Next Article in Journal
Virus-Mediated Cell-Cell Fusion
Next Article in Special Issue
Polymorphisms of Encoding Genes IL1RN and P2RX7 in Apical Root Resorption in Patients after Orthodontic Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Safirinium N-Hydroxysuccinimide Esters to Derivatization of Peptides for High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, and Fluorescent Labeling of Bacterial Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Morphological, Anatomical, and Phytochemical Studies of Carlina acaulis L. Cypsela
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 24
10.3390/ijms21249642
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Immunodetection of Pectic Epitopes, Arabinogalactan Proteins, and Extensins in Mucilage Cells from the Ovules of Pilosella officinarum Vaill. and Taraxacum officinale Agg. (Asteraceae)

by
Bartosz J. Płachno
1,*,
Małgorzata Kapusta
2,
Piotr Świątek
3,
Piotr Stolarczyk
4 and
Janusz Kocki
5
1
Department of Plant Cytology and Embryology, Institute of Botany, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, 9 Gronostajowa St., 30-387 Kraków, Poland
2
Department of Plant Cytology and Embryology, University of Gdańsk, 59. Wita Stwosza St., 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland
3
Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, 9 Bankowa St., 40-007 Katowice, Poland
4
Department of Botany, Physiology and Plant Protection, Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, University of Agriculture in Kraków, 29 Listopada 54 Ave., 31-425 Kraków, Poland
5
Department of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Lublin, 11 Radziwiłowska St., 20-080 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(24), 9642; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249642
Submission received: 26 November 2020 / Revised: 14 December 2020 / Accepted: 15 December 2020 / Published: 17 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Animal and Plant Cell–Tissue, Organ Specialization and Function: Investigational, Experimental and Medical Aspects)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The main aim of this study was to compare the cytological difference between ovular mucilage cells in two Asteraceae species—Pilosella officinarum and Taraxacum officinale—in order to determine whether pectic epitopes, arabinogalactan proteins, or extensins are present. The immunocytochemical technique was used. Both the Taracacum and Pilosella genera have been used recently as models for understanding the mechanisms of apomixis. Knowledge of the presence of signal molecules (pectic epitopes, arabinogalactan proteins, and extensins) can help better understand the developmental processes in these plants during seed growth. The results showed that in Pilosella officinarum, there was an accumulation of pectins in the mucilage, including both weakly and highly esterified pectins, which was in contrast to the mucilage of Taraxacum officinale, which had low amounts of these pectins. However, Taraxacum protoplasts of mucilage cells were rich in weakly methyl-esterified pectins. While the mucilage contained arabinogalactan proteins in both of the studied species, the types of arabinogalactan proteins were different. In both of the studied species, extensins were recorded in the transmitting tissues. Arabinogalactan proteins as well as weakly and highly esterified pectins and extensins occurred in close proximity to calcium oxalate crystals in both Taraxacum and Pilosella cells.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

There are two main types of mucilage cells in plant seeds. The first type is mucilage cells that secret mucilage outside the cell to form a mucilage drop (e.g., mucilage cells of the trapping glands of carnivorous plants of genera Drosera, Drosophyllum, Pinguicula, and Byblis [1,2,3,4] or root cells [5]). The second type is mucilage cells that produce and collect mucilage inside a cell (at least during part of the cell life). Several subtypes can be distinguished in the second group. The first subtype is epidermal mucilage cells of the seeds, e.g., Plantago [6,7,8], members of the Brassicaceae family including the model plant species Arabidopsis thaliana (e.g., [9,10,11,12]), Sapindaceae [13], fruits such as Asteraceae cypsela [14,15], and Asteraceae cypsela epidermal trichomes [16]. The second subtype is epidermal and mesophyll mucilage cells of dicotyledons, in which the mucilage accumulates between the plasmalemma and the cell wall, e.g., Opuntia ficus-indica [17], Cinnamomum burmanni [18], and Hibiscus schizopetalus [19]. The third subtype is mucilage cells in which the mucilage accumulates between the cytoplasm and the central vacuole into a specialized cavity, e.g., Araucaria angustifoli [20,21]. It should be noted that mucilage can also be secreted by ducts and cavities [22].
There are two main types of mucilage: cellulose mucilage and pectin mucilage. The first represents cell walls that have a swollen matrix, which causes the cellulose fibrils to become separated from each other. In the second type, which is composed mainly of pectins and hemicelluloses, there are no cellulose fibrils [23,24,25].
As previously mentioned, mucilage can be accumulated and secreted in various ways in seed plants. Detailed studies have been performed on mucilage seed cells of the model plant A. thaliana. In this species, mucilage is secreted into a region of the apoplast, which is adjacent to the radial and outer tangential cell walls in the mucilage seed coat cells. In a mature cell, a donut-shaped mucilage pocket surrounds the central secondary wall, called the columella [26]. Apart from A. thaliana [5,27,28], there have only been a few detailed studies on the direct immunocytochemistry of mucilage cells. Most researchers have only performed a biochemical analysis of mucilage.
Huang et al. [29] analyzed mucilage cells in the seed coat of Lepidium perfoliatum (Brassicaceae). In this species, the mucilage contains a significant amount of acidic polysaccharides as well as xyloglucans (XG), e.g., hemicellulose and β-1,3-d-glucan. Using the anti-homogalacturonan (HG) antibodies JIM5 and JIM7, it was shown that homogalacturonan with different degrees of methyl esterification occurs in the mucilage of this species. Kreitschitz and Gorb [30] performed immunolocalization of xylan and xyloglucan in the Neopallasia pectinata (Asteraceae) mucilage envelope as well as immunolocalization of arabinoxylan and xyloglucan in the Linum usitatissimum (Linaceae) mucilage envelope. Recently, Phan et al. [8] showed changes in the occurrence of pectin-associated monosaccharides during the expansion of seed mucilage in Plantago ovata seeds. These authors showed that there was a different developmental pattern in Plantago compared to the pattern in mucilage cells of A. thaliana.
Mastroberti and Mariath [21] showed a gradient of distribution in relation to pectic de-esterification as well as the increase of galactan and arabinan epitope distribution during the development of mucilage cells in Araucaria angustifolia (Araucariaceae (gymnosperm)).
The ovule mucilage cells (periendothelial tissue) of Pilosella and Hieracium belong to the type where mucilage is accumulated between the plasmalemma and the cell wall [31]. This type of mucilage accumulation also occurs in other Asteraceae genera that have the Taraxacum ovule type (Figure 1A,B) [32,33]. During the maturation of Pilosella, Hieracium, and Taraxacum, periendothelial tissue cells undergo an intense period of secretory activity that leads to dramatic cytological changes. According to Koltunow et al. [34], there is an intensive liquefaction of these cells in Hieracium. Płachno et al. [31,35] observed that the mucilage first pushes the protoplast to the center of the cell. Cytoplasmic bridges are then formed and connect the protoplast to the plasmodesmata through the mucilage layers. Then, the cell walls are broken down, and lysigenous cavities filled with mucilage are formed. In a previous paper about the immunocytochemistry of Asteraceae ovules [36], arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs), hemicelluloses, and pectic epitopes in the transmitting tissue of Taraxacum ovules were analyzed; however, the mucilage cells were not analyzed.
The genera Hieracium and Pilosella have recently been used as models for understanding the mechanisms of apomixis [37,38,39,40]. Recently, Juranić et al. [41] used 17 monoclonal antibodies that were directed against cell wall carbohydrate epitopes to determine the presence of glycan motifs in the ovule cells of Pilosella piloselloides (syn. Hieracium piloselloides) and Hieracium praealtum. However, the authors mainly focused on the young ovule stages. Using the JIM13 antibody, they showed that arabinogalactans are early markers of both the sexual and apomictic cell lineages in Hieracium spp. Additionally, these arabinogalactans occurred in the cell walls of both sexual and aposporous female gametophytes during cellularization and maturation as well as in the micropylar cells of the ovule.
To date, there have been no detailed studies on the presence of arabinogalactans and pectins in nonepidermal mucilage cells of Asteraceae ovules. Knowledge of the presence of signal molecules (pectic epitopes, arabinogalactan proteins, or extensins) in ovules of these plants can help better understand the developmental processes during seed growth. Both the Pilosella and Taraxacum genera have been recently used as models for understanding the mechanisms of apomixis in angiosperms. Thus, the main aim of this study was to determine which arabinogalactan proteins, extensins, and pectic epitopes occur in the mucilage cells of ovules/young seeds of the apomictic species Pilosella officinarum and Taraxacum officinale. The other reason for undertaking this research was because mucilage cells in these species had previously been tested for ultrastructure and changes during mucilage production. These cells can be treated as an attractive model for research into changes in intracellular transport and mucilage structure and formation.
Recently, Leszczuk et al. [42] showed an association between arabinogalactan proteins and calcium oxalate crystals in the ovaries of Fragaria × ananassa. Calcium oxalate crystals are a common characteristic of ovular cells of Asteraceae [43,44,45]. Therefore, an additional aim was to determine whether the association between arabinogalactan proteins and calcium oxalate crystals also occurs in Asteraceae.

2. Results

2.1. Pectins

In Taraxacum and Pilosella, weakly methyl-esterified pectins, homogalacturonans labeled with JIM5, occurred in the cell walls of different ovule tissue cells (Figure 1C,E). In the mucilage cells of Taraxacum, these pectins occurred in the cell walls and protoplasts, but there was less intense labeling in the mucilage (Figure 1C,D). However, in Pilosella, these pectins especially occurred in mucilage (Figure 1E). The pectins labeled with JIM5 were also associated with calcium oxalate crystals in the parenchyma ovule cells of both taxa (Figure 1C,E).
In Taraxacum, the highly esterified pectins, homogalacturonans labeled with JIM7, occurred in the cell walls of various ovule cell types (Figure 2A,B). Additionally, in Pilosella, intense labeling of the cell walls of endothelium cells occurred (Figure 2C). In the mucilage cells of Taraxacum, these pectins were recorded in the cell walls (intense signal) and in mucilage (much less intense signal) (Figure 2B). These pectins were associated with calcium oxalate crystals (Figure 3B). In Pilosella these pectins mainly occurred in the mucilage in the mucilage cells (Figure 2D). Moreover, in Pilosella, in the lysigenous cavities filled with mucilage, the pectins labeled with JIM7 occurred as granules (Figure 2D). The pectins labeled with JIM7 were also associated with calcium oxalate crystals in the parenchyma ovule cells of both taxa (Figure 2B,E).

2.2. Arabinogalactan Proteins

In Taraxacum, AGPs (labeled with JIM8) were detected in the mucilage cells (Figure 3A). AGPs mainly occurred in the mucilage cells at the micropylar pole (Figure 3B) and chalazal pole (Figure 3C). In Taraxacum, AGPs occurred in both cell walls and mucilage, which was in contrast to Pilosella, where an intense accumulation of AGPs was detected in the embryo sac and also in the protoplasts of the endothelium cells. In some ovules of Pilosella, they also occurred in the protoplasts of various ovular cells, including mucilage cells (Figure 3E); however, AGPs labeled with JIM8 were absent in the mucilage (Figure 3D,E). In the mucilage of Taraxacum, the AGP signal was heterogeneous. It had several distinct layers (Figure 3B) that stained differently when labeled with JIM8 (Figure 2B,C). Lack of detection of AGPs near calcium oxalate crystals was observed for both species.
In Taraxacum, AGPs labeled with JIM13 were present (Figure 4A,C), which was similar to AGPs labeled with JIM8 in this species. Moreover, AGPs were stained differently in the layers of the mucilage (Figure 4B,C). In Pilosella, AGPs labeled with JIM13 were detected in cell walls in the parenchyma ovule cells and some mucilage cells, primarily those near the embryo sac at the micropylar pole (Figure 4D,E). Although there were no AGPs in chalazal mucilage cells, they were associated with calcium oxalate crystals in the parenchyma ovule cells (Figure 4F).
For both examined species, AGPs labeled with JIM14 occurred in the mucilage of the mucilage cells (Figure 5A,D). These AGPs were also associated with calcium oxalate crystals in the parenchyma ovule cells of Taraxacum (Figure 5B) and likewise for Pilosella (Figure 5E).
AGPs labeled with JIM15 were only observed in some protoplasts of some mucilage cells of the Taraxacum ovules; however, they were absent in the mucilage (Figure 6A). In Pilosella, AGPs labeled with JIM15 occurred in the embryo sac, endothelium cells, and transmitting tissue, but they were absent in the mucilage cells (Figure 6B). These AGPs were associated with calcium oxalate crystals in the parenchyma ovule cells (Figure 6C).
In Taraxacum and Pilosella, AGPs labeled with LM2 occurred in the mucilage of the mucilage cells (Figure 7A–C,E). Moreover for Taraxacum, AGPs were stained differently in layers of the mucilage (Figure 7A–C), while for Pilosella, these AGPs only occurred in a few mucilage cells where they formed a layer between the mucilage and the protoplast (Figure 7E). For both species, these AGPs were also associated with calcium oxalate crystals in the parenchyma ovule/seed cells (Figure 7B,D).
In Taraxacum and Pilosella, AGPs labeled with MAC207 occurred in the mucilage cells (Figure 8A,C,D), especially in the cytoplasm (Figure 8A). However, in some mucilage cells of Pilosella, there was an especially intense labeling between the mucilage and the protoplasts (Figure 8D). For both species, these AGPs were also associated with calcium oxalate crystals in the parenchyma ovule cells (Figure 8B,C).

2.3. Extensins

In Taraxacum, the extensins labeled with JIM11 occurred in the transmitting tissue and in a group of mucilage cells at the micropyle pole in the border between the endosperm and the integument (Figure 9A). Extensins were also recorded in a few mucilage cells in the cytoplasm of these cells (Figure 9B). Meanwhile, in Pilosella, extensins labeled with JIM11 occurred only in the transmitting tissue (Figure 9C). These extensins in Pilosella were also associated with calcium oxalate crystals (Figure 9D). However, they were not recorded in the mucilage cells (Figure 9D).
In Taraxacum and Pilosella, extensins labeled with JIM20 occurred in the ovule transmitting tissue (Figure 10A) and in the pistil transmitting tissue (Figure 10A,B). Extensins labeled with JIM20 were only associated with calcium oxalate crystals in Pilosella (Figure 10C). They were not recorded in the mucilage cells (Figure 10A,B) for both species.

3. Discussion

3.1. Pectins

The pectinaceous nature of Taraxacum and Pilosella mucilage is evident from staining with periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) [31,46], ruthenium red [31], and metachromatic dye toluidine blue O (Figure 2B). In both Taraxacum and Pilosella, esterified pectins were recorded in the mucilage cells, e.g., in the cell walls. However, there were differences. The Pilosella mucilage contained both weakly and highly methyl-esterified pectins (intensive labeling with JIM5 and JIM7, respectively), which was in contrast to the mucilage of Taraxacum. However, in Taraxacum, protoplasts of mucilage cells had weakly methyl-esterified pectins that occurred as granules (intensive labeling). Moreover, the seed mucilage of A. thaliana had a pectinaceous nature, with both weakly and highly methyl-esterified pectins recoded [5,27]. Macquet et al. [27] showed that pectins labeled with JIM5 were not evenly distributed, the labeling was punctate, and there were regions where the labeling was denser. Pectins labeled with JIM7 occurred at the outer edge of the inner mucilage layer. Thus, in the A. thaliana mucilage (in the inner mucilage layer), the methyl-esterified pectins formed two distinct populations [27]. According to Huang et al. [29], one major component of the seed coat mucilage in Lepidium perfoliatum could be the highly methyl-esterified pectins. These authors observed only a weak labeling with JIM5 in the mucilage. The mucilage from the immature and mature leaves of Araucaria angustifolia was very low in the weakly methyl-esterified pectins, and it was low in the highly methyl-esterified pectins, which was in contrast to the cell walls of mucilage cells [21].
Methyl-esterified pectins are important as signal molecules, but the degree of their esterification affects the properties of both the cell walls and the mucilage. This may result in a variation in occurrence of different populations of methyl-esterified pectin in mucilage cells, not only in Taraxacum and Pilosella but also in other plants.

3.2. AGPs

Most authors have regarded AGPs as embryo sac markers in flowering plants that have a sexual mode of reproduction. AGPs have been found in the cell wall of the central cell and in cells of the egg apparatus [47,48,49,50,51,52]. JIM8 and JIM13 showed an especially strong and specific labeling in the embryo sac wall and egg apparatus as well as in the pathway of pollen tube growth [47,48,51]. Additionally, AGPs play an important role in sexual reproduction in conifers [53]. The situation is more complicated in apomictic plants. For example, in Chondrilla juncea (an obligate apomictic with the diplosporous embryo sac of Taraxacum type), AGPs labeled with JIM8 were not detectable at any of the developmental stages of the ovules [54]. Moreover, these authors observed the absence of AGPs labeled with JIM13 inside the micropylar canal and mature embryo sac of this species. In contrast to Chondrilla, Gawecki et al. [36] observed the occurrence of AGPs in the cytoplasm of synergids and in cytoplasm and the cell walls of the central cell in apomictic Taraxacum. These authors also observed AGPs in the pathway of pollen tube growth in Taraxacum ovules. However, similar to the results obtained with Chondrilla [54], AGPs labeled with JIM8 were not detected in the ovules of Taraxacum [36]. However, in this study, we observed these AGPs in Taraxacum ovules. Recently, Rojek et al. [55] found AGPs labeled with JIM13 in the initial cell, which is destined to form the functional megaspore in apomictic Boechera stricta. We observed AGPs labeled with JIM13, JIM8, and JIM15 in the cell walls of embryo sacs in apomictic Pilosella piloselloides. Thus, our results are in agreement with Juranić et al. [41], who also observed AGPs labeled with JIM13 in the cell walls of embryo sacs in apomictic Pilosella. Thus, AGPs occur in the female gametophytes in both amphimictic and apomictic taxa. However, it should be noted that according to some authors, Pilosella piloselloides hexaploids are either sexual or apomictic [52,56]. Therefore, the Pilosella piloselloides complex requires further cytoembryological investigations.
Typically, AGPs are anchored to the extracellular side of the plasma membrane, thereby forming a narrow AGP-rich region between the cell membrane and the cell wall proper [57,58,59,60]. However, in mucilage cells of both Taraxacum and Pilosella, the periplasmic space was broad and increased during maturation of these cells. While we found that the Taraxacum mucilage was reached in various AGPs (labeled with JIM8, JIM13, JIM14, and LM2), there were clear similarities and differences between AGPs in them. The labeling with JIM8 and JIM13 was very similar, namely the mucilage cell group at the micropylar pole and some mucilage cells at the chalazal pole. Only some of the mucilage cells were labeled. In contrast to this, AGPs labeled with JIM14 and LM2 were present in all of the mucilage cells. Gawecki et al. [36] also observed the accumulation of AGPs labeled with JIM13 in mucilage cells near the egg apparatus in Taraxacum. This accumulation might be connected with pollination and the growth of pollen tubes. However, we observed this accumulation at the stage when the embryo was formed. Thus, in apomictic Taraxacum, this accumulation of AGPs is the remains of sexual reproduction [32,61] or has a different function.
According to Leszczuk et al. [42], AGPs are involved in establishment of the cell wall, namely the plasma membrane continuum. During maturation in Pilosella and Taraxacum, mucilage cells undergo an intense period of secretory activity, which leads to dramatic cytological changes in the relationship between the cell wall and the plasma membrane [31,35].
The novelty shown here points toward a layered occurrence of AGPs in the mucilage. Earlier, Płachno et al. [35] showed the presence of stretches in the mucilage of Taraxacum mucilage cells using aqueous methylene blue with azure II. The presence of well visible stretches in the mucilage has also been recorded in other plants [2,62,63]. It would be quite interesting to determine whether the occurrence of these stretches is connected with the presence of AGPs.
AGPs also occurred in the Pilosella mucilage labeled with MAC207 and JIM14. These AGPs were rich in the mucilage layer near the plasmalemma.
Mastroberti and Mariath [21] found AGPs labeled with JIM13 in the mucilage in mucilage cells of Araucaria angustifolia. They showed that there was an increase in AGPs in the mucilage during the secretion stage of cells but a dramatic decrease in mature cells. These authors connected the changes in the occurrence of AGPs with the programmed cell death (PCD) process in these mucilage cells. Thus, we also suggest that the variation in the occurrence of AGPs in Taraxacum mucilage may be connected to the cytological events in these cells that lead to PCD.
An accumulation of AGPs in mucilage cells of the studied species indicates the increased activity of these cells and suggests that they may play an important role in communication between maternal tissues and the embryo.

3.3. Extensins

According to Tan et al. [64], the wall ion-regulated intermolecular interactions between AGPs and/or extensins may be involved in maintaining the integrity of the wall plasma membrane during wall loosening processes, e.g., during wall elongation or expansion. This may be a good explanation for the presence of extensins in the ovular transmitting tissue of Asteraceae. The cells of this tissue have a well-developed extracellular matrix that forms a track for pollen tube growth [32]. We observed extensins in the micropylar group of mucilage cells, and there was also an accumulation of AGPs in these cells. However, extensins can perform various roles in plants. They are involved in the plant response to stress factors [65,66,67,68], plant regeneration in in vitro conditions [69], and embryogenesis [70].
This is the first study showing the occurrence of extensins in ovules of apomictic plants. Coexistence of AGPs and extensins does not appear to be incidental and requires further investigation.

3.4. Calcium Oxalate Crystals

Leszczuk et al. [42] showed the presence of AGPs labeled with JIM13 and JIM15 in close proximity to calcium oxalate (CaOx) crystals in the ovary wall of Fragaria × ananassa (Rosaceae). These authors were successful in performing an immunogold reaction, which confirmed the presence of AGPs at the edge of the CaOx crystals. Here, we showed the presence of AGPs in close proximity to CaOx in Asteraceae. AGPs labeled with JIM13, LM2, and JIM14 occurred in close proximity to calcium oxalate crystals in the ovule cells of Taraxacum, while in Pilosella, there was a similar connection with AGPs labeled with JIM13, MC207, and LM2. AGPs bind and release cell-surface apoplastic calcium (AGP-Ca2+ capacitor calcium) [59,60,71,72]. This would explain the presence of AGPs at the edge of the CaOx crystals. Leszczuk et al. [42] proposed an attractive hypothesis: “Crystals associated with AGPs may serve dual functions: deposition of calcium ions important for the developing embryo and seed coat formation as well as involvement in the earliest events during sexual plant reproduction—the interaction between pollen tubes and female gametophyte getting ready for fertilization”. Our results are in agreement with the results of Leszczuk et al. [42]. However, we also observed an association between AGPs and CaOx in the ovules of apomicts, which do not require fertilization (Taraxacum officinale). Thus, in the studied apomicts, the deposition of calcium ions is probably more important for the developing embryo sac and later the embryo, endosperm, and seed coat formation than for pollen tube attraction and growth (Table 1).
The novelty observed in this work was the occurrence of weakly and highly esterified pectins and extensins in close proximity to CaOx in both Taraxacum and Pilosella cells (Table 1).

4. Materials and Methods

Pilosella officinarum Vaill. = Hieracium pilosella L. (hexaploid clone x = 9, [73]) plants were collected from Mt. Treskovac, Banat, Romania, and later cultivated in the garden of Bartosz Jan Płachno. Studies were conducted on the flowers both before and during anthesis. Plants that were harvested before anthesis contained a mature embryo sac, whereas plants that were harvested during anthesis already contained an embryo and endosperm, as was previously observed [31]. Taraxacum officinale agg. plants were collected in Gdańsk and Kraków-Podgórze, Poland. Studies were conducted on the flowers before and during anthesis.

Sample Preparation

Information on the antibodies used in the study are presented in Table 2.
The detailed procedure for observing the histological sections and performing immunochemical analysis are given in Płachno et al. [68]. The plant material was fixed overnight at 4 °C in 8% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (PFA, Sigma-Aldrich, Sigma-Aldrich Sp. z o.o. Poznan, Poland) with 0.25% (v/v) glutaraldehyde (GA, Sigma-Aldrich, Sigma-Aldrich Sp. z o.o. Poznan, Poland) in a piperazine-N,N′-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid (PIPES, Sigma-Aldrich, Sigma-Aldrich Sp. z o.o. Poznan, Poland) buffer. It was then embedded in LR White resin (Polysciences Europe GmbH, Hirschberg an der Bergstrasse, Germany) and sectioned into 1 µm sections, which were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich, Sigma-Aldrich Sp. z o.o. Poznan, Poland) in a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer and incubated with the primary antibodies against pectins (JIM5 and JM7), arabinogalactans (JIM8, JIM13, JIM14, JIM15, LM2, and MAC207), and extensins (JIM11 and JIM20) overnight at 4 °C. All of the primary antibodies were obtained from Plant Probes, UK, and the secondary antibody goat anti-rat conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) was from Abcam (Abcam plc, registered in England and Wales with Company Number 03509322, Discovery Drive, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0AX, UK). The chromatin in the nuclei was stained with 7 µg/mL 4′,6-diamidine-2′-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI, Sigma-Aldrich, Sigma-Aldrich Sp. z o.o. Poznan, Poland), and the samples were then cover-slipped using a Mowiol medium. They were viewed with a Leica DM6000 B (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar Germany) microscope using a FITC and DAPI filter. Some of the photos were acquired as Z stacks and deconvolved using two iterations of a 3D nonblind algorithm (Autoquant™) in order to maximize the spatial resolution, and the images are the maximum projections. At least two different replications were performed for each species and developmental stage of the analyzed flowers, and about 5–10 sections were analyzed from each organ for each antibody that was used. Negative controls were performed by omitting the primary antibody step, which resulted in no fluorescence signal in any of the control frames for any of the stained slides (Supplementary Materials, Figure S1).

5. Conclusions

Mucilage ovular cells of Taraxacum and Pilosella are a specific cell type that have a huge periplasmic space. This region between the cell membrane and the cell wall proper was found to be rich in AGPs. However, there were differences in the occurrence of the types of AGPs between the examined species. A layered occurrence of AGPs was observed in the mucilage. This is the first time (at least to the authors’ knowledge) that this specific arrangement of AGPs in mucilage has been presented. An accumulation of AGPs in mucilage cells of the studied species may indicate that they play an important role in communication between maternal tissues and the embryo.
In Pilosella officinarum, there was an accumulation of pectins, including both weakly and highly esterified pectins in the mucilage, which was in contrast to the mucilage of Taraxacum officinale, which was low in these pectins. In both species, extensins occurred in the transmitting tissue that form the track for pollen tube growth. This is the first time that the presence of extensins in the ovules of apomicts has been shown.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/24/9642/s1. Figure S1. Control reactions of immunolabeling of mucilage and cell wall components.

Author Contributions

B.J.P. and M.K. designed the project; B.J.P., M.K., and P.Ś. performed the analyses and data visualization; B.J.P. prepared the original manuscript draft; B.J.P., M.K., and P.S. cultivated and/or collected the plants; B.J.P., M.K., and P.Ś. edited the manuscript; J.K. obtained the funding. All of the authors were involved in developing the experimental concepts as well as critically revising the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Publication costs were funded by the Medical University of Lublin. This research was also partially financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland within the statutory activities of the Department of Plant Cytology and Embryology, Institute of Botany, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University in Kraków (N18/DBS/000002), the Department of Plant Cytology and Embryology, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk (531-D031-D243-20), and Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice.

Acknowledgments

Sincere thanks are due to Marcin T. Górnisiewicz (Knoxville, Tennessee) for English correction.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adlassnig, W.; Lendl, T.; Peroutka, M.; Lang, I. Deadly biological adhesive systems: Glue adhesive traps of carnivorous plants. In Biological Adhesive Systems; Von Byern, J., Grunwald, I., Eds.; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  2. Król, E.; Płachno, B.J.; Adamec, L.; Stolarz, M.; Dziubińska, M.; Trębacz, K. Quite a few reasons for calling carnivores “the most wonderful plants in the world”. Ann. Bot. 2012, 109, 47–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Płachno, B.J.; Muravnik, L.E. Functional anatomy of carnivorous traps. In Carnivorous Plants: Physiology, Ecology and Evolution; Elisson, A.M., Adamec, L., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2018; pp. 167–179. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer, U.; Jetter, R.; Poppinga, S. Non-motile traps. In Carnivorous Plants: Physiology, Ecology and Evolution; Ellison, A.M., Adamec, L., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2018; Volume 1, pp. 94–206. [Google Scholar]
  5. Willats, W.G.T.; McCartney, L.; Knox, J.P. In-situ analysis of pectic polysaccharides in seed mucilage and at the root surface of Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 2001, 213, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hyde, B.B. Mucilage-producing cells in the seed coat of Plantago ovata: Developmental fine structure. Am. J. Bot. 1970, 57, 1197–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Phan, J.L.; Tucker, M.R.; Khor, S.F.; Shirley, N.; Lahnstein, J.; Beahan, C.; Bacic, A.; Burton, R.A. Differences in glycosyltransferase family 61 accompany variation in seed coat mucilage composition in Plantago spp. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 6481–6495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Phan, J.L.; Cowley, J.M.; Neumann, K.A.; Herliana, L.; O’Donovan, L.A.; Burton, R.A. The novel features of Plantago ovata seed mucilage accumulation, storage and release. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Western, T.L.; Skinner, D.J.; Haughn, G.W. Differentiation of mucilage secretory cells of the Arabidopsis seed coat. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122, 345–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Voiniciuc, C.; Günl, M.; Schmidt, M.H.-W.; Usadel, B. Highly branched xylan made by IRREGULAR XYLEM14 and MUCILAGE-RELATED21 links mucilage to Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 2481–2495. [Google Scholar]
  11. Voiniciuc, C.; Schmidt, M.H.-W.; Berger, A.; Yang, B.; Ebert, B.; Scheller, H.V.; North, H.M.; Usadel, B.; Günl, M. MUCILAGE-RELATED10 Produces galactoglucomannan that maintains pectin and cellulose architecture in Arabidopsis seed mucilage. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 403–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Voiniciuc, C.; Yang, B.; Schmidt, M.; Günl, M.; Usadel, B. Starting to Gel: How Arabidopsis seed coat epidermal cells produce specialized secondary cell walls. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 3452–3473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Souza, M.J.; Mercadante-Simões, M.O.; Ribeiro, L.M. Secondary-cell-wall release: A particular pattern of secretion in the mucilaginous seed coat of Magonia pubescens. Am. J. Bot. 2020, 107, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Kreitschitz, A.; Vallès, J. Achene morphology and slime structure in some taxa of Artemisia L. and Neopallasia L. (Asteraceae). Flora 2007, 202, 570–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kreitschitz, A. Mucilage formation in selected taxa of the genus Artemisia L. (Asteraceae, Anthemideae). Seed Sci. Res. 2012, 22, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. De-Paula, O.C.; Marzinek, J.; Oliveira, D.M.; Paiva, É.A. Roles of mucilage in Emilia fosbergii, a myxocarpic Asteraceae: Efficient seed imbibition and diaspore adhesion. Am. J. Bot. 2015, 102, 1413–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Trachtenberg, S.; Fahn, A. The mucilage cells of Opuntia ficus-indica (L) Mill—Development, ultrastructure and mucilage secretion. Bot. Gaz. 1981, 142, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bakker, M.E.; Gerritsen, A.F.; Van der Schaaf, P.J. Development of oil and mucilage cells in Cinnamomum burmanni: An ultrastructural study. Acta Bot. Neerl. 1991, 40, 339–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bakker, M.E.; Gerritsen, A.F. The development of mucilage cells in Hibiscus schizopetalus. Acta Bot. Neerl. 1992, 41, 31–42. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mastroberti, A.A.; Mariath, J.E.A. Compartmented cells in the mesophyll of Araucaria angustifolia (Araucariaceae). Aust. J. Bot. 2003, 51, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mastroberti, A.A.; Mariath, J.E.A. Development of the mucilage cells of Araucaria angustifolia (Araucariaceae). Protoplasma 2008, 232, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fahn, A. Secretory tissue in vascular plants. Tansley Review 114. New Phytol. 1988, 108, 229–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Frey-Wyssling, A. The Plant Cell Wall. In Encyclopedia of Plant Anatomy, 3rd ed.; Gebrüder Borntraeger: Berlin, Germany, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bredenkamp, C.L.; Van Wyk, A.E. The epidermis in Passerina (Thymelaeaceae): Structure, function and taxonomic significance. Bothalia 2000, 30, 69–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kreitschitz, A. Biological properties of fruit and seed slime envelope—How to live, fly and not die. In Functional Surfaces in Biology; Gorb, N.S., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; Volumes 1–2, pp. 11–30. [Google Scholar]
  26. Western, T.L. The sticky tale of seed coat mucilages: Production, genetics and role in seed germination and dispersal. Seed Sci. Res. 2012, 22, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Macquet, A.; Ralet, M.-C.; Kronenberger, J.; Marion-Poll, A.; North, H.M. In situ, chemical and macromolecular study of the composition of Arabidopsis thaliana seed coat mucilage. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007, 48, 984–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Young, R.E.; McFarlane, H.E.; Hahn, M.G.; Western, T.L.; Haughn, G.W.; Samuels, A.L. Analysis of the Golgi apparatus in Arabidopsis seed coat cells during polarized secretion of pectin-rich mucilage. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 1623–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Huang, D.; Wang, C.; Yuan, J.; Cao, J.; Lan, H. Differentiation of the seed coat and composition of the mucilage of Lepidium perfoliatum L.: A desert annual with typical myxospermy. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2015, 7, 75–87. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kreitschitz, A.; Gorb, S.N. How does the cell wall ‘stick’ in the mucilage? A detailed microstructural analysis of the seed coat mucilaginous cell wall. Flora 2017, 29, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Płachno, B.J.; Świątek, P.; Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno, M.; Szeląg, Z.; Stolarczyk, P. Integument cell gelatinization—The fate of the integumentary cells in Hieracium and Pilosella (Asteraceae). Protoplasma 2017, 254, 2287–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Płachno, B.J.; Świątek, P.; Kozierdzka-Kiszkurno, M.; Majeský, L.; Marciniuk, J.; Stolarczyk, P. Are obligatory apomicts invested in the pollen tube transmitting tissue? Comparison of the micropyle ultrastructure between sexual and apomictic dandelions (Asteraceae, Lactuceae). Protoplasma 2015, 252, 1325–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Kolczyk, J.; Stolarczyk, P.; Płachno, B.J. Comparative anatomy of ovules in Galinsoga, Solidago and Ratibida (Asteraceae). Acta Biol. Crac. Ser. Bot. 2014, 56, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Koltunow, A.M.; Johnson, S.D.; Bicknell, R.A. Sexual and apomictic development in Hieracium. Sex. Plant Reprod. 1998, 11, 213–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Płachno, B.J.; Kurczyńska, E.; Świątek, P. Integument cell differentiation in dandelions (Taraxacum, Asteraceae, Lactuceae) with special attention paid to plasmodesmata. Protoplasma 2016, 253, 1365–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Gawecki, R.; Sala, K.; Kurczyńska, E.U.; Świątek, P.; Płachno, B.J. Immunodetection of some pectic, arabinogalactan proteins and hemicellulose epitopes in the micropylar transmitting tissue of apomictic dandelions (Taraxacum, Asteraceae, Lactuceae). Protoplasma 2017, 254, 657–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Koltunow, A.M.G.; Johnson, S.D.; Bicknell, R.A. Apomixis is not developmentally conserved in related, genetically characterized Hieracium plants of varying ploidy. Sex. Plant Reprod. 2000, 12, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Koltunow, A.M.G.; Johnson, S.D.; Okada, T. Apomixis in hawkweed: Mendel’s experimental nemesis. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 1699–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Koltunow, A.M.G.; Johnson, S.D.; Rodrigues, J.C.M.; Okada, T.; Hu, Y.; Tsuchiya, T.; Wilson, S.; Fletcher, P.; Ito, K.; Suzuki, G.; et al. Sexual reproduction is the default mode in apomictic Hieracium subgenus Pilosella, in which two dominant loci function to enable apomixis. Plant J. 2011, 66, 890–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Okada, T.; Hu, Y.; Tucker, M.R.; Taylor, J.M.; Johnson, S.D.; Spriggs, A.; Tsuchiya, T.; Oelkers, K.; Rodrigues, J.C.M.; Koltunow, A.M.G. Enlarging cells initiating apomixis in Hieracium praealtum transition to an embryo sac program prior to entering mitosis. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 216–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Juranić, M.; Tucker, M.R.; Schultz, C.J.; Shirley, N.J.; Taylor, J.M.; Spriggs, A.; Johnson, S.D.; Bulone, V.; Koltunow, A.M.G. Asexual female gametogenesis involves contact with a sexually-fated megaspore in apomictic Hieracium. Plant Physiol. 2018, 177, 1027–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Leszczuk, A.; Wydrych, J.; Szczuka, E. The occurrence of calcium oxalate crystals and distribution of arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) in ovary cells during Fragaria × ananassa (Duch.) development. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 38, 1028–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Dormer, K.J. The crystals in the ovaries of certain Compositae. Ann. Bot. 1961, 25, 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mukherjee, S.K.; Nordenstam, B. Distribution of calcium oxalate crystals in the cypselar walls in some members of the Compositae and their taxonomic significance. Comps Newsl. 2010, 48, 63–89. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kolczyk, J.; Stolarczyk, P.; Płachno, B.J. Ovule structure of Scotch thistle Onopordum acanthium L. (Cynareae, Asteraceae). Acta Biol. Crac. Ser. Bot. 2016, 58, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Musiał, K.; Płachno, B.J.; Świątek, P.; Marciniuk, J. Anatomy of ovary and ovule in dandelions (Taraxacum, Asteraceae). Protoplasma 2013, 250, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Coimbra, S.; Duarte, C. Arabinogalactan proteins may facilitate the movement of pollen tubes from the stigma to the ovules in Actinidia deliciosa and Amaranthus hypochondriacus. Euphytica 2003, 133, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Coimbra, S.; Almeida, J.; Junqueira, V.; Costa, M.L.; Pereira, L.G. Arabinogalactan proteins as molecular markers in Arabidopsis thaliana sexual reproduction. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 4027–4035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Mendes, S.P.; Mastroberti, A.A.; Mariath, J.E.; Vieira, R.C.; De Toni, K.L. Ovule and female gametophyte development in the Bromeliaceae: An embryological study of Pitcairnia encholirioides. Botany 2014, 92, 883–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Leszczuk, A.; Szczuka, E. Arabinogalactan proteins: Immunolocalization in the developing ovary of a facultative apomict Fragaria × ananassa (Duch.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 123, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Leszczuk, A.; Chylinska, M.; Zdunek, A. Distribution of arabinogalactan proteins and pectins in the cells of apple (Malus × domestica) fruit during post-harvest storage. Ann. Bot. 2019, 123, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gadella, T.W.J. Variation, hybridization and reproductive biology of Hieracium pilosella L. Proc. Kon. Nederl. Akad. Wet. Biol. Med. 1991, 94, 455–488. [Google Scholar]
  53. Rafińska, K.; Bednarska, E. Localisation pattern of homogalacturonan and arabinogalactan proteins in developing ovules of the gymnosperm plant Larix decidua Mill. Sex. Plant Reprod. 2011, 24, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chudzik, B.; Koscinska-Pajak, M.; Snieżko, R. Immunodetection of arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) in apomictic ovules of Chondrilla juncea L. Acta Biol. Crac. Ser. Bot. 2005, 47, 35. [Google Scholar]
  55. Rojek, J.; Kapusta, M.; Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno, M.; Majcher, D.; Górniak, M.; Sliwinska, E.; Sharbel, T.F.; Bohdanowicz, J. Establishing the cell biology of apomictic reproduction in diploid Boechera stricta (Brassicaceae). Ann. Bot. 2018, 122, 513–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mráz, P.; Šingliarová, B.; Urfus, T.; Krahulec, F. Cytogeography of Pilosella officinarum (Compositae): Altitudinal and Longitudinal Differences in Ploidy Level Distribution in the Czech Republic and Slovakia and the General Pattern in Europe. Ann. Bot. 2008, 101, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Showalter, A.M. Arabinogalactan-proteins: Structure, expression and function. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2001, 58, 1399–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tan, L.; Eberhard, S.; Pattathil, S.; Warder, C.; Glushka, J.; Yuan, C.; Hao, Z.; Zhu, X.; Avci, U.; Miller, J.S.; et al. An Arabidopsis cell wall proteoglycan consists of pectin and arabinoxylan covalently linked to an arabinogalactan protein. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 270–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Lopez-Hernandez, F.; Tryfona, T.; Rizza, A.; Yu, X.; Harris, M.O.; Webb, A.A.; Kotake, T.; Dupree, P. Calcium binding by arabinogalactan polysaccharides is important for normal plant development. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 3346–3369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, T. Peripheral? Not Really! The extracellular arabinogalactan proteins function in calcium signaling. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 3057–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Płachno, B.J.; Musiał, K.; Świątek, P.; Tuleja, M.; Marciniuk, J.; Grabowska-Joachimiak, A. Synergids and filiform apparatus in the sexual and apomictic dandelions from section Palustria (Taraxacum, Asteraceae). Protoplasma 2014, 251, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Wang, Z.-Y.; Gould, G.S.; Patterson, K.J. Structure and development of mucilage-crystal idioblasts in the roots of five Actinidia species. Int. J. Plant Sci. 1994, 155, 342–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Matthews, M.L.; Endress, P.K. Floral structure and systematics in four orders of rosids, including a broad survey of floral mucilage cells. Plant Syst. Evol. 2006, 260, 199–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Tan, L.; Tees, D.; Qian, J.; Kareem, S.; Kieliszewski, M.J. Intermolecular interactions between glycomodules of plant cell wall arabinogalactan-proteins and extensins. Cell Surf. 2018, 1, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sujkowska-Rybkowska, M.; Borucki, W. Accumulation and localization of extensin protein in apoplast of pea root nodule under aluminum stress. Micron 2014, 67, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wu, Y.; Fan, W.; Li, X.; Chen, H.; Takac, T.; Samajova, O.; Fabrice, M.R.; Xie, L.; Ma, J.; Samaj, J.; et al. Expression and distribution of extensins and AGPs in susceptible and resistant banana cultivars in response to wounding and Fusarium oxysporum. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Castilleux, R.; Plancot, B.; Gugi, B.; Attard, A.; Loutelier-Bourhis, C.; Lefranc, B.; Nguema-Ona, E.; Arkoun, M.; Yvin, J.C.; Driouich, A.; et al. Extensin arabinosylation is involved in root response to elicitors and limits oomycete colonization. Ann. Bot. 2020, 125, 751–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Płachno, B.J.; Adamec, L.; Świątek, P.; Kapusta, M.; Miranda, V.F.O. Life in the Current: Anatomy and Morphology of Utricularia neottioides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Betekhtin, A.; Rojek, M.; Milewska-Hendel, A.; Gawecki, R.; Karcz, J.; Kurczyńska, E.; Hasterok, R. Spatial distribution of selected chemical cell wall components in the embryogenic callus of Brachypodium distachyon. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0167426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Betekhtin, A.; Milewska-Hendel, A.; Lusinska, J.; Chajec, L.; Kurczyńska, E.; Hasterok, R. Organ and tissue-specific localisation of selected cell wall epitopes in the zygotic embryo of Brachypodium distachyon. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Lamport, D.T.A.; Várnai, P. Periplasmic arabinogalactan glycoproteins act as a calcium capacitor that regulates plant growth and development. New Phytol. 2013, 197, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lamport, D.T.A.; Várnai, P.; Seal, C.E. Back to the future with the AGP-Ca2+ flux capacitor. Ann. Bot. 2014, 114, 1069–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Ilnicki, T.; Szeląg, Z. Chromosome numbers in Hieracium and Pilosella (Asteraceae) from central and southeastern Europe. Acta Biol. Crac. Ser. Bot. 2011, 53, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Vandenbosch, K.A.; Bradley, D.J.; Knox, J.P.; Perotto, S.; Butcher, G.W.; Brewin, N.J. Common components of the infection thread matrix and the intercellular space identified by immunocytochemical analysis of pea nodules and uninfected roots. EMBO J. 1989, 8, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Knox, J.P.; Linstead, P.J.; King, J.; Cooper, C.; Roberts, K. Pectin esterification is spatially regulated both within cell walls and between developing tissues of root apices. Planta 1990, 81, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Pennell, R.I.; Janniche, L.; Kjellbom, P.; Scofield, G.N.; Peart, J.M.; Roberts, K. Developmental regulation of a plasma membrane arabinogalactan protein epitope in oilseed rape flowers. Plant Cell 1991, 3, 1317–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yates, E.A.; Valdor, J.F.; Haslam, S.M.; Morris, H.R.; Dell, A.; Mackie, W. Characterization of carbohydrate structural features recognized by anti-arabinogalactan-protein monoclonal antibodies. Glycobiology 1996, 6, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Smallwood, M.; Yates, E.A.; Willats, W.G.T.; Matrin, H.; Knox, J.P. Immunochemical comparison of membrane-associated and secreted arabinogalactan-proteins in rice and carrot. Planta 1996, 198, 452–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pennell, R.I.; Knox, P.J.; Scofield, G.N.; Selvendran, R.R.; Roberts, K.A. family of abundant plasma membrane-associated glycoproteins related to the arabinogalactan proteins is unique to flowering plants. J. Cell Biol. 1989, 108, 1967–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Smallwood, M.; Beven, A.; Donovan, N.; Neill, S.J.; Peart, J.; Roberts, K.; Knox, J.P. Localization of cell wall proteins in relation to the developmental anatomy of the carrot root apex. Plant J. 1994, 5, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Knox, P.J.; Peart, J.; Neill, S.J. Identification of novel cell surface epitopes using a leaf epidermal-strip assay system. Planta 1995, 196, 266–270. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 21 09642 g001 550
Figure 1. Histology and pectin (JIM5) detection. (A) Section through the young seed of Taraxacum officinale; note the presence of embryo (em) and mucilage cells (M). (B) Mucilage cells (M) stained with metachromatic dye toluidine blue O in an ovule of T. officinale. (C) Pectin (JIM5) detection in mucilage cells of integument periendothelial tissue in an ovule of T. officinale. (D) Pectin (JIM5) detection in mucilage cells (M); note the intense signal in the cytoplasm of mucilage cells (c) and in the cell wall (arrowhead) in an ovule of T. officinale. (E) Pectin (JIM5) detection in the ovule of Pilosella officinarum; mucilage cells of integument periendothelial tissue (M).
Figure 1. Histology and pectin (JIM5) detection. (A) Section through the young seed of Taraxacum officinale; note the presence of embryo (em) and mucilage cells (M). (B) Mucilage cells (M) stained with metachromatic dye toluidine blue O in an ovule of T. officinale. (C) Pectin (JIM5) detection in mucilage cells of integument periendothelial tissue in an ovule of T. officinale. (D) Pectin (JIM5) detection in mucilage cells (M); note the intense signal in the cytoplasm of mucilage cells (c) and in the cell wall (arrowhead) in an ovule of T. officinale. (E) Pectin (JIM5) detection in the ovule of Pilosella officinarum; mucilage cells of integument periendothelial tissue (M).
Ijms 21 09642 g001
Ijms 21 09642 g002 550
Figure 2. Pectin (JIM7) detection. (A) Distribution of the JIM7 antibody in the young seed of Taraxacum officinale; embryo (em) and mucilage cells of integument periendothelial tissue (M). (B) Pectin (JIM5) detection in mucilage cells (M) and parenchyma cells (P) in T. officinale; note the association between pectin and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows). (C) Pectin detection in ovule of Pilosella officinarum; embryo sac (es), mucilage (M), and endothelium (en). (D) Pectin detection in mucilage cells of P. officinarum. (E) Pectin association with calcium oxalate crystals (arrows) in ovule parenchyma cells of P. officinarum.
Figure 2. Pectin (JIM7) detection. (A) Distribution of the JIM7 antibody in the young seed of Taraxacum officinale; embryo (em) and mucilage cells of integument periendothelial tissue (M). (B) Pectin (JIM5) detection in mucilage cells (M) and parenchyma cells (P) in T. officinale; note the association between pectin and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows). (C) Pectin detection in ovule of Pilosella officinarum; embryo sac (es), mucilage (M), and endothelium (en). (D) Pectin detection in mucilage cells of P. officinarum. (E) Pectin association with calcium oxalate crystals (arrows) in ovule parenchyma cells of P. officinarum.
Ijms 21 09642 g002
Ijms 21 09642 g003 550
Figure 3. Arabinogalactan proteins (labeled with JIM8) detection. (A) Section through the young seed of Taraxacum officinale; note the presence of embryo (em). (B) Higher magnification of micropylar pole of T. officinale seed; note that arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) occurred in the mucilage in lysigenous cavities (M). (C) Section through the chalazal part of young seed of T. officinale with mucilage cells (M). (D) Section through the ovule of Pilosella officinarum; note the presence of embryo sac (es). (E) Detection of AGPs in protoplasts of various ovular cells of P. officinarum; mucilage cells (M).
Figure 3. Arabinogalactan proteins (labeled with JIM8) detection. (A) Section through the young seed of Taraxacum officinale; note the presence of embryo (em). (B) Higher magnification of micropylar pole of T. officinale seed; note that arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) occurred in the mucilage in lysigenous cavities (M). (C) Section through the chalazal part of young seed of T. officinale with mucilage cells (M). (D) Section through the ovule of Pilosella officinarum; note the presence of embryo sac (es). (E) Detection of AGPs in protoplasts of various ovular cells of P. officinarum; mucilage cells (M).
Ijms 21 09642 g003
Ijms 21 09642 g004 550
Figure 4. Arabinogalactan protein (labeled with JIM13) detection. (A) Sections through the young seed of Taraxacum officinale; note the presence of embryo (em). (B,C) AGP detection in mucilage cells in the young seed of T. officinale; note several distinct layers in the mucilage. (D,E) Occurrence of AGPs in embryo sac (es), endothelium, and in group of mucilage cells at micropylar pole (arrows) in Pilosella officinarum ovules. (F) Association between AGPs and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows) in ovule parenchyma cells of P. officinarum.
Figure 4. Arabinogalactan protein (labeled with JIM13) detection. (A) Sections through the young seed of Taraxacum officinale; note the presence of embryo (em). (B,C) AGP detection in mucilage cells in the young seed of T. officinale; note several distinct layers in the mucilage. (D,E) Occurrence of AGPs in embryo sac (es), endothelium, and in group of mucilage cells at micropylar pole (arrows) in Pilosella officinarum ovules. (F) Association between AGPs and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows) in ovule parenchyma cells of P. officinarum.
Ijms 21 09642 g004
Ijms 21 09642 g005 550
Figure 5. Arabinogalactan protein (labeled with JIM14) detection. (A) Section through the young seed of Taraxacum officinale; mucilage cells (M). (B) Association between AGPs and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows) in parenchyma cells; mucilage cells (M) in the young seed of T. officinale. (C) AGP detection in mucilage cells (M); note several distinct layers in the mucilage in the young seed of T. officinale. (D) AGP detection in mucilage cells (M) in Pilosella officinarum ovule. (E) Association between AGPs and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows) in ovule parenchyma cells of P. officinarum ovule.
Figure 5. Arabinogalactan protein (labeled with JIM14) detection. (A) Section through the young seed of Taraxacum officinale; mucilage cells (M). (B) Association between AGPs and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows) in parenchyma cells; mucilage cells (M) in the young seed of T. officinale. (C) AGP detection in mucilage cells (M); note several distinct layers in the mucilage in the young seed of T. officinale. (D) AGP detection in mucilage cells (M) in Pilosella officinarum ovule. (E) Association between AGPs and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows) in ovule parenchyma cells of P. officinarum ovule.
Ijms 21 09642 g005
Ijms 21 09642 g006 550
Figure 6. Arabinogalactan protein (labeled with JIM15) detection. (A) Section through the young Taraxacum seed; note the presence of embryo sac (es) and mucilage cells (M). (B) Section through the Pilosella officinarum ovule, with AGPs occurring in embryo sac; note the presence of mucilage cells (M). (C) Association between AGPs and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows) in ovule parenchyma cells of P. officinarum.
Figure 6. Arabinogalactan protein (labeled with JIM15) detection. (A) Section through the young Taraxacum seed; note the presence of embryo sac (es) and mucilage cells (M). (B) Section through the Pilosella officinarum ovule, with AGPs occurring in embryo sac; note the presence of mucilage cells (M). (C) Association between AGPs and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows) in ovule parenchyma cells of P. officinarum.
Ijms 21 09642 g006
Ijms 21 09642 g007 550
Figure 7. Detection of arabinogalactan proteins (labeled with LM2). (A) Section through the young seed of Taraxacum officinale; AGPs occurred in mucilage cells (M). (B) AGP detection in mucilage cells (M) and association between AGPs and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows) in parenchyma cells in the young seed of T. officinale. (C) AGP detection in mucilage cells (M); note several distinct layers in the mucilage in the young seed of T. officinale. (D) Association between AGPs and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows) in parenchyma cells of Pilosella officinarum ovule. (E) AGP detection in mucilage cells (M) of P. officinarum ovule.
Figure 7. Detection of arabinogalactan proteins (labeled with LM2). (A) Section through the young seed of Taraxacum officinale; AGPs occurred in mucilage cells (M). (B) AGP detection in mucilage cells (M) and association between AGPs and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows) in parenchyma cells in the young seed of T. officinale. (C) AGP detection in mucilage cells (M); note several distinct layers in the mucilage in the young seed of T. officinale. (D) Association between AGPs and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows) in parenchyma cells of Pilosella officinarum ovule. (E) AGP detection in mucilage cells (M) of P. officinarum ovule.
Ijms 21 09642 g007
Ijms 21 09642 g008 550
Figure 8. Arabinogalactan protein (labeled with MAC207) detection. (A) AGP detection in mucilage cells (M) in Taraxacum officinale ovule. (B) Association between AGPs and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows) in parenchyma cells of T. officinale ovule. (C,D) Section through the ovule of Pilosella officinarum; note the occurrence of AGPs in the mucilage cells (M) and the association between AGPs and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows).
Figure 8. Arabinogalactan protein (labeled with MAC207) detection. (A) AGP detection in mucilage cells (M) in Taraxacum officinale ovule. (B) Association between AGPs and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows) in parenchyma cells of T. officinale ovule. (C,D) Section through the ovule of Pilosella officinarum; note the occurrence of AGPs in the mucilage cells (M) and the association between AGPs and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows).
Ijms 21 09642 g008
Ijms 21 09642 g009 550
Figure 9. Extensin (labeled with JIM11) detection. (A) Section through the young seed of Taraxacum officinale; note the occurrence of extensins in the transmitting tissue (star) and mucilage cells in the micropylar pole (M). (B) Extensin detection in cytoplasm of some mucilage cells (M) of T. officinale young seed. (C) Section through the ovule of Pilosella officinarum; note the occurrence of extensins in the transmitting tissue (star); embryo sac (es). (D) Association between extensions and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows); note the mucilage cells (M) in P. officinarum ovule.
Figure 9. Extensin (labeled with JIM11) detection. (A) Section through the young seed of Taraxacum officinale; note the occurrence of extensins in the transmitting tissue (star) and mucilage cells in the micropylar pole (M). (B) Extensin detection in cytoplasm of some mucilage cells (M) of T. officinale young seed. (C) Section through the ovule of Pilosella officinarum; note the occurrence of extensins in the transmitting tissue (star); embryo sac (es). (D) Association between extensions and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows); note the mucilage cells (M) in P. officinarum ovule.
Ijms 21 09642 g009
Ijms 21 09642 g010 550
Figure 10. Extensin (labeled with JIM20) detection. (A) Section through the ovule of Taraxacum officinale; note the mucilage cells (M) and occurrence of extensins in the transmitting tissue (white star) and pistil transmitting tissue (red star). (B) Occurrence of extensins in pistil transmitting tissue of Pilosella officinarum. (C) Association between extensins and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows) in P. officinarum ovule.
Figure 10. Extensin (labeled with JIM20) detection. (A) Section through the ovule of Taraxacum officinale; note the mucilage cells (M) and occurrence of extensins in the transmitting tissue (white star) and pistil transmitting tissue (red star). (B) Occurrence of extensins in pistil transmitting tissue of Pilosella officinarum. (C) Association between extensins and calcium oxalate crystals (arrows) in P. officinarum ovule.
Ijms 21 09642 g010
Table
Table 1. Association of calcium oxalate crystals in the parenchyma cells in Taraxacum and Pilosella.
Table 1. Association of calcium oxalate crystals in the parenchyma cells in Taraxacum and Pilosella.
Antibody/SpeciesTaraxacumPilosella
JIM5++
JIM7++
JIM8−−
JIM13−+
JIM14++
JIM15−+
LM2++
MAC207−+
JIM11−+
JIM20−+
Table
Table 2. List of the monoclonal antibodies used in the current study, the epitopes they recognize, and references.
Table 2. List of the monoclonal antibodies used in the current study, the epitopes they recognize, and references.
AntibodyEpitopeReferences
Pectins
JIM5Homogalacturonan (HG) domain of c pectic polysaccharides, recognizes partially methyl-esterified epitopes of HG and can also bind to unesterified HG[74,75]
JIM7HG domain of the pectic polysaccharides, recognizes partially methyl-esterified epitopes of HG but does not bind to unesterified HG[75]
AGPs
JIM8Arabinogalactan[76]
JIM13Arabinogalactan/arabinogalactan protein[75,77]
JIM14Arabinogalactan/arabinogalactan protein[75,77]
JIM15Arabinogalactan/arabinogalactan protein[75,77]
LM2Arabinogalactan/arabinogalactan protein[76,78]
MAC207Arabinogalactan/arabinogalactan protein[77,79]
Extensins
JIM11Hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein (HRGP), periodate sensitive epitope[80,81]
JIM20Hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein (HRGP), periodate sensitive epitope[80,81]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Płachno, B.J.; Kapusta, M.; Świątek, P.; Stolarczyk, P.; Kocki, J. Immunodetection of Pectic Epitopes, Arabinogalactan Proteins, and Extensins in Mucilage Cells from the Ovules of Pilosella officinarum Vaill. and Taraxacum officinale Agg. (Asteraceae). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9642. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249642

AMA Style

Płachno BJ, Kapusta M, Świątek P, Stolarczyk P, Kocki J. Immunodetection of Pectic Epitopes, Arabinogalactan Proteins, and Extensins in Mucilage Cells from the Ovules of Pilosella officinarum Vaill. and Taraxacum officinale Agg. (Asteraceae). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(24):9642. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249642

Chicago/Turabian Style

Płachno, Bartosz J., Małgorzata Kapusta, Piotr Świątek, Piotr Stolarczyk, and Janusz Kocki. 2020. "Immunodetection of Pectic Epitopes, Arabinogalactan Proteins, and Extensins in Mucilage Cells from the Ovules of Pilosella officinarum Vaill. and Taraxacum officinale Agg. (Asteraceae)" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 24: 9642. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249642

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop