Next Article in Journal
Allosterism of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors: Therapeutic Potential for Neuroinflammation Underlying Brain Trauma and Degenerative Disorders
Next Article in Special Issue
Sweet Immunity: The Effect of Exogenous Fructans on the Susceptibility of Apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) to Venturia inaequalis
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of Stem Cell Differentiation Stage Factors (SCDSFs) Taken from Zebrafish Embryos during Organogenesis and Their Role in Regulating the Gene Expression of Normal and Pathological (Stem) Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Sugars in the Regulation of the Level of Endogenous Signaling Molecules during Defense Response of Yellow Lupine to Fusarium oxysporum
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 14
10.3390/ijms21144917
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Long-Day Photoperiod and 6-Benzyladenine Promote Runner Formation through Upregulation of Soluble Sugar Content in Strawberry

by
Yali Li
1,
Jiangtao Hu
1,
Hao Wei
1 and
Byoung Ryong Jeong
1,2,3,*
1
Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus Program), Department of Horticulture, Graduate School of Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
2
Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
3
Research Institute of Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(14), 4917; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144917
Submission received: 13 May 2020 / Revised: 6 July 2020 / Accepted: 10 July 2020 / Published: 12 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Sugars in Plant Responses to Stress and Their Regulatory Function during Development)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Commercial strawberries are mainly propagated using daughter plants produced on aerial runners because asexual propagation is faster than seed propagation, and daughter plants retain the characteristics of the mother plant. This study was conducted to investigate the effective factors for runner induction, as well as the molecular mechanisms behind the runner induction. An orthogonal test with 4 factors (photoperiod, temperature, gibberellin, and 6-benzyladenine), each with 3 levels was performed. Proteins were also extracted from the crowns with or without runners and separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis. The results of the orthogonal test showed that a long-day (LD) environment was the most influential factor for the runner formation, and 50 mg·L−1 of 6-BA significantly increased the number of runners. A proteomic analysis revealed that 32 proteins were differentially expressed (2-fold, p < 0.05) in the strawberry crowns with and without runners. A total of 16 spots were up-regulated in the crowns with runners induced by LD treatment. Identified proteins were classified into seven groups according to their biological roles. The most prominent groups were carbohydrate metabolism and photosynthesis, which indicated that the carbohydrate content may increase during runner formation. A further analysis demonstrated that the soluble sugar content was positively correlated with the number of runners. Thus, it is suggested that the photoperiod and 6-BA break the dormancy of the axillary buds and produce runners by increasing the soluble sugar content in strawberry.

1. Introduction

Cultivated strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) is one of the most popular fruits all around the world due to its beautiful appearance, flavor and health benefits. The cultivation and production of strawberry has continuously increased over the last two decades [1]. Commercially, strawberries are mainly propagated using daughter plants produced on runners, because asexual production using daughter plants is faster than seed propagation, and daughter plants retain the characteristics of the mother plant [2]. Hence, the ability to form runners carries an enormous agricultural importance. Strawberry is a rosette-forming plant, with short stems that are also called the primary crown. At the base of each leaflet along the primary crown, there is an axillary meristem (AXM), and these AXMs can either develop into runners and branch crowns, or remain dormant [3]. A high number of branch crowns means more inflorescence because only the shoot apical meristem (SAM) can develop an inflorescence [4]. It has long been observed that wild and cultivated strawberry have antagonistic processes of developing runners and flowers from different meristem crowns. Therefore, the development of the AXM is extremely important for runner production.
Factors affecting runner induction in strawberry have been studied for several decades. Seasonal flowering (June-bearing or non-remontant) and perpetual flowering (everbearing or remontant) are two different genotypes of commercial strawberries [5,6,7]. It is clear that long-days (LD) and higher temperatures promote runner formation in the seasonal flowering strawberries [8,9,10]. While higher temperatures also increase the runner production in the perpetual flowering strawberries, the effects of the photoperiod on the runner production in the perpetual flowering strawberries vary among different experiments [11,12]. Furthermore, plant growth regulators (PGRs) also play a decisive role in the fate of the AXMs. The most well-known PGRs for runner induction are gibberellins (GA). Numerous studies have shown that GA can significantly increase the runners in both wild and cultivated strawberries [13,14,15]. GA biosynthesis inhibitor prohexadione-calcium (Pro-Ca) retards the runner formation [4,16,17]. In addition, cytokinine and auxin coordinate the dormancy and outgrowth of the axillary buds in strawberry [18], and exogenous applications of benzyladenine (BA) were observed to contribute to a higher number of runners in some experiments [19,20].
Researchers began to focus on the genetic factors affecting the runner formation in strawberry in recent years. Diploid woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca) has been developed as a model for the commercial strawberry (octoploid) because of the small genome size [21]. Tenreira and his colleagues [22] found that the runnerless trait in woodland strawberry was caused by a deletion in the active site of a GA biosynthesis gene named FveGA20ox. This mutation was also found in all natural runnerless woodland strawberry plants, and exogenous applications of bioactive GA restored the runner-producing phenotype in the runnerless plants. Later, FveRGA1 was identified as a key gene controlling the runner formation in woodland strawberry plants. FveRGA1 belongs to DELLA proteins, which function as a GA signaling suppressor, and silencing FveRGA1 results in constitutive GA responses and constant development of runners [2,23]. Moreover, Mouhu et al. [10] suggested that FvSOC1 plays a central role in the photoperiodic control of runner production and flowering in woodland strawberries, and this process may also be regulated through the activation of GA biosynthesis genes. These results strongly suggest that GA biosynthesis in the axillary meristem is essential for inducing runner differentiation in diploid strawberry plants [24]. Few studies report on the genetic control of octoploid cultivated strawberry. Some studies have shown that perpetual flowering is controlled by a single dominant gene in cultivated strawberry plants [25,26], but the relation of these genes and runner production has not yet been identified. More studies have favored the polygenic control of the runnering trait. Gaston et al. [27] found that a single major quantitative trait locus (QTL) named FaPFRU negatively regulates the runnering in cultivated strawberry, which was further confirmed by Sooriyapathirana et al. [28]. Moreover, Hossain et al. [1] identified seven other QTLs, namely qRU-5D, qRU-3D1, qRU-1D2, qRU-4D, qRU-4C, qRU-5C, and qRU-2D2, that are responsible for the runner formation. These QTLs are not orthologous to the loci affecting runnering in Fragaria vesca, suggesting that runnering in diploid and octoploid strawberry are controlled by different genes. Although great progress has been made to reveal the genetic controls underlying the runner formation in strawberry, the proteomic changes underlying strawberry runnering are poorly understood. Proteomics is a reliable approach in understanding biological processes. Analyzing the proteomic changes during runner formation may help us understand the inner mechanisms.
In this study, we compared the effects of the photoperiod, temperature, GA3 and 6-BA on the runner induction in one of the most commonly cultivated strawberries in South Korea. We also compared the proteome-level changes in the crowns of the strawberry with and without runners. These results will provide new insights for the propagation of cultivated strawberry.

2. Results

2.1. Analysis of the Morphological and Growth Parameters

After 4 weeks of cultivation in three plant growth chambers, different morphologies were observed in strawberry plants (Figure 1C–E). The highest number of runners induced per plant was found in T6, and then T8 (Figure 1A). The longest runner was found in T3 (Figure 1B). The range analysis revealed that the photoperiod was the most important factor for runner induction; the long-day (LD) photoperiod (16 h) led to a strong increase in the number of runners (Table 1). The optimal day/night temperature for runner formation was 25/15 °C. 6-BA also promoted the runner induction, where a concentration of 50 mg·L−1 was the most effective. Foliar GA3 spray decreased the number of runners, where the concentration and the number of runners were negatively correlated. The plant height and petiole length were the shortest in T6 (Figure 2A,B), and the leaf length was also shorter in T6 compared to that of plants treated with GA3 (Figure 2D). The chlorophyll content (SPAD) was also higher in T6 and T8 (Figure 2F). Furthermore, through the range analysis, it was found that GA3 significantly increased the runner length, plant height, petiole length, petiole diameter, leaf length, and leaf width, but decreased the leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD), while a high daytime temperature increased the chlorophyll content (Tables S1–S7).
Half of the strawberry plants were moved to a glasshouse after cultivation in growth chambers. The data related to runners were collected 5 weeks later. T6 produced the highest number of daughter plants and also resulted in the greatest fresh weight of the daughter plants per plant. T8 produced the second highest number of daughter plants, with the second highest average daughter plant fresh weight (Figure 3B,C). On the contrary, the length of the first two internodes was shorter for plants in T6 and T8 (Figure 3A,D). The weight ratio of the daughter plant to the whole runner was also significantly increased in T6 and T8 when compared that in the other treatments (Figure 3E).

2.2. Protein Expression Profiles and Protein Identification

The proteins in the crowns of the strawberry plants with runners (LD) and without runners (SD) were separated according to their Mr and pI (Figure 4). Approximately 657 protein spots were detected in all replicates. Comparative proteomic analyses revealed that 32 spots showed significant and reproducible differences in abundance (p < 0.05 and at least 2-fold) in the two different types of crowns. A total of 16 spots (spots 9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31, and 32) were up-regulated in the crowns with runners when compared to those without crowns (Figure 5). Among these, eight spots (spots 15, 16, 20, 21, 26, 29, 31, and 32) were detected only in crowns with runners, and two spots (spots 11 and 12) were detected only in runnerless crowns. The differentially expressed protein (DEP) spots were identified by the MALDI-TOF/MS analysis, and 25 spots were successfully identified (Table 2). Most of the identified proteins were matched to proteins in the Fragaria vesca database.

2.3. Functional Classification of the DEPs

The identified proteins were classified into seven groups (Table 2). The most prominent groups were carbohydrate metabolism- and photosynthesis-related proteins, followed by proteins related to proteometabolism, stress, signaling, general metabolism, and respiration. Spots 3, 8, 9, 20, and 25 were involved in carbohydrate metabolism. Among these, spots 9 and 20 were significantly increased, while others decreased, in the crown with runners. Four photosynthesis-related spots (14, 19, 24, and 28) increased, while one photosynthesis-related protein (spot 13) decreased, in the crown with runners. Spots 6, 7, 12, and 23 were assigned to proteometabolism, and these proteins decreased in the crown with runners. There are four stress-related proteins identified: two of them (spots 1 and 4) increased in the crown without runners, while the other two (spots 31 and 32) were expressed more in the crown with runners. Moreover, one signaling protein (spot 16) was highly expressed, while two signaling proteins (spot 2 and 5) decreased, in the crown with runners. In total, three general metabolism-related proteins (spots 11, 17 and 29) were found to be differently expressed in the crown with vs. without runners, all of them except for spot 29 decreasing in the crown with runners. Furthermore, one respiration-related protein (spot 10) was highly expressed in the crown with runners.

2.4. Soluble Sugar and Starch Contents

The soluble sugar contents in young leaves and crowns were significantly increased in T6 and T8 when compared to those in the other treatments (Figure 6A,B). The sugar content in leaves of strawberry plants grown in T6 was more than twice that of plants grown in the other treatments, except for T8. The starch contents were also increased in young leaves and crowns in T6, especially for the content of starch in crowns (Figure 6C,D). Range analysis revealed that photoperiod and 50 mg·L−1 6-BA increased while GA3 decreased sugar and starch contents (Tables S8–S11).

3. Discussion

Because runner formation is photoperiod- and temperature- sensitive, we compared the impact of the photoperiod, temperature, GA3 and 6-BA on the runner induction in the strawberry ‘Seolhyang’. The results showed that the photoperiod was the most influential factor for runner induction, and the LD condition significantly increased the number of runners compared to the SD, which is consistent with the findings from previous studies [12,29]. Higher temperatures proved to be crucial for runner induction [30], so three different sets of day and night temperatures (DIF) with the same mean daily temperature of 20 °C were used in this study. The DIF of 25/15℃ was the most optimal for runner induction, indicating that both day and night temperatures are important for runner formation. The effects of the BA concentration on runner formation still remain controversial, while some researchers found that BA could improve runner induction [20], others have shown that BA alone had no effects on producing runners [31,32]. Our results showed that 6-BA (T6 and T8) significantly increased the number of runners. A recent research revealed that auxin and cytokinin coordinate the dormancy and outgrowth of axillary buds in strawberry. Relatively higher auxin activity is present in the dormant buds, and increased cytokinin activity is present in the non-dormant buds. Both the reduction in auxin accumulation and exogenous cytokinin application could trigger the regeneration of vegetative shoots in dormant buds [18]. Thus, the outgrowth of the axillary buds is affected not only by the cytokinin content, but also by auxin content. GA has been shown to play a critical role in runner formation in woodland strawberry. In this study, exogenous GA3 application decreased the number of runners. Surapornpiboon [33] also found that the runner production was negatively correlated with the GA3 concentration in cultivated strawberry, which is consistent with our results. Cultivated strawberries are complex allo-octoploids, with four relatively similar sub-genomic chromosome sets from diploid donors. A polyploid usually produces more hormones, total proteins, sugars, flavonoids, etc., compared to the corresponding diploid [34,35,36]. It could be deduced that the octoploids could increase the level of GAs, and these GAs alone are enough for producing runners in ‘Seolhyang’. Thus, the GA3 application broke the dynamic equilibrium and reduced the runner formation. In addition, the lengths of the first two internodes decreased while the weight ratios of the daughter plant to the whole runner increased in T6 and T8, which suggested that less energy was wasted.
Functional classification of the DEPs suggested that the carbohydrate content was quite different between strawberry plants with runners and those without runners. Sucrose synthase 2 (spot 9) and glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase (spot 20) were found highly expressed in the crown with runners. The sucrose synthase (SUS) has been associated with the synthesis of both storage and structural carbohydrates. It catalyzes the reversible conversion of sucrose and the UDP to fructose and the UDP-glucose [37]. The expression level of the SUS has been found highly correlated with phloem loading, which is the starting point for exporting process of carbohydrates and other nutrients from leaves [38]. Overexpression of the SUS leads to higher concentrations of fructose in leaves, whereas in elongating fibers, concentrations both glucose and fructose increased [39]. Glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase is mainly present in vacuoles and plays a key role in carbohydrate metabolism [40]. It has the capacity to break the C-N bond and produce oligosaccharides [41]. Thus, the higher expression levels of the SUS and glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase may suggest that more sugars were present in the crown with as opposed to without runners. The expression of malate dehydrogenase (MDH), glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase (G6PDH1), and lactoylglutathione lyase increased in the crown without runners. The MDH catalyzes the interconversion of malate and oxaloacetate [42]. It promoted glycolysis in actively proliferating cells [43] and may impair photosynthesis, since promoted photosynthesis was found in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants when the activity of the MDH decreased [44]. The G6PDH1 is a key regulatory enzyme in the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway that plays a central role in plant metabolism by converting glucose to ribose-5-phosphate for the biosynthetic processes such as assimilation of nitrogen and fatty-acid [45]. Lactoylglutathione lyase is also related to glycolysis [46]. Therefore, all these enzymes are involved in sugar consumption, which indicates less sugar content in the crown without as opposed to with runners.
Four proteometabolism-related proteins increased in the crown without runners. Protein disulfide-isomerase and mitochondrial-processing peptidase are involved in processing of proteins. Fumarylacetoacetase is an important enzyme involved in the amino acid catabolism [47], and the 26S protease regulatory subunit participates in protein degradation [48]. All these proteins were highly expressed in the crown without runners, which indicates that proteometabolism was enhanced under the SD condition.
Both spots 13 and 24 belong to the ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBisCo) large subunit. RuBisCo is a key enzyme for photosynthesis. It mediates the fixation of atmospheric CO2 in the Calvin cycle to produce organic carbon [49]. However, RuBisCo struggles in distinguishing CO2 from O2. The fixation of O2 results in energetically wasteful photorespiration [50]. In this study, spots 13 and 24 were presumed to be involved in photorespiration and photosynthesis, respectively, and spot 24 was more highly expressed under the LD condition, while spot 13 was less highly expressed. Moreover, two ATP-dependent photosynthesis-related chaperone proteins ClpC (spot 19) and Cpn60-2 (spot 28), together with magnesium ion binding protein (spot 14), were increased under the LD condition. ClpC and Cpn60 played an essential role in the photosynthetic activity and photosystem content [51,52,53]. Magnesium, the central element in chlorophyll [54], could affect the RuBisCo activity and is extremely crucial for photosynthesis [55]. These results indicate that photosynthesis was enhanced under the LD condition, which suggests that a greater amount of carbohydrates (such as sugar and starch) was produced by photosynthesis.
The enhanced respiration may also play an important role in the runner formation process. CoQ10 is a conserved CoQ-binding protein that is essential for proper respiration [56]. The expression level of CoQ10 (spot 10) was significantly increased under the LD condition (p < 0.05), which suggested that the respiration might be enhanced. Respiration is the metabolic bridge from photosynthesis to growth, where photosynthates are converted into substances that contribute to the plant growth, maintenance, transport, and nutrient assimilation processes [57]. Respiration achieves this process by breaking down sugars into smaller molecules (carbon skeleton intermediates) for biosynthesis, and generating ATP for all heterotrophic energy-requiring processes [58]. The enhanced photosynthesis and respiration under the LD condition indicate that more substances and energy were produced to support plant growth. Since runner formation was the most conspicuous growth difference between plants grown in the LD and SD conditions, we assume that most of the substances and energy produced by respiration were used for producing runners. However, the exact mechanisms with which carbon skeleton intermediates and energy promote runner formation are still an open question.
Recent research has proven that sugar is crucial for the bud outgrowth. For almost a century, the plant growth regulator auxin has been central to theories on apical dominance, whereby the growing shoot tip suppresses the growth of the axillary buds below. Actually, auxin transports very slowly, typically at 1 cm·h−1 through the stem [59], but it has been observed that pea (Pisum sativum) buds release up to 24 h before changes in the auxin content were observed in the adjacent stem. After the loss of the shoot tip, sugars are rapidly redistributed over large distances (150 cm·h−1) and accumulate in axillary buds within a timeframe that correlates with the bud release. Thus, a new theory of apical dominance was put forward that the shoot tip′s strong demand for sugars inhibits axillary bud outgrowth by limiting the amount of sugar translocated to those buds [60]. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that sugar not only plays a nutritional role, but also serves as a significant signaling mediator for bud release. For instance, sugar could suppress the auxin-induced strigolactone pathway to promote bud growth in rose (Rosa hybrida L. cv Radrazz) [61]. Moreover, higher expression levels of sugar metabolism and signaling genes were detected in non-dormant buds in strawberry runners when compared with the dormant buds [18]. Thus, we measured the soluble sugar and starch contents in strawberry treated with different photoperiods, temperatures, GA3 and 6-BA concentrations. Although T6 and T8 had different photoperiods, they both processed higher soluble sugar and starch contents than the other treatments, and the soluble sugar content was positively correlated with the number of runners, suggesting that sugar may play an important role in breaking the dormancy of the axillary buds and producing runners in strawberry. In addition, a range analysis revealed that GA3 significantly decreased the chlorophyll and soluble sugar contents in strawberry. These may be the means for the downregulation of the number of runners by GA3 in this experiment (Tables S7–S9). The range analysis also indicated that 6-BA slightly increased the sugar content (Tables S8 and S9). There is evidence demonstrating that 6-BA could promote photosynthesis and increase the soluble sugar content in plants [62,63], which suggests that 6-BA may promote runner formation partly by increasing the sugar content.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Culture Condition

The runner plants of the strawberry ‘Seolhyang’ were obtained from a strawberry farm (Sugok-myeon, Jinju, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea) and were stuck in the BVB Medium (Bas Van Buuren Substrate, EN-12580, De Lier, Westland, The Netherlands) in 21-cell zigzag trays (21-Zigpot/21 cell tray, Daeseung, Jeonju, Korea). All cuttings were kept on a fogged propagation bench with an 80% relative humidity for 2 weeks, and were subsequently cultivated for a month in a glasshouse with 29/20 °C day/night temperatures, an average light intensity of 450 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD coming from the sun, and a natural photoperiod of 12 h. The strawberry plants were transplanted into 10-cm plastic pots for the subsequent experiments.
An orthogonal design L9 (3)4 was used, where the 9 treatments contained different combinations of photoperiod (8, 12, or 16 h), temperature (23/17, 25/15, or 27/13 °C for day/night), GA3 (0, 50, or 100 mg·L−1), and 6-BA (0, 50, or 100 mg·L−1) (Table 3). The experiment was conducted in 3 plant growth chambers. There were 3 biological replicates (n = 3) in each treatment. The data were collected after a month. The fully-expanded young leaves and crowns were harvested and immediately put into liquid nitrogen, then stored in a −80 °C freezer until further use. The rest of the strawberry plants were moved to a glasshouse and the growth indexes of the runners were measured after 5 weeks of cultivation.

4.2. Measurement of the Chlorophyll Content

The chlorophyll content was measured with the Plus Chlorophyll Meter (Spectrum technologies, Wales, UK).

4.3. Proteomic Analysis

4.3.1. Materials for the Proteomic Analysis

As the photoperiod is the most influential factor for runner induction based on our results, we conducted another experiment to produce runners for the proteomic analysis. Strawberry plants were grown in a closed walk-in growth chamber with 25/15 ℃ day/night temperatures. Half of the strawberry plants were grown with the LD (16 h) photoperiod to produce runners, while the others were grown with the short day (SD, 10 h) photoperiod, using a light with an intensity of 300 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPFD. The crowns of the strawberry plants with 3 runners grown in LD and those with 0 runners grown in SD were collected after 2 months, were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and subsequently stored in a −80 ℃ refrigerator.

4.3.2. Protein Extraction

The total proteins in the strawberry crowns were extracted based on the methods described by Bianco et al. [64] with minor modifications. Samples weighing 0.5 g were finely ground in liquid nitrogen. The powder was transferred into a 15 mL centrifuge tube, and was suspended with a 5 mL extraction buffer (0.7 M sucrose, 0.1 M KCl, 0.5 M Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM EDTA, 1% PVP, 2% w/v β-mercaptoethanol and 1 mM PSMF, 10 mM DTT). The tube was kept in ice for 30 min before an equal volume of chilled phenol saturated with a Tris-HCl buffer (pH = 7.5) was added, and then was vortexed for 15 min. After a 20-min centrifugation at 5000 g and 4 ℃, the upper phenolic phase was collected and mixed with 5 volumes of 100 mM ammonium acetate in methanol, then was kept at −20 °C overnight. The precipitated proteins were centrifuged for 20 min at 5000 g and 4 °C, and then rinsed once with a pre-cooling methanol and twice with chilled 80% acetone. The proteins were then air-dried at room temperature and dissolved in a 400 μL rehydration buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS, 2% IPG buffer at pH 3–10 nonlinear and 0.001% bromophenol blue). Finally, the protein concentration was determined with the Bradford reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the manual, and bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as the standard.

4.3.3. Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis and Image Analysis

For the first dimension, isoelectric focusing (IEF) of proteins was performed based on the method described by Gorg et al. [65] with some modifications. The immobilized pH gradient (IPG) strips (18 cm, pH 3–10 NL) were passively rehydrated with 500 μg of protein in a 360 μL rehydration buffer in the IPGbox (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK) for 12 h. The focusing was performed in the Ettan IPGphor 3 (GE Healthcare, UK) at 20 °C with 50 mA per strip under the following conditions: 30 V for 2 h, 200 V for 1 h, 500 V for 1 h, 3000 V for 1 h, gradient from 3000 V to 8000 V within 30 min, and 8000 V for 3 h. After the first dimensional IEF, the IPG strips were equilibrated according to the method of Gorg et al. [65]. The second dimensional electrophoresis was carried out in 12% SDS-PAGE, then the gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) according to R-250/G-250 = 4:1. The images were taken with a high-resolution scanner (Epson, Long Beach, USA). The abundant difference (2-fold, p < 0.05) of the proteins in the samples were calculated with the PDQuest Advanced 2-D Analysis software (version 8.01, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) based on Student’s t-test.

4.3.4. In-Gel Digestion and MALDI-TOF/MS

The differentially expressed proteins were excised from PAGE gel with pipette tips, and the in-gel digestion was performed according to the method of Shevchenko et al. [66]. The peptide solution was then spotted onto the MALDI-TOF MS target plate. The MALDI-MS analysis was performed using an ABI 4800 Plus TOF/TOF mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Framingham, MA, USA). The running condition was set to 200 Hz ND: 355 nm YAG laser operations, and the 10 most and least intense ions per MALDI spot with signal/noise ratios >25 were selected for the subsequent MS/MS analysis in 1 kV mode with 800–1000 consecutive laser exposure. The MS/MS spectra data were searched against the NCBInr database and Protein Pilot v.3.0 software (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) with the MASCOT search engine (ver. 2.3.02, Matrix Science, London, UK) at 50 ppm of mass tolerance. Oxidation of methionines and carbamidomethylation of cysteines were allowed for the MS/MS spectra search in the databases. Individual peptide ion scores were searched using a statistically significant threshold value of p = 0.05.

4.3.5. Protein Functional Classification

The identified proteins were classified into different categories of biological processes according to gene ontology [67].

4.4. Measurements of the Soluble Sugar and Starch Contents

The soluble sugar and starch contents were determined by the anthrone–sulfuric acid colorimetry [68]. An amount of 0.3 g of leaf or crown samples were finely ground in liquid nitrogen and then extracted in 25 mL of distilled water for 30 min at 100 °C. Samples were centrifuged at 6500 rpm for 10 min before the supernatant was collected for the soluble sugar content assays. The residues of the leaves were suspended in 20 mL of distilled water and 2 mL of 9.2 M perchloric acid. The mixture was then placed in boiling water for 15 min, and after centrifugation, the supernatant was collected for the starch content assay. An amount of 0.2 mL of soluble sugar was transferred to 1.8 mL of distilled water, and 0.5 mL of starch was transferred to 1.5 mL of distilled water. An amount of 0.5 mL of 2% anthrone and 5 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid were then added to the soluble sugar or starch solutions. After the solutions were incubated in boiling water for 10 min, the absorbance of the mixed solution was measured at 630 nm for soluble sugar and 485 nm for starch with a UV-spectrophotometer (Libra S22, Biochrom Ltd., Cambridge, UK). The soluble sugar and starch contents were calculated based on the standard curve.

4.5. Measurements of the Soluble Sugar and Starch Contents

The physiological parameters were obtained in a complete randomized design with three replicates, and are presented as the mean ± the standard deviation (SD). The data collected were subjected to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan′s multiple range test at p < 0.05 with the SAS (Statistical Analysis System, V. 6.2, Cary, NC, USA) program. Furthermore, we conducted a range analysis to test the optimal level for runner induction. The equation used was R = max{Ki X} − min{Ki X}, where Ki X is the average of the following variables: photoperiod, temperature, GA3 and 6-BA, at the 1, 2, and 3 levels. X, represents the photoperiod, temperature, GA3, or 6-BA and i represents the levels of 1, 2, or 3 [69].

5. Conclusions

We compared the effects of the photoperiod, temperature, and GA3 and 6-BA concentrations on runner induction in strawberry, and we found that the photoperiod was the most influential factor for runner induction. The expected optimal combination for runner formation was a 16-h photoperiod combined with 25/15 °C day/night temperatures, and 50 mg·L−1 of 6-BA. A proteomic analysis revealed that proteins related to carbohydrate metabolism and photosynthesis were the most prominent groups under the LD condition, indicating that more carbohydrates were produced for runner induction. Moreover, we demonstrated that the soluble sugar content was positively correlated with the number of runners, which suggested that sugar may play an important role in runner formation in strawberry.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/14/4917/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. and B.R.J.; methodology, Y.L. and J.H.; software, Y.L. and J.H.; investigation, Y.L., J.H. and H.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.L., J.H. and B.R.J.; visualization, Y.L.; supervision, Y.L. and J.H.; project administration, Y.L. and B.R.J.; funding acquisition, B.R.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (Project No. 118078-2). Y.L., J.H. and H.W. were supported by a scholarship from the BK21 Plus Program, the Ministry of Education, Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hossain, M.R.; Natarajan, S.; Kim, H.-T.; Jesse, D.M.I.; Lee, C.-G.; Park, J.-I.; Nou, I.-S. High density linkage map construction and QTL mapping for runner production in allo-octoploid strawberry Fragaria× ananassa based on ddRAD-seq derived SNPs. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Caruana, J.C.; Sittmann, J.W.; Wang, W.; Liu, Z. Suppressor of runnerless encodes a DELLA protein that controls runner formation for asexual reproduction in strawberry. Mol. Plant. 2018, 11, 230–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Hytönen, T.; Elomaa, P. Genetic and environmental regulation of flowering and runnering in strawberry. Genes Genom. Genom. 2011, 5, 56–64. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hytönen, T.; Elomaa, P.; Moritz, T.; Junttila, O. Gibberellin mediates daylength-controlled differentiation of vegetative meristems in strawberry (Fragaria× ananassa Duch). BMC Plant. Biol. 2009, 9, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Heide, O.; Stavang, J.; Sønsteby, A. Physiology and genetics of flowering in cultivated and wild strawberries–a review. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 2013, 88, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Weebadde, C.; Wang, D.; Finn, C.; Lewers, K.; Luby, J.J.; Bushakra, J.; Sjulin, T.; Hancock, J. Using a linkage mapping approach to identify QTL for day-neutrality in the octoploid strawberry. Plant. Breeding 2008, 127, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Castro, P.; Bushakra, J.; Stewart, P.; Weebadde, C.; Wang, D.; Hancock, J.; Finn, C.; Luby, J.J.; Lewers, K. Genetic mapping of day-neutrality in cultivated strawberry. Mol. Breeding 2015, 35, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Heide, O.M. Photoperiod and temperature interactions in growth and flowering of strawberry. Physiol. Plant. 1977, 40, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hytönen, T.; Palonen, P.; Mouhu, K.; Junttila, O. Crown branching and cropping potential in strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duch.) can be enhanced by daylength treatments. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 2004, 79, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mouhu, K.; Kurokura, T.; Koskela, E.A.; Albert, V.A.; Elomaa, P.; Hytönen, T. The Fragaria vesca homolog of SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1 represses flowering and promotes vegetative growth. Plant. Cell 2013, 25, 3296–3310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Sønsteby, A.; Heide, O. Long-day control of flowering in everbearing strawberries. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 2007, 82, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bradford, E.; Hancock, J.F.; Warner, R.M. Interactions of temperature and photoperiod determine expression of repeat flowering in strawberry. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2010, 135, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Uddin, A.J.; Hossan, M.; Islam, M.; Ahsan, M.; Mehraj, H. Strawberry growth and yield responses to gibberellic acid concentrations. J. Expt. Biosci. 2012, 3, 51–56. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kumar, R.; Bakshi, M.; Singh, D. Influence of plant growth regulators on growth, yield and quality of strawberrry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) under UP sub tropics. Asian J. Hortic. 2012, 7, 434–436. [Google Scholar]
  15. Palei, S.; Das, K.; Sahoo, K.; Dash, D.K.; Swain, S. Influence of plant growth regulators on strawberry Cv. Chandler under Odisha condition. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2016, 7, 9945–9948. [Google Scholar]
  16. Greene, D.W.; Schloemann, S.G. Prohexadione-calcium inhibits runner formation and enhances yield of strawberry. J. Am. Pomol. Soc. 2010, 64, 125. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim, H.M.; Lee, H.R.; Kang, J.H.; Hwang, S.J. Prohexadione-calcium application during vegetative growth affects growth of mother plants, runners, and runner plants of Maehyang strawberry. Agronomy 2019, 9, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Qiu, Y.; Guan, S.C.; Wen, C.; Li, P.; Gao, Z.; Chen, X. Auxin and cytokinin coordinate the dormancy and outgrowth of axillary bud in strawberry runner. BMC Plant. Biol. 2019, 19, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kour, S.; Kumar, R.; Wali, V.; Sharma, A.; Bakshi, P. Impact of benzyladenine and gibberellic acid on quality and economics of runner production in Chandler strawberry (Fragaria× ananassa) under subtropical climate. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2017, 87, 964–967. [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu, C.; Guo, Z.; Park, Y.G.; Wei, H.; Jeong, B.R. PGR and its application method affect number and length of runners produced in ‘Maehyang’and ‘Sulhyang’strawberries. Agronomy 2019, 9, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Slovin, J.P.; Schmitt, K.; Folta, K.M. An inbred line of the diploid strawberry Fragaria vesca f. semperflorens for genomic and molecular genetic studies in the Rosaceae. Plant. Methods 2009, 5, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Tenreira, T.; Lange, M.J.P.; Lange, T.; Bres, C.; Labadie, M.; Monfort, A.; Hernould, M.; Rothan, C.; Denoyes, B. A specific gibberellin 20-oxidase dictates the flowering-runnering decision in diploid strawberry. Plant. Cell 2017, 29, 2168–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Li, W.; Zhang, J.; Sun, H.; Wang, S.; Chen, K.; Liu, Y.; Li, H.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, Z. FveRGA1, encoding a DELLA protein, negatively regulates runner production in Fragaria vesca. Planta 2018, 247, 941–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Martins, A.O.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; Araújo, W.L.; Fernie, A.R. To bring flowers or do a runner: Gibberellins make the decision. Mol. Plant. 2018, 11, 4–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Shaw, D.V.; Famula, T.R. Complex segregation analysis of day-neutrality in domestic strawberry (Fragaria× ananassa Duch.). Euphytica 2005, 145, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sugimoto, T.; Tamaki, K.; Matsumoto, J.; Yamamoto, Y.; Shiwaku, K.; Watanabe, K. Detection of RAPD markers linked to the everbearing gene in Japanese cultivated strawberry. Plant. Breeding 2005, 124, 498–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gaston, A.; Perrotte, J.; Lerceteau-Köhler, E.; Rousseau-Gueutin, M.; Petit, A.; Hernould, M.; Rothan, C.; Denoyes, B. PFRU, a single dominant locus regulates the balance between sexual and asexual plant reproduction in cultivated strawberry. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 1837–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Sooriyapathirana, S.S.; Mookerjee, S.; Weebadde, C.K.; Finn, C.E.; Lewers, K.; Bushakra, J.M.; Luby, J.J.; Stewart, P.; Neils, S.; Hancock, J.F. Identification of QTL associated with flower and runner production in octoploid strawberry (Fragaria× ananassa). J. Berry Res. 2015, 5, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Durner, E.F.; Barden, J.; Himelrick, D.; Poling, E. Photoperiod and temperature effects on flower and runner development in day-neutral, Junebearing, and everbearing strawberries. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1984, 109, 396–400. [Google Scholar]
  30. Heide, O.M.; Sønsteby, A. Interactions of temperature and photoperiod in the control of flowering of latitudinal and altitudinal populations of wild strawberry (Fragaria vesca). Physiol. Plant. 2007, 130, 280–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kender, W.; Carpenter, S.; Braun, J. Runner formation in everbearing strawberry as influenced by growth-promoting and inhibiting substances. Ann. Bot. 1971, 35, 1045–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Momenpour, A.; Taghavi, T.S.; Manochehr, S. Effects of banzyladenine and gibberellin on runner production and some vegetative traits of three strawberry cultivars. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 6, 4357–4361. [Google Scholar]
  33. Surapornpiboon, P.; Surapornpiboon, P. Effect of benzyladenine and gibberellic acid on runner production in strawberry. In Proceedings of the 19. Rajamangala University of Technology Conference, Pathum Thani, Thailand, 22–27 January 2002. [Google Scholar]
  34. Dai, F.; Wang, Z.; Luo, G.; Tang, C. Phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses of autotetraploid and diploid mulberry (Morus alba L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 22938–22956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jaskani, M.J.; Kwon, S.W.; Kim, D.H. Comparative study on vegetative, reproductive and qualitative traits of seven diploid and tetraploid watermelon lines. Euphytica 2005, 145, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bagheri, M.; Mansouri, H. Effect of induced polyploidy on some biochemical parameters in Cannabis sativa L. Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 2015, 175, 2366–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Barratt, D.P.; Derbyshire, P.; Findlay, K.; Pike, M.; Wellner, N.; Lunn, J.; Feil, R.; Simpson, C.; Maule, A.J.; Smith, A.M. Normal growth of Arabidopsis requires cytosolic invertase but not sucrose synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 13124–13129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Rennie, E.A.; Turgeon, R. A comprehensive picture of phloem loading strategies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 14162–14167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Xu, S.-M.; Brill, E.; Llewellyn, D.J.; Furbank, R.T.; Ruan, Y.-L. Overexpression of a potato sucrose synthase gene in cotton accelerates leaf expansion, reduces seed abortion, and enhances fiber production. Mol. Plant. 2012, 5, 430–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gupta, N.; Zargar, S.M.; Salgotra, R.; Dar, T.A. Identification of drought stress-responsive proteins in common bean. J. Proteins Proteom. 2019, 10, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bojarová, P.; Křen, V. Glycosidases: A key to tailored carbohydrates. Trends Biotechnol. 2009, 27, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tomaz, T.; Bagard, M.; Pracharoenwattana, I.; Lindén, P.; Lee, C.P.; Carroll, A.J.; Ströher, E.; Smith, S.M.; Gardeström, P.; Millar, A.H. Mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase lowers leaf respiration and alters photorespiration and plant growth in Arabidopsis. Plant. Physiol. 2010, 154, 1143–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Hanse, E.A.; Ruan, C.; Kachman, M.; Wang, D.; Lowman, X.H.; Kelekar, A. Cytosolic malate dehydrogenase activity helps support glycolysis in actively proliferating cells and cancer. Oncogene 2017, 36, 3915–3924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Nunes-Nesi, A.; Carrari, F.; Lytovchenko, A.; Smith, A.M.; Loureiro, M.E.; Ratcliffe, R.G.; Sweetlove, L.J.; Fernie, A.R. Enhanced photosynthetic performance and growth as a consequence of decreasing mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase activity in transgenic tomato plants. Plant. Physiol. 2005, 137, 611–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Siddappaji, M.H.; Scholes, D.R.; Bohn, M.; Paige, K.N. Overcompensation in response to herbivory in Arabidopsis thaliana: The role of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and the oxidative pentose-phosphate pathway. Genetics 2013, 195, 589–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Agapito-Tenfen, S.Z.; Guerra, M.P.; Wikmark, O.-G.; Nodari, R.O. Comparative proteomic analysis of genetically modified maize grown under different agroecosystems conditions in Brazil. Proteome Sci. 2013, 11, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Hildebrandt, T.M.; Nesi, A.N.; Araújo, W.L.; Braun, H.-P. Amino acid catabolism in plants. Mol. Plant. 2015, 8, 1563–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Czub, B.; Shah, A.Z.; Alfano, G.; Kruczek, P.M.; Chakarova, C.F.; Bhattacharya, S.S. TOPORS, a dual E3 ubiquitin and sumo1 ligase, interacts with 26 S protease regulatory subunit 4, encoded by the PSMC1 gene. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0148678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Natesh, R.; Clare, D.K.; Farr, G.W.; Horwich, A.L.; Saibil, H.R. A two-domain folding intermediate of RuBisCO in complex with the GroEL chaperonin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 118, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aigner, H.; Wilson, R.; Bracher, A.; Calisse, L.; Bhat, J.; Hartl, F.; Hayer-Hartl, M. Plant RuBisCo assembly in E. coli with five chloroplast chaperones including BSD2. Science 2017, 358, 1272–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Sjögren, L.L.; MacDonald, T.M.; Sutinen, S.; Clarke, A.K. Inactivation of the clpC1 gene encoding a chloroplast Hsp100 molecular chaperone causes growth retardation, leaf chlorosis, lower photosynthetic activity, and a specific reduction in photosystem content. Plant. Physiol. 2004, 136, 4114–4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Hayer-Hartl, M. From chaperonins to Rubisco assembly and metabolic repair. Protein Sci. 2017, 26, 2324–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yang, T.; Poovaiah, B. Arabidopsis chloroplast chaperonin 10 is a calmodulin-binding protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 275, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Tang, N.; Li, Y.; Chen, L.S. Magnesium deficiency–induced impairment of photosynthesis in leaves of fruiting Citrus reticulata trees accompanied by up-regulation of antioxidant metabolism to avoid photo-oxidative damage. J. Plant. Nutr. Soil Sci. 2012, 175, 784–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Farhat, N.; Elkhouni, A.; Zorrig, W.; Smaoui, A.; Abdelly, C.; Rabhi, M. Effects of magnesium deficiency on photosynthesis and carbohydrate partitioning. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2016, 38, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cui, T.Z.; Kawamukai, M. Coq10, a mitochondrial coenzyme Q binding protein, is required for proper respiration in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. FEBS J. 2009, 276, 748–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Amthor, J.S.; Baldocchi, D.D. Terrestrial higher plant respiration and net primary production. Terr. Global Prod. 2001, 33–59. [Google Scholar]
  58. Amthor, J. Higher plant respiration and its relationships to photosynthesis. In Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1995; pp. 71–101. [Google Scholar]
  59. Morris, S.E.; Cox, M.C.; Ross, J.J.; Krisantini, S.; Beveridge, C.A. Auxin dynamics after decapitation are not correlated with the initial growth of axillary buds. Plant. Physiol. 2005, 138, 1665–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Mason, M.G.; Ross, J.J.; Babst, B.A.; Wienclaw, B.N.; Beveridge, C.A. Sugar demand, not auxin, is the initial regulator of apical dominance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 6092–6097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Bertheloot, J.; Barbier, F.; Boudon, F.; Perez-Garcia, M.D.; Péron, T.; Citerne, S.; Dun, E.; Beveridge, C.; Godin, C.; Sakr, S. Sugar availability suppresses the auxin-induced strigolactone pathway to promote bud outgrowth. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 866–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Gupta, S.; Agarwal, V.P.; Gupta, N. Efficacy of putrescine and benzyladenine on photosynthesis and productivity in relation to drought tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Physiol. Mol. Biol. Pla. 2012, 18, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Youssef, A.; Mady, M. Influence of light intensity and benzyladenine on growth performance of Aspidistra elatior Blume plant. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2013, 9, 248–257. [Google Scholar]
  64. Bianco, L.; Lopez, L.; Scalone, A.G.; Di Carli, M.; Desiderio, A.; Benvenuto, E.; Perrotta, G. Strawberry proteome characterization and its regulation during fruit ripening and in different genotypes. J. Proteom. 2009, 72, 586–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Görg, A.; Obermaier, C.; Boguth, G.; Harder, A.; Scheibe, B.; Wildgruber, R.; Weiss, W. The current state of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 2000, 21, 1037–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shevchenko, A.; Tomas, H.; Havli, J.; Olsen, J.V.; Mann, M. In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ashburner, M.; Ball, C.A.; Blake, J.A.; Botstein, D.; Butler, H.; Cherry, J.M.; Davis, A.P.; Dolinski, K.; Dwight, S.S.; Eppig, J.T. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Lopez, S.; Maroto, J.; San Bautista, A.; Pascual, B.; Alagarda, J. Differences in carbohydrate content of waiting-bed strawberry plants during development in the nursery. Sci. Hortic. 2002, 94, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Li, S.; Huang, P.; Ding, G.; Zhou, L.; Tang, P.; Sun, M.; Zheng, Y.; Lin, S. Optimization of hormone combinations for root growth and bud germination in Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) clone leaf cuttings. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 21 04917 g001 550
Figure 1. The morphology of the strawberry plants affected by the photoperiod, temperature, gibberellin (GA3) and 6-benzyladenine (6-BA). (A) Number of runners per plant; (B) runner length; (C–E) present the morphology of the strawberry plants in T1 to T9, respectively. Runners are indicated with yellow arrows. T1, 23/27 °C + 8/16 h; T2, 23/27 °C + 12/12 h + 50 mg·L−1 GA3 + 50 mg·L−1 BA; T3, 23/27 °C + 16/8 h + 100 mg·L−1 GA3 + 100 mg·L−1 BA; T4, 25/25 °C + 8/16 h + 50 mg·L−1 GA3 + 100 mg·L−1 BA; T5, 25/25 °C + 12/12 h + 100 mg·L−1 GA3; T6, 25/25 °C + 16/8 h + 50 mg·L−1 BA; T7, 27/13 °C + 8/16 h + 100 mg·L−1 GA3 + 50 mg·L−1 BA; T8, 27/13 °C + 12/12 h + 100 mg·L−1 BA; T9, 27/13 °C + 16/8 h + 50 mg·L−1 GA3. The plants used for this experiment were one month and a half after cutting propagation and pictures were taken after another month cultivation in growth chambers. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 3). Lowercase letters indicate the significant difference according to Duncan’s multiple range test at a 0.05 level.
Figure 1. The morphology of the strawberry plants affected by the photoperiod, temperature, gibberellin (GA3) and 6-benzyladenine (6-BA). (A) Number of runners per plant; (B) runner length; (C–E) present the morphology of the strawberry plants in T1 to T9, respectively. Runners are indicated with yellow arrows. T1, 23/27 °C + 8/16 h; T2, 23/27 °C + 12/12 h + 50 mg·L−1 GA3 + 50 mg·L−1 BA; T3, 23/27 °C + 16/8 h + 100 mg·L−1 GA3 + 100 mg·L−1 BA; T4, 25/25 °C + 8/16 h + 50 mg·L−1 GA3 + 100 mg·L−1 BA; T5, 25/25 °C + 12/12 h + 100 mg·L−1 GA3; T6, 25/25 °C + 16/8 h + 50 mg·L−1 BA; T7, 27/13 °C + 8/16 h + 100 mg·L−1 GA3 + 50 mg·L−1 BA; T8, 27/13 °C + 12/12 h + 100 mg·L−1 BA; T9, 27/13 °C + 16/8 h + 50 mg·L−1 GA3. The plants used for this experiment were one month and a half after cutting propagation and pictures were taken after another month cultivation in growth chambers. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 3). Lowercase letters indicate the significant difference according to Duncan’s multiple range test at a 0.05 level.
Ijms 21 04917 g001
Ijms 21 04917 g002 550
Figure 2. The growth parameters and chlorophyll content for each treatment. (A) Plant height; (B) petiole length; (C) petiole diameter; (D) leaf length; (E) leaf width; (F) chlorophyll. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 3). Lowercase letters indicate the significant difference according to Duncan’s multiple range test at a 0.05 level.
Figure 2. The growth parameters and chlorophyll content for each treatment. (A) Plant height; (B) petiole length; (C) petiole diameter; (D) leaf length; (E) leaf width; (F) chlorophyll. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 3). Lowercase letters indicate the significant difference according to Duncan’s multiple range test at a 0.05 level.
Ijms 21 04917 g002
Ijms 21 04917 g003 550
Figure 3. The morphological and growth parameters of the strawberry plants after a 5-week cultivation in a glasshouse. (A) Morphology of the strawberry plants; (B) number of daughter plants per plant; (C) fresh weight of daughter plants; (D) length of the first 2 internodes; (E) weight ratio of the daughter plant to the whole runner. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 3). Lowercase letters indicate the significant difference according to Duncan’s multiple range test at a 0.05 level.
Figure 3. The morphological and growth parameters of the strawberry plants after a 5-week cultivation in a glasshouse. (A) Morphology of the strawberry plants; (B) number of daughter plants per plant; (C) fresh weight of daughter plants; (D) length of the first 2 internodes; (E) weight ratio of the daughter plant to the whole runner. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 3). Lowercase letters indicate the significant difference according to Duncan’s multiple range test at a 0.05 level.
Ijms 21 04917 g003
Ijms 21 04917 g004 550
Figure 4. Representative 2-DE gel maps of proteins in the crowns of strawberry plants grown with strawberry plants with runners (LD) and without runners (SD) photoperiods. The 2-DE were replicated three times and the significant differences were calculated by Student’s t-test. Numbers and arrows indicate the differentially expressed protein (DEP) spots with at least 2-fold changes between the crown with and without runners.
Figure 4. Representative 2-DE gel maps of proteins in the crowns of strawberry plants grown with strawberry plants with runners (LD) and without runners (SD) photoperiods. The 2-DE were replicated three times and the significant differences were calculated by Student’s t-test. Numbers and arrows indicate the differentially expressed protein (DEP) spots with at least 2-fold changes between the crown with and without runners.
Ijms 21 04917 g004
Ijms 21 04917 g005 550
Figure 5. The expression profiles of 32 DEPs under LD and SD conditions. LD1, LD2, LD3, SD1, SD2, and SD3 represent the three replicates in each treatment. The significant differences were calculated by Student’s t-test.
Figure 5. The expression profiles of 32 DEPs under LD and SD conditions. LD1, LD2, LD3, SD1, SD2, and SD3 represent the three replicates in each treatment. The significant differences were calculated by Student’s t-test.
Ijms 21 04917 g005
Ijms 21 04917 g006 550
Figure 6. The sugar and starch contents in strawberry plants treated with different photoperiods, temperatures, GA3 and 6-BA concentrations. (A,B) Soluble sugar contents in young leaves and crowns, respectively. (C,D) Starch contents in young leaves and crowns, respectively. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 3). Lowercase letters indicate the significant difference according to Duncan’s multiple range test at a 0.05 level.
Figure 6. The sugar and starch contents in strawberry plants treated with different photoperiods, temperatures, GA3 and 6-BA concentrations. (A,B) Soluble sugar contents in young leaves and crowns, respectively. (C,D) Starch contents in young leaves and crowns, respectively. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 3). Lowercase letters indicate the significant difference according to Duncan’s multiple range test at a 0.05 level.
Ijms 21 04917 g006
Table
Table 1. Range analysis of L9 (3)4 test results for the number of runners.
Table 1. Range analysis of L9 (3)4 test results for the number of runners.
VariableTemperaturePhotoperiodGA3BA
K16.002.6718.005.00
K214.0010.337.3315.00
K310.6717.675.3310.67
R8.0015.0012.6710.00
Optimal level25/15 °C16/8 h0 mg·L−150 mg·L−1
Ki is the average of the following variables: photoperiod, temperature, GA3 and 6-BA, at the 1, 2, and 3 levels. R = max Ki – min Ki. The greatest values for K and R are expressed in bold.
Table
Table 2. Proteins identified by the MALDI-TOF MS in strawberry.
Table 2. Proteins identified by the MALDI-TOF MS in strawberry.
Spot No.Accession No.SpeciesProtein NameScore aTheor./Exp. Mr (kDa) bTheor./Exp. pI cSC (%) d
Carbohydrate Metabolism
3gi|470120564Fragaria vescaMalate dehydrogenase, cytoplasmic-like5936.0/40.76.01/6.3523
8gi|470136472Fragaria vescaGlucose-6-phosphate 1-Dehydrogenase, cytoplasmic isoform 2-like18458.8/81.75.93/6.0736
9gi|470109046Fragaria vescaSucrose synthase 2-like9892.8/90.85.94/6.0123
20gi|470148237Fragaria vescaGlucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase15716/31.95.33/5.5832
25gi|470114187Fragaria vescaPutative lactoylglutathione lyase-like isoform 211432.6/31.05.28/5.3333
Proteometabolism
6gi|470132774Fragaria vescaProbable protein disulfide-isomerase A6-like8140.1/47.26.12/6.0230
7gi|470136937Fragaria vescaProbable mitochondrial-processing peptidase subunit beta-like21958.5/60.76.42/6.0729
12gi|470114303Fragaria vescaFumarylacetoacetase-like6945.8/45.35.57/5.8932
23gi|470142843Fragaria vesca26S protease regulatory subunit 6B homolog9946.2/55.65.48/5.5426
Photosynthesis
13gi|7008071Baccharis halimifoliaRibulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit6854.5/57.56.29/5.9220
14NES2_FRAANFragaria ananassa(3S,6E)-nerolidol synthase 2, chloroplastic/mitochondrial OS4066.6/88.66.27/5.9920
19gi|470122943Fragaria vescaChaperone protein ClpC, Chloroplastic-like93102.4/94.16.59/5.6327
24gi|237637006Linum tenueRibulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit9451.2/89.26.23/5.4617
28gi|470107388Fragaria vescaChaperonin CPN60-2, mitochondrial-like8961.8/69.95.89/5.4128
Respiration
10gi|470109651Fragaria vescaCoenzyme Q-binding protein COQ10 homolog, mitochondrial-like4528.6/31.58.85/5.9224
Signaling Proteins
2gi|470103566Fragaria vescaAnnexin D1-like26336.4/31.56.44/6.5444
5gi|470114874Fragaria vescaTranscription factor bHLH135-like5310.4/12.25.07/6.0244
16gi|571467514Glycine maxProbable calcium-binding protein CML45-like7019.5/32.34.64/5.7440
Stress-Related Proteins
1gi|470129560Fragaria vescaCatalase-like8757.1/59.76.58/6.7433
4gi|470126676Fragaria vescaChaperone protein ClpB1-like85101.8/100.55.91/6.2121
31gi|470121677Fragaria vescaMajor allergen Pru ar 1-like3617.7/22.95.39/5.5144
32gi|470106694Fragaria vescaPathogenesis-related protein 1C-like7018.1/34.25.1/5.0524
General Metabolism-Related Proteins
11gi|470134340Fragaria vescaMonodehydroascorbate reductase-like7247.2/48.66.22/5.9823
17gi|51493451Fragaria ananassaFlavanone 3-hydroxylase30741.4/43.15.61/5.7253
29gi|470144168Fragaria vescaChalcone-flavonone isomerase-like9523.6/25.44.86/5.1646
a score, MASCOT score of protein hit. b Theoretical and experimental molecular mass (Mr) calculated by MASCOT peptide mass fingerprint and protein gel images, respectively. c Isoelectric point (pI) of spots identified by MASCOT and protein gel images. d SC, sequence coverage (%).
Table
Table 3. L9 (3)4 orthogonal design used in this study.
Table 3. L9 (3)4 orthogonal design used in this study.
TreatmentTemperature
(A, D/N, °C)		Photoperiod
(B, D/N, h)		GA3
(C, mg·L−1)		6-BA
(D, mg·L−1)
T1A123/17B18/16C10D10
T2A123/17B212/12C250D250
T3A123/17B316/8C3100D3100
T4A225/15B18/16C250D3100
T5A225/15B212/12C3100D10
T6A225/15B316/8C10D250
T7A327/13B18/16C3100D250
T8A327/13B212/12C10D3100
T9A327/13B316/8C250D10
A, B, C, and D represent the temperature, photoperiod, GA3, and 6-BA, respectively; D/N means day/night.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Hu, J.; Wei, H.; Jeong, B.R. A Long-Day Photoperiod and 6-Benzyladenine Promote Runner Formation through Upregulation of Soluble Sugar Content in Strawberry. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4917. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144917

AMA Style

Li Y, Hu J, Wei H, Jeong BR. A Long-Day Photoperiod and 6-Benzyladenine Promote Runner Formation through Upregulation of Soluble Sugar Content in Strawberry. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(14):4917. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144917

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yali, Jiangtao Hu, Hao Wei, and Byoung Ryong Jeong. 2020. "A Long-Day Photoperiod and 6-Benzyladenine Promote Runner Formation through Upregulation of Soluble Sugar Content in Strawberry" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 14: 4917. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144917

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop