Next Article in Journal
MicroRNAs Present in Malignant Pleural Fluid Increase the Migration of Normal Mesothelial Cells In Vitro and May Help Discriminate between Benign and Malignant Effusions
Previous Article in Journal
Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Zeolite A from Metakaolinite for CO2 Adsorption
Previous Article in Special Issue
Host–Microbiome Interactions: Tryptophan Metabolism and Aromatic Hydrocarbon Receptors after Traumatic Brain Injury
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Role of SNAP-25 in Autism Spectrum Disorders Onset Patterns

by
Elisabetta Bolognesi
1,
Franca Rosa Guerini
1,*,
Alessandra Carta
2,
Matteo Chiappedi
3,
Stefano Sotgiu
2,
Martina Maria Mensi
3,
Cristina Agliardi
1,
Milena Zanzottera
1 and
Mario Clerici
1,4
1
Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Biotechnology, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Via Capecelatro 66, 20148 Milan, Italy
2
Unit of Child Neuropsychiatry, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
3
Child Neuropsychiatry Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
4
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(18), 14042; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241814042
Submission received: 14 August 2023 / Revised: 4 September 2023 / Accepted: 8 September 2023 / Published: 13 September 2023

Abstract

:
Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) can present with different onset and timing of symptom development; children may manifest symptoms early in their first year of life, i.e., early onset (EO-ASD), or may lose already achieved skills during their second year of life, thus showing a regressive-type onset (RO-ASD). It is still controversial whether regression represents a neurobiological subtype of ASD, resulting from distinct genetic and environmental causes. We focused this study on the 25 kD synaptosomal-associated protein (SNAP-25) gene involved in both post-synaptic formation and adhesion and considered a key player in the pathogenesis of ASD. To this end, four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the SNAP-25 gene, rs363050, rs363039, rs363043, and rs1051312, already known to be involved in neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders, were analyzed in a cohort of 69 children with EO-ASD and 58 children with RO-ASD. Both the rs363039 G allele and GG genotype were significantly more frequently carried by patients with EO-ASD than those with RO-ASD and healthy controls (HC). On the contrary, the rs1051312 T allele and TT genotype were more frequent in individuals with RO-ASD than those with EO-ASD and HC. Thus, two different SNAP-25 alleles/genotypes seem to discriminate between EO-ASD and RO-ASD. Notably, rs1051312 is located in the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of the gene and is the target of microRNA (miRNA) regulation, suggesting a possible epigenetic role in the onset of regressive autism. These SNPs, by discriminating two different onset patterns, may represent diagnostic biomarkers of ASD and may provide insight into the different biological mechanisms towards the development of better tailored therapeutic and rehabilitative approaches.

1. Introduction

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are part of the neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) classified by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5, (DSM-5) [1] as a group of conditions characterized by dysfunctional deviation of the neurodevelopmental trajectory, causing impairments of cognitive and behavioral functioning. ASD are among the commonest of NDDs, affecting 1–2% of the population, and are approximately four times more common in males than females [2,3]. ASD are characterized by a clinical spectrum of difficulties in social communication and interaction with restrictive and repetitive patterns of behaviors and interests. ASD are genetically heterogeneous with a multitude of implicated genes [4,5,6,7].
The clinical signs of ASD may have a different timing of appearance. Some children may manifest symptoms as early as within their first year of life and are considered as patients with early onset (EO-ASD). Others may lose already achieved skills, i.e., communication, during their second year of life, thus showing a regressive-type onset (RO-ASD). This developmental regression is estimated in 32% of children with ASD [8], involving decays in the main social and communication behaviors for most of them [9].
It is still not clearly established whether regressive ASD may be a neurobiological subtype with genetic and environmental susceptibility factors distinguishable from those of EO-ASD [10]. The biological mechanisms that lead to the regressive phenotype are also still unknown.
Regression has been associated with the occurrence of seizures [11], brain growth [12,13], immunological function [14,15], gastrointestinal problems [16], and genetic and genomic variations [17,18,19] that include mitochondrial and MeCP2 mutations [20,21,22]. A genetic involvement in the ASD-regressive phenotype has been suggested specifically for those genes that play a role in synaptic transmissions, such as SHANK3 and SYNGAP1 [23]. Goin-Kochel et al. [17] reported that children with ASD and mutations in postsynaptic density genes were more likely to experience regression than those with mutations in embryonic genes who were less likely to have skill losses.
Among the genes that play a role in synaptic plasticity, the SNAP-25 (synaptosomal-associated protein of 25 kDa) gene has been largely associated with common neuropsychiatric disorders, such as attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [24,25], bipolar disorders, and schizophrenia [26].
The SNAP-25 rs363043 and rs363050 polymorphisms were shown to be associated with hyperactivity and cognitive deficits in Italian children with ASD, respectively [27,28], whereas in the Han Chinese population, the rs363018 and rs8636 polymorphisms predicted a higher likelihood of developing ASD [29]. Finally, the rs3746544 G allele was observed to be more frequently carried by Iranian children with ASD [30]. In addition, the SNAP-25 gene has been largely associated with different neurological and non-neurological disorders. SNAP-25 rs363050 (A) and rs363043 (T) alleles as well as the rs363050/rs363043 A-T haplotype were associated with Alzheimer’s disease [31]. Similarly, the rs363050 AA genotype was significantly associated with the risk of sarcopenia, [32] whereas SNAP-25 rs1051312, was suggested to play a role in the development of multiple sclerosis [33].
SNAP-25, VAMP (vesicle-associated membrane protein), and syntaxins constitute the SNARE complex; these proteins are essential for the exocytosis of synaptic vesicles and, thereby, for synaptic transmission [34].
The presynaptic role of SNAP-25 in regulated exocytosis is well established; however, recently, a postsynaptic role of SNAP-25 has also been reported, including involvement in spine morphogenesis [35,36] and structural changes necessary for long-term potentiation (LTP) and synaptic maturation [37,38]. Recently, its localization in the postsynaptic plasma membrane of the hippocampus was demonstrated [39].
The principal aim of this study consisted of an evaluation of the possible role of the SNAP-25 gene in differentiating children with EO-ASD from those who develop a regressive form of ASD. To this purpose, four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the SNAP-25 gene (i.e., rs363043, rs363039, rs363050, and rs1051312), known players in neurodevelopmental disorders, were investigated [24,25,26,27,28,29,30].

2. Results

2.1. SNAP-25 rs363050, rs363039, rs363043, and rs1051312 Genotype Distribution in Children with ASD and Healthy Controls

The allele and genotype distributions of SNAP-25 rs363050, rs363039, rs363043, and rs1051312 in children with ASD and HC are shown in Table 1. Genotype frequencies for each polymorphism were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium both in ASD and in controls. First, the SNAP-25 rs363050, rs363039, rs363043, and rs1051312 allelic and genotypic distributions in children with ASD from continental Italy and in those from Sardinia were compared, and since no differences were observed, the two cohorts were grouped. The frequency of the SNAP-25 SNPs minor alleles observed in the control group was in agreement with previously reported results [27]. A higher frequency of the rs363039 G major allele was found in children with ASD compared to controls (70% vs. 63%, p = 0.05, OR = 1.4, 95% IC (0.99–1.95)), though not statistically significant. No further difference in allelic and genotype frequencies was observed for the other polymorphisms.

2.2. SNAP-25 rs363050, rs363039, rs363043, and rs1051312 Allele and Genotype Distributions in Children with ASD with Early and Regressive Onsets

Comparisons of the allele and genotype distributions were investigated in the EO-ASD, RO-ASD, and HC groups. The rs363039 G allele was more frequently carried by children with EO-ASD compared to both the children with RO-ASD (75% vs. 65%, p = 0.08, not significant) and HC (75% vs. 63%, p = 0.009, OR: 1.75, 95% IC (1.14–2.72)). Notably, the allelic frequency in the children with RO-ASD is not dissimilar to that of the HC group.
On the other hand, the rs1051312 T allele was more frequently carried by children with RO-ASD than those with EO-ASD (87% vs. 72%, p = 0.003, OR: 2.64, 95% IC (1.38–5.22)) and the HC group (87% vs. 73%, p = 0.002, OR: 2.43, 95% IC (1.38–4.5)). The genotype and allelic distributions of rs1051312 were similar between the children with EO-ASD and the HC.
The co-dominant model distribution among the studied groups confirmed the results observed for the allelic ones, as reported in Table 2. The rs303039 GG genotype is more frequent in the EO-ASD group compared to the RO-ASD (58% vs. 40%) and HC groups (58% vs. 38%). Again, only the latest comparison is statistically significant (p = 0.015). Conversely, the rs1051312 TT genotype is significantly more frequent in the RO-ASD group compared to the EO-ASD (76% vs. 49%, p = 0.008) and HC (76% vs. 53%, p = 0.006) groups.
In Table 3, the results are reported when we considered different genetic models. We found that, under the Dominant model, the frequency of the rs363039 GG genotype was higher in the EO-ASD group than in the RO-ASD group (58% vs. 40%, p = 0.04, OR: 2.19 (1.03–4.27)), and the rs1051312 TT distribution was higher in the children with RO-ASD than that in the children with EO-ASD (76.0% vs. 49.0%, p = 0.002, OR: 3.2, (1.5–6.9)).

2.3. Haplotype Analysis of SNAP-25 rs363050, rs363039, rs363043, and rs1051312 in the ASD Early and Regressive Onsets and Healthy Controls Groups

A haplotype analysis was conducted to evaluate if different SNAP-25 haplotypes are associated with the different ASD onsets. As reported in Table 4, the SNAP-25 rs363050, rs363039, rs363043, and rs1051312 A-G-T-C haplotype out of the 11 haplotypes that are generated from their combinations confers a 4.7-fold risk to have EO-ASD rather than RO-ASD (17.5% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.0008). Interestingly, the RO-ASD group has a frequency of this haplotype similar to the HC (4.2% vs. 7.2%). On the contrary, the G-A-C-T haplotype is more frequent in the RO-ASD group than in the EO-ASD group (31.0% vs. 20.3%), but the difference is not statistically significant. When we restricted the analysis to the haplotypes of rs363039 and rs1051312, the G-C haplotype was a risk factor for EO-ASD (p = 0.004, OR: 2.7 (1.3–5.5)), while the A-T haplotype was a risk factor for RO-ASD (p = 0.02, OR: 1.8 (1.1–3.3)).
Finally, Figure 1 shows the results of the linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis for the SNAP-25 SNPs. The linkage analysis showed a strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) among rs363050, rs363039, and rs363043 (D’ > 90), but no linkage disequilibrium between them and rs1051312 (D’ < 50). Rs1051312 and rs363039 can be considered independent markers in the SNAP-25 gene.

2.4. Correlation of Clinical and Functioning Scales with the ASD Early Onset, Regressive Onset, and SNAP-25 Genotypes

We analyzed the possible correlations among clinical scales, different onset patterns, and SNAP-25 polymorphisms. First, we compared ASD severity and cognitive and functioning scores between the EO-ASD and RO-ASD groups. The only significant result was a worse cognitive level in the EO-ASD group than in the RO-ASD group (ANOVA: mean values 2.4 ± 1.2 vs. 1.9 ± 1.3, p = 0.038). The cognitive level was grouped according to the historically used severity scale for mental retardation (as in DSM IV-TR, [40]) with scores from 1 to 5 (1 = normal (IQ >85), 2 = borderline IQ (70 to 85), 3 = mild mental retardation (IQ 50–55 to 70), 4 = moderate retardation (IQ 35–40 to 50–55), 5 = severe mental retardation (IQ: 20–25 to 35–40), profound mental retardation (IQ: <20–25)). When analyzing this association by adding the SNAP-25 rs363090 and rs1051312 genotypes, we found no differences in the cognitive levels between the EO-ASD and RO-ASD groups. These results suggest that the difference in the cognitive scores of the EO-ASD and RO-ASD groups is independent of the SNAP-25 polymorphisms.

3. Discussion

Our study tried to shed some light on the different onset patterns of ASD by comparing genetic variants of SNAP-25 in children with early- and regressive-onset ASD. Children with the EO-ASD pattern have evident neurodevelopmental delays and deviances already in their first year of life, while children with the regressive pattern have an apparent typical neurodevelopment until they initiate a decline or loss of the acquired skills. For many authors, regression in ASD represents a neurobiological subtype with different causes from the early-onset type [10,41].
SNAP-25 is a protein involved in pre- and post-synaptic functions. Our results showed that the SNAP-25 rs363039 G allele and GG genotype were significantly more frequent in the EO-ASD group than in the RO-ASD group in which, remarkably, the frequencies are similar to those of the HC.
On the contrary, in the RO-ASD group, the rs1051312 T allele and TT genotype have a higher frequency than in the early onset group, which has, in turn, similar frequencies to the HC.
The haplotype analysis showed that the rs363050, rs363039, rs363043, and rs1051312 haplotype A-G-T-C confers a 4.7-fold higher risk to develop EO-ASD. More specifically, the rs363039, rs1051312 G-C haplotype is significantly associated with EO-ASD, whereas the rs363039, rs1051312 A-T haplotype seems to characterize RO-ASD.
Therefore, rs363039 and rs1051312 can discriminate between EO-ASD and RO-ASD. Noteworthy, the linkage disequilibrium analysis demonstrated that they are independent markers that are not linked to each other. It is important to underline that rs1051312, located in the 3′UTR of the gene, represents a putative target site for the miR-641 [42], and the T allele is its target. MicroRNAs (MiRNA) are short, noncoding mRNA that are involved in epigenetic regulation and affect protein levels at the post-transcriptional level [43]. We may hypothesize that, in ASD regression, an adverse environmental factor can trigger an epigenetic dysregulation that alters SNAP-25 expression, resulting in disease-associated misregulation of this protein and causing the decline or loss of the acquired neurodevelopmental skills. Several other miRNAs were suggested to modify SNAP-25 expression, such as miR-153 and miR-27 (down) [44,45], miR-23a-3p, and miR-181a-5p [46].
A few studies tried to differentiate individuals with regressive and non-regressive ASD, associating distinct neural phenotypes with different onsets. Nordhal et al. [12], by using MRI techniques, analyzed the total cerebral volume in relation to ASD onset and found that boys with regression-type ASD had enlarged brain volumes compared to both boys without regression and typically developing matched controls. They also found that head growth trajectory was significantly accelerated in male children with RO-ASD (not in females) compared to both boys with EO-ASD and HC, beginning at approximately the 4/6 month of age and proceeding to the onset of behavioral symptoms [47].
Enstrom et al. [48] found different plasma levels of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a critical factor for neuronal differentiation and synaptic development, in children with ASD with different clinical onset. BDNF levels were significantly higher compared with age-matched controls without autism. Interestingly, within the ASD group, children with EO-ASD had higher plasma levels of BDNF compared to children with RO-ASD who, in turn, showed comparable BDNF levels with normal developing children, suggesting, within the ASD group, a differential BDNF response based on the onset of the autistic behaviors.
Li X et al. [49] found higher plasma levels of total secreted amyloid precursor protein (sAPPtotal) and of secreted amyloid precursor protein-α (sAPPα) in children with RO-ASD compared to children with non-regressive ASD and typically developing controls. APP is a glycoprotein secreted by glial cells and neurons that promotes neuronal proliferation and migration, cell adhesion, and synapse formation. At a young age, high levels of APP can reduce developmental spine pruning and impair synaptic long-term depression (LTD) with changes in synaptic development and plasticity, resulting in ASD and memory impairment [50,51,52].
Tamouza R and colleagues [53] analyzed the distribution of HLA haplotypes among Swedish children with ASD with and without regression and observed that the HLA-DPA1*01-DPB1*04 sub-haplotype was less represented in patients with regressive autism compared to those without regression, suggesting a protective role of this haplotype in regression.
Frye RE et al. [54] studied a group of subjects with ASD who were recruited for a natural history study. They found that being exposed to higher doses of PM2.5, either because of higher pollution levels or longer exposure to relatively lower PM2.5 doses as a consequence of outdoor recreational activities, could be correlated to an increase in regression. The authors speculated that this could have been due to the negative effect of pollution on an already (genetically) fragile mitochondrial physiology in children with ASD.
Although the mechanism leading to regression in children with ASD is still unclear, its negative prognostic role has been clearly demonstrated. Recently, Martin-Borreguero et al. [55] showed that children with RO-ASD had significantly higher core autistic symptoms and lower linguistic and social skills at 24-month follow-up. These children were also characterized by significantly worse adaptive functioning scores, both at diagnosis and 24 months later, and needed more intensive support and rehabilitative interventions. A large multicenter study that included 1027 children from China [56] confirmed these findings. Thompson et al. [57] were in line with these observations but also found no significant differences between children who had regressed from a normal functioning level and those who already had a reduced neurodevelopmental level.
Interestingly, a study conducted by Damiani et al. [58] in adults with ASD living in the rural area of Northern Italy found that those with RO-ASD showed worse behavioral profiles and more frequently received psychopharmacological prescriptions to compensate for clinical problems. Although the sample size of this study was too small to reach statistical significance, the trend was clear.
Finally, a skewed neuro-immune crosstalk may be involved early in the pathogenesis of different forms of autism, although only a few biomarkers have been identified. Increased B-cell expression of CD23+ along with different serum cytokine and adhesion molecule profiles in children with regressive ASD have been found [59]; further, a specific increase in IL-8 is described in infants with early autism compared to typical controls [60].
In conclusion, all the above research underlined clinical differences that potentially lead to a different need of rehabilitative and supportive interventions and point to a different etiology for regressive and non-regressive ASD. Our results are in line with them, suggesting a contribution for SNAP-25 genetic variants in determining the early or the regressive onset of ASD and, in the last case, probably via an epigenetic pathway.
The most relevant limitation of this study is the relatively small cohort of patients with ASD for each group coupled with the lower percentage of patients with RO-ASD compared to those with EO-ASD. Future studies should include larger samples and, possibly, have a prospective design in order to prevent retrospective recall biases when trying to define a child as having RO-ASD or EO-ASD [9]. Also, the early serum concentration of the SNAP-25 protein is needed to confirm different expression levels between EO- and RO-ASD as well as the evaluation of the miRNAs that target the SNAP-25 gene.

4. Material and Methods

4.1. Patients and Controls

One hundred and twenty-seven children (93 males, 34 females, mean age 7.9 ± 4.3 years) with ASD diagnosis according to the DSM-5 criteria [1] were enrolled at the IRCCS Mondino Foundation National Neurological Institute of Pavia (Italy) and at the Complex Operating Unit of Child Neuropsychiatry, University of Sassari (Italy). Sixty-five children (51 males, 14 females, mean age 5.8 ± 2.9 years) were from Italian peninsular descent; the remaining 62 children were of Sardinian ancestry (42 males, 20 females, mean age 10.1 ± 4.5 years). Among them, 69 children (51 males and 18 females, mean age 8 ± 4.7 years) were clinically classified as early-onset ASD, and 58 children (41 males and 17 females, mean age 7.8 ± 3.9 years) were clinically classified as regressive-onset ASD based on the loss of previously acquired social–communicative skills. The mean age in months of regression onset was 41.3 ± 22.5.
Clinical, psychiatric, neurological, and neuropsychological evaluations were carried out in all children with ASD. The diagnosis was confirmed through clinical evaluation and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule 2 (ADOS-2) [61]. Other diagnostic tools included the structured parent’s interview Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) [62] and the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) [63]. The global cognitive status was evaluated with Leiter Intelligence Scales [64], Wechsler Intelligence Scales [65], and Raven’s Progressive Matrixes [66]. The Children’s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS), which provides a measure of the impact on global functioning for youths under the age of 18, was used to evaluate the children’s general functioning [67].
The inclusion criteria were (a) age between 3 and 12 years and (b) a diagnosis of ASD confirmed by both clinical, not standardized, evaluation and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule 2 [67]. The exclusion criteria were the diagnosis of psychotic disorders and/or intellectual disability and/or other developmental disabilities without ASD, according to the DSM-5 criteria. Patients with an ascertained lesion of the central nervous system and/or genetic syndrome were also ruled out from the study. Genotyping of the children with ASD was blinded to the clinical assessment.
Two hundred and five unrelated, healthy Italian subjects were enrolled as a control group. They were sex-matched with the patients with ASD (165 males and 40 females). Since only genetic data were used to compare cases and controls, no age matching was used.
The study was designed and conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki; the research protocol was approved by the Don Gnocchi Foundation Ethical Committee (protocol n. 06_18/05/2016) on 18 May 2016.

4.2. SNPs Genotyping

Genomic DNA from patients and controls were isolated from peripheral blood or saliva. DNA from blood was obtained using a standard phenol/chloroform procedure, whereas from saliva, the ORAgene-DNA (DNA Genotek, Ottawa, ON, Canada) was used. The SNAP-25 SNPs were estimated with real-time allelic discrimination using TaqMan Assay probes (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). For rs363039, rs363043, rs363050, and rs1051312, respectively, the C_327976_10, C_2488346_10, C_329097_10, and C_339356_20 Human Pre-Designed Assays (Applied Biosystems) were used. A total of 10 ng of DNA/sample was amplified in a 10 µL reaction using TaqMan Genotyping Master Mix on 96-well plates with a CFX96TM System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). In each experiment, control samples of known genotypes and one negative control were included.

4.3. Statistical Analysis

The Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) for the rs363039, rs363043, rs363050, and rs1051312 SNPs was calculated using a chi-square method in both cases and control. 2x2 contingency tables were used to compare the distribution of the rs363039, rs363043, rs363050, and rs1051312 alleles between the EO-ASD group, RO-ASD group, and healthy controls. Allele, genotype, and haplotype distributions between the groups were compared using 2X N contingency tables. A 2X2 contingency table was applied when a statistically significant result was found, and the resulting p-value was corrected for the degree of freedom (DF). The association of each polymorphism/genotype with different onsets was evaluated with the odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). p-values were considered significant when <0.05 and, if applied, after Bonferroni correction for the proper degrees of freedom (Pc). The associations of the EO-ASD and RO-ASD groups and of SNAP-25 polymorphisms/haplotypes with the scores of clinical, behavioral, and functioning scales were tested with the parametric ANOVA (analysis of variance) or non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests, depending on the fitness of the scales to the normal distribution measured with the non-parametric Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.
Data were analyzed with SPSS version 28.0 (IBM Corp. in Armonk, NY) and the open source openEpi https://www.openepi.com, accessed on 10 April 2023. Haplotype and linkage disequilibrium analyses were performed with SHEsis online version, http://analysis.bio-x.cn/myAnalysis.php, accessed on 10 April 2023, [68].

5. Conclusions

The etiopathogenesis of regression in ASD has not yet been clearly defined. Apart from those children with evidence of a mitochondrial dysfunction or with the onset of an epileptic encephalopathy, it is widely believed that many genetic and epigenetic factors are likely to be involved [23]. There are, however, very few studies that compare the genetic variants in children with regressive and non-regressive ASD. By studying SNAP-25 gene variations, we described a different distribution for two different SNPs (rs363039 and rs1051312) between the two groups. Our data may indicate a different etiopathogenesis for the distinct ASD onsets, being that the regressive ASD is probably triggered by epigenetic factors that could affect the embryo–fetal as well as the post-natal development, as described in a recent model of autism risk [69]. SNAP-25 is essential for pre- and post-synaptic transmission along with spine morphogenesis; with all these fundamental roles in the normal neurodevelopment, variation in its genotype can be associated not only with ADHD, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia but also with different patterns of ASD onset.
These two SNAP-25 variants may be useful as predictive genetic and diagnostic markers both for an early rehabilitation of rs1051312 carriers and for a careful monitoring of their neurodevelopmental trajectory, thus enabling a personalized intervention.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.B. and M.C. (Mario Clerici); Data curation, E.B. and F.R.G.; Formal analysis, E.B. and F.R.G.; Funding acquisition, M.C. (Mario Clerici); Investigation, E.B., F.R.G., M.Z., C.A., S.S., A.C., M.C. (Matteo Chiappedi) and M.M.M.; Project administration, E.B. and M.C. (Mario Clerici); Resources, M.C. (Mario Clerici); Supervision, M.C. (Mario Clerici); Writing and original draft, E.B. and F.R.G.; Writing, review, and editing, M.C. (Mario Clerici). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported and funded by the Italian Ministry of Health: Ricerca Corrente 2022; partial support also by grants from Fondazione Alessandro and Vincenzo Negroni Prati Morosini and Fondazione Romeo and Enrica Invernizzi.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional Ethics committee of the IRCCS Fondazione Don Gnocchi Milano (protocol n. 06_18/05/2016) on 18 May 2016.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants. For children, informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardian.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the subjects enrolled in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association [APA]. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V-TR), 5th ed.; American Psychiatry Association Publishing: Washington, DC, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Maenner, M.J.; Warren, Z.; Williams, A.R.; Amoakohene, E.; Bakian, A.V.; Bilder, D.A.; Durkin, M.S.; Fitzgerald, R.T.; Furnier, S.M.; Hughes, M.M.; et al. Prevalence and characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years-Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2020. MMWR. Surveill. Summ. 2023, 72, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. OssNA. Available online: https://osservatorionazionaleautismo.iss.it/ (accessed on 1 June 2023).
  4. Trost, B.; Thiruvahindrapuram, B.; Chan, A.J.S.; Engchuan, W.; Higginbotham, E.J.; Howe, J.L.; Loureiro, L.O.; Reuter, M.S.; Roshandel, D.; Whitney, J.; et al. Genomic architecture of autism from comprehensive whole-genome sequence annotation. Cell 2022, 185, 4409–4427.e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Satterstrom, F.K.; Kosmicki, J.A.; Wang, J.; Breen, M.S.; De Rubeis, S.; An, J.Y.; Peng, M.; Collins, R.; Grove, J.; Klei, L.; et al. Large-Scale Exome Sequencing Study Implicates Both Developmental and Functional Changes in the Neurobiology of Autism. Cell 2020, 180, 568–584.e23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fu, J.M.; Satterstrom, F.K.; Peng, M.; Brand, H.; Collins, R.L.; Dong, S.; Wamsley, B.; Klei, L.; Wang, L.; Hao, S.P.; et al. Rare coding variation provides insight into the genetic architecture and phenotypic context of autism. Nat. Genet. 2022, 54, 1320–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhou, X.; Feliciano, P.; Shu, C.; Wang, T.; Astrovskaya, I.; Hall, J.B.; Obiajulu, J.U.; Wright, J.R.; Murali, S.C.; Xu, S.X.; et al. Integrating de novo and inherited variants in 42,607 autism cases identifies mutations in new moderate-risk genes. Nat. Genet. 2022, 54, 1305–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Barger, B.D.; Campbell, J.M.; McDonough, J.D. Prevalence and onset of regression within autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analytic review. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2013, 43, 817–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ozonoff, S.; Iosif, A.M. Changing conceptualizations of regression: What prospective studies reveal about the onset of autism spectrum disorder. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2019, 100, 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lainhart, J.E.; Ozonoff, S.; Coon, H.; Krasny, L.; Dinh, E.; Nice, J.; McMahon, W. Autism, regression, and the broader autism phenotype. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2002, 113, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Barger, B.D.; Campbell, J.; Simmons, C. The relationship between regression in autism spectrum disorder, epilepsy, and atypical epileptiform EEGs: A meta-analytic review. J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 2017, 42, 45–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nordahl, C.W.; Lange, N.; Li, D.D.; Barnett, L.A.; Lee, A.; Buonocore, M.H.; Simon, T.J.; Rogers, S.; Ozonoff, S.; Amaral, D.G. Brain enlargement is associated with regression in preschool-age boys with autism spectrum disorders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 20195–20200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Valvo, G.; Baldini, S.; Retico, A.; Rossi, G.; Tancredi, R.; Ferrari, A.R.; Calderoni, S.; Apicella, F.; Muratori, F.; Santorelli, F.M.; et al. Temporal lobe connects regression and macrocephaly to autism spectrum disorders. Eur. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry 2016, 25, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Scott, O.; Shi, D.; Andriashek, D.; Clark, B.; Goez, H.R. Clinical clues for autoimmunity and neuroinflammation in patients with autistic regression. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol. 2017, 59, 947–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Prosperi, M.; Guiducci, L.; Peroni, D.G.; Narducci, C.; Gaggini, M.; Calderoni, S.; Tancredi, R.; Morales, M.A.; Gastaldelli, A.; Muratori, F.; et al. Inflammatory Biomarkers are Correlated with Some Forms of Regressive Autism Spectrum Disorders. Brain Sci. 2019, 9, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Reynolds, A.M.; Soke, G.N.; Sabourin, K.R.; Croen, L.A.; Daniels, J.L.; Fallin, M.D.; Kral, T.V.E.; Lee, L.C.; Newschaffer, C.J.; Pinto-Martin, J.A.; et al. Gastrointestinal Symptoms in 2- to 5-Year-Old Children in the Study to Explore Early Development. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2021, 51, 3806–3817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Goin-Kochel, R.P.; Trinh, S.; Barber, S.; Bernier, R. Gene Disrupting Mutations Associated with Regression in Autism Spectrum Disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2017, 47, 3600–3607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gupta, A.R.; Westphal, A.; Yang, D.Y.J.; Sullivan, C.A.W.; Eilbott, J.; Zaidi, S.; Voos, A.; Vander Wyk, B.C.; Ventola, P.; Waqar, Z.; et al. Neurogenetic analysis of childhood disintegrative disorder. Mol. Autism 2017, 8, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yin, J.; Chun, C.A.; Zavadenko, N.N.; Pechatnikova, N.L.; Naumova, O.Y.; Doddapaneni, H.V.; Hu, J.; Muzny, D.M.; Schaaf, C.P.; Grigorenko, E.L. Next Generation Sequencing of 134 Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Regression. Genes 2020, 11, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Singh, K.; Singh, I.N.; Diggins, E.; Connors, S.L.; Karim, M.A.; Lee, D.; Zimmerman, A.W.; Frye, R.E. Developmental regression and mitochondrial function in children with autism. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2020, 7, 683–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Veeraragavan, S.; Wan, Y.W.; Connolly, D.R.; Hamilton, S.M.; Ward, C.S.; Soriano, S.; Pitcher, M.R.; McGraw, C.M.; Huang, S.G.; Green, J.R.; et al. Loss of MeCP2 in the rat models regression, impaired sociability and transcriptional deficits of Rett syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016, 25, 3284–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xi, C.Y.; Ma, H.W.; Lu, Y.; Zhao, Y.J.; Hua, T.Y.; Zhao, Y.; Ji, Y.H. MeCP2 gene mutation analysis in autistic boys with developmental regression. Psychiatr. Genet. 2007, 17, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tammimies, K. Genetic mechanisms of regression in autism spectrum disorder. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2019, 102, 208–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, C.; Yang, B.; Fang, D.; Zeng, H.; Chen, X.; Peng, G.; Cheng, Q.; Liang, G. The impact of SNAP-25 on brain functional connectivity density and working memory in ADHD. Biol. Psychol. 2018, 138, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, Y.S.; Dai, X.; Wu, W.; Yuan, F.F.; Gu, X.; Chen, J.G.; Zhu, L.Q.; Wu, J. The Association of SNAP25 Gene Polymorphisms in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017, 54, 2189–2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Leung, E.; Lau, E.W.; Liang, A.; de Dios, C.; Suchting, R.; Östlundh, L.; Masdeu, J.C.; Fujita, M.; Sanches, M.; Soares, J.C.; et al. Alterations in brain synaptic proteins and mRNAs in mood disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of postmortem brain studies. Mol. Psychiatry 2022, 27, 1362–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guerini, F.R.; Bolognesi, E.; Chiappedi, M.; Manca, S.; Ghezzo, A.; Agliardi, C.; Sotgiu, S.; Usai, S.; Matteoli, M.; Clerici, M. SNAP-25 single nucleotide polymorphisms are associated with hyperactivity in autism spectrum disorders. Pharmacol. Res. 2011, 64, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Braida, D.; Guerini, F.R.; Ponzoni, L.; Corradini, I.; De Astis, S.; Pattini, L.; Bolognesi, E.; Benfante, R.; Fornasari, D.; Chiappedi, M.; et al. Association between SNAP-25 gene polymorphisms and cognition in autism: Functional consequences and potential therapeutic strategies. Transl. Psychiatry 2015, 5, e500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wang, Z.; Li, J.; Zhang, T.; Lu, T.; Wang, H.; Jia, M.; Liu, J.; Xiong, J.; Zhang, D.; Wang, L. Family-based association study identifies SNAP-25 as a susceptibility gene for autism in the Han Chinese population. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2021, 105, 109985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Safari, M.R.; Omrani, M.D.; Noroozi, R.; Sayad, A.; Sarrafzadeh, S.; Komaki, A.; Manjili, F.A.; Mazdeh, M.; Ghaleiha, A.; Taheri, M. Synaptosome-Associated Protein 25 (SNAP25) Gene Association Analysis Revealed Risk Variants for ASD, in Iranian Population. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 61, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guerini, F.R.; Farina, E.; Costa, A.S.; Baglio, F.; Saibene, F.L.; Margaritella, N.; Calabrese, E.; Zanzottera, M.; Bolognesi, E.; Nemni, R.; et al. ApoE and SNAP-25 Polymorphisms Predict the Outcome of Multidimensional Stimulation Therapy Rehabilitation in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurorehabilit. Neural Repair 2016, 30, 883–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Agostini, S.; Mancuso, R.; Costa, A.S.; Guerini, F.R.; Trecate, F.; Miglioli, R.; Menna, E.; Arosio, B.; Clerici, M.; SA. M. B. A. Project. Sarcopenia associates with SNAP-25 SNPs and a miRNAs profile which is modulated by structured rehabilitation treatment. J. Transl. Med. 2021, 19, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yalın, O.Ö.; Gökdoğan Edgünlü, T.; Karakaş Çelik, S.; Emre, U.; Güneş, T.; Erdal, Y.; Eroğlu Ünal, A. Novel SNARE Complex Polymorphisms Associated with Multiple Sclerosis: Signs of Synaptopathy in Multiple Sclerosis. Balkan Med. J. 2019, 36, 174–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Palfreyman, M.T.; West, S.E.; Jorgensen, E.M. SNARE Proteins in Synaptic Vesicle Fusion. Adv. Neurobiol. 2023, 33, 63–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Antonucci, F.; Corradini, I.; Fossati, G.; Tomasoni, R.; Menna, E.; Matteoli, M. SNAP-25, a Known Presynaptic Protein with Emerging Postsynaptic Functions. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 2016, 8, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tomasoni, R.; Repetto, D.; Morini, R.; Elia, C.; Gardoni, F.; Di Luca, M.; Turco, E.; Defilippi, P.; Matteoli, M. SNAP-25 regulates spine formation through postsynaptic binding to p140Cap. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gopaul, K.R.; Irfan, M.; Miry, O.; Vose, L.R.; Moghadam, A.; Subah, G.; Hökfelt, T.; Bark, C.; Stanton, P.K. Developmental Time Course of SNAP-25 Isoforms Regulate Hippocampal Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity and Hippocampus-Dependent Learning. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Fossati, G.; Morini, R.; Corradini, I.; Antonucci, F.; Trepte, P.; Edry, E.; Sharma, V.; Papale, A.; Pozzi, D.; Defilippi, P.; et al. Reduced SNAP-25 increases PSD-95 mobility and impairs spine morphogenesis. Cell Death Differ. 2015, 22, 1425–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hussain, S.; Ringsevjen, H.; Schupp, M.; Hvalby, Ø.; Sørensen, J.B.; Jensen, V.; Davanger, S. A possible postsynaptic role for SNAP-25 in hippocampal synapses. Brain Struct. Funct. 2019, 224, 521–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  41. Barbeau, W.E. Neonatal and regressive forms of autism: Diseases with similar symptoms but a different etiology. Med. Hypotheses 2017, 109, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kovacs-Nagy, R.; Sarkozy, P.; Hu, J.; Guttman, A.; Sasvari-Szekely, M.; Ronai, Z. Haplotyping of putative microRNA-binding sites in the SNAP-25 gene. Electrophoresis 2011, 32, 2013–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yao, Q.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, X. The roles of microRNAs in epigenetic regulation. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2019, 51, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wei, C.; Thatcher, E.J.; Olena, A.F.; Cha, D.J.; Perdigoto, A.L.; Marshall, A.F.; Carter, B.D.; Broadie, K.; Patton, J.G. miR-153 regulates SNAP-25, synaptic transmission, and neuronal development. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Machitani, M.; Sakurai, F.; Wakabayashi, K.; Nakatani, K.; Tachibana, M.; Mizuguchi, H. MicroRNA miR-27 Inhibits Adenovirus Infection by Suppressing the Expression of SNAP-25 and TXN2. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e00159-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Agostini, S.; Bolognesi, E.; Mancuso, R.; Marventano, I.; Citterio, L.A.; Guerini, F.R.; Clerici, M. miR-23a-3p and miR-181a-5p modulate SNAP-25 expression. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0279961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dawson, G.; Munson, J.; Webb, S.J.; Nalty, T.; Abbott, R.; Toth, K. Rate of head growth decelerates and symptoms worsen in the second year of life in autism. Biol. Psychiatry 2007, 61, 458–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Enstrom, A.; Onore, C.; Tarver, A.; Hertz-Picciotto, I.; Hansen, R.; Croen, L.; Van de Water, J.; Ashwood, P. Peripheral Blood Leukocyte Production of BDNF following Mitogen Stimulation in Early Onset and Regressive Autism. Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2008, 4, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Li, X.; Zhou, P.; Li, Q.; Peng, B.; Cun, Y.; Dai, Y.; Wei, H.; Liu, X.; Yu, Y.; Jiang, Z.; et al. Regressive Autism Spectrum Disorder: High Levels of Total Secreted Amyloid Precursor Protein and Secreted Amyloid Precursor Protein-α in Plasma. Front. Psychiatry 2022, 13, 809543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tang, G.; Gudsnuk, K.; Kuo, S.H.; Cotrina, M.L.; Rosoklija, G.; Sosunov, A.; Sonders, M.S.; Kanter, E.; Castagna, C.; Yamamoto, A.; et al. Loss of mTOR-dependent macroautophagy causes autistic-like synaptic pruning deficits. Neuron 2014, 83, 1131–1143, Erratum in Neuron 2014, 83, 1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vogel-Ciernia, A.; Wood, M.A. Neuron-specific chromatin remodeling: A missing link in epigenetic mechanisms underlying synaptic plasticity, memory, and intellectual disability disorders. Neuropharmacology 2014, 80, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ebert, D.H.; Greenberg, M.E. Activity-dependent neuronal signalling and autism spectrum disorder. Nature 2013, 493, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tamouza, R.; Fernell, E.; Eriksson, M.A.; Anderlid, B.M.; Manier, C.; Mariaselvam, C.M.; Boukouaci, W.; Leboyer, M.; Gillberg, C. HLA Polymorphism in Regressive and Non-Regressive Autism: A Preliminary Study. Autism Res. 2020, 13, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Frye, R.E.; Cakir, J.; McCarty, P.J.; Rose, S.; Delhey, L.M.; Palmer, R.F.; Austin, C.; Curtin, P.; Yitshak-Sade, M.; Arora, M. Pollution and Maximum Temperature Are Associated with Neurodevelopmental Regressive Events in Autism Spectrum Disorder. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Martin-Borreguero, P.; Gómez-Fernández, A.R.; De La Torre-Aguilar, M.J.; Gil-Campos, M.; Flores-Rojas, K.; Perez-Navero, J.L. Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Neurodevelopmental Regression Present a Severe Pattern after a Follow-Up at 24 Months. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 644324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Hu, C.; Yang, F.; Yang, T.; Chen, J.; Dai, Y.; Jia, F.; Wu, L.; Hao, Y.; Li, L.; Zhang, J.; et al. A Multi-Center Study on the Relationship Between Developmental Regression and Disease Severity in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Front. Psychiatry 2022, 13, 796554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Thompson, L.; Gillberg, C.; Landberg, S.; Kantzer, A.K.; Miniscalco, C.; Barnevik Olsson, M.; Eriksson, M.A.; Fernell, E. Autism with and Without Regression: A Two-Year Prospective Longitudinal Study in Two Population-Derived Swedish Cohorts. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2019, 49, 2281–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Damiani, S.; Leali, P.; Nosari, G.; Caviglia, M.; Puci, M.V.; Monti, M.C.; Brondino, N.; Politi, P. Association of Autism Onset, Epilepsy, and Behavior in a Community of Adults with Autism and Severe Intellectual Disability. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gomez-Fernandez, A.; de la Torre-Aguilar, M.J.; Gil-Campos, M.; Flores-Rojas, K.; Cruz-Rico, M.D.; Martin-Borreguero, P.; Perez-Navero, J.L. Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder With Regression Exhibit a Different Profile in Plasma Cytokines and Adhesion Molecules Compared to Children Without Such Regression. Front. Pediatr. 2018, 6, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Heuer, L.S.; Croen, L.A.; Jones, K.L.; Yoshida, C.K.; Hansen, R.L.; Yolken, R.; Zerbo, O.; DeLorenze, G.; Kharrazi, M.; Ashwood, P.; et al. An Exploratory Examination of Neonatal Cytokines and Chemokines as Predictors of Autism Risk: The Early Markers for Autism Study. Biol. Psychiatry 2019, 86, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lord, C.; Rutter, M.; DiLavore, P.C.; Risi, S.; Gotham, K.; Bishop, S. Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule–Second Edition (ADOS-2); Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services Italian Edition; Colombi, C., Tancredi, R., Persico, A., Faggioli, A., Eds.; Hogrefe Editor: Firenze, Italy, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  62. Lord, C.; Rutter, M.; Le Couteur, A. Autism diagnostic interview-revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 1994, 24, 659–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Schopler, E.; Reichler, R.J.; Renner, B.R. The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), for Diagnostic Screening and Classification in Autism; Irvington: New York, NY, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  64. Roid, G.H.; Miller, L.J.; Pomplun, M.; Koch, C. Leiter International Performance Scale (Leiter-3), 3rd ed.; Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services Italian Edition; Cornoldi, C., Giofrè, D., Belacchi, C., Eds.; Giunti Organizzazioni Speciali: Firenze, Italy, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  65. Wechsler, D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 4th ed.; Harcourt Assessment: San Antonio, TX, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  66. Raven, J.C.; Court, J.H.; Raven, J. Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales; Section 2: Coloured Progressive Matrices. London: H. K. Lewis Italian Edition; Belacchi, C., Scalisi, T.G., Cannoni, E., Cornoldi, C., Eds.; Giunti Organizzazioni Speciali: Firenze, Italy, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  67. Shaffer, D.; Gould, M.S.; Brasic, J.; Ambrosini, P.; Fisher, P.; Bird, H.; Aluwahlia, S. A children’s global assessment scale (CGAS). Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1983, 40, 1228–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shi, Y.Y.; He, L. SHEsis, a powerful software platform for analyses of linkage disequilibrium, haplotype construction, and genetic association at polymorphism loci. Cell Res. 2005, 15, 97–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Panisi, C.; Guerini, F.R.; Abruzzo, P.M.; Balzola, F.; Biava, P.M.; Bolotta, A.; Brunero, M.; Burgio, E.; Chiara, A.; Clerici, M.; et al. Autism Spectrum Disorder from the Womb to Adulthood: Suggestions for a Paradigm Shift. J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) plot for the SNAP-25 SNPs rs363050, rs363039, rs363043, and rs1051312. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) plot generated with Shesis software for the four analyzed SNAP-25 SNPs rs363050, rs363039, rs363043 (all in intron 1), and rs1051312 (3′UTR). LD is displayed as pairwise D’ values, (D’). LD is represented as a gradient of colors with a red-to-white gradient reflecting higher-to-lower D’ values.
Figure 1. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) plot for the SNAP-25 SNPs rs363050, rs363039, rs363043, and rs1051312. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) plot generated with Shesis software for the four analyzed SNAP-25 SNPs rs363050, rs363039, rs363043 (all in intron 1), and rs1051312 (3′UTR). LD is displayed as pairwise D’ values, (D’). LD is represented as a gradient of colors with a red-to-white gradient reflecting higher-to-lower D’ values.
Ijms 24 14042 g001
Table 1. Allele and genotype distributions of SNAP-25 rs363050, rs363039, rs363043, and rs1051213 SNPs in children with ASD and healthy controls (HC).
Table 1. Allele and genotype distributions of SNAP-25 rs363050, rs363039, rs363043, and rs1051213 SNPs in children with ASD and healthy controls (HC).
Allele FrequencyContinental ASD
N (%)
Sardinian ASD N (%)p * Total ASD
N (%)
HC
N (%)
p °
Rs363050
A79 (61.0)75 (61.0) 154 (61.0)244 (60.0)
G51 (39.0)49 (39.0)0.9100 (39.0)166 (40.0)0.8
Rs363039
G97 (75.0)81 (65.0) 178 (70.0)257 (63.0)
A33 (25.0)43 (35.0)0.176 (30.0)153 (37.0)0.05
Rs363043
C94 (72.0)84 (68.0) 178 (70.0)298 (73.0)
T36 (28.0)40 (32.0)0.476 (30.0)112 (27.0)0.4
Rs1051312
T97 (75.0)103 (83.0) 200 (79.0)301 (73.0)
C33 (25.0)21 (17.0)0.154 (21.0)109 (27.0)0.1
Total130124 254410
Genotype frequency
Rs363050
AA24 (37.0)26 (42.0) 50 (39.0)70 (34.0)
AG31(48.0)23(37.0) 54(43.0)104 (43.0)
GG10 (15.0)13 (21.0)0.423 (18.0)31 (19.0)0.3
Rs363039
GG35 (54.0)28 (45.0) 63 (50.0)78 (38.0)
GA27 (42.0)25 (40.0) 52 (41.0)101 (49.0)
AA3 (5.0)9 (14.0)0.112 (9.0)26 (13.0)0.1
Rs363043
CC35 (54.0)32 (54.0) 67 (53.0)111 (54.0)
CT24 (37.0)20 (32.0) 44 (35.0)76 (37.0)
TT6 (9.0)10 (16.0)0.516 (13.0)18 (9.0)0.5
Rs1051312
TT36 (55.0)42 (68.0) 78 (61.0)108 (53.0)
TC25 (38.0)19 (31.0) 44 (35.0)85 (41.0)
CC4 (6.0)1 (2.0)0.25 (4.0)12 (6.0)0.2
Total127127 127205
N: absolute number of alleles/genotypes, %: allele/genotype frequency, *: Comparison between continental and Sardinian ASD, °: Comparison between total ASD and healthy controls (HC). For 2xN contingency tables, p values were adjusted with the Bonferroni correction.
Table 2. Allele and genotype distributions of SNAP-25 rs363050, rs363039, rs363043, and rs1051312 SNPs in children with ASD with early and regressive onsets.
Table 2. Allele and genotype distributions of SNAP-25 rs363050, rs363039, rs363043, and rs1051312 SNPs in children with ASD with early and regressive onsets.
Allele FrequencyASD
Early Onset
N (%)
ASD Regressive
Onset
N (%)
pHC
N (%)
p
Rs363050
A86 (62.0) *68 (59.0)° 244 (60.0)
G52 (38.0)48 (41.0)0.5166 (40.0)* 0.5. ° 0.8
Rs363039
G103 (75.0) *75 °(65.0) 257 (63.0)
A35 (25.0)41 (35.0)0.08153 (37.0)* 0.009, ° 0.7
Rs363043
C91 (66.0) *87 (75.0)° 298 (73.0)
T47 (34.0)29 (25.0)0.12112 (27.0)* 0.1. ° 0.6
Rs1051312
T99 (72.0) *101 (87.0)° 301 (73.0)
C39 (28.0)15 (13.0)0.003109 (27.0)* 0.7, ° 0.002
Total148116
Genotype frequency
Rs363050
AA30 (43.0) *20(34.0)° 70 (34.0)
AG26(38.0)28(48.0) 104 (43.0)
GG13 (19.0)10 (17.0)0.4731 (19.0)* 0.2. ° 0.5
Rs363039
GG40 (58.0) *23° (40.0) 78 (38.0)
GA23 (33.0)29 (50.0) 101 (49.0)
AA6 (9.0)6 (10.0)0.1126 (13.0)* 0.015, ° 0.9
Rs363043
CC32 (46.0) *35 (60.0)° 111 (54.0)
CT27 (39.0)17 (29.0) 76 (37.0)
TT10 (14.0)6 (10.0)0.2918 (9.0)* 0.3. ° 0.5
Rs1051312
TT34 * (49.0)44 (76.0)° 108 (53.0)
TC31 (45.0)13 (22.0) 85 (41.0)
CC4 (6.0)1 (2.0)0.00812 (6.0)* 0.9, ° 0.006
Total6958 205
N: absolute number of alleles/genotypes, %: allele/genotype frequency, *: Comparison between the early onset group and HC, °: Comparison between the regressive onset group and HC. For 2xN contingency tables, p values were adjusted with the Bonferroni correction.
Table 3. SNAP-25 rs363039 and rs1051312 under the genetic Dominant model associations with the ASD early and regressive onsets and healthy controls (HC).
Table 3. SNAP-25 rs363039 and rs1051312 under the genetic Dominant model associations with the ASD early and regressive onsets and healthy controls (HC).
Genotype FrequencyASD
Early Onset
N (%)
ASD Regressive Onset
N (%)
pOR
(95%IC)
HC
N (%)
pOR
(95%IC)
Rs363039
GG40 (58.0) *23 (40.0) 78 (38.0)
GA/AA29 (42.0)35 (60.0)0.042.09
(1.02–4.3)
127 (62.0)* 0.0042.2
(1.28–3.9)
rs1051312
TT34 (49.0)44 (76.0)° 108 (53.0)
TC/CC35 (51.0)14 (24.0)0.0023.2
(1.5–6.9)
97 (47.0)° 0.0012.8
(1.47–5.6)
N6958 205
N: absolute number of genotypes, %: genotype frequency, *: Comparison between the early onset group and HC, °: Comparison between the regressive onset group and HC.
Table 4. SNAP-25 rs363050, rs363039, rs363043, and rs1051312 haplotype analysis in the early onset ASD (EO-ASD), regressive onset ASD (RO-ASD), and healthy controls (HC).
Table 4. SNAP-25 rs363050, rs363039, rs363043, and rs1051312 haplotype analysis in the early onset ASD (EO-ASD), regressive onset ASD (RO-ASD), and healthy controls (HC).
ASD Early Onset ASD Regressive Onset HC
N%N%pOR (95%IC)N%p
4 SNPs HAPLOTYPE
A-G-T-C24 *17.554.20.00084.7 (1.8–14.1)307.2* 0.0006
G-A-C-T2820.336°31.00.051.7 (1.9–3.1)10124.7° 0.17
2 SNPs HAPLOTYPE
G-C33 *23.81210.50.0042.7 (1.3–5.7)7217.5* 0.1
A-T2920.939°33.30.021.9 (1.1–3.3)11628.3° 0.3
Total N138 116 410
N: number of haplotypes, *: Early onset group compared to HC, °: Regressive onset group compared to HC. For 2xN contingency tables, p values were adjusted with the Bonferroni correction.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bolognesi, E.; Guerini, F.R.; Carta, A.; Chiappedi, M.; Sotgiu, S.; Mensi, M.M.; Agliardi, C.; Zanzottera, M.; Clerici, M. The Role of SNAP-25 in Autism Spectrum Disorders Onset Patterns. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241814042

AMA Style

Bolognesi E, Guerini FR, Carta A, Chiappedi M, Sotgiu S, Mensi MM, Agliardi C, Zanzottera M, Clerici M. The Role of SNAP-25 in Autism Spectrum Disorders Onset Patterns. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(18):14042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241814042

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bolognesi, Elisabetta, Franca Rosa Guerini, Alessandra Carta, Matteo Chiappedi, Stefano Sotgiu, Martina Maria Mensi, Cristina Agliardi, Milena Zanzottera, and Mario Clerici. 2023. "The Role of SNAP-25 in Autism Spectrum Disorders Onset Patterns" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 18: 14042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241814042

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop