Next Article in Journal
Developing a Multi-Method Approach for Understanding Cellular Uptake and Biological Response: Investigating Co-Exposure of Macrophage-like Differentiated THP-1 Cells to Al2O3 and CeO2 Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Spontaneous Reaction of Oleacein and Oleocanthal with Primary Amines: A Biochemical Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Insights in Natural Bioactive Compounds for Periodontal Disease: Advanced Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimization of Squalene Production by Pseudozyma sp. P4-22

1
School of Biological Science and Technology, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China
2
CAS Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Shandong Engineering Laboratory of Single Cell Oil, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 189 Songling Road, Qingdao 266101, China
3
Qingdao Engineering Laboratory of Single Cell Oil, Qingdao New Energy Shandong Laboratory, 189 Songling Road, Qingdao 266101, China
4
Shandong Energy Institute, 189 Songling Road, Qingdao 266101, China
5
Haide College, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266101, China
6
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(7), 1646; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071646
Submission received: 19 February 2025 / Revised: 3 April 2025 / Accepted: 4 April 2025 / Published: 7 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomanufacturing of Natural Bioactive Compounds)

Abstract

:
Squalene is an important bioactive substance widely used in the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries. Microbial production of squalene has gained prominence in recent years due to its sustainability, safety, and environmental friendliness. In this study, a mutant strain, Pseudozyma sp. P4-22, with enhanced squalene-producing ability, was obtained through atmospheric and room temperature plasma mutagenesis of the previously screened squalene-producing yeast Pseudozyma sp. SD301. The P4-22 strain demonstrated the ability to produce squalene using various carbon and nitrogen sources. We optimized the culture conditions by employing cost-effective corn steep liquor as the nitrogen source, and the optimal pH and sea salt concentration of the medium were determined to be 5.5 and 5 g/L, respectively. Under optimal cultivation conditions, the biomass and squalene production reached 64.42 g/L and 2.06 g/L, respectively, in a 5 L fed-batch fermentation. This study highlights the potential of Pseudozyma sp. P4-22 as a promising strain for commercial-scale production of squalene.

1. Introduction

Squalene (C30H50) is a non-saponifiable lipid with six trans double bonds, belonging to the terpenoid family, and serves as a key precursor to fat-soluble vitamins, hormones, and cholesterol [1]. Squalene protects human skin from lipid oxidation caused by ultraviolet radiation or other oxidative stress [2], significantly reducing free radical transmission on the skin and thereby shielding cellular DNA from damage [3]. Like polyunsaturated fatty acids, squalene is a key component of the skin and is widely utilized in skincare products due to its moisturizing and antioxidant properties [4]. Squalene plays a significant role in generating antigen-specific T cells by transporting antigens alongside neutrophils and IL-18, thereby contributing to immune system modulation [5]. Owing to its stability and biocompatibility, squalene is employed in vaccine and drug delivery emulsions. For example, adjuvants like MF59 and AS03, which contain squalene, have been used in human influenza vaccines [6]. Following the outbreak of COVID-19 in 2019, squalene has been employed as an adjuvant in vaccines designed to combat the novel coronavirus [7,8]. As such, squalene possesses numerous beneficial properties including antioxidative [2,4], anticancer [9,10,11], anti-aging [12,13], and anti-inflammatory [9,14,15], as well as being used in the treatment of skin diseases [16] and cardiovascular health maintenance [9]. It is widely used across various sectors, such as food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics [17,18,19]. Market reports indicate that the global market size for squalene was valued at 129 million US dollars in 2020 and is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 7.3%, reaching 184 million US dollars by 2025 [4].
The primary methods for squalene production include animal/plant extraction and microbial fermentation [4]. However, growing concerns regarding ecological impacts, resource limitations, and sustainability challenges associated with traditional extraction methods have shifted the research focus toward microbial fermentation as a more viable production strategy [17,20]. Microbial production of squalene utilizes two distinct metabolic pathways [21]. In prokaryotes like Escherichia coli, squalene is typically synthesized via the 2-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway. In eukaryotes, such as yeast, fungi, microalgae, and animals, squalene is synthesized using the mevalonate acid (MVA) pathway. The MVA pathway utilizes acetyl-CoA as a precursor, and key enzymes such as 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase (HMGS), 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGR), mevalonate kinase, mevalonate-5-phosphate kinase, and diphosphomevalonate decarboxylase are employed to synthesize isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP). Both the MEP and MVA pathways ultimately isomerize IPP into dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP) through an IPP isomerase. IPP and DMAPP then condense to form farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP). Finally, two molecules of FPP are utilized to synthesize squalene through squalene synthase (SQS) [4].
While wild-type squalene-producing strains exhibit inherent environmental adaptability and biosafety advantages, their industrial application remains constrained by limitations including low yield, process instability, and long production cycles. Natural producers of squalene mainly include yeasts, Aurantiochytrium spp., and certain microalgae (see examples in Table 1). Among these, Pseudozyma spp. are yeasts of notable commercial potential, known for their ability to produce glycolipid biosurfactants, squalene, isocitric acid, and extracellular polysaccharides [22]. In our previous study, we identified the squalene-producing Pseudozyma sp. strain SD301 [23]. Subsequent research successfully performed electroporation on mutant strains derived from SD301 [24], demonstrating that genetic modification of Pseudozyma sp. strains is also feasible.
Table 1. Some wild-type strains producing squalene reported in the literature.
Table 1. Some wild-type strains producing squalene reported in the literature.
StrainsSqualene TiterMedia or Culture MethodReference
Rhodosporidium sp. DR37619 mg/Lmodified YEPD media[25]
Saccharomyces cerevisiae EGY483129 μg/Lglucose, soy peptone, and yeast extract, under semi-aerobic conditions[26]
Torulaspora delbrueckii237.25 μg/gDWmolasses[27]
Pseudozyma sp. JCC207340.52 mg/Lglucose, yeast extract, sea salt[28]
Saccharomyces cerevisiae EGY4820.70 mg/Lglucose, soy peptone, and yeast extract with 0.442 mM terbinafine and 0.044 mM methyl jasmonate[29]
Schizochytrium sp. HX-308439.98 mg/Lglucose and yeast extract; agitation and ventilation rates were set at 250 rpm and 0.6 m3h−1[30]
Thraustochytrium striatum N599713 mg/gDWglucose and yeast extract[31]
Thraustochytrium ATCC 2618572.9 mg/Lglucose and yeast extract with mannitol[32]
Aurantiochytrium sp. TWZ-97240.2 mg/Lglucose, yeast extract, 0.7 g/L α-tocopherol[33]
Aurantiochytrium sp. Yonez 5−11073.66 mg/Lglucose, tryptone, yeast extract[34]
Aurantiochytrium sp. 18W-13a1.29 g/Lglucose, proteose-peptone, yeast extract[35]
Thraustochytrium MST125365.2 mg/Lglucose, peptone, yeast extract[36]
Thraustochytrium sp. MAN37 FRU10.2 mg/gDWpeptone, yeast extract, glucose[37]
Cutaneotrichosporon oleaginosus367.89 mg/Lglucose, urea, peptone, yeast extract, 10 mg/L terbinafine[38]
Phormidium autumnale0.18 g/kgDWglucose and slaughterhouse wastewater[39]
Pseudozyma sp. SD 3012.45 g/Lglucose and yeast extract[23]
Pseudozyma sp. P4-222.06 g/Lglucose and corn steep liquorThis study
To enhance the economic viability of fermentative squalene production, this study employed atmospheric and room temperature plasma (ARTP) mutagenesis to generate and screen mutants of Pseudozyma sp. SD301 and successfully isolated a mutant strain, Pseudozyma sp. P4-22, with enhanced squalene production capacity. Subsequently, optimization of media and culture conditions was conducted using cost-effective corn steep liquor as a nitrogen source.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. ARTP Mutagenesis

ARTP mutagenesis is a plasma-based technique for inducing genetic mutations in microorganisms, plants, or other biological organisms [40]. Compared with traditional methods, this powerful mutagenesis approach offers several advantages including environmental friendliness, mild operation conditions, and rapid mutation rates. Consequently, ARTP mutagenesis, particularly when combined with high-throughput screening technologies, has found widespread application in microbiology [41,42]. In this study, we employed ARTP technology to generate mutant strains of Pseudozyma sp. SD301. From a total of 97 isolated colonies, we identified six strains exhibiting elevated squalene titers through shake-flask experiments (Figure 1). Among these, the highest-producing strain was selected and designated as P4-22. Figure 2 presents both the morphological appearance of P4-22 colonies and the characteristic gas chromatography profile of its extracted lipids. Notably, to the best of our knowledge, Pseudozyma sp. SD301 previously represented the highest reported titer among non-genetically modified microorganisms (Table 1). The superior performance of P4-22 therefore warrants further investigation.

2.2. Effect of Carbon Source on P4-22 Fermentation Performance

To investigate the influence of carbon sources on the growth and squalene accumulation of strain P4-22, we evaluated fifteen carbon sources in cultivation experiments. As shown in Table 2, each carbon source exhibited distinct effects on both cell growth and squalene production. Glucose emerged as the optimal carbon source, supporting the highest biomass (21.50 ± 0.18 g/L) and squalene titer (0.99 ± 0.03 g/L). Xylose ranked second, yielding lower biomass (17.79 ± 0.75 g/L) but comparable squalene production (0.98 ± 0.03 g/L), suggesting P4-22’s potential for utilizing cost-effective substrates like lignocellulose hydrolysate [43,44]. When sucrose was used as the carbon source, the biomass reached 19.98 ± 0.32 g/L, with a squalene titer of 0.82 ± 0.07 g/L. Other carbon sources, including maltose, lactose, succinic acid, and ethanol, enabled modest squalene accumulation, although significantly lower than that of glucose or xylose. The remaining tested carbon sources proved ineffective for squalene production.
Previous studies have demonstrated that most Pseudozyma species possess xylose metabolic capability, although utilization efficiency varies substantially among strains. For biosurfactant production, Faria et al. reported that Pseudozyma antarctica PYCC 5048T produced mannosylerythritol lipids (MEL) at similar titers from xylose and glucose, while Pseudozyma aphidis PYCC 5535T showed markedly lower production on xylose [45]. Meirke et al. observed that the oleaginous yeast Pseudozyma hubeiensis BOT-O consumed glucose and xylose at comparable rates in single-substrate media, but exhibited preferential glucose utilization in mixed sugar conditions [46]. These findings highlight the need for further investigation into xylose metabolism mechanisms in strain P4-22.

2.3. Effect of Nitrogen Source on P4-22 Fermentation Performance

Nitrogen sources play a significant role in the growth and fermentation activity of microorganisms. In this study, eight nitrogen sources were tested for their effects on the growth and squalene production of the P4-22 strain (Table 3). The results showed that P4-22 performed better with organic nitrogen sources than with inorganic ones. Among them, corn steep liquor was the most effective, giving the highest biomass (23.28 ± 0.45 g/L) and squalene titer (1.74 ± 0.003 g/L). Yeast extract gave slightly lower results, with biomass at 23.07 ± 1.44 g/L and squalene titer at 1.29 ± 0.11 g/L. Tryptone supported only small amounts of squalene production. No squalene accumulation was observed with any inorganic nitrogen sources, and cell growth was also poor under these conditions. Therefore, corn steep liquor was selected as the best nitrogen source for P4-22 fermentation. Moreover, since corn steep liquor is a low-cost nitrogen source suitable for industrial production, it was chosen for further optimization of fermentation conditions.
Previous studies on squalene production mainly used yeast extract or peptone as nitrogen sources (Table 1). However, for industrial fermentation, cheaper nitrogen sources such as inorganic salts or corn steep liquor are preferred to reduce costs. Because P4-22 cannot use inorganic nitrogen sources efficiently, corn steep liquor is the best choice for further investigation.
To determine the optimal nitrogen source concentration for strain P4-22, we tested various concentrations of corn steep liquor (10 g/L, 15 g/L, 20 g/L, 25 g/L, and 30 g/L), corresponding to carbon-to-nitrogen ratios of 6, 4, 3, 2.4, and 2, respectively. The results are presented in Figure 3. Biomass increased with higher nitrogen concentrations, reaching a maximum of 27.33 ± 0.65 g/L at 25 g/L of corn-steep liquor. Meanwhile, squalene production peaked at a corn-steep liquor concentration of 20 g/L, achieving a titer of 1.8 ± 0.08 g/L.

2.4. Effect of pH on P4-22 Fermentation

The initial pH of the culture medium is a crucial parameter in microbial fermentation, significantly affecting cell growth, metabolic activity, and product formation [47,48,49]. We examined the impact of initial pH (ranging from 3 to 9) on P4-22 growth and squalene production (Figure 4). The strain demonstrated broad pH adaptability, growing across the entire tested range. Notably, biomass accumulation showed an inverse relationship with pH, reaching maximum levels (31.31 ± 1.83 g/L) at pH 3 and gradually decreasing to 20.74 ± 0.25 g/L at pH 9. Squalene production peaked at pH 5 (1.68 ± 0.04 g/L), with corresponding biomass of 23.04 ± 0.3 g/L. pH monitoring during fermentation revealed that all cultures, except those with initial pH 3–4, reached approximately pH 5.3 by day 2. By the end of fermentation, all cultures stabilized at a final pH of around 5.5. These results indicate that the optimum pH for P4-22 fermentation is approximately 5.5.

2.5. Effect of Sea Salt Concentration on P4-22 Fermentation

Salt concentration plays a significant role in microbial growth, metabolism, and product formation [50,51,52]. To examine the effects of sea salt concentrations on P4-22 growth and squalene production, we conducted fermentations with sea salt concentrations ranging from 5 to 35 g/L (Figure 5). The results demonstrated that P4-22 could grow and produce squalene across all tested concentrations, although squalene accumulation was more favorable under lower-salt conditions. Maximum biomass (24.52 ± 0.22 g/L) occurred at 15 g/L of sea salt, with a corresponding squalene titer of 1.66 ± 0.05 g/L. Notably, the highest squalene production (2 g/L) was achieved at the lowest tested concentration 5 g/L. Based on these results, the optimal sea salt concentration for squalene production by P4-22 was determined to be 5 g/L. This represents a significant difference from the original SD301 strain, which showed optimal performance at 15 g/L of sea salt [23].

2.6. Fed-Batch Fermentation Experiments for Squalene Production

Scaling-up culture represents a critical step in transitioning laboratory-scale microbial fermentation processes to industrial-scale production. Based on our optimization results, we performed fed-batch fermentation using strain P4-22 (Figure 6A). Glucose supplementation started at 68 h, with a total of 310 mL glucose consumed during 164 h of fermentation. The process yielded a maximum biomass of 64.42 g/L and a squalene titer of 2.06 g/L. As a control, strain SD301 was fermented in a 5 L fermenter using corn steep liquor as a nitrogen source (Figure 6B). After 113 h, this strain achieved 49.83 g/L biomass and 1.34 g/L squalene titer. Under optimized conditions, P4-22 demonstrated approximately 1.5-fold higher squalene production compared to the original SD301 strain.
Notably, when using cost-effective corn steep liquor, P4-22 achieved production levels comparable to SD301 cultures employing more expensive yeast extract (Table 1) [23]. However, the improved strain required longer fermentation times. Future studies should focus on systematic medium optimization and precise fermentation controls to enhance efficiency. Our research also indicates that fermentation processes employing different low-cost carbon and nitrogen sources should be carefully optimized and studied for different chassis cells, as different strains may exhibit varying adaptability.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Strain and Culture

Pseudozyma sp. P4-22 was derived from Pseudozyma sp. SD301 (CGMCC No. 9687, China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center) through ARTP mutagenesis and stored in a laboratory freezer at −80 °C. The optical image of P4-22 was acquired using an Olympus FluoViewTM FV1000 confocal microscope.
The culture media used in this study include GYS medium (60 g/L glucose [Fufeng Group, Qingdao, China], 20 g/L yeast extract [Angel Yeast Co., Ltd., Yichang, China], 15 g/L sea salt [QianJiang Sea Salt Factory, Weifang, China]) and GCS medium (60 g/L glucose, 20 g/L corn steep liquor [Angel Yeast Co., Ltd., Yichang, China], 5 g/L sea salt). The corn steep liquor also provides the phosphate source since it contains 1% (w/w) soluble phosphate. For shake flask experiments, a single P4-22 colony was inoculated into 50 mL of GYS medium and cultured at 25 °C for 48 h. Subsequently, a 2% inoculum was transferred to a GCS medium for 6-day fermentation. All cultures were maintained at 200 rpm agitation speed.

3.2. ARTP Mutagenesis

Single colonies were inoculated into 30 mL of GYS medium and cultured at 25 °C with 200 rpm shaking for 24 h. A 10 μL aliquot of the culture was uniformly spread onto a sterilized slide, which was then placed in a sterilized Petri dish and transferred to the ARTP chamber. The distance between the slide and the plasma generator jet outlet was maintained at approximately 2–3 mm. The ARTP mutagenesis parameters were set as follows: 120 W working power, 10 L/min air flow rate, 20 °C circulating water temperature, and 90 s treatment duration. After treatment, cells were collected in an EP tube containing 1 mL sterile water, vortexed for 1 min, and serially diluted. A 100 μL aliquot of each dilution was then spread on a GYS agar plate.

3.3. Optimization of Cultivation Conditions

To investigate the effects of various chemical and physical parameters on cell growth and squalene accumulation in Pseudozyma sp. P4-22, a series of single-factor experiments was conducted. Fifteen carbon sources were tested: glucose, sucrose, maltose, xylose, raffinose, lactose, soluble starch, citric acid, malic acid, succinic acid, glycerol, methanol, ethanol, lactic acid, and sorbitol. Eight nitrogen sources were evaluated: yeast extract, peptone, corn steep liquor, urea, ammonium chloride, ammonium sulfate, sodium nitrate, and potassium nitrate. The effects of varying pH levels (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9) and sea salt concentrations (5 g/L, 15 g/L, 25 g/L, 35 g/L) on cell growth and squalene accumulation were investigated.

3.4. Fed-Batch Fermentations in a 5 L Fermenter

For scale-up fermentation in a 5 L fermenter, both primary and secondary seed cultures were prepared using a GYS medium. The primary seed culture was prepared by inoculating Pseudozyma sp. P4-22 into 50 mL of GYS medium and incubating at 25 °C with 200 rpm agitation for 24 h. The entire primary seed culture was then transferred into 200 mL of fresh GYS medium and cultivated for 48 h at 25 °C with 200 rpm agitation until the OD600 reached approximately 8, yielding the secondary seed culture. Fed-batch fermentation was carried out in a 5 L fermenter containing 3.3 L of fermentation medium inoculated with the secondary seed culture. The fermentation conditions were controlled as follows: pH was maintained at 5.5 using 2 M NaOH or 2 M HCl, the temperature was kept constant at 25 °C, and the airflow rate was maintained at 1.4–2.0 vvm. A 40% glucose solution was fed into the fermenter when the initial glucose was depleted, and the glucose concentration in the medium was then maintained below 20 g/L by adjusting the feed rate according to the glucose consumption rate in the previous period.

3.5. Analysis of Biomass

For biomass determination, 50 mL aliquots of culture were collected and centrifuged at 5000× g for 5 min. The resulting cell pellets were lyophilized for 8 h, and the biomass was quantified by dry weight measurement.

3.6. Extraction and Detection of Lipids and Squalene

For lipid extraction, 50 mg of freeze-dried cell powder (M0) was mixed with 600 μL of 6 M HCl in a 2 mL centrifuge tube. After vortexing for 30 s, the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Cell disruption was achieved through repeated cycles of alternating boiling (5 min) and freezing (−80 °C, 5 min). Subsequently, 900 μL of chloroform-methanol (2:1, v/v) was added, followed by vortexing (30 s) and centrifugation (12,000× g, 5 min). The lower organic phase was transferred to a new centrifuge tube and mixed with an equal volume of saturated NaCl solution. After vortexing (30 s) and centrifugation (at 12,000× g, 5 min) to remove proteins, the lower organic layer was transferred to a pre-weighed glass vial (M1) and dried under vacuum at 55 °C for 30 min. The total lipid content was calculated as (M2 − M1)/M0 × 100%, where M2 represents the vial weight after drying.
The extracted lipids were analyzed for squalene content using gas chromatography. For sample preparation, 1 mL of saturated NaCl solution and 2 mL of n-hexane were added to the glass vial containing the extracted lipids. Following thorough mixing, the upper hexane layer was transferred to a chromatography vial. Analysis was performed on an Agilent Technologies 7890B gas chromatograph equipped with an HP-INNOWAX capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm). The temperature program consisted of an initial hold at 100 °C for 1 min, followed by a temperature ramp at 15 °C/min to 250 °C, with a final hold at 250 °C for 5 min. The injector and detector temperatures were maintained at 280 °C. High-purity nitrogen served as the carrier gas with a split ratio of 1:19, and samples were injected at a volume of 1 μL.
Squalene quantification was achieved by comparing the sample peak area to a standard calibration curve. A series of squalene standard solutions were prepared at dilution factors ranging from 400 to 5000 (400, 500, 800, 1600, 2000, 4000, and 5000). The calibration curve was generated by plotting the peak areas obtained from gas chromatography analysis against the known squalene concentrations of each standard.

3.7. Statistical Analysis

All shake-flask experiments were conducted in triplicate, with results expressed as mean values ± standard deviation. The statistical significance of the experimental data was assessed using one-way ANOVA with a significance threshold of p < 0.05 for mean comparisons.

4. Conclusions

Pseudozyma sp. P4-22 exhibited outstanding potential for squalene production under optimized fermentation conditions (25 °C, pH 5.5, with 60 g/L glucose, 20 g/L corn steep liquor, and 5 g/L sea salt). In a 5 L fed-batch fermentation system, the strain achieved a maximum squalene titer of 2.06 g/L, demonstrating robust performance under scale-up conditions. The successful substitution of yeast extract with cost-effective corn steep liquor as the nitrogen source significantly enhances the economic viability of the process. Notably, the ability of P4-22 to utilize xylose for squalene production adds another layer of versatility to this strain, making it adaptable to different carbon sources and potentially expanding its industrial applications. These findings establish P4-22 as a promising microbial platform for squalene production and warrant further investigation into strain optimization and process development to enhance production efficiency and expand potential industrial applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.F. and X.S.; investigation, C.H., X.S. and J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, C.H.; writing—review and editing, X.S., Q.C., P.G. and Y.F.; supervision, P.G. and Y.F.; funding acquisition, X.S., Q.C. and Y.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC3402300 to Y.F.); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32470024 to Y.F., 32170051 to Q.C., 32270045 to X.S.); QIBEBT (QIBEBT/SEI/QNESL S202301 to X.S.); QIBEBT International Cooperation Project (QIBEBT ICP202304 to Y.F.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ARTPatmospheric and room temperature plasma
MEP2-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate
MVAmevalonate acid
HMGS3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase
HMGR3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase
IPPisopentenyl pyrophosphate
DMAPPdimethylallyl pyrophosphate
FPPfarnesyl pyrophosphate
SQSsqualene synthase

References

  1. Du, X.; Ma, X.; Gao, Y. The physiological function of squalene and its application prospects in animal husbandry. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1284500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kim, S.K.; Karadeniz, F. Biological importance and applications of squalene and squalane. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2012, 65, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Warleta, F.; Campos, M.; Allouche, Y.; Sánchez-Quesada, C.; Ruiz-Mora, J.; Beltrán, G.; Gaforio, J.J. Squalene protects against oxidative DNA damage in MCF10A human mammary epithelial cells but not in MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 1092–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Patel, A.; Bettiga, M.; Rova, U.; Christakopoulos, P.; Matsakas, L. Microbial genetic engineering approach to replace shark livering for squalene. Trends Biotechnol. 2022, 40, 1261–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kedl, J.D.; Kedl, R.M. How squalene GLAdly helps generate antigen-specific T cells via antigen-carrying neutrophils and IL-18. Eur. J. Immunol. 2015, 45, 376–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nakkala, J.R.; Li, Y.; Akter, L.; Kang, X.; Chen, X. Differential regulation of DC function, adaptive immunity, and MyD88 dependence by MF59 and AS03-like adjuvants. Vaccines 2024, 12, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Arunachalam, P.S.; Walls, A.C.; Golden, N.; Atyeo, C.; Fischinger, S.; Li, C.; Aye, P.; Navarro, M.J.; Lai, L.; Edara, V.V.; et al. Adjuvanting a subunit COVID-19 vaccine to induce protective immunity. Nature 2021, 594, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Iwata, S.; Pollard, A.J.; Tada, Y.; Omoto, S.; Shibata, R.Y.; Igarashi, K.; Hasegawa, T.; Ariyasu, M.; Sonoyama, T. A phase 3 randomized controlled trial of a COVID-19 recombinant vaccine S-268019-b versus ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in Japanese adults. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 9830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lou-Bonafonte, J.M.; Martínez-Beamonte, R.; Sanclemente, T.; Surra, J.C.; Herrera-Marcos, L.V.; Sanchez-Marco, J.; Arnal, C.; Osada, J. Current insights into the biological action of squalene. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62, e1800136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reddy, L.H.; Couvreur, P. Squalene: A natural triterpene for use in disease management and therapy. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 2009, 61, 1412–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gumus, E.; Erdogan, O.; Demirkan, B.; Cevik, O. Squalene suppresses Jam-A, Claudin 5, and Occludin by accelerating cell death and reducing neuronal interaction in the neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y. J. Res. Pharm. 2022, 26, 1676–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lei, X.; Zhao, S.; Chen, W.; Song, F. Comparative study on anti-aging effect of squalene and vitamin E to skin. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2013, 34, 91–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ronco, A.L.; Stéfani, E.D. Squalene: A multi-task link in the crossroads of cancer and aging. Funct. Foods Health Dis. 2013, 3, 462–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Luke, S.S.; Raj, M.N.; Ramesh, S.; Bhatt, N.P. Network pharmacology prediction and molecular docking-based strategy to explore the potential mechanism of squalene against inflammation. In Silico Pharmacol. 2024, 12, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cárdeno, A.; Aparicio-Soto, M.; Montserrat-de la Paz, S.; Bermudez, B.; Muriana, F.J.G.; Alarcón-de-la-Lastra, C. Squalene targets pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators and pathways to modulate over-activation of neutrophils, monocytes and macrophages. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 14, 779–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Del Rosso, J.Q.; Kircik, L. The primary role of sebum in the pathophysiology of acne vulgaris and its therapeutic relevance in acne management. J. Dermatolog. Treat. 2024, 35, 2296855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gohil, N.; Bhattacharjee, G.; Khambhati, K.; Braddick, D.; Singh, V. Engineering strategies in microorganisms for the enhanced production of squalene: Advances, challenges and opportunities. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, W.; Ma, X.; Wang, Y. Production of squalene by microbes: An update. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 32, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shalu, S.; Raveendranathan, P.K.; Vaidyanathan, V.K.; Blank, L.M.; Germer, A.; Balakumaran, P.A. Microbial squalene: A sustainable alternative for the cosmetics and pharmaceutical industry—A Review. Eng. Life Sci. 2024, 24, e202400003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chai, L.; Che, J.X.; Qi, Q.S.; Hou, J. Metabolic engineering for squalene production: Advances and perspectives. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 27715–27725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Paramasivan, K.; Mutturi, S. Recent advances in the microbial production of squalene. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 38, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Valasques Junior, G.L.; Dos Santos, J.D.G.; Chaves, P.F.P.; Cordeiro, L.M.C.; de Jesus, C.L.; de Lima, F.O.; Boffo, E.F.; de Assis, S.A. Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activity of α-d-mannan from Pseudozyma sp. 3 Biotech 2021, 11, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Song, X.; Wang, X.; Tan, Y.; Feng, Y.; Li, W.; Cui, Q. High production of squalene using a newly isolated yeast-like strain Pseudozyma sp. SD301. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 8445–8451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xiao, Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, S.; Cong, P.; Lu, D.; Feng, Y.; Cui, Q.; Song, X. Mutation and selection of high squalene production yeast Pseudozyma sp. induced by carbon-ions beam irradiation and its electrotransfor-mation. South China Fish. Sci. 2022, 18, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shakeri, S.; Khoshbasirat, F.; Maleki, M. Rhodosporidium sp. DR37: A novel strain for production of squalene in optimized cultivation conditions. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2021, 14, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mantzouridou, F.; Naziri, E.; Tsimidou, M.Z. Squalene versus ergosterol formation using Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Combined effect of oxygen supply, inoculum size, and fermentation time on yield and selectivity of the bioprocess. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 6189–6198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bhattacharjee, P.; Shukla, V.B.; Singhal, R.S.; Kulkarni, P.R. Studies on fermentative production of squalene. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 17, 811–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chang, M.H.; Kim, H.J.; Jahng, K.Y.; Hong, S.C. The isolation and characterization of Pseudozyma sp. JCC 207, a novel producer of squalene. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 78, 963–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Naziri, E.; Mantzouridou, F.; Tsimidou, M.Z. Enhanced squalene production by wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains using safe chemical means. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 9980–9989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ren, L.J.; Sun, G.N.; Ji, X.J.; Hu, X.C.; Huang, H. Compositional shift in lipid fractions during lipid accumulation and turnover in Schizochytrium sp. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 157, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Koopmann, I.K.; Müller, B.A.; Labes, A. Screening of a Thraustochytrid strain collection for carotenoid and squalene production characterized by cluster analysis, comparison of 18S rRNA gene sequences, growth behavior, and morphology. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ali, M.K.; Sen, B.; He, Y.; Bai, M.; Wang, G. Media supplementation with mannitol and biotin enhances squalene production of Thraustochytrium ATCC 26185 through increased glucose uptake and antioxidative mechanisms. Molecules 2022, 27, 2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ali, M.K.; Liu, X.; Li, J.; Zhu, X.; Sen, B.; Wang, G. Alpha-tocopherol significantly improved squalene production yield of Aurantiochytrium sp. TWZ-97 through lowering ROS levels and up-regulating key genes of central carbon metabolism pathways. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nakazawa, A.; Kokubun, Y.; Matsuura, H.; Yonezawa, N.; Kose, R.; Yoshida, M.; Tanabe, Y.; Kusuda, E.; Van Thang, D.; Ueda, M.; et al. TLC screening of thraustochytrid strains for squalene production. J. Appl. Phycol. 2014, 26, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kaya, K.; Nakazawa, A.; Matsuura, H.; Honda, D.; Inouye, I.; Watanabe, M.M. Thraustochytrid Aurantiochytrium sp. 18W-13a accummulates high amounts of squalene. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2011, 75, 2246–2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Otagiri, M.; Khalid, A.; Moriya, S.; Osada, H.; Takahashi, S. Novel squalene-producing thraustochytrids found in mangrove water. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2017, 81, 2034–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Miranda, A.F.; Nham Tran, T.L.; Abramov, T.; Jehalee, F.; Miglani, M.; Liu, Z.; Rochfort, S.; Gupta, A.; Cheirsilp, B.; Adhikari, B.; et al. Marine protists and Rhodotorula yeast as bio-convertors of marine waste into nutrient-rich deposits for mangrove ecosystems. Protist 2020, 171, 125738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stellner, N.I.; Rerop, Z.S.; Kyselka, J.; Alishevich, K.; Beneš, R.; Filip, V.; Celik, G.; Haack, M.; Ringel, M.; Masri, M.; et al. Value-added squalene in single-cell oil produced with Cutaneotrichosporon oleaginosus for food applications. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 8540–8550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fagundes, M.B.; Vendruscolo, R.G.; Maroneze, M.M.; Barin, J.S.; de Menezes, C.R.; Zepka, L.Q.; Jacob-Lopes, E.; Wagner, R. Towards a sustainable route for the production of squalene using cyanobacteria. Waste Biomass Valorization 2019, 10, 1295–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lu, Y.; Wang, L.Y.; Ma, K.; Li, G.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, H.X.; Lai, Q.H.; Li, H.P.; Xing, X.H. Characteristics of hydrogen production of an Enterobacter aerogenes mutant generated by a new atmospheric and room temperature plasma (ARTP). Biochem. Eng. J. 2011, 55, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.-F.; Li, H.-P.; Wang, L.-Y.; Zhang, C.; Xing, X.-H.; Bao, C.-Y. Atmospheric and room temperature plasma (ARTP) as a new powerful mutagenesis tool. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 5387–5396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Li, D.; Shen, J.; Ding, Q.; Wu, J.; Chen, X. Recent progress of atmospheric and room-temperature plasma as a new and promising mutagenesis technology. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2024, 42, e3991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liu, Y.-J.; Li, B.; Feng, Y.; Cui, Q. Consolidated bio-saccharification: Leading lignocellulose bioconversion into the real world. Biotechnol. Adv. 2020, 40, 107535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, Q.; Feng, Y.; Xuan, J. Composition of lignocellulose hydrolysate in different biorefinery strategies: Nutrients and inhibitors. Molecules 2024, 29, 2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Faria, N.T.; Santos, M.V.; Fernandes, P.; Fonseca, L.L.; Fonseca, C.; Ferreira, F.C. Production of glycolipid biosurfactants, mannosylerythritol lipids, from pentoses and d-glucose/d-xylose mixtures by Pseudozyma yeast strains. Process Biochem. 2014, 49, 1790–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mierke, F.; Brink, D.P.; Norbeck, J.; Siewers, V.; Andlid, T. Functional genome annotation and transcriptome analysis of Pseudozyma hubeiensis BOT-O, an oleaginous yeast that utilizes glucose and xylose at equal rates. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2023, 166, 103783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kaya, K.; Kazama, Y.; Abe, T.; Shiraishi, F. Influence of medium components and pH on the production of odd-carbon fatty acids by Aurantiochytrium sp. SA-96. J. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 32, 1597–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhong, Y.; Gu, J.; Shang, C.; Deng, J.; Liu, Y.; Cui, Z.; Lu, X.; Qi, Q. Sustainable succinic acid production from lignocellulosic hydrolysates by engineered strains of Yarrowia lipolytica at low pH. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 408, 131166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dias, C.; Silva, C.; Freitas, C.; Reis, A.; da Silva, T.L. Effect of medium pH on Rhodosporidium toruloides NCYC 921 carotenoid and lipid production evaluated by flow cytometry. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016, 179, 776–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sharma, A.; Singh, R.N.; Song, X.P.; Singh, R.K.; Guo, D.J.; Singh, P.; Verma, K.K.; Li, Y.R. Genome analysis of a halophilic Virgibacillus halodenitrificans ASH15 revealed salt adaptation, plant growth promotion, and isoprenoid biosynthetic machinery. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1229955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, A.; He, Y.; Sen, B.; Wang, W.; Wang, X.; Wang, G. Optimal NaCl Medium enhances squalene accumulation in Thraustochytrium sp. ATCC 26185 and influences the expression levels of key metabolic genes. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 900252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Toderich, K.N.; Mamadrahimov, A.A.; Khaitov, B.B.; Karimov, A.A.; Soliev, A.A.; Nanduri, K.R.; Shuyskaya, E.V. Differential impact of salinity stress on seeds minerals, storage proteins, fatty acids, and squalene composition of new quinoa genotype, grown in hyper-arid desert environments. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 607102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Squalene titer of selected strains obtained by ARTP mutagenesis. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e) above bars indicate statistically significant differences between means (p < 0.05), while shared letters denote no significant difference.
Figure 1. Squalene titer of selected strains obtained by ARTP mutagenesis. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e) above bars indicate statistically significant differences between means (p < 0.05), while shared letters denote no significant difference.
Molecules 30 01646 g001
Figure 2. The optical image of Pseudozyma sp. P4-22 (A) and the gas chromatography spectrum of extracted lipid (B).
Figure 2. The optical image of Pseudozyma sp. P4-22 (A) and the gas chromatography spectrum of extracted lipid (B).
Molecules 30 01646 g002
Figure 3. Effects of different corn steep liquor concentrations on growth and squalene production of P4-22. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d) above bars indicate statistically significant differences between means (p < 0.05), while shared letters denote no significant difference.
Figure 3. Effects of different corn steep liquor concentrations on growth and squalene production of P4-22. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d) above bars indicate statistically significant differences between means (p < 0.05), while shared letters denote no significant difference.
Molecules 30 01646 g003
Figure 4. Effects of different initial pH on strain growth and accumulation of squalene. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d) above bars indicate statistically significant differences between means (p < 0.05), while shared letters denote no significant difference.
Figure 4. Effects of different initial pH on strain growth and accumulation of squalene. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d) above bars indicate statistically significant differences between means (p < 0.05), while shared letters denote no significant difference.
Molecules 30 01646 g004
Figure 5. The growth and squalene accumulation of P4-22 at different salt concentrations. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c) above bars indicate statistically significant differences between means (p < 0.05), while shared letters denote no significant difference.
Figure 5. The growth and squalene accumulation of P4-22 at different salt concentrations. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c) above bars indicate statistically significant differences between means (p < 0.05), while shared letters denote no significant difference.
Molecules 30 01646 g005
Figure 6. Fed-batch fermentations of Pseudozyma sp. P4-22 (A) and Pseudozyma sp. SD301 (B).
Figure 6. Fed-batch fermentations of Pseudozyma sp. P4-22 (A) and Pseudozyma sp. SD301 (B).
Molecules 30 01646 g006
Table 2. Utilization of different carbon sources by P4-22.
Table 2. Utilization of different carbon sources by P4-22.
Carbon SourceStrain Biomass (g/L)Squalene Titer (g/L) 1
glucose21.51 ± 0.180.99 ± 0.03
sucrose19.98 ± 0.320.82 ± 0.07
maltose6.05 ± 0.520.05 ± 0.01
xylose17.79 ± 0.750.98 ± 0.03
cellobiose3.12 ± 0.27-
lactose10.27 ± 1.670.25 ± 0.17
starch soluble5.84 ± 0.22-
citric acid5.36 ± 0.05-
malic acid3.06 ± 1.79-
succinic acid12.83 ± 3.490.11 ± 0.003
glycerin5.77 ± 0.08-
methanol1.02 ± 0.06-
ethanol4.37 ± 0.110.003 ± 0.001
lactic acid3.75 ± 0.03-
sorbitol0.96 ± 0.11-
1 “-” represents the absence of squalene accumulation.
Table 3. Utilization of different nitrogen sources by P4-22.
Table 3. Utilization of different nitrogen sources by P4-22.
Nitrogen SourceStrain Biomass (g/L)Squalene Titer (g/L) 1
yeast extract23.07 ± 1.441.29 ± 0.11
tryptone12.14 ± 0.160.04 ± 0.02
corn steep liquor23.28 ± 0.451.74 ± 0.003
urea1.03 ± 0.25-
NH4Cl1.26 ± 0.14-
(NH4)2SO41.54 ± 0.19-
NaNO32.1 ± 0.45-
KNO31.69 ± 0.09-
1 “-” represents the absence of squalene accumulation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, C.; Song, X.; Li, J.; Cui, Q.; Gu, P.; Feng, Y. Optimization of Squalene Production by Pseudozyma sp. P4-22. Molecules 2025, 30, 1646. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071646

AMA Style

Huang C, Song X, Li J, Cui Q, Gu P, Feng Y. Optimization of Squalene Production by Pseudozyma sp. P4-22. Molecules. 2025; 30(7):1646. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071646

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Chen, Xiaojin Song, Jingyi Li, Qiu Cui, Pengfei Gu, and Yingang Feng. 2025. "Optimization of Squalene Production by Pseudozyma sp. P4-22" Molecules 30, no. 7: 1646. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071646

APA Style

Huang, C., Song, X., Li, J., Cui, Q., Gu, P., & Feng, Y. (2025). Optimization of Squalene Production by Pseudozyma sp. P4-22. Molecules, 30(7), 1646. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071646

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop