Next Article in Journal
α-Synuclein Aggregates in the Nigro-Striatal Dopaminergic Pathway Impair Fine Movement: Partial Reversal by the Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonist
Next Article in Special Issue
Cardiac Hamp mRNA Is Predominantly Expressed in the Right Atrium and Does Not Respond to Iron
Previous Article in Journal
The polyHIS Tract of Yeast AMPK Coordinates Carbon Metabolism with Iron Availability
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Dysregulated UPR and ER Stress Related to a Mutation in the Sdf2l1 Gene Are Involved in the Pathophysiology of Diet-Induced Diabetes in the Cohen Diabetic Rat

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 1355; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021355
by Chana Yagil 1,2, Ronen Varadi-Levi 1,2, Chen Ifrach 1 and Yoram Yagil 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 1355; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021355
Submission received: 8 December 2022 / Revised: 28 December 2022 / Accepted: 4 January 2023 / Published: 10 January 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Title: Dysregulated UPR and ER stress related to a mutation in the Sdf2l1 gene are involved in the pathophysiology of diet-induced diabetes in the Cohen Diabetic rat

Authors: Chana Yagil , Ronen Varadi-Levi , Yoram Yagil *

 

In this study authors evaluated the effects of deletion of SDF2L1 gene expression in rat models of type 2 diabetes mellitus. They observed that this deletion in the diabetic models induced dysregulation in pathways that are involved in protein folding and ER stress, concluding that this may contribute to the pathophysiology of diabetes in their animal model.

This investigation contributes to the evaluation of the pathophysiology of diabetes and highlights deletion that may contribute to the disease of diabetes of type 2. The paper is suitable for the special issue “Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases”, however some criticisms arise, and the manuscript should be revised before publication.

 

Major and minor comments

In the introduction the link between SDF2L1 and the unfolded protein response should be better described, indicating which pathways and proteins are involved. The paragraphs of the discussion, in which there is an explanation of the UPR pathways, could be moved to the introduction. This would allow to shorten the long discussion.

The legend of figure 1 does not describe the image. It must be improved by explaining protein cascades and presenting a list of abbreviations.

Fig.2 Did authors quantify protein expression? Mw of proteins should be provided in the picture.

Fig. 3 A representative blot of each protein should be added, and statistical analysis should be consistent with the graphical representation.

The text requires some corrections to punctuation.

Author Response

Please see the attachment. Thank you

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Major revision: 

Interesting paper looking at the genetic component of the UPR in rats. 

Figure 1: need to expand to include BiP, pGSK, JNK, and GAPDH

Figure 2: Should look at brain as well

Figure 3: should add marker for arm 3

Figure 4: Should add weight measurements.

Figure 5: data is sufficient

Figure 6: should measure growth hormone levels

Figure 7: figure is sufficient

The paper would greatly benefit from expansion regarding how the pathway can be targeted PMID: 28077004 and what effects this can have on behavior PMID: 25540611 

If the above are addressed and references included, paper could be of interest. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment. Thank you

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The present manuscript is very interesting and well written and designed however I have some minor points:

1- The types of the tissues used in the study not mentioned in the method section 

2-  Figure 3: All the comparisons are relative to the CDr/y RD, while no comparison between the two strains on DD (CDs vs. CDr

3- Figure 5: the scattergrams (A and C) are confusing and redundant 

4- The authors should outlined the limitations of their study  

Author Response

Please see the attachement. Thak you

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors addressed reviewer’s comment and have made substantial modifications strengthening the quality of the manuscript. I have no further comments at this time.

Back to TopTop