You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Review
  • Open Access

23 July 2023

Phosphoribosyltransferases and Their Roles in Plant Development and Abiotic Stress Response

,
,
,
and
1
College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
2
Key Laboratory of Plant Resources, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Metabolites and Their Reprogramming for Plant Tolerance under Environmental Stress 2.0

Abstract

Glycosylation is a widespread glycosyl modification that regulates gene expression and metabolite bioactivity in all life processes of plants. Phosphoribosylation is a special glycosyl modification catalyzed by phosphoribosyltransferase (PRTase), which functions as a key step in the biosynthesis pathway of purine and pyrimidine nucleotides, histidine, tryptophan, and coenzyme NAD(P)+ to control the production of these essential metabolites. Studies in the past decades have reported that PRTases are indispensable for plant survival and thriving, whereas the complicated physiological role of PRTases in plant life and their crosstalk is not well understood. Here, we comprehensively overview and critically discuss the recent findings on PRTases, including their classification, as well as the function and crosstalk in regulating plant development, abiotic stress response, and the balance of growth and stress responses. This review aims to increase the understanding of the role of plant PRTase and also contribute to future research on the trade-off between plant growth and stress response.

1. Introduction

Glycosylation, the transfer of a sugar moiety to an acceptor molecule, is a widespread modification in plants that regulates gene expression and metabolite bioactivity. This glycosyl modification occurs on carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, hormones, and other secondary metabolites to alter their important properties, such as solubility, stability, biological activity, or intermolecular interactions [,,,]. Moreover, glycosylation plays a crucial physiological role in all life processes of plants, including growth, development, and stress response [,].
Phosphoribosylation, a special glycosyl modification catalyzed by phosphoribosyltransferases (PRTase), is a key step in the biosynthetic pathways of purine and pyrimidine nucleotides, tryptophan (Try) and histidine (His), and cofactor NAD(P)+ to control the production of these metabolites []. These metabolites are essential for plants because purine and pyrimidine nucleotides, as well as Try and His are the basic constituent units of nucleic acids and proteins, respectively. In addition, Try is also a key precursor of auxin biosynthesis [], while NAD(P)+ is the core substance of energy metabolism [].
The physiological functions of many plant PRTases have been clarified [,,,,]. In addition, PRTases can collectively contribute to plant life processes since different PRTases crosstalk with each other by sharing 5-phosphoribosyl-1-pyrophosphate (PRPP) as sugar donors. However, research on plant PRTases in the past few decades mainly focuses on their role in plant survival and thriving, with little discussion about their role and crosstalk in plant development and abiotic stress responses [,]. In fact, recent studies clearly demonstrate that PRTase-related metabolic pathways are critical for chloroplast development, gametophyte development, salt, and osmotic stress response [,,,]. Herein, we summarize the recent advances in the function and crosstalk of plant PRTases in regulating plant development and abiotic stress response, aiming to provide new insights into the complicated role of PRTase in plant life processes.

2. Classification and Characteristics of PRTase

To date, studies have shown that PRTase is responsible for catalyzing the transfer of ribose-5-phosphate from the glycosyl donor PRPP to acceptor molecules (e.g., adenine, guanine, uracil) to form glycosidic bonds, which rely on divalent cations [,]. PRTase belongs to the PRT family and is identified at the amino acid sequence level []. Almost all PRTases contain a 13-residue sequence motif that is predicted to be a PRPP-binding site, which is composed of four hydrophobic amino acids, two acidic amino acids and seven variable characteristic amino acids [,].
PRTases can be divided into four categories based on the similarity of the three-dimensional structures, as shown in Figure 1A [,]. Class I PRTase is a homodimer formed by the N-terminal domain of one monomer adjoining the C-terminal domain of the other monomer, which shares a common α/β-barrel domain []. Class II PRTase monomers have two α/β-barrel domains that form homodimers in a similar manner to class I PRTase []. Class III PRTase monomers contain a small N-terminal α-helical domain and a large C-terminal α/β-barrel domain, with the N-terminal domain of one monomer close to the N-terminal domain of the other monomer, forming homodimers [,,]. Class IV PRTase are homohexamers, assembled from six monomers, each containing three α/β barrel domains [,].
As shown in Figure 1B and Table 1, different classes of PRTase are involved in different metabolic pathways. Class I PRTase is responsible for purine and pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis pathways, including amidophosphoribosyltransferase (ATase), adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT), hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HGPRT), orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT), and uracil phosphoribosyltransferase (UPRT) [,,]. Class II PRTase is involved in the NAD(P)+ biosynthesis pathway, including quinolinic acid phosphoribosyltransferase (QPRT) and nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NaPRT) [,]. Class III PRTase participates in the Try biosynthesis pathway, with only anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase (AnPRT) [,,,]. Class IV PRTase is responsible for the His biosynthesis pathway, with only ATP phosphoribosyltransferase (ATP–PRT) [,].
Table 1. Classification of PRTases, their related metabolic pathways and experimental evidence of gene function.
Figure 1. The protein structure and the catalytic reaction of PRTase, and its related metabolic pathways in plants [,,,]. (A) Protein structure and the catalytic reaction of PRTase. Different colors represent different monomers in the homodimer or homomultimer. (B) The metabolic pathways that PRTases are involved in. PRTases are shown within boxes. The green box indicates that it is chloroplast-localized, the blue box indicates that it can be chloroplast- and cytoplasm-localized, and the gray box indicates that it is cytoplasm-localized. The red dot represents 5-phosphoribosyl-1-pyrophosphate (PRPP), the common substrate of PRTases. Abbreviations for metabolites are shown in the Abbreviations list.

4. Crosstalk between the PRTase-Related Metabolic Pathways

Due to sharing the substrate PRPP, PRTase leads to crosstalk between related metabolic pathways. Furthermore, PRTase-related metabolic pathways play a synergistic role in regulating plant growth, development, and abiotic stress response.

4.1. Common Substrate of PRTases

PRPP, the intersection of PRTase-related metabolic pathways, is essential for all organisms. The competitive utilization of the common substrate PRPP by different PRTase makes it flow to the corresponding metabolic pathway. Hove-Jensen et al. [] reported that PRPP mainly flows to the purine and pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis pathways. In Escherichia coli, purine and pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis each consume 30% to 40% of PRPP, His and Try biosynthesis each consume 10% to 15% of PRPP, and NAD(P)+ biosynthesis consumes approximately 1% of PRPP []. However, the competition and distribution of PRPP in PRTase-related metabolic pathways in plants remain to be elucidated. Notably, the content of PRPP is an important factor limiting plant growth since overexpression of the PRPP synthetase gene significantly increases biomass accumulation in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana tabacum []. Hence, the competitive utilization of limited PRPP by PRTase regulates the biosynthesis of PRTase-related metabolites during plant growth.

4.2. Common Function of PRTase-Related Metabolic Pathways

The PRTase-related metabolic pathways coordinately promote plant growth and development (Figure 6A). Adenine nucleotide and His, Try, NAD(P)+ promote cytokinin signaling, IAA signaling, and mRNA 5′ NAD+ cap modification, respectively, and thus participate in chloroplast development and photosynthesis. Moreover, photosynthesis-derived glucose generates ATP through oxidative phosphorylation, which together with moderate levels of IAA activates TOR []. Importantly, TOR promotes central carbon and energy metabolism, as well as key anabolic processes, including nucleotide, amino acid, lipid, and cell wall synthesis, which are essential for rapid growth [,,,,,,,]. Overall, the PRTase-related metabolic pathways are jointly involved in plant growth and development by promoting chloroplast development and activating TOR.
Figure 6. The PRTase-related metabolic pathways co-regulate plant growth (A) and abiotic stress response (B). Proteins are represented by square boxes. Dotted lines indicate unclear roles and mechanisms. Abbreviations for proteins are as follows: auxin response factor (ARF), Arabidopsis histidine kinase (AHK), Arabidopsis response regulator (ARR), target of rapamycin (TOR), transmembrane kinase 1 (TMK1), sucrose non-fermenting 1-related protein kinase 2 (SnRK2), sucrose non-fermenting 1-related protein kinase 1 (SnRK1). Abbreviations for metabolites are shown in the Abbreviations list.
PRTase-related metabolic pathways also synergistically affect plant abiotic stress responses and the switching between growth and stress responses (Figure 6B). Under abiotic stress conditions, high levels of NAD+ and IAA directly activates ABA signaling in response to nutrient deficiencies and energy limitations. Importantly, changes in the flow of any PRTase-related metabolic pathway may alter the flux of PRPP to NAD+ or IAA biosynthesis pathways, leading to plant abiotic stress responses. For example, although the NAD+ content of multiple NAD+ biosynthesis-deficient mutants in Arabidopsis and rice is significantly reduced, they instead have an ABA hypersensitivity phenotype and excessive accumulation of ROS, resulting in growth inhibition and premature leaf senescence [,,,]. In addition, mutations in the adenine nucleotide salvage enzyme AtAPRT1 lead to enhanced oxidation and high-temperature tolerance in Arabidopsis []. His biosynthesis is also a potentially important factor in inhibiting plant growth under energy-limited conditions [].
In a mechanism similar to that of promoting plant abiotic stress response, PRTases may participate in fruit ripening (Figure 7). To date, significant increases in free NAD+ and IAA levels have been observed before the initiation of tomato fruit ripening (i.e., system II ethylene production) [,]. High levels of NAD+ and IAA may be critical for system II ethylene production and fruit ripening since they can trigger ABA signaling that mediates SlSnRK1 activation. On the one hand, activated SlSnRK1 may promote the expression of the key regulator SlRIN in the autocatalytic loop of system II ethylene and the ethylene biosynthesis genes by inactivating SlTOR and activating demethylase to remove H3K27me3 and DNA methylation [,]. In fact, heterologous overexpression of Malus hupehensis SnRK1 advanced tomato fruit ripening by about 10 days [,], whereas the silencing of SlSnRK1 expression in tomato fruit by VIGS delayed or completely inhibited ripening []. On the other hand, in addition to increased ethylene biosynthesis, activated SlSnRK1 may also enhance fruit sensitivity to ethylene, which is necessary for fruit ripening [,]. Specifically, SlSnRK1-mediated SlTOR inactivation stabilizes SlEIN3/EIL1 in a SlEIN2-dependent manner to induce downstream ethylene-responsive factors expression, resulting in increased fruit sensitivity to ethylene [,]. Huang et al. [] constructed the tomato SlEIN2 mutant slein2-1 and found it was insensitive to ethylene and completely arrested fruit ripening. Taken together, PRTase-related metabolic pathways are potentially critical in fruit ripening, mediating SlSnRK1 activation and SlTOR inactivation through the activation of ABA signaling.
Figure 7. A possible model for the regulation of fruit growth and ripening by the PRTase-related metabolic pathways. Under nutrient-enriched conditions, SnRK1 activity is inhibited, and ATP and moderate levels of IAA synergistically activate TOR to promote fruit growth. However, under nutrient-limited conditions, high levels of NAD+ and IAA activate ABA signaling, so activated SnRK1 inhibits TOR activity and promotes fruit ripening. PRTases are represented by square boxes, other proteins are represented by round boxes. Active proteins are white, and inactivated proteins are grey. Abbreviations for proteins and genes are as follows: transmembrane kinase 1 (TMK1), protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C), sucrose non-fermenting 1-related protein kinase 2 (SnRK2), sucrose non-fermenting 1-related protein kinase 1 (SnRK1), nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase (NaPRT), adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT), target of rapamycin (TOR), anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase (AnPRT), ATP phosphoribosyltransferase (ATP–PRT), ethylene insensitive 2 (EIN2), ethylene-insensitive proteins (EIN3/EIL1), colorless non-ripening (CNR), ripening inhibitor (RIN), non-ripening (NOR), ethylene-responsive factor (ERF), ACC synthase (ACS), ACC oxidase (ACO), pectate lyases (PL), tomato beta-galactosidase 4 (TBG4). Abbreviations for metabolites are shown in the Abbreviations list.

5. Conclusions and Perspectives

PRTases contribute to nucleic acid and protein synthesis, energy metabolism, hormonal signaling, and epigenetics by promoting the biosynthesis of adenine nucleotides, NAD(P)+, Try, and His. Importantly, these metabolites play an essential role in chloroplast development and plant growth through cytokinin signaling, IAA signaling, and NAD+ cap modification of mRNA. In addition, PRTases co-regulate plant abiotic stress response via crosstalk with each other. Under abiotic stress conditions, increased biosynthesis of NAD+ and Try leads to elevated levels of free NAD+ and IAA, which govern the transition of plants from growth to stress response through ABA signaling and epigenetic remodeling. In this process, NAD-dependent enzymes and the conserved SnRK1-TOR axis regulatory modules are key factors, down-regulating anabolism and up-regulating catabolism through histone acetylation/methylation remodeling and transcriptional reprogramming to coordinate nutrient supply and plant growth.
It is a brilliant strategy for plants to use the levels of PRTase-related metabolites that are necessary for growth as a signal to guide the transition between plant growth and stress response. Specifically, plants can sense a stressful environment by monitoring elevated levels of these intracellular metabolites, rapidly turning on the switch of stress response, which then triggers a reduction in these metabolite levels, further turning off the switch of growth, and vice versa. Until now, studies have found that levels of NAD+ and Try play a decisive role in the trade-off between plant growth and stress response, but the importance of adenine nucleotides and His has been underestimated. Elucidating the role and mechanism of adenine nucleotide and His biosynthesis in plant growth defense tradeoffs is an urgent but challenging goal. This knowledge will guide us in precisely regulating the levels of PRTase-related metabolites in plants to help maximize plant yield under fluctuating environmental conditions.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, Y.L.; writing—conceived and revised, W.W. and B.Z.; writing—review and editing, P.W. and B.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the China National Key R&D Program during the 14th Five-year Plan Period (Grant No. 2022YFD2100103) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant NO. 32272373 and 31871847) to B.Z.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ComponentAbbreviation
GlutamineGln
Formylglycinamide ribonucleotideFGAR
4-carboxy aminoimidazole ribonucleotideCAIR
5-formaminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotideFAICAR
AdenineAde
Adenosine triphosphateATP
Carbamoyl phosphateCP
Orotic acidOA
Uridine diphosphateUDP
AspartateAsp
Nicotinic acid mononucleotide nicotinamide mononucleotideNaMN
NicotinamideNam
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotideNADH
1-(2-carboxyphenylamino)-1-deoxyribulose-5-phosphateIGP
AuxinIAA
Pro-phosphoribosyl formimino-5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotideProFAR
Imidazoleacetol phosphateIAP
HistidineHis
Abscisic acidABA
Glycinamide ribonucleotideGAR
5-aminoimidazole ribonucleotideAIR
5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotideAICAR
Adenosine monophosphateAMP
Adenosine diphosphateADP
Guanosine monophosphateGMP
Dihydro-orotateDHO
Uridine monophosphateUMP
Cytosine triphosphateCTP
5-phosphoribosylaminePRA
Formylglycinamidine ribonucleotideFGAM
N-succinyl-5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotideSAICAR
Inosine monophosphateIMP
AdenosineAdo
Xanthosine monophosphateXMP
Carbamoyl aspartateCA
Orotidine 5′-monophosphateOMP
Uridine triphosphateUTP
IminoaspartateIA
Nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotideNaAD
NicotinateNA
AnthranilateANT
Indole-3-glycerol-phosphateIND
5-phosphoribosyl ATPPRATP
Phosphoribulosyl formimino-5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotidePRFAR
Histidinol phosphateHolP
CytokininCK
Glucose 6-phosphateGlu-6-P
QuinolinateQA
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotideNAD+
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphateNADP+
5-phosphoribosyl anthranilatePRANT
tryptophanTry
5-phosphoribosyl AMPPRAMP
Imidazoleglycerol phosphateIGP
HistidinolHol
5-phosphoribosyl-1-pyrophosphatePRPP

References

  1. Scheible, W.R.; Pauly, M. Glycosyltransferases and cell wall biosynthesis: Novel players and insights. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lairson, L.L.; Henrissat, B.; Davies, G.J.; Withers, S.G. Glycosyltransferases: Structures, functions, and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2008, 77, 521–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tiwari, P.; Sangwan, R.S.; Sangwan, N.S. Plant secondary metabolism linked glycosyltransferases: An update on expanding knowledge and scopes. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 714–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Moremen, K.W.; Haltiwanger, R.S. Emerging structural insights into glycosyltransferase-mediated synthesis of glycans. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2019, 15, 853–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sinha, S.C.; Smith, J.L. The PRT protein family. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2001, 11, 733–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kasahara, H. Current aspects of auxin biosynthesis in plants. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2016, 80, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gakière, B.; Fernie, A.R.; Pétriacq, P. More to NAD+ than meets the eye: A regulator of metabolic pools and gene expression in Arabidopsis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018, 122, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hung, W.F.; Chen, L.J.; Boldt, R.; Sun, C.W.; Li, H.M. Characterization of Arabidopsis glutamine phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate amidotransferase-deficient mutants. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 1314–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Katoh, A.; Uenohara, K.; Akita, M.; Hashimoto, T. Early steps in the biosynthesis of NAD in Arabidopsis start with aspartate and occur in the plastid. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 851–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mainguet, S.E.; Gakière, B.; Majira, A.; Pelletier, S.; Bringel, F.; Guérard, F.; Caboche, M.; Berthomé, R.; Renou, J.P. Uracil salvage is necessary for early Arabidopsis development. Plant J. 2009, 60, 280–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Woo, N.S.; Gordon, M.J.; Graham, S.R.; Rossel, J.B.; Badger, M.R.; Pogson, B.J. A mutation in the purine biosynthetic enzyme ATASE2 impacts high light signalling and acclimation responses in green and chlorotic sectors of Arabidopsis leaves. Funct. Plant Biol. 2011, 38, 401–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wu, L.; Ren, D.; Hu, S.; Li, G.; Dong, G.; Jiang, L.; Hu, X.; Ye, W.; Cui, Y.; Zhu, L.; et al. Down-Regulation of a Nicotinate Phosphoribosyltransferase Gene, OsNaPRT1, Leads to Withered Leaf Tips. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 1085–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sukrong, S.; Yun, K.Y.; Stadler, P.; Kumar, C.; Facciuolo, T.; Moffatt, B.A.; Falcone, D.L. Improved growth and stress tolerance in the Arabidopsis oxt1 mutant triggered by altered adenine metabolism. Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 1310–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.; Lin, X.; Hong, X.; Zhu, Y.; Li, W.; He, W.; An, F.; Guo, H. Adenine phosphoribosyl transferase 1 is a key enzyme catalyzing cytokinin conversion from nucleobases to nucleotides in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 1661–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yang, Z.; Shang, Z.; Wang, L.; Lu, Q.; Wen, X.; Chi, W.; Zhang, L.; Lu, C. Purine biosynthetic enzyme ATase2 is involved in the regulation of early chloroplast development and chloroplast gene expression in Arabidopsis. Photosynth. Res. 2015, 126, 285–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Men, Y.; Li, J.R.; Shen, H.L.; Yang, Y.M.; Fan, S.T.; Li, K.; Guo, Y.S.; Lin, H.; Liu, Z.D.; Guo, X.W. VaAPRT3 Gene is Associated With Sex Determination in Vitis amurensis. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 727260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pan, S.; Li, K.E.; Huang, W.; Zhong, H.; Wu, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Cai, Z.; Guo, H.; Chen, X.; et al. Arabidopsis DXO1 possesses deNADding and exonuclease activities and its mutation affects defense-related and photosynthetic gene expression. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 967–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, X.; Wei, W.; Zhu, W.; Su, L.; Xiong, Z.; Zhou, M.; Zheng, Y.; Zhou, D.X. Histone Deacetylase AtSRT1 Links Metabolic Flux and Stress Response in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2017, 10, 1510–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Perveen, S.; Rashid, N.; Tang, X.F.; Imanaka, T.; Papageorgiou, A.C. Anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakarensis shows maximum activity with zinc and forms a unique dimeric structure. FEBS Open Bio 2017, 7, 1217–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lohkamp, B.; McDermott, G.; Campbell, S.A.; Coggins, J.R.; Lapthorn, A.J. The structure of Escherichia coli ATP-phosphoribosyltransferase: Identification of substrate binding sites and mode of AMP inhibition. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 336, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shin, D.H.; Oganesyan, N.; Jancarik, J.; Yokota, H.; Kim, R.; Kim, S.H. Crystal structure of a nicotinate phosphoribosyltransferase from Thermoplasma acidophilum. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 18326–18335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marino, M.; Deuss, M.; Svergun, D.I.; Konarev, P.V.; Sterner, R.; Mayans, O. Structural and mutational analysis of substrate complexation by anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase from Sulfolobus solfataricus. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 21410–21421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wu, X.; Zhang, M.; Kuang, Z.; Yue, J.; Xue, L.; Zhu, M.; Zhu, Z.; Khan, M.H.; Niu, L. Crystal structures of anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Acta Crystallogr. F Struct. Biol. Commun. 2021, 77, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mittelstädt, G.; Jiao, W.; Livingstone, E.K.; Moggré, G.J.; Nazmi, A.R.; Parker, E.J. A dimeric catalytic core relates the short and long forms of ATP-phosphoribosyltransferase. Biochem. J. 2018, 475, 247–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ruszkowski, M. Guarding the gateway to Histidine biosynthesis in plants: Medicago truncatula ATP-phosphoribosyltransferase in relaxed and tense states. Biochem. J. 2018, 475, 2681–2697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Vos, S.; Parry, R.J.; Burns, M.R.; de Jersey, J.; Martin, J.L. Structures of free and complexed forms of Escherichia coli xanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 282, 875–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Silva, M.; Silva, C.H.; Iulek, J.; Oliva, G.; Thiemann, O.H. Crystal structure of adenine phosphoribosyltransferase from Leishmania tarentolae: Potential implications for APRT catalytic mechanism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1696, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Malik, S.S.; Patterson, D.N.; Ncube, Z.; Toth, E.A. The crystal structure of human quinolinic acid phosphoribosyltransferase in complex with its inhibitor phthalic acid. Proteins 2014, 82, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Scully, T.W.; Jiao, W.; Mittelstädt, G.; Parker, E.J. Structure, mechanism and inhibition of anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2023, 378, 20220039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zrenner, R.; Stitt, M.; Sonnewald, U.; Boldt, R. Pyrimidine and purine biosynthesis and degradation in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 805–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Decros, G.; Beauvoit, B.; Colombié, S.; Cabasson, C.; Bernillon, S.; Arrivault, S.; Guenther, M.; Belouah, I.; Prigent, S.; Baldet, P.; et al. Regulation of Pyridine Nucleotide Metabolism During Tomato Fruit Development Through Transcript and Protein Profiling. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mano, Y.; Nemoto, K. The pathway of auxin biosynthesis in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 2853–2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rees, J.D.; Ingle, R.A.; Smith, J.A. Relative contributions of nine genes in the pathway of Histidine biosynthesis to the control of free Histidine concentrations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2009, 7, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. van der Graaff, E.; Hooykaas, P.; Lein, W.; Lerchl, J.; Kunze, G.; Sonnewald, U.; Boldt, R. Molecular analysis of “de novo” purine biosynthesis in solanaceous species and in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Biosci. 2004, 9, 1803–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rosar, C.; Kanonenberg, K.; Nanda, A.M.; Mielewczik, M.; Bräutigam, A.; Novák, O.; Strnad, M.; Walter, A.; Weber, A.P. The leaf reticulate mutant dov1 is impaired in the first step of purine metabolism. Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 1227–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xing, Q.; Ru, Z.; Li, J.; Zhou, C.; Jin, D.; Sun, Y.; Wang, B. Cloning of a second form of adenine phosphoribosyltransferase gene (TaAPT2) from wheat and analysis of its association with thermo-sensitive genic male sterility (TGMS). Plant Sci. 2005, 169, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhou, C.J.; Li, J.; Zou, J.C.; Liang, F.S.; Ye, C.J.; Jin, D.M.; Weng, M.L.; Wang, B. Cloning and characterization of a second form of the rice adenine phosphoribosyl transferase gene (OsAPT2) and its association with TGMS. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 60, 365–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Liu, X.; Qian, W.; Liu, X.; Qin, H.; Wang, D. Molecular and functional analysis of hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase from Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2007, 175, 448–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Khan, S.; Pandey, S.S.; Jyotshna Shanker, K.; Khan, F.; Rahman, L.U. Cloning and functional characterization of quinolinic acid phosphoribosyl transferase (QPT) gene of Nicotiana tabacum. Physiol. Plant. 2017, 160, 253–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Muralla, R.; Sweeney, C.; Stepansky, A.; Leustek, T.; Meinke, D. Genetic dissection of Histidine biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 890–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Moffatt, B.A.; Ashihara, H. Purine and pyrimidine nucleotide synthesis and metabolism. Arab. Book 2002, 1, e0018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ito, T.; Shiraishi, H.; Okada, K.; Shimura, Y. Two amidophosphoribosyltransferase genes of Arabidopsis thaliana expressed in different organs. Plant Mol. Biol. 1994, 26, 529–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Moffatt, B.; Somerville, C. Positive selection for male-sterile mutants of Arabidopsis lacking adenine phosphoribosyl transferase activity. Plant Physiol. 1988, 86, 1150–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, S.; Yu, Z.; Wang, F.; Li, W.; Yang, Q.; Ye, C.; Sun, Y.; Jin, D.; Zhao, J.; Wang, B. Identification and characterization of a novel adenine phosphoribosyltransferase gene (ZmAPT2) from maize (Zea mays L.). DNA Seq. 2008, 19, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hewitt, M.M.; Carr, J.M.; Williamson, C.L.; Slocum, R.D. Effects of phosphate limitation on expression of genes involved in pyrimidine synthesis and salvaging in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2005, 43, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yin, Y.; Shimano, F.; Ashihara, H. Involvement of rapid nucleotide synthesis in recovery from phosphate starvation of Catharanthus roseus cells. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 1025–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mimura, K.; Sakamaki, J.I.; Morishita, H.; Kawazu, M.; Mano, H.; Mizushima, N. Genome-wide CRISPR screening reveals nucleotide synthesis negatively regulates autophagy. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 296, 100780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Busche, M.; Scarpin, M.R.; Hnasko, R.; Brunkard, J.O. TOR coordinates nucleotide availability with ribosome biogenesis in plants. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 1615–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Astot, C.; Dolezal, K.; Nordström, A.; Wang, Q.; Kunkel, T.; Moritz, T.; Chua, N.H.; Sandberg, G. An alternative cytokinin biosynthesis pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 14778–14783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Allen, M.; Qin, W.; Moreau, F.; Moffatt, B. Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase isoforms of Arabidopsis and their potential contributions to adenine and cytokinin metabolism. Physiol. Plant. 2002, 115, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Gaillard, C.; Moffatt, B.A.; Blacker, M.; Laloue, M. Male sterility associated with APRT deficiency in Arabidopsis thaliana results from a mutation in the gene APT1. Mol. Genet. Genom. 1998, 257, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bockwoldt, M.; Houry, D.; Niere, M.; Gossmann, T.I.; Reinartz, I.; Schug, A.; Ziegler, M.; Heiland, I. Identification of evolutionary and kinetic drivers of NAD-dependent signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 15957–15966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yang, L.; Shen, J.; Liu, C.; Kuang, Z.; Tang, Y.; Qian, Z.; Guan, M.; Yang, Y.; Zhan, Y.; Li, N.; et al. Nicotine rebalances NAD+ homeostasis and improves aging-related symptoms in male mice by enhancing NAMPT activity. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jiao, X.; Doamekpor, S.K.; Bird, J.G.; Nickels, B.E.; Tong, L.; Hart, R.P.; Kiledjian, M. 5′ End Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Cap in Human Cells Promotes RNA Decay through DXO-Mediated deNADding. Cell 2017, 168, 1015–1027.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kwasnik, A.; Wang, V.Y.; Krzyszton, M.; Gozdek, A.; Zakrzewska-Placzek, M.; Stepniak, K.; Poznanski, J.; Tong, L.; Kufel, J. Arabidopsis DXO1 links RNA turnover and chloroplast function independently of its enzymatic activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 4751–4764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, Y.; Li, S.; Zhao, Y.; You, C.; Le, B.; Gong, Z.; Mo, B.; Xia, Y.; Chen, X. NAD+-capped RNAs are widespread in the Arabidopsis transcriptome and can probably be translated. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 12094–12102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, H.; Zhong, H.; Zhang, S.; Shao, X.; Ni, M.; Cai, Z.; Chen, X.; Xia, Y. NAD tagSeq reveals that NAD+-capped RNAs are mostly produced from a large number of protein-coding genes in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 12072–12077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yu, X.; Willmann, M.R.; Vandivier, L.E.; Trefely, S.; Kramer, M.C.; Shapiro, J.; Guo, R.; Lyons, E.; Snyder, N.W.; Gregory, B.D. Messenger RNA 5′ NAD+ Capping Is a Dynamic Regulatory Epitranscriptome Mark That Is Required for Proper Response to Abscisic Acid in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell 2021, 56, 125–140.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fernie, A.; Hashida, S.-N.; Yoshimura, K.; Gakière, B.; Mou, Z.; Pétriacq, P. Editorial: NAD Metabolism and Signaling in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hong, Y.; Wang, Z.; Shi, H.; Yao, J.; Liu, X.; Wang, F.; Zeng, L.; Xie, Z.; Zhu, J.K. Reciprocal regulation between nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide metabolism and abscisic acid and stress response pathways in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2020, 16, e1008892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Waadt, R.; Hitomi, K.; Nishimura, N.; Hitomi, C.; Adams, S.R.; Getzoff, E.D.; Schroeder, J.I. FRET-based reporters for the direct visualization of abscisic acid concentration changes and distribution in Arabidopsis. eLife 2014, 3, e01739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Feitosa-Araujo, E.; da Fonseca-Pereira, P.; Pena, M.M.; Medeiros, D.B.; Perez de Souza, L.; Yoshida, T.; Weber, A.P.M.; Araújo, W.L.; Fernie, A.R.; Schwarzländer, M.; et al. Changes in intracellular NAD status affect stomatal development in an abscisic acid-dependent manner. Plant J. 2020, 104, 1149–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liu, W.C.; Song, R.F.; Zheng, S.Q.; Li, T.T.; Zhang, B.L.; Gao, X.; Lu, Y.T. Coordination of plant growth and abiotic stress responses by Tryptophan Synthase β Subunit1 through modulating tryptophan and ABA homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2022, 15, 973–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zandalinas, S.I.; Fichman, Y.; Mittler, R. Vascular Bundles Mediate Systemic Reactive Oxygen Signaling during Light Stress. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 3425–3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhang, H.; Zhu, J.; Gong, Z.; Zhu, J.K. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022, 23, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, P.; Zhao, L.; Qi, F.; Htwe, N.M.P.S.; Li, Q.; Zhang, D.; Lin, F.; Shang-Guan, K.; Liang, Y. The receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase RIPK regulates broad-spectrum ROS signaling in multiple layers of plant immune system. Mol. Plant. 2021, 14, 1652–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Wu, B.; Li, P.; Hong, X.; Xu, C.; Wang, R.; Liang, Y. The receptor-like cytosolic kinase RIPK activates NADP-malic enzyme 2 to generate NADPH for fueling ROS production. Mol. Plant 2022, 15, 887–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Yu, P.; Liu, Z.; Yu, X.; Ye, P.; Liu, H.; Xue, X.; Yang, L.; Li, Z.; Wu, Y.; Fang, C.; et al. Direct Gating of the TRPM2 Channel by cADPR via Specific Interactions with the ADPR Binding Pocket. Cell Rep. 2019, 27, 3684–3695.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kupis, W.; Pałyga, J.; Tomal, E.; Niewiadomska, E. The role of sirtuins in cellular homeostasis. J. Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 72, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Briggs, A.G.; Bent, A.F. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16, 372–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Vanderauwera, S.; De Block, M.; Van de Steene, N.; van de Cotte, B.; Metzlaff, M.; Van Breusegem, F. Silencing of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in plants alters abiotic stress signal transduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 15150–15155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Sánchez, J.P.; Duque, P.; Chua, N.H. ABA activates ADPR cyclase and cADPR induces a subset of ABA-responsive genes in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2004, 38, 381–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Huang, L.; Sun, Q.; Qin, F.; Li, C.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, D.X. Down-regulation of a SILENT INFORMATION REGULATOR2-related Histone deacetylase gene, OsSRT1, induces DNA fragmentation and cell death in rice. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 1508–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhong, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, Q.; Hu, Y.; Peng, H.; Zhou, D.X. The rice NAD(+)-dependent Histone deacetylase OsSRT1 targets preferentially to stress- and metabolism-related genes and transposable elements. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, D.X. Rice NAD+-dependent Histone deacetylase OsSRT1 represses glycolysis and regulates the moonlighting function of GAPDH as a transcriptional activator of glycolytic genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 12241–12255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ha, H.C.; Snyder, S.H. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase is a mediator of necrotic cell death by ATP depletion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 13978–13982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ogawa, T.; Ishikawa, K.; Harada, K.; Fukusaki, E.; Yoshimura, K.; Shigeoka, S. Overexpression of an ADP-ribose pyrophosphatase, AtNUDX2, confers enhanced tolerance to oxidative stress in Arabidopsis plants. Plant J. 2009, 57, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Koslowsky, S.; Riegler, H.; Bergmüller, E.; Zrenner, R. Higher biomass accumulation by increasing phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase activity in Arabidopsis thaliana and Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2008, 6, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Morino, K.; Matsuda, F.; Miyazawa, H.; Sukegawa, A.; Miyagawa, H.; Wakasa, K. Metabolic profiling of tryptophan-overproducing rice calli that express a feedback-insensitive alpha subunit of anthranilate synthase. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhao, Y. Auxin biosynthesis and its role in plant development. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sazuka, T.; Kamiya, N.; Nishimura, T.; Ohmae, K.; Sato, Y.; Imamura, K.; Nagato, Y.; Koshiba, T.; Nagamura, Y.; Ashikari, M.; et al. A rice tryptophan deficient dwarf mutant, tdd1, contains a reduced level of indole acetic acid and develops abnormal flowers and organless embryos. Plant J. 2009, 60, 227–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, R.; Jiang, J.; Jia, S.; Zhu, X.; Su, H.; Li, J. Overexpressing broccoli tryptophan biosynthetic genes BoTSB1 and BoTSB2 promotes biosynthesis of IAA and indole glucosinolates. Physiol. Plant. 2020, 168, 174–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Cao, M.; Chen, R.; Li, P.; Yu, Y.; Zheng, R.; Ge, D.; Zheng, W.; Wang, X.; Gu, Y.; Gelová, Z.; et al. TMK1-mediated auxin signalling regulates differential growth of the apical hook. Nature 2019, 568, 240–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Sagar, M.; Chervin, C.; Mila, I.; Hao, Y.; Roustan, J.P.; Benichou, M.; Gibon, Y.; Biais, B.; Maury, P.; Latché, A.; et al. SlARF4, an auxin response factor involved in the control of sugar metabolism during tomato fruit development. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161, 1362–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Yuan, Y.; Mei, L.; Wu, M.; Wei, W.; Shan, W.; Gong, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, F.; Yan, F.; Zhang, Q.; et al. SlARF10, an auxin response factor, is involved in chlorophyll and sugar accumulation during tomato fruit development. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 5507–5518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Yuan, Y.; Xu, X.; Gong, Z.; Tang, Y.; Wu, M.; Yan, F.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, F.; Hu, X.; et al. Auxin response factor 6A regulates photosynthesis, sugar accumulation, and fruit development in tomato. Hortic. Res. 2019, 6, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Xu, T.; Dai, N.; Chen, J.; Nagawa, S.; Cao, M.; Li, H.; Zhou, Z.; Chen, X.; De Rycke, R.; Rakusová, H.; et al. Cell surface ABP1-TMK auxin-sensing complex activates ROP GTPase signaling. Science 2014, 343, 1025–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Li, X.; Cai, W.; Liu, Y.; Li, H.; Fu, L.; Liu, Z.; Xu, L.; Liu, H.; Xu, T.; Xiong, Y. Differential TOR activation and cell proliferation in Arabidopsis root and shoot apexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 2765–2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yuan, X.; Xu, P.; Yu, Y.; Xiong, Y. Glucose-TOR signaling regulates PIN2 stability to orchestrate auxin gradient and cell expansion in Arabidopsis root. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 32223–32225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Stepanova, A.N.; Hoyt, J.M.; Hamilton, A.A.; Alonso, J.M. A Link between ethylene and auxin uncovered by the characterization of two root-specific ethylene-insensitive mutants in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 2230–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Friml, J.; Gallei, M.; Gelová, Z.; Johnson, A.; Mazur, E.; Monzer, A.; Rodriguez, L.; Roosjen, M.; Verstraeten, I.; Živanović, B.D.; et al. ABP1-TMK auxin perception for global phosphorylation and auxin canalization. Nature 2022, 609, 575–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Belda-Palazón, B.; Adamo, M.; Valerio, C.; Ferreira, L.J.; Confraria, A.; Reis-Barata, D.; Rodrigues, A.; Meyer, C.; Rodriguez, P.L.; Baena-González, E. A dual function of SnRK2 kinases in the regulation of SnRK1 and plant growth. Nat. Plants. 2020, 6, 1345–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Yang, J.; He, H.; He, Y.; Zheng, Q.; Li, Q.; Feng, X.; Wang, P.; Qin, G.; Gu, Y.; Wu, P.; et al. TMK1-based auxin signaling regulates abscisic acid responses via phosphorylating ABI1/2 in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2102544118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Nukarinen, E.; Nägele, T.; Pedrotti, L.; Wurzinger, B.; Mair, A.; Landgraf, R.; Börnke, F.; Hanson, J.; Teige, M.; Baena-Gonzalez, E.; et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals the role of the AMPK plant ortholog SnRK1 as a metabolic master regulator under energy deprivation. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hey, S.J.; Byrne, E.; Halford, N.G. The interface between metabolic and stress signalling. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Cho, Y.H.; Hong, J.W.; Kim, E.C.; Yoo, S.D. Regulatory functions of SnRK1 in stress-responsive gene expression and in plant growth and development. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158, 1955–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Broeckx, T.; Hulsmans, S.; Rolland, F. The plant energy sensor: Evolutionary conservation and divergence of SnRK1 structure, regulation, and function. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 6215–6252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ramon, M.; Dang, T.V.T.; Broeckx, T.; Hulsmans, S.; Crepin, N.; Sheen, J.; Rolland, F. Default Activation and Nuclear Translocation of the Plant Cellular Energy Sensor SnRK1 Regulate Metabolic Stress Responses and Development. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 1614–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wang, W.; Lu, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Hu, F.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, D.X. SnRK1 stimulates the Histone H3K27me3 demethylase JMJ705 to regulate a transcriptional switch to control energy homeostasis. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 3721–3742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhu, T.; Li, L.; Feng, L.; Mo, H.; Ren, M. Target of Rapamycin Regulates Genome Methylation Reprogramming to Control Plant Growth in Arabidopsis. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Fu, L.; Liu, Y.; Qin, G.; Wu, P.; Zi, H.; Xu, Z.; Zhao, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Yang, S.; et al. The TOR-EIN2 axis mediates nuclear signalling to modulate plant growth. Nature 2021, 591, 288–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Chen, Q.; Zhang, J.; Li, G. Dynamic epigenetic modifications in plant sugar signal transduction. Trends Plant Sci. 2022, 27, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Belda-Palazón, B.; Costa, M.; Beeckman, T.; Rolland, F.; Baena-González, E. ABA represses TOR and root meristem activity through nuclear exit of the SnRK1 kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2204862119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ye, R.; Wang, M.; Du, H.; Chhajed, S.; Koh, J.; Liu, K.H.; Shin, J.; Wu, Y.; Shi, L.; Xu, L.; et al. Glucose-driven TOR-FIE-PRC2 signalling controls plant development. Nature 2022, 609, 986–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Pisco, J.P.; de Chiara, C.; Pacholarz, K.J.; Garza-Garcia, A.; Ogrodowicz, R.W.; Walker, P.A.; Barran, P.E.; Smerdon, S.J.; de Carvalho, L.P.S. Uncoupling conformational states from activity in an allosteric enzyme. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Ohta, D.; Fujimori, K.; Mizutani, M.; Nakayama, Y.; Kunpaisal-Hashimoto, R.; Münzer, S.; Kozaki, A. Molecular cloning and characterization of ATP-phosphoribosyl transferase from Arabidopsis, a key enzyme in the Histidine biosynthetic pathway. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122, 907–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Hoang, X.L.T.; Prerostova, S.; Thu, N.B.A.; Thao, N.P.; Vankova, R.; Tran, L.P. Histidine Kinases: Diverse Functions in Plant Development and Responses to Environmental Conditions. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2021, 72, 297–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Akashi, H.; Gojobori, T. Metabolic efficiency and amino acid composition in the proteomes of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 3695–3700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Swire, J. Selection on synthesis cost affects interprotein amino acid usage in all three domains of life. J. Mol. Evol. 2007, 64, 558–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Hove-Jensen, B.; Andersen, K.R.; Kilstrup, M.; Martinussen, J.; Switzer, R.L.; Willemoës, M. Phosphoribosyl Diphosphate (PRPP): Biosynthesis, Enzymology, Utilization, and Metabolic Significance. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2016, 81, e00040-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Xiong, Y.; McCormack, M.; Li, L.; Hall, Q.; Xiang, C.; Sheen, J. Glucose-TOR signalling reprograms the transcriptome and activates meristems. Nature 2013, 496, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ben-Sahra, I.; Howell, J.J.; Asara, J.M.; Manning, B.D. Stimulation of de novo pyrimidine synthesis by growth signaling through mTOR and S6K1. Science 2013, 339, 1323–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ben-Sahra, I.; Hoxhaj, G.; Ricoult, S.J.H.; Asara, J.M.; Manning, B.D. mTORC1 induces purine synthesis through control of the mitochondrial tetrahydrofolate cycle. Science 2016, 351, 728–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Robitaille, A.M.; Christen, S.; Shimobayashi, M.; Cornu, M.; Fava, L.L.; Moes, S.; Prescianotto-Baschong, C.; Sauer, U.; Jenoe, P.; Hall, M.N. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveal mTORC1 activates de novo pyrimidine synthesis. Science 2013, 339, 1320–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. O’Leary, B.M.; Oh, G.G.K.; Lee, C.P.; Millar, A.H. Metabolite Regulatory Interactions Control Plant Respiratory Metabolism via Target of Rapamycin (TOR) Kinase Activation. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 666–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Wang, G.; Pichersky, E. Nicotinamidase participates in the salvage pathway of NAD biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2007, 49, 1020–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Wei, M.; Zhuang, Y.; Li, H.; Li, P.; Huo, H.; Shu, D.; Huang, W.; Wang, S. The cloning and characterization of hypersensitive to salt stress mutant, affected in quinolinate synthase, highlights the involvement of NAD in stress-induced accumulation of ABA and proline. Plant J. 2020, 102, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Pattison, R.J.; Catalá, C. Evaluating auxin distribution in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) through an analysis of the PIN and AUX/LAX gene families. Plant J. 2012, 70, 585–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Liu, R.; How-Kit, A.; Stammitti, L.; Teyssier, E.; Rolin, D.; Mortain-Bertrand, A.; Halle, S.; Liu, M.; Kong, J.; Wu, C.; et al. A DEMETER-like DNA demethylase governs tomato fruit ripening. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 10804–10809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Li, G.; Peng, F.; Zhang, L.; Shi, X.; Wang, Z. Cloning and characterization of a SnRK1-encoding gene from Malus hupehensis Rehd. and heterologous expression in tomato. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 37, 947–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Wang, X.; Peng, F.; Li, M.; Yang, L.; Li, G. Expression of a heterologous SnRK1 in tomato increases carbon assimilation, nitrogen uptake and modifies fruit development. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 1173–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Lai, T.; Wang, X.; Ye, B.; Jin, M.; Chen, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Blanks, A.M.; Gu, M.; Zhang, P.; et al. Molecular and functional characterization of the SBP-box transcription factor SPL-CNR in tomato fruit ripening and cell death. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 2995–3011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Giovannoni, J.J. Fruit ripening mutants yield insights into ripening control. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Shin, J.H.; Mila, I.; Liu, M.; Rodrigues, M.A.; Vernoux, T.; Pirrello, J.; Bouzayen, M. The RIN-regulated Small Auxin-Up RNA SAUR69 is involved in the unripe-to-ripe phase transition of tomato fruit via enhancement of the sensitivity to ethylene. New Phytol. 2019, 222, 820–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Zhuo, F.; Xiong, F.; Deng, K.; Li, Z.; Ren, M. Target of Rapamycin (TOR) Negatively Regulates Ethylene Signals in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Huang, W.; Hu, N.; Xiao, Z.; Qiu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Yang, J.; Mao, X.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Guo, H. A molecular framework of ethylene-mediated fruit growth and ripening processes in tomato. Plant Cell 2022, 34, 3280–3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.