Next Article in Journal
Novel Insights into Regulation of Human Teeth Biomineralization: Deciphering the Role of Post-Translational Modifications in a Tooth Protein Extract
Next Article in Special Issue
Antagonistic Effects of IL-4 on IL-17A-Mediated Enhancement of Epidermal Tight Junction Function
Previous Article in Journal
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone in Regulation of Thymic Development in Rats: Profile of Thymic Cytokines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential for Tight Junction Protein–Directed Drug Development Using Claudin Binders and Angubindin-1
Open AccessArticle
Peer-Review Record

Phosphatidylcholine Passes by Paracellular Transport to the Apical Side of the Polarized Biliary Tumor Cell Line Mz-ChA-1

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(16), 4034; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20164034
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(16), 4034; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20164034
Received: 6 July 2019 / Revised: 15 August 2019 / Accepted: 16 August 2019 / Published: 19 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Tight Junction and Its Proteins: More Than Just a Barrier)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The present manuscript shows that phosphatidylcholine (PC) can pass by a paracellular transport from systemic sources to the apical side of cholangiocytes, thanks to an apical negative electrical potential generated by CFTR and AE2, with consequent binding to membrane-localized mucin 3 and an equilibrated shift to secretory mucin 2. It is very interesting but there are some points to elucidate and to enrich:

- The Authors, in the Abstract, in the Introduction and in the Discussion sections, have mentioned the primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) as a disease in which PC translocation into mucus via a paracellular transport across the apical/lateral tight junction (TJ) barrier may have implications for its pathogenesis. Therefore my question is: why did they use a cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) cell line, in particular a typical extrahepatic CCA cell line? The Authors need to clarify this point.

- Related to the previous point, I am not completely agree with the sentence “These cells share indeed the characteristics of physiologic biliary epithelial cells” (line 59). In fact, we have the reference but the sentence remains too general, the Authors should explain better which are the physiologic characteristics of Mz-ChA-1. For that reason, I suggest to add a non-malignant cholangiocyte cell line, also to compare the important data obtained.

- It should be really interesting also to add some images of PC movement across the polarized and unpolarized cholangiocytes.

- In the Material and Methods section, the titles 4.1 and 4.3 are the same, they could change and specify one or put together just in one paragraph.

 

 

 


Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper by Stremmel et al., analyses the paracellular translocation of PC across the polarized biliary epithelial tumor cell line Mz-ChA-1.

The authors found that the transport is unidirectional to the PC  apical side, mediated by tight Junctions, driven by negative apical charge generated by CFTR and AE2, and stimulated by apical application of secretory mucins.

The authors evaluated the transport characteristics of PC to the apical side in regard to time, concentration, temperature and pH.

Conclusions about the fact that PC is bound to mucin 3 is not clearly documented and supported by experiments.

Line 44-45 add a reference 

In the references, there is an abundance of self-citation (7 on 16)

Specific comments:

Fig 1 molecular weight in the western blot is expressed as KD , but are Daltons (ex ZO1 is 250 KD and not 250000 kd). Furthermore, there is not shown a protein housekeeping or a densitometric analysis.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

In my opinion, the present revised version could be suitable for
publication in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

many thanks for your evaluation.

 

 

Back to TopTop