Dual-Stimuli Responsive Cystamine-Modified Polydopamine Coatings as Payload Gatekeepers
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Synthesis and Characterization of PDA_Cyst
2.2. Synthesis and Characterization of MSN@Drug@PDA_Cyst
2.3. MSN@DOX@PDA_Cyst
2.4. MSN@SO@PDA_Cyst
2.5. Drug Release from MSN@Drug@PDA_Cyst Under Different Physiological Conditions
2.5.1. DOX Release from MSN@DOX@PDA_Cyst
2.5.2. SO Release from MSN@SO@PDA_Cyst
3. Experimental
3.1. Materials and Characterization Methods
3.2. Synthesis of Cystamine-Modified Polydopamine Nanoparticles (PDA_Cyst)
3.3. Synthesis of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles (MSNs)
3.3.1. Loading DOX on MSNs
3.3.2. Loading SO on MSNs
3.4. Preparation of Cystamine-Modified Polydopamine Coated MSNs@drug (DOX or SO) Particles
3.5. Preparation of Polydopamine Coated MSNs@drug (DOX or SO) Particles
3.6. Drug Release from MSN@drug@PDA_Cyst Carriers Under Different Physiological Conditions
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- World Health Organization (WHO). Cancer. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer (accessed on 15 November 2023).
- Carvalho, C.; Santos, R.X.; Cardoso, S.; Correia, S.; Oliveira, P.J.; Santos, M.S.; Moreira, P.I. Doxorubicin: The good, the bad and the ugly effect. Curr. Med. Chem. 2009, 16, 3267–3285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardoso, H.; Alves, A.M.; Marques, M.; Vale, A.M.; Pereira, P.; Macedo, G. Hepatocellular carcinoma treatment with sorafenib: Real-life evaluation of prognostic factors and a practical clue for patient management. GE—Port. J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 23, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thorn, C.F.; Oshiro, C.; Marsh, S.; Hernandez-Boussard, T.; McLeod, H.; Klein, T.E.; Altman, R.B. Doxorubicin pathways: Pharmacodynamics and adverse effects. Pharmacogenet. Genom. 2011, 21, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Y.; Gao, Z.-H.; Qu, X.-J. The adverse effects of sorafenib in patients with advanced cancers. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2015, 116, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferlay, J.; Colombet, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Parkin, D.M.; Piñeros, M.; Znaor, A.; Bray, F. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. Int. J. Cancer 2021, 149, 778–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tao, W.; Zhang, J.; Zeng, X.; Liu, D.; Liu, G.; Zhu, X.; Liu, Y.; Yu, Q.; Huang, L.; Mei, L. Blended Nanoparticle System Based on Miscible Structurally Similar Polymers: A Safe, Simple, Targeted, and Surprisingly High Efficiency Vehicle for Cancer Therapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2015, 4, 1203–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kanapathipillai, M.; Brock, A.; Ingber, D.E. Nanoparticle targeting of anti-cancer drugs that alter intracellular signaling or influence the tumor microenvironment. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2014, 79, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bao, G.; Mitragotri, S.; Tong, S. Multifunctional Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery and Molecular Imaging. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2013, 15, 253–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gurunathan, S.; Kang, M.-H.; Qasim, M.; Kim, J.-H. Nanoparticle-Mediated Combination Therapy: Two-in-One Approach for Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lombardo, D.; Kiselev, M.A.; Caccamo, M.T. Smart Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery Application: Development of Versatile Nanocarrier Platforms in Biotechnology and Nanomedicine. J. Nanomater. 2019, 2019, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yazdani, F.; Seddigh, M. Magnetite nanoparticles synthesized by co-precipitation method: The effects of various iron anions on specifications. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016, 184, 318–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simon, J.; Flahaut, E.; Golzio, M. Overview of carbon nanotubes for biomedical applications. Materials 2019, 12, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tran, S.; DeGiovanni, P.-J.; Piel, B.; Rai, P. Cancer nanomedicine: A review of recent success in drug delivery. Clin. Transl. Med. 2017, 6, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boisselier, E.; Astruc, D. Gold nanoparticles in nanomedicine: Preparations, imaging, diagnostics, therapies and toxicity. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1759–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Park, J.-E.; Kim, M.; Hwang, J.-H.; Nam, J.-M. Golden Opportunities: Plasmonic Gold Nanostructures for Biomedical Applications based on the Second Near-Infrared Window. Small Methods 2017, 1, 1600032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.H.; Moon, M.J.; Kim, D.Y.; Heo, S.H.; Jeong, Y.Y. Hyaluronic acid-based nanostructures for cancer therapy: Recent advances and challenges. Polymers 2018, 10, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, X.; Bai, J.; Yang, W. Stimuli-Responsive Nanocarriers for Therapeutic Applications in Cancer. Cancer Biol. Med. 2021, 18, 319–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krishnan, N.N.; Henkensmeier, D.; Jang, J.H.; Kim, H.-J.; Rebbin, V.; Oh, I.-H.; Hong, S.-A.; Nam, S.-W.; Lim, T.-H. Sulfonated poly(ether sulfone)-based silica nanocomposite membranes for high-temperature polymer electrolyte fuel cell applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 7152–7161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vallet-Regí, M.; Colilla, M.; Izquierdo-Barba, I.; Manzano, M. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for drug delivery: Current insights. Molecules 2017, 23, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bouchoucha, M.; Côté, M.-F.; Gaudreault, R.C.; Fortin, M.-A.; Kleitz, F. Size-Controlled Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Tunable Drug Release and Enhanced Anti-Tumoral Activity. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 4243–4258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Lu, J.; Li, J.; Gao, Y.; Mao, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, S. Current trends in smart mesoporous silica-based nanovehicles for photoactivated cancer therapy. J. Control. Release 2021, 339, 445–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Watermann, A.; Brieger, J. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as drug delivery vehicles in cancer. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Han, N.; Bai, L.; Li, J.; Liu, J.; Che, E.; Hu, L.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, T.; et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in drug delivery and biomedical applications. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2015, 11, 313–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wen, J.; Yang, K.; Liu, F.; Li, H.; Xu, Y.; Sun, S. Diverse gatekeepers for mesoporous silica nanoparticle based drug delivery systems. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 6024–6045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, M.; Wu, Q.; Yuan, Z. “Three-in-One” multifunctional gatekeeper gated mesoporous silica nanoparticles for intracellular pH-activated targeted cancer therapy. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2018, 1, 572–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kato, Y.; Ozawa, S.; Miyamoto, C.; Maehata, Y.; Suzuki, A.; Maeda, T.; Baba, Y. Acidic extracellular microenvironment and cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2013, 13, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gamcsik, M.P.; Kasibhatla, M.S.; Teeter, S.D.; Colvin, O.M. Glutathione levels in human tumors. Biomarkers 2012, 17, 671–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Niu, B.; Liao, K.; Zhou, Y.; Wen, T.; Quan, G.; Pan, X.; Wu, C. Application of glutathione depletion in cancer therapy: Enhanced ROS-based therapy, ferroptosis, and chemotherapy. Biomaterials 2021, 277, 121110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, H.; Dellatore, S.M.; Miller, W.M.; Messersmith, P.B. Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science 2007, 318, 426–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zheng, P.; Ding, B.; Li, G. Polydopamine-incorporated nanoformulations for biomedical applications. Macromol. Biosci. 2020, 20, 2000228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mrówczyński, R. Polydopamine-based multifunctional (nano)materials for cancer therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 7541–7561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, Y.; Coy, E.; Kim, H.; Mrówczyński, R.; Torruella, P.; Jeong, D.-W.; Choi, K.S.; Jang, J.H.; Song, M.Y.; Jang, D.-J.; et al. Efficient photocatalytic production of hydrogen by exploiting the polydopamine-semiconductor interface. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 280, 119423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mrówczyński, R.; Bunge, A.; Liebscher, J. Polydopamine—an organocatalyst rather than an innocent polymer. Chem. A Eur. J. 2014, 20, 8647–8653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, D.T.; Peng, L.; Reeder, W.S.; Moosavi, S.M.; Tiana, D.; Britt, D.K.; Oveisi, E.; Queen, W.L. Rapid, selective heavy metal removal from water by a metal–organic framework/polydopamine composite. ACS Cent. Sci. 2018, 4, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Su, L.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Liang, F.; Zhang, X. Strong Antibacterial Polydopamine Coatings Prepared by a Shaking-assisted Method. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jędrzak, A.; Rębiś, T.; Nowicki, M.; Synoradzki, K.; Mrówczyński, R.; Jesionowski, T. Polydopamine grafted on an advanced Fe3O4/lignin hybrid material and its evaluation in biosensing. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 455, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jędrzak, A.; Rębiś, T.; Kuznowicz, M.; Jesionowski, T. Bio-inspired magnetite/lignin/polydopamine-glucose oxidase biosensing nanoplatform. From synthesis, via sensing assays to comparison with others glucose testing techniques. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 127, 677–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Batul, R.; Tamanna, T.; Khaliq, A.; Yu, A. Recent progress in the biomedical applications of polydopamine nanostructures. Biomater. Sci. 2017, 5, 1204–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gisbert-Garzarán, M.; Vallet-Regí, M. Redox-responsive mesoporous silica nanoparticles for cancer treatment: Recent updates. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, H.A.; Ma, Y.; Zhou, F.; Hong, S.; Lee, H. Material-independent surface chemistry beyond polydopamine coating. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 704–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, H.; Chao, Y.; Liu, J.; Huang, J.; Pan, J.; Guo, W.; Wu, J.; Sheng, M.; Yang, K.; Wang, J.; et al. Polydopamine Coated Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as a Versatile Platform with Radionuclide Labeling for Multimodal Tumor Imaging and Therapy. Theranostics 2016, 6, 1833–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Farokhi, M.; Mottaghitalab, F.; Saeb, M.R.; Thomas, S. Functionalized theranostic nanocarriers with bio-inspired polydopamine for tumor imaging and chemo-photothermal therapy. J. Control. Release 2019, 309, 203–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, H.; Scherer, N.F.; Messersmith, P.B. Single-molecule mechanics of mussel adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 12999–13003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anderson, T.H.; Yu, J.; Estrada, A.; Hammer, M.U.; Waite, J.H.; Israelachvili, J.N. The Contribution of DOPA to substrate–peptide adhesion and internal cohesion of mussel-inspired synthetic peptide films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 4196–4205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ku, S.H.; Ryu, J.; Hong, S.K.; Lee, H.; Park, C.B. General functionalization route for cell adhesion on non-wetting surfaces. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 2535–2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hong, S.; Kim, K.Y.; Wook, H.J.; Park, S.Y.; Lee, K.D.; Lee, D.Y.; Lee, H. Attenuation of The In Vivo Toxicity of Biomaterials by Polydopamine Surface Modification. Nanomedicine 2011, 6, 793–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, X.; Cao, J.; Li, H.; Li, J.; Jin, Q.; Ren, K.; Ji, J. Mussel-inspired polydopamine: A biocompatible and ultrastable coating for nanoparticles in vivo. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 9384–9395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Woźniak, A.; Walawender, M.; Tempka, D.; Coy, E.; Załęski, K.; Grześkowiak, B.F.; Mrówczyński, R. In vitro genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of polydopamine-coated magnetic nanostructures. Toxicol. In Vitro 2017, 44, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mrówczyński, R.; Markiewicz, R.; Liebscher, J. Chemistry of polydopamine analogues. Polym. Int. 2016, 65, 1288–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.; Rho, J.; Messersmith, P.B. Facile conjugation of biomolecules onto surfaces via mussel adhesive protein inspired coatings. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 431–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jin, A.; Wang, Y.; Lin, K.; Jiang, L. Nanoparticles modified by polydopamine: Working as “drug” carriers. Bioact. Mater. 2020, 5, 522–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wei, Y.; Gao, L.; Wang, L.; Shi, L.; Wei, E.; Zhou, B.; Zhou, L.; Ge, B. Polydopamine and peptide decorated doxorubicin-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a targeted drug delivery system for bladder cancer therapy. Drug Deliv. 2017, 24, 681–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lei, W.; Sun, C.; Jiang, T.; Gao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, S. Polydopamine-coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles for multi-responsive drug delivery and combined chemo-photothermal therapy. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 105, 110103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shao, M.; Chang, C.; Liu, Z.; Chen, K.; Zhou, Y.; Zheng, G.; Huang, Z.; Xu, H.; Xu, P.; Lu, B. Polydopamine coated hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles as pH-sensitive nanocarriers for overcoming multidrug resistance. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2019, 183, 110427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, X.; Xie, C.; Xia, H.; Wang, Z. pH and ultrasound dual-responsive polydopamine-coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery. Langmuir 2018, 34, 9974–9981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pada, A.-K.; Desai, D.; Sun, K.; Prakirth Govardhanam, N.; Törnquist, K.; Zhang, J.; Rosenholm, J.M. Comparison of Polydopamine-Coated Mesoporous Silica Nanorods and Spheres for the Delivery of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Anticancer Drugs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zheng, Q.; Lin, T.; Wu, H.; Guo, L.; Ye, P.; Hao, Y.; Guo, Q.; Jiang, J.; Fu, F.; Chen, G. Mussel-inspired polydopamine coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles as pH-sensitive nanocarriers for controlled release. Int. J. Pharm. 2014, 463, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, X.; Cao, Y.; Li, J.; Zheng, D.; Lan, S.; Xue, Y.; Yu, F.; Wu, M.; Zhu, X. Folic acid-modified Prussian blue/polydopamine nanoparticles as an MRI agent for use in targeted chemo/photothermal therapy. Biomater. Sci. 2019, 7, 2996–3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Singh, S.; Pal, K. Folic-acid adorned alginate-polydopamine modified paclitaxel/Zn-CuO nanocomplex for pH triggered drug release and synergistic antitumor efficacy. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 234, 123602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Binu, N.M.; Prema, D.; Prakash, J.; Balagangadharan, K.; Balashanmugam, P.; Selvamurugan, N.; Venkatasubbu, G.D. Folic acid decorated pH sensitive polydopamine coated honeycomb structured nickel oxide nanoparticles for targeted delivery of quercetin to triple negative breast cancer cells. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 630, 127609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menichetti, A.; Mordini, D.; Montalti, M. Polydopamine Nanosystems in Drug Delivery: Effect of Size, Morphology, and Surface Charge. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ren, S.; Xiao, X.; Lv, J.; Lv, S.; Wang, X.; Liu, R.; Kong, Q. Advances in the study of polydopamine nanotechnology in central nervous system disorders. Front. Mater. 2024, 11, 1396397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hemalatha, D.; Suneetha, M.; Kim, H.; Uthappa, U.T.; Rao, K.S.V.K.; Han, S.S. CD-44 Active cystamine-bridged hyaluronic acid–polydopamine nanoparticles for chemo-photothermal cancer therapy. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 682, 132879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, X.; Yang, K.; Huang, C.; Xu, S.; Wang, L.; Pi, P.; Wen, X. Novel pH-Responsive Smart Fabric: From Switchable Wettability to Controllable On-Demand Oil/Water Separation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, P.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, D.; Qi, G.; Jin, Y. Glutathione Content Detection of Single Cells under Ingested Doxorubicin by Functionalized Glass Nanopores. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 4240–4245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xie, M.; Shi, H.; Ma, K.; Shen, H.; Li, B.; Shen, S.; Wang, X.; Jin, Y. Hybrid nanoparticles for drug delivery and bioimaging: Mesoporous silica nanoparticles functionalized with carboxyl groups and a near-infrared fluorescent dye. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 395, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luo, Z.; Cai, K.; Hu, Y.; Zhao, L.; Liu, P.; Duan, L.; Yang, W. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles end-capped with collagen: Redox-responsive nanoreservoirs for targeted drug delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 640–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ostrowska, S.; Szukowska, M.; Kim, S.; Kim, Y.; Wawrzyniak, D.; Mrówczyński, R. Doxorubicin and sorafenib release from mesoporous silica nanoparticles coated with polydopamine—influence of mechanical and chemical stimuli on the process. Front. Coat. Dye Interface Eng. 2025, 3, 1531144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Huo, M.; Zhou, J.; Zou, A.; Li, W.; Yao, C.; Xie, S. DDSolver: An add-in program for modeling and comparison of drug dissolution profiles. AAPS J. 2010, 12, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Agostini, A.; Mondragón, L.; Bernardos, A.; Martínez-Máñez, R.; Marcos, M.D.; Sancenón, F.; Soto, J.; Costero, A.; Manguan-García, C.; Perona, R.; et al. Targeted cargo delivery in senescent cells using galactose-capped mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10556–10560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, X.; Nie, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Liang, Z.; Ma, Q. A novel L-cysteine regulated polydopamine nanoparticle-based electrochemiluminescence image application. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 8592–8600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, N.L.; Jia, L.P.; Ma, R.N.; Jia, W.L.; Lu, Y.Y.; Shi, S.-S.; Wang, H.-S. A novel sandwiched electrochemiluminescence immunosensor for the detection of carcinoembryonic antigen based on carbon quantum dots and signal amplification. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 89, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gościanska, J.; Olejnik, A.; Ejsmont, A.; Galarda, A.; Wuttke, S. Overcoming the paracetamol dose challenge with wrinkled mesoporous carbon spheres. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 586, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Llovet, J.M.; Ricci, S.; Mazzaferro, V.; Hilgard, P.; Gane, E.; Blanc, J.-F.; de Oliveira, A.C.; Santoro, A.; Raoul, J.-L.; Forner, A.; et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 378–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Traverso, N.; Ricciarelli, R.; Nitti, M.; Marengo, B.; Furfaro, A.L.; Pronzato, M.A.; Marinari, U.M.; Domenicotti, C. Role of glutathione in cancer progression and chemoresistance. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2013, 2013, 972913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martínez-Carmona, M.; Baeza, A.; Rodriguez-Milla, M.A.; García-Castro, J.; Vallet-Regí, M. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles grafted with a light-responsive protein shell for highly cytotoxic antitumoral therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 5746–5752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Karwicka, E. Autofagia—mechanizm przeżycia czy śmierci komórki? Postępy Biol. Komórki 2010, 37, 323–342. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, Q.; Cheng, Y. Multi-responsive photothermal-chemotherapy with drug-loaded melanin-like nanoparticles for synergetic tumor ablation. Biomaterials 2016, 81, 114–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Noh, J.; Kwon, B.; Han, E.; Park, M.; Yang, W.; Cho, W.; Yoo, W.; Khang, G.; Lee, D. Amplification of oxidative stress by a dual stimuli-responsive hybrid drug enhances cancer cell death. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McNeil, N.M.R.; McDonnell, C.; Hambrook, M.; Back, T.G. Oxidation of disulfides to thiolsulfinates with hydrogen peroxide and a cyclic seleninate ester catalyst. Molecules 2015, 20, 10748–10762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lyu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Neoh, K.G.; Chai, C.L.L. A one step method for the functional and property modification of DOPA based nanocoatings. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 12409–12415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, D.; Hu, C.; Liu, Y.; Chen, F.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, X. Enzyme-/redox-responsive mesoporous silica nanoparticles based on functionalized dopamine as nanocarriers for cancer therapy. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 6097–6105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, J.; Wang, L.; Han, X.; Dou, J.; Jiang, X.; Yuan, J. Polydopamine/keratin complexes as gatekeepers of mesoporous silica nanoparticles for pH and GSH dual responsive drug delivery. Mater. Lett. 2021, 293, 129676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.-L.; Xu, S.-H.; Zhou, H.; Wang, X.; Dong, B.; Gao, H.; Tang, J.; Yang, Y.-W. pH and Glutathione Dual-Responsive Dynamic Cross-Linked Supramolecular Network on Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Controlled Anticancer Drug Release. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 28656–28664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hao, Y.-N.; Zheng, A.-Q.; Guo, T.-T.; Shu, Y.; Wang, J.-H.; Johnson, O.; Chen, W. Glutathione triggered degradation of polydopamine to facilitate controlled drug release for synergic combinational cancer treatment. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 6742–6750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Padmaa Paarakh, M.; Ani Jose, P.; Setty, C.M.; Peterchristoper, G.V. Release kinetics—concepts and applications. Int. J. Pharm. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 12–20. Available online: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2152/cdbe9a473e4a273f3071e882f35f0ae36de3.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2019).
- Jiang, T.; Li, Y.-M.; Lv, Y.; Cheng, Y.-J.; He, F.; Zhuo, R.-X. Amphiphilic polycarbonate conjugates of doxorubicin with pH-sensitive hydrazone linker for controlled release. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2013, 11, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, C.; Tang, W.; Jiang, D.; Yang, G.; Wang, X.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, W.; Wang, P. Hyaluronic acid conjugated polydopamine functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles for synergistic targeted chemo-photothermal therapy. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 11012–11024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- LaVoie, M.J.; Ostaszewski, B.L.; Weihofen, A.; Schlossmacher, M.G.; Selkoe, D.J. Dopamine covalently modifies and functionally inactivates parkin. Nat. Med. 2005, 11, 1214–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]







| Material | N % | C % | H % | S % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDA_Cyst 3:1 | 8.74 | 53.37 | 4.11 | 0.66 |
| PDA_Cyst 1:3 | 9.17 | 54.12 | 3.86 | 4.66 |
| Receptor Medium | Zero-Order | First-Order | Higuchi | Hixson-Crowell | Korsmeyer-Peppas | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSN@DOX@PDA_Cyst 3:1 | R2 | n | ||||
| pH 4.5 | 0.8999 | 0.9136 | 0.9673 | 0.9092 | 0.9401 | 0.3774 |
| pH 4.5 + 10 mM H2O2 | 0.8524 | 0.8893 | 0.9724 | 0.8775 | 0.9229 | 0.3917 |
| pH 4.5 + 10 mM GSH | 0.8444 | 0.8976 | 0.9664 | 0.8811 | 0.9436 | 0.2988 |
| pH 5.5 | 0.8582 | 0.8788 | 0.9748 | 0.8721 | 0.9428 | 0.4422 |
| pH 5.5 + 10 mM H2O2 | 0.9317 | 0.961 | 0.9808 | 0.9526 | 0.9478 | 0.3115 |
| pH 5.5 + 10 mM GSH | 0.8889 | 0.9327 | 0.9649 | 0.92 | 0.9048 | 0.448 |
| pH 7.5 | 0.8239 | 0.8521 | 0.9716 | 0.843 | 0.9142 | 0.4306 |
| pH 7.5 + 10 mM H2O2 | 0.8025 | 0.8551 | 0.9603 | 0.8382 | 0.8822 | 0.3588 |
| pH 7.5 + 10 mM GSH | 0.8844 | 0.9409 | 0.9792 | 0.9248 | 0.9281 | 0.4082 |
| MSN@DOX@PDA_Cyst 1:3 | R2 | n | ||||
| pH 4.5 | 0.8332 | 0.8451 | 0.9775 | 0.8412 | 0.8947 | 0.5236 |
| pH 4.5 + 10 mM H2O2 | 0.9385 | 0.9529 | 0.9777 | 0.9484 | 0.9591 | 0.5052 |
| pH 4.5 + 10 mM GSH | 0.8225 | 0.8636 | 0.9606 | 0.8504 | 0.9074 | 0.3058 |
| pH 5.5 | 0.8271 | 0.8491 | 0.9659 | 0.8419 | 0.9186 | 0.3401 |
| pH 5.5 + 10 mM H2O2 | 0.8948 | 0.9236 | 0.9832 | 0.9146 | 0.9479 | 0.4015 |
| pH 5.5 + 10 mM GSH | 0.8293 | 0.874 | 0.9688 | 0.8597 | 0.9197 | 0.3824 |
| pH 7.5 | 0.8336 | 0.8602 | 0.9787 | 0.8516 | 0.9399 | 0.3408 |
| pH 7.5 + 10 mM H2O2 | 0.7828 | 0.8412 | 0.9443 | 0.8226 | 0.8676 | 0.396 |
| pH 7.5 + 10 mM GSH | 0.8413 | 0.9147 | 0.9754 | 0.8925 | 0.9302 | 0.3868 |
| Receptor Medium | Zero-Order | First-Order | Higuchi | Hixson-Crowell | Korsmeyer-Peppas | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSN@SO@PDA_Cyst 3:1 | R2 | n | ||||
| pH 4.5 | 0.5905 | 0.6029 | 0.8207 | 0.5988 | 0.7747 | 0.2639 |
| pH 4.5 + 10 mM H2O2 | 0.8641 | 0.904 | 0.9644 | 0.8915 | 0.9335 | 0.3832 |
| pH 4.5 + 10 mM GSH | 0.8455 | 0.9206 | 0.9692 | 0.8982 | 0.9334 | 0.3813 |
| pH 5.5 | 0.7551 | 0.7788 | 0.9188 | 0.771 | 0.8713 | 0.3132 |
| pH 5.5 + 10 mM H2O2 | 0.8025 | 0.8466 | 0.9513 | 0.8324 | 0.9194 | 0.3404 |
| pH 5.5 + 10 mM GSH | 0.813 | 0.8818 | 0.9641 | 0.8604 | 0.8895 | 0.3717 |
| pH 7.5 | 0.7602 | 0.7755 | 0.8914 | 0.7705 | 0.8929 | 0.2319 |
| pH 7.5 + 10 mM H2O2 | 0.9389 | 0.9513 | 0.9971 | 0.9473 | 0.995 | 0.2195 |
| pH 7.5 + 10 mM GSH | 0.7032 | 0.806 | 0.8914 | 0.7732 | 0.7876 | 0.3689 |
| MSN@SO@PDA_Cyst 1:3 | R2 | n | ||||
| pH 4.5 | 0.9098 | 0.9275 | 0.9649 | 0.9219 | 0.9088 | 0.4424 |
| pH 4.5 + 10 mM H2O2 | 0.8976 | 0.9419 | 0.9777 | 0.9287 | 0.9534 | 0.3584 |
| pH 4.5 + 10 mM GSH | 0.9121 | 0.9632 | 0.9745 | 0.9514 | 0.9602 | 0.3579 |
| pH 5.5 | 0.9411 | 0.9596 | 0.9832 | 0.9539 | 0.9837 | 0.3117 |
| pH 5.5 + 10 mM H2O2 | 0.8105 | 0.8642 | 0.9707 | 0.8471 | 0.9382 | 0.3114 |
| pH 5.5 + 10 mM GSH | 0.8283 | 0.9277 | 0.9677 | 0.8995 | 0.9187 | 0.3654 |
| pH 7.5 | 0.7786 | 0.7997 | 0.8977 | 0.7928 | 0.8497 | 0.2551 |
| pH 7.5 + 10 mM H2O2 | 0.7999 | 0.8395 | 0.9591 | 0.8267 | 0.9455 | 0.2708 |
| pH 7.5 + 10 mM GSH | 0.8823 | 0.9502 | 0.9717 | 0.9316 | 0.9472 | 0.4206 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Ostrowska, S.; Szukowska, M.; Kim, Y.; Mrówczyński, R. Dual-Stimuli Responsive Cystamine-Modified Polydopamine Coatings as Payload Gatekeepers. Molecules 2026, 31, 2413. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31142413
Ostrowska S, Szukowska M, Kim Y, Mrówczyński R. Dual-Stimuli Responsive Cystamine-Modified Polydopamine Coatings as Payload Gatekeepers. Molecules. 2026; 31(14):2413. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31142413
Chicago/Turabian StyleOstrowska, Sylwia, Monika Szukowska, Yeonho Kim, and Radosław Mrówczyński. 2026. "Dual-Stimuli Responsive Cystamine-Modified Polydopamine Coatings as Payload Gatekeepers" Molecules 31, no. 14: 2413. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31142413
APA StyleOstrowska, S., Szukowska, M., Kim, Y., & Mrówczyński, R. (2026). Dual-Stimuli Responsive Cystamine-Modified Polydopamine Coatings as Payload Gatekeepers. Molecules, 31(14), 2413. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31142413

