Next Article in Journal
An FGFR1-Binding Peptide Modified Liposome for siRNA Delivery in Lung Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Insights into the Genomic Regions and Candidate Genes of Senescence-Related Traits in Upland Cotton via GWAS
Previous Article in Journal
Phenotype Diversity of Macrophages in Osteoarthritis: Implications for Development of Macrophage Modulating Therapies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deciphering the Genetic Basis of Root and Biomass Traits in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) through the Integration of GWAS and RNA-Seq under Nitrogen Stress
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Five Rice Seed-Specific NF-YC Genes Redundantly Regulate Grain Quality and Seed Germination via Interfering Gibberellin Pathway

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(15), 8382; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158382
by Huayu Xu 1,†, Shufan Li 1,†, Bello Babatunde Kazeem 1, Abolore Adijat Ajadi 1, Jinjin Luo 1, Man Yin 1, Xinyong Liu 1, Lijuan Chen 1, Jiezheng Ying 1, Xiaohong Tong 1, Yifeng Wang 1, Baixiao Niu 2, Chen Chen 2, Xiaoshan Zeng 3,* and Jian Zhang 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(15), 8382; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158382
Submission received: 26 May 2022 / Revised: 24 July 2022 / Accepted: 26 July 2022 / Published: 29 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Plant Genomics and Breeding)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors aimed to determine the role of the transcription factors NF-YC8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, which are specifically expressed in seeds, during seed development. The authors generated these quintuple mutants and analyzed their endosperm traits, germination-related traits, and gene expression. As a result, the authors claimed that NF-YC8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 affect seed quality and germination through the ABA and GA pathways. 

The data on NF-YCs on endosperm will provide new insights for future seed quality control. However, below I have several concerns that the authors may consider in the further process of improving the manuscript.

 

Major points

1.     Lines 148-158.

Even though this manuscript aims to evaluate the redundancy of NF-TCs, this part of the manuscript only shows results for single mutants. The authors should also present similar data in quintuple mutants.

 

2.     Lines 218-235.

The authors have shown in Fig. 3 that NF-YCs may affect the expression of SARKs. On the other hand, this paragraph abruptly verifies the protein interaction between NF-YCs and SARKs. The authors should add further explanations, including the intent of the experiment.

 

3.     The discussion in every paragraph is simply a report of a previous paper. Furthermore, there is no conclusion to the manuscript, and it is unclear what the authors are ultimately trying to argue.

 

4.     Why does the title only include GA? Should it also describe ABA.

 

Minor point

5.     Line 98. 

 

Can the authors show the data of plant height and flowering date?

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The idea of generating a pentuple mutant and comparing it with single mutant to shed new light into the gene function of NF-YCs is appreciable. To improve the overall quality of manuscript following concerns should be addressed:

1.     In the introduction, there are many sentences which seems incomplete for example Line:41-44, it is obvious in an important crop like rice to have enough of literature for numerous genes controlling seed development therefore it is better to cite and explain the research available for NF-YC.

2.     In the results or methods explain about the genic regions selected as target of CRISPR and basis for selecting those regions. I think if these genes are highly similar how you have separated the mutant sites from each other.

3.     Have you studied the starch granules in individual mutants also if yes it will be interesting to know the differences and compare them with pentuple mutants? If you have available data for them, please add that in main or supplementary information.

4.     In the discussion, it is important to have a conclusion statement which summarize overall idea and importance of the study and provide future perspective.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop