Next Article in Journal
Efficiency of All-Trans Retinoic Acid on Gastric Cancer: A Narrative Literature Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Alterations of Expression of the Serotonin 5-HT4 Receptor in Brain Disorders
Previous Article in Journal
Studies on Anticonvulsant Effects of Novel Histamine H3R Antagonists in Electrically and Chemically Induced Seizures in Rats
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multi-Target Approach for Drug Discovery against Schizophrenia
Open AccessArticle

Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Strategies for Analyzing Big Data in Psychiatry

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68159 Mannheim, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(11), 3387; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113387
Received: 9 August 2018 / Revised: 22 October 2018 / Accepted: 25 October 2018 / Published: 29 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Psychiatry)
The requirement of innovative big data analytics has become a critical success factor for research in biological psychiatry. Integrative analyses across distributed data resources are considered essential for untangling the biological complexity of mental illnesses. However, little is known about algorithm properties for such integrative machine learning. Here, we performed a comparative analysis of eight machine learning algorithms for identification of reproducible biological fingerprints across data sources, using five transcriptome-wide expression datasets of schizophrenia patients and controls as a use case. We found that multi-task learning (MTL) with network structure (MTL_NET) showed superior accuracy compared to other MTL formulations as well as single task learning, and tied performance with support vector machines (SVM). Compared to SVM, MTL_NET showed significant benefits regarding the variability of accuracy estimates, as well as its robustness to cross-dataset and sampling variability. These results support the utility of this algorithm as a flexible tool for integrative machine learning in psychiatry. View Full-Text
Keywords: multi-task learning; machine learning; biomarker discovery; psychiatry multi-task learning; machine learning; biomarker discovery; psychiatry
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Cao, H.; Meyer-Lindenberg, A.; Schwarz, E. Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Strategies for Analyzing Big Data in Psychiatry. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3387.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop