Next Article in Journal
The Role of Noncovalent Interactions in the Infrared Spectra of Lignin Model Compounds: A DFT Study
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication of Novel MOF/HOF Composite for Efficient Degradation of Methylene Blue via Photo-Fenton-like Process
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 30
Issue 24
10.3390/molecules30244692
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Effects of Polyphenolic Extracts from Olive Mill Vegetation Water on Wild Boar Meat Patties

by
Caterina Altissimi
1,
David Ranucci
1,
Susanne Bauer
2,
Raffaella Branciari
1,*,
Roberta Galarini
3,
Maurizio Servili
4,
Rossana Roila
1 and
Peter Paulsen
2
1
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, 06124 Perugia, Italy
2
Centre for Food Science and Veterinary Public Health, Clinical Department for Farm Animals and Food System Science, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria
3
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Umbria e delle Marche “Togo Rosati”, 06132 Perugia, Italy
4
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, 06121 Perugia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(24), 4692; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30244692
Submission received: 2 October 2025 / Revised: 17 November 2025 / Accepted: 30 November 2025 / Published: 8 December 2025
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Game meats are particularly prone to oxidation and microbial spoilage due to their specific characteristics and the procedures required to obtain them. Various sustainable bioactive molecules derived from food industry by-products, such as olive mill wastewater, have the potential to enhance the stability and safety of game meats. The use of different levels of polyphenolic extracts from olive mill vegetation water, encapsulated through a freeze-drying process, was tested on wild boar meat patties as an antioxidant and antimicrobial. Two separate trials were performed. Trial 1 was carried out by adding different concentrations of polyphenolic extract (0, 1, and 2%) during the production of wild boar patties, and trial 2 by adding 1.5% salt and adding or not adding 2% polyphenolic extract. The first trial revealed antioxidant effects on the raw patties during storage time, both on colour (increasing in saturation index) and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (0.306, 0.268, and 0.254 mg MDA/kg after 5 days of storage in the control with 1% and 2% polyphenolic extract groups, respectively). Oxidation was also reduced during cold storage of cooked patties. Trial 1 also revealed a dose-dependent antimicrobial effect, mainly on Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp. Trial 2 confirmed that salt plus extract addition had an overall higher antimicrobial effect than when singularly added, but with a moderate increase in the hardness of the products.

1. Introduction

Extensive literature highlights the presence of polyphenols belonging to the phenylalcohol subclass, particularly tyrosol (T) and hydroxytyrosol (HT), in various plant sources, predominantly in olive-derived products such as fruits, leaves, and oil [1,2]. These compounds are known for their numerous health-promoting properties and biological activities [3]. HT and T exert potent antioxidant effects, largely attributed to their chemical structures, which enable them to inhibit the formation of free radicals generated during autoxidation processes [4]. The antimicrobial activity of olive phenols is primarily associated with their dialdehydic structure, which allows interactions with amino acids, proteins, and membrane molecules, ultimately leading to membrane permeabilization and bacterial cell lysis [5]. The olive oil industry generates considerable amounts of solid (olive pomace) and liquid (olive mill wastewater) by-products, which are rich in HT, T, and more complex polyphenolic compounds. Due to their high phytotoxicity, these wastes pose a significant environmental threat to both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, particularly in the Mediterranean region [6]. Consequently, there is increasing interest in their appropriate disposal and valorisation. One promising direction involves their reutilization in the food industry. Importantly, these by-products are characterized by a high content of phenolic compounds with demonstrated antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, including 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol (3,4-DHPEA or hydroxytyrosol) and p-hydroxyphenylethanol (p-HPEA or tyrosol). Extracts obtained from these waste materials may serve as natural alternatives to synthetic preservatives commonly used in the food industry [7].
Wild boar meat has been reported to possess superior nutritional qualities compared to conventional livestock meat [8]. However, the uncontrolled nature of its production—particularly with respect to handling, microbial contamination, and storage conditions—contributes to a higher rate of spoilage [9]. Additionally, wild boar meat is often perceived as tough and less suitable for direct consumption, leading to its frequent use in processed forms such as minced meat patties. The grinding process disrupts the muscle structure, creating a less stable matrix that promotes microbial growth as well as chemical and enzymatic oxidation. Furthermore, wild boar meat is also prone to oxidation for its high amount of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), mostly omega 3 [8]. These changes can negatively affect the safety and nutritional quality of the final product. In the food industry, especially in fresh ground meat products, additives with antioxidant properties are routinely used to mitigate these effects [7,8].
Despite being regulated under Regulation (EC) No. 1333/2008 (and subsequent amendments), synthetic food additives are often viewed with scepticism by consumers due to concerns about their potential long-term health effects [10]. As a result, there is growing consumer demand for food products containing natural antioxidants, prompting ongoing research into natural alternatives to synthetic preservatives. Among agro-industrial by-products, liquid wastes from olive oil production—namely olive mill wastewaters (OMWWs)—have shown considerable potential [11]. OMWWs contain significant concentrations of phenolic compounds, particularly HT and T, which possess well-documented antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. These properties make OMWWs promising candidates for application in food preservation, especially in meat products susceptible to oxidative and microbial spoilage such as minced meat.
The aim of this study was to explore how the addition of different concentrations of polyphenolic extract (PPE) from olive mill vegetation water (OMWW) into wild boar meat patties would enhance microbiological and chemical shelf life, and how it would influence physical-chemical traits, such as colour, water activity, and texture properties.

2. Results

2.1. Trial 1: Effects of Two PPE Doses on Antioxidant and Microbial Contamination of Wild Boar Patties

The pH values recorded in trial 1 are reported in Figure 1 with no differences among LPPE and HPPE at each time (p < 0.05).
Water activity (aw) was 0.97 ± 0.001 in the control group (CTR) and the same results were found in the group with 1 and 2% PPE added (group LPPE and HPPE).
The proximate composition of the wild boar meat patties is reported in Table 1. Differences were detected only for moisture content, with lower values in the group with a higher quantity of PPE.
The evolution of instrumental colour parameters—lightness (L*), redness (a*), and yellowness (b*)—of the different patty formulations during refrigerated storage is presented in Table 2. The colour of the patties was influenced by the incorporation of PPE, particularly concerning redness and yellowness. Specifically, the a* value decreased in the CTR samples over time, while it increased in the treated samples. Similarly, the b* value remained stable in the CTR group but increased in the PPE-treated samples. At day 0 of storage, L* values were similar across all groups. However, during storage, lightness increased in both the CTR and LPPE samples, while it remained stable in the HPPE group. Additionally, the inclusion of the extract altered the initial colour of the patties, resulting in lower redness and yellowness in treated samples compared to the control. Interestingly, by the end of the storage period, the treated samples exhibited higher a* and b* values than the control, indicating a protective effect of PPE on colour stability. Likewise, chroma (saturation) increased in the treated samples during storage, whereas it remained stable in the control group. Nevertheless, the addition of phenols had no effect on hue angle.
For each group the ΔE calculated revealed perceptible changes during time, as ΔE in the CTR and in PPE groups was >2 after 3 days and >3.5 after 5 days.
The microbial counts of the control patties before vacuum packaging were 6.12 ± 0.24, 2.91 ± 0.41, and 3.20 ± 0.35 Log cfu/g for ACC, Enterobacteriaceae, and Pseudomonas, respectively. The counts determined on raw patties after 3 and 5 days under vacuum storage at 3 °C are reported in Table 3. The difference between groups was detected for all three parameters considered, with lower values of ACC in treated patties and Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp. in patties with 2% of PPE both after 3 and 5 days of storage. An increase in counts was noticed during storage time only for ACC in all the groups and in Enterobacteriaceae in the control group (Table 3).
The average TBARS values after 3 and 5 days in both raw and cooked patties were higher in the control group than in treated ones. Differences due to storage time were highlighted in raw products but no differences were detected in treated cooked patties. Higher malondialdehyde (MDA) contents were observed after cooking, indicating that the heating process triggered fat oxidation (Table 4). The increase was, however, less pronounced in treated samples than in controls, confirming the antioxidant effect of PPE.

2.2. Trial 2: Patties with and Without PPE 2% and NaCl 1.5%

The results of the pH measured in the wild boar patties of the second trial highlight differences between patties with no PPE and salt added and the other groups. The addition of both salt and PPE was associated with an increase in the pH values in the products (Figure 2). The aw values were different between the groups, with higher values in patties made with no additives and lower values in those with salt and PPE addition (Figure 3). Differences between 3 and 5 days of storage were detected only for the patties manufactured with 2% PPE but without salt.
Development of the microflora of raw patties stored for 3 or 5 days vacuum-packaged at 3 ± 1 °C is shown in Table 5. Generally, samples with 2% PPE or 2% PPE and 1.5% NaCl added demonstrated significantly (p < 0.05) lower numbers of total aerobic colony count, Pseudomonas spp., and Enterobacteriaceae than controls (0% PPE, 0% NaCl), with differences in the order of magnitude of 1 log cycle in samples stored for 5 days.
Addition of 1.5% NaCl effectuated significantly higher results for hardness and toughness after 5 days of storage, whereas addition of 2% PPE had no significant effect on textural properties (Table 6). Cooking loss values were higher in samples with both salt and PPE added (p < 0.001).

3. Discussion

3.1. Antioxidant Activity of Phenols

The integration of phenols in wild boar meat patties ensures oxidative stability during storage time. This result can be attributed to the antioxidant capacity of PPE added into patties related to its chemical composition, as it is mainly characterized by hydroxytyrosol [7]. It has been proven that the strong antioxidant capacity of hydroxytyrosol is closely associated with its chemical structure: a phenol ring formed by a catechol group and three hydroxyl groups [12]. These functional groups could promote its preservative action in products of animal origin, as demonstrated in the literature [7,13] and confirmed in our study.
We observed a significant reduction in lipid oxidation in wild boar patties with polyphenolic extract added, especially at concentrations of both 1% and 2%, as indicated by reduced TBARS levels. This effect highlights the potent antioxidant capacity of PPE, which is crucial for extending shelf life and maintaining meat quality. The reduction in TBARSs suggests that PPE efficiently inhibited lipid peroxidation, a primary factor in the quality deterioration of meat during storage. The polyphenolic compounds in PPE, particularly hydroxytyrosol, play a significant role in the antioxidant activity. Hydroxytyrosol and other phenols are known for their ability to scavenge free radicals, interrupting the oxidative chain reaction that leads to lipid degradation [14,15]. Our findings align with those reported by Roila et al. [7], where beef burgers treated with olive mill wastewater polyphenolic extract showed up to 62% lower TBARS levels over seven days compared to untreated controls, highlighting the effectiveness of polyphenol extracts in reducing lipid oxidation. Furthermore, Martínez-Zamora et al. [12] observed a similar reduction in lipid oxidation when hydroxytyrosol was applied to lamb patties, achieving a 35% decrease in oxidation compared to control samples. Moreover, our data suggest that the antioxidant properties of PPE were effective after heating and subsequent cold storage, simulating realistic consumption scenarios for processed meat products. The addition of PPE (polyphenolic extract) caused a colour modification in the patties. The variation in colour characteristics may result from the pigments present in the extract utilized, which can substantially influence the colouration of the patties. The results of this investigation are analogous to other studies indicating a colour alteration using different extracts [16]. The study’s findings confirm that CTR patties exhibited discolouration during storage compared to treated samples, primarily characterized by a decrease in redness, and are consistent with observations by other researchers [17,18,19] regarding raw meat during refrigerated storage. The stabilizing influence of natural antioxidants on colour has been evidenced in research involving various natural antioxidants, such as avocado [19], rosemary and lemon balm [20], carnosine [21], and red grape [22]. Lorenzo et al. [23] obtained analogous results with ground pork treated with grape seed extract, where the treated samples displayed a more pronounced red colour than the control after 20 days of storage. The findings presented here align also with those of Hawashine et al. [24] and Bouraban Chibane et al. [16] about beef patties treated with olive cake, pomegranate peel, and grape seed, respectively. Furthermore, the improvement of the saturation index and the stability of the hue angle in treated samples confirmed the efficacy of polyphenols in meat for maintaining an attractive colour [25]. The discolouration noted in the preservation of red meat cuts is generally associated with the oxidation of the iron atom in the haem group of red oxymyoglobin (OxyMb) to brown metmyoglobin (MetMb) [26]. The accumulation of MetMb on the meat surface and the consequent discolouration mostly depend on the presence of reducing processes and lipid oxidation [17,26].

3.2. Antimicrobial Activity of Phenols

The antimicrobial activity of olive phenols is attributed to their dialdehydic structure, which interacts significantly with amino acids, proteins, and membrane molecules, leading to membrane permeabilization and bacterial cell lysis. Research indicates that tyrosol inhibits cyclooxygenase enzyme activity, while hydroxytyrosol exhibits protein-denaturing properties [27]. Additional research indicates that numerous polyphenolic compounds serve as effective iron scavengers, and insufficient iron impacts the growth of specific pathogenic bacteria by diminishing the ribonucleotide precursor necessary for DNA synthesis [28]. The inclusion of PPE showed a limited effect regarding antimicrobial activity. The use of a 2% concentration of PPE in wild boar patties led to a slight reduction in ACC and EB compared to the control, observed at both 3 and 5 days of refrigerated storage, while the reduction in PS was noted only after 3 days of storage. Similar limited antimicrobial effects of polyphenols were noted in a previous study on game meat by Altissimi et al. [29], despite variations in concentrations, application methods, and storage times. While the antimicrobial effects of PPE were modest, this aligns with previous findings indicating that polyphenols generally exert mild antibacterial activity in beef meat products [15]. The effects of the PPE application on other spoilage microorganisms, such as Lactic Acid Bacteria, have been investigated previously in similar meat preparations and were found to be negligible [7]. Notably, some studies suggest that using different concentrations of polyphenols or combining them with other natural antimicrobials, such as essential oils or organic acids, may offer a strategic approach to enhance the antimicrobial efficacy [16,30].
The combination of polyphenolic extract (PPE) with sodium chloride (NaCl) further improved the microbiological stability of the patties, effectively reducing microbial spoilage. NaCl is known to have antimicrobial effects due to osmotic pressure, and its combination with PPE appears to create an enhanced effect on bacterial inhibition. A synergistic action of salt and natural antimicrobials has been studied and appears to be a promising strategy to enhance the preservative effect [31,32]. This approach allows for a reduction in the concentration of plant-derived extracts, which at high levels could negatively affect the sensory characteristics of some products, while also decreasing the use of salt in certain meat products, thereby ensuring the safety and quality of meat products [32].

3.3. Effects of PPE on Wild Boar Patty Quality Traits

The quality traits of the patties were investigated mainly by colour and texture. As previously reported, the effects of the addition of PPE on the wild boar patties were significant for the colour lightness and redness; therefore, the saturation index is potentially affected by meat oxidation. Indeed, wild boar meat generally presents a different colour from pig, due to higher water retention of the muscle and amount of myoglobin [33]. From a sensory perspective, overall colour differences (ΔE) change independently within the observed group over the course of storage time, denoting that the addition of PPE cannot affect the overall colour evolution of the product. The comparison between the groups highlights that no differences in ΔE were recorded after five days and were only significant between LPPE and HPPE at three days (Table 2). The ΔE value after 3 days for LPPE is lower than the other experimental groups, attesting that this specific PPE addition allows for overall colour stabilization, making colour differences over time imperceptible to common consumers. This observation was further confirmed in frankfurter sausages treated with polyphenols, where ΔE measurements showed no noticeable colour differences for consumers, particularly in products with naturally darker hues [34].
Textural effects were observed on patties in trial 2 with an increase in the hardness and related parameters, according to the NaCl addition and the storage time of the product. These differences in the texture profiles registered (Table 6) could be ascribed to the difference in the moisture content between the control and HPPE patties (highlighted in trial 1, Table 1), due to a possible reduction in the moisture content of the products during storage time being increased by salt addition and the solubilization of the functional myofibrillar proteins due to salt that results in a tougher product [35]. Furthermore, the higher values for hardness and other textural properties in patties manufactured with NaCl are in agreement with sensory assessments (“firmness”) of coarse meat patties manufactured with varying amounts of NaCl [31]. Indeed, cooking loss was also influenced by salt addition and contributed to higher hardness values.
In conclusion, from a sensory perspective, the use of PPE in the encapsulated form on meats is particularly advantageous. Freeze-drying encapsulation with maltodextrin is demonstrated to effectively protect bioactive compounds from oxygen, light, and moisture, enhancing their stability and facilitating their incorporation into complex food systems [36]. Moreover, the use of encapsulated polyphenolic extracts has been proven not to negatively affect the sensory properties of meat products. Evidence from products such as burgers and pork patties confirm that encapsulated olive polyphenols do not induce off-flavours, bitterness, or astringency, supporting their practical feasibility and consumer acceptability [25].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Sample Preparation and Outline of the Experiments

We studied the effect of varying concentrations of a polyphenolic extract (PPE) from OMWWs and salt (NaCl) on pH, water activity, colour, specific microbial hygiene criteria, and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARSs) in patties produced from wild boar meat.

4.1.1. Polyphenolic Extract Characterization

The extracts, which are rich in polyphenols, were supplied by Stymon Natural Products P.C., located in Patras, Greece. This product is derived from OMWWs (Olea europaea L., Koroneiki cultivar). The extracts were provided as encapsulated powder obtained through a freeze-drying process. Specifically, the extracted polyphenols were subjected to freeze-drying encapsulation within amorphous carbohydrate microstructure matrices, such as maltodextrin. The product is manufactured through a patented process (GR1010150, EP4049543A1) utilizing environmentally friendly technologies. In brief, the encapsulated extract is produced by treatment with hydrolytic enzymes, followed by filtration using a membrane process, and encapsulation with a food-grade maltodextrin carrier at a 1:1 dry weight ratio. This was succeeded by lyophilization at −55 °C and 0.1 mbar, and a subsequent grinding process (freeze-drying process). The identification of single molecules composing the extract and the determination of their concentrations were carried out using Liquid Chromatography Quadrupole Time-of-Flight spectrometry (LC-QTOF; LC-TripleTOF 6600, Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA), as previously described by Roila et al. [37]. Briefly, the equipment consisted of an Exion LC™ coupled to a 6600+ TripleTOF™ (Sciex, Foster, CA, USA) equipped with an electrospray ionization source operating in negative mode (ESI-). Chromatographic separation was performed using an Acquity BEH C18 column (150 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The mobile phases were water with 0.025% acetic acid (A) and methanol/ACN 90/10 v/v% (B). Gradient elution programme: The initial mobile phase composition was 100% A held for 1 min, then linearly decreased to 80% A at 11 min, to 50% A at 15 min, and to 0% A at 18 min. This condition (100% B) was maintained until 23 min, then the system was returned to the initial conditions (100% A) within 1 min and equilibrated until 30 min. The autosampler was maintained at 25 °C, whereas the column was set at 40 °C. The injection volume was 10 µL, and the flow rate 0.25 mL/min. The curtain gas (40 psi) was nitrogen, while the GS1 (55 psi) and GS2 (55 psi) were compressed air. The interface source temperature and the spray voltage were set at 450 °C and −4.5 kV, respectively. The quantification was carried out using a five-point calibration curve (25 ng/mL, 50 ng/mL, 100 ng/mL, 250 ng/mL, and 500 ng/mL) prepared in a mixture of acetic acid 0.025%/MeOH 90/10 (v/v).
Approximately (1.0 ± 0.1) g of solid polyphenolic extracts (StymonPhen-50W) was weighed in duplicate into 50 mL Falcon tubes. Each sample was extracted with 5 mL of MeOH/H2O (80/20, v/v) containing 20 mg/L of butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), vortexed and shaken for 30 min, and centrifuged at 4000× g rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was transferred to a 10 mL volumetric flask (protected from light). A second extraction with 5 mL of the same solvent mixture was performed, followed by shaking and centrifugation under identical conditions. Extracts were combined and brought to volume with extraction mixture. Aliquots (10 µL) of the final extract were diluted to 1:10,000; 1:25,000; and 1:50,000 in 10 mL, 25 mL, and 50 mL volumetric flasks, respectively, using 0.025% acetic acid/MeOH (90/10, v/v) as diluent. Each dilution was prepared in duplicate.
After filtration, all the samples were injected into the LC system. The monitored precursors and fragment ions, along with the different declustering potentials (DPs) and collision energies (CEs) applied, and retention times (RTs) are reported in Table 7.
The specific content of the phenolic compounds in PPE, as well as their specific chromatograms, are reported in Table 8 and Figure 4.

4.1.2. Wild Boar Patty Formulation

The meat for the preparation of the patties was obtained from vacuum-packed (in packages of 4–5 kg) deboned wild boar shoulder from an approved game-handling establishment. Packs arrived within 5 days post-cutting and were used on the day of arrival. Storage was at 0–2 °C. The meat cuts were divided into appropriate portions (ca. 1.5 kg) per trial. The portions were minced (MaDo Primus, Dornhan, Germany) through a 3 mm hole plate. The ground meat was divided for carrying out two different trials, with three replicates each. The raw patties weighed approximately 60 g and had a diameter of 10 cm.
In the first trial, we produced three different formulations: control patty (CTR)-only minced meat, without antioxidant, whereas a “low PPE” (LPPE) batch and a “high PPE” PPE (HPPE) batch were prepared by adding two levels of polyphenolic extract, 1% and 2%, respectively.
In the second trial we produced four different formulations where meat patties were manufactured with a combination of PPE (0 or 2%) and sodium chloride (0 or 1.5% NaCl) as follows: CTR (without NaCl and without PPE), GA (with 1.5% NaCl and without PPE), GB (without NaCl and with 2% PPE), and GC (with 1.5% NaCl and 2% PPE).

4.2. Description of the Trials

Two set of trials were performed and then replicated.
Trial 1: In the first experiment, we studied proximate composition, water activity, and pH of freshly prepared wild boar meat patties with 0 (control CTR), 1% PPE (LPPE) and 2% PPE (HPPE) added. Moisture (drying at 102 °C for 3 h), crude protein (nitrogen content as determined by Kjeldahl method multiplied by 6.25), crude fat (ether extract), and ash (wet ashing method) were determined according to German official methods [38,39,40,41]. Determination of pH and water activity (aw) were performed on raw patties as described previously [42]. In brief, three measurements per sample were taken with a penetrating electrode for pH (Testo 205; Testo AG, Titisee-Neustadt, Germany) and with a capacitance sensor device (Lab-Swift, Novasina, Lachen, Switzerland) for aw measurement. Per sample, the average was reported. Water activity data was obtained at 22.0 °C (as reported by the instrument during measurements).
Raw patties were immediately collected for initial determinations and then stored vacuum-packaged in plastic bags (Combivac 90 µm; Felzmann, Linz, Austria) for 3 and 5 days at 3 ± 1 °C and then subjected to pH determination, colour measurement, and microbiological examination, in order to establish to what extent the PPE concentration would retard growth of contaminant bacteria and extend shelf life. Samples of raw patties with 0% PPE were also collected and analyzed before vacuum packaging to define the starting characteristics of the product. Colour (CIE L*, a*, b*) [43] was measured in non-heated samples after “blooming”, i.e., keeping the meat patties wrapped in one layer of cling foil for 1 h at 3 °C to allow oxygenation of the hemoglobin. Per sample, measurements were taken at 5 spots and 3 patties were tested per treatment condition. We used a double-beam spectrophotometer with the following settings: aperture size of 8 mm, illumination of 6500 K, and observer angle of 10° (Phyma Codec 400, Phyma, Gießhübl, Austria). Hue value (arctan(b*/a*)) and saturation index or chroma [(a*)2 + (b*)2)0.5] were also calculated.
Delta-E [ΔE = [(L* − L*0)2 + (a* − a*0)2 + (b* − b*0)2]0.5] [44] was calculated to describe the “distance” between colours of two samples and related to day 0 of preservation within each group. A ΔE value of 1 is the smallest colour difference distinguishable to the human eye [44]. In practice, ΔE around 2 is indicative for differences perceivable only for trained assessors, and consumers would identify a difference in colours when ΔE exceeds 3.5, whereas a ΔE above 5 equals two different colours [44]. Only non-heated samples were tested.
For the microbiological examination, a 10 g aliquot of the sample was collected from 3 patties and each placed in sterile bags, and nine parts of Maximum Recovery Diluent (MRD) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) were added. Homogenisation of the sample was achieved by a Stomacher-type blender (Interscience, St. Nom, France) and subsequently, tenfold serial dilutions were prepared in MRD. Samples were subjected to the following analyses: total aerobic colony count (ACC) (according to ISO 4833-2:2013 [45] on Plate Count Agar, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany, incubated for 72 h at 30 °C); Enterobacteriaceae count (EB) (according to ISO 21528-2:2017 [46] on Violet Red Bile Glucose Agar, Merck, incubated for 24 h at 37 °C), and Pseudomonas (PS) count (GSP agar, Merck, incubated for 72 h at 25 °C) [47]. The number of colony-forming units (cfus) per gram was converted to Log cfu/g.
We also studied changes in TBARSs of such stored patties after heating and subsequent storage for 1 day at 3 °C under aerobic conditions, to simulate cold storage of leftover patties to consume them the next day. Patties were heated to an internal temperature of 75 °C on a plate grill (Turbo Super Quick Grill II GG; J. Zimmermann, Oberlienz, Austria) and temperature was measured with a testo 105 thermometer (Testo AG, Titisee-Neustadt, Germany). TBARSs were determined according to Witte, Krause, and Bailey [48]. Reagents were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). All the analyses were performed in duplicate and the average reported. Trial 1 was replicated three times.
Trial 2: In the second set of experiments, we studied colour, TBARSs, pH, aw, and the evolution of the microflora and textural properties (texture profile analysis, TPA) in wild boar meat patties manufactured with a combination of PPE (0 or 2%) and sodium chloride (0 or 1.5% NaCl) with the same methods previously reported. The 4 groups were therefore CTR (without NaCl and without PPE), GA (with 1.5% NaCl and without PPE), GB (without NaCl and with 2% PPE), and GC (with 1.5% NaCl and 2% PPE). Texture profile analysis (TPA) was conducted using a CT3 texture analyser, equipped with a 50 N load cell (Ametek Brookfield, Middleboro, MA, USA). From the heated patties, samples with a 30 mm diameter were punched out with a cork borer. Samples were placed between the plate of the texture analyser and a 36 mm diameter cylindrical probe. Device settings were speed 2 mm/s, 50% compression, and 2 s between the two cycles. The following parameters were calculated: hardness (N), toughness (mJ), springiness, and chewiness (N). The number of replicates was 8, and the average values ± standard deviation were reported. The water-holding capacity of the patties was assessed through cooking loss. Samples were weighed prior to cooking at 80 °C for 1 h in plastic bags. After cooling under running tap water for 30 min, they were weighed again. The cooking loss was calculated as follows: 100 × (initial weight − final weight)/initial weight.

4.3. Statistical Analyses

The statistical analyses were performed by ANOVA using the GLM procedure. Tukey’s post hoc test to discriminate among means were used (Statgraphics 3.0, Statgraphics Technologies, The Plains, VA, USA). Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.P. and C.A.; methodology, S.B.; formal analysis, C.A., R.G., and S.B.; resources, P.P. and D.R.; data curation, R.R., and D.R.; writing—original draft preparation, C.A., D.R., and P.P.; writing—review and editing, R.B. and M.S.; supervision, P.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Italian Ministry of University and Research, PON “Ricerca e Innovazione” 2014–2020, action IV.5-“Dottorati su tematiche Green”, PhD Project title: Game Meat Green Safety.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are made available by the authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the assistance of Brigitte Pilz and PANNATURA GmbH in providing samples is acknowledged. Pettas and Stymon Natural Products IKE are acknowledged for the technical support and for the production and supply of the food-grade olive phenolic extract under patent number GR1010150 and EP4049543A1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Papageorgiou, C.S.; Lyri, P.; Xintaropoulou, I.; Diamantopoulos, I.; Zagklis, D.P.; Paraskeva, C.A. High-yield production of a rich-in-hydroxytyrosol extract from olive (Olea europaea) leaves. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gallardo-Fernández, M.; Gonzalez-Ramirez, M.; Cerezo, A.B.; Troncoso, A.M.; Garcia-Parrilla, M.C. Hydroxytyrosol in foods: Analysis, food sources, EU dietary intake, and potential uses. Foods 2022, 11, 2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Karkovic Markovic, A.; Toric, J.; Barbaric, M.; Jakobušic Brala, C. Hydroxytyrosol, Tyrosol and Derivatives and Their Potential Effects on Human Health. Molecules 2019, 24, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gutiérrez-del-Río, I.; López-Ibáñez, S.; Magadán-Corpas, P.; Fernández-Calleja, L.; Pérez-Valero, Á.; Tuñón-Granda, M.; Miguélez, E.M.; Villar, C.J.; Lombó, F. Terpenoids and polyphenols as natural antioxidant agents in food preservation. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Obied, H.K.; Bedgood, D.R., Jr.; Prenzler, P.D.; Robards, K. Bioscreening of Australian olive mill waste extracts: Biophenol content, antioxidant, antimicrobial and molluscicidal activities. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2007, 45, 1238–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ladhari, A.; Zarrelli, A.; Ghannem, M.; Ben Mimoun, M. Olive wastes as a high-potential by-product: Variability of their phenolic profiles, antioxidant and phytotoxic properties. Waste Biomass Valori. 2021, 12, 3657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Roila, R.; Sordini, B.; Esposto, S.; Ranucci, D.; Primavilla, S.; Valiani, A.; Taticchi, A.; Branciari, R.; Servili, M. Effect of the Application of a Green Preservative Strategy on Minced Meat Products: Antimicrobial Efficacy of Olive Mill Wastewater Polyphenolic Extract in Improving Beef Burger Shelf-Life. Foods 2022, 11, 2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Reitznerova, A.; Semjon, B.; Bartkovský, M.; Šuleková, M.; Nagy, J.; Klempová, T.; Marcinčák, S. Comparison of lipid profile and oxidative stability of vacuum-packed and long time-frozen fallow deer, wild boar, and pig meat. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 4059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ranucci, D.; Roila, R.; Onofri, A.; Cambiotti, F.; Primavilla, S.; Miraglia, D.; Andoni, E.; Di Cerbo, A.; Branciari, R. Improving hunted wild boar carcass hygiene: Roles of different factors involved in the harvest phase. Foods 2021, 10, 1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Silva, M.M.; Lidon, F.C. An overview on applications and side effects of antioxidant food additives. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2016, 28, 823–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Russo, E.; Spallarossa, A.; Comite, A.; Pagliero, M.; Guida, P.; Belotti, V.; Caviglia, D.; Schito, A.M. Valorization and potential antimicrobial use of olive mill wastewater (OMW) from Italian olive oil production. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Martínez-Zamora, L.; Ros, G.; Nieto, G. Synthetic vs. Natural Hydroxytyrosol for Clean Label Lamb Burgers. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nieto, G. Biological activities of three essential oils of the Lamiaceae family. Medicines 2017, 4, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Galanakis, C.M. Phenols Recovered from Olive Mill Wastewater as Additives in Meat Products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 79, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Papuc, C.; Goran, G.V.; Predescu, C.N.; Nicorescu, V.; Stefan, G. Plant Polyphenols as Antioxidant and Antibacterial Agents for Shelf-Life Extension of Meat and Meat Products: Classification, Structures, Sources, and Action Mechanisms. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 1243–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bouarab Chibane, L.; Degraeve, P.; Ferhout, H.; Bouajila, J.; Oulahal, N. Plant Antimicrobial Polyphenols as Potential Natural Food Preservatives. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 1457–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Estévez, M.; Morcuende, D.; Cava, R. Oxidative and colour changes in meat from three lines of free-range reared Iberian pigs slaughtered at 90 kg live weight and from industrial pig during refrigerated storage. Meat Sci. 2003, 65, 1139–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Haak, L.; Raes, K.; De Smet, S. Effect of plant phenolics, tocopherol and ascorbic acid on oxidative stability of pork patties. J. Sci. Food Agricult. 2009, 89, 1360–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rodríguez-Carpena, J.G.; Morcuende, D.; Estévez, M. Avocado, sunflower and olive oils as replacers of pork back-fat in burger patties: Effect on lipid composition, oxidative stability and quality traits. Meat Sci. 2012, 90, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lara, M.S.; Gutierrez, J.I.; Timón, M.; Andrés, A.I. Evaluation of two natural extracts (Rosmarinus officinalis L. and Melissa officinalis L.) as antioxidants in cooked pork patties packed in MAP. Meat Sci. 2011, 88, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Badr, H.M. Antioxidative activity of carnosine in gamma irradiated ground beef and beef patties. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 665–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Garrido, M.D.; Auqui, M.; Martí, N.; Linares, M.B. Effect of two different red grape pomace extracts obtained under different extraction systems on meat quality of pork burgers. LWT 2011, 44, 2238–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lorenzo, J.M.; Sineiro, J.; Amado, I.R.; Franco, D. Influence of natural extracts on the shelf life of modified atmosphere-packaged pork patties. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 526–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hawashin, M.D.; Al-Juhaimi, F.; Ahmed, I.A.M.; Ghafoor, K.; Babiker, E.E. Physicochemical, microbiological and sensory evaluation of beef patties incorporated with destoned olive cake powder. Meat Sci. 2016, 122, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Roila, R.; Stefanetti, V.; Carboni, F.; Altissimi, C.; Ranucci, D.; Valiani, A.; Branciari, R. Antilisterial activity of olive-derived polyphenols: An experimental study on meat preparations. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2024, 13, 12447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Faustman, C.; Sun, Q.; Mancini, R.; Suman, S.P. Myoglobin and lipid oxidation interactions: Mechanistic bases and control. Meat Sci. 2010, 86, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Medina, E.; De Castro, A.; Romero, C.; Brenes, M. Comparison of the concentrations of phenolic compounds in olive oils and other plant oils: Correlation with antimicrobial activity. J. Agricult. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 4954–4961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lim, C.K.; Penesyan, A.; Hassan, K.A.; Loper, J.E.; Paulsen, I.T. Effect of tannic acid on the transcriptome of the soil bacterium Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 3141–3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Altissimi, C.; Roila, R.; Ranucci, D.; Branciari, R.; Cai, D.; Paulsen, P. Preventing Microbial Growth in Game Meat by Applying Polyphenolic Extracts from Olive Mill Vegetation Water. Foods 2024, 13, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Rodríguez Vaquero, M.J.; Aredes Fernández, P.A.; Manca de Nadra, M.C.; Strasser de Saad, A.M. Phenolic Compound Combinations on Escherichia coli Viability in a Meat System. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 6048–6052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ruusunen, M.; Vainionpää, J.; Lyly, M.; Lähteenmäki, L.; Niemistö, M.; Ahvenainen, R.; Puolanne, E. Reducing the sodium content in meat products: The effect of the formulation in low-sodium ground meat patties. Meat Sci. 2005, 69, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Santiesteban-López, N.A.; Gómez-Salazar, J.A.; Santos, E.M.; Campagnol, P.C.B.; Teixeira, A.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Sosa-Morales, M.E.; Domínguez, R. Natural Antimicrobials: A Clean Label Strategy to Improve the Shelf Life and Safety of Reformulated Meat Products. Foods 2022, 11, 2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Machácková, K.; Zelený, J.; Lang, D.; Vinš, Z. Wild Boar Meat as a Sustainable Substitute for Pork: A Mixed Methods Approach. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Roila, R.; Valiani, A.; Servili, M.; Ranucci, D.; Galarini, R.; Ortenzi, R.; Primavilla, S.; Branciari, R. Control of Listeria monocytogenes on Frankfurters by Surface Treatment with Olive Mill Wastewater Polyphenolic Extract. Foods 2025, 14, 774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tobin, B.D.; O’Sullivan, M.G.; Hamill, R.M.; Kerry, J.P. Effect of varying salt and fat levels on the sensory quality of beef patties. Meat Sci. 2012, 91, 460–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pashazadeh, H.; Zannou, O.; Ghellam, M.; Koca, I.; Galanakis, C.M.; Aldawoud, T.M.S. Optimization and Encapsulation of Phenolic Compounds Extracted from Maize Waste by Freeze-Drying, Spray-Drying, and Microwave-Drying Using Maltodextrin. Foods 2021, 10, 1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Roila, R.; Primavilla, S.; Ranucci, D.; Galarini, R.; Paoletti, F.; Altissimi, C.; Valiani, A.; Branciari, R. The effects of encapsulation on the in vitro anti-clostridial activity of olive mill wastewater polyphenolic extracts: A promising strategy to limit microbial growth in food systems. Molecules 2024, 29, 1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Untersuchung von Lebensmitteln—Bestimmung Der Asche in Fleisch, Fleischerzeugnissen Und Wurstwaren—Gravimetrisches Verfahren (Referenzverfahren). In Amtliche Sammlung von Untersuchungsverfahren Nach §64 LFGB; Beuth: Berlin, Germany, 2017; p. L06.00-4.
  39. Untersuchung von Lebensmitteln—Bestimmung des Gesamtfettgehaltes in Fleisch und Fleischerzeugnissen—Gravimetrisches Verfahren nach Weibull-Stoldt—Referenzverfahren. In Amtliche Sammlung von Untersuchungsverfahren Nach §64 LFGB; Beuth: Berlin, Germany, 2014; p. L06.00-6.
  40. Untersuchung von Lebensmitteln—Bestimmung des Rohproteingehaltes in Fleisch und Fleischerzeugnissen; Titrimetrisches Verfahren nach Kjeldahl—Referenzverfahren. In Amtliche Sammlung von Untersuchungsverfahren Nach §64 LFGB; Beuth: Berlin, Germany, 2014; p. L06.00-7.
  41. Untersuchung von Lebensmitteln—Bestimmung des Wassergehaltes in Fleisch und Fleischerzeugnissen—Gravimetrisches Verfahren—Referenzverfahren. In Amtliche Sammlung von Untersuchungsverfahren Nach §64 LFGB; Beuth: Berlin, Germany, 2014; p. L06.00-3.
  42. Csadek, I.; Vankat, U.; Schrei, J.; Graf, M.; Bauer, S.; Pilz, B.; Schwaiger, K.; Smulders, F.J.M.; Paulsen, P. Treatment of Ready-To-Eat Cooked Meat Products with Cold Atmospheric Plasma to Inactivate Listeria and Escherichia coli. Foods 2023, 12, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. CIE (Commission Internationale de L’Éclairage (International Commission on Illumination)). Recommendations on Uniform Color Spaces, Color-Difference Equations, Psychometric Color Terms; Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage: Paris, France, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mokrzycki, W.S.; Tatol, M. Colour difference ∆E A survey. Mach. Graph. Vis. 2011, 20, 383. [Google Scholar]
  45. ISO 4833-2:2013; Microbiology of the Food Chain—Horizontal Method for the Enumeration of Microorganisms—Part 2: Colony Count at 30 °C by the Surface Plating Technique. ISO: Geneve, Switzerland, 2013.
  46. ISO 21528-2:2017; Microbiology of the Food Chain—Horizontal Method for the Detection and Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae—Part 2: Colony-Count Technique. ISO: Geneve, Switzerland, 2017.
  47. Kielwein, G. Ein Nährboden Zur Selektiven Züchtung von Pseudomonaden Und Aeromonaden. Arch. Lebensmittelhyg. 1969, 20, 131–133. [Google Scholar]
  48. Witte, V.C.; Krause, G.F.; Bailey, M.E. A New Extraction Method for Determining 2-Thiobarbituric Acid Values of Pork and Beef During Storage. J. Food Sci. 1970, 35, 582–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 30 04692 g001
Figure 1. pH of wild boar meat patties with 0 (CTR), 1% polyphenol extract (LPPE), and 2% polyphenol extract (HPPE) at the day of production and after for 3 or 5 days in vac. storage at 3 °C. CTR = control group without polyphenolic extract, LPPE = group with 1% polyphenolic extract, HPPE = group with 2% polyphenolic extract. Each value represents the average of 3 measurements per sample (n = 81). Within columns, different superscripts (a, b, c) indicate statistically significant differences, p < 0.05.
Figure 1. pH of wild boar meat patties with 0 (CTR), 1% polyphenol extract (LPPE), and 2% polyphenol extract (HPPE) at the day of production and after for 3 or 5 days in vac. storage at 3 °C. CTR = control group without polyphenolic extract, LPPE = group with 1% polyphenolic extract, HPPE = group with 2% polyphenolic extract. Each value represents the average of 3 measurements per sample (n = 81). Within columns, different superscripts (a, b, c) indicate statistically significant differences, p < 0.05.
Molecules 30 04692 g001
Molecules 30 04692 g002
Figure 2. pH of wild boar meat patties with 0 and 2% polyphenol extract (PPE) and 0 and 1.5% NaCl, in vac. storage for 3 or 5 days at 3 °C. CTR = group without polyphenolic extract and NaCl, GA = group without polyphenolic extract and with 1.5% NaCl, GB = group with 2% polyphenolic extract and without NaCl, GC = group with 2% polyphenolic extract and 1.5% NaCl. Each value represents the average of 3 measurements per sample (n = 48). Within columns, different superscripts (a, b, c) indicate statistically significant differences, p < 0.05.
Figure 2. pH of wild boar meat patties with 0 and 2% polyphenol extract (PPE) and 0 and 1.5% NaCl, in vac. storage for 3 or 5 days at 3 °C. CTR = group without polyphenolic extract and NaCl, GA = group without polyphenolic extract and with 1.5% NaCl, GB = group with 2% polyphenolic extract and without NaCl, GC = group with 2% polyphenolic extract and 1.5% NaCl. Each value represents the average of 3 measurements per sample (n = 48). Within columns, different superscripts (a, b, c) indicate statistically significant differences, p < 0.05.
Molecules 30 04692 g002
Molecules 30 04692 g003
Figure 3. Water activity (aw) of wild boar meat patties with 0 and 2% polyphenolic extract (PPE) and 0 and 1.5% NaCl, in vac. storage for 3 or 5 days at 3 °C. CTR = group without polyphenolic extract and NaCl, GA = group without polyphenolic extract and with 1.5% NaCl, GB = group with 2% polyphenolic extract and without NaCl, GC = group with 2% polyphenolic extract and 1.5% NaCl. Each value represents the average of 3 measurements per sample (n = 48). Within columns, different superscripts (a, b, c, d) indicate statistically significant differences, p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Water activity (aw) of wild boar meat patties with 0 and 2% polyphenolic extract (PPE) and 0 and 1.5% NaCl, in vac. storage for 3 or 5 days at 3 °C. CTR = group without polyphenolic extract and NaCl, GA = group without polyphenolic extract and with 1.5% NaCl, GB = group with 2% polyphenolic extract and without NaCl, GC = group with 2% polyphenolic extract and 1.5% NaCl. Each value represents the average of 3 measurements per sample (n = 48). Within columns, different superscripts (a, b, c, d) indicate statistically significant differences, p < 0.05.
Molecules 30 04692 g003
Molecules 30 04692 g004
Figure 4. Extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) and MS/MS spectra of hydroxytyrosol, tyrosol, and vanillic acid (SCIEX 6600+ LC-QTOF) of polyphenolic extract (PPE).
Figure 4. Extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) and MS/MS spectra of hydroxytyrosol, tyrosol, and vanillic acid (SCIEX 6600+ LC-QTOF) of polyphenolic extract (PPE).
Molecules 30 04692 g004
Table 1. Proximate composition of raw wild boar meat patties with 0, 1, and 2% polyphenolic extract (PPE) added.
Table 1. Proximate composition of raw wild boar meat patties with 0, 1, and 2% polyphenolic extract (PPE) added.
PPE (g/100 g)Moisture (g/100 g)Crude Protein (g/100 g)Crude Fat (g/100 g)Ash (g/100 g)
CTR72.2 c ± 0.321.4 a ± 0.34.2 a ± 0.31.2 a ± 0.2
LPPE71.6 b ± 0.321.3 a ± 0.24.3 a ± 0.21.1 a ± 0.1
HPPE70.9 a ± 0.321.0 a ± 0.24.2 a ± 0.31.2 a ± 0.1
Samples were tested after manufacture, before storage. Each value represents the average of 3 measurements. Values expressed in mean ± standard error. Within columns, different superscripts (a, b, c) indicate statistically significant differences, p < 0.05.
Table 2. Colour parameters of raw wild boar meat patties after 0, 3, and 5 days of storage.
Table 2. Colour parameters of raw wild boar meat patties after 0, 3, and 5 days of storage.
Colour CTR LPPE HPPE SEM p Value
0 Days3 Days5 Days0 Days3 Days5 Days0 Days3 Days5 DaysGroupTimeGxT
L* value40.04 a42.51 b43.29 c40.10 a42.06 ab42.90 bc40.34 a41.06 ab41.66 ab0.4400.032<0.0010.179
a* value14.25 c13.10 b12.95 ab13.37 b14.12 bc14.90 c12.37 a13.69 b14.81 c0.3090.0180.002<0.001
b* value13.37 b13.18 b13.21 b12.61 a13.48 b14.12 c12.19 a13.40 b14.21 c0.1810.595<0.001<0.001
Saturation index19.54 c18.59 bc18.54 bc18.43 b19.54 c20.54 d17.41 a19.17 c20.55 d0.3050.039<0.001<0.001
Hue angle43.2945.3145.8643.3043.7743.4744.6044.3843.820.6770.0620.3330.154
ΔE value-3.39 ab4.87 c-2.33 a4.33 c-3.90 b4.50 c0.3620.030<0.0010.150
CTR = control group without polyphenolic extract, LPPE = group with 1% polyphenolic extract, HPPE = group with 2% polyphenolic extract, L* = lightness, a* = redness, b* = yellowness, ΔE = [(L* − L*0)2 + (a* − a*0)2 + (b* − b*0)2]0.5, SEM = standard error of the mean, GxT = group × time. Samples were tested after vacuum packaging and storage at 3 °C (n = 81). Within rows, different superscripts (a, b, c, d) indicate statistically significant differences, p < 0.05.
Table 3. Microbial counts of raw wild boar meat patties with 0, 1, and 2% polyphenolic extract (PPE) after 3 and 5 days of storage.
Table 3. Microbial counts of raw wild boar meat patties with 0, 1, and 2% polyphenolic extract (PPE) after 3 and 5 days of storage.
Microbial Counts
(Log cfu/g)		CTRLPPEHPPESEM p Value
3 Days5 Days3 Days5 Days3 Days5 DaysGroupTimeGxT
ACC6.96 c7.21 d6.45 b6.91 c6.25 a6.78 c0.068<0.001<0.0010.106
Enterobacteriaceae3.02 b3.43 c2.92 b3.06 b2.30 a2.33 a0.182<0.0010.2260.507
Pseudomonas spp.3.68 c3.61 c3.37 bc3.61 c2.96 a3.18 b0.123<0.0010.2110.396
CTR = control group without polyphenolic extract, LPPE = group with 1% polyphenolic extract, HPPE = group with 2% polyphenolic extract, ACC = aerobic colony count, SEM = standard error of the mean, GxT = group × time. Samples were tested after vacuum packaging and storage at 3 °C (n = 36). Within rows, different superscripts (a, b, c, d) indicate statistically significant differences, p < 0.05.
Table 4. TBARSs (mg MDA/kg) of raw wild boar meat patties, with 0, 1, and 2% polyphenolic extract (PPE) added after 3 and 5 days of storage and then cooked.
Table 4. TBARSs (mg MDA/kg) of raw wild boar meat patties, with 0, 1, and 2% polyphenolic extract (PPE) added after 3 and 5 days of storage and then cooked.
TBARSs
(mg MDA/kg)		CTRLPPEHPPESEM p Value
3 Days5 Days3 Days5 Days3 Days5 DaysGroupTimeGxT
Raw0.261 bA0.306 cA0.224 aA0.268 bA0.225 aA0.254 bA0.006<0.001<0.0010.301
Heated1.437 bB2.011 cB 0.460 aB0.446 aB0.579 aB0.530 aB0.054<0.001<0.001<0.001
CTR = control group without polyphenolic extract, LPPE = group with 1% polyphenolic extract, HPPE = group with 2% polyphenolic extract, TBARSs = thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, MDA = malondialdehyde, SEM = standard error of the mean, GxT = group × time. Samples were tested after vacuum packaging and storage at 3 °C for 3 and 5 days and then heated to an internal temperature of 75 °C (n = 36). Within rows (a, b, c) and columns (A, B), different superscripts indicate statistically significant differences, p < 0.05.
Table 5. Microbial counts of raw wild boar meat patties with 0 and 2% polyphenolic extract (PPE) and 0 and 1.5% NaCl after 3 and 5 days of storage.
Table 5. Microbial counts of raw wild boar meat patties with 0 and 2% polyphenolic extract (PPE) and 0 and 1.5% NaCl after 3 and 5 days of storage.
Groups
Microbial Counts
(log cfu/g)		CTRGAGBGCSEMp Value
3 Days5 Days3 Days5 Days3 Days5 Days3 Days5 DaysGroupTimeGxT
ACC6.80 e7.65 g6.33 c7.26 f6.01 b6.91 e5.41 a6.62 d0.077<0.001<0.0010.094
Enterobacteriaceae4.31 c4.81 d3.83 c4.77 d3.31 a3.68 b3.27 a3.63 b0.027<0.001<0.001<0.001
Pseudomonas spp.4.70 e5.71 g4.44 d5.59 f3.83 b4.26 c3.71 b3.58 a0.043<0.001<0.001<0.001
CTR = group without polyphenolic extract and NaCl, GA = group without polyphenolic extract and with 1.5% NaCl, GB = group with 2% polyphenolic extract and without NaCl, GC = group with 2% polyphenolic extract and 1.5% NaCl, ACC = total aerobic colony count, SEM = standard error of the mean, GxT = group × time (n = 48). Within rows, different superscripts (a, b, c, d, e, f, g) indicate statistically significant differences, p < 0.05.
Table 6. Textural characteristics of wild boar meat patties, with 0 and 2% polyphenolic extract (PPE) and 0 and 1.5% NaCl, stored for 3 or 5 days at 3 °C, then heated and stored for 1 day at 3 °C.
Table 6. Textural characteristics of wild boar meat patties, with 0 and 2% polyphenolic extract (PPE) and 0 and 1.5% NaCl, stored for 3 or 5 days at 3 °C, then heated and stored for 1 day at 3 °C.
Groups
Texture Profile AnalysesCTRGAGBGCSEMp Value
3 Days5 Days3 Days5 Days3 Days5 Days3 Days5 DaysGroupTimeGxT
Hardness (N)29.32 a99.61 d38.78 a116.26 e31.89 a82.12 c51.64 b136.24 f3.252<0.001<0.001<0.001
Toughness (mJ)87.05 a350.02 b130.50 a547.22 c72.87 a329.80 b137.35 a625.12 c26.58<0.001<0.001<0.001
Springiness0.917 b0.742 a0.955 b0.867 ab0.922 b0.763 a0.935 b0.770 a0.0400.211<0.0010.684
Chewiness (N)18.33 a37.54 b27.78 a42.28 b20.79 ab30.93 b36.98 b38.17 b4.9400.0430.0020.227
Cooking Loss (%)10.53 a13.53 bc11.54 ab14.14 cd10.09 a12.69 b13.19 b15.81 d0.590<0.001<0.0010.982
CTR = group without PPE and NaCl, GA = group without PPE and with 1.5% NaCl, GB = group with 2% PPE and without NaCl, GC = group with 2% PPE and 1.5% NaCl. Each value represents the average of 8 measurements (n = 48). Within columns, different superscripts (a, b, c, d, e, f) indicate statistically significant differences, p < 0.05.
Table 7. Retention times (RTs) and monitored ions acquired using LC-QTOF in multiple reaction monitoring.
Table 7. Retention times (RTs) and monitored ions acquired using LC-QTOF in multiple reaction monitoring.
N°AnalyteRT
(Min)		Molecular
Formula		Precursor Ion
(m/z)		Fragment Ion
(m/z)		DP
(V)		CE
(V)
1Hydroxytyrosol9.6C8H10O3153.0557123.04558014
2Tyrosol12.3C8H10O2137.0608119.05209018
3Vanillic acid13.7C8H8O4167.0350152.01117015
4Vanillin14.9C8H8O3151.0401136.01666014
5p-coumaric acid15.4C9H8O3163.0401119.05006014
6Verbascoside16.5C29H36O15623.1981161.02519038
7Oleuropein17.3C25H32O13539.1770307.082410027
8Pinoresinol17.9C20H22O6357.1344151.04108020
9Luteolin18.0C15H10O6285.0405133.029311036
10Oleuropein aglycone18.1C19H22O8377.1242307.08248014
11Apigenin18.2C15H10O5269.0456117.034311035
Table 8. Mean contents (mg/g) of polyphenols recovered in the PPE *.
Table 8. Mean contents (mg/g) of polyphenols recovered in the PPE *.
ExtractHydroxytyrosol (mg/g)Tyrosol (mg/g)Vanillic Acid (mg/g)Sum (mg/g)
PPE *16.94.780.2421.9
* PPE = Polyphenols extract = StymonPhen-50W.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Altissimi, C.; Ranucci, D.; Bauer, S.; Branciari, R.; Galarini, R.; Servili, M.; Roila, R.; Paulsen, P. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Effects of Polyphenolic Extracts from Olive Mill Vegetation Water on Wild Boar Meat Patties. Molecules 2025, 30, 4692. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30244692

AMA Style

Altissimi C, Ranucci D, Bauer S, Branciari R, Galarini R, Servili M, Roila R, Paulsen P. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Effects of Polyphenolic Extracts from Olive Mill Vegetation Water on Wild Boar Meat Patties. Molecules. 2025; 30(24):4692. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30244692

Chicago/Turabian Style

Altissimi, Caterina, David Ranucci, Susanne Bauer, Raffaella Branciari, Roberta Galarini, Maurizio Servili, Rossana Roila, and Peter Paulsen. 2025. "Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Effects of Polyphenolic Extracts from Olive Mill Vegetation Water on Wild Boar Meat Patties" Molecules 30, no. 24: 4692. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30244692

APA Style

Altissimi, C., Ranucci, D., Bauer, S., Branciari, R., Galarini, R., Servili, M., Roila, R., & Paulsen, P. (2025). Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Effects of Polyphenolic Extracts from Olive Mill Vegetation Water on Wild Boar Meat Patties. Molecules, 30(24), 4692. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30244692

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop