Next Article in Journal
NGF/TRKA Decrease miR-145-5p Levels in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Kynurenine Promotes RANKL-Induced Osteoclastogenesis In Vitro by Activating the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
Global Analyses of Expressed Piwi-Interacting RNAs in Gastric Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of the TGF-β Superfamily on Osteoclasts/Osteoblasts Balance in Physiological and Pathological Bone Conditions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 20
10.3390/ijms21207655
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Rab GTPases in Osteoclastic Bone Resorption and Autophagy

by
Michèle Roy
and
Sophie Roux
*
Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5N4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(20), 7655; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207655
Submission received: 21 September 2020 / Revised: 11 October 2020 / Accepted: 13 October 2020 / Published: 16 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in Osteoclasts’ Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Small guanosine triphosphate hydrolases (GTPases) of the Rab family are involved in plasma membrane delivery, fusion events, and lysosomal and autophagic degradation pathways, thereby regulating signaling pathways and cell differentiation and function. Osteoclasts are bone-resorbing cells that maintain bone homeostasis. Polarized vesicular trafficking pathways result in the formation of the ruffled border, the osteoclast’s resorptive organelle, which also assists in transcytosis. Here, we reviewed the different roles of Rab GTPases in the endomembrane machinery of osteoclasts and in bone diseases caused by the dysfunction of these proteins, with a particular focus on autophagy and bone resorption. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying osteoclast-related bone disease development is critical for developing and improving therapies.

1. Introduction

Bone remodeling is a dynamic physiological process in which bone resorption is followed by the formation of new bone. Osteoclasts, the cells responsible for resorption, are highly polarized and mobile, indicating that they undergo intense membrane remodeling [1]. Membrane trafficking in these cells is essential not only for cell homeostasis and viability but also for bone resorption. Membrane trafficking includes processes involved in the movement of various macromolecular cargoes via membrane-bound transport vesicles and can be divided into the secretory and endocytic pathways [2]. While macroautophagy (hereinafter called autophagy) relies on secretory and endocytic pathways for the directed recycling or degradation of cargoes [3,4], transcytosis in polarized cells involves the transport of cargo from one side of the cell to the other or redistribution of the plasma membrane [5]. As small Rab guanosine triphosphate hydrolases (GTPases) are essential for the regulation of the vesicular traffic [6], they play a major role in osteoclasts. We reviewed the current knowledge regarding the network of Rab GTPases in these highly active cells with a focus on two interrelated aspects, which are osteoclastic bone resorption and autophagy, as membrane traffic is crucial for both these processes. As the available data on Rabs in osteoclasts is scarce, especially in humans, this review provides valuable insights into Rabs and their regulatory proteins as well as emerging data on Rabs in osteoclast-rich osteopetrosis, and Paget’s disease of bone.

2. Major Vesicular Trafficking Pathways in Osteoclasts: Bone Resorption and Autophagy

Osteoclasts are multinucleated cells derived from hematopoietic cells of the monocyte-macrophage lineage and are formed by the fusion of their mononuclear precursors [7]. They are highly mobile and alternate between the migratory and bone-resorbing stages, showing remarkable changes in their phenotype during these phases. Upon adhesion to the bone, osteoclasts become polarized and reorganize their cytoskeleton (Figure 1). A sealing zone is formed by densely packed actin-rich podosomes that delimit the ruffled border, which is a highly specialized area consisting of membrane expansions directed toward the target bone surface. The ruffled membrane is formed by the polarized trafficking of acid vesicles of the lysosomal pathway that massively fuse with the bone-facing membrane. This considerably increases the surface area of the ruffled membrane by forming highly convoluted membrane structures, and this plays a critical role in the degradation of the bone matrix via acidification by vacuolar H+-ATPases that are inserted in the plasma membrane and the proteases that are released in the resorption compartment during the spillage of secretory vesicles [8,9]. In non-resorptive or migrating osteoclasts, the sealing zone switches to a podosome belt, and the relaxed osteoclasts undergo depolarization [10]. In osteoclasts, the major vesicular trafficking pathways include those related to bone resorption, which depends on the formation of the ruffled membrane as a result of vesicle trafficking and fusion as well as the transcytosis of degraded products from the resorption lacuna toward the apical membrane [11,12].
Autophagy is a trafficking pathway that delivers cargo in double-membranous autophagosomes to the lysosomes for degradation and recycling (Figure 2). All the stages of formation of autophagosomes, from elongation to vesicular fusion and maturation, are dependent on the supply of membranes with the appropriate properties, thus indicating the involvement of vesicle trafficking proteins, such as Rab GTPases [15]. In osteoclasts, this pathway has been shown to be involved in oxidative stress- and hypoxia-induced differentiation [16,17]. Furthermore, the inhibition of autophagy by mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) promotes osteoclast survival and receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL)-induced formation and activation of osteoclasts [18,19]. In addition to their role in the formation of autophagosomes, some autophagy-related proteins, including LC3B, Atg5, and Rab7, are also involved in the formation of the ruffled border and sealing zone, fusion of secretory lysosomes, and subsequent bone resorption [20,21]. It has also been demonstrated that autophagy promotes osteoclast migration owing to its role in the disassembly of the podosomes via LC3-mediated degradation of kindlin-3, which is a major podosome-adaptor protein [22].

3. Rab GTPases and Their Regulators: Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors (GEFs), GTPase-Activating Proteins (GAPs), and Guanosine Diphosphate (GDP) Dissociation Inhibitors (GDIs)

Small GTPases of the Ras superfamily include the Ras, Rho, Ran, Arf, and Rab families, which are central regulators of signaling networks and cytoskeleton dynamics [23]. The functions and partners or effectors of most of the 70 identified members of the human Rab subfamily are not known [24,25]. Rab GTPases regulate different steps of vesicular transport (from budding to vesicle formation, transport, and fusion within a target membrane site) and ensure precise delivery of cargoes [26]. They function by recruiting effectors, such as sorting adaptors, cytoskeletal motor proteins, tethering factors, kinases, and phosphatases, and the spatially and temporally regulated Rab cascades contribute to the structural integrity and polarity of the secretory and endocytic pathways [6,25]. Rab GTPases predominantly integrate and mediate intracellular trafficking signals as scaffold proteins and possess multiple binding domains for regulatory molecules and downstream effectors [27]. Most Rab GTPases are ubiquitous and are grouped into subfamilies according to subcellular localization and function [27], although a single endomembrane compartment can harbor multiple Rabs in functionally distinct microdomains [25]. In addition, differential functions of some Rab GTPases have been observed in different cell types, for example, Rab13 that is involved in glucose transporter traffic in muscle cells but not in osteoclasts [28].
Rab GTPases can reversibly attach to membranes and bind GDP or GTP, switching between the active GTP-bound state, which recruits effectors, and the inactive GDP-bound state. Similar to all members of the Ras superfamily, Rab GTPases require C-terminal post-translational prenylation (lipid tail), which includes the addition of geranylgeranyl hydrophobic molecules, for associating with cytoplasmic membranes and vesicles [26]. After forming a stable complex with a Rab escort protein (REP) for facilitating their prenylation, the newly formed geranylgeranylated Rab GTPases are delivered to their target membrane. Once located at the appropriate membrane site, Rab GTPases are activated by GEFs, and the bound GDP is replaced by GTP. Active Rab GTPases can then interact with effectors via specific microdomains to perform their functions until they are inactivated by the hydrolysis of GTP to GDP after binding to a GAP. GDI solubilizes inactive prenylated Rab GTPases by binding to the lipophilic groups, thus allowing for their release into the cytosol. Membrane-associated GDI displacement factors (GDFs) mediate the delivery of Rab GTPases to new target membrane structures via the release of GDI, and the positioning of GTP is catalyzed by GEFs, which activate the Rab GTPases for their next cycle (Figure 3) [29,30].
At least six different types of Rab-activating GEFs, including those of the differentially expressed in normal and neoplastic cells (DENN), vacuolar protein sorting 9 (Vps9), and Sec2 domain families, as well as multi-subunit transport protein particle (TRAPP) complexes, with approximately 40 putative RabGEFs, have been characterized in humans [23]. Some GEFs associate with specific Rab GTPases, whereas others activate several Rab GTPases; therefore, a single Rab GTPase may be activated by different types of GEFs [32]. Unlike the low structural homology between GEFs, GAPs essentially belong to a single protein family consisting of highly conserved catalytic TBC (Tre-2/Bub2/Cdc16) domains (TBC/RabGAPs), with more than 40 different members in humans, except the TBC domain-free Rab3GAP complex that targets members of the Rab3 family. RabGAPs are less diverse than their Rab targets, and each of them may inactivate multiple Rab GTPases [29]. Interactions between GAP or GEF and a specific Rab GTPase may not regulate this Rab GDP/GTP state but may regulate that of a neighboring Rab GTPase [25,32,33].

4. The Rab GTPase Network in Autophagy

4.1. Rab GTPases Are Mainly Involved in the Early Steps of Autophagosome Formation

Rab GTPases regulate vesicular traffic events, including vesicle tethering, transport, and fusion. Several Rabs have been associated with the induction of autophagy (Rab18 and Rab37) [34,35] and regulate autophagosome biogenesis from the endoplasmic reticulum (Rab1, Rab5, and Rab32) and the Golgi apparatus (Rab33B) or facilitate the fusion of multivesicular bodies or recycling endosomes with the autophagosome (Rab11, Rab12, and Rab23) [36,37].
Rab1 and Rab5 appear to be required for autophagosome biogenesis from the endoplasmic reticulum, and the GEF TRAPPIII may activate Rab1 [36]. Rab5 has been implicated in the regulation of mTORC1 signaling, ATG5-ATG12 conjugation, and PtdIns(3)P production at the phagophore via the recruitment of type III PI3K, as well as in autophagosome closure [38]. ULK1/2, which is activated by the suppression of mTORC1 activity, mediates the phosphorylation of DENND3, a Rab12 GEF. Activated GTP-Rab12 is localized to the recycling endosomes and facilitates autophagosome trafficking [39]. Additionally, interactions between ULK1, Rab11, and TBC1D14 have been shown to transport the recycling endosomes to the phagophore assembly site during starvation-induced autophagy in HEK293 cells [40]. Similar to Rab1, Rab32 is associated with mTORC1 signaling as well as membrane trafficking from the endoplasmic reticulum, thus allowing for phagophore expansion [31]. Rab18 has been characterized as a positive regulator of early autophagy in human fibroblasts and is dependent on Rab3GAP1/2, which is a RabGEF for Rab18 [34]. Activated Rab37 has been implicated in the formation of phagophores upon the induction of autophagy via interactions with the ATG5-12/16L complex to promote the elongation of isolation membranes and expression of LC3-II [35].
Other Rab GTPases are involved in non-canonical autophagy, which represents a form of autophagy that bypasses certain canonical autophagy-related proteins. Thus, Rab9, which is involved in vesicle trafficking between the trans-Golgi and endosomes, has been implicated in the ATG5/ATG7/LC3-II-independent autophagy [37,41,42].

4.2. Late Steps of Autophagolysosome Formation

Rab GTPases are rarely involved in the later stages of autophagy, including fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes leading to autophagolysosomes (Rab8B, Rab21, and Rab24). Upon starvation-induced autophagy, Rab21 is activated by myotubularin-related protein 13 (MTMR13), a DENN domain GEF, and contributes to the formation of autophagolysosomes via interactions with its effector Vesicle-Associated Membrane Protein 8 (VAMP8), which is an R- soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment receptor (SNARE) that mediates membrane fusion [43]. Rab24 has been shown to be required in the late steps of autophagy and is involved in the clearance of autophagolysosomes [44].
Some Rab GTPases regulate both the early and late stages (Rab7, Rab9A, and Rab33B) of autophagy. Rab7 is among the best characterized Rab GTPases involved in vesicular trafficking, and plays key roles in endosome maturation, lysosome positioning, and lysosome-related organelle biogenesis [31,45]. Rab7 is involved in different steps of the autophagy process, including the regulation of mTORC1 activity, nascent autophagosome biogenesis via pleckstrin homology domain-containing family F member 1 (PLEKHF1)/phafin1, autophagosome microtubular transport via LC3-interacting effector FYVE-coiled coil containing 1 (FYCO1), and fusion with late endosomes or lysosomes via the homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting (HOPS) complex and its associated SNARE and pleckstrin homology domain containing protein family member 1 (PLEKHM1) [31,46,47]. Rac1, a GTPase of the Rho family, interacts with RabGAP Armus (TBC1D2A), which is known to inactivate Rab7, indicating that this RabGAP may regulate and co-ordinate both Rac1 and Rab7 activities during autophagy [48].

4.3. GAPs in Autophagy

Among RabGAPs, TBC1D5, TBC1D14, and the non-TBC Rab3GAP complex are involved in the formation of autophagosomes, while TBC1D2 and TBC1D25 are associated with autophagosome-lysosome fusion [15]. TBC1D20 has also been identified as a TBC/RabGAP for Rab1 and is required for autophagosome maturation [49]. TBC1D25 binds to various Rabs, including Rab33B, which is a recently discovered binding partner of LC3 that contributes to autophagolysosome maturation [50].

5. Rab GTPases in Osteoclasts

Genes encoding at least 26 small GTPases are expressed in resorbing human osteoclasts; however, only Rab13 has been studied at the protein level in these cells (Table 1) [28]. Among GEFs and GAPs, only RabGEF RIN3 and RabGAP TBC1D25 are reportedly expressed in human osteoclasts [51,52], although their functions and partners remain unclear. In rodents, the expression of most Rab GTPases in osteoclasts, including Rab1, Rab2b, Rab3, Rab5, Rab6, Rab7, Rab9, Rab10, Rab11b, Rab14, Rab18, Rab27a, and Rab44, has been reported at the protein level, whereas that of Rab4, Rab35, and Rab38 has only been reported at the mRNA level [1,8,11,53,54,55,56,57,58]. Some Rab GTPases expressed by osteoclasts are involved in autophagy, as described earlier, whereas others appear to be involved in bone resorption (Rab3d, Rab27a, and Rab44) or both autophagy and resorption (Rab5c, Rab7, and Rab11b) (Table 1).

5.1. Rab7 Is Crucial for Osteoclast Bone Resorbing Activity

Rab7 trafficking events are best described in osteoclasts, and strong evidence indicates a major role of this Rab GTPase in membrane trafficking and osteoclast activities. In rodent osteoclasts, Rab7 is highly expressed and is mainly localized to the ruffled membrane of resorbing cells, while displaying a perinuclear distribution typical of late endosomes in inactive osteoclasts [59]. The downregulation of Rab7 in osteoclasts has been shown to impair the formation of F-actin rings, inhibiting cell polarization and reducing bone resorption, which suggests its role in vesicular trafficking during bone resorption [60]. Via direct interactions with Rab7, the α3 subunit of the V-ATPase can act as Rab7-GEF allowing its recruitment to the membrane of secretory lysosomes [61]. The accessory subunit (ATP6AP1) of V-ATPase, which is involved in the regulation of lysosomal trafficking to the ruffled membrane, may also act via interactions with Rab7 [62].
PLEKHM1, a multivalent adaptor protein in the endomembrane system [63] and a specific effector for the terminal fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes [47], has been shown to colocalize with GTP-bound Rab7 in late endosomes/lysosomes. PLEKHM1 can act as a Rab7 effector for osteoclast vesicle trafficking via molecular complexes involving DEF8 (differentially expressed in factor dependent cell-Paterson (FDCP) myeloid progenitor cells 8) [64] or TRAFD1 (TRAF-type zinc finger domain containing 1) [65]. Furthermore, osteoclasts from PLEKHM1-deficient mice or those from patients with loss-of-function mutations in PLEKHM1 have compromised resorption activity due to the absence of ruffled membranes [64,66].
Rac1, a GTPase of the Rho family, has been shown to interact with Rab7 at the fusion zone of the ruffled membrane in the resorbing osteoclasts of rodents, suggesting its role in the microtubular transport of lysosomes to the bone-facing plasma membrane for forming the ruffled expansion [67].

5.2. Other Rab GTPases Involved in Osteoclast Activities

In human osteoclasts, RAB13 is highly upregulated during osteoclast differentiation, although it is not involved in bone resorption, transcytosis, endocytosis, and glucose transport. The downregulation of Rab13 does not affect osteoclast differentiation, and in mature osteoclasts, Rab13 is localized to small vesicular structures between the trans-Golgi networks and basolateral membranes, suggesting associations with the osteoclast secretory functions [28], possibly through interacting with endospanin-2, a small transmembrane protein [68].
The expression of Rab3 isoforms with known roles in exocytosis has been previously investigated in murine osteoclast precursors, which expressed Rab3a and Rab3b/c [69]. In further studies, Rab3d has been reported as the major osteoclastic Rab3 isoform, and Rab3d knockout mice were found to have high bone mass and impaired osteoclastic bone resorption. Furthermore, osteoclasts from Rab3d-deficient mice displayed the formation of normal F-actin ring and podosomes, but abnormal ruffled borders. In osteoclasts, Rab3d has been associated with a non-lysosomal post-Golgi trafficking step required for bone resorption [70]. Tctex-1, a light chain of the cytoplasmic dynein microtubule motor complex, has been identified as an Rab3d partner in the transport of secretory vesicles to the ruffled membrane during bone resorption [71].
Rab5c has been associated with early endosomes, and Rab11b, one of the most abundant Rab GTPases in rodent osteoclasts, is localized to perinuclear recycling compartments. Although neither Rab5c nor Rab11b have been detected at the ruffled membrane, they have been demonstrated to contribute to upstream events involving resorption-related vesicular transport [1]. Rab6 is localized to the Golgi apparatus in osteoclasts, although their roles in these cells remain unclear [26].
Rab9 is involved in late endosome trafficking to the trans-Golgi network in other cell types [26,57]. Owing to its colocalization with Rab7 in the late endosomes around the nuclei, Rab9 is believed to be involved in this trafficking pathway in osteoclasts. Furthermore, a fraction of Rab9 localizes to the plasma membrane adjacent to the bone matrix in a pattern complementary to that of Rab7 in active osteoclasts, although its function has not been further investigated [1].
In mice, the expression of Rab27a mRNA increased, whereas that of Rab27b decreased during osteoclast differentiation. Osteoclasts from Rab27a-deficient mice showed defects in the formation of actin rings, abnormal subcellular localization of lysosome-associated membrane protein (LAMP2) and cathepsin K, and impaired bone resorption, suggesting a role of Rab27a in the transport of secretory lysosomes in these cells [56]. In addition, Rab27a might also favor osteoclast formation, as the inhibition of its expression by miR-124 was associated with the inhibition of osteoclastogenesis [72].
Although RANKL strongly induces the expression of Rab38 in murine osteoclasts, Rab38 may be dispensable for the formation or function of osteoclasts [53]. Finally, Rab44 is a GTPase highly expressed in undifferentiated hematopoietic cells [73]. Rab44 was detected in murine osteoclasts in the Golgi apparatus and lysosomes and was shown to inhibit osteoclast differentiation by modulating intracellular Ca2+ levels [58].
Transcytosis is a vesicular trafficking pathway that has been observed in resorbing osteoclasts and involves endocytosis of degraded products at uptake zones of ruffled membranes and vesicle transport to the functional secretory domain for exocytosis. Some Rab GTPases play major roles in transcytosis in polarized cells, driving vesicular traffic from basolateral to apical membranes, as described for Rab17 in epithelial cells [55]; however, until now, no Rab GTPase has been associated with osteoclast transcytosis.

6. Rab GTPases in Human Bone Diseases

Unlike the direct involvement of Rabs reported to be upregulated in some cancers or whose genes have been found mutated in neurological disorders [74], only indirect evidence implicating individual Rabs has been provided in bone diseases, relying on the aberrant expression or mutations of their interacting proteins: effectors (PLEKHM1 as Rab7 effector) or regulatory proteins (TBC1D25, RIN3).

6.1. Osteopetrosis

Osteopetrosis is an inherited heterogeneous bone disease characterized by the inability to resorb bone, with consequential high bone mass and generalized osteosclerosis [75]. In humans, autosomal recessive osteopetrosis (ARO) is mainly (in >70% cases) associated with mutations in two genes: TCIRG1, encoding the α3 subunit of v-ATPase [76], and CLCN7, encoding anion transporter CLC-7 that works with v-ATPase to acidify the bone while maintaining electroneutrality [77].
Mutations in OSTM1, SNX10, and PLEKHM1 are rare and are also associated with forms of osteopetrosis characterized by the presence of non-functional osteoclasts (osteoclast-rich osteopetrosis). OSTM1 encodes osteopetrosis-associated transmembrane protein 1 (OSTM1), a β-subunit of CLC-7 [78], also involved in osteoclast membrane trafficking [79]. SNX10 encodes a sorting nexin (nexin 10) involved in lipid attachment and cargo sorting in the endosomal pathway [80,81]. In the presence of a SNX10 mutation, osteoclasts exhibit defective ruffled membranes and are unable to resorb bones [80]. Loss-of-function mutations in PLEKHM1 result in an intermediate or severe form of osteopetrosis in humans, with no or underdeveloped ruffled membranes in patient-derived osteoclasts [66], or altered endocytosis and autophagy in cells expressing the mutant gene [82]. These mutations reflect altered interactions of PLEKHM1 with Rab7 [66,82], leading to defective endosomal/lysosomal vesicle transport and impaired bone resorption [64].
Osteopetroses with developmental defects of osteoclasts (osteoclast-poor osteopetrosis) are more rare, secondary to diseases caused by mutations in TNFRSF11A or TNFSF11, encoding RANK and RANKL, respectively [83].

6.2. Paget’s Disease of Bone (PDB)

PDB is characterized by a focal and disorganized increase in bone turnover. As the initial phase of PDB involves excessive bone resorption, impaired osteoclasts are considered the primary cellular consequence of PDB [84]. Pagetic osteoclasts are larger and more numerous than normal osteoclasts; they are overactive and hypersensitive to osteoclastogenic factors and are resistant to apoptosis [85]. As inclusion bodies in pagetic osteoclasts resemble the sequestosome-1 or SQSTM1/p62 aggregates observed in diseases involving defective autophagy, the pathogenesis of PDB possibly involves the impairment of autophagy [86]. In previous studies, defects in autophagy flux were observed in PBD osteoclasts or Cos-1 cells harboring a PDB-associated p62 mutation, suggesting accumulation of non-degradative autophagosomes [87,88]. The activation of TBK1 (TANK binding kinase) and TBK1-induced IL-6 production may also contribute to the generation of PDB osteoclasts [89]. Rab8B has been shown to recruit TBK1 to autophagic organelles and contribute to autophagy-mediated antimicrobial defenses, such as the autophagic elimination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis via the phosphorylation and activation of p62 [31,90].
In a previous study, we identified alternative RNA splicing events in TBC1D25, which encodes TBC1 domain family member 25 (TBC1D25) and demonstrated that TBC1D25 was expressed in human osteoclasts [51]. In particular, during analyses of the two spliced isoforms of TBC1D25, we observed a slight but significant decrease in mRNA and protein expression of the long isoform in pagetic osteoclasts compared to that in the healthy osteoclasts; these observations were independent of mutations in the gene encoding SQSTM1/p62 associated with PDB [51]. Residues 134-136, which interact with LC3 as well as the TBC (Rab-GAP) domain, are missing in the short isoform, suggesting that alternative splicing regulates a proportion of active TBC1D25. Among the known osteoclast-expressed Rab GTPases, Rab13, Rab33B, and Rab34 may interact with TBC1D25 [50,91]. Finally, RIN3 is a GEF for the small GTPases, Rab5 and Rab31, and has been associated with endocytosis, vesicular trafficking, and signal transduction. Although the specific role of RIN3 in bone metabolism has not been studied, genetic variants of RIN3 have been reported to predispose to PDB [52].

7. Rab GTPases as Therapeutic Targets

Small GTPases are crucial signaling proteins that regulate various processes necessary for osteoclast function, such as cytoskeletal organization, vesicular trafficking, and cell survival. Post-translational prenylation is essential for the membrane-targeting and function of small GTPases, and disrupted prenylation may result in osteoclast apoptosis [92]. Bisphosphonates are anti-catabolic drugs that directly suppress osteoclast activity and induce osteoclast apoptosis and are widely used to treat bone disorders characterized by increased bone resorption, such as PDB, osteoporosis, and malignant osteolysis. The bone specificity of bisphosphonates (BPs) lies in their strong affinity for hydroxyapatite, and osteoclasts are subsequently mainly exposed to BPs when internalising these molecules during bone resorption. Small GTPases, such as Ras, Rho, and Rab, are targets for nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs) that inhibit their post-translational prenylation [93]. N-BPs inhibit farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) synthase of the mevalonate pathway, thus depleting cells of FPP and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate, isoprenoid lipids both required for the prenylation of small GTPases [94]. A defect in the prenylation of small GTPases prevents their membrane localization and leads to their cytosolic accumulation [94]. As a result, the mislocation of small GTPases, dysregulation of cytoskeletal rearrangements, and the disruption of the ruffled membrane formation during osteoclast polarization have been observed after treatments with N-BPs [11,95]. A defect in protein prenylation may also activate signaling pathways, as the ability of regulatory proteins such as GAPs and GDIs to modulate small GTPase activity also depends on prenylation [94].
Although N-BPs are more likely to affect geranylgeranyl small G-proteins [11], they do not specifically inhibit the prenylation of Rab proteins. Phosphonocarboxylate analogs of N-BPs do not inhibit FPP synthetase, but they do inhibit the Rab geranylgeranyltransferase (RGGT), specifically inhibiting Rab protein prenylation. A phosphonocarboxylate analog of risedronate inhibited bone resorption in vitro [96]. Similarly, although osteoclasts from gunmetal mice have reduced RGGT activity, they are formed normally and polarize into sealing zones without any disruption of F-actin rings. These osteoclasts exhibit reduced bone resorption activity because of impaired ruffled border formation in vitro. However, the remaining prenylated Rab proteins were sufficient for maintaining normal bone resorption in vivo. Furthermore, Rab7 remained 86% prenylated in these mice, and not all Rab proteins were affected by the reduction in RGGT activity [57].
Although prenylation is essential for the localization of Rab GTPases to specific intracellular compartments, targeting of prenylation may not be sufficient to alter its functions in osteoclasts. Indeed, while mice deficient in Rab3D develop osteopetrosis with reduced osteoclast activity and irregular ruffled membranes, disruption of osteoclast bone resorption was dependent on guanine nucleotide binding (formation of GTP-bound Rab3D) and not on RAb3D prenylation status [70].

8. Conclusions

Small GTPases of the Rab family play major roles in osteoclast function, particularly in autophagy and bone resorption via ruffled membranes. The mechanisms of lysosome trafficking and autophagy involving Rab GTPases in osteoclasts may be unique to this secreting cell type, and further studies on Rab GTPase activities and their regulators in osteoclasts are required. Indeed, while Rab proteins play major roles in cell homeostasis and numerous Rabs have been now identified, the functions of most of them remain unknown, as well as their effectors and regulators, particularly in osteoclasts. Currently, few effectors have been described in osteoclasts such as Rab7 effectors (Rac1, PLEKHM1), or Rab3d effector (Tctex-1), and only one RabGEF (RIN3), and one TBC/RabGAP (TBC1D25) have been reported to be expressed in human osteoclasts. In addition, the determinants of tissue- and cell-type specificity of these small GTPases remain to be identified [97]. Thus, the identification of the different Rabs involved in each step of secretory vesicle trafficking and their regulators (GEFs, GAPs) in osteoclasts, particularly in humans, would improve our knowledge on osteoclast biology and bone diseases, enable identification of specific therapeutic targets, and facilitate the study of bone resorption using these potential biomarkers.

Author Contributions

Writing—review and editing, M.R. and S.R.; funding acquisition, S.R. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC was funded by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada program (RGPIN-2016-03900).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

Beclin 1BCL-2 interacting myosin/moesin-like coiled-coil protein 1
DENNdifferentially expressed in normal and neoplastic cells
FPPfarnesyl pyrophosphate
FYCO1FYVE-coiled coil containing 1 (protein)
GAPGTPase-activating protein
GDIGDP dissociation inhibitor
GDFGDI displacement factor
GDP/GTPguanosine diphosphate (GDP)/guanosine triphosphate (GTP)
GEFguanine–nucleotide exchange factor
GGPPgeranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP)
HOPShomotypic fusion and protein sorting complex
LAMP2lysosome-associated membrane protein 2
LC3light chain 3 [Atg8 (yeast) is called LC3 in mammals]
MCSF macrophage colony-stimulating factor
mTORC1mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1
PDBPaget’s disease of bone
Phafin1a FYVE and PH (Pleckstrin homology) domain containing protein
PLEKHF1pleckstrin homology domain-containing family F member 1 (a.k.a. Phafin1)
PLEKHM1pleckstrin homology domain containing, family M (with RUN domain) member 1
PtdIns3Pphosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate
RANKLreceptor activator of NF-κB ligand
REPRab escort protein
RIN3Ras and Rab Interactor 3
RGGTRab Geranyl-Geranyl transferase
SNAREsN-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors
TBCTre-2/Bub2/Cdc16
TBK1TANK Binding Kinase1
TRAPPTransport protein particle
ULK1UNC51-like kinase 1

References

  1. Zhao, H.; Ettala, O.; Vaananen, H.K. Intracellular membrane trafficking pathways in bone-resorbing osteoclasts revealed by cloning and subcellular localization studies of small GTP-binding rab proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 293, 1060–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yarwood, R.; Hellicar, J.; Woodman, P.G.; Lowe, M. Membrane trafficking in health and disease. Dis. Model. Mech. 2020, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Davis, S.; Wang, J.; Ferro-Novick, S. Crosstalk between the Secretory and Autophagy Pathways Regulates Autophagosome Formation. Dev. Cell 2017, 41, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fraser, J.; Simpson, J.; Fontana, R.; Kishi-Itakura, C.; Ktistakis, N.T.; Gammoh, N. Targeting of early endosomes by autophagy facilitates EGFR recycling and signalling. EMBO Rep. 2019, 20, e47734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mathew, R.; Rios-Barrera, L.D.; Machado, P.; Schwab, Y.; Leptin, M. Transcytosis via the late endocytic pathway as a cell morphogenetic mechanism. EMBO J. 2020, 39, e105332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Herve, J.C.; Bourmeyster, N. Rab GTPases, master controllers of eukaryotic trafficking. Small GTPases 2018, 9, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Parfitt, A.M.; Mundy, G.R.; Roodman, G.D.; Hughes, D.E.; Boyce, B.F. A new model for the regulation of bone resorption, with particular reference to the effects of bisphosphonates. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1996, 11, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mulari, M.T.; Zhao, H.; Lakkakorpi, P.T.; Vaananen, H.K. Osteoclast ruffled border has distinct subdomains for secretion and degraded matrix uptake. Traffic 2003, 4, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, H. Membrane trafficking in osteoblasts and osteoclasts: New avenues for understanding and treating skeletal diseases. Traffic 2012, 13, 1307–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ory, S.; Brazier, H.; Pawlak, G.; Blangy, A. Rho GTPases in osteoclasts: Orchestrators of podosome arrangement. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 87, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Coxon, F.P.; Taylor, A. Vesicular trafficking in osteoclasts. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2008, 19, 424–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ng, P.Y.; Brigitte Patricia Ribet, A.; Pavlos, N.J. Membrane trafficking in osteoclasts and implications for osteoporosis. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2019, 47, 639–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Roux, S. New treatment targets in osteoporosis. Joint Bone Spine 2010, 77, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Roy, M.; Roux, S. Rab GTPases in Osteoclastic Endomembrane Systems. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 4541538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kern, A.; Dikic, I.; Behl, C. The integration of autophagy and cellular trafficking pathways via RAB GAPs. Autophagy 2015, 11, 2393–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, K.; Niu, J.; Kim, H.; Kolattukudy, P.E. Osteoclast precursor differentiation by MCPIP via oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and autophagy. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 3, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, Y.; Chen, G.; Zhang, W.; Xu, N.; Zhu, J.Y.; Jia, J.; Sun, Z.J.; Wang, Y.N.; Zhao, Y.F. Autophagy regulates hypoxia-induced osteoclastogenesis through the HIF-1alpha/BNIP3 signaling pathway. J. Cell Physiol. 2012, 227, 639–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Glantschnig, H.; Fisher, J.E.; Wesolowski, G.; Rodan, G.A.; Reszka, A.A. M-CSF, TNFalpha and RANK ligand promote osteoclast survival by signaling through mTOR/S6 kinase. Cell Death Differ. 2003, 10, 1165–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sugatani, T.; Hruska, K.A. Akt1/Akt2 and mammalian target of rapamycin/Bim play critical roles in osteoclast differentiation and survival, respectively, whereas Akt is dispensable for cell survival in isolated osteoclast precursors. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 3583–3589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chung, Y.H.; Yoon, S.Y.; Choi, B.; Sohn, D.H.; Yoon, K.H.; Kim, W.J.; Kim, D.H.; Chang, E.J. Microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 regulates Cdc42-dependent actin ring formation in osteoclast. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012, 44, 989–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. DeSelm, C.J.; Miller, B.C.; Zou, W.; Beatty, W.L.; van Meel, E.; Takahata, Y.; Klumperman, J.; Tooze, S.A.; Teitelbaum, S.L.; Virgin, H.W. Autophagy proteins regulate the secretory component of osteoclastic bone resorption. Dev. Cell 2011, 21, 966–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, Y.; Cui, Y.; Wang, L.; Han, J. Autophagy promotes osteoclast podosome disassembly and cell motility athrough the interaction of kindlin3 with LC3. Cell. Signal. 2020, 67, 109505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cherfils, J.; Zeghouf, M. Regulation of small GTPases by GEFs, GAPs, and GDIs. Physiol. Rev. 2013, 93, 269–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Colicelli, J. Human RAS superfamily proteins and related GTPases. Sci. STKE 2004, 2004, RE13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pfeffer, S.R. Rab GTPases: Master regulators that establish the secretory and endocytic pathways. Mol. Biol. Cell 2017, 28, 712–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bhuin, T.; Roy, J.K. Rab proteins: The key regulators of intracellular vesicle transport. Exp. Cell Res. 2014, 328, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schwartz, S.L.; Cao, C.; Pylypenko, O.; Rak, A.; Wandinger-Ness, A. Rab GTPases at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2007, 120, 3905–3910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hirvonen, M.J.; Mulari, M.T.; Buki, K.G.; Vihko, P.; Harkonen, P.L.; Vaananen, H.K. Rab13 is upregulated during osteoclast differentiation and associates with small vesicles revealing polarized distribution in resorbing cells. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2012, 60, 537–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Muller, M.P.; Goody, R.S. Molecular control of Rab activity by GEFs, GAPs and GDI. Small GTPases 2018, 9, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pfeffer, S.R. Rab GTPase regulation of membrane identity. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2013, 25, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Szatmari, Z.; Sass, M. The autophagic roles of Rab small GTPases and their upstream regulators: A review. Autophagy 2014, 10, 1154–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ishida, M.; Oguchi, M.E.; Fukuda, M. Multiple Types of Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors (GEFs) for Rab Small GTPases. Cell Struct. Funct. 2016, 41, 61–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Frasa, M.A.; Koessmeier, K.T.; Ahmadian, M.R.; Braga, V.M. Illuminating the functional and structural repertoire of human TBC/RABGAPs. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 13, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Feldmann, A.; Bekbulat, F.; Huesmann, H.; Ulbrich, S.; Tatzelt, J.; Behl, C.; Kern, A. The RAB GTPase RAB18 modulates macroautophagy and proteostasis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 486, 738–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Song, Y.; Shang, D.; Cheng, H.; Zhou, R. The small GTPase RAB37 functions as an organizer for autophagosome biogenesis. Autophagy 2018, 14, 727–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Amaya, C.; Fader, C.M.; Colombo, M.I. Autophagy and proteins involved in vesicular trafficking. FEBS Lett. 2015, 589, 3343–3353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ao, X.; Zou, L.; Wu, Y. Regulation of autophagy by the Rab GTPase network. Cell Death Differ. 2014, 21, 348–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhou, F.; Zou, S.; Chen, Y.; Lipatova, Z.; Sun, D.; Zhu, X.; Li, R.; Wu, Z.; You, W.; Cong, X.; et al. A Rab5 GTPase module is important for autophagosome closure. PLoS Genet. 2017, 13, e1007020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xu, J.; Fotouhi, M.; McPherson, P.S. Phosphorylation of the exchange factor DENND3 by ULK in response to starvation activates Rab12 and induces autophagy. EMBO Rep. 2015, 16, 709–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Longatti, A.; Lamb, C.A.; Razi, M.; Yoshimura, S.; Barr, F.A.; Tooze, S.A. TBC1D14 regulates autophagosome formation via Rab11- and ULK1-positive recycling endosomes. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 197, 659–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lindqvist, L.M.; Simon, A.K.; Baehrecke, E.H. Current questions and possible controversies in autophagy. Cell Death Discov. 2015, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Nishida, Y.; Arakawa, S.; Fujitani, K.; Yamaguchi, H.; Mizuta, T.; Kanaseki, T.; Komatsu, M.; Otsu, K.; Tsujimoto, Y.; Shimizu, S. Discovery of Atg5/Atg7-independent alternative macroautophagy. Nature 2009, 461, 654–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jean, S.; Cox, S.; Nassari, S.; Kiger, A.A. Starvation-induced MTMR13 and RAB21 activity regulates VAMP8 to promote autophagosome-lysosome fusion. EMBO Rep. 2015, 16, 297–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yla-Anttila, P.; Eskelinen, E.L. Roles for RAB24 in autophagy and disease. Small GTPases 2018, 9, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, T.; Ming, Z.; Xiaochun, W.; Hong, W. Rab7: Role of its protein interaction cascades in endo-lysosomal traffic. Cell. Signal. 2011, 23, 516–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hyttinen, J.M.; Niittykoski, M.; Salminen, A.; Kaarniranta, K. Maturation of autophagosomes and endosomes: A key role for Rab7. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1833, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. McEwan, D.G.; Popovic, D.; Gubas, A.; Terawaki, S.; Suzuki, H.; Stadel, D.; Coxon, F.P.; Miranda de Stegmann, D.; Bhogaraju, S.; Maddi, K.; et al. PLEKHM1 regulates autophagosome-lysosome fusion through HOPS complex and LC3/GABARAP proteins. Mol. Cell 2015, 57, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Carroll, B.; Mohd-Naim, N.; Maximiano, F.; Frasa, M.A.; McCormack, J.; Finelli, M.; Thoresen, S.B.; Perdios, L.; Daigaku, R.; Francis, R.E.; et al. The TBC/RabGAP Armus coordinates Rac1 and Rab7 functions during autophagy. Dev. Cell 2013, 25, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sidjanin, D.J.; Park, A.K.; Ronchetti, A.; Martins, J.; Jackson, W.T. TBC1D20 mediates autophagy as a key regulator of autophagosome maturation. Autophagy 2016, 12, 1759–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Itoh, T.; Kanno, E.; Uemura, T.; Waguri, S.; Fukuda, M. OATL1, a novel autophagosome-resident Rab33B-GAP, regulates autophagosomal maturation. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 192, 839–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Klinck, R.; Laberge, G.; Bisson, M.; McManus, S.; Michou, L.; Brown, J.P.; Roux, S. Alternative splicing in osteoclasts and Paget’s disease of bone. BMC Med. Genet. 2014, 15, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  52. Vallet, M.; Soares, D.C.; Wani, S.; Sophocleous, A.; Warner, J.; Salter, D.M.; Ralston, S.H.; Albagha, O.M. Targeted sequencing of the Paget’s disease associated 14q32 locus identifies several missense coding variants in RIN3 that predispose to Paget’s disease of bone. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015, 24, 3286–3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Charles, J.F.; Coury, F.; Sulyanto, R.; Sitara, D.; Wu, J.; Brady, N.; Tsang, K.; Sigrist, K.; Tollefsen, D.M.; He, L.; et al. The collection of NFATc1-dependent transcripts in the osteoclast includes numerous genes non-essential to physiologic bone resorption. Bone 2012, 51, 902–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ha, B.G.; Hong, J.M.; Park, J.Y.; Ha, M.H.; Kim, T.H.; Cho, J.Y.; Ryoo, H.M.; Choi, J.Y.; Shin, H.I.; Chun, S.Y.; et al. Proteomic profile of osteoclast membrane proteins: Identification of Na+/H+ exchanger domain containing 2 and its role in osteoclast fusion. Proteomics 2008, 8, 2625–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Itzstein, C.; Coxon, F.P.; Rogers, M.J. The regulation of osteoclast function and bone resorption by small GTPases. Small GTPases 2011, 2, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Shimada-Sugawara, M.; Sakai, E.; Okamoto, K.; Fukuda, M.; Izumi, T.; Yoshida, N.; Tsukuba, T. Rab27A regulates transport of cell surface receptors modulating multinucleation and lysosome-related organelles in osteoclasts. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Taylor, A.; Mules, E.H.; Seabra, M.C.; Helfrich, M.H.; Rogers, M.J.; Coxon, F.P. Impaired prenylation of Rab GTPases in the gunmetal mouse causes defects in bone cell function. Small GTPases 2011, 2, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yamaguchi, Y.; Sakai, E.; Okamoto, K.; Kajiya, H.; Okabe, K.; Naito, M.; Kadowaki, T.; Tsukuba, T. Rab44, a novel large Rab GTPase, negatively regulates osteoclast differentiation by modulating intracellular calcium levels followed by NFATc1 activation. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 33–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Palokangas, H.; Mulari, M.; Vaananen, H.K. Endocytic pathway from the basal plasma membrane to the ruffled border membrane in bone-resorbing osteoclasts. J. Cell Sci. 1997, 110, 1767–1780. [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhao, H.; Laitala-Leinonen, T.; Parikka, V.; Vaananen, H.K. Downregulation of small GTPase Rab7 impairs osteoclast polarization and bone resorption. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 39295–39302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Matsumoto, N.; Sekiya, M.; Tohyama, K.; Ishiyama-Matsuura, E.; Sun-Wada, G.H.; Wada, Y.; Futai, M.; Nakanishi-Matsui, M. Essential Role of the a3 Isoform of V-ATPase in Secretory Lysosome Trafficking via Rab7 Recruitment. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Yang, D.Q.; Feng, S.; Chen, W.; Zhao, H.; Paulson, C.; Li, Y.P. V-ATPase subunit ATP6AP1 (Ac45) regulates osteoclast differentiation, extracellular acidification, lysosomal trafficking, and protease exocytosis in osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2012, 27, 1695–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Rawet-Slobodkin, M.; Elazar, Z. PLEKHM1: A multiprotein adaptor for the endolysosomal system. Mol. Cell 2015, 57, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Fujiwara, T.; Ye, S.; Castro-Gomes, T.; Winchell, C.G.; Andrews, N.W.; Voth, D.E.; Varughese, K.I.; Mackintosh, S.G.; Feng, Y.; Pavlos, N.; et al. PLEKHM1/DEF8/RAB7 complex regulates lysosome positioning and bone homeostasis. JCI Insight 2016, 1, e86330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Witwicka, H.; Jia, H.; Kutikov, A.; Reyes-Gutierrez, P.; Li, X.; Odgren, P.R. TRAFD1 (FLN29) Interacts with Plekhm1 and Regulates Osteoclast Acidification and Resorption. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Van Wesenbeeck, L.; Odgren, P.R.; Coxon, F.P.; Frattini, A.; Moens, P.; Perdu, B.; MacKay, C.A.; Van Hul, E.; Timmermans, J.P.; Vanhoenacker, F.; et al. Involvement of PLEKHM1 in osteoclastic vesicular transport and osteopetrosis in incisors absent rats and humans. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 919–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sun, Y.; Buki, K.G.; Ettala, O.; Vaaraniemi, J.P.; Vaananen, H.K. Possible role of direct Rac1-Rab7 interaction in ruffled border formation of osteoclasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 32356–32361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hirvonen, M.J.; Buki, K.G.; Sun, Y.; Mulari, M.T.; Harkonen, P.L.; Vaananen, K.H. Novel interaction of Rab13 and Rab8 with endospanins. FEBS Open Bio 2013, 3, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Abu-Amer, Y.; Teitelbaum, S.L.; Chappel, J.C.; Schlesinger, P.; Ross, F.P. Expression and regulation of RAB3 proteins in osteoclasts and their precursors. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1999, 14, 1855–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pavlos, N.J.; Xu, J.; Riedel, D.; Yeoh, J.S.; Teitelbaum, S.L.; Papadimitriou, J.M.; Jahn, R.; Ross, F.P.; Zheng, M.H. Rab3D regulates a novel vesicular trafficking pathway that is required for osteoclastic bone resorption. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 25, 5253–5269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pavlos, N.J.; Cheng, T.S.; Qin, A.; Ng, P.Y.; Feng, H.T.; Ang, E.S.; Carrello, A.; Sung, C.H.; Jahn, R.; Zheng, M.H.; et al. Tctex-1, a novel interaction partner of Rab3D, is required for osteoclastic bone resorption. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 31, 1551–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tang, L.; Yin, Y.; Liu, J.; Li, Z.; Lu, X. MiR-124 Attenuates Osteoclastogenic Differentiation of Bone Marrow Monocytes Via Targeting Rab27a. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 43, 1663–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Tokuhisa, M.; Kadowaki, T.; Ogawa, K.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Kido, M.A.; Gao, W.; Umeda, M.; Tsukuba, T. Expression and localisation of Rab44 in immune-related cells change during cell differentiation and stimulation. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Hutagalung, A.H.; Novick, P.J. Role of Rab GTPases in membrane traffic and cell physiology. Physiol. Rev. 2011, 91, 119–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tolar, J.; Teitelbaum, S.L.; Orchard, P.J. Osteopetrosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 2839–2849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Pangrazio, A.; Caldana, M.E.; Lo Iacono, N.; Mantero, S.; Vezzoni, P.; Villa, A.; Sobacchi, C. Autosomal recessive osteopetrosis: Report of 41 novel mutations in the TCIRG1 gene and diagnostic implications. Osteoporos. Int. 2012, 23, 2713–2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kornak, U.; Kasper, D.; Bosl, M.R.; Kaiser, E.; Schweizer, M.; Schulz, A.; Friedrich, W.; Delling, G.; Jentsch, T.J. Loss of the ClC-7 chloride channel leads to osteopetrosis in mice and man. Cell 2001, 104, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lange, P.F.; Wartosch, L.; Jentsch, T.J.; Fuhrmann, J.C. ClC-7 requires Ostm1 as a beta-subunit to support bone resorption and lysosomal function. Nature 2006, 440, 220–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pandruvada, S.N.; Beauregard, J.; Benjannet, S.; Pata, M.; Lazure, C.; Seidah, N.G.; Vacher, J. Role of Ostm1 Cytosolic Complex with Kinesin 5B in Intracellular Dispersion and Trafficking. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016, 36, 507–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Stattin, E.L.; Henning, P.; Klar, J.; McDermott, E.; Stecksen-Blicks, C.; Sandstrom, P.E.; Kellgren, T.G.; Ryden, P.; Hallmans, G.; Lonnerholm, T.; et al. SNX10 gene mutation leading to osteopetrosis with dysfunctional osteoclasts. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Teasdale, R.D.; Collins, B.M. Insights into the PX (phox-homology) domain and SNX (sorting nexin) protein families: Structures, functions and roles in disease. Biochem. J. 2012, 441, 39–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Bo, T.; Yan, F.; Guo, J.; Lin, X.; Zhang, H.; Guan, Q.; Wang, H.; Fang, L.; Gao, L.; Zhao, J.; et al. Characterization of a Relatively Malignant Form of Osteopetrosis Caused by a Novel Mutation in the PLEKHM1 Gene. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2016, 31, 1979–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Sobacchi, C.; Schulz, A.; Coxon, F.; Villa, A.; Helfrich, M. Osteopetrosis: Genetics, treatment and new insights into osteoclast function. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2013, 9, 522–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Roodman, G.D.; Windle, J.J. Paget disease of bone. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Chamoux, E.; Couture, J.; Bisson, M.; Morissette, J.; Brown, J.P.; Roux, S. The p62 P392L mutation linked to Paget’s disease induces activation of human osteoclasts. Mol. Endocrinol. 2009, 23, 1668–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Helfrich, M.H.; Hocking, L.J. Genetics and aetiology of Pagetic disorders of bone. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2008, 473, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. McManus, S.; Bisson, M.; Chamberland, R.; Roy, M.; Nazari, S.; Roux, S. Autophagy and 3-Phosphoinositide-Dependent Kinase 1 (PDK1)-Related Kinome in Pagetic Osteoclasts. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2016, 31, 1334–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Usategui-Martin, R.; Gestoso-Uzal, N.; Calero-Paniagua, I.; De Pereda, J.M.; Del Pino-Montes, J.; Gonzalez-Sarmiento, R. A mutation in p62 protein (p. R321C), associated to Paget’s disease of bone, causes a blockade of autophagy and an activation of NF-kB pathway. Bone 2020, 133, 115265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sun, Q.; Sammut, B.; Wang, F.M.; Kurihara, N.; Windle, J.J.; Roodman, G.D.; Galson, D.L. TBK1 mediates critical effects of measles virus nucleocapsid protein (MVNP) on pagetic osteoclast formation. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2014, 29, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Pilli, M.; Arko-Mensah, J.; Ponpuak, M.; Roberts, E.; Master, S.; Mandell, M.A.; Dupont, N.; Ornatowski, W.; Jiang, S.; Bradfute, S.B.; et al. TBK-1 promotes autophagy-mediated antimicrobial defense by controlling autophagosome maturation. Immunity 2012, 37, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Itoh, T.; Satoh, M.; Kanno, E.; Fukuda, M. Screening for target Rabs of TBC (Tre-2/Bub2/Cdc16) domain-containing proteins based on their Rab-binding activity. Genes Cells 2006, 11, 1023–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Coxon, F.P.; Thompson, K.; Rogers, M.J. Recent advances in understanding the mechanism of action of bisphosphonates. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2006, 6, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Russell, R.G. Bisphosphonates: From bench to bedside. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1068, 367–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Rogers, M.J.; Monkkonen, J.; Munoz, M.A. Molecular mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates and new insights into their effects outside the skeleton. Bone 2020, 139, 115493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Coxon, F.P.; Helfrich, M.H.; Van’t Hof, R.; Sebti, S.; Ralston, S.H.; Hamilton, A.; Rogers, M.J. Protein geranylgeranylation is required for osteoclast formation, function, and survival: Inhibition by bisphosphonates and GGTI-298. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2000, 15, 1467–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Coxon, F.P.; Helfrich, M.H.; Larijani, B.; Muzylak, M.; Dunford, J.E.; Marshall, D.; McKinnon, A.D.; Nesbitt, S.A.; Horton, M.A.; Seabra, M.C.; et al. Identification of a novel phosphonocarboxylate inhibitor of Rab geranylgeranyl transferase that specifically prevents Rab prenylation in osteoclasts and macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 48213–48222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Agola, J.O.; Jim, P.A.; Ward, H.H.; Basuray, S.; Wandinger-Ness, A. Rab GTPases as regulators of endocytosis, targets of disease and therapeutic opportunities. Clin. Genet. 2011, 80, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 21 07655 g001
Figure 1. Bone resorption: a multi-step process involving vesicle trafficking. Osteoclasts polarize and reorganize their cytoskeleton upon adhering to the bone. The sealing zone (an actin-rich organelle-free zone) is formed by a peripheral belt of adhesive structures, which delimits the ruffled border, a highly specialized area consisting of membrane expansions directed toward the bone. The ruffled membrane is formed as a result of polarized vesicular trafficking and extensive fusion and plays a critical role in the degradation of bone matrix. Degraded bone matrix products are internalized at the uptake zone and transported by transcytosis toward the functional secretory domain. Several Rab proteins identified in osteoclasts have been added (in red). E: endosome; RE: recycling endosomes. Adapted from [8,13,14].
Figure 1. Bone resorption: a multi-step process involving vesicle trafficking. Osteoclasts polarize and reorganize their cytoskeleton upon adhering to the bone. The sealing zone (an actin-rich organelle-free zone) is formed by a peripheral belt of adhesive structures, which delimits the ruffled border, a highly specialized area consisting of membrane expansions directed toward the bone. The ruffled membrane is formed as a result of polarized vesicular trafficking and extensive fusion and plays a critical role in the degradation of bone matrix. Degraded bone matrix products are internalized at the uptake zone and transported by transcytosis toward the functional secretory domain. Several Rab proteins identified in osteoclasts have been added (in red). E: endosome; RE: recycling endosomes. Adapted from [8,13,14].
Ijms 21 07655 g001
Ijms 21 07655 g002
Figure 2. Basics of autophagy: autophagy starts at a membrane core assembly site, which requires the activity of Beclin1- phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and UNC51-like kinase 1 (ULK1) complexes. Upstream signaling pathways regulate ULK1 complex activity, including PI3K/protein kinase B (PKB or Akt) and extracellular-signal regulated kinase (ERK), which function via mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), a potent inhibitor of autophagy. Vesicle expansion requires the Atg5-Atg12 conjugate and phosphatidyl inositol ethanolamine (PE)-conjugated LC3-II, both attached to the autophagosome membrane. Finally, fusion with a lysosome produces the autophagolysosome, the contents of which are degraded. Other abbreviations: Beclin1: BCL-2 interacting myosin/moesin-like coiled-coil protein 1; LC3: light chain 3 [Atg8 (yeast) is called LC3 in mammals]; PtdIns3P: phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate; SNAREs: N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors; WIPI: WD repeat domain phosphoinositide-interacting protein. Adapted from [14].
Figure 2. Basics of autophagy: autophagy starts at a membrane core assembly site, which requires the activity of Beclin1- phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and UNC51-like kinase 1 (ULK1) complexes. Upstream signaling pathways regulate ULK1 complex activity, including PI3K/protein kinase B (PKB or Akt) and extracellular-signal regulated kinase (ERK), which function via mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), a potent inhibitor of autophagy. Vesicle expansion requires the Atg5-Atg12 conjugate and phosphatidyl inositol ethanolamine (PE)-conjugated LC3-II, both attached to the autophagosome membrane. Finally, fusion with a lysosome produces the autophagolysosome, the contents of which are degraded. Other abbreviations: Beclin1: BCL-2 interacting myosin/moesin-like coiled-coil protein 1; LC3: light chain 3 [Atg8 (yeast) is called LC3 in mammals]; PtdIns3P: phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate; SNAREs: N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors; WIPI: WD repeat domain phosphoinositide-interacting protein. Adapted from [14].
Ijms 21 07655 g002
Ijms 21 07655 g003
Figure 3. Activation/deactivation cycle of Rab guanosine triphosphate hydrolases (GTPases). In their active GTP-bound form, Rab GTPases are attached to the inner membrane and recruit various effectors until they are inactivated via hydrolysis of GTP to guanosine diphosphate (GDP) after binding to a GTPase-activating protein (GAP). GDP dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) solubilize inactive Rabs, allowing for their release into the cytosol. Membrane-associated GDI displacement factors (GDFs) mediate the delivery of Rab GTPases to new target membrane structures via GDI release. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) then activate Rabs by changing GDP for a GTP, thereby initiating a new cycle. Adapted from [29,31].
Figure 3. Activation/deactivation cycle of Rab guanosine triphosphate hydrolases (GTPases). In their active GTP-bound form, Rab GTPases are attached to the inner membrane and recruit various effectors until they are inactivated via hydrolysis of GTP to guanosine diphosphate (GDP) after binding to a GTPase-activating protein (GAP). GDP dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) solubilize inactive Rabs, allowing for their release into the cytosol. Membrane-associated GDI displacement factors (GDFs) mediate the delivery of Rab GTPases to new target membrane structures via GDI release. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) then activate Rabs by changing GDP for a GTP, thereby initiating a new cycle. Adapted from [29,31].
Ijms 21 07655 g003
Table 1. Identification of Rab GTPases in osteoclasts and their involvement in autophagy and bone resorption.
Table 1. Identification of Rab GTPases in osteoclasts and their involvement in autophagy and bone resorption.
Rab GTPasesHuman OsteoclastsRodent OsteoclastsAutophagy (Non-Osteoclastic Cells)Bone Resorption
Gene ExpressionGene ExpressionProtein
1 X (b)XX
2 X (b)
3 (a–d)X (c) X (a, b/c, d) X (d)
4 (a, b)X (a)X (b)
5X (a, b)X (c)XXX (c)
6 X
7XXXXX
8X (b) X
9 (a, b)X (a)XX
10X X
11 (a, b)X (a)X (b)X (b)XX (b)
12X X
13X --
14X X
15, 17, 19--
18X XX
20X
21X X
22aX
23X X
24X X
25, 26--
27 (a, b)X (a)X (a)X (a) X (a)
28, 29--
30X
31X
32X X
33 (a, b)X (a, b) X (b)
34X
35 X
36, 37-- X
38XX --
39a/b, 40--
44 XX X 1
1 indirect impact (osteoclast formation). [X detected; -- not detected; Isoforms identified with lowercase letters are specified where appropriate].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Roy, M.; Roux, S. Rab GTPases in Osteoclastic Bone Resorption and Autophagy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7655. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207655

AMA Style

Roy M, Roux S. Rab GTPases in Osteoclastic Bone Resorption and Autophagy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(20):7655. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207655

Chicago/Turabian Style

Roy, Michèle, and Sophie Roux. 2020. "Rab GTPases in Osteoclastic Bone Resorption and Autophagy" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 20: 7655. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207655

APA Style

Roy, M., & Roux, S. (2020). Rab GTPases in Osteoclastic Bone Resorption and Autophagy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(20), 7655. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207655

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop