Next Article in Journal
Quartz Crystal Microbalance Platform for SARS-CoV-2 Immuno-Diagnostics
Previous Article in Journal
Transluminal Pillars—Their Origin and Role in the Remodelling of the Zebrafish Caudal Vein Plexus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Role of CPNE7 (Copine-7) in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis and Metastasis

1
Department of Medical Life Science, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(23), 16704; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242316704
Submission received: 28 September 2023 / Revised: 2 November 2023 / Accepted: 5 November 2023 / Published: 24 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Oncology)

Abstract

:
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common and deadly cancers in the world. However, no effective treatment for the disease has yet been found. For this reason, several studies are being carried out on the treatment of CRC. Currently, there is limited understanding of the role of CPNE7 (copine-7) in CRC progression and metastasis. The results of this study show that CPNE7 exerts an oncogenic effect in CRC. First, CPNE7 was shown to be significantly up-regulated in CRC patient tissues and CRC cell lines compared to normal tissues according to IHC staining, qRT-PCR, and western blotting. Next, this study used both systems of siRNA and shRNA to suppress CPNE7 gene expression to check the CPNE7 mechanism in CRC. The suppressed CPNE7 significantly inhibited the growth of CRC cells in in vitro experiments, including migration, invasion, and semisolid agar colony-forming assay. Moreover, the modified expression of CPNE7 led to a decrease in the levels of genes associated with epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). The epithelial genes E-cadherin (CDH1) and Collagen A1 were upregulated, and the levels of mesenchymal genes such as N-cadherin (CDH2), ZEB1, ZEB2, and SNAIL (SNAL1) were downregulated after CPNE7 inhibition. This study suggests that CPNE7 may serve as a potential diagnostic biomarker for CRC patients.

1. Introduction

Worldwide, the incidence of CRC is the highest after lung cancer and prostate cancer, and the mortality rate is very high [1]. In Korea, the incidence rate is the third highest, after thyroid cancer and breast cancer [2]. Recently, the mortality rate of CRC patients has decreased due to early diagnosis including colonoscopy [3], but in about 25% of patients diagnosed with CRC, it is accompanied by metastasis [4]. Metastasis is closely related to CRC as a major cause of death in CRC patients [5]. Therefore, there is a need to identify reliable biomarkers that can be used as new targets for CRC patients. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide and remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. Sustained cell proliferation and invasion, increased metastasis and drug resistance are the hallmarks of CRC. Among people diagnosed with colorectal cancer, 20% have metastatic CRC and 40% have recurrence after previously treated localized disease. The prognosis of metastatic CRC is poor, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 20%. In this context, biomarkers of metastasis are an important factor to consider, with both diagnostic and therapeutic implications. It would be essential to find non-invasive biomarkers for prognosis and early detection of CRC.
CPNEs (copines) are a family of membrane bound proteins that are highly conserved, soluble, ubiquitous and calcium dependent in a variety of eukaryotes [6]. The soluble membrane proteins CPNEs contain two tandem C2 domains at the N-terminus and an A domain at the C-terminus [7]. The diversity of CPNEs could have multiple roles in different signaling pathways depending on several factors, such as calcium sensitivity, lipid specificity, and target proteins [8]. CPNE is involved not only in the development and differentiation of the nervous system but also in the development and progression of many tumor types. CPNE consists of nine families—from 1 to 9—whose exact functions and biological roles are unclear, but studies have shown that the CPNE family may mediate signaling pathways related to tumor formation and development.
CPNE7 has high homology with other members of the copine family, including CPNE1, CPNE3, and CPNE6. This copine family is a potential tumor suppressor gene [6]. CPNE7 is a member of the CPNE gene family associated with cell membrane metastasis due to increased intracellular calcium [9]. It is mainly involved in calcium signaling, but it has been shown to have functions related to cell differentiation in the cytoplasm. CPNE7 is one of the tumor suppressor genes in breast cancer tissue. The bladder transitional cell carcinoma sequencing analysis shows the 565 candidate gene mutations that include CPNE7 [6]. It is thought that mutation of CPNE7 may be related to an important mechanism related to bladder cancer [10]. However, a recent study showed that high expression of CPNE7 in mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) promotes oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) metastasis through the NF-κB pathway [11]. At present, the role of CPNE7 in cancer mechanisms is not clearly known, and therefore, further research is needed. The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between CPNE7 expression and CRC progression and metastasis. In addition, it will prove its potential as a marker for predicting progression in CRC patients and analyze the functional effect of CPNE7 in mediated hallmarks of cancer, including cell proliferation, migration, and invasion.
Currently, the role of CPNE7 in cancer mechanisms is not well understood, and further research is needed. According to The Human Protein Atlas, the high expression of CPNE7 does not show significant changes in the survival of CRC patients. However, in a group of 250 CRC patients who participated in our study, CPNE7 confirmed its potential as a potential oncogene, and significant differences were also found in in vitro experiments. In another study based on bioinformatic analysis of transcriptome sequencing and Co-IP, CPNE7 was shown to act as an oncogene [11]. The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between CPNE7 expression and CRC progression and metastasis. In addition, it will prove its potential as a prognositc marker in CRC patients and analyze the functional effect of CPNE7 in mediated hallmarks of cancer, including cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. It is thought that mutation of CPNE7 may be associated with an important mechanism in bladder cancer. The role of CPNE7 in promoting or inhibiting CRC in cancer pathogenesis is currently unclear and requires further investigation.

2. Results

2.1. Relationship of CPNE7 Expression and Clinicopathologic Factor of Patients with CRC

In previous studies, CPNE7 was identified in the process of screening genes with significant differences in expression by NGS analysis in CRC patients [12,13,14]. The expression of CPNE7 was confirmed via statistical analysis in approximately 250 FFPE (formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded) tissues from CRC patients. The patient’s tissues are obtained via surgical resection of the cancer. Patients were classified according to the level of CPNE7 expression, and age, sex, lymph node stage, meta, stage, survival rate, etc., were analyzed. The overall male/female ratio of colorectal cancer patients was 59.2% (148) male and 40.8% (102) female. Among them, 23.2% (58) of male and 27.6% (69) of female patients had high CPNE7 expression. The percentage of patients by TNM (tumor node metastasis) stage was I stage, 14.8%; II stage, 39.6%; III stage, 59%; and 4.8% in IV stage, and the patients had 45% venous invasion and 59% lymphatic invasion. There was no statistically significant difference in the presence or absence of venous invasion and lymphatic invasion in patients with high and low expressions of CPNE7 (Table 1). However, statistically significant results were identified in univariate (p = 0.032) and multivariate (p = 0.048) Cox regression analysis in patients with high and low expression of CPNE7 (Table 2).
SW480, SW620, HCT116, HT29, and a colon fibroblast cell line CCD-18-co were used for qRT-PCR (Figure 1A). As a result, CPNE7 expression was relatively higher in the colorectal cancer cell lines than in the normal cell line CCD-18-co, especially in SW480 and HCT116. This demonstrated that CPNE7 expression was higher in the CRC cell line than in the normal cell line. Western blotting was performed using four CRC cell lines. The protein expression level of CPNE7 was high in all CRC cell lines (Figure 1B, Figures S1 and S2). The implications of this high expression of CPNE7 could possibly affect tumor progression and patient survival.

2.2. Functional Effect of CPNE7 in CRC Cell Lines

As the stage of the colorectal cancer increased, the expression of CPNE7 was found to be statistically significantly higher. It was therefore necessary to confirm the effect of CPNE7 expression on cell growth and proliferation. A CPNE7-siRNA-treated knockdown cell line generated a colorectal cancer cell line with relatively high CPNE7 expression compared to a normal cell line. The survival rate was compared between the CPNE7 knockdown cell line and the control cell line. This was confirmed at the mRNA and protein levels, showing that CPNE7 expression levels were reduced by more than 80% in all four colorectal cancer cell lines. It was confirmed that SW480 (Figure 2A) at the mRNA level and SW620 (Figure 2B, Figures S3 and S4) in protein level were the most knockdown compared to the control group.
The CPNE7 knockdown cells were used to confirm the functional changes in CRC cell lines expressing CPNE7 (Figure 2C). As a result of comparing the difference in proliferation between the baseline CRC cell line and the CPNE7 knockdown cell line, all four colorectal cancer cell lines showed significant differences at 24, 48, and 72 h. At 72 h, the control group grew by approximately 300%, and the CPNE7 siRNA treated group grew by approximately 90%, which was confirmed to be a 3-fold difference. In the case of HCT116, the difference in cell growth was very large at 24 h, showing a difference of about 4 times—100% from 25%—and a difference of more than 3 times—170% from 50%—at 72 h. These data suggest that CPNE7 expression affects the growth of colorectal cancer cells.
First, it was evaluated that the siRNA-CPNE7-treated cell line had decreased functionally. Next, CPNE7 shRNA infection was performed to make a stable knockdown cell line for in vivo studies (Figures S5 and S6). mRAN and protein expression levels were decreased after CPNE7 shRNA infection (Figure 3A,B), and the cell number in the migration and invasion assay decreased compared to the control. Proliferation was significantly lower approximately 2-fold in CPNE7 inhibition cells, this result was similar to CPNE7 siRNA treated CRC cells (Figure 3C). Cell migration was reduced to 65% and cell invasion to 50%. In migration, an average of 175 cells was measured in the control group, and an average of 115 was found in the CPNE7-shRNA-infected group. Invasion was measured in an average 146 and 76 cells (Figure 3D–G). Mean from these results, CPNE7 is important for cell proliferation and cell migration ability in CRC.
Wound-healing experiments were performed using SW480, which had the highest expression of CPNE7 among CRC cell lines (Figure 3H,I). It was confirmed that there was a significant difference in wound-healing ability between the control and CPNE7 knockdown cell lines. At 12 h, approximately 34% of the wound was filled in the control group, but 25% of the wound was filled in the siRNA group, and at 24 h, it was confirmed that approximately 64% and 47% of the wound was recovered, respectively. At 36 h, the figures were 93% and 73%, respectively, confirming a 20% difference in wound healing. Finally, at 48 h, the wounds in all areas of the control group were filled first, and about 4% of the wounds in the CPNE7-siRNA-treated group were not filled.
From these results of functional data analysis, it was confirmed that proliferation, migration, invasion, colonization, and wound healing rate were greatly reduced after inhibition of CPNE7 expression in all CRC cell lines, and in the same aspect as the patient data, the high expression of CPNE7 in CRC could affect tumor progression and patient survival rate. This suggests that CPNE7 is involved in the regulation of colon cancer cell growth in vitro. Therefore, we thought that CPNE7 might be involved in EMT.

2.3. CPNE7 Inhibition Leads to the Dysregulation of EMT Signatures in CRC Cells

Given that inhibition of CPNE7 by siRNA treatment and shRNA infection had an inhibitory effect on CRC cell motility, we sought to identify the signaling pathway of CPNE7. EMT enables migration and invasion of various cancers and is closely associated with poor prognosis in CRC. Among the EMT genes, we compared and confirmed the expression of eight genes: E-cadherin, N-cadherin, MMP2, MMP3, ZEB1, ZEB2, SNAIL, and Collagen A1 (Figure 4). The expression of E-cadherin and Collagen A1, known as epithelial markers, increased by more than 600% and 1800%, respectively. The EMT-TFs (transcription factors) ZEB1 and ZEB2 increased by about 1100% and 250%, respectively, and MMP2, MMP3, and SNAIL were reduced by about 40%. When CPNE7 was knocked down in CRC cell lines, the expressions of E-cadherin and Collagen A1, which are epithelial markers, increased and the expression of genes known as mesenchymal markers generally decreased, suggesting that CPNE7 is associated with promoting EMT. This result suggests that CPNE7 expression may be associated with EMT.

2.4. Patient Survival Rate According to CPNE7 Expression in FFPE Tissue in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Finally, it was necessary to verify that the function of CPNE7 expression of in vitro displayed the same aspect in tissue samples from CRC patients (Figure 5). CPNE7 protein expression on CRC patients was identified via IHC staining (Figure 5A). CPNE7 was specified as a membrane protein, but IHC confirmed that it was also present in the cytoplasm and nucleus. CPNE7 expression was higher in high-TNM-stage tissues compared to low-TNM-stage tissues. Kaplan–Meier plot analysis shows that the survival rate of patients with high CPNE7 expression is lower than that of patients with low CPNE7 expression (Figure 5B). At 40 months, approximately 27% of the low-CPNE7 patients had died, whereas approximately 58% of the high-CPNE7 patients had died. While 3 of the 123 low-expression patients died and 10 survived, at 120 months, 127 high-expression patients died and 1 survived. The CPNE7 high/low expression patient group was classified as TNM stage 0, 1/2, 3 [15]. As a result of comparing the CPNE7 expression level and the survival rate of patients, it was confirmed that the higher the expression of CPNE7, the lower the survival rate of the patients, which was statistically significant.
Schematic diagram of epithelial–mesenchymal transition pathways involving CPNE7 in colorectal cancer (Figure 6). When CPNE7 is over-expressed in colorectal cancer, the levels of epithelial markers decrease (purple) while mesenchymal markers increase (blue).

3. Discussion

CRC is a disease that has been studied by many researchers but has yet to be fully conquered. Approximately 56% of patients die from this disease, and most of them are patients with metastases [6]. Therefore, early detection is very important and requires a meaningful search for a marker. The configuration, histological grade, and diameter of adenocarcinoma and lymphovascular invasion have been correlated with the degree of invasion [16]. The extension of tumor infiltration into the lymph nodes or veins has a negative impact on patient survival [17], and 50% of CRC patients still develop metastases after surgery [18]. Early diagnosis of CRC is crucial to improving the success of treatment approaches. To our knowledge, there are no reliable predictors of CRC development or progression. Therefore, early detection is very important and requires a meaningful search for markers.
In the previous study, tissue samples from 250 CRC patients were analyzed for NGS (next generation sequencing) data. There is a paper that looks at other genes selected based on the same NGS analysis [12,13,14]. Of the 250 cases examined by IHC, 127 showed some expression of CPNE7 in CRC cells and 123 showed negative staining. In recent years, as the number of colorectal cancer patients has increased significantly and the mortality rate of colorectal cancer patients has increased, research into CRC metastasis has emerged. This research team identified a significant increase in expression in CRC patients and the role of the CPNE7 gene, a member of the copine family associated with tumor development. CPNE7, a member of the copine family, consists of calcium-dependent membrane-binding proteins. There are studies showing that the increase and decrease in calcium affects human carcinogenesis [19,20] and is associated with calcium signaling [21]. In addition, there are studies suggesting that it may help prevent colorectal adenomas and reduce the risk of recurrence [22]. Deregulation of calcium sigmalling is often detrimental and has been linked to each of the ‘hallmarks of cancer’ [6]. Increased expression of inflammatory cytokines causes subsequent expression of tumor-related genes such as various target genes and CPNE7 [23]. There is a study that Copine family affects the development and progression of the canceler. And role of CPNE7 was tumor suppressor gene in breast cancer [6]. In another study, CPNE7 exhibited highly contrasting expression levels between normal and tumour samples in cancer stem cells [24].
This study showed that the expression of CPNE7 was significantly increased in the high-metastatic-stage CRC patient group. As a result of the analysis based on the patients’ TNM stage, the high expression of CPNE7 was confirmed in the patient group with a high TNM stage, and the clinical significance of CPNE7 expression in CRC patients was evaluated. The analysis based on the stage patients, the high expression of CPNE7 was confirmed in the patient group with high stages (2 and 3), and the clinical significance of CPNE7 expression in CRC patients was evaluated. This means that the presence or absence of CPNE7 is associated with survival rate and prognosis in patients CRC malignancies. To verify this, when CPNE7 expression was increased or decreased, changes in cell proliferation, migration, and metastasis were examined at the level of the CRC cell line to confirm whether CPNE7 expression was actually related to the stage or metastasis of CRC. As a result of the comparative analysis of the expression of CPNE7 in the CRC cell line and the normal colorectal epithelial cell line, the expression of CPNE7 is higher in the CRC cell line. This confirms the same aspect as the patient data with higher expression of CPNE7 in CRC compared to normal. To further analyze the role of CPNE7 expression in vitro, a gene-silencing experiment was performed. Compared to the control group, the cell line proliferation, migration, and colonization abilities of CPNE7-suppressed cells were significantly reduced. It was confirmed that the rate of round filling was also significantly reduced. Therefore, it was confirmed that CPNE7 expression affects tumor progression, metastasis, and survival.
There was a need to investigate which signaling pathways CPNE7 affects in CRC survival, metastasis, and invasion, and we linked this pathway to EMT. This study has shown the change in expression of EMT-related genes from CPNE7 expressions. Epithelial gene E-cadherin levels were upregulated, and mesenchymal genes, such as N-cadherin, were downregulated after CPNE7 silencing in CRC cell lines. EMT is a crucial embryonic program that is aberrantly activated in cancer and other diseases and is carried out by various EMT transcription factors (EMT-TFs). ZEB proteins have been shown to protect lung cancer cells from EGFR-induced senescence through their ability to down-regulate CDKN1A and CDKN2B. CPNE7 is a transcription factor that promotes tumor invasion and metastasis by inducing EMT in CRC cell lines but also plays a dual role in suppressing it depending on the situation. Our results showed that CPNE7 acts as a tumor oncogene in CRC cells in vitro. The expression of CPNE7 is thought to regulate the expression of the EMT gene. A recent study showed that high expression of CPNE7 in mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) promotes oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) metastasis through the NF-κB pathway [11].
CPNE7 mediates signaling and metastasis in many tumors. However, ‘The Human Protein Atlas’ with this classic and robust transcriptomic analysis of around 600 cases does not show any effect of CPNE7 expression on CRC patient survival. In our study, the data from 250 colorectal cancer patients may be statistically slightly more CPNE7 specific than the patient data from the human atlas. However, it is necessary to identify the role of CPNE7 in other cancers as well as colorectal cancer, and the role of CPNE7 in CRC has not been clearly identified. This study will provide important support for identifying the role of CPNE7 in CRC. Tumor associated inflammation can induce various molecules expressed by surrounding cells or the tumor itself to create a microenvironment that is potentially pro-cancer [23]. Some studies have shown that CPNE7 is considered a potential tumor suppressor gene in bladder cancer [6]. However, according to the results of this study, the role of CPNE7 in CRC is different. Cell proliferation, migration, and invasion were decreased after CPNE7 silencing in CRC cell lines (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Low expression of E-cadherin is associated with poor prognosis in stage III CRC [25]. Another EMT marker, N-cadherin, is associated with metastasis and decreased survival in CRC patients with high expression [26].
Survival of colorectal cancer patients is known to be closely related to metastasis. The aim of this study is to determine the contribution of CPNE7 to the growth, tumorigenesis, and invasion of colorectal cancer cells, and as a result of the analysis of the patient data, it was found that the expression of CPNE7 was associated with the metastasis of CRC. In this study, we have finally demonstrated that CPNE7 is associated with the initiation, progression, and metastasis of colorectal cancer, and through further studies in the future, we will be able to confirm its potential as a gene therapy or biomarker for colorectal cancer patients. The ultimate goal of this research team’s ongoing research is to contribute to the treatment of CRC patients with CPNE7 overexpression through gene silencing. As a follow-up study, we are currently synthesizing CPNE7 antibodies and will perform in vitro and in vivo experiments using the produced antibodies. It is hoped that this will help to improve the survival rate of colorectal cancer patients.
Research on CPNE7 in colorectal cancer with potential as a biomarker should be continuously conducted, and further verification in in vivo studies is also required. In future studies, we will generate an antibody against CPNE7 to demonstrate its therapeutic potential targeting patients with CPNE7 overexpression in colorectal cancer.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Lines and Culture

The human CRC cell lines SW480, SW620, HT29, HCT116, and CCD-18-co were purchased from the Korean cell line bank (Seoul, Republic of Korea). CRC cells were grown in complete media (RPMI 1640 medium (Hyclone, Washington, DC, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Young in Frontier, Seoul, Republic of Korea) and 1% penicillin streptomycin solution (ABS) (Corning, NY, USA) at 37 °C in a humid atmosphere containing 5% CO₂. Normal cells were added to HEPES (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA, USA15630080) 0.25% and NaHCO3 (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA, 144-55-8) 0.25% in complete media.

4.2. Tissue Specimens from Patients

The 250 CRC specimens were obtained from patients who underwent surgery at Soonchunhyang University Cheonan hospital between 2013 and 2018. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. They were examined for CPNE7 expression by immunohistochemical staining. Tumor stage was evaluated according to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification system.

4.3. Small Interfering RNA (siRNA) and Transient Transfection

The human CRC cell lines were seeded 5 × 105 cells in a 10 cm cell culture dish. After 24 h, the medium was changed to a mixture of CPNE7 siRNA, Opti MEM (Thermo fisher, Waltham, MA, USA, 31985-062), Hiperfect® (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany, 301707), which replaced the existing media. CPNE7 siRNA was used to silence the CPNE7 gene, and after 72 h, it was replaced with RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS and 1% ABS.

4.4. Short Hairpin RNA (shRNA) and Transient Transfection

Cells seeding was treated in the same way as the siRNA protocol. For transfections, cells were incubated with CPNE7 shRNA (ORIGENE, Rockville, MD, USA, TL305242) at 50 μmol/L concentrations in Opti MEM medium. The transfection efficiencies of cell lines were tested by transfection of the shRNA plasmid negative control vector (ORIGENE, Rockville, MD, USA, TR30008). Gene knockdown was assessed by measuring mRNA by qRT-PCR 48 h after treatment.

4.5. Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Colon cancer cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well in 6-well cell culture plates. After culturing for 24 h, 1 ml RiboEx (GeneAll, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 301-001) was added to each well according to manufacturer protocol. Total RNA was isolated from all cell lines using the Hybrid-R™ kit (GeneAll, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 305-101). Reverse transcription was performed using ReverTra Ace™ kit (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan, FSQ-101). Primer of CPNE7 (forward GTC TTC ACG GTG GAC TAC TAC T, reverse ATG CGT GTC GTA CAC CTC AAA) was used to confirm gene expression. Quantitative qRT-PCR was performed using the SYBR® Green (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan, QPK-201). The PCR cycle included one cycle at 95 °C for 1 min followed by 39 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C at 15 s, and 72 °C for 25 s.

4.6. Cell Proliferation Analysis

Cell proliferation was measured using an Ez-cytox cell viability assay kit (DOGEN, Seoul, Republic of Korea, EZ-3000). Cells were seeded in the 96-well plates. Then, at 24, 48, and 72 h after incubation, each well was treated with Ez-cytox solution. Incubation proceeded for 2 h in a humidified incubator at 37 °C containing CO2. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a Microplate reader (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA, 51119200).

4.7. Transwell Migration Assay

A migration assay was performed to measure the ability of cells to migrate. Using a 24-well plate containing a 6.5 mm polycarbonate filter (Corning, NY, USA, 3422), the transwell was added 250 μL of RPMI 1640 and 3 × 10⁵ cells. In the bottom chamber, 750 μL of RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS and 1% ABS was added. It was incubated for 48 h in a humidified incubator at 37 °C containing CO2. After that, the medium in the bottom chamber and the transwell chamber was removed and the chamber was washed three times using phosphate buffered saline (PBS). To fix the cells in the membrane of the washed chamber, 4% formaldehyde was applied to the transwell and the bottom chambers and was reacted for 2 min. After washing 3 times with PBS, 100% methyl alcohol was applied and reacted for 10 min. Cells were stained by immersing the transwell chamber in 0.5% crystal violet solution for 2 min. Using an optical microscope, 5 sites of membrane were randomly photographed (900 × 1200 μm2).

4.8. Transwell Invasion Assay

Invasion was assayed using a 24-well plate containing a 6.5 mm polycarbonate filter. The inside of the transwell was covered with a non-growth factor 1:4 ratio matrigel dilution in RPMI 1640 and incubated 1 h at 37 °C. 5 × 10⁵. Cells were then plated in the insert cells, and 750 μL of RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FBS and 1% ABS was added to the bottom chamber. After 72 h of incubation, cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde and stained with 0.005% crystal violet.

4.9. Semisolid Agar Colony-Forming Assay

Semisolid assays were treated with 1% agarose gel with 20% FBS in a 6 cm plate. After the bottom gel hardened, it was mixed with 0.7% agarose with 20% FBS and CRC cells. Cells were incubated for 13 days at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The wells containing agarose were stained with 0.005% crystal violet, and colonies were counted.

4.10. Western Blot

The cells were lysed in Pro-prep™ (INtRON, Seongnam, Republic of Korea, 17081) protein extraction solution. After resting overnight, the lysates were centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min and used as the supernatant. The protein concentrations in four CRC cell lines were determined using bicinchoninic acid (BCA) (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA, 23227) assay. Equal quantities of 30 μg/μL of protein were resolved using 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The gel was transferred onto a membrane (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA, IPVH00010) and blocked for 1 h in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (BOVOGEN, Keilor East, Australia, BSAS 0.1) in the 1× TBST (BIORAD, Hercules, CA, USA, 1706435) with 0.05% tween20 (SIGMA, St. Louis, MI, USA, 9005-64-5). The membrane incubated the CPNE7 antibody (YNTOAB, Seongnam, Republic of Korea) diluted at 1:50 at 4 °C overnight. The anti-rabbit secondary antibody (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA, A11008) was diluted with 1:1000 after washing three times with Dulbecco’s PBS (WELGENE, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea, LB001-02) and was reacted at room temperature for 2 h. Subsequently, the blots were detected using Pierce™ ECL Western Blotting Substrate (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA, 32209).

4.11. Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Paraffin-embedded CRC tissue specimens were sectioned to a thickness of 4 μm and dried on slides for one day. The slide tissue sample was stored at 60 °C for a 1 h, and deparaffin was performed. Antigens used a 3% H2O2 at 95 °C antigen retriever buffer. For permeability, 0.2% triton solution was treated. For blocking 5% BSA in PBS was treated for 15 min, and the first antibody was treated with diluted 1:500 rabbit polyclonal antibody CPNE7 (MYBioSourece, San Diego, CA, USA, MBS7114526) [27]. It incubated at 4 °C overnight. The second antibody was treated with diluted 1:1000 goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L), HRP (Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA, 31460) for 1 h at room temperature. CPNE7 was scored from 0 to 4 based on the IHC assay results of the FFPE block in CRC patients as read by a pathologist—0 and 1 were defined by dividing it into CPNE7 low-expression groups and 2 and 3 were defined by division into high-expression groups [28].

4.12. Statistical Analysis

The Student t-test was performed by comparing proliferation, migration, invasion, and semisolid agar assay in a control CRC cell line and a CPNE7 knockdown CRC cell line. ROC curve analysis was performed by comparing the survival data in high expressions of the CPNE7 patient group and low expressions of CPNE7 patient group. Statistical analysis was performed through the SPSS 19.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows OS and p < 0.05 was considered significant. Survival data were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method.

5. Conclusions

In this study, it was discovered that CPNE7 is a viable target gene for the treatment of CRC. The overexpression of CPNE7 is more prevalent in patients with higher stages of CRC. Decreasing the expression of CPNE7 in CRC significantly mitigates cancer cell functions. The upregulation of CPNE7 in CRC might contribute to the EMT process of cancer cells. Finally, we propose that CPNE7 serves as a predictive marker and oncogene for CRC. However, additional cytokine expression validation and in vivo experiments are necessary to confirm this hypothesis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms242316704/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.-J.B., H.-J.K. and D.-H.K.; methodology, M.-J.B., H.-J.K. and D.-H.K.; software, D.-H.K., T.-S.A., K.-S.K. and T.-W.K.; validation, H.-J.K., D.-H.K. and K.-S.K.; formal analysis, T.-S.A., K.-S.K., T.-W.K., S.-H.L., D.-W.L. and J.-S.R.; investigation, H.-J.K., T.-S.A., K.-S.K. and T.-W.K.; resources, T.-S.A., K.-S.K., T.-W.K., S.-H.L., D.-W.L. and J.-S.R.; data curation, H.-J.K. and D.-H.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.-J.K. and D.-H.K.; writing—review and editing, M.-J.B. and H.-J.K.; visualization, H.-J.K.; supervision, M.-J.B.; project administration, M.-J.B.; funding acquisition, M.-J.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (2019R1I1A3A0106191115) and the research fund of Soonchunhyang University (2023-0055).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of NAME OF INSTITUTE (protocol code NON2017-008-011 and date of approval).” for studies involving humans.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F.; Bsc, M.F.B.; Me, J.F.; Soerjomataram, M.I.; et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hong, S.; Won, Y.J.; Lee, J.J.; Jung, K.W.; Kong, H.J.; Im, J.S.; Seo, H.G. Cancer statistics in Korea: Incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2018. Cancer Res. Treat. Off. J. Korean Cancer Assoc. 2021, 53, 301–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kuipers, E.J.; Grady, W.M.; Lieberman, D.; Seufferlein, T.; Sung, J.J.; Boelens, P.G.; van de Velde, C.J.H.; Watanabe, T. Colorectal cancer. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2015, 1, 15065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Muratore, A.; Zorzi, D.; Bouzari, H.; Amisano, M.; Massucco, P.; Sperti, E.; Capussotti, L. Asymptomatic colorectal cancer with un-resectable liver metastases: Immediate colorectal resection or up-front systemic chemotherapy? Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007, 14, 766–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Riihimäki, M.; Hemminki, A.; Sundquist, J.; Hemminki, K. Patterns of metastasis in colon and rectal cancer. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tang, H.; Pang, P.; Qin, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Wu, Q.; Song, S.; Li, F. The CPNE family and their role in cancers. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 689097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Damer, C.K.; Bayeva, M.; Hahn, E.S.; Rivera, J.I.; Socec, C. Copine A, a calcium-dependent membrane-binding protein, transiently localizes to the plasma membrane and intracellular vacuoles in Dictyostelium. BMC Cell Biol. 2005, 6, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ilacqua, A.N.; Price, J.E.; Graham, B.N.; Buccilli, M.J.; McKellar, D.R.; Damer, C.K. Cyclic AMP signaling in Dictyostelium promotes the translocation of the copine family of calcium-binding proteins to the plasma membrane. BMC Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Perestenko, P.V.; Pooler, A.M.; Noorbakhshnia, M.; Gray, A.; Bauccio, C.; McIlhinney, R.A.J. Copines-1, -2, -3, -6 and -7 show different calcium-dependent intracellular membrane translocation and targeting: Calcium-dependent translocation of copines. FEBS J. 2010, 277, 5174–5189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pan, H.; Xu, X.; Wu, D.; Qiu, Q.; Zhou, S.; He, X.; Zhou, Y.; Qu, P.; Hou, J.; He, J.; et al. Novel somatic mutations identified by whole-exome sequencing in muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Oncol. Lett. 2016, 11, 1486–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ji, X.; Sun, T.; Xie, S.; Qian, H.; Song, L.; Wang, L.; Liu, L.; Feng, Q. Upregulation of CPNE7 in mesenchymal stromal cells promotes oral squamous cell carcinoma metastasis through the NF-κB pathway. Cell Death Discov. 2021, 7, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dekker, E.; Sanduleanu, S. Colorectal cancer: Strategies to minimize interval CRC in screening programmes: Colorectal cancer, Nature reviews. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 13, 10–12. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim, Y.J.; Kang, D.H.; Song, G.J.; Ahn, T.S.; Son, M.W.; Lee, M.S. Clinical relevance of Lgr5 expression in colorectal cancer patients. Korean J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 14, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shin, E.J.; Kim, H.J.; Son, M.W.; Ahn, T.S.; Lee, H.Y.; Lim, D.R.; Bae, S.B.; Jeon, S.; Kim, H.; Jeong, D.; et al. Epigenetic inactivation of RUNX3 in colorectal cancer. Ann. Surg. Treat Res. 2018, 94, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lobbes, L.A.; Schütze, M.A.; Droeser, R.; Arndt, M.; Pozios, I.; Lauscher, J.C.; Hering, N.A.; Weixler, B. Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor M3 Expression and Survival in Human Colorectal Carcinoma—An Unexpected Correlation to Guide Future Treatment? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kikuchi, R.; Takano, M.; Takagi, K.; Fujimoto, N.; Nozaki, R.; Fujiyoshi, T.; Uchida, Y. Management of early invasive colorectal cancer. Risk of recurrence and clinical guidelines. Dis. Colon Rectum 1995, 38, 1286–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wibe, A.; Syse, A.; Andersen, E.; Tretli, S.; Myrvold, H.E.; Søreide, O.; Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: Anterior vs abdominoperineal resection. Dis. Colon Rectum 2004, 47, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kim, S.; Kim, D.; Roh, S.; Hong, I.; Kim, H.; Ahn, T.S.; Kang, D.H.; Lee, M.S.; Baek, M.-J.; Kwak, H.J.; et al. Expression of Spermine Oxidase Is Associated with Colorectal Carcinogenesis and Prognosis of Patients. Bio-Medicines 2022, 10, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Pretzsch, E.; Bösch, F.; Neumann, J.; Ganschow, P.; Bazhin, A.; Guba, M.; Werner, J.; Angele, M. Mechanisms of metastasis in colorectal cancer and metastatic organotropism: Hematogenous versus peritoneal spread. J. Oncol. 2019, 2019, 7407190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jaffe, L.F. A calcium-based theory of carcinogenesis. Adv. Cancer Res. 2005, 94, 231–263. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kadio, B.; Yaya, S.; Basak, A.; Djè, K.; Gomes, J.; Mesenge, C. Calcium role in human carcinogenesis: A comprehensive analysis and critical review of literature. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016, 35, 391–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Stewart, T.A.; Yapa, K.T.; Monteith, G.R. Altered calcium signaling in cancer cells. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta 2015, 1848 Pt B, 2502–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Atsumi, T.; Singh, R.; Sabharwal, L.; Bando, H.; Meng, J.; Arima, Y.; Yamada, M.; Harada, M.; Jiang, J.-J.; Kamimura, D.; et al. Inflammation amplifier, a new paradigm in cancer biology. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, J.; Wu, S.; Peng, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Dong, Y.; Ran, F.; Geng, H.; Zhang, K.; Li, J.; Huang, S.; et al. Constructing a cancer stem cell related prognostic model for predicting immune landscape and drug sensitivity in colorectal cancer. Front. Pharmacol. 2023, 14, 1200017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yun, J.-A.; Kim, S.-H.; Hong, H.K.; Yun, S.H.; Kim, H.C.; Chun, H.-K.; Cho, Y.B.; Lee, W.Y. Loss of E-Cadherin expression is associated with a poor prognosis in stage III colorectal cancer. Oncology 2014, 86, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yan, X.; Yan, L.; Liu, S.; Shan, Z.; Tian, Y.; Jin, Z. N-cadherin, a novel prognostic biomarker, drives malignant progression of colorectal cancer. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 2999–3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Y.Y.; Zhou, C.X.; Gao, Y. Podoplanin promotes the invasion of oral squamous cell carcinoma in coordination with MT1-MMP and Rho GTPases. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2015, 5, 514–529. [Google Scholar]
  28. Varghese, F.; Bukhari, A.B.; Malhotra, R.; De, A. IHC Profiler: An open source plugin for the quantitative evaluation and automated scoring of immunohistochemistry images of human tissue samples. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. CPNE7 expression in CRC patients’ tissue samples and CRC cell lines. (A) RNA-level expression of CPNE7 (175 bp) and GAPDH (245 bp) in CRC cell lines. (B) Protein expression levels according to western blot in four CRC cell lines (SW480; colon adenocarcinoma, SW620; colorectal carcinoma, HCT116; colorectal carcinoma, HT29; colon adenocarcinoma, DLD1; colon adenocarcinoma, CCD-18-co; colon normal fibroblast).
Figure 1. CPNE7 expression in CRC patients’ tissue samples and CRC cell lines. (A) RNA-level expression of CPNE7 (175 bp) and GAPDH (245 bp) in CRC cell lines. (B) Protein expression levels according to western blot in four CRC cell lines (SW480; colon adenocarcinoma, SW620; colorectal carcinoma, HCT116; colorectal carcinoma, HT29; colon adenocarcinoma, DLD1; colon adenocarcinoma, CCD-18-co; colon normal fibroblast).
Ijms 24 16704 g001
Figure 2. CPNE7 inhibition by siRNA suppresses the growth of CRC cell lines. Identify the effects of CPNE7 siRNA transfection through (A) qRT-PCR and (B) western blotting. (C) Cell viability test with control cells and siRNA-treated cells. Control cells and siRNA treated cells were compared through (D) transwell migration, (E) invasion, and (F) semisolid agar colony-forming assay (* p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05). Scale bar size 100 μm.
Figure 2. CPNE7 inhibition by siRNA suppresses the growth of CRC cell lines. Identify the effects of CPNE7 siRNA transfection through (A) qRT-PCR and (B) western blotting. (C) Cell viability test with control cells and siRNA-treated cells. Control cells and siRNA treated cells were compared through (D) transwell migration, (E) invasion, and (F) semisolid agar colony-forming assay (* p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05). Scale bar size 100 μm.
Ijms 24 16704 g002
Figure 3. CPNE7 inhibition by sh-CPNE7 infection suppresses the growth of SW480 CRC cell line. The effects of CPNE7 shRNA infection were identified through qRT-PCR (A,B) and western blotting (A). The (C) proliferation, (D,F) migration, and (E,G) invasion of CPNE7 in the CRC cell line treated with CPNE7 shRNA were checked. (H,I) Wound-healing assay of CRC cell lines after gene knockdown using siRNA. The black dotted line represents the first wound area of 0 hr, marked with the same position in all time zones. * p was considered statistically significant. (* p < 0.01). Scale bar size 100 μm.
Figure 3. CPNE7 inhibition by sh-CPNE7 infection suppresses the growth of SW480 CRC cell line. The effects of CPNE7 shRNA infection were identified through qRT-PCR (A,B) and western blotting (A). The (C) proliferation, (D,F) migration, and (E,G) invasion of CPNE7 in the CRC cell line treated with CPNE7 shRNA were checked. (H,I) Wound-healing assay of CRC cell lines after gene knockdown using siRNA. The black dotted line represents the first wound area of 0 hr, marked with the same position in all time zones. * p was considered statistically significant. (* p < 0.01). Scale bar size 100 μm.
Ijms 24 16704 g003
Figure 4. Expression of mRNA of CRC cells. (A,B) Relative mRNA expression levels of SNAIL, MMP2, MMP3, Collagen A1 (COL1A1), E-cadherin, and N-cadherin in CRC cell line. (* p < 0.01).
Figure 4. Expression of mRNA of CRC cells. (A,B) Relative mRNA expression levels of SNAIL, MMP2, MMP3, Collagen A1 (COL1A1), E-cadherin, and N-cadherin in CRC cell line. (* p < 0.01).
Ijms 24 16704 g004
Figure 5. CPNE7 protein expression level on CRC patient tissue sample according to (A) IHC. (B) The survival rate graph in high or low expression of CPNE7 in patients. (a = score 0, b = score 1, c = score 2, d = score 3). Scale bar size 100μm.
Figure 5. CPNE7 protein expression level on CRC patient tissue sample according to (A) IHC. (B) The survival rate graph in high or low expression of CPNE7 in patients. (a = score 0, b = score 1, c = score 2, d = score 3). Scale bar size 100μm.
Ijms 24 16704 g005
Figure 6. CPNE7 study schema related to EMT. Relationship of signaling pathway at metastasis to the increase in CPNE7.
Figure 6. CPNE7 study schema related to EMT. Relationship of signaling pathway at metastasis to the increase in CPNE7.
Ijms 24 16704 g006
Table 1. Comparison of clinicopathologic factor and CPNE7 expression.
Table 1. Comparison of clinicopathologic factor and CPNE7 expression.
Clinicopathological
Factors
CPNE7Totalp Value
High
Expression
(N = 127)
Low
Expression
(N = 123)
Age, years, mean (SD)63.1 (12.6)63.0 (12.7)63.10 (12.6)0.181
Sex, N (%) 0.124
Male69 (27.6)79 (31.61)148 (59.2)
Female58 (23.2)44 (17.6)102 (40.8)
TMN stage, N (%) 0.820
I17 (6.8)20 (8.0)37 (14.8)
II52 (20.8)47 (18.8)99 (39.6)
III53 (21.2)49 (19.6)102 (40.8)
IV5 (2.0)7 (2.8)12 (4.8)
Vascular invasion, N (%) 0.481
0102 (40.8)103 (41.2)205 (82.0)
125 (10.0)20 (8.0)45 (18.0)
Lymphatic invasion, N (%) 0.230
093 (37.2)98 (39.2)191 (76.4)
134 (13.6)25 (10.0)59 (23.6)
Table 2. Cox regression analysis of the clinicopathological factor (* p < 0.05).
Table 2. Cox regression analysis of the clinicopathological factor (* p < 0.05).
Clinicopathological FactorsMultivariate AnalysisUnivariate Analysis
Hazard Ratio
(95% CI)
pHazard Ratio
(95% CI)
p
Age, years, mean (SD)1.63(1.00–2.68)0.0501.51 (0.94–2.42)0.087
Sex, N (%)
Female vs. Male0.98 (0.64–1.51)0.9521.13 (0.74–1.72)0.548
TNM stage, N (%) 0.005 * 0.001 *
I1.00 1.00
II1.08 (0.50–2.30)0.8381.16 (0.54–2.26)0.692
III1.90 (0.91–3.95)0.0852.01 (0.98–4.13)0.055
IV4.05 (1.48–11.09)0.006 *4.60 (1.77–11.96)0.002 *
Venous Invasion
High vs. Low0.87 (0.41–1.85)0.7351.59 (0.97–2.59)0.062
Lymphatic Invasion
High vs. Low1.74 (0.89–3.37)0.1021.94 (1.25–3.03)0.003 *
CPNE7 expression
High vs. Low1.54 (1.00–2.38)0.048 *1.58 (1.03–2.41)0.032 *
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kong, H.-J.; Kang, D.-H.; Ahn, T.-S.; Kim, K.-S.; Kim, T.-W.; Lee, S.-H.; Lee, D.-W.; Ryu, J.-S.; Beak, M.-J. The Role of CPNE7 (Copine-7) in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis and Metastasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16704. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242316704

AMA Style

Kong H-J, Kang D-H, Ahn T-S, Kim K-S, Kim T-W, Lee S-H, Lee D-W, Ryu J-S, Beak M-J. The Role of CPNE7 (Copine-7) in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis and Metastasis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(23):16704. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242316704

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kong, Hye-Jeong, Dong-Hyun Kang, Tae-Sung Ahn, Kwang-Seock Kim, Tae-Wan Kim, Soo-Hyeon Lee, Dong-Woo Lee, Jae-Sung Ryu, and Moo-Jun Beak. 2023. "The Role of CPNE7 (Copine-7) in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis and Metastasis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 23: 16704. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242316704

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop