Evaluation of Water Status and Thermal Characteristics of Dried Carrot Half-Slices in Correlation with Physicochemical and Sensory Properties
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Physicochemical Properties of Dried Carrot
2.1.1. Dry Matter Content (DM), Water Activity (AW), Polyphenol Content and Antioxidant Activity (DPPH and ABTS)
2.1.2. Sorption Properties
2.1.3. Structure and Microstructure Analysis
2.1.4. Glass Transition Temperature (Tg)
2.1.5. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
2.1.6. Color Parameters and Sensory Evaluation
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Material and Experimental Procedure
4.2. Technological Methods
4.2.1. Osmotic Enrichment (OE)
4.2.2. Microwave-Vacuum Drying (MVD)
4.2.3. Freeze-Drying (FD)
4.3. Analytical Part
4.3.1. Dry Matter Content, Water Activity, and Color Parameters
4.3.2. Hygroscopicity Determination and Sorption Isotherms
4.3.3. Analysis of Texture Properties
4.3.4. Microstructure Analysis Using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)
4.3.5. Microstructure and Porosity Analysis Using X-Ray Microtomography
4.3.6. Thermal Properties
4.3.7. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy
4.4. Chemical Assays
4.4.1. Extraction Procedure
4.4.2. Total Phenolic Content (TPC) Determination
4.4.3. Antioxidant Activity Determination
4.5. Sensory Evaluation
4.6. Statistical Analysis
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Global Market Insights. Healthy Snacks Market Size—By Product Type, Distribution Channel Analysis, Share, Growth Forecast, 2025–2034. 2025. Available online: https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/healthy-snacks-market (accessed on 15 December 2025).
- Purkiewicz, A.; Ciborska, J.; Tańska, M.; Narwojsz, A.; Starowicz, M.; Przybyłowicz, K.E.; Sawicki, T. The impact of the method extraction and different carrot variety on the carotenoid profile, total phenolic content and antioxidant properties of juices. Plants 2020, 9, 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bystrická, J.; Kavalcová, P.; Musilová, J.; Vollmannová, A.; Tóth, T.; Lenková, M. Carrot (Daucus carota L. ssp. sativus (Hoffm.) Arcang.) as source of antioxidants. Acta Agric. Slov. 2015, 105, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ikram, A.; Rasheed, A.; Ahmad Khan, A.; Khan, R.; Ahmad, M.; Bashir, R.; Hassan Mohamed, M. Exploring the health benefits and utility of carrots and carrot pomace: A systematic review. Int. J. Food Prop. 2024, 27, 180–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ignaczak, A.; Woźniak, Ł.; Salamon, A.; Szczepańska-Stolarczyk, J.; Trych, U.; Chobot, M.; Kowalska, J.; Kowalska, H. Shaping the physicochemical and health-promoting properties of carrot snacks produced by microwave-vacuum drying with preliminary thermal and enriching treatment. Molecules 2024, 29, 5100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ignaczak, A.; Woźniak, Ł.; Marzec, A.; Kowalska, J.; Chobot, M.; Kowalska, H. The influence of osmotic treatment, edible coatings application, and reduced pressure on microwave–vacuum-dried carrot properties. Molecules 2025, 30, 1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Wang, B.; Lv, W.; Xiao, H. Optimizing crispness and nutrient retention in carrot snacks: Multi-stage drying via microwave-infrared and negative pressure puffing with moisture-dependent transition. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2025, 105, 104171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dueik, V.; Marzullo, C.; Bouchon, P. Effect of vacuum inclusion on the quality and the sensory attributes of carrot snacks. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 50, 361–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Bi, J.; Lyu, M.; Lyu, J. Insight into the effect of osmosis agents on macro-and micro-texture, water distribution, and thermal stability of instant controlled pressure drop drying peach chips. Food Chem. 2024, 440, 138236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Figiel, A.; Michalska, A. Overall quality of fruits and vegetables products affected by the drying processes with the assistance of vacuum-microwaves. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 18, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, L.L.; Zhang, M. Trends in development of dried vegetable products as snacks. Dry. Technol. 2012, 30, 448–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, Y.; Xu, Y.; Meng, P.; Tu, D.; Zhao, Y.; Fu, L.; Tian, Y. Impact of combined ultrasonic and microwave vacuum drying on physicochemical properties and structural characteristics of polysaccharides from shiitake mushrooms (Lentinus edodes). Ultrason. Sonochem. 2025, 115, 107283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wojdyło, A.; Lech, K.; Nowicka, P. Effects of different drying methods on the retention of bioactive compounds, on-line antioxidant capacity and color of the novel snack from red-fleshed apples. Molecules 2020, 25, 5521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wardhani, N.S.K.; Amanda, N.; Sari, A.R. Microwave vacuum drying on fruit: A review. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Smart and Innovative Agriculture (ICoSIA 2021), Online, 3–4 November 2021; Atlantis Press: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 309–316. [Google Scholar]
- Kaur Dhillon, G.; Kour, A.; Gupta, N. Optimization of low-cost drying technology for preservation of peach (Prunus persica) using RSM. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 2022, 22, 525–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radziejewska-Kubzdela, E.; Biegańska-Marecik, R.; Szadzińska, J.; Spiżewski, T.; Gapiński, B.; Kowiel, A.; Mierzwa, D. The Effect of the Cultivar and Process Parameters on Quality and Biologically Active Compounds Content in Impregnated Carrot Tissue. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 11984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trusinska, M.; Rybak, K.; Drudi, F.; Tylewicz, U.; Nowacka, M. Combined effect of ultrasound and vacuum impregnation for the modification of apple tissue enriched with aloe vera juice. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2024, 104, 106812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowacka, M.; Kowalska, H.; Tylewicz, U.; Ciurzyńska, A.; Skarżyńska, A.; Trusińska, M.; Ignaczak, A.; Karwacka, M.; Chobot, M.; Pobiega, K.; et al. Emerging Technologies in Dried Fruit Snacks: Nutritional Enrichment and Sustainable Production. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2025, 24, e70225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowalska, H.; Trusinska, M.; Rybak, K.; Wiktor, A.; Witrowa-Rajchert, D.; Nowacka, M. Shaping the properties of osmo-dehydrated strawberries in fruit juice concentrates. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, J.; Yi, J.; Bi, J.; Gao, H.; Zhou, M.; Liu, X. Impacts of explosion puffing drying combined with hot-air and freeze drying on the quality of papaya chips. Int. J. Food Eng. 2017, 13, 20160250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Muhtaseb, A.H.; McMinn, W.A.M.; Magee, T.R.A. Moisture sorption isotherm characteristics of food products: A review. Food Bioprod. Process. 2002, 80, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eim, V.S.; Rosselló, C.; Femenia, A.; Simal, S. Moisture sorption isotherms and thermodynamic properties of carrot. Int. J. Food Eng. 2011, 7, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iaccheri, E.; Castagnini, J.M.; Tylewicz, U.; Rocculi, P. Modelling the mechanical properties and sorption behaviour of pulsed electric fields (PEF) treated carrots and potatoes after air drying for food chain management. Biosyst. Eng. 2022, 223, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhandari, B.R.; Howes, T. Implication of glass transition for the drying and stability of dried foods. J. Food Eng. 1999, 40, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escobedo-Avellaneda, Z.; Rodríguez-Martínez, V.; Serment-Moreno, V.; Velázquez, G.; Welti-Chanes, J.; Torres, J.A. Selected applications of water activity management in the food industry. In Water Activity in Foods: Fundamentals and Applications; Barbosa-Cánovas, G.V., Fontana, A.J., Jr., Schmidt, S.J., Labuza, T.P., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 465–482. [Google Scholar]
- Caballero-Cerón, C.; Guerrero-Beltrán, J.A.; Mújica-Paz, H.; Torres, J.A.; Welti-Chanes, J. Moisture sorption isotherms of foods: Experimental methodology, mathematical analysis, and practical applications. In Water Stress in Biological, Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Food Systems; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 187–214. [Google Scholar]
- Prawiranto, K.; Defraeye, T.; Derome, D.; Bühlmann, A.; Hartmann, S.; Verboven, P.; Nicolai, B.; Carmeliet, J. Impact of drying methods on the changes of fruit microstructure unveiled by X-ray micro-computed tomography. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 10606–10624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tapia, M.S.; Alzamora, S.M.; Chirife, J. Effects of water activity (a) on microbial stability as a hurdle in food preservation. In Water Activity in Foods; Barbosa-Cánovas, G.V., Fontana, A.J., Jr., Schmidt, S.J., Labuza, T.P., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 323–355. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, C.; Li, R.; Liao, Y.; Dong, H.; Liu, Y.; Jing, Y.; Li, L.; Cheng, S.; Chen, G. Effect of vacuum microwave drying pretreatment on the production, characteristics, and quality of jujube powder. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2025, 222, 117674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowalska, J.; Lenart, A.; Roszkowska, S.; Kowalska, H. The influence of chokeberry juice and inulin as osmotic-enriching agents in pre-treatment on polyphenols content and sensory quality of dried strawberries. Agric. Food Sci. 2019, 28, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amin, M.R.; Sharmin, T.; Ahmed, S.; Bari, M.S.; Mahomud, M.S.; Roy, J. Effect of microwave output power on the kinetics of color change, physicochemical and bioactive constituent features of pre-treated carrot slices. Appl. Food Res. 2024, 4, 100452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatta, S.; Stevanovic Janezic, T.; Ratti, C. Freeze-drying of plant-based foods. Foods 2020, 9, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, M.X.; Wang, B.; Li, Y.; Nie, X.R.; Mao, J.; Guo, Q.; Xu, N.; Fu, R.; Guo, Z.; Zhao, X.; et al. Exploration of the impact of different drying methods on the quality of Gastrodia elata: A study based on drying kinetics and multidimensional quality evaluation. Food Chem. 2025, 464, 141628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boudebbaz, K.; Brouk, M.; Laalem, R.; Zabaiou, N. Gastroprotective properties of flavonoid-rich extract of Pulicaria odora against ethanol-induced gastric ulcer in mice. Heliyon 2025, 11, e41625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Guo, X.; Wang, R.; Geng, Z.; Jia, J.; Pang, S.; Du, Y.; Jia, S.; Cui, J. Ultrasonic assisted extraction of anthocyanins from rose flower petal in DES system and enzymatic acylation. LWT 2023, 180, 114693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jakubczyk, E.; Rybak, K.; Witrowa-Rajchert, D.; Wiktor, A.; Rąbkowski, R.; Nowacka, M. Convective drying with the application of ultrasonic pre-treatment: The effect of applied conditions on the selected properties of dried apples. Foods 2024, 13, 3893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caballero-Cerón, C.; Serment-Moreno, V.; Velazquez, G.; Torres, J.A.; Welti-Chanes, J. Hygroscopic properties and glass transition of dehydrated mango, apple and banana. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 540–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cybulska, B.; Doe, P.E. Water and food quality. In Chemical and Functional Properties of Food Components, 2nd ed.; Sikorski, Z.E., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002; pp. 25–50. [Google Scholar]
- Wiktor, A.; Witrowa-Rajchert, D. drying kinetics and quality of carrots subjected to microwave-assisted drying preceded by combined pulsed electric field and ultrasound treatment. Dry. Technol. 2020, 38, 176–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michalski, P.; Nur-A-Tomal, M.S.; Crawford, S.; Rudman, M.; van‘t Hag, L. Advancement in fruit drying through the analysis of moisture sorption isotherms: Processing effects on Australian native fruits in comparison to apple. J. Food Eng. 2025, 395, 112526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowacka, M.; Janiak, G.; Kidon, M.; Czapski, J.; Witrowa-Rajchert, D. Applying mathematical models to describe water vapour adsorption isotherms of dried purple and orange carrots. Food Sci. Technol. Qual. 2012, 19, 60–72. (In Polish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gondek, E.; Lewicki, P.P. Moisture sorption isotherms of dried and candied fruits. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2005, 4, 63–71. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Ross, Y.H. Chemical and rheological changes during phase transition in food. Food Technol. 1995, 10, 97–102. [Google Scholar]
- Peleg, M. On modeling changes in food and biosolids and around their glass transition temperature range. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1996, 36, 46–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, H.; Zhang, M.; Mujumdar, A.S.; Lun, R.X. Analysis of Temperature Distribution 932 and SEM Images of Microwave Freeze Drying Banana Chips. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 1144–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, B.G.; James, B.J.; Ho, C.A. Microstructural characteristics of dried carrot pieces and real time observations during their exposure to moisture. Int. J. Food Eng. 2007, 3, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondal, M.H.T.; Ahmmed, R.; Khan, M.J. Ultrasound pretreated freeze-drying of carrot: Effect on nutritional value, bioactive compounds and microstructure. Appl. Food Res. 2025, 5, 100966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haide, R.; Fest-Santini, S.; Santini, M. Use of X-ray micro-computed tomography for the investigation of drying processes in porous media: A review. Dry. Technol. 2022, 40, 1731–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oladejo, A.O.; Gruber, S.; Foerst, P. Applications of non-invasive measuring techniques of internal changes during drying of food products. J. Food Eng. 2025, 396, 112558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marzec, A.; Kowalska, H.; Kowalska, J.; Domian, E.; Lenart, A. Influence of pear variety and drying methods on the quality of dried fruit. Molecules 2020, 25, 5146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siebert, T.; Zuber, M.; Hamann, E.; Baumbach, T.; Karbstein, H.P.; Gaukel, V. Micro-CT visualization of structure development during freeze-drying processes. Dry. Technol. 2020, 38, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Jia, Y.; Li, Y.; Jiao, X.; He, Y.; Wen, L.; Wang, Z. Comprehensive impact of pre-treatment methods on white radish quality, water migration, and microstructure. Food Chem. X 2024, 24, 101991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joardder, M.U.H.; Bosunia, M.H.; Hasan, M.M.; Ananno, A.A.; Karim, A. Significance of Glass Transition Temperature of Food Material in Selecting Drying Condition: An In-Depth Analysis. Food Rev. Int. 2023, 40, 952–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varas Perez, P.; Fagot, A.; Heleven, M.; Smeets, K.; Samyn, P.; Adriaensens, P.; Marchal, W.; Vandamme, D. Assessing food by-products macrocomposition by FTIR microspectroscopy. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2025, 417, 4663–4679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matys, A.; Nowacka, M.; Witrowa-Rajchert, D.; Wiktor, A. Chemical and Thermal Characteristics of PEF-Pretreated Strawberries Dried by Various Methods. Molecules 2024, 29, 3924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barnes, M.; Sulé-Suso, J.; Millett, J.; Roach, P. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy as a non-destructive method for analysing herbarium specimens. Biol. Lett. 2023, 19, 20220546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ciurzynska, A.; Trusinska, M.; Rybak, K.; Wiktor, A.; Nowacka, M. The Influence of pulsed electric field and air temperature on the course of hot-air drying and the bioactive compounds of apple tissue. Molecules 2023, 28, 2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunjal, M.; Singh, J.; Kaur, S.; Choudhary, R.; Rasane, P. Effect of particle size distribution on physical, functional, antioxidant, thermal, and morphological properties of radish sango microgreens powder. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2026, 192, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Izli, N.; Izli, G.; Taskin, O. Impact of different drying methods on the drying kinetics, color, total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of pineapple. CYTA-J. Food 2018, 16, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akcicek, A.; Avci, E.; Tekin-Cakmak, Z.H.; Kasapoglu, M.Z.; Sagdic, O.; Karasu, S. Influence of different drying techniques on the drying kinetics, total bioactive compounds, anthocyanin profile, color, and microstructural properties of blueberry fruit. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 41603–41611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ignaczak, A.; Salamon, A.; Kowalska, J.; Marzec, A.; Kowalska, H. Influence of pre-treatment and drying methods on the quality of dried carrot properties as snacks. Molecules 2023, 28, 6407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ropelewska, E.; Lewandowski, M. The changes in color and image parameters and sensory attributes of freeze-dried clones and a cultivar of red-fleshed apples. Foods 2024, 13, 3784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Y.; Geng, J.; Li, P.; Zhao, Y.; Han, J.; Yang, H.; Cao, S. Effect of blanching times and drying temperatures on the color, moisture migrations, microstructures, phytochemicals, and flavors of chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Food Chem. 2025, 486, 144690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Czett, D.; Nagy, V.; Kurtán, T.; Király, S.B.; Szabó, P.; Agócs, A.; Deli, J.; Böddi, K. Effect of aggregation behaviour on the antioxidant capacity of carotenoids. J. Mol. Liq. 2025, 421, 126870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, T.M.; Durance, T.D.; Scaman, C.H. Characterization of vacuum microwave, air and freeze dried carrot slices. Food Res. Int. 1998, 31, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, A.A.D.L.; Leal, G.F.; Marques, M.R.; Reis, L.C.C.; Junqueira, J.R.D.J.; Macedo, L.L.; Corrêa, J.L.G. Emerging drying technologies and their impact on bioactive compounds: A systematic and bibliometric review. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 6653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marzec, A.; Kowalska, H.; Zadrożna, M. Analysis of instrumental and sensory texture attributes of microwave–convective dried apples. J. Texture Stud. 2010, 41, 417–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surmacka-Szcześniak, A.S. Texture is a sensory property. Food Qual. Prefer. 2002, 13, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, J.; Bi, J.; Yi, J.; Wu, X.; Zhou, M.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, J.N. Characteristics of cell wall pectic polysaccharides affect textural properties of instant controlled pressure drop dried carrot chips derived from different tissue zone. Food Chem. 2019, 293, 358–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, J.; Bi, J.; Yi, J.; Lyu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, Y.; Yu, Y. Characterization of tissue-specific differences in cell wall pectic polysaccharides of carrot root. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hiranvarachat, B.; Suvarnakuta, P.; Devahastin, S. Isomerisation kinetics and antioxidant activities of β-carotene in carrots undergoing different drying techniques and conditions. Food Chem. 2008, 107, 1538–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knockaert, G.; Lemmens, L.; Van Buggenhout, S.; Hendrickx, M.; Van Loey, A. Changes in β-carotene during processing of carrots. In Processing and Impact on Active Components in Food; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 11–16. [Google Scholar]
- Marzec, A.; Kowalska, J.; Domian, E.; Galus, S.; Ciurzyńska, A.; Kowalska, H. Characteristics of dough rheology and the structural, mechanical, and sensory properties of sponge cakes with sweeteners. Molecules 2021, 26, 6638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]





| Sample Codes | Dry Matter Content, DM [%] | Water Activity, AW [-] | TPC [mg GAE/100 g d.m.] | DPPH [mg Trolox/g d.m.]/ABTS [mg Trolox/g d.m.] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh Carrot | 12.40 ± 0.14 | 0.986 ± 0.002 | 235.8 ± 62.6 aA | 5.2 ± 1.1/4.6 ± 0.5 |
| MVD | 89.83 ± 1.58 aA | 0.459 ± 0.001 bA | 1194.3 ± 102.3 aB | 4.6 ± 0.6 aB/3.5 ± 0.8 bB |
| MVD_CH | 96.91 ± 0.24 aB | 0.242 ± 0.005 bA | 2350.4 ± 198.6 aD | 6.4 ± 1.0 aD/4.9 ± 0.1 bB |
| MVD_SB | 91.01 ± 1.66 aA | 0.477 ± 0.005 bA | 779.4 ± 66.6 aB | 3.7 ± 0.2 aA/2.8 ± 0.3 bB |
| MVD_CHE | 89.79 ± 0.62 aA | 0.392 ± 0.003 bA | 1345.3 ± 39.5 aC | 4.8 ± 0.4 aC/4.5 ± 0.4 bC |
| MVD_CA | 89.64 ± 0.84 aA | 0.477 ± 0.004 bA | 345.4 ± 26.6 aA | 0.9 ± 0.7 aA/1.9 ± 0.2 bA |
| FD | 93.70 ± 1.08 bA | 0.128 ± 0.003 aA | 752.9 ± 41.2 aB | 2.4 ± 0.4 aB/2.9 ± 0.4 aB |
| FD_CH | 95.60 ± 0.40 bB | 0.092 ± 0.003 aA | 2443.2 ± 132.9 aD | 7.5 ± 0.2 aD/0.9 ± 0.1 aB |
| FD_SB | 92.28 ± 0.31 bA | 0.159 ± 0.001 aA | 922.4 ± 40.4 aB | 4.1 ± 0.2 aB/3.3 ± 0.8 aB |
| FD_CHE | 93.22 ± 0.31 bA | 0.114 ± 0.002 aA | 1453.2 ± 39.6 aC | 5.3 ± 0.6 aC/4.5 ± 0.5 aC |
| FD_CA | 93.85 ± 0.03 bA | 0.096 ± 0.001 aA | 235.5 ± 40.0 aA | 0.7 ± 0.1 aA/0.6 ± 0.2 aA |
| Hygroscopicity | Sorption Isotherms | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factors/p-Value | Medium Value | Factors/p-Value | Medium Value | ||
| MVD control a CH a SB a CHE a CA a FD control a | Pretreatment/0.2015 | 7.1624 10.2508 7.8330 8. 119 8.7986 10.6442 | MVD control a CH d SB f CHE b CA c FD control d | Pretreatment/* 0.0000 | 14.4830 18.9551 18.6074 16.1130 17.6473 18.1058 |
| MVD a FD b | Drying method/* 0.0021 | 7.5403 9.9787 | MVD b FD a | Drying method/* 0.0000 | 17.6512 17.3957 |
| 15 a 30 a 45 ab 60 ab 120 bc 180 cd 240 de 360 e 600 f 1440 g 1800 g 3000 h 4320 h | Time/* 0.0000 | 1.35906 1.36176 1.59880 1.79313 3.01804 3.85984 4.74994 6.10045 9.45298 17.62265 17.91786 22.22446 | 0.000 b 0.113 a 0.225 c 0.329 d 0.438 e 0.529 f 0.648 g 0.753 i 0.810 j 0.930 k | Water activity/* 0.0000 | 0.1407 0.2052 1.1409 2.9711 5.7259 8.1854 15.2971 20.3506 29.0330 92.1845 |
| many cases | Pretreatment × Time * 0.0359 | many cases | many cases | Pretreatment × Water activity * 0.0000 | many cases |
| many cases | Drying method × Time * 0.0359 | many cases | many cases | Drying method × Water activity * 0.0000 | many cases |
| Models/Parameters | MVD | MVD_CH | MVD_SB | MVD_CHE | MVD_CA | FD | FD_CH | FD_SB | FD_CHE | FD_CA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xm | 6.059 | 6.976 | 7.164 | 6.929 | 8.124 | 7.280 | 6.820 | 7.278 | 6.103 | 6.454 | |
| BET | C | 0.820 | 1.394 | 1.335 | 0.902 | 0.715 | 0.984 | 2.233 | 0.985 | 0.978 | 0.918 |
| R2 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.995 | |
| RMSE | 0.739 | 1.282 | 0.962 | 1.071 | 1.094 | 1.108 | 1.033 | 1.013 | 0.861 | 1.751 | |
| Ve | 6.096 | 8.272 | 6.057 | 7.506 | 6.804 | 7.315 | 6.370 | 6.636 | 6.785 | 13.014 | |
| Xm | 7.265 | 6.970 | 6.807 | 6.095 | 6.514 | 7.376 | 7.242 | 6.719 | 7.125 | 5.024 | |
| GAB | C | 0.566 | 1.398 | 1.559 | 1.276 | 1.290 | 0.953 | 1.826 | 1.221 | 0.694 | 2.016 |
| K | 0.990 | 1.000 | 1.003 | 1.007 | 1.012 | 0.999 | 0.996 | 1.005 | 0.991 | 1.014 | |
| R2 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.996 | |
| RMSE | 0.665 | 1.282 | 0.938 | 0.992 | 0.853 | 1.108 | 0.987 | 0.975 | 0.790 | 1.520 | |
| Ve | 5.486 | 8.272 | 5.906 | 6.947 | 5.308 | 7.310 | 6.086 | 6.387 | 6.224 | 11.301 | |
| a | 4.809 | 6.487 | 6.337 | 5.043 | 4.984 | 5.972 | 7.699 | 5.671 | 5.330 | 4.371 | |
| Lewicki | b | 1.066 | 1.021 | 1.039 | 1.101 | 1.157 | 1.059 | 0.956 | 1.078 | 1.036 | 1.129 |
| c | 3.922 | 1.808 | 1.606 | 1.911 | 1.560 | 2.596 | 1.487 | 2.055 | 3.460 | 1.166 | |
| R2 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.996 | |
| RMSE | 0.720 | 1.230 | 0.891 | 0.954 | 0.853 | 1.033 | 0.915 | 0.910 | 0.785 | 1.580 | |
| Ve | 5.943 | 7.939 | 5.612 | 6.684 | 5.307 | 6.818 | 5.641 | 5.961 | 6.187 | 11.743 | |
| Oswin | a | 5.601 | 7.902 | 7.940 | 6.556 | 6.893 | 7.237 | 9.030 | 7.177 | 6.111 | 6.056 |
| b | 1.024 | 0.959 | 0.967 | 1.019 | 1.054 | 1.002 | 0.905 | 1.005 | 0.998 | 1.023 | |
| R2 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.995 | |
| RMSE | 0.773 | 1.300 | 1.013 | 1.050 | 0.996 | 1.109 | 1.019 | 1.009 | 0.862 | 1.722 | |
| Ve | 5.970 | 7.847 | 5.967 | 6.882 | 5.797 | 6.845 | 5.875 | 6.184 | 6.355 | 11.975 | |
| Henderson | a | 0.389 | 0.311 | 0.315 | 0.365 | 0.374 | 0.340 | 0.269 | 0.345 | 0.364 | 0.384 |
| b | 0.440 | 0.472 | 0.467 | 0.440 | 0.422 | 0.451 | 0.506 | 0.448 | 0.454 | 0.436 | |
| R2 | 0.998 | 0.992 | 0.992 | 0.993 | 0.994 | 0.995 | 0.992 | 0.994 | 0.997 | 0.987 | |
| RMSE | 1.128 | 2.415 | 2.434 | 2.193 | 2.408 | 2.002 | 2.477 | 2.219 | 1.325 | 2.786 | |
| Ve | 8.707 | 14.578 | 14.341 | 14.372 | 14.013 | 12.359 | 14.284 | 13.605 | 9.770 | 1.931 | |
| Sample | A | B | C |
|---|---|---|---|
| MVD | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| MVD_CH | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| MVD_SB | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| MVD_CHE | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| MVD_CA | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| FD | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| FD_CH | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| FD_SB | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| FD_CHE | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| FD_CA | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Sample Codes | Percent Object Volume [%] POV | Closed Porosity [%] CP | Total Porosity [%] TP | Structure Thickness [mm] ST | Degree of Anisotropy [−] DA | Object Surface/Volume Ratio [mm−1] OSVR | Structure Model Index SMI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MVD | 18.07 ± 1.31 aAB | 0.17 ± 0.01 aB | 81.51 ± 0.71 bAB | 0.041 ± 0.004 aA | 1.79 ± 0.04 aA | 91.97 ± 0.77 bA | 0.65 ± 0.01 aA |
| MVD_SB | 11.48 ± 1.37 aA | 0.03 ± 0.00 aA | 88.52 ± 1.37 bB | 0.032 ± 0.002 aA | 2.14 ± 0.99 aA | 133.60 ± 1.66 bC | 0.58 ± 0.01 aC |
| MVD_CHE | 11.33 ± 0.36 aA | 0.03 ± 0.02 aA | 88.67 ± 0.36 bAB | 0.031 ± 0.004 aA | 1.81 ± 0.32 aA | 106.89 ± 1.05 bBC | 0.60 ± 0.01 aAB |
| MVD_CA | 7.44 ± 2.49 aA | 0.06 ± 0.01 aA | 92.56 ± 2.49 bB | 0.031 ± 0.003 aA | 2.91 ± 0.39 aA | 133.06 ± 19.73 bC | 0.74 ± 0.12 aBC |
| MVD_CH | 29.83 ± 0.81 aB | 0.04 ± 0.00 aA | 70.95 ± 0.48 bA | 0.034 ± 0.001 aA | 1.84 ± 0.02 aA | 134.37 ± 20.95 bAB | 0.65 ± 0.19 aA |
| FD | 23.31 ± 1.86 bAB | 0.14 ± 0.01 aB | 76.69 ± 1.86 aAB | 0.040 ± 0.003 bA | 3.26 ± 0.48 aA | 82.40 ± 1.52 aA | 2.25 ± 0.02 bA |
| FD_SB | 13.35 ± 0.55 bA | 0.01 ± 0.01 aA | 85.72 ± 1.86 aB | 0.038 ± 0.001 bA | 1.91 ± 0.01 aA | 121.36 ± 1.72 aC | 0.77 ± 0.13 bC |
| FD_CHE | 25.44 ± 0.10 bA | 0.06 ± 0.00 aA | 74.56 ± 0.10 aAB | 0.037 ± 0.001 bA | 2.36 ± 0.28 aA | 89.26 ± 1.74 aBC | 1.14 ± 0.05 bAB |
| FD_CA | 23.37 ± 2.91 bA | 0.01 ± 0.01 aA | 76.63 ± 2.91 aB | 0.035 ± 0.000 bA | 2.00 ± 0.26 aA | 97.01 ± 0.62 aC | 1.63 ± 0.51 bBC |
| FD_CH | 33.68 ± 1.96 bB | 0.04 ± 0.01 aA | 66.32 ± 1.96 aA | 0.038 ± 0,006 bA | 3.36 ± 0.49 aA | 107.02 ± 0.64 aAB | 0.65 ± 0.01 bA |
| Sample Code | Parameter L* | Parameter a* | Parameter b* | Saturation C | Hue Color h | ΔE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh Carrot | 35.7 ± 0.1 aA | 13.8 ± 0.1 aAB | 23.8 ± 0.1 aC | 38.3 ± 0.1 aC | 30.0 ± 0.1 aA | - |
| MVD | 50.2 ± 3.3 aB | 14.8 ± 2.4 aBC | 38.4 ± 2.5 aD | 52.3 ± 1.3 aD | 21.0 ± 2.0 aA | 20.7 ± 3.9 aB |
| MVD_SB | 44.3 ± 3.0 aB | 25.6 ± 2.1 aC | 38.9 ± 3.7 aA | 51.2 ± 0.8 aD | 33.5 ± 3.3 aA | 21.2 ± 3.8 aB |
| MVD_CHE | 52.4 ± 4.2 aA | 22.9 ± 3.1 aBC | 48.8 ± 3.3 aB | 30.0 ± 1.6 aB | 65.1 ± 2.3 aB | 26.7 ± 5.0 aA |
| MVD_CA | 54.0 ± 2.8 aB | 14.2 ± 1.9 aC | 37.4 ± 1.9 aD | 47.3 ± 1.3 aA | 34.3 ± 2.0 aA | 17.8 ± 2.5 aAB |
| MVD_CH | 20.5 ± 1.0 aA | 4.61 ± 0.7 aA | 1.4 ± 0.5 aA | 21.0 ± 1.5 aD | 73.6 ± 1.0 aC | 28.6 ± 1.1 aAB |
| FD | 71.2 ± 1.81 bB | 23.4 ± 2.5 bBC | 36.5 ± 1.6 aD | 75.0 ± 3.6 aD | 32.5 ± 1.8 aA | 22.4 ± 0.8 bB |
| FD_SB | 68.1 ± 0.9 bB | 20.4 ± 1.9 bC | 42.6 ± 3.7 aA | 71.1 ± 2.8 aD | 25.7 ± 3.3 aA | 38.2 ± 1.5 bB |
| FD_CHE | 25.9 ± 2.5 bA | 14.9 ± 1.4 bBC | 6.9 ± 0.7 aB | 45.5 ± 2.4 aB | 69.8 ± 2.7 aB | 19.7 ± 1.6 bA |
| FD_CA | 40.8 ± 2.5 bB | 23.6 ± 2.8 bC | 34.7 ± 2.2 aD | 72.6 ± 1.8 aA | 28.5 ± 4.7 aA | 15.9 ± 1.2 bAB |
| FD_CH | 29.7 ± 1.7 bA | 19.9 ± 0.7 bA | 3.2 ± 0.3 aA | 35.8 ± 1.1 aD | 80.9 ± 4.1 aC | 17.6 ± 8.8 bAB |
| Sample Code | Appearance | Smell | Color | Crunchiness | Taste | Overall Desirability | Hardness; Fmax [N] | Breaking Work [mJ] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MVD | 5.6 ± 1.2 aA | 6.3 ± 2.2 aA | 7.0 ± 1.6 aA | 5.2 ± 1.0 aA | 6.4 ± 1.6 aAB | 5.8 ± 1.5 aAB | 7.9 ± 1.4 bA | 3.1 ± 0.8 bA |
| MVD_SB | 6.1 ± 1.5 aA | 6.1 ± 1.9 aA | 7.9 ± 1.0 aA | 8.4 ± 0.8 aB | 6.7 ± 0.9 aA | 6.8 ± 0.9 aA | 6.9 ± 0.8 bA | 8.6 ± 0.3 bA |
| MVD_CHE | 5.4 ± 1.3 aA | 6.2 ± 2.2 aA | 6.5 ± 1.5 aA | 8.2 ± 0.8 aB | 6.8 ± 1.8 aAB | 6.8 ± 1.4 aAB | 11.6 ± 2.3 bA | 11.1 ± 0.3 bA |
| MVD_CA | 6.1 ± 1.6 aA | 6.5 ± 1.9 aA | 7.6 ± 1.2 aA | 8.0 ± 0.8 aB | 7.8 ± 1.8 aB | 7.3 ± 1.5 aB | 9.4 ± 1.5 bA | 3.0 ± 0.5 bA |
| MVD_CHE | 5.4 ± 1.3 aA | 6.2 ± 2.2 aA | 6.5 ± 1.5 aA | 8.2 ± 0.8 aB | 6.8 ± 1.8 aAB | 6.8 ± 1.4 aAB | 11.6 ± 2.3 bA | 11.1 ± 0.3 bA |
| MVD_CH | 5.5 ± 1.6 aA | 5.6 ± 1.6 aA | 6.2 ± 1.8 aA | 4.9 ± 1.0 aA | 5.7 ± 1.8 aA | 5.5 ± 1.4 aA | 8.9 ± 1.6 bA | 3.1 ± 0.1 bA |
| FD | 6.7 ± 1.3 bA | 7.4 ± 1.3 bA | 7.0 ± 1.6 aA | 7.0 ± 1.4 aA | 7.9 ± 1.0 aAB | 7.4 ± 0.8 bAB | 4.8 ± 1.1 aA | 2.0 ± 1.2 aA |
| FD_SB | 8.1 ± 0.9 bA | 6.7 ± 1.3 bA | 8.0 ± 1.2 aA | 6.1 ± 1.1 aB | 5.6 ± 1.7 aA | 6.3 ± 1.2 bA | 4.1 ± 0.9 aA | 1.0 ± 1.3 aA |
| FD_CHE | 7.4 ± 0.8 bA | 6.8 ± 1.3 bA | 7.0 ± 1.3 aA | 7.0 ± 1.1 aB | 7.5 ± 1.1 aAB | 7.5 ± 1.1 bAB | 5.2 ± 0.6 aA | 1.2 ± 2.7 aA |
| FD_CA | 8.0 ± 0.8 bA | 6.7 ± 1.7 bA | 7.5 ± 1.2 aA | 7.4 ± 1.3 aB | 7.8 ± 1.1 aB | 7.9 ± 1.0 bB | 5.1 ± 1.2 aA | 1.3 ± 0.4 aA |
| FD_CH | 7.7 ± 1.3 bA | 6.6 ± 1.4 bA | 7.5 ± 1.4 aA | 6.3 ± 1.1 aA | 6.6 ± 1.1 aA | 6.8 ± 0.8 bA | 4.8 ± 0.9 aA | 0.7 ± 1.5 aA |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Ignaczak, A.; Woźniak, Ł.; Kozłowska, M.; Kowalska, H. Evaluation of Water Status and Thermal Characteristics of Dried Carrot Half-Slices in Correlation with Physicochemical and Sensory Properties. Molecules 2026, 31, 1789. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31111789
Ignaczak A, Woźniak Ł, Kozłowska M, Kowalska H. Evaluation of Water Status and Thermal Characteristics of Dried Carrot Half-Slices in Correlation with Physicochemical and Sensory Properties. Molecules. 2026; 31(11):1789. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31111789
Chicago/Turabian StyleIgnaczak, Anna, Łukasz Woźniak, Mariola Kozłowska, and Hanna Kowalska. 2026. "Evaluation of Water Status and Thermal Characteristics of Dried Carrot Half-Slices in Correlation with Physicochemical and Sensory Properties" Molecules 31, no. 11: 1789. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31111789
APA StyleIgnaczak, A., Woźniak, Ł., Kozłowska, M., & Kowalska, H. (2026). Evaluation of Water Status and Thermal Characteristics of Dried Carrot Half-Slices in Correlation with Physicochemical and Sensory Properties. Molecules, 31(11), 1789. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31111789































