Next Article in Journal
Metabolite and Proteomic Profiling of Serum Reveals the Differences in Molecular Immunity between Min and Large White Pig Breeds
Next Article in Special Issue
Structural Insights into M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Signaling Bias between Gαq and β-Arrestin through BRET Assays and Molecular Docking
Previous Article in Journal
Dietary Protection against Cognitive Impairment, Neuroinflammation and Oxidative Stress in Alzheimer’s Disease Animal Models of Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammation
Previous Article in Special Issue
GB83, an Agonist of PAR2 with a Unique Mechanism of Action Distinct from Trypsin and PAR2-AP
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Starvation Induces Extracellular Accumulation of Polyphosphate in Dictyostelium discoideum to Inhibit Macropinocytosis, Phagocytosis, and Exocytosis

Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3474, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(6), 5923; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065923
Submission received: 16 February 2023 / Revised: 10 March 2023 / Accepted: 16 March 2023 / Published: 21 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue G Protein-Coupled Receptors 2023)

Abstract

:
Dictyostelium discoideum is a soil-dwelling unicellular eukaryote that accumulates extracellular polyphosphate (polyP). At high cell densities, when the cells are about to overgrow their food supply and starve, the corresponding high extracellular concentrations of polyP allow the cells to preemptively anticipate starvation, inhibit proliferation, and prime themselves to begin development. In this report, we show that starved D. discoideum cells accumulate cell surface and extracellular polyP. Starvation reduces macropinocytosis, exocytosis, and phagocytosis, and we find that these effects require the G protein-coupled polyP receptor (GrlD) and two enzymes, Polyphosphate kinase 1 (Ppk1), which is required for synthesizing intracellular polyP, cell surface polyP, and some of the extracellular polyP, and Inositol hexakisphosphate kinase (I6kA), which is required for cell surface polyP and polyP binding to cells, and some of the extracellular polyP. PolyP reduces membrane fluidity, and we find that starvation reduces membrane fluidity; this effect requires GrlD and Ppk1, but not I6kA. Together, these data suggest that in starved cells, extracellular polyP decreases membrane fluidity, possibly as a protective measure. In the starved cells, sensing polyP appears to decrease energy expenditure from ingestion, and decrease exocytosis, and to both decrease energy expenditures and retain nutrients.

1. Introduction

Eukaryotic cells possess the ability to uptake particles by phagocytosis or fluid by macropinocytosis. Phagocytosis and macropinocytosis share a common evolutionary origin, and these processes co-evolved as feeding mechanisms [1]. Dictyostelium discoideum is a soil amoeba that feeds on bacteria by phagocytosis [1,2,3]. Some D. discoideum strains can be grown axenically in a defined liquid nutrient medium, and these axenic strains possess an increased rate of macropinocytosis [4,5,6,7,8,9]. The axenic strains have a mutation in the gene encoding the Ras GTPase activating the protein Neurofibromin (NF1) that regulates both phagocytosis and macropinocytosis [10], and the loss of NF1 potentiates Ras activation at the sites where membrane ruffles form during macropinocytosis, thus increasing macropinocytosis [10]. Following endocytosis, the particle or fluid is transferred to lysosomes where the particle or fluid is digested, and the undigested material is then exocytosed [11,12].
In nutrient-rich conditions, D. discoideum exists as unicellular amoebae. Starvation initiates a developmental cycle where cells aggregate together to form a multicellular fruiting body consisting of a mass of spores held off the substrate by a column of stalk cells [13,14]. During development, starting 1 h after starvation, D. discoideum cells suppress macropinocytosis by ~80% [15], and after 6 h of starvation, D. discoideum cells suppress phagocytosis by ~50% [16]. At 8 h of starvation, most D. discoideum cells have almost completely reduced both macropinocytosis and phagocytosis [16]. However, during development, a small percentage of cells maintain high levels of phagocytosis and behave similar to immune cells that patrol the multicellular structures [17,18]. In addition, starting 1 h after starvation, D. discoideum cells reduce exocytosis, and at 4 h exocytosis is reduced by >50% [15]. How D. discoideum cells inhibit macropinocytosis, phagocytosis, and exocytosis during development remains unclear.
Polyphosphate (polyP) is a polymer of inorganic phosphate residues linked by phosphoanhydride bonds. PolyP is present in all life kingdoms [19], and it is involved in energy and phosphate storage, survival under stress conditions, and biofilm formation, and virulence in prokaryotes, and blood coagulation, inflammation, proliferation of leukemia cells, and bone calcification in eukaryotes [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Proliferating D. discoideum cells continuously secrete polyP, and when the cells have reached a high cell density where the cells will be about to overgrow their nutrient source, the corresponding high extracellular polyP concentrations inhibit proliferation, reduce phagocytosis, macropinocytosis, and exocytosis, and induce aggregation [24,27,28]. D. discoideum synthesizes some polyP using polyphosphate kinase 1 (Ppk1), a highly conserved enzyme in prokaryotes, and likely to have been acquired by D. discoideum through horizontal gene transfer [29,30]. D. discoideum cells lacking Ppk1 have undetectable levels of intracellular polyP [30], and reduced but detectable levels of extracellular polyP [27]. PolyP levels are also reduced in cells lacking inositol hexakisphosphate kinase A (I6kA), an enzyme that phosphorylates the inositol pyrophosphate IP6 to generate IP7 [27,31]. This suggests that both Ppk1 and I6kA are involved in polyP synthesis in D. discoideum and either of the enzymes might compensate for the loss of the other enzyme. PolyP shows saturable binding to D. discoideum, and the binding is lost in cells lacking the G protein-coupled receptor GrlD [32]. GrlD is required for polyP inhibition of proliferation [32]. In addition, GrlD, Ppk1, and I6kA are all required for polyP inhibition of macropinocytosis and exocytosis in proliferating cells [27,28]. Although polyP inhibits phagocytosis in proliferating cells [28], we do not know whether GrlD, Ppk1, or I6kA are required for this inhibition.
PolyP induces aggregation of D. discoideum cells even in the presence of nutrients [24], suggesting that high levels of extracellular polyP may act as a signal that lets cells sense that they are at a high cell density, and thus probably about to overgrow their food supply and starve. This, in turn, would allow cells to be able to anticipate starvation and begin development. Throughout development, D. discoideum cells accumulate high concentrations of intracellular polyP, and the concentrations reach > 100-fold in the fruiting body compared to vegetative cells [30,33].
Little is known about the function of polyP during D. discoideum development. In this report, we examined how D. discoideum regulates polyP production in response to starvation. We found that after 6 h of starvation, D. discoideum accumulates large amounts of secreted and cell-surface extracellular polyP, and the development-associated reduction in macropinocytosis, exocytosis, and phagocytosis requires GrlD, Ppk1, and I6kA. This then suggests that the development-associated reduction in macropinocytosis, exocytosis, and phagocytosis is caused by high extracellular levels of polyP sensed by the receptor GrlD.

2. Results

2.1. Starving D. discoideum Cells Require GrlD and Ppk1 to Accumulate Normal Levels of Extracellular and Cell Surface polyP, and I6kA to Accumulate Normal Levels of Cell Surface polyP

Proliferating D. discoideum cells accumulate extracellular polyP, and the extracellular polyP concentration reaches a maximum (~705 µg/mL) when the cell density reaches a maximum (stationary phase; ~2 × 107 cells/ml) [27]. Loss of either Ppk1 or I6kA reduces this accumulation by ~50%, although only at very high cell densities [27]. The cells then require GrlD to sense the extracellular polyP [32]. Starvation induces the accumulation of intracellular polyP in D. discoideum cells [30,33]. To determine if D. discoideum cells accumulate extracellular polyP during starvation, wild-type (WT) cells or cells lacking GrlD (grlD), polyphosphate kinase 1 (ppk1), or inositol hexakisphosphate kinase A (i6kA) were incubated for 6 h in the defined growth medium SIH, or the starvation buffer PBM. Conditioned medium (CM) was collected and clarified, and the polyP concentration was quantified by incubating CM with DAPI and measuring fluorescence at 550 nm after excitation at 415 nm [28,34]. As previously observed [27], mid-log phase WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells had comparable levels of extracellular polyP (Figure 1A). Compared with cells in SIH or cells starved for 2 h (Figure 1A,B), extracellular polyP levels in WT cells increased after 6 h in PBM (Figure 1B). Compared to WT cells, grlD and ppk1 cells accumulated less extracellular polyP after starvation for 6 h (Figure 1B). The i6kA cells had extracellular polyP concentrations similar to WT (Figure 1A,B). Together, these data suggest that D. discoideum cells accumulate extracellular polyP during the early stages of starvation, that I6kA is not necessary for this effect, and that Ppk1 mediates some but not all of the extracellular polyP accumulation. It is likely that because sensing polyP is needed for cells to accumulate polyP, cells also require GrlD to increase extracellular polyP at 6 h of starvation.
PolyP forms condensed spherical nanoparticles on the surface of activated human platelets [35]. Cell-surface-associated polyP can be detected with the cell-impermeable high affinity nucleic acid stain SYTOX [35]. To determine if extracellular polyP is present on the cell surface, cells were stained with SYTOX. We found that WT cells starved for 6 h showed increased SYTOX staining compared to cells in SIH (Figure 1C,D). To determine if the SYTOX staining was due to nucleic acid that is present on the cell surface, for instance due to release from dead cells, WT cells were starved in PBM for 5.5 h, then ribonuclease (RNase) or deoxyribonuclease (DNase) were added to cells, and the cells were incubated for 30 min, and then SYTOX staining of the cells was performed. We also tested the enzymatic activity of RNase and DNase by incubating RNA or DNA with RNase or DNase at the concentration that was used to treat the cells. At concentrations where the RNase or DNase completely digested RNA or DNA, respectively (Figure 2A), RNase or DNase did not significantly affect the fluorescence intensity of the SYTOX staining (Figure 2B), suggesting that the fluorescence on cells from SYTOX staining is not due to the presence of extraneous nucleic acids, but likely due to the presence of polyP.
In the control assays for Figure 1C,D, cells were incubated in PBM in the presence of 5 µg/mL of yeast exopolyphosphatase (PPX), an enzyme that degrades polyP by removing terminal phosphate residues [36]. At 2 and 3 h of incubation, the SYTOX staining was slightly higher in the PPX-treated group than in the cells incubated in SIH or PBM alone. It is possible that D. discoideum might compensate for an initial loss of polyP when exposed to PPX by synthesizing more polyP. However, in cells incubated in PBM with PPX at 6 h, the fluorescence intensity of the SYTOX staining was significantly lower than in the cells incubated in SIH or PBM alone (Figure 1C). This suggests that cells do not compensate for a persistent degradation of extracellular polyp or cannot maintain high levels of production, and that the SYTOX staining at 6 h of starvation may be due to polyP on the cells. In SIH, ppk1 and i6kA appeared to have decreased SYTOX staining, but this was not statistically significant (Figure 1D). For cells starved for 6 h, compared to WT cells, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells showed decreased SYTOX staining (Figure 1D). These data suggest that in addition to the accumulation of extracellular polyP at 6 h of starvation, D. discoideum cells accumulate cell surface polyP at 6 h of starvation, and that this process is potentiated by GrlD, Ppk1, and I6kA.

2.2. Cells Require GrlD and I6kA to Bind Exogenous polyP

WT D. discoideum cells bind extracellular polyP, and the loss of GrlD reduces the binding of polyP to cells [27,32]. To test if the binding of extracellular polyP to WT cells increases the SYTOX staining, cells in SIH were incubated with exogenous polyP and incubated with SYTOX. As in Figure 1D, in SIH in the absence of exogenous polyP, WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells showed similar levels of SYTOX staining. Incubation with exogenous polyP increased the SYTOX staining of WT and ppk1 cells, but not grlD or i6kA cells (Figure 2C,D). Together, the data suggest that SYTOX shows a basal staining on cells, and that GrlD and I6kA are needed for cells to bind additional exogenous polyP.

2.3. Starvation Reduces the Cell Membrane Fluidity of D. discoideum Cells, and This Requires GrlD and Ppk1

Cell membrane physical properties such as membrane fluidity are important regulators of endocytosis and exocytosis in mammalian cells [37,38]. We previously observed that in SIH (where cells are unstarved and vegetative), WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells have similar membrane fluidity, that polyP decreases membrane fluidity of WT cells, and that this requires GrlD, Ppk1, and I6kA [28]. Compared to WT and i6kA cells in SIH [28] or freshly starved WT cells, WT and i6kA cells starved for 6 h showed a decreased membrane fluidity as indicated by an increased half-life of recovery, decreased diffusion coefficient, and decreased mobile fraction (Figure 3A,B). Compared with cells in SIH ([28] and Figure 3B), the grlD and ppk1 cells starved for 6 h did not show decreased membrane fluidity (Figure 3B). Together, these data suggest that starvation reduces cell membrane fluidity in D. discoideum cells, and that this effect requires GrlD and Ppk1 but not I6kA.

2.4. Starving D. discoideum Cells Require GrlD, Ppk1, and I6kA to Reduce Macropinocytosis and Nutrient Retention

As previously observed [15,28], starvation for 6 h decreased macropinocytosis of TRITC-dextran in WT cells (Figure 4A). Starvation increased macropinocytosis in grlD cells and had no significant effect on ppk1 and i6kA cells (Figure 4A). Starvation reduces exocytosis [15], and in agreement with this we observed that after ingesting TRITC-dextran, and subsequently allowing 1 h for excretion of ingested TRITC-dextran, WT cells starved for 6 h retained more TRITC-dextran than freshly starved cells (Figure 4B). Starvation for 6 h did not significantly affect the retention of TRITC-dextran by grlD, ppk1, or i6kA cells (Figure 4B). These results indicate that at 6 h after starvation, cells require GrlD, Ppk1, and I6kA to reduce macropinocytosis, decrease exocytosis, and increase retention of materials ingested by macropinocytosis.

2.5. Starving D. discoideum Cells Require GrlD, Ppk1, and I6kA to Reduce Phagocytosis

As with macropinocytosis (Figure 4A), and as previously observed [16], starvation for 6 h modestly reduced the net phagocytosis of yeast bioparticles in a population of WT cells (Figure 4C and Figure S1E). Analyzing the same data for the percentage of cells ingesting bioparticles, this was not accompanied by a reduced percentage of cells with phagocytosed yeast (Figure 4D and Figure S1E). Starvation for 6 h increased both phagocytosis and the percent of cells with phagocytosed yeast in grlD and ppk1 cells, but had no significant effect in i6kA cells (Figure 4C,D and Figure S1D–F).

2.6. Cells Lacking GrlD or Ppk1 Are Abnormally Large

At 6 h of starvation, grlD and ppk1 cells had increased macropinocytosis and phagocytosis compared with WT cells, but no significant change in retention of ingested TRITC-dextran (Figure 4A–C). Although during starvation there is probably little nutrients for cells to uptake by phagocytosis, the increased macropinocytosis of grlD and ppk1 cells might increase their mass. To examine this, WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA were starved, and cell size, cell mass, and total protein content were measured. Although grlD and ppk1 cells tended to be larger and have more mass than WT cells (Figure 5A–C), their mass did not significantly increase from 0 to 6 h compared to WT cells, suggesting that the increased macropinocytosis of grlD and ppk1 cells did not cause them to significantly gain additional mass over the first 6 h of starvation. Compared with WT cells, grlD cells had more total protein content at all times examined, probably because they are intrinsically larger cells, and ppk1 cells had more protein at 3 and 6 h of starvation (Figure 5D), suggesting that for unknown reasons, they convert nutrient stores to protein.

3. Discussion

PolyP is an autocrine signaling molecule in D. discoideum. Cells growing in the presence of nutrients (vegetative cells) secrete polyP, and at high cell densities where the cells are about to overgrow their food source, the concomitant high extracellular concentrations of polyP inhibit cell proliferation without compromising cell growth [27]. PolyP also primes cells to anticipate starvation and prepare them to enter starvation-induced development [24]. Here, we showed that starved D. discoideum cells accumulate soluble and cell surface polyP and can bind exogenous polyP. PolyP inhibits the membrane fluidity of vegetative cells [28], and here we observed that compared to vegetative cells, starved cells have a decreased membrane fluidity.
Ppk1 synthesizes polyP, and as expected cells lacking Ppk1 have reduced accumulation of both extracellular and cell surface polyP during starvation. PolyP decreases membrane fluidity, and so also as expected, ppk1 cells do not decrease membrane fluidity during starvation. Supporting the idea that polyP mediates the starvation-induced decrease in macropinocytosis, phagocytosis, and exocytosis, ppk1 cells do not exhibit these decreases. Compared to WT cells, ppk1 cells have reduced binding of exogenous polyP, suggesting the possibility that polyP increases levels of the receptor that binds polyP.
GrlD is the receptor that binds and senses polyP, and as expected starved grlD cells show reduced binding of exogenous polyP. Unexpectedly, the grlD cells do not accumulate either extracellular or cell-surface polyP, suggesting that there exists some sort of feedback mechanism where sensing some polyP is needed to accumulate extracellular polyP. This might prevent cells from wasting energy releasing polyP in a situation where the cell is in an environment such as a rainstorm where the polyP will be immediately washed away. As a result of either not sensing or not accumulating extracellular polyP, cells lacking GrlD do not decrease membrane fluidity, macropinocytosis, phagocytosis, and exocytosis during starvation, further supporting the idea that sensing extracellular polyP mediates these decreases.
Along with Ppk1, I6kA is involved in the accumulation of polyP in vegetative cells, and in starved i6kA cells we observed normal levels of extracellular polyP but reduced levels of cell surface polyP. An intriguing possibility is that I6kA generates a polyP that has an inositol at one end, and that the cell surface polyP is associated with this hypothetical modified polyP. The i6kA cells show reduced binding of exogenous polyP, suggesting that I6kA affects the GrlD receptor directly, or that cell-surface polyP is needed for GrlD localization to the cell surface, or that cell-surface polyP is needed for GrlD function. Cells lacking I6kA show a normal decrease in membrane fluidity at 6 h of starvation, but do not decrease macropinocytosis, phagocytosis, and exocytosis. This then indicates that during starvation, the increase in cell surface polyP is not responsible for the decrease in membrane fluidity, and that reduced cell surface polyP but not altered membrane fluidity is not responsible for the starvation effects on macropinocytosis, phagocytosis, and exocytosis.
High levels of polyP increase the size and mass of vegetative cells [27]. This would initially suggest that grlD cells that do not sense polyP [32], and ppk1 cells, which make no detectable intracellular polyP [30] and have ~a 50% reduction in extracellular polyP [27], would tend to be small. However, we observed that vegetative and starved grlD and ppk1 cells are abnormally large. Both grlD and ppk1 cells are defective in cytokinesis and are multinucleate, which can cause cells to become abnormally large [29,39]. For the grlD cells, one possible explanation is these cells sense that there is an abnormally low level of extracellular polyP, and as a result the grlD cells inappropriately sense that they have become isolated from a colony of other cells, and decrease cytokinesis and thus increase cell size and nutrient reserves in response to this abnormal situation. For the ppk1 cells, one possible explanation is that making polyP is energetically costly, and not making intracellular polyP allows the ppk1 cells to be larger than WT cells; another possibility is that polyP helps cytokinesis and thus there is defective cytokinesis in the ppk1 cells. Together, these results suggest that in addition to acting as a cell density sensing signal during growth, polyP has significant functions as a signal during development.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. D. discoideum Cell Culture

WT AX2 (DBS0237699) [4], grlD (DBS0350227) [39], ppk1 (DBS0350686) [30], and i6kA (DBS0236426) [40] D. discoideum strains were obtained from the Dictyostelium Stock Center [41]. D. discoideum cell cultures were maintained at 21 °C in type 353003 tissue culture dishes (Corning, Durham, NC, USA) in 10 mL of SIH defined minimal medium (Formedium, Norfolk, UK) under no selection (AX2) or selection with 5 µg/mL blasticidin (grlD, ppk1, and i6kA). Cells were also grown on SM/5 agar [42] on lawns of E. coli DB (DBS0350636) in a type 25384-302 Petri dish (VWR, Radnor, PA). 100 µg/mL dihydrostreptomycin and 100 µg/mL ampicillin were used to kill E. coli in D. discoideum cultures obtained from SM/5 agar [43]. D. discoideum cells from 80–90% confluent cultures in a tissue culture dish were collected using a sterile glass pipette, transferred to 15 mL conical tubes (Falcon, VWR), washed 2 times with SIH by centrifugation at 500× g for 5 min, the cell density was measured with a hemocytometer, and 300 µL of cells at 1 × 106 cells/mL was transferred to the well of a type 353219 96-well, black/clear, tissue culture treated plate (Corning) to obtain 3 × 105 cells per well, or 1 mL was transferred to the well of a type 353047 24-well tissue culture plate (Corning) to obtain 106 cells per well. For starvation assays, D. discoideum cells in a 96-well, black/clear, tissue culture treated plate or a 24-well tissue culture plate were washed twice with PBM (20 mM KH2PO4, 0.01 mM CaCl2, and 1 mM MgCl2, pH adjusted to 6.1 with KOH) by centrifuging the plate at 500× g for 3 min and replacing the supernatant with fresh PBM, and cells were incubated for 0, 1, 3, and 6 h for starvation. The 24- and 96-well plates with cells were incubated in a Tupperware container with wet paper towels for humidity.

4.2. Recombinant Polyphosphatase Purification and polyP Concentration Measurement

Recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae exopolyphosphatase (PPX) [36,44] was purified following the method described for the purification of recombinant autocrine proliferation repressor protein AprA [45]. D. discoideum cells and culture supernatants were treated with PPX as previously described [46]. PolyP concentrations were determined in conditioned medium (CM) following [28]. Briefly, cultures of cells growing in SIH, or starved in PBM for the indicated times (both in stationary submerged culture as described above) were gently swirled and the supernatant was collected. This was then clarified by centrifugation at 300× g for 5 min. The supernatant was then clarified by centrifugation at 12,000× g for 2 min, and the supernatant was collected and designated CM. The CM was incubated with 25 µg/mL DAPI (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) for 5 min at room temperature, and fluorescence was measured at 550 nm after exciting at 415 nm. PolyP standards (Spectrum, Cat# S0169; New Brunswick, NJ, USA) were used to determine the concentration of polyP in the CMs.

4.3. PolyP Binding Assay and SYTOX Staining of Membrane-Bound polyP

PolyP binding assays were performed as previously described [32], except that tag-free polyP was utilized instead of biotinylated polyP, and the bound polyP was stained with the polyP-binding fluorescent dye SYTOX as previously described [35]. Briefly, D. discoideum cells in a 96-well, black/clear, tissue culture-treated plate were spun down at 500× g for 3 min. The SIH medium was replaced with fresh SIH medium containing 705 µg/mL polyP and incubated for 3 min. Cells were spun down at 500× g for 3 min and the medium was replaced with fresh SIH. This step was repeated twice to remove unbound polyP. SIH medium containing 1.5 µM SYTOX (Cat#S7020, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was added to the cells and incubated for 10 min, and images were taken using a 40× objective on a Nikon Eclipse Ti2 inverted microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY, USA). Deconvolution of images was carried out using the Richardson-Lucy algorithm [47] in Nikon NIS-Elements AR software. The fluorescence intensity of SYTOX staining was analyzed by ImageJ [48]. SYTOX staining of cells in SIH or cells starved in PBM for 2, 3, or 6 h was performed as described above but in the absence of added exogenous polyP. Where indicated, 5 µg/mL PPX was added to the cells incubated in the PBM during the 2, 3, or 6 h of starvation.

4.4. DNase and RNase Treatments

Cells were starved in PBM for 5.5 h in a 96-well, black/clear, tissue culture-treated plate as described above and 50 µg/mL RNase (Cat#109142, Roche CustomBiotech, Indianapolis, IN, USA) or 50 µg/mL DNase (04536282001, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) were added to cells, and the cells were incubated for 30 min, SYTOX staining of the cells was performed, and images of the cells were taken as described above. To test the enzymatic activity of RNase and DNase, 1 µg of total RNA isolated from WT D. discoideum cells as previously described [49] or 1 µg of a plasmid DNA PDM232 [50] was incubated without or with 50 µg/mL of RNase or DNase, respectively, for 45 min at room temperature, and resolved by 0.7% agarose gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide stain [51].

4.5. Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching (FRAP)

Photobleaching assays to measure the cell membrane fluidity were performed as previously described [28,52], except that the D. discoideum cells were starved in PBM buffer for the indicated times.

4.6. Macropinocytosis and Exocytosis Assays

For both macropinocytosis and exocytosis, tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate–dextran (TRITC-dextran) (T1162-100MG, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO. USA) was used to visualize ingestion and retention in adhered D. discoideum cells [28,53]. For macropinocytosis, cells were starved in a 24-well plate in PBM with 5 µL of 1 mg/mL TRITC-dextran for 1 h to allow macropinocytosis of the TRITC-dextran. After 1 h, the cells incubated with TRITC-dextran were spun down at 500× g for 3 min, the supernatant was replaced with fresh PBM, and this step was repeated twice. Cells were gently washed off of the bottom of the plate with 200 µL PBM. The median fluorescence of the live cell population was recorded using the PE-A fluorescence gate on a Accuri C6 flow cytometer (BD, San Jose, CA, USA). The same procedure was repeated for the 6 h starved cells by adding TRITC-dextran at 6 h of starvation and collecting the cells at 7 h.
The exocytosis assay was performed similarly to the endocytosis assay. Freshly starved cells were incubated with TRITC-dextran for 1 h, and the cells were washed 3 times with PBM as above, an aliquot of cells was collected and the fluorescence of the retained ingested TRITC-dextran was measured using the flow cytometer, and 1 mL of PBM was then added to the remaining cells to allow exocytosis. After 1 h, cells were collected, and the fluorescence of the retained ingested TRITC-dextran was measured. Similarly, cells starved for 6 h were incubated with TRITC-dextran for 1 h, and the cells were washed as above with PBM, and 1 mL of conditioned medium collected from cells starved for 6 h in PBM in a separate culture were added to the cells with ingested TRITC-dextran to allow exocytosis for 1 h. The percentage of TRITC-dextran retained after exocytosis was calculated from the median fluorescence of the ingested TRITC-dextran in the cells that were allowed to exocytose for 1 h divided by the median fluorescence of the ingested TRITC-dextran in the cells that were not allowed to exocytose.

4.7. Phagocytosis Assay

D. discoideum cells were starved for 0 and 6 h, as described above. The cells were collected and 800 µL was used to measure background fluorescence intensity in the PerCP-A channel in the Accuri C6 flow cytometer. The remaining 200 µL in the wells were incubated with 5 µL of 1 mg/mL of Alexa 594-labeled Zymosan-A yeast BioParticles (Cat#Z23374, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in PBM and allowed to phagocytose for 1 h. Cells were collected, and the fluorescence of the live cell population was measured using the fluorescence gating for Alexa 594 on the flow cytometer (Supplementary Figure S1). D. discoideum cells were identified and gated by their size and granularity as indicated by P7 in Supplementary Figure S1A. D. discoideum cells without phagocytosed yeast, only yeast, or D. discoideum cells with phagocytosed yeast were identified by their size and fluorescence (Supplementary Figure S1B–D). This generated the graphs showing a histogram of fluorescence intensity on the x-axis and number of events (cells) on the y-axis (Supplementary Figure S1E–H). Using the Alexa Fluor 594 fluorescence channel, a linear marker gate was drawn to encompass 100% of the cells in the histogram. The fluorescence intensities of the D. discoideum cells with phagocytosed yeast were then analyzed for the median fluorescence intensities, which were then normalized to the median fluorescence intensities of the 0 hour starved WT D. discoideum cells with the phagocytosed yeast (Figure 4C).The percentages of D. discoideum cells with phagocytosed yeast were also analyzed from the histograms by counting the number of cells in the high fluorescence peak area (bars in Supplementary Figure S1E–H) as a percentage of the total number of cells.

4.8. Cell Size, Mass, and Protein Determination

To determine cell size, mass, and total protein content, 50 mL of cells at 1 × 106 cells/mL were starved as described above in a shaking culture for 0, 1, 3, or 6 h. For cell size measurement, at each time point, 100 µL of cells were transferred to a 96-well, black/clear, tissue-culture-treated plate, and images of cells were taken using a 40× objective on a Nikon Eclipse Ti2 inverted microscope. Cell sizes were measured using Fiji (ImageJ; NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). At least 50 cells from each of three independent experiments were used to measure cell size.
For cell mass and total protein content measurement, cells from 10 mL starved cells were collected by centrifugation at 500× g for 3 min. The pellet was resuspended in approximately 500 µL of residual PBM and transferred to microcentrifuge tubes. The cells were collected by centrifugation at 3000× g for 3 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the cell pellets were weighed. The total protein content of cells was determined as previously described [54].

4.9. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 9 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) and the tests indicated in the figure legends. A p < 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24065923/s1, Figure S1: Starving D. discoideum cells require GrlD, Ppk1, and I6kA to reduce phagocytosis.

Author Contributions

R.R. designed, performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the paper. I.I. and S.J. performed experiments, and R.H.G. coordinated the study and wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants GM118355 and GM139486.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Further information and requests for reagents may be directed to, and will be fulfilled by, the authors Ramesh Rijal ([email protected]) and Richard Gomer ([email protected]).

Acknowledgments

We thank Darrell Pilling for assisting with the flow cytometry assays and data analysis. The use of the Microscopy and Imaging Center facility at Texas A&M University is acknowledged. The Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope acquisition was supported by the Office of the Vice President for Research at Texas A&M University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

References

  1. Cardelli, J. Phagocytosis and macropinocytosis in Dictyostelium: Phosphoinositide-based processes, biochemically distinct. Traffic 2001, 2, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vuillemin, P. Une Acrasiee bacteriophage. C. R. S Eances L’acad. Emie Sci. Paris 1903, 137, 387–389. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cosson, P.; Soldati, T. Eat, kill or die: When amoeba meets bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2008, 11, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Watts, D.; Ashworth, J. Growth of myxamoebae of the cellular slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum in axenic culture. Biochem. J. 1970, 119, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Franke, J.; Kessin, R. A defined minimal medium for axenic strains of Dictyostelium discoideum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1977, 74, 2157–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Watts, D. Vitamin requirements for growth of Myxamoebae of Dictyostelium discoideum in a defined medium. Microbiology 1977, 98, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sussman, R.; Sussman, M. Cultivation of Dictyostelium discoideum in axenic medium. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1967, 29, 53–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hacker, U.; Albrecht, R.; Maniak, M. Fluid-phase uptake by macropinocytosis in Dictyostelium. J. Cell Sci. 1997, 110 Pt 2, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Loomis, W.F., Jr. Sensitivity of Dictyostelium discoideum to nucleic acid analogues. Exp. Cell Res. 1971, 64, 484–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bloomfield, G.; Traynor, D.; Sander, S.P.; Veltman, D.M.; Pachebat, J.A.; Kay, R.R. Neurofibromin controls macropinocytosis and phagocytosis in Dictyostelium. Elife 2015, 4, e04940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Maniak, M. Fusion and fission events in the endocytic pathway of Dictyostelium. Traffic 2003, 4, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Neuhaus, E.M.; Almers, W.; Soldati, T. Morphology and dynamics of the endocytic pathway in Dictyostelium discoideum. Mol. Biol. Cell 2002, 13, 1390–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Raper, K.B. Dictyostelium discoideum, a new species of. J. Agric. Res. 1935, 50, 135. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kessin, R.H. Dictyostelium: Evolution, Cell Biology, and the Development of Multicellularity; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2001; Volume 38. [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith, E.W.; Lima, W.C.; Charette, S.J.; Cosson, P. Effect of starvation on the endocytic pathway in Dictyostelium cells. Eukaryot. Cell 2010, 9, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Katoh, M.; Chen, G.; Roberge, E.; Shaulsky, G.; Kuspa, A. Developmental commitment in Dictyostelium discoideum. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 2038–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Zhang, X.; Zhuchenko, O.; Kuspa, A.; Soldati, T. Social amoebae trap and kill bacteria by casting DNA nets. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Chen, G.; Zhuchenko, O.; Kuspa, A. Immune-like phagocyte activity in the social amoeba. Science 2007, 317, 678–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Rao, N.N.; Gomez-Garcia, M.R.; Kornberg, A. Inorganic polyphosphate: Essential for growth and survival. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009, 78, 605–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kornberg, A.; Rao, N.N.; Ault-Riche, D. Inorganic polyphosphate: A molecule of many functions. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1999, 68, 89–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Crooke, E.; Akiyama, M.; Rao, N.N.; Kornberg, A. Genetically altered levels of inorganic polyphosphate in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 6290–6295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rashid, M.H.; Rumbaugh, K.; Passador, L.; Davies, D.G.; Hamood, A.N.; Iglewski, B.H.; Kornberg, A. Polyphosphate kinase is essential for biofilm development, quorum sensing, and virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 9636–9641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Schroder, H.C.; Kurz, L.; Muller, W.E.; Lorenz, B. Polyphosphate in bone. Biochem. C/C Biokhimiia 2000, 65, 296–303. [Google Scholar]
  24. Suess, P.M.; Watson, J.; Chen, W.; Gomer, R.H. Extracellular polyphosphate signals through Ras and Akt to prime Dictyostelium discoideum cells for development. J. Cell Sci. 2017, 130, 2394–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Hassanian, S.M.; Avan, A.; Ardeshirylajimi, A. Inorganic polyphosphate: A key modulator of inflammation. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2017, 15, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Smith, S.A.; Mutch, N.J.; Baskar, D.; Rohloff, P.; Docampo, R.; Morrissey, J.H. Polyphosphate modulates blood coagulation and fibrinolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 903–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Suess, P.M.; Gomer, R.H. Extracellular Polyphosphate Inhibits Proliferation in an Autocrine Negative Feedback Loop in Dictyostelium discoideum. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 20260–20269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Rijal, R.; Kirolos, S.A.; Rahman, R.J.; Gomer, R.H. Dictyostelium discoideum cells retain nutrients when the cells are about to outgrow their food source. J. Cell Sci. 2022, 135, jcs260107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, H.; Gomez-Garcia, M.R.; Shi, X.; Rao, N.N.; Kornberg, A. Polyphosphate kinase 1, a conserved bacterial enzyme, in a eukaryote, Dictyostelium discoideum, with a role in cytokinesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 16486–16491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Livermore, T.M.; Chubb, J.R.; Saiardi, A. Developmental accumulation of inorganic polyphosphate affects germination and energetic metabolism in Dictyostelium discoideum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 996–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Saiardi, A.; Erdjument-Bromage, H.; Snowman, A.M.; Tempst, P.; Snyder, S.H. Synthesis of diphosphoinositol pentakisphosphate by a newly identified family of higher inositol polyphosphate kinases. Curr. Biol. 1999, 9, 1323–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Suess, P.M.; Tang, Y.; Gomer, R.H. The putative G protein-coupled receptor GrlD mediates extracellular polyphosphate sensing in Dictyostelium discoideum. Mol. Biol. Cell 2019, 30, 1118–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Klein, G.; Cotter, D.A.; Martin, J.B.; Bof, M.; Satre, M. Germination of Dictyostelium discoideum spores. A phosphorus-31 NMR analysis. Biochemistry 1988, 27, 8199–8203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Aschar-Sobbi, R.; Abramov, A.Y.; Diao, C.; Kargacin, M.E.; Kargacin, G.J.; French, R.J.; Pavlov, E. High sensitivity, quantitative measurements of polyphosphate using a new DAPI-based approach. J. Fluoresc. 2008, 18, 859–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Verhoef, J.J.; Barendrecht, A.D.; Nickel, K.F.; Dijkxhoorn, K.; Kenne, E.; Labberton, L.; McCarty, O.J.; Schiffelers, R.; Heijnen, H.F.; Hendrickx, A.P.; et al. Polyphosphate nanoparticles on the platelet surface trigger contact system activation. Blood 2017, 129, 1707–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wurst, H.; Kornberg, A. A soluble exopolyphosphatase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Purification and characterization. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 10996–11001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ben-Dov, N.; Korenstein, R. Proton-induced endocytosis is dependent on cell membrane fluidity, lipid-phase order and the membrane resting potential. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1828, 2672–2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ge, S.; White, J.G.; Haynes, C.L. Critical role of membrane cholesterol in exocytosis revealed by single platelet study. ACS Chem. Biol. 2010, 5, 819–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Tang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Herlihy, S.E.; Brito-Aleman, F.J.; Ting, J.H.; Janetopoulos, C.; Gomer, R.H. An Autocrine Proliferation Repressor Regulates Dictyostelium discoideum Proliferation and Chemorepulsion Using the G Protein-Coupled Receptor GrlH. mBio 2018, 9, e02443-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Luo, H.R.; Huang, Y.E.; Chen, J.C.; Saiardi, A.; Iijima, M.; Ye, K.; Huang, Y.; Nagata, E.; Devreotes, P.; Snyder, S.H. Inositol pyrophosphates mediate chemotaxis in Dictyostelium via pleckstrin homology domain-PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 interactions. Cell 2003, 114, 559–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Fey, P.; Dodson, R.J.; Basu, S.; Chisholm, R.L. One Stop Shop for Everything Dictyostelium: Dicty Base and the Dicty Stock Center in 2012. In Dictyostelium Discoideum Protocols; Eichinger, L., Rivero, F., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 59–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Sussman, M. Chapter 14 Biochemical and Genetic Methods in the Study of Cellular Slime Mold Development. In Methods in Cell Biology; Prescott, D.M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1966; Volume 2, pp. 397–410. [Google Scholar]
  43. Brock, D.A.; Gomer, R.H. A cell-counting factor regulating structure size in Dictyostelium. Genes Dev. 1999, 13, 1960–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gray, M.J.; Wholey, W.Y.; Wagner, N.O.; Cremers, C.M.; Mueller-Schickert, A.; Hock, N.T.; Krieger, A.G.; Smith, E.M.; Bender, R.A.; Bardwell, J.C.; et al. Polyphosphate is a primordial chaperone. Mol. Cell 2014, 53, 689–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Brock, D.A.; Gomer, R.H. A secreted factor represses cell proliferation in Dictyostelium. Development 2005, 132, 4553–4562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Rijal, R.; Cadena, L.A.; Smith, M.R.; Carr, J.F.; Gomer, R.H. Polyphosphate is an extracellular signal that can facilitate bacterial survival in eukaryotic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 31923–31934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Laasmaa, M.; Vendelin, M.; Peterson, P. Application of regularized Richardson-Lucy algorithm for deconvolution of confocal microscopy images. J. Microsc. 2011, 243, 124–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Shihan, M.H.; Novo, S.G.; Le Marchand, S.J.; Wang, Y.; Duncan, M.K. A simple method for quantitating confocal fluorescent images. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2021, 25, 100916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Rijal, R.; Consalvo, K.M.; Lindsey, C.K.; Gomer, R.H. An endogenous chemorepellent directs cell movement by inhibiting pseudopods at one side of cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 2019, 30, 242–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Veltman, D.M.; Akar, G.; Bosgraaf, L.; Van Haastert, P.J. A new set of small, extrachromosomal expression vectors for Dictyostelium discoideum. Plasmid 2009, 61, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Aaij, C.; Borst, P. The gel electrophoresis of DNA. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1972, 269, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tanaka, M.; Kikuchi, T.; Uno, H.; Okita, K.; Kitanishi-Yumura, T.; Yumura, S. Turnover and flow of the cell membrane for cell migration. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Rivero, F.; Maniak, M. Quantitative and Microscopic Methods for Studying the Endocytic Pathway. In Dictyostelium Discoideum Protocols; Eichinger, L., Rivero, F., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 423–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Phillips, J.E.; Gomer, R.H. The ROCO kinase QkgA is necessary for proliferation inhibition by autocrine signals in Dictyostelium discoideum. Eukaryot. Cell 2010, 9, 1557–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Starving D. discoideum cells require GrlD and Ppk1 to accumulate extracellular polyP, and GrlD, Ppk1, and I6kA to accumulate cell surface polyP. (A,B) Wild-type (WT), grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells were incubated in SIH (A) or starved in PBM (B) for 2, 3, and 6 h and extracellular polyP concentrations were measured at the indicated times. (C) WT cells were incubated in SIH, PBM, or PBM with PPX for 2, 3, and 6 h, stained with SYTOX (green), and the mean fluorescence intensities of SYTOX staining were measured at the indicated times. The mean fluorescence intensity of SYTOX staining in cells incubated in SIH for 2 h was considered 1. Representative images of 3 independent experiments are shown. Cell boundaries in the enlarged insets show the SYTOX staining (green) of cells. DIC indicates differential interference contrast. Bars are 10 µm. (D) WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells were incubated in SIH or PBM for 6 h, stained with SYTOX, and the mean fluorescence intensities of SYTOX staining were measured. The mean fluorescence intensity of SYTOX staining in cells incubated in SIH for 6 h was considered 1. Representative images of 3 independent experiments are shown. Bar is 10 µm. Values are mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments (AD). * indicates p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and **** p < 0.0001 (One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test (B,C)) (Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test (D)).
Figure 1. Starving D. discoideum cells require GrlD and Ppk1 to accumulate extracellular polyP, and GrlD, Ppk1, and I6kA to accumulate cell surface polyP. (A,B) Wild-type (WT), grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells were incubated in SIH (A) or starved in PBM (B) for 2, 3, and 6 h and extracellular polyP concentrations were measured at the indicated times. (C) WT cells were incubated in SIH, PBM, or PBM with PPX for 2, 3, and 6 h, stained with SYTOX (green), and the mean fluorescence intensities of SYTOX staining were measured at the indicated times. The mean fluorescence intensity of SYTOX staining in cells incubated in SIH for 2 h was considered 1. Representative images of 3 independent experiments are shown. Cell boundaries in the enlarged insets show the SYTOX staining (green) of cells. DIC indicates differential interference contrast. Bars are 10 µm. (D) WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells were incubated in SIH or PBM for 6 h, stained with SYTOX, and the mean fluorescence intensities of SYTOX staining were measured. The mean fluorescence intensity of SYTOX staining in cells incubated in SIH for 6 h was considered 1. Representative images of 3 independent experiments are shown. Bar is 10 µm. Values are mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments (AD). * indicates p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and **** p < 0.0001 (One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test (B,C)) (Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test (D)).
Ijms 24 05923 g001
Figure 2. Starving D. discoideum cells require GrlD and I6kA to bind exogenous polyP. (A) Agarose gels of total RNA or plasmid DNA untreated (Control) or treated with RNase or DNase, respectively, stained with ethidium bromide are shown. Kbp indicates kilo base pair, and s indicates Svedbergs, a unit for sedimentation coefficient. (B) WT cells starved in PBM for 6 h were treated with RNase or DNase and stained with SYTOX, and the normalized mean fluorescence intensities of SYTOX staining were determined. (C) Vegetative WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells were incubated no polyP (0) or with 705 µg/mL polyP and stained with SYOTX. For (B,C), representative merged images of differential interference contrast (DIC) and the SYTOX staining (green) are shown from 3 independent experiments. Bars are 10 µm. (D) Quantification of the mean fluorescence intensities of SYTOX staining from C are shown. The mean fluorescence intensity of the SYTOX staining in WT cells with no polyP (0) was considered 1. Values in (B,D) are mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. * indicates p < 0.05 and **** p < 0.0001 (t tests).
Figure 2. Starving D. discoideum cells require GrlD and I6kA to bind exogenous polyP. (A) Agarose gels of total RNA or plasmid DNA untreated (Control) or treated with RNase or DNase, respectively, stained with ethidium bromide are shown. Kbp indicates kilo base pair, and s indicates Svedbergs, a unit for sedimentation coefficient. (B) WT cells starved in PBM for 6 h were treated with RNase or DNase and stained with SYTOX, and the normalized mean fluorescence intensities of SYTOX staining were determined. (C) Vegetative WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells were incubated no polyP (0) or with 705 µg/mL polyP and stained with SYOTX. For (B,C), representative merged images of differential interference contrast (DIC) and the SYTOX staining (green) are shown from 3 independent experiments. Bars are 10 µm. (D) Quantification of the mean fluorescence intensities of SYTOX staining from C are shown. The mean fluorescence intensity of the SYTOX staining in WT cells with no polyP (0) was considered 1. Values in (B,D) are mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. * indicates p < 0.05 and **** p < 0.0001 (t tests).
Ijms 24 05923 g002
Figure 3. Starvation reduces cell membrane fluidity of WT and i6kA cells. (A,B) Half-life of recovery, diffusion coefficient, and mobile fraction were calculated from fluorescence recovery after photobleaching of WT cells starved in PBM for 0, 1, 3 and 6 h (A) and WT cells incubated in SIH for 0 h or WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells starved in PBM for 6 h (B). Values are mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (One-way ANOVA with Brown-Forsythe and Welch test).
Figure 3. Starvation reduces cell membrane fluidity of WT and i6kA cells. (A,B) Half-life of recovery, diffusion coefficient, and mobile fraction were calculated from fluorescence recovery after photobleaching of WT cells starved in PBM for 0, 1, 3 and 6 h (A) and WT cells incubated in SIH for 0 h or WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells starved in PBM for 6 h (B). Values are mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (One-way ANOVA with Brown-Forsythe and Welch test).
Ijms 24 05923 g003
Figure 4. Starving D. discoideum cells require GrlD, Ppk1, and I6kA to reduce macropinocytosis, exocytosis, and phagocytosis. (A) WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells starved in PBM for 0 or 6 h were allowed to macropinocytose TRITC-dextran, and the median fluorescence intensity per cell of ingested TRITC-dextran were measured. The median fluorescence intensity per cell in WT cells starved for 0 h was considered 100%. (B) WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells starved in PBM for 0 or 6 h were allowed to macropinocytose TRITC-dextran as in (A), uningested TRITC-dextran was removed, and cells were allowed to excrete the ingested TRITC-dextran for 1 h. The median fluorescence intensities per cell of TRITC-dextran retained after 1 h of excretion were determined. (C,D) WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells were starved for 0 or 6 h and allowed to phagocytose Zymosan-A bioparticles for 1 h. The average median fluorescence intensity of ingested bioparticles, normalized to 0 h WT cells are shown in (C), and percentages of cells with ingested bioparticles are shown in (D). For all panels, cells were starved in stationary submerged culture. All values are mean ± SEM of 4 independent experiments. * indicates p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (Two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test).
Figure 4. Starving D. discoideum cells require GrlD, Ppk1, and I6kA to reduce macropinocytosis, exocytosis, and phagocytosis. (A) WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells starved in PBM for 0 or 6 h were allowed to macropinocytose TRITC-dextran, and the median fluorescence intensity per cell of ingested TRITC-dextran were measured. The median fluorescence intensity per cell in WT cells starved for 0 h was considered 100%. (B) WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells starved in PBM for 0 or 6 h were allowed to macropinocytose TRITC-dextran as in (A), uningested TRITC-dextran was removed, and cells were allowed to excrete the ingested TRITC-dextran for 1 h. The median fluorescence intensities per cell of TRITC-dextran retained after 1 h of excretion were determined. (C,D) WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells were starved for 0 or 6 h and allowed to phagocytose Zymosan-A bioparticles for 1 h. The average median fluorescence intensity of ingested bioparticles, normalized to 0 h WT cells are shown in (C), and percentages of cells with ingested bioparticles are shown in (D). For all panels, cells were starved in stationary submerged culture. All values are mean ± SEM of 4 independent experiments. * indicates p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 (Two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test).
Ijms 24 05923 g004
Figure 5. Starvation does not alter cell size, mass, and total protein content. (A) Representative images of vegetative WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells growing in submerged stationary culture are shown from 3 independent experiments. Bar is 20 µm. (B) Cell areas of 106 cells/mL WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells starved in PBM in submerged stationary culture for 0, 1, 3, and 6 h. At least 50 cells from three independent experiments were taken to measure the cell size. (C,D) Cell mass per 107 cells (C) and total protein content per 106 cells (D) were determined for WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells starved in PBM for indicated times. All values are mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. For (B,D), * indicates p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and p < 0.0001 **** (Two-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák’s multiple comparisons test).
Figure 5. Starvation does not alter cell size, mass, and total protein content. (A) Representative images of vegetative WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells growing in submerged stationary culture are shown from 3 independent experiments. Bar is 20 µm. (B) Cell areas of 106 cells/mL WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells starved in PBM in submerged stationary culture for 0, 1, 3, and 6 h. At least 50 cells from three independent experiments were taken to measure the cell size. (C,D) Cell mass per 107 cells (C) and total protein content per 106 cells (D) were determined for WT, grlD, ppk1, and i6kA cells starved in PBM for indicated times. All values are mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. For (B,D), * indicates p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and p < 0.0001 **** (Two-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák’s multiple comparisons test).
Ijms 24 05923 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rijal, R.; Ismail, I.; Jing, S.; Gomer, R.H. Starvation Induces Extracellular Accumulation of Polyphosphate in Dictyostelium discoideum to Inhibit Macropinocytosis, Phagocytosis, and Exocytosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5923. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065923

AMA Style

Rijal R, Ismail I, Jing S, Gomer RH. Starvation Induces Extracellular Accumulation of Polyphosphate in Dictyostelium discoideum to Inhibit Macropinocytosis, Phagocytosis, and Exocytosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(6):5923. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065923

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rijal, Ramesh, Issam Ismail, Shiyu Jing, and Richard H. Gomer. 2023. "Starvation Induces Extracellular Accumulation of Polyphosphate in Dictyostelium discoideum to Inhibit Macropinocytosis, Phagocytosis, and Exocytosis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 6: 5923. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065923

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop