Next Article in Journal
Paracetamol Removal from Aqueous Media Through Fenton Reaction Using ZSM-5 Zeolite Produced from Fly Ash
Previous Article in Journal
Biomanufacturing of Natural Bioactive Compounds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Exploiting Methyl Triazenes as Attractive Alternatives to Temozolomide and Dacarbazine for Cancer Therapy

by
Goreti Ribeiro Morais
*,
Gabriel C. Nwokolo
,
Harriet N. L. Lamptey Mills
,
Richard T. Wheelhouse
and
Robert A. Falconer
Institute of Cancer Therapeutics, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2026, 31(7), 1103; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071103
Submission received: 9 February 2026 / Revised: 19 March 2026 / Accepted: 24 March 2026 / Published: 27 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Molecules for Targeted Cancer Therapy)

Abstract

Temozolomide and dacarbazine are untargeted anticancer prodrugs that have been widely employed in the treatment of melanoma and glioblastoma. These agents decompose into a short-lived monomethyl triazene intermediate, culminating in the release of a methyl diazonium cation that serves as the DNA-alkylating species responsible for tumour destruction. However, due to their high chemical lability, these agents have been associated with chemotherapy resistance, mutagenicity, tumour relapse, and significant off-target toxicity. One promising strategy towards the resolution of these limitations involves the design of arylmethyl triazene prodrugs, which enable targeted tumour-specific drug delivery. This review explores the various approaches used to selectively deliver alkyl aryl triazenes as alternatives to current therapies. It highlights early chemical strategies such as N-acylation and etherification of monomethyl triazenes, along with associated kinetic studies. The selective activation of novel triazenes in murine and human melanoma cells through a tyrosinase-responsive promoiety is discussed. Recent progress in nitroaromatic-based prodrugs designed to exploit the hypoxic microenvironment of glioblastoma is also examined. Additionally, we summarise the development of combi-triazenes and their underlying chemistries, which enable the simultaneous release of two active therapeutic agents.

1. Introduction

Methyl triazenes such as dacarbazine (DTIC) are an important class of compounds with significant clinical interest in cancer. Oxidation of DTIC by the liver cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes yields N-demethylated 5-(3-methyl triazen-1-yl)imidazole-4-carboxamide (MTIC) [1]. In contrast, temozolomide (TMZ) is an imidazotetrazine alkylating agent which is spontaneously hydrolysed into the same MTIC under physiological pH without the need for activation in the liver [2]. MTIC subsequently fragments (t1/2~2 min) into the inactive analogues aminoimidazole carboxamide (AIC) and methyl diazonium, with the latter spontaneously releasing molecular nitrogen and a methyl carbocation, a highly electrophilic species that alkylates the DNA to produce different ratios of guanine- and adenine-methylated adducts, resulting in cell death (Scheme 1). Despite the differences in their activation, both DTIC and TMZ generate the same methylation agent [3], and both are used in the management of advanced melanoma, soft tissue sarcoma [4], and glioblastoma (GBM) [5]. In addition to DTIC and TMZ, mitozolomide (MTZ) (Figure 1), the 3-chloroethyl analogue of TMZ, has been reported, but despite an initially exciting preclinical profile, its clinical progress was hampered due to significant toxic side effects [6].
The main difficulty with non-selective prodrugs such as DTIC and TMZ arises from their non-discriminatory cytotoxicity, which extends beyond tumour cells to destroy normal cells, resulting in significant side effects that undermine their clinical utility [7]. Furthermore, DTIC not only possesses modest pharmacological effectiveness as a single agent, partly due to the lower activity of CYP enzymes in humans compared to rodents, but also displays chemical instability and susceptibility to photodecomposition [8], as well as a characteristic formation of toxic diazonium salts, which render it a substantial therapeutic liability [9,10]. Comparatively, TMZ, a small (194 Da) and highly lipophilic molecule that is rapidly absorbed after oral administration [2], is also characterised by reduced pharmacological efficacy as a result of its short half-life (1.8 h), as it is almost entirely cleared from plasma within 8 h of administration [11]. A strategy to enhance the bioavailability, improve efficacy, and minimise systemic toxicity of DTIC and TMZ involves the design of specific prodrugs related to compound 3 (Scheme 2) capable of releasing the monomethyl triazene 5 of the MTIC type specifically at the tumour site. To identify prodrugs that not only by-pass oxidative metabolism as the activation mechanism of the aryl dimethyltriazenes 3 (Scheme 2) but also achieve a controlled release of monomethyltriazene, various derivatives of 4 and 5 have been synthesised and studied over recent decades.
Common synthetic routes to obtain aryl triazenes involve the reaction of anilines 6 with a nitrite ion under acidic conditions to form the diazonium salt 7, which is then quenched with a primary or secondary amine (Scheme 3A) [12]. This method requires a strong electron-withdrawing group in the phenyl ring (R = o-,m-, and p-NO2; o-, m, and p-CO2R1; p-CN and p-COCH3) to prevent the formation of pentaazadiene or 1,3-diaryltriazene by-products instead of the desired aryl metyltriazene 8 [13]. However, the challenges associated with this method are the low stability of the diazonium chloride salts, which may impose a constraint on compound storage, and by extension, their large-scale application [14]. Alternatively, the aryl diazonium can be prepared as a tetrafluoroborate salt 9, accomplished by reacting anilines with tert-butyl nitrite in the presence of boron trifluoride etherate (Scheme 3B) [15]. An alternative innovative route to 1-aryl-3,3-dialkyltriazenes, in good to excellent yields (71–94%), involved the nitrous oxide-mediated coupling of dialkyl lithium amines and aryl magnesium compounds (Scheme 3C). This new method established that aryl Grignard reagents can be used as C nucleophiles, predicating the extension of their use to alkynyl and alkenyl analogues [16]. Unfortunately, the use of gaseous nitrous oxide as the nitrogen donor in this step poses a significant challenge, as the reagent is not routinely available. Subsequently, aryl magnesium halides were reacted with organic azides, but this was only demonstrated for the synthesis of 1-aryl-3-cyclic triazenes [17]. More recently, a nonradical base-promoted substitution of arylazo sulfones and amines generated disubstituted and trisubstituted triazenes, furnishing a stable alternative approach to classic triazene synthesis [18]. Moreover, arylazo sulfones can be prepared from anilines and possess the desirable advantage of higher stability to storage under ambient conditions than the aryldiazonium salts [19].
The development of new 1-aryl-3-methyltriazene prodrugs usually involves the incorporation of 4 and 5 (Scheme 2) as raw materials, as exemplified by the Rosa [20,21,22,23] and Vaughan groups [24,25,26], who designed ether and thioether derivatives of the short-lived hydroxymethyl triazene 4 as prodrugs for the active metabolite monomethyltriazene 5. Unlike the hydroxymethyltriazenes 4, ether and thioether derivatives demonstrate better stability in aqueous media at physiological pH, highlighting their potential as viable prodrug candidates. Methoxymethyltriazene displayed antitumour activity in vivo against certain tumours while lacking activity in vitro, suggesting the presence of a biological mechanism necessary for the activation of the methoxymethyl group to the active metabolite [24]. The synthesis of those derivatives was straightforward and was achieved by the nucleophilic attack of the alcohol on an iminium species, which is in equilibrium with the 3-acetoxymethyl analogue 12 (Scheme 4) [26]. One impediment to this group of prodrugs derives from the observation that despite maintaining chemical stability under neutral and basic conditions, the ether prodrugs were found to be susceptible to decomposition under slightly acidic media, a factor that effectively hinders their clinical applicability [22].
Like the ether analogues 14, the prodrugs of 5 functionalized with a 3-acyl group, by a conventional dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) coupling reaction (Scheme 5), readily decomposed into the respective anilines under acidic or basic conditions, rendering them unsuitable as prodrugs [27,28]. On the other hand, acylation of the α-amino group, as in prodrugs 18 and 19 (Figure 2), was a good strategy to reduce the chemical reactivity of these triazene derivatives while retaining the rapid rate of enzymatic hydrolysis [29,30]. Compared to TMZ (t1/2 = approx. 2 h in both pH 7.4 phosphate buffer), triazenes 19 showed higher chemical stability (t1/2 = approx. 8–84 h). Modulation of log P was also accomplished using α-(acylamino)acyl derivatives 19, ensuring effective absorption through biological membranes [29]. The kinetic parameters of triazenes 19 suggested that they are promising candidates for prodrug development; however, the lack of a targeting trigger limited further investigations.
Further enhancement of the chemical stability in isotonic phosphate buffer (80 min–7 days) was achieved by exploring the acyloxymethyl carbamate functionality, which was introduced as shown in Scheme 6. While this study demonstrated that the acyloxymethyl carbamate derivatives 22 provide an alternative prodrug system for the anticancer triazenes that bypass the need for oxidative demethylation, their low stability in human plasma (5 min–2 h) represents a significant drawback of this strategy.
Preliminary work on the non-specific prodrugs, which informed their chemical and enzymatic stability, was crucial for the design of specific methyltriazene prodrugs by exploiting enzymes and other conditions unique to the tumour microenvironment or specific targets. This review aims to highlight different preclinical approaches for targeted delivery of aryl methyltriazenes, the underpinning chemistry, kinetic studies and mechanisms of bioactivation. The rationale and synthesis of the different triazene hybrids will be discussed as well.

2. Specific Methyl Triazene Prodrugs

2.1. Targeting Tyrosinase

Tyrosinase is overexpressed in malignant melanoma but largely absent in other cells, which makes it a potential target for prodrug development [32]. Interestingly, the degree of malignancy in melanoma has been shown to correlate with tyrosinase activity [33]. Tyrosinase is the main enzyme involved in the human pigmentation process, where it catalyses the hydroxylation of L-tyrosine to form dopaquinone, which then undergoes intramolecular Michael addition of the amino group to the quinone ring. This latter step specifically underlies the inspiration for the development of a tyrosinase-dependent prodrug strategy aimed at releasing nitrogen mustards specifically in melanocytes [32]. Building on previous work, Perry and co-workers developed a new class of targeted methyl triazenes by synthesising several prodrugs in which the methyl triazene was connected to dopamine or tyramine, as the tyrosine-sensitive unit, via a urea group (Figure 3) [34].
These prodrugs were designed to be activated by tyrosinase by incorporating a phenol group susceptible to activation by the enzyme, with the release of the monomethyl triazene was envisaged to occur via the pathway depicted in Scheme 7. The process of cyclization renders the urea connection vulnerable to a hydrolytic attack in cyclic analogue 25. Synthesis of the prodrugs was achieved via the reaction of 1-aryl-3-methyltriazenes with 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate, followed by nucleophilic attack of the amine group in dopamine or tyramine under basic conditions to generate the urea bond. The synthesised prodrugs not only showed excellent stability both in pH 7.4 buffer and in human plasma but also proved to be good substrates for tyrosinase. However, the release of the cytotoxic monomethyltriazene did not occur, as the reduced nucleophilicity of the modified amine nitrogen in triazenes 24 hindered the release of the alkylating triazene after enzymatic activation [34].
In order to provide effective release of the active metabolite in melanocytes, other tyrosinase-activated prodrugs were developed by the same group. These novel compounds (Scheme 8) included 3-aminoacyl triazenes 27 derived from N-acyltyrosine, an amino acid that is considered a good tyrosinase substrate. Interestingly, the authors reported the first microwave-assisted synthesis of triazenes as an alternative strategy to the traditional amide coupling reaction [35]. These triazenes 27 were successfully metabolised by tyrosinase with a concomitant release of monomethyltriazenes 15 and demonstrated excellent stability in a pH 7.4 buffer (approx. 40–72 h) as well as in human plasma (approx. 1.2–9.5 h), which suggests sufficient stability to reach the tumour cells intact.
These novel prodrugs exhibited significant cytotoxicity, with the percentage of apoptotic/necrotic cells showing a direct correlation with the level of tyrosinase activity in melanoma cell lines, MNT-1 and B16F10. Compared to TMZ, these prodrugs showed increased specificity for tyrosinase-expressing cells, suggesting strong targeted therapeutic potential for melanoma treatment [35]. This work validated the advantage of an amide linker for the release of the active metabolite. Since then, evidence has shown that the α-amino group in 27 is not a requisite for tyrosinase affinity and activation, since novel triazene prodrugs 32, derived from hydroxyphenylalkyl acids 31, also demonstrated cytotoxicity in cell lines with a high level of expression of this enzyme [36]. Similar to N-acyltyrosine analogues, the most biologically active triazenes 32 exhibited greater cytotoxicity than the standard agent TMZ. The 3-Acyltriazenes 32 (Scheme 9) were accomplished using methyltriazene precursors 15, which were derived from the corresponding hydroxymethyltriazenes 30 [13,37]. Depending on the carboxylic acid employed, different coupling reagents were used; however, the overall yields were low (<26%), likely due to the inherent instability of triazene 15, which is prone to decomposition under the reaction conditions.
Melanoma-specific tyrosinase overexpression and catalytic activity has also been explored as a platform for the simultaneous delivery of two pharmacophores with antimelanoma activities [38]. Triazene hybrids 33 and 34 (Figure 4) were successfully metabolised by tyrosinase within 0.5 to 4 min, with kinetic studies of 33 confirmed the exhibition of a 2- to 4-fold higher affinity for mushroom tyrosinase than the natural L-tyrosine. Comparison of the reactivities of these hybrid prodrugs confirmed that urea derivatives 33 are more stable than amides 34 in PBS at 37 °C and in human plasma [38], which is in accordance with previous work by the same group [34,35,36]. In addition, since urea-derived compounds are poor substrates for plasma enzymes, premature hydrolysis is prevented, allowing the prodrug to remain intact in blood circulation, while arriving at the tumour site in high concentrations.
Newer prodrugs 33, unlike their urea-derived counterparts 23 [34], exhibited an increased and selective potency towards human melanoma cell line (MNT-1) and murine cell line (B16F10), without significant effect on healthy human keratinocyte cells (HaCaT). The MNT-1 melanoma cell line showed higher levels of tyrosinase than BF16F10 but still exhibited comparable cytotoxicity, suggesting higher sensitivity of the murine model to the alkylating methyltriazene. This selectivity most likely reflected their ability to cyclize once upon oxidation by tyrosinase, leading to the release of the active metabolite methyl triazene 15 and 35b, an analogue of 4-S-cysteaminylphenol (4-S-CAP) (Scheme 10) [38]. 4-S-CAP is a substrate of melanoma tyrosinase that inhibits in vivo growth of malignant melanoma and causes depigmentation of dark skin [39,40]. Furthermore, evidence shows that the antitumour activity of 33 not only resulted from the conjugation of the two pharmacophores, but also depended on the type of linkage, since prodrugs containing an amide linker exhibited cytotoxic activity only against the A375 cell line. However, the low levels of tyrosinase expression in the A375 cell line suggests that the cytotoxicity of analogues 34 on the cell line might be due to the enzymatic instability of the amide bond in human plasma. Nonetheless, data obtained with urea-based analogues (33) confirms the superiority of a triazene hybrid strategy with its release of two biologically active agents. This also confirms how important the stability of the linkage between the promoeity and methyl triazene is. Compounds that were easily metabolised by tyrosinase or any other trigger but display low human plasma stability were ruled out since the alkylating unit would be released independently of the enzymatic process. Preliminary in vivo safety studies demonstrated absence of chemically induced toxicity in major organs and no adverse hepatic effects, an encouraging finding for the development of a tumour-targeted strategy [38].

2.2. Targeting Nitroreductase

GBM is the most common malignant primary brain tumour in adults, with an average survival of 12–15 months [41], and TMZ being the first-line treatment following diagnosis [42]. One key feature that advanced TMZ as a first-line therapy in the treatment of GBM is its ability to efficiently cross the blood–brain barrier, where its conversion to MTIC partially exploits the pH difference between the extracellular and intracellular environment of GBM tumours, allowing for oral administration [11,43]. Unfortunately, resistance to TMZ therapy is inevitable in glioma, resulting in disease relapse and poor prognosis [42].
The requirement for selective delivery of methyl diazonium in glioma, together with the recognition that, similar to other tumours, the low-oxygen environment of GBM [44] offers a promising therapeutic avenue for treatment, inspired Braga and co-workers to develop nitroaromatic-based methyltriazene derivatives 36 (Scheme 11) as hypoxia-activated prodrugs (HAP) [45]. It has previously been demonstrated that brain tumour samples could metabolise the experimental bioreductive drug, tirapazamine, to the two-electron reduction product, confirming these tumours as suitable targets for bioreductive therapy [46].
The synthesis of triazene-based HAP (36) proceeded via a carbamate bond formation between monomethyltriazene 15 and a bioreductive trigger, using either the appropriate nitroaryl alcohol activated with 1,1′-carbonyldiimidazole (CDI) or the corresponding nitroaryl chloroformate. A negative control lacking the nitro group (Scheme 11) was also synthesised [45]. The CNS multiparameter optimisation (CNS MPO) scores for these prodrugs ranged between 4.0 and 4.9, indicating that they have the potential to cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) [47]. Amongst the synthesised prodrugs, those with the 5-nitrofurfuryl promoeity were the most extensively activated (within 1 min) by Escherichia coli nitroreductase (NTR) NfsB. However, subsequent studies revealed that a prodrug in this series was cytotoxic to human primary dermal fibroblasts, thereby excluding it as a viable targeted prodrug [45]. In contrast, three prodrugs from the 4-nitrobenzyl series (R = COMe, CO2Me and CO2Et) not only exhibited better selective cytotoxicity against glioblastoma cell lines (LN-229 and U87 MG) than the equivalent dose of TMZ, but also induced apoptosis in LN-229 cells, as well as senescence in U-87 cells under hypoxic conditions. However, the comparable cytotoxicity observed under both hypoxic and normoxic conditions highlights the need for further development as triazene-based HAP for glioblastoma treatment [45].
In a different study, prodrug 36a (Scheme 12) was also obtained through the insertion of a single nitrogen atom into aryl diazene carboxylates 39 using N-amino pyridinium iodide 37 under basic conditions, followed by alkylation at the 3-position with methyl iodide. This recently developed approach offers mild, straightforward reaction conditions and accommodates a broad substrate scope. This novel methodology follows the aziridination-ring opening arrangement to insert a single nitrogen atom. The aziridination occurs through initial nucleophilic addition of the anion 38, generated from the pyridinium salt, across the nitrogen double bond of the aryl diazene carboxylate 39 to generate a zwitterionic intermediate 40. This intermediate undergoes intramolecular cyclization followed by pyridine elimination, leading to the formation of a triaziridine ring in 41. Subsequent ring opening through ArN–NCO2R bond cleavage furnishes the aryl triazene carboxylate 42 (Scheme 12) [48]. However, this new method requires the preceding synthesis of the diazene, which provided a higher yield for the triazene-based HAP 36a (85%) [48] compared to the 22% obtained when triazene 15 was reacted with 4-nitrobenzylchloroformate [45].

3. Triazene Hybrids

Drug hybridization is an important pharmacological strategy in drug design owing to the associated advantage of conferring diverse structural features and biological activities to chemical compounds. It also offers a sophisticated form of combination therapy, in which two or more different bioactive compounds can be fused covalently in a single molecule [49]. Such a hybrid drug construct can interact with multiple targets and/or mechanisms involved in proliferation, increasing anticancer drug potency as well as overcoming drug resistance [50]. This class of drugs is particularly important for methyltriazene prodrugs, where the methylation of DNA by the active metabolite methyl group triggers the activation of DNA damage repair (DDR) mechanisms, which are enabled by a plethora of signalling pathways in cancer. Furthermore, the release of an aromatic amine when a monomethyl triazene of type MTIC (2) undergoes hydrolysis in addition to methyl diazonium has inspired the development of triazene hybrids. In this approach, the methyltriazene is combined with another bioactive agent via the aromatic amine function, which is regenerated upon release of the active methyl diazonium.
Combi-triazenes are hybrids employed in the exploration of the tumour-targeting strategy designated as “combi-targeting”, where inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase (TK) are combined with DNA-damaging agents to irreversibly inhibit EGF-dependent tumorigenesis. The role and overexpression of EGFR in cancer, including in glioblastoma, is well documented [51], and this dysregulation drives tumorigenesis, making it a key drug target, with multiple EGFR inhibitors approved for clinical use [52]. Original reports of a “combi-triazene” molecule merged aminoquinazolines with a methyl triazene motif [53,54]. The design of these combi-triazenes was aimed at enhancing the potency of the alkylating agent as well as circumventing problems associated with the reversibility of EGFR inhibitors. The feasibility of this concept was well demonstrated with two combi-triazene prototypes, SMA41 (45a) and BJ200 (45b), both of which were small enough to bind the EGFR ATP binding site and behave as a competitive enzyme inhibitor while also producing DNA damage. An example of this is seen in EGFR-overexpressing A431 cells, where antiproliferative studies of SMA41 and BJ200 confirmed their ability to both damage DNA and block EGFR autophosphorylation [53,54].
Synthesis of quinazolinyl triazene 45a (SMA41, Scheme 13) produced good yields. Treatment of aminoquinazoline 43a [55] with nitrosonium tetrafluoroborate in cold acetonitrile provided the intermediate diazonium salt 44a, which in turn was reacted with aqueous methylamine in situ, followed by raising the pH of the resulting mixture with potassium carbonate [53]. Alternatively, using 14C-methylamine hydrochloride as the amine to react with intermediate 44a led to the radiosynthesis of 14C-labelled SMA41 45 [56]. Biodistribution studies with this 14C-labelled SMA41 allowed the tracking of the released 14C-mehyl diazonium. It was demonstrated that the 14C-methyl group was distributed throughout DNA, RNA and mainly protein, which showed that SMA41 diffused into the cells followed by decomposition into 6-amino-4-anilinoquinazoline 43a and methyl diazonium that non-specifically alkylates RNA, proteins and nuclear DNA (Scheme 14) [57]. Previous analysis demonstrated that in cell culture media, SMA41 (45a) could be converted to quinazoline diamine 43a in an 80% yield with a half-life of approximately 34 min., as determined by UV analysis [58].
To enhance the EGFR inhibitory potency and stability of these combi-triazenes, a new strategy termed “cascade release” (CR) was explored, with the aim of masking the combi-molecule as a prodrug (Figure 5) intended to simultaneously release both antitumour agents (EGFR inhibitor and DNA-alkylating agent) by hydrolytic activation. Prodrug 47 showed similar EGFR binding affinity as the parental combi-triazene, since the acylation had no effect on the π-extended system of 1,2,3-triazene. However, when the acylation is directly in the triazene, as in prodrug 46, the binding affinity to the ATP site of EGFR was 3-fold lower [59]. Structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies of the quinazolines showed dependence on the electronic character of the substituents at the 6-position, with electron-donating groups producing an increase in affinity while electron-withdrawing groups produce a deleterious effect [55,60]. Prodrug 46, which was prepared in poor yield (18%) by reacting combi-triazene 45a with acetyl chloride in chloroform, was not suitable for the CR strategy as it displayed high hydrolytic stability under physiological conditions (serum-containing media at 37 °C), even after 48 h. An alternative prodrug 47 was much less stable with a half-life of 42 min. in serum-containing media [59]. Furthermore, while prodrug 47 had no effect on chemical stability, it induced significant levels of DNA strand breaks with 100-fold greater potency than its single-targeted DNA-damaging counterpart TMZ [61]. Jean-Claude and co-workers postulated that the pronounced antiproliferative potency of 47 was due to its ability to simultaneously damage DNA and irreversibly inhibit EGFR activity through the multistep degradation cascade of 47, which generated two electrophiles, an iminium ion (49) and methyl diazonium (Scheme 15). Indeed, acetoxymethyltriazene 47 acted as an irreversible inhibitor of EGFR, while the corresponding quinazoline 52 induced only reversible inhibition [61]. It must be noted that combi-triazenes 45a and 45b also acted as irreversible inhibitors of EGFR, but the antiproliferative potency only increased 8-fold and 11-fold, respectively, against A431 cells in comparison to TMZ [62]. As previously stated, studies with radiolabeled 14C-SMA41 showed that protein was also methylated in addition to DNA and RNA, which in itself might have contributed to the irreversibility observed with compounds 45.
Furthermore, A431 cells are phenotypically characterised by their overexpression of EGFR, as well as the expression of O6-methylguanine methyl transferase (O6-MGMT), a DNA repair enzyme that repairs the O6-alkylguanosine DNA adduct and induces resistance to methylating agents. The chemical feature of prodrug 47 conferred superior antiproliferative activity in a cell line in which a classical methylating agent of the same class did not show any detectable activity. However, the half-life of 47 is comparable to the half-lives of acetoxymethyltriazenes 14 [24,63], which are rapidly converted to the corresponding methyl triazenes and parental combi-triazene (t1/2 = 45 min). Further attempts to increase the bioavailability of combi-molecules led to the design of the corresponding 3,3-dimethyltriazene prodrugs intended to be metabolically activated. However, this type of molecule failed to generate adequate levels of monoalkyltriazenes in vivo as the quinazoline moiety might have blocked CYP activation [64]. To remedy this, the combi-triazene 45b was masked with carbamates featuring different leaving groups (vinyl, chloroalkyl, acetoxymethyl and p-nitrophenyl carbamates) to modulate the hydrolysis following addition on the carbonyl moiety of the N3-carbamyltriazene 48 (Figure 5) [65]. This study conclusively demonstrated that combi-molecules stabilised by attaching a carbamate to the N3 of the triazene chain achieved greater stability compared to the previously reported acetoxymethyl-N3 strategy [59,61]. More importantly, it was shown that stability could be achieved without any significant loss in the binary EGFR-DNA targeting properties of the identified lead molecule 48 (Figure 5). Synthesis of 48 and related carbamates was accomplished using similar procedures to the acyloxymethyl prodrugs 22 [31].
Figure 5. Examples of cascade-release prodrugs of EGFR-based combi-triazenes [59,66].
Figure 5. Examples of cascade-release prodrugs of EGFR-based combi-triazenes [59,66].
Molecules 31 01103 g005
SMA41 (45a) was the first combi-triazene studied in vivo, but it showed only moderate activity in a preclinical tumour xenograft model (A431; carcinoma of the vulva). This was attributed to its poor water solubility, lack of sensitivity of A431 cells that express O6-MGMT, and a very short half-life [67]. A new quinazolinotriazene (53) (Scheme 16) was developed, containing a polar N,N-dimethylaminoethyl group attached to the N3 of the triazene, where it could serve both as a water-soluble and more potent alkylating moiety. The goal was to generate N,N-dimethylaminoethylguanine adducts, which were anticipated to serve as poorer substrates for MGMT than O6-methylguanosine (O6-MeG) (Scheme 1), resulting in higher potency [68]. Combi-triazene 53 was more stable (t1/2 = 108 min.) than SMA41, and the higher stability of this class of triazenes may be due to their ability to form intramolecular hydrogen bonding (Scheme 16) that stabilises the conjugated tautomer. Compound 53 showed 5-fold stronger EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity than SMA41, and marked binary targeting properties involving the simultaneous inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation in addition to DNA damage induction. Contrary to 45b and SMA41, compound 53 triggered substantial levels of apoptosis. Furthermore, 53 showed significantly greater antitumour activity (p < 0.05) than SMA41 in the human MDA-MB-468 breast cancer xenograft model. The results indicated that the appendage of N,N-dimethylaminoethyl to combi-triazenes could offer an alternative solution to the reduced water solubility and lack of potency associated with monofunctional combi-triazenes against resistant tumours [68].
Interestingly, Jean-Claude and co-workers designed an alternative combi-triazene 55 (Scheme 17) with a chloroethyl group attached to the N3 of the triazene [69]. Chloroethyl is the tetrazine appendage in the preclinical MTZ (Figure 1), where the formation of the active chloroethyl diazonium species induces N1-guanine–N3-cytosine strand crosslinks, leading to cell death [70]. Synthesis of combi-triazene 55 was attempted by reacting aryl diazonium with chloroethylamine in the presence of triethylamines. However, under the basic conditions, 55 was found to be unstable and rearranged to form 56 following the loss of a nitrogen molecule [69]. Combi-molecule 56, combining an EGFR inhibitor with a ‘half-mustard’ moiety, was found to be a potent EGFR inhibitor and exhibited fluorescence properties that permitted the quantitation of subcellular uptake by flow cytometry. The fluorescence intensities increased with increasing levels of EGFR in a panel of isogenic and established cell lines [69]. It was demonstrated that 56 was the first prototype of a combi-molecule capable of generating the binary EGFR/DNA targeting activity without the requirement for hydrolytic cleavage [71]. Further, to circumvent the problems associated with 55, the same authors designed combi-triazene 57 (Figure 6), which contains a chloroethylaminoethyl group that conferred a second alkylating function to the released alkyldiazonium species [72].
Within the same combi-triazene approach, hybrid 58a (Figure 7), comprising a monomethyl triazene conjugated to a 2-phenylaminopyrimidopyridine moiety, was engineered for the dual targeting of Bcr-Abl and DNA [73]. Bcr-Abl is a constitutively activated tyrosine kinase implicated in chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML). With the demonstration that imatinib, a Bcr-Abl inhibitor, sensitised Bcr-Abl-expressing cells to cytotoxic DNA-damaging agents by depleting the antiapoptotic properties associated with the Bcr-Abl pathway, there was an impetus to design a combi-triazene hybrid [74,75]. In cell culture media, 58a was hydrolysed into 58b with a half-life of 27 min. In leukaemia cells expressing varied levels of Bcr-Abl, 58a was consistently more potent than TMZ, and this was attributed to its ability to simultaneously block Bcr-Abl and related DNA repair activity, while inducing significant DNA lesions in Bcr-Abl-expressing cells [73]. Nonetheless, 58a exhibited weak Bcr–Abl inhibitory activity, which led to the design of 59a (Figure 7), incorporating a trifluoromethyl-substituted benzamide moiety envisioned to enhance Bcr–Abl potency [76].
Other combi-triazenes were designed to disrupt the DDR pathways responsible for the repair of DNA adducts generated by the methylating agents. The majority of these adducts are processed through poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-dependent base excision repair machinery. Indeed, several ongoing clinical trials are exploring the combination of PARP inhibitors with TMZ [77], which motivated the design of the molecular hybrid 60 (Figure 8). Compound 60 consisted of the conjugation of the PARP inhibitor 4-amino-1,8-naphthalimide (ANI) to a monomethyltriazene, with synthesis accomplished via diazotization, as described in Scheme 3A, and its 15N and 13C-labelled form was also synthesised for characterisation purposes [78,79]. Biological studies on 60 demonstrated higher levels of DNA damage than TMZ and showed strong potency in both BRCA1/2 wild-type and mutated cells, with a 6-fold selectivity for the mutants. Since acquired resistance to PARP inhibitors is mediated by the reactivation of wild-type BRCA1/2 [80], this suggests that the potentiation observed with PARP inhibition is attributable to the methyl alkylating unit. Furthermore, 60 was 65–303-fold more potent than TMZ, 4–63-fold than ANI alone, and 3–47-fold more than their corresponding equimolar combinations. Its potency was independent of MGMT expression, which suggested that this combi-molecular approach directed at blocking PARP and damaging DNA can lead to single molecules with selective and enhanced potency against BRCA1/2 mutant cells, and with an activity independent of MGMT, the major predictive biomarker for resistance to TMZ [79].
Furthermore, with evidence of the role of MGMT in DNA damage repair and chemoresistance to alkylating agents, including TMZ and DTIC, the covalent combination of monomethyltriazene with O6-methylguanine-DNA methyl transferase (MGMT) inhibitors has been developed [81]. This is particularly important since MGMT demethylates the DNA-guanosine residues (Scheme 18) that account for the therapeutic effect of the methyl diazonium. Therefore, MGMT has been considered a promising target to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of methyl diazonium and evade resistance. This motivated the design of hybrid 61 (Scheme 19), which involved the direct conjugation of the monomethyl triazene to the aromatic amine of the O6-benzyl guanine, a known MGMT inhibitor [82]. Like TMZ and DTIC, the highly electron-deficient triazene 61 showed an optimal hydrolysis rate, while the carbamate group favoured the fragmentation route via hydrolysis at the carbonyl of the carbamoyl group (path A). In addition, the instability of the purinyl diazonium compounds precluded the application of the classical method of acylated triazene preparation in these analogues. Synthesis of 61 and related analogues was achieved via condensation of heterocyclic nitroso derivative 62 with hydrazide 63 (Scheme 20), which is similar to the conditions employed for the synthesis of the triazene moiety of TMZ [83], and particularly well suited to the preparation of electron-deficient triazenes [84] Chemosensitivity studies in the NCI 60 human tumour cell line panel identified hybrid 61 as the most active dual targeting agent for MGMT and DNA, exhibiting an IC50 of 10 µM, compared to 100 µM for TMZ [82]. Further studies would benefit from expression studies confirming the presence or absence of MGMT to correlate the higher cytotoxicity with simultaneous DNA alkylation and MGMT inhibitor mechanisms. Since MGMT is responsible for temozolomide resistance in GBM, further studies should be performed in a temozolomide-resistant cancer cell line with high level of MGMT expression (U373M) to confirm the benefit of a triazene hybrid conjugated to an MGMT inhibitor.
Along similar lines, to overcome the unsatisfactory therapeutic efficacy of TMZ in GBM, a new triazene hybrid was designed for targeted cancer therapy, which involved the combination of the aryl methyltriazene with valproic acid (VPA). VPA is an antiepileptic drug and histone deacetylases (HDAC) inhibitor used to control seizures in patients with brain tumours [85]. Further evidence that the combination of VPA and TMZ produced potentiated antitumour effects in TMZ-resistant glioma cells [86], as well as the amenability of the carboxylic group of the VPA to conjugation at the N3-position of the triazene, supported the development of hybrid 65 (Scheme 10) [87]. The synthesis of hybrid 65 was carried out in the same manner as for N-acyltriazene 32 (Scheme 9). Preclinical evaluation showed that hybrid 65 exhibited a stronger antiproliferative effect on GL261 glioma cells than TMZ, with cytotoxic activity predominantly targeting cancer cells, while producing a markedly lower impact on normal astrocytes. Moreover, not only was an enhanced autophagic activity observed with 65, which might have contributed to its increased cytotoxicity, but it also induced an alteration in the morphology of GL261 cells, producing a non-polar, rounded phenotype that impaired their migratory capacity. Notably, unlike TMZ, cells exposed to 65 maintained drug resistance levels close to control conditions [87].
SAR and mechanistic studies of a series of N-acyltriazenes 66 (Figure 9) and their anti-glioma activity [88], showed that these hybrid compounds incorporated triazene moieties bearing various substituents along with HDAC inhibitor-related short-chain fatty acids such as valproic and butyric acids, including hybrid 65 previously studied. Similar to the N-acyltriazenes 32 and 65, these analogues 66 were isolated only in moderate yields (approximately 23–25%), even when HOBt was used to promote the coupling rearrangement process. Compared to the lead molecule 65, hybrid agent 66 containing an aryl carboxamide (R1) triazene conjugated to VPA (R2) was found to be the most potent in this series, showing selective targeting toward GL261 glioma cells and an effective decrease in invasive cell properties. In contrast to TMZ, which undergoes hydrolysis to release the alkylating metabolite monomethyltriazene, hybrids 66 showed enhanced chemical and metabolic stability. Moreover, the full conjugates 66 exhibited both low DNA-alkylating potential and weak HDAC inhibition, indicating that their antiproliferative activity depended on the release of both anticancer agents [88]. These findings support valproate triazene hybrids as a new class of targeted agents, offering clear chemotherapeutic advantages over TMZ and demonstrating strong potential for application in glioblastoma treatment [87,88].
Other hybrids have been developed by other researchers. Gellerman and co-workers called these molecular chimaeras, with their group developing a wide range of structurally different combinations of methyl triazenes and various pharmacophores. They investigated the dual action of methyl triazene chimaeras containing the DNA-intercalating 9-anilinoacridine [89], which has served as a widely utilised structural core for hybrid drug candidates over the last three and a half decades [90]. The planar structure of the acridine associated with the presence of both hydrogen acceptor and donor groups allows it to intercalate the DNA and bind to the minor groove, stabilising the DNA-drug complex [91,92]. However, these have also been impeded by several clinical drawbacks. One of these is the fast deactivation of amsacrine, employed in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, by glutathione-associated drug resistance mechanisms. This limitation prompted the design of new-generation analogues and ultimately led to the development of 9-anilinoacridines (9-AnA) and new triazene-acridine chimaeras. Syntheses of nine bifunctional anticancer agents have been straightforwardly achieved via a nucleophilic aromatic substitution (Scheme 21) reaction, using readily accessible 9-AnAs and methyl triazene structural building blocks [89]. Preliminary antiproliferative assays identified chimaera 69a (Figure 10), which displayed potent cell-growth inhibition with IC50 values of 2.9 μM and 0.8 μM against H1299 (NSCLC) and WM-266-4 (human metastatic melanoma) cells, respectively. Further studies demonstrated that this antiproliferative activity arises from two independent mechanisms: DNA alkylation and topoisomerase II inhibition [89].
The identification of the effectiveness of the potent molecular chimaera CM358, formed by conjugating amonafide with chlorambucil, against human metastatic melanoma [93], motivated the development of related hybrids that instead exploited a methyl-triazene core, establishing an additional DNA-reactive triazene-hybrid platform [94]. Like acridines, amonafide is a topoisomerase II inhibitor which triggers a double-strand break (DSB) and cell death. These new chimaeras (aminafidazene) 72a and 72b (Figure 11) consisted of amonafide, or its 4-amino isomers, and the methyl triazene moiety, protected with a carbamate group and tethered through a self-immolative 4-aminobenzyl carbamate linker. Model chimeric compounds 72c and 72d, which lack the dimethylamino group, were also prepared to allow differentiation of the biological effects of the monomethyl-triazene core from those of the N-dimethylaminoethyl arm. The synthesis of these hybrids began with the synthesis of azene 75 (Scheme 19), comprising a monomethyl-triazene moiety protected and stabilised by a methyl carbamate group, and obtained through a well-known transformation which started with diazotization of 4-aminobenzyl alcohol 74, followed by condensation with 40% aqueous methyl amine. Monomethyl triazene was quickly purified by extractive work-up and immediately reacted with methyl chloroformate to afford the carbamate azene 75 in good yield (ca. 60%). Then, hybrids 72 were synthesised in moderate to good yields (47–71%) in two sequential steps. First, the amino naphthalimides were transformed into the respective reactive isocyanates followed by addition of azene 75 (Scheme 22). Exposure of the HTC116 cancer cell line to the chimeric molecules 72a and 72b induced markedly increased levels of DSBs, accompanied by delayed repair kinetics compared with cells treated with amonafide or monomethyl-triazene alone. Conversely, incorporation of the methyl-triazene unit into the non-intercalating amonafide analogues 72c and 72d did not produce these effects. Consistent with the elevated levels of DSBs, compounds 72a and 72b exhibited significantly stronger antiproliferative activity in HCT116 cancers than either amonafide or azene 75. The red-shift in fluorescence observed upon release of the amino-naphthalimide core enabled real-time monitoring of prodrug activation, confirming that the chimaera selectively accumulated and became activated at tumour sites. In a xenograft model in vivo, this targeted activation translated into significantly enhanced tumour-suppressive efficacy compared with amonafide. These findings suggest that targeting methyl-alkylating groups to the vicinity of DSB sites may represent a promising strategy for improving the anticancer potency of topoisomerase II inhibitors [94].
Another theranostic chimaera was developed, which consisted of the DNA-methylating methyl moiety conjugated to a fluorogenic xanthene–cyanine dye as a photosensitizer [95]. The activatable near-infrared (NIR) dye XCy has been previously explored for fluorescence drug delivery monitoring [96] and photodynamic therapy (PDT) applications [97]. The photosensitizer component of this molecular hybrid provides a long-wavelength fluorescent signal, which was exploited for monitoring drug delivery and accumulation for photodynamic therapy (PDT). Synthesis of activatable fluorescent chimaeras 77a and 77b started with azene 75, which contained the monomethyl triazene moiety protected and stabilised by methyl carbamate, as reported above [94]. Furthermore, 75 was transformed into its brominated counterpart 76 in very good yield (68%), followed by nucleophilic substitution by the phenol of XCy and I-XCy (Scheme 23). These chimaeras were obtained in good yields (47–58%) after preparative HPLC purification [95].
The suggested mechanism of action of the chimaeras 77 is shown in Scheme 24. These chimaeras are neither phototoxic nor fluorescent because the chromophore exists in the “off” form with the protected hydroxyl function [96]. Upon the environmentally mediated cleavage of the biodegradable carbamate group [94], the highly unstable monomethyl triazene 78 is formed, which is spontaneously cleaved to produce the highly reactive methyl carbocation causing the DNA methylation. In the next step, the ether bond of 79 is self-immolatively cleaved, yielding the “on” form of the xanthene–cyanine XCy (80a) and iodo-xanthene–cyanine I-XCy (80b) chromophore. The XCy chromophore generates highly cytotoxic species under NIR light excitation and, in addition, provided an NIR fluorescence signal. Thus, the free XCy dye acted both as the NIR photosensitizer and the fluorescent reporter signalling the drug activation events. Preliminary antiproliferative assays demonstrated that the developed chimaeras exhibited higher antitumour activity in breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-238) upon NIR light irradiation compared to their structural constituents, the xanthene-cyanine photosensitizer and monomethyl triazene components [95].
More recently, conjugation of the carbamate azenebromide 76 with different FDA-approved anticancer drugs produced eight different chimaeras (Figure 12), featuring different combinations of two pharmacophores, which following investigation in various leukaemia cell lines, led to the identification of a potent chimaera, doxorubizen (81g), a sequel of the known DNA intercalator and topoisomerase II (Topo-II) inhibitor doxorubicin (Dox) and azene [98]. Molecular docking and molecular dynamic simulations identified doxorubizen as a more potent Topo-II inhibitor than Dox, owing to its ability to bind within the major groove of DNA. In addition, the monomethyl triazene group is optimally positioned through intercalation of the tetracene core, potentially enabling methylation of nearby guanine residues. Consistent with these structural insights, doxorubizen exhibited markedly higher cytotoxicity, mitochondrial depolarization, DNA intercalation, and cell-death induction compared with Dox. In fact, a Topo-II activity assay further confirmed its strong inhibitory effect. The mechanism of action of doxorubizen involves inhibition of DNA damage repair near double-strand breaks through guanine methylation, along with enhanced mitochondrial depolarisation and increased apoptosis. Moreover, in an acute leukaemia xenograft model, doxorubizen significantly reduced leukaemia burden relative to Dox while preserving body weight and liver function. Collectively, these findings highlight the promising therapeutic potential of doxorubizen for leukaemia treatment.

4. Conclusions

Methyl triazenes are among the earliest classes of alkylating agents introduced into clinical cancer therapy. In this review, we outline the evolution of these traditional prodrugs. While the first non-selective prodrugs lacked sufficient selectivity and ultimately did not gain clinical acceptance, they laid the groundwork for designing more advanced derivatives capable of tumour-targeted delivery. Notably, recently developed enzyme-activated methyl triazene derivatives provide a promising strategy, which has been summarised in Table 1. Moreover, the delivery of a second pharmacophore in addition to the methyl triazene clearly showed a potentiation in cytotoxicity, but the lack of tumour microenvironment activation of these triazene hybrids rendered them prone to unspecific release of the alkylating agent. Despite being at preclinical stages, these examples are setting up the research ground for future innovative activatable delivery systems of methytriazene hybrids to address the key limitations of the historical drugs DTIC and TMZ. On the other hand, the incorporation of TMZ into targeted nanosystems or the complexation of the tetrazine ring of TMZ with metals has been shown to be an alternative not only to improve the kinetic stability of TMZ but also to improve its solubility and delivery.

Funding

This research was funded by Masonic Charitable Foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Masonic Charitable Foundation (MCF) for supporting GCN with a PhD studentship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Meer, L.; Janzer, R.C.; Kleihues, P.; Kolar, G.F. In vivo metabolism and reaction with dna of the cytostatic agent, 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-carboxamide (DTIC). Biochem. Pharmacol. 1986, 35, 3243–3247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Stevens, M.F.G.; Hickman, J.A.; Langdon, S.P.; Chubb, D.; Vickers, L.; Stone, R.; Baig, G.; Goddard, C.; Gibson, N.W.; Slack, J.A.; et al. Antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics in mice of 8-carbamoyl-3-methyl-imidazo[5,1-d]-1,2,3,5-tetrazin-4(3H)-one (CCRG 81045; M & B 39831), a novel drug with potential as an alternative to dacarbazine. Cancer Res. 1987, 47, 5846–5852. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Marchesi, F.; Turriziani, M.; Tortorelli, G.; Avvisati, G.; Torino, F.; De Vecchis, L. Triazene compounds: Mechanism of action and related DNA repair systems. Pharmacol. Res. 2007, 56, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Legha, S.S. Current therapy for malignant melanoma. Semin. Oncol. 1989, 16, 34–44. [Google Scholar]
  5. Szklener, K.; Mazurek, M.; Wieteska, M.; Wacławska, M.; Bilski, M.; Mańdziuk, S. New Directions in the Therapy of Glioblastoma. Cancers 2022, 14, 5377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Somers, R.; Santoro, A.; Verweij, J.; Lucas, P.; Rouëssé, J.; Kok, T.; Casali, A.; Seynaeve, C.; Thomas, D. Phase II study of mitozolomide in advanced soft tissue sarcoma of adults: The EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Eur. J. Cancer 1992, 28, 855–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Singhal, N.; Selva-Nayagam, S.; Brown, M.P. Prolonged and severe myelosuppression in two patients after low-dose temozolomide treatment- case study and review of literature. J. Neuro-Oncol. 2007, 85, 229–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Takayama, S.; Nagai, Y.; Sugiyama, T.; Ito, F.; Miyazaki, J. Photodegradation of dacarbazine irradiated by common lighting sources: An examination of the differences between light-emitting diode (LED) and fluorescent light. J. Pharm. Sci. 2026, 115, 104148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Reid, J.M.; Kuffel, M.J.; Miller, J.K.; Rios, R.; Ames, M.M. Metabolic Activation of Dacarbazine by Human Cytochromes P450: The Role of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP2E1. Clin. Cancer Res. 1999, 5, 2192–2197. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gerulath, A.H.; Loo, T.L. Mechanism of action of 5-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-caboxamide in mammalian cells in culture. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1972, 21, 2335–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Newlands, E.S.; Blackledge, G.R.P.; Slack, J.A.; Rustin, G.J.; Smith, D.B.; Stuart, N.S.; Quarterman, C.P.; Hoffman, R.; Stevens, M.F.G.; Brampton, M.H.; et al. Phase I trial of temozolomide (CCRG 81045: M&B 39831: NSC 362856). Br. J. Cancer 1992, 65, 287–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Connors, T.A.; Goddard, P.M.; Merai, K.; Ross, W.C.J.; Wilman, D.E.V. Tumour inhibitory triazenes: Structural requirements for an active metabolite. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1976, 25, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ahern, T.P.; Fong, H.; Vaughan, K. Open-chain nitrogen compounds. Part II. Preparation, characterization, and degradation of 1(3)-Aryl-3(1)-methyltriazenes; the effect of substituents on the reaction of diazonium salts with methylamine. Can. J. Chem. 1977, 55, 1701–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ullrich, R.; Grewer, T. Decomposition of aromatic diazonium compounds. Thermochim. Acta 1993, 225, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Doyle, M.P.; Bryker, W.J. Alkyl nitrite-metal halide deamination reactions. 6. Direct synthesis of arenediazonium tetrafluoroborate salts from aromatic amines, tert-butyl nitrite, and boron trifluoride etherate in anhydrous media. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 1572–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kiefer, G.; Riedel, T.; Dyson, P.J.; Scopelliti, R.; Severin, K. Synthesis of Triazenes with Nitrous Oxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 302–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Suleymanov, A.A.; Scopelliti, R.; Fadaei Tirani, F.; Severin, K. One-Pot Synthesis of Trisubstituted Triazenes from Grignard Reagents and Organic Azides. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 3323–3326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Z.; Wang, R.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Liu, E.; Liang, H.; Zhao, Y. Base-Promoted Synthesis of Triazenes via Formal Substitution of Arylazo Sulfones with Amines. Org. Lett. 2025, 27, 10471–10476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kice, J.L.; Gabrielsen, R.S. Thermal decomposition of benzenediazo sulfones. II. Benzyl benzenediazo sulfone. J. Org. Chem. 1970, 35, 1010–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Iley, J.; Fernandes, L.; Rosa, E. Triazene drug metabolites. Part 12. Base catalysed formation of 3-alkyl-1-aryltriazenes from 3-alkyl-3-hydroxymethyl-1-aryltriazenes. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1992, 2, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fernandes, L.; Francisco, A.P.; Iley, J.; Rosa, E. Triazene drug metabolites. Part 14. Kinetics and mechanism of the acid-catalysed hydrolysis of 3-alkoxymethyl-3-alkyl-1-aryltriazenes. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1994, 2313–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Carvalho, E.; Francisco, A.P.; Iley, J.; Rosa, E. The Mechanism of Hydrolysis of Aryl Ether Derivatives of3-Hydroxymethyltriazenes. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 2005, 2056–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Iley, J.; Moreira, R.; Rosa, E. Triazene drug metabolites. Part 11. Synthesis of S-cysteinyl and related derivatives of N-hydroxymethyltriazenes. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1991, 3241–3244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hemens, C.M.; Manning, H.W.; Vaughan, K.; LaFrance, R.J.; Tang, Y. Open-chain nitrogen compounds. Part V. Hydroxymethyltriazenes: Synthesis of some new alkyl homologues of the anti-tumour 3-methyl-3-hydroxymethyltriazenes and preparation of the derived acetoxymethyl-, benzoyloxymethyl-, and methoxymethyltriazenes. Can. J. Chem. 1984, 62, 741–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vanghan, K.; Manning, H.W.; Merrin, M.P.; Hooper, D.L. Open chain nitrogen compounds. XIII: 1-Aryl-3-arylthiomethyl-3-methyltriazenes and 3-(arylazo)-1,3-thiazolidines. Can. J. Chem. 1988, 66, 2487–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Merrin, M.P.; Hooper, D.L.; LaFrance, R.J.; Snooks, R.; Vaughan, K. Open-chain nitrogen compounds. Part XIV. Synthesis of 1-aryl-3-aryloxymethyl-3-methyltriazenes and 1-aryl-3-(hydroxyaryl)methyl-3-methyltriazenes. Can. J. Chem. 1992, 70, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Carvalho, E.; Iley, J.; Rosa, E. Triazene drug metabolites. Part 13. The decomposition of 3-acyl-3-alkyl-1-aryltriazenes in aqueous sulfuric acid. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1993, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Iley, J.N.; Moreira, R.; Rosa, E. Triazene drug metabolites. Part 4. Kinetics and mechanism of the decomposition of 1-aryl-3-benzoyloxymethyl-3-methyltriazenes in mixed aqueous–organic solvents. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1987, 1503–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Perry, M.d.J.; Carvalho, E.; Rosa, E.; Iley, J. Towards an efficient prodrug of the alkylating metabolite monomethyltriazene: Synthesis and stability of N-acylamino acid derivatives of triazenes. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 1049–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Carvalho, E.; Iley, J.; Perry, M.d.J.; Rosa, E. Triazene Drug Metabolites: Part 15. Synthesis and Plasma Hydrolysis of Anticancer Triazenes Containing Amino Acid Carriers. Pharm. Res. 1998, 15, 931–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Carvalho, E.; Francisco, A.P.; Iley, J.; Rosa, E. Triazene drug metabolites. Part 17: Synthesis and plasma hydrolysis of acyloxymethyl carbamate derivatives of antitumour triazenes. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2000, 8, 1719–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jordan, A.M.; Khan, T.H.; Malkin, H.; Osborn, H.M.I.; Photiou, A.; Riley, P.A. Melanocyte-Directed enzyme prodrug therapy (MDEPT): Development of second generation prodrugs for targeted treatment of malignant melanoma. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9, 1549–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rooseboom, M.; Commandeur, J.N.M.; Vermeulen, N.P.E. Enzyme-Catalyzed Activation of Anticancer Prodrugs. Pharmacol. Rev. 2004, 56, 53–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Perry, M.J.; Mendes, E.; Simplício, A.L.; Coelho, A.; Soares, R.V.; Iley, J.; Moreira, R.; Francisco, A.P. Dopamine- and tyramine-based derivatives of triazenes: Activation by tyrosinase and implications for prodrug design. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 3228–3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Monteiro, A.S.; Almeida, J.; Cabral, G.; Severino, P.; Videira, P.A.; Sousa, A.; Nunes, R.; Pereira, J.D.; Francisco, A.P.; Perry, M.J.; et al. Synthesis and evaluation of N-acylamino acids derivatives of triazenes. Activation by tyrosinase in human melanoma cell lines. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 70, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sousa, A.; Santos, F.; Gaspar, M.M.; Calado, S.; Pereira, J.D.; Mendes, E.; Francisco, A.P.; Perry, M.J. The selective cytotoxicity of new triazene compounds to human melanoma cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2017, 25, 3900–3910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cheng, S.; Iley, J. Synthesis of 1-aryl-3-methyltriazenes by base-promoted decomposition of 1-aryl-3-hydroxymethyl3-methyltriazenes. J. Chem. Res. 1983, 320–321. [Google Scholar]
  38. Granada, M.; Mendes, E.; Perry, M.J.; Penetra, M.J.; Gaspar, M.M.; Pinho, J.O.; Serra, S.; António, C.T.; Francisco, A.P. Sulfur Analogues of Tyrosine in the Development of Triazene Hybrid Compounds: A New Strategy against Melanoma. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 1669–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shosuke, I.; Toshiaki, K.; Kiichi, I.; Tsutomu, K.; Kowichi, J. Mechanism of selective toxicity of 4-S-cysteinylphenol and 4-S-cysteaminylphenol to melanocytes. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1987, 36, 2007–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jimbow, K.; Iwashina, T.; Alena, F.; Yamada, K.; Pankovich, J.; Umemura, T. Exploitation of Pigment Biosynthesis Pathway as a Selective Chemotherapeutic Approach for Malignant Melanoma. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1993, 100, S231–S238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Le Calvez, K.; Mauricaite, R.; Treasure, P.; Booth, T.C.; Price, S.J.; Brodbelt, A.; Gregory, J.J.; Dadhania, S.; Pakzad-Shahabi, L.; Dumba, M.; et al. Adult glioblastoma in England: Incidence, treatment, and outcomes with novel population-based strata. Cancer Epidemiol. 2025, 97, 102811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Jezierzański, M.; Nafalska, N.; Stopyra, M.; Furgoł, T.; Miciak, M.; Kabut, J.; Gisterek-Grocholska, I. Temozolomide (TMZ) in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme-a literature review and clinical outcomes. Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31, 3994–4002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Stéphanou, A.; Ballesta, A. pH as a potential therapeutic target to improve temozolomide antitumor efficacy: A mechanistic modeling study. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2019, 7, e00454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Beppu, T.; Kamada, K.; Yoshida, Y.; Arai, H.; Ogasawara, K.; Ogawa, A. Change of Oxygen Pressure in Glioblastoma Tissue Under Various Conditions. J. Neuro-Oncol. 2002, 58, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Braga, C.; Ferreira-Silva, M.; Corvo, M.L.; Moreira, R.; Fernandes, A.R.; Vaz, J.; Perry, M.J. Nitroaromatic-based triazene prodrugs to target the hypoxic microenvironment in glioblastoma. RSC Med. Chem. 2025, 16, 1350–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rampling, R.; Cruickshank, G.; Lewis, A.D.; Fitzsimmons, S.A.; Workman, P. Direct measurement of pO2 distribution and bioreductive enzymes in human malignant brain tumors. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1994, 29, 427–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wager, T.T.; Hou, X.; Verhoest, P.R.; Villalobos, A. Central Nervous System Multiparameter Optimization Desirability: Application in Drug Discovery. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2016, 7, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kumar, P.; Kant, R.; Rastogi, N. Nitrogen atom insertion into N=N double bonds: Straightforward access to triazenes. Chem. Commun. 2025, 61, 16632–16635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Viegas-Junior, C.; Danuello, A.; da Silva Bolzani, V.; Barreir, E.J.; Fraga, C.A.M. Molecular hybridization: A useful tool in the design of new drug prototypes. Curr. Med. Chem. 2007, 14, 1829–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gediya, L.K.; Njar, V.C. Promise and challenges in drug discovery and development of hybrid anticancer drugs. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2009, 4, 1099−1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sigismund, S.; Avanzato, D.; Lanzetti, L. Emerging functions of the EGFR in cancer. Mol. Oncol. 2018, 12, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Abourehab, M.A.S.; Alqahtani, A.M.; Youssif, B.G.M.; Gouda, A.M. Globally Approved EGFR Inhibitors: Insights into Their Syntheses, Target Kinases, Biological Activities, Receptor Interactions, and Metabolism. Molecules 2021, 26, 6677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Matheson, S.L.; McNamee, J.; Jean-Claude, B.J. Design of a chimeric 3-methyl-1,2,3-triazene with mixed receptor tyrosine kinase and DNA damaging properties: A novel tumor targeting strategy. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2001, 296, 832–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Brahimi, F.; Matheson, S.L.; Dudouit, F.; Mcnamee, J.P.; Tari, A.M.; Jean-Claude, B.J. Inhibition of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mediated Signaling by “Combi-Triazene” BJ2000, a New Probe for Combi-Targeting Postulates. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002, 303, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rewcastle, G.W.; Denny, W.A.; Bridges, A.J.; Zhou, H.; Cody, D.R.; McMichael, A.; Fry, D.W. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors. 5. Synthesis and structure-activity relationships for 4-[(phenylmethyl)amino]- and 4-(phenylamino)quinazolines as potent adenosine 5′-triphosphate binding site inhibitors of the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 3482–3487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Matheson, S.L.; Mzengeza, S.; Jean-Claude, B.J. Synthesis of 1-[4-(m-tolyl)amino-6-quinazolinyl]-3-[14C]-methyl triazene: A radiolabeled probe for the combi-targeting concept. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2003, 46, 729–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Matheson, S.L.; Brahimi, F.; Jean-Claude, B.J. The combi-targeting concept: Intracellular fragmentation of the binary epidermal growth factor (EGFR)/DNA targeting “combi-triazene” SMA41. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2004, 67, 1131–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Matheson, S.L.; McNamee, J.P.; Jean-Claude, B.J. Differential responses of EGFR-/AGT-expressing cells to the “combi-triazene” SMA41. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2003, 51, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Banerjee, R.; Rachid, Z.; McNamee, J.; Jean-Claude, B.J. Synthesis of a Prodrug Designed To Release Multiple Inhibitors of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase and an Alkylating Agent: A Novel Tumor Targeting Concept. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 5546–5551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rewcastle, G.W.; Murray, D.K.; Elliott, W.L.; Fry, D.W.; Howard, C.T.; Nelson, J.M.; Roberts, B.J.; Vincent, P.W.; Hollis Showalter, H.D.; Winters, R.T.; et al. Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. 14. Structure−Activity Relationships for Methyl- amino-Substituted Derivatives of 4-[(3-Bromophenyl)amino]-6-(methylamino)- pyrido[3,4-d]pyrimidine (PD 158780), a Potent and Specific Inhibitor of the Tyrosine Kinase Activity of Receptors for the EGF Family of Growth Factors. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 742–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Banerjee, R.; Rachid, Z.; Qiu, Q.; McNamee, J.P.; Tari, A.M.; Jean-Claude, B.J. Sustained antiproliferative mechanisms by RB24, a targeted precursor of multiple inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor and a DNA alkylating agent in the A431 epidermal carcinoma of the vulva cell line. Br. J. Cancer 2004, 91, 1066–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  62. Rachid, Z.; Brahimi, F.; Katsoulas, A.; Teoh, N.; Jean-Claude, B.J. The Combi-Targeting Concept: Chemical Dissection of the Dual Targeting Properties of a Series of “Combi-Triazenes”. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 4313–4321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hemens, C.M.; Vaughan, K. Kinetic study of the solvolysis reactions of 1-aryl-3-acetoxymethyl-3-alkyltriazenes: Evidence for iminium ion intermediates and the SN1 mechanism. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1986, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Qiu, Q.; Larroque, A.L.; Gibbs, B.; Fang, Y.; Lakhrissi, Y.; Soucy, J.P.; Mzengeza, S.; Rachid, Z.; Jean-Claude, B.J. Molecular analysis of the in vivo metabolism and biodistribution of metabolically and non-metabolically activated combi-molecules of the triazene class. Drug Metab. Lett. 2009, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rachid, Z.; MacPhee, M.; Williams, C.; Todorova, M.; Jean-Claude, B.J. Design and synthesis of new stabilized combi-triazenes for targeting solid tumors expressing the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or its closest homologue HER2. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 5505–5509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Golabi, N.; Rachid, Z.; Qiu, Q.; Huang, Y.; Jean-Claude, B.J. In vitro and in vivo biodistribution of ZRS1, a stabilized type I N-acetoxymethyl carbamate-containing combi-molecule. Drug Metab. Lett. 2011, 5, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Matheson, S.L.; McNamee, J.P.; Wang, T.; Alaoui-Jamali, M.A.; Tari, A.M.; Jean-Claude, B.J. The Combi-Targeting Concept: Dissection of the Binary Mechanism of Action of the Combi-Triazene SMA41 in Vitro and Antitumor Activity in Vivo. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004, 311, 1163–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Brahimi, F.; Rachid, Z.; McNamee, J.P.; Alaoui-Jamali, M.A.; Tari, A.M.; Jean-Claude, B.J. Mechanism of action of a novel “combi-triazene” engineered to possess a polar functional group on the alkylating moiety: Evidence for enhancement of potency. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2005, 70, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rachid, Z.; Brahimi, F.; Domarkas, J.; Jean-Claude, B.J. Synthesis of half-mustard combi-molecules with fluorescence properties: Correlation with EGFR status. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 1135–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Warren, J.J.; Forsberg, L.J.; Beese, L.S. The structural basis for the mutagenicity of O6-methyl-guanine lesions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 19701–19706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Brahimi, F.; Rachid, Z.; Qiu, Q.; McNamee, J.P.; Li, Y.J.; Tari, A.M.; Jean-Claude, B.J. Multiple mechanisms of action of ZR2002 in human breast cancer cells: A novel combi-molecule designed to block signaling mediated by the ERB family of oncogenes and to damage genomic DNA. Int. J. Cancer 2004, 112, 484–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Rachid, Z.; Brahimi, F.; Qiu, Q.; Williams, C.; Hartley, J.M.; Hartley, J.A.; Jean-Claude, B.J. Novel Nitrogen Mustard-Armed Combi-Molecules for the Selective Targeting of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Overexperessing Solid Tumors:  Discovery of an Unusual Structure−Activity Relationship. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 2605–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Katsoulas, A.; Rachid, Z.; Brahimi, F.; McNamee, J.; Jean-Claude, B.J. Engineering 3-alkyltriazenes to block bcr-abl kinase: A novel strategy for the therapy of advanced bcr-abl expressing leukemias. Leuk. Res. 2005, 29, 693–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Massimino, M.; Manzella, L.; Stagno, F.; Consoli, M.L.; Fallica, M.; Aloisi, A.; Di Raimondo, F.; Messina, A.; Vigneri, P. BCR-ABL Tyrosine Kinase Activity Modulates the Phosphorylation, Localization and Function of Interferon Regulatory Factor 5 (irf-5) in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Cells. Blood 2009, 114, 2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kano, Y.; Akutsu, M.; Tsunoda, S.; Mano, H.; Sato, Y.; Honma, Y.; Furukawa, Y. In vitro cytotoxic effects of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 in combination with commonly used antileukemic agents. Blood 2001, 97, 1999–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Katsoulas, A.; Rachid, Z.; McNamee, J.P.; Williams, C.; Jean-Claude, B.J. Combi-targeting concept: An optimized single-molecule dual-targeting model for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008, 7, 1033–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Del Rivero, J.; Perez, K.; Geyer, S.M.; Khalil, M.F.; Vijendran, A.; Kordaris-Corkill, A.; Shergill, A.; Spencer, K.R.; Soares, H.P.; Lopez, C.D.; et al. Alliance A021804: A prospective, multi-institutional phase II trial evaluating temozolomide versus temozolomide and olaparib for advanced pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 41, TPS4191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Senhaji Mouhri, Z.; Goodfellow, E.; Kelley, S.P.; Stein, R.S.; Rogers, R.D.; Jean-Claude, B.J. 15N-, 13C- and 1H-NMR Spectroscopy Characterization and Growth Inhibitory Potency of a Combi-Molecule Synthesized by Acetylation of an Unstable Monoalkyltriazene. Molecules 2017, 22, 1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Senhaji Mouhri, Z.; Goodfellow, E.; Jean-Claude, B. A type I combi-targeting approach for the design of molecules with enhanced potency against BRCA1/2 mutant- and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (mgmt)- expressing tumour cells. BMC Cancer 2017, 17, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, H.; Liu, Z.-Y.; Wu, N.; Chen, Y.-C.; Cheng, Q.; Wang, J. PARP inhibitor resistance: The underlying mechanisms and clinical implications. Mol. Cancer 2020, 19, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yu, W.; Zhang, L.; Wei, Q.; Shao, A. O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT): Challenges and New Opportunities in Glioma Chemotherapy. Front. Oncol. 2020, 9, 1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Wanner, M.J.; Koch, M.; Koomen, G.-J. Synthesis and Antitumor Activity of Methyltriazene Prodrugs Simultaneously Releasing DNA-Methylating Agents and the Antiresistance Drug O6-Benzylguanine. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 6875–6883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wanner, M.J.; Koomen, G.J. A new synthesis of temozolomide. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 1877–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Beukers, M.W.; Wanner, M.J.; Von Frijtag Drabbe Künzel, J.K.; Klaasse, E.C.; Ijzerman, A.P.; Koomen, G.-J. N 6 -Cyclopentyl-2-(3-phenylaminocarbonyltriazene-1-yl)adenosine (TCPA), a Very Selective Agonist with High Affinity for the Human Adenosine A 1 Receptor. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 1492–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Thotala, D.; Karvas, R.M.; Engelbach, J.A.; Garbow, J.R.; Hallahan, A.N.; DeWees, T.A.; Laszlo, A.; Hallahan, D.E. Valproic acid enhances the efficacy of radiation therapy by protecting normal hippocampal neurons and sensitizing malignant glioblastoma cells. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 35004–35022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ryu, C.H.; Yoon, W.S.; Park, K.Y.; Kim, S.M.; Lim, J.Y.; Woo, J.S.; Jeong, C.H.; Hou, Y.; Jeun, S.-S. Valproic Acid Downregulates the Expression of MGMT and Sensitizes Temozolomide-Resistant Glioma Cells. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 2012, 987495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Pinheiro, R.; Braga, C.; Santos, G.; Bronze, M.R.; Perry, M.J.; Moreira, R.; Brites, D.; Falcão, A.S. Targeting Gliomas: Can a New Alkylating Hybrid Compound Make a Difference? ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2017, 8, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Braga, C.; Vaz, A.R.; Oliveira, M.C.; Marques, M.M.; Moreira, R.; Brites, D.; Perry, M.J. Targeting gliomas with triazene-based hybrids: Structure-activity relationship, mechanistic study and stability. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 172, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Walunj, D.; Egarmina, K.; Tuchinsky, H.; Shpilberg, O.; Hershkovitz-Rokah, O.; Grynszpan, F.; Gellerman, G. Expedient synthesis and anticancer evaluation of dual-action 9-anilinoacridine methyl triazene chimeras. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2021, 97, 237–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Prasher, P.; Sharma, M. Medicinal chemistry of acridine and its analogues. MedChemComm 2018, 9, 1589–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Oyeyode, M.; Tempel, M.; Lakowski, T.M.; Davie, J.R. DNA intercalating drugs: Mechanisms of action in cancer treatment. Adv. Biol. Regul. 2025, 98, 101115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Varakumar, P.; Rajagopal, K.; Aparna, B.; Raman, K.; Byran, G.; Lima, C.M.G.; Rashid, S.; Nafady, M.H.; Emran, T.B.; Wybraniec, S. Acridine as an Anti-Tumour Agent: A Critical Review. Molecules 2023, 28, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Gilad, Y.; Tuchinsky, H.; Ben-David, G.; Minnes, R.; Gancz, A.; Senderowitz, H.; Luboshits, G.; Firer, M.A.; Gellerman, G. Discovery of potent molecular chimera (CM358) to treat human metastatic melanoma. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 138, 602–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Walunj, D.; Thankarajan, E.; Prasad, C.; Tuchinsky, H.; Baldan, S.; Sherman, M.Y.; Patsenker, L.; Gellerman, G. Targeted methylation facilitates DNA double strand breaks and enhances cancer suppression: A DNA intercalating/methylating dual-action chimera Amonafidazene. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 225, 113811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Thankarajan, E.; Walunj, D.; Bazylevich, A.; Prasad, C.; Hesin, A.; Patsenker, L.; Gellerman, G. A novel, dual action chimera comprising DNA methylating agent and near-IR xanthene-cyanine photosensitizer for combined anticancer therapy. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2022, 37, 102722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ebaston, T.M.; Rozovsky, A.; Zaporozhets, A.; Bazylevich, A.; Tuchinsky, H.; Marks, V.; Gellerman, G.; Patsenker, L.D. Peptide-Driven Targeted Drug-Delivery System Comprising Turn-On Near-Infrared Fluorescent Xanthene–Cyanine Reporter for Real-Time Monitoring of Drug Release. ChemMedChem 2019, 14, 1727–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yuan, B.; Wang, H.; Xu, J.-F.; Zhang, X. Activatable Photosensitizer for Smart Photodynamic Therapy Triggered by Reactive Oxygen Species in Tumor Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 26982–26990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Walunj, D.; Egarmina, K.; Zipin-Roitman, A.; Muddineni, S.S.N.A.; Tkachenko, I.; Mitra, P.; Tobi, D.; Bazylevich, A.; Shpilberg, O.; Milyavsky, M.; et al. Novel dual action chimera doxorubizen demonstrates superior efficacy to doxorubicin in acute leukemia. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 10607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Activation and mechanism of action of dacarbazine and temozolomide [3].
Scheme 1. Activation and mechanism of action of dacarbazine and temozolomide [3].
Molecules 31 01103 sch001
Figure 1. Chemical structure of mitozolomide (MTZ).
Figure 1. Chemical structure of mitozolomide (MTZ).
Molecules 31 01103 g001
Scheme 2. Oxidative metabolism of aryl dimethyl triazenes 3 under physiological conditions [12].
Scheme 2. Oxidative metabolism of aryl dimethyl triazenes 3 under physiological conditions [12].
Molecules 31 01103 sch002
Scheme 3. General synthetic methods to obtain aryl triazenes. (A) via diazonium chloride with amines; (B) via diazonium tetrafluoroborate with amines; (C) via nitrous oxide-mediated coupling of dialkyl lithium amines and Grignard reagents.
Scheme 3. General synthetic methods to obtain aryl triazenes. (A) via diazonium chloride with amines; (B) via diazonium tetrafluoroborate with amines; (C) via nitrous oxide-mediated coupling of dialkyl lithium amines and Grignard reagents.
Molecules 31 01103 sch003
Scheme 4. Synthesis of 3-alkyloxy-3-methyltriazene via an iminium salt [26].
Scheme 4. Synthesis of 3-alkyloxy-3-methyltriazene via an iminium salt [26].
Molecules 31 01103 sch004
Scheme 5. Synthesis of aminoacyl triazenes 17 and 18. Reagents and conditions: (i) N-Boc amino acids, dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC), dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP); (ii) HCl, CH3NO2.
Scheme 5. Synthesis of aminoacyl triazenes 17 and 18. Reagents and conditions: (i) N-Boc amino acids, dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC), dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP); (ii) HCl, CH3NO2.
Molecules 31 01103 sch005
Figure 2. Chemical representation of N-(acylamino)acyl triazenes 19 [29].
Figure 2. Chemical representation of N-(acylamino)acyl triazenes 19 [29].
Molecules 31 01103 g002
Scheme 6. Synthesis of 3-(acyloxymethyloxycarbonyl)-1-aryl-3-methyltriazenes 22. Reagents: i. ClCH2OCOCl, CH2Cl2, triethylamine; ii. NaI, acetone; iii. RCO2Ag or RCOOH/Ag2CO3, acetone, tetrabutylammonium bromide [31].
Scheme 6. Synthesis of 3-(acyloxymethyloxycarbonyl)-1-aryl-3-methyltriazenes 22. Reagents: i. ClCH2OCOCl, CH2Cl2, triethylamine; ii. NaI, acetone; iii. RCO2Ag or RCOOH/Ag2CO3, acetone, tetrabutylammonium bromide [31].
Molecules 31 01103 sch006
Figure 3. Dopamine- and tyramine-based triazene prodrugs [34].
Figure 3. Dopamine- and tyramine-based triazene prodrugs [34].
Molecules 31 01103 g003
Scheme 7. Proposed activation pathway for tyramine-based triazene prodrugs 23 triggered by tyrosinase via enzymatic oxidation [34].
Scheme 7. Proposed activation pathway for tyramine-based triazene prodrugs 23 triggered by tyrosinase via enzymatic oxidation [34].
Molecules 31 01103 sch007
Scheme 8. Representation of N-acyltyrosine-based triazene prodrugs 27 activated by enzymatic oxidation [35].
Scheme 8. Representation of N-acyltyrosine-based triazene prodrugs 27 activated by enzymatic oxidation [35].
Molecules 31 01103 sch008
Scheme 9. Synthetic route to acyltriazene 32. Reagents and conditions: (i) NaOH until pH 7 and then formaldehyde; (ii) MeNH2; (iii) water, MeNH2; (iv) NaH, and DCC/DMAP or DMT/MM.
Scheme 9. Synthetic route to acyltriazene 32. Reagents and conditions: (i) NaOH until pH 7 and then formaldehyde; (ii) MeNH2; (iii) water, MeNH2; (iv) NaH, and DCC/DMAP or DMT/MM.
Molecules 31 01103 sch009
Figure 4. Triazene hybrid prodrugs based on sulfur analogues of tyrosine [38].
Figure 4. Triazene hybrid prodrugs based on sulfur analogues of tyrosine [38].
Molecules 31 01103 g004
Scheme 10. Tyrosinase-mediated metabolization of triazene hybrid 33 into monomethyltriazene [38].
Scheme 10. Tyrosinase-mediated metabolization of triazene hybrid 33 into monomethyltriazene [38].
Molecules 31 01103 sch010
Scheme 11. Nitroaromatic-based methyltriazene hypoxic-activated prodrugs 36. ArNO2: bioreductive trigger.
Scheme 11. Nitroaromatic-based methyltriazene hypoxic-activated prodrugs 36. ArNO2: bioreductive trigger.
Molecules 31 01103 sch011
Scheme 12. Proposed mechanism for the efficient insertion of nitrogen to prepare triazene carboxylates [48].
Scheme 12. Proposed mechanism for the efficient insertion of nitrogen to prepare triazene carboxylates [48].
Molecules 31 01103 sch012
Scheme 13. Synthesis of combi-triazenes SMA41 (45a) and BJ200 (45b). Reagents and conditions: (i) NOBF4, MeCN, 0 °C; (ii) aq. CH3NH2; (iii) K2CO3.
Scheme 13. Synthesis of combi-triazenes SMA41 (45a) and BJ200 (45b). Reagents and conditions: (i) NOBF4, MeCN, 0 °C; (ii) aq. CH3NH2; (iii) K2CO3.
Molecules 31 01103 sch013
Scheme 14. Degradation of 14C-labelled combi-triazene SMA41.
Scheme 14. Degradation of 14C-labelled combi-triazene SMA41.
Molecules 31 01103 sch014
Scheme 15. Proposed cascade degradation of prodrug 47 and its mechanism of action [61].
Scheme 15. Proposed cascade degradation of prodrug 47 and its mechanism of action [61].
Molecules 31 01103 sch015
Scheme 16. Hydrolysis and binary targeting of combi-triazene 53.
Scheme 16. Hydrolysis and binary targeting of combi-triazene 53.
Molecules 31 01103 sch016
Scheme 17. Proposed mechanism for the formation of combi-molecule 56 [69].
Scheme 17. Proposed mechanism for the formation of combi-molecule 56 [69].
Molecules 31 01103 sch017
Figure 6. Chemical structure of combi-triazene 57 [72].
Figure 6. Chemical structure of combi-triazene 57 [72].
Molecules 31 01103 g006
Figure 7. Chemical structure of combi-triazenes 58a and 59a for dual targeting of Bcr-Abl and DNA [73]. Blue box: Bcr-Abl-targeting moiety; red box: DNA-alkylating moiety.
Figure 7. Chemical structure of combi-triazenes 58a and 59a for dual targeting of Bcr-Abl and DNA [73]. Blue box: Bcr-Abl-targeting moiety; red box: DNA-alkylating moiety.
Molecules 31 01103 g007
Figure 8. Chemical structure of combi-triazene for dual targeting of PARP and DNA [79].
Figure 8. Chemical structure of combi-triazene for dual targeting of PARP and DNA [79].
Molecules 31 01103 g008
Scheme 18. Methylation of DNA and MGMT-catalysed demethylation of guanosine residues [81].
Scheme 18. Methylation of DNA and MGMT-catalysed demethylation of guanosine residues [81].
Molecules 31 01103 sch018
Scheme 19. Chemical structure of triazene hybrid 61 for dual targeting of MGMT and DNA [82].
Scheme 19. Chemical structure of triazene hybrid 61 for dual targeting of MGMT and DNA [82].
Molecules 31 01103 sch019
Scheme 20. Synthetic route to triazene hybrid 61 [82]. Reagents and conditions: (a) acetic acid/CH2Cl2 1:3, rt, 18 h; (b) CH3CN/water, reflux, 30 min.
Scheme 20. Synthetic route to triazene hybrid 61 [82]. Reagents and conditions: (a) acetic acid/CH2Cl2 1:3, rt, 18 h; (b) CH3CN/water, reflux, 30 min.
Molecules 31 01103 sch020
Figure 9. Chemical structures of triazene-valproic acid 65 and related analogues 66 [87,88].
Figure 9. Chemical structures of triazene-valproic acid 65 and related analogues 66 [87,88].
Molecules 31 01103 g009
Scheme 21. Synthesis of triazene 9-AnA chimaeras 69 by nucleophilic substitution using either aminoacridine (A) or chloroacridine (B) [89]. Reagents and conditions: i. Cs2CO3, DMF, 90 °C, 2 h; ii.10% Pd/C, H2 (1 atm), EtOH, rt, 3 h; iii. NaH, DMF, 0 °C to rt, 12 h.
Scheme 21. Synthesis of triazene 9-AnA chimaeras 69 by nucleophilic substitution using either aminoacridine (A) or chloroacridine (B) [89]. Reagents and conditions: i. Cs2CO3, DMF, 90 °C, 2 h; ii.10% Pd/C, H2 (1 atm), EtOH, rt, 3 h; iii. NaH, DMF, 0 °C to rt, 12 h.
Molecules 31 01103 sch021
Figure 10. Lead methyl triazene 9-AnA chimaera.
Figure 10. Lead methyl triazene 9-AnA chimaera.
Molecules 31 01103 g010
Figure 11. Chemical structures of aminafidazene hybrids 72 [94].
Figure 11. Chemical structures of aminafidazene hybrids 72 [94].
Molecules 31 01103 g011
Scheme 22. Synthesis of monomethyl triazene hybrids 72 [94]. Reagents and conditions: (a) Pd/C, H2 (1 atm), MeOH, rt, 12 h; (b) i. NaNO2/HCl, 0 °C, 45 min; ii. MeNH2; (c) ClCO2Me, CH2Cl2, DIPEA, 0 °C to rt, 6 h; (d) i. triphosgene, DIPEA, CH2Cl2, 0 °C; ii. azene (75), CH2Cl2, rt, 24 h.
Scheme 22. Synthesis of monomethyl triazene hybrids 72 [94]. Reagents and conditions: (a) Pd/C, H2 (1 atm), MeOH, rt, 12 h; (b) i. NaNO2/HCl, 0 °C, 45 min; ii. MeNH2; (c) ClCO2Me, CH2Cl2, DIPEA, 0 °C to rt, 6 h; (d) i. triphosgene, DIPEA, CH2Cl2, 0 °C; ii. azene (75), CH2Cl2, rt, 24 h.
Molecules 31 01103 sch022
Scheme 23. Synthesis of activatable chimaeras 77 [95]. Reagents and conditions: (i) PBr3, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 30 min; (ii) xCy or I-xCy, K2CO3, CH3CN, rt.
Scheme 23. Synthesis of activatable chimaeras 77 [95]. Reagents and conditions: (i) PBr3, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 30 min; (ii) xCy or I-xCy, K2CO3, CH3CN, rt.
Molecules 31 01103 sch023
Scheme 24. Proposed mechanism for fluorescence following activation of photosensitizer and DNA methylating agent. Step A. Carbamate bond cleavage; Step B. Self-immolative cleavage [95].
Scheme 24. Proposed mechanism for fluorescence following activation of photosensitizer and DNA methylating agent. Step A. Carbamate bond cleavage; Step B. Self-immolative cleavage [95].
Molecules 31 01103 sch024
Figure 12. Chemical structures of chimaeras 81a81h [98]. Combination of carbamate methyl triazene with SN38 (81a); 6-mercaptopurin (81b); lenalidomide (81c); riluzole (81d); 5-fluorouracil (81e); combretastatin (81f); doxorubicin (81g) (Doxorubizen); Etoposide (81h).
Figure 12. Chemical structures of chimaeras 81a81h [98]. Combination of carbamate methyl triazene with SN38 (81a); 6-mercaptopurin (81b); lenalidomide (81c); riluzole (81d); 5-fluorouracil (81e); combretastatin (81f); doxorubicin (81g) (Doxorubizen); Etoposide (81h).
Molecules 31 01103 g012
Table 1. Comparison of different targeted strategies activated by the tumour microenvironment.
Table 1. Comparison of different targeted strategies activated by the tumour microenvironment.
ActivationPromoeity LinkageHalf-Life (t1/2)Cytotoxicity
TyrosinaseTyramine based UreaPBS pH 7.4 = 0.25–15 days;
80% human plasma = 0.4–2 days; tyrosinase = 2.1–2.3 min
No cytotoxicity observed because no methyl triazene was released
N-acyltyrosine based AmidePBS pH 7.4 = 42.2–72.2 h;
80% human plasma = 1.23–9.54 h; tyrosinase = 8.9–19.8 min
Showed limited cytotoxicity against MNT-1 cell line
cysteaminylphenol based AmidePBS pH 7.4 = 3.6–5.8 days;
80% human plasma = 2.9–8.7 h; tyrosinase = 2.1–2.3 min
Comparable cytotoxicity to TMZ in MNT-1 and BF16F10 cancer cell lines
UreaPBS pH 7.4 > 10 days;
80% human plasma = 30.5–105 h; tyrosinase = 0.5–3.7 min
Higher cytotoxicity than TMZ in MNT-1 and BF16F10 cancer cell lines
HypoxiaNitroaryl basedCarbamateCell culture media > 2.5 days; nitroreductase = 10 to >60 minHigher cytotoxicity than TMZ against U-87 cancer cell line but no significant difference between hypoxic and normoxic conditions
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ribeiro Morais, G.; Nwokolo, G.C.; Lamptey Mills, H.N.L.; Wheelhouse, R.T.; Falconer, R.A. Exploiting Methyl Triazenes as Attractive Alternatives to Temozolomide and Dacarbazine for Cancer Therapy. Molecules 2026, 31, 1103. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071103

AMA Style

Ribeiro Morais G, Nwokolo GC, Lamptey Mills HNL, Wheelhouse RT, Falconer RA. Exploiting Methyl Triazenes as Attractive Alternatives to Temozolomide and Dacarbazine for Cancer Therapy. Molecules. 2026; 31(7):1103. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071103

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ribeiro Morais, Goreti, Gabriel C. Nwokolo, Harriet N. L. Lamptey Mills, Richard T. Wheelhouse, and Robert A. Falconer. 2026. "Exploiting Methyl Triazenes as Attractive Alternatives to Temozolomide and Dacarbazine for Cancer Therapy" Molecules 31, no. 7: 1103. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071103

APA Style

Ribeiro Morais, G., Nwokolo, G. C., Lamptey Mills, H. N. L., Wheelhouse, R. T., & Falconer, R. A. (2026). Exploiting Methyl Triazenes as Attractive Alternatives to Temozolomide and Dacarbazine for Cancer Therapy. Molecules, 31(7), 1103. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071103

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop