y.; Tang, X.; Zhou, G.; Wang, C. MsHDZ23, a Novel Miscanthus HD-ZIP Transcription Factor, Participates in Tolerance to Multiple Abiotic Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3253. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063253

AMA Style

Liu N, Yu R, Deng W, Hu R, He G, He K, Kong Y, Tang X, Zhou G, Wang C. MsHDZ23, a Novel Miscanthus HD-ZIP Transcription Factor, Participates in Tolerance to Multiple Abiotic Stresses. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(6):3253. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063253

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Naixu, Ruikang Yu, Wendi Deng, Ruibo Hu, Guo He, Kang He, Yingzhen Kong, Xianfeng Tang, Gongke Zhou, and Congpeng Wang. 2024. "MsHDZ23, a Novel Miscanthus HD-ZIP Transcription Factor, Participates in Tolerance to Multiple Abiotic Stresses" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 6: 3253. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063253

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop