Next Article in Journal
Interactive Responses of Solanum Dulcamara to Drought and Insect Feeding are Herbivore Species-Specific
Next Article in Special Issue
MET/HGF Co-Targeting in Pancreatic Cancer: A Tool to Provide Insight into the Tumor/Stroma Crosstalk
Previous Article in Journal
Lipopolysaccharide-Preconditioned Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells Induce M1 Polarization of Macrophages through Extracellular Vesicles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Matriptase-Induced Phosphorylation of MET is Significantly Associated with Poor Prognosis in Invasive Bladder Cancer; an Immunohistochemical Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 12
10.3390/ijms19123844
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

HGF/c-MET Signaling in Melanocytes and Melanoma

by
Malgorzata Czyz
Department of Molecular Biology of Cancer, Medical University of Lodz, 6/8 Mazowiecka Street, 92-215 Lodz, Poland
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(12), 3844; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123844
Submission received: 9 November 2018 / Revised: 26 November 2018 / Accepted: 30 November 2018 / Published: 3 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF))
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/ mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (c-MET) signaling is involved in complex cellular programs that are important for embryonic development and tissue regeneration, but its activity is also utilized by cancer cells during tumor progression. HGF and c-MET usually mediate heterotypic cell–cell interactions, such as epithelial–mesenchymal, including tumor–stroma interactions. In the skin, dermal fibroblasts are the main source of HGF. The presence of c-MET on keratinocytes is crucial for wound healing in the skin. HGF is not released by normal melanocytes, but as melanocytes express c-MET, they are receptive to HGF, which protects them from apoptosis and stimulates their proliferation and motility. Dissimilar to melanocytes, melanoma cells not only express c-MET, but also release HGF, thus activating c-MET in an autocrine manner. Stimulation of the HGF/c-MET pathways contributes to several processes that are crucial for melanoma development, such as proliferation, survival, motility, and invasiveness, including distant metastatic niche formation. HGF might be a factor in the innate and acquired resistance of melanoma to oncoprotein-targeted drugs. It is not entirely clear whether elevated serum HGF level is associated with low progression-free survival and overall survival after treatment with targeted therapies. This review focuses on the role of HGF/c-MET signaling in melanoma with some introductory information on its function in skin and melanocytes.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

HGF (hepatocyte growth factor), also known as scatter factor and tumor cytotoxic factor, is a large multidomain heterodimeric protein that belongs to the cytokine family [1]. HGF was discovered a long time ago [2], and soon after, HGF was cloned and expressed [3,4]. Evidence for the identity of hepatocyte growth factor, scatter factor, and tumor cytotoxic factor was provided shortly after [5,6]. The gene encoding HGF is located on chromosome 7, and consists of 18 exons and 17 introns [7]. HGF is the exclusive ligand of c-MET (cellular mesenchymal–epithelial transition factor), a membrane-bound receptor with kinase activity [8,9]. Met- or Hgf-null mutations in mice resulted in a lethal phenotype in utero, which was caused by the impaired development of placenta and liver [10,11].
HGF and c-MET expression can be upregulated by bFGF (basic fibroblast growth factor), oncostatin M, TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-α), IL-1 (interleukin-1), IL-6 (interleukin-6), and several other cytokines [12] with the contribution of transcription factors HIF-1α (hypoxia-inducible factor 1α) and NF-κB (nuclear factor-κB).
HGF is secreted as a precursor, which is processed to a functional heterodimer by extracellular proteases. HGF, secreted mainly by cells of mesenchymal origin, acts in a paracrine manner on epithelial cells that express the c-MET receptor. It induces c-MET dimerization, which activates its autophosphorylation, the recruitment of various transducers such as GAB1 (Grb2-associated binder 1), GRB2 (growth factor receptor-bound protein 2), SOS (Son of Sevenless), SRC (Rous sarcoma oncogene cellular homolog), SHC (Src homology 2 domain-containing), PI3K (phosphatidylinositol 3′ kinase), PLCγ-1 (phospholipase C γ-1), SHIP2 (Src homology 2-containing inositol 5-phosphatase 1), and STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3), among others. HGF/c-MET signaling is transmitted from the cell membrane to the nucleus mainly by the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), PI3K/AKT, NF-κB, and STAT3/5 signaling pathways that influence several processes, including morphogenesis, proliferation, survival, angiogenesis, motility, and invasion (for review [13,14]). All of these processes that are triggered by HGF/c-MET signaling (Figure 1) lead to induction of the complex cellular program called “invasive growth”, which is active in diverse physiological and pathological contexts.
HGF/c-MET signaling contributes to a plethora of processes accompanying embryogenesis and tissue regeneration in adulthood, and restrains fibrosis [14,15,16,17]. The abnormal activity of the HGF/c-MET pathway has been also documented in a wide range of cancers (for review [18,19,20,21,22] and the references therein), including breast [23], esophageal [24], and cervical [25] cancers, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [26,27], brain tumors [28], head and neck [29,30], and non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) [31], among others.
HGF-c-MET interaction, participating in the epithelial–mesenchymal interaction, is an example of paracrine signaling as normal cells expressing c-MET do not release HGF under physiological conditions. This may change, however, after malignant transformation, as shown for several cancers [16,32,33,34,35], including melanoma [36]. This review focuses on the role of HGF/c-MET signaling in melanoma with some introductory information on its function in skin and melanocytes.

2. HGF/c-MET Signaling in the Skin

The skin, one of the largest organs of the human body, acts as a physical barrier between the organism and its environment. It plays an important photoprotective function that is executed by epidermal melanocytes producing melanin, which is then transferred from melanosomes, the specialized intracellular organelles, to overlaying keratinocytes, to induce pigmentation. Several autocrine and paracrine factors regulate the activity of melanocytes and other cellular components of skin, leading to dermal tissue homeostasis, and the HGF/c-MET pathway substantially contributes to this regulation.
Fibroblast-derived HGF was early recognized as a modulator of epithelial cell motility [37]. It is one of the most effective mitogenic factors secreted by fibroblasts [38]. HGF produced by dermal fibroblasts is an important mitogenic factor for keratinocytes. The first indirect evidence on the presence of c-MET on keratinocytes has been provided by showing the mitogenic and motogenic effects of HGF in these cells [39,40,41,42]. It has been shown that HGF expression and secretion can be induced in skin fibroblasts by other growth factors, EGF (epidermal growth factor), PDGF (platelet-derived growth factor), and bFGF [43]. Production of HGF in skin fibroblasts in vitro could be also stimulated by various molecules, including okadaic acid and calyculin A [44], staurosporine [45], interleukin-1 alone [46], or in combination with interferon-gamma [47] and the antibiotic polymyxin B [48]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that HGF is elevated in aged skin dermis in vivo, which is the consequence of reduced fibroblast size, and which may contribute to the age-related loss of collagen [49].
HGF is diffusely distributed in normal skin [50], and its receptor c-MET has been detected in the epidermis and dermis [51]. In the hair follicle, c-MET has been identified on keratinocytes and HGF, as released by neighboring fibroblasts in the dermal papillae [52]. HGF/c-MET signaling is involved in hair follicle morphogenesis and cycling in skin [52]. c-MET has been also identified in arrector pili muscles and blood vessels [51].
The presence of functioning c-MET on keratinocytes is crucial for wound healing in the skin. It contributes to the generation of the hyperproliferative epithelium in skin wounds [51,53,54,55]. It has been demonstrated that HGF can accelerate wound healing by promoting the dedifferentiation of epidermal cells [56], whereas the inactivation of HGF in mice with anti-HGF IgG leads to retarded cutaneous wound healing, which is associated with decreased neovascularization, and the formation of tissue granulation [51]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that HGF/c-MET signaling regulates the motogenic function of keratinocytes during skin wound healing by inducing the expression of small G protein ARF6 (ADP-ribosylation factor 6) in those cells [57].
The role of HGF/c-MET signaling in dermal tissue homeostasis can be also executed by other components of the skin [58]. In the model of tight-skin mice, which exhibits fibrosis, HGF diminished the thickening of subcutaneous dermal tissue, which was accompanied by the lowered expression of IL-4 and TGF-β [59]. HGF was demonstrated to inhibit the production of IL-4 in CD4+ T cells, as stimulated by allogenic dendritic cells. Skin dendritic cells, including Langerhans cells express c-MET, which when activated induces emigration of Langerhans cells from skin [60,61]. Thus, a similar program to MET-driven EMT (epithelial–mesenchymal transition) is mediated in Langerhans cells upon inflammatory activation, indicating an important role of HGF/c-MET signaling in skin immunity [58].
Exposure of the skin to ultraviolet (UV) radiation induces melanogenesis and the p53-dependent DNA damage response pathway [62,63,64]. HGF can inhibit UV-induced apoptosis in keratinocytes through the stimulation of the PI3K/AKT pathway [65]. Using genetically engineered mouse models, it was shown that the skin of mice overexpressing HGF and exposed to chronic suberythermal UV radiation exerted significantly enhanced sensitivity to the development of nonmelanocytic over melanocytic skin malignancies [66]. The differential expression of HGF has been induced in fibroblasts and in keratinocytes by ultraviolet A and B radiation [67,68].

3. HGF/c-MET Signaling in Melanocytes

HGF is not secreted by normal melanocytes, but as melanocytes express c-MET, they are receptive to HGF [40,50]. An early study has shown that HGF, as a mitogen, stimulates proliferation and melanocyte growth [39,69], and since then it is used in the culturing of melanocytes [39]. HGF received by melanocytes maintained high level of tyrosinase activity and melanin content [70]. Overexpression of HGF in transgenic mice resulted in the hyperproliferation of melanocytes in ectopic sites, melanosis in the central nervous system, and hyperpigmentation of the skin [71]. Melanocytes are cells derived from the precursor cells called melanoblasts, which originate from the neural crest cells. Studies performed with neural crest cells indicated that HGF is among the stimuli that affect melanoblast viability, proliferation, and differentiation into melanocytes [72]. Deficiency in the c-MET receptor did not lead to abnormalities in the early development of melanocytes. Using mouse embryos with a targeted Met null mutation (Met–/–), it has been demonstrated that HGF/c-MET signaling influenced, but was not required for the initial development of neural crest-derived melanocytes in vivo and in vitro [72]. However, adding HGF to neural crest cultures resulted in an elevated number of melanoblasts with increased survival potential and their differentiation into melanocytes [72].
It has been also demonstrated that HGF protects melanocytes from apoptosis [73] although it is not effective against apoptosis induced by TRAIL (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand) [74]. The mechanisms behind the protective activity of HGF include upregulation of c-MET expression by MITF-M, a transcription factor of melanocytes and melanoma cells. MITF plays an important pro-survival role in melanocytes and melanoma [75]. It binds to the MET promoter in response to α-melanocyte stimulating hormone (α-MSH), which is markedly increased by UV radiation, or in response to forskolin, another c-AMP-elevating agent [73].
It has been shown that HGF/c-MET signaling is suppressed in melanocytes by Plexin B1, the receptor for Semaphorin D [76]. Plexin B1 can associate with c-MET, forming an oligomeric receptor–receptor complex, which inhibits the HGF/c-MET pathway by blocking SHP2 activity, followed by the abrogation of MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT activation in melanocytes. Interestingly, mutations in SHP2, blocking its activity, have been identified in LEOPARD syndrome, a disorder characterized by multiple lentigines [77].

4. HGF/c-MET Signaling in Melanoma

Already in the early 1990s, HGF has been shown to contribute to melanoma growth [40,70], and c-MET has been detected on melanoma cells [50,78]. The expression pattern of c-MET has been recognized as being prognostically relevant for primary cutaneous melanoma [79]. The amplification of MET, and the genomic rearrangements of MET, resulting in in-frame MET kinase fusions and c-MET activation, have been identified in melanoma [80,81].
It has been demonstrated in preclinical studies that the enhanced activity of HGF/c-MET can activate the proliferation of melanoma cells [82], increase their invasive capacity [78,83,84,85], and protect melanoma cells from apoptosis [73].
Dissimilar to melanocytes, melanoma cells not only express c-MET, but also HGF [83]. It has been demonstrated that c-Met can be constitutively active in melanoma cells without exogenous HGF stimulation [86]. Thus, melanoma cell proliferation, survival, and acquisition of the metastatic phenotype can be supported by autocrine HGF/c-MET signaling (Figure 2).
The mechanism of HGF/c-MET signaling contribution to melanoma cell protection from apoptosis is, to some extent, similar as in melanocytes. It has been shown that cAMP-elevating agents such as α-MSH and forskolin increase the c-MET level by involving MITF-dependent transcriptional mechanism [73]. MITF silencing reduced MET expression in those cell lines that expressed both MITF and MET [73]. However, MET expression is not controlled exclusively by MITF, as no tight correlations were observed between MITF level and MET expression in other melanoma cell lines. Overexpression of HGF and c-MET in melanoma cells enhances cell protection from cell death, which was shown to be mediated by the activation of the MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways [87,88], frequently modified in melanomas. Apoptosis induced by the knockdown of BRAFV600E in melanoma cells can be prevented by growth factors, including HGF [89]. HGF/c-MET-dependent activation of the MAPK/ERK cascade can be decreased by the membrane receptor NOTCH and intracellular protein SPROUTY [90,91], and c-MET can contribute to the upregulation of both proteins, thus inducing negative regulators of their own activity. This interaction, however, needs to be further explored. The PI3K/AKT pathway can be activated indirectly by RAS, and/or directly by MET. This pathway can suppress apoptosis through the inactivation of proapoptotic BAD and the activation of MDM2, leading to the degradation of pro-apoptotic p53. Although the HGF/c-MET signaling also triggers NF-κB signaling, it did not contribute to the anti-apoptotic function of HGF/c-MET signaling [73]. Interestingly, it has been shown for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma that a high level of HGF can inhibit apoptosis induced by anoikis [92]. This may also be important during the dissemination of melanoma cells at distant metastases, especially when cells enter the bloodstream. Another study has reported that c-MET can promote cell survival also in a HGF-independent manner, by interacting and sequestering FAS [93].
HGF has been recognized as contributing to the regulation of the interaction between melanoma cells and their microenvironment. Autocrine expression and the activation of HGF downregulates the expression of E-cadherin and Desmoglein 1, which decouples melanoma cells from keratinocytes [94]. HGF, through the activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway, induces the expression of fibronectin and its extracellular assembly on the surface of melanoma cells, which enhances their metastatic potential [95]. HGF can be bound by surface adhesion molecule CD44, which facilitates its presentation to c-MET, and HGF binding to c-MET upregulates the expression of the CD44v6 isoform in melanoma cells [96]. It has been recently shown that HGF can contribute to the induction of the invadopodia formation, which was correlated with an enhanced invasive potential of melanoma cells [97]. HGF/c-MET signaling promotes the metastatic dissemination of melanoma cells, also through exosomes that are used for intercellular communication. These small vesicles are employed by melanoma cells to spread their proteins and nucleic acids, including microRNAs (miRNAs) [98]. It has been shown that the c-MET oncoprotein can be transported via melanoma-derived exosomes [99]. The level of activated c-MET is enhanced in this way in the bone marrow-derived cells (BMDCs). This stimulates the proangiogenic phenotype of BMDCs and their mobilization to the lungs and lymph nodes, where BMDCs facilitate the formation of a metastatic niche for melanoma cells. It has been shown that exosomes derived from Met-high B16-F10 melanoma cells containing a higher level of Met than those from Met-low cells [100]. The number of lung metastases of Met-low cells could be increased by the pretreatment of mice, with exosomes taken from Met-high melanoma cells.
HGF, c-MET and soluble MET (s-MET) are considered as biomarkers for melanoma, and they may provide a way to evaluate the response to therapy. High c-MET expression in melanoma samples has also been correlated with a poor clinical outcome [79]. Much lower levels of s-MET were detected in healthy donors and metastasis-free uveal melanoma patients, than in those with metastatic disease [101]. A high level of HGF was found in advanced disease, and in patients with progressive disease [102], and high baseline serum levels of HGF, above the median, have been correlated with lower progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). It has been earlier shown that melanoma patients with a high stromal HGF level had a poorer response to treatment with vemurafenib, an inhibitor of BRAFV600E, used alone or in combination with trametinib, an inhibitor of MEK1/2, than those lacking HGF [103].
The HGF/c-MET pathway is controlled at multiple levels, and the regulation of MET expression by miRNAs is one of them. There are several examples supporting the notion that even slight alterations in miRNA expression levels may induce the development of pathologies, including melanoma [104]. The c-MET transcript is a target of several miRNAs, including the miR-34 family [105], miR-137 [106], and miR-144 [107]. As their expression is downregulated in melanoma, mainly by epigenetic silencing, the c-MET level is increased, leading to the enhancement of HGF/c-MET signaling.

5. HGF/c-MET Signaling in Melanoma that Is Resistant to Targeted Therapies

Despite the recent developments in oncoprotein-targeted drugs, melanoma is still considered a deadly disease. As a mutation in BRAF is present in the majority of melanomas, which leads to enhanced activity of the RAF-MEK-ERK pathway, BRAFV600E/K has been chosen as the main target for the development of new therapies. There are two FDA-approved drugs targeting BRAFV600E/K, vemurafenib (PLX4032) and dabrafenib, but their efficacy against melanoma is not fully satisfactory, even if they are used in combination with inhibitors of the downstream kinases MEK1/2, trametinib, and cobimetinib [108]. Melanoma patients either show innate resistance to these targeted drugs, or acquired resistance is developed in the majority of patients after few months of treatment [109]. Several mechanisms of innate and acquired resistance have been identified [110,111]. As melanoma is strongly dependent on the microenvironment (TME, tumor microenvironment) [112,113], the role of the microenvironment in developing resistance has been also in focus. The role of HGF/c-MET signaling in response of melanoma to targeted therapies, and subsequent development of resistance has been investigated, which has resulted in several publications [103,114,115,116,117,118,119]. The results of these studies are not fully consistent, and they largely depend on methodology used, but the main reason for the discrepancies between results may lie in the heterogeneity of melanoma leading to the broad spectrum of activities of different pathways within one tumor. Bearing heterogeneity in mind, the results showing the role of HGF/c-MET signaling in response to targeted therapies and resistance development are grouped based on methodology, which was applied, namely as the results obtained in preclinical studies and the findings derived from clinical studies.

6. Preclinical Study Results

To address the potential involvement of c-MET activation in resistance to targeted therapies, a panel of 27 patient-derived melanoma cell lines were genetically characterized [115]. One cell line, LM38, exerting innate resistance to vemurafenib, showed increased activation of c-MET, which was associated with the amplification of MET. Vemurafenib, in combination with an inhibitor of c-MET, SU-11274, inhibited LM38 cell growth, as shown by G1 cell arrest and release of adenylate kinase in the absence of activation of caspase 3. A combination of vemurafenib and SU-11274 inhibited HGF-mediated invasion into Matrigel, preventing wound closure and inhibiting the expression of integrin β1. Based on these results, the authors suggested that HGF/c-MET signaling plays an important role in innate resistance to vemurafenib.
To investigate the influence of the microenvironment on melanoma response to targeted therapeutics, melanoma cells were cocultured with 18 different stromal cell lines, and among seven cell lines that conferred resistance to PLX-4720, a vemurafenib analogue, six were fibroblast cell lines [103]. The proliferation of melanoma cells cocultured with fibroblasts, and exposed to PLX-4720 was less affected by the drug than the proliferation of melanoma cells cultured alone. This was considered as an indication that stromal component(s) could rescue melanoma cells from PLX-4720-induced cell death. To find out if this rescue effect was mediated by direct fibroblast–melanoma cell contact, or by secreted factor(s), melanoma cells exposed to the drug were cultured in fibroblast-conditioned media. The results indicated that it was a secreted factor, which was identified as HGF by an antibody array-based analysis of 567 factors. The proliferation of melanoma cells was less inhibited by PLX-4720 in the medium from HGF-secreting fibroblast cultures than in the fresh medium. Next, melanoma cells were exposed to either PLX-4720 or PD-184352 (MEK1/2 inhibitor) in the presence of increasing concentrations (6.25–50 ng/mL) of recombinant HGF, HGF-neutralizing antibodies, or crizotinib, a MET inhibitor. Treatment with crizotinib reduced the HGF-mediated increase in proliferation, suggesting that rescue was MET-dependent. Relative proliferation was less reduced by drugs in the presence of HGF, whereas adding antibodies neutralizing HGF reversed this effect [103]. Authors suggested that HGF mediated innate resistance to inhibitors of BRAFV600E/K.
Similar conclusions were drawn from experiments performed with vemurafenib (PLX-4032) [114,120]. The acute resistance to BRAF inhibitor induced by HGF was quantified by calculating the IC50 (half-maximum inhibitory concentration) of vemurafenib in the presence and absence of HGF in the culture medium [114]. Among 18 melanoma cell lines analyzed, four displayed complete HGF-induced rescue, six partial and for eight melanoma cell lines addition of HGF did not affect melanoma cell response to vemurafenib. Among 12 additional BRAFV600E melanoma cell lines, HGF markedly antagonized vemurafenib sensitivity only in five lines [114]. As shown in this study, the correlation between the expression and the HGF rescue effect in melanoma cells treated with vemurafenib was not high (r2 = 0.56). In the study of Lito et al., HGF attenuated the sensitivity to vemurafenib in five out of eight BRAFV600E melanoma cell lines [120]. These results indicate that HGF can suppress effects of BRAFV600E inhibition but only in selected melanoma cell lines.
In a more recently published report [118], it has been demonstrated that the proliferation and phenotype of six BRAFV600E patient-derived melanoma cells were not detectably influenced by exogenous HGF. Cell distribution in the cell cycle, the expression of CCND1, the activity of signaling pathways crucial for melanoma, including the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, WNT/β-catenin pathway, and NF-κB signaling were very similar when different growth factors, HGF, EGF and bFGF, were used in the culture medium alone, in combination or were omitted. This suggests that growth factors, including HGF, are not necessary for BRAFV600E melanoma cell growth in vitro. Moreover, the effects of vemurafenib or trametinib on melanoma cells were also very similar in all of these growth conditions [118]. Interestingly, the presence of growth factors did not influence the percentages of subpopulations of Ki-67high (proliferating) cells and CD271 (NGFR)high (stem-like, crest-like) cells, and these percentages were reduced similarly by drugs in the presence or absence of different growth factors. Altogether, these results suggest that growth factors, including HGF, do not substantially alter the effects of acute treatment of melanoma cells with inhibitors of the MAPK/ERK pathway, vemurafenib and trametinib.
The half-life of exogenous HGF protein is short, and high levels of HGF cannot be kept in vivo, even by repeated infusions of HGF [53]. Results of in vivo studies on a possible role of HGF/c-MET signaling in the development of resistance to BRAFV600E inhibitors were not conclusive, which might be partially due to sample sizes.

7. Clinical Results

HGF was detected in melanoma-associated stromal cells in 68% BRAFV600E patient-derived biopsies from patients prior to treatment (23/34 biopsies) [103], whereas, when 10 on-treatment biopsies were analyzed, HGF expression was found to be enhanced in 50% of them, compared to its pre-treatment level. In another study, the ability of stromal cells, which are few in number and located at the periphery of metastatic nodules, to counteract treatment via HGF was questioned [117]. In this study, stromal or parenchymal HGF immunoreactivity has been evaluated as a biomarker for melanoma response to RAF inhibitors, and the results were not unambiguous. In another study, the evaluation of patients did not provide satisfactory results to validate HGF as a biomarker for melanoma response to targeted therapies [102]. Also, the MET clinical score was not a statistically significant predictive factor for therapy with vemurafenib [116].
There is no reliable method to quantify the HGF level directly in a living patient [117]. The levels of growth factors, which are secreted from multiple sources, dynamically change. In patients enrolled onto the BRIM2 clinical trial, pretreatment plasma HGF levels ranged from 0.033 to 7.2 ng/mL, with a median value of 0.33 ng/mL [114]. Assays for the reliable detection of HGF and MET levels are still under development [121,122].

8. Targeting HGF/c-MET Signaling in Melanoma

The inhibitors of HGF/c-MET signaling are developed to target mainly c-MET (Table 1), but their efficacy is largely limited by resistance. Cabozantinib showed clinical activity in patients with metastatic melanoma, including uveal melanoma [123], although it is unclear whether this is exclusively due to the inhibitory effects on c-MET, as cabozantinib also inhibits VEGF receptors and the AXL receptor tyrosine kinase. The inhibition of c-Met activity alone by Crizotinib was sufficient to strongly inhibit the metastasis of uveal melanoma in a mouse model [124]. A Phase II trial of adjuvant crizotinib in high-risk uveal melanoma following definitive therapy (NCT02223819) is ongoing. SU11274 was shown to induce the apoptosis and differentiation of melanoma cells in vitro [125]. The antitumor activity of SU11274 was also observed in a melanoma xenograft model [86,126]. SU11274, used for intraperitoneal administration achieved a significant inhibitory effect on liver metastasis induced by the intrasplenic injection of metastatic melanoma cells [86]. On the contrary, SU11274 was shown to increase the tumorigenicity and alter the bioenergetic state of melanoma cells [127]. Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that combination of SU11274 and vemurafenib inhibited the growth of melanoma cells with constitutively activated c-MET more efficiently than SU11274 alone [115]. Foretinib inhibited the migration and invasion capacity of B16F10 melanoma cells, with an IC50 of 21 nM [128]. PHA-665752, another c-MET inhibitor, inhibited the migration of NRAS-mutated melanoma cells toward HGF [129]. PHA-665752, while suppressing the phosphorylation of c-MET, significantly inhibited the PI3K/AKT pathway activity and motility of uveal melanoma cells in vitro, and tumor growth in nude mice [130]. Tivantinib (ARQ 197) is clinically tested as a c-MET inhibitor [131]. Preliminary evidence of the therapeutic potential of combinatorial therapy, tivantinib, and sorafenib, was obtained in adult melanoma patients [132]. The synergistic effect of vemurafenib and tivantinib on cell viability was observed in c-MET-expressing melanoma cells that harbored a mutation leading to BRAFV600E [126]. In vitro, tivantinib did not inhibit the autophosphorylation of c-MET, and its cytotoxic activity was independent of its ability to bind c-MET [133]. The dietary flavonoid quercetin, whose safety for clinical application was reviewed [134], has been shown to inhibit melanoma cell migration and invasion in an in vitro study, and to prevent melanoma lung metastasis in vivo [135]. This antimetastatic activity of quercetin might be partially due to the inhibition of HGF/c-MET signaling by the suppression of c-MET dimerization, its phosphorylation, and as a consequence, the attenuation of downstream transducers [36]. A therapeutic development strategy for quercetin as an antimelanoma agent has been presented [136]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that quercetin can inhibit the phosphorylation of JAK2 and STAT1 in interferon gamma-primed keratinocytes [137].

9. Conclusions

HGF is an important mediator of interactions between cancer cells and stroma cells [140]. Moreover, several elements of the microenvironment, including ECM components [19] can either promote or inhibit HGF/c-MET signaling. Thus, the discrepancies between the results obtained in preclinical studies, and in clinics, it might be a consequence of the differences in the microenvironment used in the experimental settings or present in the patients’ malignancies.
The contribution of the HGF/c-MET signaling to wound healing, including skin repair, inspires the development of drugs with agonistic activities, as a part of regenerative medicine. From an opposite perspective, the role of the HGF/c-MET pathway in the progression of several tumors, including melanoma, stimulates research towards the development of inhibitors of this pathway. Both agonists and antagonists influencing the HGF/c-MET signaling are currently being tested in clinical trials. These “two-pronged approaches”, already early recognized [141], are being closely examined for possible applications in tissue repair and cancer treatment without inducing deleterious side-effects.

Funding

This work was supported by the Grant 2014/15/B/NZ7/00947 from National Science Centre (Poland).

Acknowledgments

I express my sincere gratitude to Mrs Ewa Lewandowska for her assistance in the preparation of the reference list and figures.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nakamura, T.; Nawa, K.; Ichihara, A.; Kaise, N.; Nishino, T. Purification and subunit structure of hepatocyte growth factor from rat platelets. FEBS Lett. 1987, 224, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Nakamura, T.; Nawa, K.; Ichihara, A. Partial purification and characterization of hepatocyte growth factor from serum of hepatectomized rats. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1984, 122, 1450–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nakamura, T.; Nishizawa, T.; Hagiya, M.; Seki, T.; Shimonishi, M.; Sugimura, A.; Tashiro, K.; Shimizu, S. Molecular cloning and expression of human hepatocyte growth factor. Nature 1989, 342, 440–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Miyazawa, K.; Tsubouchi, H.; Naka, D.; Takahashi, K.; Okigaki, M.; Arakaki, N.; Nakayama, H.; Hirono, S.; Sakiyama, O.; Takahashi, K.; et al. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of cDNA for human hepatocyte growth factor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1989, 163, 967–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Higashio, K.; Shima, N.; Goto, M.; Itagaki, Y.; Nagao, M.; Yasuda, H.; Morinaga, T. Identity of a tumor cytotoxic factor from human fibroblasts and hepatocyte growth factor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1990, 170, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Weidner, K.M.; Arakaki, N.; Hartmann, G.; Vandekerckhove, J.; Weingart, S.; Rieder, H.; Fonatsch, C.; Tsubouchi, H.; Hishida, T.; Daikuhara, Y.; et al. Evidence for the identity of human scatter factor and human hepatocyte growth factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 7001–7005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Seki, T.; Hagiya, M.; Shimonishi, M.; Nakamura, T.; Shimizu, S. Organization of the human hepatocyte growth factor-encoding gene. Gene 1991, 102, 213–219. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bottaro, D.P.; Rubin, J.S.; Faletto, D.L.; Chan, A.M.; Kmiecik, T.E.; Vande Woude, G.F.; Aaronson, S.A. Identification of the hepatocyte growth factor receptor as the c-met proto-oncogene product. Science 1991, 251, 802–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Naldini, L.; Vigna, E.; Narsimhan, R.P.; Gaudino, G.; Zarnegar, R.; Michalopoulos, G.K.; Comoglio, P.M. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) stimulates the tyrosine kinase activity of the receptor encoded by the proto-oncogene c-MET. Oncogene 1991, 6, 501–504. [Google Scholar]
  10. Uehara, Y.; Minowa, O.; Mori, C.; Shiota, K.; Kuno, J.; Noda, T.; Kitamura, N. Placental defect and embryonic lethality in mice lacking hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor. Nature 1995, 373, 702–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schmidt, C.; Bladt, F.; Goedecke, S.; Brinkmann, V.; Zschiesche, W.; Sharpe, M.; Birchmeier, C. Scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor is essential for liver development. Nature 1995, 373, 699–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bhownick, N.A.; Neilson, E.G.; Moses, H.L. Stromal fibroblasts in cancer initiation and progression. Nature 2004, 432, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Furge, K.A.; Zhang, Y.W.; Vande Woude, G.F. Met receptor tyrosine kinase: Enhanced signaling through adapter proteins. Oncogene 2000, 19, 5582–5589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Trusolino, L.; Bertotti, A.; Comoglio, P.M. MET signalling: Principles and functions in development, organ regeneration and cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 834–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bladt, F.; Riethmacher, D.; Isenmann, S.; Aguzzi, A.; Birchmeier, C. Essential role for the c-met receptor in the migration of myogenic precursor cells into the limb bud. Nature 1995, 376, 768–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nakamura, T.; Sakai, K.; Nakamura, T.; Matsumoto, K. Hepatocyte growth factor twenty years on: Much more than a growth factor. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011, 26, 188–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Fukushima, T.; Uchiyama, S.; Tanaka, H.; Kataoka, H. Hepatocyte Growth Factor Activator: A Proteinase Linking Tissue Injury with Repair. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gao, C.F.; Vande Woude, G.F. HGF/SF-Met signaling in tumor progression. Cell Res. 2005, 15, 49–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Noriega-Guerra, H.; Freitas, V.M. Extracellular Matrix Influencing HGF/c-MET Signaling Pathway: Impact on Cancer Progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, H.; Feng, Q.; Chen, W.-D.; Wang, Y.-D. HGF/c-MET: A Promising Therapeutic Target in the Digestive System Cancers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hartmann, S.; Bhola, N.E.; Grandis, J.R. HGF/Met Signaling in Head and Neck Cancer: Impact on the Tumor Microenvironment. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 4005–4013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Matsumoto, K.; Umitsu, M.; De Silva, D.M.; Roy, A.; Bottaro, D.P. Hepatocyte growth factor/MET in cancer progression and biomarker discovery. Cancer Sci. 2017, 108, 296–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bendinelli, P.; Maroni, P.; Matteucci, E.; Desiderio, M.A. Epigenetic regulation of HGF/Met receptor axis is critical for the outgrowth of bone metastasis from breast carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Takada, N.; Yano, Y.; Matsuda, T.; Otani, S.; Osugi, H.; Higashino, M.; Kinoshita, H.; Fukushima, S. Expression of immunoreactive human hepatocyte growth factor in human esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer Lett. 1995, 97, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Boromand, N.; Hasanzadeh, M.; ShahidSales, S.; Farazestanian, M.; Gharib, M.; Fiuji, H.; Behboodi, N.; Ghobadi, N.; Hassanian, S.M.; Ferns, G.A.; et al. Clinical and prognostic value of the C-Met/HGF signaling pathway in cervical cancer. J. Cell Physiol. 2018, 233, 4490–4496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kondo, S.; Ojima, H.; Tsuda, H.; Hashimoto, J.; Morizane, C.; Ikeda, M.; Ueno, H.; Tamura, K.; Shimada, K.; Kanai, Y.; et al. Clinical impact of c-Met expression and its gene amplification in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 18, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hu, C.T.; Wu, J.R.; Cheng, C.C.; Wu, W.S. The Therapeutic Targeting of HGF/c-Met Signaling in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Alternative Approaches. Cancers 2017, 9, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Abounader, R.; Laterra, J. Scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor in brain tumor growth and angiogenesis. Neuro Oncol. 2005, 7, 436–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. De Herdt, M.J.; Baatenburg de Jong, R.J. HGF and c-MET as potential orchestrators of invasive growth in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Front. Biosci. 2008, 13, 2516–2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Arnold, L.; Enders, J.; Thomas, S.M. Activated HGF-c-Met Axis in Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers 2017, 9, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Pasquini, G.; Giaccone, G. C-MET inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2018, 27, 363–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Seneviratne, D.; Ma, J.; Tan, X.; Kwon, Y.K.; Muhammad, E.; Melhem, M.; DeFrances, M.C.; Zarnegar, R. Genomic instability causes HGF gene activation in colon cancer cells, promoting their resistance to necroptosis. Gastroenterology 2015, 148, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xie, Q.; Bradley, R.; Kang, L.; Koeman, J.; Ascierto, M.L.; Worschech, A.; De Giorgi, V.; Wang, E.; Kefene, L.; Su, Y.; et al. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) autocrine activation predicts sensitivity to MET inhibition in glioblastoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 570–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lengyel, E.; Prechtel, D.; Resau, J.H.; Gauger, K.; Welk, A.; Lindemann, K.; Salanti, G.; Richter, T.; Knudsen, B.; Vande Woude, G.F.; et al. C-Met overexpression in node-positive breast cancer identifies patients with poor clinical outcome independent of Her2/neu. Int. J. Cancer 2005, 113, 678–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Di Renzo, M.F.; Poulsom, R.; Olivero, M.; Comoglio, P.M.; Lemoine, N.R. Expression of the Met/hepatocyte growth factor receptor in human pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 1995, 55, 1129–1138. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Cao, H.H.; Cheng, C.Y.; Su, T.; Fu, X.Q.; Guo, H.; Li, T.; Tse, A.K.; Kwan, H.Y.; Yu, H.; Yu, Z.L. Quercetin inhibits HGF/c-Met signaling and HGF-stimulated melanoma cell migration and invasion. Mol. Cancer 2015, 14, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Stoker, M.; Gherardi, E.; Perryman, M.; Gray, J. Scatter factor is a fibroblast-derived modulator of epithelial cell mobility. Nature 1987, 327, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Imokawa, G.; Yada, Y.; Morisaki, N.; Kimura, M. Biological characterization of human fibroblast-derived mitogenic factors for human melanocytes. Biochem. J. 1998, 330, 1235–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Matsumoto, K.; Tajima, H.; Nakamura, T. Hepatocyte growth factor is a potent stimulator of human melanocyte DNA synthesis and growth. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1991, 176, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kan, M.; Zhang, G.; Zarnegar, R.; Michalopoulos, G.; Myoken, Y.; McKeehan, W.L.; Stevens, J.L. Hepatocyte growth factor/hepatopoietin A stimulates the growth of rat kidney proximal tubule epithelial cells (RPTE), rat nonparenchymal liver cells, human melanoma cells, mouse keratinocytes and stimulates anchorage-independent growth of SV-40 transformed RPTE. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1991, 174, 331–337. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sato, C.; Tsuboi, R.; Shi, C.-M.; Rubin, J.S.; Ogawa, H. Comparative study of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor and keratinocyte growth factor effects on human keratinocytes. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1995, 104, 958–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. McCawley, L.J.; O’Brien, P.; Hudson, L.G. Epidermal growth factor (EGF)- and scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor (SF/HGF)-mediated keratinocyte migration is coincident with induction of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9. J. Cell Physiol. 1998, 176, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gohda, E.; Matsunaga, T.; Kataoka, H.; Takebe, T.; Yamamoto, I. Induction of hepatocyte growth factor in human skin fibroblasts by epidermal growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor and fibroblast growth factor. Cytokine 1994, 6, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gohda, E.; Nagao, T.; Yamamoto, I. Stimulation of hepatocyte growth factor production in human fibroblasts by the protein phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2000, 60, 1531–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yagi, Y.; Sotani, T.; Nagao, T.; Horio, T.; Yamamoto, I.; Gohda, E. Induction by staurosporine of hepatocyte growth factor production in human skin fibroblasts independent of protein kinase inhibition. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2003, 66, 1797–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Matsumoto, K.; Okazaki, H.; Nakamura, T. Up-regulation of hepatocyte growth factor gene expression by interleukin-1 in human skin fibroblasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1992, 188, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Takami, Y.; Motoki, T.; Yamamoto, I.; Gohda, E. Synergistic induction of hepatocyte growth factor in human skin fibroblasts by the inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1 and interferon-gamma. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 327, 212–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sugiura, Y.; Hiramatsu, K.; Hamauzu, R.; Motoki, T.; Miyazaki, M.; Uto, H.; Tsubouchi, H.; Tanaka, S.; Gohda, E. Mitogen-activated protein kinases-dependent induction of hepatocyte growth factor production in human dermal fibroblasts by the antibiotic polymyxin B. Cytokine 2012, 60, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Qin, Z.; Worthen, C.A.; Quan, T. Cell-size-dependent upregulation of HGF expression in dermal fibroblasts: Impact on human skin connective tissue aging. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2017, 88, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Saitoh, K.; Takahashi, H.; Sawada, N.; Parsons, P.G. Detection of the c-met proto-oncogene product in normal skin and tumours of melanocytic origin. J. Pathol. 1994, 174, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yoshida, S.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Itami, S.; Yoshikawa, K.; Tabata, Y.; Matsumoto, K.; Nakamura, T. Neutralization of hepatocyte growth factor leads to retarded cutaneous wound healing associated with decreased neovascularization and granulation tissue formation. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2003, 120, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lindner, G.; Menrad, A.; Gherardi, E.; Merlino, G.; Welker, P.; Handjiski, B.; Roloff, B.; Paus, R. Involvement of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor and met receptor signaling in hair follicle morphogenesis and cycling. FASEB J. 2000, 14, 319–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Matsumoto, K.; Nakamura, T. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) as a tissue organizer for organogenesis and regeneration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997, 239, 639–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chmielowiec, J.; Borowiak, M.; Morkel, M.; Stradal, T.; Munz, B.; Werner, S.; Wehland, J.; Birchmeier, C.; Birchmeier, W. c-Met is essential for wound healing in the skin. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 177, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Conway, K.; Price, P.; Harding, K.G.; Jiang, W.G. The molecular and clinical impact of hepatocyte growth factor, its receptor, activators, and inhibitors in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2006, 14, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, J.F.; Duan, H.F.; Wu, C.T.; Zhang, D.J.; Deng, Y.; Yin, H.L.; Han, B.; Gong, H.C.; Wang, H.W.; Wang, Y.L. HGF accelerates wound healing by promoting the dedifferentiation of epidermal cells through β1-integrin/ILK pathway. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 470418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Miura, Y.; Ngo Thai Bich, V.; Furuya, M.; Hasegawa, H.; Takahashi, S.; Katagiri, N.; Hongu, T.; Funakoshi, Y.; Ohbayashi, N.; Kanaho, Y. The small G protein Arf6 expressed in keratinocytes by HGF stimulation is a regulator for skin wound healing. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 46649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Sagi, Z.; Hieronymus, T. The Impact of the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Regulator Hepatocyte Growth Factor Receptor/Met on Skin Immunity by Modulating Langerhans Cell Migration. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Iwasaki, T.; Imado, T.; Kitano, S.; Sano, H. Hepatocyte growth factor ameliorates dermal sclerosis in the tight-skin mouse model of scleroderma. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2006, 8, R161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kurz, S.M.; Diebold, S.S.; Hieronymus, T.; Gust, T.C.; Bartunek, P.; Sachs, M.; Birchmeier, W.; Zenke, M. The impact of c-met/scatter factor receptor on dendritic cell migration. Eur. J. Immunol. 2002, 32, 1832–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Baek, J.H.; Birchmeier, C.; Zenke, M.; Hieronymus, T. The HGF receptor/Met tyrosine kinase is a key regulator of dendritic cell migration in skin immunity. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 1699–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gilchrest, B.A.; Park, H.Y.; Eller, M.S.; Yaar, M. Mechanisms of ultraviolet light-induced pigmentation. Photochem. Photobiol. 1996, 63, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liu, M.; Pelling, J.C. UV-B/A irradiation of mouse keratinocytes results in p53-mediated WAF1. CIP1 expression. Oncogene 1995, 10, 1955–1960. [Google Scholar]
  64. Eller, M.S.; Maeda, T.; Magnoni, C.; Atwal, D.; Gilchrest, B.A. Enhancement of DNA repair in human skin cells by thymidine dinucleotides: Evidence for a p53-mediated mammalian SOS response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 12627–12632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Mildner, M.; Eckhart, L.; Lengauer, B.; Tschachler, E. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor inhibits UVB induced apoptosis of human keratinocytes via the PI-3-kinase pathway. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1999, 113, 1136–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Noonan, F.P.; Otsuka, T.; Bang, S.; Anver, M.R.; Merlin, G. Accelerated Ultraviolet Radiation-induced Carcinogenesis in Hepatocyte Growth Factor/Scatter Factor Transgenic Mice. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 3738–3743. [Google Scholar]
  67. Brenner, M.; Degitz, K.; Besch, R.; Berking, C. Differential expression of melanoma-associated growth factors in keratinocytes and fibroblasts by ultraviolet A and ultraviolet B radiation. Br. J. Dermatol. 2005, 153, 733–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mildner, M.; Mlitz, V.; Gruber, F.; Wojta, J.; Tschachler, E. Hepatocyte growth factor establishes autocrine and paracrine feedback loops for the protection of skin cells after UV irradiation. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2007, 127, 2637–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Matsumoto, K.; Hashimoto, K.; Yoshikawa, K.; Nakamura, T. Marked stimulation of growth and motility of human keratinocytes by hepatocyte growth factor. Exp. Cell Res. 1991, 196, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Halaban, R.; Rubin, J.S.; Funasaka, Y.; Cobb, M.; Boulton, T.; Faletto, D.; Rosen, E.; Chan, A.; Yoko, K.; White, W.; et al. Met and hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor signal transduction in normal melanocytes and melanoma cells. Oncogene 1992, 7, 2195–2206. [Google Scholar]
  71. Takayama, H.; La Rochelle, W.J.; Anver, M.; Bockman, D.E.; Merlino, G. Scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor as a regulator of skeletal muscle and neural crest development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 5866–5871. [Google Scholar]
  72. Kos, L.; Aronzon, A.; Takayama, H.; Maina, F.; Ponzetto, C.; Merlino, G.; Pavan, W. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor-MET signaling in neural crest-derived melanocyte development. Pigment Cell Res. 1999, 12, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Beuret, L.; Flori, E.; Denoyelle, C.; Bille, K.; Busca, R.; Picardo, M.; Bertolotto, C.; Ballotti, R. Up-regulation of MET expression by alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone and MITF allows hepatocyte growth factor to protect melanocytes and melanoma cells from apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 14140–14147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Larribere, L.; Khaled, M.; Tartare-Deckert, S.; Busca, R.; Luciano, F.; Bille, K.; Valony, G.; Eychene, A.; Auberger, P.; Ortonne, J.P.; et al. PI3K mediates protection against TRAIL-induced apoptosis in primary human melanocytes. Cell Death Differ. 2004, 11, 1084–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Hartman, M.L.; Czyz, M. MITF in melanoma: Mechanisms behind its expression and activity. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2015, 72, 1249–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Soong, J.; Scott, G. Plexin B1 inhibits MET through direct association and regulates Shp2 expression in melanocytes. J. Cell Sci. 2013, 126, 688–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Conti, E.; Dottorini, T.; Sarkozy, A.; Tiller, G.E.; Esposito, G.; Pizzuti, A.; Dallapiccola, B. A novel PTPN11 mutation in LEOPARD syndrome. Hum. Mutat. 2003, 21, 654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Natali, P.G.; Nicotra, M.R.; Di Renzo, M.F.; Prat, M.; Bigotti, A.; Cavaliere, R.; Comoglio, P.M. Expression of the c-Met/HGF receptor in human melanocytic neoplasms: Demonstration of the relationship to malignant melanoma tumour progression. Br. J. Cancer 1993, 68, 746–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cruz, J.; Reis-Filho, J.S.; Silva, P.; Lopes, J.M. Expression of c-met tyrosine kinase receptor is biologically and prognostically relevant for primary cutaneous malignant melanomas. Oncology 2003, 65, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Moore, S.R.; Persons, D.L.; Sosman, J.A.; Bobadilla, D.; Bedell, V.; Smith, D.D.; Wolman, S.R.; Tuthill, R.J.; Moon, J.; Sondak, V.K.; et al. Detection of copy number alterations in metastatic melanoma by a DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization probe panel and array comparative genomic hybridization: A southwest oncology group study (S9431). Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 2927–2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yeh, I.; Botton, T.; Talevich, E.; Shain, A.H.; Sparatta, A.J.; de la Fouchardiere, A.; Mully, T.W.; North, J.P.; Garrido, M.C.; Gagnon, A.; et al. Activating MET kinase rearrangements in melanoma and Spitz tumours. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Recio, J.A.; Merlino, G. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor activates proliferation in melanoma cells through p38 MAPK, ATF-2 and cyclin D1. Oncogene 2002, 21, 1000–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Otsuka, T.; Takayama, H.; Sharp, R.; Celli, G.; LaRochelle, W.J.; Bottaro, D.P.; Ellmore, N.; Vieira, W.; Owens, J.W.; Anver, M.; et al. c-Met autocrine activation induces development of malignant melanoma and acquisition of the metastatic phenotype. Cancer Res. 1998, 58, 5157–5167. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Ferraro, D.; Corso, S.; Fasano, E.; Panieri, E.; Santangelo, R.; Borrello, S.; Giordano, S.; Pani, G.; Galeotti, T. Pro-metastatic signaling by c-Met through RAC-1 and reactive oxygen species (ROS). Oncogene 2006, 25, 3689–3698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Lee, Y.J.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, D.W.; Nam, H.S.; Cho, M.K. Expression of the c-Met Proteins in Malignant Skin Cancers. Ann. Dermatol. 2011, 23, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kenessey, I.; Keszthelyi, M.; Kramer, Z.; Berta, J.; Adam, A.; Dobos, J.; Mildner, M.; Flachner, B.; Cseh, S.; Barna, G.; et al. Inhibition of c-Met with the specific small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU11274 decreases growth and metastasis formation of experimental human melanoma. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2010, 10, 332–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Xiao, G.H.; Jeffers, M.; Bellacosa, A.; Mitsuuchi, Y.; Vande Woude, G.F.; Testa, J.R. Anti-apoptotic signaling by hepatocyte growth factor/Met via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Chattopadhyay, C.; Grimm, E.A.; Woodman, S.E. Simultaneous inhibition of the HGF/MET and Erk1/2 pathways affect uveal melanoma cell growth and migration. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e83957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Christensen, C.; Guldberg, P. Growth factors rescue cutaneous melanoma cells from apoptosis induced by knockdown of mutated (V 600 E) B-RAF. Oncogene 2005, 24, 6292–6302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Stella, M.C.; Trusolino, L.; Pennacchietti, S.; Comoglio, P.M. Negative feedback regulation of Met-dependent invasive growth by Notch. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25, 3982–3996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lee, C.C.; Putnam, A.J.; Miranti, C.K.; Gustafson, M.; Wang, L.M.; Vande Woude, G.F.; Gao, C.F. Overexpression of sprouty 2 inhibits HGF/SF-mediated cell growth, invasion, migration, and cytokinesis. Oncogene 2004, 23, 5193–5202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Zeng, Q.; Chen, S.; You, Z.; Yang, F.; Carey, T.E.; Saims, D.; Wang, C.Y. Hepatocyte growth factor inhibits anoikis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells by activation of ERK and Akt signaling independent of NFkappa B. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 25203–25208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Wang, X.; DeFrances, M.C.; Dai, Y.; Pediaditakis, P.; Johnson, C.; Bell, A.; Michalopoulos, G.K.; Zarnegar, R. A mechanism of cell survival: Sequestration of Fas by the HGF receptor Met. Mol. Cell 2002, 9, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Li, G.; Schaider, H.; Satyamoorthy, K.; Hanakawa, Y.; Hashimoto, K.; Herlyn, M. Downregulation of E-cadherin and Desmoglein 1 by autocrine hepatocyte growth factor during melanoma development. Oncogene 2001, 20, 8125–8135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Gaggioli, C.; Deckert, M.; Robert, G.; Abbe, P.; Batoz, M.; Ehrengruber, M.U.; Ortonne, J.P.; Ballotti, R.; Tartare-Deckert, S. HGF induces fibronectin matrix synthesis in melanoma cells through MAP kinase-dependent signaling pathway and induction of Egr-1. Oncogene 2005, 24, 1423–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Recio, J.A.; Merlino, G. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor induces feedback up-regulation of CD44v6 in melanoma cells through Egr-1. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 1576–1582. [Google Scholar]
  97. Makowiecka, A.; Simiczyjew, A.; Nowak, D.; Mazur, A.J. Varying effects of EGF, HGF and TGFβ on formation of invadopodia and invasiveness of melanoma cell lines of different origin. Eur. J. Histochem. 2016, 60, 2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Gajos-Michniewicz, A.; Duechler, M.; Czyz, M. MiRNA in melanoma-derived exosomes. Cancer Lett. 2014, 347, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Peinado, H.; Alečković, M.; Lavotshkin, S.; Matei, I.; Costa-Silva, B.; Moreno-Bueno, G.; Hergueta-Redondo, M.; Williams, C.; García-Santos, G.; Ghajar, C.; et al. Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 883–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Adachi, E.; Sakai, K.; Nishiuchi, T.; Imamura, R.; Sato, H.; Matsumoto, K. Different growth and metastatic phenotypes associated with a cell-intrinsic change of Met in metastatic melanoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 70779–70793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Barisione, G.; Fabbi, M.; Gino, A.; Queirolo, P.; Orgiano, L.; Spano, L.; Picasso, V.; Pfeffer, U.; Mosci, C.; Jager, M.J.; et al. Potential Role of Soluble c-Met as a New Candidate Biomarker of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015, 133, 1013–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hügel, R.; Muendlein, A.; Volbeding, L.; Drexel, H.; Richtig, E.; Wehkamp, U.; Painsi, C.; Lange-Asschenfeldt, B.; Hauschild, A.; Egberts, F. Serum levels of hepatocyte growth factor as a potential tumor marker in patients with malignant melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2016, 26, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Straussman, R.; Morikawa, T.; Shee, K.; Barzily-Rokni, M.; Qian, Z.R.; Du, J.; Davis, A.; Mongare, M.M.; Gould, J.; Frederick, D.T.; et al. Tumour micro-environment elicits innate resistance to RAF inhibitors through HGF secretion. Nature 2012, 487, 500–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Wozniak, M.; Mielczarek, A.; Czyz, M. miRNAs in Melanoma: Tumor Suppressors and Oncogenes with Prognostic Potential. Curr. Med. Chem. 2016, 23, 3136–3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Hermeking, H. The miR-34 family in cancer and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2010, 17, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Luo, C.; Tetteh, P.W.; Merz, P.R.; Dickes, E.; Abukiwan, A.; Hotz-Wagenblatt, A.; Holland-Cunz, S.; Sinnberg, T.; Schittek, B.; Schadendorf, D.; et al. miR-137 inhibits the invasion of melanoma cells through downregulation of multiple oncogenic target genes. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2013, 133, 768–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Sun, L.; Bian, G.; Meng, Z.; Dang, G.; Shi, D.; Mi, S. MiR144 inhibits uveal melanoma cell proliferation and invasion by regulating c-met expression. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124428. [Google Scholar]
  108. Volpe, V.O.; Klufas, D.M.; Hegde, U.; Grant-Kels, J.M. The new paradigm of systemic therapies for metastatic melanoma. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2017, 77, 356–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Welsh, S.J.; Rizos, H.; Scolyer, R.A. Long GV Resistance to combination BRAF and MEK inhibition in metastatic melanoma: Where to next? Eur. J. Cancer 2016, 62, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Wang, L.; Leite de Oliveira, R.; Huijberts, S.; Bosdriesz, E.; Pencheva, N.; Brunen, D.; Bosma, A.; Song, J.Y.; Zevenhoven, J.; Los-de Vries, G.T.; et al. An Acquired Vulnerability of Drug-Resistant Melanoma with Therapeutic Potential. Cell 2018, 173, 1413–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Teh, J.L.F.; Aplin, A.E. Playing the Melanoma Endgame. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 4629–4630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Brandner, J.M.; Haass, N.K. Melanoma’s connections to the tumour microenvironment. Pathology 2013, 45, 443–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ahmed, F.; Haass, N.K. Microenvironment-Driven Dynamic Heterogeneity and Phenotypic Plasticity as a Mechanism of Melanoma Therapy Resistance. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Wilson, T.R.; Fridlyand, J.; Yan, Y.; Penuel, E.; Burton, L.; Chan, E.; Peng, J.; Lin, E.; Wang, Y.; Sosman, J.; et al. Widespread potential for growth-factor-driven resistance to anticancer kinase inhibitors. Nature 2012, 487, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Vergani, E.; Vallacchi, V.; Frigerio, S.; Deho, P.; Mondellini, P.; Perego, P.; Cassinelli, G.; Lanzi, C.; Testi, M.A.; Rivoltini, L.; et al. Identification of MET and SRC activation in melanoma cell lines showing primary resistance to PLX4032. Neoplasia 2011, 13, 1132–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Jubb, A.M.; Ribas, A.; Sosman, J.A.; McArthur, G.A.; Yan, Y.; Rost, S.; Zhao, S.; Koeppen, H. Impact of MET expression on outcome in BRAF(V600E/K) advanced melanoma. Histopathology 2013, 63, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Lezcano, C.; Lee, C.W.; Larson, A.R.; Menzies, A.M.; Kefford, R.F.; Thompson, J.F.; Mihm, M.C., Jr.; Ogino, S.; Long, G.V.; Scolyer, R.A.; et al. Evaluation of stromal HGF immunoreactivity as a biomarker for melanoma response to RAF inhibitors. Mod. Pathol. 2014, 27, 1193–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Zalesna, I.; Osrodek, M.; Hartman, M.L.; Rozanski, M.; Sztiller-Sikorska, M.; Niewinna, K.; Nejc, D.; Czyz, M. Exogenous growth factors bFGF, EGF and HGF do not influence viability and phenotype of V600EBRAF melanoma cells and their response to vemurafenib and trametinib in vitro. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Corso, S.; Giordano, S. Cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous mechanisms of HGF/MET-driven resistance to targeted therapies: From basic research to a clinical perspective. Cancer Discov. 2013, 3, 978–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Lito, P.; Pratilas, C.A.; Joseph, E.W.; Tadi, M.; Halilovic, E.; Zubrowski, M.; Huang, A.; Wong, W.L.; Callahan, M.K.; Merghoub, T.; et al. Relief of profound feedback inhibition of mitogenic signaling by RAF inhibitors attenuates their activity in BRAFV600E melanomas. Cancer Cell 2012, 22, 668–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Srivastava, A.K.; Hollingshead, M.G.; Weiner, J.; Navas, T.; Evrard, Y.A.; Khin, S.A.; Ji, J.J.; Zhang, Y.; Borgel, S.; Pfister, T.D.; et al. Pharmacodynamic Response of the MET/HGF Receptor to Small-Molecule Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Examined with Validated, Fit-for-Clinic Immunoassays. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 3683–3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Kaye, D.R.; Pinto, P.A.; Cecchi, F.; Reilly, J.; Semerjian, A.; Rabe, D.C.; Gupta, G.; Choyke, P.L.; Bottaro, D.P. Tumor and Plasma Met Levels in Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Daud, A.; Kluger, H.M.; Kurzrock, R.; Schimmoller, F.; Weitzman, A.L.; Samuel, T.A.; Moussa, A.H.; Gordon, M.S.; Shapiro, G.I. Phase II randomised discontinuation trial of the MET/VEGF receptor inhibitor cabozantinib in metastatic melanoma. Br. J. Cancer 2017, 116, 432–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Surriga, O.; Rajasekhar, V.K.; Ambrosini, G.; Dogan, Y.; Huang, R.; Schwartz, G.K. Crizotinib, a c-Met inhibitor, prevents metastasis in a metastatic uveal melanoma model. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2013, 12, 2817–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Puri, N.; Ahmed, S.; Janamanchi, V.; Tretiakova, M.; Zumba, O.; Krausz, T.; Jagadeeswaran, R.; Salgia, R. c-Met is a potentially new therapeutic target for treatment of human melanoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 2246–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Etnyre, D.; Stone, A.L.; Fong, J.T.; Jacobs, R.J.; Uppada, S.B.; Botting, G.M.; Rajanna, S.; Moravec, D.N.; Shambannagari, M.R.; Crees, Z.; et al. Targeting c-Met in melanoma: Mechanism of resistance and efficacy of novel combinatorial inhibitor therapy. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2014, 15, 1129–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Kucerova, L.; Demkova, L.; Skolekova, S.; Bohovic, R.; Matuskova, M. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU11274 increased tumorigenicity and enriched for melanomainitiating cells by bioenergetic modulation. BMC Cancer 2016, 16, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Qian, F.; Engst, S.; Yamaguchi, K.; Yu, P.; Won, K.-A.; Mock, L.; Lou, T.; Tan, J.; Li, C.; Tam, D.; et al. Inhibition of tumor cell growth, invasion, and metastasis by EXEL-2880 (XL880, GSK1363089), a novel inhibitor of HGF and VEGF receptor tyrosine Kinases. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 8009–8016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Chattopadhyay, C.; Ellerhorst, J.A.; Ekmekcioglu, S.; Greene, V.R.; Davies, M.A.; Grimm, E.A. Association of Activated c-met with NRAS-mutated human melanomas: A possible avenue for targeting. Int. J. Cancer 2012, 131, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Wang, Z.; He, C.; Liu, L.; Ma, N.; Chen, X.; Zheng, D.; Qiu, G.H. PHA665752 inhibits the HGF-stimulated migration and invasion of cells by blocking PI3K/AKT pathway in uveal melanoma. Neoplasma 2017, 64, 377–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Adjei, A.A.; Schwartz, B.; Garmey, E. Early Clinical Development of ARQ 197, a Selective, Non–ATP-Competitive Inhibitor Targeting MET Tyrosine Kinase for the Treatment of Advanced Cancers. Oncologist 2011, 16, 788–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Puzanov, I.; Sosman, J.; Santoro, A.; Saif, M.W.; Goff, L.; Dy, G.K.; Zucali, P.; Means-Powell, J.A.; Ma, W.W.; Simonelli, M.; et al. Phase 1 trial of tivantinib in combination with sorafenib in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. Investig. New Drugs 2015, 33, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Basilico, C.; Pennacchietti, S.; Vigna, E.; Chiriaco, C.; Arena, S.; Bardelli, A.; Valdembri, D.; Serini, G.; Michieli, P. Tivantinib (ARQ197) displays Cytotoxic activity that is independent of its ability to bind MET. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 2381–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Okamoto, T. Safety of quercetin for clinical application (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 2005, 16, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Cao, H.H.; Tse, A.K.; Kwan, H.Y.; Yu, H.; Cheng, C.Y.; Su, T.; Fong, W.F.; Yu, Z.L. Quercetin exerts anti-melanoma activities and inhibits STAT3 signaling. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014, 87, 424–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Harris, Z.; Donovan, M.G.; Branco, G.M.; Limesand, K.H.; Burd, R. Quercetin as an Emerging Anti-Melanoma Agent: A Four-Focus Area Therapeutic Development Strategy. Front. Nutr. 2016, 3, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Lee, K.M.; Kang, J.H.; Yun, M.; Lee, S.B. Quercetin inhibits the poly(dA:dT)-induced secretion of IL-18 via down-regulation of the expressions of AIM2 and pro-caspase-1 by inhibiting the JAK2/STAT1 pathway in IFN-γ-primed human keratinocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 503, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Schöffski, P.; Gordon, M.; Smith, D.C.; Kurzrock, R.; Daud, A.; Vogelzang, N.J.; Lee, Y.; Scheffold, C.; Shapiro, G.I. Phase II randomised discontinuation trial of cabozantinib in patients with advanced solid tumours. Eur. J. Cancer 2017, 86, 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Gordon, M.S.; Kluger, H.M.; Shapiro, G.; Kurzrock, R.; Edelman, G.; Samuel, T.A.; Moussa, A.H.; Ramies, D.A.; Laird, A.D.; Schimmoller, F.; et al. Activity of cabozantinib (XL184) in metastatic melanoma: Results from a phase II randomized discontinuation trial (RDT). J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 8531. [Google Scholar]
  140. Matsumoto, K.; Nakamura, T. Hepatocyte growth factor and the Met system as a mediator of tumor-stromal interactions. Int. J. Cancer 2006, 119, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Bradbury, J. A two-pronged approach to the clinical use of HGF. Lancet 1998, 351, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 19 03844 g001 550
Figure 1. HGF/c-MET signaling. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is mainly produced and secreted by mesenchymal cells as an inactive precursor, pro-HGF. Cleavage of pro-HGF to active HGF, followed by its binding to c-MET on epithelial cells, results in the dimerization of two c-MET molecules, and structural changes in a multi-substrate docking site. Recruitment of GRB2 to this site induces the autophosphorylation and binding of various transducers. Son of Sevenless (SOS) can recruit RAS-GTP to the membrane and active RAS-GTP can trigger the MAPK/ERK pathway. The autophosphorylated residue of c-MET acts also as a docking site for PI3K, which activates the AKT/mTOR pathway. Pathway activation drives transcriptional programs that mediate a plethora of cell phenotypes, including these participating in morphogenesis, proliferation, survival, motility, and invasiveness. The MET-triggered MAPK/ERK pathway is primarily involved in cell proliferation, whereas PI3K recruitment is required for the survival and induction of cell motility and invasion. RAC1-PAK signaling contributes to activities in other pathways.
Figure 1. HGF/c-MET signaling. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is mainly produced and secreted by mesenchymal cells as an inactive precursor, pro-HGF. Cleavage of pro-HGF to active HGF, followed by its binding to c-MET on epithelial cells, results in the dimerization of two c-MET molecules, and structural changes in a multi-substrate docking site. Recruitment of GRB2 to this site induces the autophosphorylation and binding of various transducers. Son of Sevenless (SOS) can recruit RAS-GTP to the membrane and active RAS-GTP can trigger the MAPK/ERK pathway. The autophosphorylated residue of c-MET acts also as a docking site for PI3K, which activates the AKT/mTOR pathway. Pathway activation drives transcriptional programs that mediate a plethora of cell phenotypes, including these participating in morphogenesis, proliferation, survival, motility, and invasiveness. The MET-triggered MAPK/ERK pathway is primarily involved in cell proliferation, whereas PI3K recruitment is required for the survival and induction of cell motility and invasion. RAC1-PAK signaling contributes to activities in other pathways.
Ijms 19 03844 g001
Ijms 19 03844 g002 550
Figure 2. Simplified schematic illustration of the regulation of c-MET expression and activity in melanoma cells. (A) In normal skin, HGF is released mainly by fibroblasts to induce changes in melanocytes (paracrine signaling). In melanoma, autocrine signaling is also observed; (B) c-MET expression can be increased in melanoma cells through different mechanisms, including transcriptional regulation by MITF and reduced level of miRNAs targeting c-MET transcript. Activity of c-MET can be enhanced by elevated level of HGF produced and released by stromal cells (paracrine signaling) and melanoma cells (autocrine signaling) in response to diverse molecular stimuli, and with the regulatory contribution of ECM; Up- and down-arrows show enhanced and reduced levels of indicated molecules, respectively; (C) The enhanced activity of HGF/c-MET signaling in melanoma cells plays an important role in melanoma progression by supporting proliferation, survival, motility, and invasiveness, including niche formation. It is unclear whether HGF and/or c-MET are melanoma biomarkers, or whether the HGF/c-MET signaling contributes to the development of resistance to oncoprotein-targeted therapies.
Figure 2. Simplified schematic illustration of the regulation of c-MET expression and activity in melanoma cells. (A) In normal skin, HGF is released mainly by fibroblasts to induce changes in melanocytes (paracrine signaling). In melanoma, autocrine signaling is also observed; (B) c-MET expression can be increased in melanoma cells through different mechanisms, including transcriptional regulation by MITF and reduced level of miRNAs targeting c-MET transcript. Activity of c-MET can be enhanced by elevated level of HGF produced and released by stromal cells (paracrine signaling) and melanoma cells (autocrine signaling) in response to diverse molecular stimuli, and with the regulatory contribution of ECM; Up- and down-arrows show enhanced and reduced levels of indicated molecules, respectively; (C) The enhanced activity of HGF/c-MET signaling in melanoma cells plays an important role in melanoma progression by supporting proliferation, survival, motility, and invasiveness, including niche formation. It is unclear whether HGF and/or c-MET are melanoma biomarkers, or whether the HGF/c-MET signaling contributes to the development of resistance to oncoprotein-targeted therapies.
Ijms 19 03844 g002
Table
Table 1. Inhibitors of HGF/c-MET signaling investigated in melanoma cells, in preclinical and clinical studies.
Table 1. Inhibitors of HGF/c-MET signaling investigated in melanoma cells, in preclinical and clinical studies.
Name of InhibitorDesigned/Assessed ActivityType of ExperimentsReferences
CabozantinibXL184
BMS-907351		Inhibitor of c-METClinical trialNCT00940225
[123,138,139]
Crizotinib
PF-02341066		Adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-competitive inhibitor of catalytic activity of c-METPreclinical in vivo
clinical trial (uveal melanoma)		[103,124]
NCT02223819 (ongoing)
Foretinib
EXEL-2880		ATP-competitive inhibitor of c-METPreclinical in vitro
Preclinical in vivo		[128]
PHA-665752Inhibitor of Y1234 and Y1235 in catalytic region of c-METPreclinical in vitro[129,130]
SU11274Selective inhibitor of Y1234 and Y1235 in catalytic region of c-METPreclinical in vitro
Preclinical in vivo		[86,115,125,126,127]
Tivantinib
ARQ 197		Non-ATP-competitive inhibitor of c-MET; binding to dephosphorylated c-METPreclinical in vitro
Preclinical in vivo
Clinical trial		[126,131,132,133]
NCT00827177
E7050ATP-competitive inhibitor of c-METClinical trialNCT01433991
QuercetinInhibitor of c-MET phosphorylation and dimerizationPreclinical in vitro
Preclinical in vivo		[36,135]
https://clinicaltrials. gov.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Czyz, M. HGF/c-MET Signaling in Melanocytes and Melanoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3844. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123844

AMA Style

Czyz M. HGF/c-MET Signaling in Melanocytes and Melanoma. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(12):3844. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123844

Chicago/Turabian Style

Czyz, Malgorzata. 2018. "HGF/c-MET Signaling in Melanocytes and Melanoma" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 12: 3844. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123844

APA Style

Czyz, M. (2018). HGF/c-MET Signaling in Melanocytes and Melanoma. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(12), 3844. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123844

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop