Next Article in Journal
A Systematic Review of the Effect of Vericiguat on Patients with Heart Failure
Previous Article in Journal
Red Blood Cells and Endothelium Derived Circulating Extracellular Vesicles in Health and Chronic Heart Failure: A Focus on Phosphatidylserine Dynamics in Vesiculation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Blue Light Regulates Cell Wall Structure and Carbohydrate Metabolism of Soybean Hypocotyl
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Phosphoribosyltransferases and Their Roles in Plant Development and Abiotic Stress Response

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(14), 11828; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411828
by Ye Liu 1, Peiwen Wu 1, Bowen Li 1, Weihao Wang 2,* and Benzhong Zhu 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(14), 11828; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411828
Submission received: 13 June 2023 / Revised: 19 July 2023 / Accepted: 21 July 2023 / Published: 23 July 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The review, in my opinion meets the high stadards of the journal! Only minor corrections, listed below are needed.

 I am not qualified to assess the quality of English in this paper. However, for me, the review is easy to read and quite undesrstandable!

 

General comment for the figures – it is not very clear whether they are compilation of already existing data (and if ”yes” there should be a respective citation) or they represent models developed and suggested by the authors.

The figures, if possible should be with higher resolution! In addition – the legends are very detailed and thus, too long. Since there is an Abbreviations list the names of the compounds could be referred referring to the list!

3.4. Class III PRTase should be 3.4. Class IV PRTase

Author Response

Please see enclosed file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript could it be published as it stands. However, I would recommend the authors to carefully read again the manuscript and correct some mistakes reagarding the articles referenced. Some references do not match with what the authors report.

I am very glad the authors wrote this manuscript. It is a well-written, needed, and useful review . The authors are analytical and the tables/shcematics that they are presenting indeed help the author very much. I belive that the manuscript could be published prior to some minor revision. And after the authors have checked again some minor typos that exist.

minor corrections

Author Response

Please check the file enclosed.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop