Next Article in Journal
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Two Series of Novel A-Ring Fused Steroidal Pyrazines as Potential Anticancer Agents
Next Article in Special Issue
Modulation of NLRP3 Inflammasome through Formyl Peptide Receptor 1 (Fpr-1) Pathway as a New Therapeutic Target in Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Into the Seed: Auxin Controls Seed Development and Grain Yield
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microtubule-Mediated NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation Is Independent of Microtubule-Associated Innate Immune Factor GEF-H1 in Murine Macrophages
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms21051668
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

DROSHA-Dependent miRNA and AIM2 Inflammasome Activation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

by
Soo Jung Cho
1,2,
Mihye Lee
3,
Heather W. Stout-Delgado
1,2,* and
Jong-Seok Moon
3,*
1
Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10011, USA
2
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10011, USA
3
Department of Integrated Biomedical Science, Soonchunhyang Institute of Medi-bio Science (SIMS), Soonchunhyang University, Chungcheongnam-do, Cheonan-si 31151, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(5), 1668; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051668
Submission received: 7 January 2020 / Revised: 23 February 2020 / Accepted: 27 February 2020 / Published: 28 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inflammasome)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive interstitial lung disease. Chronic lung inflammation is linked to the pathogenesis of IPF. DROSHA, a class 2 ribonuclease III enzyme, has an important role in the biogenesis of microRNA (miRNA). The function of miRNAs has been identified in the regulation of the target gene or protein related to inflammatory responses via degradation of mRNA or inhibition of translation. The absent-in-melanoma-2 (AIM2) inflammasome is critical for inflammatory responses against cytosolic double stranded DNA (dsDNA) from pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and self-DNA from danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). The AIM2 inflammasome senses double strand DNA (dsDNA) and interacts with the adaptor apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain (ASC), which recruits pro-caspase-1 and regulates the maturation and secretion of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18. A recent study showed that inflammasome activation contributes to lung inflammation and fibrogenesis during IPF. In the current review, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of the DROSHA–miRNA–AIM2 inflammasome axis in the pathogenesis of IPF.

1. Introduction

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic and progressive lung disease that is the most common interstitial lung disease. IPF is a lethal disorder of unknown etiology and has an incidence in northern America estimated between six and 18 per 100,000 inhabitants [1]. Since the time of diagnosis, patients with IPF have a 2–3 years median survival period [2]. IPF has been linked to certain areas of chronic inflammation, abnormal immune responses, cell injury, cell proliferation, and impaired wound healing, which leads to respiratory failure and death [3,4]. The current approach to IPF diagnosis is multidimensional including clinical, radiological, and histopathological features. Using the current guidelines, a confident diagnosis of IPF can be made based on proper clinical history and subpleural, basal predominant reticular opacities with traction bronchiectasis on high resolution computed tomography [5]. For the patients with non-diagnostic clinical and radiographical findings, surgical lung biopsy is recommended and often shows spatial heterogeneity with areas of subpleural and paraseptal fibrosis and honeycombing [6]. Although the etiology of IPF remains unknown, there are several potential risk factors such as smoking, various types of infection, and exposure of environmental particles. Additionally, genetic alteration by specific genes including surfactant protein A2, surfactant protein C, ELMO/CED-12 domain containing 2, mucin 5b, and telomerase genes was associated with IPF [7,8]. In this context, the role of microRNA (miRNA), a family of small non-coding RNAs, is important for the regulation of genes through post-transcriptional modification, which causes various cellular changes such as cell differentiation, cell proliferation, and the interaction between cells and cells [9]. More recently drosha ribonuclease III (DROSHA) that processes miRNA, has been recognized as a key molecule in the pathogenesis of IPF [10]. In parallel with this emerging interest in the molecular mechanisms that generate miRNA, there has been consistent interest in controlling inflammation including AIM2 inflammasome activation in chronic inflammatory conditions such as IPF. In this review, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of the DROSHA–miRNA–AIM2 inflammasome axis in the pathogenesis of IPF.

2. DROSHA-Dependent miRNA Biogenesis in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)

2.1. The Role of DROSHA in IPF

DROSHA is a nuclease of the RNase III family [11,12]. As a core nuclease in nucleus, DROSHA plays a role in the initiation of miRNA maturation (Figure 1). DROSHA produces precursor miRNA (pre-RNA) via cleavage of primary miRNA (pri-miRNA) transcripts that are transported to cytoplasm and affect the regulation of molecular targets [13]. The DROSHA protein is localized into the nucleus by phosphorylation and leads to ultimate miRNA processing function [14]. Treatment with MG-132, a selective proteasome inhibitor, also increases the level of DROSHA, which suggests that DROSHA is regulated by post-translational modification [15]. DGCR8 (DiGeorge syndrome critical region 8), a cofactor of “Microprocessor” was reported to stabilize DROSHA through protein-protein interactions [16]. Under stress conditions, p38MAPK phosphorylates DROSHA, which decreases the interaction of DROSHA with DGCR8 [17]. The next critical step in miRNA biogenesis is pre-miRNA processing by DROSHA, which generates pre-miRNA that defines the miRNA sequences embedded in long pre-miRNAs [18,19]. Recently, we have reported for the first time that the protein expression of DROSHA was increased in alveolar macrophages of patients with IPF and mice with bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis [10]. Conversely, DGCR8, a cofactor of DROSHA, protein expression was comparable between IPF and the control lungs [10]. After pre-miRNAs are exported to cytoplasm by exportin 5 in a Ran-GTP-dependent manner [20], Dicer, which is a well conserved RNAse III endoribonuclease, performs the further process in cytoplasm as the maturation of miRNAs makes progress [21]. Interestingly, Dicer was noted to be downregulated in fibroblasts from IPF lung [22]. This suggests that DROSHA, DGCR8, and Dicer play independent roles in IPF pathogenesis.

2.2. The Role of miRNA in IPF

DROSHA is involved in maturation or processing and not the biogenesis of microRNAs (miRNAs), small non-coding RNA molecules that have 18–25 nucleotides [9,23]. The miRNAs are expressed in the various types of organs and cells [18,19,24]. The miRNAs could change the inflammatory responses via the regulation of gene expression by post-transcriptional modifications that cause degradation and inhibition of the translation of the molecular target [18,19,24]. Recent studies have shown that mature miRNAs could be potential biomarkers for diagnosis in many human diseases such as cancers, cardiovascular disease, and neurodegenerative disease [25,26,27,28]. In a study of IPF, the changes of miRNAs were demonstrated in the analysis of miRNA arrays containing probes for 450 miRNAs with isolated RNA from the lungs from patients with IPF or the control [29]. It is reported that approximately 10% of miRNAs are significantly changed in human IPF lungs (Figure 2). Pandit et al. showed that downregulation of let-7d in IPF and inhibition of let-7d caused increases in profibrotic effects including the production of N-cadherin-2, vimentin, α-SMA, and HMGA1. In addition, Eliot et al. reported that let-7 downregulates ligand-independent estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated pulmonary fibrosis and this study suggested that let-7 dependent ER expression has an important role in male-predominant fibrotic lung disease [30]. Additionally, in a murine fibrosis model, a relative abundance of miRNA levels in bleomycin-treated lung was demonstrated [31]. Wei et al. showed that TGF-β1-induced miR-133a inhibits myofibroblast differentiation and pulmonary fibrosis by downregulating a-SMA, CTGF, and collagens [32]. The targets of miR-133a are TGF-β receptor 1, CTGF, and collagen type 1-a1. Bahudhanapati et al. reported that miR-144-3p is upregulated in IPF fibroblasts compared with the control fibroblasts [33]. miR-144-3p controls the expression of relaxin/insulin-like family peptide receptor 1(RXFP1) in fibroblasts from lungs with IPF [34]. Recent studies have identified the interaction between long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and miRNAs. Jiang et al. showed that inhibition of pulmonary fibrosis-regulatory lncRNA (PFRL) prevents pulmonary fibrosis by disrupting the miR-26a/smad2 loop [34]. In addition, another lncRNA, pulmonary fibrosis-associated lncRNA (PFAL) was found to be upregulated during lung fibrosis in vitro and in vivo fibrosis models [35]. Mechanistically, PFRL promoted lung fibroblast activation by acting as a competing endogenous RNA for miR-18a. Liu et al. analyzed the function and regulatory mechanism of miR-708-3p and showed that miR-708-3p is decreased in IPF lungs [36]. They reported that miR-708-3p directly controls a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 17 (ADAM17) [36]. IPF is the most common interstitial lung fibrosis that shares similar pathways with other fibrotic disease such as scleroderma [37]. Several microRNAs including, but not limited to miR-29, miR-21-5p, and miR-26a-5p play important roles in lung fibrosis and disease progression [38,39,40,41,42,43].
What are the targets of these miRNAs in the pathogenesis of lung fibrosis? Lung epithelial cells and fibroblasts play a critical role in the development and progression of lung fibrosis [44]. Let-7d, miR-29b, miR-26a, and miR-98 mediates antifibrotic effect by regulating myofibroblast activation and differentiation [29,42,45,46]. Conversely, miR-21, miR-424, and miR-145 are pro-fibrotic by suppressing negative regulators of TGF-β signaling [47,48,49]. Another important pathway that plays a central role in IPF development are aberrant inflammatory responses. There are several miRNAs that have been related to pulmonary fibrosis, out of which only miR-29 has been shown to regulate the innate immune response in vivo [45]. The administration of miR-29 attenuates both inflammatory response and fibrosis in the bleomycin induced lung fibrosis model. Currently, miRNAs have a critical role as key gene regulators that control fibrosis and inflammation, which in turn are potential targets for IPF disease treatment (Figure 2).

3. The Activation of Inflammasomes in IPF

3.1. The Role of Inflammasome-Dependent Inflammation in IPF

Alveolar macrophages are resident innate immune cells in the airways [50,51,52,53]. Alveolar macrophages play a key role in antimicrobial phagocytosis and in the pathogenesis of fibrotic lung disease as a critical type of cell in the lung [50,51,52,53]. Inflammasomes are multiprotein complexes, expressed in innate immune cells such as macrophages. Inflammasomes make inflammatory responses by the recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), which come from bacterial, virus, and fungi, and danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that come from injured or dead cells [54,55]. The types of inflammasomes are distinguished by the combination of specific sensor proteins including NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing 1 (NLRP1), Nod-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3), NLRC4, or PYHIN (pyrin and HIN domain-containing protein) family members absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2), with the adaptor protein, adaptor apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain (ASC), and the effector protein, capasae-1 [56,57,58]. The activation of NLRP3 inflammasome by the inflammasome complex formation is induced by various bacteria and viral particles, whereas AIM2 inflammasome is activated by double strand DNA (dsDNA) originating from bacteria, virus, and abnormal hosts [59,60,61,62,63]. Specific inflammasome complexes are defined by their subunits, and the precise conglomeration of various subunits to create these complexes depends on specific biologic activators [64,65]. Since the sensor proteins in inflammasomes are activated by specific activators, the sensor proteins interact with ASC and caspase-1 [64,65]. This interaction promotes the ASC speck formation and the cleavage of caspase-1, which are required for inflammasome activation [64,65]. Finally, the cleaved caspase-1 p10 fragment induces maturation and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 [64,65].
Recent studies suggest a role for NLRP3 inflammasome activation in lung inflammation and fibrosis [66,67,68,69]. Elevated inflammasome activation has been reported to be augmented in human IPF lungs. Specifically, IL-18 protein levels were highly expressed in alveolar macrophages and epithelial cells [70]. Lasithiotaki et al. showed that transcriptional levels of inflammasome components, NLRP3 and caspase-1, were elevated in IPF patients when compared to the controls [71]. In addition, NLRP3 inflammasome activation by ATP was significantly increased in alveolar macrophages from IPF patients when compared to the controls [71]. Other studies have shown that inflammasome activation is present in other fibrotic lung diseases such as systemic sclerosis [72]. Fibroblasts from systemic sclerosis showed increased expression of multiple genes that was associated with the inflammasome or downstream signaling molecules [72]. Several studies have demonstrated a role for the NLRP3 inflammasome and its regulated cytokines in lung fibrosis in experimental lung fibrosis [68,73,74]. Given the increased prevalence of IPF in older populations, Stout-Delgado et al. investigated the role of NLRP3 inflammasome activation in age-dependent pulmonary fibrosis. Aging was found to be associated with the increased production of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species, which led to NLRP3 inflammasome activation and IL-1β and IL-18 secretion [73,75]. The role of NLRP3 inflammasome has also been tested in other pulmonary fibrosis models including ventilator induced lung fibrosis, silica-induced fibrosis, and particular manner-induced fibrosis [68,74,76]. Although the NLRP3 inflammasome is mainly expressed in innate immune cells, there are several reports of inflammasome independent function of NLRP3 in murine fibrosis models. Lv et al. demonstrated that mechanical stretch promotes the activation of endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and lung fibrosis via NLRP3-mediated signaling cascade [74]. Tian et al. showed that the NLRP3 inflammasome is activated in alveolar epithelial cells and that the NLRP3 inflammasome may regulate EMT through TGF-β1 [77]. While the study of the NLRP3 inflammasome has been explored in various lung fibrosis models, the role of AIM2 inflammasome has not been fully investigated. Terlizzi et al. demonstrated that the activation of the AIM2 inflammasome is increased in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with IPF. The AIM2 inflammasome activation contributes to the production and release of pro-fibrotic mediators [78]. Recently, our findings demonstrated that the expression and activation of AIM2 inflammasome expression and activation is enhanced in a lung fibrosis exacerbation model [79]. Therefore, recent studies suggest that the activation of NLRP3 or AIM2 inflammasome-dependent inflammation has a critical role in the progression of lung fibrosis.

3.2. The Mechanism of Inflammasome Activation in IPF

Several studies have shown the upstream mechanism by which the NLRP3 inflammasome is activated in animal fibrosis models. Vimentin, the most abundant intermediate filament in the cytoplasm, regulates the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome in the asbestos-induced lung injury and fibrosis model [80]. Inflammation, endothelial, and alveolar epithelial barrier permeability and fibrosis are attenuated in vimentin deficient mice after asbestos challenge, and vimentin-knockdown macrophages showed decreased active caspase-1 and IL-1β levels. Furthermore, in this study, the direct protein–protein interaction between NLRP3 and vimentin was demonstrated. Doster et al. showed that NLRP3 inflammasome activation is triggered by reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are generated by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase (NOX) upon particle phagocytosis [81]. Inhibition of NADPH oxidase suppressed NLRP3 inflammasome activation and NLRP3 deficient mice had reduced inflammation and fibrosis after asbestos exposure. ROS can be repressed by autophagy [82]. Meng et al. demonstrated that the activation of autophagy suppressed angiotensin II-induced pulmonary fibrosis via the inhibition of ROS-derived NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Another study reported similar findings that autophagic dysfunction in alveolar epithelial cells leads to subsequent lung fibrosis in a silica nanoparticle-induced fibrosis model [83]. Metabolic stimulation can also stimulate NLRP3 inflammasome activation in lung fibrosis models. Xu et al. described that statin use is associated with interstitial lung abnormalities among smokers in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Gene, a well-defined large cohort of smokers [84]. In addition, they reported that statin administration increases bleomycin-induced lung inflammation and fibrosis via the NLRP3 inflammasome activation in a mouse model. While the upstream regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome activation has been well described in lung fibrosis models, the mechanism by which AIM2 inflammasome is activated in lung fibrosis has not been fully elucidated. Recently, we have described that glucose transport 1 (GLUT1)-dependent glycolysis regulates the exacerbation of lung fibrosis via AIM2 inflammasome activation [79]. We reported that GLUT1 deficiency ameliorates S. pneumoniae-mediated exacerbation of lung fibrosis in a mouse model [79]. In this study, we found that GLUT1 contributes to AIM2 inflammasome activation in macrophages [79]. We also found that the deficiency of GLUT1 suppressed the activation of AIM2 inflammasome in lung tissues under S. pneumoniae-mediated exacerbation of lung fibrosis [79].

4. Drosha ribonuclease III (DROSHA)-Dependent AIM2 Inflammasome Activation in IPF

4.1. The Activation of DROSHA in Alveolar Macrophages during IPF

While the changes of selective miRNA, which regulate differentiation, proliferation, and interaction between cell and cell, were identified and investigated in IPF, the role of DROSHA in alveolar macrophages, which are a critical cell type for pulmonary inflammation in IPF pathogenesis, remains unclear. The amount of evidence supports that macrophages play critical roles that affect fibrotic responses [85]. Alveolar macrophages produce transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1), which promotes collagen accumulation, in both humans and mice [86,87]. These results suggest that a potential mechanism by which alveolar macrophages contribute to IPF. In addition to their role in TGF-β1 production, macrophages lead to the secretion of various inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-12 [88]. Additionally, macrophages produce various chemokines such as CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL12, CCL5, CCL17, and CCL18 [88]. Additionally, the macrophage-derived production of lipid mediators including eicosanoids might contribute to fibrosis [89]. On the other hand, the function of lipid mediators has not been fully identified, further investigation is needed in patients with IPF and a mouse model of lung fibrosis. Macrophages also regulate ECM remodeling by the secretion of matrix metalloproteinases and by the rearrangement of collagen [90,91]. From a different aspect, macrophages could determine the metabolic fate of environmental cells, which might conduct the glycolytic reprogramming in fibroblast during fibrosis [92,93]. Additionally, macrophages produce vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which is related to both pro-fibrotic responses or anti-fibrotic responses [94,95,96]. It depends on the pattern of expression of angiogenic factors and the target cell. Therefore, macrophages are critical for the development of pulmonary fibrosis.
In other cells, the function of DROSHA has been reported [17,21,97]. In smooth muscle cells, the roles of DROSHA are required for cell survival [97]. Additionally, DROSHA regulates stress-induced death by phosphorylation of its N terminus via p38 MAPK [17]. The translocation of DROSHA by phosphorylation into cytosol from the nucleus is the regulatory mechanism of stress-induced death [21]. In the function of T cells, DROSHA is critical for T cell compartment. Deficiency of DROSHA results in T lymphopenia, particularly in the CD8+ compartment [21]. This study suggests that DROSHA-dependent miRNA production is required for the homeostasis of mature T cells [86]. In our recent study, we showed an increase in the DROSHA protein expression levels in alveolar macrophages during IPF [10]. Immunohistochemistry staining indicated that the protein levels of DROSHA were significantly increased in lung tissues from patients with IPF compared to non-IPF patients [10]. In particular, the intensity and number of DROSHA-positive staining in CD68-positive alveolar macrophages were significantly increased in lung tissues from patients with IPF [10]. These results showed that the high levels of DROSHA in alveolar macrophages contributed to pulmonary inflammation in patients with IPF [10]. Similarly, the protein levels of DROSHA were elevated in alveolar macrophages in a mouse model of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis [10]. In other words, the expression levels of DGCR8 were not changed in lung tissues between patients with IPF and non-IPF patients [10]. Our results demonstrated that the elevation of DROSHA in alveolar macrophages is critical for pulmonary inflammation in IPF pathogenesis [10].

4.2. The Role of DROSHA in AIM2 Inflammasome Activation

Among the various inflammasomes, the mechanism of AIM2 inflammasome activation remains unclear. Currently, the representative mechanism of AIM2 inflammasome activation has been identified by the recognition of dsDNA by AIM2 [59,60,61,62,63] or the increase of AIM2 expression levels [98]. These two mechanisms are required for the AIM2 inflammasome complex formation, which causes the activation of caspase-1 p10 via cleavage of pro-caspase-1.
In our recent study, we suggest that DROSHA is an upstream regulator of AIM2 inflammasome activation [10]. We showed that the deficiency of DROSHA suppresses the activation of caspase-1 by AIM2 inflammasome activation in alveolar macrophages [10]. The deficiency of DROSHA reduces the apoptosis-associated speck-like protein aontaining a CARD (ASC) speck formation in the AIM2 inflammasome complex formation during AIM2 inflammasome activation [10]. These results suggest that DROSHA is critical for the activation of caspase-1 and AIM2 inflammasome complex formation during AIM2 inflammasome activation [10]. As further investigation of the molecular mechanism for DROSHA-dependent AIM2 inflammasome activation is conducted, the understanding of the cellular pathway related to the regulation of DROSHA expression could be important for the discovery of a new mechanism for AIM2 inflammasome activation. Previous studies have shown that the expression of DROSHA is tightly controlled by various cellular pathways such as post-translational modifications, protein degradation pathways, and alternative splicing [88,89,90,91,92]. Link et al. showed that the alternative splicing of DROSHA causes the alteration of the subcellular localization of DROSHA between the cytoplasm and nucleus [14,99]. They suggest that the cytosolic DROSHA potentially alters the function depending on the interaction with partners such as substrate RNAs or regulatory mechanisms [100,101]. Additionally, Ye et al. showed that E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase Mdm2 directly interacts with DROSHA [102]. Its interaction induces the ubiquitination of DROSHA, which causes the degradation of DROSHA protein [103]. Therefore, further investigation for the molecular mechanisms that affect DROSHA expression via alternative splicing or ubiquitination of DROSHA under IPF pathogenesis in AIM2 inflammasome activation is needed.

4.3. miRNA as DAMPs in AIM2 Inflammasome Activation

AIM2 inflammasome is activated by the recognition of cytosolic self-dsDNA as well as foreign dsDNA from pathogens [99]. AIM2 has been shown to detect dsDNA in a sequence-independent manner [62,63]. Since miRNAs, which are produced by DROSHA, have a hairpin structure with double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), miRNAs could make hetero-triplex structures in the location of specific sequences of DNA through the interaction with dsDNA [13]. Recent reports suggest that sub-cellular localization is critical to miRNA function [104]. Among the miRNA compartment, the localization of miRNA in the cytoplasm is important for RNA granules, endomembranes, and the export of miRNA to extracellular space [104]. Since cytosolic miRNAs have double-strand structure as well as dsDNA, cytosolic miRNA could be an activator of the AIM2 inflammasome. In our recent study, we found that the transduction of miRNAs in a sequence-independent manner promoted the activation of the AIM2 inflammasome and the cleavage of caspase-1 in macrophages [10]. Moreover, the transduction of miRNAs increased the maturation and secretion of IL-1β and IL-18 [10]. Furthermore, transduction of miRNAs increased the protein complex formation of AIM2 inflammasome by ASC speck formation, which is important for AIM2 inflammasome activation [10]. These results suggest that the double-stranded structure of cytosolic miRNAs induces the AIM2 inflammasome activation via AIM2 inflammasome complex formation (Figure 3).
DAMPs could contribute to lung inflammation and fibrosis during IPF. There are various types of DAMPs that come from different origins. The simple type of DAMPs might be intracellular components including nucleic acids such as DNA or RNA and organelles that are released from dying and injured cells. DAMPs might be released by cells through the transportation via the processes using endosomes and membrane bound vesicles. Among the various types of DAMPs, certain DAMP can be produced by the characteristic alteration of intracellular proteins such as the transformation from collagens to collagen fragments. These kinds of DAMPs are recognized by innate immune receptors and the activated pro-inflammatory signaling pathway. The activation of these immune receptors could be protective or harmful events, which is determined by the type of DAMP and DAMP-related specific receptor. In IPF, the role of DAMPs has been investigated in IL-17A receptor (IL-17RA)-mediated NF-kB signaling and the role of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) during inflammation and fibrosis [102,105]. IL-17A stimulates proliferation and survival of airway smooth muscle cells via the activation of IL-17RA [106]. The stimulation of IL-17RA leads to changes to various cellular pathways including cell proliferation, myofibroblast differentiation, and the production of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins [102]. The levels of HMGB1 in BAL were increased in patients with IPF compared the control [105]. In bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice, HMGB1 protein levels were elevated in bronchiolar epithelial cells at early stage and in alveolar epithelial and inflammatory cells at late stage [105]. Recent study showed that the levels of miRNAs were increased in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) from patients with IPF relative to the controls [104]. These findings showed that the miRNA in BAL could contribute to damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP)-dependent chronic lung inflammation in the progression of IPF [104,105]. In our recent study, we showed that the intracellular excessive accumulation of miRNA promotes AIM2 inflammasome-dependent caspase-1 activation in alveolar macrophages [10]. Moreover, the intracellular excessive accumulation of miRNA increases the ASC speck formation that is required for AIM2 inflammasome complex formation. Our results suggest that miRNA could be a critical DAMP for AIM2 inflammasome activation in pulmonary inflammation during IPF [10]. Based on our observation, the high levels of miRNA in BAL or blood in patients with chronic lung diseases might be a prognostic biomarker for the prediction of IPF.

4.4. Therapeutic Approach of AIM2 Inflammasome Activation

Recent studies have shown that potential inhibitors have been identified as the NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor [107,108,109,110,111,112]. The effects of potential NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitors such as OLT1177, Tranilast, Oridonin, CY-09, and MCC950 were demonstrated in cells and a representative mouse model for high fat diet (HFD)-induced diabetes, acute arthritis, and Parkinson’s disease [107,108,109,110,111,112]. Each potential NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor reduced the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome through the alteration of upstream pathways for NLRP3 inflammasome activation including mitochondrial dysfunction and potassium efflux [107,108,109,110,111,112]. Unlike the NLRP3 inflammasome, the understanding of potential inhibitor for AIM2 inflammasome activation is still unclear. Recent studies showed that the potential molecules that could inhibit AIM2 including pyrin-only proteins (POPs), CARD-only proteins (COPs), and TRIM11 [113,114]. In particular, pyrin-only proteins 1 (POP1) and POP3 suppressed the activation of AIM2 inflammasome via the interference of PYD-PYD interaction [115,116]. Additionally, IFI16-β, as a new inhibitor of AIM2 inflammasome activation, was investigated for new knowledge for the design and development of anti-inflammatory agents [117]. In human chronic skin disease, cathelicidin peptide LL-37 inhibits the activation of the AIM2 inflammasome by interfering cytosolic DNA in keratinocytes [118]. This result suggests that cathelicidin LL-37 might be a therapeutic target of the AIM2 inflammasome to ameliorate cutaneous inflammation in chronic skin disease.
In cancer, increased expression of AIM2 has been reported in nasopharyngeal carcinoma tumors [119,120], oral squamous cell carcinoma [121], and lung adenocarcinoma [122]. On the other hand, AIM2 has been shown to suppress the development of cancer such as colorectal cancer [123,124]. Reduced expression and instability of the AIM2 have been reported in cancer tissues from patients with colorectal cancer [124,125,126]. The reduction of AIM2 expression is linked to a poorer prognosis in colorectal cancer patients [127]. Furthermore, the reduction of AIM2 expression was found in prostate cancer [128]. In different types of tumor tissue, the variation of AIM2 expression may play a role in the pathogenesis of various cancers. Since the role and activation of AIM2 are different in each type of cancer, the drug discovery for the therapeutic target of the AIM2 inflammasome should be conducted carefully.
Currently, the selective chemical inhibitor for the AIM2 inflammasome has not been identified as a therapeutic agent in human diseases such as IPF. In future investigations, the finding and validation of the selective chemical inhibitor for the AIM2 inflammasome might be important for the treatment of IPF.

5. Conclusions

In this review, the understanding of the DROSHA–miRNA–AIM2 inflammasome axis in the pathogenesis of IPF could be helpful to further investigate the field of interaction between the miRNA and AIM2 inflammasome during IPF. The evidence for the importance of AIM2 inflammasome activation in IPF and other lung diseases could provide the necessity of developing therapeutic agents for the AIM2 inflammasome [129,130,131]. Recent reports imply that the activation of the AIM2 inflammasome or other inflammasomes is a critical event during the severity of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [129,130,131]. A new study, which could discover a therapeutic approach to the control of inflammasomes in various lung diseases, is needed. Furthermore, the novel strategy for the inhibition of DROSHA such as specific chemical inhibitors or therapeutic agents on human clinical trials is still unclear. As a therapeutic approach for human diseases including IPF, a high throughput platform to discover and validate specific DROSHA inhibitors should be started in the near future. Therefore, the novel approach for the development of the therapeutic agents belonging to the AIM2 inflammasome should be attempted by global scientists who have the passion to cure human lung diseases.

Funding

This work was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2019M3E5D1A02069071) (to Jong-Seok Moon).

Acknowledgments

We thank Ji Hun Jeong.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Raghu, G.; Weycker, D.; Edelsberg, J.; Bradford, W.Z.; Oster, G. Incidence and prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 174, 810–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Raghu, G.; Collard, H.R.; Egan, J.J.; Martinez, F.J.; Behr, J.; Brown, K.K.; Colby, T.V.; Cordier, J.F.; Flaherty, K.R.; Lasky, J.A.; et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 183, 788–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lederer, D.J.; Martinez, F.J. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 1811–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sgalla, G.; Iovene, B.; Calvello, M.; Ori, M.; Varone, F.; Richeldi, L. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Pathogenesis and management. Respir. Res. 2018, 19, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Raghu, G. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Guidelines for diagnosis and clinical management have advanced from consensus-based in 2000 to evidence-based in 2011. Eur. Respir. J. 2011, 37, 743–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Daccord, C.; Maher, T.M. Recent advances in understanding idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. F1000Research 2016, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Wilson, M.S.; Wynn, T.A. Pulmonary fibrosis: Pathogenesis, etiology and regulation. Mucosal. Immunol. 2009, 2, 103–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Baumgartner, K.B.; Samet, J.M.; Stidley, C.A.; Colby, T.V.; Waldron, J.A. Cigarette smoking: A risk factor for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1997, 155, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gebert, L.F.R.; MacRae, I.J. Regulation of microRNA function in animals. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cho, S.J.; Hong, K.S.; Jeong, J.H.; Lee, M.; Choi, A.M.K.; Stout-Delgado, H.W.; Moon, J.S. DROSHA-Dependent AIM2 Inflammasome Activation Contributes to Lung Inflammation during Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Cells 2019, 8, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Filippov, V.; Solovyev, V.; Filippova, M.; Gill, S.S. A novel type of RNase III family proteins in eukaryotes. Gene 2000, 245, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, H.; Xu, H.; Miraglia, L.J.; Crooke, S.T. Human RNase III is a 160-kDa protein involved in preribosomal RNA processing. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 36957–36965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Lee, Y.; Ahn, C.; Han, J.; Choi, H.; Kim, J.; Yim, J.; Lee, J.; Provost, P.; Rådmark, O.; Kim, S.; et al. The nuclear RNase III Drosha initiates microRNA processing. Nature 2003, 425, 415–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Tucker, L.; Ramratnam, B. Phosphorylation of the RNase III enzyme Drosha at Serine300 or Serine302 is required for its nuclear localization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 6610–6619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tang, X.; Wen, S.; Zheng, D.; Tucker, L.; Cao, L.; Pantazatos, D.; Moss, S.F.; Ramratnam, B. Acetylation of drosha on the N-terminus inhibits its degradation by ubiquitination. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e72503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Han, J.; Lee, Y.; Yeom, K.H.; Nam, J.W.; Heo, I.; Rhee, J.K.; Sohn, S.Y.; Cho, Y.; Zhang, B.T.; Kim, V.N. Molecular basis for the recognition of primary microRNAs by the Drosha-DGCR8 complex. Cell 2006, 125, 887–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Yang, Q.; Li, W.; She, H.; Dou, J.; Duong, D.M.; Du, Y.; Yang, S.H.; Seyfried, N.T.; Fu, H.; Gao, G.; et al. Stress induces p38 MAPK-mediated phosphorylation and inhibition of Drosha-dependent cell survival. Mol. Cell 2015, 57, 721–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 2004, 116, 281–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kim, Y.K.; Kim, B.; Kim, V.N. Re-evaluation of the roles of DROSHA, Export in 5, and DICER in microRNA biogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E1881–E1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bohnsack, M.T.; Czaplinski, K.; Gorlich, D. Exportin 5 is a RanGTP-dependent dsRNA-binding protein that mediates nuclear export of pre-miRNAs. RNA 2004, 10, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chong, M.M.; Rasmussen, J.P.; Rudensky, A.Y.; Littman, D.R. The RNAseIII enzyme Drosha is critical in T cells for preventing lethal inflammatory disease. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 2005–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Herrera, J.; Beisang, D.J.; Peterson, M.; Forster, C.; Gilbertsen, A.; Benyumov, A.; Smith, K.; Korenczuk, C.E.; Barocas, V.H.; Guenther, K.; et al. Dicer1 Deficiency in the Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Fibroblastic Focus Promotes Fibrosis by Suppressing MicroRNA Biogenesis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 198, 486–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Inui, M.; Martello, G.; Piccolo, S. MicroRNA control of signal transduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 252–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lai, E.C. Micro RNAs are complementary to 3′ UTR sequence motifs that mediate negative post-transcriptional regulation. Nat. Genet. 2002, 30, 363–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhou, S.S.; Jin, J.P.; Wang, J.Q.; Zhang, Z.G.; Freedman, J.H.; Zheng, Y.; Cai, L. miRNAS in cardiovascular diseases: Potential biomarkers, therapeutic targets and challenges. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2018, 39, 1073–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Filipow, S.; Laczmanski, L. Blood Circulating miRNAs as Cancer Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment Response. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hamam, R.; Hamam, D.; Alsaleh, K.A.; Kassem, M.; Zaher, W.; Alfayez, M.; Aldahmash, A.; Alajez, N.M. Circulating microRNAs in breast cancer: Novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Wang, M.; Qin, L.; Tang, B. MicroRNAs in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pandit, K.V.; Corcoran, D.; Yousef, H.; Yarlagadda, M.; Tzouvelekis, A.; Gibson, K.F.; Konishi, K.; Yousem, S.A.; Singh, M.; Handley, D.; et al. Inhibition and role of let-7d in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2010, 182, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Elliot, S.; Periera-Simon, S.; Xia, X.; Catanuto, P.; Rubio, G.; Shahzeidi, S.; El Salem, F.; Shapiro, J.; Briegel, K.; Korach, K.S.; et al. MicroRNA let-7 Downregulates Ligand-Independent Estrogen Receptor-mediated Male-Predominant Pulmonary Fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 200, 1246–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xie, T.; Liang, J.; Guo, R.; Liu, N.; Noble, P.W.; Jiang, D. Comprehensive microRNA analysis in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis identifies multiple sites of molecular regulation. Physiol. Genom. 2011, 43, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Wei, P.; Xie, Y.; Abel, P.W.; Huang, Y.; Ma, Q.; Li, L.; Hao, J.; Wolff, D.W.; Wei, T.; Tu, Y. Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1-induced miR-133a inhibits myofibroblast differentiation and pulmonary fibrosis. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bahudhanapati, H.; Tan, J.; Dutta, J.A.; Strock, S.B.; Sembrat, J.; Àlvarez, D.; Rojas, M.; Jäger, B.; Prasse, A.; Zhang, Y.; et al. MicroRNA-144-3p targets relaxin/insulin-like family peptide receptor 1 (RXFP1) expression in lung fibroblasts from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 5008–5022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Jiang, H.; Chen, Y.; Yu, T.; Zhao, X.; Shan, H.; Sun, J.; Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Shan, H.; Liang, H. Inhibition of lncRNA PFRL prevents pulmonary fibrosis by disrupting the miR-26a/smad2 loop. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2018, 315, L563–L575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, X.; Yu, T.; Shan, H.; Jiang, H.; Sun, J.; Zhao, X.; Su, W.; Yang, L.; Shan, H.; Liang, H. lncRNA PFAL promotes lung fibrosis through CTGF by competitively binding miR-18a. FASEB J. 2018, 32, 5285–5297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Liu, B.; Li, R.; Zhang, J.; Meng, C.; Zhang, J.; Song, X.; Lv, C. MicroRNA-708-3p as a potential therapeutic target via the ADAM17-GATA/STAT3 axis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018, 50, e465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bagnato, G.; Roberts, W.N.; Roman, J.; Gangemi, S. A systematic review of overlapping microRNA patterns in systemic sclerosis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2017, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Khalil, W.; Xia, H.; Bodempudi, V.; Kahm, J.; Hergert, P.; Smith, K.; Peterson, M.; Parker, M.; Herrera, J.; Bitterman, P.B.; et al. Pathologic Regulation of Collagen I by an Aberrant Protein Phosphatase 2A/Histone Deacetylase C4/MicroRNA-29 Signal Axis in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Fibroblasts. Am. J. Respir.Cell Mol. Biol. 2015, 53, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Parker, M.W.; Rossi, D.; Peterson, M.; Smith, K.; Sikström, K.; White, E.S.; Connett, J.E.; Henke, C.A.; Larsson, O.; Bitterman, P.B. Fibrotic extracellular matrix activates a profibrotic positive feedback loop. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 1622–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Díaz-Piña, G.; Ordoñez-Razo, R.M.; Montes, E.; Páramo, I.; Becerril, C.; Salgado, A.; Santibañez-Salgado, J.A.; Maldonado, M.; Ruiz, V. The Role of ADAR1 and ADAR2 in the Regulation of miRNA-21 in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Lung 2018, 196, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, G.; Friggeri, A.; Yang, Y.; Milosevic, J.; Ding, Q.; Thannickal, V.J.; Kaminski, N.; Abraham, E. miR-21 mediates fibrogenic activation of pulmonary fibroblasts and lung fibrosis. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 1589–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Liang, H.; Gu, Y.; Li, T.; Zhang, Y.; Huangfu, L.; Hu, M.; Zhao, D.; Chen, Y.; Liu, S.; Dong, Y.; et al. Integrated analyses identify the involvement of microRNA-26a in epithelial-mesenchymal transition during idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Cell Death Dis. 2014, 5, e1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liang, H.; Xu, C.; Pan, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Li, T.; Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Huangfu, L.; et al. The antifibrotic effects and mechanisms of microRNA-26a action in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Mol. Ther. 2014, 22, 1122–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Rajasekaran, S.; Rajaguru, P.; Sudhakar Gandhi, P.S. MicroRNAs as potential targets for progressive pulmonary fibrosis. Front. Pharmacol. 2015, 6, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Montgomery, R.L.; Yu, G.; Latimer, P.A.; Stack, C.; Robinson, K.; Dalby, C.M.; Kaminski, N.; van Rooij, E. MicroRNA mimicry blocks pulmonary fibrosis. EMBO Mol. Med. 2014, 6, 1347–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gao, S.Y.; Zhou, X.; Li, Y.J.; Liu, W.L.; Wang, P.Y.; Pang, M.; Xie, S.Y.; Lv, C.J. Arsenic trioxide prevents rat pulmonary fibrosis via miR-98 overexpression. Life Sci. 2014, 114, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yamada, M.K.H.; Ota, C.; Takahashi, T.; Tando, Y.; Suzuki, T.; Fujino, N.; Makiguchi, T.; Takagi, K.; Suzuki, T.; Ichinose, M. The increase of microRNA-21 during lung fibrosis and its contribution to epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pulmonary epithelial cells. Respir. Res. 2013, 14, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Xiao, X.; Huang, C.; Zhao, C.; Gou, X.; Senavirathna, L.K.; Hinsdale, M.; Lloyd, P.; Liu, L. Regulation of myofibroblast differentiation by miR-424 during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2015, 566, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Yang, S.; Cui, H.; Xie, N.; Icyuz, M.; Banerjee, S.; Antony, V.B.; Abraham, E.; Thannickal, V.J.; Liu, G. miR-145 regulates myofibroblast differentiation and lung fibrosis. FASEB J. 2013, 27, 2382–2391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Bringardner, B.D.; Baran, C.P.; Eubank, T.D.; Marsh, C.B. The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2008, 10, 287–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Wynn, T.A. Integrating mechanisms of pulmonary fibrosis. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 1339–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Byrne, A.J.; Maher, T.M.; Lloyd, C.M. Pulmonary Macrophages: A New Therapeutic Pathway in Fibrosing Lung Disease? Trends Mol. Med. 2016, 22, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Desai, O.; Winkler, J.; Minasyan, M.; Herzog, E.L. The Role of Immune and Inflammatory Cells in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Front. Med. 2018, 5, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Schroder, K.; Tschopp, J. The inflammasomes. Cell 2010, 140, 821–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Broz, P.; Dixit, V.M. Inflammasomes: Mechanism of assembly, regulation and signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 16, 407–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Latz, E.; Xiao, T.S.; Stutz, A. Activation and regulation of the inflammasomes. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fernandes-Alnemri, T.; Wu, J.; Yu, J.W.; Datta, P.; Miller, B.; Jankowski, W.; Rosenberg, S.; Zhang, J.; Alnemri, E.S. The pyroptosome: A supramolecular assembly of ASC dimers mediating inflammatory cell death via caspase-1 activation. Cell Death Differ. 2007, 14, 1590–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Martinon, F.; Burns, K.; Tschopp, J. The inflammasome: A molecular platform triggering activation of inflammatory caspases and processing of proIL-beta. Mol. Cell 2002, 10, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lamkanfi, M.; Dixit, V.M. Inflammasomes and their roles in health and disease. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012, 28, 137–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Jin, C.; Flavell, R.A. Molecular mechanism of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. J. Clin. Immunol. 2010, 30, 628–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Man, S.M.; Karki, R.; Kanneganti, T.D. AIM2 inflammasome in infection, cancer, and autoimmunity: Role in DNA sensing, inflammation, and innate immunity. Eur. J. Immunol. 2016, 46, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Hornung, V.; Ablasser, A.; Charrel-Dennis, M.; Bauernfeind, F.; Horvath, G.; Caffrey, D.R.; Latz, E.; Fitzgerald, K.A. AIM2 recognizes cytosolic dsDNA and forms a caspase-1-activating inflammasome with ASC. Nature 2009, 458, 514–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Rathinam, V.A.; Jiang, Z.; Waggoner, S.N.; Sharma, S.; Cole, L.E.; Waggoner, L.; Vanaja, S.K.; Monks, B.G.; Ganesan, S.; Latz, E.; et al. The AIM2 inflammasome is essential for host defense against cytosolic bacteria and DNA viruses. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Proell, M.; Gerlic, M.; Mace, P.D.; Reed, J.C.; Riedl, S.J. The CARD plays a critical role in ASC foci formation and inflammasome signalling. Biochem. J. 2013, 449, 613–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Vajjhala, P.R.; Mirams, R.E.; Hill, J.M. Multiple binding sites on the pyrin domain of ASC protein allow self-association and interaction with NLRP3 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 41732–41743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Gasse, P.; Riteau, N.; Charron, S.; Girre, S.; Fick, L.; Pétrilli, V.; Tschopp, J.; Lagente, V.; Quesniaux, V.F.; Ryffel, B.; et al. Uric acid is a danger signal activating NALP3 inflammasome in lung injury inflammation and fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2009, 179, 903–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gasse, P.; Mary, C.; Guenon, I.; Noulin, N.; Charron, S.; Schnyder-Candrian, S.; Schnyder, B.; Akira, S.; Quesniaux, V.F.; Lagente, V.; et al. IL-1R1/MyD88 signaling and the inflammasome are essential in pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2007, 117, 3786–3799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Cassel, S.L.; Eisenbarth, S.C.; Iyer, S.S.; Sadler, J.J.; Colegio, O.R.; Tephly, L.A.; Carter, A.B.; Rothman, P.B.; Flavell, R.A.; Sutterwala, F.S. The Nalp3 inflammasome is essential for the development of silicosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 9035–9040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Wu, J.; Yan, Z.; Schwartz, D.E.; Yu, J.; Malik, A.B.; Hu, G. Activation of NLRP3 inflammasome in alveolar macrophages contributes to mechanical stretch-induced lung inflammation and injury. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 3590–3599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kitasato, Y.; Hoshino, T.; Okamoto, M.; Kato, S.; Koda, Y.; Nagata, N.; Kinoshita, M.; Koga, H.; Yoon, D.Y.; Asao, H.; et al. Enhanced expression of interleukin-18 and its receptor in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2004, 31, 619–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lasithiotaki, I.; Giannarakis, I.; Tsitoura, E.; Samara, K.D.; Margaritopoulos, G.A.; Choulaki, C.; Vasarmidi, E.; Tzanakis, N.; Voloudaki, A.; Sidiropoulos, P.; et al. NLRP3 inflammasome expression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and rheumatoid lung. Eur. Respir. J. 2016, 47, 910–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Artlett, C.M.; Sassi-Gaha, S.; Rieger, J.L.; Boesteanu, A.C.; Feghali-Bostwick, C.A.; Katsikis, P.D. The inflammasome activating caspase 1 mediates fibrosis and myofibroblast differentiation in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011, 63, 3563–3574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Stout-Delgado, H.W.; Cho, S.J.; Chu, S.G.; Mitzel, D.N.; Villalba, J.; El-Chemaly, S.; Ryter, S.W.; Choi, A.M.; Rosas, I.O. Age-Dependent Susceptibility to Pulmonary Fibrosis Is Associated with NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2016, 55, 252–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Lv, Z.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.J.; Mao, Y.F.; Dong, W.W.; Ding, Z.N.; Meng, G.X.; Jiang, L.; Zhu, X.Y. NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation Contributes to Mechanical Stretch-Induced Endothelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Pulmonary Fibrosis. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 46, e49–e58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Jung Cho, S.; Stout-Delgado, H.W. Aging and Lung Disease. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2019, 82, 433–459. [Google Scholar]
  76. Zheng, R.; Tao, L.; Jian, H.; Chang, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, H. NLRP3 inflammasome activation and lung fibrosis caused by airborne fine particulate matter. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 163, 612–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Tian, R.; Zhu, Y.; Yao, J.; Meng, X.; Wang, J.; Xie, H.; Wang, R. NLRP3 participates in the regulation of EMT in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Exp. Cell Res. 2017, 357, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Terlizzi, M.; Molino, A.; Colarusso, C.; Donovan, C.; Imitazione, P.; Somma, P.; Aquino, R.P.; Hansbro, P.M.; Pinto, A.; Sorrentino, R. Activation of the Absent in Melanoma 2 Inflammasome in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells From Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients Leads to the Release of Pro-Fibrotic Mediators. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Cho, S.J.; Moon, J.S.; Nikahira, K.; Yun, H.S.; Harris, R.; Hong, K.S.; Huang, H.; Choi, A.M.K.; Stout-Delgado, H. GLUT1-dependent glycolysis regulates exacerbation of fibrosis via AIM2 inflammasome activation. Thorax 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Dos Santos, G.; Rogel, M.R.; Baker, M.A.; Troken, J.R.; Urich, D.; Morales-Nebreda, L.; Sennello, J.A.; Kutuzov, M.A.; Sitikov, A.; Davis, J.M.; et al. Vimentin regulates activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Dostert, C.; Pétrilli, V.; Van Bruggen, R.; Steele, C.; Mossman, B.T.; Tschopp, J. Innate immune activation through Nalp3 inflammasome sensing of asbestos and silica. Science 2008, 320, 674–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Meng, Y.; Pan, M.; Zheng, B.; Chen, Y.; Li, W.; Yang, Q.; Zheng, Z.; Sun, N.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X. Autophagy Attenuates Angiotensin II-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis by Inhibiting Redox Imbalance-Mediated NOD-Like Receptor Family Pyrin Domain Containing 3 Inflammasome Activation. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2019, 30, 520–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zhao, X.; Wei, S.; Li, Z.; Lin, C.; Zhu, Z.; Sun, D.; Bai, R.; Qian, J.; Gao, X.; Chen, G.; et al. Autophagic flux blockage in alveolar epithelial cells is essential in silica nanoparticle-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Xu, J.F.; Washko, G.R.; Nakahira, K.; Hatabu, H.; Patel, A.S.; Fernandez, I.E.; Nishino, M.; Okajima, Y.; Yamashiro, T.; Ross, J.C.; et al. Statins and pulmonary fibrosis: The potential role of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2012, 185, 547–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Wynn, T.A.; Vannella, K.M. Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity 2016, 44, 450–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Young, L.R.; Gulleman, P.M.; Short, C.W.; Tanjore, H.; Sherrill, T.; Qi, A.; McBride, A.P.; Zaynagetdinov, R.; Benjamin, J.T.; Lawson, W.E.; et al. Epithelial-macrophage interactions determine pulmonary fibrosis susceptibility in Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome. JCI Insight 2016, 1, e88947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Toossi, Z.; Hirsch, C.S.; Hamilton, B.D.; Knuth, C.K.; Friedlander, M.A.; Rich, E.A. Decreased production of TGF-beta 1 by human alveolar macrophages compared with blood monocytes. J. Immunol. 1996, 156, 3461–3468. [Google Scholar]
  88. Arango Duque, G.; Descoteaux, A. Macrophage cytokines: Involvement in immunity and infectious diseases. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Huang, S.K.; Peters-Golden, M. Eicosanoid lipid mediators in fibrotic lung diseases: Ready for prime time? Chest 2008, 133, 1442–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Rohani, M.G.; McMahan, R.S.; Razumova, M.V.; Hertz, A.L.; Cieslewicz, M.; Pun, S.H.; Regnier, M.; Wang, Y.; Birkland, T.P.; Parks, W.C. MMP-10 regulates collagenolytic activity of alternatively activated resident macrophages. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2015, 135, 2377–2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Madsen, D.H.; Leonard, D.; Masedunskas, A.; Moyer, A.; Jürgensen, H.J.; Peters, D.E.; Amornphimoltham, P.; Selvaraj, A.; Yamada, S.S.; Brenner, D.A.; et al. M2-like macrophages are responsible for collagen degradation through a mannose receptor-mediated pathway. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 202, 951–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Biswas, S.K.; Mantovani, A. Orchestration of metabolism by macrophages. Cell Metab. 2012, 15, 432–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Xie, N.; Tan, Z.; Banerjee, S.; Cui, H.; Ge, J.; Liu, R.M.; Bernard, K.; Thannickal, V.J.; Liu, G. Glycolytic reprogramming in myofibroblast differentiation and lung fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2015, 192, 1462–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Stockmann, C.; Kerdiles, Y.; Nomaksteinsky, M.; Weidemann, A.; Takeda, N.; Doedens, A.; Torres-Collado, A.X.; Iruela-Arispe, L.; Nizet, V.; Johnson, R.S. Loss of myeloid cell-derived vascular endothelial growth factor accelerates fibrosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 4329–4334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Barratt, S.L.; Blythe, T.; Jarrett, C.; Ourradi, K.; Shelley-Fraser, G.; Day, M.J.; Qiu, Y.; Harper, S.; Maher, T.M.; Oltean, S.; et al. Differential expression of VEGF-Axxx isoforms is critical for development of pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 196, 479–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Murray, L.A.; Habiel, D.M.; Hohmann, M.; Camelo, A.; Shang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Coelho, A.L.; Peng, X.; Gulati, M.; Crestani, B.; et al. Antifibrotic role of vascular endothelial growth factor in pulmonary fibrosis. JCI Insight 2017, 2, e92192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Fan, P.; Chen, Z.; Tian, P.; Liu, W.; Jiao, Y.; Xue, Y.; Bhattacharya, A.; Wu, J.; Lu, M.; Guo, Y.; et al. miRNA biogenesis enzyme Drosha is required for vascular smooth muscle cell survival. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e60888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lugrin, J.; Martinon, F. The AIM2 inflammasome: Sensor of pathogens and cellular perturbations. Immunol. Rev. 2018, 281, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Leung, A.K. The whereabouts of microRNA Actions: Cytoplasm and beyond. Trends Cell Biol. 2015, 25, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Link, S.; Grund, S.E.; Diederichs, S. Alternative splicing affects the subcellular localization of Drosha. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 5330–5343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Dai, L.; Chen, K.; Youngren, B.; Kulina, J.; Yang, A.; Guo, Z.; Li, J.; Yu, P.; Gu, S. Cytoplasmic Drosha activity generated by alternative splicing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 10454–10466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Zhang, J.; Wang, D.; Wang, L.; Wang, S.; Roden, A.C.; Zhao, H.; Li, X.; Prakash, Y.S.; Matteson, E.L.; Tschumperlin, D.J.; et al. Profibrotic effect of IL-17A and elevated IL-17RA in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and rheumatoid arthritis-associated lung disease support a direct role for IL-17A/IL-17RA in human fibrotic interstitial lung disease. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2019, 316, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Ye, P.; Liu, Y.; Chen, C.; Tang, F.; Wu, Q.; Wang, X.; Liu, C.G.; Liu, X.; Liu, R.; Liu, Y.; et al. An mTORC1-Mdm2-Drosha axis for miRNA biogenesis in response to glucose- and amino acid-deprivation. Mol. Cell 2015, 57, 708–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Fan, L.; Yu, X.; Huang, Z.; Zheng, S.; Zhou, Y.; Lv, H.; Zeng, Y.; Xu, J.F.; Zhu, X.; Yi, X. Analysis of microarray-identified genes and microRNAs associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Mediat. Inflamm. 2017, 1804240, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Hamada, N.; Maeyama, T.; Kawaguchi, T.; Yoshimi, M.; Fukumoto, J.; Yamada, M.; Yamada, S.; Kuwano, K.; Nakanishi, Y. The role of high mobility group box1 in pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2008, 39, 440–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Chang, Y.; Al-Alwan, L.; Risse, P.A.; Halayko, A.J.; Martin, J.G.; Baglole, C.J.; Eidelman, D.H.; Hamid, Q. Th17-associated cytokines promote human airway smooth muscle cell proliferation. FASEB J. 2012, 26, 5152–5160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Coll, R.C.; Robertson, A.A.; Chae, J.J.; Higgins, S.C.; Munoz-Planillo, R.; Inserra, M.C.; Vetter, I.; Dungan, L.S.; Monks, B.G.; Stutz, A.; et al. A small-molecule inhibitor of the NLRP3 inflammasome for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Gordon, R.; Albornoz, E.A.; Christie, D.C.; Langley, M.R.; Kumar, V.; Mantovani, S.; Robertson, A.A.B.; Butler, M.S.; Rowe, D.B.; O’Neill, L.A.; et al. Inflammasome inhibition prevents α-synuclein pathology and dopaminergic neurodegeneration in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018, 10, eaah4066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Duncan, J.A.; Bergstralh, D.T.; Wang, Y.; Willingham, S.B.; Ye, Z.; Zimmermann, A.G.; Ting, J.P. Cryopyrin/NALP3 binds ATP/dATP, is an ATPase, and requires ATP binding to mediate inflammatory signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 8041–8046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Marchetti, C.; Swartzwelter, B.; Koenders, M.I.; Azam, T.; Tengesdal, I.W.; Powers, N.; de Graaf, D.M.; Dinarello, C.A.; Joosten, L.A.B. NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor OLT1177 suppresses joint inflammation in murine models of acute arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2018, 20, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Huang, Y.; Jiang, H.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, Y.; Tao, J.; Deng, X.; Liang, G.; Zhang, H.; Jiang, W.; et al. Tranilast directly targets NLRP3 to treat inflammasome-driven diseases. EMBO Mol. Med. 2018, 10, e8689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. He, H.; Jiang, H.; Chen, Y.; Ye, J.; Wang, A.; Wang, C.; Liu, Q.; Liang, G.; Deng, X.; Jiang, W.; et al. Oridonin is a covalent NLRP3 inhibitor with strong anti-inflammasome activity. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Matusiak, M.; Van Opdenbosch, N.; Lamkanfi, M. CARD- and pyrin-only proteins regulating inflammasome activation and immunity. Immunol. Rev. 2015, 265, 217–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Liu, T.; Tang, Q.; Liu, K.; Xie, W.; Liu, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, R.F.; Cui, J. TRIM11 Suppresses AIM2 Inflammasome by Degrading AIM2 via p62-Dependent Selective Autophagy. Cell Rep. 2016, 16, 1988–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. De Almeida, L.; Khare, S.; Misharin, A.V.; Patel, R.; Ratsimandresy, R.A.; Wallin, M.C.; Perlman, H.; Greaves, D.R.; Hoffman, H.M.; Dorfleutner, A.; et al. The PYRIN domain-only protein POP1 inhibits inflammasome assembly and ameliorates inflammatory disease. Immunity 2015, 43, 264–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Khare, S.; Ratsimandresy, R.A.; de Almeida, L.; Cuda, C.M.; Rellick, S.L.; Misharin, A.V.; Wallin, M.C.; Gangopadhyay, A.; Forte, E.; Gottwein, E.; et al. The PYRIN domain-only protein POP3 inhibits ALR inflammasomes and regulates responses to infection with DNA viruses. Nat. Immunol. 2014, 15, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wang, P.H.; Ye, Z.W.; Deng, J.J.; Siu, K.L.; Gao, W.W.; Chaudhary, V.; Cheng, Y.; Fung, S.Y.; Yuen, K.S.; Ho, T.H.; et al. Inhibition of AIM2 inflammasome activation by a novel transcript isoform of IFI16. EMBO Rep. 2018, 19, e45737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Dombrowski, Y.; Peric, M.; Koglin, S.; Kammerbauer, C.; Göss, C.; Anz, D.; Simanski, M.; Gläser, R.; Harder, J.; Hornung, V.; et al. Cytosolic DNA triggers inflammasome activation in keratinocytes in psoriatic lesions. Sci. Transl. Med. 2011, 3, 82ra38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Man, S.M.; Zhu, Q.; Zhu, L.; Liu, Z.; Karki, R.; Malik, A.; Sharma, D.; Li, L.; Malireddi, R.K.; Gurung, P.; et al. Critical Role for the DNA Sensor AIM2 in Stem Cell Proliferation and Cancer. Cell 2015, 162, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Wilson, J.E.; Petrucelli, A.S.; Chen, L.; Koblansky, A.A.; Truax, A.D.; Oyama, Y.; Rogers, A.B.; Brickey, W.J.; Wang, Y.; Schneider, M.; et al. Inflammasome-independent role of AIM2 in suppressing colon tumorigenesis via DNA-PK and Akt. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 906–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. DeYoung, K.L.; Ray, M.E.; Su, Y.A.; Anzick, S.L.; Johnstone, R.W.; Trapani, J.A.; Meltzer, P.S.; Trent, J.M. Cloning a novel member of the human interferon-inducible gene family associated with control of tumorigenicity in a model of human melanoma. Oncogene 1997, 15, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Dihlmann, S.; Tao, S.; Echterdiek, F.; Herpel, E.; Jansen, L.; Chang-Claude, J.; Brenner, H.; Hoffmeister, M.; Kloor, M. Lack of Absent in Melanoma 2 (AIM2) expression in tumor cells is closely associated with poor survival in colorectal cancer patients. Int. J. Cancer. 2014, 135, 2387–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Schulmann, K.; Brasch, F.E.; Kunstmann, E.; Engel, C.; Pagenstecher, C.; Vogelsang, H.; Kruger, S.; Vogel, T.; Knaebel, H.P.; Rüschoff, J.; et al. HNPCC-associated small bowel cancer: Clinical and molecular characteristics. Gastroenterology 2005, 128, 590–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Woerner, S.M.; Kloor, M.; Schwitalle, Y.; Youmans, H.; Doeberitz, M.; Gebert, J.; Dihlmann, S. The putative tumor suppressor AIM2 is frequently affected by different genetic alterations in microsatellite unstable colon cancers. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2007, 46, 1080–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kim, T.M.; Laird, P.W.; Park, P.J. The landscape of microsatellite instability in colorectal and endometrial cancer genomes. Cell 2013, 155, 858–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Ponomareva, L.; Liu, H.; Duan, X.; Dickerson, E.; Shen, H.; Panchanathan, R.; Choubey, D. AIM2, an IFN-inducible cytosolic DNA sensor, in the development of benign prostate hyperplasia and prostate cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 2013, 11, 1193–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Wang, L.J.; Hsu, C.W.; Chen, C.C.; Liang, Y.; Chen, L.C.; Ojcius, D.M.; Tsang, N.M.; Hsueh, C.; Wu, C.C.; Chang, Y.S. Interactome-wide analysis identifies end-binding protein 1 as a crucial component for the speck-like particle formation of activated absence in melanoma 2 (AIM2) inflammasomes. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2012, 11, 1230–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Chen, L.C.; Wang, L.J.; Tsang, N.M.; Ojcius, D.M.; Chen, C.C.; Ouyang, C.N.; Hsueh, C.; Liang, Y.; Chang, K.P.; Chen, C.C.; et al. Tumour inflammasome-derived IL-1beta recruits neutrophils and improves local recurrence-free survival in EBV-induced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. EMBO Mol. Med. 2012, 4, 1276–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Dos Santos, G.; Kutuzov, M.A.; Ridge, K.M. The inflammasome in lung diseases. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2012, 303, L627–L633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. De Falco, G.; Terlizzi, M.; Sirignano, M.; Commodo, M.; D’Anna, A.; Aquino, R.P.; Pinto, A.; Sorrentino, R. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from smokers release higher levels of IL-1-like cytokines after exposure to combustion-generated ultrafine particles. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Molino, A.; Terlizzi, M.; Colarusso, C.; Rossi, A.; Somma, P.; Saglia, A.; Pinto, A.; Sorrentino, R. AIM2/IL-1α/TGF-β Axis in PBMCs From Exacerbated Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients Is Not Related to COX-2-Dependent Inflammatory Pathway. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 21 01668 g001 550
Figure 1. The maturation of miRNA by drosha ribonuclease III (DROSHA).
Figure 1. The maturation of miRNA by drosha ribonuclease III (DROSHA).
Ijms 21 01668 g001
Ijms 21 01668 g002 550
Figure 2. The various roles of miRNA in the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).
Figure 2. The various roles of miRNA in the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).
Ijms 21 01668 g002
Ijms 21 01668 g003 550
Figure 3. The role of miRNA-dependent AIM2 inflammasome activation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).
Figure 3. The role of miRNA-dependent AIM2 inflammasome activation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).
Ijms 21 01668 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cho, S.J.; Lee, M.; Stout-Delgado, H.W.; Moon, J.-S. DROSHA-Dependent miRNA and AIM2 Inflammasome Activation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051668

AMA Style

Cho SJ, Lee M, Stout-Delgado HW, Moon J-S. DROSHA-Dependent miRNA and AIM2 Inflammasome Activation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(5):1668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051668

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cho, Soo Jung, Mihye Lee, Heather W. Stout-Delgado, and Jong-Seok Moon. 2020. "DROSHA-Dependent miRNA and AIM2 Inflammasome Activation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 5: 1668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051668

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop