Next Article in Journal
History of Organophosphorus Compounds in the Context of Their Use as Chemical Warfare Agents
Next Article in Special Issue
Sulfide Oxidation to Sulfone Using Sodium Chlorite and Hydrochloric Acid in Organic Solvents
Previous Article in Journal
Stabilisation of Nanosilver Supramolecular Hydrogels with Trisodium Citrate
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects and Impact of Selenium on Human Health, A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Static and Dynamic Assessments of a Sulfur-Triglyceride Composite for Antimicrobial Surface Applications

by
Shalini K. Wijeyatunga
1,
Perla Y. Sauceda-Oloño
1,
Nawoda L. Kapuge Dona
1,
Bárbara G. S. Guinati
1,
Katelyn M. Derr
1,
Katelyn A. Tisdale
1,
Ashlyn D. Smith
1,*,
Andrew G. Tennyson
1,2,* and
Rhett C. Smith
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
2
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(7), 1614; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071614
Submission received: 10 March 2025 / Revised: 28 March 2025 / Accepted: 29 March 2025 / Published: 4 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organosulfur and Organoselenium Chemistry II)

Abstract

:
Over 80 MT of elemental sulfur, a byproduct of fossil fuel desulfurization, are generated annually. This has spurred the development of high sulfur content materials (HSMs) via inverse vulcanization as a productive pathway towards sulfur utilization. In this study, we evaluate the antimicrobial performance of SunBG90, an HSM made from brown grease and sulfur, as tiles or infused into fabric squares. The static antimicrobial activity of SunBG90 tiles was assessed, revealing excellent efficacy against Gram-positive bacteria, with reductions of 96.84% for Staphylococcus aureus and 91.52% for Listeria monocytogenes. The tiles also exhibited strong antifungal activity, reducing Candida auris by 96.20% and mold (fumigatus) by 83.77%. In contrast, efficacy against Gram-negative bacteria was more variable, with moderate reductions for Escherichia coli (61.10%) and Salmonella enteritidis (62.15%), lower activity against Campylobacter jejuni and Salmonella typhi, and no effect on Clostridium perfringens. Under dynamic conditions, SunBG90-infused fabrics achieved a near-complete inhibition of L. monocytogenes (99.91%) and high reduction of E. coli (98.49%), along with a 96.24% inhibition of Candida auris. These results highlight the potential and limitations of SunBG90 for antimicrobial applications, emphasizing the need for further optimization to achieve consistent broad-spectrum activity.

1. Introduction

Over 80 MT of unutilized sulfur is produced annually by the desulfurization of fossil fuels, making sulfur utilization a critical goal for waste utilization. Preparing copolymers and composites with sulfur as the majority component, collectively termed high sulfur content materials (HSMs), has emerged as a potential way to utilize sulfur while creating a new class of materials with versatile applications [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. HSMs are most commonly made by the inverse vulcanization of elemental sulfur with olefins, but more recent reports show that aryl halides, anisole derivatives, and even hydrocarbons or polymers featuring benzylic protons, are susceptible to reaction with elemental sulfur to produce HSMs. A wide range of organics have thus served as comonomers for the synthesis of HSMs, including plastic waste [39,40,41,42,43,44,45], plant oils [46,47,48,49,50,51], animal fats [40,41,52,53,54], wastewater sludge [55], terpenoids [4,42,56,57,58,59,60], polysaccharides [57,60,61,62,63,64], lignin [65,66,67,68,69,70], raw lignocellulosic biomass, and mixed-material waste. Prominent applications of HSMs include lithium–sulfur batteries [24,25,71,72,73,74,75,76,77], adhesives [46,47,78], and in separation/remediation agents [2,5,49,79,80,81,82,83,84,85]. The current report, however, will focus on the potential antimicrobial activity of HSMs.
Several recent reports indicate the potential of HSMs as antimicrobial agents. These materials are generally prepared by the inverse vulcanization of olefins with elemental sulfur. For example, coatings prepared using 1,3-diisopropenylbenzene (DIB) with embedded SiO2 nanoparticles exhibited an 81% inhibition of E. coli (a Gram-negative bacterium) and 75% inhibition of S. aureus (a Gram-positive bacterium) [86]. Another study on HSMs made from the inverse vulcanization of sulfur with dicyclopentadiene or DIB indicated up to a 99.9% reduction in E. coli and S. aureus viability [87]. A more systematic study on such materials revealed a dependence of efficacy on test temperature and the polymer’s glass transition temperature, thus offering insights into the potential to design materials for desired applications using structure–activity relationships [88,89]. Sulfur–nylon composites were similarly explored for activity against Gram-positive bacteria S. aureus, B. subtilis, and S. epidermidis, as well as Gram-negative bacteria E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and K. pneumoniae. Strong inhibition was only reported for some composites against E. coli [90].
The antimicrobial properties of HSMs made from the inverse vulcanization of more sustainable monomers have also been explored, including those to which other antimicrobial agents have been added. For example, Gentamicin-loaded HSMs from vegetable oils were shown to have increased efficacy against P. aeruginosa (a Gram-negative bacterium). In this study, the antibiotic was credited with killing the bacteria, while the sulfur-rich material was credited with helping to localize antibiotic accumulation at the infection site [91]. In another study, blends of poly(lactic acid) with an HSM made from sulfur and tung oil have demonstrated high efficacy against S. aureus, B. subtilis, P. aeruginosa, and E.coli [92].
Considerably less has been reported on the antimicrobial activity of HSMs against fungi than against bacteria. One study on an HSM made from sulfur and plant-derived urushiol indicated an inhibition efficiency greater than 80% against S. aureus and over 52% against the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae [93]. Another study combined tung oil with sorbic acid to form an HSM that was effective against S. aureus, E. coli, B. subtilis, P. aeruginosa, and S. cerevisiae. This HSM fully eliminated S. aureus, B. subtilis, E. coli, and S. cerevisiae in culture, while inhibiting over 90% of P. aeruginosa [94].
The foregoing summary of studies involving the antimicrobial properties of HSMs highlights the potential for HSMs to exhibit broad efficacy against microorganisms, but also points to mixed results, sometimes even against the same test organisms. The composition and presence or absence of the supporting matrix, blend component, etc., all appear to influence the potential of HSMs against different types of organisms. In the current work, the antimicrobial efficacy of SunBG90 (Figure 1)—a well-studied animal fat-derived HSM made from sunflower oil (5 wt. %), brown grease (5 wt. %), and sulfur (90 wt. %) [54,95,96,97]—is evaluated. To provide a more complete picture of the antimicrobial ability of SunBG90 against microorganisms in different application settings, we studied inhibition under static and dynamic conditions. One part of this study used stationary tiles of SunBG90 to test against a range of pathogens representing Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, and fungi (yeast and mold), according to the ASTM E 2180-18 protocol [98,99,100,101]. In the second part of this study, we infused SunBG90 into squares of fabric used in food preparation facility shoe coverings. We tested the ability of these fabric squares to inhibit select microorganisms of interest in food preparation or pharmaceutical facilities under dynamic conditions according to the ASTM E 2149-20 protocol [102,103,104,105].

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Microbe Selection and Antimicrobial Properties of Static Hard Surfaces (ASTM E 2180-18)

2.1.1. Preparation of Tile Test Samples and Test Organism Rationale

SunBG90 was prepared [54] and fabricated into tiles [97] according to the published procedures (Figure 2a).
The antimicrobial performance of the SunBG90 tiles was evaluated using the ASTM E 2180-18 method (schematically represented in Figure 3), with results summarized in Table 1.
The assay assessed the reduction in viable counts of a range of microorganisms after 24 h of exposure to the material under static conditions. Microbes were selected from those studied in the aforementioned studies on the antimicrobial properties of HSMs or that pose particular threats to human health. For example, Staphylococcus aureus is a common Gram-positive bacterium responsible for skin infections, pneumonia, and bloodstream infections, including those caused by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [106,107,108]. Surfaces that inhibit S. aureus could prevent hospital-acquired infections. Listeria monocytogenes poses significant risks in food processing and storage environments, particularly in pregnant women, newborns, and immunocompromised individuals [109,110,111,112]. Clostridium perfringens is a spore-forming bacterium linked to food poisoning and gangrene [113,114,115,116]. Salmonella enteritidis [117,118,119,120] and Campylobacter jejuni (two strains are studied here) are major causes of gastroenteritis [121,122], and certain strains of Escherichia coli are pathogenic and cause severe gastrointestinal diseases [123,124,125,126]. These organisms are all critical targets in food industry settings. Salmonella typhi is the causative agent of typhoid fever, a significant public health concern in areas with inadequate sanitation [127,128,129,130]. Effective antimicrobial surfaces could help curb its transmission via contaminated water or surfaces in both healthcare and food service settings. In addition to bacteria, two fungi, Candida auris and Aspergillus fumigatus, were also evaluated in this study. C. auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant yeast known for causing invasive infections in healthcare settings [131,132,133,134]; so, effective antimicrobial surfaces can help prevent its rapid spread, particularly in hospitals and long-term care facilities. A. fumigatus is a mold responsible for invasive aspergillosis, especially in immunocompromised or COVID-19-afflicted individuals, which can lead to life-threatening conditions [135,136,137,138]. Surfaces that inhibit its growth are critical in healthcare and agricultural environments to reduce airborne spore exposure.

2.1.2. Efficacy Against Gram-Positive Bacteria

The tiles exhibited excellent antimicrobial activity against key Gram-positive bacteria. For example, Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538) demonstrated a 96.84% reduction, and Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC 19115) showed a 91.52% reduction. This high efficacy is particularly significant given the clinical relevance of these pathogens frequently implicated in hospital-acquired infections.

2.1.3. Variable Activity Against Gram-Negative Bacteria

In contrast to the consistently high activity against Gram-positive bacteria, the results against Gram-negative bacteria were more variable. Salmonella enteritidis (ATCC 13076) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739) showed similarly moderate reductions of 62.15% and 61.10%, respectively. However, for other Gram-negative organisms such as Campylobacter jejuni (ATCC 29428 and 33291) and Salmonella typhi (ATCC 14028), the reductions were lower—37.70%, 37.53%, and 32.87%, respectively. These differences may be attributed to the inherent structural complexity of Gram-negative cell envelopes, including the protective outer membrane that can impede the penetration or action of antimicrobial agents. The moderate efficacy observed suggests that while the SunBG90 disrupts these bacteria to some degree, the further optimization or addition of other agents to the tile formulation may be required to achieve higher levels of reduction across all Gram-negative species on these surfaces.
Interestingly, SunBG90 did not demonstrate any antimicrobial effect against Clostridium perfringens (ATCC 13124), with a reduction of 0%. C. perfringens is known for its resilient spore-forming capability and unique cell wall composition, which may confer intrinsic resistance to the antimicrobial mechanisms that are effective against other bacteria [109,113,114,115,116]. This finding indicates a limitation of the current formulation and underscores the need for additional investigations into the material’s spectrum of activity and possible modifications to target more resistant organisms.

2.1.4. Efficacy Against Fungi

The antifungal activity of the tiles was evaluated using two representative fungal organisms. Candida auris (CDC B11903), an emerging yeast pathogen, experienced a 96.20% reduction, indicating that the material is highly effective against yeast forms. Similarly, the tiles reduced the viability of a mold, represented by fumigatus (ATCC 204305), by 83.77%. The robust performance against both yeast and mold suggests that the SunBG90 coating could possess broad-spectrum antifungal properties, which is especially valuable in environments where fungal contamination poses a risk.

2.2. Microbe Selection and Antimicrobial Properties of SunBG90-Infused Fabric Under Dynamic Conditions (ASTM E 2149-20)

2.2.1. Preparation of SunBG90-Infused Fabric Squares

Fabric samples for testing in this study were prepared by cutting squares measuring 5.08 cm × 5.08 cm from commercial shoe coverings made of a spunbond–meltblown–spunbond (SMS) polypropylene material. Each fabric square was submerged separately in a 0.01 g/mL solution of SunBG90 in chloroform. The chloroform was then allowed to evaporate under ambient conditions (Figure 2b). This method leads to the infusion of 3 mg of material per square centimeter (19 mg per square inch) of fabric. The fabric squares maintained their flexibility and general appearance but with a slight darkening of the color after SunBG90 infusion. The antimicrobial performance of the SunBG90-infused fabric squares was assessed using the ASTM E 2149-20 method (steps are summarized in Figure 4), and the results are summarized in Table 2. In this method, a fabric square that has been infused with the agent is placed in growth media for the organism of interest and is in constant motion to test the ability of the fabric to reduce the organism under simulated movement as if the fabric was, for example, being worn as part of personal protective equipment for healthcare or industrial food service workers. Examples of the Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and a fungus against which SunBG90 tiles showed the greatest efficacy within each class of organism were selected for evaluation under these dynamic conditions.

2.2.2. Activity Against Gram-Positive Bacteria

For Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC 19115), the infused fabrics achieved a substantial reduction of 99.91% after 8 h. This near-complete inhibition underscores the strong bactericidal effect of the antimicrobial agents incorporated into the fabric when challenged with a clinically significant Gram-positive organism. In contrast, Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538) was not reduced under the same conditions, suggesting that differences in bacterial cell wall composition or resistance mechanisms may limit the efficacy of the antimicrobial compounds in this context.

2.2.3. Activity Against Gram-Negative Bacteria

Among Gram-negative bacteria, the results were similarly selective. Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739) was highly susceptible to the treatment, exhibiting a 98.49% reduction after 8 h. On the other hand, Salmonella enteritidis (ATCC 13076) displayed no reduction, which may be due to variations in the outer membrane composition or other intrinsic resistance factors that hinder the activity of the antimicrobial agents released from the fabric.

2.2.4. Activity Against Yeast

The infused fabrics also demonstrated strong antifungal properties. Candida auris (CDC B11903) showed a 96.24% reduction after 8 h, indicating that the fabric formulation is highly effective against this problematic yeast. This robust antifungal activity is significant given the challenges of controlling C. auris in healthcare and other high-risk environments.

2.3. Summary of Antimicrobial Properties

The results obtained from the SunBG90-coated tiles and the SunBG90-infused fabrics provide valuable insights into the antimicrobial performance of this novel material across different substrates and testing conditions.
In the tile study (ASTM E 2180-18), the SunBG90 coating demonstrated high efficacy against key Gram-positive bacteria. Both Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes exhibited reductions exceeding 90%, and the material also showed potent antifungal activity against the pathogenic yeast Candida auris and pathogenic mold Aspergillus fumigatus. However, the activity against Gram-negative bacteria was more variable, with moderate reductions observed for Escherichia coli and Salmonella enteritidis, and considerably lower efficacy against Campylobacter jejuni and Salmonella typhi. Notably, no antimicrobial effect was observed against Clostridium perfringens. These outcomes suggest that while the SunBG90 coating is highly effective against many clinically relevant organisms, its activity may be hindered by structural features such as the outer membranes characteristic of Gram-negative bacteria or the inherent resilience of spore-formers like C. perfringens.
The antimicrobial performance exhibited a pronounced time-dependent effect in the fabric study (ASTM E 2149-20), which employs dynamic agitation in a liquid medium. After 8 h of exposure, the fabrics achieved the near-complete inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes (99.91%) and a high reduction in Escherichia coli (98.49%). The antifungal performance was similarly robust against Candida auris (96.24%). In contrast, the fabric failed to reduce Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella enteritidis under the same conditions. This selective efficacy could be attributed to differences in the release kinetics of the active compounds from the fabric matrix or to variations in microbial cell wall composition that influence the interaction with the antimicrobial agents.
When comparing the two substrates, several factors emerge. The tiles, with their static application of the antimicrobial coating, likely offer a more uniform and immediately available active surface, which explains the consistent performance against many Gram-positive organisms and fungi. Conversely, the efficacy of the fabric relies on the diffusion and release of microbes over time—a process that seems highly effective for certain organisms like L. monocytogenes and E. coli but less so for others such as S. aureus and S. enteritidis. This discrepancy may be due to differences in the physical and chemical environments provided by a rigid surface versus a flexible, porous matrix.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Testing of Tiles According to ASTM E 2180-18

3.1.1. Sample Preparation

The antimicrobial activity of polymeric tile surfaces was evaluated using ASTM E2180-18, a standard method for determining the activity of incorporated antimicrobial agents in hydrophobic or polymeric materials. The test material, labeled SunBG90 (as previously reported [54], elemental analysis calculated C 3.85, H 1.00, S 90.00 and found C 5.17, H 0.40, S 92.33), was tested against ten microorganisms. Control tiles of identical composition without antimicrobial treatment were used as negative controls.
Each tile sample was prepared as a uniform 2.5 × 2.5 cm section according to the reported procedure [97] and placed into sterile Petri dishes in triplicate for each tested microorganism.

3.1.2. Microorganisms and Growth Conditions

The challenge microorganisms used in this study were sourced from ATCC and included the following:
  • Campylobacter jejuni (ATCC 33291, ATCC 29428);
  • Aspergillus fumigatus (ATCC 204305);
  • Salmonella typhi (ATCC 14028);
  • Salmonella enteritidis (ATCC 13076);
  • Clostridium perfringens (ATCC 13124);
  • Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC 19115);
  • Candida auris (ATCC CDC B11903);
  • Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538);
  • Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739).
Bacterial cultures were grown for 18–72 h and fungal cultures were grown for 5–7 days on appropriate media at required incubation conditions:
  • Aerobic incubation (30–35 °C) for most bacteria;
  • Anaerobic incubation (30–35 °C) for C. perfringens;
  • Microaerophilic incubation (37 ± 2 °C) for C. jejuni;
  • Fungal incubation (20–25 °C) for A. fumigatus and C. Auris.
Cultures were adjusted to 1–5 × 108 CFU/mL using a spectrophotometer before being incorporated into the testing medium.

3.1.3. Preparation of Inoculated Agar Slurry

A thin-layer agar slurry method was used to ensure uniform microbial contact with the tile surface. The slurry was prepared by dissolving 0.85 g NaCl and 0.3 g agar-agar in 100 mL of deionized water. For each organism, a separate agar slurry was prepared and equilibrated at 45 °C. The standardized microbial suspension was added to the molten agar to achieve a final concentration of 1–5 × 106 CFU/mL.

3.1.4. Experimental Procedure

Surface Preparation

The tile surfaces were pre-wet using sterile 0.85% saline applied with a cotton swab to promote the even distribution of the inoculum.

Inoculation and Incubation

A 0.5–1 mL aliquot of the inoculated agar slurry was pipetted onto the test and control tiles.
The slurry was allowed to gel, ensuring consistent contact with the tile surface.
The samples were incubated at their respective contact temperatures for 24 h.

Microbial Recovery and Enumeration

After 0 h (immediately after inoculation) and 24 h (post-incubation), microorganisms were recovered by transferring the tile surfaces into 120 mL sterile neutralizing broth to achieve an initial 1:10 dilution.
The tiles were vortexed for 1 min to release attached microorganisms.
Serial dilutions were performed, and colony-forming units (CFU/mL) were determined by plating on appropriate media.

3.1.5. Controls and Quality Assurance:

Purity Control: Each microorganism was streaked and incubated to confirm identity via Gram staining and colony morphology.
Sterility Control: All reagents, diluents, and growth media were tested for sterility prior to use.
Growth Promotion Test: A low-inoculum control (<100 CFU) was plated to confirm media viability.

3.1.6. Data Analysis

Microbial reduction was calculated as the percent reduction and log reduction relative to the untreated controls using the following equations:
P e r c e n t   R e d u c t i o n = a b a × 100 L o g 10   R e d u c t i o n = L o g 10 a L o g 10 b
where the variables are defined as follows:
a = Antilog of the geometric mean CFU/mL from the control samples.
b = Geometric mean CFU/mL from the treated samples.

3.1.7. Interpretation of Results

Tiles with >90% bacterial reduction were considered highly effective, while those with <50% reduction were considered minimally effective.

3.2. Testing of Fabric Squares According to ASTM E 2149-20

3.2.1. Sample Preparation

SunBG90 was prepared according to the reported procedure by heating sulfur, brown grease, and sunflower oil [97]. Squares measuring 5.08 cm × 5.08 cm were cut from commercial shoe covers (KIMTECH Shoe Covers, Model 69254). Each fabric square was submerged separately in a solution containing approximately 0.01 g/mL of SunBG90 dissolved in chloroform. After the chloroform had completely evaporated, the squares were removed and weighed before and after infusion.
Textile fabric squares were tested for antimicrobial activity according to ASTM E2149-20, which evaluates antimicrobial activity under dynamic contact conditions. Five fabric samples, each treated with antimicrobial agents according to the above procedure, were obtained. Untreated control fabric samples with an identical composition were also included. Each sample was weighed to 1.0 ± 0.1 g before testing.

3.2.2. Bacterial Culture Preparation

Challenge microorganisms were sourced from standard culture collections and included the following:
Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC# 19115);
Escherichia coli (ATCC# 8739);
Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC# 6538);
Salmonella enteritidis (ATCC# 13076);
Candida auris (CDC# B11903).
Bacterial cultures were grown in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) at 35 ± 2 °C for 18 h prior to testing. The cultures were then diluted in Phosphate Buffer Solution (PBS) with a 0.01% wetting agent to achieve a final working concentration of 1.5–3.0 × 105 CFU/mL, as determined by absorbance measurements at 475 nm on a spectrophotometer.

3.2.3. Experimental Procedure

Each fabric sample was placed in a sterile 250 mL screw-cap Erlenmeyer flask containing 50 ± 0.5 mL of the bacterial suspension. The flasks were secured onto a wrist-action shaker and agitated at the maximum stroke for 8 h at 25 ± 2 °C to ensure dynamic contact between the microorganisms and the fabric surface.
After the exposure period, aliquots were removed from each flask, serially diluted, and plated on selective agar media, including the following:
Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) (general enumeration);
MacConkey Agar (Gram-negative bacteria);
Mannitol Salt Agar (S. aureus);
Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate (XLD) Agar (Salmonella);
Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (C. auris).
Plates were incubated aerobically for 48 h at 35 ± 2 °C for L. monocytogenes, E. coli, S. aureus, and S. enteritidis, and 20–25 °C for C. auris. Colony-forming units (CFU) were counted, and the percent reduction in bacterial population was calculated relative to the untreated control using the following formula:
P e r c e n t   R e d u c t i o n = B A B × 100 L o g 10   R e d u c t i o n = L o g 10 B L o g 10 A
where the variables are defined as follows:
A = CFU/mL for the treated fabric after contact time;
B = CFU/mL for the untreated control.

3.2.4. Control and Quality Assurance

Sterility Control: All reagents, buffers, and neutralizers were tested to confirm sterility before use.
Purity Control: Each bacterial culture was verified via Gram staining and colony morphology prior to testing.
Growth Promotion Test: Less than 100 CFU of each challenge microorganism was inoculated into its respective growth media to confirm viability.

4. Conclusions

Our investigation on the antimicrobial properties of SunBG90 reveals that the material’s efficacy is strongly influenced by both its substrate form and the testing conditions. Under static conditions (ASTM E 2180-18), SunBG90-coated tiles demonstrated outstanding activity against key Gram-positive pathogens, achieving reductions of 96.84% for Staphylococcus aureus and 91.52% for Listeria monocytogenes. The tiles also exhibited robust antifungal activity, with a 96.20% reduction for Candida auris and an 83.77% reduction for A. fumigatus. In contrast, antimicrobial performance against Gram-negative bacteria was more variable, with moderate reductions observed for Escherichia coli (61.10%) and Salmonella enteritidis (62.15%), and lower efficacy against Campylobacter jejuni (approximately 37.7%) and Salmonella typhi (approximately 32.9%), while no effect was detected against Clostridium perfringens. Under dynamic conditions (ASTM E 2149-20), SunBG90-infused fabric squares achieved the near-complete inhibition of L. monocytogenes (99.91%) and a high reduction in E. coli (98.49%), along with strong antifungal efficacy against Candida auris (96.24%), although no reduction was observed for S. aureus and Salmonella enteritidis. These findings underscore that the antimicrobial performance of SunBG90 is substrate-dependent, with static tiles providing a uniformly active surface and dynamic fabrics relying on the controlled release of active agents. It should be noted that the potential of SunBG90 to irritate skin is as-yet unknown. Current fabrics are intended for use as shoe coverings in food preparation or pharmaceutical facilities, where these fabrics are not exposed to skin directly, but additional studies would be needed for any skin-contact applications. This study highlights both the promise and the limitations of SunBG90, emphasizing the need for further formulation optimization to achieve consistent, broad-spectrum antimicrobial efficacy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.C.S. and A.D.S.; methodology, R.C.S., S.K.W. and P.Y.S.-O.; validation, R.C.S., S.K.W. and P.Y.S.-O.; formal analysis, R.C.S., A.G.T., S.K.W. and P.Y.S.-O.; investigation, S.K.W., P.Y.S.-O., B.G.S.G., K.M.D., K.A.T. and N.L.K.D.; resources, R.C.S. and A.D.S.; data curation, S.K.W. and P.Y.S.-O.; writing—original draft preparation, R.C.S., A.G.T. and S.K.W.; writing—review and editing, all authors; supervision, R.C.S. and A.G.T.; funding acquisition R.C.S. and A.D.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Foundation grant number CHE-2203669 awarded to RCS, a seed grant from ACREC to RCS and ADS, and a seed grant from South Carolina Department of Agriculture through ACRE to RCS and ADS.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are provided in the article or can be requested from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
HSMHigh Sulfur Content Material
SunBG90Composite made from 90 wt. % sulfur, 5 wt. % brown grease, and 5 wt. % sunflower oil
DIB1,3-Diisopropenylbenzene
SMSSpunbond–Meltblown–Spunbond
ASTMAmerican Society for Testing and Materials

References

  1. Pople, J.M.M.; Nicholls, T.P.; Pham, L.N.; Bloch, W.M.; Lisboa, L.S.; Perkins, M.V.; Gibson, C.T.; Coote, M.L.; Jia, Z.; Chalker, J.M. Electrochemical Synthesis of Poly(trisulfides). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 11798–11810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Newman, B.; Doeven, E.H.; Francis, P.S.; Stojcevski, F.; Hayne, D.J.; Chalker, J.M.; Henderson, L.C. A high value application of reclaimed carbon fibers: Environmental remediation and redeployment in structural composites. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2023, 35, e00546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mueller, F.G.; Lisboa, L.S.; Chalker, J.M. Inverse Vulcanized Polymers for Sustainable Metal Remediation. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2023, 7, 2300010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yan, P.; Zhao, W.; Tonkin, S.J.; Chalker, J.M.; Schiller, T.L.; Hasell, T. Stretchable and Durable Inverse Vulcanized Polymers with Chemical and Thermal Recycling. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 1167–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Worthington, M.J.H.; Mann, M.; Muhti, I.Y.; Tikoalu, A.D.; Gibson, C.T.; Jia, Z.; Miller, A.D.; Chalker, J.M. Modelling mercury sorption of a polysulfide coating made from sulfur and limonene. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022, 24, 12363–12373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stojcevski, F.; Stanfield, M.K.; Hayne, D.J.; Mann, M.; Lundquist, N.A.; Chalker, J.M.; Henderson, L.C. Inverse Vulcanisation of canola oil as a route to recyclable chopped carbon fibre composites. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2022, 32, e00400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mann, M.; Pauling, P.J.; Tonkin, S.J.; Campbell, J.A.; Chalker, J.M. Chemically Activated S-S Metathesis for Adhesive-Free Bonding of Polysulfide Surfaces. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2022, 223, 2100333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gupta, A.; Worthington, M.J.H.; Patel, H.D.; Johnston, M.R.; Puri, M.; Chalker, J.M. Reaction of sulfur and sustainable algae oil for polymer synthesis and enrichment of saturated triglycerides. ACS Sust. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 9022–9028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chalker, J.M.; Mann, M.; Worthington, M.J.H.; Esdaile, L.J. Polymers Made by Inverse Vulcanization for Use as Mercury Sorbents. Org. Mater. 2021, 3, 362–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bu Najmah, I.; Lundquist, N.A.; Stanfield, M.K.; Stojcevski, F.; Campbell, J.A.; Esdaile, L.J.; Gibson, C.T.; Lewis, D.A.; Henderson, L.C.; Hasell, T.; et al. Insulating Composites Made from Sulfur, Canola Oil, and Wool. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 2352–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Molineux, J.; Lee, T.; Kim, K.J.; Kang, K.-S.; Lyons, N.P.; Nishant, A.; Kleine, T.S.; Durfee, S.W.; Pyun, J.; Norwood, R.A. Fabrication of Plastic Optics from Chalcogenide Hybrid Inorganic/Organic Polymers for Infrared Thermal Imaging. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2024, 12, 2301971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Qureshi, M.H.; Bao, J.; Kleine, T.S.; Kim, K.-J.; Carothers, K.J.; Molineux, J.; Cho, E.; Kang, K.-S.; Godman, N.P.; Coropceanu, V.; et al. Synthesis of Deuterated and Sulfurated Polymers by Inverse Vulcanization: Engineering Infrared Transparency via Deuteration. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 27821–27829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bischoff, D.J.; Lee, T.; Kang, K.-S.; Molineux, J.; O’Neil Parker, W., Jr.; Pyun, J.; Mackay, M.E. Unraveling the rheology of inverse vulcanized polymers. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 7553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bao, J.; Martin, K.P.; Cho, E.; Kang, K.-S.; Glass, R.S.; Coropceanu, V.; Bredas, J.-L.; Parker, W.O.N., Jr.; Njardarson, J.T.; Pyun, J. On the Mechanism of the Inverse Vulcanization of Elemental Sulfur: Structural Characterization of Poly(sulfur-random-(1,3-diisopropenylbenzene)). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 12386–12397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pyun, J.; Carrozza, C.F.; Silvano, S.; Boggioni, L.; Losio, S.; de Angelis, A.R.; O’Neil Parker, W., Jr. Nuclear magnetic resonance structural characterization of sulfur-derived copolymers from inverse vulcanization. Part 1: Styrene. J. Polym. Sci. 2022, 60, 3471–3477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nishant, A.; Kim, K.-J.; Showghi, S.A.; Himmelhuber, R.; Kleine, T.S.; Lee, T.; Pyun, J.; Norwood, R.A. High Refractive Index Chalcogenide Hybrid Inorganic/Organic Polymers for Integrated Photonics. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2022, 10, 2200176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, T.; Dirlam, P.T.; Njardarson, J.T.; Glass, R.S.; Pyun, J. Polymerizations with Elemental Sulfur: From Petroleum Refining to Polymeric Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kang, K.-S.; Olikagu, C.; Lee, T.; Bao, J.; Molineux, J.; Holmen, L.N.; Martin, K.P.; Kim, K.-J.; Kim, K.H.; Bang, J.; et al. Sulfenyl Chlorides: An Alternative Monomer Feedstock from Elemental Sulfur for Polymer Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 23044–23052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kang, K.-S.; Iyer, K.A.; Pyun, J. On the Fundamental Polymer Chemistry of Inverse Vulcanization for Statistical and Segmented Copolymers from Elemental Sulfur. Chem. Eur. J. 2022, 28, e202200115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Y.; Konopka, K.M.; Glass, R.S.; Char, K.; Pyun, J. Chalcogenide hybrid inorganic/organic polymers (CHIPs) via inverse vulcanization and dynamic covalent polymerizations. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 5167–5173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kang, K.-S.; Phan, A.; Olikagu, C.; Lee, T.; Loy, D.A.; Kwon, M.; Paik, H.-j.; Hong, S.J.; Bang, J.; Parker, W.O., Jr.; et al. Segmented Polyurethanes and Thermoplastic Elastomers from Elemental Sulfur with Enhanced Thermomechanical Properties and Flame Retardancy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 22900–22907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kwon, M.; Lee, H.; Lee, S.-H.; Jeon, H.B.; Oh, M.-C.; Pyun, J.; Paik, H.-j. Dynamic Covalent Polymerization of Chalcogenide Hybrid Inorganic/Organic Polymer Resins with Norbornenyl Comonomers. Macromol. Res. 2020, 28, 1003–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gomez, I.; Mantione, D.; Leonet, O.; Blazquez, J.A.; Mecerreyes, D. Hybrid Sulfur-Selenium Co-polymers as Cathodic Materials for Lithium Batteries. ChemElectroChem 2018, 5, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gomez, I.; Mecerreyes, D.; Blazquez, J.A.; Leonet, O.; Ben Youcef, H.; Li, C.; Gomez-Camer, J.L.; Bundarchuk, O.; Rodriguez-Martinez, L. Inverse vulcanization of sulfur with divinylbenzene: Stable and easy processable cathode material for lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Power Sources 2016, 329, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gomez, I.; Leonet, O.; Blazquez, J.A.; Mecerreyes, D. Inverse Vulcanization of Sulfur using Natural Dienes as Sustainable Materials for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 3419–3425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Grimm, A.P.; Scheiger, J.M.; Roesky, P.W.; Theato, P. Inverse vulcanization of trimethoxyvinylsilane particles. Polym. Chem. 2022, 13, 5852–5860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Scheiger, J.M.; Direksilp, C.; Falkenstein, P.; Welle, A.; Koenig, M.; Heissler, S.; Matysik, J.; Levkin, P.A.; Theato, P. Inverse Vulcanization of Styrylethyltrimethoxysilane-Coated Surfaces, Particles, and Crosslinked Materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 18639–18645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Duarte, M.E.; Huber, B.; Theato, P.; Mutlu, H. The unrevealed potential of elemental sulfur for the synthesis of high sulfur content bio-based aliphatic polyesters. Polym. Chem. 2020, 11, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nguyen, D.T.; Hoefling, A.; Yee, M.; Nguyen, G.T.H.; Theato, P.; Lee, Y.J.; Song, S.-W. Enabling High-Rate and Safe Lithium Ion-Sulfur Batteries by Effective Combination of Sulfur-Copolymer Cathode and Hard-Carbon Anode. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 480–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mutlu, H.; Theato, P.; Ceper Ezgi, B.; Ozmen Mehmet, M.; Li, X.; Yang, J.; Dong, W.; Theato, P.; Yang, J. Sulfur Chemistry in Polymer and Materials Science. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2019, 40, e1800650. [Google Scholar]
  31. Jia, J.; Yan, P.; Cai, S.D.; Cui, Y.; Xun, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Dodd, L.; Hu, X.; Lester, D.; et al. Solvated Inverse vulcanisation by photopolymerisation. Eur. Polym. J. 2024, 207, 112815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hanna, V.; Graysmark, M.; Willcock, H.; Hasell, T. Liquid polybutadiene reinforced inverse vulcanised polymers. J. Mater. Chem. A 2024, 12, 1211–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dale, J.J.; Stanley, J.; Dop, R.A.; Chronowska-Bojczuk, G.; Fielding, A.J.; Neill, D.R.; Hasell, T. Exploring Inverse Vulcanisation Mechanisms from the Perspective of Dark Sulfur. Eur. Polym. J. 2023, 195, 112198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dale, J.J.; Hanna, V.; Hasell, T. Manipulating Inverse Vulcanization Comonomers to Generate High-Tensile-Strain Polymers. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2023, 5, 6761–6765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, B.; Petcher, S.; Dop, R.A.; Yan, P.; Zhao, W.; Wang, H.; Dodd, L.J.; McDonald, T.O.; Hasell, T. Inverse vulcanised sulfur polymer nanoparticles prepared by antisolvent precipitation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 13704–13710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jia, J.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.-Q.; Liu, T.; Yan, P.; Gong, X.-Q.; Zhao, C.; Chen, L.; Miao, C.; Zhao, W.; et al. Photoinduced inverse vulcanization. Nat. Chem. 2022, 14, 1249–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hanna, V.; Yan, P.; Petcher, S.; Hasell, T. Incorporation of fillers to modify the mechanical performance of inverse vulcanised polymers. Polym. Chem. 2022, 13, 3930–3937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, B.; Dodd, L.J.; Yan, P.; Hasell, T. Mercury capture with an inverse vulcanized polymer formed from garlic oil, a bioderived comonomer. React. Funct. Polym. 2021, 161, 104865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wijeyatunga, S.K.; Tennyson, A.G.; Smith, R.C. High-Sulfur-Content Materials Derived from Postconsumer Polystyrene Wastes: Thermomechanical Properties, Environmental Impacts, and Microstructural Insights. ACS Sustain. Resour. Manag. 2024, 1, 2173–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lopez, C.V.; Smith, R.C. Composites produced from Waste Plastic with Agricultural and Energy Sector By-Products. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2023, 141, e54828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lopez, C.V.; Smith, R.C. Chemical Recycling of Poly(ethylene terephthalate) via Sequential Glycolysis, Oleoyl Chloride Esterification and Vulcanization to yield Durable Composites. Mater. Adv. 2023, 4, 2785–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wijeyatunga, S.K.; Derr, K.M.; Maladeniya, C.P.; Sauceda-Oloño, P.Y.; Tennyson, A.G.; Smith, R.C. Upcycling waste PMMA to durable composites via a transesterification-inverse vulcanization process. J. Polym. Sci. 2024, 62, 554–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Derr, K.M.; Smith, R.C. Thiocracking of Multi-Materials: High-Strength Composites from Post-Consumer Food Packaging Jars. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Derr, K.M.; Smith, R.C. One-Pot Method for Upcycling Polycarbonate Waste to Yield High-Strength, BPA-Free Composites. J. Polym. Sci. 2023, 62, 1115–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Derr, K.M.; Lopez, C.V.; Maladeniya, C.P.; Tennyson, A.G.; Smith, R.C. Transesterification-vulcanization route to durable composites from post-consumer poly(ethylene terephthalate), terpenoids, and industrial waste sulfur. J. Polym. Sci. 2023, 61, 3075–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Davis, A.E.; Sayer, K.B.; Jenkins, C.L. A comparison of adhesive polysulfides initiated by garlic essential oil and elemental sulfur to create recyclable adhesives. Polym. Chem. 2022, 13, 4634–4640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Herrera, C.; Ysinga, K.J.; Jenkins, C.L. Polysulfides Synthesized from Renewable Garlic Components and Repurposed Sulfur Form Environmentally Friendly Adhesives. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 35312–35318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lopez, C.V.; Karunarathna, M.S.; Lauer, M.K.; Maladeniya, C.P.; Thiounn, T.; Ackley, E.D.; Smith, R.C. High Strength, Acid-Resistant Composites from Canola, Sunflower, or Linseed Oils: Influence of Triglyceride Unsaturation on Material Properties. J. Poly. Sci. 2020, 58, 2259–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tikoalu, A.D.; Lundquist, N.A.; Chalker, J.M. Mercury Sorbents Made By Inverse Vulcanization of Sustainable Triglycerides: The Plant Oil Structure Influences the Rate of Mercury Removal from Water. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2020, 4, 1900111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lopez, C.V.; Maladeniya, C.P.; Smith, R.C. Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: Advances and Trends. Electrochem. 2020, 1, 226–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guinati, B.G.S.; Sauceda Oloño, P.Y.; Kapuge Dona, N.L.; Derr, K.M.; Wijeyatunga, S.K.; Tennyson, A.G.; Smith, R.C. Upcycling mixed-material waste with elemental sulfur: Applications to plant oil, unseparated biomass, and raw post-consumer food waste. RSC Sustain. 2024, 2, 1819–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lopez, C.V.; Smith, A.D.; Smith, R.C. Evaluation of Animal Fats and Vegetable Oils as Comonomers in Polymer Composite Synthesis: Effects of Plant/Animal Sources and Comonomer Composition on Composite Properties. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2023, 9, 2300233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lopez, C.V.; Derr, K.M.; Smith, A.D.; Tennyson, A.G.; Smith, R.C. Chemical, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties of Sulfur Polymer Composites Comprising Low-Value Fats and Pozzolan Additives. Chemistry 2023, 5, 2166–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lopez, C.V.; Smith, A.D.; Smith, R.C. High strength composites from low-value animal coproducts and industrial waste sulfur. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 1535–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tisdale, K.A.; Wijeyatunga, S.K.; Graham, M.J.; Sauceda-Oloño, P.Y.; Tennyson, A.G.; Smith, A.D.; Smith, R.C. High Strength Composites from Wastewater Sludge, Plant Oils, and Fossil Fuel By-Product Elemental Sulfur. J. Polym. Environ. 2025, 33, 1972–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tisdale, K.A.; Maladeniya, C.P.; Lopez, C.V.; Tennyson, A.G.; Smith, R.C. Sustainable Composites from Waste Sulfur, Terpenoids, and Pozzolan Cements. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lauer, M.K.; Tennyson, A.G.; Smith, R.C. Thermomorphological and mechanical properties of vulcanized octenyl succinate/terpenoid-derivatized corn starch composites. Mater. Adv. 2022, 3, 4186–4193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Maladeniya, C.P.; Smith, R.C. Influence of Component Ratio on Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Terpenoid-Sulfur Composites. J. Compos. Sci. 2021, 5, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Maladeniya, C.P.; Karunarathna, M.S.; Lauer, M.K.; Lopez, C.V.; Thiounn, T.; Smith, R.C. A Role for Terpenoid Cyclization in the Atom Economical Polymerization of Terpenoids with Sulfur to Yield Durable Composites. Mater. Adv. 2020, 1, 1665–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lauer, M.K.; Tennyson, A.G.; Smith, R.C. Green Synthesis of Thermoplastic Composites from a Terpenoid-Cellulose Ester. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2020, 2, 3761–3765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lauer, M.K.; Estrada-Mendoza, T.A.; McMillen, C.D.; Chumanov, G.; Tennyson, A.G.; Smith, R.C. Durable Cellulose–Sulfur Composites Derived from Agricultural and Petrochemical Waste. Adv. Sust. Syst. 2019, 3, 1900062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lauer, M.K.; Karunarathna, M.S.; Tennyson, A.G.; Smith, R.C. Robust, remeltable and remarkably simple to prepare biomass-sulfur composites. Mater. Adv. 2020, 1, 2271–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lauer, M.K.; Sanders, Z.E.; Smith, A.D.; Smith, R.C. Morphological and mechanical characterization of high-strength sulfur composites prepared with variably-sized lignocellulose particles. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 7413–7422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lauer, M.K.; Tennyson, A.G.; Smith, R.C. Inverse vulcanization of octenyl succinate-modified corn starch as a route to biopolymer-sulfur composites. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 2391–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Karunarathna, M.S.; Lauer, M.K.; Smith, R.C. Facile route to an organosulfur composite from biomass-derived guaiacol and waste sulfur. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 20318–20322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Karunarathna, M.S.; Lauer, M.K.; Tennyson, A.G.; Smith, R.C. Copolymerization of an aryl halide and elemental sulfur as a route to high sulfur content materials. Polym. Chem. 2020, 11, 1621–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Karunarathna, M.S.; Lauer, M.K.; Thiounn, T.; Smith, R.C.; Tennyson, A.G. Valorization of waste to yield recyclable composites of elemental sulfur and lignin. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 15683–15690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Karunarathna, M.S.; Maladeniya, C.P.; Lauer, M.K.; Tennyson, A.G.; Smith, R.C. Durable Composites by Vulcanization of Oleyl-Esterified Lignin. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 3234–3240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Karunarathna, M.S.; Smith, R.C. Valorization of Lignin as a Sustainable Component of Structural Materials and Composites: Advances from 2011 to 2019. Sustainability 2020, 12, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Karunarathna, M.S.; Tennyson, A.G.; Smith, R.C. Facile new approach to high sulfur-content materials and preparation of sulfur-lignin copolymers. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sahadevan, S.A.; Xiao, X.; Ma, Y.; Forsberg, K.; Olsson, R.T.; Gardner, J.M. Sulfur-oleylamine copolymer synthesized via inverse vulcanization for the selective recovery of copper from lithium-ion battery E-waste. Mater. Chem. Front. 2023, 7, 1374–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jeong, J.; Kyu, T. Development of Multifunctional Cathode Binder via Inverse Vulcanization for Lithium-Sulfur Battery with Enhanced Capacity Retention. J. Phys. Chem. C 2023, 127, 11836–11844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhao, F.; Li, Y.; Feng, W. Recent Advances in Applying Vulcanization/Inverse Vulcanization Methods to Achieve High-Performance Sulfur-Containing Polymer Cathode Materials for Li-S Batteries. Small Methods 2018, 2, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, Y.; Griebel, J.J.; Dirlam, P.T.; Nguyen, N.A.; Glass, R.S.; MacKay, M.E.; Char, K.; Pyun, J. Inverse vulcanization of elemental sulfur and styrene for polymeric cathodes in Li-S batteries. J. Polym. Sci. Part. A Polym. Chem. 2017, 55, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Arslan, M.; Kiskan, B.; Cengiz, E.C.; Demir-Cakan, R.; Yagci, Y. Inverse vulcanization of bismaleimide and divinylbenzene by elemental sulfur for lithium sulfur batteries. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 80, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Dirlam, P.T.; Simmonds, A.G.; Kleine, T.S.; Nguyen, N.A.; Anderson, L.E.; Klever, A.O.; Florian, A.; Costanzo, P.J.; Theato, P.; Mackay, M.E.; et al. Inverse vulcanization of elemental sulfur with 1,4-diphenylbutadiyne for cathode materials in Li-S batteries. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 24718–24722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Simmonds, A.G.; Griebel, J.J.; Park, J.; Kim, K.R.; Chung, W.J.; Oleshko, V.P.; Kim, J.; Kim, E.T.; Glass, R.S.; Soles, C.L.; et al. Inverse Vulcanization of Elemental Sulfur to Prepare Polymeric Electrode Materials for Li-S Batteries. ACS Macro Lett. 2014, 3, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sayer, K.B.; Miller, V.L.; Merrill, Z.; Davis, A.E.; Jenkins, C.L. Allyl sulfides in garlic oil initiate the formation of renewable adhesives. Polym. Chem. 2023, 14, 3091–3098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lundquist, N.A.; Chalker, J.M. Confining a spent lead sorbent in a polymer made by inverse vulcanization prevents leaching. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2020, 26, e00222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lundquist, N.A.; Worthington, M.J.H.; Adamson, N.; Gibson, C.T.; Johnston, M.R.; Ellis, A.V.; Chalker, J.M. Polysulfides made from re-purposed waste are sustainable materials for removing iron from water. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 1232–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Esdaile, L.J.; Chalker, J.M. The Mercury Problem in Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 6905–6916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Crockett, M.P.; Evans, A.M.; Worthington, M.J.H.; Albuquerque, I.S.; Slattery, A.D.; Gibson, C.T.; Campbell, J.A.; Lewis, D.A.; Bernardes, G.J.L.; Chalker, J.M. Sulfur-Limonene Polysulfide: A Material Synthesized Entirely from Industrial By-Products and Its Use in Removing Toxic Metals from Water and Soil. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1714–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Petcher, S.; Parker, D.J.; Hasell, T. Macroporous sulfur polymers from a sodium chloride porogen-a low cost, versatile remediation material. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2019, 5, 2142–2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Parker, D.J.; Jones, H.A.; Petcher, S.; Cervini, L.; Griffin, J.M.; Akhtar, R.; Hasell, T. Low cost and renewable sulfur-polymers by inverse vulcanization, and their potential for mercury capture. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 11682–11692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hasell, T.; Parker, D.J.; Jones, H.A.; McAllister, T.; Howdle, S.M. Porous inverse vulcanized polymers for mercury capture. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 5383–5386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Miao, C.; Xun, X.; Dodd, L.J.; Niu, S.; Wang, H.; Yan, P.; Wang, X.-C.; Li, J.; Wu, X.; Hasell, T.; et al. Inverse Vulcanization with SiO2-Embedded Elemental Sulfur for Superhydrophobic, Anticorrosion, and Antibacterial Coatings. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2022, 4, 4901–4911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Smith, J.A.; Mulhall, R.; Goodman, S.; Fleming, G.; Allison, H.; Raval, R.; Hasell, T. Investigating the Antibacterial Properties of Inverse Vulcanized Sulfur Polymers. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 5229–5234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Dop, R.A.; Neill, D.R.; Hasell, T. Antibacterial Activity of Inverse Vulcanized Polymers. Biomacromolecules 2021, 22, 5223–5233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Dop, R.A.; Neill, D.R.; Hasell, T. Sulfur-Polymer Nanoparticles: Preparation and Antibacterial Activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 20822–20832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wadi, V.S.; Jena, K.K.; Halique, K.; Alhassan, S.M. Linear Sulfur–Nylon Composites: Structure, Morphology, and Antibacterial Activity. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2020, 2, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Farioli, A.S.; Martinez, M.V.; Barbero, C.A.; Acevedo, D.F.; Yslas, E.I. Antimicrobial Activity of Gentamicin-Loaded Biocomposites Synthesized through Inverse Vulcanization from Soybean and Sunflower Oils. Sustain. Chem. 2024, 5, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chen, X.; Zhang, R.; Mao, Y.; Zhong, L.; Lin, P.; Deng, Q.; Zheng, B.; Shen, H.; Feng, Z.; Zhang, H. Development of a toughened and antibacterial Poly(lactide acid) (PLA) with preserved strength by elemental sulfur-based bio-renewable dynamically crosslinked elastomers. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 467, 143419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Shen, H.; Qiao, H.; Zhang, H. Sulfur-urushiol copolymer: A material synthesized through inverse vulcanization from renewable resources and its latent application as self-repairable and antimicrobial adhesive. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 450, 137905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Shen, H.; Chen, X.; Zheng, B.; Zhang, H. Sorbic Acid–Tung Oil–Sulfur Terpolymer Prepared via Inverse Vulcanization and Its Application as Antibacterial and Toughness Modifier for Polylactide. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2024, 6, 14351–14364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sauceda-Oloño, P.Y.; Lopez, C.V.; Patel, B.K.; Smith, A.D.; Smith, R.C. Influence of Thermal and Chemical Stresses on Thermal Properties, Crystal Morphology, and Mechanical Strength Development of a Sulfur Polymer Composite. Macromol 2024, 4, 240–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Sauceda-Oloño, P.Y.; Guinati, B.G.S.; Smith, A.D.; Smith, R.C. Influence of Additives on Flame-Retardant, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties of a Sulfur–Triglyceride Polymer Composite. J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sauceda-Olono, P.Y.; Borbon-Almada, A.C.; Gaxiola, M.; Smith, A.D.; Tennyson, A.G.; Smith, R.C. Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Recyclable Composites Prepared from Bio-Olefins and Industrial Waste. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. van Hoogstraten, S.W.G.; Fechter, J.; Bargon, R.; van Agtmaal, J.L.; Peeters, L.C.W.; Geurts, J.; Arts, J.J.C. The Antibacterial Properties of a Silver Multilayer Coating for the Prevention of Bacterial Biofilm Formation on Orthopedic Implants-An In Vitro Study. Coatings 2024, 14, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Cui, J.; Yeasmin, R.; Shao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, J. Fabrication of Ag+, Cu2+, and Zn2+ Ternary Ion-Exchanged Zeolite as an Antimicrobial Agent in Powder Coating. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 751–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tabriz, K.R.; Katbab, A.A. Preparation of modified-TiO2/PLA nanocomposite films: Micromorphology, photo-degradability and antibacterial studies. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1914, 070009/1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tinteri, C.; Potenza, M.; Rizzetto, R. Antimicrobial efficacy and longevity of silver+zeolite incorporating preinsulated ducts installed in real healthcare settings. J. Prev. Med. Hyg. 2012, 53, 177–180. [Google Scholar]
  102. Wynne, K.J.; Zolotarskaya, O.; Jarrell, R.; Wang, C.; Amin, Y.; Brunson, K. Facile Modification of Medical-Grade Silicone for Antimicrobial Effectiveness and Biocompatibility: A Potential Therapeutic Strategy against Bacterial Biofilms. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 46626–46638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Roman, L.E.; Villalva, C.; Uribe, C.; Paraguay-Delgado, F.; Sousa, J.; Vigo, J.; Vera, C.M.; Gomez, M.M.; Solis, J.L. Textiles Functionalized with Copper Oxides: A Sustainable Option for Prevention of COVID-19. Polymers 2022, 14, 3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Lopez-R, M.; Barrios, Y.; Perez, L.D.; Soto, C.Y.; Sierra, C. Metal-Organic Framework (MOFs) tethered to cotton fibers display antimicrobial activity against relevant nosocomial bacteria. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2022, 537, 120955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Huang, C.; Hu, C.; Sun, G.; Ji, B.; Yan, K. Antimicrobial finish of cotton fabrics treated by sophorolipids combined with 1,2,3,4-butanetetracarboxyic acid. Cellulose 2020, 27, 2859–2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Pulingam, T.; Parumasivam, T.; Gazzali, A.M.; Sulaiman, A.M.; Chee, J.Y.; Lakshmanan, M.; Chin, C.F.; Sudesh, K. Antimicrobial resistance: Prevalence, economic burden, mechanisms of resistance and strategies to overcome. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 170, 106103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Chang, R.Y.K.; Nang, S.C.; Chan, H.-K.; Li, J. Novel antimicrobial agents for combating antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2022, 187, 114378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Bai, A.D.; Lo, C.K.L.; Komorowski, A.S.; Suresh, M.; Guo, K.; Garg, A.; Tandon, P.; Senecal, J.; Del Corpo, O.; Stefanova, I.; et al. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2022, 28, 1076–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Friedman, M. Chemistry, Antimicrobial Mechanisms, and Antibiotic Activities of Cinnamaldehyde against Pathogenic Bacteria in Animal Feeds and Human Foods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 10406–10423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Allen, K.J.; Walecka-Zacharska, E.; Chen, J.C.; Katarzyna, K.-P.; Devlieghere, F.; Van Meervenne, E.; Osek, J.; Wieczorek, K.; Bania, J. Listeria monocytogenes—An examination of food chain factors potentially contributing to antimicrobial resistance. Food Microbiol. 2016, 54, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Beceiro, A.; Tomas, M.; Bou, G. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence: A successful or deleterious association in the bacterial world? Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 26, 185–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Temple, M.E.; Nahata, M.C. Treatment of listeriosis. Ann. Pharmacother. 2000, 34, 656–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Venhorst, J.; van der Vossen, J.M.B.M.; Agamennone, V. Battling Enteropathogenic Clostridia: Phage Therapy for Clostridioides difficile and Clostridium perfringens. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 891790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Sharan, M.; Vijay, D.; Dhaka, P.; Bedi, J.S.; Gill, J.P.S. Biofilms as a microbial hazard in the food industry: A scoping review. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 133, 2210–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Mak, P.H.W.; Rehman, M.A.; Kiarie, E.G.; Topp, E.; Diarra, M.S. Production systems and important antimicrobial resistant-pathogenic bacteria in poultry: A review. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2022, 13, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Abd El-Hack, M.E.; El-Saadony, M.T.; Elbestawy, A.R.; El-Shall, N.A.; Saad, A.M.; Salem, H.M.; El-Tahan, A.M.; Khafaga, A.F.; Taha, A.E.; AbuQamar, S.F.; et al. Necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens: Disease characteristics and prevention using organic antibiotic alternatives—A comprehensive review. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 101590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Castro-Vargas, R.E.; Herrera-Sanchez, M.P.; Rodriguez-Hernandez, R.; Rondon-Barragan, I.S. Antibiotic resistance in Salmonella spp. isolated from poultry: A global overview. Vet. World 2020, 13, 2070–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lamas, A.; Miranda, J.M.; Regal, P.; Vazquez, B.; Franco, C.M.; Cepeda, A. A comprehensive review of non-enterica subspecies of Salmonella enterica. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 206, 60–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Shah, D.H.; Paul, N.C.; Sischo, W.C.; Crespo, R.; Guard, J. Population dynamics and antimicrobial resistance of the most prevalent poultry-associated Salmonella serotypes. Poult. Sci. 2017, 96, 687–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Gantois, I.; Ducatelle, R.; Pasmans, F.; Haesebrouck, F.; Gast, R.; Humphrey, T.J.; Van Immerseel, F. Mechanisms of egg contamination by Salmonella enteritidis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 33, 718–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Klancnik, A.; Simunovic, K.; Sternisa, M.; Ramic, D.; Smole Mozina, S.; Bucar, F. Anti-adhesion activity of phytochemicals to prevent Campylobacter jejuni biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces. Phytochem. Rev. 2021, 20, 55–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Elgamoudi, B.A.; Korolik, V. Campylobacter Biofilms: Potential of Natural Compounds to Disrupt Campylobacter jejuni Transmission. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Bastidas-Caldes, C.; de Waard, J.H.; Salgado, M.S.; Villacís, M.J.; Coral-Almeida, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Calvopiña, M. Worldwide Prevalence of mcr-mediated Colistin-Resistance Escherichia coli in Isolates of Clinical Samples, Healthy Humans, and Livestock—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pathogens 2022, 11, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Laird, T.J.; Abraham, S.; Jordan, D.; Pluske, J.R.; Hampson, D.J.; Trott, D.J.; O’Dea, M. Porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli: Antimicrobial resistance and development of microbial-based alternative control strategies. Vet. Microbiol. 2021, 258, 109117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Loayza, F.; Graham, J.P.; Trueba, G. Factors obscuring the role of E. coli from domestic animals in the global antimicrobial resistance crisis: An evidence-based review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2020, 17, 3061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Cho, S.; Jackson, C.R.; Frye, J.G. The prevalence and antimicrobial resistance phenotypes of Salmonella, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus sp. in surface water. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 71, 3–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Shahid, S.; Mahesar, M.; Ghouri, N.; Noreen, S. A review of clinical profile, complications and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Salmonella Typhi isolates in children in Karachi. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Marchello, C.S.; Carr, S.D.; Crump, J.A. A systematic review on antimicrobial resistance among Salmonella Typhi worldwide. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2020, 103, 2518–2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Karkey, A.; Thwaites, G.E.; Baker, S. The evolution of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella Typhi. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2018, 34, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Dougan, G.; Baker, S. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and the pathogenesis of typhoid fever. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 68, 317–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Du, H.; Bing, J.; Hu, T.; Ennis, C.L.; Nobile, C.J.; Huang, G. Candida auris: Epidemiology, biology, antifungal resistance, and virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Forsberg, K.; Woodworth, K.; Walters, M.; Berkow, E.L.; Jackson, B.; Chiller, T.; Vallabhaneni, S. Candida auris: The recent emergence of a multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Perlin, D.S.; Rautemaa-Richardson, R.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A. The global problem of antifungal resistance: Prevalence, mechanisms, and management. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, e383–e392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Arendrup, M.C.; Patterson, T.F. Multidrug-resistant Candida: Epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and treatment. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 216, S445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Machado, M.; Valerio, M.; Alvarez-Uria, A.; Olmedo, M.; Veintimilla, C.; Padilla, B.; De la Villa, S.; Guinea, J.; Escribano, P.; Ruiz-Serrano, M.J.; et al. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in the COVID-19 era: An expected new entity. Mycoses 2021, 64, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Lai, C.-C.; Yu, W.-L. COVID-19 associated with pulmonary aspergillosis: A literature review. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2021, 54, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Arastehfar, A.; Carvalho, A.; Houbraken, J.; Lombardi, L.; Garcia-Rubio, R.; Jenks, J.D.; Rivero-Menendez, O.; Aljohani, R.; Jacobsen, I.D.; Berman, J.; et al. Aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillosis: From basics to clinics. Stud. Mycol. 2021, 100, 100115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Latge, J.-P.; Chamilos, G. Aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillosis in 2019. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 33, e00140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structural representation of SunBG90. Sunflower oil is primarily composed of triglycerides and brown grease is a mixture of free fatty acids and monoglycerides, diglycerides, and triglycerides; R1 and R2 are H or fatty acid chains. R3 represents hydrocarbon chains to simplify the diagram.
Figure 1. Structural representation of SunBG90. Sunflower oil is primarily composed of triglycerides and brown grease is a mixture of free fatty acids and monoglycerides, diglycerides, and triglycerides; R1 and R2 are H or fatty acid chains. R3 represents hydrocarbon chains to simplify the diagram.
Molecules 30 01614 g001
Figure 2. (a) Samples of SunBG90 tiles tested using the ASTM E 2180-18 method and (b) for antimicrobial activity assessment.
Figure 2. (a) Samples of SunBG90 tiles tested using the ASTM E 2180-18 method and (b) for antimicrobial activity assessment.
Molecules 30 01614 g002
Figure 3. Steps of the ASTM E 2180-18 test protocol.
Figure 3. Steps of the ASTM E 2180-18 test protocol.
Molecules 30 01614 g003
Figure 4. Steps of the ASTM E 2149-20 test protocol.
Figure 4. Steps of the ASTM E 2149-20 test protocol.
Molecules 30 01614 g004
Table 1. Antimicrobial efficacy of SunBG90 tiles tested by ASTM E 2180-18 method.
Table 1. Antimicrobial efficacy of SunBG90 tiles tested by ASTM E 2180-18 method.
OrganismATCC #
or CDC#
ClassificationTime (h)Reduction (%)
L. monocytogenes19115Gram-positive Bacteria24 h91.52
S. aureus6538Gram-positive Bacteria24 h96.84
C. perfringens13124Gram-positive Bacteria24 h0
S. enteritidis13076Gram-negative Bacteria24 h62.15
E. coli8739Gram-negative Bacteria24 h61.10
C. jejuni29428Gram-negative Bacteria24 h37.70
C. jejuni33291Gram-negative Bacteria24 h37.53
S. typhi14028Gram-negative Bacteria24 h32.87
C. aurisCDC B11903Yeast24 h96.20
A. fumigatus204305Mold24 h83.77
Table 2. Antimicrobial efficacy of SunBG90-infused fabrics tested by ASTM E 2149-20 method.
Table 2. Antimicrobial efficacy of SunBG90-infused fabrics tested by ASTM E 2149-20 method.
OrganismATCC #
or CDC #
ClassificationTime (h)Reduction (%)
L. monocytogenes19115Gram-positive Bacteria1 h13.35
L. monocytogenes19115Gram-positive Bacteria8 h99.91
S. aureus6538Gram-positive Bacteria8 h0
E. coli8739Gram-negative Bacteria8 h98.49
S. enteritidis13076Gram-negative Bacteria8 h0
C. aurisCDC B11903Yeast8 h96.24
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wijeyatunga, S.K.; Sauceda-Oloño, P.Y.; Kapuge Dona, N.L.; Guinati, B.G.S.; Derr, K.M.; Tisdale, K.A.; Smith, A.D.; Tennyson, A.G.; Smith, R.C. Static and Dynamic Assessments of a Sulfur-Triglyceride Composite for Antimicrobial Surface Applications. Molecules 2025, 30, 1614. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071614

AMA Style

Wijeyatunga SK, Sauceda-Oloño PY, Kapuge Dona NL, Guinati BGS, Derr KM, Tisdale KA, Smith AD, Tennyson AG, Smith RC. Static and Dynamic Assessments of a Sulfur-Triglyceride Composite for Antimicrobial Surface Applications. Molecules. 2025; 30(7):1614. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071614

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wijeyatunga, Shalini K., Perla Y. Sauceda-Oloño, Nawoda L. Kapuge Dona, Bárbara G. S. Guinati, Katelyn M. Derr, Katelyn A. Tisdale, Ashlyn D. Smith, Andrew G. Tennyson, and Rhett C. Smith. 2025. "Static and Dynamic Assessments of a Sulfur-Triglyceride Composite for Antimicrobial Surface Applications" Molecules 30, no. 7: 1614. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071614

APA Style

Wijeyatunga, S. K., Sauceda-Oloño, P. Y., Kapuge Dona, N. L., Guinati, B. G. S., Derr, K. M., Tisdale, K. A., Smith, A. D., Tennyson, A. G., & Smith, R. C. (2025). Static and Dynamic Assessments of a Sulfur-Triglyceride Composite for Antimicrobial Surface Applications. Molecules, 30(7), 1614. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071614

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop