The Impact of Volatile and Non-Volatile Co-Extracted Matrix Components on the Reproducible Residue Analysis of Pesticides Using GC-MS/MS
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Result and Discussion
2.1. Analysis the Matrix Components of the Tested Commodities
2.1.1. Analysis of Acetonitrile Extracted Matrix Components, Thermally Untreated
2.1.2. Analysis of Acetonitrile Extracted Matrix Components After Thermal Heating at 100 °C
2.1.3. Analysis of Acetonitrile Extracted Matrix Components After Thermal Heating at 280 °C
2.1.4. Analysis of Fennel Extracted Matrix Components Using Acetonitrile and Ethyl Acetate
2.1.5. Evaluation of Forward Gas Flow Versus Backflush Cleaning
2.2. Method Precision and Reproducibility
2.3. Validation of the Optimized Method
2.4. The Analysis of Real Market Samples
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Chemicals and Reagents
3.2. Market Sample Collection
3.3. Sample Processing and Preparation
3.4. Fourier-Transform Infrared Analysis
3.5. GC-MS/MS Instrumentation and Conditions
3.6. Analysis of Volatile and Nonvolatile Matrix Components of the Tested Commodities
3.7. Method Validation
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Uclés, S.; Lozano, A.; Sosa, A.; Parrilla Vázquez, P.; Valverde, A.; Fernández-Alba, A.R. Matrix interference evaluation employing GC and LC coupled to triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry. Talanta 2017, 174, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poole, C.F. Matrix-induced response enhancement in pesticide residue analysis by gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1158, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bulaić Nevistić, M.; Kovač Tomas, M. Matrix Effect Evaluation in GC/MS-MS Analysis of Multiple Pesticide Residues in Selected Food Matrices. Foods 2023, 12, 3991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rebecca Veeneman, J.S. Multiresidue Pesticide Analysis with the Agilent Intuvo 9000 GC and Agilent 7000 Series Mass Spectrometer; Agil Technol Inc.: Santa Clara, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Jankowska, M.; Rutkowska, E.; Iwaniuk, P.; Kaczy, P. Evaluation of Broad-Spectrum Pesticides Based on Unified Multi-Analytical Procedure in Fruits and Vegetables for Acute Health Risk Assessment. Foods 2025, 14, 2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vargas-pérez, M.; Prestes, O.D.; Romero-gonzález, R. A Simplified Multi-Residue Method Using µ SPE Clean-Up Combined with Gas Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry for the Determination of 250 Pesticide Residues in Cow’ s Milk. Chemosensors 2025, 13, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hakme, E.; Lozano, A.; Uclés, S.; Gomez-Ramos, M.M. ARF-A High-throughput Gas chromatography-Mass spectrometry analysis of pesticide residues in spices by using the Enhanced Matrix Removal-lipid and the sample dilution approach. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1573, 28–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peter, M.; Müller, C. Systematic Comparison of Extract Clean-Up with Currently Used Sorbents for Dispersive Solid-Phase Extraction. Molecules 2024, 29, 4656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pihlström, T.; Blomkvist, G.; Friman, P.; Pagard, U.; Österdahl, B. Analysis of pesticide residues in fruit and vegetables with ethyl acetate extraction using gas and liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 389, 1773–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taha, S.M.; Gadalla, S.A. Development of an efficient method for multi residue analysis of 160 pesticides in herbal plant by ethyl acetate hexane mixture with direct injection to GC-MS/MS. Talanta 2017, 174, 767–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, L.; Dong, L.; Huang, Q.; Ma, S.; Fantke, P.; Li, J.; Jiang, J.; Fitzgerald, M.; Yang, J.; Jia, Z.; et al. Detection and risk assessments of multi-pesticides in 1771 cultivated herbal medicines by LC/MS-MS and GC/MS-MS. Chemosphere 2021, 262, 127477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pszczolińska, K.; Shakeel, N.; Barchanska, H. A simple approach for pesticide residues determination in green vegetables based on QuEChERS and gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2022, 114, 104783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shendy, A.H.; Al-Ghobashy, M.A.; Mohammed, M.N.; Gad Alla, S.A.; Lotfy, H.M. Simultaneous determination of 200 pesticide residues in honey using gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in conjunction with streamlined quantification approach. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1427, 142–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Belarbi, S.; Vivier, M.; Zaghouani, W.; De Sloovere, A.; Agasse-Peulon, V.; Cardinael, P. Comparison of new approach of GC-HRMS (Q-Orbitrap) to GC–MS/MS (triple-quadrupole) in analyzing the pesticide residues and contaminants in complex food matrices. Food Chem. 2021, 359, 129932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van der Steen, J.J.M.; Brodschneider, R.; Brusbardis, V.; Buddendor, B.; Carreck, N.; Danneels, E.; de Graaf, D.C.; Gratzer, K.; Gray, A.; Hatjina, F.; et al. Synthetic varroacides in honey bee colonies: A comprehensive monitoring program across the European Union. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2026, 42, 104861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ly, T.K.; Ho, T.D.; Behra, P.; Nhu-Trang, T.T. Determination of 400 pesticide residues in green tea leaves by UPLC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS combined with QuEChERS extraction and mixed-mode SPE clean-up method. Food Chem. 2020, 326, 126928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abo-Gaida, A.A.H.; Shendy, A.H.; Taha, S.M.; Mahmoud, H.A.; Attallah, E.R.; Fernandez-Alba, A.R. Fennel-seeds extract as an analyte protectant for the GC-MS/MS residue analysis of 182 pesticide in strawberries: Comparing the manual mixing and sandwich injection. J. Chromatogr. Open 2022, 2, 100056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lozano, A.; Rajskia, Ł.; Belmonte-Valles, N.; Uclés, A.; Uclés, S.; Mezcua, M. ARF-A Pesticide analysis in teas and chamomile by liquid chromatography and gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry using a modified QuEChERS method: Validation and pilot survey in real samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1268, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, H.; Lehotay, S.J.; Geis-asteggiante, L. Variability of matrix effects in liquid and gas chromatography—Mass spectrometry analysis of pesticide residues after QuEChERS sample preparation of different food crops. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1270, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anastassiades, M.; Maštovská, K.; Lehotay, S.J. Evaluation of analyte protectants to improve gas chromatographic analysis of pesticides. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 1015, 163–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maštovská, K.; Lehotay, S.J.; Anastassiades, M. Combination of analyte protectants to overcome matrix effects in routine GC analysis of pesticide residues in food matrixes. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 8129–8137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.M.; Park, J.H.; Abd El-Aty, A.M.; Choi, J.H.; Cho, S.K.; Yang, A.; Park, K.H.; Shim, J.H. Analysis of kresoxim-methyl and its thermolabile metabolites in Korean plum: An application of pepper leaf matrix as a protectant for GC amenable metabolites. J. Sep. Sci. 2013, 36, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, H.; Anastassiades, M.; Dörk, D.; Hong, S.; Moon, B. Compensation for matrix effects in GC analysis of pesticides by using cucumber extract. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410, 5481–5489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kandaswamy, C.; Presley, D.; Ahammed, T.P.S. Improved chromatographic performance in red chilli powder pesticide residue quantitation by retention gap introduction in gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 59, 1692–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Melton, L.M.; Taylor, M.J. MethodsX Use of a deactivated PTV injector liner and GCMS / MS for the quantitative determination of multiple pesticide residues in fruit and vegetables. MethodsX 2021, 8, 101180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yun, D.; Bae, J.; Kang, Y.; Lim, C.; Jang, G.; Eom, M.; Choe, W. Simultaneous Analysis of 272 Pesticides in Agricultural Products by the QuEChERS Method and Gas Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Molecules 2024, 29, 2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acosta-dacal, A.; Díaz-díaz, R.; Alonso-gonzález, P.; Bernal-suárez, M.M.; Parga-dans, E.; Serra-majem, L.; Ortiz-andrellucchi, A.; Zumbado, M.; Santos, E.; Furtado, V.; et al. Pesticide Residues in Fruits and Vegetables from Cape Verde: A Multi-Year Monitoring and Dietary Risk Assessment Study. Molecules 2025, 14, 2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taha, S.M. A Rapid Sensitive and Selective GC-Ms/Ms Method for Multi Residue Analysis of A Large Number of Pesticides in Chamomile. Egypt. J. Chem. 2021, 64, 605–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrer, C.; Lozano, A.; Agüera, A.; Girón, A.J. Overcoming matrix effects using the dilution approach in multiresidue methods for fruits and vegetables. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 7634–7639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vazquez, P.P.; Ferrer, C.; Bueno, M.J.M.; Fernandez-Alba, A.R. Pesticide residues in spices and herbs: Sample preparation methods and determination by chromatographic techniques. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 115, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsuchiyama, T.; Katsuhara, M.; Nakajima, M. Compensation of matrix effects in gas chromatography—Mass spectrometry analysis of pesticides using a combination of matrix matching and multiple isotopically labeled internal standards. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1524, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. Analytical Quality Control and Method Validation Procedures for Pesticide Residues Analysis in Food and Feed, SANTE/11312/2021 v2026. 2025. Available online: https://food.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-11/pesticides_mrl_guidelines_wrkdoc_2021-11312.pdf (accessed on 28 February 2026).
- Khammassi, M.; Loupassaki, S.; Tazarki, H.; Mezni, F.; Slama, A.; Tlili, N.; Zaouali, Y.; Mighri, H.; Jamoussi, B.; Khaldi, A. Variation in essential oil composition and biological activities of Foeniculum vulgare Mill. populations growing widely in Tunisia. J. Food Biochem. 2018, 42, e12532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soliman, M. Sandwich injection and analyte protectants as a way to decrease the drift due to matrix effect between bracketing calibration in GC-MS/MS: A case study. Talanta 2021, 225, 121970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milner, C.; Kinghorn, R.; Klee, M.S. The Use of Automated Backflush on the 7890A/5975A GC-MS System—Setup Example Using Biomarkers; Agil Technol Inc.: Santa Clara, CA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]









| Matrix | Pesticide | Positive Samples (n) | Min (mg/kg) | Max (mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strawberry, (n = 10) | Diniconazole | 1 | <LOQ * | <LOQ * |
| Metalaxyl | 2 | 0.01 | 0.069 | |
| Difenoconazole | 2 | 0.011 | 0.012 | |
| Pyridaben | 1 | 0.014 | 0.014 | |
| Pyrimethanil | 1 | 0.031 | 0.031 | |
| Fenazaquin | 2 | 0.027 | 0.029 | |
| Cyprodinil | 1 | 0.014 | 0.014 | |
| Boscalid | 1 | 0.015 | 0.015 | |
| L. Cyhalothrin | 1 | <LOQ * | <LOQ * | |
| Dry Mint, (n = 7) | Atrazine | 5 | <LOQ * | 0.02 |
| Chlorpyrifos | 4 | <LOQ * | 0.039 | |
| L. Cyhalothrin | 1 | 0.014 | 0.014 | |
| Cypermethrin | 3 | <LOQ * | 0.01 | |
| Profenofos | 2 | <LOQ * | 0.01 | |
| Propiconazol | 1 | <LOQ * | <LOQ * | |
| Pendimethalin | 5 | 0.012 | 0.032 | |
| Moringa, (n = 3) | Atrazine | 3 | 0.011 | 0.032 |
| Pendimethalin | 2 | 0.015 | 0.017 | |
| Oxyfluorfen | 2 | 0.021 | 0.027 | |
| L. Cyhalothrin | 1 | <LOQ * | <LOQ * | |
| Chlorfenapyr | 1 | 0.03 | 0.03 | |
| Cypermethrin | 1 | 0.031 | 0.031 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Abo-Gida, A.-A.H.; Aziz, A.-T.; Issa, M.; Taha, S.M.; Fernández-Alba, A.R. The Impact of Volatile and Non-Volatile Co-Extracted Matrix Components on the Reproducible Residue Analysis of Pesticides Using GC-MS/MS. Molecules 2026, 31, 1449. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31091449
Abo-Gida A-AH, Aziz A-T, Issa M, Taha SM, Fernández-Alba AR. The Impact of Volatile and Non-Volatile Co-Extracted Matrix Components on the Reproducible Residue Analysis of Pesticides Using GC-MS/MS. Molecules. 2026; 31(9):1449. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31091449
Chicago/Turabian StyleAbo-Gida, Abd-Alrahman H., Al-Thabiani Aziz, Muhammed Issa, Sherif M. Taha, and Amadeo R. Fernández-Alba. 2026. "The Impact of Volatile and Non-Volatile Co-Extracted Matrix Components on the Reproducible Residue Analysis of Pesticides Using GC-MS/MS" Molecules 31, no. 9: 1449. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31091449
APA StyleAbo-Gida, A.-A. H., Aziz, A.-T., Issa, M., Taha, S. M., & Fernández-Alba, A. R. (2026). The Impact of Volatile and Non-Volatile Co-Extracted Matrix Components on the Reproducible Residue Analysis of Pesticides Using GC-MS/MS. Molecules, 31(9), 1449. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31091449

