Next Article in Journal
Pulsed Electric Fields Reshape the Malting Barley Metabolome: Insights from UHPLC-HRMS/MS
Previous Article in Journal
Proposal for Self-Degrading Power Cables Incorporating Graphitic Carbon Nitride to Address Electronic Waste Challenges and Evaluation of Decomposition Efficiencies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Between Heritage Conservation and Forensic Science: An Analytical Study of Personal Items Found in Mass Graves of the Francoism (1939–1956) (Spain)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Analytical Strategies to Study Cultural Heritage Samples—2nd Edition

by
Maria Luisa Astolfi
1,2,* and
Maria Pia Sammartino
1,†
1
Department of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
2
Research Center for Applied Sciences to the Safeguard of Environment and Cultural Heritage (CIABC), Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The author is currently retired.
Molecules 2025, 30(19), 3952; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30193952
Submission received: 24 September 2025 / Accepted: 30 September 2025 / Published: 1 October 2025

1. Introduction

The study of cultural heritage samples represents a unique intersection of science, history, and art, where the careful application of analytical techniques can uncover invaluable information about materials, manufacturing processes, degradation phenomena, and conservation strategies. In recent years, advances in analytical chemistry, spectroscopy, microscopy, and multi-modal imaging have revolutionized the approach to heritage science, allowing researchers to obtain detailed compositional and structural information while minimizing sample destruction [1]. These methods are particularly crucial for irreplaceable artifacts, historical documents, wall paintings, textiles, and archaeological finds, where traditional sampling strategies may be limited or impossible.
Recent trends in heritage science have emphasized non-invasive and minimally invasive techniques, reflecting both ethical considerations and technological progress [1,2]. For instance, vibrational spectroscopies such as Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy, in combination with chemometric data analysis, provide precise information on organic and inorganic components without compromising the artifact’s integrity [3,4]. Similarly, hyperspectral imaging and portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) allow in situ chemical mapping of materials in complex cultural contexts [5]. The application of mass spectrometry, including gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and ambient mass spectrometry techniques, has further enabled the detailed characterization of organic binders, pigments, and volatile compounds [6,7,8,9,10]. Such technological integration has also been complemented by nanomaterial applications, where engineered nanoparticles and functionalized hydrogels offer innovative strategies for conservation, cleaning, and protective coatings [11,12].
The multidisciplinary nature of heritage research has encouraged collaborations among chemists, materials scientists, conservators, art historians, and archaeologists. This collaborative approach not only improves the reliability of analytical results but also ensures that scientific findings are translated into practical conservation strategies. In addition, computational modeling and data-driven approaches, including multivariate statistical analysis and machine learning algorithms, have become increasingly valuable for interpreting complex datasets and predicting long-term behavior of materials under various environmental conditions [13].
Recent studies have highlighted the importance of developing comprehensive analytical workflows that integrate multiple techniques, allowing for cross-validation of results and deeper insights into the chemical and physical transformations occurring in cultural heritage objects [14,15]. Examples include the identification of metal soap formation in oil paints, the detection of early synthetic dyes in textiles, and the non-invasive characterization of historic print techniques [16,17,18,19,20]. The continuous refinement of these methodologies enhances both preventive conservation strategies and forensic studies, providing robust evidence for provenance, authenticity, and degradation assessment [21,22,23,24].
Moreover, the growing awareness of environmental and anthropogenic impacts on heritage materials has reinforced the need for continuous monitoring and tailored interventions [25,26]. From airborne pollutants affecting paper and textiles to light-induced photodegradation of pigments, understanding the mechanisms of deterioration is essential for designing effective conservation protocols [27,28,29,30,31]. By integrating chemical, physical, and environmental data, contemporary heritage science enables informed decision-making for the preservation of artifacts across centuries.
Overall, the contributions to the second edition of the Special Issue “Advances in Analytical Strategies to Study Cultural Heritage Samples” exemplify the diversity and sophistication of current research, illustrating how modern analytical strategies can both expand scientific understanding and support practical conservation efforts.

2. An Overview of Published Articles

The second edition of the Special Issue comprises nine contributions, which collectively highlight state-of-the-art in heritage science analytical strategies. Doménech-Carbó et al. (contribution 1) represented a compelling integration of heritage conservation methodologies with forensic science approaches, addressing a highly sensitive historical context: the mass graves of the Francoism era in Spain (1939–1956). The authors employed a comprehensive multi-analytical strategy to examine personal objects recovered from these sites, including clothing, metal objects, and personal effects, aiming to both preserve the material integrity of the items and extract critical forensic information. Non-destructive techniques such as XRF, FTIR, and optical microscopy were combined with targeted sampling strategies to provide a detailed chemical and physical characterization of the artifacts. The study not only revealed the composition and degradation patterns of the materials but also offered insights into the manufacturing techniques and potential provenance of the objects. By bridging conservation science and forensic analysis, this work underscores the potential of analytical chemistry to support both historical reconstruction and ethical handling of sensitive cultural heritage. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of developing protocols that minimize sample handling while maximizing the information obtainable from fragile and invaluable items, setting a precedent for future studies in similar socio-historical contexts. This contribution exemplifies how interdisciplinary approaches can enhance the understanding of both material culture and historical events, combining methodological rigor with societal relevance.
Chiodini et al. (contribution 2) highlighted the application of modern analytical chemistry techniques to historical book conservation. The authors investigated volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted by two rare books, aiming to understand degradation processes and chemical interactions within paper and ink components. Using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and headspace analysis, they identified specific VOC profiles associated with oxidation, hydrolysis, and microbial activity. The work demonstrates how VOC monitoring can serve as an early diagnostic tool to detect degradation before visible damage occurs, providing crucial information for preventive conservation strategies. This non-invasive approach ensures the preservation of the integrity of the historical texts while offering actionable insights for long-term storage and environmental control.
Botti et al. (contribution 3) explored innovative nanocomposite hydrogels as cleaning and protective agents for paper-based artworks. The study focused on poly(acrylic acid)/TiO2 formulations, which combine mechanical cleaning efficacy with photocatalytic antimicrobial properties. The hydrogels were thoroughly characterized for their rheological behavior, swelling capacity, and interaction with paper fibers. Application tests demonstrated effective removal of surface contaminants without compromising the paper structure. This research underscores the potential of nanotechnology for cultural heritage conservation, offering environmentally friendly solutions that enhance both cleaning efficiency and long-term protection.
Labate et al. (contribution 4) employed a combination of non-invasive techniques—including XRF, UV–visible diffuse reflectance spectrophotometry with optical fibres (FORS), and portable X-ray diffraction (XRD)—to investigate the chemical transformations responsible for the blackening of originally blue paint layers. The multi-analytical approach allowed the identification of pigment composition, degradation products, and environmental factors contributing to discoloration. The study provides valuable insights into both the deterioration mechanisms and suitable conservation strategies, demonstrating how integrated non-destructive analysis can support informed decision-making in artwork preservation. Further exploring paint systems, the study by Poli et al. (contribution 5) provided initial insights into metal soap formation in alkyd-based paints using FTIR spectroscopy. The authors investigated the early stages of this common degradation phenomenon, monitoring the chemical interactions between metal ions and fatty acid components. The results offer proof-of-concept data that enhance understanding of degradation pathways and underscore the importance of early detection for preventive conservation. Such findings can guide conservators in selecting suitable environmental and storage conditions to mitigate metal soap-related deterioration. Freixas-Jambert et al. (contribution 6) focused on bromoil photographic prints, which present unique conservation challenges due to their complex organic and inorganic components. Using external reflection FTIR spectroscopy as a non-invasive technique, the study successfully identified key binder and pigment constituents, providing insights into historical photographic processes and degradation mechanisms. This work underscores the value of minimally destructive analytical methods for the characterization, study, and preservation of sensitive photographic heritage.
Textile heritage was explored by Forleo et al. (contribution 7), who applied ATR-FTIR spectroscopy combined with multivariate curve resolution–alternating least squares (MCR-ALS) algorithms to profile early synthetic dyes on historic woolen samples. This approach allowed the authors to deconvolute complex overlapping spectral signals, identifying the presence of early synthetic dyes while preserving the integrity of the delicate fibers. By providing detailed chemical information on historical dyeing techniques, this study contributes to understanding the material composition, degradation pathways, and conservation needs of textile artifacts.
The insights gained from such advanced spectroscopic and chemometric analyses resonate with complementary strategies demonstrated in other contributions of the Special Issue. De Caro et al. (contribution 8) explored the functionalization of artwork packaging using Ag-doped TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles, providing innovative solutions for the preventive conservation and protection of cultural heritage materials. Similarly, Nádvorníková et al. (contribution 9) employed GC–MS combined with principal component analysis to differentiate lipid binders in wall paintings, illustrating how sophisticated analytical workflows can resolve complex organic mixtures and inform appropriate conservation strategies. Together, these studies exemplify the integration of non-destructive and minimally invasive analytical techniques with chemometrics and material functionalization approaches, highlighting the breadth of modern heritage science from chemical characterization to preventive conservation.

3. Conclusions

The second edition of the Special Issue highlights the continued evolution of analytical strategies in heritage science, emphasizing minimally invasive and multi-modal approaches. The studies presented demonstrate that integrating advanced spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, imaging, and nanomaterials can provide comprehensive insights into both the composition and degradation of cultural artifacts. Furthermore, these contributions underscore the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration, combining expertise in chemistry, materials science, conservation, and art history to achieve meaningful results.
The editorial emphasizes that future research should continue to develop accessible, robust, and non-destructive methods while considering sustainability and environmental impacts. As analytical technologies advance, researchers are better equipped to address long-standing conservation challenges, improve preventive care, and inform policy decisions regarding cultural heritage management. The achievements of this Special Issue exemplify the scientific and practical value of contemporary analytical strategies, and they provide a roadmap for future investigations in the field.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank all the authors who have chosen to report their results in this Special Issue and thank the contributions of the academic editors; all peer reviewers; and editorial team members.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Doménech-Carbó, M.T.; Pasíes Oviedo, T.; Roca, R.C.; Múgica Mestanza, J. Between Heritage Conservation and Forensic Science: An Analytical Study of Personal Items Found in Mass Graves of the Francoism (1939–1956) (Spain). Molecules 2025, 30, 2783. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30132783.
  • Chiodini, C.; Rovellini, P.; Chiodini, M.; Giacomelli, L.; Baglio, D.; the 5B IISS Torno Working Group. Modern Analytical Chemistry Meets Heritage Books: Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from Two Books Preserved at the Biblioteca Capitolare of Busto Arsizio. Molecules 2025, 30, 2447. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30112447.
  • Botti, S.; Bonfigli, F.; D’Amato, R.; Rodesi, J.; Santonicola, M.G. Poly(Acrylic Acid)/TiO2 Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Paper Artwork Cleaning and Protection. Molecules 2025, 30, 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30010075.
  • Labate, M.; Aceto, M.; Chiari, G.; Baiocco, S.; Operti, L.; Agostino, A. Multi-Analytical and Non-Invasive Approach for Characterising Blackened Areas of Originally Blue Paints. Molecules 2024, 29, 6043. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29246043.
  • Poli, T.; Haaf, M.P.; Piccirillo, A.; Costa, A.P.; Craig, R.L.; Pozzi, F. First Insights into the Formation of Metal Soaps in Alkyd-Based Paints: A Proof-of-Concept Investigation Using FTIR Spectroscopy. Molecules 2024, 29, 5840. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29245840.
  • Freixas-Jambert, R.; Ruiz-Recasens, C.; Nieto-Villena, A.; Oriola-Folch, M. Non-Invasive Characterisation of Bromoil Prints by External Reflection FTIR Spectroscopy. Molecules 2024, 29, 5833. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29245833.
  • Forleo, T.; Giannossa, L.C.; De Juan Capdevila, A.; Lagioia, G.; Mangone, A. Hats Off to Modeling! Profiling Early Synthetic Dyes on Historic Woolen Samples with ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy and Multivariate Curve Resolution–Alternating Least Square Algorithm. Molecules 2024, 29, 4651. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194651.
  • de Caro, T.; Toro, R.G.; Cassone, L.; Barbaccia, F.I.; Zaratti, C.; Colasanti, I.A.; La Russa, M.F.; Macchia, A. Functionalization of Artwork Packaging Materials Utilizing Ag-Doped TiO2 and ZnO Nanoparticles. Molecules 2024, 29, 3712. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29153712.
  • Nádvorníková, J.; Pitthard, V.; Kurka, O.; Kučera, L.; Barták, P. Egg vs. Oil in the Cookbook of Plasters: Differentiation of Lipid Binders in Wall Paintings Using Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry and Principal Component Analysis. Molecules 2024, 29, 1520. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29071520.

References

  1. Astolfi, M.L. Advances in analytical strategies to study cultural heritage samples. Molecules 2023, 28, 6423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ma, C.; Dou, H.; Zhao, Z.; Qiu, X.; Li, H.; Wang, X. Review of in-situ non- and micro-destructive techniques for pigment analysis in architectural heritage. npj Herit. Sci. 2025, 13, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yogurtcu, B.; Cebi, N.; Koçer, A.T.; Erarslan, A. A review of non-destructive Raman spectroscopy and chemometric techniques in the analysis of cultural heritage. Molecules 2024, 29, 5324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Daher, C.; Bellot-Gurlet, L.; Le Hô, A.S.; Paris, C.; Regert, M. Advanced discriminating criteria for natural organic substances of cultural heritage interest: Spectral decomposition and multivariate analyses of FT-Raman and FT-IR signatures. Talanta 2013, 115, 540–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Possenti, E.; Miliani, C.; Cotte, M.; Realini, M.; Colombo, C. SR-based μXRD–μXRF 2D mapping to study Mg-rich historical frescoes subjected to inorganic conservation treatments. Analyst 2025, 150, 1590–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Shi, S.; Zong, S.; Li, Y.; Wei, S. Identification of organic binding media in ancient architectural decoration by THM–Py–GC/MS. J. Cult. Herit. 2024, 67, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tamburini, D.; Fulcher, K.; Briggs, L.; von Aderkas, N.; Pulak, C.; Stacey, R. Advances in the characterisation and identification of mastic (Pistacia sp.) resin in archaeological samples by GC-QToF-MS. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 836–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ding, L.; Yang, Q.; Liu, J.; Lee, Z. Evaluating volatile organic compounds from Chinese traditional handmade paper by SPME-GC/MS. Herit. Sci. 2021, 9, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tammekivi, E.; Vahur, S.; Vilbaste, M.; Leito, I. Quantitative GC–MS analysis of artificially aged paints with variable pigment and linseed oil ratios. Molecules 2021, 26, 2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vettorazzo, C.; Sandström, E.; Troalen, L.G.; Mackay, C.L.; Hulme, A.N. Heritage science applications of ambient mass spectrometry. Anal. Methods 2025, 17, 3357–3369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mastrangelo, R.; Chelazzi, D.; Baglioni, P. New horizons on advanced nanoscale materials for cultural heritage conservation. Nanoscale Horiz. 2024, 9, 566–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ioan, M.; Anghel, D.F.; Anastasescu, M.; Gifu, I.C.; Alexandrescu, E.; Matei, R.I.; Petcu, C.; Stanculescu, I.; Sanda, G.A.; Bala, D.; et al. Hybrid materials based on ZnO nanoparticles and organo-modified silica coatings as eco-friendly anticorrosive protection for metallic historic artifacts. Coatings 2023, 13, 1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fiorini, L.; Conti, A.; Pellis, E.; Bonora, V.; Masiero, A.; Tucci, G. Machine learning-based monitoring for planning climate-resilient conservation of built heritage. Drones 2024, 8, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Catelli, E.; Li, Z.; Sciutto, G.; Oliveri, P.; Prati, S.; Occhipinti, M.; Tocchio, A.; Alberti, R.; Frizzi, T.; Malegori, C.; et al. Towards the non-destructive analysis of multilayered samples: A novel XRF-VNIR-SWIR hyperspectral imaging system combined with multiblock data processing. Anal. Chim. Acta 2023, 1239, 340710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, M.; Liu, S.; Shao, H.; Ba, Z.; Liu, J.; Albu Kaya, M.G.; Tang, K.; Han, G. Development trend in non-destructive techniques for cultural heritage: From material characterization to AI-driven diagnosis. Heritage 2025, 8, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hermans, J.J.; Keune, K.A.; van Loon, A.N.; Stols-Witlox, M.J.; Corkery, R.W.; Iedema, P.D. The synthesis of new types of lead and zinc soaps: A source of information for the study of oil paint degradation. In Proceedings of the Building Strong Culture through Conservation: Pre-prints ICOM-CC 17th Triennial Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 15 September 2014; pp. 17–19. [Google Scholar]
  17. Quintero Balbas, D.; Lanterna, G.; Cirrincione, C.; Fontana, R.; Striova, J. Non-invasive identification of textile fibres using near-infrared fibre optics reflectance spectroscopy and multivariate classification techniques. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2022, 137, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Koochakzaei, A.; Mobasher Maghsoud, E.; Jelodarian Bidgoli, B. Non-invasive imaging and spectroscopy techniques for identifying historical pigments: A case study of Iranian manuscripts from the Qajar era. Herit. Sci. 2023, 11, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tarilonte, E.; González-Mendia, O.; Costantini, I.; Castro, K.; Maguregui, I. A multi-analytical approach for the identification of surface whitening phenomena in contemporary oil painting and its application to metal soaps. J. Cult. Herit. 2025, 74, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Poli, T.; Haaf, M.P.; Piccirillo, A.; Costa, A.P.; Craig, R.L.; Pozzi, F. First insights into the formation of metal soaps in alkyd-based paints: A proof-of-concept investigation using FTIR spectroscopy. Molecules 2024, 29, 5840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Edwards, H.G.; Vandenabeele, P.; Colomban, P. Raman Spectroscopy in Cultural Heritage Preservation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  22. Donais, M.K.; Vandenabeele, P. Portable spectroscopy for on-site and in situ archaeology studies. In Portable Spectroscopy and Spectrometry; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 523–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Baglioni, M.; Poggi, G.; Chelazzi, D.; Baglioni, P. Advanced materials in cultural heritage conservation. Molecules 2021, 26, 3967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Magdy, M. Analytical techniques for the preservation of cultural heritage: Frontiers in knowledge and application. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2022, 52, 1171–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sammartino, M.P.; Grendene, A.; Astolfi, M.L.; Marcheggiani, S.; Mancini, L.; Vitali, M.; Antonucci, A.; Baldassarri, P.; Della Giovampaola, I.; Visco, G. Ancient spring waters still emerging and accessible in the Roman Forum area: Chemical–physical and microbiological characterization. Open Chem. 2023, 21, 20230366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Colantonio, C.; Baldassarri, P.; Avino, P.; Astolfi, M.L.; Visco, G. Visual and physical degradation of the black and white mosaic of a Roman Domus under Palazzo Valentini in Rome: A preliminary study. Molecules 2022, 27, 7765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. del Hoyo-Meléndez, J.M. Physico-chemical characterisation and light stability of dyes and pigments found in cultural heritage objects: Insights from microfading testing for assessing light fastness. Color. Technol. 2025, 141, 265–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Paolin, E.; Strlič, M. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in heritage environments and their analysis: A review. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 4620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Uring, P.; Chabas, A.; Alfaro, S.C. Textile ageing due to atmospheric gases and particles in indoor cultural heritage. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 66340–66354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Harth, A. The study of pigments in cultural heritage: A review using machine learning. Heritage 2024, 7, 3664–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Coletti, C.; Antonelli, F.; Germinario, L.; Maritan, L.; Piovesan, R.; Tesser, E.; Mazzoli, C. Investigating stone materials from some European cultural heritage sites for predicting future decay. Rend. Lincei Sci. Fis. Nat. 2025, 36, 103–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Astolfi, M.L.; Sammartino, M.P. Advances in Analytical Strategies to Study Cultural Heritage Samples—2nd Edition. Molecules 2025, 30, 3952. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30193952

AMA Style

Astolfi ML, Sammartino MP. Advances in Analytical Strategies to Study Cultural Heritage Samples—2nd Edition. Molecules. 2025; 30(19):3952. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30193952

Chicago/Turabian Style

Astolfi, Maria Luisa, and Maria Pia Sammartino. 2025. "Advances in Analytical Strategies to Study Cultural Heritage Samples—2nd Edition" Molecules 30, no. 19: 3952. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30193952

APA Style

Astolfi, M. L., & Sammartino, M. P. (2025). Advances in Analytical Strategies to Study Cultural Heritage Samples—2nd Edition. Molecules, 30(19), 3952. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30193952

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop