Next Article in Journal
Hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna Jacq.): A Review of Therapeutic Potential and Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Microgravity, Hypergravity, and Ionizing Radiation on the Enzymatic Activity of Proteinase K
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Rosemary and Oregano Extract Addition on Selected Quality Properties of Pork Pâtés During Cold Storage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Simultaneous Quantitative Analysis of Polymorphic Impurities in Canagliflozin Tablets Utilizing Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Partial Least Squares Regression

1
College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Qinghai Minzu University, Xining 810007, China
2
Key Laboratory of Resource Chemistry and Eco-Environmental Protection in Tibetan Plateau, State Ethnic Affairs Commission, Xining 810007, China
3
Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Nanomaterials and Technology, Qinghai Minzu University, Xining 810007, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2026, 31(2), 230; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31020230
Submission received: 4 November 2025 / Revised: 17 December 2025 / Accepted: 2 January 2026 / Published: 9 January 2026

Abstract

Canagliflozin (CFZ), a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, is extensively utilized in the management of type 2 diabetes. Among its various polymorphic forms, the hemi-hydrate (Hemi-CFZ) has been selected as the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) for CFZ tablets due to its superior solubility. However, during the production, storage, and transportation of CFZ tablets, Hemi-CFZ can undergo transformations into anhydrous (An-CFZ) and monohydrate (Mono-CFZ) forms under the influence of environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, and pressure, which may adversely impact the bioavailability and clinical efficacy of CFZ tablets. Therefore, it is imperative to develop rapid, accurate, non-destructive, and non-contact methods for quantifying An-CFZ and Mono-CFZ content in CFZ tablets to control polymorphic impurity levels and ensure product quality. This research evaluated the feasibility and reliability of using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR) combined with partial least squares regression (PLSR) for simultaneous quantitative analysis of An-CFZ and Mono-CFZ in CFZ tablets, elucidating the quantifying mechanisms of the quantitative analysis model. Orthogonal experiments were designed to investigate the effects of different pretreatment methods and ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithms on the performance of quantitative models. An optimal PLSR model for simultaneous quantification of An-CFZ and Mono-CFZ in CFZ tablets was established and validated over a concentration range of 0.0000 to 10.0000 w/w%. The resulting model, YAn-CFZ/Mono-CFZ = 0.0207 + 0.9919 X, achieved an R2 value of 0.9919. By analyzing the relationship between the NIR spectral signals selected by the ACO algorithm and the molecular structure information of An-CFZ and Mono-CFZ, we demonstrated the feasibility and reliability of the NIR-PLSR approach for quantifying these polymorphic forms. Additionally, the mechanism of PLSR quantitative analysis was further explained through the variance contribution rates of latent variables (LVs), the correlations between LVs loadings and tablets composition, and the relationships between LV scores and An-CFZ/Mono-CFZ content. This study not only provides a robust method and theoretical foundation for monitoring An-CFZ and Mono-CFZ content in CFZ tablets throughout production, processing, storage, and transportation, but also offers a reliable methodological reference for the simultaneous quantitative analysis and quality control of multiple polymorphic impurities in other similar drugs.

1. Introduction

Polymorphism, which has attracted attention in the field of solid drug research and quality control, refers to the formation of different crystal structures of the same active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) under varying crystallization conditions [1,2,3]. These structural differences lead to significant variations in properties such as solubility (amorphous indomethacin shows higher solubility than its γ form), stability (ritonavir form II is more stable than form I), and bioavailability (the α form of azelnidipine exhibits better bioavailability compared to its β form), which significantly influence the efficacy and safety of drugs [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Therefore, accurate quantitative analysis of polymorphic impurities in drugs is essential for maintaining the quality and consistency of drug production.
Traditional analytical methods for quantifying polymorphic impurities in solid drugs, such as X-ray diffraction, thermal analysis, and vibrational spectroscopy, offer unique advantages but also have limitations like complex sample preparation, time-consuming processes, and high costs [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. In recent years, near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy has emerged as a promising technique due to its rapid, non-destructive nature, lack of reagent requirement, and capability for online monitoring [4,12,14,15,16]. NIR spectroscopy leverages the vibrational absorption characteristics of drug components in the near-infrared region to measure the absorption of near-infrared light by solid drug samples, thereby providing insights into hydrogen bonding and hydrogen-containing groups within the molecules [4,12,14,15,16,17]. However, NIR spectroscopy faces challenges such as severe spectral band overlap and weak signals, which hinder its application in accurately quantifying polymorphic impurities in solid drugs [4,12,14,15,16]. Thus, selecting an appropriate pretreatment method to preprocess the spectral data is crucial for achieving accurate quantitative analysis of polymorphic impurity content in solid drugs using NIR spectroscopy.
Effective pretreatment methods not only significantly improve the signal-to-noise ratio and analytical precision of spectral data but also provide a robust foundation for subsequent data analysis and modeling [4,5,11,12,15,16,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Extensive literatures have shown that techniques like Multivariate Scattering Correction (MSC), Standard Normal Variate transformation (SNV), Savitzky–Golay first derivative (SG1st), Savitzky–Golay second derivative (SG2nd), and Wavelet Transform (WT) effectively reduce interference factors such as instrument noise, baseline drift, and light scattering, thereby significantly enhancing the quality of spectral data [4,5,11,12,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Although spectral pretreatment methods significantly enhance the accuracy of quantitative analysis of chemical components in complex mixtures based on NIR spectra, a substantial amount of information in NIR spectra remains unrelated to the molecular structure of the sample components even after pretreatment [4,24]. Consequently, it is essential to employ an appropriate spectral data selection method to extract key information pertinent to the molecular structure of the sample components from the NIR spectral data.
In the 1990s, Marco Dorigo introduced the ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm, which effectively addresses the optimal combination of NIR spectral bands by simulating the pheromone-based route-selection mechanism observed in ant foraging behavior [25,26,27,28,29]. This algorithm can be applied to model and predict the content of polymorphic impurities in solid drugs, offering advantages such as intelligent search, global optimization, and robust performance, which help reduce overlap and weak information in spectral data [25,26,27,28,29]. However, due to the complex composition of excipients in solid drugs, multicollinearity issues arise in the collected spectra, affecting the accurate quantification of polymorphic impurities.
To tackle this challenge, Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR), which combines elements from Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Principal Component Analysis (LVA), and Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA), can mitigate multicollinearity by identifying latent structural relationships between independent and dependent variables [15,16,19,20,21,30,31]. By constructing latent variables as linear combinations of the original independent and dependent variables, PLSR enhances both the predictive and explanatory power of the model, thereby achieving rapid and precise prediction of impurity crystal content in drugs [15,16,19,20,21,30,31].
This study aims to optimize NIR spectral data using different pretreatment methods and the ACO algorithm to construct a PLSR model for rapid, non-destructive, and non-contact accurate quantitative analysis of the anhydrous (An-CFZ) and monohydrate (Mono-CFZ) contents in canagliflozin (CFZ) tablets. This approach not only enhances the efficiency of NIR analysis but also accurately determines the content of multiple polymorphic impurities in CFZ tablets simultaneously, offering an innovative solution for quality control of polymorphic drugs, thereby advancing the quality control practices in pharmaceutical research and production.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Samples Preparation

2.1.1. Materials

Commercially available CFZ tablets were manufactured by blending Hemi-CFZ with excipients in a predetermined ratio and subsequently compressing them into tablets. During the tablet manufacturing process, Hemi-CFZ may undergo transformation into Mono-CFZ or An-CFZ due to environmental factors such as humidity, temperature, and pressure. These changes can potentially impact the safety and clinical efficacy of CFZ tablets. The Hemi-CFZ, An-CFZ, Mono-CFZ, and excipients utilized as standard substances in the experiment were all supplied by a partner, with a purity of ≥99.90%.

2.1.2. Preparation of the Tablet Samples

All standard substances were finely ground using an agate mortar and sieved through a 100-mesh screen. Based on the predetermined ratio of Hemi-CFZ to excipients found in commercially available CFZ tablets, Hemi-CFZ and excipients were thoroughly mixed. Subsequently, according to the ratios illustrated in Figure 1, corresponding weights of An-CFZ and Mono-CFZ were added, and a total of 2.0000 g of each CFZ tablet was prepared. All weighing procedures were conducted using a METTLER Toledo Electronic Balance (ME204T/02, Mettler Toledo Instrument (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Powder X-Ray Diffraction

All PXRD patterns were obtained using the R-AXIS-RAPID powder diffractometer (Rigaku Co., Akishima, Japan) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5405 Å). The instrument was operated at 40 kV and 100 mA. All tests were performed under ambient conditions, with a step size of 0.02° and a scanning rate of 8°/min over the 2θ range of 2 to 40°. Each sample underwent three PXRD analyses. To maintain consistency and accuracy, all tests were conducted under standardized settings, ensuring reproducibility of the results. The specified operating parameters and environmental conditions were strictly adhered to throughout the analysis process.

2.2.2. Near Infrared Spectroscopy

All NIR spectra were recorded using an FT-NIR spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Antaris II, Waltham, MA, USA). Each spectrum was the average of 16 scans covering the spectral range of 10,000–4000 cm−1 (wavenumber interval was 4 cm−1) at a resolution of 8 cm−1. All standard substances were scanned three times, and the average spectrum was calculated and used as their spectra. For each calibration sample, three consecutive scans were performed, and the average spectrum was calculated. Subsequently, this sample was removed and replaced, and the above process was repeated twice, yielding three sets of parallel spectral data. To ensure data reliability and accuracy, all measurements were conducted under standardized conditions. The repeated scans provided robust datasets, enhancing the precision of the spectral information obtained. This approach facilitated reliable and reproducible results for further analysis.

2.3. Pretreatment of Spectra Data

In accordance with the division principles for the calibration and validation sets of small-scale datasets and the actual needs of the partners, the NIR spectra, represented by a 129 × 1550 spectral data matrix, were specifically partitioned into a calibration set (a 41 × 3 × 1550 spectral matrix) and a verification set (a 6 × 1550 spectral matrix). The calibration set consisted of 41 samples, each of which was taken three times, yielding an average spectrum as described in Section 2.2.2. Whereas the verification set included 6 samples taken from the same concentration level with the calibration set and re-prepared, each was scanned three times consecutively, and the average spectrum was taken. These datasets were used to develop and validate quantitative models aimed at determining the concentrations of An-CFZ and Mono-CFZ in CFZ tablets.
To optimize spectral bands selection and reduce extraneous information caused by scattering effects, variations in light path due to non-uniform particle distribution, and differences in particle sizes, the ACO algorithm was employed alongside various preprocessing techniques, including MSC, SNV, SG1st, SG2nd, and WT. Orthogonal experiments were designed to investigate the influence of the impact of parameters like ant numbers, the number of selected spectral bands, pheromone evaporation rates, and pretreatment methods on the performance of the PLSR model. These techniques ensured that the processed spectral data accurately reflected their intrinsic characteristics.
Subsequently, PLSR analysis was conducted using MATLAB 2024a to establish robust PLSR models for NIR analysis. Linear regression data processing was performed using Origin 9.1 software. Model performance was evaluated based on the Correlation Coefficient (R2), Root Mean Square Error of Calibration (RMSEC), Cross-Validation (RMSECV), and Prediction Error (RMSEP). These metrics were calculated based on Equations (1) and (2).
R 2 = 1 i = 1 n y i y ^ i 2 / i = 1 n y i y ¯ 2
R S M E = i = 1 n y i y ^ i 2 / n
where y i , y ^ i , y ¯ , and n in Equations (1) and (2) represent the theoretical value, calculated value, averaged value, and the number of samples, respectively.

2.4. Validation of Developed Models

To validate the accuracy of the correction models, NIR was employed to analyze samples with known An-CFZ (0.5000%, 1.5000%, 2.5000%, 3.5000%, 4.5000%, and 5.0000% w/w) and Mono-CFZ content (0.5000%, 1.5000%, 2.5000%, 3.5000%, 4.5000%, and 5.0000% w/w), and the established PLSR model was used for prediction. Furthermore, the precision, repeatability, and stability of NIR were assessed using Mono-CFZ and An-CFZ content at a concentration level of 4.5000% w/w. The Relative Standard Deviation (RSD%) was calculated for the PLSR model according to Equation (3), whereas the Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ) were determined for the PLSR model using Equations (4) and (5), respectively.
R S D = i = 1 n y ^ i y ¯ 2 / n 1 / y ¯ × 100 %
L O D = 3.3 σ / s
L O Q = 10 σ / s
where y ^ i , y ¯ , n , σ , and s in Equations (3)–(5) represent the predicted content values, the average of the predicted content values of the samples, the number of the samples, the standard deviation of predicted content values, and the slope of the correlation curve, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Different Forms of CFZ

Figure 2 presents the PXRD patterns and NIR spectra of An-CFZ, Hemi-CFZ, Mono-CFZ, and excipients. In Figure 2A, 2.4°, 10.1°, 17.2°, 18.1°, 27.8° 2θ were considered as the characteristic peaks of An-CFZ, and 3.8°, 10.9°, 13.0°, 15.5°, 16.2°, 17.3°, 18.8°, 20.3° 2θ and 4.1°, 8.3°, 12.0°, 12.5°, 15.3°, 16.8°, 17.4°, 17.9°, 20.4°, 22.8° 2θ were that of Hemi-CFZ and Mono-CFZ, respectively. The PXRD characteristic peaks of the three CFZ crystal forms were in complete agreement with previously reported data, confirming that the An-CFZ, Hemi-CFZ, and Mono-CFZ samples provided by the partner meet the required standards for crystal structure and purity [14,24,32].
In Figure 2B, the NIR characteristic peaks of the three CFZ crystal forms align with the findings of Liu et al., demonstrating significant differences among the crystal forms [14,24]. This suggested the potential of using NIR spectroscopy to quantitatively analyze polymorphic impurity content in CFZ tablets. However, Figure 2B also revealed that the NIR spectra of Hemi-CFZ and excipients exhibit characteristics highly similar to those of An-CFZ and Mono-CFZ, which may complicate the quantitative analysis of polymorphic impurity content in CFZ tablets using NIR spectra.

3.2. Construction of NIR Spectral Database

The NIR spectra of 41 different CFZ tablet samples, each containing varying amounts of An-CFZ and Mono-CFZ (with each sample measured in triplicate and the average value used as the primary spectral data), were utilized for the quantitative analysis of An-CFZ, Mono-CFZ, and total polymorphic impurity (Mono-CFZ + An-CFZ) contents in CFZ tablets, as illustrated in Figure S1. The calibration and validation sets were divided into 31 submatrices to construct a new NIR spectral database. This database was employed to select the optimal spectral bands for the PLSR model using the ACO algorithm, as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3 presents the NIR spectra of CFZ tablet samples with five different concentrations of An-CFZ (10.0000%, 5.0000%, 1.5000%, 2.5000%, and 0.0000%) and Mono-CFZ (0.0000%, 2.5000%, 3.5000%, 5.0000%, and 10.0000%). Each spectrum represents the average of nine parallel measurements.

3.3. Selection and Pretreatment of NIR Spectra

Raw NIR spectra of CFZ tablets frequently contain significant noise and redundant information, which could compromise the accuracy and efficiency of quantitative analysis for An-CFZ and Mono-CFZ. To mitigate this issue, we developed PLSR models using both the global NIR spectrum and spectra divided into 31 sub-intervals (taking 50 wavenumber sampling points as a sub-interval, the width of each sub-interval was approximately 200 cm−1). The results are presented in Figure 4.
As shown in Figure 4A, when the number of latent variables (LVs) was set to 5, the average RMSECV value of the global spectral PLSR model reached 1.0432%. Although further increasing the number of LVs (N) slightly decreases the average RMSECV value, the improvement is marginal and may increase the risk of overfitting. From Figure 4B, it is evident that the average RMSECV values of PLSR models based on sub-intervals 9, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 28, 29, 30, and 31 are lower than those of the global spectrum PLSR model, indicating that the information within these sub-intervals is critical for the quantitative analysis of polymorphic impurities in CFZ tablets.
Therefore, prior to establishing the optimization PLSR quantitative analysis model, we employed the ACO algorithm along with various pretreatment methods to select and pretreat the raw NIR spectra. Key parameters of the ACO algorithm include the number of ants (A), the pheromone evaporation rate (B), and the number of selected spectral bands (C). Among them, A is directly associated with the exploration ability and computational efficiency, B functions as the lever for balancing exploration and exploitation, and C determines the complexity of the space and the difficulty of the search. Since the number of iterations of the ACO algorithm can theoretically be infinite, it has minimal impact on spectral band selection. Various pretreatment methods (D) effectively reduce noise in the raw NIR spectra, thereby enhancing the performance of the PLSR quantitative model. To optimize the selection and pretreat of the raw NIR spectra, a four-factor, three-level orthogonal experiment (as shown in Table 1) was designed. Through single-factor experiments, the optimal levels for each factor were chosen, and the average RMSEP of the PLSR model served as the evaluation criterion in all experiments. The orthogonal experimental results are illustrated in Figure 5.
As indicated by the extreme value (R) in Figure 5, the influence of the pretreatment method (D), number of ants (A), number of selected bands (C), and pheromone evaporation rate (B) on the performance of the PLSR model decreases in that order. Specifically, the pretreatment method has the most significant impact on PLSR model performance, followed by the number of ants and the number of selected bands, with the pheromone evaporation rate having the least effect. Therefore, the ranking of each factor’s influence on PLSR model performance is D > A > C > B.
Moreover, Figure 5 illustrates the changes in RMSEP values under different conditions: the RMSEP value was minimized when the preprocessing method was SG2nd, the number of ants was 300, the number of selected spectral bands was 5, and the pheromone evaporation rate was 0.3. This indicates that the combination D2A3C1B1 provides the best experimental conditions for optimal PLSR model performance.
Additionally, considering that the analysis efficiency of each experiment decreases with the number of ACO algorithm iterations, it was found that the highest quantitative analysis efficiency occurs under the following conditions: SG2nd pretreatment of the raw NIR spectrum, with 300 ants, 10 selected spectral bands, and a pheromone evaporation rate of 0.3. This may be attributed to the increased number of spectral bands aiding in more effectively distinguishing An-CFZ and Mono-CFZ components in CFZ tablets. Consequently, D2A3C2B1 represents the optimal combination of experimental conditions.

3.4. Establishment of PLSR Model

Based on the optimal conditions determined above, the ACO algorithm selected the following spectral bands to establish the PLSR model: 20, 17, 26, 11, 18, 10, 8, 13, 6, and 23. The results after SG2nd preprocessing are shown in Figure 6.
The N value in the PLSR model is a critical parameter influencing model performance. Therefore, the RMSEC of the PLSR model’s predicted values was used as an evaluation metric to analyze the impact of different N values on model performance, with specific results shown in Table 2. As indicated in Table 2, when N ≤ 4, RMSEC (An-CFZ, Mono-CFZ, total polymorphic impurities, average) was ≥0.3000%, despite the high prediction efficiency of the model. Conversely, when N > 5, RMSEC (An-CFZ, Mono-CFZ, total crystalline impurity, average) was less than 0.3000%, leading to significantly improved prediction accuracy but reduced prediction efficiency. After a comprehensive evaluation of prediction accuracy, efficiency, and stakeholder requirements, N = 5 was chosen as the optimal solution. The final Calibration curve between the reference values and predicted values was YAn-CFZ/Mono-CFZ = 0.0207 + 0.9919 X, R2 = 0.9919, and the Calibration curve of An-CFZ, Mono-CFZ, and total polymorphic impurities is illustrated in Figure 7.

3.5. Verification and Evaluation of the PLSR Model

The optimal PLSR model established using the ACO algorithm selected spectral bands was validated using a series of CFZ tablet samples with known Mono-CFZ, An-CFZ, and total polymorphic impurity contents (as shown in Table 3). NIR spectra of these samples were collected and pretreated using the SG2nd method. The spectra were reconstructed based on specific spectral bands selected by the ACO algorithm (20, 17, 26, 11, 18, 10, 8, 13, 6, and 23). The optimal PLSR model was then used to predict the contents of Mono-CFZ, An-CFZ, and total polymorphic impurities in the known tablet samples to evaluate the model’s prediction accuracy. The results are summarized in Table 3. To further validate the method’s effectiveness, particular attention was given to the data collection for samples with Mono-CFZ, An-CFZ, and total polymorphic impurity contents of 4.5000%, 4.5000%, and 9.0000% w/w, respectively. Additionally, the precision, repeatability, and stability results are also presented in Table 3.
As illustrated in Table 3, the optimal PLSR model accurately predicted the content of An-CFZ, Mono-CFZ, and total polymorphic impurities in six known CFZ tablet samples. Specifically, the mean prediction errors were 0.0141%, 0.0099%, and 0.0550% for An-CFZ, Mono-CFZ, and total polymorphic impurities, respectively. These low error rates indicate a high degree of consistency between the predicted and reference values, thereby confirming the robust predictive performance of the PLSR model.

3.6. Discussion on Quantitative Mechanism of PLSR Model

As illustrated in Figure 4B, the sub-interval PLSR model that divides the original NIR spectrum into 31 sub-intervals (taking 50 wavenumber sampling points as a sub-interval, the width of each sub-interval was approximately 200 cm−1) and establishes them separately shows lower RMSE values for several sub-intervals compared to the global-spectrum PLSR model. Specifically, the sub-intervals with lower RMSE values are numbered 21, 28, 23, 29, 22, 30, 31, 27, 24, 16, and 9, with sub-interval 21 achieving the lowest RMSECV of 0.3031%. In contrast, the optimal PLSR model established by selecting spectral bands using the ACO algorithm has modeling bands at positions 20, 17, 26, 11, 18, 10, 8, 13, 6, and 23 (as shown in Table 4), resulting in an RMSE of 0.2411%. This indicates superior performance over both the global-spectrum PLSR model and the individual sub-interval PLSR models. Notably, there is a discrepancy between the sub-intervals selected by the ACO algorithm and those with lower RMSE values compared to the global-spectrum model. Therefore, it is essential to further investigate the relationship between the spectral information selected by the ACO algorithm and the structural characteristics of Mono-CFZ and An-CFZ to better understand the quantitative analysis mechanism of the optimal PLSR model.
As illustrated in Table 4, the NIR spectral subintervals selected by the ACO algorithm are predominantly located within the 9010–7471 cm−1 and 6888–4964 cm−1 regions. Specifically, the 9010–7471 cm−1 region primarily captures the fundamental vibrational information of various chemical bonds in the molecule, aiding in distinguishing excipients from active ingredients (An-CFZ, Hemi-CFZ, and Mono-CFZ) in CFZ tablets, such as the overtone information of C=O in the aliphatic hydrocarbons at 8621 cm−1 [17]. Meanwhile, the 6888–4964 cm−1 region provides information on the fundamental frequency vibration’s overtones and combination information of O-H in crystalline water, hydroxyl and hydrogen bonds, as well as the combination frequencies of O-H stretching vibration and H-O-H bending vibration of water molecules, effectively highlighting subtle differences among An-CFZ, Hemi-CFZ, and Mono-CFZ. For instance, the peaks at 6913 cm−1 and 6811 cm−1 are likely attributed to the fundamental frequency vibration’s overtones and combinations information of hydroxyl groups and hydrogen bonds in Hemi-CFZ within CFZ tablets [17,33,34,35]. Furthermore, the peak at 5099 cm−1 may indicate the combination frequencies of O-H stretching and H-O-H bending vibrations of water molecules in Hemi-CFZ/Mono-CFZ of CFZ tablets [35].
In conclusion, the fundamental frequency information of various chemical bonds, along with the vibrational overtones and combination information of hydrogen bonds and hydrogen-containing groups observed through NIR spectra, provides a valuable opportunity and theoretical foundation for using the ACO algorithm to select the NIR global-spectrum for the quantitative analysis of An-CFZ, Mono-CFZ, and total polymorphic impurities in CFZ tablets.
The PLSR model constructed using NIR spectra, which was pretreated with SG2nd and selected by the ACO algorithm, is most suitable for the quantitative analysis of An-CFZ and Mono-CFZ content in CFZ tablets. The study further explores the mechanism of this model in quantifying these two components within CFZ tablets. Figure 8 illustrates the loadings and scores of LVI, where LVI accounts for 20.9512% of the molecular structure information and 50.0589% of the polymorphic impurities content information of CFZ tablets (Figure 8A). A robust quantitative relationship was established between scores of LVI and the An-CFZ content in CFZ tablets, with the correction curve expressed as YAn-CFZ = 2.5610 + 26.6577 Xs and R2 = 0.9525 (Figure 8C), indicating that LVI primarily captures An-CFZ-related information in CFZ tablets.
LVII explains 36.0995% of the molecular structure information and 31.5720% of the polymorphic impurity content information of the CFZ tablet (Figure 9A). A strong quantitative relationship was established between its scores and the Mono-CFZ content in CFZ tablet samples, with the correction curve given by YMono-CFZ = 2.5610 − 21.6286Xs and R2 = 0.6242 (Figure 9B), indicating that LVII primarily captures Mono-CFZ-related information in the CFZ tablets.
LVIII, LVIV, and LVV account for 13.3664%, 12.7601%, and 0.9839% of the molecular structure information, and 16.5380%, 0.2287%, and 0.7531% of the polymorphic impurity content information of the CFZ tablet, respectively (Figures S2–S4). Although these LVs explain a smaller proportion of the information, they still contribute significantly to enhancing model performance.
These five LVs explain 84.1611% of the molecular structure information and 99.0517% of the polymorphic impurity content information in CFZ tablets, demonstrating that the model effectively utilizes nearly all relevant information from the reconstructed NIR spectra. This model is reliable for the quantitative analysis of An-CFZ and Mono-CFZ in CFZ tablets. Specifically, LVI is primarily used for the quantitative analysis of An-CFZ, while LVII is mainly used for the quantitative analysis of Mono-CFZ. The collaborative effort of these five LVs enhances the accuracy and precision of the quantitative analysis of An-CFZ and Mono-CFZ.
Compared with the study published by Liu et al. in 2024 [24], this study significantly improved model performance and further clarified the feasibility, reliability, and mechanism of using NIR spectroscopy for the simultaneous quantitative analysis of An-CFZ and Mono-CFZ contents in CFZ tablets.

4. Conclusions

The aim of this study was to develop a rapid, accurate, non-destructive, and non-contact method for the simultaneous quantitative analysis of multiple polycrystalline impurities in drugs based on NIR spectroscopy, and to investigate its feasibility, reliability, and mechanism, thereby effectively controlling the content of polymorphic impurities and ensuring drug quality during production.
Early studies have shown that PLSR models based on the original global-spectrum exhibit and 31 sub-intervals have poor performance. Therefore, we conducted various pretreatments of NIR spectra within 31 sub-intervals (the range of 10,000 to 4000 cm−1) and employed the ACO algorithm to select the most suitable spectral bands, and established the optimal PLSR model for simultaneous quantitative analysis of An-CFZ and Mono-CFZ in CFZ tablets.
The reliability of the model in research was evaluated using N, LV variance contribution rate, cumulative variance contribution rate, and the relationship between LV scores and the content of An-CFZ and Mono-CFZ. Additionally, the relationship between the spectral information of the optimal modeling band selected by the ACO algorithm and the characteristic chemical bonds, hydrogen bonds, and hydrogen-containing groups in An-CFZ and Mono-CFZ molecules revealed the feasibility and mechanism of simultaneous quantitative analysis of these components in CFZ tablets using NIR spectroscopy.
This study provides theoretical support for the simultaneous quantitative analysis of multiple polymorphic impurities during the production, storage, and transportation of CFZ tablets, providing a reference method for quality control of CFZ tablets and a reliable basis for the quantitative analysis and quality control of other similar drugs. However, it cannot be denied that further exploration and discussion are still needed in the analysis of intact commercial tablets and the transferability of the method.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules31020230/s1. Table S1: Samples used to establish the An-CFZ/Mono-CFZ content quantitative models; Figure S1: NIR spectral of the CFZ tablet samples; Figure S2: Loadings (A) and scores of LVIII (B–D); Figure S3: Loadings (A) and scores of LVIV (B–D); Figure S4: Loadings (A) and scores of LVV (B–D).

Author Contributions

M.L.: Investigation, Writing—original draft, and Writing—review and editing. R.F.: Data curation. G.X.: Investigation. W.D.: Methodology. H.Q.: Writing—original draft. P.D.: Visualization. P.S.: Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Qinghai Province grant number (2023-ZJ-922M). And the APC was funded by Qinghai Minzu University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article and Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Qinghai Minzu University for providing the experimental conditions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Hilfiker, R. Polymorphism: In the Pharmaceutical Industry, 1st ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Brittain, H.G. Polymorphism in Pharmaceutical Solids, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Pinehurst, NC, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Raw, A.S.; Yu, L.X. Pharmaceutical solid polymorphism in drug development and regulation. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2004, 56, 235–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, M.D.; Fu, R.; Liu, J.C.; Song, P.; Li, H.C.; Dong, W.B.; Sun, Z. Quantitative analysis of amorphous form in indomethacin by near infrared spectroscopy combined with partial least squares regression analysis. Molecules 2024, 29, 5290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, M.D.; Liu, J.C.; Wang, Q.H.; Song, P.; Li, H.C.; Qin, Y.R.; Wu, S.G.; Gong, J.B. Quantitative analysis of amorphous form in indomethacin binary polymorphic mixtures using infrared spectroscopy analytical techniques combined with chemometrics methods. Arab. J. Chem. 2023, 16, 104885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bauer, J.; Spanton, S.; Henry, R.; Quick, J.; Dziki, W.; Porter, W.; Morris, J. Ritonavir: An extraordinary example of conformational polymorphism. Pharm. Res. 2001, 18, 859–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, D.; Wang, M.; Yang, C.Q.; Wang, J.; Ren, G.D. Solid state characterizations and analysis of stability in Azelnidipine polymorphs. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2012, 60, 995–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Shefter, E.; Higuchi, T. Dissolution behavior of crystalline solvated and non-solvated forms of some pharmaceuticals. J. Pharm. Sci. 1963, 52, 781–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Polat, S.; Eral, H.B. Effect of L-alanyl-glycine dipeptide on calcium oxalate crystallization in artificial urine. J. Cryst. Growth 2021, 566, 126176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Atici, E.B.; Karlığa, B. Quantitative determination of two polymorphic forms of imatinib mesylate in a drug substance and tablet formulation by X-ray powder diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry and attenuated total reflectance fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2015, 114, 330–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, M.D.; Shi, P.; Wang, G.L.; Wang, G.; Song, P.; Liu, Y.M.; Wu, S.G.; Gong, J.B. Quantitative analysis of binary mixtures of entecavir using solid-state analytical techniques with chemometric methods. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bhavana, V.; Chavan, R.B.; Mannava, M.K.C.; Nangia, A.; Shastri, N.R. Quantification of niclosamide polymorphic forms A comparative study by Raman, NIR and MIR using chemometric techniques. Talanta 2019, 199, 679–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Agatonovic, K.S.; Glass, B.D.; Mangan, M.; Smithson, J. Analysing the crystal purity of mebendazole raw material and its stability in a suspension formulation. Int. J. Pharm. 2008, 361, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, M.D.; Liu, J.C.; Wang, Q.H.; Song, P.; Li, H.C.; Wu, S.G.; Gong, J.B. Quantitative analysis of low content polymorphic impurities in canagliflozin tablets by PXRD, NIR, ATR-FITR and Raman solid-state analysis techniques combined with stoichiometry. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2023, 293, 122458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hennigan, M.C.; Ryder, A.G. Quantitative polymorph contaminant analysis in tablets using Raman and near infra-red spectroscopies. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2013, 72, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hu, Y.; Erxleben, A.; Ryder, A.G.; McArdle, P. Quantitative analysis of sulfathiazole polymorphs in ternary mixtures by attenuated total reflectance infrared, near-infrared and Raman spectroscopy. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2010, 53, 412–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Workman, J.; Weyer, L. Practical Guide to Interpretive Near-Infrared Spectroscopy, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Croker, D.M.; Hennigan, M.C.; Maher, A.; Hu, Y.; Ryder, A.G.; Hodnett, B.K. A comparative study of the use of powder X-ray diffraction, Raman and near infrared spectroscopy for quantification of binary polymorphic mixtures of piracetam. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2012, 63, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kang, Y.L.; Shao, Z.Y.; Wang, Q.; Hu, X.R.; Yu, D.D. Quantitation of polymorphic impurity in entecavir polymorphic mixtures using powder X-ray diffractometry and Raman spectroscopy. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2018, 158, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Da Silva, V.H.; Goncalves, J.L.; Vasconcelos, F.V.C.; Pimentel, M.F.; Pereira, C.F. Quantitative analysis of mebendazole polymorphs in pharmaceutical raw materials using near-infrared spectroscopy. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2015, 115, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Farias, M.; Carneiro, R. Simultaneous quantification of three polymorphic forms of carbamazepine in the presence of excipients using Raman spectroscopy. Molecules 2014, 19, 14128–14138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nagy, B.; Farkas, A.; Balogh, A.; Pataki, H.; Vajna, B.; Nagy, Z.K.; Marosi, G. Quantification and handling of nonlinearity in Raman micro-spectrometry of pharmaceuticals. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2016, 128, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pazesh, S.; Lazorova, L.; Berggren, J.; Alderborn, G.; Gråsjö, J. Considerations on the quantitative analysis of apparent amorphicity of milled lactose by Raman spectroscopy. Int. J. Pharm. 2016, 511, 488–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, M.D.; Liu, J.C.; Wang, Q.H.; Song, P.; Li, H.C.; Sun, Z.; Shi, C.L.; Dong, W.B. Quantitative analysis of low-content impurity crystal forms in canagliflozin tablets by NIR solid-state analysis technique. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2024, 311, 124000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Huang, X.W.; Zou, X.B.; Zhao, J.W.; Shi, J.Y.; Zhang, X.L.; Holmes, M. Measurement of total anthocyanins content in flowering tea using near infrared spectroscopy combined with ant colony optimization models. Food Chem. 2014, 164, 536–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hu, L.Q.; Yin, C.L.; Ma, S.; Liu, Z.M. Rapid detection of three quality parameters and classification of wine based on Vis-NIR spectroscopy with wavelength selection by ACO and CARS algorithms. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018, 205, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Arslan, M.; Zou, X.B.; Tahir, H.E.; Shi, J.Y.; Zareef, M.; Rakha, A.; Bilal, M. Rapid screening of phenolic compounds from wild Lycium ruthenicum Murr. using portable near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy coupled multivariate analysis. Anal. Lett. 2020, 54, 512–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Allegrini, F.; Olivieri, A.C. A new and efficient variable selection algorithm based on ant colony optimization. Applications to near infrared spectroscopy/partial least-squares analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 699, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guo, Z.M.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Sun, C.J.; Jayan, H.; Majeed, U.; Watson, N.J.; Zou, X.B. Dynamic nondestructive detection models of apple quality in critical harvest period based on Near-Infrared spectroscopy and intelligent algorithms. Foods 2024, 13, 1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zappi, A.; Maini, L.; Galimberti, G.; Caliandro, R.; Melucci, D. Quantifying API polymorphs in formulations using X-ray powder diffraction and multivariate standard addition method combined with net analyte signal analysis. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 130, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Y.; Chow, P.S.; Tan, R.B.H. Quantification of polymorphic impurity in an enantiotropic polymorph system using differential scanning calorimetry, X-ray powder diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. Int. J. Pharm. 2011, 415, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhu, Y.F.; Kang, Y.L.; Zhu, L.; Yu, K.X.; Chen, S.; Tang, G.P.; Hu, X.R. Investigation of solubility behavior of canagliflozin hydrate crystals combining crystallographic and Hirshfeld surface calculations. Molecules 2021, 26, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tsenkova, R. Introduction: Aquaphotomics: Dynamic spectroscopy of aqueous and biological systems describes peculiarities of water. J. Near Infrared Spectrosc. 2009, 17, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cui, X.Y.; Cai, W.S.; Shao, X.G. Glucose induced variation of water structure from temperature dependent near infrared spectra. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 105729–105736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bonner, O.D.; Woolsey, G.B. Effect of solutes and temperature on the structure of water. J. Phys. Chem. 1968, 72, 899–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Samples used to establish and verify the quantitative models.
Figure 1. Samples used to establish and verify the quantitative models.
Molecules 31 00230 g001
Figure 2. PXRD patterns and NIR spectra of standard substances. (A) PXRD patterns of An-CFZ, Hemi-CFZ, Mono-CFZ, and excipients; (B) NIR spectra of An-CFZ, Hemi-CFZ, Mono-CFZ, and Hemi-CFZ + excipients.
Figure 2. PXRD patterns and NIR spectra of standard substances. (A) PXRD patterns of An-CFZ, Hemi-CFZ, Mono-CFZ, and excipients; (B) NIR spectra of An-CFZ, Hemi-CFZ, Mono-CFZ, and Hemi-CFZ + excipients.
Molecules 31 00230 g002
Figure 3. ATR-FTIR spectra of 31 submatrices. Different colors on the curves represent different spectral band numbers.
Figure 3. ATR-FTIR spectra of 31 submatrices. Different colors on the curves represent different spectral band numbers.
Molecules 31 00230 g003
Figure 4. The RMSECV of PLSR models. (A) RMSECV vs. LVs of global PLSR model and (B) RMSECV of IPLS interval models. The dotted line represents the RMSECV for the global PLSR model, and the italic numbers indicate optimal LVs of interval models. The blue line represents the NIR spectra of Hemi-CFZ.
Figure 4. The RMSECV of PLSR models. (A) RMSECV vs. LVs of global PLSR model and (B) RMSECV of IPLS interval models. The dotted line represents the RMSECV for the global PLSR model, and the italic numbers indicate optimal LVs of interval models. The blue line represents the NIR spectra of Hemi-CFZ.
Molecules 31 00230 g004
Figure 5. Results of orthogonal experiment. k1, k2, and k3 represent the average RMSEP values of experiments for each factor at each level, and R represents the range values of k1, k2, and k3 for each factor. A, B, C, and D represent the number of ants, the pheromone evaporation rates, the number of selected spectral bands, and pretreatment methods, respectively.
Figure 5. Results of orthogonal experiment. k1, k2, and k3 represent the average RMSEP values of experiments for each factor at each level, and R represents the range values of k1, k2, and k3 for each factor. A, B, C, and D represent the number of ants, the pheromone evaporation rates, the number of selected spectral bands, and pretreatment methods, respectively.
Molecules 31 00230 g005
Figure 6. NIR spectra of 31 submatrices. The black portions on the curves represent spectral bands not selected by the ACO algorithm.
Figure 6. NIR spectra of 31 submatrices. The black portions on the curves represent spectral bands not selected by the ACO algorithm.
Molecules 31 00230 g006
Figure 7. Calibration curve of Mono-CFZ, An-CFZ, and total polymorphic impurities. (A) Calibration curve of Mono-CFZ; (B) Calibration curve of An-CFZ; (C) Calibration curve of total polymorphic impurities.
Figure 7. Calibration curve of Mono-CFZ, An-CFZ, and total polymorphic impurities. (A) Calibration curve of Mono-CFZ; (B) Calibration curve of An-CFZ; (C) Calibration curve of total polymorphic impurities.
Molecules 31 00230 g007
Figure 8. Loadings (A) and scores of LVI (BD). The color curves in A represent the ACO algorithm-selected spectral bands, and the white represents the ACO algorithm-not-selected spectral bands. (BD) represent the relationship between the scores of LVI and the reference values of Mono-CFZ, An-CFZ, and total polymorphic impurity (Mono-CFZ + An-CFZ) content, respectively.
Figure 8. Loadings (A) and scores of LVI (BD). The color curves in A represent the ACO algorithm-selected spectral bands, and the white represents the ACO algorithm-not-selected spectral bands. (BD) represent the relationship between the scores of LVI and the reference values of Mono-CFZ, An-CFZ, and total polymorphic impurity (Mono-CFZ + An-CFZ) content, respectively.
Molecules 31 00230 g008
Figure 9. Loadings (A) and scores of LVII (BD). The color curves in A represent the ACO algorithm-selected spectral bands, and the white represents the ACO algorithm-not-selected spectral bands. (BD) represented the relationship between the scores of LVII and the reference values of Mono-CFZ, An-CFZ, and total polymorphic impurity (Mono-CFZ + An-CFZ) content, respectively.
Figure 9. Loadings (A) and scores of LVII (BD). The color curves in A represent the ACO algorithm-selected spectral bands, and the white represents the ACO algorithm-not-selected spectral bands. (BD) represented the relationship between the scores of LVII and the reference values of Mono-CFZ, An-CFZ, and total polymorphic impurity (Mono-CFZ + An-CFZ) content, respectively.
Molecules 31 00230 g009aMolecules 31 00230 g009b
Table 1. Factors and levels of orthogonal experiment.
Table 1. Factors and levels of orthogonal experiment.
Experiment NumberA aB aC aD a
11000.35SG1st
21000.510SG2nd
31000.715SG2nd + WT
42000.310SG2nd + WT
52000.515SG1st
62000.75SG2nd
73000.315SG2nd
83000.55SG2nd + WT
93000.710SG1st
a A represents the number of ants, B represents the pheromone evaporation rate, C represents the number of spectral bands, and D represents the pretreatment method.
Table 2. Effects of different LV numbers on PLSR model performance.
Table 2. Effects of different LV numbers on PLSR model performance.
NRMSEC
An-CFZMono-CFZAn-CFZ + Mono-CFZAverage
12.45500.78072.04161.7591
20.25730.44950.56370.4235
30.23480.41660.49220.3812
40.23130.24270.32250.2655
50.22150.22140.28030.2411
60.22090.18860.25940.2230
70.17800.16360.22420.1886
80.16520.14240.18130.1630
90.13770.14580.16550.1497
100.13130.12680.15020.1361
150.07770.07580.08060.0780
200.04100.05670.05190.0499
250.02730.02690.02400.0260
Table 3. Validation results of the PLSR model.
Table 3. Validation results of the PLSR model.
SamplesMono-CFZ (%)An-CFZ (%)Total Polymorphic Impurity (%)
ReferencePredictedReferencePredictedReferencePredicted
V1 a0.50000.49230.50000.49271.00000.9783
V2 a1.50001.47881.50001.48013.00002.9789
V3 a2.50002.49712.50002.49845.00005.0331
V4 a3.50003.50523.50003.50477.00006.8749
V5 a4.50004.48664.50004.50259.00009.1205
V6 a5.00004.96575.00004.976910.00009.9915
Precision (RSD%)4.50001.10474.50000.99789.00001.2369
Repeatability (RSD%)4.50001.11234.50001.01149.00001.2517
Stability (RSD%)4.50001.21314.50001.13279.00001.2434
a V1, V2, V3, V4, V5 and V6 are the samples used to validate the PLSR model.
Table 4. Wavenumber region corresponding to the spectral band number selected by the ACO algorithm to establish the optimal PLSR model.
Table 4. Wavenumber region corresponding to the spectral band number selected by the ACO algorithm to establish the optimal PLSR model.
Spectral Band NumberWavenumberSpectral Band NumberWavenumber
206310–6121 cm−1108238–8049 cm−1
176888–6699 cm−188624–8435 cm−1
265153–4964 cm−1137660–7471 cm−1
118046–7857 cm−169010–8821 cm−1
186696–6507 cm−1235731–5542 cm−1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, M.; Fu, R.; Xu, G.; Dong, W.; Qi, H.; Dong, P.; Song, P. Simultaneous Quantitative Analysis of Polymorphic Impurities in Canagliflozin Tablets Utilizing Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Partial Least Squares Regression. Molecules 2026, 31, 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31020230

AMA Style

Liu M, Fu R, Xu G, Dong W, Qi H, Dong P, Song P. Simultaneous Quantitative Analysis of Polymorphic Impurities in Canagliflozin Tablets Utilizing Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Partial Least Squares Regression. Molecules. 2026; 31(2):230. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31020230

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Mingdi, Rui Fu, Guiyu Xu, Weibing Dong, Huizhi Qi, Peiran Dong, and Ping Song. 2026. "Simultaneous Quantitative Analysis of Polymorphic Impurities in Canagliflozin Tablets Utilizing Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Partial Least Squares Regression" Molecules 31, no. 2: 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31020230

APA Style

Liu, M., Fu, R., Xu, G., Dong, W., Qi, H., Dong, P., & Song, P. (2026). Simultaneous Quantitative Analysis of Polymorphic Impurities in Canagliflozin Tablets Utilizing Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Partial Least Squares Regression. Molecules, 31(2), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31020230

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop