Next Article in Journal
SAK3 Administration Improves Spine Abnormalities and Cognitive Deficits in AppNL-G-F/NL-G-F Knock-in Mice by Increasing Proteasome Activity through CaMKII/Rpt6 Signaling
Previous Article in Journal
Human PSC-Derived Hepatocytes Express Low Levels of Viral Pathogen Recognition Receptors, but Are Capable of Mounting an Effective Innate Immune Response
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) as an Active Component Citrus Jabara That Suppresses FcεRI-Mediated Mast Cell Activation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Phenotypic and Functional Diversity of Mast Cells

Department of Pharmacology, Division of Pathological Sciences, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Misasagi Nakauchi-cho 5, Yamashina-ku, Kyoto 607-8414, Japan
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(11), 3835; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113835
Submission received: 14 May 2020 / Revised: 27 May 2020 / Accepted: 27 May 2020 / Published: 28 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Activation and Modulation of Mast Cells)
Mast cells, which originate from hematopoietic stem cells, are distributed in nearly all vascularized tissues. As no leukocytes that are categorized as mast cells could be found in the circulation, it is considered that the terminal differentiation of mast cells occurs under the strong influence of their microenvironment [1,2,3]. Recent studies shed light on the origin and heterogeneity of tissue human and murine mast cells [4,5,6]. The microenvironment might regulate the expression profiles of both the receptors and mediators of tissue mast cells. The sensor molecules, including the cell surface receptors expressed in tissue mast cells, determine to which types of environmental changes they should respond, while the capacity of the mediators’ release determine how they should act on these changes (Figure 1). Accumulating evidence indicates that mast cells could exert a wide variety of physiological and pathological effects in the context of spatiotemporal immune responses. Recent progress in the field of mast cell research has provided us with many powerful tools, such as a variety of gene-targeted mice lacking tissue mast cells, primary mast cell cultures, and various “omics” approaches to clarify this complexity [7], thereby enabling a comprehensive update of our knowledge about mast cell functions. The studies found in this Special Issue “Activation and Modulation of Mast Cells” are involved in this new tide of research.
IgE-mediated activation of mast cells has been intensively studied because mast cells play an essential role in IgE-mediated immediate allergic responses. Mast cells were also found to undergo degranulation in an IgE-independent manner, although it remains largely unknown how mast cells are activated by various secretagogues, such as compound 48/80 and several bioactive peptides including neuropeptides and antibacterial peptides because no suitable culture models have been developed for the in-depth investigation of IgE-independent degranulation. Recently, Staphylococcus δ-toxin was found to induce degranulation of murine mast cells, implying the important role of degranulation induced by the bacterial peptide toxin in atopic dermatitis [8]. Tatemoto et al. first proposed that a Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor subtype, MRGPRX2, should be involved in secretagogue-induced degranulation of mast cells [9]. McNeil et al. recently demonstrated that one of the murine MRGPRX2 orthologues, MrgprB2, should be responsible for IgE-independent degranulation of mast cells and various pseudo allergic responses in mice [10]. In this issue, Chompunud Na Ayudhya et al. demonstrated the functional roles of some key amino acid residues of MRGPRX2 using molecular biochemical approaches [11]. Apart from the Mrgpr family, Yoshida et al. also investigated IgE-independent degranulation of murine mast cells. They revealed that prostaglandin E2 and ATP could synergistically induce degranulation by acting on EP3 and P2X4 receptors, respectively [12]. Arriaga-Gomez et al. demonstrated that methylisothiazolinone could induce persistent tactile sensitivity and mast cell accumulation in female genital skin tissues [13]. Although the target molecules of methylisothiazolinone remain to be identified, it is likely that cutaneous mast cells could be directly activated by several contact allergens. Indeed, Dudeck et al. demonstrated the activation of cutaneous mast cells in the presence of several conventional contact allergens [14]. IL-33 and thymic stromal lymphopoietin were found to be potential modulators of mast cell functions [15]. Ishimaru et al. unexpectedly found that a synthetic REV-ERB agonist, SR9009, could suppress the activation of murine mast cells induced by the IgE/antigen complex or IL-33 and these effects were independent of disturbance of the circadian clock [16]. Lyons and Pullen reviewed the recent findings of IgE-independent activation of mast cells, with a focus on the context-dependent actions of TGF-β and IL-10 [17].
Diversity of phenotype and function of tissue mast cells needs more attention for a better understanding of their function. Although the concept that tissue mast cells can be categorized into two subtypes—connective tissue type and mucosal type—is commonly recognized, more detailed characterization in the context of spatiotemporal localization should be useful for elucidation of the roles of tissue mast cells. In this issue, Kakinoki et al. characterized the phenotypic changes of murine mast cells induced by IL-9, which might be essential for the development of the intestinal mast cell population [18]. Gion et al. characterized a unique population of mast cells, which may uptake IgE molecules in human eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis [19]. Mast cells are well known for their potential to produce a wide variety of mediators, such as biogenic amines, lipid mediators, cytokines/chemokines, and growth factors [20]. Among them, the physiological and pathological roles of mast cell proteases have emerged in recent studies using various gene-targeted mouse models [21]. Accumulating evidence suggests that the expression profiles of mast cell proteases should reflect the heterogeneity of tissue mast cells [22,23]. In this issue, Fu et al. demonstrated the specific in vitro cleavages of a series of cytokines and chemokines by mast cell proteases including human tryptase, raising the possibility that mast cell proteases modulate the direction of immune responses [24]. Ohneda et al. clarified the functional roles of GATA1 and GATA2 in transcriptional regulation of the Tpsb2 gene that encodes mouse mast cell protease 6 in murine mast cells [25].
It will be of great help for novel therapeutic approaches of inflammatory diseases to identify endogenous target molecules and synthetic compounds that could modulate the activity of tissue mast cells. Kataoka et al. summarized the modulatory roles and therapeutic potential of killer immunoglobulin-like receptor 2DL4 (CD158d) in human mast cells [26]. Uchida et al. identified a natural compound from a citrus fruit, Jabara, which could suppress degranulation and IL-6 production of murine mast cells upon IgE-mediated antigen stimulation [27].
The contents of this Special Issue reflect the diverse aspects of mast cell research. I hope that these studies will stimulate researchers and encourage further exploration in the field of mast cell research.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kitamura, Y. Heterogeneity of mast cells and phenotypic change between subpopulations. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1989, 7, 59–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cildir, G.; Pant, H.; Lopez, A.F.; Tergaonkar, V. The transcriptional program, functional heterogeneity, and clinical targeting of mast cells. J. Exp. Med. 2017, 214, 2491–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Frossi, B.; Mion, F.; Sibilano, R.; Danelli, L.; Pucillo, C.E.M. Is it time for a new classification of mast cells? What do we know about mast cell heterogeneity? Immunol. Rev. 2018, 282, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dwyer, D.F.; Barrett, N.A.; Austen, K.F. Immunological Genome Project Consortium. Expression profiling of constitutive mast cells reveals a unique identity within the immune system. Nat. Immunol. 2016, 17, 878–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gentek, R.; Ghigo, C.; Hoeffel, G.; Bulle, M.J.; Msallam, R.; Gautier, G.; Launay, P.; Chen, J.; Ginhoux, F.; Bajénoff, M. Hemogenic endothelial fate mapping reveals dual developmental origin of mast Cells. Immunity 2018, 48, 1160–1171.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Plum, T.; Wang, X.; Rettel, M.; Krijgsveld, J.; Feyerabend, T.B.; Rodewald, H.R. Human mast cell proteome reveals lineage, putative functions, and structural basis for cell ablation. Immunity 2020, 18, 404–416.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Reber, L.L.; Marichal, T.; Galli, S.J. New models for analyzing mast cell functions in vivo. Trends Immunol. 2012, 33, 613–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Nakamura, Y.; Oscherwitz, J.; Cease, K.B.; Chan, S.M.; Muñoz-Planillo, R.; Hasegawa, M.; Villaruz, A.E.; Cheung, G.Y.C.; McGavin, M.J.; Travers, J.B.; et al. Staphylococcus δ-toxin induces allergic skin disease by activating mast cells. Nature 2013, 503, 397–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tatemoto, K.; Nozaki, Y.; Tsuda, R.; Konno, S.; Tomura, K.; Furuno, M.; Ogasawara, H.; Edamura, K.; Takagi, H.; Iwamura, H.; et al. Immunoglobulin E-independent activation of mast cell is mediated by Mrg receptors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 349, 1322–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. McNeil, B.D.; Pundir, P.; Meeker, S.; Han, L.; Undem, B.J.; Kulka, M.; Dong, X. Identification of a mast-cell-specific receptor crucial for pseudo-allergic drug reactions. Nature 2015, 519, 237–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Chompunud Na Ayudhya, C.; Roy, S.; Alkanfari, I.; Ganguly, A.; Ali, H. Identification of Gain and Loss of Function Missense Variants in MRGPRX2’s Transmembrane and Intracellular Domains for Mast Cell Activation by Substance P. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Yoshida, K.; Tajima, M.; Nagano, T.; Obayashi, K.; Ito, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Matsuoka, I. Co-Stimulation of Purinergic P2X4 and Prostanoid EP3 Receptors Triggers Synergistic Degranulation in Murine Mast Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Arriaga-Gomez, E.; Kline, J.; Emanuel, E.; Neamonitaki, N.; Yangdon, T.; Zacheis, H.; Pasha, D.; Lim, J.; Bush, S.; Boo, B.; et al. Repeated Vaginal Exposures to the Common Cosmetic and Household Preservative Methylisothiazolinone Induce Persistent, Mast Cell-Dependent Genital Pain in ND4 Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Dudeck, A.; Dudeck, J.; Scholten, J.; Petzold, A.; Surianarayanan, S.; Köhler, A.; Peschke, K.; Vöhringer, D.; Waskow, C.; Krieg, T.; et al. Mast cells are key promoters of contact allergy that mediate the adjuvant effects of haptens. Immunity 2011, 34, 973–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Saluja, R.; Zoltowska, A.; Ketelaar, M.E.; Nilsson, G. IL-33 and Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin in mast cell functions. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 778, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ishimaru, K.; Nakajima, S.; Yu, G.; Nakamura, Y.; Nakao, A. The Putatively Specific Synthetic REV-ERB Agonist SR9009 Inhibits IgE–and IL-33-Mediated Mast Cell Activation Independently of the Circadian Clock. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lyons, D.O.; Pullen, N.A. Beyond IgE: Alternative Mast Cell Activation Across Different Disease States. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kakinoki, A.; Kameo, T.; Yamashita, S.; Furuta, K.; Tanaka, S. Establishment and Characterization of a Murine Mucosal Mast Cell Culture Model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gion, Y.; Okano, M.; Koyama, T.; Oura, T.; Nishikori, A.; Orita, Y.; Tachibana, T.; Marunaka, H.; Makino, T.; Nishizaki, K.; et al. Clinical Significance of Cytoplasmic IgE-Positive Mast Cells in Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Mukai, K.; Tsai, M.; Saito, H.; Galli, S.J. Mast cells as sources of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. Immunol. Rev. 2018, 282, 121–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Caughey, G.H. Mast cell proteases as pharmacological targets. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 778, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Reynolds, D.S.; Stevens, R.L.; Lane, W.S.; Carr, M.H.; Austen, K.F.; Serafin, W.E. Different mouse mast cell populations express various combinations of at least six distinct mast cell serine proteases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 3230–3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Lutzelschwab, C.; Pejler, G.; Aveskogh, M.; Hellman, L. Secretory granule proteases in rat mast cells. Cloning of 10 different serine proteases and a carboxypeptidase A from various rat mast cell populations. J. Exp. Med. 1997, 185, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Fu, Z.; Akula, S.; Thorpe, M.; Hellman, L. Highly Selective Cleavage of TH2-Promoting Cytokines by the Human and the Mouse Mast Cell Tryptases, Indicating a Potent Negative Feedback Loop on TH2 Immunity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ohneda, K.; Ohmori, S.; Yamamoto, M. Mouse Tryptase Gene Expression is Coordinately Regulated by GATA1 and GATA2 in Bone Marrow-Derived Mast Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Kataoka, T.R.; Ueshima, C.; Hirata, M.; Minamiguchi, S.; Haga, H. Killer Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor 2DL4 (CD158d) Regulates Human Mast Cells Both Positively and Negatively: Possible Roles in Pregnancy and Cancer Metastasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Uchida, R.; Kato, M.; Hattori, Y.; Kikuchi, H.; Watanabe, E.; Kobayashi, K.; Nishida, K. Identification of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) as an Active Component Citrus Jabara That Suppresses FcεRI-Mediated Mast Cell Activation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. A viewpoint of mast cell research. Three viewpoints, such as differentiation states, expression patterns of the receptors, and capacities of the mediator release, might be useful for the comprehensive understanding of functions of tissue mast cells. Mrgpr, Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor; P2X, purine ionotropic receptor; EP, prostaglandin E receptor.
Figure 1. A viewpoint of mast cell research. Three viewpoints, such as differentiation states, expression patterns of the receptors, and capacities of the mediator release, might be useful for the comprehensive understanding of functions of tissue mast cells. Mrgpr, Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor; P2X, purine ionotropic receptor; EP, prostaglandin E receptor.
Ijms 21 03835 g001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tanaka, S. Phenotypic and Functional Diversity of Mast Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3835. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113835

AMA Style

Tanaka S. Phenotypic and Functional Diversity of Mast Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(11):3835. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113835

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tanaka, Satoshi. 2020. "Phenotypic and Functional Diversity of Mast Cells" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 11: 3835. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113835

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop