Next Article in Journal
Bacterial Cellulose—Carboxymethylcellulose Composite Loaded with Turmeric Extract for Antimicrobial Wound Dressing Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Non-Receptor 11 (PTPN11/Shp2) as a Driver Oncogene and a Novel Therapeutic Target in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Previous Article in Journal
Tacrine-Based Hybrids: Past, Present, and Future
Previous Article in Special Issue
May EPH/Ephrin Targeting Revolutionize Lung Cancer Treatment?
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Establishment of Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma Cell Lines from Surgical and Recurrence Biopsy Specimens

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 1722; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021722
by Shunpei Yamanaka 1, Susumu Suzuki 2,3,*, Hideaki Ito 4, Karnan Sivasundaram 5, Ichiro Hanamura 6, Ikuko Okubo 2, Kazuhiro Yoshikawa 2, Shoya Ono 7, Taishi Takahara 8, Akira Satou 8, Toyonori Tsuzuki 8, Ryuzo Ueda 3, Tetsuya Ogawa 1,* and Yasushi Fujimoto 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 1722; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021722
Submission received: 3 November 2022 / Revised: 4 January 2023 / Accepted: 12 January 2023 / Published: 15 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Advances in Cancer Therapy 2.0)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Cell lines of mucoepidermoid carcinoma were obtained at the initial surgery and after recurrence. Both cell lines showed similar character in terms of morphology, bioactivity, genetic abnormalities, and poor response to chemotherapy. However, the good response to cetuximab at the initial stage was lost at the time of recurrence.

 

The methodology is clearly described and performed correctly. The data are also clear.

Although this is a small case report, given that mucoepidermoid carcinoma is relatively rare and we have few data about its genetic and phenotypic aspects, this paper is worth for publication. Particularly, the phenotypic change at the time of recurrence is an important finding.

Author Response

We sincerely thank you for appreciating our research.

Reviewer 2 Report

This is an interesting study that established cell lines from both surgical and recurrent biopsy specimens of the same mucoepidermoid carcinoma patient.

A few minor revisions are listed below.

 

Line 88: MEC1-R1 cells were not smaller than AMU-MEC1 and AMU-MEC1-R2 cells. MEC1-R1 cells appears to be the same size as AMU-MEC1 and AMU-MEC1-R2 cells in Figure 1.

Legend to Figure 6, lines 4: B. not U

Author Response

Thank you very much for the revisions.

  • We deleted sentence Line 88 “AMU-MEC1-R1 cells were smaller than AMU-MEC1 and AMU-MEC1-R2 cells.” because this sentence makes no sense.
  • We revised Figure 6 legend according to your comments.

Please refer revised manuscript.

Back to TopTop