Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Extraction Process for Flavonoids from Sonchus oleraceus L. and Evaluation of Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Luteoloside
Previous Article in Journal
Exploiting Methyl Triazenes as Attractive Alternatives to Temozolomide and Dacarbazine for Cancer Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Removal of Malachite Green Dye from Aqueous Solution by a Novel Activated Carbon Prepared from Baobab Seeds Using Chemical Activation Method
 
 
Due to scheduled maintenance work on our servers, there may be short service disruptions on this website between 11:00 and 12:00 CEST on March 28th.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Paracetamol Removal from Aqueous Media Through Fenton Reaction Using ZSM-5 Zeolite Produced from Fly Ash

1
Departamento de Engenharia Química, Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, R. Conselheiro Emídio Navarro, 1, 1959-007 Lisboa, Portugal
2
Centro de Química Estrutural, Faculdade de Ciências, Institute of Molecular Sciences, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
3
Departamento de Química e Bioquímica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Ed.C8, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2026, 31(7), 1104; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071104
Submission received: 14 February 2026 / Revised: 24 March 2026 / Accepted: 25 March 2026 / Published: 27 March 2026

Abstract

The purpose of this study is the exploration of the catalytic performance of a ZSM-5 zeolite produced from iron-rich fly ash, without any additional iron loading, in removing paracetamol via a heterogenous Fenton reaction. The structural and textural characterization by powder X-ray diffraction and N2 adsorption isotherms showed that a pure ZSM-5 phase was synthesized, but lower crystallinity and textural parameters were obtained when compared with commercial ZSM-5. The XPS analysis revealed significant amounts of iron and yttrium, which enhanced the electronic properties of the samples’ surface when compared with iron-impregnated commercial ZSM-5. The catalytic reaction was followed through UV-spectroscopy and kinetic models were applied to the data; the best fit was obtained for a pseudo-first-order model. All fly ash-based zeolites showed increased paracetamol removal when compared with commercial iron-loaded ZSM-5, which may be attributed to the more disordered structure, able to accommodate large paracetamol species (dimers). On the other hand, the effect of yttrium on the electronic properties of iron sites may increase the OH radical formation, thus increasing the paracetamol removal rate, despite the progressive drop on paracetamol removal upon regeneration–reuse cycles due to Fe leaching.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The supply of drinking water is one of the greatest concerns for industrialized societies. Among persistent organic pollutants (POPs), pharmaceuticals are of particular concern due to their increasing consumption and unclear cumulative effects on human health and the environment [1,2]. Paracetamol (PA), also designated as acetaminophen, is a drug used to treat fever and mild to moderate pain. PA toxicity was evaluated in hosts like bacteria, algae, protozoan, and fishes, showing that long-term exposure can cause genetic damage, oxidative lipid degradation, and denaturation of cellular proteins [3,4]. On the other hand, by-products generated during PA degradation, such as hydroquinone, benzoquinone or nitrophenols [5,6] can be as harmful or even more than the original compound [3]. Thus, the removal of PA and/or its degradation products from wastewater is mandatory to avoid harmful health effects on living beings and environment. Several studies point out that even after conventional wastewater treatment processes, a significant amount of PA may remain in the environment either in its original form or as by-products; therefore, more efficient processes are required to remove or convert it into innocuous compounds [7]. In recent decades, several studies have shown that advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are effective for degrading organic molecules, including pharmaceutical compounds. AOPs generate highly reactive and non-selective oxidant species, such as hydroxyl radicals, OH, which can transform organic molecules into simple H2O and CO2, as final products [2,3]. A typical homogeneous Fenton reaction follows a free radical mechanism, involving the interaction between Fe2+ and H2O2 in acidic conditions. The OH radical species are generated, promoting the degradation of a wide range of organic molecules, Equations (1)–(3).
Fe2+ + H2O2 → Fe3+ + OH + OH
Fe3+ + H2O2OOH + Fe2+ + H+
RH + OH → H2O + R → Degradation → Mineralization
Recent computational studies have complemented experimental investigations by elucidating molecular-level degradation pathways. For instance, Mai et al. [8] employed density functional theory (DFT) calculations to investigate the initial degradation mechanism of salicylic acid via electrochemical oxidation, providing insights into intermediate product formation and reaction energetics. Such computational approaches are increasingly valuable for understanding complex advanced oxidation process mechanisms that are difficult to characterize experimentally.
The main drawback of the homogeneous Fenton reaction is the need to operate in a very acidic environment, typically at a pH between 2 and 4, to avoid the precipitation of inactive iron oxyhydroxides species [9], which form iron sludges. The costs associated with the removal of these sludges, effluent treatment and catalyst loss, make the quest for alternative heterogeneous catalysts most appealing. Several heterogeneous iron-based catalysts have been studied, which allow operation in a wider pH range with reuse possibility [10,11]. Fe-containing zeolites are among the most interesting candidates to replace homogeneous catalysts, due to their crystalline, ordered porous structure, and ability to anchor metal species both at the external and inner surface. Thus, hetero-Fenton reactions occur, according to Equation (4), where Z-Fe2+ and Z-Fe3+ are the iron species supported on the zeolite [12].
Z-Fe2+ + H2O2 → Z-Fe3+ + OH + OH
Several studies report the use of iron-loaded zeolites as Fenton and photo-Fenton catalysts for the removal of a wide range of organic pollutants [12,13,14,15]. The catalytic performance of these materials strongly depends on the type of zeolite structure and the Si/Al ratio [12]. On the other hand, high iron loadings may result on important losses of microporous volume and clogging of pore openings, which hinders access to the inner porosity [7]. Iron-loaded ZSM-5 (MFI structure), one of the most used zeolites as a heterogeneous catalyst or catalyst support, has stood out as an effective Fenton or photo-Fenton catalyst [7,15]. Recently, modified Fe-ZSM-5 was studied in the removal of methylene blue dye [14]. In this case, prior to iron loading, commercial ZSM-5 was modified through desilication, followed, in some cases, by acid leaching. The generated mesoporosity facilitated diffusion, leading to an improved catalytic performance, but also increased the catalyst preparation costs. Accordingly, low cost and effective synthesis procedures for iron-loaded zeolites are desired.
Fly ash (FA) is a by-product of coal combustion in thermal power plants, with a worldwide production of about 780 million tonnes, but a low recycling rate of around 25%, mostly as an additive for cement (≈20%) [16,17]. Therefore, the disposal of large amounts of this industrial solid waste has become a serious environmental concern and, from the perspective of Circular Economy, is still a resource to be explored. The chemical composition of FA depends on the coal origin and technological processes used in thermal power plants. According to Vassilev and Vassileva [18], about 188 mineral groups have been identified in FAs. The chemical composition of FA, in order of decreasing amounts, includes oxygen, silicon, aluminum, calcium, iron, carbon, potassium, magnesium, and sulfur. Rare earth elements (REEs) have also been detected. The presence of these elements has been highlighted given the scarcity and critical need for various industry sectors like automotive, electronics, energy, etc., enhancing the feasibility of extracting REEs from fly ashes [19,20].
Since all fly ash materials are rich in mineral phases containing Si and Al—the main components of zeolites—the process of turning FA into zeolites has attracted growing interest, as it reduces waste disposal and converts the material into a valuable product. The synthesis of several zeolite structures has been reported [21,22], including ZSM-5 [23].
Zeolite synthesis from FA requires digestion in alkaline media to dissolve the insoluble glass phase and crystalline phases such as mullite and quartz, thereby transforming the building blocks into the aluminosilicate framework typical of zeolites [21,24]. However, this process raises concerns since it could mobilize toxic heavy metals, contaminating the environment. Feng et al. [21] investigated this issue and concluded that less than 20% of heavy metals (copper, chromium, and lead) from FA entered wastewater, whereas the rest, along with almost all cadmium, iron, and nickel, was incorporated into the synthesized zeolite structures. Moreover, these elements remained in the zeolite structure without further leaching, regardless of the pH conditions; thus, the synthesized zeolites are safe for applications without environmental contamination.
The application of FA-based zeolites has been reviewed in several case studies [16,22,25,26]. Most examples refer to their use as adsorbents, including the removal of heavy metals [27], dioxins [28] and CO2 [29], among others. Although catalytic applications are less explored, a few examples include fast pyrolysis of biomass [30] and conversion of glucose to 5-hydroxymethylfufural (HMF) [31]. Within the scope of Fenton catalysis, a recent study reported tetracycline degradation in Fenton-like oxidation reactions using Fe-, Cu- and Fe/Cu-loaded ZSM5-5 zeolite produced from fly ash and rice husk [32]. In the same context, the present study deals with the synthesis of ZSM-5 zeolite from FA. Given the rich composition of iron and other elements in the raw fly ash used, the potentialities of FA-ZSM5 as Fenton catalysts are explored without further addition of metal ions. Thus, the major goal of this work is to valorize industrial waste, eliminating additional steps and costs associated with metal ion introduction, to prepare an effective Fenton catalyst for paracetamol removal from aqueous media.

2. Results

2.1. Materials Characterization

The characterization of the FA sample was performed in a previous study [33], where the bulk mineral content was examined, as well as the leaching effect when FA contacted with aqueous media. In brief, proximate analysis of the FA revealed low moisture and volatile matter contents, with almost 95 wt.% ash. The material’s crystalline structure was characterized by XRD diffractometry, showing two predominant phases: quartz (~77.9%), mullite (~8.0%), and small amounts of magnetite. BET surface area analysis yielded a specific surface area of 13.2 m2 g−1, and particle size distribution ranged from 0.5 to 10 μm.
Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) analysis revealed that the major components of fly ash were aluminum at 10.1 wt% (3.7 mmol g−1) and silicon at 26.5 wt% (9.5 mmol g−1), with iron present at approximately 4.3 wt% (0.8 mmol g−1). Additional minor constituents comprised magnesium, potassium, calcium, sodium, manganese, zinc, and other trace elements.
The aqueous leachate data showed that Ca, Mg, and K were released most significantly, whereas Al and Si were released to the environment at less than 1%. Accordingly, FA can be used safely without significant release of harmful elements through leaching [33].
ZSM-5 zeolite was synthesized from fly ash, using a two-step synthesis procedure, reported in the literature [30,34]. To optimize the synthesis, the amount of structuring agent tetrapropylammonium bromide (TPABr), added during the alkaline digestion step, and the duration of autoclave treatment were evaluated. For complete characterization, surface analysis by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed on both the raw FA and on the zeolite sample FA_ZSM5_006_72—synthesized with a SiO2:TPABr ratio of 1:0.06 for 72 h in an autoclave at 160 °C (see detailed synthesis procedure below). A commercial ZSM-5 zeolite loaded with the same iron content as detected on FA, Fe/ZSM5_C, was also examined. The survey spectra are shown in Figure 1.
As expected, oxygen, silicon, carbon, iron, and aluminum were detected in all samples, including the iron introduced into the commercial ZSM-5. For FA and the derived zeolite sample FA_ZSM5_006_72, additional elements such as sodium, calcium and yttrium were also identified. It is noteworthy that these elements are present in both FA and FA-ZSM5_006_72 indicating that leaching during synthesis media is not significant and that the elements are incorporated into the zeolite structure. Table 1 presents the corresponding surface composition of FA, FA_ZSM5_006_72 and Fe/ZSM5_C samples.
As expected, oxygen, carbon, silicon and aluminum are the main elements. Sodium, iron and yttrium are present in substantially lower amounts. When comparing the surface composition of FA with that of the derived zeolite sample, FA_ZSM5_006_72, a decrease in carbon content is observed, attributable to the calcination step, and an increase in silicon due to the addition of SiO2 during zeolite synthesis. As mentioned before, the contents of sodium, iron and yttrium transferred from FA to FA_ZSM5_006_72 zeolite, are particularly relevant in the case of iron: the surface amount present on Fe/ZSM5_C is identical, suggesting that further addition of iron to the FA derived sample may not be required. This is especially important because the intended application of the produced zeolites is in Fenton reactions, where iron species serve as active sites. Nevertheless, the presence of other elements, namely yttrium, should not be disregarded, given the known influence of rare earth elements (REEs) on the electronic properties of surrounding elements.
Figure 2 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns of FA_ZSM5 zeolite samples, along with commercial ZSM-5 zeolite used as reference material.
The diffraction pattern of the starting FA material presents almost no crystalline phases, with only a few low intensity peaks ascribed to silica (quartz), mullite and magnetite [33]. On the other hand, FA-ZSM5 samples preset high intensity peaks typical of a crystalline material. When comparing all FA_ZSM5 samples with the commercial zeolite, ZSM5_C the diffraction patterns are essentially identical. To quantify the crystallinity percentage of the synthesized samples the procedure reported in ASTM D 5758-01 [35] was followed. The crystallinity percentage was obtained by dividing the cumulative area of the peaks between 22.44 and 25.15 02θ of each sample by the area of the correspondent peaks of commercial ZSM-5_C, using Peak-fit 4.12 software (Grafiti Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). The results obtained are presented in Table 2. As can be observed, all FA_ZSM5 samples present a crystallinity percentage of almost 80%. The first conclusion is that the variation in the operating conditions, namely the amount of surfactant added and the duration of the hydrothermal treatment, do not allow the samples to be differentiated. On the other hand, the lower crystallinity can also be attributed to the presence of structural defects, because of the synthesis conditions and thermal treatments during calcination procedure generating extra framework aluminum species (EFAl) [36].
The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms at −196 °C for FA_ZSM5 samples and reference ZSM5_C are showed in Figure 3. The isotherm and respective textural parameters of FA were not included because of the material’s very low porosity; however, a previous study applied the BET method to estimate a specific surface area of 13.2 m2g−1 [33].
All the isotherms displayed in Figure 3 can be classified as a combination of type I + IV [37], showing, as expected, the prevalence of microporosity and some mesoporosity, denoted by hysteresis at relative pressure between 0.5 and 0.95. This hysteresis is attributed to particle aggregation. All zeolite samples prepared from FA display lower microporosity development compared with the commercial material ZSM5_C, since, in all cases, a notorious downward deviation in the low relative pressure region is noted. The textural parameters for all samples are depicted in Table 2, where microporosity was quantified using the αs method, and a non-porous silica as reference material [38]. This method allows to distinguish the volume of ultramicropores (Vulta, ϕ < 0.7 nm) and supermicropores (Vsuper, 0.7 nm < ϕ < 2 nm). The volume of the narrow pores, Vultra, is obtained from the line defined by experimental points at p/p0 > 0.02 up to, usually, p/p0 = 0.4, which corresponds to αs = 1. The back extrapolation of the region defined by the points obtained at p/p0 > 0.4 corresponds to the total micropore volume, Vmicro, allowing to calculate the volume of the larger micropores, Vsuper, through the difference between Vmicro and Vultra. Mesopore volume, Vmeso, is calculated as the difference between the total pore volume, Vtotal, and Vmicro, where Vtotal corresponds to the total amount of N2 uptake at p/p0 > 0.95, in line with the Gurvich rule [38].
In line with previous observations, it can be observed that for all FA-based samples the textural parameters are always lower when compared with the reference ZSM5_C. In general, there are no significant differences between FA_ZSM5 samples; however, a closer look reveals that Vultra is slightly higher in the case of FA_ZSM5_012_24 and FA_ZSM5_006_72 samples. This suggests that the greater amount of TPABr added during synthesis or a longer hydrothermal treatment slightly impact the development of the narrow pores characteristic of the zeolitic framework. Conversely, compared with the commercial sample, Vsuper is substantially lower in all cases, whereas Vmeso, that results mainly from crystallites aggregation, presents slightly lower values for all FA_ZSM5 samples.
To evaluate the electronic properties of the samples, the measurements of magnetic susceptibility were performed in a balance, using the configuration of the traditional Gouy method. The mass susceptibility χ g (in c.g.s.) units can be quantified using the general expression:
χ g = l m C ( R R o ) + χ ν ,   a i r   A
where C is the constant of proportionality of the balance obtained by calibration with a standard substance (HgCo(SCN)4), R is the reading obtained with the tube containing the sample, R0 is the reading of the empty tube, l is the sample length (cm) m is the sample weight (g), A is the cross-sectional area of the tube and Xv,air is the volume susceptibility of the displaced air. For powder samples, which is the present case, the term Xv,air A may be ignored. Table 3 presents the values of magnetic susceptibilities for all samples.
As expected, all samples present ferromagnetic behavior due to the presence of iron in their composition. However, all FA_ZSM5 samples present higher χ g when comparing the solely iron-loaded Fe/ZSM5_C. Fly ash naturally contains pre-existing ferromagnetic phases that are retained during synthesis, like Magnetite phase (Fe3O4) that contributes significantly to the overall magnetic susceptibility of FA-ZSM5 samples, whereas the Fe-impregnated ZSM5_C sample lack this inherent contribution. Additionally, the higher χ g may be attributed to interactions between iron and other elements present on FA. In fact, the influence of REE, particularly Y3+ on the magnetic properties of iron-containing materials, was reported in the literature [39]. The presence of REE on metal-loaded zeolites has been shown to reduce metal sintering while enhancing stability and dispersion, thereby positively affecting hydrogenation activity [40]. To our knowledge, the effect of yttrium inclusion on heterogenous Fenton catalysts has not yet been reported. However, Munoz et al. [41] reviewed several studies in which other elements, such as Mn or Co improved the oxidation rate and mineralization of magnetite-based catalysts by accelerating decomposition of H2O2 into OH radicals. Thus, it is reasonable to admit that the presence of yttrium (or traces of other elements, not detected on XPS survey) on FA_ZSM5 samples may exert a similar effect.

2.2. Catalytic Tests and Kinetic Studies

The performance of FA_ZSM-5 zeolites was evaluated in the removal of paracetamol (PA) via a Fenton reaction at 40 °C in the presence of H2O2. A commercial ZSM-5, only with H2O2, served as a control test; negligible PA removal was observed, leading to the conclusion that, in the chosen operating conditions, the reaction is effective only when Fe species are present. Figure 4 presents the kinetic curves, expressed as C/C0 vs. t where C is the PA concentration at a given reaction time and C0 is the initial PA concentration. After 1 h of contact between the heterogeneous catalysts and PA molecules, adsorption equilibrium was reached. The amount of PA adsorbed during the equilibration period was quantified. For all samples, the adsorption capacity values were below 3% (relative to the initial concentration of PA), indicating that the interaction occurs mainly at the catalyst external surface.
A first inspection of the kinetic profiles in Figure 4 reveals that all FA_ZSM5 samples show a more pronounced decay of C/C0 with time, when compared with the Fe/ZSM5_C reference sample. Despite these differences, a more rigorous analysis requires quantification through kinetic modeling.
The kinetic behavior was studied using pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models, assuming that, regardless of the large number of reaction steps, Fenton reactions are described, albeit approximately, by one of these two kinetic models. The pseudo-first-order reaction law assumes that the rate of the reaction depends only on the concentration of one reagent, expressed as:
C C 0 = e k p 1 t
where [C] is the dye concentration, [C0] the initial dye concentration, kp1 is the pseudo-first-order kinetic constant and t is the reaction time. On the other hand, the pseudo-second-order rate law commonly assumes that the reaction rate depends on both reagent and surface sites [42] and can be expressed as:
[ C ] [ C 0 ] = 1 k p 2 [ C 0 ] t + 1
being kp2 the pseudo-second-order kinetic constant and the other symbols keep the same meaning as stated before.
The application of pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models in this study is justified by their widespread use in Fenton chemistry and their ability to capture the dominant mechanistic pathways—namely, the initial dependence on pollutant concentration and the interaction between hydroxyl radicals and the target contaminant. Although these simplified models neglect secondary effects such as mass-transfer limitations or radical quenching, they provide a tractable framework for interpreting the early-stage degradation kinetics observed in our experiments. It is important to acknowledge that Fenton reactions are intrinsically multi-step processes involving iron cycling, radical generation and recombination, and potential side reactions. The pseudo-kinetic approach therefore represents an approximation that prioritizes the most influential factors while remaining consistent with the experimental data [14,43].
The values of the rate constants of pseudo-first- and second-order are presented in Table 4. To validate the quality of the fit of non-linear equations to the experimental points, the following statistical parameters are also present: coefficient of determination (R2), the fit standard error of the regression (SFit), and the Fisher–Snedecor parameter (F). In all cases, the number of experimental points used in the non-linear regression was five.
A brief inspection of the results shows that, under the chosen experimental conditions, the pseudo-first-order kinetic model is the one that best fits the experimental data, with the corresponding kinetic constant, kp1, higher when compared with the pseudo-second-order rate constant, kp2. These observations are in line with the literature for other contaminants [43,44] and with one of the few studies on paracetamol removal using heterogenous catalysts [45]. The fit to the pseudo-first-order model indicates that only the initial phase of the degradation process is occurring since, as can be visualized in Figure 4, a true plateau was never reached even after 180 min of reaction.
In line with the kinetic profiles in Figure 4, the values obtained for rate constants depicted on Table 4 show substantially higher values for all FA_ZSM5 samples when compared with Fe/ZSM5_C. These results cannot be explained by the classic crystallinity and texture parameters (Table 2) since in all cases FA_ZSM5 samples present lower crystallinity and Vmicro than the reference catalyst. To rationalize these results it must be noted that when operating at a pH of around 4, as in the case of this work, PA molecules may exist as dimers [46,47]. Their estimated dimensions (in nm) 1.58 (length) × 1.19 (width) × 0.46 (thickness), are incompatible with the elliptical pore openings of ZSM-5 zeolite (in nm) 0.51 × 0.55 and 0.53 × 0.56 [48]. Accordingly, most Fenton reactions likely occur at the external surface of zeolite crystals or pore openings.
This assumption justifies the low rate constant and PA removal after 180 min observed in the assay with Fe/ZSM5_C, but not the higher values observed with FA_ZSM5 samples. The structural and textural parameters of FA_ZSM5 samples do not present enough variability to justify the differences between them. However, they all have a disordered fraction (about 20% crystallinity lower than the reference material), which can reduce diffusional constraints and improve catalytic performance relative to Fe/ZSM5_C. In fact, structural defects and consequent EFAl species can have a beneficial role on the catalytic performance. A classic example is the improved catalytic behavior of FAU zeolite in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) where EFAl species are generated through steaming [49] or, more recently, the introduction of aluminon cations followed by calcination, leading to an increase in EFAl species, with a positive impact on the transformation 4-tert butyl cyclohexanone with isopropanol in the presence of Y-modified zeolite [50].
XPS analysis of a representative FA_ZSM5 sample shows an identical surface iron content, but also detects yttrium, which may affect catalytic performance. Other authors have studied the effect of yttrium inclusion in heterogeneous catalysts. For instance, Wang et al. [51] studied the role of Y inclusion on Ce/Ni-Metakaolin and its effect on the catalytic performance in CO2 methanation. The authors showed that the presence of yttrium promotes the creation of oxygen vacancies which increases the nickel dispersion, resulting in increased activity on CO2 methanation. On the other hand, Zhang et al. [52] and Li et al. [53] studied the prominent role of oxygen vacancies in the formation of hydroxyl radicals to promote Fenton reaction by weakening the O-O bond of adsorbed H2O2, which benefits the electron transfer by reducing its decomposition activation energy. As a result, a higher amount of OH species is produced, improving the efficiency in Fenton reaction. In this study we assume that the results can be interpreted considering previous literature showing increased magnetic susceptibility of FA-ZSM5 materials—especially for sample FA_ZSM5_012_24.
These combined effects positively influence catalytic performance, kp1 is about 1.6–1.8 times higher than for FA_ZSM5_006_24 and FA_ZSM5_006_72, respectively, and more than 6 times higher than for Fe/ZSM5_C.

2.3. pH Effect on PA Degradation

To investigate the effect of pH on PA degradation, a series of catalytic assays was performed using the FA_ZSM5_012_24 sample; while keeping all other experimental parameters constant, the reaction was carried out at pH values from 2 to 9. Figure 5 presents the PA degradation percentage at each pH value after 1 h of reaction.
As shown in Figure 5, PA removal efficiency remains high at low pH values (pH 2 and 4) but exhibits a drastic decrease at pH 6 and 9. These results align with established literature on heterogeneous Fenton reactions, where substantial degradation efficiency loss is observed at pH > 4 [54,55]. This behavior can be ascribed to the presence of excess H2O2 that readily decomposes into H2O and O2 under alkaline conditions, thereby reducing OH radical production. Consequently, optimal Fenton activity occurs in acidic conditions (pH 2–4), while alkaline environments promote non-productive H2O2 decomposition rather than OH radical generation, resulting in significantly slower degradation reactions [56,57]. The lower PA removal at pH 2 can be attributed to the formation of stable coordination complexes and excessive leaching of iron ions from the solid catalyst into the solution [58,59].

2.4. Regeneration Studies

To investigate the ability to reuse the FA-based catalysts, FA_ZSM5_012_24 sample—previously identified as the best performing catalyst—was submitted to four consecutive catalytic runs under identical conditions. Thermal regeneration between each cycle was carried out at 350 °C for 4 h, with a heating rate of 5 °C min−1. The results presented in Figure 6 show the PA removal percentage after 2 h of reaction.
As can be seen, there is a progressive decrease in PA removal with the number of reuse cycles. There is an approximate 20% drop from the fresh sample to the first reuse cycle (R1), followed by more pronounced decreases of almost 50% and 70% for R2 and R3, respectively, when compared to the fresh catalyst. This decline correlates clearly with the progressive decrease in Fe content within the zeolite structure due to leaching phenomena, as depicted by the orange dashed line in Figure 6.
No significant loss of crystallinity during the reuse cycles was observed, as seen in Figure 7.
An investigation on lixiviation effects was carried out on fresh samples FA_ZSM5_006_72 and FA_ZSM5_012_24 as well as the reference Fe/ZSM5_C catalyst. After a 1 h equilibration time, the solid was removed by centrifugation and the reaction was conducted in the usual manner. After 45 min the reaction was stopped, and PA absorbance was measured. In all cases, the ratio between PA concentration after 45 min reaction and the initial concentration was C/C0 ≈ 1, indicating that the reaction did not occur in homogeneous media. This may be explained considering the released species were present in insufficient amounts to catalyze PA degradation in detectable amounts after 45 min. Additionally, deposition of reaction products and sub-products on the zeolite surface, ineffectively removed during thermal regeneration, should also be considered. This explanation is strengthened by the observation that after R3 there was a ~30% decrease in the total porous volume of the zeolite samples while maintaining the crystalline structure typical of ZSM-5 material, denoting that the chosen regeneration conditions were insufficient to remove all organic matter from the heterogeneous catalyst.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Catalysts Preparation

The starting fly ash (FA) material originated from a Portuguese thermoelectric power plant utilizing Colombian bituminous coal for combustion. Fly ash is captured via electrostatic precipitators and subsequently stored in silos, where our sample was collected. Upon analysis, the FA sample was classified as non-compliant for sale, and is therefore considered waste. In this study the FA sample was quartered and used without further treatment. The chemicals used for the zeolite synthesis and catalytic experiments were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), and used as received.
The synthesis of ZSM-5 zeolite (MFI structure) followed published protocols [30,34], with some adaptations. Briefly, 1.5 g of FA was suspended in a 2 M NaOH solution at 90 °C, on a heating plate with temperature control (IKA C-MaHS7, Staufen, Germany). Then, 3.413 g of SiO2 were added to adjust the global Si/Al ratio to 12 and the required amount of tetrapropylammonium bromide (TPABr) to attain the molar ratio 1 SiO2: 0.06 or 0.12 TPABr. After 3 h mixing at 210 rpm the suspension was transferred to stainless steel PTFE-lined autoclaves and heated at 160 °C under autogenous pressure for 24 or 72 h. The material was recovered by filtration, washed until pH around 7, dried overnight and calcined at 540 °C for 5 h, with a heating ramp of 50 min−1 (Nabertherm B170, Bahnhofstr, Germany). The samples were designated as: FA_ZSM5_x_y, where x is the TPABr added (molar ratio) and y corresponds to the time spent inside the autoclave (h). A commercial ZSM-5 zeolite (Zeolyst, Conshohocken, PA, USA), with a SiO2/Al2O3 = 30 (CBV3024E, Lot2200-99) was used as a reference material. About 4 wt.% of iron was introduced by incipient wetness impregnation method, using the amount of water correspondent to the previously determined porous volume of the solid. This amount of water was used to dissolve Fe(NO3)3. 9H2O (>99%) and mix with the solid until a paste was formed. The sample was dried and calcined at 350 °C, with a heating rate of 50 min−1.

3.2. Physicochemical Characterization

The samples were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectroscopy ICP-AES at Laboratório de Análises, IST, Lisbon, to probe the chemical composition of FA. Surface composition was studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, XPS, performed at INCAR, Oviedo. The structural characterization of parent FA and produced zeolites was assessed from X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns, acquired at room temperature using a Pan’Analytical PW3050/60X’Pert PRO (θ/2θ) diffractometer (Phillips, Almelo, The Netherlands), equipped with X’Celerator detector with automatic data acquisition (X’Pert Data Collector (v2.0b) software), using a monochromatized CuKα radiation as incident beam, 40 kV-30 mA. The scans were made in a 2θ range of 5–40° with a step size of 0.017° 2θ and a time per step of 0.6 s. N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms were performed to characterize the textural properties of the samples. The assays were made in an automatic apparatus ASAP2010 (Micromerics Instruments Corporation, Norcross, GA, USA). Prior to each experiment the samples (about 50 mg) were outgassed at 300 °C for 3 h under vacuum greater than 10−2 Pa. The magnetic susceptibility measurements were performed in a balance MSK-MK1 (Sherwood Scientific, Cambridge, UK).

3.3. Catalytic Tests

The catalytic tests were performed following a previously optimized procedure [14]. In brief, 10 mg of the samples was accurately weighted and placed in 50 mL Falcon type tubes. Then, 25 mL of 20 ppm paracetamol (PA) solution was added to each tube and the tubes were immersed in a thermostatic bath at 40 °C (Julabo MP, Seelbach, Germany). The bath was positioned on a multiposition magnetic stirrer (Selecta Multimatic 9-S, Barcelona, Spain), with the stirring speed set to 400 rpm. The system was left to reach adsorption equilibrium for 1 h. This equilibrium stage was optimized previously [14] and the reaction was initiated only after it was achieved. Immediately before starting the reaction, the pH was adjusted to values of 2, 4, 6 and 9 (using a 0.5 M HCl solution) to investigate the effect o pH; for all other assays the pH was set to 4. The reaction began by adding 0.5 mL of a 70 mM H2O2 solution to each tube. At predetermined time points, the reaction was stopped by adding 3 drops of 0.5 M NaOH solution. The solid was separated from the reaction medium by centrifugation (Hermle, Z206A, Gosheim, Germany), with a recovery rate of 80–85%. The absorbance of the remaining solution was measured with a double-beam spectrophotometer (VWR, UC-6300PC, Radnor, PA, USA) using a 10 mm optical length quartz cell and water as reference. For each sample at every specified time point, three independent aliquots were collected from a single Falcon tube and analyzed separately. This approach ensured a standard deviation below 5%. Before the measuremets, a calibration curve was prepared with PA solutions at concentrations that produced absorbances ranging from 0.15 and 1.0, thereby satisfying the Beer–Lambert law.

4. Conclusions

ZSM-5 zeolite was successfully synthesized from fly ash waste with SiO2 supplementation to match commercial material composition, by optimizing both structure-directing agent concentration and hydrothermal treatment duration. The obtained materials displayed diffraction patterns characteristic of MFI zeolite structure, with low impurity content, while the N2 isotherm showed a profile typical of zeolites. Although the textural parameters were lower than those of commercial ZSM-5 zeolite. Beyond the expected Si and Al contents, significant amounts of Fe and Y were detected in the FA and incorporated into the synthesized samples. FA-ZSM5 samples showed increased magnetic susceptibility compared with iron-only loaded commercial ZSM-5, indicating synergistic effects between iron and other elements such as yttrium that migrate from FA to the derived zeolite samples. This effect was most pronounced for the sample with a high amount of structuring agent (FA_ZSM5_012_24), suggesting that the quantity of structuring agent influences metal ion distribution or reflects the heterogeneity of the raw FA. Catalytic performance in the removal of paracetamol via Fenton reaction showed enhanced PA removal by FA_ZSM5 samples compared with Fe/ZSM5_C. Two main interpretations may explain this behavior: (i) Surface site catalysis—the catalytic reactions likely occur at the external surface of the zeolite crystals, as PA molecules tend to form dimers that cannot readily diffuse into the zeolite pore structure. A more disordered FA_ZSM5 structure can therefore benefit the reaction by providing additional active sites; (ii) Yttrium-enhanced radical formation—yttrium may promote the generation of OH radicals, through oxygen vacancies creation, especially in FA_ZSM5_012_24, further boosting catalytic activity. Regeneration and reuse studies showed a progressive decrease in PA removal efficiency, with a significant drop of almost 70% relative to the fresh catalysts after repeated cycles due to Fe leaching.
Overall, these preliminary results demonstrate that fly ash—classified as non-compliant for sale—can be valorized into a zeolite-based Fenton catalyst. The rich Fe content of FA eliminates the need for additional activation steps, and the presence of other elements (e.g., Y) appears to enhance catalytic performance. Encouraged by these findings, further kinetic, mechanistic studies and environmental impact (toxicity) will be pursued, along with investigations into the removal of other contaminants such as industrial organic dyes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P.C. and A.M.; methodology, N.N., H.F.S. and A.S.M.; investigation, N.H. and S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.; writing—review and editing, A.M., N.N. and A.P.C.; supervision, A.M. and A.P.C.; project administration, A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P. (FCT) through Centro de Química Estrutural (CQE Projects UID/00100/2025, UID/PRR/100/2025, respectively https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/00100/2025 and https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/PRR/00100/2025) and Institute of Molecular Sciences (IMS Project LA/P/0056/2020, https://doi.org/10.54499/LA/P/0056/2020) and Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa (IPL) through Project IPL/2024/Ash2ZeoCat ISEL. A.S.M. is funded by FCT with co-funding from PRR, República Portuguesa and Next Generation EU in the framework of contract 2023.15441.TENURE.005/CP00003/CT00003.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ferreira, I.A.; Carreira, T.G.; Diório, A.; Bergamasco, R.; Vieira, M.F. Occurrence and Removal of Pharmaceuticals from Water Using Modified Zeolites: A Review. Desalin. Water Treat. 2023, 302, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Całus-Makowska, K.; Dziubińska, J.; Grosser, A.; Grobelak, A. Application of the Fenton and Photo-Fenton Processes in Pharmaceutical Removal: New Perspectives in Environmental Protection. Desalin. Water Treat. 2025, 321, 100949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pacheco-Álvarez, M.; Picos Benítez, R.; Rodríguez-Narváez, O.M.; Brillas, E.; Peralta-Hernández, J.M. A Critical Review on Paracetamol Removal from Different Aqueous Matrices by Fenton and Fenton-Based Processes, and Their Combined Methods. Chemosphere 2022, 303, 134883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nogueira, A.F.; Pinto, G.; Correia, B.; Nunes, B. Embryonic Development, Locomotor Behavior, Biochemical, and Epigenetic Effects of the Pharmaceutical Drugs Paracetamol and Ciprofloxacin in Larvae and Embryos of Danio Rerio When Exposed to Environmental Realistic Levels of Both Drugs. Environ. Toxicol. 2019, 34, 1177–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, L.; Yin, X.; Li, S.F.Y. Bio-Electrochemical Degradation of Paracetamol in a Microbial Fuel Cell-Fenton System. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 276, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Villota, N.; Lomas, J.M.; Camarero, L.M. Study of the Paracetamol Degradation Pathway That Generates Color and Turbidity in Oxidized Wastewaters by Photo-Fenton Technology. J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem. 2016, 329, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Velichkova, F.; Delmas, H.; Julcour, C.; Koumanova, B. Heterogeneous Fenton and Photo-fenton Oxidation for Paracetamol Removal Using Iron Containing ZSM-5 Zeolite as Catalyst. AIChE J. 2017, 63, 669–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mai, N.L.; Ambauen, N.; Hallé, C.; Meyn, T.; Trinh, T.T. Initial Degradation Mechanism of Salicylic Acid via Electrochemical Process. Chem. Phys. 2021, 543, 111071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Klavarioti, M.; Mantzavinos, D.; Kassinos, D. Removal of Residual Pharmaceuticals from Aqueous Systems by Advanced Oxidation Processes. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 402–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, N.; He, X.; Ye, J.; Dai, H.; Peng, W.; Cheng, Z.; Yan, B.; Chen, G.; Wang, S. H2O2 Activation and Contaminants Removal in Heterogeneous Fenton-like Systems. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 458, 131926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ganiyu, S.O.; Zhou, M.; Martínez-Huitle, C.A. Heterogeneous Electro-Fenton and Photoelectro-Fenton Processes: A Critical Review of Fundamental Principles and Application for Water/Wastewater Treatment. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 235, 103–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Domergue, L.; Georgi, A.; Schierz, A.; Cimetière, N.; Giraudet, S.; Hauchard, D. Regeneration of the Adsorption Properties of Hydrophobic Zeolites for the Treatment of Diclofenac by Fenton-like Process: Influence of Fenton Catalyst Location. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 379, 134557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Azusano, I.P.I.; Caparanga, A.R.; Chen, B.H. Degradation of Ketoprofen Using Iron-Supported ZSM-5 Catalyst via Heterogeneous Fenton Oxidation. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 612, 012048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Carvalho, A.P.; Costa, J.; Martins, A.; Fonseca, A.M.; Neves, I.C.; Nunes, N. Zeolite Modification for Optimizing Fenton Reaction in Methylene Blue Dye Degradation. Colorants 2025, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Adityosulindro, S.; Julcour, C.; Barthe, L. Heterogeneous Fenton Oxidation Using Fe-ZSM5 Catalyst for Removal of Ibuprofen in Wastewater. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 5920–5928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yao, Z.T.; Ji, X.S.; Sarker, P.K.; Tang, J.H.; Ge, L.Q.; Xia, M.S.; Xi, Y.Q. A Comprehensive Review on the Applications of Coal Fly Ash. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2015, 141, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gollakota, A.R.K.; Volli, V.; Shu, C.M. Progressive Utilisation Prospects of Coal Fly Ash: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 672, 951–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Vassilev, S.V.; Vassileva, C.G. Methods for Characterization of Composition of Fly Ashes from Coal-Fired Power Stations: A Critical Overview. Energy Fuels 2005, 19, 1084–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Anand Rao, K.; Serajuddin, M.; RamaDevi, G.; Thakurta, S.G.; Sreenivas, T. On the Characterization and Leaching of Rare Earths from a Coal Fly Ash of Indian Origin. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2020, 56, 541–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Taggart, R.K.; Rivera, N.A.; Levard, C.; Ambrosi, J.-P.; Borschneck, D.; Hower, J.C.; Hsu-Kim, H. Differences in Bulk and Microscale Yttrium Speciation in Coal Combustion Fly Ash. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2018, 20, 1390–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Feng, W.; Wan, Z.; Daniels, J.; Li, Z.; Xiao, G.; Yu, J.; Xu, D.; Guo, H.; Zhang, D.; May, E.F.; et al. Synthesis of High Quality Zeolites from Coal Fly Ash: Mobility of Hazardous Elements and Environmental Applications. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 202, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, W.; Zhang, T.; Lv, Y.; Jing, T.; Gao, X.; Gu, Z.; Li, S.; Ao, H.; Fang, D. Recent Progress on the Synthesis and Applications of Zeolites from Industrial Solid Wastes. Catalysts 2024, 14, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ndlovu, N.Z.N.; Ameh, A.E.; Petrik, L.F.; Ojumu, T.V. Synthesis and Characterisation of Pure Phase ZSM-5 and Sodalite Zeolites from Coal Fly Ash. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 34, 105436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lee, Y.-R.; Soe, J.T.; Zhang, S.; Ahn, J.-W.; Park, M.B.; Ahn, W.-S. Synthesis of Nanoporous Materials via Recycling Coal Fly Ash and Other Solid Wastes: A Mini Review. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 317, 821–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jha, B.; Singh, D.N. Applications of Fly Ash Zeolites: Case Studies. In Fly Ash Zeolites; Advanced Structured Materials; Springer: Singapore, 2016; Volume 78, pp. 191–202. ISBN 978-981-10-1402-4. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mlonka-Mędrala, A. Recent Findings on Fly Ash-Derived Zeolite Synthesis and Utilization According to Circular Economy Concept. Energies 2023, 16, 6593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Da Silva, L.T.V.; De Freitas, A.D.L.; De Gois Martins, T.; De Morais França, A.M.; Loiola, A.R.; Do Nascimento, R.F. Comparative Study on the Performance of Two Synthetic Zeolite 4A on the Removal of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solution—Effect of Coal Fly Ash as Al and Si Source. Desalin. Water Treat. 2023, 310, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gui, L.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, K.; Shi, X.; Liang, S.; Duan, H.; Yang, Z.; Yuan, S.; Guo, L.; Xu, J.; et al. Recycling of Fly Ash to Synthesize Zeolites for Efficient Removal of Dioxins. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 112970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, Y.; Zhao, Z.-W.; Zhang, C.; Jiao, W.-Z.; Liu, Y.-Z. Synthesis of Zeolite X from Fly Ash in an Impinging Stream Reactor and Its Mechanisms. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2024, 294, 120123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vichaphund, S.; Aht-Ong, D.; Sricharoenchaikul, V.; Atong, D. Characteristic of Fly Ash Derived-Zeolite and Its Catalytic Performance for Fast Pyrolysis of Jatropha Waste. Environ. Technol. 2014, 35, 2254–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Andola, S.C.; Singh, K.; Bhati, K.; Singh, G.; Malik, R. Valorization of Coal Fly Ash into Zeolite Y Catalyst for Enhanced Glucose to 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural Conversion. ACS Sustain. Resour. Manag. 2025, 2, 2416–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, Y.; Gu, S.; Li, L.; Wang, M. From Waste to Catalyst: Growth Mechanisms of ZSM-5 Zeolite from Coal Fly Ash & Rice Husk Ash and Its Performance as Catalyst for Tetracycline Degradation in Fenton-like Oxidation. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 345, 123509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rosa, T.; Martins, A.; Santos, M.; Trindade, T.; Nunes, N. Coal Fly Ash Waste, a Low-Cost Adsorbent for the Removal of Mordant Orange Dye from Aqueous Media. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2021, 32, 2245–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mi, X.; Hou, Z.; Li, X. Controllable Synthesis of Nanoscaled ZSM-5 Aggregates with Multivariate Channel under the Synergistic Effect of Silicate-1 and TPABr Using Dual-Silica Source. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2021, 323, 111224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. ASTM D5758-01; Standard Test Method for Determination of Relative Crystallinity of Zeolite ZSM-5 by X-Ray Diffraction 2021. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
  36. Khivantsev, K.; Jaegers, N.R.; Kovarik, L.; Derewinski, M.A.; Kwak, J.-H.; Szanyi, J. On the Nature of Extra-Framework Aluminum Species and Improved Catalytic Properties in Steamed Zeolites. Molecules 2022, 27, 2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.P.; Rodriguez-reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K.S.W. Physisorption of Gases, with Special Reference to the Evaluation of Surface Area and Pore Size Distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gregg, S.J.; Sing, K.S.W. Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1982; ISBN 0-12-300956-1. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kowalik, P.; Mikulski, J.; Borodziuk, A.; Duda, M.; Kamińska, I.; Zajdel, K.; Rybusinski, J.; Szczytko, J.; Wojciechowski, T.; Sobczak, K.; et al. Yttrium-Doped Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Magnetic Hyperthermia Applications. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 6871–6883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Martins, A.; Silva, J.M.M.; Ribeiro, M.F.F. Influence of Rare Earth Elements on the Acid and Metal Sites of Pt/HBEA Catalyst for Short Chain n-Alkane Hydroisomerization. Appl. Catal. Gen. 2013, 466, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Munoz, M.; De Pedro, Z.M.; Casas, J.A.; Rodriguez, J.J. Preparation of Magnetite-Based Catalysts and Their Application in Heterogeneous Fenton Oxidation—A Review. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 176–177, 249–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Phan, T.T.N.; Nikoloski, A.N.; Bahri, P.A.; Li, D. Adsorption and Photo-Fenton Catalytic Degradation of Organic Dyes over Crystalline LaFeO3-Doped Porous Silica. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 36181–36190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chen, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Guan, X.; Liu, Y.; Nie, J.; Li, C. A Rapid Fenton Treatment of Bio-Treated Dyeing and Finishing Wastewater at Second-Scale Intervals: Kinetics by Stopped-Flow Technique and Application in a Full-Scale Plant. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Raheb, I.; Manlla, M.S. Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies of the Degradation of Methylene Blue by Photo-Fenton Reaction. Heliyon 2021, 7, e07427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Van, H.T.; Nguyen, L.H.; Hoang, T.K.; Nguyen, T.T.; Tran, T.N.H.; Nguyen, T.B.H.; Vu, X.H.; Pham, M.T.; Tran, T.P.; Pham, T.T.; et al. Heterogeneous Fenton Oxidation of Paracetamol in Aqueous Solution Using Iron Slag as a Catalyst: Degradation Mechanisms and Kinetics. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 18, 100670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Galhetas, M.; Mestre, A.S.; Pinto, M.L.; Gulyurtlu, I.; Lopes, H.; Carvalho, A.P. Carbon-Based Materials Prepared from Pine Gasification Residues for Acetaminophen Adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 240, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nematollahi, D.; Shayani-Jam, H.; Alimoradi, M.; Niroomand, S. Electrochemical Oxidation of Acetaminophen in Aqueous Solutions: Kinetic Evaluation of Hydrolysis, Hydroxylation and Dimerization Processes. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54, 7407–7415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Baerlocher, C.; Meier, W.M.; Olson, D.H. Atlas of Zeolite Framework Types, 5th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001; ISBN 0-444-50701-9. [Google Scholar]
  49. Vogt, E.T.C.; Weckhuysen, B.M. Fluid Catalytic Cracking: Recent Developments on the Grand Old Lady of Zeolite Catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 7342–7370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Batool, S.R.; Sushkevich, V.L.; Van Bokhoven, J.A. Correlating Lewis Acid Activity to Extra-Framework Aluminum Species in Zeolite Y Introduced by Ion-Exchange. J. Catal. 2022, 408, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, Y.; Ye, Q.; Xu, X.; Dhmees, A.S.; Cui, X. Effect of Yttrium on Ce/Ni-Metakaolin Catalysts for CO2 Methanation. Molecules 2023, 28, 7079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, N.; Tsang, E.P.; Chen, J.; Fang, Z.; Zhao, D. Critical Role of Oxygen Vacancies in Heterogeneous Fenton Oxidation over Ceria-Based Catalysts. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 558, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, H.; Shang, J.; Yang, Z.; Shen, W.; Ai, Z.; Zhang, L. Oxygen Vacancy Associated Surface Fenton Chemistry: Surface Structure Dependent Hydroxyl Radicals Generation and Substrate Dependent Reactivity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 5685–5694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhu, X.; Li, H.; Shang, X.; He, T. Fe-Cu Binary Oxide Loaded Zeolite as Heterogeneous Fenton Catalyst for Degradation of Carbamazepine at near-Neutral pH. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 73181–73190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hassan, H.; Hameed, B.H. Fe-Natural Zeolite as Highly Active Heterogeneous Catalyst in Decolorization of Reactive Blue 4. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 2020, 11, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, Y.; Hu, P.; Wang, H. Computationally Revisiting pH- and Ligand-Dependence of Fenton Reaction Selectivity and Activity in Aqueous Solution. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2025, 27, 12929–12937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cai, H.; Li, X.; Ma, D.; Feng, Q.; Wang, D.; Liu, Z.; Wei, X.; Chen, K.; Lin, H.; Qin, S.; et al. Stable Fe3O4 Submicrospheres with SiO2 Coating for Heterogeneous Fenton-like Reaction at Alkaline Condition. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 764, 144200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Litter, M.I.; Slodowicz, M. An Overview on Heterogeneous Fenton and photoFenton Reactions Using Zerovalent Iron Materials. J. Adv. Oxid. Technol. 2017, 20, 20160164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Queirós, S.; Morais, V.; Rodrigues, C.S.D.; Maldonado-Hódar, F.J.; Madeira, L.M. Heterogeneous Fenton’s Oxidation Using Fe/ZSM-5 as Catalyst in a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 141, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XPS survey spectrum of samples FA (A), FA_ZSM5_006_72 (B) and Fe/ZSM5_C (C).
Figure 1. XPS survey spectrum of samples FA (A), FA_ZSM5_006_72 (B) and Fe/ZSM5_C (C).
Molecules 31 01104 g001aMolecules 31 01104 g001b
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of FA_ZSM5 samples and commercial ZSM-5. Miller indexes of the main diffraction peaks are indicated according to the IZA Database of Zeolite Structures (http://www.iza-structure.org/databases/ (accessed on 18 December 2025)).
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of FA_ZSM5 samples and commercial ZSM-5. Miller indexes of the main diffraction peaks are indicated according to the IZA Database of Zeolite Structures (http://www.iza-structure.org/databases/ (accessed on 18 December 2025)).
Molecules 31 01104 g002
Figure 3. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms at −196 °C for FA-ZSM5 samples and commercial ZSM5_C. The open and closed symbols represent adsorption and desorption, respectively.
Figure 3. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms at −196 °C for FA-ZSM5 samples and commercial ZSM5_C. The open and closed symbols represent adsorption and desorption, respectively.
Molecules 31 01104 g003
Figure 4. PA removal kinetic curves obtained from the application of pseudo-first-order kinetic model. The points representing the experimental data and respective coefficient of determination (R2) are included.
Figure 4. PA removal kinetic curves obtained from the application of pseudo-first-order kinetic model. The points representing the experimental data and respective coefficient of determination (R2) are included.
Molecules 31 01104 g004
Figure 5. Removal percentage of PA after 1 h reaction at 40 °C, changing pH from 2 to 9 for FA_ZSM5_012_24 sample. Experimental conditions: 10 mg catalyst, 25 mL of 20 ppm PA solution, stirring at 400 rpm, H2O2 (70 mM, 0.5 mL) added to initiate reaction.
Figure 5. Removal percentage of PA after 1 h reaction at 40 °C, changing pH from 2 to 9 for FA_ZSM5_012_24 sample. Experimental conditions: 10 mg catalyst, 25 mL of 20 ppm PA solution, stirring at 400 rpm, H2O2 (70 mM, 0.5 mL) added to initiate reaction.
Molecules 31 01104 g005
Figure 6. PA removal percentage (green bars) and Fe content (orange dashed line) for the FA_ZSM5_012_24 sample and three consecutive reuse cycles (R1–R3). Reaction at 40 °C, pH = 4 for 2 h with thermal regeneration between each cycle (350 °C, 4 h). Experimental conditions: 10 mg catalyst, 25 mL of 20 ppm PA solution, stirring at 400 rpm, and H2O2 (70 mM, 0.5 mL) added to initiate the reaction.
Figure 6. PA removal percentage (green bars) and Fe content (orange dashed line) for the FA_ZSM5_012_24 sample and three consecutive reuse cycles (R1–R3). Reaction at 40 °C, pH = 4 for 2 h with thermal regeneration between each cycle (350 °C, 4 h). Experimental conditions: 10 mg catalyst, 25 mL of 20 ppm PA solution, stirring at 400 rpm, and H2O2 (70 mM, 0.5 mL) added to initiate the reaction.
Molecules 31 01104 g006
Figure 7. X-ray diffraction patterns of FA_ZSM5_012_24 sample and first (R1) and third (R3) reuse cycles.
Figure 7. X-ray diffraction patterns of FA_ZSM5_012_24 sample and first (R1) and third (R3) reuse cycles.
Molecules 31 01104 g007
Table 1. Surface contents determined from XPS atomic percentages for FA, Fa_ZSM5_006_72, and Fe/ZSM5_C samples.
Table 1. Surface contents determined from XPS atomic percentages for FA, Fa_ZSM5_006_72, and Fe/ZSM5_C samples.
Element (at%)FAFA_ZSM5_006_72Fe_ZSM5_C
O40.7245.4947.66
C31.7216.8018.66
Si12.8228.6131.60
Al9.054.611.41
Na0.631.27-
Fe0.430.680.68
Y2.811.73-
Table 2. Degree of crystallinity and textural parameters obtained from N2 adsorption isotherms for FA_ZSM5 samples, commercial ZSM-5 before (ZSM-5) and after iron loading (Fe/ZSM5_C).
Table 2. Degree of crystallinity and textural parameters obtained from N2 adsorption isotherms for FA_ZSM5 samples, commercial ZSM-5 before (ZSM-5) and after iron loading (Fe/ZSM5_C).
SampleCXRD 1
(%)
Vsuper
(cm3 g−1)
Vultra
(cm3 g−1)
Vmicro 2
(cm3 g−1)
Vmeso 3
(cm3 g−1)
Aext
(m2 g−1)
ZSM-5_C1000.050.100.150.0735
FA_ZSM5_006_24780.010.070.080.0534
FA_ZSM5_012_24790.020.080.100.0535
FA_ZSM5_006_72780.020.080.090.0635
1 Degree of crystallinity (CXRD) calculated from powder X-ray diffraction patterns, using commercial ZSM-5 as reference. 2 Microporous volume, Vmicro, and external surface area Aext, quantified through the application of αs method; 3 Mesoporous volume, Vmeso = Vtotal − Vmicro, where the total volume (Vtotal) corresponds to the amount of N2 adsorbed at p/p0 ≈ 0.95.
Table 3. Magnetic susceptibility ( χ g ) measurements for FA_ZSM5 samples and reference ZSM- Fe/ZSM5_C at 25 °C.
Table 3. Magnetic susceptibility ( χ g ) measurements for FA_ZSM5 samples and reference ZSM- Fe/ZSM5_C at 25 °C.
Sample χ g
(c.g.s.) × 105
Fe/ZSM5_C1.4
FA_ZSM5_006_245.1
FA_ZSM5_012_249.2
FA_ZSM5_006_722.9
Table 4. Rate constants of pseudo-first-order (kp1) and pseudo-second-order (kp2) for the kinetic curves of PA removal, correspondent statistical parameters R2, SFit and F (see description in the text).
Table 4. Rate constants of pseudo-first-order (kp1) and pseudo-second-order (kp2) for the kinetic curves of PA removal, correspondent statistical parameters R2, SFit and F (see description in the text).
SamplePseudo-First-Order Kinetic Model
kp1 (min−1) × 10−3R2sFitF
Fe/ZSM5_C1.4 ± 0.20.9620.39576.4
FA_ZSM5_006_245.3 ± 0.60.9790.970137.0
FA_ZSM5_012_249.2 ± 0.40.9960.530787.6
FA_ZSM5_006_724.9 ± 0.70.9621.17975.4
SamplePseudo-Second-Order Kinetic Model
kp2 (ppm−1 min−1) × 10−4R2sFitF
Fe/ZSM5_C0.9 ± 0.10.9490.45955.7
FA_ZSM5_006_243.6 ± 0.80.9441.56251.0
FA_ZSM5_012_247.2 ± 0.90.9841.077188.3
FA_ZSM5_006_723.3 ± 0.80.9181.72833.5
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Horta, N.; Martins, S.; Silva, H.F.; Nunes, N.; Mestre, A.S.; Carvalho, A.P.; Martins, A. Paracetamol Removal from Aqueous Media Through Fenton Reaction Using ZSM-5 Zeolite Produced from Fly Ash. Molecules 2026, 31, 1104. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071104

AMA Style

Horta N, Martins S, Silva HF, Nunes N, Mestre AS, Carvalho AP, Martins A. Paracetamol Removal from Aqueous Media Through Fenton Reaction Using ZSM-5 Zeolite Produced from Fly Ash. Molecules. 2026; 31(7):1104. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071104

Chicago/Turabian Style

Horta, Nuno, Sofia Martins, Hugo F. Silva, Nelson Nunes, Ana S. Mestre, Ana P. Carvalho, and Angela Martins. 2026. "Paracetamol Removal from Aqueous Media Through Fenton Reaction Using ZSM-5 Zeolite Produced from Fly Ash" Molecules 31, no. 7: 1104. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071104

APA Style

Horta, N., Martins, S., Silva, H. F., Nunes, N., Mestre, A. S., Carvalho, A. P., & Martins, A. (2026). Paracetamol Removal from Aqueous Media Through Fenton Reaction Using ZSM-5 Zeolite Produced from Fly Ash. Molecules, 31(7), 1104. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31071104

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop