Next Article in Journal
Synthesis, Characterization and Photoactivation Studies on the Novel Pt(IV)-Based [Pt(OCOCH3)3(phterpy)] Complex
Next Article in Special Issue
The Therapeutic Potential of Pyroptosis in Melanoma
Previous Article in Journal
Self-Prepared Hyaluronic Acid/Alkaline Gelatin Composite with Nano-Hydroxyapatite and Bone Morphogenetic Protein for Cranial Bone Formation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential Development of Vitrified Immature Human Oocytes: Influence of the Culture Medium and the Timing of Vitrification
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Identification of Novel Pathways Regulated by APE1/Ref-1 in Human Retinal Endothelial Cells

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 1101; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021101
by Mahmut Mijit 1,†, Sheng Liu 2,†, Kamakshi Sishtla 3, Gabriella D. Hartman 3,4, Jun Wan 2,5,‡, Timothy W. Corson 3,4,5,6,7,‡ and Mark R. Kelley 1,3,4,6,7,*,‡
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 1101; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021101
Submission received: 9 November 2022 / Revised: 26 December 2022 / Accepted: 3 January 2023 / Published: 6 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 23rd Anniversary of IJMS: Advances in Biochemistry)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper is clearly written and the overall experimental plan is sound. I have some major issues that should be addressed:

1.  DEG validation should be confirmed through Western blotting experiments on at least the most interesting genes

2. The author should test whether some of the DEG are regulated through redox based mechanisms by APE1 using the well known APE1 redox inhibitor E3330

3. An emerging field of investigation is the role of APE1 in miRNAs processing. The effect the authors show on DEG could be due to miR-mediated effects. The authors should discuss this aspect.

Author Response

Please find our responses in attached word file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

interesting results!

An important consideration has to be made: a clearer integration of the clinical implications of these results is important, starting from the abstract and also extensively in the discussion in order to make this paper usable also by clinicians. 

Author Response

Please find our responses in the attached word file.

 

Thanks!

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors properly addressed my previous concerns

Reviewer 2 Report

I have no additional comments

Back to TopTop