Next Article in Journal
New Cases and Mutations in SEC23B Gene Causing Congenital Dyserythropoietic Anemia Type II
Next Article in Special Issue
Turmeric and Curcumin—Health-Promoting Properties in Humans versus Dogs
Previous Article in Journal
Do Colonic Mucosal Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Levels Play a Role in Diverticular Disease? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Epothilones as Natural Compounds for Novel Anticancer Drugs Development
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 12
10.3390/ijms24129936
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bioactivity Profiling and Quantification of Gastrodin in Gastrodia elata Cultivated in the Field versus Facility via Hyphenated High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography

by
Fernanda L. B. Mügge
1,†,
Cheul Muu Sim
2,
Bernd Honermeier
3 and
Gertrud E. Morlock
1,*,†
1
Department of Food Science, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany
2
Neutron Science Center, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon 34057, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Agronomy and Crop Physiology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(12), 9936; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24129936
Submission received: 6 April 2023 / Revised: 22 May 2023 / Accepted: 28 May 2023 / Published: 9 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological Properties of Medicinal Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Gastrodia elata (Orchidaceae) is native to mountainous areas of Asia and is a plant species used in traditional medicine for more than two thousand years. The species was reported to have many biological activities, such as neuroprotective, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activity. After many years of extensive exploitation from the wild, the plant was added to lists of endangered species. Since its desired cultivation is considered difficult, innovative cultivation methods that can reduce the costs of using new soil in each cycle and at the same time avoid contamination with pathogens and chemicals are urgently needed on large scale. In this work, five G. elata samples cultivated in a facility utilizing electron beam-treated soil were compared to two samples grown in the field concerning their chemical composition and bioactivity. Using hyphenated high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) and multi-imaging (UV/Vis/FLD, also after derivatization), the chemical marker compound gastrodin was quantified in the seven G. elata rhizome/tuber samples, which showed differences in their contents between facility and field samples and between samples collected during different seasons. Parishin E was also found to be present. Combining HPTLC with on-surface (bio)assays, the antioxidant activity and inhibition of acetylcholinesterase as well as the absence of cytotoxicity against human cells were demonstrated and compared between samples.

1. Introduction

Gastrodia elata Blume belongs to the family Orchidaceae and is commonly used in traditional medicine. The plant is native to the mountain regions of Eastern Asia, ranging from Nepal to China, Korea, Japan, and Russia [1]. Gastrodiae rhizoma, the dried tuber of G. elata, is mainly used to treat affections of the central nervous system, such as headache, migraine, dizziness, and epilepsy [2]. Previous scientific works have provided in vitro and in vivo pharmacological evidence of neuroprotective activity [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11], antidepressant [12,13], antioxidant [14,15,16,17,18,19] and anti-inflammatory effects [20,21,22,23].
Unfortunately, overexploitation of the plant in the native regions has placed G. elata on lists of endangered species [24]. Its cultivation and growth are difficult and often hindered by the presence of pathogenic fungi in the soil that can cause root rot, which also makes the use of pesticides necessary in some cases to avoid the loss of the plants or to allow the reuse of the same soil multiple times [25,26]. The alternative of using new soil for each cultivation cycle is not sustainable and increases costs; therefore, innovative techniques of removing pathogens that allow soil reuse are of great value. Electron beam treatment has been successfully used in the cultivation of Panax ginseng, with much higher root survival (81%) compared to that in the untreated reused soil (0%) and a similar rate to that in the virgin soil (78%) as well as comparable levels of ginsenosides in both cases [25].
For complex sample analysis, hyphenated high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) is a versatile tool that can be used for simultaneous sample separation, allowing authenticity screening [27,28,29,30,31,32], non-target bioprofiling [33,34,35,36], as well as quantification of chemical marker compounds [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44] from a wide variety of samples, including foods, plants, and other natural products. The combination of multiple analytical steps and identification of bioactivity by the same workflow makes hyphenated HPTLC a very sustainable technique and allows complex mixtures, such as plant extracts, to be studied in parallel in a much faster and straightforward way [45,46].
In this study, soil treatment with an electron beam, which removes the pathogenic fungi, but at the same time allows beneficial bacteria to thrive and promote plant growth [25], was applied to the cultivation of G. elata. The cultivation facility using the treated soil was adapted from that used for P. ginseng, and G. elata samples were harvested after two years in different time intervals. The chemical composition and bioactivity of five G. elata extracts obtained from dried and steam-treated tuber samples cultivated in a facility utilizing electron beam-treated soil were compared to two extracts from plants grown in the field. For their analysis, hyphenated HPTLC combined with multi-imaging and non-target effect-directed on-surface assays was used.

2. Results

2.1. Origin, Harvest, and Post-Harvest Processing of Samples

Seed propagation, cultivation, and trade of Gastrodia elata Blume (G) have been authorized by the Korean government under the “Law on Protection and Management of Wildlife” and comply with internationally endangered species resolution (Conf. 11.15 (Rev. CoP18). Samples were cultivated as described (Section 4.2) at Muju-Gun, Jeollabuk-Do, South Korea. Three harvest cycles of the rhizomes were performed over a period of twelve months, and seven different samples were obtained, starting by a facility harvest in April 2021, followed by simultaneous harvests from the facility and field in November 2021, and one last cycle also from both facility and field in April 2022. After each harvest, the samples were boiled in steam at 80 °C for 5 min, cut, and naturally dried in the sunshine. This post-harvest processing was relevant for sample storage. Samples were consecutively named G1 to G5 according to the harvest period. To account for intrasample variability, for the first harvest period, three samples G1.1, G1.2, and G1.3 were collected and stored individually. Each sample was cut into pieces and pulverized (visual characteristics in Table S1). For comparison, one Panax ginseng (Pg) sample was prepared accordingly. This medicinal plant well known from traditional medicine was selected since facility cultivation and soil treatment was adapted from the protocol used for Pg cultivation.

2.2. Selection of the Extractant

Traditionally, G. elata is consumed after boiling the roots in water. The water and the roots are consumed. Similar to this traditional use, two different types of extracts were prepared at 100 mg/mL using either 50% ethanol in bidistilled water (50% EtOH) or decoction in bidistilled water at 95 °C for 1 h, both followed by ultrasonication for 30 min. All extracts along with the Pg extract were applied on the HPTLC plate silica gel 60 and developed with a mixture of ethyl acetate–methanol–bidistilled water–formic acid, 7.3/1.25/1.0/0.45, V/V/V/V, adapted from [47]. Detection was performed at FLD 366 nm after derivatization with Natural Product reagent A, followed by PEG treatment for visualization of phenolic compounds (Figure S1a) and with 2-naphthol sulfuric acid reagent for visualization of saccharides (Figure S1b). Similar G profiles between the 50% EtOH extracts and the boiled water extracts were observed but with much higher amounts of extracted compounds (more intense bands) for the 50% EtOH extracts, which was selected for further analyses. As expected, the co-analysis and comparison with the Pg sample showed different chemical profiles between both plants and, as expected, the absence of gastrodin (hRF 50) in Pg (Figure S1b). Gastrodin, vanillin and vanillyl alcohol reported as bioactive substances in G. elata tubers [11,48] were used as chemical marker compounds.

2.3. Comparative Chemical and Effect-Directed Profiling

Four identical HPTLC silica gel 60 plates (NP) containing the seven G extracts (10 µg/band each) were prepared. For chemical derivatization, a reagent sequence was used with Fast Blue salt B (image under white light illumination not shown since not much was visible), followed by Natural Product reagent A and PEG for visualization of phenolics (Figure 1a) and the 2-naphthol sulfuric acid reagent mainly used for visualization of saccharides, among others (Figure 1b). For detection of antioxidants, the diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH•) assay (Figure 1c) and the 2,2′-azino-di-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline sulfonic acid)(ABTS) assay (Figure 1d) were used. The autograms were recorded instantly. On the DPPH• autogram (Figure 1c), yellow bands on a purple background indicated radical scavenging activity. Apart from strong signals at the application zone, one prominent antioxidant band at hRF 67 was detected in all samples, and another band at hRF 95 was also detected, although weaker in the response for samples G2 and G5. In the ABTS autogram (Figure 1d), antioxidant components were observed as colorless (white) zones on a green background. Apart from strong signals at the application zone, the previous antioxidant band at hRF 95 was also detected by this assay, again weaker in the response for samples G2 and G5. The reference vanillyl alcohol showed a strong antioxidant response at a slightly lower hRF for both assays which needs further confirmation (shown subsequently). The acetylcholinesterase inhibition autogram did not show bands with strong activity at the same amounts applied (Figure S2). The very weak inhibition response at hRF 57 was slightly stronger for samples G2 and G5.
The results of the effect-directed profiling were confirmed on wettable reversed phase RP-18 W layers (Figure 1). An orthogonal mobile phase system had to be developed, and the extracts were successfully separated using water–acetonitrile–methanol–formic acid 4.5/1/1/0.2, V/V/V/V. The chemical marker compounds gastrodin, vanillin, and vanillyl alcohol were migrating in the reverse order, and the zone resolution between vanillin and vanillyl alcohol was substantially improved. Vanillin was not visible/detectable at the given amounts in the samples in the chromatograms/autograms. Vanillyl alcohol on the RP plate again showed an antioxidant response at a similar position as an antioxidant band in the samples for both assays. However, the hRF of vanillyl alcohol compared to the samples was not identical, which was proven by confirmative studies via overlapped application to study the retardation behavior of vanillyl alcohol partially migrating in the matrix (Figure 2). This showed that vanillyl alcohol did not match to the marker compound in the samples. The recording of high-resolution mass spectra [49] of this vanillyl alcohol-like compound zone showed the base peak at m/z 459.1149 [M-H]– in the negative ionization mode, confirmed by the respective sodium adduct in the positive ionization mode, which was tentatively assigned to the molecular formula of C19H24O13. It was preliminarily assigned to Parishin E reported as a phenolic glycoside originally isolated from G. elata [50], however, needs further proof by co-chromatography. At least the chromatographic and spectral data as well as successful derivatization with the 2-naphthol sulfuric acid reagent underline this preliminary assignment.
The latest cytotoxicity bioassay protocol for the adherent HEK 293T-CMV-ELuc cells on the HPTLC plate silica 60 RP-18 W [28] was used in the first experiment (Figure S3a without development). The G. elata G1.1 extract was manually applied along with a Saussurea costus extract (100 mg/mL methanolic solution [28]) used as plant-based positive cytotoxic control, both 500 µg/band, and curcumin (2 µg/band) as another example compound to be tested due to its strong light-absorbing pigments. Cytotoxicity of the samples was tested using the tetrazolium salt MTT to observe a reduction in purple-colored vivid cells and the luciferin solution to detect a reduction in cell bioluminescence. After a 24 h incubation, cytotoxicity was only observed for S. costus, but not for G. elata. Then, the samples were applied again and two-step separated, first with a comparatively more apolar solvent mixture (ethyl acetate–toluene 4/1, V/V) up to 6 cm, dried, and then developed with a more middle polar solvent mixture (ethyl acetate–methanol 4/1, V/V) up to 3 cm. The G. elata G1.1 and S. costus samples were compared, and again cytotoxicity was only observed for S. costus (Figure S3c). To confirm the absence of cytotoxicity for G. elata, another facility sample (G2) and one field sample (G3) from the same harvest were studied in a two-step development (Figure 3).
Each sample was applied twice at increasing amounts (1–4 mg/band). After the plate cut, one sample set was subjected to the derivatization and the other to the cytotoxicity bioassay. After derivatization with the 2-naphthol sulfuric acid reagent, the preliminary assigned Parishin E (hRF 78) was observed for G3 but not for G2, and the gastrodin at hRF 35 for G3 and less intense for G2 (Figure 3). HEK293T cells expressing luciferase were again used for the on-surface cytotoxicity assay, as previously described [28]. After the 24 h incubation, cytotoxicity was not observed for either G2 or G3, as evident from the intact bioluminescent HEK 293T-CMV-ELuc cell stripes on the increasing amounts of both samples tested. Even with the highest applied sample amount of 4 mg, which almost overloaded the adsorbent, no cytotoxic effect was observed.

2.4. Quantification of the Marker Compound Gastrodin

For quantification of the chemical marker compound gastrodin, the seven extracts of the G samples (10 µg each, 10 µL/band) were applied together with seven (or eight) different standard levels. The preliminary assigned Parishin E was equivalently calculated via the vanillyl alcohol signal response after derivatization, which was found to be comparable from the chromatographic and spectral properties. For separation of the preliminary assigned Parishin E from the front-eluting vanillin, the solvent strength of the mobile phase was reduced, i.e., the formic acid was removed but the proportions of the other solvents remained (ethyl acetate–methanol–bidistilled water (7.3/1.25/1.0, V/V/V). After derivatization with a 2-naphthol sulfuric acid reagent, the samples G4 and G5 showed band distortions. Such a matrix effect can be observed for samples with high contents of saccharides [37,43,51,52]. At hRF 30–40, it is noticeable that the band corresponding to gastrodin is distorted in samples G4 and G5 (Figure 4a), which normally leads to an increased quantification error. To circumvent this distortion, a known strategy in HPTLC is diluting the sample with the same solvent and applying a respective higher sample volume to obtain the same amount [53]. In this case, 30 µL of a 1:3 dilution of the 100 mg/mL extracts (Figure 4b) was applied.
Gastrodin quantification was successful under this condition; however, it was not yet possible to equivalently calculate the preliminary assigned Parishin E for samples G2 and G5, and thus double the amount of extract was applied (60 µL of the 1:3 dilution). Although this brought back the interference of the matrix for samples G4 and G5, the detection of the preliminary assigned Parishin E (hRF 90) was improved for samples G2 and G5 (Figure 4c). Hence, in a future plant extract screening, two different volumes of an unkown sample should be applied to allow for quantification. Due to the very low vanillin content in the sample and migration close to the solvent front (hRF > 95), the quantification of vanillin remained challenging, even for the higher amounts applied.
The quantification of gastrodin as well as the semi-quantification of the preliminary assigned Parishin E calculated equivalently to vanillyl alcohol were repeated on different days via absorbance measurement at 580 nm and the overall mean was calculated (Table 1). The precision values represent the method’s ruggedness and are therefore higher since different sample dilutions and sample application volumes were used as discussed. In the future, the sample concentration could be fixed to 0.3 mg/mL and a 15 µL sample volume could be applied on a slightly larger area (8 mm × 3.5 mm) to better spread the matrix at the application zone and thus improve its penetration by the mobile phase mixture during the development.
As observed for the HPTLC profiles and calculated mean content, sample G4 (facility sample from April 2022) had the lowest gastrodin content, followed by G2 (facility sample from November 2021). G2 was also the sample with the lowest preliminary assigned Parishin E content, but G4 was the one with the highest content. The two important field samples G3 and G5 were contrasting in the results; while G5 had a higher gastrodin content (by ¼ higher), it was half in the preliminary assigned Parishin E content compared to G3. In contrast, sample G1 showed a high content of both substances. Samples G1.1 and G1.3 had very similar results (both highest content of gastrodin and second highest content of the preliminary assigned Parishin E), whereas sample G1.2 showed a slightly lower content of gastrodin (by 15%) and even lower content for the preliminary assigned Parishin E (by ca. 40%). Hence, also within the same batch, there are differences to be expected between the individual tubers.

3. Discussion

Hyphenated HPTLC [45] and its miniaturization to an open-source 2LabsToGo system [54] is a straightforward, fast, and low-cost technique for the separation of complex mixtures. It contributes to more sustainable methods, analyzing all samples simultaneously with less consumption of chemical reagents. Up to twelve hyphenation dimensions including substance identification via high-resolution mass spectrometry have been reported for HPTLC [33,34]. Hence, to exploit the potential of hyphenated HPTLC, it was successfully applied for the first time to bioactivity screening of Gastrodia elata samples. The novel cultivation in the facility using electron-beam-treated soil and the inoculation of the symbiotic fungi allowed plant growth as for the cultivation in the field. As expected [26,55,56], differences between the seven studied facility and field samples and the different harvest times were observed. Variations in the number of radical scavenging bands among samples were observed, which can also have been influenced by the post-harvest processing of the different batches [57]. The prominent antioxidative zone at hRF 95 was assumed to be Parishin E, which still needs confirmation by co-chromatography. As the other prominent antioxidative zone at hRF 67 (Figure 1c, NP) did not match with the marker compound gastrodin, its identification through elution to high-resolution mass spectrometry might be interesting. In comparison to the antioxidative potential, the acetylcholinesterase inhibition response of the seven G. elata samples was very weak. Encouragingly for commercialization, none of the facility or field samples tested showed cytotoxic properties even at high amounts (4 mg) studied, which was close to overloading the adsorbent.
Exploiting microchemical derivatization for selective detection, the quantitative analysis of the chemical marker compounds gastrodin and further compounds was simply performed, contrary to complex instrumentation used otherwise [48,58]. Differences in the gastrodin content were evident. The preliminary assigned Parishin E was equivalently calculated to vanillyl alcohol based on the signal response obtained after derivatization, which was found to be comparable from the chromatographic and spectral behavior. The report of vanillyl alcohol as a chemical marker in the G. elata rhizome/tuber in the literature [11,48,59,60] is herewith questioned. Vanillin was not quantified since it was present at low amounts and too close to the solvent front. Thus, the present quantitative method still needs further improvement as mentioned.
The G. elata rhizome/tuber with attributed cytoprotective and other beneficial properties due to its chemical marker compounds [61,62,63,64,65,66,67] has a similar potential to that of Panax ginseng, which is an example of a traditionally used species that after many studies and confirmation of its beneficial properties has been spread around the world. After further optimization of the facility cultivation, G. elata is assumed to successfully provide high amounts of standardized extracts, rich in bioactive secondary plant metabolites [68,69,70].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals and Materials

HPTLC plates silica gel 60 (batch HX13161141) as well as HPTLC plates silica gel 60 RP-18 wettable (W) (batch HX28689296), all 20 cm × 10 cm, were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Before use, HPTLC plates silica gel 60 were pre-washed with methanol–water (4:1 V/V), dried in an oven (Memmert, Schwabach, Germany) for 20 min at 110 °C, and stored wrapped in aluminum foil. The RP-18 W layer binder was hardened by heating at 120 °C for 1 h (Plate heater, CAMAG). After cooling down, the plates were pre-washed first with methanol and then with ethyl acetate. All salts (per analysis quality) were water-free unless stated otherwise. All solvents were of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade. Ethanol, methanol, ethyl acetate, Triton X-100, glycerol, vanillin, 2–aminoethyl diphenyl borate (natural product reagent A), sulfuric acid, and tris-(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane (Tris) were obtained from Carl Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany). Acetic acid was purchased from VWR Chemicals (Radnor, PA, USA), and polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG) was obtained from J.T. Baker-Avantor (Deventer, The Netherlands). Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM high glucose), DMEM/F12 medium without phenol red, fetal bovine serum, hygromycin B, and TrypLE Express solution were bought from Gibco (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Phosphate-buffered saline, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), tricine, dithiothreitol (DTT), trans-1,2-cyclohexane diamine tetraacetic acid monohydrate (CDTA), citric acid, all salts for buffer preparations, thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT), Fast Blue salt B, 2-naphthol, 2,2′-azino-di-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline sulfonic acid) (ABTS), potassium persulfate and penicillin/streptomycin solution for cell culture were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Magnesium carbonate hydroxide pentahydrate and diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH•, 95%) were bought from Alfa Aesar (Karlsruhe, Germany). Double-concentrated phosphate-buffered saline was obtained from Biochrom (Berlin, Germany). D-Luciferin sodium salt and adenosine triphosphate were purchased from Cayman Chemical Company (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Bidistilled water was prepared using a Heraeus Destamat Bi-18E (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany). Gastrodin was obtained from Phytolab (Vestenbergsgreuth, Germany). Vanillyl alcohol was obtained from Acros Organics (ThermoFisher Scientific, Geel, Belgium). The origin of HEK293T cells constitutively expressing enhanced beetle luciferase (ELuc) was previously described [28].

4.2. Cultivation, Harvest, and Post-Harvest Processing

Gastrodia elata Blume samples were cultivated at 150-91 Domaro Mupung-Myeon, Muju-Gun, Jeollabuk-Do, Republic of Korea. The mature rhizomes, disease free, and with an evident flowering shoot at the end were planted in sand soil. The pots were maintained in the dark at 24 °C. After six weeks, manual pollination was conducted as the flowers opened. Each tuber produced very tiny seeds (ca. 14 µg per 4 million seeds, 1.0 mm in length, and 0.5 mm in width). Capsules with mature seeds were harvested about three weeks after manual pollination before its dehiscence and stored at 4 °C. The two symbiotic fungi Mycena osmundicola and Armillaria mella were obtained from the Muju Rural Technology Center for seed germination. The mycelia culture medium was produced by mixing rice bran and distilled water. Homogenized inoculum of symbiotic fungi was applied to mycelia culture and mixed with fallen leaves and branches of Quercus species for 4 weeks. The seeds of G. elata were germinated by the orchid mycorrhizal fungus nutrition of Mycena osmundicola. During 8 weeks of symbiotic culture, the initiation of the protocorm mainly elongated up to about a 6 mm development was induced. Subsequent infection with Armillaria mella allowed the protocorm to further develop into juvenile tubers grown to approximately 50 mm at 24 °C in the dark for 16 weeks. The immature tubers were directly transplanted for production in the field or facility, embedded with fallen leaves and branches of Quercus species inoculated with Armillaria mella. One hundred tubers were planted per square meter, cultivated, and grown to a size bigger than 100 mm for 1 year. In the Korean facility, irrigation was performed with sprinklers and fog water systems. The field soil was irrigated by rainfall and artificial sprinklers. The facility is an interlocking panel-type house with smart multi-stage cultivation and natural lighting. The harvest dates, after two years of cultivation, were 1 April 2021, 1 November 2021, and 1 April 2022. The post-harvest process included boiling in a steam of 80° C for 5 min and natural drying in sunshine.

4.3. Extraction and Standard Solutions

Each sample was milled at 25,000 rpm for two rounds for 1 min using a small laboratory grinder (Tube-Mill control, IKA, Staufen, Germany). Two types of extracts were prepared for each sample, using either 50% ethanol in bidistilled water or only bidistilled water digerated at 95 °C for 1 h. Each ground sample (300 mg) was placed inside a centrifuge tube and vortexed with a 3 mL extractant for 30 s, followed by ultrasonication for 30 min (Sonorex Digiplus, Bandelin, Berlin, Germany). After centrifugation at 3000× g for 10 min (Labofuge 400, Heraeus, Hanau, Germany), the supernatants were transferred to sampler vials (100 mg/mL). Gastrodin, vanillin, and vanillyl alcohol standard solutions were prepared as 1 mg/mL solutions in methanol and transferred to a sampler vial.

4.4. HPTLC–UV/Vis/FLD Method

Extracts (0.1 µL/band) were applied as 7 mm bands on a pre-washed plate (Automatic TLC Sampler 4, CAMAG, Muttenz, Switzerland). For higher application volumes (10–60 µL/band), the samples were applied as an area (7 mm × 3.5 mm). Calibration standards (gastrodin, vanillin, and vanillyl alcohol, 0.2–5 µL/band each) were applied for quantification. Plates were developed with ethyl acetate–methanol–bidistilled water–formic acid (7.3/1.25/1.0/0.45 V/V/V/V) for the bioactivity profiling, or with ethyl acetate–methanol–bidistilled water (7.3/1.25/1.0, V/V/V) for quantification, both up to a migration distance of 7 cm in a twin trough chamber (20 cm × 10 cm, CAMAG). After plate drying for 4 min with a stream of cold air (hair dryer), the plates were documented at Vis and FLD 366 nm (TLC Visualizer 2, CAMAG). For derivatization, the following reagent sequence was applied through automatic piezoelectric spraying (Derivatizer, CAMAG), i.e., first, Fast Blue salt B solution (100 mg Fast Blue salt B in 100 mL 70% ethanol, freshly prepared) followed by intermediate drying was applied, then either the Natural Product A reagent (1 g 2–aminoethyl diphenyl borate in 100 mL ethanol) followed by a PEG solution (6% polyethylene glycol 6000 in ethanol) and plate drying followed by documentation, or the 2-naphthol sulfuric acid reagent (5 g 2-naphthol in 33 mL of ethanol followed by 20 mL of sulfuric acid added dropwise, and finally 127 mL of ethanol and 13 mL of water) heated at 130 °C for 5 min followed by documentation was applied. For quantification, absorbance measurement was performed at 580 nm (TLC Scanner 4, CAMAG). Mainly polynomial regressions were used for building the calibration curves (Figures S4 and S5). The software visionCATS (version 3.2.22308.1, CAMAG) operated and controlled the instruments. The recording of high-resolution mass spectra was performed as reported [49].

4.5. Bioactivity Profiling

The antioxidant DPPH• assay [71] was performed by spraying 4 mL of 0.04% methanolic DPPH• solution (green nozzle, level 4). The antioxidant ABTS·assay [72] was performed by immersing the plate in 50 mL ABTS·solution (1:1 mixed freshly from 7 mmol/L of the diammonium salt solution and 2.45 mmol/L K2S2O8 solution) for 2 s (TLC Immersion Device, CAMAG), followed by drying in the ambient air for 30 s.
For the acetylcholinesterase inhibition assay [46], the plates were pre-wetted with a 0.5 mL TRIS-HCl buffer (7.55 mg/mL TRIS, pH 7.8 adjusted with HCl, green nozzle, level 6). Then, a 1.5 mL acetylcholinesterase solution (6.66 U/mL plus 1 mg/mL BSA in TRIS-HCl buffer) was applied (green nozzle, level 6). The plate was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. For detection, a 0.5 mL substrate–chromogenic reagent solution (1 mg/mL indoxyl acetate and 2 mg/mL Fast Blue salt B in ethanol) was sprayed (2 mL, green nozzle, level 6) to obtain colorless (white) inhibition zones on a purple background. The positive control was rivastigmine (0.1 mg/mL in methanol, 2, 4, and 8 μL/band).
For the cytotoxicity bioassay [28], HEK 293T-CMV-ELuc cells were cultivated, harvested from the culture flasks, and resuspended in assay medium DMEM/F12 without phenol red supplemented with a 5% fetal bovine serum solution and penicillin/streptomycin. Before application of the cells, RP-18 W plates were neutralized by immersion in a citrate buffer solution of pH 12 (6 g/L citric acid monohydrate and 10 g/L of disodium hydrogen phosphate anhydrate), followed by plate drying, immersion in double concentrated phosphate-buffered saline (9.55 g in 500 mL bidistilled water), and removal of the liquid excess. Cell application was performed as a stripe along each track. Plate incubation for 24 h followed. The bioassay [28,49] was slightly modified, using the application of 400 µL cell suspension (containing 5000 cells/µL) and an adhesive tape for sealing of the incubation chamber. For detection of the cell bioluminescence, the plate was completely dried under cold air (hair dryer) and immersed (immersion speed 3 cm/s, immersion time 5 s) twice into the luciferin solution (40 mM tricine, 2.14 mM magnesium carbonate hydroxide pentahydrate, 5.34 mM magnesium sulfate heptahydrate, 0.2 mM EDTA, 3 mM DTT, 1.1 mM D-luciferin and 20 mM adenosine triphosphate and mixed with lysis buffer containing 25 mM Tris pH 7.8, 2 mM DTT, 2 mM CDTA, 1% Triton X-100 and 10% glycerol, and citrate buffer pH 12). The bioluminescence was recorded using exposure times of 1 and then 10 min (Bioluminizer, CAMAG). In addition, the tetrazolium salt MTT was used (Figure S3a) to detect cytotoxicity as described elsewhere [28].

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24129936/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.L.B.M., G.E.M.; methodology, F.L.B.M., G.E.M.; formal analysis, F.L.B.M., G.E.M.; investigation, F.L.B.M.; resources, C.M.S., G.E.M.; writing—original draft preparation, F.L.B.M., G.E.M.; writing—review and editing, G.E.M., C.M.S., B.H.; supervision, G.E.M.; funding acquisition, G.E.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Instrumentation was partially funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—INST 162/536-1 FUGG.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Julia Heil and Stefan Roling, both Department of Food Science, JLU Gießen, Germany, for performing HPTLC assays/Figure 2 experiment and recording of high-resolution mass spectra, respectively, and to An Chan-Soo, Cheonmaga Agricultural Corporation, Jeollabuk-Do, South Korea, for providing the G. elata samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kew Royal Botanic Gardens. Gastrodia elata: Plants of the World Online. Available online: https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:635522-1 (accessed on 1 May 2023).
  2. Zhan, H.-D.; Zhou, H.-Y.; Sui, Y.-P.; Du, X.-L.; Wang, W.-H.; Dai, L.; Sui, F.; Huo, H.-R.; Jiang, T.-L. The rhizome of Gastrodia elata Blume-An ethnopharmacological review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 189, 361–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. An, H.; Kim, I.S.; Koppula, S.; Kim, B.W.; Park, P.J.; Lim, B.O.; Choi, W.S.; Lee, K.H.; Choi, D.K. Protective effects of Gastrodia elata Blume on MPP+-induced cytotoxicity in human dopaminergic SH-SY5Y cells. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 130, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huang, J.-Y.; Yuan, Y.-H.; Yan, J.-Q.; Wang, Y.-N.; Chu, S.-F.; Zhu, C.-G.; Guo, Q.-L.; Shi, J.-G.; Chen, N.-H. 20C, a bibenzyl compound isolated from Gastrodia elata, protects PC12 cells against rotenone-induced apoptosis via activation of the Nrf2/ARE/HO-1 signaling pathway. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2016, 37, 731–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Jung, T.-Y.; Suh, S.-I.; Lee, H.; Kim, I.-S.; Kim, H.-J.; Yoo, H.-S.; Lee, S.-R. Protective effects of several components of Gastrodia elata on lipid peroxidation in gerbil brain homogenates. Phytother. Res. 2007, 21, 960–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lin, Y.-E.; Lin, C.-H.; Ho, E.-P.; Ke, Y.-C.; Petridi, S.; Elliott, C.J.; Sheen, L.-Y.; Chien, C.-T. Glial Nrf2 signaling mediates the neuroprotection exerted by Gastrodia elata Blume in Lrrk2-G2019S Parkinson’s disease. Elife 2021, 10, e73753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ma, Q.; Wan, Q.; Huang, S.; Dai, H.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Luo, H.; Zhao, Y. Phenolic Constituents with Inhibitory Activities on Acetylcholinesterase from the Rhizomes of Gastrodia elata. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2015, 51, 158–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Seok, P.R.; Oh, S.J.; Choi, J.W.; Lim, C.R.; Choi, J.R.; Kim, J.H.; Shin, J.-H. The protective effects of Gastrodia elata Blume extracts on middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 28, 857–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liang, W.-Z.; Jan, C.-R.; Hsu, S.-S. Cytotoxic effects of gastrodin extracted from the rhizome of Gastrodia elata Blume in glioblastoma cells, but not in normal astrocytes, via the induction of oxidative stress-associated apoptosis that involved cell cycle arrest and p53 activation. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 107, 280–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, Z.-B.; Wu, Z.; Chen, F.-K.; Zou, L.-B. The protective effects of phenolic constituents from Gastrodia elata on the cytotoxicity induced by KCl and glutamate. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2006, 29, 963–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lu, C.; Qu, S.; Zhong, Z.; Luo, H.; Lei, S.S.; Zhong, H.-J.; Su, H.; Wang, Y.; Chong, C.-M. The effects of bioactive components from the rhizome of Gastrodia elata blume (Tianma) on the characteristics of Parkinson’s disease. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 963327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lin, Y.-E.; Chou, S.-T.; Lin, S.-H.; Lu, K.-H.; Panyod, S.; Lai, Y.-S.; Ho, C.-T.; Sheen, L.-Y. Antidepressant-like effects of water extract of Gastrodia elata Blume on neurotrophic regulation in a chronic social defeat stress model. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 215, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, P.-J.; Sheen, L.-Y. Gastrodiae Rhizoma (天麻tiān má): A review of biological activity and antidepressant mechanisms. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2011, 1, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Liu, J.; Mori, A. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of Gastrodia elata Bl. and Uncaria rhynchophylla (Miq.) Jacks. Neuropharmacology 1992, 31, 1287–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shi, A.; Xiang, J.; He, F.; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, G.; Lin, Y.; Zhou, N. The Phenolic Components of Gastrodia elata improve Prognosis in Rats after Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion by Enhancing the Endogenous Antioxidant Mechanisms. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 7642158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Song, E.; Chung, H.; Shim, E.; Jeong, J.-K.; Han, B.-K.; Choi, H.-J.; Hwang, J. Gastrodia elata Blume Extract Modulates Antioxidant Activity and Ultraviolet A-Irradiated Skin Aging in Human Dermal Fibroblast Cells. J. Med. Food 2016, 19, 1057–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tan, W.; Zheng, Q.; Feng, K.; Feng, X.; Zhong, W.; Liao, C.; Li, S.; Liu, Y.; Hu, W. Neuroprotection of Gastrodia elata polyphenols against H2O2-induced PC12 cell cytotoxicity by reducing oxidative stress. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 1050775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xian, J.W.; Choi, A.Y.-T.; Lau, C.B.-S.; Leung, W.N.; Ng, C.F.; Chan, C.W. Gastrodia and Uncaria (tianma gouteng) water extract exerts antioxidative and antiapoptotic effects against cerebral ischemia in vitro and in vivo. Chin. Med. 2016, 11, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Yu, S.J.; Kim, J.R.; Lee, C.K.; Han, J.E.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, H.-S.; Hong, J.H.; Kang, S.G. Gastrodia elata blume and an active component, p-hydroxybenzyl alcohol reduce focal ischemic brain injury through antioxidant related gene expressions. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2005, 28, 1016–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hwang, S.M.; Lee, Y.J.; Kang, D.G.; Lee, H.S. Anti-inflammatory effect of Gastrodia elata rhizome in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2009, 37, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ahn, E.-K.; Jeon, H.-J.; Lim, E.-J.; Jung, H.-J.; Park, E.-H. Anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic activities of Gastrodia elata Blume. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 110, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. He, P.; Hu, Y.; Huang, C.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Dai, H.; Wang, R.; Gao, Y. N-Butanol Extract of Gastrodia elata Suppresses Inflammatory Responses in Lipopolysaccharide-Stimulated Macrophages and Complete Freund’s Adjuvant- (CFA-) Induced Arthritis Rats via Inhibition of MAPK Signaling Pathway. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2020, 2020, 1658618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Lee, J.Y.; Jang, Y.W.; Kang, H.S.; Moon, H.; Sim, S.S.; Kim, C.J. Anti-inflammatory action of phenolic compounds from Gastrodia elata root. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2006, 29, 849–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. UNEP-United Nations Environment Program. Appendix II-CITES-Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Available online: https://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/app/2023/E-Appendices-2023-02-23.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2023).
  25. Sim, C.M.; Seong, B.J.; Kim, D.W.; Kim, Y.B.; Wi, S.G.; Kim, G.; Oh, H.; Kim, T.; Chung, B.Y.; Song, J.Y.; et al. Continuous cropping of endangered therapeutic plants via electron beam soil-treatment and neutron tomography. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Long, L.l.p.; Luo, L.f.l. Effects of different years of natural recovery of Gastrodia elata on the community structure of bacteria and fungi in rhizosphere soil. Res. Sq. 2021, Preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Krstić, Đ.D.; Ristivojević, P.M.; Gašić, U.M.; Lazović, M.; Fotirić Akšić, M.M.; Milivojević, J.; Morlock, G.E.; Milojković-Opsenica, D.M.; Trifković, J.Đ. Authenticity assessment of cultivated berries via phenolic profiles of seeds. Food Chem. 2023, 402, 134184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mügge, F.L.B.; Morlock, G.E. Planar bioluminescent cytotoxicity assay via genetically modified adherent human reporter cell lines, applied to authenticity screening of Saussurea costus root. J. Chromatogr. A 2022, 1683, 463522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Chepngeno, J.; Imathiu, S.; Owino, W.O.; Morlock, G.E. Baobab pulp authenticity and quality control by multi-imaging high-performance thin-layer chromatography. Food Chem. 2022, 390, 133108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guzelmeric, E.; Ristivojević, P.; Trifković, J.; Dastan, T.; Yilmaz, O.; Cengiz, O.; Yesilada, E. Authentication of Turkish propolis through HPTLC fingerprints combined with multivariate analysis and palynological data and their comparative antioxidant activity. LWT 2018, 87, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Frommenwiler, D.A.; Booker, A.; Vila, R.; Heinrich, M.; Reich, E.; Cañigueral, S. Comprehensive HPTLC fingerprinting as a tool for a simplified analysis of purity of ginkgo products. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 243, 112084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Morlock, G.E.; Heil, J. HI-HPTLC-UV/Vis/FLD-HESI-HRMS and bioprofiling of steviol glycosides, steviol, and isosteviol in Stevia leaves and foods. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 6431–6448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Schreiner, T.; Morlock, G.E. Non-target bioanalytical eight-dimensional hyphenation including bioassay, heart-cut trapping, online desalting, orthogonal separations and mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2021, 1647, 462154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Schreiner, T.; Ronzheimer, A.; Friz, M.; Morlock, G.E. Multiplex planar bioassay with reduced diffusion on normal phase, identifying androgens, verified antiandrogens and synergists in botanicals via 12D hyphenation. Food Chem. 2022, 395, 133610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Darwish, R.S.; Shawky, E.; Hammoda, H.M.; Harraz, F.M. Peroxidase inhibitory and antioxidant constituents from Juniperus L. species guided by HPTLC-bioautography and molecular docking studies. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 35, 4653–4657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Darwish, R.S.; Hammoda, H.M.; Ghareeb, D.A.; Abdelhamid, A.S.A.; Harraz, F.M.; Shawky, E. Seasonal dynamics of the phenolic constituents of the cones and leaves of oriental Thuja (Platycladus orientalis L.) reveal their anti-inflammatory biomarkers. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 24624–24635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Morlock, G.E.; Sabir, G. Comparison of two orthogonal liquid chromatographic methods for quantitation of sugars in food. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2011, 34, 902–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Krüger, S.; Winheim, L.; Morlock, G.E. Planar chromatographic screening and quantification of coumarin in food, confirmed by mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2018, 239, 1182–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Krüger, S.; Bergin, A.; Morlock, G.E. Effect-directed analysis of ginger (Zingiber officinale) and its food products, and quantification of bioactive compounds via high-performance thin-layer chromatography and mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2018, 243, 258–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Morlock, G.E.; Busso, M.; Tomeba, S.; Sighicelli, A. Effect-directed profiling of 32 vanilla products, characterization of multi-potent compounds and quantification of vanillin and ethylvanillin. J. Chromatogr. A 2021, 1652, 462377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Abdel Salam, N.A.; Ghazy, N.M.; Shawky, E.; Sallam, S.M.; Shenouda, M.L. Validated HPTLC Method for Dihydrokaempferol-4′-O-glucopyranoside Quantitative Determination in Alcea Species. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2018, 56, 518–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alqarni, M.H.; Alam, P.; Foudah, A.I.; Muharram, M.M.; Shakeel, F. Combining Normal/Reversed-Phase HPTLC with Univariate Calibration for the Piperine Quantification with Traditional and Ultrasound-Assisted Extracts of Various Food Spices of Piper nigrum L. under Green Analytical Chemistry Viewpoint. Molecules 2021, 26, 732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Morlock, G.; Vega-Herrera, M. Two new derivatization reagents for planar chromatographic quantification of sucralose in dietetic products. J. Planar Chromatogr.–Mod. TLC 2007, 20, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Saçıcı, E.; Yesilada, E. Development of new and validated HPTLC methods for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of hyperforin, hypericin and hyperoside contents in Hypericum species. Phytochem. Anal. 2022, 33, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Morlock, G.E. Planar chromatographic super-hyphenations for rapid dereplication. Phytochem. Rev. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Schreiner, T.; Sauter, D.; Friz, M.; Heil, J.; Morlock, G.E. Is Our Natural Food Our Homeostasis? Array of a Thousand Effect-Directed Profiles of 68 Herbs and Spices. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 755941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wagner, H.; Bauer, R.; Melchart, D.; Xiao, P.-G.; Staudinger, A. Rhizoma Gastrodiae Tianma. In Chromatographic Fingerprint Analysis of Herbal Medicines: Thin-Layer and High Performance Liquid Chromatography of Chinese Drugs; Wagner, H., Bauer, R., Melchart, D., Xiao, P.-G., Staudinger, A., Eds.; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 2011; pp. 255–262. ISBN 978-3-7091-0763-8. [Google Scholar]
  48. Ong, E.S.; Heng, M.Y.; Tan, S.N.; Hong Yong, J.W.; Koh, H.; Teo, C.C.; Hew, C.S. Determination of gastrodin and vanillyl alcohol in Gastrodia elata Blume by pressurized liquid extraction at room temperature. J. Sep. Sci. 2007, 30, 2130–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Klingelhöfer, I.; Pham Ngoc, L.; van der Burg, B.; Morlock, G.E. A bioimaging system combining human cultured reporter cells and planar chromatography to identify novel bioactive molecules. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1183, 338956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, X.D.; Zhu, J.; Yang, R.; Liu, J.P.; Li, L.; Zhang, H.B. Phenolic constituents from the rhizomes of Gastrodia elata. Nat. Prod. Res. 2007, 21, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wald, J.P.; Morlock, G.E. Quantification of steviol glycosides in food products, Stevia leaves and formulations by planar chromatography, including proof of absence for steviol and isosteviol. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1506, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Oberlerchner, J.T.; Böhmdorfer, S.; Rosenau, T.; Potthast, A. A matrix-resistant HPTLC method to quantify monosaccharides in wood-based lignocellulose biorefinery streams. Holzforschung 2018, 72, 645–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Klingelhöfer, I.; Morlock, G.E. Challenges in quantitative high-performance thin-layer chromatography—Part 2: Influence of the application mode on the result. JPC-J. Planar Chromatogr.-Mod. TLC 2017, 30, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Morlock, G.E.; Koch, J.; Schwack, W. Miniaturized open-source 2LabsToGo screening of lactose-free dairy products and saccharide-containing foods. J. Chromatogr. A 2023, 1688, 463720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ma, X.-D.; Fan, Y.-X.; Jin, C.-C.; Wang, F.; Xin, G.-Z.; Li, P.; Li, H.-J. Specific targeted quantification combined with non-targeted metabolite profiling for quality evaluation of Gastrodia elata tubers from different geographical origins and cultivars. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1450, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Jiang, W.-K.; Zhang, J.-Q.; Guo, L.-P.; Yang, Y.; Xiao, C.-H.; Yuan, Q.-S.; Wang, X.; Zhou, T. Thoughts and suggestions on ecological cultivation of Gastrodia elata. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 2022, 47, 2277–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wu, Z.; Gao, R.; Li, H.; Liao, X.; Tang, X.; Wang, X.; Su, Z. How steaming and drying processes affect the active compounds and antioxidant types of Gastrodia elata Bl. f. glauca S. chow. Food Res. Int. 2022, 157, 111277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Tang, C.; Wang, L.; Liu, X.; Cheng, M.; Xiao, H. Chemical fingerprint and metabolic profile analysis of ethyl acetate fraction of Gastrodia elata by ultra performance liquid chromatography/quadrupole-time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2016, 1011, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Teo, C.-C.; Tan, S.-N.; Yong, J.-W.; Hew, C.-S.; Ong, E.-S. Evaluation of the extraction efficiency of thermally labile bioactive compounds in Gastrodia elata Blume by pressurized hot water extraction and microwave-assisted extraction. J. Chromatogr. A. 2008, 1182, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kim, I.S.; Choi, D.-K.; Jung, H.J. Neuroprotective Effects of Vanillyl Alcohol in Gastrodia elata Blume Through Suppression of Oxidative Stress and Anti-Apoptotic Activity in Toxin-Induced Dopaminergic MN9D Cells. Molecules 2011, 16, 5349–5361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Chen, J.; Huang, Y.; Hu, X.; Bian, X.; Nian, S. Gastrodin prevents homocysteine-induced human umbilical vein endothelial cells injury via PI3K/Akt/eNOS and Nrf2/ARE pathway. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Fan, S.; Tian, W.; Wang, Q.; Shangguan, C.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Yue, L.; Chen, C. Evaluation of the changes in active substances and their effects on intestinal microflora during simulated digestion of Gastrodia elata. LWT 2022, 169, 113924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, S.; Hao, X.; Yu, L.; Zhang, P.; Cao, W.; Chen, H.; Zhu, D. Gastrodin causes vasodilation by activating KATP channels in vascular smooth muscles via PKA-dependent signaling pathway. J. Recept. Signal Transduct. Res. 2017, 37, 543–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Huang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, C.; He, Q.; Chen, F.; Yu, H.; Lu, G.; Jiang, N.; Liu, X. The effects of fresh Gastrodia elata Blume on the cognitive deficits induced by chronic restraint stress. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 890330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, Y.; Gao, J.; Peng, M.; Meng, H.; Ma, H.; Cai, P.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Si, G. A Review on Central Nervous System Effects of Gastrodin. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lu, J.; Ma, X.; Gao, W.-C.; Zhang, X.; Fu, Y.; Liu, Q.; Tian, L.; Qin, X.-D.; Yang, W.; Zheng, H.-Y.; et al. Gastrodin Exerts Cardioprotective Action via Inhibition of Insulin-Like Growth Factor Type 2/Insulin-Like Growth Factor Type 2 Receptor Expression in Cardiac Hypertrophy. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 16763–16774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Park, S.; Kim, D.S.; Kang, S. Gastrodia elata Blume water extracts improve insulin resistance by decreasing body fat in diet-induced obese rats: Vanillin and 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde are the bioactive candidates. Eur. J. Nutr. 2011, 50, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, L.; Wang, Y.-C.; Qin, L.-Y.; He, H.-Y.; Yu, X.-L.; Yang, M.-Z.; Zhang, H.-B. Dynamics of fungal communities during Gastrodia elata growth. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Yu, E.; Gao, Y.; Li, Y.; Zang, P.; Zhao, Y.; He, Z. An exploration of mechanism of high quality and yield of Gastrodia elata Bl. f. glauca by the isolation, identification and evaluation of Armillaria. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tang, C.; Wu, B.; Wu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, B. Novel Strategies Using Total Gastrodin and Gastrodigenin, or Total Gastrodigenin for Quality Control of Gastrodia elata. Molecules 2018, 23, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Morlock, G.E.; Heil, J.; Inarejos-Garcia, A.M.; Maeder, J. Effect-Directed Profiling of Powdered Tea Extracts for Catechins, Theaflavins, Flavonols and Caffeine. Antioxid 2021, 10, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sherma, J. Review of the Determination of the Antioxidant Activity of Foods, Food Ingredients, and Dietary Supplements by Thin Layer Chromatography-Direct Bioautography, Spectrometry, and the Dot-Blot Procedure. J. AOAC Int. 2018, 101, 1285–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 09936 g001 550
Figure 1. Chemical and effect-directed profiles of Gastrodia elata samples: G1–G5 (10 or 15 µg/band each) and chemical marker compounds gastrodin, vanillin and vanillyl alcohol (1 or 2 µg/band each) on HPTLC plates silica gel 60 developed with ethyl acetate–methanol–bidistilled water–formic acid (7.3/1.25/1.0/0.45, V/V/V/V) or HPTLC plates silica 60 RP-18 W developed with water–acetonitrile–methanol–formic acid (4.5/1/1/0.2, V/V/V/V), detected (a) at FLD 366 nm via the Fast Blue salt B reagent (not shown) followed by Natural Product reagent A and PEG on NP, or just at FLD 366 nm on RP, and at white light illumination after the (b) Fast Blue salt B reagent followed by 2-naphthol sulfuric acid reagent, (c) DPPH• assay, and (d) ABTS assay.
Figure 1. Chemical and effect-directed profiles of Gastrodia elata samples: G1–G5 (10 or 15 µg/band each) and chemical marker compounds gastrodin, vanillin and vanillyl alcohol (1 or 2 µg/band each) on HPTLC plates silica gel 60 developed with ethyl acetate–methanol–bidistilled water–formic acid (7.3/1.25/1.0/0.45, V/V/V/V) or HPTLC plates silica 60 RP-18 W developed with water–acetonitrile–methanol–formic acid (4.5/1/1/0.2, V/V/V/V), detected (a) at FLD 366 nm via the Fast Blue salt B reagent (not shown) followed by Natural Product reagent A and PEG on NP, or just at FLD 366 nm on RP, and at white light illumination after the (b) Fast Blue salt B reagent followed by 2-naphthol sulfuric acid reagent, (c) DPPH• assay, and (d) ABTS assay.
Ijms 24 09936 g001
Ijms 24 09936 g002 550
Figure 2. Overlapped application of the gastrodia sample extract (G3, 30 µL, 100 mg/mL in 50% ethanol) with the reference vanillic acid (vac, not detectable) and vanillyl alcohol (va; both 3 µL each, 1 mg/mL in methanol) applied as a 21 mm band each with a 7 mm overlapping part on HPTLC plates silica 60 RP-18 W developed with water–acetonitrile–methanol–formic acid (4.5/1/1/0.2, V/V/V/V), and detected at white light illumination after the 2-naphthol sulfuric acid reagent.
Figure 2. Overlapped application of the gastrodia sample extract (G3, 30 µL, 100 mg/mL in 50% ethanol) with the reference vanillic acid (vac, not detectable) and vanillyl alcohol (va; both 3 µL each, 1 mg/mL in methanol) applied as a 21 mm band each with a 7 mm overlapping part on HPTLC plates silica 60 RP-18 W developed with water–acetonitrile–methanol–formic acid (4.5/1/1/0.2, V/V/V/V), and detected at white light illumination after the 2-naphthol sulfuric acid reagent.
Ijms 24 09936 g002
Ijms 24 09936 g003 550
Figure 3. On-surface cytotoxicity bioassay via adherent HEK293T-CMV-ELuc cells: one facility (G2) and one field sample (G3) of G. elata (1–4 mg/band each, 10–40 µL/band) were applied on HPTLC plates silica 60 RP-18 W, two-step developed with (1) ethyl acetate–toluene (4/1, V/V) up to 6 cm, and after drying, with (2) ethyl acetate–methanol (4/1, V/V) up to 3 cm, and detected (a) at white light illumination after derivatization with the 2-naphthol sulfuric acid reagent and (b) cell bioluminescence after the cytotoxicity bioassay (depicted as a greyscale image; NT: non-treated cells applied on the plate background and used as negative control; plate with positive control in Figure S3c).
Figure 3. On-surface cytotoxicity bioassay via adherent HEK293T-CMV-ELuc cells: one facility (G2) and one field sample (G3) of G. elata (1–4 mg/band each, 10–40 µL/band) were applied on HPTLC plates silica 60 RP-18 W, two-step developed with (1) ethyl acetate–toluene (4/1, V/V) up to 6 cm, and after drying, with (2) ethyl acetate–methanol (4/1, V/V) up to 3 cm, and detected (a) at white light illumination after derivatization with the 2-naphthol sulfuric acid reagent and (b) cell bioluminescence after the cytotoxicity bioassay (depicted as a greyscale image; NT: non-treated cells applied on the plate background and used as negative control; plate with positive control in Figure S3c).
Ijms 24 09936 g003
Ijms 24 09936 g004 550
Figure 4. Quantification of chemical marker compounds: HPTLC-Vis profiles of seven Gastrodia elata samples applied at (a) 10 µL/band of 100 mg/mL, (b) 30 µL/band of 33 mg/mL, and (c) 60 µL/band of 33 mg/mL, along with different calibration levels S1–S8 of gastrodin (gd), vanillyl alcohol (va) and vanillin (v) (0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 µg/band each) on HPTLC plates silica gel 60 developed with ethyl acetate–methanol–bidistilled water 7.3/1.25/1.0, V/V/V, and detected at white light illumination after derivatization with the 2-naphthol sulfuric acid reagent.
Figure 4. Quantification of chemical marker compounds: HPTLC-Vis profiles of seven Gastrodia elata samples applied at (a) 10 µL/band of 100 mg/mL, (b) 30 µL/band of 33 mg/mL, and (c) 60 µL/band of 33 mg/mL, along with different calibration levels S1–S8 of gastrodin (gd), vanillyl alcohol (va) and vanillin (v) (0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 µg/band each) on HPTLC plates silica gel 60 developed with ethyl acetate–methanol–bidistilled water 7.3/1.25/1.0, V/V/V, and detected at white light illumination after derivatization with the 2-naphthol sulfuric acid reagent.
Ijms 24 09936 g004
Table
Table 1. Method ruggedness: Quantification of the mean gastrodin contents (± standard deviation, sd) in the G. elata samples via calibrations performed on 3 to 5 days and plates with different sample dilutions/volumes applied; semi-quantification of the preliminary assigned Parishin E equivalently calculated to vanillyl alcohol.
Table 1. Method ruggedness: Quantification of the mean gastrodin contents (± standard deviation, sd) in the G. elata samples via calibrations performed on 3 to 5 days and plates with different sample dilutions/volumes applied; semi-quantification of the preliminary assigned Parishin E equivalently calculated to vanillyl alcohol.
Method Ruggedness: Mean Contents (n = 3–5 days/plates; ±Standard Deviation)
G. elata SamplesGastrodin
(µg/100 mg ± sd)		Preliminary Assigned Parishin E
(µg/100 mg ± sd) Equivalently Calculated to Vanillyl Alcohol
G1.1209 ± 22203 ± 19
G1.2182 ± 16129 ± 19
G1.3218 ± 28218 ± 14
G2102 ± 2724 ± 3
G3146 ± 20186 ± 10
G493 ± 11235 ± 16
G5198 ± 2292 ± 6
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mügge, F.L.B.; Sim, C.M.; Honermeier, B.; Morlock, G.E. Bioactivity Profiling and Quantification of Gastrodin in Gastrodia elata Cultivated in the Field versus Facility via Hyphenated High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9936. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24129936

AMA Style

Mügge FLB, Sim CM, Honermeier B, Morlock GE. Bioactivity Profiling and Quantification of Gastrodin in Gastrodia elata Cultivated in the Field versus Facility via Hyphenated High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(12):9936. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24129936

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mügge, Fernanda L. B., Cheul Muu Sim, Bernd Honermeier, and Gertrud E. Morlock. 2023. "Bioactivity Profiling and Quantification of Gastrodin in Gastrodia elata Cultivated in the Field versus Facility via Hyphenated High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 12: 9936. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24129936

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop