Next Article in Journal
Skin Wound following Irradiation Aggravates Radiation-Induced Brain Injury in a Mouse Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Lipopolysaccharide Tolerance in Human Primary Monocytes and Polarized Macrophages
Previous Article in Journal
N-Methyl Costaricine and Costaricine, Two Potent Butyrylcholinesterase Inhibitors from Alseodaphne pendulifolia Gamb.
Previous Article in Special Issue
Beneficial Effects of Tacrolimus on Brain-Death-Associated Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Pigs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Functional Analysis of a CTL-X-Type Lectin CTL16 in Development and Innate Immunity of Tribolium castaneum

1
Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products of the Ministry of Agriculture (Jinan), Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China
2
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biodiversity and Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
3
Division of Plant Science and Technology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(13), 10700; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310700
Submission received: 10 May 2023 / Revised: 23 June 2023 / Accepted: 24 June 2023 / Published: 27 June 2023

Abstract

:
C-type lectins (CTLs) are a class of proteins containing carbohydrate recognition domains (CRDs), which are characteristic modules that recognize various glycoconjugates and function primarily in immunity. CTLs have been reported to affect growth and development and positively regulate innate immunity in Tribolium castaneum. However, the regulatory mechanisms of TcCTL16 proteins are still unclear. Here, spatiotemporal analyses displayed that TcCTL16 was highly expressed in late pupae and early adults. TcCTL16 RNA interference in early larvae shortened their body length and narrowed their body width, leading to the death of 98% of the larvae in the pupal stage. Further analysis found that the expression level of muscle-regulation-related genes, including cut, vestigial, erect wing, apterous, and spalt major, and muscle-composition-related genes, including Myosin heavy chain and Myosin light chain, were obviously down-regulated after TcCTL16 silencing in T. castaneum. In addition, the transcription of TcCTL16 was mainly distributed in the hemolymph. TcCTL16 was significantly upregulated after challenges with lipopolysaccharides, peptidoglycans, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus. Recombinant CRDs of TcCTL16 bind directly to the tested bacteria (except Bacillus subtilis); they also induce extensive bacterial agglutination in the presence of Ca2+. On the contrary, after TcCTL16 silencing in the late larval stage, T. castaneum were able to develop normally. Moreover, the transcript levels of seven antimicrobial peptide genes (attacin2, defensins1, defensins2, coleoptericin1, coleoptericin2, cecropins2, and cecropins3) and one transcription factor gene (relish) were significantly increased under E. coli challenge and led to an increased survival rate of T. castaneum when infected with S. aureus or E. coli, suggesting that TcCTL16 deficiency could be compensated for by increasing AMP expression via the IMD pathways in T. castaneum. In conclusion, this study found that TcCTL16 could be involved in developmental regulation in early larvae and compensate for the loss of CTL function by regulating the expression of AMPs in late larvae, thus laying a solid foundation for further studies on T. castaneum CTLs.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Insect innate immune systems utilize soluble and membrane-bound receptors to recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) on the surface of pathogenic microorganisms [1]. Beta-1, 3-glucan recognition proteins (βGRPs), peptidoglycan-recognition proteins (PGRPs), Gram-negative binding proteins (GNBPs), and lectins bind to glycolipids, polysaccharides, and glycoproteins on pathogen surfaces to induce a cascade of downstream defense responses [2,3]. Based on their domain action mechanisms and architectures, animal lectins are classified into C-type lectins (CTLs), β-galactose-specific lectin, immunoglobulin-type lectin, mannose-6-phosphate receptors, pentraxins, etc. [4]. CTLs are one of the largest and most diverse families of lectins in vertebrates and invertebrates. They are characterized by the requirement of Ca2+ to maintain carbohydrate-binding structures and activities. Each CTL has one or more carbohydrate recognition domains (CRD), known as CTL domains, which are composed of β-sheets, α-helices, and loops [5].
Animal CTLs are usually involved in innate immunity, including regulating anti-fungal immunity [6], enhancing melanization, phagocytosis, and encapsulation [7,8,9], prophenoloxidase activation [10], bacterial clearance [8], and regulation of the production of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) [11]. Based on the number of CRDs and domain architectures, insect CTLs are classified into three groups: the CTL-S type, the immulectin type, and the CTL-X type [12]. Normally, CTL-S has a single CRD, while immulectin has at least two CRD domains. Previous studies found that Drosophila melanogaster lectin 2 (DL2) and DL3, belonging to the CTL-S type, could agglutinate E. coli and enhance melanization and encapsulation in vitro [13,14]. Regenectin (CTL-S) was involved in the regeneration of cockroach legs [15]. Helicoverpa armigera CTL-3 [16] and Ostrinia furnacalis IML-10 [17], belonging to the immulectin type, could promote cellular encapsulation and aggregation. Different from the above two groups, besides the CRD domain, the CTL-X group contains other functional domains, such as an extracellular domain (CUB), complement control protein (CCP) modules, immunoglobulin modules (Ig), a chitin-binding domain (CBM), the discoidin domain family (F5/8 type C domain), and an epidermal-growth-factor-like domain (EGF) [18]. Studies have found that CTL-X CTLs are mainly involved in insect growth and development. For instance, furrowed (a CTL-X type lectin) in D. melanogaster is required for the development of bristles and eyes [19,20]. Similarly, contactin (a CTL-X type lectin) is also required for paracellular barrier function and septate junction organization [21,22,23]. However, it is unknown whether CTL-X-type CTLs are also involved in the innate immunity and/or development of Tribolium castaneum.
T. castaneum, a destructive insect pest of stored grain-based products, is a model organism widely used in immunological, developmental, and evolutionary biology research [24,25]. A total of 17 CTL genes have been identified in the T. castaneum genome using a bioinformatics approach [26]. Earlier studies have found that TcCTL3 plays a vital role in the immune response towards bacterial infection by influencing the expression of AMPs [27]. TcCTL5 was found to participate in the innate immunity and individual movement of T. castaneum [28]. In addition to its role in the immune response, TcCTL12 was found to have extensive functions in the regulation of development in T. castaneum [1]. There is no doubt that these CTLs can induce protective responses during bacterial infections in T. castaneum. In contrast, viruses are able to utilize mosquito CTLs to facilitate infection. A previous study identified an Aedes aegypti CTL, mosGCTL-1, that facilitated West Nile virus (WNV) infection in vitro and in vivo. The expression of mosGCTL-1 was upregulated after WNV infection, and it interacted with mosPTP-1, which enabled viral attachment to cells and facilitated viral entry [29]. Moreover, Aedes aegypti mosGCTL genes were first identified by Liu et al. [30] as key susceptibility factors for dengue virus (DENV)-2 infection. Further study found that mosGCTL-3 could significantly enhance viral infectivity by interacting with the DENV-2 envelope protein in vitro and in vivo. However, it is not clear whether there are genes in the CTL family of T. castaneum that negatively regulate the immune response during bacterial infection and what the underlying regulatory mechanism is.
In the past 2–3 decades, many studies on the functions of insect CTLs in innate immunity have been published. Nevertheless, the function of TcCTL16 has not been studied yet. To explore the function of TcCTL16, a CTL-X type CTL, we cloned the full-length cDNA of TcCTL16 from T. castaneum and investigated its developmental and tissue-specific expression profiles, as well as its response to different elicitors. Most importantly, we investigated its role in development and pattern recognition, agglutination, and AMP regulation after bacterial infection. This research lays a solid foundation for further studies of T. castaneum CTLs.

2. Results

2.1. Domain Organization, Structure, and Evolutionary Relationships among CTLs

The open reading frame (ORF) of TcCTL16 is 2511 bp in length and encodes a protein of 836 amino acids (Figure S1), with a theoretical molecular mass of 92.71 kD and an isoelectric point of 8.28 (Gene ID:TC002984). Four CCPs (the first from C43 to C98, the second from C387 to C440, the third from C445 to C500, and the fourth from C505 to C560), one CRD (from P251 to Q381) and one transmembrane helix region (from I678 to V700) were identified in the protein (Figure 1). As shown in Figure S2, CTL-S5, 6, and 13 contain the QPD, WLD, and WHD motifs, respectively, which may bind a variety of carbohydrates. The carbohydrate-recognition motif in other CTLs presents a mutated signature, such as WSA, WNS, YFR, etc., and thus, their characteristics need further investigation (Figure S2).
Phylogenetic analysis showed that 17 CTLs of T. castaneum formed close lineal homology groups with CTLs in Hymenoptera (H. laboriosa and A. glabripennis), Lepidoptera (M. sexta and B. mori), and Diptera (A. gambiae and D. melanogaster) (Figure S3). Our results showed that these genes belong to lineal homologues, closely clustered with genes of Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Lepidoptera. Some CTLs of D. melanogaster, A. gambiae, and A. glabripennis were found to be isolated into a single branch, suggesting the gene duplication of CTLs in the species, while there were no species-specific genes in M. sexta, B. mori, or T. castaneum. IML 3 and some CTL-S-type lectins (AgmCTL11, DmCTL29, BmCTLS6, MsCTLS5, HaKOC60049.1, AglXP0233132226.1, and TcCTL8) are clustered into one branch, suggesting that TcCTL3 may originate from CTL-S-type lectins (Figure S3).

2.2. Spatiotemporal Expression of TcCTL16

qRT-PCR analysis revealed that TcCTL16 was transcribed throughout all developmental stages, showing a low level at the LA stage and high levels at the LP and EA stages (Figure 2A), suggesting TcCTL16 could play an important role in the growth and development of T. castanuem. Moreover, the expression levels of TcCTL16 varied in different larval tissues, with the highest expression in the hemolymph, while it exhibited low transcription levels in gut, fat body, epidermis, and Malpighian tube tissues (Figure 2B).

2.3. TcCTL16 Silencing in Early Larvae Influence Growth and Development

When we applied a knockdown of TcCTL16 on early larvae (12-day-old larvae), the cumulative survival rate of T. castaneum was only 2% (Figure 3A). In addition, TcCTL16 silencing slowed down the growth and development of the larvae, shortened their body length (Figure 3B), and narrowed their body width (Figure 3C); this all occurred when the 12-day-old larvae were injected with ds-TcCTL16. Next, the expression of genes associated with muscle regulation and composition was examined after TcCTL16 silencing. Our results showed that the expression levels of muscle-regulation-related genes, including cut, vestigial (vg), erect wing (ewg), apterous (ap), and spalt major (salm), were obviously down-regulated compared with the control group (Figure 3D). Genes associated with muscle composition, including Myosin heavy chain (Mhc) and Myosin light chain (Mlc), were also decreased (Figure 3E). These results indicate that TcCTL16 may influence the growth and development of T. castaneum by regulating genes associated with muscle regulation and composition.

2.4. TcCTL16 Responses to Polysaccharide or Bacterial Challenge

The mRNA levels of TcCTL16 in the LPS-challenged group and PGN-challenged group were significantly upregulated from 48 to 60 h and 24 to 60 h, respectively (Figure 4A,B). In addition, for the E. coil-challenged group, the transcript level of TcCTL16 increased significantly from 48 to 72 h (Figure 4C). The transcript level of TcCTL16 increased significantly at 12, 36, 48, and 72 h after the S. aureus challenge (Figure 4D). These results illustrated that TcCTL16 could take part in the innate immune responses of T. castanuem.

2.5. Production of rTcCTL16 CRD and Its Binding and Agglutination Capacity to Microbes

rCTL16 was expressed in inclusion bodies from E. coli BL21 (DE3) (Figure 5A, lane 4) and purified through a Ni Sepharose 6 Fast Flow column (Figure 5A, lane 5). Western blot assay verified the successful expression of rCTL16 (Figure 5B, lane 6). To investigate whether rCTL16 could bind to Gram+ or Gram bacteria, a bacterial binding assay was performed. rCTL16 exhibited strong binding activities toward Gram+ bacteria (S. aureus and B. thuringiensis) and Gram bacteria (E. coli and P. aeruginosa) but had no binding ability to B. subtilis (Figure 5C). Moreover, as shown in Figure 5D, rCTL16 protein could agglutinate Gram+ bacteria (S. aureus and B. thuringiensis) and Gram bacteria (E. coli and P. aeruginosa) but had no agglutinating ability to B. subtilis.

2.6. TcCTL16 Silencing on Late Larvae Does Not Affect Viability of Beetles

The efficiency of TcCTL16 RNAi reached 65% on the first day and 80% on the third and remained at 80% on the fifth day (Figure 6A) on late larvae (15-day-old larvae). Interestingly, no significant impact on the 15-day-old larvae viability of ds-TcCTL16- and ds-GFP-injected beetles was observed (Figure 6B).

2.7. Effects of TcCTL16 Gene Knockdown on Defense against Bacterial Infection

As shown in Figure 7A, silencing TcCTL16 significantly inhibited the TcCTL16 transcript level post-E. coli challenge. In addition, the expression of rel, a TF of the IMD signaling pathway, was upregulated in the E. coli-challenged group (Figure 7B). Furthermore, the results showed that the E. coli-induced expression of seven AMP genes (att2, def1, def2, cole1, cole2, cecr2, and cecr3) was upregulated, while the expression of att1, att3, and def3 was not compared to the control beetles (ds-GFP + E. coli) (Figure 7C). Moreover, the survival rate of TcCTL16-RNAi T. castaneum infected with Gram-positive S. aureus (Figure 7D) and Gram-negative E. coli (Figure 7E) increased significantly compared with the control group. Taken together, our results suggest that loss of TcCTL16 after RNAi could be compensated for by increasing AMP expression via the IMD pathways in T. castaneum.

3. Discussion

As a superfamily of proteins, CTLs bind to ligands with characteristic modules of one or more CRDs in a Ca+-dependent manner [31]. The functions of animal CTLs have been well studied in the past 2–3 decades [32,33,34], but information about the roles of CTLs in T. castaneum is relatively scarce. In this study, a CTL-X gene (TcCTL16) from T. castaneum was functionally characterized for the first time in insects. Our results show that TcCTL16 influences growth and development in early larvae, and more interestingly, TcCTL16 silencing can be compensated for by increasing AMP expression in late larvae in T. castaneum.
TcCTL16, a CTL-X protein, contains one CRD domain, four CCPs, and one transmembrane domain. Interestingly, it does not contain a signal peptide but instead contains a transmembrane protein, suggesting that it may be secreted by a non-classical secretory pathway [35]. Additionally, the non-classical secretory pathway is closely related to cell proliferation, immune response, tumor formation and infectious disease pathology [36], suggesting that TcCTL16 has extensive functions in T. castanuem.
We found that TcCTL16 was expressed at all stages of development and was especially highly expressed in the LP and EA stages. Pupation is an important stage of metamorphosis for holometabolous insects [28]. High expression of TcCTL16 in late pupae suggests that TcCTL16 might play an important role in the development and metamorphosis of T. castaneum. Our results showed that TcCTL16 RNAi in early larvae shortened their body length and narrowed their body width, leading to the death of 98% of the larvae in the pupal stage. This phenomenon is consistent between the uif (CTL-X) of flies and the TcCTL5 and TcCTL12 of T. castaneum, the absence of which leads to death primarily in larvae [1,28,37]. Studies have shown that as a developmentally regulated protein, lectins are possibly involved in the recognition and fusion process during the myoblast fusion phase [38,39,40]. It is well known that muscle morphology and remodeling occur to accommodate the needs of insects during the metamorphosis of insects [41,42]. On this basis, we further examined the transcription of genes associated with muscle regulation and composition after TcCTL16 knockdown. Compared with the control group, the transcript levels of muscle regulation genes, including cut, vg, ewg, ap, salm, and Ims, were obviously down-regulated, and muscle-composition-related genes (Mhc and Mlc) were also decreased. All of the above studies indicate that TcCTL16 may be involved in the growth and development of T. castaneum by regulating muscle-related genes.
In addition, our results showed that the mRNA of TcCTL16 exhibited relatively high levels in the hemolymph, which was consistent with the distribution characteristics of C-type lectins in T. castaneum [1,27,28,43]. Similarly, some C-type lectins in silkworms (e.g., BmLBP, BmMBP, BmLEL-3, and BmCTL-S3) and mosquitoes (e.g., AsCTLMA15, AsCTLGA5, and AsCTL15) are mainly found in the hemolymph or hemocytes [8,44,45,46,47]. As an important immune component of invertebrates, hemolymph plays extremely important functions in defense by mediating nodule formation and encapsulation and by the exocytosis of a battery of bioactive molecules, such as AMPs [48]. Next, the transcript level of TcCTL16 was obviously upregulated after injection with LPS, PGN, E. coli, and S. aureus. This expression pattern was consistent with the stimulation of CTLs in other invertebrates. For instance, the transcription of Eriocheir sinensis EsCTL [49], M. sexta immulectin-2 [50], Portunus trituberculatus PtCLec2 [51], and B. mori C-type lectin 5 [52] were induced significantly after bacterial challenge. The results suggest that TcCTL16 could be involved in the immune response to microbial infection in T. castaneum.
The function of most insect C-type lectins is to bind to bacteria by interacting with carbohydrates on the bacterial surface. Our study showed that rCTL16 displayed a Ca2+-dependent ability to bind to Gram+ bacteria (S. aureus and B. thuringiensis) and Gram bacteria (E. coli and P. aeruginosa) but had no binding activity on B. subtilis. Similar to the BmMBPs from B. mori [47], they have a high affinity to a wide range of Gram+ and Gram- bacteria, although with different intensities. The lack of an ability to bind rCTL16 to B. subtilis suggests that it may not be able to recognize this bacterium. We know that the binding of C-type lectins to the surface of a pathogen may be the first step in their recognition and the initiation of defense mechanisms in innate immunity [12]. Therefore, the binding ability of rCTL16 towards microorganisms suggests its functions in recognizing these foreign intruders. Bacterial agglutination is an important biological role of C-type lectins. Our results further showed that rCTL16 was capable of agglutinating Gram+ bacteria (S. aureus and B. thuringiensis) and Gram bacteria (E. coli and P. aeruginosa) in a calcium-dependent manner, but it had no agglutinating ability against B. subtilis. Similar agglutination activity has also been observed in multi-CTLs from invertebrates, such as MsIML-2 from M. sexta [53] and LvPLP from Litopenaeus vannamei [54]. These results indicate that TcCTL16 has the ability to recognize S. aureus, B. thuringiensis, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa and agglutinate these bacteria in a calcium-dependent manner.
Furthermore, the recognition and agglutination activity of CTLs is the initial stage of the defense mechanism. Most CTLs can induce a range of immune responses to clear the bacteria, fungi, and viruses, such as regulating the expression of AMPs [55]. MjCC-CL from Marsupenaeus japonicus can regulate the expression of AMPs by directly activating the JAK/STAT pathway to protect against bacterial infection [11]. Next, an RNAi experiment was performed to further prove the function of TcCTL16 in regulating AMPs. Our results showed that the transcription of 7 AMPs (att2, def1, def2, cole1, cole2, cecr2, and cecr3) was obviously increased after TcCTL16 knockdown in late larvae under E. coli stimulation, suggesting that loss of TcCTL16 after RNAi could be compensated for by the increased expression of AMP genes. It has been reported that T. castaneum exhibit resistance to pathogen infection mainly through the expression of AMPs regulated by the Toll and IMD pathways [26]. The transcription factors of these two signaling pathways are dif1 and dif2 (Toll) and rel and jnk (IMD) [56]. By examining the expression pattern of transcription factors, we found that the transcript levels of rel were significantly upregulated after TcCTL16 RNAi under E. coli infection, suggesting that TcCTL16 loss could increase AMPs via the IMD pathway. Moreover, compared with the control group, the survival rate of TcCTL16-RNAi T. castaneum infected with E. coli and S. aureus increased significantly. These results directly supported the conclusion that the decreased mortality rate observed following bacterial injection of the ds-TcCTL16-treated beetles was primarily caused by enhanced larval resistibility to bacterial infection. In short, T. castaneum was able to compensate for the loss of TcCTL16 by increasing AMP expression, thus increasing the survival rate in TcCTL16 knockdown beetles.
In summary, we functionally characterized a CTL-X protein, TcCTL16. The results showed that TcCTL16 was expressed at all stages of development, and TcCTL16 silencing in early larvae influenced the growth and development of T. castaneum. Moreover, TcCTL16 could bind to microorganisms in a Ca2+-dependent manner, and the loss of TcCTL16 in late larvae could be compensated for by the increased expression of AMP genes via the IMD immune pathway, thus decreased mortality in TcCTL16 knockdown beetles. Together, our sequence comparison and function analysis of TcCTL16 establish a solid foundation for future studies of T. castaneum CTL proteins.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animals and Chemicals

The T. castaneum Georgia-1 (GA-1) strain was used for all experiments in this study. Beetles were reared in whole wheat flour containing brewer’s yeast (5%) at 30 °C, 40% relative humidity, and a 14:10 h light:dark photoperiod [27]. LPS from E. coli and PGN from S. aureus were obtained from Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA). The pET-28a (+) vectors E. coli Trans1T1 and E. coli BL21 (DE3) were purchased from TransGene (Beijing, China). A one-step cloning kit was purchased from Vazyme (Nanjing, China).

4.2. Identification and Cloning of TcCTL16 Gene

A pool of three 15-day-old larvae was used to isolate total RNA, and then 1 μg total RNA was converted to cDNA using a previously described method [43,57]. The full-length cDNA sequence of TcCTL16 was downloaded from Beetlebase (http://www.beetlebase.com/ accessed on 22 June 2023). TcCTL16 was amplified by RT-PCR with the primers TcCTL16-F and TcCTL16-R (Table 1) and sequenced for confirmation by Springen Biotechnology Company (Nanjing, China). A similarity analysis was conducted using BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ accessed on 22 June 2023). The corresponding cDNA was conceptually translated, and the deduced proteins were predicted using ExPASy (http://www.expasy.org/ accessed on 22 June 2023).

4.3. Sequence and Phylogenetic Analysis

The CTL amino acid sequences of T. castaneum were obtained from Beetlebase (http://www.beetlebase.org/ accessed on 22 June 2023) and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ accessed on 22 June 2023). The CTL amino acid sequences of Habropoda laboriosa and Anoplophora glabripennis were obtained from the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ accessed on 22 June 2023). The CTL sequences of Manduca sexta and Bombyx mori were obtained from the literature [5,18]. The CTL sequences of Anopheles gambiae and D. melanogaster were obtained from http://cegg.unige.ch/Insecta/immunodb accessed on 22 June 2023. These sequences were aligned with ClustalW2 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/ accessed on 22 June 2023). The neighbor-joining trees were constructed with 1000 bootstrap replicates in MEGA7. Domain architecture prediction of the proteins was performed using SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/ accessed on 22 June 2023). The SignalP 4.1 program was used to predict the presence and location of the signal peptide (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP4.1/ accessed on 22 June 2023). The potential disulfide bonds and their positions were predicted using the Scanprosite program (http://www.expasy.ch/tools/scanprosite/ accessed on 22 June 2023).

4.4. Spatiotemporal Expression of TcCTL16

For the stage-specific expression study, total RNA was extracted from pools of multiple individuals in the following developmental stages: early eggs (EE, 1 day old, ~50 mg), late eggs (LE, 3 days old, ~50 mg), early larvae (EL, 1 day old, ~50 mg), late larvae (LL, 20 days old, 3 individuals), early pupae (EP, 1 day old, 3 individuals), late pupae (LP, 5 days old, 3 individuals), early adults (EA, 1 day old, 3 individuals), and late adults (LA, 10 days old, 3 individuals). For the tissue-specific expression study, total RNA was also extracted from pools of approximately 100 15-day-old larval tissues, including gut, fat body, epidermis, hemocytes, and Malpighian tubule tissues. Reverse transcription was performed using 1 μg total RNA. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was employed to analyze the expression patterns of TcCTL16 with a SYBR Green Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions by the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (ABI). The primer sequences (TcCTL16-qF and TcCTL16-qR) for TcCTL16 are listed in Table 1. T. castaneum ribosomal protein S3 (Tcrps3) was used as the internal reference [58]. The relative expression levels of TcCTL16 were calculated according to the 2−ΔΔCT method. The experiments were carried out in three technique repeats and three biological replicates.

4.5. Expression Profiles of TcCTL16 after Being Challenged with Polysaccharides and Bacteria

To measure TcCTL16 expression after LPS, PGN, S. aureus, and E. coli challenges, 12-day-old larvae were collected and separated into three groups. Approximately 60 synchronous larvae in each group were injected with LPS, PGN, S. aureus, E. coli, or physiological buffer (0.373 g/L KCl, 0.038 g/L Na3PO4·12H2O, pH 7.0). Pools of three randomly selected larvae were sampled for RNA isolation at 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 h post-injection to reveal the temporal expression profile of TcCTL16. TcCTL16 expression levels in the beetles challenged with polysaccharides and bacterium were determined via qRT-PCR as described in 2.4. The primer sequences of TcCTL16 (TcCTL16-qF and TcCTL16-qR) are listed in Table 1. Three technical repeats for each biological replicate and a total of three biological replicates were performed.

4.6. Production of Recombinant TcCTL16 and Western Blot Analysis

The partial cDNA fragment encoding the CRD domain of TcCTL16 was amplified with primers (TcCTL16-F and TcCTL16-R, Table 1). The fragments were then ligated into pET-28a (+) plasmids with His-tag using the Hieff Clone Plus One Step Cloning Kit (Yeasen, Shanghai, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions, which were further transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells for protein expression. The recombinant CRD protein (designated rCTL16) was expressed in insoluble form and purified by a Ni Sepharose 6 Fast Flow column (GE Health care, Marlborough, MA, USA) under denatured conditions (8 M urea). The purified protein was refolded in gradient urea-TBS glycerol buffer according to Wang et al. [59]. Then, the resultant proteins were separated by 12.5% reducing sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and visualized with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 (Jiancheng, Nanjing, China). At the same time, the resultant proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes using Bio-Rad Criterion (Mini Trans-Blot, Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA), and then the membranes were blocked in 10 mL of TBS containing 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA, 771407, AiKB, Qingdao, China) for 2 h at room temperature (RT). The membranes were washed three times with TBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (TBST) and incubated overnight at 4 ℃ with anti-His rabbit polyclonal antibodies (Transgen, Beijing, China) at a 1: 2000 dilution in 5% BSA. After incubation, the membranes were washed four times with TBST and incubated at RT for 2 h with a goat anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate (Transgen, Beijing, China) diluted 1:5000 in TBST. The bands were detected by incubation with an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrate solution (E411-01/02) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Vazyme, Nanjing, China).

4.7. Microorganism Binding and Agglutination of TcCTL16

Five types of microorganisms, including three Gram+ bacteria (S. aureus, B. subtilis, and Bacillus thuringiensis) and two Gram bacteria (E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa), were used to test the binding spectrum of rCTL16 as previously described [27]. The bacteria were cultured overnight and centrifuged at 6000× g for 5 min at RT. The resulting bacterial pellets were washed three times with TBS and resuspended in TBS at 2 × 108 cells/mL. In the presence of 10 mM Ca2+, purified rCTL16 were incubated respectively with each of the five microorganisms mentioned above for 1 h at RT with gentle rotation. The microorganisms were pelleted and washed four times with 1 mL of TBS. The pellet was resuspended in 100 µL of 7% SDS solution and centrifuged at 6000× g for five min. The supernatant was collected for Western blotting as described in Section 2.6.
Five types of microorganisms, as mentioned above, were also used to detect the direct agglutination ability of rCTL16 according to a previously described method [1]. The equal volume of bacterial suspension (5 × 106 bacterial count in 25 µL) was incubated with rCTL16 (100 µg/mL) at 28 °C for 1 h in the presence of 10 mM Ca2+. The recombinant methyl-CpG-binding domain (rTcMBD) with a His tag from T. castaneum was used as a negative control. Agglutination reactions were observed using a compound light microscope with a 1000× objective.

4.8. dsRNA-Mediated RNAi Assay

The double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) targeting the TcCTL16 was synthesized with an in vitro transcription T7 kit for dsRNA synthesis (Takara, Kyoto, Japan). The DNA template for the ds-TcCTL16 preparation was generated by RT-PCR using the gene-specific primers ds-TcCTL16-F and ds-TcCTL16-R (Table 1). Afterward, the formation of dsRNA was monitored by determining the molecular size using agarose gel electrophoresis and quantified by spectrophotometry. The length of the ds-TcCTL16 was 530 bp. The dsRNA targeting GFP (as control) was synthesized as previously described [27].
To investigate the RNAi’s efficiency, a total of 200 ng ds-TcCTL16 in 200 nL was injected into the body cavity of each 12-day larva. Beetles injected with an equal volume of ds-GFP were set as control groups. Total RNA was isolated from pools of three larvae of ds-TcCTL16 and ds-GFP groups on days 1, 2, and 3 after injection. Then, a total of 1 μg RNA was converted to cDNA, and qRT-PCR was performed to quantify the TcCTL16 level using the method described in Section 2.4.
The 12-day-old larvae were injected with the ds-TcCTL16 to test its influence on the growth and development of T. castaneum. Transcript levels of genes involved in muscle regulation and composition were measured with the primers listed in a published article [1].
To further explore whether TcCTL16 participates in the immune response through regulating the expression of AMP and transcription factor (TF) genes in red flour beetles, we injected ds-TcCTL16 into 15-day-old larvae and then challenged them with E. coli after 3 days using the above method. When TcCTL16 was knocked down by RNAi, transcript levels of ten AMPs and four TFs were measured at 60 h post bacterial challenge with qRT-PCR using the primers listed in a published paper [1,27]. Three technical repeats per replicate and three biological replicates were carried out for each experiment.

4.9. Survival Assay

T. castaneum were divided into four groups (30 larvae per group) to evaluate the larva survival rate for S. aureus and E. coli infection after TcCTL16 knockdown. ds-GFP was used as a control. After TcCTL16 was knocked down by ds-TcCTL16 injection, all larvae were injected with 200 nL of S. aureus (about 7.0 × 104 cells) or E. coli (about 7.8 × 104 cells) at 72 h post-dsRNA injection. The number of dead larvae was monitored every 12 h, and the survival rates were calculated. The experiments were repeated three times.

4.10. Statistical Analyses

The gene expression data and the mean values of the RNAi-treated larvae versus the mean values of the control larvae were compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in combination with Student’s t-test using the SPSS version 13.0 statistics program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data obtained were presented as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms241310700/s1.

Author Contributions

J.B., Y.W. and M.N.; writing—original draft preparation, J.B., B.L., Q.S. and M.N.; writing—review and revision, R.G., P.L. and Y.J.; figure, table, data curation, formal analysis and methodology, J.B., R.G., P.L., Y.J. and M.N.; funding acquisition, L.G.; project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Shandong Provincial Natural Foundation, grant number ZR2022QC074 and Agricultural Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of the Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, grant number CXGC2021B14, CXGC2022E05 and CXGC2023F05.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Shandong Provincial Natural Foundation (Grant No. ZR2022QC074) and the Agricultural Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of the Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, S.; Hong, Y.; Du, Y.; Hu, Z.; Tang, J.; Wang, S.; Feng, F.; Li, B. Functional analysis of TcCTL12 in innate immunity and development in Tribolium castaneum. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 206, 422–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, X.; He, Y.; Cao, X.; Gunaratna, R.T.; Chen, Y.-R.; Blissard, G.; Kanost, M.R.; Jiang, H. Phylogenetic analysis and expression profiling of the pattern recognition receptors: Insights into molecular recognition of invading pathogens in Manduca sexta. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015, 62, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Stokes, B.A.; Yadav, S.; Shokal, U.; Smith, L.C.; Eleftherianos, I. Bacterial and fungal pattern recognition receptors in homologous innate signaling pathways of insects and mammals. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Chettri, D.; Boro, M.; Sarkar, L.; Verma, A.K. Lectins: Biological significance to biotechnological application. Carbohydr. Res. 2021, 506, 108367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rao, X.-J.; Cao, X.; He, Y.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.-R.; Blissard, G.; Kanost, M.R.; Yu, X.-Q.; Jiang, H. Structural features, evolutionary relationships, and transcriptional regulation of C-type lectin-domain proteins in Manduca sexta. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015, 62, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Cheng, Y.; Lin, Z.; Wang, J.-M.; Xing, L.-S.; Xiong, G.-H.; Zou, Z. CTL14, a recognition receptor induced in late stage larvae, modulates anti-fungal immunity in cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2018, 84, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, X.-W.; Zhao, X.-F.; Wang, J.-X. C-type Lectin Binds to β-Integrin to Promote Hemocytic Phagocytosis in an Invertebrate. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 2405–2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Zhan, M.-Y.; Shahzad, T.; Yang, P.-J.; Liu, S.; Yu, X.-Q.; Rao, X.-J. A single-CRD C-type lectin is important for bacterial clearance in the silkworm. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2016, 65, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ao, J.; Ling, E.; Yu, X.-Q. Drosophila C-type lectins enhance cellular encapsulation. Mol. Immunol. 2007, 44, 2541–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Arumugam, G.; Sreeramulu, B.; Paulchamy, R.; Thangavel, S.; Sundaram, J. Purification and functional characterization of lectin with phenoloxidase activity from the hemolymph of cockroach, Periplaneta americana. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2017, 95, e21390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sun, J.-J.; Lan, J.-F.; Zhao, X.-F.; Vasta, G.R.; Wang, J.-X. Binding of a C-type lectin’s coiled-coil domain to the Domeless receptor directly activates the JAK/STAT pathway in the shrimp immune response to bacterial infection. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Xia, X.; You, M.; Rao, X.J.; Yu, X.Q. Insect C-type lectins in innate immunity. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2018, 83, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tanji, T.; Ohashi-Kobayashi, A.; Natori, S. Participation of a galactose-specific C-type lectin in Drosophila immunity. Biochem. J. 2006, 396, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Yu, X.Q.; Kanost, M.R. A family of C-type lectins in Manduca sexta. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2001, 484, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Kubo, T.; Kawasaki, K.; Natori, S. Transient Appearance and Localization of a 26-kDa Lectin, a Novel Member of the Periplaneta Lectin Family, in Regenerating Cockroach Leg. Dev. Biol. 1993, 156, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, P.; Zhuo, X.R.; Tang, L.; Liu, X.S.; Wang, Y.F.; Wang, G.X.; Yu, X.Q.; Wang, J.L. C-type lectin interacting with β-integrin enhances hemocytic encapsulation in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 86, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Song, Z.-K.; Tian, M.-L.; Dong, Y.-P.; Ren, C.-B.; Du, Y.; Hu, J. The C-type lectin IML-10 promotes hemocytic encapsulation by enhancing aggregation of hemocytes in the Asian corn borer Ostrinia furnacalis. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 118, 103314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rao, X.-J.; Shahzad, T.; Liu, S.; Wu, P.; He, Y.-T.; Sun, W.-J.; Fan, X.-Y.; Yang, Y.-F.; Shi, Q.; Yu, X.-Q. Identification of C-type lectin-domain proteins (CTLDPs) in silkworm Bombyx mori. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2015, 53, 328–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chin, M.-L.; Mlodzik, M. The Drosophila Selectin Furrowed Mediates Intercellular Planar Cell Polarity Interactions via Frizzled Stabilization. Dev. Cell 2013, 26, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. A Leshko-Lindsay, L.; Corces, V.G. The role of selectins in Drosophila eye and bristle development. Development 1997, 124, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Banerjee, S.; Pillai, A.M.; Paik, R.; Li, J.; Bhat, M.A. Axonal ensheathment and septate junction formation in the peripheral nervous system of Drosophila. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 3319–3329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Faivre-Sarrailh, C.; Banerjee, S.; Li, J.; Hortsch, M.; Laval, M.; Bhat, M.A. Drosophila contactin, a homolog of vertebrate contactin, is required for septate junction organization and paracellular barrier function. Development 2004, 131, 4931–4942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Stork, T.; Engelen, D.; Krudewig, A.; Silies, M.; Bainton, R.J.; Klämbt, C. Organization and function of the blood-brain barrier in Drosophila. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 587–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Tonk, M.; Knorr, E.; Cabezas-Cruz, A.; Valdés, J.J.; Kollewe, C.; Vilcinskas, A. Tribolium castaneum defensins are primarily active against Gram-positive bacteria. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2015, 132, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Consortium, T.G.S. The first genome sequence of a beetle, Tribolium castaneum, a model for insect development and pest biology. Nature 2008, 452, 949–955. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zou, Z.; Evans, J.D.; Lu, Z.; Zhao, P.; Williams, M.; Sumathipala, N.; Hetru, C.; Hultmark, D.; Jiang, H. Comparative genomic analysis of the Tribolium immune system. Genome Biol. 2007, 8, R177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Bi, J.; Ning, M.; Li, J.; Zhang, P.; Wang, L.; Xu, S.; Zhong, Y.; Wang, Z.; Song, Q.; Li, B. A C-type lectin with dual-CRD from Tribolium castaneum is induced in response to bacterial challenge. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 3965–3974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, J.; Bi, J.; Zhang, P.; Wang, Z.; Zhong, Y.; Xu, S.; Wang, L.; Li, B. Functions of a C-type lectin with a single carbohydrate-recognition domain in the innate immunity and movement of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Insect Mol. Biol. 2021, 30, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cheng, G.; Cox, J.; Wang, P.; Krishnan, M.N.; Dai, J.; Qian, F.; Anderson, J.F.; Fikrig, E. A C-Type Lectin Collaborates with a CD45 Phosphatase Homolog to Facilitate West Nile Virus Infection of Mosquitoes. Cell 2010, 142, 714–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Liu, Y.; Zhang, F.; Liu, J.; Xiao, X.; Zhang, S.; Qin, C.; Xiang, Y.; Wang, P.; Cheng, G. Transmission-Blocking Antibodies against Mosquito C-Type Lectins for Dengue Prevention. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1003931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Dodd, R.; Drickamer, K. Lectin-like proteins in model organisms: Implications for evolution of carbohydrate-binding activity. Glycobiology 2001, 11, 71R–79R. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zelensky, A.N.; E Gready, J. The C-type lectin-like domain superfamily. FEBS J. 2005, 272, 6179–6217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, X.-W.; Wang, J.-X. Diversity and multiple functions of lectins in shrimp immunity. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2012, 39, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pees, B.; Yang, W.; Zárate-Potes, A.; Schulenburg, H.; Dierking, K. High Innate Immune Specificity through Diversified C-Type Lectin-Like Domain Proteins in Invertebrates. J. Innate Immun. 2016, 8, 129–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ahmed, R.; Anam, K.; Ahmed, H. Development of Galectin-3 Targeting Drugs for Therapeutic Applications in Various Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hung, C.-H.; Huang, H.-L.; Hsu, K.-T.; Ho, S.-J.; Ho, S.-Y. Prediction of non-classical secreted proteins using informative physicochemical properties. Interdiscip. Sci. Comput. Life Sci. 2010, 2, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, L.; Ward, R.E. uninflatable encodes a novel ectodermal apical surface protein required for tracheal inflation in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 2009, 336, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Rai, M.; Nongthomba, U.; Grounds, M.D. Chapter nine—Skeletal muscle degeneration and regeneration in mice and flies. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2014, 108, 247–281. [Google Scholar]
  39. Abmayr, S.M.; Pavlath, G.K. Myoblast fusion: Lessons from flies and mice. Development 2012, 139, 641–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Schweitzer, R.; Zelzer, E.; Volk, T. Connecting muscles to tendons: Tendons and musculoskeletal development in flies and vertebrates. Development 2010, 137, 2807–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Laurichesse, Q.; Soler, C. Muscle development: A view from adult myogenesis in Drosophila. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 104, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chaturvedi, D.; Prabhakar, S.; Aggarwal, A.; Atreya, K.B.; VijayRaghavan, K. Adult Drosophila muscle morphometry through microCT reveals dynamics during ageing. Open Biol. 2019, 9, 190087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Bi, J.; Feng, F.; Li, J.; Mao, J.; Ning, M.; Song, X.; Xie, J.; Tang, J.; Li, B. A C-type lectin with a single carbohydrate-recognition domain involved in the innate immune response of Tribolium castaneum. Insect Mol. Biol. 2019, 28, 649–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Koizumi, N.; Imamura, M.; Kadotani, T.; Yaoi, K.; Iwahana, H.; Sato, R. The lipopolysaccharide-binding protein participating in hemocyte nodule formation in the silkworm Bombyx mori is a novel member of the C-type lectin superfamily with two different tandem carbohydrate-recognition domains. FEBS Lett 1999, 443, 139–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Shi, X.-Z.; Kang, C.-J.; Wang, S.-J.; Zhong, X.; Beerntsen, B.T.; Yu, X.-Q. Functions of Armigeres subalbatus C-type lectins in innate immunity. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014, 52, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Takase, H.; Watanabe, A.; Yoshizawa, Y.; Kitami, M.; Sato, R. Identification and comparative analysis of three novel C-type lectins from the silkworm with functional implications in pathogen recognition. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2009, 33, 789–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Watanabe, A.; Miyazawa, S.; Kitami, M.; Tabunoki, H.; Ueda, K.; Sato, R. Characterization of a novel C-type lectin, Bombyx mori multibinding protein, from the B. mori hemolymph: Mechanism of wide-range microorganism recognition and role in immunity. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 4594–4604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Tassanakajon, A.; Rimphanitchayakit, V.; Visetnan, S.; Amparyup, P.; Somboonwiwat, K.; Charoensapsri, W.; Tang, S. Shrimp humoral responses against pathogens: Antimicrobial peptides and melanization. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2018, 80, 81–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, L.; Wang, L.; Zhang, D.; Li, F.; Wang, M.; Huang, M.; Zhang, H.; Song, L. A novel C-type lectin from crab Eriocheir sinensis functions as pattern recognition receptor enhancing cellular encapsulation. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2013, 34, 832–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Yu, X.Q.; Kanost, M.R. Immulectin-2, a lipopolysaccharide-specific lectin from an insect, Manduca sexta, is induced in response to gram-negative bacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 37373–37381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Liu, Y.; Su, Y.; Zhang, A.; Cui, Z. A C-Type Lectin Highly Expressed in Portunus trituberculatus Intestine Functions in AMP Regulation and Prophenoloxidase Activation. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Geng, T.; Lv, D.-D.; Huang, Y.-X.; Hou, C.-X.; Qin, G.-X.; Guo, X.-J. JAK/STAT signaling pathway-mediated immune response in silkworm (Bombyx mori) challenged by Beauveria bassiana. Gene 2016, 595, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yu, X.-Q.; Ma, Y. Calcium is not required for immulectin-2 binding, but protects the protein from proteinase digestion. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2006, 36, 505–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bi, J.; Ning, M.; Xie, X.; Fan, W.; Huang, Y.; Gu, W.; Wang, W.; Wang, L.; Meng, Q. A typical C-type lectin, perlucin-like protein, is involved in the innate immune defense of whiteleg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2020, 103, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhou, J.; Fang, N.N.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, K.Y.; Mao, B.; Na Kong, L.; Chen, Y.; Ai, H. Identification and characterization of two novel C-type lectins from the larvae of housefly, Musca domestica L. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2018, 98, e21467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yokoi, K.; Koyama, H.; Ito, W.; Minakuchi, C.; Tanaka, T.; Miura, K. Involvement of NF-κB transcription factors in antimicrobial peptide gene induction in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2012, 38, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Xiong, W.; Gao, S.; Mao, J.; Wei, L.; Xie, J.; Liu, J.; Bi, J.; Song, X.; Li, B. CYP4BN6 and CYP6BQ11 mediate insecticide susceptibility and their expression is regulated by Latrophilin in Tribolium castaneum. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 2744–2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lord, J.C.; Hartzer, K.; Toutges, M.; Oppert, B. Evaluation of quantitative PCR reference genes for gene expression studies in Tribolium castaneum after fungal challenge. J. Microbiol. Methods 2010, 80, 219–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, M.; Wang, L.; Huang, M.; Yi, Q.; Guo, Y.; Gai, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, H.; Song, L. A galectin from Eriocheir sinensis functions as pattern recognition receptor enhancing microbe agglutination and haemocytes encapsulation. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2016, 55, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of TcCTL16 protein showing all six domains. Four CCPs, one K12A domain, one CRD and one transmembrane helix region (blue box) were identified in TcCTL16 protein. The pink box is low complexity region.
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of TcCTL16 protein showing all six domains. Four CCPs, one K12A domain, one CRD and one transmembrane helix region (blue box) were identified in TcCTL16 protein. The pink box is low complexity region.
Ijms 24 10700 g001
Figure 2. The spatiotemporal expression of TcCTL16. (A) Developmental expression patterns of TcCTL16. The RNA extract from whole body was used for the qRT-PCR at different developmental stages. The relative expressions of the target transcripts in the early egg served as the calibrator for the developmental expression profiling. (B) Tissue-specific expression patterns of TcCTL16 in gut, fat body, epidermis, hemolymph, and Malpighian tubule from the 15-day-old larvae. The relative expression of the target transcripts in larva was employed as the calibrator for the tissue-specific expression profiling.
Figure 2. The spatiotemporal expression of TcCTL16. (A) Developmental expression patterns of TcCTL16. The RNA extract from whole body was used for the qRT-PCR at different developmental stages. The relative expressions of the target transcripts in the early egg served as the calibrator for the developmental expression profiling. (B) Tissue-specific expression patterns of TcCTL16 in gut, fat body, epidermis, hemolymph, and Malpighian tubule from the 15-day-old larvae. The relative expression of the target transcripts in larva was employed as the calibrator for the tissue-specific expression profiling.
Ijms 24 10700 g002
Figure 3. Statistics of survival rate (A), body length (B), and body width (C) compared with WT, ds-GFP, and ds-TcCTL16 groups. The expression levels of genes involved in muscle regulation (D) and muscle composition (E) after TcCTL16 RNAi. WT: wild type; ds-GFP: GFP-RNAi larvae; ds-TcCTL16: TcCTL16-RNAi larvae. Tcrps3 was used as a reference gene. The results are the mean and standard errors of three biological replications (n = 3). Asterisk denotes significant differences (** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).
Figure 3. Statistics of survival rate (A), body length (B), and body width (C) compared with WT, ds-GFP, and ds-TcCTL16 groups. The expression levels of genes involved in muscle regulation (D) and muscle composition (E) after TcCTL16 RNAi. WT: wild type; ds-GFP: GFP-RNAi larvae; ds-TcCTL16: TcCTL16-RNAi larvae. Tcrps3 was used as a reference gene. The results are the mean and standard errors of three biological replications (n = 3). Asterisk denotes significant differences (** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).
Ijms 24 10700 g003
Figure 4. qRT-PCR analysis of TcCTL16 expression 12 h to 72 h after LPS (A), PGN (B), E. coli (C) and S. aureus (D) challenge. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001) compared with values of the control. The results are the mean and standard errors of three biological replicates.
Figure 4. qRT-PCR analysis of TcCTL16 expression 12 h to 72 h after LPS (A), PGN (B), E. coli (C) and S. aureus (D) challenge. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001) compared with values of the control. The results are the mean and standard errors of three biological replicates.
Ijms 24 10700 g004
Figure 5. SDS-PAGE (A) and Western blotting (B) analysis of the rCTL16 protein. Lane M: the protein molecular weight marker; lane 1: the supernatant protein of E. coli with pET-28a; lane 2: precipitated protein from E. coli with pET-28a; lane 3: the supernatant protein of E. coli with pET-28a-TcCTL16; lane 4: the precipitated protein from E. coli with pET-28a-TcCTL16; lane 5: purified recombinant TcCTL16 protein; lane 6: Western blot based on the sample from lane 5. (C) Binding of each recombinant protein rCTL16 to microorganisms (S. aureus, B. subtilis, B. thuringiensis, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa) were detected by Western blot. (D) Microorganism agglutination activities of rCTL16 with either the absence or presence of Ca2+. Three Gram-positive (S. aureus, B. subtilis, and B. thuringiensis) and two Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli and P. aeruginosa) are shown. rTcMBD was used as a negative control protein. Agglutination reactions were observed using a compound light microscope with a 1000× objective. The red arrows indicate the agglutination region.
Figure 5. SDS-PAGE (A) and Western blotting (B) analysis of the rCTL16 protein. Lane M: the protein molecular weight marker; lane 1: the supernatant protein of E. coli with pET-28a; lane 2: precipitated protein from E. coli with pET-28a; lane 3: the supernatant protein of E. coli with pET-28a-TcCTL16; lane 4: the precipitated protein from E. coli with pET-28a-TcCTL16; lane 5: purified recombinant TcCTL16 protein; lane 6: Western blot based on the sample from lane 5. (C) Binding of each recombinant protein rCTL16 to microorganisms (S. aureus, B. subtilis, B. thuringiensis, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa) were detected by Western blot. (D) Microorganism agglutination activities of rCTL16 with either the absence or presence of Ca2+. Three Gram-positive (S. aureus, B. subtilis, and B. thuringiensis) and two Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli and P. aeruginosa) are shown. rTcMBD was used as a negative control protein. Agglutination reactions were observed using a compound light microscope with a 1000× objective. The red arrows indicate the agglutination region.
Ijms 24 10700 g005
Figure 6. TcCTL16 expression patterns on 1st, 3rd, and 5th days in the dsRNA-TcCTL16-treated insects. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01) compared with values of the ds-GFP. (A). Phenotypes of WT, ds-GFP, and ds-TcCTL16 groups. L, late larvae; P, late pupae; A, early adults. Pictures were taken by Olympus DP-72 digital camera (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) through an Olympus SZX-16 microscope (Olympus Corporation). The larvae were photographed at ×16 magnification, while the pupae and adults were at ×20 magnification (B).
Figure 6. TcCTL16 expression patterns on 1st, 3rd, and 5th days in the dsRNA-TcCTL16-treated insects. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01) compared with values of the ds-GFP. (A). Phenotypes of WT, ds-GFP, and ds-TcCTL16 groups. L, late larvae; P, late pupae; A, early adults. Pictures were taken by Olympus DP-72 digital camera (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) through an Olympus SZX-16 microscope (Olympus Corporation). The larvae were photographed at ×16 magnification, while the pupae and adults were at ×20 magnification (B).
Ijms 24 10700 g006
Figure 7. TcCTL16 expression patterns in response to E. coli challenge in the dsRNA-TcCTL16-treated insects (A). The expression patterns of transcription factor (B) and AMP (C) genes upon E. coli challenge after successful RNAi of TcCTL16. The survival rate of TcCTL16-RNAi larvae infected with S. aureus (D) and E. coli (E). The number of dead beetles was recorded every 12 hr post-challenge. The control group was ds-GFP + bacterium (S. aureus or E. coli). Statistical comparisons were performed between the ds-GFP-injected and ds-TcCTL16-injected insects. Tcrps3 was used as a reference gene. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001) compared with values of the control. The results are the mean and standard errors of three biological replicates.
Figure 7. TcCTL16 expression patterns in response to E. coli challenge in the dsRNA-TcCTL16-treated insects (A). The expression patterns of transcription factor (B) and AMP (C) genes upon E. coli challenge after successful RNAi of TcCTL16. The survival rate of TcCTL16-RNAi larvae infected with S. aureus (D) and E. coli (E). The number of dead beetles was recorded every 12 hr post-challenge. The control group was ds-GFP + bacterium (S. aureus or E. coli). Statistical comparisons were performed between the ds-GFP-injected and ds-TcCTL16-injected insects. Tcrps3 was used as a reference gene. Asterisks indicate significant differences (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001) compared with values of the control. The results are the mean and standard errors of three biological replicates.
Ijms 24 10700 g007
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used in the current study.
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used in the current study.
NameSequence (5′-3′)
PCR:
TcCTL16-FATGGTCGTGTGTCAGTGCAAGG
TcCTL16-RATATCTCTTCTGGTCGCGGTGC
 TcCTL16-FatgggtcgcggatccgaattcATGGTCGTGTGTCAGTGCAAGG
 TcCTL16-RgtggtggtggtggtgctcgagATATCTCTTCTGGTCGCGGTGC
RNAi:
 ds-TcCTL16-FtaatacgactcactatagggATGGTCGTGTGTCAGTGCAA
 ds-TcCTL16-RtaatacgactcactatagggATTGTGGCAGGTTTGTTCGC
qRT-PCR:
TcCTL16-qFTGTGAACCTGTCCAGTGCG
TcCTL16-qRCATCATACTGTCCATTCGCC
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bi, J.; Wang, Y.; Gao, R.; Liu, P.; Jiang, Y.; Gao, L.; Li, B.; Song, Q.; Ning, M. Functional Analysis of a CTL-X-Type Lectin CTL16 in Development and Innate Immunity of Tribolium castaneum. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10700. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310700

AMA Style

Bi J, Wang Y, Gao R, Liu P, Jiang Y, Gao L, Li B, Song Q, Ning M. Functional Analysis of a CTL-X-Type Lectin CTL16 in Development and Innate Immunity of Tribolium castaneum. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(13):10700. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310700

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bi, Jingxiu, Yutao Wang, Rui Gao, Pingxiang Liu, Yuying Jiang, Lei Gao, Bin Li, Qisheng Song, and Mingxiao Ning. 2023. "Functional Analysis of a CTL-X-Type Lectin CTL16 in Development and Innate Immunity of Tribolium castaneum" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 13: 10700. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310700

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop